• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Combining spatial and economic criteria in tree-level harvest planning

    2020-07-16 07:20:08PetteriPackalenTimoPukkalaandAdriPascual
    Forest Ecosystems 2020年2期

    Petteri Packalen,Timo Pukkala and Adrián Pascual

    Abstract

    Keywords: Spatial optimization, Tree selection, Cellular automata, Remote sensing,Airborne laser scanning

    Background

    Forest inventories employing Airborne Laser Scanning(ALS) data have become common in many countries(Nilsson et al. 2017). The ALS-based forest inventory methods (Hyypp? et al. 2008) are typically categorized into two groups: the area-based approach (ABA) (Means et al. 2000; N?sset 2002; Magnussen et al. 2013) and individual tree detection (ITD) (Hyypp? et al. 2001;Koch et al. 2006; L?hivaara et al. 2014). So far, most operational forest inventories employing ALS data have been implemented with the ABA (Maltamo et al. 2014).In ABA, stand attribute models are fitted with sample plots using metrics calculated from ALS data and then these models are used to predict stand attributes of the whole inventory area, typically using square grid cells(e.g. 16 m×16 m) as inventory units.

    In ITD, the inventory unit is an individual tree. The first step is to detect and delineate the trees. Then ALS features, such as local maxima mimicking tree height,are extracted on a tree-by-tree basis and used to estimate tree-level attributes, such as tree height and diameter. Tree locations are also an intrinsic output of ITD.The disadvantage of ITD is that tree detection fails when tree crowns overlap, or if there are many small trees under the dominant tree layer (Falkowski et al. 2008;Lindberg et al. 2010). Failures in tree detection and errors in the prediction of tree attributes make ITD more sensitive to bias than ABA at the aggregated (e.g. forest stand) level (Vauhkonen 2010). However, the advantage of ITD is that it produces a more detailed description of forest: tree level attributes, including tree locations.

    Forest plans are typically composed of homogenous regions for which inventory data are available. Most commonly,this region or inventory unit is a forest stand.In the ALS era, stand-level data are usually derived from ABA predictions in grid cells. In spatial forest planning,the inventory unit has been a stand (?hman 2000),microstand (Pascual et al. 2019), hexagon (Packalen et al. 2011)or pixel/cell(Lu and Eriksson 2000).To date,the use of tree-level data in forest or harvest planning has received limited attention. For example, Martín-Fernández and García-Abril (2005) developed a tree-level optimization method following an approach based on close-to-nature forestry, and Bettinger and Tang (2015)maximized the tree-level species mingling value in order to intersperse tree species across a forest. Algorithms have also been proposed for tree cut selection using a distance-dependent growth model (e.g. Pukkala and Miina 1998). Vauhkonen and Pukkala (2016) selected trees based on their value growth rate, and Pukkala et al.(2015) optimized the tree selection rule in thinning treatments when the profitability of forest management is maximized. These studies accounted for the location of trees when deciding the order in which to cut the trees. However, the spatial distribution of harvested trees was not controlled in optimization although it may be of great importance from ecological and practical viewpoints (Heinonen et al. 2018). Wing et al. (2019) implemented a method for group-selection silviculture that accounts for spatial aggregation, and utilized manually corrected stem map data that was derived by ITD.

    Controlling the spatial distribution of individual harvested trees or other harvest units, such as micro-stands or stands, is possible both in mathematical programming(?hman 2002) and in heuristic planning methods(Heinonen et al. 2007). Heuristic methods are more flexible and may be easier to use in large and complicated spatial problems (Bettinger et al. 2002; Heinonen et al.2018). Two lines of heuristics have been developed for spatial forest planning problems: global and local methods (also called centralized and decentralized methods) (Heinonen and Pukkala 2007; Pukkala et al.2014). Common examples of centralized heuristics are simulated annealing, tabu search and genetic algorithms(Bettinger et al. 2002). Of the two categories of heuristics, decentralized methods may be faster and more feasible when the number of calculation units is very large,which is often the case in tree-level planning (Heinonen and Pukkala 2007).

    Examples of decentralized heuristics are cellular automata (CA) (Strange et al. 2001, 2002; Mathey et al.2007) and the spatial version of the reduced cost method(Hoganson and Rose 1984; Pukkala et al. 2008). The aim of decentralized heuristics is to maximize or minimize a local objective function, which in tree-level planning is a tree-level function. This function is modified with a part that takes into account the global objectives or constraints of the planning problem. In the reduced costs method, global objectives are dealt with the dual prices of global constraints, whereas the applications of CA employ a global priority function that is added to the local function.

    Cellular automata, which were used in the current study, are self-organizing algorithms based on the assumption that the interaction between cells decreases rapidly with increasing distance (Von Neumann 1966;Strange et al. 2001; Wolfram 2002). Although the name of the method refers to (square-shaped) cells, the method can also be used with other types of calculation units. Each unit takes one of a limited number of states,which can be management schedules, land uses or, as in the current study, the cut vs. uncut status of an individual tree. The purpose of CA is to find the optimal status for each cell,by considering the variables of the cell itself and the local neighborhood of the cell. The cell states evolve in discrete time steps according to a set of rules.Spatial relationships can be included in CA and other heuristic methods in various ways, for instance by considering only spatially adjacent calculation units(similar vs. different prescription), by also including the neighbors of adjacent units (Kurttila et al. 2002)or using distance as the criterion of neighborhood(Heinonen et al. 2018).

    The aim of the study is to present a tree selection method that removes economically mature trees from the stand while also considering the spatial distribution of the harvested trees. A user controls whether the pattern of harvested trees is clustered or dispersed. We present a solution as to how tree-level data can be used in the spatial formulation of the optimization model common in forest and harvesting planning. The proposed method was tested in Central Spain on a stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) forest area with two different spatial distributions of trees. For this purpose, we implemented a simple ITD inventory, although the focus is on the tree selection algorithm.

    Study area and materials

    The study area is the public forest MUP50 owned by the municipality of Portillo in the province of Valladolid(366658-371652 Easting, 4590001-4586476 Northing,711-862 m a.s.l.) located in Castilla y León (Central Spain). The study area of 1100 ha consists of pure stone pine stands at different stages of development. The area is part of the Northern Plateau (Calama et al. 2008)where the stone pine forests are managed using evenaged forestry with the aim of providing a constant flow of revenue (timber, firewood and nut production) and other ecosystem services, such as erosion control(Calama et al. 2011).

    We selected two sub-areas in a 78-year old stone pine forest. These two areas differed in average tree size and the spatial distribution of the trees (Fig.1). In Area #1(106.4 ha), the spatial distribution of the trees was more or less regular, i.e., tree spacing was somewhat constant.In Area #2 (47.9 ha), the trees grow more in groups and stand density and tree spacing was variable.

    Field sample plots

    Systematic sampling was used to establish a network of 35 circular sample plots in the area and used to model the relationship between tree height and diameter.Sample plots were collected in 2010. The size of each plot was 706.86 m2, i.e. circular plots with a radius of 15 m. The sample plots contained a total of 344 trees. The locations of the plot centers were determined by a submeter precision GNSS equipment (Garmin International Inc., Missouri, USA). On each plot, all trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) over 7.5 cm were callipered and their heights were measured using a Vertex IV hypsometer (Hagl?f, Sweden). In addition, the distance and heading with respect to the plot center were determined with the distance meter and a Vertex IV compass (Hagl?f, Sweden). All the measured trees were stone pines. A summary of tree- and plot-level attributes is provided in Table 1.

    Airborne laser scanning data

    The ALS data were collected in 2010 using an ALS60 laser scanning system. The study area was scanned from an altitude of 2000 m above ground level with a scan angle of ±10 degrees. The average density of first echoes per square meter was 0.5. A digital terrain model (DTM)was constructed by first classifying echoes as ground and non-ground hits according to the approach described by Axelsson (2000). Then, a raster DTM of 1 m spatial resolution was interpolated from ground hits using Delaunay triangulation. Heights above ground level(AGL) were calculated by subtracting the DTM from the elevation of ALS echoes.

    Table 1 Minimum, mean,and maximum of tree and plot attributes

    Methods

    Individual tree detection and tree attribute prediction

    The canopy height model (CHM) of 1 m spatial resolution was interpolated by searching the highest ALS echo at AGL within each cell. If there were no ALS echoes within a cell, the value was interpolated from the neighboring cells. Individual trees were detected by searching treetops from the CHM. This was implemented with a local maximum filter (Hyypp? et al.2001). The CHM was slightly smoothed before searching local maxima to remove false positives (Koch et al.2006). Local maxima located <3 m (AGL) were removed in order to exclude local maxima on the ground and very small trees. Tree height was considered the same as the height (AGL) of the local maxima in the unsmoothed CHM. Tree detection worked quite well in the study area even though the ALS data had low echo density. The reason for this is that the crowns of individual stone pine trees do not usually touch each other.

    The trees measured in the field plots and ALSdetected trees were linked to each other if treetops were located within a 3-m Euclidean distance in threedimensional space (see details in Vauhkonen et al. 2011).Then a tree diameter model was fitted using successfully linked trees as follows:

    where DBH is the diameter at breast height in the fieldmeasured tree, HALSis the ALS detected tree height, and β0and β1are coefficients estimated from the data. We fitted the model with the least squares method using the nls function available in the R environment (R Development Core Team 2011). The estimated model coefficients (β0=5.3602, β1=2.2675) were statistically significant with both p-values less than 0.001.The coefficient of determination (R2) of the model was 0.66 and the RMSE was 5.26 cm. Finally, the model was used to predict DBH for all detected trees in the study area. The outputs of the ITD inventory were tree coordinates(XY), height and DBH for all detected trees.

    Growth and yield models

    The models presented in Calama and Montero (2006)were used to calculate the stem volume using predicted tree height and DBH for all trees. For each detected tree,the number of trees per hectare, basal area and dominant height (mean height of 100 largest trees per hectare)were computed using a buffer of 20 m around the tree.Site index was calculated using the existing model of Calama et al. (2003). The stand age in the study area was 78 years. The taper model (Calama and Montero 2006) was used to calculate the value of the stem. The following assortments, top diameters (dtop), minimum log lengths (hmin) and unit prices were assumed (Pasalodos-Tato et al. 2016): grade 1 (dtop≥40 cm, hmin2.4 m,30 €·m-3), grade 2 (dtop≥30 cm, hmin2.4 m, 18 €·m-3),grade 3(dtop≥20 cm, hmin2.4 m,13 €·m-3),grade 4 timber (dtop≥5 cm, hmin1.0 m, 5 €·m-3). The models from Calama and Montero (2004, 2005) were used to predict the 5-year increment in DBH and tree height, and the taper model was again used to compute the volume and the value of the trees 5 years later. Value increment was obtained as the difference of stem value at two time points. The relative value increment over a period of 5 years was calculated by dividing value increment by the value of the stem in the beginning of the 5-year period.See Pasalodos-Tato et al. (2016) for more details.

    A power diagram to create tree regions

    Tree-level forest data consist of detached tree regions(i.e. tree crowns) or points (i.e. stem locations), but not adjacent regions (e.g. grid cells or stands). Here we consider trees as point type objects. Then, we partition the space to trees with the assumption that a large tree occupies a larger area than a small tree. We refer to these partitions as tree regions. The partitioning is based on a power diagram, which is a type of weighted Voronoi diagram (Aurenhammer 1987). The power diagram is defined from a set of circles. Circle center is called a site.In this study, detected tree locations are sites and predicted DBH multiplied by 50 defines the radius of each circle. The power diagram consists of the points with the smallest power distance for a particular circle. In the case where all the circle radii are equal, the power diagram coincides with the Voronoi diagram. An example of the power diagram is given in Fig.2. Tree regions enable the use of adjacency relationships that take into account tree size, and the spatial optimization can be performed in a similar way as employed with traditional regions (e.g. grid cell or stand).

    Spatial optimization

    The cellular automaton developed for this study follows the ideas presented in Heinonen and Pukkala (2007) in which both local and global objectives are included in the priority function. In this study, the following priority function P was maximized for each tree:

    where VTreeis the volume of the subject tree (m3), VTotalis the volume of all trees within the optimization area,RelValInc is the relative value increment of the tree (%in 5 years), CC is the proportion of the cut-cut border(of the total border length with adjacent tree regions;Fig.3); CuC is the proportion of the cut-uncut border;w1, w2and w3are the weights of the “l(fā)ocal” tree-level objectives RelValInc, CC and CuC, respectively; p1, p2and p3are sub-priority functions of the local objective variables (Fig.4); w4is the initial weight of the “global”objective TotCut (total volume of cut trees) and p4is a priority function for the global objective. In this study,the proposed target volume to be harvested was 20% of the initial standing volume. The target harvest was 654.6 m3for Area #1 and 459.3 m3for Area #2.

    The priority function of Eq. 2 can be interpreted as a removal score for a tree. Low relative value increment(high economic maturity) and presence (aggregation problem) or absence (dispersion problem) of cut neighbors increases the probability of removal. Maximizing CC leads to the aggregation of cut trees and a large total area of cut trees, while the minimization of CuC contributes to compact aggregations on cut trees (Heinonen and Pukkala 2004).

    In the CA developed in this study, two options were inspected for every tree for several iterations:cutting the tree or letting it continue to grow. The option that maximizes the priority function was selected. All trees were inspected during each iteration in random order. After a certain number of iterations,the weighting of the global objective variable (w4) was progressively incremented using a certain step. Iterations with gradually increasing value for w4were repeated until the total volume of harvested trees was sufficiently close to the target value of harvested volume. In this study, the initial value of w4in the optimizations was always 0.01. Three iterations were conducted with the initial value, after which the value of w4was incremented by 0.01 after every additional iteration. Iterations were stopped when the difference between the achieved harvested volume and the target volume was less than 5% of the target removal.

    The CA described above is a simplified version of the automaton proposed by Strange et al. (2002) and Heinonen and Pukkala (2007). The first simplification is that the innovation probability is constant (one),implying that all trees are inspected at every iteration.The second simplification is that there are no mutations (mutation probability is constantly zero). Previous studies have shown that a high innovation probability and a low mutation probability work well in forest management problems (e.g., Heinonen and Pukkala 2007).

    The CA described above leads to aggregations of cut trees. If the aim is to disperse cut trees, CC needs to be minimized and CuC maximized.In that case, the priority functions for CC and CuC need to be replaced by a 1-0 and 0-1 sub-utility functions, respectively, as shown with dashed lines in Fig.4. The following weights were used to mimic the various silvicultural tree selection methods in optimization:

    · Non-spatial: RelValInc (w1=0.99), CC (w2=0.00),CuC (w3=0.00), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Single tree: RelValInc (w1=0.84), CC (w2=0.05),CuC (w3=0.10), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Tree group: RelValInc (w1=0.79), CC (w2=0.05),CuC (w3=0.15), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Clearcut:RelValInc (w1=0.69), CC (w2=0.10),CuC (w3=0.20), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    In the Single tree selection,the aim was to disperse trees,which was achieved by using the sub-priority functions for CC and CuC shown as dashed lines in Fig.4. In the Tree group and Clearcut selections, the aim was to aggregate trees, which was achieved by using the sub-priority functions for CC and CuC shown as continuous lines in Fig.4.

    Results

    Initial tree regions

    The number of tree regions in Area#1 and Area#2 was 13,438 and 4296, respectively. The tree regions, together with tree volume and relative value increment of the tree, are shown in Fig.5. Tree spacing and consequently the size of tree regions differed between areas.The size of tree regions was smaller in Area #1 (mean 73, range 6-279 m2) than in Area#2(mean 98,range 10-938 m2).In general,trees were much larger in Area #2 (mean 0.49 m3, max 1.70 m3per tree)than in Area#1(mean 0.26 m3,max 0.72 m3per tree).The relative value increment (% in 5 years) was almost equal in both areas but due to larger trees the value increment(€in 5 years)was substantially higher in Area#2.

    There was a clear east-west gradient in relative value increment in Area #2. This was partly due to small trees that rapidly increased their value but was also due to the higher site index (data not shown here) in the western part of Area #2. The relationship between tree volume and relative value increment was apparent: low tree volume indicated high relative value increment, which is logical due to the rapidly increasing proportion of valuable timber assortments in small trees.

    Effect of tree selection method on stem number, tree size and value increment

    In the absence of spatial objectives (Non-spatial), the proportion of cut trees (Table 2) and the relative value increment of those trees (Table 3) were less than in cases where spatial objective variables were included.

    Table 2 Effect of tree selection method on the number of trees and mean diameter at breast height (DBH)for cut and uncut trees

    Table 3 Effect of tree selection method on the relative value increment (%in 5 years)for cut, uncut and post-cut trees

    The difference between Non-spatial and Single tree selections was clearly evident: aiming for dispersed locations of cut trees increased the average relative value increment of cut trees by almost 70%. This means that the dispersion objective led to the removal of trees that were not among the most economically mature. In both areas, the inclusion of spatial objective variables slightly decreased the average DBH of the cut trees.

    In Tree group and Clearcut the purpose was to aggregate cut trees.The relative value increment of cut trees increased more (compared to Non-spatial) when more weighting was given to aggregating harvested trees,meaning that large cutting aggregations led to the removal of many economically productive trees. Logically, the difference in relative value increment between cut and uncut trees decreased with increasing importance of creating cutting aggregations. In Area #2, the relative value increment of cut trees was greatest with Clearcut, whereas the Single tree method in Area#1 clearly resulted in the greatest relative value increment of cut trees.This suggests that Clearcut in Area#2 and Single tree in Area#1 were most in conflict with the economic objective.

    The relative value increment was also computed after simulating the removal of the selected trees. The relative value increments were calculated with the assumption that the cut trees no longer existed in the stand.We call this the"post-cut" stage (Table 3). In general, the post-cut values were slightly greater than the uncut values. The difference in uncut and post-cut values was greatest in Single-tree selection and smallest in Clearcut selection, because Single tree selection decreased the competition of almost all trees,whereas the competition in Clearcut was decreased only for trees that were growing near the edges of the cut areas.

    Size and spatial distribution of harvest blocks

    The number of harvest blocks (continuous tree regions selected for cutting) was 4-5 times greater in Single tree than in the Non-spatial tree selection method (Table 4).Correspondingly, the mean size of the harvest blocks was about three times smaller in Single tree than in the Non-spatial selection method. Moving from the Nonspatial to the Tree group method increased the mean size of harvest blocks 8- or 9-fold. The Clearcut selection, which had a higher weighting on spatial objectives,clearly provided the largest harvest block size and the smallest number of harvest blocks.

    On average, the distance from a cut tree to the nearest cut tree was longest with the Single-tree selection method (Table 5). This proves that Single-tree selection performed as desired (the purpose was to disperse cut trees). In the Non-spatial selection, the mean distance between cut trees was shorter than with the Single-tree selection and the standard deviation of distances was greatest. This is a logical outcome because Non-spatial selection does not attempt to generate a particular spatial distribution of trees.In the Tree group and Clearcut selections, the distances of cut trees were shortest because the aim was to cluster cut trees. The mean distances from uncut trees to their nearest neighbors were also shortest in the Tree group and Clearcut where most of the area was not thinned at all. Compared to cut trees, however, the mean distances did not vary much between tree selection methods.

    Maps showing the spatial pattern of harvest blocks and the tree regions are displayed in Fig.6(Area #1) and Fig.7 (Area #2). Visual inspection verifies the conclusions drawn from Tables 4 and 5: (a) the Non-spatial selection does not show any particular spatial layout, (b)the Single-tree selection disperses trees to be cut, (c) the Tree group and (d) Clearcut selections cluster cut trees to various degrees, Clearcut more than Tree group. The spatial distribution of cut trees is slightly different in the two areas. In Area #1, where the spatial distribution is somewhat regular, the Single-tree method selected trees to be cut more evenly than in Area #2, where trees grow more in groups and stand density and tree spacing is variable.

    Table 4 Number of harvest blocks(i.e., continuous tree regions selected for cutting) and mean size(m2) of blocks

    Table 5 Mean distance between trees and their nearest neighbors.

    Discussion

    We presented a new approach for tree-level harvest planning that considers both the spatial distribution and the value increment of the trees. The problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem, which is solved by a tailored CA algorithm. The idea is to bundle the tree selection method with tree-level inventory data obtained by means of ITD and ALS data. The ITD inventory is currently a feasible method for certain forest types in an operational setting.Therefore,there is a need to develop spatially explicit methods for tree-level harvest and forest planning.

    Spatial optimization in the forestry context is typically based on adjacency relationships of region type objects (Weintraub and Murray 2006). In practice, adjacency is often defined by computing cut-cut and cut-uncut border lengths of adjacent regions. Because tree-level data do not form adjacent regions, we partitioned the space to trees with the assumption that a large tree represents a larger area than a small tree.This means that both tree size and distance to its neighbors are included in the definition of adjacency:for large trees the length of the common border with adjacent trees is greater than for small trees. However, it is not apparent how strongly tree size should affect the size of the tree region. We used a power diagram to compose the tree regions, wherein the radius of a circle is the tuning parameter, the value of which depended on the tree size. We defined the radius of the circle to be 50×DBH. This value was selected arbitrarily, and future studies should examine the best approach to define its value more precisely.For example, the radius of a circle could be defined based on the growth potential of a tree.

    Tree selection was combined with the use of an individual tree-level growth model that takes into account the neighborhood of the target tree. If tree selection requires the use of growth models, such as the relative value increment used in this study, it makes sense to use distance-dependent tree-level growth models or regular tree-level growth models in a spatial manner. Otherwise,the growth model predicts similar growth for all spatial distributions of trees and does not properly react to cuttings in the neighborhood of a target tree.

    We controlled the spatial distribution of cut trees by modifying the weights and sub-priority functions of spatial objective variables CC and CuC. The weight of the global objective (total volume of cut trees) was fixed to a small initial value (0.01) in every case. The economic criteria (relative value increment) always received the remainder of the weights (1 - TotCut -CC - CuC). In the Non-spatial selection, the weights of CC and CuC were set to zero, thus the spatial aspect was ignored entirely (Figs. 5a and 6a). It provided a reference to other selections that took the spatial distribution of the trees into account. In the Single tree selection, CC was minimized and CuC was maximized. This clearly dispersed trees to be cut(Figs. 6b and 7b). In the Tree group selection, cutting aggregations were targeted with low weights for CC and CuC. This led to tree groups of different sizes(Figs. 6c and 7c). In the Clearcut selection, the spatial weights of CC and CuC were larger, which led to bigger tree groups resampling traditional clearcut areas(Figs. 6d and 7d). We deliberately used a rather simple priority function; there could be more objective variables and sub-priority functions. For instance, a constraint type sub-priority function could be used to force a certain size of tree groups.

    Modifying the sub-priority functions and the weights of the spatial objective variables (CC and CuC) offers a means to enable the CA to mimic different disturbance regimes (Kuuluvainen 2016; Kulakowski et al. 2017),while always aiming at economically profitable forestry.For example, dispersion of cut trees (Single tree) mimics the damage caused by some insects that kill individual weak trees, the Tree group selection produces a landscape similar to wind damage (Kulakowski et al. 2017)and the Clearcut selection might correspond to damage caused by forest fire. Therefore, varying the weightings and sub-priority functions of spatial objective variables makes it possible to produce forested landscapes resembling those that result from different natural disturbance regimes.

    In addition to disturbance regimes, it is also possible to mimic alternative silvicultural systems, ranging from continuous cover selection forestry (Single tree) via group selection (Wing et al. 2019) to evenaged forestry where clear-fellings are conducted in mature stands. The degree to which a certain disturbance regime or silvicultural system is pursued can be closely controlled. If low weights are given to the spatial objectives, the outcome of CA mainly depends on the heterogeneity of the forest. Large disturbances are created in forests where economically mature trees form large aggregations and tree groups are harvested when mature trees occur in groups. In this way, it is possible to mimic different disturbance regimes at minimal loss in profitability of timber production. A greater need to control the spatial aggregation of cut trees would increase economic losses.

    In this study, we present and evaluate the proposed tree selection method as a tool for tree-level harvest planning. However, the method can be used as a part of a multi-objective forest planning system, in which dynamic treatment units are composed from trees by means of spatial optimization. This means that the trees to be cut are selected in each planning period, and subsequent periods must take into consideration the silvicultural operations implemented in earlier periods. The use of the proposed tree selection method as a part of multi-objective forest planning needs to be examined in subsequent studies.

    Conclusions

    The proposed tree selection method considers the spatial distribution of harvested trees and economic goals. It can be used to simulate cuttings in different type of silvicultural systems and mimic various disturbance regimes. It is easy to control by adjusting the sub-priority functions and the weightings of the spatial objectives. The method is utilized here as a tool in tree-level harvest planning but it can also be used in longer term forest management planning.

    Abbreviations

    ALS: Airborne laser scanning; ABA: Area-based approach; ITD: Individual tree detection; CHM: Canopy height model; AGL: Above ground level;DTM: Digital terrain model; DBH: Diameter at breast height; RMSE: Root mean square error; HALS: Height of ALS detected tree; CR: Circle’s radius in power diagram; CA:Cellular automaton;RelValInc:Relative value increment of the tree; TotCut: Total volume of cut trees; CC:Proportion of cut-cut border; CuC: Proportion of cut-uncut border; VTree: Volume of the subject tree; VTotal: Volume of all trees

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Mr. Francisco Rodríguez from the ‘For? Forest Technologies’ for providing the field plot data to this study.

    Authors’contributions

    All authors contributed to the design and implementation of analysis.Authors also wrote the manuscript together,and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This research was supported by the University of Eastern Finland Strategic Funding, School of Forest Sciences and the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland for the FORBIO project (Decision Number 314224).Adrián Pascual was also partially funded by Portuguese National Funds through FCT -Funda??o para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. in the scope of Norma Transitória - DL57/2016/CP5151903067/CT4151900586, and the project MODFIRE-A multiple criteria approach to integrate wildfire behavior in forest management planning with the reference PCIF/MOS/0217/2017.

    Availability of data and materials

    The tree regions and associated tree attributes used in the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland.2Forest Research Center, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.

    Received: 11 September 2019 Accepted: 23 March 2020

    久久久久精品人妻al黑| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 操出白浆在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产在线免费精品| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久久欧美国产精品| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 91成人精品电影| 色94色欧美一区二区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 在线观看国产h片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久青草综合色| 超碰97精品在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 午夜日本视频在线| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 一区福利在线观看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 老司机影院毛片| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 最黄视频免费看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| a级毛片黄视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 黄片小视频在线播放| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 婷婷成人精品国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 在线观看国产h片| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| av在线播放精品| 国产野战对白在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 久久97久久精品| av在线app专区| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 超碰成人久久| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 在线观看国产h片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产又爽黄色视频| bbb黄色大片| 曰老女人黄片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 99热国产这里只有精品6| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 久久免费观看电影| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | av在线播放精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 成人国产av品久久久| 1024视频免费在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产片内射在线| av在线app专区| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 天天添夜夜摸| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 尾随美女入室| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧美成人午夜精品| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品三级大全| 国产色婷婷99| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲人成电影观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产片内射在线| 一个人免费看片子| 一区二区av电影网| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久热在线av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 老司机影院成人| 考比视频在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 国产极品天堂在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 五月开心婷婷网| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| tube8黄色片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 一级黄片播放器| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲成色77777| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 少妇 在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 久热这里只有精品99| 在线观看三级黄色| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 99香蕉大伊视频| 性色av一级| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 在线观看国产h片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美97在线视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 99热全是精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 丁香六月天网| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| avwww免费| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线观看国产h片| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久99精品国语久久久| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品一区二区免费观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 中文字幕色久视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 黄频高清免费视频| 午夜激情av网站| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 悠悠久久av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 永久免费av网站大全| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日本av免费视频播放| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲av男天堂| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 高清av免费在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 天堂8中文在线网| 在线天堂中文资源库| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| a级毛片黄视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| av在线播放精品| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲精品视频女| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品一国产av| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久97久久精品| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 在现免费观看毛片| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 午夜福利视频精品| 考比视频在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 在线看a的网站| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产成人精品在线电影| 丁香六月欧美| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 深夜精品福利| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久久视频综合| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲国产欧美网| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 悠悠久久av| 久久久久视频综合| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 精品福利永久在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| av在线播放精品| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 黄色一级大片看看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 精品亚洲成国产av| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品成人在线| tube8黄色片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久免费观看电影| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | av在线老鸭窝| 中国三级夫妇交换| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产色婷婷99| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产毛片在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| av电影中文网址| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 色吧在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 日日啪夜夜爽| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产精品成人在线| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 老熟女久久久| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 高清av免费在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久久久精品性色| 免费不卡黄色视频| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 男女免费视频国产| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 男女免费视频国产| 99久久人妻综合| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 电影成人av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲国产看品久久| 午夜91福利影院| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产麻豆69| 国产在线视频一区二区|