• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Negation scope detection with a conditional random field model①

    2017-06-27 08:09:23LydiaLazibZhaoYanyanQinBingLiuTing
    High Technology Letters 2017年2期

    Lydia Lazib, Zhao Yanyan, Qin Bing, Liu Ting

    (Research Center for Social Computing and Information Retrieval, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R.China)

    Negation scope detection with a conditional random field model①

    Lydia Lazib, Zhao Yanyan, Qin Bing②, Liu Ting

    (Research Center for Social Computing and Information Retrieval, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R.China)

    Identifying negation cues and their scope in a text is an important subtask of information extraction that can benefit other natural language processing tasks, including but not limited to medical data mining, relation extraction, question answering and sentiment analysis. The tasks of negation cue and negation scope detection can be treated as sequence labelling problems. In this paper, a system is presented having two components: negation cue detection and negation scope detection. In the first phase, a conditional random field (CRF) model is trained to detect the negation cues using a lexicon of negation words and some lexical and contextual features. Then, another CRF model is trained to detect the scope of each negation cue identified in the first phase, using basic lexical and contextual features. These two models are trained and tested using the dataset distributed within the *Sem Shared Task 2012 on resolving the scope and focus of negation. Experimental results show that the system outperformed all the systems submitted to this shared task.

    negation detection, negation cue detection, negation scope detection, natural language processing

    0 Introduction

    Negation, as simple as it can be in concept, is a complex and an essential phenomenon in any language. It has the ability to inverse the meaning of an affirmative statement into its opposite meaning. In a sentence, the presence of negation is indicated by the presence of a negation cue. The negation cue is a lexical element that carries negation meaning. A negation cue can occur in different forms[1]: as an explicit negation, which can be a single word negation (e.g., “no”, “not”) or a multiple words negation (e.g., “neither…nor” or “rather than”), as an implicit negation, where syntactic patterns imply negative semantics (e.g., “This movie was below my expectations.”), or as a morphological negation, where word roots are modified with a negating prefix (e.g., “un-”, “in-” or “dis-”) or negating suffix (e.g., “-less”). The scope of negation is the sequence of words in the sentence that is affected by the negation cue[2]. For example, in Sentence (1) the wordnotis the negation cue, and the discontinuous word sequences ‘Holmes’ and ‘sayanything’ form the scope.

    [Holmes] did not [say anything].

    (1)

    For many NLP (natural language processing) applications, distinguishing between affirmative and negative information is an important task. A system that does not deal with negation would treat the facts in these cases incorrectly as positives. For example, in sentiment analysis detecting the negation is a critical process, as it may change the polarity of a text and results in a wrong prediction. And in query answering systems failing to account for negation can result in giving wrong answers.

    However, most of the systems developed for processing natural language data do not consider the negation present in the sentence. Although, various works have dealt with the identification of negations and their scope in sentences, machine learning techniques started to be used since the creation of the Bioscope corpus[3]. This corpus boosted several research experiments on scope resolution. Ref.[4] proposed a supervised system that finded the negation cue and their scopes in biomedical texts. The system consists of two memory-based engines, one decides if the tokens in a sentence are negation cues, and another finds the full scope of these negation cues. Ref.[2] used a decision tree to classify whether a token is at the beginning, inside or outside a negation cue. In the scope finding task, they use three classifiers (k-nearest neighbor, SVM and CRF classifier) to predict whether a token is the first token in the scope sequence, the last or neither. And Ref.[5] proposed a new approach for tree kernel-based scopes detection by using structured syntactic parse information. Their experiments on the Bioscope corpus showed that both constituent and dependency structured syntactic parse features have the advantage in capturing the potential relationship between cues and their scopes. But the processing of these feature-rich methods takes a lot of effort and knowledge, and is time-consuming.

    Negation has also been studied in the context of sentiment analysis, as a wrong interpretation of a negated fact may lead to assign a wrong polarity to the text, and results in a wrong prediction. Ref.[6] affirmed that applying a simple rule that considers only the two words following the negation keyword as being negated by that keyword to be effective. This method yielded a significant increase in overall sentiment classification accuracy. Ref.[1] proposed a negation detection system based on CRF, modeled using features from an English dependency parser. And report the impact of accurate negation detection on state-of-the-art sentiment analysis system. Their system improved the precision of positive sentiment polarity detection by 35.9% and negative sentiment polarity detection by 46.8%. Ref.[7] proposed a sophisticated approach to identify negation scopes for Twitter sentiment analysis. They incorporated to their sentiment classifier several features that benefit from negation scope detection. The results confirm that taking negation into account improves sentiment classification performance significantly. And Ref.[8] used machine learning methods to recognize automatically negative and speculative information, and incorporated their approach to a sentiment classifier. The results achieved demonstrate that accurate detection of negations is of vital importance to the sentiment classification task.

    In this paper, a system is proposed to detect the negation cues and their corresponding scopes, in respect to the closed task of the *Sem Shared Task 2012[9]. The system is divided into two cascade sub-tasks, one that detects the negation cues, and another that detects the scope of negation cues identified by the first sub-task. A CRF model is trained using lexical and contextual features on both sub-tasks. These features, compared to those used in previous work[5,10-12]are simple to process and are less time-consuming.

    This paper includes four sections. In Section 1 the approach is presented to solve the two tasks of the system. Section 2 describes the corpus used in the experiment. Then, in Section 3 different experimental settings, the experimental results and the corresponding analysis are presented. And finally, concluding remarks are contained in Section 4.

    1 System description

    The system is decomposed to identify the scope of negation into two cascade sub-tasks: negation cue detection and negation scope detection. The scope detection is dependent on the task of finding the negation cues.

    To conduct the experiment, the corpus provided by organizers of the *Sem Shared Task 2012 (will be described in Section 2) is used. In order to do a fair comparison with the work submitted during this shared task, all the requirements of the task are followed, which means that the classifier can use only the information provided in the training dataset, without using any external tool to respect the requirement of the closed task.

    The approach to detect the negation cues and their respective scope in a sentence is to consider the two tasks as sequence labelling problems. The conditional random fields (CRF)[13]classifier has proved in several previous work to be more efficient in solving this kind of problems[10-12]compared with other machine learning techniques.

    The negation cues present in the test data are identified by training a CRF model using some lexical and contextual features and a lexicon of negation cues that are present in the training data. To identify the scope of negation, a CRF model is also trained using lexical and contextual features.

    The illustration of the approach is shown in Fig.1.

    The details of the two sub-tasks are described in the subsections below.

    1.1 Negation cue detection

    In this task, all the negation cues presented in the sentences are identified. The negation cues are grouped under five types, depending upon how they are present in the data. They can be:

    ? Single word cues: not, no, never, etc.

    ? Continuous multiword cues: rather than, by no means, etc.

    ? Discontinuous multiword cues: neither…nor,etc.

    ? Prefix cues: words starting with the prefixes: in-, im-, un-, etc. e.g. impossible.

    ? Suffix cues: words ending with the suffix: -less, e.g. useless.

    Fig.1 Illustration of the whole approach of the proposed negation cue and scope detection

    Because of the restriction of the closed task of the shared task, any external dictionary or lexicon for negation words couldn’t be used. The system creates two lexicons, one corresponding to the negation words (single word, continuous multiword, and discontinuous multiword) by collecting all the negation words that can appear in the training dataset, and another corresponding to the different negation affixes (prefixes, suffixes) found in the training dataset. These two lists are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

    The CRF model was trained on a set of lexical and contextual features. The process of features selection started by combining different features used in some previous work similar to the task[10,11]. This feature set has been polished from the features that was proved empirically to be useless, and added new features that improved the cue detection task. The final feature set used to train the CRF model is presented in Table 3.

    Table 1 Lexicon of negation cues (single and multi-words)

    Table 2 Lexicon of negation cues (prefixes and suffixes)

    Table 3 Feature set for negation cue detection

    The CRF model used considers the features of the current token, two previous and two forward tokens. It also uses features conjunctions by combining features of neighboring tokens, and bigram features.

    The CRF model can classify a word in a sentence as being:

    ? “O”: not part of any negation cue

    ? “NEG”: as a single word negation

    ? “NEG_DIS”: as a discontinuous multiword negation

    ? “NEG_CONT”: as a continuous multiword negation

    ? “PRE”: as a prefix negation

    ? “SUF”: as a suffix negation

    The system uses the lexicon presented in Table 1 to set the values of the three features: “Match_Single”, “Multi_Continuous” or “Multi_Discontinuous”, by searching all the words in the sentences of the data that match the words in the lexicon. For each word that matches the system sets the corresponding feature to 1 and set the others to 0.

    The system uses the lexicon presented in Table 2 the same way, except that here it searches whether the words in the sentence start with a prefix, end with a suffix or are just simple words. The features modified in this case are: “StartsWithPrefix” and “EndsWithSuffix”.If the current token is detected as a prefix (or suffix) negation cue, a special treatment should be done on this token to split it into a prefix (or suffix) negation cue and its corresponding sub-token, using a simple regular expression method.

    1.2 Negation scope detection

    A CRF model is also trained to identify the scope of negation. The negation cues identified in the first sub-task are used as the new cues, and the scope of which will be identified. If a sentence contains more than one negation cue, then each one will be treated separately, by creating a new training/test instance of the same sentence for each negation cue presenting in the same sentence.

    To identify the scope, the model considers the features shown in Table 4. These features are token specific features (Token) and contextual features (e.g., relative position of the token to the cue, whether the token and the cue are in the same segment, etc.), and have the advantage in capturing the potential relationship between cues and their scopes (e.g. the number of token between the current token and the cue, the relative position of the current token from the cue: before, after or same, etc.), and make the prediction of the scope more relevant. They are also simple features, which are less time-consuming, comparing to other features used in other methods[10-12]. New features are also created by combining neighboring features and bigram features.

    Table 4 Feature set for negation scope detection

    The CRF model can classify a token in a sentence as being inside (I) or outside (O) the scope of negation. And if the negation cue starts or ends with one of the affixes (prefixes or suffixes) listed in Table 2, the scope of negation includes only the part of the negation cue excluding the affix. Thus, for each negation cue having these affixes, the affix is removed from the cue and the remaining part is considered as the scope.

    2 Data set

    Research on negation scope detection has mainly focused on the biomedical domain, and has been neglected in open-domain because of the lack of corpora. One of the only freely available corpus is the dataset released by the organizers of the *Sem Shared Task 2012. This dataset includes stories of Conan Doyle, and is annotated with negation cues and their corresponding scope, as well as the event that is negated. The cues are the words that express negation, and the scope is the part of the sentence that is affected by the negation cue. The negation event is the main event actually negated by the negation cue. Table 5 shows an example sentence from the dataset.

    Column 1: contains the name of the file

    Column 2: contains the sentence number within the file

    Column 3: contains the token number within the sentence

    Column 4: contains the token

    Column 5: contains the lemma

    Column 6: contains the part-of-speech (POS) tag

    Column 7: contains the parse tree information

    Column 8 to last:

    ? If the sentence does not contain a negation, column 8 contains “***” and there are no more columns.

    ? If the sentence does contain negations, the information for each one is provided in three columns: the cue, a word that belongs to the scope, and the negated event, respectively.

    Table 5 Example sentence annotated for negation following *Sem Shared Task 2012

    The annotation of cues and scopes is inspired by the Bioscope corpus annotation[3], but there are some differences. The first difference is that the cue is not considered to be part of the scope. The second, the scopes can be discontinuous, and includes the subject, which is not the case in the Bioscope corpus. And finally, the morphological negations are annotated as in the example in Sentence (2) below:

    [He] declares that he heard cries but [is] un [able to state from what direction they came].

    (2)

    Statistics for the corpus are presented in Table 6. More information about the annotations guidelines are provided by Ref.[14], including inter-annotator agreement.

    Table 6 Corpus statistics

    3 Experiments and Results

    The CRF model for negation cue and scope detection is trained and tested against the datasets described in Section 2. The identification of cues and scopes is evaluated using the evaluation tool provided by the organizer of the *Sem Shared Task 2012 which uses the standard precision, recall, and F-measure metrics to evaluate the system. The evaluation is performed on different levels:

    1) Cue level: the metrics are performed only for the cue detection.

    2) Scope CM (cue match): the metrics are calculated at scope level, but require a strict cue match. All tokens of the cue have to be correctly identified.

    3) Scope tokens (no cue match): the metrics are performed at the token level. The total of scope tokens in a sentence is the sum of tokens of all scopes. For example, if a sentence has 2 scopes, one with 5 tokens and another with 4, the total number of scope tokens is 9.

    The punctuation marks are ignored by the evaluation tool to relax the scope evaluation.

    The CRF++ tool is used to train the two CRF models for negation cue and negation scope detection.

    The results obtained by the system over the test data are shown in Table 7.

    Table 7 Results of negation cue and negation scope detection

    The analysis of the results obtained by each component are described in the subsections below.

    3.1 Negation cue detection

    The system achieves an F1 score of 93.69% in the task of negation cue detection using a CRF model.The effectiveness of the system is limited by the coverage of the lexicon. Due to the low coverage of the lexicon, the system fails to identify negation cues that are present only in the test data and never appear in the training data. However, the results still outperform all the results submitted to the shared task. As can be seen in Table 9, the system outperforms the system of the participant FBK[11], who got the first place on cue detection task in the shared task.

    Also, some words such asnever,nothing,not,noandwithoutare mostly present as negation cues in the data, but not always. Such in the phrasenodoubt, which is present nine times in the test data, but the wordnois a negation cue in only four of them. The wordsaveis also present once as a negation cue in the training data, but is never a negation cue in the test data. Therefore, our system invariability predicts these occurrences ofsavein the test data as negation cues.

    3.2 Negation scope detection

    The system is able to achieve an F1 score of 86.51% for negation scope detection on scope tokens level (without cue match),and an F1 score of 75.59% on scope level (with cue match). The results show that our system has a higher precision than recall in identifying the scope. As mentioned earlier, the negation cues identified in the first task are used to identify the scope of negation. Using a test data with a 7% error in negation cues as the input to this component and some of the errors of the system in predicting the scope lead to a low recall value in the scope detection.

    Table 8 shows the results of the negation scope detection system using the gold cues. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our system on scope detection task, with an increase of almost 5% on the scope level (with cue match) and 3% on scope tokens level (without cue match).

    Table 8 Results of negation scope detection based on Gold Cues

    The results are compared with the three best work results submitted for the *Sem shared task 2012 in Table 9. The system outperforms these three best work on both cue and scope detection tasks. The participant FBK[11]also used a CRF model to identify the negation cues in a sentence, but has omitted to use the feature related to the “Token”, which is considered as the most valuable feature to identify the negation cue. For scope detection (on scope level), the participant UWashington[12]used essentially lexical and syntactic features, but has neglected the features that capture the relationship between the current token and the negation cue in a sentence. And for scope detection (on scope tokens level), the participant UiO1[15]used the SVM classifier to identify the scope of negation. Their results are outperformed by more than 3%, which emphasis the theory that the CRF classifier is more effective in resolving sequence labelling problems.

    Table 9 Performance comparison with the results of the participants of the *Sem Shared Task

    4 Conclusion

    In this paper an approach is proposed to identify the negation cue and the scope of negation in a sentence. It is shown that considering these two tasks as sequence labelling problems, and using CRF model to solve them achieves a considerable accuracy. However, the system cannot cover the negation cues that are not present in the training data. It also misclassifies some negation cues that can appear in non-negated contexts. Moreover, in order to improve the overall accuracy of the scope detection, an accurate system is needed to detect the negation cues, since the errors in the negation cue detection propagates to the identification of the scope. Using features that capture the relationship between the tokens and the negation cue are relevant in identifying the scope of negation.

    As future work, we would like to use an extensive lexicon of negation cues to better predict the negation cues. It is also intended to use the current system to solve some problems related to the negation. It is believed that this kind of system can improve the accuracy of several work that are sensitive to the polarity in the information extraction and natural language processing domain, like sentiment analysis or question answering systems.

    [ 1] Councill I G, McDonald R, Velikovich L. What's great and what's not: learning to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing, ACL, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. 51-59

    [ 2] Morante R, Daelemans W. A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Boulder, USA, 2009. 21-29

    [ 3] Szarvas G, Vincze V, Farkas R, et al. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Columbus, USA, 2008. 38-45

    [ 4] Morante R, Liekens A, Daelemans W. Learning the scope of negation in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Honolulu, USA, 2008. 715-724

    [ 5] Zou B, Zhou G, Zhu Q. Tree Kernel-based Negation and Speculation Scope Detection with Structured Syntactic Parse Features, In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, USA, 2013. 968-976

    [ 6] Hogenboom A, Van Iterson P, Heerschop B, et al. Determining negation scope and strength in sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Kyoto, Japan, 2011. 2589-2594

    [ 7] Reitan J, Faret J, Gamb?ck B, et al. Negation scope detection for twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6thWorkshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA), Lisbon, Portugal, 2015. 99-108

    [ 8] Cruz N P, Taboada M, Mitkov R. A machine learning approach to negation and speculation detection for sentiment analysis.Journaloftheassociationforinformationscienceandtechnology, 2016, 67(9): 2118-2136

    [ 9] Morante R, Blanco E. *SEM 2012 shared task: Resolving the scope and focus of negation. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Montreal, Canada, 2012. 265-274

    [10] Abu-Jbara A, Radev D. UMichigan: A conditional random field model for resolving the scope of negation. In: Proceedings of the 1st Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Montreal, Canada, 2012. 328-334

    [11] Chowdhury M, Mahbub F. FBK: Exploiting phrasal and contextual clues for negation scope detection. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Montreal, Canada, 2012. 340-346

    [12] White J P. UWashington: Negation resolution using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Montreal, Canada, 2012. 335-339

    [13] Lafferty J, McCallum A, Pereira F C N. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML),Massachusetts, USA, 2001. 282-289

    [14] Morante R, Schrauwen S, Daelemans W. Annotation of negation cues and their scope: Guidelines v1.Computationallinguisticsandpsycholinguisticstechnicalreportseries, CTRS-003, 2011

    [15] Read J, Velldal E, ?vrelid L, et al. Uio1: Constituent-based discriminative ranking for negation resolution. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Montreal, Canada, 2012. 310-318

    Lydia Lazib, born in 1990. She is a Ph.D candidate in Harbin Institute of Technology. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science Department of Mouloud MAMMERI University of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria in 2011 and 2013 respectively. Her research interests include sentiment analysis and negation detection.

    10.3772/j.issn.1006-6748.2017.02.011

    ①Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Programme of China (No. 2015AA015407), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61273321), and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20122302110039).

    ②To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bing.qin@gmail.com

    on May 12, 2016

    美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产区一区二久久| 777米奇影视久久| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 18在线观看网站| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 高清欧美精品videossex| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久人妻av系列| 久久青草综合色| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 一本久久精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 丁香六月欧美| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产片内射在线| 少妇 在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品免费大片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 自线自在国产av| videosex国产| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| av一本久久久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 两个人免费观看高清视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一级片免费观看大全| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 操出白浆在线播放| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 91成人精品电影| 国产精品二区激情视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产区一区二久久| 看免费av毛片| 岛国在线观看网站| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| av电影中文网址| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 操美女的视频在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 日日夜夜操网爽| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产色视频综合| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 一夜夜www| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲国产欧美网| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 在线播放国产精品三级| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国产av精品麻豆| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 夫妻午夜视频| 999精品在线视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 我的亚洲天堂| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 91成人精品电影| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产在线免费精品| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 无限看片的www在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 桃花免费在线播放| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 一本综合久久免费| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 岛国在线观看网站| 色在线成人网| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 搡老乐熟女国产| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美在线黄色| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 五月开心婷婷网| 老司机福利观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 露出奶头的视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 91老司机精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 成人手机av| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 自线自在国产av| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 人人澡人人妻人| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 色94色欧美一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久性视频一级片| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲成人手机| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产高清videossex| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 高清av免费在线| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久免费观看电影| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 电影成人av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 老司机靠b影院| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产野战对白在线观看| 一夜夜www| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美| 岛国毛片在线播放| 性少妇av在线| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 高清欧美精品videossex| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 久久 成人 亚洲| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产av国产精品国产| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 一本大道久久a久久精品| av视频免费观看在线观看| 成人手机av| 99九九在线精品视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产精品成人在线| 咕卡用的链子| h视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 高清欧美精品videossex| 天天影视国产精品| 1024视频免费在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产麻豆69| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 久久香蕉激情| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 性少妇av在线| 99久久人妻综合| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 老司机靠b影院| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产在线一区二区三区精| a级毛片在线看网站| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产精品.久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 满18在线观看网站| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 久久中文看片网| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 免费看a级黄色片| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 在线看a的网站| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 岛国在线观看网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 色94色欧美一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 青青草视频在线视频观看| 丁香欧美五月| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 少妇 在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 岛国在线观看网站| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 成人精品一区二区免费| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 香蕉国产在线看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | svipshipincom国产片| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 777米奇影视久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 成人手机av| 在线观看66精品国产| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久av网站| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 少妇精品久久久久久久| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产一区二区 视频在线| h视频一区二区三区| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 不卡av一区二区三区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲国产欧美网| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一个人免费看片子| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 黄片小视频在线播放| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产精品免费大片| 成年动漫av网址| 国产精品免费大片| 国产高清激情床上av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩免费av在线播放| av福利片在线| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 美女主播在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲伊人色综图| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 黄片小视频在线播放| 脱女人内裤的视频| 大香蕉久久网| netflix在线观看网站| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 视频区图区小说| 丁香六月天网| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 午夜免费成人在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 怎么达到女性高潮| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 成年动漫av网址| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99国产精品99久久久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | www.自偷自拍.com| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产男女内射视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成人手机| 在线看a的网站| 一区二区三区激情视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 免费观看av网站的网址| 少妇 在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产精品.久久久| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美|