• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of acute cholangitis of different severity

    2022-10-24 09:15:40YaoChiHuangChiHuanWuMuHsienLeeShengFuWangYungKuanTsouChengHuiLinKaiFengSungNaiJenLiu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年38期

    Yao-Chi Huang, Chi-Huan Wu, Mu Hsien Lee, Sheng Fu Wang, Yung-Kuan Tsou, Cheng-Hui Lin, Kai-FengSung,Nai-Jen Liu

    Abstract

    Key Words: Acute cholangitis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; severity; Timing; Thirtyday mortality; Length of hospital stay

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Without treatment, patients with acute cholangitis (AC) may progress to septicemia and organ failure resulting in mortality[1,2]. Over the past two decades, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) has been generally accepted as a first-line treatment for AC[3,4]. Although delayed biliary drainage may not affect the risk of complications in patients who respond well to antibiotics, some patients with AC require early ERCP to avoid (persistent) organ failure or mortality[2,5,6]. Despite consensus on the need for biliary drainage, the optimal timing for early ERCP remains unclear due to mixed results in the literature[7]. Different definitions of early ERCP have been used in the literature,ranging from 12 h to 72 h[2,5,8-11]. The varied definitions among studies have led to inconsistent conclusions. In addition, the definitions of AC are not uniform across studies. More importantly, most studies did not define the timing of ERCP by stratifying the severity of AC[7]. In this context, the recently published Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) provide not only a diagnosis of AC but also a severity grading, which is important for predicting prognosis and determining treatment strategies[3]. However,although TG18 recommends early or urgent biliary drainage for moderate or severe cholangitis, there is no specific timing for early or urgent ERCP. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether the timing of ERCP is associated with improved outcomes in AC patients with different severities.

    MATERlALS AND METHODS

    This was a retrospective study conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Center. At our center, ERCP has been the first-line of treatment for patients with AC for the past two decades. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB No. 202200881B0). Since this was a retrospective study using routine clinical treatment or diagnostic medical records, the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the waiver of the participant's consent. All methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations.

    Definition of acute cholangitis

    The diagnostic criteria for AC were based on the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines, including systemic inflammation, cholestasis and imaging findings[3]. Systemic inflammation included fever (body temperature >38 °C) or evidence of an inflammatory response [white blood cell (WBC) count < 4000 or > 10000/μL or C-reactive protein ≥ 1 mg/dL]. Cholestasis included jaundice (serum total bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL) or abnormal liver function tests (serum alkaline phosphatase, r-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alanine aminotransferase > 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal value). Imaging findings included bile duct dilatation or imaging evidence of etiology such as strictures, stones or stents. A definite diagnosis of AC was defined as one item in systemic inflammation, one item in cholestasis and one item in imaging findings.

    Definition of the severity of acute cholangitis

    AC severity was divided into three grades based on the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines[3]. Grade III (severe) AC was AC associated with the onset of dysfunction in at least one of the following organs/systems:cardiovascular dysfunction (defined as hypotension requiring dopamine ≥ 5 μg/kg per min, or any dose of norepinephrine), neurological dysfunction (presence of conscious disturbance), respiratory dysfunction (defined as PaO2/FiO2ratio < 300), renal dysfunction (oliguria, serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL), hepatic dysfunction [defined as prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) >1.5] or hematological dysfunction (defined as platelet count < 100 × 103/μL). Grade II (moderate) AC was AC associated with any two of the following conditions: abnormal WBC count (> 12000/μL or <4000/μL), high fever (≥ 39 °C), old age (≥ 75 years), hyperbilirubinemia (serum total bilirubin ≥ 5 mg/dL), or hypoalbuminemia (< lower limit of normal value × 0.7). Grade I (mild) AC was AC that did not meet the criteria of “Grade III” or “Grade II” AC at initial diagnosis.

    Definition of time to ERCP

    Time to ERCP was defined as the time from the emergency department visit to the commencement of ERCP.

    Patient selection and clinical variables

    The study flow chart is shown in Figure 1. Between 2016 and 2017, 2121 patients who underwent ERCP in our center were retrospectively collected from the computer database of the Therapeutic Endoscopy Center. The inclusion criteria were patients who met the TG18/TG13 criteria for a definite diagnosis of AC. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Patients who did not meet the criteria for a definite diagnosis of AC;(2) inpatients who developed AC after hospitalization; and (3) patients who received ERCP 7 or more days after an emergency department visit. For patients readmitted for AC during the study period, we included only the first admission and the ERCP procedure.

    Medical records were reviewed, and the following data were obtained: sex; age; clinical manifestations, including body temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, saturation, respiratory rate and urine output; laboratory values including WBC count, platelet count, PT-INR, C-reactive protein,creatinine, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, r-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and albumin; diagnosis and treatment of ERCP, including causes of obstruction (such as stones, malignant strictures or stent dysfunction); and the timing of ERCP.

    Outcome assessments

    The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU admission rate, length of hospital stay (LOHS) and 30-d readmission rate. The results were first compared for patients receiving ERCP ≤ 24 hvs> 24 h and then for patients receiving ERCP ≤ 48 hvs> 48 h. Subgroup analyses were also performed in patients with grade I, II, and III AC.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variable data are represented by the median and interquartile range (IQR); categorical variables are presented as a number (%). For comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variable data and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for suitable categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with 30-d mortality.Only variables with aPvalue < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Two-tailedPvalues < 0.05 were considered statistically significant andPvalues = 0.05 were considered marginally significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 22.0;SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

    Figure 1 Study flow chart. AC: Acute cholangitis; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

    RESULTS

    A total of 683 patients who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. Among them, there were 170 (24.9%) grade III AC patients, 179 grade II AC patients (26.4%) and 334 grade I AC patients(48.9%).

    Patient characteristics

    The baseline characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 66 (53-78) years; 57.2% were male. The median body temperature was 37.5 (36.8-38.4) °C and 58.4% of patients had abnormal WBC counts. The median platelet count was 198 × 103(148 × 103-251× 103)/μL. The median serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase were 150 U/L, 166 U/L and 265 U/L, respectively. Serum amylase and lipase data were available for 307 (44.9%) and 487 (71.3%) patients with median levels of 65 U/L and 37 U/L,respectively. The median serum bilirubin level was 3.7 (2.3-6.3) mg/dL and the median creatine level was 0.93 (0.73-1.24) mg/dL. The median PT/INR was 1.1 (1.1-1.2). Only 133 (19.5%) patients had data on serum albumin and the median level was 3.56 (3.05-3.98) g/dL. Twenty-nine (4.2%) patients had cardiovascular dysfunction, 35 (5.1%) patients had neurological dysfunction and 48 (7%) patients had respiratory dysfunction.

    Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h:Compared with ERCP > 24 h, patients with ERCP ≤ 24 h had significantly lower body temperature (median, 37.2 °Cvs37.5 °C.P= 0.003),significantly higher serum alanine aminotransferase (median, 194 U/Lvs156 U/L,P= 0.02) and serum creatinine levels (median, 0.96vs0.93,P= 0.004), and significantly higher proportions of abnormal WBC counts (70.9%vs55.4%,P= 0.001), cardiovascular dysfunction (11.2%vs2.6%,P< 0.001) and respiratory dysfunction (14.2%vs5.3%,P< 0.001).

    Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h:Compared with ERCP > 48 h, patients with ERCP ≤ 48 h had significantly lower body temperature (median, 37.4 °Cvs37.6 °C,P= 0.009),significantly higher serum alanine aminotransferase levels (median, 188 U/Lvs142 U/L,P= 0.004) and significantly lower PT/INR (median, 1.1vs1.2,P= 0.001).

    ERCP characteristics and causes of AC

    The characteristics of ERCP are listed in Table 2. Causes of AC included common bile duct stones(CBDS, 74.4%), malignant biliary obstruction (MBO, 10.2%), biliary stent dysfunction (8.9%), benign biliary stricture (4.5%) and others (1.9%). ERCP failed in 1% of patients. For patients with successful ERCP, endoscopic treatments during ERCP included endoscopic sphincterotomy (81.7%), endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (0.7%), bile duct stone retrieval (73.5%), stone-free bile duct clearance (5.4%),removal of old biliary stents (8.8%), insertion of new biliary stents (27.4%), dilation of biliary strictures(1%) and others (0.4%).

    Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h:The median time to ERCP was 17.7 (9.0-20.4) h in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group and 67.6 (43.6-98.9) h in the ERCP > 24 h group. Only malignant biliary obstruction as a cause of AC was significantly less common in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group (5.2%vs11.5%,P= 0.032). In therapeutic ERCP, bile duct stone retrieval was higher in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group (80.6%vs71.8%,P= 0.038) whereas the old biliary stent removal rate was lower (4.5%vs9.8%,P= 0.049).

    Table 1 Characteristics of the patients

    Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h:The median time to ERCP was 26.0 (18.8-40.1) h in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group and 88.5 (67.2-114.6) h in the ERCP > 48 h group. Regarding indications for ERCP, CBDS was more common in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group (81.5%vs68.3%,P< 0.001) whereas malignant biliary obstruction (6.1%vs13.8%,P< 0.001) and stent dysfunction were less common (5.4%vs11.9%,P= 0.003). In therapeutic ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy (85.7%vs78.3%,P= 0.013) and bile duct stone retrieval (79.6%vs68.3%,P= 0.001) were more frequent in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group whereas the removal of old biliary stents (5.4%vs11.7%,P= 0.004) and the insertion of new biliary stents (22.3%vs31.7%,P= 0.006) were less frequent.

    Primary and secondary outcomes

    The primary and secondary outcomes are summarized in Table 3.

    Overall patients:Overall, the 30-d mortality rate was 1.02% (or 7/683). The ICU admission rate was 5.4%; the median LOHS was 7 (5-10) d; and the 30-d readmission rate was 12.7%.

    (1) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h: The overall 30-d mortality rate was 0 in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group and 1.3% in the ERCP > 24 h group. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P= 0.356). Regarding secondary outcomes, the ERCP ≤ 24 h group had significantly higher ICU admission rates (11.2%vs4.0%,P= 0.001) and shorter LOHS (median, 6 dvs7 d,P= 0.018).

    (2) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h: Overall, the 30-d mortality rate was significantly lower in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group than in the ERCP > 48 h group (0vs1.9%,P= 0.017). For secondary outcomes, the ERCP ≤ 48 h group had a significantly shorter LOHS (median, 6 dvs8 d,P<0.001).

    Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Patients with Grade III AC:The 30-d mortality rate was 3.5% (or 6/170) for patients with grade III AC.The ICU admission rate was 15.3%; the median LOHS was 7 (7-14) d; and the 30-d readmission rate was 13.5% in this patient group.

    (1) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h: The 30-d mortality rate for grade III AC patients was 0 in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group and 4.6% in the ERCP > 24 h group. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P= 0.338). Regarding secondary outcomes, the ERCP ≤ 24 h group had significantly higher ICU admission rates (9.0%vs2.6%,P= 0.002).

    (2) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h: Among grade III AC patients, the 30-d mortality rate was significantly lower in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group than in the ERCP > 48 h group (0vs6.1%,P= 0.039). Regarding secondary outcomes, the ERCP ≤ 48 h group had significantly higher ICU admission rates (22.2%vs10.2%,P= 0.031).

    Patients with Grade II AC:The 30-d mortality rate was 0 for patients with grade II AC. The ICU admission rate was 2.8%; the median LOHS was 7 (5-10) d; and the 30-d readmission rate was 13.4% in this patient group.

    (1) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h: The only significant finding in grade II AC patients was that the LOHS was shorter (median, 6 dvs7 d,P= 0.047) in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group.

    (2) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h: Among grade II AC patients, the only significant finding was that the LOHS was shorter (median, 6 dvs8 d,P= 0.001) in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group.

    Patients with Grade I AC:The 30-d mortality rate was 0.3% (or 1/334) for patients with grade I AC. The ICU admission rate was 1.8%; the median LOHS was 6 (5-9) d; and the 30-d readmission rate was 12% in this patient group.

    (1) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 24 h and ERCP > 24 h: The only significant finding in grade I AC patients was that the LOHS was shorter (median, 6 dvs7 d,P= 0.005) in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group.

    Table 3 Primary and secondary outcomes

    (2) Comparisons between ERCP ≤ 48 h and ERCP > 48 h: Among grade I AC patients, the only significant finding was that the LOHS was shorter (median, 6 dvs7 d,P< 0.001) in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group.

    Factors associated with 30-d mortality

    The results of the univariate and multivariate analyses are listed in Table 4. The univariate analysis revealed that malignant biliary obstruction (OR: 6.817, 95%CI: 1.494-31.109,P= 0.013), hepatic dysfunction (OR: 8.896, 95%CI: 1.645-48.119,P= 0.011), respiratory dysfunction (OR: 10.517, 95%CI:2.284-48.431,P= 0.003), neurological dysfunction (OR: 15.094, 95%CI: 3.241-70.298,P= 0.001),cardiovascular dysfunction (OR: 18.750, 95%CI: 3.990-88.112,P< 0.001), severity of AC (severevsmoderate + mild, OR: 18.732, 95%CI: 2.239-156.728,P= 0.007), ICU admission (OR: 7.326, 95%CI: 1.373-39.101,P= 0.02), and time to ERCP (every 1-d delay, OR: 1.950, 95%CI: 1.252-3.038,P= 0.003) were associated with 30-d mortality. The multivariate analysis revealed that time to ERCP (every 1-d delay,OR: 2.081, 95%CI: 1.154-3.753,P= 0.015) was the only independent factor associated with 30-d mortality.However, cardiovascular dysfunction (OR: 17.756, 95%CI: 0.994-317.241,P= 0.050) was of marginal significance.

    DlSCUSSlON

    Kiriyamaet al[3] reported that early or urgent ERCP significantly reduced 30-d mortality only in patients with grade II AC compared with patients who did not receive early or urgent ERCP. This result may be due to the lack of well-defined timing for early or urgent ERCP. In a meta-analysis published in 2020, Duet al[7] reported that early ERCP reduced in-hospital mortality regardless of whether it was defined as < 24 h, < 48 h or < 72 h. In the present study, we found that ERCP ≤ 48 h but not ERCP ≤ 24 hsignificantly reduced 30-d mortality. Our results were consistent with the 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommending ERCP ≤ 48 h in AC patients[12]. In that study,however, the data were insufficient to stratify by disease severity. In a subgroup analysis, we found that the same survival benefit was observed only in patients with grade III AC but not in patients with grade II or I AC. These results were because patients with grade III AC had significantly higher 30-d mortality than those with grade II or I AC (3.5%vs0vs0.3%,P= 0.001). Hakutaet al[10] reported that time to ERCP was not associated with clinical outcomes (including in-hospital mortality) in patients with nongrade III AC. Therefore, we recommend emergent ERCP (≤ 48 h) for patients with grade III AC in terms of survival benefit.

    Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors associated with 30-d mortality

    However, 30-d mortality in AC has been reported to range from 1% to 16% between studies, which may be one of the reasons leading to inconsistent conclusions about the optimal timing of ERCP[11,13-15]. Differences in mortality may be due to different patient populations in different studies,e.g.,patients with AC due to CBDS and MBO may have different clinical courses and prognoses. Kiriyamaet al[14] reported that patients with AC associated with MBO had a higher 30-d mortality rate than those with AC associated with CBDS. In our univariate analysis, MBO was a factor associated with 30-d mortality. Therefore, one of the reasons for the low 30-d mortality in our study was the low proportion of patients with MBO (10.2%). In contrast, Tanet al[11] included 43% of MBO patients in their study and reported a 30-d mortality rate of 16%. However, Parket al[15] included only patients with AC associated with distal MBO and reported an overall 30-d mortality rate of 4.8%. Therefore, there may be some other factors associated with 30-d mortality between studies.

    Of the five organ failure criteria used to diagnose grade III AC, cardiovascular dysfunction was the only independent factor associated with 30-d mortality in the current study. Therefore, among grade III AC patients, those with cardiovascular dysfunction may need to be treated differently[16,17]. Karvellaset al[17] reported an overall mortality rate of 37% in 260 patients with AC-related septic shock. They found that delayed biliary decompression > 12 h from the onset of shock was one of three independent factors associated with mortality. The 2019 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend biliary drainage (preferably endoscopic) within 12 h of shock onset for AC patients with CBDS-related septic shock[16]. Therefore, cardiovascular dysfunction should be weighed when developing new guidelines in the future.

    Some studies found no survival benefit but did find early ERCP to reduce the LOHS[18-21]. Houet al[20] reported that in a multivariate analysis, the LOHS increased by 1.44 d for every 1-d delay in ERCP (P< 0.001). Similar results were seen in the study by Zhuet al[18]: LOHS increased by 1.49 d for every 1-d delay in biliary drainage (P< 0.0001). However, these findings were not stratified by disease severity.Although we did not perform a multivariate analysis of the LOHS, our results suggested that the LOHS could be significantly reduced regardless of ERCP ≤ 24 h or ≤ 48 h. In subgroup analyses stratified by disease severity, this benefit was only observed in patients with grade I or II AC. The benefit of early ERCP in shortening the LOHS might be offset by higher ICU admission rates in grade III AC patients.Similar findings were found by Janget al[19], who recommended urgent ERCP (≤ 24 h) for patients with grade I or II AC because it can shorten the LOHS.

    This study has several limitations. First, this retrospective, single-center study might have inherent selection bias. Patients with cardiovascular dysfunction and respiratory dysfunction tended to receive ERCP ≤ 24 h. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting the results of this subgroup analysis.Second, we identified patients from the endoscopy database. AC patients who died before receiving ERCP might not have been included in this study, resulting in an underestimation of 30-d mortality.Third, data on albumin, one of the criteria for class II AC, were available in only 19.5% of patients.Therefore, some patients with grade II AC may be misclassified as grade I AC and vice versa.

    CONCLUSlON

    ERCP ≤ 48 h but not ≤ 24 h has a survival benefit in AC patients; this benefit is only observed in patients with grade III AC. Early ERCP is also recommended for patients with grade I or II AC because it shortens the LOHS.

    ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

    Research methods

    The retrospective cohort study included 683 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for acute cholangitis defined by the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines. Among them, there were 170 (24.9%) grade III acute cholangitis patients, 179 grade II acute cholangitis patients (26.4%) and 334 grade I acute cholangitis patients (48.9%). Results are first compared between patients receiving ERCP ≤ 24 h and > 24 h, and then between patients receiving ERCP ≤ 48 h and > 48 h. Subgroup analyses are performed on patients with grade III, II or I acute cholangitis.

    Research results

    When 24 h was considered a critical value for ERCP timing, we found that patients with malignant biliary obstruction received ERCP ≤ 24 h less frequently when compared with ERCP > 24 h (5.2%vs11.5%). Patients with organ dysfunction such as cardiovascular dysfunction (11.2%vs2.6%) and respiratory dysfunction (14.2%vs5.3%) or those admitted to the ICU (11.2%vs4%) tended to receive ERCP ≤ 24 h. Patients with ERCP ≤ 24 h had significantly shorter hospital stays (median, 6 dvs7 d).Stratified by the severity of acute cholangitis, higher ICU admission was only observed in grade III acute cholangitis and a shorter length of hospital stay was only observed in grade I and II acute cholangitis. Regarding 30-d mortality, the results of ERCP ≤ 24 h and > 24 h were not significantly different, either in the overall population or in patients with grade I, II or III acute cholangitis. When 48 h was considered a critical value for ERCP timing, patients with choledocholithiasis received ERCP ≤ 48 h more frequently (81.5%vs68.3%). Patients who received ERCP ≤ 48 h had significantly lower 30-d mortality (0vs1.9%) and shorter hospital stays (6 dvs8 d). Stratified by the severity of acute cholangitis,lower 30-d mortality (0vs6.1%) and higher ICU admission rates (22.2%vs10.2%) were only observed in grade III acute cholangitis and a shorter length of hospital stay was only observed in grade I and II acute cholangitis. In the multivariate analysis, cardiovascular dysfunction and time to ERCP were two independent factors associated with 30-d mortality.

    Research conclusions

    ERCP ≤ 48 h but not ≤ 24 h has a survival benefit in acute cholangitis patients; this benefit is only observed in patients with grade III acute cholangitis. Early ERCP is also recommended for patients with grade I and II acute cholangitis because it shortens the length of hospital stay.

    Research perspectives

    Of the five organ failure criteria used to diagnose grade III AC, cardiovascular dysfunction was the only independent factor associated with 30-d mortality in the current study. Therefore, cardiovascular dysfunction should be weighed more heavily in the development of new guidelines in the future.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Huang YC contributed to the conceptualization of the study and original manuscript; Wu CH,Lee MH and Wang SF contributed to data planning, interpretation and formal analysis; Lin CH and Sung KF contributed to data collection; Tsou YK is committed to the conceptualization of the study, manuscript writing,review and editing; Liu NJ contributed to revising the final version of the manuscript for submission.

    lnstitutional review board statement:This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB No. 202200881B0).

    lnformed consent statement:Since this was a retrospective study using clinical routine treatment or diagnostic medical records, the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the waiver of the participant's consent.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

    Data sharing statement:Technical appendix, statistical code and dataset available from the corresponding author at flying@adm.cgmh.org.tw.

    STROBE statement:The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:Taiwan

    ORClD number:Chi-Huan Wu 0000-0002-3913-8010; Mu Hsien Lee 0000-0003-3664-5313; Sheng Fu Wang 0000-0002-7856-2957; Yung-Kuan Tsou 0000-0002-7254-7369; Cheng-Hui Lin 0000-0001-8102-0625; Kai-Feng Sung 0000-0001-6118-0234;Nai-Jen Liu 0000-0002-7992-0234.

    S-Editor:Gong ZM

    L-Editor:Filipodia

    P-Editor:Gong ZM

    极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 97在线视频观看| av卡一久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 只有这里有精品99| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 一本一本综合久久| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一级毛片电影观看| 人妻系列 视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本午夜av视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 有码 亚洲区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产永久视频网站| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 99热这里只有精品一区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产精品.久久久| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲成色77777| 日本wwww免费看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 精品酒店卫生间| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 午夜福利视频精品| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日本视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 舔av片在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产成人91sexporn| 熟女av电影| 久久久久国产网址| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 一区二区av电影网| av一本久久久久| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| av线在线观看网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品.久久久| 国产极品天堂在线| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 视频区图区小说| 97热精品久久久久久| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美97在线视频| 色网站视频免费| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久精品夜色国产| videos熟女内射| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 色综合色国产| 亚洲成色77777| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av在线观看视频网站免费| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| av.在线天堂| 97在线视频观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 五月天丁香电影| 国产毛片在线视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 三级经典国产精品| 综合色av麻豆| tube8黄色片| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 777米奇影视久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 午夜福利高清视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久久久久久久成人| 高清av免费在线| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 欧美激情在线99| 免费少妇av软件| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av男天堂| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 熟女av电影| 色吧在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产av不卡久久| 91精品国产九色| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 黄片wwwwww| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 有码 亚洲区| av线在线观看网站| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产成人91sexporn| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 69人妻影院| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲av.av天堂| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 97在线视频观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 看免费成人av毛片| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产成人精品婷婷| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 中国国产av一级| 性色av一级| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲国产精品999| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 中国三级夫妇交换| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产视频内射| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 色播亚洲综合网| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费观看性生交大片5| av在线亚洲专区| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 少妇的逼水好多| 色哟哟·www| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 一区二区av电影网| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一级av片app| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 一级黄片播放器| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产高潮美女av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 五月天丁香电影| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 永久网站在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲精品第二区| 男人舔奶头视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久热精品热| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 深夜a级毛片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 深夜a级毛片| 极品教师在线视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 色吧在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 综合色丁香网| 国产成人精品福利久久| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| av在线蜜桃| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 欧美性感艳星| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日本三级黄在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 免费少妇av软件| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲四区av| 国产乱人视频| 欧美3d第一页| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲成色77777| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品一及| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 搞女人的毛片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 身体一侧抽搐| 青春草国产在线视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 大香蕉久久网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 97超视频在线观看视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99久久精品热视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av.在线天堂| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲在线观看片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 五月天丁香电影| av播播在线观看一区| 99久久人妻综合| 色哟哟·www| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲综合精品二区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 一级a做视频免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产精品无大码| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产成人aa在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久久欧美国产精品| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产男女内射视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久久久久久国产电影| 97在线视频观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 成人二区视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产乱人视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 观看美女的网站| 日本黄大片高清| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 超碰97精品在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 毛片女人毛片| 日韩中字成人| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 黄片wwwwww| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 嫩草影院新地址| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| videos熟女内射| 一级毛片电影观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲综合精品二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产视频内射| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费av毛片视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美3d第一页| 色吧在线观看|