• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of rebinding rate and asymmetry in unbinding rate on cargo transport by multiple kinesin motors

    2021-05-19 09:02:48YaoWangYuYingLiuJianLiangPengYeWangandPingXie
    Communications in Theoretical Physics 2021年1期

    Yao Wang,Yu-Ying Liu,Jian Liang,Peng-Ye Wang and Ping Xie

    1 College of Engineering and College of Science,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China

    2 Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Physics,Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China

    Abstract Many intracellular transports are performed by multiple molecular motors in a cooperative manner.Here,we use stochastic simulations to study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,focusing mainly on effects of the form of unbinding rate versus force and the rebinding rate of single motors on the cooperative transport.We consider two forms of the unbinding rate.One is the symmetric form with respect to the force direction,which is obtained according to Kramers theory.The other is the asymmetric form,which is obtained from the prior studies for the single kinesin motor.With the asymmetric form the simulated results of both velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by two identical motors and those by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor are in quantitative agreement with the available experimental data,whereas with the symmetric form the simulated results are inconsistent with the experimental data.For the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a much slower motor,the asymmetric form can give both larger velocity and longer run length than the symmetric form,giving an explanation for why kinesin adopts the asymmetric form of the unbinding rate rather than the symmetric form.For the cooperative transport by two identical motors,while the velocity is nearly independent of the rebinding rate,the run length increases linearly with the rebinding rate.For the cooperative transport by two different motors,the increase of the rebinding rate of one motor also enhances the run length of the cooperative transport.The dynamics of transport by N(N=3,4,5,6,7 and 8)motors is also studied.

    Keywords:molecular motors,collective transport,kinesin

    1.Introduction

    In the cell the long-distance transports of cargoes,in forms of vesicles,organelles mitochondria,mRNA particles,liposomes,etc,are carried out by molecular motors such as kinesin and dynein[1–5].Kinesin motors such as kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 move processively toward the plus end of microtubule(MT),transporting cargo from cell center to periphery,while cytoplasmic dynein motors move processively toward the minus end of MT,transporting cargo from cell periphery to center.In this work,we focus on the transport by kinesin motors.

    The dynamics of the single kinesin motors has been studied intensively and extensively.For instance,using single-molecule experimental techniques,the stepping behaviors of the motors were revealed and the dependencies of the quantities such as velocity and processivity(characterized by run length)upon the force acting on the motors were determined[6–9].Using theoretical analyses and numerical simulations,the experimental data on force dependencies of these quantities were quantitatively explained[10–16].As cargoes are usually transported by several motors as a team,the cooperative transports by multiple motors were also widely studied[17–23].For example,by designing the cargo bound with two motors,it was revealed that the velocity of the cooperative transport by two identical kinein-1 motors is close to that of the single motors,while the run length of the cooperative transport is about 1.7-fold larger than that of the single motors[21,23].The run length of the cooperative transport by two identical kinein-2 motors(with a rebinding rate being about 4-fold larger than kinesin-1)is about 3.7-fold larger than that of the single motors[18].The run length of the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor is larger than that by two identical kinesin-1 motors[18].By mixing kinesin-1 and a mutant one purposefully slowed 15-fold,the velocity of the cooperative transport was dominated by the faster wild-type(WT)kinesin-1[19].By elaborately designing the cargo bound with multiple motors,the velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by N(N=1,2,4,7)motors were also studied[20].Meanwhile,the cooperative transports by two or multiple motors were also widely studied both theoretically and numerically[24–37].For example,by assuming that the motors share load equally,the cooperative transport by multiple motors was studied theoretically[37].Using the single motors’ unbinding rate that is obtained from the experimental data the numerical studies of the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin-1 motors reproduced quantitatively the available experimental data of both the velocity and run length[35,36].

    Despite the extensive studies,many issues on the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors are still unclear.For example,the explanation of the experimental data is still lacking showing that the velocity of the cooperative transport by the faster kinesin motor and the much slower one was dominated by the faster one[19].What are the magnitudes of the run length and stall force of the cooperative transport by the faster motor and the much slower one compared to those of the faster one?Although the experimental data showed that the cooperative transport by a kinein-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor has a longer run length than the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors[18],the theoretical or numerical explanation of the experimental data is still lacking.What is the magnitude of the velocity of the cooperative transport by a kinein-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor compared to that of the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors? Moreover,how does the variation of rebinding rate of the two single motors affect the cooperative transport by the two motors?Although the cooperative transport by multiple motors was studied theoretically and computationally[33,36],it is necessary to make the theoretical or numerical studies using the relation of the unbinding rate versus force in both forward and backward directions which is obtained from the available experimental data showing the dramatic asymmetry in the two directions[9,38].The purpose of this work is to use stochastic simulations to study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,addressing the unclear issues,explaining the available experimental data and providing predicted results.

    Table 1.Parameter values for WT kinesin-1 motor.

    2.Methods

    2.1.Single kinesin modeling

    To study the cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors,it is required to know the force dependences of the rate of forward stepping,rate of backward stepping,velocity and unbinding rate of the single kinesin motors.Here,we use the model proposed before[39–41]to present the expressions for the force dependences of the forward stepping rate(kF),backward stepping rate(kB)and velocity(v1)of a kinesin motor,which can be written as

    where F is the force on the coiled-coil stalk of the motor and d=8 nm is the step size.The force F is defined to have a negative value when it is along the forward direction(the plus end of MT).In equations(1)–(3)there are four adjustable parameters r0,FS,k(+)and k(?),which can be determined by fitting to the available single-molecule data.Each of the four parameters has a clear physical meaning,with r0denoting the unloaded forward-to-backward stepping ratio(noting that from equations(1)and(2)the stepping ratio has the formFSthe stall force at which r=1 andthe ATPase rate of the trailing head andthe ATPase rate of the leading head.By adjusting r0=802,FS=8 pN,k(+)=97.5?s1and k(?)=3?s1(table 1)and with equation(3)the single-molecule data of Andreasson et al[9]on force dependence of velocity v1for WT kinesin-1 can be reproduced well(figure S1(a)is available online at stacks.iop.org/CTP/73/015603/mmedia in supplemental materials).For the mutant kinesin-1,we take its velocityforward stepping rateand backward stepping ratewhereαis a constant,which is usually larger than 1,andandare the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate of the WT kinesin-1,respectively,which are calculated using equations(1)–(3)and with parameter values given in table 1.The above choice of the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate for the mutant motor,which are reduced by the same factor relative to those for the WT case,can be understood as follows.It is considered that the mutations reduce the ATPase rates of the two kinesin heads and thus the identical mutations in the two heads have the same effect on the reduction of the two ATPase rates k(+)and k(?).As seen from equations(1)–(3),the velocity,forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate are therefore reduced by the same factor.On the other hand,we have checked that provided that the velocity is reduced by the same factor,reducing the forward stepping rate and backward stepping rate by different factors has nearly no effect on our results.Similarly,we consider here that a different velocity of WT kinesin-2 relative to WT kinesin-1 arises mainly from the different ATPase rate.Thus,for WT kinesin-2,for simplicity of treatment,we also take its velocityforward stepping rateand backward stepping ratewhereand

    Here,we consider two forms for the force dependence of the unbinding rate of the single kinesin motor.One form is determined by considering the process of a Brownian particle escaping from a potential well,as usually done in the literature.According to Kramers theory,the dependence of the unbinding rate upon force can be written as

    whereε0is the unbinding rate under no external force on the motor and Fdis the unbinding force.Since the unbinding rate described by equation(4)is symmetric with respect to the force direction,it is simply called symmetric unbinding rate.

    The other form is determined from the prior experimental,theoretical and computational studies.The single-molecule data on force dependence of run length for kinesin-1 showed that the run length is dramatically asymmetric with respect to the force direction[9,38],which was well explained computationally[42]and theoretically[43].These studies indicate that the unbinding rate is asymmetric with respect to the force direction,and thus it is simply called asymmetric unbinding rate.For convenience,we present the expressions for the force dependence of unbinding rate under forward(F<0)and backward(F>0)forces,separately.First,we focus on F<0.The single-molecule[9]and computational[42]data on the run length can be fitted well to a two-exponential function[35]

    where B=870.87 nm,Fd1=0.70 pN,C=71.50 nm and Fd2=20.69 pN(table 1)(figure S1(b)in supplemental materials).The unbinding rate under F<0 can then be calculated by

    where v1and L1are calculated by equations(3)and(5).Second,we focus on F>0.As shown in equation(4),we simply take the following form for the force dependence of unbinding rateL1=v1εand equation(7),the experimental[9]and computational[42]data on the force dependence of run length under F≥0 can be reproduced well(figure S1(b)in supplemental materials).It is noted that the available single-molecule data for kinesin-1 indicated that the unbinding rate could exhibit the characteristic of slip-catch-slip bond[44],which was explained quantitatively by later computational and theoretical studies[43,45].To be consistent with these studies,we also make calculations using the slip-catch-slip-bond form for the unbinding rate versus F(>0)(see section S1 in supplemental materials).We have checked that under no external force on the cargo,both the simple form of equation(7)and the slipcatch-slip-bond form of equations(S1)and(S2)(see section S1 in supplemental materials)for the unbinding rate of the single motors give nearly the same results on the dynamics of cooperative transports by multiple motors presented in this work.This is because under no external force on the cargo,the probability for the occurrence of the internal forces among the motors which are larger than that where the catch bond occurs is negligibly small.Under large backward external loads,the two forms give different results(see section S1 in supplemental materials).For the case of the external load on the cargo,the results calculated with the simple from of equation(7)are shown in the main text and the corresponding results calculated with the slip-catch-slip-bond form are shown in supplemental materials.

    In this work,for simplicity,for all kinesin motors(including WT kinesin-1,mutant kinesin-1 and kinesin-2)we take the same value of unbinding rate under any force,implying that the run lengths of the mutant kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 are reduced byα-fold relative to that of the WT kinesin-1.

    By takingε0=0.82?s1and Fd=4 pN(table 1),and with

    2.2.Simulation methods for multiple coupled kinesin motors

    Multiple kinesin motors are connected to a common cargo through a linker as a linear spring with an elastic coupling strength K.We take K=0.3 pN nm?1(table 1),as determined experimentally[46].No interaction is present among motors.The distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state(with zero internally elastic force)is taken to be l0=48 nm,close to that designed in the experiments[21,22].We use Monte-Carlo algorithm to simulate the forward stepping,backward stepping,unbinding and rebinding of each motor,as done in our previous work[35](see also section S2 in supplemental materials).All motors are bound initially to MT.Each motor can step forward and backward stochastically on MT with the step size d=8 nm,the forward stepping rate kFcalculated by equation(1)and the backward stepping rate kBcalculated by equation(2).Each motor can unbind stochastically from MT with the unbinding rate calculated by equations(4)–(7)(or equations(4)–(6),(S1)and(S2))and can rebind stochastically to MT with a rebinding rateμindependent of force.The motor is considered to rebind to the MT-binding site that is nearest to the connecting point of its linker on the cargo along the movement direction.For the case of no external force acting on the cargo,after each stepping,unbinding or rebinding of one motor,the cargo is adjusted to a position with zero net force on the cargo.For the case of an external force Fextacting on the cargo,Fextis shared equally by the motors bound to MT,while the unbound motors experience no force(including both internal and external forces).After each stepping,unbinding or rebinding of one motor,the cargo is adjusted to a position with a net force of Fexton the cargo.For example,when two motors are bound to MT and one motor(called motor A)makes i(i is an integer)net steps relative to the other one(called motor B),motor A experiences a forceFi,A=(idK+Fext)/2while motor B experiences a forceFi,B=(?idK+Fext)/2.When only one motor is bound to MT,the motor experiences a force of Fext.We takeμ=5?s1for WT and mutant kinesin-1 motors,as indicated experimentally[47]and used in the previous theoretical and computational works[37,47–49].For kinesin-2,we take its rebinding rateμ(2)=βμ(1),whereβis a constant andμ(1)=μ=5?s.1 It is mentioned that since the distance between two neighboring motors,l0=48 nm,is large,our simulations show that any lagging motor on the track can hardly pass the leading ones.Moreover,as we have checked,the arranged order of different types of motors along the track does not affect our results.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Asymmetric unbinding rate has advantages over symmetric unbinding rate in cooperative transport by two kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the dynamics of the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors.One is the WT kinesin-1 with velocity v1and the other is the one(e.g.mutant kinesin-1)with velocity(see Methods).We consider both symmetric and asymmetric unbinding rates.In figures 1(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusα,respectively,for both symmetric and asymmetric unbinding rates under no external force,where v2and L2are velocity and run length of the cargo driven by the two motors,respectively,while v1and L1are velocity and run length of the single WT motor,respectively.

    First,it is seen that the simulated results of both v2/v1and L2/L1atα=1,which corresponds to the case of two WT kinesin motors,for the asymmetric unbinding rate are in quantitative agreement the experimental data of Rogers et al[21](red circles)and those of Xu et al[23](black squares).By contrast,the simulated result of L2/L1atα=1 for the symmetric unbinding rate is deviated far away from the experimental data.These imply that the asymmetric unbinding rate is more reasonable than the symmetric unbinding rate to characterize the kinesin motors.

    Second,for the symmetric unbinding rate,both v2/v1and L2/L1decrease largely with the increase ofαand become leveling off at aboutα>10,with v2/v1decreasing from about 0.93 atα=1 to about 0.38 at largeαwhile L2/L1decreasing from about 2.72 atα=1 to about 0.73 at largeα.By contrast,for the asymmetric unbinding rate,both v2/v1and L2/L1decrease slightly with the increase ofαforα≥1 and become leveling off at aboutα>4,with v2/v1decreasing from about 0.99 atα=1 to about 0.72 at largeαwhile L2/L1decreasing from about 1.76 atα=1 to about 1.1 at largeα.Moreover,at any value ofα,v2/v1for the asymmetric unbinding rate is always larger than for the symmetric unbinding rate.Although L2/L1atα<3 for the asymmetric unbinding rate is smaller than for the symmetric unbinding rate,L2/L1for the asymmetric unbinding rate atα>3 is larger than for the symmetric unbinding rate.Specifically,for the asymmetric unbinding rate,we see that v2≈0.72v1and L2≈1.1L1atα=15,implying that the transport properties by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with the velocity slowed by 15-fold are similar to those of the faster WT kinesin-1(noting that the cargo velocity v2≈0.72v1is more than 10-fold larger than the velocity of v1/15 for the slower motor while the cargo run length L2≈1.1L1is more than 16-fold larger than the run length of L1/15 for the slower motor).This is consistent with the available experimental data showing that with mixtures of WT kinesin-1 and a mutant one purposefully slowed 15-fold,the transport velocity was dominated by the faster WT one[19].Taken together,the above results indicate that for the system of the cargo transport by a fast motor and a slow motor,the system has a better performance(with a larger velocity and a longer run length)for the asymmetric unbinding rate than for the symmetric unbinding rate.This provides an explanation for why the kinesin motor adopts the asymmetric unbinding rate rather than the symmetric unbinding rate.

    As it is known,for the single motor its velocity has approximately a Gaussian distribution[50,51],with the peak value in the distribution being equal to the mean velocity of the motor.Then,an interesting issue for the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor is what the distribution of velocities appears.To this end,we statistically study the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figure 1(c),where for comparison we also show the velocity distribution of the single WT kinesin-1 and that of the single mutant one.It is seen that the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor also has nearly a Gaussian form,but with a wider width than the distribution for the single motor.As expected,the position of the peak value for the velocity distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and aslower motor is much closer to that for the velocity distribution of the single faster motor.In addition,we also statistically study the run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figure 1(d),where for comparison we also show the run-length distribution of the single WT kinesin-1 and that of the single mutant one.It is seen that the run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a slower motor is approximately single exponential,resembling those of single motors.

    Figure 1.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One corresponds to WT kinesin-1 motor having velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 motor having velocityv1αand rebinding rateμ.Lines are simulated results.Symbols are experimental data,with red circles from Rogers et al[21]and black squares from Xu et al[23].(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus α.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(v2/v1)=∣ ?(v2v1)? v1∣Δ v1+ ∣ ?(v2v1)?v2∣Δv 2.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus α.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣ΔL1 + ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are Gaussian fits.Left,middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold,the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor,respectively.(d)Run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are single-exponential fits.Left,middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold,the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor,respectively.

    As noted above,with the asymmetric unbinding rate the velocity and run length of the cargo transported by a faster motor and a slower one under no external force are close to those of the cargo transported by the single faster one.Then,it is interesting to see what the advantage of the cargo transport using the former design over using the latter design.To this end,we simulate the cooperative transport by a faster WT kinesin-1 and a mutant kinesin-1 with its velocity slowed by 15-fold for the asymmetric unbinding rate under an external force Fextacting on the cargo.The results of v2and L2versus Fextare shown in figure 2(see also figure S2).Interestingly,we see that the stall force(under which v2=0 and L2=0)is about 14.2 pN,which is about 1.8-fold larger than that by the single motor(Fs=8 pN,see table 1).Thus,by adopting the asymmetric unbinding rate for the kinesin motors,while the cooperative transport by the faster and slower motors under no external force has the velocity and run length close to those by the single faster one,the cooperative transport can provide a stall force evidently larger than that by the single one.

    Figure 2.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under the external force.One motor corresponds to WT kinesin-1 having velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 having velocityv1α(α=15)and rebinding rateμ.The panel shows velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext.

    3.2.Effect of rebinding rate on cooperative transport by two kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the effect of varying rebinding rate on the dynamics of the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors.The WT kinesin-1 has velocity v1and rebinding rateμ,while the other kinesin(e.g.kinesin-2)has velocityand rebinding rate(see methods).Since the asymmetric unbinding rate is more reasonable than the symmetric unbinding rate,we consider only the asymmetric unbinding rate in this section.

    First,we consider the cooperative transport by two identical motors.For this case,it is evident that although v2and L2are dependent onα,ratios v2/v1and L2/L1are independent ofαunder no external force.In figures 3(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβ,respectively,under no external force.It is seen that while the variation of the rebinding rate has nearly no effect on the cooperative transport velocity v2,the run length L2increases linearly with the increase of the rebinding rate.The recent experimental data of Feng et al[18]showed that the rebinding rate of kinesin-2 is about 4-fold larger than that of kinesin-1,equivalent toβ=4 for kinesin-2.Thus,from

    figure 3(b)we see that the simulated data of run length for both kinesin-1 atβ=1 and kinesin-2 atβ=4 are in good agreement with the experimental data[18].To see the effect of varying rebinding rate on the dynamics of the cooperative transport under the external force Fext,in figures 3(c)and(d)(see also figure S3)we show the simulated results of v2and L2versus Fextfor different values ofβand fixedα=1.The results of the stall force versusβare shown in inset of figure 3(c)(see also inset of figure S3(a)).It is seen interestingly that the stall force increases with the increase of the rebinding rate,but with the increase rate decreasing with the increase of the rebinding rate.

    The experimental data of Feng et al[18]showed that the run length of single kinesin-1 is 0.77 μm while that of single kinesin-2 is 0.65 μm,implying that the velocity of the single kinesin-1 is about 1.18-fold larger than that of the single kinesin-2 in our model(see Methods).Thus,it is interesting to study the cooperative transport by a motor with velocity v1and rebinding rateμand a motor with velocityand rebinding rateμ(2)=βμ.The simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβunder no external force are shown in figures 4(a)and(b),respectively.From figure 4(a)it is seen that v2/v1decreases only slightly withβand becomes leveling off at highβ.By contrast,from figure 4(b)it is seen that L2/L1increases evidently withβand also becomes leveling off at highβ.Specifically,atβ=4 the ratio L2/L1increases to a value that is about 90% of the maximum value at highβ.This implies that the further increase ofβfromβ=4 has only a very small contribution to the enhancement of the run length of the cooperative transport.These results indicate thatβ=4 for kinesin-2 is an optimal value to ensure a large velocity and a long run length for the cooperative transport by kinesin-1 and kinesin-2.

    To make comparisons among the transport by a single kinesin-1 motor(abbreviated as K1),the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors(abbreviated as K1–K1)and the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(abbreviated as K1–K2),in figures 4(c)and(d)we show the simulated results of the velocity and run length,respectively,for the three systems under no external force,where for comparison the available experimental data[18]for the run length are also shown.From figures 4(c)and(d)it is seen that while the velocity has only a slight difference among the three systems,the run length for K1–K2 is evidently larger than that for K1–K1 that is larger than that for K1.Moreover,from figure 4(d)we see that our simulated results are in agreement with the available experimental data[18].

    To see generally how variations ofαandβaffect the cooperative transport by one motor with velocity v1and rebinding rateμand the other motor with velocityand rebinding ratein figures 5(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of v2/v1and L2/L1versusβ,respectively,for different values ofαunder no external force.From figure 5(a)it is seen that in general,for a large value ofαthe variation ofβhas a larger effect on v2/v1than for a small value ofα.By contrast,for a large value ofαthe variation ofβhas a smaller effect on L2/L1than for a small value ofα(figure 5(b)).

    Figure 3.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin motors with rebinding rate βμ.For kinesin-1 β=1,and for kinesi-2 β=4.Lines are simulated results.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β under no external force.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β under no external force.Symbols are experimental data from Feng et al[18],where K1–K1 represents the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors and K1–K2 represents the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣Δ L1+ ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for β=1 and α=1.Inset shows stall force versus β.(d)Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for β=4 and α=1.

    3.3.Cooperative transport by multiple kinesin motors

    In this section,we focus on the dynamics of the cargo transport by multiple identical WT kinesin-1 motors,with each motor having velocity v1and rebinding rateμ.We consider no external force on the cargo.

    In figures 6(a)and(b)we show the simulated results of vN/v1and LN/L1versus motor number N,respectively,for the asymmetric unbinding rate(black circles),where vNand LNare velocity and run length of the cargo,respectively.For comparison,the available experimental data[20]are also shown in figure 6(green triangles).It is seen that while the simulated results of vN/v1decreases only slightly with the increase of N(figure 6(a)),the simulated results of LN/L1increases exponentially with the increase of N(figure 6(b)).The simulated data of vN/v1are consistent with the experimental data(figure 6(a)).The simulated data of LN/L1for N=2 and 4 are also in agreement with the experimental data(figure 6(b)).However,the simulated value of LN/L1for N=7 is evidently larger than the experimental one.The origin of the deviation between the simulated and experimental data could be described as follows.In the experimental design,when N is small(e.g.N≤4)the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is large,whereas when N is large(e.g.N=7)the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is small[20].Thus,for the system with a large N(e.g.N=7),a trailing motor can often encounter its neighboring leading motor.When the trailing motor encounters the leading one,the trailing motor is likely to unbind from MT[52–54],which results in the reduction of the run length of the cargo.By contrast,in our simulations we take the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state is large(l0=48 nm)(see methods),a trailing motor can hardly encounter its neighboring leading one,and thus no interference among the motors is present.For comparison,we also show the simulated results for the symmetric unbinding rate,with the results being also shown in figure 6(red squares).It is seen that vN/v1for the symmetric unbinding rate has a large decrease for a given N>1 than for the asymmetric unbinding rate(figure 6(a)).LN/L1for the symmetric unbinding rate increases much quicker than for the asymmetric unbinding rate(figure 6(b)),with the simulated data at a larger N being deviated far away from the experimental data.These further indicate that the symmetric unbinding rate is more unreasonable than the asymmetric unbinding rate to characterize the kinesin motors,as concluded in section 3.1.

    Figure 4.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and the other has velocityv1α(α=1.18)and rebinding rate βμ.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β.(c)Velocity for transport by single kinesin-1 motor(K1),velocity for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors (K1–K1)and velocity for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(K1–K2).Kinesin-1 has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ,and kinesin-2 has velocityv1α(α=1.18)and rebind rate βμ(β=4).(d)Run length for transport by single kinesin-1 motor(K1),run length for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors(K1–K1)and run length for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor(K1–K2).For comparison,the experimental data of Feng et al[18]are also shown.

    Figure 5.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force.One motor has velocity v1 andrebinding rateμ,and the other has velocityv1αand rebinding rate βμ.(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus β for different values of α.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus β for different values of α.

    Furthermore,we statistically study the velocity distribution and run-length distribution of the cooperative transport by N motors for the asymmetric unbinding rate.The results are shown in figures 6(c)and(d)and in figures S4 and S5(see supplemental materials).It is seen that for any N,the velocity distribution has a Gaussian form and the run-length distribution approximately has a single-exponential form,which are in agreement with the experimental data[20].Moreinterestingly,it is seen that the half width of the Gaussian velocity distribution decreases with the increase of the motor number N(right panel of figure 6(c)).

    Figure 6.Dynamics of the cooperative transport by N(N>1)identical kinesin motors under no external force.The motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rateμ.Lines are simulated results.Symbols are experimental data from Derr et al[20].(a)Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus N.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(v2v1)=∣ ?(v2v1)? v1∣Δ v1+ ∣ ?(v2v1)?v2∣Δv 2.(b)Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus N.The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ(L2L1)=∣ ?(L2L1)?L1∣Δ L1+ ∣ ?(L2L1)?L2∣ΔL 2.(c)Simulated results of velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are Gaussian fits.Left and middle panels correspond to N=4 and 7,respectively,and right panel shows the half width of the Gaussian velocity distribution versus N.(d)Simulated results of run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate.Lines are single-exponential fits.Left,middle and right panels correspond to N=4,5 and 7,respectively.

    4.Concluding remarks

    We studied the cooperative transport by two kinesin motors using both asymmetric and symmetric unbinding rate of the single motor.Using asymmetric unbinding rate the simulated results of the velocity and run length of the cooperative transport by two kinein-1 motors are consistent with the available experimental data,whereas using symmetric unbinding rate the corresponding simulated results are inconsistent with the available experimental data.The studies show that for the cooperative transport by a faster motor and a much slower motor,the asymmetric unbinding rate can give a larger velocity and a longer run length than the symmetric unbinding rate,providing an explanation for why the kinesin motor adopts the asymmetric unbinding rate rather than the symmetric unbinding rate.With the asymmetric unbinding rate,while the cooperative transport by the faster and much slower motors under no external load has the velocity and run length close to those by the single faster one,the cooperative transport can provide a stall force nearly two-fold larger than that by the single faster one.This indicates that the cooperative transport by the faster and much slower motors has advantages over the transport by a single faster motor.

    We studied the effect of the rebinding rate of the motor on the cooperative transport by two motors using asymmetric unbinding rate.The studies show that for the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin motors,while the velocity is nearly independent of the variation of the rebinding rate of the single motors,the run length increases linearly with the increase of the rebinding rate,and the stall force also increases with the increase of the rebinding rate but becomes saturated at high rebinding rate.For the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors,the increase of the rebinding rate of one motor can also enhance the run length of the cooperative transport.The simulated results explain quantitatively the available experimental data on the cooperative transport by two kinesin-2 motors and that by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor.

    The studies on cooperative transport by N(N>2)kinesin motors using asymmetric unbinding rate show that the velocity is insensitive to the motor number N whereas the run length increases exponentially with the motor number N.More interestingly,the velocity distribution for any N has a Gaussian form,with the half width of the distribution decreasing with the increase of N.The velocity for any N is consistent with the available experimental data.The run length for a small N(e.g.N≤4)is also in agreement with the available experimental data.However,for a large N(e.g.

    N=7)the simulated run length is evidently larger than the experimental one.This may be due to that in our simulations we choose the distance between two neighboring motors in the equilibrium state has a large value(48 nm)and thus the interference among motors are not needed to consider.The future studies are hoped to consider the distance between any two motors having a small value and consider the interference between two motors when one motor encounters the other one,explaining quantitatively the available experimental data for a large N(e.g.N=7).

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.11775301).

    ORCID iDs

    美女视频免费永久观看网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产在线免费精品| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 少妇 在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | av不卡在线播放| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 桃花免费在线播放| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| videos熟女内射| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 一本久久精品| 中国国产av一级| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久av网站| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 性色av一级| 51国产日韩欧美| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 91久久精品电影网| 免费观看在线日韩| 老司机影院毛片| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产毛片在线视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久久久国产网址| 尾随美女入室| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 有码 亚洲区| 有码 亚洲区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 高清av免费在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 一级毛片电影观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 婷婷色综合www| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产在视频线精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 一区二区av电影网| 97超视频在线观看视频| 97在线视频观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 免费av中文字幕在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 成人影院久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久成人av| av不卡在线播放| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| av不卡在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久狼人影院| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| av网站免费在线观看视频| 成人手机av| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品国产国语对白av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 少妇的逼水好多| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产片内射在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产乱来视频区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| freevideosex欧美| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产av国产精品国产| av卡一久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲国产精品999| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产在视频线精品| 性色av一级| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 一级毛片电影观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产高清三级在线| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日本wwww免费看| 在线观看三级黄色| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 简卡轻食公司| 在线观看人妻少妇| 九草在线视频观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 色哟哟·www| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 另类精品久久| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 考比视频在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| av在线app专区| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产淫语在线视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 午夜久久久在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲国产av新网站| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产精品无大码| 久久97久久精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 色吧在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 午夜91福利影院| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 另类精品久久| 久久久久国产网址| 久久久久久伊人网av| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 九色成人免费人妻av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 91成人精品电影| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品.久久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 制服人妻中文乱码| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 色哟哟·www| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一级毛片我不卡| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 午夜91福利影院| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产乱来视频区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 一本一本综合久久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 曰老女人黄片| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久婷婷青草| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 另类精品久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 午夜av观看不卡| 曰老女人黄片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美性感艳星| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 大码成人一级视频| 老熟女久久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| kizo精华| 亚州av有码| 高清毛片免费看| 国产精品一国产av| 曰老女人黄片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 99久久人妻综合| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 春色校园在线视频观看| .国产精品久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲图色成人| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| 熟女av电影| 国产男女内射视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| www.色视频.com| 18禁观看日本| 日韩中字成人| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| www.色视频.com| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日韩中字成人| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一级a做视频免费观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 永久网站在线| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产亚洲最大av| 蜜桃在线观看..| 中国国产av一级| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久久精品94久久精品| av视频免费观看在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 精品亚洲成国产av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 婷婷色综合www| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日本免费在线观看一区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 午夜视频国产福利| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产综合精华液| 蜜桃在线观看..| 天堂8中文在线网| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 一级毛片电影观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产成人精品福利久久| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 九草在线视频观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久99精品国语久久久| 香蕉精品网在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品一国产av|