• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Using genomic data to improve the estimation of general combining ability based on sparse partial diallel cross designs in maize

    2020-10-21 10:02:02XinWangZhenliangZhangYangXuPenghenLiXueaiZhangChenwuXu
    The Crop Journal 2020年5期

    Xin Wang,Zhenliang Zhang,Yang Xu,Penghen Li,Xueai Zhang,Chenwu Xu,*

    aCollege of Information Engineering,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China

    bKey Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops,College of Agriculture,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China

    cInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center(CIMMYT),Mexico D.F.06600,Mexico

    ABSTRACT

    1.Introduction

    The concept of general combining ability(GCA),originally defined by Sprague and Tatum[1],refers to the average performance of a line in hybrid combinations.It can be estimated using the difference between the average of its hybrids and the general average for all crossings.GCA is mainly a measure of additive effects,which can be directly transmitted from parents to offspring.In recent years,doubled haploid(DH)technology has facilitated the generation of a large number of inbred lines,making GCA evaluation the major bottleneck in hybrid maize breeding[2].Therefore,the evaluation of GCA is a crucial process for hybrid development,and the maize line with high GCA is an essential component for producing elite hybrids[3].

    Estimation of GCA can be obtained easily using the complete diallel cross design or North Carolina Design II(NC II)[4,5].However,with the development of breeding programs,a great quantity of inbred lines are available.The number of possible crosses grows very rapidly,making these designs time and resource intensive.Partial diallel cross designs in which only a subset of possible crosses is performed are more attractive options[6].They allow the evaluation of a greater number of inbred lines in crosses[7].In the classic circulant designs[8],each of n lines is only crossed with s other lines,instead of n-1 lines as in the complete diallel.In this way,each line is guaranteed to be involved in the sampling crosses.Analysis using circulant diallels significantly reduces the number of crosses in which each genitor is involved,and enables the participation of a greater number of genitors[9].However,in breeding practice,only a small proportion of hybrids are possible to be evaluated in the field,making the partial diallel table very sparse.This means that the average value of s is small,and some complex factors of field trials may bring big fluctuation to s for the parental lines.In this scenario,limited research has been reported to estimate the GCA.So,there is an urgent need to develop procedures to allow the accurate evaluation of GCA based on sparse partial diallel cross(SPDC)designs[6].

    Previous studies[10–12]have proposed many statistical methods for diallel analysis.Among them,diallel mating models proposed by Griffing[10]are the most widely used models for investigating the genetic parameters(general and specific combining ability).For a partial diallel cross scheme,traditional studies[13]used the ordinary least squares(OLS)to estimate GCA.However,if the diallel table is very sparse,the great reduction in the ratio of observed hybrids will be striking.Using the traditional OLS to evaluate many inbred lines with a small sample of hybrids can't ensure high accuracy.

    Fortunately,with the advances of molecular biology,breeders can accurately understand the genetic structure of breeding populations,and thus greatly improve the estimation of genetic parameters using genomic prediction(GP).Estimated breeding values based on the genotypes of individuals were remarkably accurate[14,15].Some studies[16,17]used GS models for directly predicting agronomic traits in inbred lines,and some others[18–20]used GS for predicting hybrid performance.Various methods,such as Genomic best linear unbiased prediction(GBLUP),Bayes,the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)and machine learning[21–24]have been developed for GP,and these differ with respect to assumptions about the marker effects.GBLUP and RR-BLUP[21]assign identical variance to all loci and essentially treat all of them as equally important.In BayesA,markers are assumed to have different variances and follows a posterior scaled inverse chi-square distribution[22].The prior in BayesB assumes that the variance of markers is equal to zero with probabilityπ,and the complement with probability 1–πfollows a scaled inverse chi-square distribution[22].In Bayes Cπ,the mixture probabilityπhas a prior uniform distribution[25].LASSO is a popular method for regression that uses a penalty to achieve a sparse solution,and it is somewhat indifferent to closely correlated markers and tends to pick one and ignore the others[26].Machine learning is also an alternative for GS.It has been employed to enhance the prediction of genetic values for wheat and maize[27,28].Although various models have been successfully applied to GS,some studies[29–31]showed that not much variation in prediction accuracy among the different models was observed.

    In terms of the GCA analyses and hybrid prediction,Bernardo[32–34]was one of the first to advocate the BLUP model[35]in maize.From then on,many studies have been reported to analyze GCA especially when predicting hybrids.For predicting the GCA of a maize testcross population,Riedelsheimer et al.[2]proposed a genomic selection(GS)approach based on RR-BLUP,showing that more efficient predictive procedures could be developed using genomic data.With a linear mixed model using the ASReml-R software[36],Kadam et al.[37]evaluated random inbreds derived from biparental families of maize.Using GBLUP and BayesB,Technow et al.[38]investigated genome properties of the parental line based on the Dent×Flint heterotic pattern.Greenberg et al.[6]developed a hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate quantitative genetic parameter from partial diallel cross designs.Werner et al.[39]considered GCA and specific combining ability(SCA)to apply RR-BLUP and Bayesian models for predicting hybrid performance in oilseed rape using a collection of 220 paternal DH lines and five malesterile inbred lines.Recently,using GBLUP and a complete diallel cross design with twenty-eight single-crosses formed between eight parental lines,Velez-Torres et al.[40]concluded that GS is a more effective and efficient approach to predict the GCA of maize lines compared with phenotyping method.However,in most of the previous studies,more attention has been paid to the prediction accuracy of hybrids,and the prediction of parental GCA is not the focus.For an SPDC maize population,few studies have been reported to systematically investigate the GP accuracy for GCA.

    The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of GP for estimating the GCA of maize inbred lines with SPDC systems.As mentioned earlier,the accuracy of various GS models is similar.Considering that GBLUP is more suitable for quantitative traits influenced by polygenes and its high computational efficiency[15],GBLUP was adopted in this study.Using genome-wide SNPs called from a real maize data set of 266 inbred lines,genetic and phenotypic values of all possible hybrids were simulated.And thus different hybrid sample sizes and different distributions of parental lines involved in crossing were investigated.Such a scheme was implemented to assess the efficacy of GP in estimating the GCA of lines.Then,the utility of statistical approaches was illustrated with an example using an actual trait of maize.The methods we described would be useful in various sets of maize and other crops.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1. Materials

    2.1.1. Plant materials

    The models were fitted to the maize data set from Yangzhou University. Partial diallel crossings between a total of 266 maize inbred lines were performed during the 2017 and 2018 maize growing seasons from field trials on the experimental farms in Yangzhou and Taian, China, and two replicates were made in each environment. Regardless of reciprocals, ear weight (EW) for 945 hybrids were collected to estimate the GCA of the inbred lines. The phenotypes fitting the statistical model were the average performance of each hybrid from two environments. The 266 inbred lines were genotyped, and 319,668 SNPs evenly distributed on chromosomes were called initially. 61,468 genome-wide SNPs were filtered by eliminating the heterozygosity >0.05 and the missing rate > 0.05.Genotypes of the hybrids were inferred from SNPs of their inbred parents.

    2.1.2. Simulations

    Based on the genotypes mentioned above, a large number of simulations were performed to assess the prediction accuracy of different statistical approaches. Considering additive and dominant genetic effects of markers, several traits of all the 35,245 possible hybrids with 200 QTLs and different heritabilities were randomly simulated. The numbers of QTLs on chromosome 1–10 are 29, 32, 21, 25, 21, 12, 15, 21, 9, and 15,respectively. According to the study of Meuwissen et al. [22],the additive effects of the 200 QTLs were drawn from a gamma distribution with shape parameter α = 0.4 and scale parameter β = 1.66. Half of the additive effects had positive effects and the other half had negative effects. The dominant effects were determined as the product of the absolute additive effects and the degree of dominance, which was drawn from a normal distribution with mean and variance equal to 0.193 and 0.3122,respectively. In the 200 QTLs, two loci on chromosome 1 and chromosome 3 were found to have weak over-dominant effects. For all the simulated hybrids, the ratio of dominant variance to additive variance was 0.160. Normal independent error deviations with variances calculated were added to meet assumed heritability, and the simulated phenotypes were centered and standardized to unit variance. Finally, three traits with heritability of 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3, named T7, T5, and T3 were obtained.

    2.1.3. Sampling designs

    Two types of sampling designs were performed to evaluate the difference in predictive accuracy. First, for each trait of the 35,245 hybrids, different numbers of hybrids (m = 500, 1000,and 2000)were sampled as the training sets to estimate the GCA of the 266 parental lines.Second,with a certain sample size of hybrids mentioned above,three distributions of parental lines were designed.One was similar to a circulant diallel table.In this paper it was called balanced sampling,which meant that all parental lines were involved in nearly an equal number of crosses(designated s).Another was called random sampling,which meant that the crossing times of all the lines were random but at least 1.The third was called unbalanced sampling,which meant that only part of the 266 lines(n=200 or 150)were involved in random crossing.Each sampling method was randomly repeated 20 times to obtain the average results of 20 replicates.The density plot for the crossing times of the 266 lines derived from the 20 samplings with different methods is shown in Fig.1.Taking the first round of sampling with m=500 as an example,the detailed sampling scheme is illustrated in Table S1.In this study,for the random samplings,the crossing times(s)of each inbred line was classified into three levels to compare the accuracy for line subsets with different s value.About a quarter of the lines with the lowest s value were defined as low-frequency;a quarter of the lines with the highest s value were defined as high-frequency;the middle half was defined as mediumfrequency.

    2.2.Methods

    The Griffing Model[10]was used for analyzing our SPDC schemes:

    where yijis the phenotypic value of the hybrids between line i and line j(i,j=1,2,…,n);μis the overall mean;giand gjare the GCA effects of the ith parent and the jth parent,respectively;sijis the SCA effect for the cross between the ith and jth parents;andεijis the random error effect.

    Based on the above model,three statistical approaches were applied.One obtained estimations through the OLS and the other two utilized GP to predict the GCA.In our simulations,knowing the phenotypes of all the possible hybrids,the true GCA of all the 266 inbred lines can be calculated with its definition.The coefficient of determination(the squared Pearson correlation coefficient)between the true GCA and predicted GCA was adopted to evaluate the accuracy of different statistical approaches.

    2.2.1.OLS approach

    In the matrix form,the vector for m observed hybrids can be represented by:

    Fig.1–Density plot for the crossing times of the 266 inbred lines derived from 20 rounds of random,balanced and unbalanced samplings,respectively.

    2.2.2.GP approach

    GBLUP is an efficient method using whole-genome markers to predict genetic values and phenotypes of interest.It exploits the genomic relationships between training population and testing population to predict the genomic values for unknown individuals[42].In this study,two GP approaches using GBLUP were performed for predicting the GCA of the 266 lines.One was designated GP-I,which used the Griffing Model to directly estimate the GCA.The other,designated GP-II,estimated the GCA by predicting the phenotypes of all possible hybrids.

    The model of GP-I can be described as:

    The model of GP-II can be described as:

    3.Results

    3.1.Comparison of the methods for estimating the GCA

    For the traits T7,T5 and T3,based on random and balanced samplings,the prediction results of OLS,GP-I and GP-II using different sample sizes were compared in Table 1.In each case,the trait T7 had the highest accuracy,while the trait T3 had the lowest accuracy,showing that the estimation of GCA was largely dependent on heritability.

    It is notable that the accuracy of each approach was always higher than the heritability of a target trait,showing that the GCA for maize lines can be accurately predicted with SPDC designs.This character is very beneficial to genetic improvement in breeding practice.For T7,derived from the random sampling i.e.,when the sample size was 500,GP-II gave the highest accuracy(0.8068).It was 4.7% higher than that of GP-I(0.7709)and 9.6% higher than that of OLS(0.7361);when the sample sizes were 1000 and 2000,GP-II gave the highest accuracy as before.At this time,the accuracy of GP-I was only slightly higher than that of OLS and the advantage of GP-II was smaller.For T5,when the sample sizes were 500 and 1000,the statistical approaches showed the similar pattern increasing from OLS to GP-II.When the sample size was 2000,the accuracy of GP-I was once again slightly higher than that of OLS.For T3,no matter which sample size was adopted,GP-II gave much more accurate GCA than GP-I and OLS,and the accuracies obtained by GP-I always substantially exceeded that of OLS.

    Obviously,the sample size had a great influence on the accuracy.For all the three traits,statistical approaches with the sample size of 2000 provided the highest accuracies,followed by those with the sample size of 1000,reflecting that a big sample size could substantially contribute to the prediction.Additionally,the sample size affected the significance of GP approaches over OLS.As mentioned above,the smaller the sample size,the higher the level of significance was,showing that GP is particularly beneficial for the estimation of GCA with a sparse partial diallel table.No matter which statistical approach was used,when comparing the random and balanced samplings,their accuracies werenot significantly different,showing that the random sampling commonly used in breeding practice had little impact on the average accuracy of GCA.

    Table 1 – Comparison of accuracy using OLS, GP-I, and GP-II with different sampling designs and training set sizes.

    In brief,GP-II performed the best in our research and would be a promising approach for estimating the GCA of maize and other crops.

    3.2.Accuracy with different numbers of inbred lines involved in crossing

    Sometimes,due to insufficient material resources or experimental budget,the number of inbred lines involved in crossing is limited.Therefore,in this study,the effect of line quantity on prediction was explored.To simplify the problem,only the GP-II approach that had the highest accuracy in the previous experiments was investigated.The accuracy for the 266 lines with different numbers of lines(n=150,200,and 266)involved in random crossing was plotted against the sampling number of hybrids(Fig.2).As expected,for each of the three traits,the accuracy was higher for the sampling designs with 266 lines over the sampling designs with 200 and 150 lines.For T7,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 22.9%,25.2%,and 30.4%higher than that with n=150,respectively;For T5,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 20.8%,22.3%,and 27.7%higher than that with n=150,respectively;For T3,when the sample size was 500,1000 and 2000,the highest accuracy obtained with n=266 was 14.0%,17.5%,and 24.4%higher than that with n=150,respectively.It was clear that the advantage of more inbred lines involved in crossing could be brought into full play when predicting a high-heritability trait with a big sample size of hybrids.

    3.3.Accuracy for subsets of inbred lines

    The results of above research demonstrated that no significant differences were found between the accuracies of the random and balanced samplings.However,for the random sampling,inbred lines involved in crossing with different frequency must provide different amounts of information.Therefore,taking GP-II for instance,accuracy for lines involved in crossing with different levels of frequency derived from the random sampling were demonstrated in Table 2.It was shown that the lines involved in crossing with highfrequency always got the highest accuracy,and those with low-frequency performed the worst.For predicting T3,with the sample size of 500,the high-frequency lines achieved the biggest increase(55.3%)in accuracy relative to the lowfrequency lines.That is to say,although the random sampling brings us similar accuracy to the balanced sampling,the prediction for low-frequency lines may suffer from much lower accuracy,especially for a low-heritability trait with a small sample size of hybrids.

    Fig.2–Accuracy of GP-II for the 266 inbred lines with different numbers of lines(n=150,200,or 266)involved in the random crossing.

    Unbalanced sampling design was also concerned in this research.The accuracies of GP-II for lines involved and not involved in crossing are summarized in Table 3.As expected,the accuracies were always much higher for the involved lines over the non-involved lines.In most cases,the accuracy increases with the sample size.It is interesting to note that the accuracy of non-involved lines is always less sensitive to the sample size than that of the involved lines.In particular for T7,the accuracy of the 166 non-involved lines with m=2000(0.4105)was 6.4%higher than that with m=500(0.3858),while the advantage of the 150 involved lines was 10.5%;in the same way,the accuracy of the 66 non-involved lines with m=2000(0.4594)was only 4.3%higher than that with m=500(0.4405),while the advantage of the 200 involved lines was 14.5%.For T5 and T3,the pattern of the accuracy was similar to that for T7.

    Table 2–Accuracy of GP-II for inbred lines involved in crossing with different levels of frequency.

    In each case,accuracy of involved lines with n=200 was lower than that with n=150.A good interpretation was that the involved lines with n=150 has higher frequency in crossing,which showed again the contribution of highfrequency to prediction.On the contrary,accuracies of noninvolved lines with n=200 were almost higher than that with n=150.The reason may be that the advantage of highfrequency cannot work on the non-involved lines,and a sample of hybrids derived from more lines can benefit the prediction.

    Table 3–Accuracy of GP-II for inbred lines involved and not involved in crossing derived from the unbalanced samplings.

    3.4.Prediction results for EW of maize

    In addition to the simulated studies,actual EW of 945 hybrids were used to estimate the GCA of the 266 inbred lines.The predicted GCA values were sorted in descending order and the prediction results of the top 20 inbred lines are demonstrated in Table 4.As shown,eight common varieties,including B93,B57,B108,B74,B214,B275,B254,and B167 were screen out by all the three statistical approaches.It is noteworthy that the coefficient of determination between the predicted GCA of GPII and OLS was the highest(0.8703),and up to sixteen common varieties were selected by the two approaches simultaneously,indicating that the intersection between the results of GP-II and OLS was more reliable in this scenario.Moreover,the absolute GCA values predicted by GP-I were lower than those predicted by OLS and GP-II.The reason may be that the non-additive effects were excluded from the estimates of GCA when using GP-I.Although this exclusion may not affect the predictive accuracy,the loss of non-additive variance will inevitably reduce the absolute values of the predicted GCA.

    4.Discussion

    With a complete diallel cross scheme,the GCA of inbred line can be easily calculated with its definition[1].However,because of the large number of possible crosses,Kempthorne and Curnow[7]suggested the partial diallel cross to evaluate inbred lines.Each of the n lines are crossed with s other lines,and there will be ns/2 crosses in the whole set.In this scenario,although the OLS was widely used for estimating the GCA[13,44],genomic information was ignored.GS uses all molecular markers for predicting the performance of the candidates,and it has shown tangible genetic gains in maize breeding[14].Recently,Alves et al.[45]pointed out that GS can be used to estimate genetic parameters accurately in maize hybrids.For maize inbred lines,there is no reason to doubt the advantage of GS over the phenotype-based OLS.Comparisons of the three approaches in the present study have shown that GP-II and GP-I are superior to OLS,showing that prediction with genomic data can help improve the estimation of GCA for inbred lines based on SPDC designs.

    Riedelsheimer et al.[2]crossed 285 diverse Dent inbred lines with two testers and predicted the GCA using genomic and metabolic information.Predictive accuracies(the Pearson correlation)ranged from 0.72 to 0.81 for GP,which are similar to ours for T3 and T5.However,a fivefold cross-validation scheme was applied in their prediction and the predicted GCA values of one subset were estimated using the observed GCA values of the other four subsets.In our research,the situation was quite different.The partial diallel table was assumed to be very sparse.Even if the hybrid sample size is equal 2000,the ratio of the sample size(2000)to the possible hybrid size(35,245)is only 5.7%,making it impossible to obtain a GCA observation of any line.In other words,our prediction is based on the SPDC.The sampling hybrids are treated as the training set,and their number is often lager than the number of lines with identified GCA.Maybe this is the reason why our accuracies are slightly higher than those of Riedelsheimer et al.[2].

    Population design plays a vital role in breeding programs,and partial diallel cross is preferable in many cases.For instance,Miranda Filho and Vencovsky[13]estimated the GCA for ear length of maize in a partial diallel cross with n=10 and s=3.Reis et al.[44]estimated the genetic parameters using a partial circulant diallel cross design with n=34(two groups of parents)and different sizes of s(from 2 to 5).Analysis using cross-validation process showed that the accuracy increased as the value of s increased.Our balanced and unbalanced sampling designs just mimicked the partial diallel cross scheme.With n=266,the hybrid sample size was set to 500,1000,and 2000,respectively.Correspondingly,the mean of s was 3.8,7.5,and 15.0.Note that s was much less than n-1.The inadequate phenotypic information of each parental line in crossing couldn't guarantee the accurate estimation of GCA.Although Vivas et al.[9]declared that it is possible to obtain good agreement(correlation coefficient above 0.8)with s=3,our accuracies with s=3.8 are still lower than those with s=7.5 and s=15.0.When evaluating the efficiency of the circulant diallel,Veiga et al.[46]pointed out that it is advantageous to increase the s value for a lowheritability trait.In our research,with the sample size of 500 for predicting T3,accuracies of OLS were substantially lower than those of GP-I and GP-II,showing that the reduction in the s value decreased the potential accuracy of OLS.However,it is gratifying that the GP approaches using genomic information have been demonstrated to partly compensate the“small s”problem.

    The unbalanced sampling design was also worthy of attention in breeding practice.Because of experimental cost and complex factors in field trails,involving all inbred lines in crossing is impossible.Previous studies[19,47]have adopted the strategy of predicting untested single-cross hybrids in maize and rice.However,few GS studies have been undertaken in predicting the GCA of the lines that never participate in crossing.In this case,the traditional phenotype-based OLS is impracticable.Our research has demonstrated that the GCA of the non-involved lines could also be estimated using GP approaches based on SPDC designs.This strategy allows a reliable selection of more inbred lines for their potential to create superior hybrids.But on the other hand,lines never or seldom involved in crossing were found to have lower accuracy than the involved lines.In this respect,our results are in agreement with those reported by Fristche-Neto et al.[48]who have indicated that the number of parents and the crosses per parent in the training sets should be maximized when predicting maize hybrid performance.

    Table 5–Accuracy of GP-II for the GCA of 266 inbred lines and for all the potential hybrids with the random samplings.

    Maize breeding involves two critical steps,developing superior inbred lines from breeding populations and identifying elite combinations of two inbred lines[52].With the development of DH and other technologies,breeders have been able to develop a large number of inbred lines which need to be evaluated by their performance in crosses.However,the number of potential crosses grows rapidly,making the field evaluation of hybrid performance time and resource intensive.Sparse partial diallel tables are becoming more and more common in breeding practice.GCA is mainly a measure of additive effects,and it is in response to selection of inbred lines.Accurate prediction of the GCA will enhance the efficiency of inbred line selection,and then accelerate the hybrid breeding.In actual breeding projects,especially for the scenario with only datasets based on SPDC designs,breeders can evaluate their inbred lines using the methods proposed in the present study.Then,for different heterotic groups,top inbred lines can be selected,and a few corresponding testers can be used to perform the validation by field trials.We believe that in this way,the efficiency and accuracy of maize breeding can be improved.

    Previous studies[3,53,54]have used maize introgression lines or recombination inbred lines to perform testcrosses for detecting significant loci of GCA.In all these experiments,phenotypes of hybrids were observed and the true GCA value could be calculated with certainty.However,in most breeding programs,only a small part of possible hybrids can be identified in field trials,and thus the detection work can't be carried out.In such cases,methods proposed in the present study guarantee a reliable estimation for the GCA, providing an opportunity for further detection of significant loci. This strategy may open up a promising research direction for inbred line selection in maize and other crops.

    Supplementary data for this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.04.012.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0100303),the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31801028,31902101),the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice(Wuhan University)(KF201701),the Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project in Yangzhou University(2019CXJ052)and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

    Author contributions

    Xin Wang performed the analysis and wrote the paper.Zhenliang Zhang,Yang Xu,and Pengchen Li collected the data.Xuecai Zhang assisted with the analysis.Chenwu Xu conceived and designed the analysis.

    国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产精品三级大全| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久人人爽人人片av| 一个人免费看片子| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 成年av动漫网址| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产高清videossex| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 尾随美女入室| 一区在线观看完整版| 两个人看的免费小视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品.久久久| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 五月开心婷婷网| 91国产中文字幕| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 午夜91福利影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久久欧美国产精品| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 免费观看人在逋| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久国产精品影院| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 91字幕亚洲| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 蜜桃在线观看..| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久热在线av| 自线自在国产av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产1区2区3区精品| 自线自在国产av| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 看免费成人av毛片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 男女免费视频国产| 一个人免费看片子| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 91字幕亚洲| 久久青草综合色| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产一级毛片在线| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 一级黄色大片毛片| 777米奇影视久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 深夜精品福利| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久青草综合色| 中文欧美无线码| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费少妇av软件| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产片内射在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| av片东京热男人的天堂| 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品二区激情视频| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 91精品三级在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| avwww免费| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久免费观看电影| 国产av国产精品国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 色94色欧美一区二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 午夜两性在线视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产激情久久老熟女| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产淫语在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| www.自偷自拍.com| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 黄片小视频在线播放| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 色网站视频免费| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 黄片播放在线免费| a级毛片黄视频| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久久视频综合| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 成人影院久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 老司机靠b影院| 久久av网站| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 男女国产视频网站| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| xxx大片免费视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 考比视频在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久性视频一级片| 99热全是精品| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产男女内射视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 嫩草影视91久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一级黄片播放器| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 十八禁人妻一区二区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 午夜两性在线视频| 九草在线视频观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 搡老岳熟女国产| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲av美国av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 午夜久久久在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本午夜av视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美97在线视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久热在线av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲综合色网址| av在线app专区| 女警被强在线播放| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 成人手机av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产一级毛片在线| 青草久久国产| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久久久久国产电影| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 操美女的视频在线观看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| a 毛片基地| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 999精品在线视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 性少妇av在线| 天天影视国产精品| 午夜久久久在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 制服人妻中文乱码| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产精品成人在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 精品第一国产精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 美女中出高潮动态图| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产av国产精品国产| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 中文欧美无线码| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 大香蕉久久成人网| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 97在线人人人人妻| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 五月天丁香电影| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产成人91sexporn| tube8黄色片| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产精品 国内视频| 另类精品久久| av片东京热男人的天堂| 久热这里只有精品99| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产片内射在线| h视频一区二区三区| 91麻豆av在线| 一个人免费看片子| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 中文欧美无线码| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 高清av免费在线| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| av福利片在线| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 黄频高清免费视频| 99热全是精品| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 手机成人av网站| 国产色视频综合| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 精品一区二区三卡| 看免费av毛片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日本wwww免费看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 男女国产视频网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久国产精品影院| 久久这里只有精品19| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 男女免费视频国产| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| www.999成人在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 成人国语在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 热re99久久国产66热| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 91老司机精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 一区在线观看完整版| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 日本午夜av视频| 性色av一级| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 一级毛片电影观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久免费观看电影| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 又大又爽又粗| 老司机靠b影院| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 午夜影院在线不卡| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| av网站在线播放免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 99九九在线精品视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 在线观看国产h片| 大型av网站在线播放| 老熟女久久久| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成人手机av|