• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Syntheses, Crystal Structures, Anticancer Activities and DNA-Binding Properties of the Dibutyltin Complexes Based on Benzoin Aroyl Hydrazone①

    2022-03-12 07:43:40JIANGWuJiuTANYuJunMANJiTiTANYuXing
    結(jié)構(gòu)化學(xué) 2022年2期

    JIANG Wu-Jiu TAN Yu-Jun MAN Ji-Ti TAN Yu-Xing②

    a (Key Laboratory of Functional Metal-organic Compounds of Hunan Province, Key Laboratory of Functional Organometallic Materials, University of Hunan Province, Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center for Monitoring and Treatment of Heavy Metals Pollution in the Upper Reaches of XiangJiang River, College of Chemistry and Materials Science,Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, Hunan 421008, China)

    b (Emergency Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China)

    ABSTRACT Dibutyltin benzoin benzoyl hydrazone complex I [C6H5(O)C=N-N=C(Ph)CH(Ph)O]2[(n-Bu)2Sn]2 and dibutyltin benzoin salicyl hydrazone complex II [2-(OH)-C6H4(O)C=N-N=C(Ph)CH(Ph)O]2[(n-Bu)2Sn]2 were synthesized and characterized by IR, 1H, 13C and 119Sn NMR spectra, HRMS, elemental analysis and thermal stability analysis, and the crystal structures were determined by X-ray diffraction. The crystal of complex I belongs to monoclinic system, space group P21/n with a = 11.1942(8), b = 10.4754(7), c = 23.6700(17) ?, β =101.529(2)°, Z = 2, V = 2719.6(3) ?3, Dc = 1.371 Mg·m-3, μ(MoKα) = 0.966 mm-1, F(000) = 1152, R = 0.0458 and wR = 0.1312. The crystal of complex II is of triclinic system, space group Pwith a = 9.9960(4), b =11.2466(4), c = 14.0509(5) ?, α = 69.4190(10)°, β = 70.0600(10)°, γ = 81.8090(10)°, Z = 1, V = 1389.69(9) ?3,Dc = 1.380 Mg·m-3, μ(MoKα) = 0.950 mm-1, F(000) = 592, R = 0.0284 and wR = 0.0690. In vitro antitumor activities of both complexes were evaluated by CCK8 method against three human cancer cell lines (MCF7,NCI-H460 and HepG2), and complex II exhibited better antitumor activity than I. The interaction between complexes and calf thymus DNA was studied by UV-vis, fluorescence spectroscopy and viscosity measurements.

    Keywords: dibutyltin, complex, synthesis, crystal structure, DNA;

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Since the discovery of the first efficacious anticancer metallodrugs cisplatin in 1965 by Rosenberg[1], metal complexes with anti-cancer activity began to attract people.During the last few years, it is noticeable that organotin compounds occupied an important place in cancer chemotherapy reports[2-5]because of their cytotoxic effects,ability to bind with DNA, anti-proliferating nature, and apoptotic-inducing nature. Although there are many reports on the biological activity and structures of different organotin compounds[6-8], it is difficult for scientists to accurately predict the biological activity of drugs based on the chemical structures of drugs in advance, so a large number of potentially biologically activity molecules are synthesized and exploring the structure-activity relationship is academically helpful to lay the foundation for the development of new organometallic anti-cancer drugs.

    The structure of the compound determines its properties, so the ligand plays an important role in geometry and affects the biological activities[9-11]. Therefore, we designed to use acylhydrazone as a ligand, which has peptide bonds and multiple sites, and plays a strong role in regulating the coordination of metals. In this paper, we have synthesized two dibutyltin complexes based on benzoin aroylhydrazone,and their structures were characterized. The inhibitory activities of the complex on cancer cells in vitro were tested,and the interactions with DNA were studied, which provides an important theoretical basis for the development of new metal antitumor drugs.

    2 EXPERIMENTAL

    2. 1 Instruments and reagents

    Infrared spectrum (KBr) was recorded by the Prestige-21 infrared spectrometer (Japan Shimadzu, 4000~400 cm-1).1H,13C and119Sn NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker AVANCE-500 NMR spectrometer. The elemental analysis was determined by PE-2400(II) elemental analyzer.Crystallographic data of the complexes were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer. HRMS was measured with the Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL (ESI source). Melting points were determined using an X4 digital microscopic melting point apparatus without correction(Beijing Tektronix Instrument Co. Ltd.). Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were recorded on a NETZSCH TG 209 F3 instrument at a heating rate of 20 ℃·min-1from 40 to 800 ℃under air. The UV spectra were determined with the UV-2550 spectrophotometer (Shimazu). Fluorescence spectra were obtained with a Hitachi F-7000 spectrophotometer with quartz cuvette (path length = 1 cm).

    Benzoin benzoyl hydrazone and benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand were prepared according to the literatures[12]. Ethidium bromide (EB), calf thymus DNA and tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl aminomethane (tris) were from Sigma-Aldrich LLC. Cisplatin was from QiLu pharmaceutical CO., Ltd.Dibutyltin oxide was from Alfa Aesar (China) Chemical Co.,Ltd. Other chemicals were from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All reagents of analytical grade were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification. The human breast cancer cells (MCF-7, ATCC No: HTB-22), human lung cancer cells (NCI-H460, ATCC No: HTB-177) and human liver cancer cells (HepG2, ATCC No: HB-8065) were obtained from American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC). Culture media RPMI-1640 (10.0%) were purchased from USA GIBICO. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm)obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore Co., USA) was used in all experiments. Tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution was prepared by a certain amount of tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl aminomethane dissolved in ultrapure water before using, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.40 with hydrochloric acid solution (0.1 mol·L-1).The purity of CT-DNA was determined by comparing the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280= 1.8~1.9/1). The concentration of CT-DNA was calculated by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (ε260= 6600 L·mol-1·cm-1). The reserve solution was stored at 4 ℃. The ethidium bromide solution was prepared by a certain amount of ethidium bromide solid dissolved in tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution.

    2. 2 Syntheses of the complexes

    A mixture of dibutyltin oxide (1.0 mmol), benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand (1.0 mmol) and CH3OH (20.0 mL) was added in a round-bottomed flask (50.0 mL), and refluxed with stirring for 6.0 h. Then the mixture was cooled and filtered. The complex crystals were obtained by controlling solvent evaporation. Complex I was yellow crystal. Yield:86%. m.p.: 131~133 ℃. Anal. Calcd. (C58H68N4O4Sn2): C,62.05; H, 6.11; N, 4.99%. Found: C, 62.11; H, 6.07; N,4.91%. FT-IR (KBr, cm-1): 3086, 3053, 3028ν(=C-H), 2954,2922ν(-C-H), 1606ν(C=N), 686ν(Sn-O), 588ν(Sn-O-Sn),530ν(Sn-N), 430ν(Sn-C).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): 8.13~8.15 (d,J= 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.91~7.93 (m, 2H),7.46~7.49 (m, 1H), 7.38~7.43 (m, 5H), 7.14~7.23 (m, 5H),6.25 (s, 1H), 1.62~1.71 (m, 4H), 1.47~1.51 (m, 4H),1.34~1.40 (m, 4H), 0.85~0.90 (m, 6H).13C NMR (126 MHz,CDCl3,δ/ppm): 171.76, 165.94, 143.59, 133.84, 131.67,131.27, 130.71, 129.73, 128.60, 128.17, 128.10, 128.06,127.47, 77.78, 27.14, 27.06, 26.65, 26.56, 21.30, 20.63, 13.30,13.56.119Sn NMR (187 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): -108.71.HRMS (ESI)m/zcalcd. for C58H68N4O4Sn2Na+[M+Na]+1145.31708, found 1145.31689.

    Complex II was prepared in a similar procedure (Fig. 1) as I by benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand (1.0 mmol) in place of benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand. The product was colorless crystal with the yield of 82%. m.p.: 164~166 ℃.Anal. Calcd. (C58H68N4O6Sn2): C, 60.33; H, 5.94; N, 4.85%.Found: C, 60.34; H, 5.98; N, 4.92%. FT-IR (KBr, cm-1):3458ν(-O-H), 3059, 3030ν(=C-H), 2954, 2922ν(C-H),1629ν(C=N), 671ν(Sn-O), 594ν(Sn-O-Sn), 501ν(Sn-N),459ν(Sn-C).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm): 12.01(s,1H), 7.99 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.48-7.49 (m, 2H), 7.40-7.42(m, 3H), 7.34 (t,J= 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22~7.25 (m, 2H),7.17~7.19 (m, 3H), 6.89 (t,J= 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.12 (s, 1H),1.65~1.73 (m, 4H), 1.49~1.60 (m, 4H), 1.36~1.42 (m, 4H),0.91 (t,J= 7.3 Hz, 4H).13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm):172.59, 167.62, 160.00, 142.29, 133.47, 131.93, 130.92,129.57, 128.67, 128.62, 127.94, 127.82, 127.38, 118.73,117.08, 115.98, 78.29, 27.05, 27.01, 26.65, 26.52, 22.19,21.52, 13.61, 13.57.119Sn NMR (187 MHz, CDCl3,δ/ppm):-125.56. HRMS (ESI)m/zcalcd. for C58H68N4O6Sn2Na+[M+Na]+1177.30691, found 1177.30676.

    Fig. 1. Syntheses of the complexes

    2. 3 Crystal structure determination

    Suitable single crystals with dimensions of 0.41mm ×0.31mm × 0.16mm (I) and 0.48mm × 0.33mm × 0.23mm (II)were selected for data collection at 273(2) K on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated MoKαradiation (λ= 0.71073 ?)using aφ-ωmode. All the data were corrected byLpfactors and empirical absorbance. The structure was solved by direct methods. All non-hydrogen atoms were determined in successive difference Fourier synthesis, and hydrogen atoms were added according to theoretical models. All hydrogen and non-hydrogen atoms were refined by their isotropic and anisotropic thermal parameters through full-matrix leastsquares techniques. All calculations were completed by the SHELXTL-97[13]program. For complex I, a total of 37434 reflections were obtained in the range of 3.00<θ<26.00° with 5293 unique ones (Rint= 0.0314),S= 1.037, (Δρ)max= 1.012 and (Δρ)min= -0.897 e/?3, max transmission was 0.8569,min transmission was 0.6916, and the completeness was 99.4%. For complex II, a total of 28937 reflections were obtained in the range of 3.10<θ<27.52° with 6372 unique ones (Rint= 0.0241),S= 1.059, (Δρ)max= 0.563, (Δρ)min=-0.4518 e/?3, max transmission was 0.8111, min transmission was 0.6595, and the completeness was 99.6%.The selected bond lengths and bond angles for I and II are listed in Table 1.

    2. 4 In vitro anti-tumor activity assays

    The synthesized complexes were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 50 mM as stock solution. To avoid DMSO toxicity, the concentration of DMSO was less than 0.1% (v/v)in all experiments. MCF7, NCI-H460 and HepG2 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and grown at 37 ℃ in a saturated humidified atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2. Cell proliferation was assessed by CCK8 assay[14-16]. 100 μL of cells (5 × 104cells·mL-1) was incubated at 37 ℃, and 5%CO2was seeded into 96 well plates. Then the medium was replaced with the respective medium containing complexes at different concentrations and incubated for 72 h. 10 μL CCK8 solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 ℃ for additional 4 h. The optical density was detected with a microplate reader at 450 nm. Six concentrations (5 nM~50 μM) were set for the compounds and at least 3 parallels of every concentration were used. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The data were calculated using Graph Pad Prism version 7.0. The IC50was fitted using a non-linear regression model with a sigmoidal dose response.

    2. 5 Interaction with DNA

    In the fluorescence study, a mixture of CT-DNA (30 μM),EB (3 μM) and different concentration complexes I or II solution (0~80 μM) was placed in a 5 mL volumetric flask in tris-HCl (0.01 mol·L-1) buffer solution[15,16]. After 3 h, the fluorescence spectra were acquired at 25 ℃. The excitation wavelength was 258 nm, and the emission wavelength is shown in the spectrum. The slit scanning width of emission and excitation is 5.0 nm. Finally, the quenching constant (Ksv)values of I or II were determined by using the Stern-Volmer equation[17].

    In the UV-visible absorption spectrometry study, the investigation of the possible binding modes of complex to DNA and the calculation of the corresponding DNAbinding constants (Kb) were carried out by UV-vis spectroscopy. UV-visible absorption spectrometry experiments were carried out with a constant concentration of complexes I or II (50 μM) while the concentration of CT-DNA (0~50 μM) in tris-buffer was varied. The intrinsic binding constants (Kb) were calculated according the following Wolfe-Shimmer equation[18]:

    wherecDNAis the concentration of CT-DNA,εAthe observed extinction coefficient at arbitrary DNA concentration,εFthe extinction coefficient of the free complex, andεBthe extinction coefficient of the complex when fully combining to CT-DNA. The DNA-binding constantsKbgiven by the ratio of the slope to the intercept were determined by the Wolfe-Shimmer equation and the plotscDNA/(εA-εF) versuscDNA.

    The viscosity measurements were carried out in the Ubbelohde viscometer in a water bath with 25.00 ±0.02 °C. Viscosity experiments were performed by fixed DNA concentration (50 μM) and increasing the concentration of complex I or II (0~50 μM). The flow time of sample was measured with a digital stopwatch.The values of viscosity were calculated from the flow times of DNA containing solutions corrected for the flow time of buffer alone (t0),η= (t-t0)[19]. Data were presented as (η/η0)1/3versus (ccomplex/cDNA), whereηis the viscosity of DNA in the presence of the complex,η0the viscosity of DNA alone,ccomplexthe concentration of the complex andcDNAthe concentration of DNA.

    3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    3. 1 Spectral analyses

    In FT-IR spectra of I, the characteristic peaks ofν(Sn-O),ν(Sn-O-Sn),ν(Sn-N) andν(Sn-C) occur at 686, 588, 530 and 430 cm-1, and the same characteristic peaks of II are located at 671, 594, 501 and 459 cm-1[20], respectively, which indicate similar structures for both complexes. The above results are confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.

    In the1H NMR spectrum, the integral area ratio of each peak is consistent with the number of protons in each group of the expected structure[21]. The hydrogen proton absorption peaks of the aryl ring of complexes I and II are observed at 7.14~8.15 and 6.89~7.99 ppm in the low field, respectively.The -CH(Ph)O- protons in I and II appear at 6.25 and 6.12 ppm, respectively. The -OH protons in benzoin salicyl hydrazone ligand of II appear at 12.01 ppm. Methyl and methylene on the butyl group peak are observed at the high field position.

    The13C NMR spectra show carbon atoms from carboxyls of I and II have the same peak positions, and those of other groups are consistent with the number of structural carbon atoms theoretically speculated. It can be inferred from the positions of hydrogen proton and carbon peaks of both complexes that I and II have similar structures, which is consistent with the results of X-ray single-crystal diffraction.

    The119Sn NMR spectrum indicates Sn-core peaks of I and II are a single peak with -108.71 and -125.56 ppm,respecttively, showing the existence of a single organotin complex in both complexes.

    In HRMS spectra, mass spectral peaks of complex I appear atm/z1145.31689, which can be attributed to the absorption peaks of [M+Na]+. Complex II is found atm/z1177.30676 due to the absorption peaks of [M+Na]+.

    3. 2 Structure description

    The molecular structures of I and II are shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that complexes I and II have similar molecular structures. They are centrosymmetric dimer distannoxane, with a Sn2O2four-membered ring in the middle of the molecule. The center of the ring is the symcenter of the molecule. In the four-membered Sn2O2ring, the sum of the interior angles is 360°, indicating this ring is planar. Each oxygen atom O(2) bridges the two tin atoms in an antisymmetric unit, with the Sn(1)-O(2) bond belonging to the normal Sn-O covalent bond: the Sn(1)-O(2)ibond distances (2.581 ? I, 2.849 ? II) are greater than the covalent radii of Sn and O (2.13 ?), while much less than the sum of the van der Waals radii of 3.69 ?.

    Fig. 2. Molecular structures of I and II. Symmetry codes for (I): i 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; (II): i -x+1, -y+1, -z

    Table 1. Selected Bond Lengths (?) and Bond Angles (°) for I and II

    Take complex I as an example, the asymmetric unit comprises one benzoin benzoyl hydrazone ligand and a dibutyltin. The central tin atom is six-coordinated by two oxygen (O(1) and O(2)) and one nitrogen (N(2)) atoms from the ligand, two carbon atoms (C(22) and C(26)) from the butyl group, and one oxygen atom (O(2)i) from the other ligand. The axial positions are occupied by two methylene carbon atoms (C(22) and C(26)) from the butyl group, and the C(22)-Sn(1)-C(26) angle is 139.5(4)°, which obviously deviates from 180°. The equatorial positions are occupied by O(1), O(2), N(2) and O(2)i, and the bond lengths and angles between the five atoms and the tin atom are different, so in I the central tin atom is six-coordinated in a distorted octahedral geometry, and similar coordination mode is for II.

    3. 3 Thermal stability

    Thermal stabilities of both complexes were carried out using a NETZSCH TG 209 F3 thermogravimetric analyzer from 40 to 800 ℃ at a rate of 20 ℃·min-1under an air atmosphere at a flowing rate of 20.0 mL·min-1. As shown in Fig. 3, complexes I and II have no weight loss at 40 to 180 ℃. This shows that there is not solvent molecule involved in coordination in complex, which is consistent with X-ray single-crystal diffraction data. In the next stages, both complexes suffer complete decomposition until 800 ℃,corresponding to the removal of ligand and the dibutyl group attached to the tin atom. The remaining weight (27.40% (I)and 26.26% (II)) indicates the final products are SnO2(26.85% (I) and 26.11% (II)). In summary, I and II are rather stable up to about 200 and 180 ℃, respectively.

    Fig. 3. TG-DTG curves for I and II

    3. 4 Anticancer activity

    The in vitro antitumor activities of complexes I and II were evaluated by CCK8 assay against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines, using cisplatin as the positive control,with the results shown in Table 2. The anticancer activity of the ligand is relatively poor and there is no selectivity against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines, but complexes I and II have obvious inhibitory effects on these three cancer cells, and they are better than cisplatin. Among three cancer cells, complexes I and II are also the most sensitive to HepG2, withIC50of 1.43 ± 0.72 μM and 0.73 ± 0.21 μM,respectively. In a word, complex II has slightly stronger inhibitory effect than I. From the test results, we can see significant statistical difference between complexes (or ligands) and cisplatin (P< 0.05). The molecular structure difference between I and II is only the substituents attached to the benzene ring on ligand by crystal structure analysis.Thereby, it can be preliminarily inferred that the substituents on the ligand have only a slight effect on the anti-cancer activity, which may be related to the synergistic effect of the ligand and organotin.

    Table 2. Inhibition Action of the Complexes to Cancer Cell in vitro

    3. 5 Interaction with DNA

    Fig. 4 shows the effects of I and II on the fluorescent spectra of EB-DNA system with different concentrations.With increasing the concentration of complex, the fluorescence of EB-DNA complex system is quenched. This shows that complexes I and II interact with the EB-DNA system. The reasons may be as follows: (1) The complex will compete with EB for binding to the site on CT-DNA. The more complexes are added, the more EB originally bound to CT-DNA will be replaced by the complexes, which will reduce the fluorescence intensity of the EB-DNA system. (2)The complex and CT-DNA will compete to bind to EB,resulting in a decrease in the concentration of EB originally bound to CT-DNA, and it caused fluorescence quenching of EB-DNA. (3) The complex forms a new non-fluorescence compound with the EB-DNA system, that is, the DNA-EB-complex system, which leads to a decrease in the fluorescence intensity. In addition, the fluorescence spectrum of EB did not change significantly with the addition of complex I or II, indicating no interaction between the complexes and EB. And combined with the UV-visible absorption spectra, the binding between complexes I or II and CT-DNA is an embed mode. This basically eliminates reasons (2) and (3). In a word, the complex has a competitive effect with the DNA-EB system. To study quantificationally the binding capacity of complexes I or II and DNA[22,23], we employed the classical Stern-Volmer equationI0/I= 1 +KSVccomplexto obtain the quenching constantsKSVof complexes replacing EB and DNA with 1.0 × 105L·mol-1(I)and 2.5 × 105L·mol-1(II). The result showed that the binding strength of complex II is higher than that of I.

    Fig. 5 shows the effects on UV-visible absorption spectra of I and II in the absence and presence of CT-DNA. The electronic absorption spectral data showed that when increasing the concentration of CT-DNA (0~80 μmol·L-1)added to complex I or II, both of the abovementioned absorption bands showed hypochromism and redshift (about 5 nm). The rate of hypochromism is 25% for I and 32% for II.According to the literatures[24,25], the DNA and the complex molecules are intercalation as probable mode of interaction,and the ultraviolet spectrum will have a significant hypochromism and accompany the red shift. The reason for the hypochromism is that the interaction between the complex and DNA causes the change of molecule conformation. And the change of the spectrum is related to the binding force. The stronger effect, the more obvious hypochromism. This phenomenon explains why the complex molecule inserts into the DNA. This preliminary result indicated that I or II intercalates into the DNA. TheKbvalues of complexes were calculated as 3.25 × 103L·mol-1(r2= 0.98)(I) and 4.98 × 103L·mol-1(r2= 0.99) (II) from the absorption spectra, and the high binding constant values reveal that the complex strongly interacts with DNA. It shows that complex I is stronger than II. The value is similar to those of complexes reported in the literature[26,27].

    Fig. 4. Effects of II on the fluorescent spectra of EB-DNA system cCT-DNA = 30 μmol·L-1; cEB = 3 μmol·L-1; from a to i,ccomplex = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 μmol·L-1, respectively; inset: plot of I0/I vs. ccomplex; λex = 258 nm

    Fig. 5. UV-visible absorption spectra of II in tris-HCl buffer upon addition of CT-DNA (ccomplex = 50 μmol·L-1);from a to i, cDNA = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 μmol·L-1, respectively. The arrow shows the absorbance changes with increasing the DNA concentration. Inset: plot of cDNA/(εA - εF) vs. cDNA

    The literatures[28,29]reported that a significant increase in the viscosity of DNA on the addition of a complex indicates the classical intercalative mode of binding to DNA. In contrast, if the interaction of the complex with DNA is caused by partial or non-classical insertion, the viscosity change of the DNA solution is not obvious or unchanged. As can be seen from Fig. 6, the relative viscosity of CT-DNA steadily increases with the concentration of the complex, and its trend is consistent with EB with the viscosity increase order to be EB > II >I. It shows that both the complex and EB interact with DNA in a similar mode. This observation can be explained by the fact that the complexes and DNA adopt a classical intercalation model, which requires that the DNA helix must be extended, resulting in an increase of DNA viscosity. The result further suggests an intercalating binding mode of the complexes with DNA and also parallels the above spectroscopic results.

    4 CONCLUSION

    Two dibutyltin (IV) complexes were synthesized.Complexes I and II are also a centrosymmetric dimer. II is stronger against MCF-7, HepG2 and NCI-H460 cell lines in vitro antitumour activity. The DNA-binding studies using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy showed that the intrinsic binding constant,Kb, was 3.25× 103L·mol-1(I) and 4.98 ×103L·mol-1(II). The fluorescent spectra showed that the Stern-Volmer quenching constant,KSV, was calculated as 1.0× 105L·mol-1(I) and 2.5 × 105L·mol-1(II). Therefore, both the complex and EB interact with DNA in a similar mode,thus proving that complexes and DNA adopt a classical intercalative binding, and the binding strength of complex II is higher than that of I.

    Fig. 6. Effect of increasing amounts of the complexes and EB on the relative viscosity at 25.00 ± 0.02 °C

    日韩欧美在线二视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 99热只有精品国产| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 精品久久久久久,| 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 变态另类丝袜制服| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 深夜精品福利| 青草久久国产| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 精品福利观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 91麻豆av在线| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 午夜精品在线福利| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 99热6这里只有精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精华一区二区三区| a在线观看视频网站| 久久精品91蜜桃| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 午夜免费鲁丝| 黄片播放在线免费| 人人澡人人妻人| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 麻豆av在线久日| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲av美国av| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产视频内射| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 9191精品国产免费久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品野战在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久国内视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 精品久久久久久,| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久国产精品影院| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 老司机靠b影院| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产av在哪里看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久久久久大精品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 色在线成人网| 久久久久九九精品影院| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 免费看十八禁软件| 精品高清国产在线一区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| av有码第一页| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 一级毛片高清免费大全| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 成人国产综合亚洲| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 午夜福利高清视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久伊人香网站| av中文乱码字幕在线| www.www免费av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 一区二区三区激情视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 91大片在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 不卡一级毛片| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 香蕉丝袜av| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精品人妻1区二区| 青草久久国产| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲国产欧美网| 99热只有精品国产| 日本在线视频免费播放| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 999久久久国产精品视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 91国产中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| av电影中文网址| videosex国产| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品九九99| xxx96com| 天堂动漫精品| 看免费av毛片| 天堂动漫精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品二区激情视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 国产片内射在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 91麻豆av在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 香蕉久久夜色| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 成人三级黄色视频| 中国美女看黄片| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 女警被强在线播放| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 熟女电影av网| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 91大片在线观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久亚洲真实| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 观看免费一级毛片| av欧美777| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 91老司机精品| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| tocl精华| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| xxxwww97欧美| av在线播放免费不卡| 高清在线国产一区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人欧美| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久伊人香网站| 国产精品,欧美在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲中文av在线| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 久久精品国产综合久久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 香蕉丝袜av| 搞女人的毛片| 91av网站免费观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 自线自在国产av| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品久久视频播放| av免费在线观看网站| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 操出白浆在线播放| 黄色 视频免费看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产精华一区二区三区| av免费在线观看网站| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产又爽黄色视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 美国免费a级毛片| 麻豆av在线久日| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品免费视频内射| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久久久久大精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 草草在线视频免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日韩欧美三级三区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 99国产精品99久久久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲精品在线美女| 热99re8久久精品国产| www日本黄色视频网| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产三级在线视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 97碰自拍视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久精品成人免费网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 69av精品久久久久久| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 妹子高潮喷水视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| bbb黄色大片| 日韩欧美三级三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜精品在线福利| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品免费视频内射| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| videosex国产| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟|