• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genome-wide association mapping for grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat(Triticum turgidum ssp.durum)

    2020-10-21 10:01:50AmsAlmuTilyFyissRobrtoTubrosMroMfrriGiusppSirTsfyLttBklAbyo
    The Crop Journal 2020年5期

    Ams Almu*,Tily Fyiss,Robrto Tubros,Mro Mfrri,Giuspp Sir,Tsfy Ltt,Bkl Abyo

    aDepartment of Microbial,Cellular and Molecular Biology,Addis Ababa University,P.O.Box 1176,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    bDepartment of Biology,Debre Tabor University,Ethiopia

    cDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences,University of Bologna,Viale G Fanin,44-40127 Bologna,Italy

    dOromia Agricultural Research Institute,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    eInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center(CIMMYT),Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    ABSTRACT

    1.Introduction

    Durum wheat(Triticum turgidum ssp.durum)is an allotetraploid wheat comprising an A genome from the diploid species T.urartu and a B genome from Aegilops speltoides or a relative that may now be extinct[1].Durum wheat is the main source of semolina for production of pasta(particularly in Europe and North America)and couscous and bread in the Middle East and North Africa.Ethiopia is a center of durum genetic diversity.This high diversity is associated with the wide range of agroecological conditions and farmer cultural diversity[2–4]and is a focus of genetic studies and a source of novel alleles[5,6].Ethiopian durum wheat kernels include several color types[4].In Ethiopia,the crop is used mainly for local consumption.Despite the high genetic diversity and suitable conditions for durum production,the country depends on imported durum,owing to a lack of high-quality cultivars[7].

    Grain shape traits(grain length and width)strongly influence yield and milling quality[8,9].These traits are quantitative traits controlled by several genes[10]and their genetic improvement is a target of durum breeding[11].

    The grain color of durum wheat comes from its pigments,consisting of carotenoids and anthocyanins.A yellowishamber color,which is an essential quality parameter of durum semolina,is due to the carotenoid pigment/yellow pigment content(YPC)in the whole kernel and is commercially identified as the yellow index[12].Anthocyanins,in contrast,accumulate in the pericarp or aleurone of durum wheat and provide the blue,purple,and red colors of the grain[13].In addition to their visual appeal,both carotenoids and anthocyanins influence human health and nutrition[14–16].

    Red grain color of wheat increases dormancy and has been used as a marker for resistance to preharvest sprouting in wheat breeding programs[17].Carotenoids have been a target of plant breeders,mainly in response to the needs of pasta producers.However,because of their role in health and nutrition and a corresponding consumer demand,anthocyanins have become a target of genetic improvement[13,18].Grain color is controlled by genetic and environmental factors and cultivation practices.Genes involved in pigment accumulation and proteins with regulatory roles have been identified[13].

    Digital image analysis is increasingly used in plant science,especially in phenomics[19].Novel software packages based on digital image analysis allows detailed imaging of grain features including shape and color[20,21].

    Elucidating the genetic basis of complex quantitative traits controlling agronomic traits of economic importance is key to modern plant breeding.Genome-wide association mapping(GWAS)involves genotyping a large collection of accessions with numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs)distributed throughout the genome and testing their association with phenotypic traits.SNP genotyping platforms have been constructed to permit genome-assisted selection by identifying quantitative trait loci(QTL)[22].The 90K wheat SNP array by Illumina allows genome-wide scans for this purpose[23,24].

    Numerous QTL for whole grain or flour color of both bread and durum wheat have been identified[25–31].The unexploited Ethiopian durum wheat landraces are rich in genetic diversity for many traits including grain shape and color.The objective of this study was to perform a genome-wide association analysis for grain shape and color traits using Ethiopian durum wheats.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    A panel of 192 Ethiopian spring durum wheats comprising 167 landraces and 25 cultivars (Table S1) was assembled.Accessions were collected and maintained by Debre-Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) and Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC), Ethiopia as single-seed descent (SSD)progenies. From this panel, Liu et al. [5] used 182 (160 landraces and 22 cultivars) to identify QTL for stripe rust resistance. Landrace accessions were originally collected from major wheat-producing areas of Ethiopia, including Bale,Gondar, Gojjam, Shewa, Tigray, and Wollo and included 12 lines currently cultivated in the USA. Cultivars were released by DZARC and SARC from 1994 to 2010 and have been cultivated in Ethiopia.

    2.2. Phenotypic data

    All accessions were planted in consecutive growing seasons(2013/2014 and 2014/2015) at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC), located between 07°06′12″ N and 07°07′29″ N and 40°12′40″ E to 40°13′52″ E, for purification by ear-to-row planting. Purified and homogeneous accessions were planted in 2015/2016 in a completely randomized block design with three replications. All accessions were grown in two-row plots 1 m long with 15 cm between rows. The field was managed following local agricultural practices. Twenty homogeneous and healthy seeds were selected from each replicate for digital image analysis. Digital images were acquired with a flatbed CanoScan LiDE 120 F (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), with a true optical resolution of 4800 dpi and 48-bit internal color depth.Seeds were spread on the scanner glass and spaced for accurate measurement. Black cardboard was used to cover the scanner to increase contrast and reduce reflection. All images were scanned at 24-bit with 300 dpi resolution and 2250 × 3705 pixels and recorded in a JPEG format.

    2.3. Digital image analysis

    Digital image measurements were collected with GrainScan[21], a software package developed for high-throughput phenotyping of cereal grains. The default-automated threshold was used to measure grain length (GL) and grain width(GW). The mean value of 20 seeds per replicate was recorded.Commission Internationale l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab, a threedimensional (L*a*b*) color space method, was used to measure the color of accessions. Calibration with a color checker,which is scanned under the same setting as the seeds, was used to change the raw RGB value measured by the scanner to standardized CIE L*a*b* values. CIE L* values represent brightness, CIE a* indicates redness (positive values) and greenness(negative values)and CIE b*represents yellowness(positive value)and blueness(negative value).

    2.4.Phenotypic data analysis

    2.5.Genotypic data

    For each accession,25 one-week-old plants from the same seed source used for digital image analysis were pooled for genomic DNA extraction using a DNeasy 96 Plant Kit(Qiagen GmbH,Hilden,Germany).An Illumina high-density 90K wheat SNP array[23]was used for genotyping accessions.SNP calling and clustering were performed with GenomeStudio 2011.1(Illumina,San Diego,CA,USA).Calls showing residual heterozygosity were assigned as missing values.SNP markers with minor-allele frequency<0.05 and>0.1 missing values per accession were excluded.After filtering,imputation of missing data was performed with Beagle 4.0[32].Considering the higher levels of homozygosity exist in durum wheat,imputation was made without any phased reference populations.Twenty five markers were considered in the imputation rolling window with an overlap of a single marker,the typical number of markers included in a 0.5 cM interval.Since tuning of other parameters did not improve imputation accuracy,default values were kept.

    A high-density consensus map of tetraploid wheat generated by Maccaferri et al.[24]was used to assign chromosome positions of SNPs and markers with unknown positions were excluded.

    2.6.Population structure and kinship analysis

    A Bayesian model-based(Markov chain Monte Carlo,MCMC)clustering approach was used for population structure analysis by STRUCTURE 2.3[33].The Haploview Tagger function(based on analysis of marker pairwise r2values)was used to select tag-SNPs with a tagger filter set at r2=0.5 in HAPLOVIEW 4.2[34]and 1496 tag-SNPs were selected for population structure analysis.The most likely subgroup number was inferred by the log probability(ln PD)and an ad-hoc statistic(ΔK)based on the rate of change of ln PD between runs using successive K-values as described by Evanno et al.[35].Based on this,theΔK shows a clear peak at the ideal number of subgroups.Ten subgroups with 20 independent runs for each subgroup were done under an admixture model of population structure with correlated allele frequencies and a burn-in period of 50,000 iterations and 100,000 MCMC iterations after burn-in were calculated for each run.

    The Haploview Tagger function was also used to select tag-SNPs for kinship matrix (K) analysis with a tagger filter set at r2= 0.1 in HAPLOVIEW and 4842 tag-SNPs were selected to compute the K and incorporated in the mixed linear model(MLM) along with the population structure (Q) value for GWAS analysis by TASSEL v.5.2 [36].

    2.7. Linkage disequilibrium and genome-wide association analysis

    Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was calculated as r2values between pairwise SNPs using TASSEL. The specific critical r2value beyond which LD is due to true physical linkage was determined by taking the 95th percentile of r2data of unlinked marker pairs [37]. LD decay was estimated as physical distance using the procedure of Hill and Weir [38] in R [39]and an LD decay curve was fitted with a smoothing spline regression line at the genome level.

    An MLM [40] was used for genome-wide association(GWAS) analysis with population structure (Q) and kinship(K) covariates. Population structure was estimated as the first 10 principal components (PCs) calculated from tag-SNPs (r2=0.5) and kinship was measured as similarity matrix from tag-SNPs (r2= 0.1) in TASSEL software package. Three levels of significance were introduced for reporting GWAS QTL: (i)experiment-wise P ≤ .05 (-lg P ≥ 4.00) for “major” QTL, (ii)marker-wise P ≤ .001 (-lg P ≥ 3.00) for “nominal” QTL, and (iii)marker-wise P ≤ 0.005, (-lg P ≥ 2.5) for “suggestive” QTL. The experiment-wise threshold was established from the number of independent SNP tests estimated in HAPLOVIEW using the tagger function of r2= 0.3 [41] and the total number of tag-SNPs was 816. Bonferroni adjustment for multiple GWAS tests(P ≤ 0.05) was equal to -lg P = 4.04 (rounded to 4). Hence the experiment-wise, Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold at P = 0.05 matched a marker-wise threshold of -lg P ≥ 4.00.Significance intervals of identified QTL were reported as the intervals after inclusion of all SNPs associated with the trait with P ≤ 0.01 (marker-wise) and in LD of r2≥ 0.3. The confidence interval of a QTL was defined based on ±2.25 cM(LD decay of this panel) from the GWAS QTL peak (QTL-tag SNP).

    3.Results

    3.1. Phenotypic variation

    Highly significant variation was observed among accessions for all grain shape and color traits (Table 1, Fig. 1).Maximum values of 8.84 and 3.57 mm and minimum values of 5.21 and 2.44 mm were recorded for grain length and width with mean values of 7.50 and 3.05 mm, respectively. CIE L*(brightness) ranged from 41.38 to 68.51 with a mean of 57.26,CIE a* ranged from 6.48 to 14.15 with a mean of 9.56, and CIE b*ranged from 8.78 to 21.43 with a mean of 16.14. The phenotypic means of accessions are presented in Table S2.A normal distribution was observed for GL and b*, whereas GW, L* and a* showed bimodal distributions (Fig. 2). CIE L*showed negative correlation with a* and positive correlation with b* (Fig. 3). CIE a* showed negative correlations with GW,b*, and GL. Thousand-grain weight showed no correlation with either grain shape or color-related traits, indicated that the variation in color and shape traits was not due to seed size. The trait was accordingly not included in GWAS analysis.

    3.2. Population structure

    The optimal subgroup of the panel was inferred using the second-order rate of change of the likelihood in STRUCTURE.The result showed a clear peak at K = 3 indicating that three is the optimal number of subgroups in the panel. Subgroups 1, 2,and 3 contained respectively 75, 27, and 90 accessions (Table S1). Of the 25 cultivars, 24 were clustered in subgroup 2 with two landraces from Bale and Gojjam. Most of the landraces(44)collected from Sinana Agricultural Research Center were grouped in subgroup 1 along with one cultivar (selam), 12 landraces collected from DZARC, 8 landraces from Wollo, and landraces from Gojjam, Shewa and Tigray. The remaining 90 landraces were clustered in subgroup 3.

    Accessions did not cluster by geographical background.Eight landraces from northern Ethiopia (Wollo) were grouped in subgroup 1, whereas 25 landraces with the same origin were clustered in subgroup 3. Landraces from central Ethiopia(Akaki and Shewa)grouped in both subgroups 1(four landraces)and 3(19 landraces).All 12 Ethiopian landraces now cultivated in the USA were grouped in subgroup 3.

    Fig.1–Images of accessions with highest values of CIE L*(EP150),b*(EP121),a*(EP182),GL(EP130),GW(EP029)and with amber(EP004).

    Fig.2–Frequency distributions of grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Fig.3–Correlation coefficients and levels of significance among phenotypic mean values of kernel shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;TGW,thousand-grain weight;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.*,**and***,significance at P<0.05,P<0.01,and P<0.001,respectively.

    Table 1–ANOVA for kernel shape and color-traits of Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.

    3.3.Linkage disequilibrium

    The genome-wide LD of the panel decayed below r2=0.3(the standard critical threshold)at 2.25 cM(Fig.4).This means that±2.25 cM would be the confidence interval of a given QTL from the QTL-tag SNP(a SNP found at the peak of the corresponding QTL). The specific critical r2value beyond which LD is due to true physical linkage was 0.15 and the intersection of the threshold and the LD decay curve was at 5.75 cM.

    3.4. Genome-wide association analysis

    An MLM with population structure and kinship matrix(MLM + Q + K) was chosen for marker trait association (MTA)analysis, as the quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot showed that the observed MTA P-values were close to the expected distribution (Fig. S1). Genotypes of 75,010 missing SNPs were imputed. After filtering followed by imputation, 10,789 polymorphic SNP markers (4591 from the A and 6198 from the B genome) and phenotypic values for grain shape and color traits were used for MTA analysis. The Population structure data estimated as the first 10 PCs resulting from 1496 tag-SNPs and kinship matrix data resulting from 4842 tag-SNPs were also incorporated in the MLM-GWAS analysis.

    A total of 46 QTL were identified for grain shape and color traits. The only two QTL with -lg P ≥ 4 were EPdwa*-2A and EPdwL*-2A.2, with -lg P values of 5.39 and 5.23 and phenotypic variance of 11.4% and 11.0%, respectively. Eighteen nominal QTL reached the -lg P ≥ 3 threshold, of which five QTL each were identified for b* and GL and four QTL each for L* and GW with phenotypic variance ranging from 5.5% to 6.8% (Table 2).The other 26 QTL were identified as suggestive QTL with -lg P ≥ 2.5 (Table S3).

    Fig.4–A scatter plot of pairwise SNPs showing genome-wide linkage disequilibrium(LD)decay in 192 Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.Genetic distance in cM is plotted against the LD estimate(r2)for pairs of markers.The blue solid curve represents the smoothing spline regression model fitted to LD decay.The horizontal red line represents the standard critical r2 value of the genome(r2=0.30),the horizontal yellow line represents the 95th percentile unlinked r2 value of the genome(r2=0.15),the vertical orange dashed line represents the genetic distance(2.25 cM)at which the standard critical r2 intersects with the LD decay curve,and the green dashed line represents the genetic distance(5.75 cM)at which the 95th percentile unlinked r2 intersects with the LD decay curve.

    3.5. QTL for grain length and width

    Five nominal QTL (EPdwGL-2B, EPdwGL-4B, EPdwGL-5A,EPdwGL-6A, and EPdwGL-7B) for grain length were identified on chromosomes 2B, 4B, 5A, 6A, and 7B, respectively (Table 2,Fig. S2). EPdwGW-2A.1, EPdwGW-2A.2, EPdwGW-5A, and EPdwGW-7B were the four nominal QTL detected for grain width on chromosomes 2A (2), 5A and 7B, respectively. Eleven suggestive QTL for GL and GW were identified (Table S3).Allelic distributions and effects for QTL-tagging SNPs are described in Tables S4 and S5 for GL and GW, respectively.

    3.6. QTL for color traits

    A major QTL with two alleles having a positive effect for a*(redness) (EPdwa*-2A) and a negative effect for L* (brightness)(EPdwL*-2A.2) was identified at a locus (IWB72154,QTL-tag SNP) on the long arm of chromosome 2A with a slightly more significant MTA for a* (-lg P =5.39)than for L*(-lg P = 5.23) and explained respectively 11.4% and 11.0% of phenotypic variance. This QTL also showed a pleotropic effect for grain width(Fig. 5). Adjacent to this major QTL, another locus (IWB8286,QTL-tag SNP) made a nominal QTL for L* (EPdwL*-2A.1)with negative effect and a suggestive QTL for a* with positive effect(Table S3). Four further nominal QTL (EPdwL*-1A, EPdwL*-2A.1,EPdwL*-7A,and EPdwL*-7B)for L*were detected on chromosomes 1A, 2A, 7A and 7B, respectively (Table 2). Five nominal QTL, EPdwb*-1B, EPdwb*-3A, EPdwb*-4B, EPdwb*-5A,and EPdwb*-7B, for b* (yellowness) were detected on chromosomes 1B, 3A, 4B, 5A, and 7B, respectively. Ten further suggestive QTL for L*, a*, and b* traits were identified (Table S2). Allelic distributions and effects of QTL-tagging SNPs for b*,L*, and a* traits are described in Tables S6, S7, and S8,respectively.

    4.Discussion

    A panel of 192 Ethiopian durum wheat accessions comprising 167 landraces collected from major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia and 25 improved varieties released between 1994 and 2010 and cultivated in the country was assembled to map QTL for shape and color traits using GWAS analysis.High variation recorded in grain shape and color trait values suggested the potential of GWAS for identifying QTL.

    Because of nonrandom mating,isolation,or artificial selection,structured populations are present in most plant populations.Consequently,genetic loci may be spuriously associated with a trait when there is no true association.The probability of a false positive,or type I error,increases in association mapping studies if population structure is not appropriately accounted for[33].For this reason,assessment of population structure is crucial for any GWAS analysis.The present panel was stratified into three subgroups.Liu et al.[5]reported the same subgroups using these accessions,and 10 more genotypes were added for the present study.Subgroup 2 was composed of cultivars.Landraces made up the other two subgroups,irrespective of their geographic origin.This admixture could be accounted for by seed exchange between farmers in local markets throughout the country[42].Understanding the linkage disequilibrium(LD)pattern in germplasm is essential for reasons including selection of the marker density and experimental design to be used for GWAS analysis and for defining identified QTL regions[43].

    Both GW and GL showed significant positive correlations with L*and b*and negative correlations with a*.To our knowledge,no published report has described the relationship between grain shape and color traits in wheat.CIE b*(yellowness)showed a significant negative correlation with a*(redness),in agreement with a previous finding[44]but unlike that study,showed a significant positive correlation with L*(brightness).However,Goriewa-Duba et al.[45]also reported a highly significant positive correlation between b*and L*.This difference might have arisen from the samples taken for analysis in which,unlike in the present study,the flour(endosperm)was used.For instance,Humphries et al.[46]found higher values of a*and b*but lower L*in wheat bran than in flour.However,they reported a significant correlation between values of color traits in grain and flour across genotypes and concluded that color values could be extrapolated from the easily accessible part of the grain.A strong positive correlation between b*and a*has been reported[47].CIE b*has been used as an alternative descriptor of yellow pigment content(YPC),an essential quality parameter in the pasta industry,given their strong correlation[29].Red wheat kernels have been identified as resistant to preharvest sprouting and this relationship could be due either to the pleiotropic effect of genes controlling red-testa pigmentation(R)or to linkage between these genes and other genes affecting preharvest sprouting[17].

    Grain shape and color are important for many reasons.Identifying QTL for these traits will facilitate the transfer of favorable alleles based on selection strategies and breeding objectives.Grain shape and color traits are crucial quality parameters with various uses and have been used as selection criteria in durum wheat breeding.Previous studies identified QTL on all chromosomes and genomes for grain length,grain width and color traits.In the present study,the QTL regions associated with GL and GW were distinct except for a QTL on chromosome arm 5AL indicated in previous reports[10].QTL were detected in chromosome regions reported previously.Chen et al.[48]reported QTL for GL on chromosome arms 1BS and 5AL and for GW on 4BS,7BS,and 7BL.Gao et al.[49]identified a stable TGW QTL,QTKW.caas-7AL,in all tested environments using an F8 recombinant inbred line population of Chinese spring wheat.Ma et al.[50]identified the TaCYP78A3 gene of the CYP78A family,encoding cytochrome CYP78A3 P450,on the short arms of bread wheat chromosome group 7(7AS,7BS,and 7DS),which was associated with grain size and shape,and silencing of this gene reduced the values of these traits.Yan et al.[51]identified the TaGW8 gene,with TaGW8-B1a and TaGW8-B1b alleles,on chromosome 7B,which had a significant effect on both grain size and shape traits.Wang et al.[52]cloned a TaGS5 gene found on chromosomes 3AS and 3DS of Chinese bread wheat that controls thousand-grain weight and grain width.In agreement with these reports,QTL for GL and GW on the same regions of chromosomes 7A and 7B were detected in the present study.QTL for grain shape traits located close to positions found in a previous study[8]were identified on all chromosomes except 3A.

    Fig.5–A major QTL(IWB72154,the QTL-tag SNP)identified on the long arm of chromosome 2A with a positive effect on CIE a*and a negative effect on CIE L*.Identified QTL are shown at the left of the chromosome with blue representing-lg P≥2.5(suggestive QTL);red representing-lg P≥3(nominal QTL),and green representing-lg P≥4(major QTL).Lengths of bars indicate confidence intervals of QTL and horizontal lines indicate positions of QTL-tagging SNPs.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Table 2–List of identified QTL for grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat.

    Many QTL for color traits have been identified in both bread and durum wheat[27,53].The Psy1 gene,a gene coding for the enzyme phytoene synthase 1,which is considered the rate-limiting molecule in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway,cosegregated with yellow pigment content(YPC)and CIE b*on chromosomes 7BL[27]and 7AL[54].A second Psy gene(Psy2)is located on group 5 chromosomes of durum wheat[27].Crawford and Francki[55]identified a SNP in the gene encoding lycopene-cylcase that controls phenotypic variation for flour b*color on chromosome 3A.In agreement with these findings,QTL for b*were detected on the same chromosome arms:3AL,5AS,and 7BL.Additional b*QTL were identified on chromosome arms 1BL,2AL,2BL,4BS,and 6AL.A major QTL controlling both L*(brightness)and a*(redness)at a single locus(IWB72154)was identified on the long arm of chromosome 2A.Another locus(IWB8286)made a nominal QTL for L*(EPdwL*-2A.1)with negative effect and a suggestive QTL for a*with positive effect.Since it has a positive effect on a*and negative effect on L*,this QTL could be a locus with two alleles.Sherman et al.[56]identified a locus on chromosome group 3 in bread wheat for grain color with red as dominant and white as recessive alleles and reported that the degree of red color is additive,with genotypes homozygous dominant at all three loci(R-A1b,R-B1b,and R-D1b)having the darkest red color and only those homozygous recessive at all three genes being white(R-A1a,R-B1a,and R-D1a).Seven QTL were identified for L*on chromosome arms 1AS,2AS,5AL,6AL,7AL(2)and 7BL and four QTL for a*on chromosome arms 1AS,2AL,5AS,and 7AL.Most grain color QTL identified in the present study overlapped with those identified in previous studies.For instance,Zahi et al.[31]identified a major QTL for a*(QFa.caas-2AL.2)on the long arm of chromosome 2A and for b*(QFb.caas-1BL.2)on the long arm of chromosome 1B and QFb.caas-5AS.1 on the short arm of chromosome 5A near to the respective QTL EPdwa*-2A,EPdwb*-1B,and EPdwb*-5A detected in the present study.

    Similar to the significant correlation observed among grain shape and color related traits in the phenotypic data,a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage was observed in the MTA analysis of these traits(Fig.6).Five GW QTL having a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage with color traits on chromosome arms 2AL(two),4BS,5AL,and 7BL were identified.A single GL QTL was also identified as having a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage with b*and a*on the short arm of chromosome arm 5A.Further investigation of this pleotropic effect may shed light on the responsible genetic architecture.

    5. Conclusions

    Novel QTL were detected in a panel of genetically rich and untapped Ethiopian durum wheat landraces in a singleenvironment-single-location study. Use of multi-environment,multi-year phenotypic data could reveal QTL stable across environments. A major QTL controlling both redness and brightness traits on chromosome arm 2AL was detected. QTL for grain shape and color traits were identified in chromosome regions in which major QTL or/and genes were detected in previous studies. Digital image analysis is an inexpensive and non-invasive alternative to trait evaluations.

    Supplementary data for this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.001.

    Conflict of interest

    Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Fig.6–Genetic map of QTL for grain shape and color traits identified in 192 Ethiopian durum wheat,projected on the SNPbased tetraploid consensus map[24].Identified QTL are shown at the left of the chromosome with blue representing-lg P≥2.5(suggestive QTL);red representing-lg P≥3(nominal QTL),and green representing-lg P≥4(major QTL).Lengths of bars indicate confidence intervals of QTL and horizontal lines indicate positions of QTL-tagging SNPs.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,the Department for International Development of the United Kingdom,and the AGER Agroalimentare e Ricerca-Project“From seed to pasta—Multidisciplinary approaches for a more sustainable and high quality durum wheat production”for their financial support to genotype accessions.We are grateful to Debre Zeit and Sinana Agricultural Research Centers for their generous provision of landraces and cultivars used in this study.The first author is further indebted to Addis Ababa University and University of Bologna for the training provided.

    Author contributions

    AA, RT, and TF conceived and designed the study. TL and BA assembled the panel. MM conducted the fingerprinting of accessions. AA, TL, and GS conducted phenotyping and data analysis. AA prepared the manuscript. TF and RT edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲人成电影观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久免费观看电影| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 大香蕉久久网| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产色视频综合| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久这里只有精品19| 成人三级做爰电影| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 另类精品久久| 午夜视频精品福利| h视频一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 视频区图区小说| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 女警被强在线播放| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 久久影院123| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 69av精品久久久久久 | 国产精品久久久久成人av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 性少妇av在线| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 自线自在国产av| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| cao死你这个sao货| 9色porny在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 制服诱惑二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产色视频综合| av国产精品久久久久影院| 午夜视频精品福利| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美大码av| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 婷婷成人精品国产| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 午夜激情av网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| tocl精华| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 视频区图区小说| 一本综合久久免费| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久久久国内视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 搡老岳熟女国产| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 黄色 视频免费看| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久久精品94久久精品| av天堂在线播放| 国产成人精品无人区| 男女国产视频网站| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 一区福利在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品成人在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 少妇 在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 手机成人av网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 在线观看www视频免费| 日韩电影二区| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美大码av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| av在线播放精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲伊人色综图| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产在线观看jvid| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 18禁观看日本| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 一本久久中文字幕| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲av成人av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 不卡一级毛片| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美午夜高清在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产av又大| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久久久大精品| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 1024手机看黄色片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 窝窝影院91人妻| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品野战在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 午夜福利18| 久99久视频精品免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 色播亚洲综合网| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 午夜福利高清视频| 成人手机av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 嫩草影院精品99| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 99久久精品热视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久久久性生活片| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产99白浆流出| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久中文字幕一级| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| av天堂在线播放| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 女警被强在线播放| 成年版毛片免费区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| av在线天堂中文字幕| 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品电影一区二区在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一进一出抽搐动态| 午夜激情av网站| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久久伊人香网站| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 我要搜黄色片| 级片在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久久久久久久中文| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲av熟女| 国产片内射在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 床上黄色一级片| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 看免费av毛片| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 日韩有码中文字幕| av免费在线观看网站| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 免费看a级黄色片| 成人手机av| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久热爱精品视频在线9| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产区一区二久久| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 变态另类丝袜制服| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| av有码第一页| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 老司机靠b影院| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 婷婷亚洲欧美| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 黄色女人牲交| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 窝窝影院91人妻| 午夜福利18| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日日夜夜操网爽| 最好的美女福利视频网| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久人妻av系列| 嫩草影视91久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日本 欧美在线| 脱女人内裤的视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 老司机福利观看| 不卡一级毛片| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 成人18禁在线播放| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 露出奶头的视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久热在线av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲片人在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久草成人影院| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 91大片在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲18禁久久av| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久久久久大精品| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产片内射在线| 88av欧美| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 香蕉国产在线看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| av国产免费在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲av熟女| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 一本一本综合久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 成人精品一区二区免费| 一夜夜www| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 成人手机av| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本a在线网址| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 日韩有码中文字幕| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日本熟妇午夜| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 在线观看一区二区三区|