• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Mixing planting proportions in a plantation aff ects functional traits and biomass allocation of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei seedlings

    2022-11-04 09:24:08MeiqinZhaYouzhiHanXiangrongCheng
    Journal of Forestry Research 2022年6期

    Meiqin Zha 1,2 · Youzhi Han 1 · Xiangrong Cheng 2

    Abstract Functional traits of trees are signif icantly associated with their adaptation strategies and productivity.However, the eff ects of species composition and mixing proportion on the functional traits of trees grown in mixed plantations have not been studied extensively. In this study,planting experiments (duration about seven months) were used to study variations in functional traits and biomass allocation of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook and Phoebe bournei (Hemsley) Yang seedlings in f ive diff erent mixes (0C:4P, 1C:3P, 1C:1P, 3C:1P, and 4C:0P). Total leaf area per seedling increased in each species as its respective proportion in the mixture decreased. However, the specif ic leaf area decreased for P. bournei under low percent composition, and the specif ic leaf area for C. lanceolata diff ered only marginally among the plantings. The net photosynthetic rates of the two species were higher in the mixed plantings than in their corresponding monocultures, whereas the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and instantaneous water use effi ciency were not diff erent among the plantings.The average root length and root surface area of C. lanceolata and P. bournei were higher in the mixed plantings than in their monocultures. Specif ically, root surface area of C.lanceolate and both root length and surface area of P. bournei increased signif icantly in the 1C:3P and 2C:2P mixed plantings. Leaf, stem, root, and total dry mass per seedling for C. lanceolata decreased with its increasing percent composition in the mixed plantings, while these variables varied less for P. bournei. The plasticity of biomass allocation was relatively low for both species. Total biomass per planting was higher in the mixed plantings than in the monocultures.Our study indicates that species composition and mixing proportion can considerably aff ect the functional traits of C.lanceolata and P. bournei. The increase in productivity in the mixed plantings may be partially attributed to low rates of competition between the two species, and future studies should examine the diff erent interspecies relationships. The results of this study can be used to improve plantation productivity and ultimately increase the sustainability of tree products and help to better understand the adaptation strategies of plant coexistence.

    Keywords Mixing proportion · Tree species composition · Functional traits · Interspecif ci relationship ·Intraspecif ic relationship

    Introduction

    Plantations play important roles in providing timber and environment protection (Liu et al. 2018). In China, the total area covered by plantations is 79.54 million ha, accounting for 32.9% of the total forest area (Du et al. 2020). However,most plantations are managed as monocultures, often resulting in reduced productivity, biodiversity, and capacity for ecological services (Farooq et al. 2019a). Mixed plantations have certain advantages over monocultures, including higher biomass production, faster nutrient cycling, higher stability and recovery capacity, and increased diversity in ecological services (Xiang et al. 2015). Nevertheless, the advantages of mixed plantations largely depend on the species composition and the mixing proportions (Bauhus et al. 2004).

    In recent years, studies have focused on the relationships between tree species composition and functional traits or productivity (Pretzsch et al. 2010; To?go et al. 2015). In mixed plantations, species composition has shown a substantial eff ect on plant functional traits, which may in turn aff ect stand productivity (Forey et al. 2016). For example,Bolte and Villanueva ( 2006) reported that specific root length (SRL) and specif ic root surface area (SRA) of European beech (Fagus sylvaticaL.) were signif icantly higher in mixed European beech and Norway spruce (Picea abies(L.)H. Karst.) plantations than in monocultures. However, Xiang et al. ( 2015) found no signif icant diff erences between mixed and pure stands in specif ic root length, specif ic root surface area, or f ine-root biomass of ring-cupped oak (Quercus glaucaThunb.) or of Japanese oak (Lithocarpus glaber(Thunb.) Nakai). Variations in functional traits in diff erent compositions are associated with species interactions (Lei et al. 2012). Additionally, the relationship between species composition and stand productivity is believed to mainly depend on the net eff ect of interaction between a given pair of species (Forrester 2014). Nevertheless, these interactions are often associated with many biotic and abiotic factors such as climate, soil fertility, tree age, functional diversity of the tree species, and availability of resources (Ammer 2019). For example, the growth characteristics ofEucalyptus globulusLabill. andAcacia mearnsiiDe Wild. in mixed plantations vary considerably with time, which indicates that the vector size and direction of plant interaction are aff ected by spatial and temporal dynamics of resource availability(Forrester et al. 2011). However, studies on the eff ects of tree species composition on productivity in mixed plantations mainly involve growth, nutrient cycles, biological productivity, and eco-economic benef its (Forrester et al. 2006; Piotto 2008; Chomel et al. 2014; Niccoli et al. 2021). Knowledge of the eff ects by which above- and below-ground interactions among diff erent species on functional traits and of how these interactions aff ect productivity are poorly understood(Roscher et al. 2011; Abakumova et al. 2016).

    In the management of mixed plantations, determining the optimal mixing proportion is important to optimize stand productivity. Bauhus et al. ( 2000) reported that the highest stem volume and tree height occurred in a 50% southern blue gum(Eucalyptus globulus) and 50% black wattle (Acacia mearnsii)mixture. Ghorbani et al. ( 2018) demonstrated that 50% eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoidesMarsh.) and 50% Caucasian alder (Alnus subcordataC.A.Mey.) could provide economic and environmental benef its by increasing the stability and productivity of the stands. The mixing proportion changes the stand structure and may inf luence above- and belowground functional traits of trees (Qin et al. 2016). For example, Nunes et al. ( 2014) found that the specif ic leaf area of Douglas- f ir(Pseudotsuga menziesii(Mirb.) Franco) did not diff er signif icantly among three mixing proportions with sweet chestnut(Castanea sativaMill.) but was signif icantly higher in the 50:50 Douglas- f ir and sweet chestnut plantings compared with the monocultures. However, little information is available on the eff ects of mixing proportions on above- and below-ground functional traits of diff erent tree species.

    Cunninghamia lanceolata(Lamb.) Hook. is a fast-growing evergreen coniferous species widely planted in southern China for its high timber productivity (Farooq et al. 2019b; Wu et al.2019). According to the 9th National Forest Resources Inventory,C. lanceolatacovers more than 11 million ha, which occupies almost 14.2% of the area of all plantations and 6.0%of the total forested area in China (Ma and Lin 2019). In recent years, southern China has established numerous mixed plantations ofC. lanceolataand broadleaved species with the aim of improving stand productivity and stability.Phoebe bournei(Hemsley) Yang is a typical evergreen broadleaf species widely distributed in subtropical China. It is commonly known as ‘wood with golden wire’ and can be used for high-quality furniture and handicrafts due to its brilliant color and remarkable durability (Zhang et al. 2021). As a valuable and protected broadleaf reforestation species,P. bourneiis often planted withC. lanceolatain mixed plantations (Wang et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021). However, the eff ects of various mixing proportions of the two species on their functional traits are poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to study the eff ects of mixing species proportions on the functional traits and biomass allocation ofC. lanceolataandP. bourneiseedlings using planter experiments. Specif ically, the following research questions were addressed: (1) how do functional traits and biomass allocation of the two species vary with mixing species proportions? (2) what are the correlations between functional traits and biomass allocation in the diff erent planting? and (3) what are the possible physiological mechanisms underpinning the observed responses of functional traits and biomass allocation to the variation of mixing species proportions?

    Materials and methods

    Study site

    The experiment was carried out at the Hushan Tree Nursery (30°3′ N, 119°57′ E, elevation 35 m a.s.l.) in Fuyang,Zhejiang Province, China. The Hushan Tree Nursery is in a typical subtropical, humid monsoon climate with an average annual temperature of 16.4 °C. The total annual sunshine at the study site is 1816 h, and the average annual precipitation is 1441.9 mm. The frost-free period is 252 d. The 18 m × 6 m experimental greenhouse was 3 m high and covered with transparent plastic f ilm.

    Plant materials and experimental design

    Two tree species,C. lanceolataandP. bournei, were selected based on their wide cultivation and multiple functions. For each species, 100 one-year-old seedlings with similar heights and diameters were randomly divided into two groups of 50 seedlings each. One group was randomly selected for planting experiments, and the other group used for initial traits and biomass measurements according to Shen et al. ( 2019). The results are shown in Table 1.

    The study consisted of the following plantings, each describing the composition of a single pot: fourP. bourneiseedlings (0C:4P), oneC. lanceolataand threeP. bourneiseedlings (1C:3P), twoC. lanceolataand twoP. bourneiseedlings (2C:2P), threeC. lanceolataand oneP. bourneiseedlings (3C:1P), and fourC. lanceolataseedlings (4C:0P)(Fig. 1). Each planting was replicated f ive times, resulting in total 25 pots.Yellow-red soil was collected from a natural forest in Hushan Nature Reserve, air-dried and sieved through a 1 × 1 cm mesh screen to remove stones and plant material.Organic manure and sand were purchased from the same horticulture company, and mixed with the soil at a ratio 7:2:1 (soil:manure:sand). Mixed soil (20 kg) was placed into plastic pots (external diameter: 48 cm, internal diameter: 41.5 cm, and height: 31 cm, with four drainage holes at the bottom). The initial chemical properties of the soil(Table 2) were analyzed according to Bao ( 2000). On March 18, 2019, the two species were planted at 20 cm × 20 cm spacing in each pot according to the f ive experimental plantings described above. Weeds in the pots were periodically removed and the seedlings watered every f ive days.

    Photosynthetic gas exchange measurements

    The photosynthetic gas exchange parameters of the two species were measured with a Li-6400XT portable photosynthetic system (Li-6400XT, Li-Cor, USA). A standard 2 cm × 3 cm leaf chamber and 2 cm × 6 cm needle leaf chamber were used to measure leaves ofP. bourneiandC. lanceolata, respectively. During each measurement, air temperature (Ta, °C) at 25 °C - 28 °C, and relative humidity (RH, %) at 58 - 62%, by the Li-6400XT portable photosynthesis system. CO2concentration in the sample chamberwas 400 μmol mol -1 , and a f ixed f low rate of 500 μmol s -1 was used. Light intensities were controlled using artif icial lighting with blue and red LED sources and were set at 1000 μmol m -2 s -1 for photosynthetically active radiation.All measurements were taken between 9:00 and 11:00 am September 17-19, 2019. In each planting pot, one seedling was selected for each species and three healthy, mature leaves selected for measurement. Net photosynthetic rate(Pn, μmol m -2 s -1 ), transpiration rate (Tr, mmol m -2 s -1 ),and stomatal conductance (Gs, mmol m -2 s -1 ) were recorded for 2 min after stable photosynthesis was established. The instantaneous water use effi ciency (WUE, μmol m -1 ) was calculated as net photosynthetic rate/transpiration rate.

    Table 1 Initial traits and biomass of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei seedlings

    Fig. 1 Mixtures used in the experiment. 0C:4P: four Phoebe bournei seedlings; 1C:3P: one Cunninghamia lanceolata and three P. bournei seedlings;2C:2P:two C. lanceolata and two P. bournei seedlings;3C:1P: three C. lanceolata and one P. bournei seedlings;and 4C:0P:four C. lanceolata seedlings

    Table 2 Chemical properties of soil

    Morphological trait measurements

    All seedlings were harvested October 25, 2019, seven months after potting. Seedlings were cut at the stem and divided into leaves and stems. Roots were washed with water to remove soil, placed into labeled bags, and temporarily stored within 3 h on ice in a cooler.

    A subsample of 20 healthy, mature leaves of each species per pot in each planting was randomly selected and pooled as a mixed sample for leaf area, thickness and saturated fresh weight measurements. The leaf thickness, excluding main and large secondary veins, was measured using a micrometer. The leaves were recut under deionized water to remove the petiole or rachis and were kept in deionized water at 4 °C for 12 h in darkness. They were then dried to remove any surface water and weighed to determine their saturated fresh weight (Paula and Pausas 2006; Qin and Shangguan 2019).Mean leaf area (MLA, cm 2 ), total leaf area (TLA, cm 2 ), root length (RL, cm), root surface area (RSA, cm 2 ), and average root diameter (ARD, mm) were determined using rootscanning equipment (WinRHIZO, Canada) and leaf and root image analysis software. All leaf and root samples were oven-dried at 60 °C to a constant mass and weighed. Specif ic leaf area (SLA, cm 2 g -1 ) was calculated as leaf area (LA,cm 2 ) divided by its dry mass (LM, g). Leaf dry matter content (LDMC, g g -1 ) was calibrated as dry mass per saturated fresh mass. Specif ic root length (SRL, cm g -1 ) and specif ic root area (SRA, cm 2 g -1 ) were the ratios between root length(RL) and root dry mass (RM, g), and between root surface area (RSA) and RM, respectively. The leaf morphological traits (MLA, TLA, SLA, LT, LDMC), root morphological traits (RL, RSA, SRL, SRA, ARD), biomass and its allocation ratio [LM, RM, stem dry mass (SM, g), total dry mass per seedling (TMPS, g), leaf-mass ratio (LMR), stem-mass ratio (SMR), root-mass ratio (RMR), and root-shoot ratio(R/S, def ined as dry weight of root biomass divided by dry weight of shoot biomass)] were reported as average values in each seedling, and total biomass per planting (TMPP, g)was reported as an average per planting.

    Statistical analyses

    All data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test) before statistical analyses, and when necessary, were log-transformed. Diff erences in morphological and physiological characteristics and biomass ofC.lanceolataandP. bourneiin the diff erent planting mixtures were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)and Duncan’s multiple range test in IBM SPSS 25.0 software(P< 0.05).

    Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to explore the variation in functional traits and biomass allocation in the diff erent mixtures, and Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate their relationships. PCA was conducted using the ggplot2 (Version 3.3.5; Wickham 2021), ggrepel(Version 0.9.1; Slowikowski et al. 2021), plyr (Version 1.8.6;Wickham 2020), and vegan (Version 2.5-7; Oksanen et al.2020) packages. Pearson’s correlation analysis used the corrplot (Version 0.84; Wei and Simko 2017) package in R statistical software.

    The diff erence in functional traits and biomass allocation ofC. lanceolataandP. bourneibetween the planting mixtures was tested using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) in the vegan package (ADONIS function) in R 3.6.3 (Anderson 2005).

    Results

    Variations in leaf functional traits

    Several leaf morphological traits ofC. lanceolataandP.bourneivaried signif icantly among the diff erent plantings(Table 3). ForC. lanceolata, the mean leaf area (MLA)and specif ic leaf area (SLA) did not diff er signif icantly(P> 0.05), whereas the total leaf area (TLA) and leaf thickness (LT) were higher in the mixed plantings than in the 4C:0P planting. The leaf dry matter content (LDMC) ofC.lanceolatawas the highest in the 2C:2P mixed planting and lowest in the 1C:3P mixed planting. ForP. bournei, the mean leaf area, total leaf area, and leaf thickness were signif icantly higher in the mixed plantings than in the 0C:4P planting(P< 0.05), whereas, the specif ic leaf area decreased with the decrease in the proportion ofP. bourneiin the species composition (P< 0.05). The leaf dry matter content showed no signif icant diff erence among the plantings (P> 0.05).

    Net photosynthetic rates (Pn) ofC. lanceolataandP.bourneiwere higher in the mixed plantings than in their corresponding monocultures, especially in the 2C:2P planting, while transpiration rates (Tr), stomatal conductance(Gs) levels, and instantaneous water use effi ciency (WUE)of the two species were not signif icantly diff erent among the plantings (P> 0.05, Table 4).

    Table 3 Mean values of the leaf morphological traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings

    Variations in root functional traits

    Root morphological traits of the two species differed among the plantings (Table 5). ForC. lanceolata, root length (RL) and root surface area (RSA) were higher in the mixed plantings than in the pureC. lanceolataplanting and highest in the 2C:2P planting. Additionally, specific root area (SRA) was highest in the 2C:2P mixed planting. Specific root length (SRL) and average root diameter (ARD) showed no differences between the 4C:0P and mixed plantings (P> 0.05). ForP. bournei,root length and root surface area were significantly higher in the 1C:3P and 2C:2P mixed plantings than in the pureP. bourneiplanting (P< 0.05). In addition, specific root length and root areas were not significantly different among the plantings (P> 0.05). Average root diameter was significantly higher in the mixed plantings than in the pureP. bourneiplanting (P< 0.05), with the highest value observed in the 1C:3P mixed planting.

    Biomass allocation

    Leaf dry mass (LM), stem dry mass (SM), root dry mass(RM), and total dry mass per seedling (TMPS) of the two species were aff ected by the diff erent planting combinations(P< 0.05) (Fig. 2). ForC. lanceolata, these values were higher in the mixed plantings than in the pureC. lanceolataplanting. Leaf dry mass, stem dry mass, and total dry mass per seedling in the mixed plantings decreased with an increase in the proportion ofC. lanceolata, although this pattern was not observed for root dry mass. ForP. bournei,leaf dry mass, stem dry mass, root dry mass, and total dry mass per seedling were also signif icantly higher in the mixed plantings than in the pureP. bourneiplanting (P< 0.05),and all four values were the highest in the 1C:3P planting.However, the leaf dry mass, stem dry mass, root dry mass,and total dry mass per seedling did not diff er signif icantly between the mixed plantings (P> 0.05).

    Total biomass per planting (TMPP) was higher in the mixed plantings than in the monocultures (Fig. 3). Specif ically, total biomass in the 1C:3P, 2C:2P, and 3C:1P mixedplantings was 29.3%, 37.4%, and 38.9%, respectively, higher than in the pureC. lanceolataplanting, and 121.2%, 135.1%,and 137.7% higher than in the pureP. bourneiplanting.

    Table 4 Mean values of leaf photosynthetic traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings

    Table 5 Mean values of root morphological traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings

    Fig. 2 Eff ects of diff erent mixed species proportions on a leaf, b stem, c root,and d total biomass per seedling for Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean ( n = 5). Diff erent letters represent signif icant diff erences among the plantings at the P < 0.05 level,with lowercase letters for C. lanceolata,and capital letters for P. bournei. Notes:SP: four C. lanceolata or four P. bournei seedlings; 1C:3P: one C. lanceolata and three P. bournei seedlings; 2C:2P:two C.lanceolata and two P. bournei seedlings;and 3C:1P: three C. lanceolata and one P.bournei seedlings

    Fig. 3 Eff ects of diff erent mixed species proportions on total biomass per planting for Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei.Data are mean ± SD. Diff erent lowercase letters indicate signif icant diff erences among the plantings at the P < 0.05 level

    For bothC. lanceolataandP. bournei, mixed plantings had no significant effect on the leaf mass ratio (LMR),root mass ratio (RMR), or root/shoot ratio (R/S) (P> 0.05)but inf luenced the shoot mass ratio (SMR).C. lanceolatawhich was the highest in the 1C:3P group compared with the other three plantings. The stem mass ratio ofP. bourneiwas higher in all mixed plantings than in the pureP. bourneiplanting Table 6 .

    Correlations of functional traits with tree species mixture

    The two species showed similar relationships between functional traits and biomass variables (Fig. 4). Total leaf area was signif icantly correlated with the root length (RL),root surface area (RSA), leaf dry mass (LM), stem dry mass (SM), root dry mass (RM), and total dry mass per seedling (TMPS). The root length and root surface area had strong positive correlations with the leaf dry mass,stem dry mass, root dry mass, and total dry mass per seedling. However, the two species showed diff erent correlations between functional traits and biomass allocation. ForC. lanceolata, the leaf dry matter content had a signif icant positive correlation with root traits (Fig. 4 a), and there were positive correlations between net photosynthetic and transpiration rates. ForP. bournei, total leaf area was positively correlated with net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance (Fig. 4 b). Leaf dry mass, stem dry mass,root dry mass, and total dry mass per seedling were also positively correlated with net photosynthetic rates.

    The functional traits of leaves and roots, as well as biomass allocation forC. lanceolataandP. bourneiamong the diff erent plantings were further analyzed by PCA (Fig. 5). ForC. lanceolata, the f irst two components explained 96.0% of the total variance (58.6% and 37.4%,respectively, Fig. 5 a), and the total leaf area (TLA), root length (RL), and specif ic root length (SRL) contributed most to variation in the mixed plantings. The variation characteristics of the functional traits were signif icantly diff erent in the 1C:3P and 2C:2P mixtures compared to the 4C:0P monoculture (P< 0.05, Table 7). ForP. bournei, the f irst two PCA components of functional traits accounted for 97.4% of the variability in the data (76.0% and 21.4%,respectively, Fig. 5 b), and the total leaf area, root length and specif ic root length also varied signif icantly. The functional traits showed signif icant diff erences between 1P:3Cand 2P:2C mixtures (P< 0.05), and between 1P:3C, 2P:2C,3P:1C, and 0C:4P mixtures (P< 0.05, Table 7).

    Table 6 Mean values of leaf mass, stem mass, and root mass ratios, and root /shoot ratios of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings

    Fig. 4 Correlation analysis of functional traits and biomass allocation of a Cunninghamia lanceolata and b Phoebe bournei in the different plantings; **a highly signif icant correlation at P < 0.01 (bilateral), * a signif icant correlation at P < 0.05 (bilateral), n = 5. Notes:MLA: Mean leaf area, TLA: Total leaf area, SLA: Specif ic leaf area,LT: Leaf thickness, LDMC: Leaf dry matter content, Pn: Net photosynthetic rate, Tr: Transpiration rate, Gs: Stomatal conductance,WUE: Instantaneous water use effi ciency, RL: Root length, RSA:Root surface area, SRL: Specif ic root length, SRA: Specif ic root area,ARD: Average root diameter, LM: leaf dry mass, SM: Stem dry mass,RM: Root dry mass, TMPS: Total dry mass per seedling

    Discussion

    Eff ects of mixing proportion on leaf morphological and physiological traits

    Leaves convert light and CO2into chemical energy via photosynthesis (Cochrane et al. 2016). Leaf functional traits can ref lect the responses and adaptation strategies of plants to changes in biotic and abiotic factors (Qin and Shangguan 2019). Our results indicate that leaf functional traits diff er between broadleaf (P. bournei) and coniferous (C. lanceolata) species in response to mixed composition. The mean leaf area (MLA), total leaf area (TLA), and leaf thickness(LT) ofP. bourneiwere higher in the mixed plantings than in the 0C:4P monoculture, while the specif ic leaf area (SLA)increased proportionally with increased percent composition in the diff erent plantings (Table 3). The total leaf area and leaf thickness ofC. lanceolatawere also higher in the mixed plantings than in the 4C:0P monoculture, although there were no signif icant diff erences in the mean leaf area and specif ic leaf area between the monoculture and mixed plantings (Table 3). Qin et al. ( 2016) demonstrated that the mean leaf area and specif ic leaf area of black locust (Robinia pseudoacaciaL., a deciduous broadleaf) and Siberian elm (Ulmus pumilaL., a deciduous broadleaf) were higher in mixed plantings than in monocultures in a f ield experiment in northwest China. The specif ic leaf area of Siberian elm decreased marginally with increasing mixing proportion. In another study, Qin and Shangguan ( 2019) found that the mean leaf area and specif ic leaf area of Masson’s pine (Pinus massonianaLamb., a conifer) did not diff er signif icantly between monocultures and mixed plantations.These diff erent responses may be related to diff erences in plant growth type (deciduous broadleaf, conifer) (Qin and Shangguan 2019). Additionally, we found that the leaf dry matter content (LDMC) showed little variation among the diff erentC. lanceolataandP. bourneiplantings. Similarly,Qin et al. ( 2016) observed that the leaf dry matter content of black locust and Siberian elm did not show signif icant changes among plantations. However, Qin and Shangguan( 2019) reported that the leaf dry matter content of Masson’s pine was signif icantly lower in mixed plantations than inmonocultures. In addition, Benavides et al. ( 2019) observed that, compared with pure stands, the leaf dry matter content was higher in boreal and Mediterranean forests, while the opposite occurred in temperate forests. Therefore, the variation in leaf dry matter content in mixed stands largely depends on environmental conditions (moisture levels and temperature) and/or competition for soil resources in more diverse communities (Grossiord et al. 2014; Jucker et al.2014). In this study, the growth of seedlings was not limited by nutrients or water in any of the plantings, and accordingly, there was no signif icant diff erence in leaf dry matter content between the monocultures and mixed plantings. Net photosynthetic rates (Pn) ofC. lanceolataandP. bourneidecreased with their increasing mixing proportion, although other variables related to leaf morphology and photosynthesis showed less variation for the two species. Qin et al.( 2016) found that net photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates (Tr), and stomatal conductance (Gs) of black locust increased with higher mixing and were the lowest in monocultures. In addition, they found that photosynthetic variables for Siberian elm varied less among diff erent planting mixtures. These diff erent results may be because the mixing proportions can considerably aff ect photosynthetic variables,although these eff ects depend on the species. Moreover,these f indings may also be due to diff erent environmental conditions.

    Fig. 5 Principal component(PCA) analysis of functional traits and biomass allocation of a Cunninghamia lanceolata and b Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings. n = 5. 0C:4P: four P. bournei seedlings; 1C:3P or 3P:1C: one C. lanceolata and three P. bournei seedlings;2C:2P or 2P:2C: two C. lanceolata and two P. bournei seedlings; 3C:1P or 1P:3C: three C.lanceolata and one P. bournei seedlings; 4C:0P: four C. lanceolata seedlings. Notes: MLA:mean leaf area, TLA: total leaf area, SLA: specif ic leaf area,LT: leaf thickness, LDMC:Leaf dry matter content, Pn:Net photosynthetic rate, Tr:Transpiration rate, Gs: stomatal conductance, WUE: instantaneous water use effi ciency, RL:root length, RSA: root surface area, SRL: specif ic root length,SRA: specif ic root area, ARD:average root diameter, LM: leaf dry mass, SM: stem dry mass,RM: root dry mass, LMR: leaf mass ratio, SMR: stem mass ratio, RMR: root mass ratio,R/S: root/shoot ratio

    Table 7 Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) signif icance test for diff erences in functional traits and biomass allocation of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei in the diff erent plantings

    Eff ects of mixing proportion on root morphological traits

    Roots are critical for the acquisition of water and mineral nutrients (Bardgett et al. 2014) and their functional traits can be used to infer resource acquisition strategies and mediate plant feedback with ecosystem functions (Bardgett et al.2014; Iversen 2014). Our results showed higher root lengths(RL) and root surface area (RSA) in the mixed plantings than in the monocultures, with the highest values in the 2C:2P planting (Table 5). This suggests that mixed plantings promote the capacity of both species to successfully exploit soil resources. Madsen et al. ( 2020) suggested that tropical tree roots extend further in mixed stands than in monocultures. Xiang et al. ( 2015) similarly found that the f ine root densities of Masson’s pine and Japanese oak were higher in mixed plantings than in monocultures. Conversely, Bolte and Villanueva ( 2006) reported that the f ine root densities of European beech and Norway spruce were lower in mixed than in pure stands. These results indicate that the inf luence of species composition on root functional traits are complex, and variations may be due to plasticity in response to species, stand composition, stand age, and interactions with neighbors (Shu et al. 2018). Our results may be attributed to lower interspecif ic competition compared to intraspecif ic competition (Table 4). In addition, the results also indicate that the specif ic root length (SRL) and specif ic root area(SRA) ofC. lanceolataandP. bourneiwere unaff ected by diff erent mixing proportions if both species were present(Table 5). Shu et al. ( 2018) observed that the specif ic root length ofP. massonianawas signif icantly higher in mixedP.massonianaandCinnamomum camphora(L.) J. Presl. plantations than in corresponding monocultures. The variations of specif ic root length under diff erent species composition may result from interactions between the species planted.However, Cheng et al. ( 2020) noted that the absorption of soil resources during the growth stage of seedlings may be improved by extending the root system rather than by forming thinner roots with a higher specif ic root length. In this study, the absence of signif icant diff erence in the specif ic root length and specif ic root area may be attributed to consistent soil conditions, including suffi cient water supply and high concentrations of nutrients. Furthermore, these results may be due to the short experimental period, which could have been insuffi cient to identify the competitive eff ect on soil resource utilization in the diff erent plantings.

    Link between biomass allocation and functional traits

    Biomass is an important indicator for evaluating the productivity of ecosystems. A positive relationship between species richness and productivity is universal (simova et al. 2013). Some studies have found that higher productivity occurs in mixed-species plantations compared with monocultures (Bielak et al. 2014; Pretzsch and Schutze 2016; Steckel et al. 2019). Our results also showed higher biomass in the mixed plantings than in the monocultures(Fig. 2), which may be attributed to increased benef its and reduced competitive interactions (Ammer 2019). For example, Bauhus et al. ( 2000) showed that superior productivity in mixed plantations of southern blue gum and black wattle may be the result of canopy stratif ication and improved nitrogen supply to the southern blue gum through nitrogen f ixation by black wattles. This study also found that the biomass ofC. lanceolatadecreased with increased proportion, and the biomass ofP. bourneivaried less in the three mixtures with no signif icant diff erences observed in total biomass (Fig. 2). Bauhus et al. ( 2004) reported that stem volume and biomass were the highest in a 50% black wattle and 50% southern blue gum mixed plantation. Forrester et al. ( 2004) found that volumes and aboveground biomass of southern blue gum and black wattle were signif icantly higher in mixtures than in monocultures at both the tree level and at the stand level after three to four years. Nevertheless,Santos et al. ( 2016) demonstrated that the overall biomass production ofEucalyptus urograndishybrids (Eucalyptus grandis×Eucalyptus urophylla) and brown salwood (Acacia mangiumWilld.) planted at a ratio of 1:1 was equal to or lower than that of theE. urograndismonocultures. The eff ect of diff erent mixing proportions on productivity mainly depends on the balance between positive and negative interactions among species (Forrester et al. 2004). Our results may be related to the complementary utilization of aboveand belowground resources by the two species in the mixed plantings and the suffi cient supply of soil nutrients and water during the experiment. Biomass allocation can ref lect the ability of plants to obtain resources. According to the optimal allocation theory, plants increase investment in organs that can obtain restricted resources (Baraloto et al. 2010).Our results demonstrate that the mixing proportion had no signif icant eff ect on biomass allocation forC. lanceolataandP. bournei. This may also be related to the relatively short experimental period or low plasticity in individual seedlings during the early growth stage.

    Numerous studies have found that plants do not adapt to their environment by simply changing a single trait, but instead respond to and survive environmental changes by altering many functional traits of diff erent organs (Freschet et al. 2010). In this study, the total leaf area (TLA), root length (RL), and root surface area (RSA) were positively correlated with the leaf dry mass (LM), stem dry mass (SM),root dry mass (RM), and total dry mass per seedling (TMPS)for both species (Fig. 4), indicating that the variations in biomass depended on above- and belowground resource acquisition. Generally, higher biomass in mixed plantations than in monocultures is associated with complementarity interactions. These may include a higher light interception as a result of aboveground niche separation, or from vertical belowground niche segregation, in which the roots of one species shift to a deeper soil prof ile to explore higher volumes (Bauhus et al. 2004; Bolte and Villanueva 2006).Therefore, in this study, the increase in biomass of the two species in the mixtures may be due to increase plasticity differences in certain functional traits caused by interspecif ic complementary interactions. Overall, signif icant positive correlations between functional traits of leaves and roots,and biomass production and its allocation inC. lanceolataandP. bourneiamong diff erent plantings not only indicate multi-trait convergent adaptation, but some functional traits also showed diff erent responses to diff erent mixing proportions. In general, the correlations between plant functional traits are closely related to the site conditions of the habitat,phenotypic plasticity of plant traits, and physiological characteristics of the species themselves (McCarthy and Enquist 2007). Therefore, there were diff erences in the relationships between functional traits and biomass allocation ofC. lanceolataandP. bourneigrown in the diff erent plantings.

    Conclusion

    Variations in functional traits and biomass allocation ofC.lanceolataandP. bourneiwere studied in diff erent mixture proportions. These functional traits showed diff erent responses to species composition mixtures. Overall, the mixed species plantings had positive eff ects on seedling growth due to lower interspecif ic competition. The increase in the biomass of the two species in the mixed plantings was likely due to increases in the aboveground (total leaf area) and belowground (root length and specif ic root length)resource exploitation. The variation in interspecif ic functional traits in mixed plantations may change with increasing stand age for species with strong interspecif ic competition.Future research should focus on the relationships between growth, stand structure, and interspecif ic functional traits.Our results indicate that the mixing proportion considerably aff ects functional traits and biomass allocation of seedlings and that determining the appropriate mixing proportions is crucial to enhance productivity. Mixtures of species should be adopted instead of monocultures as this can increase productivity and limit some of the negative ecological eff ects associated with monocultures.

    手机成人av网站| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| videosex国产| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产99久久九九免费精品| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| av福利片在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日本熟妇午夜| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产成人av教育| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日本一二三区视频观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 深夜精品福利| 欧美在线黄色| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产三级中文精品| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 我要搜黄色片| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| ponron亚洲| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 制服人妻中文乱码| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 成年免费大片在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美zozozo另类| 露出奶头的视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 色av中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 午夜a级毛片| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| svipshipincom国产片| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 一夜夜www| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲五月天丁香| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| av有码第一页| 久久中文看片网| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久久久久久午夜电影| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| av天堂在线播放| 久久精品影院6| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 我要搜黄色片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲最大成人中文| 曰老女人黄片| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 色综合站精品国产| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 91麻豆av在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品高清国产在线一区| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 午夜福利高清视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日本 欧美在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久久香蕉精品热| avwww免费| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久性视频一级片| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产野战对白在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 久久99热这里只有精品18| www.999成人在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 日本 欧美在线| 女警被强在线播放| 日本在线视频免费播放| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线播放国产精品三级| 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 嫩草影院精品99| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 91老司机精品| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 免费高清视频大片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 看免费av毛片| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产精品影院久久| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产高清videossex| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 黄片小视频在线播放| 91av网站免费观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 一夜夜www| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 窝窝影院91人妻| 在线观看www视频免费| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 变态另类丝袜制服| a在线观看视频网站| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 在线观看日韩欧美| 脱女人内裤的视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产高清videossex| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 大型av网站在线播放| 老司机福利观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美色视频一区免费| 91老司机精品| ponron亚洲| 极品教师在线免费播放| aaaaa片日本免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| bbb黄色大片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 草草在线视频免费看| 69av精品久久久久久| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美午夜高清在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 99久久精品热视频| 又大又爽又粗| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 69av精品久久久久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产av不卡久久| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 99热6这里只有精品| 9191精品国产免费久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| av欧美777| 一本久久中文字幕| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| a级毛片a级免费在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品久久久久久,| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线观看一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产熟女xx| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜免费激情av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 香蕉av资源在线| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 91成年电影在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 手机成人av网站| 88av欧美| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| www国产在线视频色| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 91麻豆av在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 色av中文字幕| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 99久久精品热视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 香蕉久久夜色| 日韩欧美三级三区| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产熟女xx| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 在线观看www视频免费| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品一及| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久国产精品影院| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜福利欧美成人| xxxwww97欧美| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久中文看片网| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| xxxwww97欧美| 午夜福利在线在线| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 久久伊人香网站| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产区一区二久久| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| www.www免费av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 91av网站免费观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲精品在线美女| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 午夜免费观看网址| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲av成人av| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 免费看十八禁软件| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 九色成人免费人妻av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产成人aa在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| ponron亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 香蕉av资源在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国产视频内射| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 久久国产精品影院| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看|