• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Using genomic data to improve the estimation of general combining ability based on sparse partial diallel cross designs in maize

    2020-10-21 10:02:02XinWangZhenliangZhangYangXuPenghenLiXueaiZhangChenwuXu
    The Crop Journal 2020年5期

    Xin Wang,Zhenliang Zhang,Yang Xu,Penghen Li,Xueai Zhang,Chenwu Xu,*

    aCollege of Information Engineering,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China

    bKey Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops,College of Agriculture,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China

    cInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center(CIMMYT),Mexico D.F.06600,Mexico

    ABSTRACT

    1.Introduction

    The concept of general combining ability(GCA),originally defined by Sprague and Tatum[1],refers to the average performance of a line in hybrid combinations.It can be estimated using the difference between the average of its hybrids and the general average for all crossings.GCA is mainly a measure of additive effects,which can be directly transmitted from parents to offspring.In recent years,doubled haploid(DH)technology has facilitated the generation of a large number of inbred lines,making GCA evaluation the major bottleneck in hybrid maize breeding[2].Therefore,the evaluation of GCA is a crucial process for hybrid development,and the maize line with high GCA is an essential component for producing elite hybrids[3].

    Estimation of GCA can be obtained easily using the complete diallel cross design or North Carolina Design II(NC II)[4,5].However,with the development of breeding programs,a great quantity of inbred lines are available.The number of possible crosses grows very rapidly,making these designs time and resource intensive.Partial diallel cross designs in which only a subset of possible crosses is performed are more attractive options[6].They allow the evaluation of a greater number of inbred lines in crosses[7].In the classic circulant designs[8],each of n lines is only crossed with s other lines,instead of n-1 lines as in the complete diallel.In this way,each line is guaranteed to be involved in the sampling crosses.Analysis using circulant diallels significantly reduces the number of crosses in which each genitor is involved,and enables the participation of a greater number of genitors[9].However,in breeding practice,only a small proportion of hybrids are possible to be evaluated in the field,making the partial diallel table very sparse.This means that the average value of s is small,and some complex factors of field trials may bring big fluctuation to s for the parental lines.In this scenario,limited research has been reported to estimate the GCA.So,there is an urgent need to develop procedures to allow the accurate evaluation of GCA based on sparse partial diallel cross(SPDC)designs[6].

    Previous studies[10–12]have proposed many statistical methods for diallel analysis.Among them,diallel mating models proposed by Griffing[10]are the most widely used models for investigating the genetic parameters(general and specific combining ability).For a partial diallel cross scheme,traditional studies[13]used the ordinary least squares(OLS)to estimate GCA.However,if the diallel table is very sparse,the great reduction in the ratio of observed hybrids will be striking.Using the traditional OLS to evaluate many inbred lines with a small sample of hybrids can't ensure high accuracy.

    Fortunately,with the advances of molecular biology,breeders can accurately understand the genetic structure of breeding populations,and thus greatly improve the estimation of genetic parameters using genomic prediction(GP).Estimated breeding values based on the genotypes of individuals were remarkably accurate[14,15].Some studies[16,17]used GS models for directly predicting agronomic traits in inbred lines,and some others[18–20]used GS for predicting hybrid performance.Various methods,such as Genomic best linear unbiased prediction(GBLUP),Bayes,the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)and machine learning[21–24]have been developed for GP,and these differ with respect to assumptions about the marker effects.GBLUP and RR-BLUP[21]assign identical variance to all loci and essentially treat all of them as equally important.In BayesA,markers are assumed to have different variances and follows a posterior scaled inverse chi-square distribution[22].The prior in BayesB assumes that the variance of markers is equal to zero with probabilityπ,and the complement with probability 1–πfollows a scaled inverse chi-square distribution[22].In Bayes Cπ,the mixture probabilityπhas a prior uniform distribution[25].LASSO is a popular method for regression that uses a penalty to achieve a sparse solution,and it is somewhat indifferent to closely correlated markers and tends to pick one and ignore the others[26].Machine learning is also an alternative for GS.It has been employed to enhance the prediction of genetic values for wheat and maize[27,28].Although various models have been successfully applied to GS,some studies[29–31]showed that not much variation in prediction accuracy among the different models was observed.

    In terms of the GCA analyses and hybrid prediction,Bernardo[32–34]was one of the first to advocate the BLUP model[35]in maize.From then on,many studies have been reported to analyze GCA especially when predicting hybrids.For predicting the GCA of a maize testcross population,Riedelsheimer et al.[2]proposed a genomic selection(GS)approach based on RR-BLUP,showing that more efficient predictive procedures could be developed using genomic data.With a linear mixed model using the ASReml-R software[36],Kadam et al.[37]evaluated random inbreds derived from biparental families of maize.Using GBLUP and BayesB,Technow et al.[38]investigated genome properties of the parental line based on the Dent×Flint heterotic pattern.Greenberg et al.[6]developed a hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate quantitative genetic parameter from partial diallel cross designs.Werner et al.[39]considered GCA and specific combining ability(SCA)to apply RR-BLUP and Bayesian models for predicting hybrid performance in oilseed rape using a collection of 220 paternal DH lines and five malesterile inbred lines.Recently,using GBLUP and a complete diallel cross design with twenty-eight single-crosses formed between eight parental lines,Velez-Torres et al.[40]concluded that GS is a more effective and efficient approach to predict the GCA of maize lines compared with phenotyping method.However,in most of the previous studies,more attention has been paid to the prediction accuracy of hybrids,and the prediction of parental GCA is not the focus.For an SPDC maize population,few studies have been reported to systematically investigate the GP accuracy for GCA.

    The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of GP for estimating the GCA of maize inbred lines with SPDC systems.As mentioned earlier,the accuracy of various GS models is similar.Considering that GBLUP is more suitable for quantitative traits influenced by polygenes and its high computational efficiency[15],GBLUP was adopted in this study.Using genome-wide SNPs called from a real maize data set of 266 inbred lines,genetic and phenotypic values of all possible hybrids were simulated.And thus different hybrid sample sizes and different distributions of parental lines involved in crossing were investigated.Such a scheme was implemented to assess the efficacy of GP in estimating the GCA of lines.Then,the utility of statistical approaches was illustrated with an example using an actual trait of maize.The methods we described would be useful in various sets of maize and other crops.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1. Materials

    2.1.1. Plant materials

    The models were fitted to the maize data set from Yangzhou University. Partial diallel crossings between a total of 266 maize inbred lines were performed during the 2017 and 2018 maize growing seasons from field trials on the experimental farms in Yangzhou and Taian, China, and two replicates were made in each environment. Regardless of reciprocals, ear weight (EW) for 945 hybrids were collected to estimate the GCA of the inbred lines. The phenotypes fitting the statistical model were the average performance of each hybrid from two environments. The 266 inbred lines were genotyped, and 319,668 SNPs evenly distributed on chromosomes were called initially. 61,468 genome-wide SNPs were filtered by eliminating the heterozygosity >0.05 and the missing rate > 0.05.Genotypes of the hybrids were inferred from SNPs of their inbred parents.

    2.1.2. Simulations

    Based on the genotypes mentioned above, a large number of simulations were performed to assess the prediction accuracy of different statistical approaches. Considering additive and dominant genetic effects of markers, several traits of all the 35,245 possible hybrids with 200 QTLs and different heritabilities were randomly simulated. The numbers of QTLs on chromosome 1–10 are 29, 32, 21, 25, 21, 12, 15, 21, 9, and 15,respectively. According to the study of Meuwissen et al. [22],the additive effects of the 200 QTLs were drawn from a gamma distribution with shape parameter α = 0.4 and scale parameter β = 1.66. Half of the additive effects had positive effects and the other half had negative effects. The dominant effects were determined as the product of the absolute additive effects and the degree of dominance, which was drawn from a normal distribution with mean and variance equal to 0.193 and 0.3122,respectively. In the 200 QTLs, two loci on chromosome 1 and chromosome 3 were found to have weak over-dominant effects. For all the simulated hybrids, the ratio of dominant variance to additive variance was 0.160. Normal independent error deviations with variances calculated were added to meet assumed heritability, and the simulated phenotypes were centered and standardized to unit variance. Finally, three traits with heritability of 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3, named T7, T5, and T3 were obtained.

    2.1.3. Sampling designs

    Two types of sampling designs were performed to evaluate the difference in predictive accuracy. First, for each trait of the 35,245 hybrids, different numbers of hybrids (m = 500, 1000,and 2000)were sampled as the training sets to estimate the GCA of the 266 parental lines.Second,with a certain sample size of hybrids mentioned above,three distributions of parental lines were designed.One was similar to a circulant diallel table.In this paper it was called balanced sampling,which meant that all parental lines were involved in nearly an equal number of crosses(designated s).Another was called random sampling,which meant that the crossing times of all the lines were random but at least 1.The third was called unbalanced sampling,which meant that only part of the 266 lines(n=200 or 150)were involved in random crossing.Each sampling method was randomly repeated 20 times to obtain the average results of 20 replicates.The density plot for the crossing times of the 266 lines derived from the 20 samplings with different methods is shown in Fig.1.Taking the first round of sampling with m=500 as an example,the detailed sampling scheme is illustrated in Table S1.In this study,for the random samplings,the crossing times(s)of each inbred line was classified into three levels to compare the accuracy for line subsets with different s value.About a quarter of the lines with the lowest s value were defined as low-frequency;a quarter of the lines with the highest s value were defined as high-frequency;the middle half was defined as mediumfrequency.

    2.2.Methods

    The Griffing Model[10]was used for analyzing our SPDC schemes:

    where yijis the phenotypic value of the hybrids between line i and line j(i,j=1,2,…,n);μis the overall mean;giand gjare the GCA effects of the ith parent and the jth parent,respectively;sijis the SCA effect for the cross between the ith and jth parents;andεijis the random error effect.

    Based on the above model,three statistical approaches were applied.One obtained estimations through the OLS and the other two utilized GP to predict the GCA.In our simulations,knowing the phenotypes of all the possible hybrids,the true GCA of all the 266 inbred lines can be calculated with its definition.The coefficient of determination(the squared Pearson correlation coefficient)between the true GCA and predicted GCA was adopted to evaluate the accuracy of different statistical approaches.

    2.2.1.OLS approach

    In the matrix form,the vector for m observed hybrids can be represented by:

    Fig.1–Density plot for the crossing times of the 266 inbred lines derived from 20 rounds of random,balanced and unbalanced samplings,respectively.

    2.2.2.GP approach

    GBLUP is an efficient method using whole-genome markers to predict genetic values and phenotypes of interest.It exploits the genomic relationships between training population and testing population to predict the genomic values for unknown individuals[42].In this study,two GP approaches using GBLUP were performed for predicting the GCA of the 266 lines.One was designated GP-I,which used the Griffing Model to directly estimate the GCA.The other,designated GP-II,estimated the GCA by predicting the phenotypes of all possible hybrids.

    The model of GP-I can be described as:

    The model of GP-II can be described as:

    3.Results

    3.1.Comparison of the methods for estimating the GCA

    For the traits T7,T5 and T3,based on random and balanced samplings,the prediction results of OLS,GP-I and GP-II using different sample sizes were compared in Table 1.In each case,the trait T7 had the highest accuracy,while the trait T3 had the lowest accuracy,showing that the estimation of GCA was largely dependent on heritability.

    It is notable that the accuracy of each approach was always higher than the heritability of a target trait,showing that the GCA for maize lines can be accurately predicted with SPDC designs.This character is very beneficial to genetic improvement in breeding practice.For T7,derived from the random sampling i.e.,when the sample size was 500,GP-II gave the highest accuracy(0.8068).It was 4.7% higher than that of GP-I(0.7709)and 9.6% higher than that of OLS(0.7361);when the sample sizes were 1000 and 2000,GP-II gave the highest accuracy as before.At this time,the accuracy of GP-I was only slightly higher than that of OLS and the advantage of GP-II was smaller.For T5,when the sample sizes were 500 and 1000,the statistical approaches showed the similar pattern increasing from OLS to GP-II.When the sample size was 2000,the accuracy of GP-I was once again slightly higher than that of OLS.For T3,no matter which sample size was adopted,GP-II gave much more accurate GCA than GP-I and OLS,and the accuracies obtained by GP-I always substantially exceeded that of OLS.

    Obviously,the sample size had a great influence on the accuracy.For all the three traits,statistical approaches with the sample size of 2000 provided the highest accuracies,followed by those with the sample size of 1000,reflecting that a big sample size could substantially contribute to the prediction.Additionally,the sample size affected the significance of GP approaches over OLS.As mentioned above,the smaller the sample size,the higher the level of significance was,showing that GP is particularly beneficial for the estimation of GCA with a sparse partial diallel table.No matter which statistical approach was used,when comparing the random and balanced samplings,their accuracies werenot significantly different,showing that the random sampling commonly used in breeding practice had little impact on the average accuracy of GCA.

    Table 1 – Comparison of accuracy using OLS, GP-I, and GP-II with different sampling designs and training set sizes.

    In brief,GP-II performed the best in our research and would be a promising approach for estimating the GCA of maize and other crops.

    3.2.Accuracy with different numbers of inbred lines involved in crossing

    Sometimes,due to insufficient material resources or experimental budget,the number of inbred lines involved in crossing is limited.Therefore,in this study,the effect of line quantity on prediction was explored.To simplify the problem,only the GP-II approach that had the highest accuracy in the previous experiments was investigated.The accuracy for the 266 lines with different numbers of lines(n=150,200,and 266)involved in random crossing was plotted against the sampling number of hybrids(Fig.2).As expected,for each of the three traits,the accuracy was higher for the sampling designs with 266 lines over the sampling designs with 200 and 150 lines.For T7,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 22.9%,25.2%,and 30.4%higher than that with n=150,respectively;For T5,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 20.8%,22.3%,and 27.7%higher than that with n=150,respectively;For T3,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 14.0%,17.5%,and 24.4%higher than that with n=150,respectively.It was clear that the advantage of more inbred lines involved in crossing could be brought into full play when predicting a high-heritability trait with a big sample size of hybrids.

    3.3.Accuracy for subsets of inbred lines

    The results of above research demonstrated that no significant differences were found between the accuracies of the random and balanced samplings.However,for the random sampling,inbred lines involved in crossing with different frequency must provide different amounts of information.Therefore,taking GP-II for instance,accuracy for lines involved in crossing with different levels of frequency derived from the random sampling were demonstrated in Table 2.It was shown that the lines involved in crossing with highfrequency always got the highest accuracy,and those with low-frequency performed the worst.For predicting T3,with the sample size of 500,the high-frequency lines achieved the biggest increase(55.3%)in accuracy relative to the lowfrequency lines.That is to say,although the random sampling brings us similar accuracy to the balanced sampling,the prediction for low-frequency lines may suffer from much lower accuracy,especially for a low-heritability trait with a small sample size of hybrids.

    Fig.2–Accuracy of GP-II for the 266 inbred lines with different numbers of lines(n=150,200,or 266)involved in the random crossing.

    Unbalanced sampling design was also concerned in this research.The accuracies of GP-II for lines involved and not involved in crossing are summarized in Table 3.As expected,the accuracies were always much higher for the involved lines over the non-involved lines.In most cases,the accuracy increases with the sample size.It is interesting to note that the accuracy of non-involved lines is always less sensitive to the sample size than that of the involved lines.In particular for T7,the accuracy of the 166 non-involved lines with m=2000(0.4105)was 6.4%higher than that with m=500(0.3858),while the advantage of the 150 involved lines was 10.5%;in the same way,the accuracy of the 66 non-involved lines with m=2000(0.4594)was only 4.3%higher than that with m=500(0.4405),while the advantage of the 200 involved lines was 14.5%.For T5 and T3,the pattern of the accuracy was similar to that for T7.

    Table 2–Accuracy of GP-II for inbred lines involved in crossing with different levels of frequency.

    In each case,accuracy of involved lines with n=200 was lower than that with n=150.A good interpretation was that the involved lines with n=150 has higher frequency in crossing,which showed again the contribution of highfrequency to prediction.On the contrary,accuracies of noninvolved lines with n=200 were almost higher than that with n=150.The reason may be that the advantage of highfrequency cannot work on the non-involved lines,and a sample of hybrids derived from more lines can benefit the prediction.

    Table 3–Accuracy of GP-II for inbred lines involved and not involved in crossing derived from the unbalanced samplings.

    3.4.Prediction results for EW of maize

    In addition to the simulated studies,actual EW of 945 hybrids were used to estimate the GCA of the 266 inbred lines.The predicted GCA values were sorted in descending order and the prediction results of the top 20 inbred lines are demonstrated in Table 4.As shown,eight common varieties,including B93,B57,B108,B74,B214,B275,B254,and B167 were screen out by all the three statistical approaches.It is noteworthy that the coefficient of determination between the predicted GCA of GPII and OLS was the highest(0.8703),and up to sixteen common varieties were selected by the two approaches simultaneously,indicating that the intersection between the results of GP-II and OLS was more reliable in this scenario.Moreover,the absolute GCA values predicted by GP-I were lower than those predicted by OLS and GP-II.The reason may be that the non-additive effects were excluded from the estimates of GCA when using GP-I.Although this exclusion may not affect the predictive accuracy,the loss of non-additive variance will inevitably reduce the absolute values of the predicted GCA.

    4.Discussion

    With a complete diallel cross scheme,the GCA of inbred line can be easily calculated with its definition[1].However,because of the large number of possible crosses,Kempthorne and Curnow[7]suggested the partial diallel cross to evaluate inbred lines.Each of the n lines are crossed with s other lines,and there will be ns/2 crosses in the whole set.In this scenario,although the OLS was widely used for estimating the GCA[13,44],genomic information was ignored.GS uses all molecular markers for predicting the performance of the candidates,and it has shown tangible genetic gains in maize breeding[14].Recently,Alves et al.[45]pointed out that GS can be used to estimate genetic parameters accurately in maize hybrids.For maize inbred lines,there is no reason to doubt the advantage of GS over the phenotype-based OLS.Comparisons of the three approaches in the present study have shown that GP-II and GP-I are superior to OLS,showing that prediction with genomic data can help improve the estimation of GCA for inbred lines based on SPDC designs.

    Riedelsheimer et al.[2]crossed 285 diverse Dent inbred lines with two testers and predicted the GCA using genomic and metabolic information.Predictive accuracies(the Pearson correlation)ranged from 0.72 to 0.81 for GP,which are similar to ours for T3 and T5.However,a fivefold cross-validation scheme was applied in their prediction and the predicted GCA values of one subset were estimated using the observed GCA values of the other four subsets.In our research,the situation was quite different.The partial diallel table was assumed to be very sparse.Even if the hybrid sample size is equal 2000,the ratio of the sample size(2000)to the possible hybrid size(35,245)is only 5.7%,making it impossible to obtain a GCA observation of any line.In other words,our prediction is based on the SPDC.The sampling hybrids are treated as the training set,and their number is often lager than the number of lines with identified GCA.Maybe this is the reason why our accuracies are slightly higher than those of Riedelsheimer et al.[2].

    Population design plays a vital role in breeding programs,and partial diallel cross is preferable in many cases.For instance,Miranda Filho and Vencovsky[13]estimated the GCA for ear length of maize in a partial diallel cross with n=10 and s=3.Reis et al.[44]estimated the genetic parameters using a partial circulant diallel cross design with n=34(two groups of parents)and different sizes of s(from 2 to 5).Analysis using cross-validation process showed that the accuracy increased as the value of s increased.Our balanced and unbalanced sampling designs just mimicked the partial diallel cross scheme.With n=266,the hybrid sample size was set to 500,1000,and 2000,respectively.Correspondingly,the mean of s was 3.8,7.5,and 15.0.Note that s was much less than n-1.The inadequate phenotypic information of each parental line in crossing couldn't guarantee the accurate estimation of GCA.Although Vivas et al.[9]declared that it is possible to obtain good agreement(correlation coefficient above 0.8)with s=3,our accuracies with s=3.8 are still lower than those with s=7.5 and s=15.0.When evaluating the efficiency of the circulant diallel,Veiga et al.[46]pointed out that it is advantageous to increase the s value for a lowheritability trait.In our research,with the sample size of 500 for predicting T3,accuracies of OLS were substantially lower than those of GP-I and GP-II,showing that the reduction in the s value decreased the potential accuracy of OLS.However,it is gratifying that the GP approaches using genomic information have been demonstrated to partly compensate the“small s”problem.

    The unbalanced sampling design was also worthy of attention in breeding practice.Because of experimental cost and complex factors in field trails,involving all inbred lines in crossing is impossible.Previous studies[19,47]have adopted the strategy of predicting untested single-cross hybrids in maize and rice.However,few GS studies have been undertaken in predicting the GCA of the lines that never participate in crossing.In this case,the traditional phenotype-based OLS is impracticable.Our research has demonstrated that the GCA of the non-involved lines could also be estimated using GP approaches based on SPDC designs.This strategy allows a reliable selection of more inbred lines for their potential to create superior hybrids.But on the other hand,lines never or seldom involved in crossing were found to have lower accuracy than the involved lines.In this respect,our results are in agreement with those reported by Fristche-Neto et al.[48]who have indicated that the number of parents and the crosses per parent in the training sets should be maximized when predicting maize hybrid performance.

    Table 5–Accuracy of GP-II for the GCA of 266 inbred lines and for all the potential hybrids with the random samplings.

    Maize breeding involves two critical steps,developing superior inbred lines from breeding populations and identifying elite combinations of two inbred lines[52].With the development of DH and other technologies,breeders have been able to develop a large number of inbred lines which need to be evaluated by their performance in crosses.However,the number of potential crosses grows rapidly,making the field evaluation of hybrid performance time and resource intensive.Sparse partial diallel tables are becoming more and more common in breeding practice.GCA is mainly a measure of additive effects,and it is in response to selection of inbred lines.Accurate prediction of the GCA will enhance the efficiency of inbred line selection,and then accelerate the hybrid breeding.In actual breeding projects,especially for the scenario with only datasets based on SPDC designs,breeders can evaluate their inbred lines using the methods proposed in the present study.Then,for different heterotic groups,top inbred lines can be selected,and a few corresponding testers can be used to perform the validation by field trials.We believe that in this way,the efficiency and accuracy of maize breeding can be improved.

    Previous studies[3,53,54]have used maize introgression lines or recombination inbred lines to perform testcrosses for detecting significant loci of GCA.In all these experiments,phenotypes of hybrids were observed and the true GCA value could be calculated with certainty.However,in most breeding programs,only a small part of possible hybrids can be identified in field trials,and thus the detection work can't be carried out.In such cases,methods proposed in the present study guarantee a reliable estimation for the GCA, providing an opportunity for further detection of significant loci. This strategy may open up a promising research direction for inbred line selection in maize and other crops.

    Supplementary data for this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.04.012.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0100303),the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31801028,31902101),the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice(Wuhan University)(KF201701),the Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project in Yangzhou University(2019CXJ052)and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

    Author contributions

    Xin Wang performed the analysis and wrote the paper.Zhenliang Zhang,Yang Xu,and Pengchen Li collected the data.Xuecai Zhang assisted with the analysis.Chenwu Xu conceived and designed the analysis.

    一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久这里只有精品中国| videossex国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 在现免费观看毛片| 看黄色毛片网站| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久久久久大精品| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 99热全是精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 色网站视频免费| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 日本免费在线观看一区| 高清av免费在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| av在线亚洲专区| 久久99精品国语久久久| av在线播放精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 热99在线观看视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| h日本视频在线播放| 日本午夜av视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品.久久久| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产成人freesex在线| 美女大奶头视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 日韩欧美在线乱码| 特级一级黄色大片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久久精品94久久精品| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 午夜视频国产福利| 黄色一级大片看看| 级片在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲在久久综合| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品国产三级普通话版| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| av在线老鸭窝| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一本久久精品| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 久久久久久久久中文| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 69av精品久久久久久| av黄色大香蕉| ponron亚洲| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产成人福利小说| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| www日本黄色视频网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产高清三级在线| 只有这里有精品99| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 久久久精品94久久精品| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产亚洲最大av| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 午夜a级毛片| 欧美色视频一区免费| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久这里只有精品中国| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 久久久久性生活片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久久久网色| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 少妇丰满av| 亚洲国产色片| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲成色77777| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 精品久久久噜噜| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 午夜免费激情av| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av播播在线观看一区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 午夜视频国产福利| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 99热全是精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 久久人妻av系列| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| www.色视频.com| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品人妻视频免费看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 免费看a级黄色片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久精品夜色国产| 99热精品在线国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 永久网站在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 午夜福利高清视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久草成人影院| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产成人freesex在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产综合懂色| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 久久久久性生活片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 日本色播在线视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产乱人视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 在现免费观看毛片| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲综合精品二区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久午夜福利片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 免费大片18禁| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 男女国产视频网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产成人福利小说| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 老司机福利观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产视频内射| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 成人二区视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一级av片app| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产乱来视频区| 午夜福利在线在线| 一级黄片播放器| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久久久性生活片| 深夜a级毛片| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 久久草成人影院| av免费观看日本| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 看片在线看免费视频| 嫩草影院精品99| av在线亚洲专区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产综合懂色| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 精品久久久久久久久av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 丝袜喷水一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| www.av在线官网国产| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产高潮美女av| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女国产视频在线观看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 男女国产视频网站| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一本久久精品| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 综合色丁香网| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 日韩高清综合在线| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 九九热线精品视视频播放| av在线亚洲专区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| av卡一久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 一级爰片在线观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| videossex国产| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 岛国毛片在线播放| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 直男gayav资源| 国产av不卡久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| av线在线观看网站| 国产成人福利小说| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产 一区精品| 国产综合懂色| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 一级黄色大片毛片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 99久久精品热视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 一级av片app| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 免费看日本二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 伦精品一区二区三区| 午夜免费激情av| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 级片在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 色网站视频免费| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲av.av天堂| 97超碰精品成人国产| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 22中文网久久字幕| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产不卡一卡二| 成人欧美大片| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲图色成人| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| h日本视频在线播放| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久午夜福利片| 日本五十路高清| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品.久久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 成人无遮挡网站| 中文欧美无线码| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 永久网站在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 色哟哟·www| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 国产在视频线精品| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| kizo精华| 毛片女人毛片| 成人国产麻豆网| 尾随美女入室| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美性感艳星| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久热久热在线精品观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 91久久精品电影网| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频|