• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Ground vegetation, forest floor and mineral topsoil in a clear-cutting and reforested Scots pine stands of different ages: a case study

    2022-09-08 06:16:14DovilGustienIvetaVarnagirytKabainskienVidasStaknas
    Journal of Forestry Research 2022年4期

    Dovil? Gustien? ·Iveta Varnagiryt?-Kaba?inskien? ·Vidas Stak?nas

    Abstract Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) is a dominant tree species on nutrient-poor sandy soils in the Baltic region’s hemiboreal forests.A final clear-cut in commercial stands is a common practice.However, the maintenance of relatively stable vegetation indices and ecological processes throughout the rotation promote new scientific and social debates.Overall, clear-cuttings disturb forest functions for a certain period, i.e., phytocenoses with forest-based species composition, biodiversity, and vegetation cover.Soil organic carbon (SOC) and nutrients can also be affected.As key indices, ground vegetation, SOC and main nutrients in the forest floor and in 40-cm topsoil layer were analysed in the clear-cuttings (not reforested) and in reforested 10-, 30-, and 101-year-old Scots pine stands in 2020.The results show an increase in species richness at the beginning of stand formation up to 30 years after clear-cutting; species typical of a mature forest occurred relatively quickly post-harvest.The mean mass of forest floor vegetation was negatively related to the richness of ground vegetation species.Forest floor pH consequently decreased with stand age.Higher SOC levels were in the mature stand.In the mineral topsoil layers, total SOC and total nitrogen were in the upper 10-cm layer in the 30-year-old stand.A post-harvest peak in mineral N concentration was observed and other nutrients, especially mobile P2 O 5 , K 2 O, Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ , increased the clear-cuttings and in the 10-year-old stand compared to the mature stand.

    Keywords Pinus sylvestris · Species cover·Richness ·Soil organic carbon·Soil nutrients·Mature stand

    Introduction

    The role of forests in the context of climate change mitigation is widely discussed, highlighting the importance of these ecosystems.Forests store large amounts of carbon (C)in various ecosystem compartments, both in soil and in plant biomass, accumulating carbon dioxide through continuous C sequestration (Nave et al.2010; Kowalska et al.2020).The continuing functioning of forest ecosystems ensures natural absorbing of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (Pregitzer and Euskirchen 2004; Pan et al.2011).The growing demand for timber and biomass for energy under conventional forest management practices does not presuppose consideration of alternatives to clear-cutting harvesting (Puettmann et al.2015).Therefore, final clear-cutting when mature stands are felled during one operation is still widely used.On the other hand, there is a growing debate about the compatibility of such forest harvesting with the maintenance and sustainable use of forest ecosystems (ME 2016, 2020; Maciūnait? 2017).Also, clear-cutting, which destroys forest structure, is likely to disrupt C sequestration for some time (Nave et al.2010).

    Despite the stem-only or whole-tree harvesting, clear-cutting operations alter ground vegetation species composition and cover, soil organic matter (SOC) and nutrient imbalances in the forest floor and in the mineral soil (Gundersen et al.2006; Armolaitis et al.2008, 2018; Nave et al.2010;?esonien? et al.2019).Until plant communities again reach the pre-harvest level, the specific forest structural elements and functions (vegetation response, soil chemistry.)most likely will occur on reforested sites of different ages.It can be argued hypothetically that differences from the mature stand should continue for a limited time.If changes in ground vegetation indices could be detected soon after clear-cutting (?esonien? et al.2019; Stefańska-Krzaczek et al.2019; Ilintsev et al.2020), changes in the soil could be less noticeable.An exception is a post-harvest peak in nitrate concentrations in runoffwater which is caused by more intensive mineralization of organic matter in the clearcuttings (Bergholm et al.2015; Armolaitis et al.2018).Previous studies have shown that the loss of other nutrients due to forest harvesting during the whole stand rotation was compensated by atmospheric precipitation and litterfall in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) stands on nutrient-poor sandy soils (Armolaitis et al.2013).

    In order to clarify the processes that occur in clear-cuttings of forest stands, both short-term and long-term studies are carried out to monitor nutrient changes and the risk of mobile compounds leaching to groundwater (Gundersen et al.2006; Armolaitis et al.2008, 2018; Laudon et al.2009;L?fgren et al.2009; Palviainen et al.2014; ?esonien? et al.2019).In line with the changing climate, the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and SOC stocks in forests and logging sites has also received particular attention (Schulze and Freibauer 2005; Nave et al.2010; Schelker et al.2012).

    It is well-known that soil is an important C and nitrogen(N) pool, including approximately 75% of organic C and 95% of N (Schlesinger 1997).C accumulation in forest ecosystems occurs mainly through vegetation, litter/floor and in the mineral soil (Lee et al.2014; Laf leur et al.2018).Plant communities, their biodiversity and cover, and forest floor alter the C cycle and interactions between soil organic C and N (Schulze et al.2000).However, accurate estimates of soil C and N during a forest rotation are still lacking.

    As early successional species, Scots pine has a wide ecological plasticity but is light demanding.The species prevalence depends on edaphic conditions; therefore, most Scots pine stands grow on nutrient-poor soils.Despite the wide distribution of Scots pine, previous studies have not identified associated plant species or communities throughout its geographical and edaphic regions (Kelly and Connolly 2000).This warrants the need for such studies in different regions and habitats.In Lithuania, forest management practices show that clear-cuttings are the major disturbance in Scots pine forests.In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the assessment of the impact of clear-cutting on understory vegetation and soil (?esonien? et al.2019).However, more attention has been paid to the initial, shortterm effects.Therefore, this study aimed to identify the main changes in ground vegetation composition, content of soil organic carbon and other nutrients on the forest floor and in the mineral topsoil layers in clear-cuts and in Scots pine stands of different ages.Our hypothesis was that the most important changes in forest vegetation, forest floor and mineral topsoil are likely to be recorded in recent clear-cuttings up to the initiation stage of the stand, which is represented by sites of about 10-years old, and that the 30-year-old stand would become more similar to a mature forest.

    Materials and methods

    Study site

    The study was carried out in south-eastern Lithuania (54°38′16.19″ N; 24° 56′ 3.59″ E) on land of the Trakai Regional Division of State Forest Enterprise in July–September 2020.Mean annual temperature was 6.9 °C, and mean annual precipitation 695 mm over 1981–2010.During 2020, mean temperatures were about 2 °C above and rainfall 120 mm below normal.

    Four different study sites, including a clear-cut (one year after harvesting) and 10-, 30-, and 101-year-old Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris) stands were selected as typical Scots pine stands within this area.For all sites, the forest type wasPinetum vaccinio-myrtillosumand the forest site type was Nb–oligotrophic mineral soil with a normal moisture regime,according to Lithuanian classification (Vai?ys et al.2006).The soils are arenosols of coarse sand with low (< 5%)clay + silt content (Buivydait? et al.2001; IUSS Working Group WRB 2007).The diagnostic ground vegetation species wereVaccinium myrtillusL.andV.vitis-idaeaL., and moss speciesHylocium splendens(Hedw.) Schimp.,Pleurozium schreberi(Brid.) Mitt.andPtilium crista-castrensis(Hedw.).

    For the assessment of selected vegetation and soil parameters, a 2000 m2circular plot with a radius of 25.24 m was established (Fig.1).

    Fig.1 Location of the study in Lithuania and the scheme of ground vegetation assessment, forest floor and mineral topsoil sampling

    In clear-cut, harvesting was carried out in 2019.Boles and logging residues except for stumps and roots, were removed from this site.The 10-year-old stand was initially established as a pure Scots pine with total density of 11,150 stems ha-1was specific because it comprised a small number of naturally regenerated birch trees in the undergrowth.These birch seedlings are to be removed during the first thinning up to 15-year-old according to the Lithuanian forest management practices.The 30-year-old stand was 90% Scots pine and 10% Norway spruce (Picea abies(L.) H.Karst).Stand volume was 165 m3ha-1, basal area 28 m2ha-1, and mean DBH 14 cm.The mature 101-year-old stand was 100%Scots pine with small Norway spruce trees in the understory.Stand volume was 415 m3ha-1, basal area 36 m2ha-1, and mean DBH 46 cm.

    Vegetation assessment

    The understorey vegetation was studied at the four different sites during the period of maximum herbaceous plant cover in July 2020.Assessment was carried out on five 10 m × 10 m plots located in the centre of the site and at 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° azimuths from the centre (Fig.1).In each site, the assessment was carried out in 25 vegetation quadrates (1 m × 1 m subplots).A 100 cm2square mesh frame was used to assess % cover of each species visually.The mean value of each species cover was then calculated per site.Frequency of each species was determined as the number of subplots in which the species was found divided by the total number of subplots (Ehlers et al.2003).

    Species assessment was made in three different vertical strata: moss layer, herb layer (all non-ligneous, and ligneous ≤ 0.5 m height), shrub layer (non-ligneous and ligneous) > 0.5 m height, and tree layer > 5 m height according to Canullo et al.( 2011).

    For species diversity at the different sites, ground vegetation species richness (number of species) and Shannon diversity index (H′) were evaluated (Magurran 2004).The Shannon diversity index (H′) was calculated by Eq.1:

    wheren iis the cover of theith species;Nis the total cover of vegetation on the site.

    Soil sampling and chemical analysis

    Forest floor mass [forest litter (OL) + fragmented litter(OF) + humified litter (OH)] was determined by sampling within a 25 cm × 25 cm metallic frame.For mass determination, composite floor samples were obtained from four subsamples, oven-dried at 105 °C to a constant mass, and weighted.

    Mineral topsoil samples of the 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–40 cm layers were collected using a metallic soil auger in August–September 2020.Four composite samples were combined from 10 subsamples collected systematically in each plot with the distance between sampling points of at least 5 m.

    Indicators determined in the forest floor and mineral topsoil samples were: pH determined in a 0.01 M CaCl2suspension (ISO 10390:2005), organic carbon (C) determined with a Heraeus apparatus (ISO 10694, dry combustion at 900 °C),and total nitrogen (N) analysed using the Kjeldahl method(ISO 11261).Concentrations of mineral N were determined by the spectrometric method (ISO 14256-2) in 1 M KCl extraction: NH4-N using sodium phenolate and sodium hypochlorite, and NO3-N using sulphanilamide.Mineral N (Nmin) was determined by summing NH4-N and NO3-N.Mobile potassium (K2O) and phosphorus (P2O5) were determined by the égnér-Riehm-Domingo (A-L) method (égnér et al.1960).Soil chemical analyses were conducted in the Agrochemical Research Laboratory of LAMMC.

    Statistical analysis

    To find the significant differences between the sites,ANOVA followed by a post-hoc LSD test was used.Data are presented as means ± standard error (SE).Different letters next to the mean values are statistically significantly different atp< 0.05 between the sites.Pearson correlation measured the linear correlation between two variables.Statistical analyses were conducted using STATISTICA 12.0(StatSoft.Inc, 2007) software.

    Results

    Ground vegetation in the clear-cutting and reforested Scots pine stands

    Moss cover was the most numerous at all sites with some differences in species composition due the specific stand age(Table 1).In the clear-cut,Pleurozium schreberi(Brid.) Mitt.dominated, followed byHylocomium splendens(Hedw.)Schimp.andPtilium crista-castrensis(Hedw.) De Not.In the 10-year-old stand,Pohlia nutans(Hedw.) Lindb., Pleurozium schreberiandDicranum polysetumSw.covered 14.0%,5.0%, and 2.0%, respectively.In the 30-year-old stand,Pleurozium schreberiandHylocomium splendenswas the largest cover withPtilium crista-castrensisandDicranum polysetumat 3.7 to 5.6%.Three main species of mosses were found in the mature forest: 14.1% forPtilium crista-castrensis,20.8% forPleurozium schreberiand 53.7% forHylocium splendens.Compared with the other sites, the largest moss cover was in the mature stand.However, the largest number of moss species was in the 10-year-old stand; the number of moss species decreased with stand age.However, the lowest mean moss cover was in the 10-year-old stand (Fig.2).

    The largest total number of species of vascular plants >50 cm in height was in the clear-cut and 10-year-old stand(26 species) (Table 1).The number of vascular species in the 30-year-old stand was 23 species.Ten species of vascular plants, typical for the forest typePinetum vacciniomyrtillosum, were found in the mature stand.In the clear-cut,Vaccinium myrtilluscover was almost 7%, and the cover ofVaccinium vitis-idaeaandPteridium aquilinumexceeded 2%.In both 30- and 101-year-old sites,Vaccinium myrtillusandV.vitis-idaeawere 11–13% and 6%, respectively.There were no statistically significant differences between the clear-cut and the mature forest.

    The highest mean species richness was in the 10- and 30-year-old sites at 17 and 14 species, respectively (Table 1).However, the lowest average species richness (7) was in the mature forest.The forest floor cover did not show significant differences between the sites (Fig.2).However, there was still a strong negative correlation between species richness and forest floor mass withR= - 0.854 (p< 0.05).

    Fig.2 Mean cover (%) of vascular plants, mosses, and forest floor at different sites; bars are mean ± SE ( n = 4); different letters a, b and c indicate statistically significant differences between sites ( p < 0.05)

    The highest Shannon species diversity indexH′was for ground vegetation and mosses in the 10-year-old stand compared the clear-cutting and the sites (Table 2).The highest Shannon index for vascular plants was at the clear-cut site.The lowest Shannon index for all vegetation (ground vegetation, vascular plants, and mosses) was in the mature stand,indicating the lowest ground vegetation diversity at this site.

    Soil carbon and nutrients in the forest floor and mineral topsoil

    The highest average forest floor mass (OL + OF + OH) was for the 101-year-old stand.Forest floor mass in the clear-cut site was similar to that of the mature stand (Table 3).Such results could be because of a shorter time after harvesting and changes in forest floor could only occur later.

    The mean mass of the forest floor was 2.2–2.9 times lower 10–30 years after harvesting than in the mature stand(Table 3).Higher pH values were in the clear-cuttings and decreased with increasing stand age.The highest concentration of organic carbon was in the 101-year-old stand, while the highest total N was in the 30-year-old stand.The lowest C concentration was in the 10-years old stand.A significantly lower total P was found in the 10-years old stand (the difference from the clear-cut site was 1.4 times) and of total Mg in the 30-years old stand (the difference from the clearcut site was 1.3 times).

    Total N was 1.3 times higher in the upper 10-cm mineral topsoil layer of the 30-years old stand than in the mature forest (Fig.3 A).However, in the 10–20 cm and 20–40 cm layers, a 1.3 times higher concentration of N was found in the clear-cutting site than in the 30-year-old stand.The data show a significant increase of mineral N in the fresh clear-cutting, the highest amounts were in the 0–10 cm and 10 - 20 cm layers (Fig.3 B).The values differed from the mature stand by 7.0, 3.6, and 1.4 times for the 0–10 cm,10–20 cm and 20–40 cm layers, respectively.The highest concentration of organic C was in the 10-cm layer of the 30-year-old Scots pine site (Fig.3 C).This value was 1.4 times higher than organic C levels in the mature forest.However, in the 10–20 cm topsoil layer of the 30-year-old stand, SOC concentration was 1.2 times lower than in the mature forest.The pHcacl2values in the mineral 0–10 cm topsoil showed the most significant variation between sites(Fig.3 D).The highest pH values ( pHcacl23.7–3.8) were in the fresh clear-cut and 10-year-old Scots pine site.The lowest pH ( pHcacl23.6) was in the 30-year-old site and the mature 101-year-old forest.However, no significant differences between the sites were found in deeper topsoil layers.

    Fig.3 A Mean concentrations of total nitrogen (N, %), B, mineral N(mg kg -1 ), C, organic C (%), D, and pHcacl2 on different sites (clearcut, and 10-, 30- and 101-year-old Scots pine stands).Bars show the mean ± SE ( n = 4); different letters a and b indicate statistically significant differences between sites ( p < 0.05)

    Table 4 shows an overview of the mean concentrations of other soil nutrients at the different sites.Due to the effect of clear-cutting, the concentrations of mobile elements (P2O5,K2O, Ca2+and Mg2+) changed more than the concentrations of total elements (P, K, Ca and Mg).Clear-cutting tended to increase the concentrations of total Ca and Mg; also, P2O5,K2O and mobile Ca2+.

    Table 1 (continued)

    Table 1 Cover (%) and frequency of plant species at different sites

    Table 2 Shannon species diversity index ( H′) of vascular plants, mosses and ground vegetation at different sites; different letters a and b indicate significant differences among sites within the same plant group ( p < 0.05)

    Table 3 Mean mass of forest floor (t ha -1 ), pHcacl2 , and mean concentrations of organic C, total N, P, K, Ca and Mg at different sites; different letters a, b and c indicate significant differences among sites ( p < 0.05)

    Table 4 Mean (± SE) concentrations of total P, K, Ca and Mg, P 2O 5, K 2O , mobile Ca2 + and Mg2 + in mineral topsoil layers at different sites(clear-cut, and 10-, 30- and 101-year-old Scots pine stands); different letters a, b and c indicate statistically significant differences between sites ( p < 0.05)

    Discussion

    The present study identified the changes in ground vegetation and forest soils in a clear-cut and reforested sites of Scots pine of different ages.Recent forest management practices in Lithuania are moving towards sustainable forestry,requiring the maintenance of all ecological processes and biodiversity throughout the whole stand rotation.

    This study found that the largest number of ground vegetation species, including both vascular plants and mosses,was found in the clear-cut and the 10-year-old stand, and deceased with stand age.Some species, typical of mature stands (forest-dependent species), were already present in the 30-year-old stand:Goodyera repens,Luzula pilosa,Vaccinium myrtillus,Vaccinium vitis-idaea,and the mossesDicranum polysetum,Hylocium splendens,Pleurozium schreberiandPtilium crista-castrensis.

    The diagnostic species found in our survey corresponded well with those obtained by Stefańska-Krzaczek et al.2019 in Scots pine stands of similar ages.The most abundant understory vascular plant species in the study area wereV.myrtillus,V.vitis-idaea, andCalluna vulgaris(Karazija 2003; Hekkala et al.2014; Stefańska-Krzaczek et al.2019).This suggests that reforested sites could recover during the first 30-year period.Previous studies found that different types of silvicultural management highly modify ground vegetation, even under the same tree species (Tyle 1989;Ilintsev et al.2020; Marozas and Sasnauskien? 2021).For example, shelter wood cuttings in Scots pine stands resulted in an increase of herbaceous species but decreased the abundance of mosses and lichens (Marozas and Sasnauskien? 2021 ).Among other practices, clear-cutting has a drastic impact on vegetation cover, thereby nutrient consumption by vegetation becomes significantly reduced (Finér et al.2003;Palviainen et al.2005; Gundersen et al.2006).Clear-cutting is often shown to have a significant impact on ground vegetation and a decrease in species diversity (Meier et al.1995;Qian et al.1997).However, Battles et al.( 2001) found only a short-term decrease or even an increase in species richness,or no effect due to forest management.

    In our study, the 1.6 times higher cover of mosses was in the mature stand than in the clear-cut.This corresponds well with the study by ?esonien? et al.( 2019), which identified mosses as the most sensitive to disturbances.Different researchers have noted that a severe ecosystem disturbance could cause stressful conditions that become favourable for some species or that it could be related to greater disruption of the forest floor (Battles et al.2001; Augusto et al.2003).The findings of our study showed that species richness negatively correlated to forest floor mass, reflecting those of Augusto et al.( 2003) who showed that herb cover and species richness were negatively correlated to litter thickness.In addition, the response of species to forest management depends on the characteristics of the species and the ability to adapt to changed environmental conditions (Riegel et al.1995).Nevertheless, the composition of ground vegetation in Scots pine stands depends on stand age, which provides different environmental conditions (Karazija 2003;Stefańska-Krzaczek et al.2019).Previous studies have concluded that age-class forestry based on clear cuttings did not favour epiphytes and epixylous species.Final harvesting was beneficial to light-demanding species and the benefits gradually vanished after canopy closure (Stefańska-Krzaczek et al.2019).It was also noticed that species richness increased after clear-cutting.Changes in microenvironmental conditions create new ecological niches that lead to changes in plant cover and composition and the emergence of different ecological cenotic groups (Ilintsev et al.2020).

    In this study, the highest concentration of mineral N was found in the 0–20 cm topsoil on the clear-cut site.Clear-cutting also increased concentrations of P2O5, K2O, P2O5, Ca2+and Mg2+compared with the mature stand, and these differences remained for a relatively long period, 10–30 years after harvesting.As noted by Palviainen et al.( 2004), the fastest decomposition of organic matter and nutrient release in the soil of clear-cuttings is expected during the first three years after harvesting.The level of nitrates stabilizes after four or five years, but the leaching of organic C and other nutrients could be up to 10–20 years after clear-cutting(Palviainen et al.2004, 2014; Gundersen et al.2006; Nave et al.2010).The latter effect in our study could have been occurring between 10 and 30 years of stand formation.For comparison, shelterwood harvesting had a short-term and relatively weak negative effect on soil nutrients, especially mineral N, compared to the effect of clear-cuttings (Marozas et al.2018).

    The concentrations SOC and total N in mineral topsoil up to 40 cm depth were analysed at each site: increased concentrations in the upper 10-cm layer were on the 30-year-old site compared to the clear-cut.Typically, during the clear-cutting of a mature stand when all logging residues are removed compared with stem only harvesting, the stocks and concentrations of SOC and nutrients are reduced (Thiffault et al.2011; Achat et al.2015a).The previous studies indicated that nutrient release is often accelerated after clear-cutting where logging residues were removed (Piirainen et al.2009;Finér et al.2016).Such operations can cause nutrient imbalances or C and N depletion in the site.However, these studies had controversial results when assessing the effects of clear-cutting on soil chemistry.For example, Nave et al.( 2010) found little change in mineral SOC after clear-cutting, but James and Harrison ( 2016) reported a significant reduction in SOC of mineral forest soil.The impact of harvesting on SOC and N depends on soil layers and element concentrations or stocks (Vanguelova et al.2010; Achat et al.2015b; Moreno-Fernandez et al.2015).Our results show that C:N ratios were in a range between 25:1 and 39:1 in the 40-cm topsoil layer in all studied sites.The lowest mean C:N ratio was in the clear-cutting site.In the 20-40 cm topsoil layer, the C:N ratio was 39:1 in the 30-year-old site,and 34:1 in the mature stand.Overall, the C:N ratio was the lowest in the fresh clear-cut, then increased to 30:1 and did not change with stand age.Olsson et al.( 1996) showed that whole-tree harvesting increased C:N ratios in the 5-cm soil layer and this effect was detected 16 years after felling.Hume et al.( 2018) also stated that harvesting increased soil C and C:N ratios but reduced soil N.The findings of our study showed higher pH on the forest floor and upper 10-cm mineral topsoil with large variations in the deeper layers in the clear-cutting and 10-year-old sites.However, no statistically significant differences were found between pH values in the 30-year-old site and mature forest.Changes in pH occurred after whole-tree harvesting but had disappeared 26–28 years after harvest as shown by Zetterberg and Olsson ( 2011).However, the differences in nutrient pools due to harvesting were still significant in the upper 20-cm layer.

    In general, clear-cutting can affect numerous components of forest ecosystems, including development of phytocenosis, often seen as one of the most sensitive components to environmental changes.Forest harvesting leads to nutrient loss due to increased forest floor mineralization and intensified leaching processes.A reduced ability by vegetation to absorb nutrients also contributes to this process.Otherwise,these effects are not universal for all habitats and climatic zones even for the same Scots pine species.Furthermore,post-harvest nutrient losses and leaching are generally low compared to those removed by stem harvesting (Armolaitis et al.2013).Intensified leaching of nutrients after clear-cutting appears to be relatively small to affect nutrient balance over the long-term (Titus et al.1998).Our study had several limitations and further research is needed to more accurately evaluate soil vegetation and soil chemistry at different stages of stand rotation in hemiboreal forests in the Baltic region.

    Conclusions

    This study was designed to determine the effect of clearcutting on ground vegetation indices–species richness and cover–and also on forest floor and mineral 40-cm topsoil layer in comparison to 10-, 30-year-old Scots pine stands and a mature 101-year-old stand.The maintenance of ecological processes and biodiversity throughout the rotation is a key aspect in sustainable forestry.The ground vegetation assessment showed an increase in species richness at the beginning of stand formation soon after clear-cutting and a relatively rapid emergence to pre-harvest conditions about 30 years after harvesting.The mean mass of forest floor was negatively related to the richness of the ground vegetation.The highest forest floor pH was in the clear-cutting and consequently decreased with stand age; the highest concentration of organic C was in the mature stand with no clear trend for other nutrients.In mineral topsoil layers,higher modifications were for mineral N and mobile elements in the post-harvest period.The highest concentrations of total C and N were in the mineral 10–20 cm topsoil layer of the clear-cutting, and in the upper 10-cm soil layer of the 30-year-old stands.

    AcknowledgementsThis paper is based on Dovil? Gustien? Ph.D.project “Peculiarities of reforestation in clear cuttings of Scots pine stands on nutrient poor sites” (2017–2023), and partly presents research findings obtained through the Long-term Research Program “Sustainable Forestry and Global Changes” implemented by the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.This work was conducted within the framework of the CAR-ES network for 2016–2020, funded by Nordic Forest Research.

    欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| av在线播放精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产激情久久老熟女| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 91成人精品电影| 一个人免费看片子| av线在线观看网站| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产成人欧美| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 国产成人欧美| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 777米奇影视久久| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 少妇 在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 满18在线观看网站| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 高清av免费在线| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 搡老岳熟女国产| www.精华液| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 超色免费av| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久婷婷青草| 国产淫语在线视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 精品第一国产精品| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 性色av一级| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日本午夜av视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| av福利片在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| av在线老鸭窝| 久久婷婷青草| 九草在线视频观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲国产av新网站| 成人影院久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 91国产中文字幕| 少妇的丰满在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| av在线app专区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产成人欧美| 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| av免费观看日本| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 观看美女的网站| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产 精品1| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 超色免费av| 国产 一区精品| 一区在线观看完整版| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品无大码| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 9色porny在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| netflix在线观看网站| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 人妻一区二区av| 操美女的视频在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| kizo精华| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| videosex国产| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产精品三级大全| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久av网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 男人操女人黄网站| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久性视频一级片| 观看美女的网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 考比视频在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产极品天堂在线| av天堂久久9| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产精品 国内视频| 中国国产av一级| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 国产野战对白在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 免费看不卡的av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人三级做爰电影| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 悠悠久久av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 午夜福利,免费看| 一区二区av电影网| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 青草久久国产| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 日本欧美视频一区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 99香蕉大伊视频| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 丁香六月天网| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| kizo精华| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 观看av在线不卡| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 男女免费视频国产| 精品国产国语对白av| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产欧美网| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 美女中出高潮动态图| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品成人在线| 不卡av一区二区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 久久这里只有精品19| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 日本av免费视频播放| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 9热在线视频观看99| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品三级大全| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 深夜精品福利| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 制服人妻中文乱码| 丁香六月天网| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 夫妻午夜视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 男人操女人黄网站| 一级黄片播放器| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 女人精品久久久久毛片| 18禁观看日本| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 91老司机精品| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲四区av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 电影成人av| 在现免费观看毛片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 咕卡用的链子| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久狼人影院| 国产成人91sexporn| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 18禁观看日本| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 午夜av观看不卡| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产av精品麻豆| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 多毛熟女@视频| 天天影视国产精品| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产成人欧美| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品久久久久久电影网| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 综合色丁香网| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 成人国产麻豆网| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 一区在线观看完整版| 999精品在线视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 午夜老司机福利片| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 日本91视频免费播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 天天影视国产精品| 国产精品免费大片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 性色av一级| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 香蕉国产在线看| 免费少妇av软件| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 一级黄片播放器| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产成人欧美| 尾随美女入室| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲综合精品二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品无大码| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 视频区图区小说| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日日撸夜夜添|