• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Syntheses, Crystal Structures, Anticancer Activities and DNA-Binding Properties of the Dibutyltin Complexes Based on Benzoin Aroyl Hydrazone①

    2022-03-12 07:43:40JIANGWuJiuTANYuJunMANJiTiTANYuXing
    結(jié)構(gòu)化學(xué) 2022年2期

    JIANG Wu-Jiu TAN Yu-Jun MAN Ji-Ti TAN Yu-Xing②

    a (Key Laboratory of Functional Metal-organic Compounds of Hunan Province, Key Laboratory of Functional Organometallic Materials, University of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center for Monitoring and Treatment of Heavy Metals Pollution in the Upper Reaches of XiangJiang River, College of Chemistry and Materials Science,Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, Hunan 421008, China)

    b (Emergency Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China)

    ABSTRACT Dibutyltin benzoin benzoyl hydrazone complex I [C6H5(O)C=N-N=C(Ph)CH(Ph)O]2[(n-Bu)2Sn]2 and dibutyltin benzoin salicyl hydrazone complex II [2-(OH)-C6H4(O)C=N-N=C(Ph)CH(Ph)O]2[(n-Bu)2Sn]2 were synthesized and characterized by IR, 1H, 13C and 119Sn NMR spectra, HRMS, elemental analysis and thermal stability analysis, and the crystal structures were determined by X-ray diffraction. The crystal of complex I belongs to monoclinic system, space group P21/n with a = 11.1942(8), b = 10.4754(7), c = 23.6700(17) ?, β =101.529(2)°, Z = 2, V = 2719.6(3) ?3, Dc = 1.371 Mg·m-3, μ(MoKα) = 0.966 mm-1, F(000) = 1152, R = 0.0458 and wR = 0.1312. The crystal of complex II is of triclinic system, space group Pwith a = 9.9960(4), b =11.2466(4), c = 14.0509(5) ?, α = 69.4190(10)°, β = 70.0600(10)°, γ = 81.8090(10)°, Z = 1, V = 1389.69(9) ?3,Dc = 1.380 Mg·m-3, μ(MoKα) = 0.950 mm-1, F(000) = 592, R = 0.0284 and wR = 0.0690. In vitro antitumor activities of both complexes were evaluated by CCK8 method against three human cancer cell lines (MCF7,NCI-H460 and HepG2), and complex II exhibited better antitumor activity than I. The interaction between complexes and calf thymus DNA was studied by UV-vis, fluorescence spectroscopy and viscosity measurements.

    Keywords: dibutyltin, complex, synthesis, crystal structure, DNA;

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Since the discovery of the first efficacious anticancer metallodrugs cisplatin in 1965 by Rosenberg[1], metal complexes with anti-cancer activity began to attract people.During the last few years, it is noticeable that organotin compounds occupied an important place in cancer chemotherapy reports[2-5]because of their cytotoxic effects,ability to bind with DNA, anti-proliferating nature, and apoptotic-inducing nature. Although there are many reports on the biological activity and structures of different organotin compounds[6-8], it is difficult for scientists to accurately predict the biological activity of drugs based on the chemical structures of drugs in advance, so a large number of potentially biologically activity molecules are synthesized and exploring the structure-activity relationship is academically helpful to lay the foundation for the development of new organometallic anti-cancer drugs.

    The structure of the compound determines its properties, so the ligand plays an important role in geometry and affects the biological activities[9-11]. Therefore, we designed to use acylhydrazone as a ligand, which has peptide bonds and multiple sites, and plays a strong role in regulating the coordination of metals. In this paper, we have synthesized two dibutyltin complexes based on benzoin aroylhydrazone,and their structures were characterized. The inhibitory activities of the complex on cancer cells in vitro were tested,and the interactions with DNA were studied, which provides an important theoretical basis for the development of new metal antitumor drugs.

    2 EXPERIMENTAL

    2. 1 Instruments and reagents

    Infrared spectrum (KBr) was recorded by the Prestige-21 infrared spectrometer (Japan Shimadzu, 4000~400 cm-1).1H,13C and119Sn NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker AVANCE-500 NMR spectrometer. The elemental analysis was determined by PE-2400(II) elemental analyzer.Crystallographic data of the complexes were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer. HRMS was measured with the Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL (ESI source). Melting points were determined using an X4 digital microscopic melting point apparatus without correction(Beijing Tektronix Instrument Co. Ltd.). Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were recorded on a NETZSCH TG 209 F3 instrument at a heating rate of 20 ℃·min-1from 40 to 800 ℃under air. The UV spectra were determined with the UV-2550 spectrophotometer (Shimazu). Fluorescence spectra were obtained with a Hitachi F-7000 spectrophotometer with quartz cuvette (path length = 1 cm).

    Benzoin benzoyl hydrazone and benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand were prepared according to the literatures[12]. Ethidium bromide (EB), calf thymus DNA and tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl aminomethane (tris) were from Sigma-Aldrich LLC. Cisplatin was from QiLu pharmaceutical CO., Ltd.Dibutyltin oxide was from Alfa Aesar (China) Chemical Co.,Ltd. Other chemicals were from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All reagents of analytical grade were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification. The human breast cancer cells (MCF-7, ATCC No: HTB-22), human lung cancer cells (NCI-H460, ATCC No: HTB-177) and human liver cancer cells (HepG2, ATCC No: HB-8065) were obtained from American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC). Culture media RPMI-1640 (10.0%) were purchased from USA GIBICO. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm)obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore Co., USA) was used in all experiments. Tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution was prepared by a certain amount of tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl aminomethane dissolved in ultrapure water before using, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.40 with hydrochloric acid solution (0.1 mol·L-1).The purity of CT-DNA was determined by comparing the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280= 1.8~1.9/1). The concentration of CT-DNA was calculated by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (ε260= 6600 L·mol-1·cm-1). The reserve solution was stored at 4 ℃. The ethidium bromide solution was prepared by a certain amount of ethidium bromide solid dissolved in tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution.

    2. 2 Syntheses of the complexes

    A mixture of dibutyltin oxide (1.0 mmol), benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand (1.0 mmol) and CH3OH (20.0 mL) was added in a round-bottomed flask (50.0 mL), and refluxed with stirring for 6.0 h. Then the mixture was cooled and filtered. The complex crystals were obtained by controlling solvent evaporation. Complex I was yellow crystal. Yield:86%. m.p.: 131~133 ℃. Anal. Calcd. (C58H68N4O4Sn2): C,62.05; H, 6.11; N, 4.99%. Found: C, 62.11; H, 6.07; N,4.91%. FT-IR (KBr, cm-1): 3086, 3053, 3028ν(=C-H), 2954,2922ν(-C-H), 1606ν(C=N), 686ν(Sn-O), 588ν(Sn-O-Sn),530ν(Sn-N), 430ν(Sn-C).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): 8.13~8.15 (d,J= 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.91~7.93 (m, 2H),7.46~7.49 (m, 1H), 7.38~7.43 (m, 5H), 7.14~7.23 (m, 5H),6.25 (s, 1H), 1.62~1.71 (m, 4H), 1.47~1.51 (m, 4H),1.34~1.40 (m, 4H), 0.85~0.90 (m, 6H).13C NMR (126 MHz,CDCl3,δ/ppm): 171.76, 165.94, 143.59, 133.84, 131.67,131.27, 130.71, 129.73, 128.60, 128.17, 128.10, 128.06,127.47, 77.78, 27.14, 27.06, 26.65, 26.56, 21.30, 20.63, 13.30,13.56.119Sn NMR (187 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): -108.71.HRMS (ESI)m/zcalcd. for C58H68N4O4Sn2Na+[M+Na]+1145.31708, found 1145.31689.

    Complex II was prepared in a similar procedure (Fig. 1) as I by benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand (1.0 mmol) in place of benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand. The product was colorless crystal with the yield of 82%. m.p.: 164~166 ℃.Anal. Calcd. (C58H68N4O6Sn2): C, 60.33; H, 5.94; N, 4.85%.Found: C, 60.34; H, 5.98; N, 4.92%. FT-IR (KBr, cm-1):3458ν(-O-H), 3059, 3030ν(=C-H), 2954, 2922ν(C-H),1629ν(C=N), 671ν(Sn-O), 594ν(Sn-O-Sn), 501ν(Sn-N),459ν(Sn-C).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): 12.01(s,1H), 7.99 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.48-7.49 (m, 2H), 7.40-7.42(m, 3H), 7.34 (t,J= 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22~7.25 (m, 2H),7.17~7.19 (m, 3H), 6.89 (t,J= 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.12 (s, 1H),1.65~1.73 (m, 4H), 1.49~1.60 (m, 4H), 1.36~1.42 (m, 4H),0.91 (t,J= 7.3 Hz, 4H).13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm):172.59, 167.62, 160.00, 142.29, 133.47, 131.93, 130.92,129.57, 128.67, 128.62, 127.94, 127.82, 127.38, 118.73,117.08, 115.98, 78.29, 27.05, 27.01, 26.65, 26.52, 22.19,21.52, 13.61, 13.57.119Sn NMR (187 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm):-125.56. HRMS (ESI)m/zcalcd. for C58H68N4O6Sn2Na+[M+Na]+1177.30691, found 1177.30676.

    Fig. 1. Syntheses of the complexes

    2. 3 Crystal structure determination

    Suitable single crystals with dimensions of 0.41mm ×0.31mm × 0.16mm (I) and 0.48mm × 0.33mm × 0.23mm (II)were selected for data collection at 273(2) K on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated MoKαradiation (λ= 0.71073 ?)using aφ-ωmode. All the data were corrected byLpfactors and empirical absorbance. The structure was solved by direct methods. All non-hydrogen atoms were determined in successive difference Fourier synthesis, and hydrogen atoms were added according to theoretical models. All hydrogen and non-hydrogen atoms were refined by their isotropic and anisotropic thermal parameters through full-matrix leastsquares techniques. All calculations were completed by the SHELXTL-97[13]program. For complex I, a total of 37434 reflections were obtained in the range of 3.00<θ<26.00° with 5293 unique ones (Rint= 0.0314),S= 1.037, (Δρ)max= 1.012 and (Δρ)min= -0.897 e/?3, max transmission was 0.8569,min transmission was 0.6916, and the completeness was 99.4%. For complex II, a total of 28937 reflections were obtained in the range of 3.10<θ<27.52° with 6372 unique ones (Rint= 0.0241),S= 1.059, (Δρ)max= 0.563, (Δρ)min=-0.4518 e/?3, max transmission was 0.8111, min transmission was 0.6595, and the completeness was 99.6%.The selected bond lengths and bond angles for I and II are listed in Table 1.

    2. 4 In vitro anti-tumor activity assays

    The synthesized complexes were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 50 mM as stock solution. To avoid DMSO toxicity, the concentration of DMSO was less than 0.1% (v/v)in all experiments. MCF7, NCI-H460 and HepG2 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and grown at 37 ℃ in a saturated humidified atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2. Cell proliferation was assessed by CCK8 assay[14-16]. 100 μL of cells (5 × 104cells·mL-1) was incubated at 37 ℃, and 5%CO2was seeded into 96 well plates. Then the medium was replaced with the respective medium containing complexes at different concentrations and incubated for 72 h. 10 μL CCK8 solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 ℃ for additional 4 h. The optical density was detected with a microplate reader at 450 nm. Six concentrations (5 nM~50 μM) were set for the compounds and at least 3 parallels of every concentration were used. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The data were calculated using Graph Pad Prism version 7.0. The IC50was fitted using a non-linear regression model with a sigmoidal dose response.

    2. 5 Interaction with DNA

    In the fluorescence study, a mixture of CT-DNA (30 μM),EB (3 μM) and different concentration complexes I or II solution (0~80 μM) was placed in a 5 mL volumetric flask in tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution[15,16]. After 3 h, the fluorescence spectra were acquired at 25 ℃. The excitation wavelength was 258 nm, and the emission wavelength is shown in the spectrum. The slit scanning width of emission and excitation is 5.0 nm. Finally, the quenching constant (Ksv)values of I or II were determined by using the Stern-Volmer equation[17].

    In the UV-visible absorption spectrometry study, the investigation of the possible binding modes of complex to DNA and the calculation of the corresponding DNAbinding constants (Kb) were carried out by UV-vis spectroscopy. UV-visible absorption spectrometry experiments were carried out with a constant concentration of complexes I or II (50 μM) while the concentration of CT-DNA (0~50 μM) in tris-buffer was varied. The intrinsic binding constants (Kb) were calculated according the following Wolfe-Shimmer equation[18]:

    wherecDNAis the concentration of CT-DNA,εAthe observed extinction coefficient at arbitrary DNA concentration,εFthe extinction coefficient of the free complex, andεBthe extinction coefficient of the complex when fully combining to CT-DNA. The DNA-binding constantsKbgiven by the ratio of the slope to the intercept were determined by the Wolfe-Shimmer equation and the plotscDNA/(εA-εF) versuscDNA.

    The viscosity measurements were carried out in the Ubbelohde viscometer in a water bath with 25.00 ±0.02 °C. Viscosity experiments were performed by fixed DNA concentration (50 μM) and increasing the concentration of complex I or II (0~50 μM). The flow time of sample was measured with a digital stopwatch.The values of viscosity were calculated from the flow times of DNA containing solutions corrected for the flow time of buffer alone (t0),η= (t-t0)[19]. Data were presented as (η/η0)1/3versus (ccomplex/cDNA), whereηis the viscosity of DNA in the presence of the complex,η0the viscosity of DNA alone,ccomplexthe concentration of the complex andcDNAthe concentration of DNA.

    3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    3. 1 Spectral analyses

    In FT-IR spectra of I, the characteristic peaks ofν(Sn-O),ν(Sn-O-Sn),ν(Sn-N) andν(Sn-C) occur at 686, 588, 530 and 430 cm-1, and the same characteristic peaks of II are located at 671, 594, 501 and 459 cm-1[20], respectively, which indicate similar structures for both complexes. The above results are confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.

    In the1H NMR spectrum, the integral area ratio of each peak is consistent with the number of protons in each group of the expected structure[21]. The hydrogen proton absorption peaks of the aryl ring of complexes I and II are observed at 7.14~8.15 and 6.89~7.99 ppm in the low field, respectively.The -CH(Ph)O- protons in I and II appear at 6.25 and 6.12 ppm, respectively. The -OH protons in benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand of II appear at 12.01 ppm. Methyl and methylene on the butyl group peak are observed at the high field position.

    The13C NMR spectra show carbon atoms from carboxyls of I and II have the same peak positions, and those of other groups are consistent with the number of structural carbon atoms theoretically speculated. It can be inferred from the positions of hydrogen proton and carbon peaks of both complexes that I and II have similar structures, which is consistent with the results of X-ray single-crystal diffraction.

    The119Sn NMR spectrum indicates Sn-core peaks of I and II are a single peak with -108.71 and -125.56 ppm,respecttively, showing the existence of a single organotin complex in both complexes.

    In HRMS spectra, mass spectral peaks of complex I appear atm/z1145.31689, which can be attributed to the absorption peaks of [M+Na]+. Complex II is found atm/z1177.30676 due to the absorption peaks of [M+Na]+.

    3. 2 Structure description

    The molecular structures of I and II are shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that complexes I and II have similar molecular structures. They are centrosymmetric dimer distannoxane, with a Sn2O2four-membered ring in the middle of the molecule. The center of the ring is the symcenter of the molecule. In the four-membered Sn2O2ring, the sum of the interior angles is 360°, indicating this ring is planar. Each oxygen atom O(2) bridges the two tin atoms in an antisymmetric unit, with the Sn(1)-O(2) bond belonging to the normal Sn-O covalent bond: the Sn(1)-O(2)ibond distances (2.581 ? I, 2.849 ? II) are greater than the covalent radii of Sn and O (2.13 ?), while much less than the sum of the van der Waals radii of 3.69 ?.

    Fig. 2. Molecular structures of I and II. Symmetry codes for (I): i 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; (II): i -x+1, -y+1, -z

    Table 1. Selected Bond Lengths (?) and Bond Angles (°) for I and II

    Take complex I as an example, the asymmetric unit comprises one benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand and a dibutyltin. The central tin atom is six-coordinated by two oxygen (O(1) and O(2)) and one nitrogen (N(2)) atoms from the ligand, two carbon atoms (C(22) and C(26)) from the butyl group, and one oxygen atom (O(2)i) from the other ligand. The axial positions are occupied by two methylene carbon atoms (C(22) and C(26)) from the butyl group, and the C(22)-Sn(1)-C(26) angle is 139.5(4)°, which obviously deviates from 180°. The equatorial positions are occupied by O(1), O(2), N(2) and O(2)i, and the bond lengths and angles between the five atoms and the tin atom are different, so in I the central tin atom is six-coordinated in a distorted octahedral geometry, and similar coordination mode is for II.

    3. 3 Thermal stability

    Thermal stabilities of both complexes were carried out using a NETZSCH TG 209 F3 thermogravimetric analyzer from 40 to 800 ℃ at a rate of 20 ℃·min-1under an air atmosphere at a flowing rate of 20.0 mL·min-1. As shown in Fig. 3, complexes I and II have no weight loss at 40 to 180 ℃. This shows that there is not solvent molecule involved in coordination in complex, which is consistent with X-ray single-crystal diffraction data. In the next stages, both complexes suffer complete decomposition until 800 ℃,corresponding to the removal of ligand and the dibutyl group attached to the tin atom. The remaining weight (27.40% (I)and 26.26% (II)) indicates the final products are SnO2(26.85% (I) and 26.11% (II)). In summary, I and II are rather stable up to about 200 and 180 ℃, respectively.

    Fig. 3. TG-DTG curves for I and II

    3. 4 Anticancer activity

    The in vitro antitumor activities of complexes I and II were evaluated by CCK8 assay against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines, using cisplatin as the positive control,with the results shown in Table 2. The anticancer activity of the ligand is relatively poor and there is no selectivity against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines, but complexes I and II have obvious inhibitory effects on these three cancer cells, and they are better than cisplatin. Among three cancer cells, complexes I and II are also the most sensitive to HepG2, withIC50of 1.43 ± 0.72 μM and 0.73 ± 0.21 μM,respectively. In a word, complex II has slightly stronger inhibitory effect than I. From the test results, we can see significant statistical difference between complexes (or ligands) and cisplatin (P< 0.05). The molecular structure difference between I and II is only the substituents attached to the benzene ring on ligand by crystal structure analysis.Thereby, it can be preliminarily inferred that the substituents on the ligand have only a slight effect on the anti-cancer activity, which may be related to the synergistic effect of the ligand and organotin.

    Table 2. Inhibition Action of the Complexes to Cancer Cell in vitro

    3. 5 Interaction with DNA

    Fig. 4 shows the effects of I and II on the fluorescent spectra of EB-DNA system with different concentrations.With increasing the concentration of complex, the fluorescence of EB-DNA complex system is quenched. This shows that complexes I and II interact with the EB-DNA system. The reasons may be as follows: (1) The complex will compete with EB for binding to the site on CT-DNA. The more complexes are added, the more EB originally bound to CT-DNA will be replaced by the complexes, which will reduce the fluorescence intensity of the EB-DNA system. (2)The complex and CT-DNA will compete to bind to EB,resulting in a decrease in the concentration of EB originally bound to CT-DNA, and it caused fluorescence quenching of EB-DNA. (3) The complex forms a new non-fluorescence compound with the EB-DNA system, that is, the DNA-EB-complex system, which leads to a decrease in the fluorescence intensity. In addition, the fluorescence spectrum of EB did not change significantly with the addition of complex I or II, indicating no interaction between the complexes and EB. And combined with the UV-visible absorption spectra, the binding between complexes I or II and CT-DNA is an embed mode. This basically eliminates reasons (2) and (3). In a word, the complex has a competitive effect with the DNA-EB system. To study quantificationally the binding capacity of complexes I or II and DNA[22,23], we employed the classical Stern-Volmer equationI0/I= 1 +KSVccomplexto obtain the quenching constantsKSVof complexes replacing EB and DNA with 1.0 × 105L·mol-1(I)and 2.5 × 105L·mol-1(II). The result showed that the binding strength of complex II is higher than that of I.

    Fig. 5 shows the effects on UV-visible absorption spectra of I and II in the absence and presence of CT-DNA. The electronic absorption spectral data showed that when increasing the concentration of CT-DNA (0~80 μmol·L-1)added to complex I or II, both of the abovementioned absorption bands showed hypochromism and redshift (about 5 nm). The rate of hypochromism is 25% for I and 32% for II.According to the literatures[24,25], the DNA and the complex molecules are intercalation as probable mode of interaction,and the ultraviolet spectrum will have a significant hypochromism and accompany the red shift. The reason for the hypochromism is that the interaction between the complex and DNA causes the change of molecule conformation. And the change of the spectrum is related to the binding force. The stronger effect, the more obvious hypochromism. This phenomenon explains why the complex molecule inserts into the DNA. This preliminary result indicated that I or II intercalates into the DNA. TheKbvalues of complexes were calculated as 3.25 × 103L·mol-1(r2= 0.98)(I) and 4.98 × 103L·mol-1(r2= 0.99) (II) from the absorption spectra, and the high binding constant values reveal that the complex strongly interacts with DNA. It shows that complex I is stronger than II. The value is similar to those of complexes reported in the literature[26,27].

    Fig. 4. Effects of II on the fluorescent spectra of EB-DNA system cCT-DNA = 30 μmol·L-1; cEB = 3 μmol·L-1; from a to i,ccomplex = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 μmol·L-1, respectively; inset: plot of I0/I vs. ccomplex; λex = 258 nm

    Fig. 5. UV-visible absorption spectra of II in tris-HCl buffer upon addition of CT-DNA (ccomplex = 50 μmol·L-1);from a to i, cDNA = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 μmol·L-1, respectively. The arrow shows the absorbance changes with increasing the DNA concentration. Inset: plot of cDNA/(εA - εF) vs. cDNA

    The literatures[28,29]reported that a significant increase in the viscosity of DNA on the addition of a complex indicates the classical intercalative mode of binding to DNA. In contrast, if the interaction of the complex with DNA is caused by partial or non-classical insertion, the viscosity change of the DNA solution is not obvious or unchanged. As can be seen from Fig. 6, the relative viscosity of CT-DNA steadily increases with the concentration of the complex, and its trend is consistent with EB with the viscosity increase order to be EB > II >I. It shows that both the complex and EB interact with DNA in a similar mode. This observation can be explained by the fact that the complexes and DNA adopt a classical intercalation model, which requires that the DNA helix must be extended, resulting in an increase of DNA viscosity. The result further suggests an intercalating binding mode of the complexes with DNA and also parallels the above spectroscopic results.

    4 CONCLUSION

    Two dibutyltin (IV) complexes were synthesized.Complexes I and II are also a centrosymmetric dimer. II is stronger against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines in vitro antitumour activity. The DNA-binding studies using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy showed that the intrinsic binding constant,Kb, was 3.25× 103L·mol-1(I) and 4.98 ×103L·mol-1(II). The fluorescent spectra showed that the Stern-Volmer quenching constant,KSV, was calculated as 1.0× 105L·mol-1(I) and 2.5 × 105L·mol-1(II). Therefore, both the complex and EB interact with DNA in a similar mode,thus proving that complexes and DNA adopt a classical intercalative binding, and the binding strength of complex II is higher than that of I.

    Fig. 6. Effect of increasing amounts of the complexes and EB on the relative viscosity at 25.00 ± 0.02 °C

    男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久香蕉精品热| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产成人一区二区在线| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品久久久噜噜| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日本a在线网址| 美女高潮的动态| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| h日本视频在线播放| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一夜夜www| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 一级av片app| 特级一级黄色大片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 观看美女的网站| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久久久久久久中文| 日日啪夜夜撸| 嫩草影院新地址| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 永久网站在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 简卡轻食公司| 久久人妻av系列| 国产黄片美女视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲av.av天堂| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本在线视频免费播放| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲精品色激情综合| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费看光身美女| 永久网站在线| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 俺也久久电影网| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 成年免费大片在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美bdsm另类| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品久久久久久久久av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产成人av教育| 久久草成人影院| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 在线观看66精品国产| 搡老岳熟女国产| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日本 欧美在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美成人a在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 一级av片app| 看免费成人av毛片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| xxxwww97欧美| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 69人妻影院| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一夜夜www| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日韩欧美三级三区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 热99re8久久精品国产| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 18+在线观看网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产老妇女一区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产高潮美女av| 欧美zozozo另类| 免费在线观看日本一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久热精品热| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 成人精品一区二区免费| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美性感艳星| av在线老鸭窝| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 免费av观看视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 老司机福利观看| .国产精品久久| 免费高清视频大片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 欧美区成人在线视频| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 在线看三级毛片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产老妇女一区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 热99在线观看视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产三级中文精品| 久久6这里有精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久精品影院6| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美日韩黄片免| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| videossex国产| 99热这里只有精品一区| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成人av教育| 免费看光身美女| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲不卡免费看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 天堂动漫精品| 99热精品在线国产| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 联通29元200g的流量卡| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 色5月婷婷丁香| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲av熟女| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 亚洲av一区综合| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| av在线天堂中文字幕| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 高清在线国产一区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 色哟哟·www| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 九色成人免费人妻av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 色哟哟·www| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 我要搜黄色片| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜福利高清视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久草成人影院| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 极品教师在线免费播放| av专区在线播放| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲不卡免费看| 色综合色国产| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 91在线观看av| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 精品久久久久久久久av| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| avwww免费| 日本黄色片子视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99热网站在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 深夜a级毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 91狼人影院| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 日本 av在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产乱人视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 黄色配什么色好看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| ponron亚洲| 国产单亲对白刺激| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 免费高清视频大片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| av黄色大香蕉| 嫩草影院精品99| av天堂中文字幕网| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 天堂网av新在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产在视频线在精品| 露出奶头的视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 俺也久久电影网| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 十八禁网站免费在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 简卡轻食公司| 99久久精品热视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 级片在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 深夜a级毛片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 色综合站精品国产| 小说图片视频综合网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 黄色配什么色好看| 三级毛片av免费| 色吧在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲国产色片| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 搡老岳熟女国产| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 美女大奶头视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 91av网一区二区| 成人欧美大片| 日韩高清综合在线| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| a在线观看视频网站| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久久久国内视频|