• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    On the System Performance of Mobile Edge Computing in an Uplink NOMA WSN With a Multiantenna Access Point Over Nakagami-m Fading

    2022-04-15 04:03:56VanTruongTruongVanNhanVoDacBinhHaandChakchaiSoIn
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2022年4期

    Van-Truong Truong, Van Nhan Vo, Dac-Binh Ha, and Chakchai So-In,

    Abstract—In this paper, we study the system performance of mobile edge computing (MEC) wireless sensor networks (WSNs)using a multiantenna access point (AP) and two sensor clusters based on uplink nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA). Due to limited computation and energy resources, the cluster heads(CHs) offload their tasks to a multiantenna AP over Nakagami-m fading. We proposed a combination protocol for NOMA-MECWSNs in which the AP selects either selection combining (SC) or maximal ratio combining (MRC) and each cluster selects a CH to participate in the communication process by employing the sensor node (SN) selection. We derive the closed-form exact expressions of the successful computation probability (SCP) to evaluate the system performance with the latency and energy consumption constraints of the considered WSN. Numerical results are provided to gain insight into the system performance in terms of the SCP based on system parameters such as the number of AP antennas, number of SNs in each cluster, task length, working frequency, offloading ratio, and transmit power allocation.Furthermore, to determine the optimal resource parameters, i.e.,the offloading ratio, power allocation of the two CHs, and MEC AP resources, we proposed two algorithms to achieve the best system performance. Our approach reveals that the optimal parameters with different schemes significantly improve SCP compared to other similar studies. We use Monte Carlo simulations to confirm the validity of our analysis.

    I. INTRODUCTION

    IN recent years, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been commonly applied in many fields, such as agriculture,industry, healthcare monitoring, and traffic control, and play an important role in Internet of Things (IoT) applications [1],[2]. The sensor nodes (SNs) in a WSN system collect data and must process this information to control the corresponding actuator [3], [4]. For example, agricultural SNs collect local environmental information and calculations to drive a water pump [5], [6]. Each vehicle, which is considered a mobile SN in the vehicle-to-everything WSN, gathers traffic information and processes it to make self-driving decisions and provide cooperative collision avoidance [7]. However, a WSN is challenging to implement in practical scenarios because of the limited resources of SNs, e.g., computational ability, energy,and throughput. For example, SNs cannot complete all tasks in real time by themselves due to limitations on computing resources and operating energy [8], [9].

    Therefore, mobile edge computing (MEC) [10] is a potential solution to meet computation-intensive and latency-crucial applications at limited resource SNs [11], [12]. According to the MEC paradigm, the SNs divide the computation workloads into parts and offload some parts to the MEC servers in the edge network. With short propagation distances and simple protocols, SNs can achieve very low latency within their limited energy capacity. Additionally, using effective computation offloading strategies, the MEC technique can decrease the energy consumption of the SNs and prolong their battery life [13].

    Furthermore, there are many advantages when applying MEC to WSNs, including decreasing traffic passing through infrastructure [10], reducing the latency for applications [11],[12], and raising the exactitude rate of task processing [14].However, an MEC-WSN network deploying a billion SNs in the future will create a massive amount of IoT data transmitted in the network [15]. This results in satisfying service requirements such as connection density and extremely high throughput in tight latency constraints. Hence,nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) can be applied to solve WSN throughput limitations in contrast to traditional orthogonal multiple access (OMA) [16]–[18]. Furthermore,the uplink NOMA architecture contributes to realizing the MEC model for WSNs [19]–[21]. NOMA can simultaneously serve many sensors with extremely high data rates and very low latency with the same frequency resources. With these advantages, many studies on the challenges of implementing NOMA in the MEC paradigm have been performed [22]–[25].For example, Wuet al. [22] proposed a model in which mobile users offloaded their tasks to computation servers at the edge of cellular networks using NOMA. This work proposed algorithms to minimize the system latency.

    Furthermore, an MEC server located at the base station(BS), which can provide the computing and storage capacity for many users, was proposed in [23]. The authors used a successive convex approximation algorithm to minimize the total cost of the network. Yeet al. proposed the MEC network in [24], where two users could offload their computational tasks to the MEC server via an uplink NOMA. The proposed offloading scheme can work in three modes: complete local computation, partial computation offloading, and complete offloading. An optimization problem is presented that maximizes the successful computation probability (SCP) by optimizing the offloading time, power allocation, and offloading ratio of the two users. The authors concluded that NOMA could improve system performance for MEC networks.

    From the above discussion, it is apparent that prior works have investigated the simple Rayleigh channel model and some essential system parameters such as the number of SNs;however, the number of antennas has not been examined.Thus, our work considers a WSN model with two sensor clusters and a multiantenna access point (AP) using uplink NOMA and Nakagami-mfading. Note that Nakagami-mis a general distribution, whereas Rayleigh, Rician, and Hoyt are special cases [26], [27]. We investigate the communication protocol using a combination of selection combining(SC)/maximal ratio combining (MRC) and the best sensor node selection (BSS)/random sensor node selection (RSS)approaches to promote the advantages of the multinode and multiantenna system. The main contributions of our work are as follows:

    1) We investigate a WSN architecture based on MEC,where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantenna AP using the uplink NOMA over Nakagami-mfading. We propose a protocol for this system with a combination of SC/MRC and BSS/RSS schemes. Furthermore, we derive the closed-form exact analytical expressions of the SCP for these schemes.

    2) We propose two algorithms to determine the optimal resource parameters (including the transmit power allocation,offloading ratio of the SNs, and resources of the AP) so that the SCP is maximized under energy constraints.

    3) We examine the system performance with respect to the task length, working frequency, offloading ratio, number of SNs, number of antennas, Nakagami-mshape factor, and transmit power allocation to understand the behaviors of the proposed system.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section II summarizes several related works. The system model is presented in Section III. Section IV presents a performance analysis. Section V presents the simulation results and discussion. Section VI concludes our paper.

    II. RELATED WORK

    In this section, we investigate several works that studied the MEC uplink NOMA techniques in WSNs.

    One of the issues that has attracted the attention of academics is the need to evaluate the NOMA-MEC system within the maximum allowed time. Dinget al. [19] proposed the idea of two users offloading their tasks to an MEC server.Their work uses two iterative algorithms to minimize the system delay: Dinkelbach’s method and Newton’s method.The work concludes that Newton’s method converges faster than Dinkelbach’s method. This model was also used by Yeet al.in [24]. However, these works use the simple uplink NOMA model, which is not close to reality because wireless network systems generally work with many users, and in particular, WSNs require several SNs to ensure reliability. By contrast, Daiet al. proposed a more complex model in [28]. In particular, multiple users simultaneously offload their tasks to the MEC BS. The work proposes a method to minimize system latency with constrained parameters as a subcarrier assignment and computation resource allocation problem.While their work presented exciting results regarding the relationship between the length of the message and the system latency, a limitation is that it fails to identify and assess the effect of the fading channel on system performance.

    To complement these deficiencies, the work in [29], which was developed from the simple NOMA-MEC model in [24],proposed an MEC network that considered the effect of wireless channels. The authors investigated the system performance in terms of the SCP by considering parameters such as the channel coefficient, distance between the user and the server, power allocation ratio, and offloading ratio.Specifically, the users are divided into two groups: center users and edge users, which are distributed according to a Poisson distribution and communicate with the MEC server over quasistatic Rayleigh fading. All devices in the system are equipped with a single antenna. Yeet al. proposed a new offloading scheme that could operate in three modes, namely,partial computation offloading, complete local computation,and complete offloading, and there are three user selection schemes based on the distance from the users to the MEC server: i) random center user and random edge user selection,ii) nearest center user and farthest edge user selection, and iii)nearest center user and nearest edge user selection. However,many essential aspects were not explored by this work, such as the effect of the number of users in each group, the bandwidth, the operating frequency, and the system energy consumption.

    To realize an MEC model, considering only the maximum allowed time delay is not sufficient; the constraints on system energy consumption must also be considered, which makes sense in WSNs since the sensors have very limited power.Thus, some authors have examined both time and energy constraints of the MEC system. Zhanget al. [30] investigated the trade-off between energy consumption and latency in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)-MEC network. They proposed an iterative search algorithm that incorporated the interior penalty function to find the optimal solution. Although the system uses binary offloading,the partial offloading model is closer to reality because users can select between self-computing or receiving assistance from the MEC server with the offloading ratio parameter.

    A more realistic resource management in an MEC system was proposed by Yanget al. in [31]. The users are distributed in groups and perform binary or partial offloading to the BS using the uplink NOMA. The authors solved the problem of minimizing a linear combination of the maximum allowed time delay and total energy consumption of all users and offered superior advantages over time division multiple access(TDMA) and frequency division multiple access (FDMA)techniques. A similar model was proposed by Wanget al. to solve the energy consumption and application execution latency minimization of smart mobile devices [32]. The constraints of the optimal problem include the transmit power,user computational speed, number of cycles required for the application, and offloading ratio under dynamic voltage scaling technology. The common point of these proposed models is that all implementations are single-input, singleoutput (SISO) that operate over the simple fading channel model, i.e., Rayleigh fading.

    A more complex model was proposed in [33]–[36]. For example, Wuet al. proposed a multi-user NOMA model for both uplink and downlink, where the edge server communicates with a group of mobile terminals (MTs). In this system, the users utilize the uplink to send the computation workload to the BS and vice versa, while the BS uses the downlink to feed back the results to the users. The authors proposed the offloaded computational workload optimization algorithm to minimize the overall delay in completing the MT workload. The results were compared with those of LINGO (a commercial optimization package), which showed the advantages of the NOMA-enabled computational-offloading scheme. However, in [24], [29], [37], the downlink merely transmits the small size and simple control signal; thus, it is unnecessary to investigate.

    In addition, Wanget al. [34] proposed a model where multiple users simultaneously offloaded their workloads to a multiantenna BS. The authors use the Lagrange method to solve the problem of optimizing the energy consumption of the users, where the variables are the task partition, local CPU frequencies, and user offloading ratio. However, their work ignored the contribution of the task execution time to the system delay budget. This assumption is not reasonable because the MEC server has average resources; hence,considering this time is meaningful. Moreover, the work did not describe how to select users in NOMA communication and how to obtain the best-received signals of a multiantenna BS. A similar model was proposed by Wanget al. in [35]. The authors analyzed the system in two scenarios to minimize the total energy consumption of the users: binary offloading and partial offloading. They used the Lagrange method and branch-and-bound-based algorithms to solve the optimization problem for these two cases; however, the computational complexity became vast when the number of users increased.These works did not mention protocols that used the multiuser and multiantenna aspects in the NOMA-MEC system.

    To the best of our knowledge, no prior works consider the uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN using a multiantenna access point(AP) with an SN selection scheme (BSS/RSS) implemented with a diversity combination technique (SC/MRC). In this study, we investigate a model for the uplink NOMA-MEC network in WSNs, where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantenna AP over a Nakagami-mfading channel.

    III. SYSTEM AND CHANNEL MODEL

    We define the notations adopted in the next part of this work in Table I.

    In the cluster-based WSN, multiple sensor nodes are classified into multiple clusters to take advantage of this approach, such as energy efficiency, more reliable network communication, and minimized tolerance [38], [39]. When applying the uplink NOMA technique to the WSN system, the AP divides clusters into disjunct pairs and allocates the available resources to these pairs [40].

    In this paper, we consider the uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN over the Nakagami-mchannel for one pair of clusters, as depicted in Fig. 1. Specifically, the model consists of two sensor clusters (AandB) and one MEC server at theAP. As used in [36], [41], clusterAhasNhigh-priority SNs, which are denoted byAn(1 ≤n≤N); clusterBhasMlow-priority SNs, which are denoted byBm(1 ≤m≤M). This is the primary case in an uplink NOMA network, often used in research to ensure the delay in successive interference cancellation (SIC) is significantly reduced. Furthermore, with insights into system design from a two-cluster solution, a general solution with multiple clusters can also be obtained without much difficulty [42]–[44]. SNs are single-antenna devices, theAPis equipped withKantennas, and they operate in half-duplex mode [45]. Suppose that the SNs perform the same application with task lengthL(bits), which are independent of one another and divided into different groups[19], [24], [29]. LetT(seconds) be the maximum allowed time delay of the system. Due to limited computing capabilities and energy,AnandBmcannot complete their tasks inT. Therefore,AnandBmsimultaneously offload their tasks with offloading ratio βν(0 ≤βν≤1,ν ∈{A,B}) to theAPusing the uplink NOMA.

    TABLE I NOTATIONS

    Fig. 1. System model for an uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN using a multiantenna access point.

    A. Sensor Node Antenna Selection

    The solutions obtained by choosing two CHs and an antenna are presented in this subsection.

    1) Best Sensor Node Selection-Selection Combining (BSSSC) Scheme:When using the BSS-SC scheme,APselects antennask?Aandk?Bfor the communication process with two CHs (An?andBm?) based on the channel power gains. We use this scheme for two reasons:

    i) TheAPselects one ofKantennas that has the lowest complexity of all received diversity techniques for communication.

    ii) Cluster ν consists of a set of SNs that are distributed near one another and perform similar monitoring tasks [4], [5],[49]. Furthermore, using the CH strategy helps to reduce energy consumption, save communication bandwidth and enhance the scalability of the WSN [50]–[52]. Thus, one can select CHs that participate in the communication process that can help the channel achieve the highest instantaneous SNR.

    The formulas describe the indices of the selected antenna and two CHs for communication as follows:

    whereS NR0is the SNR in the absence of fading [53].

    TABLE II SCHEMES FOR AN UPLINK NOMA-MEC-WSN USING A MULTIANTENNA ACCESS POINT

    2) Best Sensor Node Selection-Maximal Ratio Combining(BSS-MRC) Scheme:Although BSS-SC is a low-complexity technique, it is not the best solution because the remaining(K?1)antennas of theAPare wasted. Therefore, we use the BSS-MRC scheme, where all antennas of anAPparticipate in the communication process. The channel with the highest sum of individual instantaneous SNRs is selected. The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:

    3) Combining the Best Sensor Node Selection and Random Sensor Node Selection:For the system using NOMA, the signal from one SN will interfere with other signals; thus,selecting the BSS for both clusters does not guarantee achieving high efficiency in terms of system performance.Therefore, we consider the RSS technique for selecting CHs.The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:

    The RSS technique is based on a random function that randomly picks a number from an interval. Its time complexity isO(1); thus, RSS has a much lower complexity than BSS. Hence, we propose a solution that combines BSS and RSS to select CHs as follows: i) Best Sensor node-A Selection - Random Sensor node-B Selection, denoted by S1,and ii) Random Sensor node-A Selection - Best Sensor node-B Selection, denoted by S2. Combined with two different combination methods (SC and MRC), the system can operate in one of four schemes:

    a) S1-SC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of the selected antenna and CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows: (1) and (6).

    Fig. 2. Time flowchart of the proposed protocol.

    b) S1-MRC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:(3) and (6).

    c) S2-SC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of the selected antenna and CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows: (2) and (5).

    d) S2-MRC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:(3) and (5).

    B. System Protocol

    Based on one of these six schemes, we describe the system protocol in Algorithm 1. After theAPestimates the channel information and calculates the optimal set of parameters, the system begins to perform all tasks. LetNTbe the number of tasks that the system must perform. The time flowchart for the proposed protocol is shown in Fig. 2. In the first phase, theAPdecides to select the CHs and antenna for communication in durationt0. In the second phase, the CHs simultaneously offload their tasks to theAPusing the optimal power allocation and offloading ratio in durationt1. In the third phase,APuses the SIC technique to decode the superimposed data. Then, theAPand CHs compute their data in durationt2.Finally, the CHs download their results from theAPduringt3.In the scope of this paper, we consider the communication between CHs and sensor members to be solved [54]–[57].Therefore, we do not hold this time in the proposed protocol and sett0= 0. According to the study in [11], [12], [24], [29],t3is assumed to be much smaller thant1andt2and consequently negligible because the resources of the MEC server at theAPare sufficiently strong to very quickly perform the initial parameter selection calculations. Moreover, the calculation results in the downloading phase are usually much smaller in size than the offloaded bit task sequence; hence, the SNs very quickly obtain results via the downlink NOMA.

    Algorithm 1 Proposed Algorithm for the Uplink NOMAMECWSN Protocol Setup:1: The estimates the channel information of the two sensor clusters.APOptimalset AP 2: The calculates using Algorithm 2 – MSCPC or Algorithm 3 – MSCPS.i=1 NT 3: for to do?4: Phase 1:5: switch (Scheme)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 6: case BSS-SC: selects , , , and using (1) and (2)AP?m?n 7: case BSS-MRC: selects and using (3) and (4)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 8: case S1-SC: selects , , , and using (1) and (6)9: case S1-MRC: selects and using (3) and (6)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 10: case S2-SC: selects , , and using (2) and (5)AP?m?n AP?m?n 11: case S2-MRC: selects and using (3) and (5)12: end switch A?nβ?A,λ?13: updates B ?mβ?B,λ?14: updates APG?15: updates?16: Phase 2:A?nB ?mβ?ALβ?BL ithAP 17: and simultaneously offload and bits of task to the using uplink NOMA.18: Phase 3:APβ?ALβ?BL 19: uses SIC technique to decode and .A?n(1?β?A)Lith 20: computes the bits task .B ?m(1?β?B)Lith 21: computes the bits task .AP(β?A+β?B)Lith 22: computes the bits task .?23: Phase 4:APA?nB ?m?24: downloads the computation results to and 25: end for

    To perform further analyses, we derive the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function(CDF) of the channel power gains, i.e.,XandY, in the SC and MRC schemes as follows.

    Because the channel gains follow the Nakagami distribution, for the SC schemes, i.e., BSS-SC, S1-SC, and S2-SC, the CDFs ofXandYare expressed as follows [41]:

    IV. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION

    A. Successful Computation Probability Analysis

    First, we define the SCP, which is denoted by ξSto be the probability that the CHsAn?andBm?successfully compute all tasksLwithin a maximum allowed time delay of systemT.Specifically, the SCP is the probability that the total communication timet1in Phase 2 and computing timet2in Phase 3 of the SNsAn?andBm?and theAPare less thanT.Thus, we derive the SCP according to the following formula:

    B. Problem Formulation and Solution

    Based on the above model, we formulate the optimization problem to maximize the SCP (here, “MSCP” refers to the“maximal successful computation probability”)

    Algorithm 2 MSCP Optimization With Minimum Total Energy Based on the Chop-up-and-Update Algorithm (MSCPC)ˉγA,ˉγB,L,C,f,T,Bw,PCk,PCMEC,hAPkAn,hAPkBm Input:1: Initialize:Optimalset(0,0,0,0,0)2:S TA △=(βAsta,βBsta,Gsta,λsta)←(0,0,1,0.5)3:S TO △=(βAsto,βBsto,Gsto,λsto)←(1,1,5,1)4:(?min A ,?minB ,?minG ,?minλ )←(0.01,0.01,1,0.01)5:?A= 1 2(βAsto ?βAsta)>?minA 6: while do ?B= 1 2(βBsto ?βBsta)>?minB 7: while do ?G = 1 2(Gsto ?Gsta)>?minG 8: while do ?λ= 1 2(λsto ?λsta)>?minλ 9: while do ξS(1)CP(1)△=(?A,?B,?G,?λ)ξS(2)CP(2)△=(?A+?min A ,?B+?minB ,?G+?minG ,?λ+?minλ )10: Calculate at and at using:11: switch (Scheme)12: case BSS-SC: Calculate using (30)ξS 13: case BSS-MRC: Calculate using (31)ξS 14: case S1-SC: Calculate using (32)ξS 15: case S1-MRC: Calculate using (34)ξS ξS 16: case S2-SC: Calculate using (33)ξS 17: case S2-MRC: Calculate using (35)18: end switch ξS(1)>ξS(2)19: if then S TO ←CP(1)20: Update ξS(1)<ξS(2)21: els if then S TA ←CP(2)22: Update 23: else E(1)CP(1)E(2)CP(2)24: Calculate at , and at by (15) +(16) + (19) + (20)E(1)≤E(2)25: if then S TO ←CP(1)26: Update 27: else S TA ←CP(2)28: Update 29: end if 30: end if 31: end while 32: end while 33: end while 34: end while Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)←Optimalset(ξS(1),βAsta,βBsta,Gsta,λsta)35: Update Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)36: Return

    Algorithm 3 MSCP Optimization With Minimum Total Energy Based on the Search Algorithm (MSCPS)ˉγA,ˉγB,L,C,f,T,Bw,PCk,PCMEC,hAPkAn,hAPkBm Input:1: Initialize:Optimalset(0,0,0,0,0)2:3:S TA △=(βA,βB,G,λ)←(0,0,1,0.5)4:(?min Index=1 A ,?minB ,?minG ,?minλ )←(0.01,0.01,1,0.01)5:6: Step 1: Search LOOP process βA ≤βAsto=1 7: while do βB ≤βBsto=1 8: while do G ≤Gsto=5 9: while do λ ≤λsto=1 10: while do 11: switch (Scheme)12: case BSS-SC: Calculate using (30)ξS 13: case BSS-MRC: Calculate using (31)ξS ξS 14: case S1-SC: Calculate using (32)15: case S1-MRC: Calculate using (34)ξS 16: case S2-SC: Calculate using (33)ξS ξS 17: case S2-MRC: Calculate using (35)18: end switch ξS ≥ξSmax 19: if () then ξS>ξSmax 20: if () then Optimalset 21: Reset 22: end if(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)Index ←(ξS,βA,βB,G,λ)23: Update Index ←Index+1 24: Update 25: end if λ ←λ+?min 26: Update 27: end while G ←G+?min λ 28: Update G

    29: end while βB ←βB+?min 30: Update 31: end while βA ←βA+?min B 32: Update 33: end while 34: Step 2: Find Optimalset with the smallest energy constraint i=1Index A 35: for to length() do Ei 36: Calculate using (15) + (16) + (19) + (20)37: end for Emin=min(Ei)38:39: Update Optimalset ←Optimalset(:,i)Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)40: Return

    V. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    In this section, we provide numerical results on the SCP. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to verify the analysis results.Unless otherwise stated, the parameters required during the simulation and analysis are shown in Table III [29], [41].

    TABLE III TYPICAL VALUES OF THE PARAMETERS IN THE SIMULATION

    As shown in Figs. 3–16, both analysis (Ana.) and simulation(Sim.) results are highly agreeable, which verifies our analysis. Fig. 3 compares the SCP in six schemes: BSS-SC,S1-SC, S2-SC, BSS-MRC, S1-MRC, and S2-MRC, as described in Table II. We observe that the MRC schemes always have better SCPs than the corresponding SC schemes.This results makes sense when the system operates under MRC schemes; the overall SNR is equal to the sum of individual SNRs of all signals received fromKantennas,which yields the maximum diversity gain.

    Fig. 3. Comparison of ξS in different schemes.

    We continue to observe two scheme groups: the SC scheme group and MRC scheme group. Within each group, the S1 scheme has the best SCP, followed by the SCP of the BSS scheme, and the S2 scheme has the worst SCP. Hence, when the system works with NOMA, the signals may interfere with one another. In addition, signalxAis first decoded in theAPbecause under the assumption of λ>0.5, i.e.,PA>PB, the system performance is good when signalxAis better than signalxB. Therefore, the SCP reaches its maximum value under the S1 scheme. Because signalxAis selected as the best one while signalxBis randomly selected (i.e., not the best signal in clusterB), it will cause less interference onxAwhen decoding at theAP. By selecting the CH in contrast to the S1 schemes, the SCP of the S2 schemes has the lowest value.With the BSS schemes, although both clusters select their best SNs, the strong signal fromBmaffects the decoding ofAnat theAPand reduces the SCP.

    Another observation is that ξSreaches saturation when the transmit SNR is very low (less than 10 dBm), which shows that the proposed system is suitable for WSN applications when the transmit power of the SNs is very low but still ensures communication quality.

    Fig. 4 shows the comparison of the total throughput between NOMA and OMA schemes, where the bandwidth is 1 Hz. As expected, in this figure, we observe that the total achieved throughput of the NOMA scheme significantly outperforms that of the OMA scheme. This trend is inevitable and will repeat in all of our subsequent experiments; thus, we will not present them in the remaining figures.

    To easily observe the effect of the power allocation ratioλ on the system performance, we use the FCP as a metric, as defined in Remark 5. In Fig. 5, there are one or more points that minimize the FCP (i.e., yield the largest SCP) for the six schemes. We observed that the minimum FCP occurs whenλ is in the range of 0.5 to 1, consistent with (8) and (9), where more power is allocated to cluster A. However, among those points, Algorithm 2 or Algorithm 3 selects only the optimal points to have the lowest energy consumption. With increasing λ, transmit powerPAincreases, and transmit powerPBdecreases, which decreases the FCP. However, whenλ increases to 1, all transmit powerPis allocated to SNAn,while SNBmdoes not have sufficient power to operate, which results in a high FCP.

    Fig. 4. Comparison of the total throughput among NOMA and OMA schemes, where the bandwidth is 1 Hz.

    Fig. 5. F versus the power allocation.

    Fig. 6 shows the SCP by task length under different SN operating frequencies. We set power allocation λ to 0.55. We observe that ξSdecreases whenLincreases, which is a reasonable result because whenLincreases, the time spent on the offloading phase from the SN to theAPalso increases,which reduces the time for the computing phase. Thus, both SNs andAPwill likely not have sufficient time to handle all of their tasks, so the SCP decreases.

    Fig. 6. ξS versus the length of tasks under different SN operating frequencies.

    Another observation is that when a higher amount of frequency resources is used, the SCP is better because when the frequency increases, the process in the computing phase more quickly occurs and guarantees the system allowed delay time, which increases the system performance. With the proposed system, when the SN operating frequency increases from 50 MHz to 100 MHz, ξSimproves by 10%. When the SN operating frequency increases from 100 MHz to 1 GHz,ξSimproves only by approximately 2%. This outcome proves that with increasingf, the proposed system performance can be improved; however, ξSwill be saturated at frequencies above 1 GHz.

    We observe that the task length of the SNs will significantly affect the performance of the proposed system when the operating frequency of the SNs is lower than 50 MHz, while it has no significant effect when the SNs operate at 100 MHz and above.

    Fig. 6 compares the performance of the proposed system with those of the other six schemes. In all scenarios, we find that the MRC schemes have higher ξSthan the SC schemes,and the S1 schemes have higher ξSthan the BSS schemes and S2 schemes. However, the difference in ξSwhen the proposed system operates in SC and MRC schemes is not massive (only approximately 1%), while the complexity of calculation when communicating with the MRC schemes is higher than that with the SC schemes. Therefore, for applications with limited system resources, we consider using the SC schemes to obtain a desirable ξSwith lower computational complexity than the MRC schemes. Figs. 7 and 8 depict the effects of the number of antennas (K) of theAPand number of SNs in each cluster(NandM) on the SCP in the 2 scheme groups: the SC and MRC scheme groups. We set power allocation λ to 0.55. We perform six test scenarios on the proposed model: 1) all devices in the network are equipped with a single antenna, and each cluster has 1 node; 2) all devices in the network are equipped with a single antenna, and each cluster has 2 nodes;3) theAPis a 2-antenna device, where each cluster has 1 node; 4) theAPis a 2-antenna device, where each cluster has 2 nodes; 5) theAPis a 2-antenna device; cluster A has 1 node,and cluster B has 2 nodes (scheme S2); and 6) theAPis a 2-antenna device, cluster A has 2 nodes, and cluster B has 1 node (scheme S1).

    Fig. 7. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different numbers of AP antennas and SNs in clusters with the SC schemes.

    Fig. 8. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different numbers of AP antennas and SNs in clusters with the MRC schemes.

    Figs. 7 and 8 show the difference between SC and MRC scheme groups. We observe that Scenarios 2 and 3 of the SC schemes have entirely identical results, which makes perfect sense for formula (30) in Lemma 1, where ξSSCis constant when the product of the number of antennas of theAPand the number of SNs in each cluster is constant. However, in the MRC schemes, the number of antennas is more critical because allAPantennas participate in the communication process. Hence, a higherKcorresponds to better system performance (ξSMRCin Scenario 3 is better than ξSMRCin Scenario 2), which appears reasonable considering that the BSS-MRC scheme uses all antennas.

    We investigate the effect of the bandwidth on the system performance, i.e.,Bw= 100 MHz andBw= 200 MHz. The bandwidth significantly affects the SCP when the transmit SNR is less than 10 dBm.

    Fig. 9. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the BSS schemes.

    Fig. 10. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the S1 schemes.

    Fig. 11. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the S2 schemes.

    Figs. 9–11 depict the SCP for different shape factors of Nakagami-m(mAandmB) in the BSS, S1 and S2 schemes.Clearly, the SCP associated withmA= 1 andmB= 1 is the smallest because whenmA= 1 andmB= 1, the transmission channels follow Rayleigh fading. Moreover, we observe that a higher shape factormcorresponds to a higher ξS. This result occurs because whenmAandmBincrease, the channel quality improves, which improves the system performance. The small figure in Fig. 9 shows that whenmAandmBincrease from 3 to 4, ξSinsignificantly changes. However, when shape factormincreases, the number of operations required to calculateξSconsiderably increases.s We observe that the system performance when using the two proposed algorithms are identical and relatively better than that of the solution in [21]. Moreover, our analysis of the system energy consumption is more realistic.

    Fig. 12. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the BSS schemes.

    Fig. 13. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the S1 schemes.

    Fig. 14. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the S2 chemes.

    Fig. 15. System performance comparison (simulation results) among the optimal algorithms in the SC schemes.

    Fig. 16. System performance comparison (simulation results) among the optimal algorithms in the MRC schemes.

    VI. CONCLUSIONS

    In this paper, we investigate the system performance of a WSN based on the NOMA-MEC architecture. We considered a system model where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantennaAPover Nakagami-mfading. We proposed a communication protocol with six schemes for the considered system: BSS-SC, BSS-MRC, S1-SC, S1-MRC, S2-SC, and S2-MRC. For each scheme, we derived the system performance analytical expressions in terms of the SCP. With the development of sensor circuit designs and digital signal processing, the proposed system model can be considered for deployment in practical scenarios. Therefore, our results are useful for wireless communication system designers and researchers in investigations about NOMA-MEC-WSN systems. In addition, we proposed two MSCP algorithms with the lowest system energy consumption: MSCPS and MSCPC. Finally,numerical results are provided with the key parameters to evaluate system performance using Monte Carlo simulations.

    In future work, we will explore the case in which some antennas inKantennas are used to balance algorithmic complexity and system performance. We will also consider the error propagation effect during SCP computation to expand the scope of the study. Meanwhile, the combination of the NOMA-MEC-WSN system and radio frequency energy harvesting (RF EH) can improve the energy efficiency of SNs and prolong their battery life. This concept motivated us to investigate the RF EH NOMA-MEC-WSN multiple-cluster system, where the CHs will receive wireless energy from theAPand use that energy for communication and local computation with imperfect CSI.

    We now prove (30). By using the fundamental properties of CDFs and PDFs and applying the definition of probability, we obtain (A-0). Let us set

    APPENDIX PROOF OF (30)

    国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 超色免费av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 男女免费视频国产| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 香蕉丝袜av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 精品第一国产精品| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 窝窝影院91人妻| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 91成年电影在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产成人av教育| 成人18禁在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产男女内射视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产高清videossex| 国产高清videossex| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产男女内射视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 满18在线观看网站| 国产麻豆69| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 午夜老司机福利片| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲精品一二三| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久狼人影院| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 免费少妇av软件| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 黄片播放在线免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产片内射在线| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| videos熟女内射| 在线天堂中文资源库| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产av又大| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 91麻豆av在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲av成人av| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 人妻 亚洲 视频| a在线观看视频网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲全国av大片| 极品教师在线免费播放| 老司机福利观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜91福利影院| 一a级毛片在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 午夜91福利影院| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产99白浆流出| videosex国产| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 手机成人av网站| 深夜精品福利| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 欧美在线黄色| 久久 成人 亚洲| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 久久中文字幕一级| 99香蕉大伊视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 女警被强在线播放| 窝窝影院91人妻| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产av又大| 欧美性长视频在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产99白浆流出| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 超碰成人久久| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 老司机福利观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜激情av网站| 色94色欧美一区二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产麻豆69| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 精品福利观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| av网站在线播放免费| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 欧美大码av| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 免费看a级黄色片| 91国产中文字幕| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 成人手机av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| av免费在线观看网站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 欧美成人午夜精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 丝袜美足系列| 天堂√8在线中文| av一本久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 18在线观看网站| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 丁香六月欧美| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 午夜免费成人在线视频| av福利片在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 亚洲国产欧美网| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 99re在线观看精品视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 午夜两性在线视频| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品福利观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 色94色欧美一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美精品av麻豆av| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 色在线成人网| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日本五十路高清| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲伊人色综图| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 日本五十路高清| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | av在线播放免费不卡| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 美国免费a级毛片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品一区二区三卡| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久久影院123| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久青草综合色| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 成人影院久久| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 乱人伦中国视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 黄色视频不卡| 91在线观看av| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲色图av天堂| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 一级片免费观看大全| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 搡老岳熟女国产| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 欧美午夜高清在线| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久亚洲真实| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 中文字幕色久视频| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| videosex国产| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产成人欧美| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 免费少妇av软件| 伦理电影免费视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 咕卡用的链子| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| av天堂在线播放| 久久久国产一区二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日本a在线网址| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| tube8黄色片| 国产片内射在线| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | 国产不卡一卡二| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 少妇 在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 免费少妇av软件| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产成人影院久久av| 18禁观看日本| 国产男女内射视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| av免费在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美日韩精品网址| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 成人影院久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久热在线av| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人精品在线电影| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 久久久国产一区二区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 999精品在线视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 男人操女人黄网站| av在线播放免费不卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| tocl精华| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 午夜视频精品福利| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 女警被强在线播放| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产色视频综合| 99re在线观看精品视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 麻豆av在线久日| 色在线成人网| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 电影成人av| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品 国内视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久青草综合色| 免费看十八禁软件| 丁香欧美五月| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲成人手机| tocl精华| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 香蕉久久夜色| av福利片在线| 宅男免费午夜| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 视频区图区小说| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 在线av久久热|