• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    On the System Performance of Mobile Edge Computing in an Uplink NOMA WSN With a Multiantenna Access Point Over Nakagami-m Fading

    2022-04-15 04:03:56VanTruongTruongVanNhanVoDacBinhHaandChakchaiSoIn
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2022年4期

    Van-Truong Truong, Van Nhan Vo, Dac-Binh Ha, and Chakchai So-In,

    Abstract—In this paper, we study the system performance of mobile edge computing (MEC) wireless sensor networks (WSNs)using a multiantenna access point (AP) and two sensor clusters based on uplink nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA). Due to limited computation and energy resources, the cluster heads(CHs) offload their tasks to a multiantenna AP over Nakagami-m fading. We proposed a combination protocol for NOMA-MECWSNs in which the AP selects either selection combining (SC) or maximal ratio combining (MRC) and each cluster selects a CH to participate in the communication process by employing the sensor node (SN) selection. We derive the closed-form exact expressions of the successful computation probability (SCP) to evaluate the system performance with the latency and energy consumption constraints of the considered WSN. Numerical results are provided to gain insight into the system performance in terms of the SCP based on system parameters such as the number of AP antennas, number of SNs in each cluster, task length, working frequency, offloading ratio, and transmit power allocation.Furthermore, to determine the optimal resource parameters, i.e.,the offloading ratio, power allocation of the two CHs, and MEC AP resources, we proposed two algorithms to achieve the best system performance. Our approach reveals that the optimal parameters with different schemes significantly improve SCP compared to other similar studies. We use Monte Carlo simulations to confirm the validity of our analysis.

    I. INTRODUCTION

    IN recent years, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been commonly applied in many fields, such as agriculture,industry, healthcare monitoring, and traffic control, and play an important role in Internet of Things (IoT) applications [1],[2]. The sensor nodes (SNs) in a WSN system collect data and must process this information to control the corresponding actuator [3], [4]. For example, agricultural SNs collect local environmental information and calculations to drive a water pump [5], [6]. Each vehicle, which is considered a mobile SN in the vehicle-to-everything WSN, gathers traffic information and processes it to make self-driving decisions and provide cooperative collision avoidance [7]. However, a WSN is challenging to implement in practical scenarios because of the limited resources of SNs, e.g., computational ability, energy,and throughput. For example, SNs cannot complete all tasks in real time by themselves due to limitations on computing resources and operating energy [8], [9].

    Therefore, mobile edge computing (MEC) [10] is a potential solution to meet computation-intensive and latency-crucial applications at limited resource SNs [11], [12]. According to the MEC paradigm, the SNs divide the computation workloads into parts and offload some parts to the MEC servers in the edge network. With short propagation distances and simple protocols, SNs can achieve very low latency within their limited energy capacity. Additionally, using effective computation offloading strategies, the MEC technique can decrease the energy consumption of the SNs and prolong their battery life [13].

    Furthermore, there are many advantages when applying MEC to WSNs, including decreasing traffic passing through infrastructure [10], reducing the latency for applications [11],[12], and raising the exactitude rate of task processing [14].However, an MEC-WSN network deploying a billion SNs in the future will create a massive amount of IoT data transmitted in the network [15]. This results in satisfying service requirements such as connection density and extremely high throughput in tight latency constraints. Hence,nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) can be applied to solve WSN throughput limitations in contrast to traditional orthogonal multiple access (OMA) [16]–[18]. Furthermore,the uplink NOMA architecture contributes to realizing the MEC model for WSNs [19]–[21]. NOMA can simultaneously serve many sensors with extremely high data rates and very low latency with the same frequency resources. With these advantages, many studies on the challenges of implementing NOMA in the MEC paradigm have been performed [22]–[25].For example, Wuet al. [22] proposed a model in which mobile users offloaded their tasks to computation servers at the edge of cellular networks using NOMA. This work proposed algorithms to minimize the system latency.

    Furthermore, an MEC server located at the base station(BS), which can provide the computing and storage capacity for many users, was proposed in [23]. The authors used a successive convex approximation algorithm to minimize the total cost of the network. Yeet al. proposed the MEC network in [24], where two users could offload their computational tasks to the MEC server via an uplink NOMA. The proposed offloading scheme can work in three modes: complete local computation, partial computation offloading, and complete offloading. An optimization problem is presented that maximizes the successful computation probability (SCP) by optimizing the offloading time, power allocation, and offloading ratio of the two users. The authors concluded that NOMA could improve system performance for MEC networks.

    From the above discussion, it is apparent that prior works have investigated the simple Rayleigh channel model and some essential system parameters such as the number of SNs;however, the number of antennas has not been examined.Thus, our work considers a WSN model with two sensor clusters and a multiantenna access point (AP) using uplink NOMA and Nakagami-mfading. Note that Nakagami-mis a general distribution, whereas Rayleigh, Rician, and Hoyt are special cases [26], [27]. We investigate the communication protocol using a combination of selection combining(SC)/maximal ratio combining (MRC) and the best sensor node selection (BSS)/random sensor node selection (RSS)approaches to promote the advantages of the multinode and multiantenna system. The main contributions of our work are as follows:

    1) We investigate a WSN architecture based on MEC,where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantenna AP using the uplink NOMA over Nakagami-mfading. We propose a protocol for this system with a combination of SC/MRC and BSS/RSS schemes. Furthermore, we derive the closed-form exact analytical expressions of the SCP for these schemes.

    2) We propose two algorithms to determine the optimal resource parameters (including the transmit power allocation,offloading ratio of the SNs, and resources of the AP) so that the SCP is maximized under energy constraints.

    3) We examine the system performance with respect to the task length, working frequency, offloading ratio, number of SNs, number of antennas, Nakagami-mshape factor, and transmit power allocation to understand the behaviors of the proposed system.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section II summarizes several related works. The system model is presented in Section III. Section IV presents a performance analysis. Section V presents the simulation results and discussion. Section VI concludes our paper.

    II. RELATED WORK

    In this section, we investigate several works that studied the MEC uplink NOMA techniques in WSNs.

    One of the issues that has attracted the attention of academics is the need to evaluate the NOMA-MEC system within the maximum allowed time. Dinget al. [19] proposed the idea of two users offloading their tasks to an MEC server.Their work uses two iterative algorithms to minimize the system delay: Dinkelbach’s method and Newton’s method.The work concludes that Newton’s method converges faster than Dinkelbach’s method. This model was also used by Yeet al.in [24]. However, these works use the simple uplink NOMA model, which is not close to reality because wireless network systems generally work with many users, and in particular, WSNs require several SNs to ensure reliability. By contrast, Daiet al. proposed a more complex model in [28]. In particular, multiple users simultaneously offload their tasks to the MEC BS. The work proposes a method to minimize system latency with constrained parameters as a subcarrier assignment and computation resource allocation problem.While their work presented exciting results regarding the relationship between the length of the message and the system latency, a limitation is that it fails to identify and assess the effect of the fading channel on system performance.

    To complement these deficiencies, the work in [29], which was developed from the simple NOMA-MEC model in [24],proposed an MEC network that considered the effect of wireless channels. The authors investigated the system performance in terms of the SCP by considering parameters such as the channel coefficient, distance between the user and the server, power allocation ratio, and offloading ratio.Specifically, the users are divided into two groups: center users and edge users, which are distributed according to a Poisson distribution and communicate with the MEC server over quasistatic Rayleigh fading. All devices in the system are equipped with a single antenna. Yeet al. proposed a new offloading scheme that could operate in three modes, namely,partial computation offloading, complete local computation,and complete offloading, and there are three user selection schemes based on the distance from the users to the MEC server: i) random center user and random edge user selection,ii) nearest center user and farthest edge user selection, and iii)nearest center user and nearest edge user selection. However,many essential aspects were not explored by this work, such as the effect of the number of users in each group, the bandwidth, the operating frequency, and the system energy consumption.

    To realize an MEC model, considering only the maximum allowed time delay is not sufficient; the constraints on system energy consumption must also be considered, which makes sense in WSNs since the sensors have very limited power.Thus, some authors have examined both time and energy constraints of the MEC system. Zhanget al. [30] investigated the trade-off between energy consumption and latency in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)-MEC network. They proposed an iterative search algorithm that incorporated the interior penalty function to find the optimal solution. Although the system uses binary offloading,the partial offloading model is closer to reality because users can select between self-computing or receiving assistance from the MEC server with the offloading ratio parameter.

    A more realistic resource management in an MEC system was proposed by Yanget al. in [31]. The users are distributed in groups and perform binary or partial offloading to the BS using the uplink NOMA. The authors solved the problem of minimizing a linear combination of the maximum allowed time delay and total energy consumption of all users and offered superior advantages over time division multiple access(TDMA) and frequency division multiple access (FDMA)techniques. A similar model was proposed by Wanget al. to solve the energy consumption and application execution latency minimization of smart mobile devices [32]. The constraints of the optimal problem include the transmit power,user computational speed, number of cycles required for the application, and offloading ratio under dynamic voltage scaling technology. The common point of these proposed models is that all implementations are single-input, singleoutput (SISO) that operate over the simple fading channel model, i.e., Rayleigh fading.

    A more complex model was proposed in [33]–[36]. For example, Wuet al. proposed a multi-user NOMA model for both uplink and downlink, where the edge server communicates with a group of mobile terminals (MTs). In this system, the users utilize the uplink to send the computation workload to the BS and vice versa, while the BS uses the downlink to feed back the results to the users. The authors proposed the offloaded computational workload optimization algorithm to minimize the overall delay in completing the MT workload. The results were compared with those of LINGO (a commercial optimization package), which showed the advantages of the NOMA-enabled computational-offloading scheme. However, in [24], [29], [37], the downlink merely transmits the small size and simple control signal; thus, it is unnecessary to investigate.

    In addition, Wanget al. [34] proposed a model where multiple users simultaneously offloaded their workloads to a multiantenna BS. The authors use the Lagrange method to solve the problem of optimizing the energy consumption of the users, where the variables are the task partition, local CPU frequencies, and user offloading ratio. However, their work ignored the contribution of the task execution time to the system delay budget. This assumption is not reasonable because the MEC server has average resources; hence,considering this time is meaningful. Moreover, the work did not describe how to select users in NOMA communication and how to obtain the best-received signals of a multiantenna BS. A similar model was proposed by Wanget al. in [35]. The authors analyzed the system in two scenarios to minimize the total energy consumption of the users: binary offloading and partial offloading. They used the Lagrange method and branch-and-bound-based algorithms to solve the optimization problem for these two cases; however, the computational complexity became vast when the number of users increased.These works did not mention protocols that used the multiuser and multiantenna aspects in the NOMA-MEC system.

    To the best of our knowledge, no prior works consider the uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN using a multiantenna access point(AP) with an SN selection scheme (BSS/RSS) implemented with a diversity combination technique (SC/MRC). In this study, we investigate a model for the uplink NOMA-MEC network in WSNs, where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantenna AP over a Nakagami-mfading channel.

    III. SYSTEM AND CHANNEL MODEL

    We define the notations adopted in the next part of this work in Table I.

    In the cluster-based WSN, multiple sensor nodes are classified into multiple clusters to take advantage of this approach, such as energy efficiency, more reliable network communication, and minimized tolerance [38], [39]. When applying the uplink NOMA technique to the WSN system, the AP divides clusters into disjunct pairs and allocates the available resources to these pairs [40].

    In this paper, we consider the uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN over the Nakagami-mchannel for one pair of clusters, as depicted in Fig. 1. Specifically, the model consists of two sensor clusters (AandB) and one MEC server at theAP. As used in [36], [41], clusterAhasNhigh-priority SNs, which are denoted byAn(1 ≤n≤N); clusterBhasMlow-priority SNs, which are denoted byBm(1 ≤m≤M). This is the primary case in an uplink NOMA network, often used in research to ensure the delay in successive interference cancellation (SIC) is significantly reduced. Furthermore, with insights into system design from a two-cluster solution, a general solution with multiple clusters can also be obtained without much difficulty [42]–[44]. SNs are single-antenna devices, theAPis equipped withKantennas, and they operate in half-duplex mode [45]. Suppose that the SNs perform the same application with task lengthL(bits), which are independent of one another and divided into different groups[19], [24], [29]. LetT(seconds) be the maximum allowed time delay of the system. Due to limited computing capabilities and energy,AnandBmcannot complete their tasks inT. Therefore,AnandBmsimultaneously offload their tasks with offloading ratio βν(0 ≤βν≤1,ν ∈{A,B}) to theAPusing the uplink NOMA.

    TABLE I NOTATIONS

    Fig. 1. System model for an uplink NOMA-MEC-WSN using a multiantenna access point.

    A. Sensor Node Antenna Selection

    The solutions obtained by choosing two CHs and an antenna are presented in this subsection.

    1) Best Sensor Node Selection-Selection Combining (BSSSC) Scheme:When using the BSS-SC scheme,APselects antennask?Aandk?Bfor the communication process with two CHs (An?andBm?) based on the channel power gains. We use this scheme for two reasons:

    i) TheAPselects one ofKantennas that has the lowest complexity of all received diversity techniques for communication.

    ii) Cluster ν consists of a set of SNs that are distributed near one another and perform similar monitoring tasks [4], [5],[49]. Furthermore, using the CH strategy helps to reduce energy consumption, save communication bandwidth and enhance the scalability of the WSN [50]–[52]. Thus, one can select CHs that participate in the communication process that can help the channel achieve the highest instantaneous SNR.

    The formulas describe the indices of the selected antenna and two CHs for communication as follows:

    whereS NR0is the SNR in the absence of fading [53].

    TABLE II SCHEMES FOR AN UPLINK NOMA-MEC-WSN USING A MULTIANTENNA ACCESS POINT

    2) Best Sensor Node Selection-Maximal Ratio Combining(BSS-MRC) Scheme:Although BSS-SC is a low-complexity technique, it is not the best solution because the remaining(K?1)antennas of theAPare wasted. Therefore, we use the BSS-MRC scheme, where all antennas of anAPparticipate in the communication process. The channel with the highest sum of individual instantaneous SNRs is selected. The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:

    3) Combining the Best Sensor Node Selection and Random Sensor Node Selection:For the system using NOMA, the signal from one SN will interfere with other signals; thus,selecting the BSS for both clusters does not guarantee achieving high efficiency in terms of system performance.Therefore, we consider the RSS technique for selecting CHs.The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:

    The RSS technique is based on a random function that randomly picks a number from an interval. Its time complexity isO(1); thus, RSS has a much lower complexity than BSS. Hence, we propose a solution that combines BSS and RSS to select CHs as follows: i) Best Sensor node-A Selection - Random Sensor node-B Selection, denoted by S1,and ii) Random Sensor node-A Selection - Best Sensor node-B Selection, denoted by S2. Combined with two different combination methods (SC and MRC), the system can operate in one of four schemes:

    a) S1-SC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of the selected antenna and CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows: (1) and (6).

    Fig. 2. Time flowchart of the proposed protocol.

    b) S1-MRC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:(3) and (6).

    c) S2-SC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of the selected antenna and CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows: (2) and (5).

    d) S2-MRC scheme:The formulas that describe the indices of CHsAn?andBm?for communication are as follows:(3) and (5).

    B. System Protocol

    Based on one of these six schemes, we describe the system protocol in Algorithm 1. After theAPestimates the channel information and calculates the optimal set of parameters, the system begins to perform all tasks. LetNTbe the number of tasks that the system must perform. The time flowchart for the proposed protocol is shown in Fig. 2. In the first phase, theAPdecides to select the CHs and antenna for communication in durationt0. In the second phase, the CHs simultaneously offload their tasks to theAPusing the optimal power allocation and offloading ratio in durationt1. In the third phase,APuses the SIC technique to decode the superimposed data. Then, theAPand CHs compute their data in durationt2.Finally, the CHs download their results from theAPduringt3.In the scope of this paper, we consider the communication between CHs and sensor members to be solved [54]–[57].Therefore, we do not hold this time in the proposed protocol and sett0= 0. According to the study in [11], [12], [24], [29],t3is assumed to be much smaller thant1andt2and consequently negligible because the resources of the MEC server at theAPare sufficiently strong to very quickly perform the initial parameter selection calculations. Moreover, the calculation results in the downloading phase are usually much smaller in size than the offloaded bit task sequence; hence, the SNs very quickly obtain results via the downlink NOMA.

    Algorithm 1 Proposed Algorithm for the Uplink NOMAMECWSN Protocol Setup:1: The estimates the channel information of the two sensor clusters.APOptimalset AP 2: The calculates using Algorithm 2 – MSCPC or Algorithm 3 – MSCPS.i=1 NT 3: for to do?4: Phase 1:5: switch (Scheme)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 6: case BSS-SC: selects , , , and using (1) and (2)AP?m?n 7: case BSS-MRC: selects and using (3) and (4)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 8: case S1-SC: selects , , , and using (1) and (6)9: case S1-MRC: selects and using (3) and (6)AP?kA ?kB ?m?n 10: case S2-SC: selects , , and using (2) and (5)AP?m?n AP?m?n 11: case S2-MRC: selects and using (3) and (5)12: end switch A?nβ?A,λ?13: updates B ?mβ?B,λ?14: updates APG?15: updates?16: Phase 2:A?nB ?mβ?ALβ?BL ithAP 17: and simultaneously offload and bits of task to the using uplink NOMA.18: Phase 3:APβ?ALβ?BL 19: uses SIC technique to decode and .A?n(1?β?A)Lith 20: computes the bits task .B ?m(1?β?B)Lith 21: computes the bits task .AP(β?A+β?B)Lith 22: computes the bits task .?23: Phase 4:APA?nB ?m?24: downloads the computation results to and 25: end for

    To perform further analyses, we derive the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function(CDF) of the channel power gains, i.e.,XandY, in the SC and MRC schemes as follows.

    Because the channel gains follow the Nakagami distribution, for the SC schemes, i.e., BSS-SC, S1-SC, and S2-SC, the CDFs ofXandYare expressed as follows [41]:

    IV. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION

    A. Successful Computation Probability Analysis

    First, we define the SCP, which is denoted by ξSto be the probability that the CHsAn?andBm?successfully compute all tasksLwithin a maximum allowed time delay of systemT.Specifically, the SCP is the probability that the total communication timet1in Phase 2 and computing timet2in Phase 3 of the SNsAn?andBm?and theAPare less thanT.Thus, we derive the SCP according to the following formula:

    B. Problem Formulation and Solution

    Based on the above model, we formulate the optimization problem to maximize the SCP (here, “MSCP” refers to the“maximal successful computation probability”)

    Algorithm 2 MSCP Optimization With Minimum Total Energy Based on the Chop-up-and-Update Algorithm (MSCPC)ˉγA,ˉγB,L,C,f,T,Bw,PCk,PCMEC,hAPkAn,hAPkBm Input:1: Initialize:Optimalset(0,0,0,0,0)2:S TA △=(βAsta,βBsta,Gsta,λsta)←(0,0,1,0.5)3:S TO △=(βAsto,βBsto,Gsto,λsto)←(1,1,5,1)4:(?min A ,?minB ,?minG ,?minλ )←(0.01,0.01,1,0.01)5:?A= 1 2(βAsto ?βAsta)>?minA 6: while do ?B= 1 2(βBsto ?βBsta)>?minB 7: while do ?G = 1 2(Gsto ?Gsta)>?minG 8: while do ?λ= 1 2(λsto ?λsta)>?minλ 9: while do ξS(1)CP(1)△=(?A,?B,?G,?λ)ξS(2)CP(2)△=(?A+?min A ,?B+?minB ,?G+?minG ,?λ+?minλ )10: Calculate at and at using:11: switch (Scheme)12: case BSS-SC: Calculate using (30)ξS 13: case BSS-MRC: Calculate using (31)ξS 14: case S1-SC: Calculate using (32)ξS 15: case S1-MRC: Calculate using (34)ξS ξS 16: case S2-SC: Calculate using (33)ξS 17: case S2-MRC: Calculate using (35)18: end switch ξS(1)>ξS(2)19: if then S TO ←CP(1)20: Update ξS(1)<ξS(2)21: els if then S TA ←CP(2)22: Update 23: else E(1)CP(1)E(2)CP(2)24: Calculate at , and at by (15) +(16) + (19) + (20)E(1)≤E(2)25: if then S TO ←CP(1)26: Update 27: else S TA ←CP(2)28: Update 29: end if 30: end if 31: end while 32: end while 33: end while 34: end while Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)←Optimalset(ξS(1),βAsta,βBsta,Gsta,λsta)35: Update Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)36: Return

    Algorithm 3 MSCP Optimization With Minimum Total Energy Based on the Search Algorithm (MSCPS)ˉγA,ˉγB,L,C,f,T,Bw,PCk,PCMEC,hAPkAn,hAPkBm Input:1: Initialize:Optimalset(0,0,0,0,0)2:3:S TA △=(βA,βB,G,λ)←(0,0,1,0.5)4:(?min Index=1 A ,?minB ,?minG ,?minλ )←(0.01,0.01,1,0.01)5:6: Step 1: Search LOOP process βA ≤βAsto=1 7: while do βB ≤βBsto=1 8: while do G ≤Gsto=5 9: while do λ ≤λsto=1 10: while do 11: switch (Scheme)12: case BSS-SC: Calculate using (30)ξS 13: case BSS-MRC: Calculate using (31)ξS ξS 14: case S1-SC: Calculate using (32)15: case S1-MRC: Calculate using (34)ξS 16: case S2-SC: Calculate using (33)ξS ξS 17: case S2-MRC: Calculate using (35)18: end switch ξS ≥ξSmax 19: if () then ξS>ξSmax 20: if () then Optimalset 21: Reset 22: end if(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)Index ←(ξS,βA,βB,G,λ)23: Update Index ←Index+1 24: Update 25: end if λ ←λ+?min 26: Update 27: end while G ←G+?min λ 28: Update G

    29: end while βB ←βB+?min 30: Update 31: end while βA ←βA+?min B 32: Update 33: end while 34: Step 2: Find Optimalset with the smallest energy constraint i=1Index A 35: for to length() do Ei 36: Calculate using (15) + (16) + (19) + (20)37: end for Emin=min(Ei)38:39: Update Optimalset ←Optimalset(:,i)Optimalset(ξSmax,β?A,β?B,G?,λ?)40: Return

    V. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    In this section, we provide numerical results on the SCP. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to verify the analysis results.Unless otherwise stated, the parameters required during the simulation and analysis are shown in Table III [29], [41].

    TABLE III TYPICAL VALUES OF THE PARAMETERS IN THE SIMULATION

    As shown in Figs. 3–16, both analysis (Ana.) and simulation(Sim.) results are highly agreeable, which verifies our analysis. Fig. 3 compares the SCP in six schemes: BSS-SC,S1-SC, S2-SC, BSS-MRC, S1-MRC, and S2-MRC, as described in Table II. We observe that the MRC schemes always have better SCPs than the corresponding SC schemes.This results makes sense when the system operates under MRC schemes; the overall SNR is equal to the sum of individual SNRs of all signals received fromKantennas,which yields the maximum diversity gain.

    Fig. 3. Comparison of ξS in different schemes.

    We continue to observe two scheme groups: the SC scheme group and MRC scheme group. Within each group, the S1 scheme has the best SCP, followed by the SCP of the BSS scheme, and the S2 scheme has the worst SCP. Hence, when the system works with NOMA, the signals may interfere with one another. In addition, signalxAis first decoded in theAPbecause under the assumption of λ>0.5, i.e.,PA>PB, the system performance is good when signalxAis better than signalxB. Therefore, the SCP reaches its maximum value under the S1 scheme. Because signalxAis selected as the best one while signalxBis randomly selected (i.e., not the best signal in clusterB), it will cause less interference onxAwhen decoding at theAP. By selecting the CH in contrast to the S1 schemes, the SCP of the S2 schemes has the lowest value.With the BSS schemes, although both clusters select their best SNs, the strong signal fromBmaffects the decoding ofAnat theAPand reduces the SCP.

    Another observation is that ξSreaches saturation when the transmit SNR is very low (less than 10 dBm), which shows that the proposed system is suitable for WSN applications when the transmit power of the SNs is very low but still ensures communication quality.

    Fig. 4 shows the comparison of the total throughput between NOMA and OMA schemes, where the bandwidth is 1 Hz. As expected, in this figure, we observe that the total achieved throughput of the NOMA scheme significantly outperforms that of the OMA scheme. This trend is inevitable and will repeat in all of our subsequent experiments; thus, we will not present them in the remaining figures.

    To easily observe the effect of the power allocation ratioλ on the system performance, we use the FCP as a metric, as defined in Remark 5. In Fig. 5, there are one or more points that minimize the FCP (i.e., yield the largest SCP) for the six schemes. We observed that the minimum FCP occurs whenλ is in the range of 0.5 to 1, consistent with (8) and (9), where more power is allocated to cluster A. However, among those points, Algorithm 2 or Algorithm 3 selects only the optimal points to have the lowest energy consumption. With increasing λ, transmit powerPAincreases, and transmit powerPBdecreases, which decreases the FCP. However, whenλ increases to 1, all transmit powerPis allocated to SNAn,while SNBmdoes not have sufficient power to operate, which results in a high FCP.

    Fig. 4. Comparison of the total throughput among NOMA and OMA schemes, where the bandwidth is 1 Hz.

    Fig. 5. F versus the power allocation.

    Fig. 6 shows the SCP by task length under different SN operating frequencies. We set power allocation λ to 0.55. We observe that ξSdecreases whenLincreases, which is a reasonable result because whenLincreases, the time spent on the offloading phase from the SN to theAPalso increases,which reduces the time for the computing phase. Thus, both SNs andAPwill likely not have sufficient time to handle all of their tasks, so the SCP decreases.

    Fig. 6. ξS versus the length of tasks under different SN operating frequencies.

    Another observation is that when a higher amount of frequency resources is used, the SCP is better because when the frequency increases, the process in the computing phase more quickly occurs and guarantees the system allowed delay time, which increases the system performance. With the proposed system, when the SN operating frequency increases from 50 MHz to 100 MHz, ξSimproves by 10%. When the SN operating frequency increases from 100 MHz to 1 GHz,ξSimproves only by approximately 2%. This outcome proves that with increasingf, the proposed system performance can be improved; however, ξSwill be saturated at frequencies above 1 GHz.

    We observe that the task length of the SNs will significantly affect the performance of the proposed system when the operating frequency of the SNs is lower than 50 MHz, while it has no significant effect when the SNs operate at 100 MHz and above.

    Fig. 6 compares the performance of the proposed system with those of the other six schemes. In all scenarios, we find that the MRC schemes have higher ξSthan the SC schemes,and the S1 schemes have higher ξSthan the BSS schemes and S2 schemes. However, the difference in ξSwhen the proposed system operates in SC and MRC schemes is not massive (only approximately 1%), while the complexity of calculation when communicating with the MRC schemes is higher than that with the SC schemes. Therefore, for applications with limited system resources, we consider using the SC schemes to obtain a desirable ξSwith lower computational complexity than the MRC schemes. Figs. 7 and 8 depict the effects of the number of antennas (K) of theAPand number of SNs in each cluster(NandM) on the SCP in the 2 scheme groups: the SC and MRC scheme groups. We set power allocation λ to 0.55. We perform six test scenarios on the proposed model: 1) all devices in the network are equipped with a single antenna, and each cluster has 1 node; 2) all devices in the network are equipped with a single antenna, and each cluster has 2 nodes;3) theAPis a 2-antenna device, where each cluster has 1 node; 4) theAPis a 2-antenna device, where each cluster has 2 nodes; 5) theAPis a 2-antenna device; cluster A has 1 node,and cluster B has 2 nodes (scheme S2); and 6) theAPis a 2-antenna device, cluster A has 2 nodes, and cluster B has 1 node (scheme S1).

    Fig. 7. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different numbers of AP antennas and SNs in clusters with the SC schemes.

    Fig. 8. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different numbers of AP antennas and SNs in clusters with the MRC schemes.

    Figs. 7 and 8 show the difference between SC and MRC scheme groups. We observe that Scenarios 2 and 3 of the SC schemes have entirely identical results, which makes perfect sense for formula (30) in Lemma 1, where ξSSCis constant when the product of the number of antennas of theAPand the number of SNs in each cluster is constant. However, in the MRC schemes, the number of antennas is more critical because allAPantennas participate in the communication process. Hence, a higherKcorresponds to better system performance (ξSMRCin Scenario 3 is better than ξSMRCin Scenario 2), which appears reasonable considering that the BSS-MRC scheme uses all antennas.

    We investigate the effect of the bandwidth on the system performance, i.e.,Bw= 100 MHz andBw= 200 MHz. The bandwidth significantly affects the SCP when the transmit SNR is less than 10 dBm.

    Fig. 9. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the BSS schemes.

    Fig. 10. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the S1 schemes.

    Fig. 11. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different Nakagami- m shape factors in the S2 schemes.

    Figs. 9–11 depict the SCP for different shape factors of Nakagami-m(mAandmB) in the BSS, S1 and S2 schemes.Clearly, the SCP associated withmA= 1 andmB= 1 is the smallest because whenmA= 1 andmB= 1, the transmission channels follow Rayleigh fading. Moreover, we observe that a higher shape factormcorresponds to a higher ξS. This result occurs because whenmAandmBincrease, the channel quality improves, which improves the system performance. The small figure in Fig. 9 shows that whenmAandmBincrease from 3 to 4, ξSinsignificantly changes. However, when shape factormincreases, the number of operations required to calculateξSconsiderably increases.s We observe that the system performance when using the two proposed algorithms are identical and relatively better than that of the solution in [21]. Moreover, our analysis of the system energy consumption is more realistic.

    Fig. 12. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the BSS schemes.

    Fig. 13. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the S1 schemes.

    Fig. 14. ξS versus the transmit SNR for different values of G in the S2 chemes.

    Fig. 15. System performance comparison (simulation results) among the optimal algorithms in the SC schemes.

    Fig. 16. System performance comparison (simulation results) among the optimal algorithms in the MRC schemes.

    VI. CONCLUSIONS

    In this paper, we investigate the system performance of a WSN based on the NOMA-MEC architecture. We considered a system model where two sensor clusters communicate with a multiantennaAPover Nakagami-mfading. We proposed a communication protocol with six schemes for the considered system: BSS-SC, BSS-MRC, S1-SC, S1-MRC, S2-SC, and S2-MRC. For each scheme, we derived the system performance analytical expressions in terms of the SCP. With the development of sensor circuit designs and digital signal processing, the proposed system model can be considered for deployment in practical scenarios. Therefore, our results are useful for wireless communication system designers and researchers in investigations about NOMA-MEC-WSN systems. In addition, we proposed two MSCP algorithms with the lowest system energy consumption: MSCPS and MSCPC. Finally,numerical results are provided with the key parameters to evaluate system performance using Monte Carlo simulations.

    In future work, we will explore the case in which some antennas inKantennas are used to balance algorithmic complexity and system performance. We will also consider the error propagation effect during SCP computation to expand the scope of the study. Meanwhile, the combination of the NOMA-MEC-WSN system and radio frequency energy harvesting (RF EH) can improve the energy efficiency of SNs and prolong their battery life. This concept motivated us to investigate the RF EH NOMA-MEC-WSN multiple-cluster system, where the CHs will receive wireless energy from theAPand use that energy for communication and local computation with imperfect CSI.

    We now prove (30). By using the fundamental properties of CDFs and PDFs and applying the definition of probability, we obtain (A-0). Let us set

    APPENDIX PROOF OF (30)

    国产精品一国产av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 简卡轻食公司| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 色哟哟·www| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| videos熟女内射| 久久97久久精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 成人国产麻豆网| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久99一区二区三区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | videossex国产| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产色婷婷99| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 性色avwww在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲中文av在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲成人手机| 黄片播放在线免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 在线观看国产h片| 搡老乐熟女国产| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 少妇的逼好多水| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 插逼视频在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产 精品1| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲四区av| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产片内射在线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 观看av在线不卡| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| av免费在线看不卡| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一级片'在线观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产成人91sexporn| 视频区图区小说| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 22中文网久久字幕| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 久久免费观看电影| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| av视频免费观看在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产成人91sexporn| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 91精品三级在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 少妇丰满av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 尾随美女入室| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 777米奇影视久久| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 一级毛片 在线播放| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日韩av免费高清视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲精品一二三| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 日本色播在线视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| av卡一久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 午夜福利,免费看| www.av在线官网国产| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 有码 亚洲区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 黄色一级大片看看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲综合色网址| 一本久久精品| 91精品国产九色| 国产在线免费精品| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲成色77777| 黑人高潮一二区| av不卡在线播放| 日本91视频免费播放| 永久网站在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 少妇 在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日本黄大片高清| av免费在线看不卡| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲中文av在线| av免费在线看不卡| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 草草在线视频免费看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久久久精品性色| 91精品国产九色| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久精品夜色国产| 一级爰片在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 老熟女久久久| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲综合色网址| 婷婷色综合www| 如何舔出高潮| 国产在线视频一区二区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | av播播在线观看一区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 黄色一级大片看看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲在久久综合| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 三级国产精品片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 午夜日本视频在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 日韩中字成人| av不卡在线播放| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 97在线人人人人妻| 色网站视频免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 高清欧美精品videossex| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 97超视频在线观看视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 秋霞伦理黄片| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久精品夜色国产| 97超碰精品成人国产| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 成人二区视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| videossex国产| 赤兔流量卡办理| 观看av在线不卡| 简卡轻食公司| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久 成人 亚洲| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 在线看a的网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲精品视频女| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美人与善性xxx| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产成人精品无人区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 成人无遮挡网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩中字成人| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久婷婷青草| av福利片在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产淫语在线视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 高清av免费在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 熟女电影av网| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲图色成人| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 精品久久久噜噜| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲图色成人| 永久免费av网站大全| 青青草视频在线视频观看| av在线app专区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 成人影院久久| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产在线免费精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品久久久久久电影网| a 毛片基地| 老女人水多毛片| 少妇人妻 视频| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 精品酒店卫生间| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| av天堂久久9| 国产淫语在线视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 一个人免费看片子| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久影院123| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产精品三级大全| av线在线观看网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 午夜免费鲁丝| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久久久伊人网av| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日韩成人伦理影院| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜91福利影院| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 熟女电影av网| 精品国产国语对白av| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人精品一,二区| 99热网站在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产一级毛片在线| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久精品夜色国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产精品免费大片| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产片内射在线| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 秋霞伦理黄片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 蜜桃在线观看..| 色哟哟·www| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| kizo精华| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产在视频线精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看|