• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Increased salinity and groundwater levels lead to degradation of the Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the Yellow River Delta

    2022-09-08 06:16:12ChaoxiaLuChenZhaoJingLiuKailunLiBaoshanWangMinChen
    Journal of Forestry Research 2022年4期

    Chaoxia Lu ·Chen Zhao·Jing Liu·Kailun Li ·Baoshan Wang·Min Chen

    Abstract Forest degradation is a worldwide problem,although its causes vary due to geographical and climatic differences and man-made causes.In recent years, the Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the Yellow River Delta has suffered severe degradation.The causative mechanisms were investigated in the field over two years, and the results show that increased forest degradation was ref lected by increased tree mortality, high leaf and soil sodium salt levels and groundwater depth.Average tree diameters decreased, and leaf chlorophyll and soil microbial contents decreased.Redundancy discriminate analysis (RDA) showed that degradation of the forest was correlated positively with soil salt content, but negatively with groundwater depth.Correlation analysis showed that 0.79%–0.95% soil salt content and above 1.20 m groundwater depth caused the death of R.pseudoacacia trees due to localized anthropogenic economic activities, such as rice farming, that disrupted the original water–salt balance.Measures are recommended to prevent further degradation and restore degraded forests.Keywords Forest degradation·Groundwater depth ·Robinia pseudoacacia forest·Soil salt content·The Yellow River Delta

    Introduction

    Forests plays important roles in improving the environment,providing resources for humans, regulating the circulation of air and water in nature, affecting climate change, protecting soils from wind and rain, and reducing the harm caused by environmental pollution (Führer 2000; Lasch et al.2002).However, forest degradation is worldwide (Zhang et al.2010;Mitchard et al.2011 ; Evans 2017) and is an important issue in the global carbon cycle and climate change (Führer 2000;Lasch et al.2002).The main causes of forest degradation include the effects of human economic activities such as illegal logging and building construction, as well as changes in the natural environment, such as soil erosion and global warming (Curran et al.2004; Sheil et al.2009; Matricardi et al.2020; Yu et al.2020).Given the vital importance of forests to human life, taking steps to avoid forest degradation and to restore degraded forests is a crucial challenge.Because of the variety of environments in which forests occur, the causes of their degradation vary widely and appropriate mitigation methods may be different.Among causes of forest degradation, the abundance or scarcity of water and salt are important factors.Doyle et al.( 2010) showed that climate variability and sea level rise resulting in increasing tidal inundation and saltwater intrusion were the main causes of tidal forest degradation in coastal regions of the southeastern United States and the Gulf and south Atlantic coasts.The degree of tidal forest degradation depends on the sensitivity of forest species to saltwater (Krauss et al.2009).In contrast, tidal saltwater forests (i.e., mangroves) are expected to expand with rising sea levels (Saintilan and Wilton 2001; Rogers et al.2005).For inland forest decline (e.g., western white pine in California and silver fir in the Vosges Mountains in France), drought has always been a major cause (Becker et al.1989; Auclair et al.1990).In northwestern China, drought and high soil salinity are the causes of forest degradation (Samuel et al.2011; Lian 2020).It is important to determine the primary causes of forest degradation so that measures might be taken to prevent further degradation and restore degraded forests.

    2Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan 250100,People’s Republic of China

    The Yellow River Delta (YRD) is relatively new land formed from the abundant sediment deposited by the Yellow River into the Bohai Bay (Xia et al.2010; Duan et al.2018; Qi et al.2018; Zhu et al.2019).In order to improve the ecology and local natural environment, 10,000 ha ofRobinia pseudoacaciaL.(black locust) plantations were established from 1959 to 1960 and is now the largest plantedR.pseudoacaciaforest in Asia (Zhang et al.2009; Xia et al.2010;Liu et al.2011; Wang et al.2015).In the decades since its formation, theR.pseudoacaciaforest has greatly promoted the local economy (Xia et al.2010; Peng et al.2014).However,in recent years, the forest has undergone increasingly severe degradation, with numerous trees dying in their crowns or in their entirety (Fig.S1) (Xia et al.2010; Liu et al.2011; Wang et al.2015).If the cause of degradation is not determined and restoration implemented in a timely fashion, the forest will disappear completely.

    Robinia pseudoacaciais endemic to a few small areas in the United States (Barrett et al.1990).Because ofits rapid growth,drought tolerance and nitrogen fixation properties (Wei et al.2009), the species thrives in both temperate and semiarid regions and has become one of the most widely cultivated tree species worldwide.However, it is often reported to be invasive and difficult to eradicate (Krizsik and Kormoczi 2000;Motta et al.2009).But in the last two decades, the degradation ofR.pseudoacaciaforests have been reported and without a consensus on the cause or causes.Snyder et al.( 2007) and Blujdea et al.( 2011) suggested thatR.pseudoacaciaforest degradation in southwest of Romania is caused by anthropogenic disturbances, such as repeatedly cut and continuous browsed by grazing animals (Unruh Snyder et al.2007; Blujdea et al.,2011).Berthold et al.( 2009) suggested that the reduction in growth ofR.pseudoacaciain Hungary was due to pathogens rather than to chemical changes or acidification of the soil.On the Loess Plateau,R.pseudoacaciaforest degradation has appeared, manifested as being oflow ecological benefit,dry shoots, sparse undergrowth because of water shortages,nutritional deficiencies, density restricted conditions and site mismatches (Xu et al.2019).The YRDR.pseudoacaciaplantation forest has experienced increasingly severe degradation,however, the degradation mechanism is unknown.To determine the reasons for the degradation, an afforestation model,forest component allocation, canopy health, water–salt dynamics, and soil physical and chemical properties of plantedR.pseudoacaciahave been done (Bespalov and Os’kina 2006;Hofmann et al.2009; Xia et al.2010; Mao et al.2016).But the studies only investigated soil properties or forest degradation separately, and there were no detailed investigation forest degradation characteristics nor correlation analysis of forest degradation and soil characteristics, so the conclusions are one-sided and unconvincing.In this study, forest degradation characteristics, soil conditions (including salt content, groundwater levels, and microbial status), the correlation between forest degradation characteristics and soil conditions and the effects of farming patterns around the forest on soil conditions are investigated.A comprehensive view of the degradation of theR.pseudoacaciaforest in the YRD will supply a reliable scientific basis for local ecological management and sustainable development in the future.

    The main objectives of this study were: (1) to obtainR.pseudoacaciaforest degradation data and soil conditions data and their correlation analysis results; (2) to elucidate the degradation mechanism of theR.pseudoacaciaforest in the YRD; and, (3) to recommend remedial measures to local authorities.

    Materials and methods

    Study site

    The study site was located in the YRD (118°15′–119°19′ E,37°24′–38°10′ N, Kenli District, Dongying City, Shandong Province).The YRD has a warm temperate, continental monsoon climate and there are four distinct seasons.Spring and autumn are dry and windy while summers are hot and rainy, and sometimes typhoons occur.Soils in the YRD are high in salt and poor in nutrients.

    Rainfall, evaporation and temperature data for theR.pseudoacaciaforest area were provided by the Dongying City Meteorological Bureau for 2017 and 2018 (Fig.S2).Evaporation is high most of the year except in winter.There is little rainfall in spring and autumn, and considerable rainfall in summer (in July and August).On August 18–19, 2018,Typhoon Rumbia led to f looding at the experimental site.R.pseudoacaciagrowth period is from April to October.

    TheR.pseudoacaciaforest was created from 1959 to 1960 through planting.The average age is 60 years and average height 15 m.Different degrees of degradation have occurred in recent years such as crown dieback, windthrow and death.

    Determination of the degradation level of R.pseudoacacia

    This was graded according to the range of dieback length.The following scale was used: CK (control, no dieback); ID(level I degradation, the dieback length was 2–4 m); IID,the dieback length was 5–7 m; IIID, the dieback length was 8–10 m; and IVD, all trees were dead (Fig.S1).

    The ranges of dieback length for the different levels were determined with a laser altimeter (XR850, Beijing Xinrui Zhicheng Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing,China) in the middle of each month from May to September 2017 and in 2018.

    Determination of collar and breast-height diameters,mortality and falling rates, plant species distribution and quantity, and collecting leaves and soil samples

    For each degradation level, five 100 m × 100 m areas were selected by the five-point sampling method and 50 trees selected to determine degradation indicators in the middle of each month from April to October 2017 and 2018.

    The total number of trees (a), number of dead trees (b)and the number of fallen trees (c) were counted for each degradation level.The mortality rate (A) and fallen rate (B)were calculated using the following formulas:

    Collar and breast-height diameters were measured with a millimeter-scale ruler for each degradation level.

    ForR.pseudoacacialeafion content and chlorophyll content, mature leaves from the same leaf position (third branch position from the lowest branch) were collected for each degradation level.

    For depth from surface to the water table, soil salt content, pH and soil microorganisms, soil samples were from the surface using a spade, and the depth from the surface to the level of the groundwater was measured for each degradation level.Samples were collected for measuring salt content, pH and microorganisms.For each degradation level, 100 m × 100 m areas were selected with the five-point sampling method, and the species and numbers of plants were counted in the middle of each month from May to September 2017 and 2018.Five replicates (five 100 m × 100 m areas) per treatment were carried out.

    Determination of leafion and chlorophyll contents, soil salt content, pH, and soil microorganisms

    Leaves were washed twice with deionized water and surface water drained off.A 0.3 g sample of leaves was weighed,placed into a test tube, 10 mL of deionized water added,and the test tube sealed with parafilm.The test tubes were placed in a boiling water bath for two hours and then cooled to room temperature.The solution in each tube was filtered and the filtrate diluted to 25 mL with deionized water and used to measure the sodium ion (Na+) content using a f lame photometer (410 Flame Photometer, Sherwood Scientific,UK).The chlorine ion (Cl-) content was measured using an ion chromatograph (Dionex ICS-1100, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, Delaware, USA).Five replicates(five 100 m × 100 m areas) per treatment were made for each degradation level in the middle of each month from April to October 2017 and 2018.

    Samples of 0.5 g leaves were weighed and then ground completely in 10 mL 80% acetone.The solution was filtered and diluted to 25 mL with 80% acetone (Qiu et al.2018).The absorbance of the chlorophyll solution was determined at 663 (A663) and 645 nm (A645) using a TU-1810 UV–visible spectrophotometer (Puxi Biological Technology Co., Beijing, China).Total chlorophyll (C t, mg L-1) was calculated using the formula below according to Arnon ( 1949).Five repetitions (five 100 m × 100 m areas and 50 trees were sampled in each area with the five-point sampling method) per treatment were carried out for each degradation level in the middle of each month from April to October 2017 and 2018.

    Soil electrical conductivity (EC, dS m-1) at different soil depths (0.5, 0.5–1.0, and 1.0–1.5 m) at different degradation levels was determined with a WET-2 sensor (Delta-T,Cambridge, UK) in the middle of each month from May to September.The EC values were converted into percent salt content (SC) using the below formula:

    Five repetitions (five 100 m × 100 m areas) per treatment were carried out for each degradation level in the middle of each month from April to October 2017 and 2018.

    A 100 g soil sample from different soil depths (0.5,0.5–1.0, and 1.0–1.5 m) were extracted with 500 mL of 0.01 mol L-1CaCl2solution.After thorough stirring, they were equilibrated for 30 min and then measured with a pH meter (PHS-3E, Shanghai Instrument and Electric Instrument Co., Ltd.).[Five repetitions (five 100 m × 100 m areas)per treatment were carried out for each degradation level in the middle of each month from April to October 2017 and 2018.]

    The numbers of culturable soil microorganisms were determined according to Qi et al.( 2018).Populations and species of microorganisms were analyzed according to Shi et al.( 2017) in July of 2018.For each sample, 500 mg of soil was subjected to extraction of total genomic DNA with the E.Z.N.A.Soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, USA) and the DNA purified and quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA).PCR amplification of each extract was done for the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA(the primer sequence: 338F: 5′-ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC A-3′; 806R: 5′-GGA CTA CHVGGG TWT CTAAT-3′).Double-end splicing according to the original sequence was done to obtain the optimized sequence (tag), and was followed by clustering of the optimized sequence, division into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and classification into categories based on the OTU sequence composition.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed with the software package SPSS (IBM, SPSS statistics 19.0).Statistical significances were determined using analysis of variance(ANOVA).The significant differences between values atP< 0.05 were identified using Duncan’s multiple range tests.The relationships betweenR.pseudoacaciagrowth indicators, ion content and depth of groundwater, and the relationships between the number of cultural soil microorganisms,ion content and depth of groundwater were visualized using redundancy discriminate analysis (RDA), which is a linear canonical community ordination method.

    Results

    Condition of R.pseudoacacia trees at different degradation levels in 2017 and 2018

    Mortality rate, falling rate and height of dieback

    Under the control (CK), trees were growing with very low mortality and falling rates.At higher levels of degradation,mortality and falling rate were significantly higher.Mortality reached 100% in trees at the IVD degradation level in 2017 and at IIID and IVD degradation levels in 2018.In 2017 and 2018, both the mortality and the falling rates increased from April to October (Fig.1 A–D).At higher levels of degradation, dieback became increasingly serious.At the fourth grade of degradation (IVD), the entire tree died (Fig.1 E, F).

    Fig.1 Mortality, falling rates and tree-top death height of trees at different degradation levels.Values are mean ± standard deviation of five biological replicates.Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.A mortality rate in 2017; B mortality rate in 2018; C falling rate in 2017; D falling rate in 2018; E average temperature in 2017; F average temperature in 2018

    Contents of chlorophyll and Na + in leaves at different degradation levels

    In 2017 and 2018, the chlorophyll content of trees at all degradation levels increased initially and then decreased from April to October (Fig.2 A, B).Chlorophyll content significantly decreased as the degree of degradation increased every month.

    The Na+content increased as the degree of degradation increased every month.In September and October of 2017 and 2018, the Na+content significantly increased compared to other months at levels IID and IIID, (Fig.2 C, D).In June–August of 2018, Na+levels decreased compared to other months at levels IID and IIID.

    Fig.2 Chlorophyll and Na + contents of trees on different degradation levels in 2017 and 2018.A Chlorophyll content in leaves in 2017; B chlorophyll content in leaves in 2018; C Na + content in leaves in 2017; D Na + content in leaves in 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of 5 biological replicates.Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests

    Root collar and breast diameters at different degradation levels

    Measurements of ground and breast height diameters in 2017 and 2018 showed that, as degradation increased, root collar and breast diameters decreased.In 2017, collar diameters were largest under the controls (CK) and decreased at higher degradation levels.Diameter at breast height (DBH)showed no differences between the controls and level ID, but were lower at higher degradation levels.In 2018, root collar diameters also showed no differences between controls and level ID, but were less at other degradation levels compared with the controls.DBH were largest in the controls and decreased at higher degradation levels.Collar diameter and DBH showed no significant changes at degradation levels IID, IIID and IVD in 2017 and 2018 (Fig.S3).

    Root characteristics at degradation levels IIID and IVD

    Fig.S4 shows that the development of the main roots were severely damaged.Numerous lateral roots branched from the main root next to the surface and grew horizontally.In addition, many lateral roots formed from the main roots about 0.5 m from the surface, and the main roots either were degraded or bent horizontally to grow at about 0.7 m from the surface (Table S1, Fig.S4).In degraded areas, the roots grew and developed in the same way regardless of the size of the trees (Table S1).

    Groundwater levels and soil characteristics

    Groundwater levels and salinity at different degradation levels

    Regardless of month in either year, the groundwater was the deepest under control conditions and decreased as the degree of degradation increased.In both years, the depth of the water table was shallowest in August at all degradation levels (Fig.3), which may be due to heavy rainfalls (Figs.3 and S2).

    Fig.3 Depth from surface to groundwater level on different degradation levels in 2017 and 2018.A The groundwater depth in 2017; B the groundwater depth in 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of 5 biological replicates.Bars with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests

    In both years, salt content in different soil depths increased as the degree of degradation increased.The salt content was closely related to the degradation level and soil depth.The salt content was the least in the surface layer than in deeper layers.In both years, at every degradation level, soil salt content was negatively correlated with rainfall(Figs.4 and S2).

    Biological diversity in soil and above ground at different degradation levels in 2017 and 2018

    The populations and species of soil microorganisms at different degradation levels were analyzed (Fig.5, Table 1).There were no significant differences in microorganisms at different degradation levels and soil depths.As the level of degradation increased and soil depth increased, soil microbial content significantly decreased (Table 1).

    Fig.5 Relative abundance of soil microorganisms on different degradation levels in 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates.(CKA, soil microorganisms from ground surface to 0.5 m underground of CK; CKB, soil microorganisms from 0.5 to 1.0 m underground of CK; CKC, soil microorganisms from 1.0 to 1.5 m underground of CK; MDA, soil microorganisms from ground surface to 0.5 m underground of IID; MDB, soil microorganisms from 0.5 to 1.0 m underground of IID; MDC, soil microorganisms from 1.0 to 1.5 m underground of IID; SDA, soil microorganisms from ground surface to 0.5 m underground of IVD; SDB, soil microorganisms from 0.5 to 1.0 m underground of IVD; SDC, soil microorganisms from 1.0 to 1.5 m underground of IVD)

    In Fig.4, with the level of degradation increasing, the salt content of the surface gradually increased as well.Different soil salinities led to significant differences in the distribution and quantity of plant species (Table S2).Halophytes such asSuaeda salsaL.,Tamarix chinensisL.andPhragmites communisTrin.were mainly distributed in severely degraded areas with high surface salt contents.Salt-sensitive species such asEleusine indica,Chloris virgataSwartz andEclipta prostratewere found in the control sites and lightly degraded areas with low salt levels.Other species such asInula japonicaandPotentilla reptanswere distributed throughout the study area.The numbers of species were larger on sites with low salt content.

    Fig.4 Salinity at different soil depths (0–0.5, 0.5–1.0 and 1.0–1.5 m) on different degradation levels in 2017 and 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of five biological replicates.Bars with dif-ferent letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests

    Table 1 Effects of degradation level and depth on numbers of culturable soil microorganisms in July of 2017 and 2018

    Relationships between condition of R.pseudoacacia trees and environment

    RDA plots of growth characteristics and the number of culturable soil microorganisms with ion content and groundwater depth

    RDA analysis was used to examine the relationships between the growth characteristics ofR.pseudoacaciaand soil ion content and depth of groundwater.Ion content correlated positively with dieback height, falling and mortality rates,and leaf sodium ion content, but negatively with collar diameter, breast diameter and leaf chlorophyll contents (Fig.6 A,B).In contrast, groundwater depth was negatively correlated with falling mortality rates and leaf sodium ion content, but positively with collar diameter, breast diameter, and leaf chlorophyll content.

    RDA analysis also examined the relationships between the number of culturable soil microorganisms, the soil ion content, and the depth of groundwater.The results show that groundwater depth positively correlated with the number of culturable soil microorganisms, but negatively with soil ion content (Fig.6 C, D).

    Fig.6 RDA plots of the growth indicators of Robinia pseudoacacia and the number of culturable soil microorganisms with soil ion content and the depth of groundwater in experimental fields in 2017 and 2018.The red “Ion content” and “Depth” mean soil ion content and depth of groundwater, respectively.A RDA plots of R.pseudoacacia growth characteristics with soil ion content and groundwater depth in 2017; B RDA plots of R.pseudoacacia growth characteristics with soil ion content and groundwater depth in 2018; C RDA plots of the number of culturable soil microorganisms with soil ion content and groundwater depth in 2017; D RDA plots of the number of culturable soil microorganisms with soil ion content and groundwater depth in 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of 5 biological replicates.Bars labeled with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests

    According to the RDA analysis, the main factor affecting the growth ofR.pseudoacaciaand the number of culturable soil microorganisms was soil ion content, and the depth of groundwater was secondary.

    Correlation analysis of mortality of R.pseudoacacia with soil ion content and depth of groundwater

    Mortality ofR.pseudoacaciacorrelated positively with salt content and negatively with the depth of groundwater(Fig.7), i.e., high salt content and high groundwater levels led to the death of the species.With regards to the salt content, when the mortality rate was 50%, the level of salt in the soil was about 0.95% in 2017 and 0.79% in 2018, which shows with time the saline environment increased, more salt accumulated in the species and the lethal salt concentration decreased in 2018.For the depth of groundwater, when the mortality rate was 50%, the depths of groundwater were 1.21 m in 2017 and 1.18 m in 2018.

    Fig.7 Correlation analysis of mortality of R.pseudoacacia with soil ion content and the depth of groundwater in 2017 and 2018.A Correlation analysis of mortality rate of R.pseudoacacia with soil ion content in experimental fields in 2017; B Correlation analysis of mortality rate of R.pseudoacacia with soil ion content in 2018; C Correlation analysis of falling rate of R.pseudoacacia with the depth of groundwater in 2017; D correlation analysis of falling rate of R.pseudoacacia with the depth of groundwater in experimental fields in 2018.Values are mean ± standard deviation of 5 biological replicates.Bars labeled with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests

    Discussion

    Forest degradation is a worldwide problem and it is important to identify the underlying mechanisms and propose mitigation measures.Because of geographical and climatic differences, forests in different regions have suffered varying types and degrees of disturbance (Simula 2009; Matricardi et al.2020; Yu et al.2020).The Yellow River Delta (YRD),is the fan-shaped alluvial plain formed by the deposition of sediment carried by the Yellow River (Qi et al.2018; Zhu et al.2019) and is thus new land with high salt levels, low nutrient and organic matter contents, and overall a delicate ecosystem (Xia et al.2010).Ecological restoration technology based on vegetation restoration is one of the main means for the reconstruction of delicate ecosystems in the Delta.

    There is no logging, grazing or plant diseases and insect pests, and not caused by changes in soil pH (Fig.S5).This study started from the dynamic changes of water and salt in soil to investigate degradation mechanism.Mao et al.( 2016)showed that precipitation impacts on soil moisture and salt in the Yellow River Delta.Our results showed that rainfall decreased soil salt content while decreasing the depth of groundwater, especially in August (Figs.3 and 4), which is beneficial for shallow-rooted plants but leads to the decline of deep-rooted species (Du et al.2013).High salt content in the deeper layers of the soil causes changes to the spatial structure ofR.pseudoacaciaroots.The spatial distribution and characteristics of the fine roots of this species were distributed in the shallow soil layer, as shown by these results (Table S1, Fig.S4).Plants have developed different strategies to adapt to high salinity, among one important option is avoiding salinity, especially in the roots (Zhu 2001;Guo et al.2012, 2018; Du et al.2013).Galvan-Ampudia and Testerink ( 2011) showed that high salt levels change auxin distribution, affecting root system architecture, and altering lateral root formation and the direction of primary root growth.High salt contents on severely degraded areas caused main roots to degenerate or lose geotropism and horizontal growth (Table S1, Fig.S4), suggestive of a strategy of salinity avoidance rather than salt tolerance (Du et al.2013).Our study showed that the salt content in the surface soil layer was relatively low compared to that in deeper layers(Fig.4), which is consistent with Mao et al.( 2016).The large volume of surface roots is beneficial to the acclimation of trees to saline soils and is related to high nutrient concentrations (Ford and Deans 1997), but it makes the trees vulnerable to windthrow.Soils on severely degraded sites often contain high salt levels, which is shown by the type and quantity of surface plant species (Table S2), and halophytes such asS.salsaandT.chinensiswere mainly distributed on severely degraded areas.Soil characteristics affect the distribution of microorganisms (Fig.5, Table 1).

    The RAD analysis between the state ofR.pseudoacaciaand the environment showed that the main factor causing the degradation ofR.pseudoacaciaforest is high soil salt, and the secondary factor is depth of groundwater (Fig.6).This has been the result of economic activities in the Yellow River Delta; rice planting in particular has disrupted the original water–salt balance in the forest, resulting in high salt contents and high groundwater levels (Bobba 2002).Xia et al.( 2010)have shown that changes in soil volume weight, porosity,permeability and water storage are some causes of forest degradation, but our results show that high salt content and groundwater lead to forest degradation (Figs.6 and 7).The more severe the degradation of these forests, the higher the ion content and the shallower the ground water (Figs.2, 3, 4 and 5).The most severe degradation occurred on sites closest to rice fields (Fig.S6).Heavy summer rainfall, especially in August, is another factor causing rises in groundwater levels.High salt content and high groundwater tables cause root necrosis, leading to high mortality.At the same time, strong winds that normally occur due to monsoons in the YRD (Wang et al.2014) cause the trees to tilt and sometimes fall, especially given the shallow roots that develop in response to high salinity.

    The causes ofR.pseudoacaciaforest degradation in the YRD have been identified and remedial measures are needed.Local agricultural planting needs to be changed and engineering measures such as a developed drainage system should be implemented to reduce soil salt content to < 0.8%and groundwater levels to < 1.2 m.

    Conclusion

    The degradation of theR.pseudoacaciaforest in the Yellow River Delta is caused by increasing soil salt contents and decreasing groundwater depth.Redundancy discriminate analysis and correlation analysis showed soil ion content > 0.8% was the main factor causing degradation while groundwater depth < 1.2 m was secondary.High soil salt content and high groundwater were due to local human economic activities and remedial measures are recommended.

    亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| videosex国产| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 久久 成人 亚洲| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久性视频一级片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 黄片小视频在线播放| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 欧美97在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 多毛熟女@视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日本欧美视频一区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久精品国产综合久久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 看免费av毛片| av天堂久久9| 亚洲av男天堂| 日本午夜av视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 少妇人妻 视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 日本欧美视频一区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| a级毛片黄视频| 国产高清videossex| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成人一区二区在线| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 91老司机精品| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久99精品国语久久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| tube8黄色片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 国产色视频综合| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久影院123| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 丁香六月天网| 国产成人91sexporn| videosex国产| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美另类一区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久精品成人免费网站| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美在线黄色| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 天天影视国产精品| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲国产av新网站| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 一本久久精品| 性色av一级| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| av不卡在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av福利片在线| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 青草久久国产| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 色94色欧美一区二区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 成在线人永久免费视频| 中国美女看黄片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 9色porny在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 一区福利在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 99热网站在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| 日本五十路高清| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一个人免费看片子| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 五月开心婷婷网| 男人操女人黄网站| 一个人免费看片子| 黄色视频不卡| 国产色视频综合| 国产精品免费大片| 超碰成人久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 操出白浆在线播放| 免费av中文字幕在线| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 日本五十路高清| 久热这里只有精品99| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 午夜老司机福利片| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品一国产av| 国产高清videossex| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| av国产精品久久久久影院| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 99热网站在线观看| av电影中文网址| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 麻豆av在线久日| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 丁香六月欧美| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久久久网色| 欧美97在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 99热全是精品| 欧美97在线视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 久久久精品94久久精品| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 97在线人人人人妻| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 天堂8中文在线网| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产色视频综合| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产野战对白在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 男女国产视频网站| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 热re99久久国产66热| 91成人精品电影| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久av网站| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 老司机影院成人| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 性色av一级| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 男女国产视频网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 精品第一国产精品| 飞空精品影院首页| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 99久久人妻综合| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久青草综合色| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 午夜91福利影院| 观看av在线不卡| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 美女主播在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| avwww免费| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 超色免费av| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 成人手机av| 婷婷成人精品国产| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 丁香六月天网| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 99热网站在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产高清videossex| 久久av网站| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久99一区二区三区| 精品福利观看| 国产精品一国产av| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 国产在线观看jvid| 国产高清videossex| 捣出白浆h1v1| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一个人免费看片子| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲中文av在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 满18在线观看网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 成在线人永久免费视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| tube8黄色片| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久精品成人免费网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产成人91sexporn| h视频一区二区三区| 91老司机精品| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 五月开心婷婷网| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久久久久久国产电影| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 99久久综合免费| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 性色av一级| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲九九香蕉| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 大香蕉久久网| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 大型av网站在线播放| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲成色77777| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 中文欧美无线码| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 观看av在线不卡| 少妇精品久久久久久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久热在线av| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 在现免费观看毛片| av福利片在线| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 丝袜美足系列| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 老熟女久久久| 在线观看国产h片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久热在线av| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲成人手机| 1024视频免费在线观看| 丁香六月天网| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 大码成人一级视频| 国产在线免费精品| 少妇 在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 91精品三级在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 热re99久久国产66热| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 免费看十八禁软件| tube8黄色片| 高清不卡的av网站| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 尾随美女入室| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产一区二区三区av在线|