• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    2023-01-06 05:22:52XinMuLIXinYiGAOGaryTseShenDaHONGKangYinCHENGuangPingLITongLIU
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2022年12期

    Xin-Mu LI, Xin-Yi GAO, Gary Tse,2, Shen-Da HONG, Kang-Yin CHEN, Guang-Ping LI,Tong LIU,?

    1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; 2. Kent and Medway Medical School,Canterbury, United Kingdom; 3. National Institute of Health Data Science at Peking University, Peking University, Beijing,China; 4. Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an inexpensive and easily accessible investigation for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases including heart failure (HF). The application of artificial intelligence (AI) has contributed to clinical practice in terms of aiding diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification and guiding clinical management. The aim of this study is to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published studies on the application of AI for HF detection based on the ECG. METHODS We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify literature using AI for HF detection based on ECG data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Random-effects models were used for calculating the effect estimates and hierarchical receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted. Subgroup analysis was performed. Heterogeneity and the risk of bias were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 11 studies including 104,737 subjects were included. The area under the curve for HF diagnosis was 0.986,with a corresponding pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) and diagnostic odds ratio of 831.51 (95% CI: 127.85-5407.74). In the patient selection domain of QUADAS-2, eight studies were designated as high risk. CONCLUSIONS According to the available evidence, the incorporation of AI can aid the diagnosis of HF. However, there is heterogeneity among machine learning algorithms and improvements are required in terms of quality and study design.

    Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome caused by various etiologies of abnormal cardiac structure or function,resulting in ventricular dysfunction, reduced cardiac output, and failing to meet the needs of peripheral tissues.[1,2]There are currently 64.3 million people with HF worldwide and the prevalence in the general adult population of developed countries is 1%-2% and increases with age.[3]As a serious manifestation or late stage of various heart diseases, HF is significantly associated with higher mortality and rehospitalizations, placing an increasing burden on the healthcare systems, and has been a matter of public health issue.[4,5]

    Early diagnosis and intervention are important for the management of HF, leading to better disease prognosis and decreases of HF-related expenditures. However, the symptoms and signs derived from history and physical examination are indispensable but usually nonspecific. With the advantages of noninvasive, conveniently available and inexpensive, the electrocardiogram (ECG) has been an essential investigation of cardiovascular medicine. Given that the pathophysiological changes of the heart lead to the alterations of cardiac electrical activity, the rational application of ECG data may provide opportunities for early detection of HF.

    In the past decades, with the revolutionary development and widespread application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, we have ushered in a novel era of disease diagnosis and management.The efficient processing ability of AI achieves specific goals and flexible tasks, so that reliable evidence-based medicine advice was provided for clinicians in clinical decision-making. AI mainly includes machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL),and DL consists of multiple processing layers and is capable of processing more complex data.[6]The application of AI has contributed to clinical practice in terms of aiding diagnosis,[7]early detection,[8]predicting prognosis,[9,10]risk stratification,[11]and guiding clinical management.[12]One specific area of interest is the combination of AI with ECG for the detection of HF, which may overcome some difficulties in diagnosis clinically.[13]The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in people with HF based on the ECG.

    METHODS

    This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Information for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations.[14]

    Search Strategy and Study Selection

    Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched, from inception up to January 17, 2022, to identify original literature that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithm using ECG data for people with HF. The following search terms were used: ((heart failure) OR (left ventricle dysfunction)) AND ((ECG) OR (electrocardiogram)) AND ((Machine Learning) OR (Artificial Intelligence) OR (Neural Networks) OR (Support Vector Machine) OR (Naive Bayes)). The field of search were abstract and title. The references of all relevant articles were reviewed to identify any other appropriate articles. The search was limited to publications written in English.

    Studies that met the following criteria were included: (1) involved people with HF or left ventricular dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) ≤ 35%]; (2) AI algorithm using ECG data was the index test; and (3) diagnostic accuracy of performance were reported [i.e., true positives (TP, clinical diagnosis showing HF detected/predicted-as-HF by AI), false positives (FP, clinical diagnosis showing non-HF detected/predicted-as-HF by AI),true negatives (TN, clinical diagnosis showing non-HF without AI detection or prediction as non-HF),and false negatives (FN, clinical diagnosis showing HF missed by AI or predicted as non-HF)] or if they could be extracted.

    Studies satisfying the following criteria were excluded: (1) letters, editorials, conference abstracts,systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements and guidelines; (2) articles not related to the research topic; and (3) articles without sufficient data to construct a 2 × 2 confusion matrix (i.e., TP, FP, TN,and FN).

    Two review authors independently performed the literature search and title/abstract screening, and the articles were excluded which were not associated with research topic. The remaining articles were screened for eligibility by analyzing the full text. Disagreements were resolved by an independent cardiologist. The reasons for exclusion were recorded. Results of the literature search are shown in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Flow diagram of the study selection process.

    Data Extraction and Study Quality Assessment

    The data of the included studies were extracted,including authors, year of publication, TP, FP, TN,FN, type of analyzed ECG data [heart rate variability (HRV) or ECG signals or raw ECG], type of ML model (DL or classical ML), type of dataset, definition of HF (congestive HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction), sizes of ECG samples, number of patients and country of origin. Herein, the DL was defined as the studies that applying deep neural networks (e.g., convolutional neural networks) as their main algorithm. Otherwise, the studies were classified as classical ML.[15]

    Assessment for risk of bias and quality were completed by following the QUADAS-2.[16]Two categories, risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability, were assessed in the three domains of patient selection, index test and reference standard, with the former being assessed in addition by the domain flow and timing. For specific assessment of the risk of bias, we set the following criteria, that is, for each of the four domains: (1) when the answer to each question is “yes”, the overall bias risk of the domain is “l(fā)ow”;(2) when the answer to any question is “no”, there is a bias risk, and the overall bias risk of the domain is“high”; (3) define “unclear” when the data reported is insufficient to make a judgment; (4) when any domain is high risk, the overall bias risk score is “high”;and (5) only when the bias risk of one domain is unclear, the overall bias risk of the study is “unclear”.The recommendation of the QUADAS-2 tool was followed, and the clinical applicability of each study was scored by evaluating whether it matched the concerns of our review, and rated as “l(fā)ow”, “high” or“unclear”. Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and independent assessment by another researcher to reach consensus. The final study quality was classified as low risk of bias, high risk of bias, and unclear.

    Statistical Analysis

    The pooled proportions of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using an inverse-variance model. A random-effects model was utilized to calculate the overall proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) and forest plots were provided. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) model was used to draw the SROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.[17]All studies and the summary estimate were presented by a triangle and a dot which was surrounded by a 95% CI, respectively.

    The heterogeneity and threshold effect of the included studies were determined. The heterogeneity was evaluated using Higgins inconsistency index(I2). We consideredI2cutoff points of 25%, 50%, and 75% as indicative of low heterogeneity, moderate heterogeneity, and high heterogeneity, respectively.[18]

    The Spearman correlation coefficient between sensitivity and specificity with a strong negative correlation indicates a threshold effect. The heterogeneity was explained by performing subgroup meta-analyses. Variables which might impact on the diagnostic accuracy were selected as follow: (1) type of ECG data;(2) type of ML model; (3) definition of HF; (4) sizes of ECG samples; and (5) country of origin. Subgroup analyses were performed if at least two studies provided the data of interest. The publication bias was assessed by Deeks’ funnel plot.[19]

    Deeks’ funnel plot was performed in Stata 16.0(Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA). Other statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software 4.1.1 (http://www.r-proje ct.org).

    RESULTS

    Study Search

    The search strategy yielded a total of 479 studies,and three additional articles were identified after searching the bibliographies of these articles. After removing 131 duplicates, the screening of the remaining 351 titles and abstracts yielded 66 potentially eligible articles for full-text review. Overall, 49 articles were then further identified in system review. We excluded 38 studies due to insufficient data to perform meta-analytic approaches, leading to 11 articles included in the final analysis. Reasons for exclusion were recorded. The disposition of studies excluded after the full-text review is shown in Figure 1.

    Study Characteristics

    A total of 104,737 participants were included in this meta-analysis, with individual studies ranging from 40 to 97,829 participants. Eight studies[20-27]were conducted using public ECG datasets and three studies[28-30]were from patient-level datasets. Eight studies were conducted in American centers,[20-24,28-30]and three studies were conducted in both American and European centers.[25-27]DL was used in seven studies,[23,25-30]and classical ML was used in four studies as AI system.[20-22,24]Besides, type of data included in studies were raw ECG, ECG signals and HRV.In terms of the sample sizes utilized in the modeling, eight studies[21,23,25-30]were greater than 1000 and the remaining part[20,22,24]were the opposite. Study characteristics are comprehensively shown in Table 1. Although several different algorithms were used by part of the studies, all algorithms were included to show the frequencies of algorithms in HF detection. In general, neural networks and support vector machine were dominant, accounting for 45%and 24%, respectively; followed by random forest(supplemental material, Figure 1S).

    Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies.

    There was also no significant threshold effect by Spearman correlation coefficient between sensitivity and specificity on detection of HF.

    Diagnostic Performance of HF

    For all of the 11 included studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) and 831.51 (95% CI:127.85-5407.74), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and DOR ranged from 0.27-0.99, 0.86-1.00 and 13.7-88902.8, respectively. Heterogeneity was present for all sensitivity, specificity and DOR. The diagnosis in HF was associated with pooled AUC of 0.986. Performances of the analysis are illustrated in three forest plots (Figures 2-4) and a SROC curve(Figure 5).

    To investigate the possible sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses according to the categorical variables were performed. All the heterogeneity level of pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR turn to be low heterogeneity (I2= 0), if sizes of ECG samples of the study are lower than 1000 in the subgroup of sample size.[20,22,24]There is no statistical difference between groups, so it may be inappropriate to identify sample size of data as a source of heterogeneity. All the heterogeneity level of pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR turn to be moderate heterogeneity, if type of analyzed ECG data is identified as sources of heterogeneity on the subgroup analysis, with significant statistical difference (P< 0.01).The forest plots for subgroup can be found in supplemental material, Figure 2S. No significant publication bias was found (P= 0.19), according to visual inspection of Deeks’ funnel plot (supplemental material, Figure 3S) and by Deeks’ regression test.

    Figure 2 Forest plot of sensitivity.

    Figure 3 Forest plot of specificity.

    Figure 4 Forest plot of diagnostic odds ratio.

    Quality of Evidence and Risk of Bias

    The quality assessment of the 11 studies we included met the criteria of QUADAS-2. Detailed results of risk of bias are shown in Table 2. Amongst these, eight studies were designated as high risk of bias,[20-27]two studies had unclear risk of bias,[28,30]and the remaining study was classified as low risk of bias.[29]Each of the eight studies had a high risk of bias, because they included data from the healthy population databases and the HF patients databases, respectively; without avoiding a case-control study. The subjects included of the remaining three studies were all from registered studies, and two of them were assessed as unclear, because they did not describe the inclusion process in detail. In addition,low clinical applicability was identified in three trials in the domain of patient selection due to the presence of comorbidities among the subjects.[28-30]And unclear clinical applicability was identified in eight studies on the same domain as it was not clarified whether the data obtained from the databases was continuous or random.[20-27]The risk of bias and concern of applicability were shown in Figure 6 and supplemental material, Figure 4S, respectively.

    Figure 6 Risk of bias according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria.

    Table 2 Quality assessment according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria.

    Figure 5 SROC curve of artificial intelligence based on electrocardiogram for heart failure diagnosis. Each triangle represents an individual study, the triangle size is proportional to each study size. The diamond represents summary sensitivity and specificity. The ellipse represents the 95% confidence region. SROC: summary receiver operating characteristics.

    DISCUSSION

    The meta-analysis demonstrated the potential performance of AI-ECG as a decision-making tool to assist in identifying HF. Herein, we showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 0.95, 0.98 and 831.51, respectively; with AUC of 0.986. However, an inevitable heterogeneity was present due to several challenges, resulting in low clinical applicability probably.

    With the booming development of AI applied in clinical medicine, the excellent performance of algorithms based on ECG has been increasingly reported.[13]Given that lack of confusion matrix, several studies were excluded, which may lead to bias of meta-analysis. Current work tends to apply DL with large amounts of patient level data,[28,30,31]which it is consistent with clinical state, and we are undergoing a transition period from classical ML to DL. It has been demonstrated DL outperformed other ML methods.[31-34]In the field of HF detection, ML algorithms were utilized by a total of eight studies before 2019, while there were four studies associated with DL. By the end of 2021, the number of studies using DL has increased to 13 and four times more frequently used compared to traditional ML. The combination of more complex network architecture with big-ger training data provides a chance for the model to explore formerly unknown clues in detection field.In addition, the demand of data augmentation may contribute to developing the clinical dataset.

    Attia,et al.[28]have identified LVEF ≤ 35% using a combination of 12-lead ECG and echocardiogram data derived from more than 52,000 patients in a convolutional neural network model, with an accuracy of 85.7% and AUC of 0.93. In patients without ventricular dysfunction, those with a positive AI screen were at a fourfold risk of developing future ventricular dysfunction compared with those with a negative screen. In the external validation with 4277 patients, the performance of the model for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains robust, as well as in patients requiring admission to the cardiac intensive care unit.[35]Furthermore, AI-ECG networks have demonstrated performance stability and robustness across multiple ethnicities, supporting wide applicability.[36]To identify milder patients in the early phases of left ventricular dysfunction, which was defined by combination of diastolic echocardiogram parameters and global longitudinal strain. Potter,et al.[37]developed a ML algorithm from “energy waveform”ECG. The sensitivity and specificity of random forest as a screening tool for at-risk asymptomatic individuals were 88% and 70%, respectively; and meanwhile its discriminative ability is superior to clinical score, biomarker and automated ECG analysis.

    Despite the presence of normal LVEF, early stages of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction can progress to HF.[38]For HF patients with reduced LVEF,changes in diastolic function precede or develop concomitantly with the onset of systolic dysfunction.[39]The above evidence motivates researchers to take into account of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the aspect of HF management. In 2018,an innovative study showed an AUC of 0.91 for prediction of abnormal myocardial relaxation from signal-processed surface ECG.[40]Subsequently, the team incorporated ML into a novel ECG-based model to predict the quantitative values of the left ventricular relaxation velocities (e’) measured by echocardiography using signal-processed surface ECG,traditional ECG, and clinical features.[41]The analysis revealed that the estimated e’ can discriminate abnormal myocardial relaxation and diastolic, with AUC of 0.84 and 0.80 in the external test sets, respectively. It has been recognized ECG signals as a type of biosignal need to receive special attention, because ML algorithms of biosignal analysis can be based on multidimensional features in time domain, frequency domain, or time-frequency domain.[42]In biosignal pre-processing, improper filtering can lead to waveform deformation, change of time-domain features, and narrowed frequency range.[43]Therefore,the pre-processing of ECG signals plays a key role in improving the performance of ML algorithms.

    A DL model, recently, was developed to simultaneously identify right and left ventricular dysfunction from the ECG, which was the first time to estimate LVEF value as a continuous variable.[44]Effective information was extracted by using 700,000 ECGs for approximately 150,000 unique patients for the evaluation of LVEF and composite right ventricular outcome. For LVEF classification in external validation, AUC at detection of LVEF ≤ 40%, 40% <LVEF ≤ 50%, and LVEF > 50% were 0.94, 0.73, and 0.87, respectively. For prediction of composite right ventricular outcome, AUC of 0.84 was achieved.Moreover, the first convolutional neural network combined with ECG yielded a sensitivity of 99% at a specificity of 60% for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to the European Society of Cardiology criteria.[45]The studies provided deeper insights into cardiological application capabilities of AI.

    The main drawback of our systematic review and meta-analysis is the heterogeneity across the published studies, leaving uncertainty on the interaction between AI and human in clinical practice. Despite subgroup analysis was performed based on vital characteristics, there still remains some points to be highly regarded. Numerous algorithms in our analysis were trained and validated on relatively small and similar datasets, such as accessible the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center congestive HF database consisting of only 15 congestive HF patients.[21-23,25-27]All of the published models were developed in America. The current trend has a potential of promoting inequality in healthcare as no models were developed or validated in low-income countries. As for presence or absence of comorbidities in patients with HF, since previous studies were not rigorously characterized, the current study is difficult to pre-characterize. To ensure generalizability,the development of models using datasets from a wide range of ethnicities and countries is needed.Moreover, most of these studies were conducted in experimental settings and further validation work is required in real-world settings. Recognizing this,the pooled results may not consistent with clinical practice and could potentially be biased. Interpreting the application of clinical aspects is difficult, hence multidisciplinary cooperation is in greater need.Notably, the ECGs of 22,641 adult patients without prior HF were obtained to detect a new diagnosis of an ejection fraction of ≤ 50% in the ECG AI-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction study representing a real-life setting.[46]The AI screening tool increased the diagnosis of low ejection fraction from 1.6%to 2.1%, which highlighted the technique integrated into primary care was meaningful and improved the diagnosis of low ejection fraction.

    LIMITATIONS

    There are several limitations that must be noted.Firstly, technical details are usually not disclosed in full details, leading to arbitrariness of methodologies and inevitable statistical heterogeneity, and thereby have the potential to impact on the accuracy of conclusion. Despite lack of uniform standards,12 critical questions have been suggested for cardiovascular health professionals to appraise the development and testing of AI prediction models.[47]Secondly, researchers tend to publish diagnostic tests with best diagnostic accuracies and similar datasets were used to develop models, resulting in data overfitting. It is not certain whether some algorihms with nonsatisfactory results were removed or not. However,there was no obvious asymmetry on the Deeks’ plot to suggest significant publication bias. Thirdly, the data analyzed in studies included was heterogeneous, including ECG signals, HRV and raw ECGs.Maybe raw ECGs are optimal for clinical setting, but the availability of large amounts of clinical data limits further application. Last but not least, most studies were conducted in relatively small number of patients, thereby limiting the accuracy of ML algorithms.

    CONCLUSIONS

    The meta-analysis showed AI-ECG is a valuable method for predicting HF or reduced LVEF. However, because of the potential bias and heterogeneity, further exploration with large datasets is urgently needed and improvements are required of quality and study design to confirm the role of AI in clinical practice.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81970270 & No.8217 0327), the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (20JC ZDJC00340 & 20JCZXJC00130), and the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project(TJYXZDXK-029A). All authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 咕卡用的链子| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产不卡一卡二| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 日本wwww免费看| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美午夜高清在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 黑人操中国人逼视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 怎么达到女性高潮| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 最黄视频免费看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 高清av免费在线| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 捣出白浆h1v1| 乱人伦中国视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 大型av网站在线播放| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 在线观看66精品国产| a级毛片黄视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 久久亚洲真实| 色94色欧美一区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日本欧美视频一区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 成年版毛片免费区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| av天堂久久9| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 午夜激情av网站| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲成人手机| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 超碰成人久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 在线播放国产精品三级| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| av欧美777| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲第一av免费看| videos熟女内射| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产片内射在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 欧美大码av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 五月天丁香电影| 手机成人av网站| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 岛国在线观看网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 手机成人av网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 一本久久精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 手机成人av网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产不卡一卡二| www.999成人在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 久久av网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 黄色成人免费大全| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 一级毛片女人18水好多| 免费在线观看日本一区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 成人三级做爰电影| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久中文字幕一级| kizo精华| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 成人手机av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产不卡一卡二| 色94色欧美一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 制服诱惑二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲成人手机| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美午夜高清在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产精品 国内视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| av网站在线播放免费| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久久中文字幕一级| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产一区二区| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 少妇 在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 人妻一区二区av| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 一本综合久久免费| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 午夜激情av网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 一夜夜www| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美大码av| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 曰老女人黄片| 美女午夜性视频免费| 黄频高清免费视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 咕卡用的链子| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 成人国语在线视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久久久网色| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 精品久久久精品久久久| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| kizo精华| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 一级毛片电影观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产av精品麻豆| 一级片'在线观看视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 精品福利观看| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 美女福利国产在线| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 在线看a的网站| 久久久国产一区二区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 丁香欧美五月| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 嫩草影视91久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 操美女的视频在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 国产高清videossex| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久欧美国产精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 91大片在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人国语在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 桃花免费在线播放| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 两个人看的免费小视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 老司机影院毛片| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 国产精品影院久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久热这里只有精品99| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日本五十路高清| 超色免费av| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| videosex国产| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品九九99| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| netflix在线观看网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久性视频一级片| av一本久久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 1024香蕉在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 黄色视频不卡| 最黄视频免费看| 黄片播放在线免费| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 免费少妇av软件| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 电影成人av| 搡老乐熟女国产| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产精品 国内视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 视频区图区小说| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av天堂久久9| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 又大又爽又粗| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产成人欧美| 大型av网站在线播放| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲精品在线美女| 满18在线观看网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 成人三级做爰电影| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 美女主播在线视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品少妇内射三级| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 一本综合久久免费| 日韩欧美免费精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 成人手机av| 丁香六月欧美| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 精品久久久久久电影网| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 性少妇av在线| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 美女主播在线视频| 999精品在线视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| av免费在线观看网站| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 久久人妻av系列| 丝袜喷水一区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产精品二区激情视频| av天堂久久9| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 久久久久网色| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 成人国产av品久久久| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 亚洲人成电影观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 热re99久久国产66热| 大香蕉久久网| 免费av中文字幕在线| 另类精品久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产在视频线精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4|