• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genome-wide association mapping for grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat(Triticum turgidum ssp.durum)

    2020-10-21 10:01:50AmsAlmuTilyFyissRobrtoTubrosMroMfrriGiusppSirTsfyLttBklAbyo
    The Crop Journal 2020年5期

    Ams Almu*,Tily Fyiss,Robrto Tubros,Mro Mfrri,Giuspp Sir,Tsfy Ltt,Bkl Abyo

    aDepartment of Microbial,Cellular and Molecular Biology,Addis Ababa University,P.O.Box 1176,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    bDepartment of Biology,Debre Tabor University,Ethiopia

    cDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences,University of Bologna,Viale G Fanin,44-40127 Bologna,Italy

    dOromia Agricultural Research Institute,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    eInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center(CIMMYT),Addis Ababa,Ethiopia

    ABSTRACT

    1.Introduction

    Durum wheat(Triticum turgidum ssp.durum)is an allotetraploid wheat comprising an A genome from the diploid species T.urartu and a B genome from Aegilops speltoides or a relative that may now be extinct[1].Durum wheat is the main source of semolina for production of pasta(particularly in Europe and North America)and couscous and bread in the Middle East and North Africa.Ethiopia is a center of durum genetic diversity.This high diversity is associated with the wide range of agroecological conditions and farmer cultural diversity[2–4]and is a focus of genetic studies and a source of novel alleles[5,6].Ethiopian durum wheat kernels include several color types[4].In Ethiopia,the crop is used mainly for local consumption.Despite the high genetic diversity and suitable conditions for durum production,the country depends on imported durum,owing to a lack of high-quality cultivars[7].

    Grain shape traits(grain length and width)strongly influence yield and milling quality[8,9].These traits are quantitative traits controlled by several genes[10]and their genetic improvement is a target of durum breeding[11].

    The grain color of durum wheat comes from its pigments,consisting of carotenoids and anthocyanins.A yellowishamber color,which is an essential quality parameter of durum semolina,is due to the carotenoid pigment/yellow pigment content(YPC)in the whole kernel and is commercially identified as the yellow index[12].Anthocyanins,in contrast,accumulate in the pericarp or aleurone of durum wheat and provide the blue,purple,and red colors of the grain[13].In addition to their visual appeal,both carotenoids and anthocyanins influence human health and nutrition[14–16].

    Red grain color of wheat increases dormancy and has been used as a marker for resistance to preharvest sprouting in wheat breeding programs[17].Carotenoids have been a target of plant breeders,mainly in response to the needs of pasta producers.However,because of their role in health and nutrition and a corresponding consumer demand,anthocyanins have become a target of genetic improvement[13,18].Grain color is controlled by genetic and environmental factors and cultivation practices.Genes involved in pigment accumulation and proteins with regulatory roles have been identified[13].

    Digital image analysis is increasingly used in plant science,especially in phenomics[19].Novel software packages based on digital image analysis allows detailed imaging of grain features including shape and color[20,21].

    Elucidating the genetic basis of complex quantitative traits controlling agronomic traits of economic importance is key to modern plant breeding.Genome-wide association mapping(GWAS)involves genotyping a large collection of accessions with numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs)distributed throughout the genome and testing their association with phenotypic traits.SNP genotyping platforms have been constructed to permit genome-assisted selection by identifying quantitative trait loci(QTL)[22].The 90K wheat SNP array by Illumina allows genome-wide scans for this purpose[23,24].

    Numerous QTL for whole grain or flour color of both bread and durum wheat have been identified[25–31].The unexploited Ethiopian durum wheat landraces are rich in genetic diversity for many traits including grain shape and color.The objective of this study was to perform a genome-wide association analysis for grain shape and color traits using Ethiopian durum wheats.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    A panel of 192 Ethiopian spring durum wheats comprising 167 landraces and 25 cultivars (Table S1) was assembled.Accessions were collected and maintained by Debre-Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) and Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC), Ethiopia as single-seed descent (SSD)progenies. From this panel, Liu et al. [5] used 182 (160 landraces and 22 cultivars) to identify QTL for stripe rust resistance. Landrace accessions were originally collected from major wheat-producing areas of Ethiopia, including Bale,Gondar, Gojjam, Shewa, Tigray, and Wollo and included 12 lines currently cultivated in the USA. Cultivars were released by DZARC and SARC from 1994 to 2010 and have been cultivated in Ethiopia.

    2.2. Phenotypic data

    All accessions were planted in consecutive growing seasons(2013/2014 and 2014/2015) at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC), located between 07°06′12″ N and 07°07′29″ N and 40°12′40″ E to 40°13′52″ E, for purification by ear-to-row planting. Purified and homogeneous accessions were planted in 2015/2016 in a completely randomized block design with three replications. All accessions were grown in two-row plots 1 m long with 15 cm between rows. The field was managed following local agricultural practices. Twenty homogeneous and healthy seeds were selected from each replicate for digital image analysis. Digital images were acquired with a flatbed CanoScan LiDE 120 F (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), with a true optical resolution of 4800 dpi and 48-bit internal color depth.Seeds were spread on the scanner glass and spaced for accurate measurement. Black cardboard was used to cover the scanner to increase contrast and reduce reflection. All images were scanned at 24-bit with 300 dpi resolution and 2250 × 3705 pixels and recorded in a JPEG format.

    2.3. Digital image analysis

    Digital image measurements were collected with GrainScan[21], a software package developed for high-throughput phenotyping of cereal grains. The default-automated threshold was used to measure grain length (GL) and grain width(GW). The mean value of 20 seeds per replicate was recorded.Commission Internationale l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab, a threedimensional (L*a*b*) color space method, was used to measure the color of accessions. Calibration with a color checker,which is scanned under the same setting as the seeds, was used to change the raw RGB value measured by the scanner to standardized CIE L*a*b* values. CIE L* values represent brightness, CIE a* indicates redness (positive values) and greenness(negative values)and CIE b*represents yellowness(positive value)and blueness(negative value).

    2.4.Phenotypic data analysis

    2.5.Genotypic data

    For each accession,25 one-week-old plants from the same seed source used for digital image analysis were pooled for genomic DNA extraction using a DNeasy 96 Plant Kit(Qiagen GmbH,Hilden,Germany).An Illumina high-density 90K wheat SNP array[23]was used for genotyping accessions.SNP calling and clustering were performed with GenomeStudio 2011.1(Illumina,San Diego,CA,USA).Calls showing residual heterozygosity were assigned as missing values.SNP markers with minor-allele frequency<0.05 and>0.1 missing values per accession were excluded.After filtering,imputation of missing data was performed with Beagle 4.0[32].Considering the higher levels of homozygosity exist in durum wheat,imputation was made without any phased reference populations.Twenty five markers were considered in the imputation rolling window with an overlap of a single marker,the typical number of markers included in a 0.5 cM interval.Since tuning of other parameters did not improve imputation accuracy,default values were kept.

    A high-density consensus map of tetraploid wheat generated by Maccaferri et al.[24]was used to assign chromosome positions of SNPs and markers with unknown positions were excluded.

    2.6.Population structure and kinship analysis

    A Bayesian model-based(Markov chain Monte Carlo,MCMC)clustering approach was used for population structure analysis by STRUCTURE 2.3[33].The Haploview Tagger function(based on analysis of marker pairwise r2values)was used to select tag-SNPs with a tagger filter set at r2=0.5 in HAPLOVIEW 4.2[34]and 1496 tag-SNPs were selected for population structure analysis.The most likely subgroup number was inferred by the log probability(ln PD)and an ad-hoc statistic(ΔK)based on the rate of change of ln PD between runs using successive K-values as described by Evanno et al.[35].Based on this,theΔK shows a clear peak at the ideal number of subgroups.Ten subgroups with 20 independent runs for each subgroup were done under an admixture model of population structure with correlated allele frequencies and a burn-in period of 50,000 iterations and 100,000 MCMC iterations after burn-in were calculated for each run.

    The Haploview Tagger function was also used to select tag-SNPs for kinship matrix (K) analysis with a tagger filter set at r2= 0.1 in HAPLOVIEW and 4842 tag-SNPs were selected to compute the K and incorporated in the mixed linear model(MLM) along with the population structure (Q) value for GWAS analysis by TASSEL v.5.2 [36].

    2.7. Linkage disequilibrium and genome-wide association analysis

    Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was calculated as r2values between pairwise SNPs using TASSEL. The specific critical r2value beyond which LD is due to true physical linkage was determined by taking the 95th percentile of r2data of unlinked marker pairs [37]. LD decay was estimated as physical distance using the procedure of Hill and Weir [38] in R [39]and an LD decay curve was fitted with a smoothing spline regression line at the genome level.

    An MLM [40] was used for genome-wide association(GWAS) analysis with population structure (Q) and kinship(K) covariates. Population structure was estimated as the first 10 principal components (PCs) calculated from tag-SNPs (r2=0.5) and kinship was measured as similarity matrix from tag-SNPs (r2= 0.1) in TASSEL software package. Three levels of significance were introduced for reporting GWAS QTL: (i)experiment-wise P ≤ .05 (-lg P ≥ 4.00) for “major” QTL, (ii)marker-wise P ≤ .001 (-lg P ≥ 3.00) for “nominal” QTL, and (iii)marker-wise P ≤ 0.005, (-lg P ≥ 2.5) for “suggestive” QTL. The experiment-wise threshold was established from the number of independent SNP tests estimated in HAPLOVIEW using the tagger function of r2= 0.3 [41] and the total number of tag-SNPs was 816. Bonferroni adjustment for multiple GWAS tests(P ≤ 0.05) was equal to -lg P = 4.04 (rounded to 4). Hence the experiment-wise, Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold at P = 0.05 matched a marker-wise threshold of -lg P ≥ 4.00.Significance intervals of identified QTL were reported as the intervals after inclusion of all SNPs associated with the trait with P ≤ 0.01 (marker-wise) and in LD of r2≥ 0.3. The confidence interval of a QTL was defined based on ±2.25 cM(LD decay of this panel) from the GWAS QTL peak (QTL-tag SNP).

    3.Results

    3.1. Phenotypic variation

    Highly significant variation was observed among accessions for all grain shape and color traits (Table 1, Fig. 1).Maximum values of 8.84 and 3.57 mm and minimum values of 5.21 and 2.44 mm were recorded for grain length and width with mean values of 7.50 and 3.05 mm, respectively. CIE L*(brightness) ranged from 41.38 to 68.51 with a mean of 57.26,CIE a* ranged from 6.48 to 14.15 with a mean of 9.56, and CIE b*ranged from 8.78 to 21.43 with a mean of 16.14. The phenotypic means of accessions are presented in Table S2.A normal distribution was observed for GL and b*, whereas GW, L* and a* showed bimodal distributions (Fig. 2). CIE L*showed negative correlation with a* and positive correlation with b* (Fig. 3). CIE a* showed negative correlations with GW,b*, and GL. Thousand-grain weight showed no correlation with either grain shape or color-related traits, indicated that the variation in color and shape traits was not due to seed size. The trait was accordingly not included in GWAS analysis.

    3.2. Population structure

    The optimal subgroup of the panel was inferred using the second-order rate of change of the likelihood in STRUCTURE.The result showed a clear peak at K = 3 indicating that three is the optimal number of subgroups in the panel. Subgroups 1, 2,and 3 contained respectively 75, 27, and 90 accessions (Table S1). Of the 25 cultivars, 24 were clustered in subgroup 2 with two landraces from Bale and Gojjam. Most of the landraces(44)collected from Sinana Agricultural Research Center were grouped in subgroup 1 along with one cultivar (selam), 12 landraces collected from DZARC, 8 landraces from Wollo, and landraces from Gojjam, Shewa and Tigray. The remaining 90 landraces were clustered in subgroup 3.

    Accessions did not cluster by geographical background.Eight landraces from northern Ethiopia (Wollo) were grouped in subgroup 1, whereas 25 landraces with the same origin were clustered in subgroup 3. Landraces from central Ethiopia(Akaki and Shewa)grouped in both subgroups 1(four landraces)and 3(19 landraces).All 12 Ethiopian landraces now cultivated in the USA were grouped in subgroup 3.

    Fig.1–Images of accessions with highest values of CIE L*(EP150),b*(EP121),a*(EP182),GL(EP130),GW(EP029)and with amber(EP004).

    Fig.2–Frequency distributions of grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Fig.3–Correlation coefficients and levels of significance among phenotypic mean values of kernel shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;TGW,thousand-grain weight;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.*,**and***,significance at P<0.05,P<0.01,and P<0.001,respectively.

    Table 1–ANOVA for kernel shape and color-traits of Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.

    3.3.Linkage disequilibrium

    The genome-wide LD of the panel decayed below r2=0.3(the standard critical threshold)at 2.25 cM(Fig.4).This means that±2.25 cM would be the confidence interval of a given QTL from the QTL-tag SNP(a SNP found at the peak of the corresponding QTL). The specific critical r2value beyond which LD is due to true physical linkage was 0.15 and the intersection of the threshold and the LD decay curve was at 5.75 cM.

    3.4. Genome-wide association analysis

    An MLM with population structure and kinship matrix(MLM + Q + K) was chosen for marker trait association (MTA)analysis, as the quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot showed that the observed MTA P-values were close to the expected distribution (Fig. S1). Genotypes of 75,010 missing SNPs were imputed. After filtering followed by imputation, 10,789 polymorphic SNP markers (4591 from the A and 6198 from the B genome) and phenotypic values for grain shape and color traits were used for MTA analysis. The Population structure data estimated as the first 10 PCs resulting from 1496 tag-SNPs and kinship matrix data resulting from 4842 tag-SNPs were also incorporated in the MLM-GWAS analysis.

    A total of 46 QTL were identified for grain shape and color traits. The only two QTL with -lg P ≥ 4 were EPdwa*-2A and EPdwL*-2A.2, with -lg P values of 5.39 and 5.23 and phenotypic variance of 11.4% and 11.0%, respectively. Eighteen nominal QTL reached the -lg P ≥ 3 threshold, of which five QTL each were identified for b* and GL and four QTL each for L* and GW with phenotypic variance ranging from 5.5% to 6.8% (Table 2).The other 26 QTL were identified as suggestive QTL with -lg P ≥ 2.5 (Table S3).

    Fig.4–A scatter plot of pairwise SNPs showing genome-wide linkage disequilibrium(LD)decay in 192 Ethiopian durum wheat accessions.Genetic distance in cM is plotted against the LD estimate(r2)for pairs of markers.The blue solid curve represents the smoothing spline regression model fitted to LD decay.The horizontal red line represents the standard critical r2 value of the genome(r2=0.30),the horizontal yellow line represents the 95th percentile unlinked r2 value of the genome(r2=0.15),the vertical orange dashed line represents the genetic distance(2.25 cM)at which the standard critical r2 intersects with the LD decay curve,and the green dashed line represents the genetic distance(5.75 cM)at which the 95th percentile unlinked r2 intersects with the LD decay curve.

    3.5. QTL for grain length and width

    Five nominal QTL (EPdwGL-2B, EPdwGL-4B, EPdwGL-5A,EPdwGL-6A, and EPdwGL-7B) for grain length were identified on chromosomes 2B, 4B, 5A, 6A, and 7B, respectively (Table 2,Fig. S2). EPdwGW-2A.1, EPdwGW-2A.2, EPdwGW-5A, and EPdwGW-7B were the four nominal QTL detected for grain width on chromosomes 2A (2), 5A and 7B, respectively. Eleven suggestive QTL for GL and GW were identified (Table S3).Allelic distributions and effects for QTL-tagging SNPs are described in Tables S4 and S5 for GL and GW, respectively.

    3.6. QTL for color traits

    A major QTL with two alleles having a positive effect for a*(redness) (EPdwa*-2A) and a negative effect for L* (brightness)(EPdwL*-2A.2) was identified at a locus (IWB72154,QTL-tag SNP) on the long arm of chromosome 2A with a slightly more significant MTA for a* (-lg P =5.39)than for L*(-lg P = 5.23) and explained respectively 11.4% and 11.0% of phenotypic variance. This QTL also showed a pleotropic effect for grain width(Fig. 5). Adjacent to this major QTL, another locus (IWB8286,QTL-tag SNP) made a nominal QTL for L* (EPdwL*-2A.1)with negative effect and a suggestive QTL for a* with positive effect(Table S3). Four further nominal QTL (EPdwL*-1A, EPdwL*-2A.1,EPdwL*-7A,and EPdwL*-7B)for L*were detected on chromosomes 1A, 2A, 7A and 7B, respectively (Table 2). Five nominal QTL, EPdwb*-1B, EPdwb*-3A, EPdwb*-4B, EPdwb*-5A,and EPdwb*-7B, for b* (yellowness) were detected on chromosomes 1B, 3A, 4B, 5A, and 7B, respectively. Ten further suggestive QTL for L*, a*, and b* traits were identified (Table S2). Allelic distributions and effects of QTL-tagging SNPs for b*,L*, and a* traits are described in Tables S6, S7, and S8,respectively.

    4.Discussion

    A panel of 192 Ethiopian durum wheat accessions comprising 167 landraces collected from major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia and 25 improved varieties released between 1994 and 2010 and cultivated in the country was assembled to map QTL for shape and color traits using GWAS analysis.High variation recorded in grain shape and color trait values suggested the potential of GWAS for identifying QTL.

    Because of nonrandom mating,isolation,or artificial selection,structured populations are present in most plant populations.Consequently,genetic loci may be spuriously associated with a trait when there is no true association.The probability of a false positive,or type I error,increases in association mapping studies if population structure is not appropriately accounted for[33].For this reason,assessment of population structure is crucial for any GWAS analysis.The present panel was stratified into three subgroups.Liu et al.[5]reported the same subgroups using these accessions,and 10 more genotypes were added for the present study.Subgroup 2 was composed of cultivars.Landraces made up the other two subgroups,irrespective of their geographic origin.This admixture could be accounted for by seed exchange between farmers in local markets throughout the country[42].Understanding the linkage disequilibrium(LD)pattern in germplasm is essential for reasons including selection of the marker density and experimental design to be used for GWAS analysis and for defining identified QTL regions[43].

    Both GW and GL showed significant positive correlations with L*and b*and negative correlations with a*.To our knowledge,no published report has described the relationship between grain shape and color traits in wheat.CIE b*(yellowness)showed a significant negative correlation with a*(redness),in agreement with a previous finding[44]but unlike that study,showed a significant positive correlation with L*(brightness).However,Goriewa-Duba et al.[45]also reported a highly significant positive correlation between b*and L*.This difference might have arisen from the samples taken for analysis in which,unlike in the present study,the flour(endosperm)was used.For instance,Humphries et al.[46]found higher values of a*and b*but lower L*in wheat bran than in flour.However,they reported a significant correlation between values of color traits in grain and flour across genotypes and concluded that color values could be extrapolated from the easily accessible part of the grain.A strong positive correlation between b*and a*has been reported[47].CIE b*has been used as an alternative descriptor of yellow pigment content(YPC),an essential quality parameter in the pasta industry,given their strong correlation[29].Red wheat kernels have been identified as resistant to preharvest sprouting and this relationship could be due either to the pleiotropic effect of genes controlling red-testa pigmentation(R)or to linkage between these genes and other genes affecting preharvest sprouting[17].

    Grain shape and color are important for many reasons.Identifying QTL for these traits will facilitate the transfer of favorable alleles based on selection strategies and breeding objectives.Grain shape and color traits are crucial quality parameters with various uses and have been used as selection criteria in durum wheat breeding.Previous studies identified QTL on all chromosomes and genomes for grain length,grain width and color traits.In the present study,the QTL regions associated with GL and GW were distinct except for a QTL on chromosome arm 5AL indicated in previous reports[10].QTL were detected in chromosome regions reported previously.Chen et al.[48]reported QTL for GL on chromosome arms 1BS and 5AL and for GW on 4BS,7BS,and 7BL.Gao et al.[49]identified a stable TGW QTL,QTKW.caas-7AL,in all tested environments using an F8 recombinant inbred line population of Chinese spring wheat.Ma et al.[50]identified the TaCYP78A3 gene of the CYP78A family,encoding cytochrome CYP78A3 P450,on the short arms of bread wheat chromosome group 7(7AS,7BS,and 7DS),which was associated with grain size and shape,and silencing of this gene reduced the values of these traits.Yan et al.[51]identified the TaGW8 gene,with TaGW8-B1a and TaGW8-B1b alleles,on chromosome 7B,which had a significant effect on both grain size and shape traits.Wang et al.[52]cloned a TaGS5 gene found on chromosomes 3AS and 3DS of Chinese bread wheat that controls thousand-grain weight and grain width.In agreement with these reports,QTL for GL and GW on the same regions of chromosomes 7A and 7B were detected in the present study.QTL for grain shape traits located close to positions found in a previous study[8]were identified on all chromosomes except 3A.

    Fig.5–A major QTL(IWB72154,the QTL-tag SNP)identified on the long arm of chromosome 2A with a positive effect on CIE a*and a negative effect on CIE L*.Identified QTL are shown at the left of the chromosome with blue representing-lg P≥2.5(suggestive QTL);red representing-lg P≥3(nominal QTL),and green representing-lg P≥4(major QTL).Lengths of bars indicate confidence intervals of QTL and horizontal lines indicate positions of QTL-tagging SNPs.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Table 2–List of identified QTL for grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat.

    Many QTL for color traits have been identified in both bread and durum wheat[27,53].The Psy1 gene,a gene coding for the enzyme phytoene synthase 1,which is considered the rate-limiting molecule in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway,cosegregated with yellow pigment content(YPC)and CIE b*on chromosomes 7BL[27]and 7AL[54].A second Psy gene(Psy2)is located on group 5 chromosomes of durum wheat[27].Crawford and Francki[55]identified a SNP in the gene encoding lycopene-cylcase that controls phenotypic variation for flour b*color on chromosome 3A.In agreement with these findings,QTL for b*were detected on the same chromosome arms:3AL,5AS,and 7BL.Additional b*QTL were identified on chromosome arms 1BL,2AL,2BL,4BS,and 6AL.A major QTL controlling both L*(brightness)and a*(redness)at a single locus(IWB72154)was identified on the long arm of chromosome 2A.Another locus(IWB8286)made a nominal QTL for L*(EPdwL*-2A.1)with negative effect and a suggestive QTL for a*with positive effect.Since it has a positive effect on a*and negative effect on L*,this QTL could be a locus with two alleles.Sherman et al.[56]identified a locus on chromosome group 3 in bread wheat for grain color with red as dominant and white as recessive alleles and reported that the degree of red color is additive,with genotypes homozygous dominant at all three loci(R-A1b,R-B1b,and R-D1b)having the darkest red color and only those homozygous recessive at all three genes being white(R-A1a,R-B1a,and R-D1a).Seven QTL were identified for L*on chromosome arms 1AS,2AS,5AL,6AL,7AL(2)and 7BL and four QTL for a*on chromosome arms 1AS,2AL,5AS,and 7AL.Most grain color QTL identified in the present study overlapped with those identified in previous studies.For instance,Zahi et al.[31]identified a major QTL for a*(QFa.caas-2AL.2)on the long arm of chromosome 2A and for b*(QFb.caas-1BL.2)on the long arm of chromosome 1B and QFb.caas-5AS.1 on the short arm of chromosome 5A near to the respective QTL EPdwa*-2A,EPdwb*-1B,and EPdwb*-5A detected in the present study.

    Similar to the significant correlation observed among grain shape and color related traits in the phenotypic data,a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage was observed in the MTA analysis of these traits(Fig.6).Five GW QTL having a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage with color traits on chromosome arms 2AL(two),4BS,5AL,and 7BL were identified.A single GL QTL was also identified as having a pleiotropic effect or tight linkage with b*and a*on the short arm of chromosome arm 5A.Further investigation of this pleotropic effect may shed light on the responsible genetic architecture.

    5. Conclusions

    Novel QTL were detected in a panel of genetically rich and untapped Ethiopian durum wheat landraces in a singleenvironment-single-location study. Use of multi-environment,multi-year phenotypic data could reveal QTL stable across environments. A major QTL controlling both redness and brightness traits on chromosome arm 2AL was detected. QTL for grain shape and color traits were identified in chromosome regions in which major QTL or/and genes were detected in previous studies. Digital image analysis is an inexpensive and non-invasive alternative to trait evaluations.

    Supplementary data for this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.001.

    Conflict of interest

    Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Fig.6–Genetic map of QTL for grain shape and color traits identified in 192 Ethiopian durum wheat,projected on the SNPbased tetraploid consensus map[24].Identified QTL are shown at the left of the chromosome with blue representing-lg P≥2.5(suggestive QTL);red representing-lg P≥3(nominal QTL),and green representing-lg P≥4(major QTL).Lengths of bars indicate confidence intervals of QTL and horizontal lines indicate positions of QTL-tagging SNPs.GL,grain length;GW,grain width;L*,brightness;a*,redness;b*,yellowness.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,the Department for International Development of the United Kingdom,and the AGER Agroalimentare e Ricerca-Project“From seed to pasta—Multidisciplinary approaches for a more sustainable and high quality durum wheat production”for their financial support to genotype accessions.We are grateful to Debre Zeit and Sinana Agricultural Research Centers for their generous provision of landraces and cultivars used in this study.The first author is further indebted to Addis Ababa University and University of Bologna for the training provided.

    Author contributions

    AA, RT, and TF conceived and designed the study. TL and BA assembled the panel. MM conducted the fingerprinting of accessions. AA, TL, and GS conducted phenotyping and data analysis. AA prepared the manuscript. TF and RT edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 天堂动漫精品| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 悠悠久久av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 少妇的逼好多水| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 脱女人内裤的视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久6这里有精品| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| av在线天堂中文字幕| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 天堂动漫精品| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久伊人香网站| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 在线观看66精品国产| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 变态另类丝袜制服| av国产免费在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 舔av片在线| 香蕉av资源在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 日本 av在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产单亲对白刺激| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 久久精品人妻少妇| 99久国产av精品| 88av欧美| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久香蕉国产精品| 成人国产综合亚洲| 一本一本综合久久| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| aaaaa片日本免费| 69人妻影院| 国产精品三级大全| 在线观看一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产免费男女视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 51国产日韩欧美| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产成人福利小说| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| av天堂在线播放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲片人在线观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 少妇的逼水好多| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 不卡一级毛片| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日本一本二区三区精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产色片| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 欧美3d第一页| 免费观看人在逋| 午夜福利在线在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 精品日产1卡2卡| 91麻豆av在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 舔av片在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲内射少妇av| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产av不卡久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 九色成人免费人妻av| 有码 亚洲区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 床上黄色一级片| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久久久大精品| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 日本免费a在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 俺也久久电影网| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 最好的美女福利视频网| 午夜影院日韩av| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久草成人影院| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久伊人香网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 免费看十八禁软件| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 搞女人的毛片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 色在线成人网| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 成年版毛片免费区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 有码 亚洲区| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 18+在线观看网站| 在线观看66精品国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产高清激情床上av| avwww免费| 国产av不卡久久| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久久精品大字幕| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲av熟女| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲 国产 在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| aaaaa片日本免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲美女视频黄频| www.www免费av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕久久专区| 精品福利观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 天堂√8在线中文| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| av在线蜜桃| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久久成人免费电影| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线观看日韩欧美| 亚洲在线观看片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 午夜a级毛片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 俺也久久电影网| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 一本久久中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 丁香欧美五月| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产午夜精品论理片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| av欧美777| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 成人欧美大片| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲在线自拍视频| ponron亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 久久性视频一级片| 欧美日本视频| 在线视频色国产色| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| av视频在线观看入口| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲无线在线观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产视频内射| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日本 av在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 看黄色毛片网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 内地一区二区视频在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 男人舔奶头视频| 日本免费a在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 日韩欧美三级三区| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 青草久久国产| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品国产高清国产av| www日本黄色视频网| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 在线播放国产精品三级| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 九色国产91popny在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 91av网一区二区| 青草久久国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产高清激情床上av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 久久亚洲真实| 中文字幕久久专区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 悠悠久久av| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产美女午夜福利| av天堂中文字幕网| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| www国产在线视频色| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| a级毛片a级免费在线| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久中文看片网| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 熟女电影av网| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 成人三级黄色视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 色综合站精品国产| 免费观看精品视频网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 床上黄色一级片|