• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of rebinding rate and asymmetry in unbinding rate on cargo transport by multiple kinesin motors

    2021-05-19 09:02:48YaoWangYuYingLiuJianLiangPengYeWangandPingXie
    Communications in Theoretical Physics 2021年1期

    Yao Wang,Yu-Ying Liu,Jian Liang,Peng-Ye Wang and Ping Xie

    1 College of Engineering and College of Science,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China

    2 Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Physics,Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China

    Abstract Many intracellular transports are performed by multiple molecular motors in a cooperative manner.Here,we use stochastic simulations to study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,focusing mainly on effects of the form of unbinding rate versus force and the rebinding rate of single motors on the cooperative transport.We consider two forms of the unbinding rate.One is the symmetric form with respect to the force direction,which is obtained according to Kramers theory.The other is the asymmetric form,which is obtained from the prior studies for the single kinesin motor.With the asymmetric form the simulated results of both velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by two identical motors and those by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor are in quantitative agreement with the available experimental data,whereas with the symmetric form the simulated results are inconsistent with the experimental data.For the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a much slower motor,the asymmetric form can give both larger velocity and longer run length than the symmetric form,giving an explanation for why kinesin adopts the asymmetric form of the unbinding rate rather than the symmetric form.For the cooperative transport by two identical motors,while the velocity is nearly independent of the rebinding rate,the run length increases linearly with the rebinding rate.For the cooperative transport by two different motors,the increase of the rebinding rate of one motor also enhances the run length of the cooperative transport.The dynamics of transport by N(N=3,4,5,6,7 and 8)motors is also studied.

    Keywords:molecular motors,collective transport,kinesin

    1.Introduction

    In the cell the long-distance transports of cargoes,in forms of vesicles,organelles mitochondria,mRNA particles,liposomes,etc,are carried out by molecular motors such as kinesin and dynein[1–5].Kinesin motors such as kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 move processively toward the plus end of microtubule(MT),transporting cargo from cell center to periphery,while cytoplasmic dynein motors move processively toward the minus end of MT,transporting cargo from cell periphery to center.In this work,we focus on the transport by kinesin motors.

    The dynamics of the single kinesin motors has been studied intensively and extensively.For instance,using single-molecule experimental techniques,the stepping behaviors of the motors were revealed and the dependencies of the quantities such as velocity and processivity(characterized by run length)upon the force acting on the motors were determined[6–9].Using theoretical analyses and numerical simulations,the experimental data on force dependencies of these quantities were quantitatively explained[10–16].As cargoes are usually transported by several motors as a team,the cooperative transports by multiple motors were also widely studied[17–23].For example,by designing the cargo bound with two motors,it was revealed that the velocity of the cooperative transport by two identical kinein-1 motors is close to that of the single motors,while the run length of the cooperative transport is about 1.7-fold larger than that of the single motors[21,23].The run length of the cooperative transport by two identical kinein-2 motors(with a rebinding rate being about 4-fold larger than kinesin-1)is about 3.7-fold larger than that of the single motors[18].The run length of the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor is larger than that by two identical kinesin-1 motors[18].By mixing kinesin-1 and a mutant one purposefully slowed 15-fold,the velocity of the cooperative transport was dominated by the faster wild-type(WT)kinesin-1[19].By elaborately designing the cargo bound with multiple motors,the velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by N(N=1,2,4,7)motors were also studied[20].Meanwhile,the cooperative transports by two or multiple motors were also widely studied both theoretically and numerically[24–37].For example,by assuming that the motors share load equally,the cooperative transport by multiple motors was studied theoretically[37].Using the single motors’ unbinding rate that is obtained from the experimental data the numerical studies of the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin-1 motors reproduced quantitatively the available experimental data of both the velocity and run length[35,36].

    Despite the extensive studies,many issues on the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors are still unclear.For example,the explanation of the experimental data is still lacking showing that the velocity of the cooperative transport by the faster kinesin motor and the much slower one was dominated by the faster one[19].What are the magnitudes of the run length and stall force of the cooperative transport by the faster motor and the much slower one compared to those of the faster one?Although the experimental data showed that the cooperative transport by a kinein-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor has a longer run length than the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors[18],the theoretical or numerical explanation of the experimental data is still lacking.What is the magnitude of the velocity of the cooperative transport by a kinein-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor compared to that of the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors? Moreover,how does the variation of rebinding rate of the two single motors affect the cooperative transport by the two motors?Although the cooperative transport by multiple motors was studied theoretically and computationally[33,36],it is necessary to make the theoretical or numerical studies using the relation of the unbinding rate versus force in both forward and backward directions which is obtained from the available experimental data showing the dramatic asymmetry in the two directions[9,38].The purpose of this work is to use stochastic simulations to study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,addressing the unclear issues,explaining the available experimental data and providing predicted results.

    Table 1.Parameter values for WT kinesin-1 motor.

    2.Methods

    2.1.Single kinesin modeling

    To study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,it is required to know the force dependences of the rate of forward stepping,rate of backward stepping,velocity and unbinding rate of the single kinesin motors.Here,we use the model proposed before[39–41]to present the expressions for the force dependences of the forward stepping rate(kF),backward stepping rate(kB)and velocity(v1)of a kinesin motor,which can be written as

    where F is the force on the coiled-coil stalk of the motor and d=8 nm is the step size.The force F is defined to have a negative value when it is along the forward direction(the plus end of MT).In equations(1)–(3)there are four adjustable parameters r0,FS,k(+)and k(?),which can be determined by fitting to the available single-molecule data.Each of the four parameters has a clear physical meaning,with r0denoting the unloaded forward-to-backward stepping ratio(noting that from equations(1)and(2)the stepping ratio has the formFSthe stall force at which r=1 andthe ATPase rate of the trailing head andthe ATPase rate of the leading head.By adjusting r0=802,FS=8 pN,k(+)=97.5?s1and k(?)=3?s1(table 1)and with equation(3)the single-molecule data of Andreasson et al[9]on force dependence of velocity v1for WT kinesin-1 can be reproduced well(figure S1(a)is available online at stacks.iop.org/CTP/73/015603/mmedia in supplemental materials).For the mutant kinesin-1,we take its velocityforward stepping rateand backward stepping ratewhereαis a constant,which is usually larger than 1,andandare the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate of the WT kinesin-1,respectively,which are calculated using equations(1)–(3)and with parameter values given in table 1.The above choice of the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate for the mutant motor,which are reduced by the same factor relative to those for the WT case,can be understood as follows.It is considered that the mutations reduce the ATPase rates of the two kinesin heads and thus the identical mutations in the two heads have the same effect on the reduction of the two ATPase rates k(+)and k(?).As seen from equations(1)–(3),the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate are therefore reduced by the same factor.On the other hand,we have checked that provided that the velocity is reduced by the same factor,reducing the forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate by different factors has nearly no effect on our results.Similarly,we consider here that a different velocity of WT kinesin-2 relative to WT kinesin-1 arises mainly from the different ATPase rate.Thus,for WT kinesin-2,for simplicity of treatment,we also take its velocityforward stepping rateand backward stepping ratewhereand

    Here,we consider two forms for the force dependence of the unbinding rate of the single kinesin motor.One form is determined by considering the process of a Brownian particle escaping from a potential well,as usually done in the literature.According to Kramers theory,the dependence of the unbinding rate upon force can be written as

    whereε0is the unbinding rate under no external force on the motor and Fdis the unbinding force.Since the unbinding rate described by equation(4)is symmetric with respect to the force direction,it is simply called symmetric unbinding rate.

    The other form is determined from the prior experimental,theoretical and computational studies.The single-molecule data on force dependence of run length for kinesin-1 showed that the run length is dramatically asymmetric with respect to the force direction[9,38],which was well explained computationally[42]and theoretically[43].These studies indicate that the unbinding rate is asymmetric with respect to the force direction,and thus it is simply called asymmetric unbinding rate.For convenience,we present the expressions for the force dependence of unbinding rate under forward(F<0)and backward(F>0)forces,separately.First,we focus on F<0.The single-molecule[9]and computational[42]data on the run length can be fitted well to a two-exponential function[35]

    where B=870.87 nm,Fd1=0.70 pN,C=71.50 nm and Fd2=20.69 pN(table 1)(figure S1(b)in supplemental materials).The unbinding rate under F<0 can then be calculated by

    where v1and L1are calculated by equations(3)and(5).Second,we focus on F>0.As shown in equation(4),we simply take the following form for the force dependence of unbinding rateL1=v1εand equation(7),the experimental[9]and computational[42]data on the force dependence of run length under F≥0 can be reproduced well(figure S1(b)in supplemental materials).It is noted that the available single-molecule data for kinesin-1 indicated that the unbinding rate could exhibit the characteristic of slip-catch-slip bond[44],which was explained quantitatively by later computational and theoretical studies[43,45].To be consistent with these studies,we also make calculations using the slip-catch-slip-bond form for the unbinding rate versus F(>0)(see section S1 in supplemental materials).We have checked that under no external force on the cargo,both the simple form of equation(7)and the slipcatch-slip-bond form of equations(S1)and(S2)(see section S1 in supplemental materials)for the unbinding rate of the single motors give nearly the same results on the dynamics of cooperative transports by multiple motors presented in this work.This is because under no external force on the cargo,the probability for the occurrence of the internal forces among the motors which are larger than that where the catch bond occurs is negligibly small.Under large backward external loads,the two forms give different results(see section S1 in supplemental materials).For the case of the external load on the cargo,the results calculated with the simple from of equation(7)are shown in the main text and the corresponding results calculated with the slip-catch-slip-bond form are shown in supplemental materials.

    In this work,for simplicity,for all kinesin motors(including WT kinesin-1,mutant kinesin-1 and kinesin-2)we take the same value of unbinding rate under any force,implying that the run lengths of the mutant kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 are reduced byα-fold relative to that of the WT kinesin-1.

    By takingε0=0.82?s1and Fd=4 pN(table 1),and with

    2.2.Simulation methods for multiple coupled kinesin motors

    Multiple kinesin motors are connected to a common cargo through a linker as a linear spring with an elastic coupling strength K.We take K=0.3 pN nm?1(table 1),as determined experimentally[46].No interaction is present among motors.The distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state(with zero internally elastic force)is taken to be l0=48 nm,close to that designed in the experiments[21,22].We use Monte-Carlo algorithm to simulate the forward stepping,backward stepping,unbinding and rebinding of each motor,as done in our previous work[35](see also section S2 in supplemental materials).All motors are bound initially to MT.Each motor can step forward and backward stochastically on MT with the step size d=8 nm,the forward stepping rate kFcalculated by equation(1)and the backward stepping rate kBcalculated by equation(2).Each motor can unbind stochastically from MT with the unbinding rate calculated by equations(4)–(7)(or equations(4)–(6),(S1)and(S2))and can rebind stochastically to MT with a rebinding rateμindependent of force.The motor is considered to rebind to the MT-binding site that is nearest to the connecting point of its linker on the cargo along the movement direction.For the case of no external force acting on the cargo,after each stepping,unbinding or rebinding of one motor,the cargo is adjusted to a position with zero net force on the cargo.For the case of an external force Fextacting on the cargo,Fextis shared equally by the motors bound to MT,while the unbound motors experience no force(including both internal and external forces).After each stepping,unbinding or rebinding of one motor,the cargo is adjusted to a position with a net force of Fexton the cargo.For example,when two motors are bound to MT and one motor(called motor A)makes i(i is an integer)net steps relative to the other one(called motor B),motor A experiences a forceFi,A=(idK+Fext)/2while motor B experiences a forceFi,B=(?idK+Fext)/2.When only one motor is bound to MT,the motor experiences a force of Fext.We takeμ=5?s1for WT and mutant kinesin-1 motors,as indicated experimentally[47]and used in the previous theoretical and computational works[37,47–49].For kinesin-2,we take its rebinding rateμ(2)=βμ(1),whereβis a constant andμ(1)=μ=5?s.1 It is mentioned that since the distance between two neighboring motors,l0=48 nm,is large,our simulations show that any lagging motor on the track can hardly pass the leading ones.Moreover,as we have checked,the arranged order of different types of motors along the track does not affect our results.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Asymmetric unbinding rate has advantages over symmetric unbinding rate in cooperative transport by two kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the dynamics of the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors.One is the WT kinesin-1 with velocity v1and the other is the one(e.g.mutant kinesin-1)with velocity(see Methods).We consider both symmetric and asymmetric unbinding rates.In figures 1(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusα,respectively,for both symmetric and asymmetric unbinding rates under no external force,where v2and L2are velocity and run length of the cargo driven by the two motors,respectively,while v1and L1are velocity and run length of the single WT motor,respectively.

    First,it is seen that the simulated results of both v2/v1and L2/L1atα=1,which corresponds to the case of two WT kinesin motors,for the asymmetric unbinding rate are in quantitative agreement the experimental data of Rogers et al[21](red circles)and those of Xu et al[23](black squares).By contrast,the simulated result of L2/L1atα=1 for the symmetric unbinding rate is deviated far away from the experimental data.These imply that the asymmetric unbinding rate is more reasonable than the symmetric unbinding rate to characterize the kinesin motors.

    Second,for the symmetric unbinding rate,both v2/v1and L2/L1decrease largely with the increase ofαand become leveling off at aboutα>10,with v2/v1decreasing from about 0.93 atα=1 to about 0.38 at largeαwhile L2/L1decreasing from about 2.72 atα=1 to about 0.73 at largeα.By contrast,for the asymmetric unbinding rate,both v2/v1and L2/L1decrease slightly with the increase ofαforα≥1 and become leveling off at aboutα>4,with v2/v1decreasing from about 0.99 atα=1 to about 0.72 at largeαwhile L2/L1decreasing from about 1.76 atα=1 to about 1.1 at largeα.Moreover,at any value ofα,v2/v1for the asymmetric unbinding rate is always larger than for the symmetric unbinding rate.Although L2/L1atα<3 for the asymmetric unbinding rate is smaller than for the symmetric unbinding rate,L2/L1for the asymmetric unbinding rate atα>3 is larger than for the symmetric unbinding rate.Specifically,for the asymmetric unbinding rate,we see that v2≈0.72v1and L2≈1.1L1atα=15,implying that the transport properties by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with the velocity slowed by 15-fold are similar to those of the faster WT kinesin-1(noting that the cargo velocity v2≈0.72v1is more than 10-fold larger than the velocity of v1/15 for the slower motor while the cargo run length L2≈1.1L1is more than 16-fold larger than the run length of L1/15 for the slower motor).This is consistent with the available experimental data showing that with mixtures of WT kinesin-1 and a mutant one purposefully slowed 15-fold,the transport velocity was dominated by the faster WT one[19].Taken together,the above results indicate that for the system of the cargo transport by a fast motor and a slow motor,the system has a better performance(with a larger velocity and a longer run length)for the asymmetric unbinding rate than for the symmetric unbinding rate.This provides an explanation for why the kinesin motor adopts the asymmetric unbinding rate rather than the symmetric unbinding rate.

    As it is known,for the single motor its velocity has approximately a Gaussian distribution[50,51],with the peak value in the distribution being equal to the mean velocity of the motor.Then,an interesting issue for the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor is what the distribution of velocities appears.To this end,we statistically study the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figure 1(c),where for comparison we also show the velocity distribution of the single WT kinesin-1 and that of the single mutant one.It is seen that the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor also has nearly a Gaussian form,but with a wider width than the distribution for the single motor.As expected,the position of the peak value for the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and aslower motor is much closer to that for the velocity distribution of the single faster motor.In addition,we also statistically study the run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figure 1(d),where for comparison we also show the run-length distribution of the single WT kinesin-1 and that of the single mutant one.It is seen that the run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor is approximately single exponential,resembling those of single motors.

    Figure 1.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One corresponds to WT kinesin-1 motor having velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 motor having velocityv1αand rebinding rateμ.Lines are simulated results.Symbols are experimental data,with red circles from Rogers et al[21]and black squares from Xu et al[23].(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus α.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(v2/v1)=∣ ?(v2v1)? v1∣Δ v1+ ∣ ?(v2v1)?v2∣Δv 2.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus α.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣ΔL1 + ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are Gaussian fits.Left,middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold,the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor,respectively.(d)Run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are single-exponential fits.Left,middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold,the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor,respectively.

    As noted above,with the asymmetric unbinding rate the velocity and run length of the cargo transported by a faster motor and a slower one under no external force are close to those of the cargo transported by the single faster one.Then,it is interesting to see what the advantage of the cargo transport using the former design over using the latter design.To this end,we simulate the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate under an external force Fextacting on the cargo.The results of v2and L2versus Fextare shown in figure 2(see also figure S2).Interestingly,we see that the stall force(under which v2=0 and L2=0)is about 14.2 pN,which is about 1.8-fold larger than that by the single motor(Fs=8 pN,see table 1).Thus,by adopting the asymmetric unbinding rate for the kinesin motors,while the cooperative transport by the faster and slower motors under no external force has the velocity and run length close to those by the single faster one,the cooperative transport can provide a stall force evidently larger than that by the single one.

    Figure 2.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under the external force.One motor corresponds to WT kinesin-1 having velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 having velocityv1α(α=15)and rebinding rateμ.The panel shows velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext.

    3.2.Effect of rebinding rate on cooperative transport by two kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the effect of varying rebinding rate on the dynamics of the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors.The WT kinesin-1 has velocity v1and rebinding rateμ,while the other kinesin(e.g.kinesin-2)has velocityand rebinding rate(see methods).Since the asymmetric unbinding rate is more reasonable than the symmetric unbinding rate,we consider only the asymmetric unbinding rate in this section.

    First,we consider the cooperative transport by two identical motors.For this case,it is evident that although v2and L2are dependent onα,ratios v2/v1and L2/L1are independent ofαunder no external force.In figures 3(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβ,respectively,under no external force.It is seen that while the variation of the rebinding rate has nearly no effect on the cooperative transport velocity v2,the run length L2increases linearly with the increase of the rebinding rate.The recent experimental data of Feng et al[18]showed that the rebinding rate of kinesin-2 is about 4-fold larger than that of kinesin-1,equivalent toβ=4 for kinesin-2.Thus,from

    figure 3(b)we see that the simulated data of run length for both kinesin-1 atβ=1 and kinesin-2 atβ=4 are in good agreement with the experimental data[18].To see the effect of varying rebinding rate on the dynamics of the cooperative transport under the external force Fext,in figures 3(c)and(d)(see also figure S3)we show the simulated results of v2and L2versus Fextfor different values ofβand fixedα=1.The results of the stall force versusβare shown in inset of figure 3(c)(see also inset of figure S3(a)).It is seen interestingly that the stall force increases with the increase of the rebinding rate,but with the increase rate decreasing with the increase of the rebinding rate.

    The experimental data of Feng et al[18]showed that the run length of single kinesin-1 is 0.77 μm while that of single kinesin-2 is 0.65 μm,implying that the velocity of the single kinesin-1 is about 1.18-fold larger than that of the single kinesin-2 in our model(see Methods).Thus,it is interesting to study the cooperative transport by a motor with velocity v1and rebinding rateμand a motor with velocityand rebinding rateμ(2)=βμ.The simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβunder no external force are shown in figures 4(a)and(b),respectively.From figure 4(a)it is seen that v2/v1decreases only slightly withβand becomes leveling off at highβ.By contrast,from figure 4(b)it is seen that L2/L1increases evidently withβand also becomes leveling off at highβ.Specifically,atβ=4 the ratio L2/L1increases to a value that is about 90% of the maximum value at highβ.This implies that the further increase ofβfromβ=4 has only a very small contribution to the enhancement of the run length of the cooperative transport.These results indicate thatβ=4 for kinesin-2 is an optimal value to ensure a large velocity and a long run length for the cooperative transport by kinesin-1 and kinesin-2.

    To make comparisons among the transport by a single kinesin-1 motor(abbreviated as K1),the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors(abbreviated as K1–K1)and the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(abbreviated as K1–K2),in figures 4(c)and(d)we show the simulated results of the velocity and run length,respectively,for the three systems under no external force,where for comparison the available experimental data[18]for the run length are also shown.From figures 4(c)and(d)it is seen that while the velocity has only a slight difference among the three systems,the run length for K1–K2 is evidently larger than that for K1–K1 that is larger than that for K1.Moreover,from figure 4(d)we see that our simulated results are in agreement with the available experimental data[18].

    To see generally how variations ofαandβaffect the cooperative transport by one motor with velocity v1and rebinding rateμand the other motor with velocityand rebinding ratein figures 5(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβ,respectively,for different values ofαunder no external force.From figure 5(a)it is seen that in general,for a large value ofαthe variation ofβhas a larger effect on v2/v1than for a small value ofα.By contrast,for a large value ofαthe variation ofβhas a smaller effect on L2/L1than for a small value ofα(figure 5(b)).

    Figure 3.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin motors with rebinding rate βμ.For kinesin-1 β=1,and for kinesi-2 β=4.Lines are simulated results.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β under no external force.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β under no external force.Symbols are experimental data from Feng et al[18],where K1–K1 represents the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors and K1–K2 represents the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣Δ L1+ ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for β=1 and α=1.Inset shows stall force versus β.(d)Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for β=4 and α=1.

    3.3.Cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the dynamics of the cargo transport by multiple identical WT kinesin-1 motors,with each motor having velocity v1and rebinding rateμ.We consider no external force on the cargo.

    In figures 6(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of vN/v1and LN/L1versus motor number N,respectively,for the asymmetric unbinding rate(black circles),where vNand LNare velocity and run length of the cargo,respectively.For comparison,the available experimental data[20]are also shown in figure 6(green triangles).It is seen that while the simulated results of vN/v1decreases only slightly with the increase of N(figure 6(a)),the simulated results of LN/L1increases exponentially with the increase of N(figure 6(b)).The simulated data of vN/v1are consistent with the experimental data(figure 6(a)).The simulated data of LN/L1for N=2 and 4 are also in agreement with the experimental data(figure 6(b)).However,the simulated value of LN/L1for N=7 is evidently larger than the experimental one.The origin of the deviation between the simulated and experimental data could be described as follows.In the experimental design,when N is small(e.g.N≤4)the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is large,whereas when N is large(e.g.N=7)the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is small[20].Thus,for the system with a large N(e.g.N=7),a trailing motor can often encounter its neighboring leading motor.When the trailing motor encounters the leading one,the trailing motor is likely to unbind from MT[52–54],which results in the reduction of the run length of the cargo.By contrast,in our simulations we take the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is large(l0=48 nm)(see methods),a trailing motor can hardly encounter its neighboring leading one,and thus no interference among the motors is present.For comparison,we also show the simulated results for the symmetric unbinding rate,with the results being also shown in figure 6(red squares).It is seen that vN/v1for the symmetric unbinding rate has a large decrease for a given N>1 than for the asymmetric unbinding rate(figure 6(a)).LN/L1for the symmetric unbinding rate increases much quicker than for the asymmetric unbinding rate(figure 6(b)),with the simulated data at a larger N being deviated far away from the experimental data.These further indicate that the symmetric unbinding rate is more unreasonable than the asymmetric unbinding rate to characterize the kinesin motors,as concluded in section 3.1.

    Figure 4.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other has velocityv1α(α=1.18)and rebinding rate βμ.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β.(c)Velocity for transport by single kinesin-1 motor(K1),velocity for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors (K1–K1)and velocity for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(K1–K2).Kinesin-1 has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and kinesin-2 has velocityv1α(α=1.18)and rebind rate βμ(β=4).(d)Run length for transport by single kinesin-1 motor(K1),run length for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors(K1–K1)and run length for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(K1–K2).For comparison,the experimental data of Feng et al[18]are also shown.

    Figure 5.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One motor has velocity v1 andrebinding rateμ,and the other has velocityv1αand rebinding rate βμ.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β for different values of α.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β for different values of α.

    Furthermore,we statistically study the velocity distribution and run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by N motors for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figures 6(c)and(d)and in figures S4 and S5(see supplemental materials).It is seen that for any N,the velocity distribution has a Gaussian form and the run-length distribution approximately has a single-exponential form,which are in agreement with the experimental data[20].Moreinterestingly,it is seen that the half width of the Gaussian velocity distribution decreases with the increase of the motor number N(right panel of figure 6(c)).

    Figure 6.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by N(N>1)identical kinesin motors under no external force.The motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ.Lines are simulated results.Symbols are experimental data from Derr et al[20].(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus N.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(v2v1)=∣ ?(v2v1)? v1∣Δ v1+ ∣ ?(v2v1)?v2∣Δv 2.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus N.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣Δ L1+ ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Simulated results of velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are Gaussian fits.Left and middle panels correspond to N=4 and 7,respectively,and right panel shows the half width of the Gaussian velocity distribution versus N.(d)Simulated results of run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are single-exponential fits.Left,middle and right panels correspond to N=4,5 and 7,respectively.

    4.Concluding remarks

    We studied the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors using both asymmetric and symmetric unbinding rate of the single motor.Using asymmetric unbinding rate the simulated results of the velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by two kinein-1 motors are consistent with the available experimental data,whereas using symmetric unbinding rate the corresponding simulated results are inconsistent with the available experimental data.The studies show that for the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a much slower motor,the asymmetric unbinding rate can give a larger velocity and a longer run length than the symmetric unbinding rate,providing an explanation for why the kinesin motor adopts the asymmetric unbinding rate rather than the symmetric unbinding rate.With the asymmetric unbinding rate,while the cooperative transport by the faster and much slower motors under no external load has the velocity and run length close to those by the single faster one,the cooperative transport can provide a stall force nearly two-fold larger than that by the single faster one.This indicates that the cooperative transport by the faster and much slower motors has advantages over the transport by a single faster motor.

    We studied the effect of the rebinding rate of the motor on the cooperative transport by two motors using asymmetric unbinding rate.The studies show that for the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin motors,while the velocity is nearly independent of the variation of the rebinding rate of the single motors,the run length increases linearly with the increase of the rebinding rate,and the stall force also increases with the increase of the rebinding rate but becomes saturated at high rebinding rate.For the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors,the increase of the rebinding rate of one motor can also enhance the run length of the cooperative transport.The simulated results explain quantitatively the available experimental data on the cooperative transport by two kinesin-2 motors and that by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor.

    The studies on cooperative transport by N(N>2)kinesin motors using asymmetric unbinding rate show that the velocity is insensitive to the motor number N whereas the run length increases exponentially with the motor number N.More interestingly,the velocity distribution for any N has a Gaussian form,with the half width of the distribution decreasing with the increase of N.The velocity for any N is consistent with the available experimental data.The run length for a small N(e.g.N≤4)is also in agreement with the available experimental data.However,for a large N(e.g.

    N=7)the simulated run length is evidently larger than the experimental one.This may be due to that in our simulations we choose the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state has a large value(48 nm)and thus the interference among motors are not needed to consider.The future studies are hoped to consider the distance between any two motors having a small value and consider the interference between two motors when one motor encounters the other one,explaining quantitatively the available experimental data for a large N(e.g.N=7).

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.11775301).

    ORCID iDs

    成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 人妻一区二区av| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 在线观看三级黄色| 国产 一区精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 男女免费视频国产| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| av有码第一页| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 少妇的逼水好多| av视频免费观看在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲综合色惰| 美女国产视频在线观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 97超视频在线观看视频| 中国三级夫妇交换| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产男女内射视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 香蕉精品网在线| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 另类精品久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成人二区视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 22中文网久久字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 熟女av电影| 亚洲性久久影院| 熟女av电影| 人妻一区二区av| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av福利片在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 另类精品久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久狼人影院| 伦精品一区二区三区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| av福利片在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日本黄大片高清| 街头女战士在线观看网站| av福利片在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品三级大全| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | av福利片在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久 成人 亚洲| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 在线观看www视频免费| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 最黄视频免费看| 大码成人一级视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 一本一本综合久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日韩成人伦理影院| 九九在线视频观看精品| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 赤兔流量卡办理| 老司机影院毛片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 18+在线观看网站| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日本色播在线视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久热久热在线精品观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 在线播放无遮挡| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 老司机影院成人| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲成人手机| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 热re99久久国产66热| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产精品免费大片| 精品少妇内射三级| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚州av有码| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 色吧在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲成人手机| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人精品一,二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日日啪夜夜爽| 麻豆成人av视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品免费大片| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 性色av一级| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 麻豆成人av视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 少妇 在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 99久久精品热视频| 午夜91福利影院| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲国产av新网站| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 搡老乐熟女国产| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 九草在线视频观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产在线免费精品| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费看av在线观看网站| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产永久视频网站| 久久影院123| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产 一区精品| 嫩草影院入口| 一个人免费看片子| 熟女电影av网| 日韩av免费高清视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 51国产日韩欧美| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚州av有码| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 99热6这里只有精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| 少妇人妻 视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久青草综合色| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 午夜免费鲁丝| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 高清毛片免费看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久久久久人妻| 九九在线视频观看精品| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| av有码第一页| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 三级国产精品片| www.av在线官网国产| 成人国产av品久久久| av黄色大香蕉| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产91av在线免费观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 天堂8中文在线网| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 午夜免费观看性视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| av在线app专区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久av网站| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产精品.久久久| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 丁香六月天网| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 午夜91福利影院| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 中国三级夫妇交换| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 在线观看国产h片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 99九九在线精品视频 | 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 高清不卡的av网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 综合色丁香网| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲成色77777| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 韩国av在线不卡| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 在线观看三级黄色| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 久久精品久久久久久久性| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产成人freesex在线| av天堂久久9| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲国产色片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久 成人 亚洲| 人妻一区二区av| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产色婷婷99| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 妹子高潮喷水视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 在线观看国产h片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 9色porny在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 极品教师在线视频| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 99九九在线精品视频 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 妹子高潮喷水视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 两个人的视频大全免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 精品久久久精品久久久| 九草在线视频观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚州av有码| 老女人水多毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久免费观看电影| 久久精品夜色国产| freevideosex欧美| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 老司机影院毛片| 国产亚洲最大av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 9色porny在线观看| 国产在线免费精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲精品第二区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产成人精品一,二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 成人影院久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站 | 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品.久久久| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久精品夜色国产| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲成人手机| av.在线天堂| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久热久热在线精品观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| tube8黄色片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产 精品1| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 七月丁香在线播放| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 男女国产视频网站| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频|