• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Combining spatial and economic criteria in tree-level harvest planning

    2020-07-16 07:20:08PetteriPackalenTimoPukkalaandAdriPascual
    Forest Ecosystems 2020年2期

    Petteri Packalen,Timo Pukkala and Adrián Pascual

    Abstract

    Keywords: Spatial optimization, Tree selection, Cellular automata, Remote sensing,Airborne laser scanning

    Background

    Forest inventories employing Airborne Laser Scanning(ALS) data have become common in many countries(Nilsson et al. 2017). The ALS-based forest inventory methods (Hyypp? et al. 2008) are typically categorized into two groups: the area-based approach (ABA) (Means et al. 2000; N?sset 2002; Magnussen et al. 2013) and individual tree detection (ITD) (Hyypp? et al. 2001;Koch et al. 2006; L?hivaara et al. 2014). So far, most operational forest inventories employing ALS data have been implemented with the ABA (Maltamo et al. 2014).In ABA, stand attribute models are fitted with sample plots using metrics calculated from ALS data and then these models are used to predict stand attributes of the whole inventory area, typically using square grid cells(e.g. 16 m×16 m) as inventory units.

    In ITD, the inventory unit is an individual tree. The first step is to detect and delineate the trees. Then ALS features, such as local maxima mimicking tree height,are extracted on a tree-by-tree basis and used to estimate tree-level attributes, such as tree height and diameter. Tree locations are also an intrinsic output of ITD.The disadvantage of ITD is that tree detection fails when tree crowns overlap, or if there are many small trees under the dominant tree layer (Falkowski et al. 2008;Lindberg et al. 2010). Failures in tree detection and errors in the prediction of tree attributes make ITD more sensitive to bias than ABA at the aggregated (e.g. forest stand) level (Vauhkonen 2010). However, the advantage of ITD is that it produces a more detailed description of forest: tree level attributes, including tree locations.

    Forest plans are typically composed of homogenous regions for which inventory data are available. Most commonly,this region or inventory unit is a forest stand.In the ALS era, stand-level data are usually derived from ABA predictions in grid cells. In spatial forest planning,the inventory unit has been a stand (?hman 2000),microstand (Pascual et al. 2019), hexagon (Packalen et al. 2011)or pixel/cell(Lu and Eriksson 2000).To date,the use of tree-level data in forest or harvest planning has received limited attention. For example, Martín-Fernández and García-Abril (2005) developed a tree-level optimization method following an approach based on close-to-nature forestry, and Bettinger and Tang (2015)maximized the tree-level species mingling value in order to intersperse tree species across a forest. Algorithms have also been proposed for tree cut selection using a distance-dependent growth model (e.g. Pukkala and Miina 1998). Vauhkonen and Pukkala (2016) selected trees based on their value growth rate, and Pukkala et al.(2015) optimized the tree selection rule in thinning treatments when the profitability of forest management is maximized. These studies accounted for the location of trees when deciding the order in which to cut the trees. However, the spatial distribution of harvested trees was not controlled in optimization although it may be of great importance from ecological and practical viewpoints (Heinonen et al. 2018). Wing et al. (2019) implemented a method for group-selection silviculture that accounts for spatial aggregation, and utilized manually corrected stem map data that was derived by ITD.

    Controlling the spatial distribution of individual harvested trees or other harvest units, such as micro-stands or stands, is possible both in mathematical programming(?hman 2002) and in heuristic planning methods(Heinonen et al. 2007). Heuristic methods are more flexible and may be easier to use in large and complicated spatial problems (Bettinger et al. 2002; Heinonen et al.2018). Two lines of heuristics have been developed for spatial forest planning problems: global and local methods (also called centralized and decentralized methods) (Heinonen and Pukkala 2007; Pukkala et al.2014). Common examples of centralized heuristics are simulated annealing, tabu search and genetic algorithms(Bettinger et al. 2002). Of the two categories of heuristics, decentralized methods may be faster and more feasible when the number of calculation units is very large,which is often the case in tree-level planning (Heinonen and Pukkala 2007).

    Examples of decentralized heuristics are cellular automata (CA) (Strange et al. 2001, 2002; Mathey et al.2007) and the spatial version of the reduced cost method(Hoganson and Rose 1984; Pukkala et al. 2008). The aim of decentralized heuristics is to maximize or minimize a local objective function, which in tree-level planning is a tree-level function. This function is modified with a part that takes into account the global objectives or constraints of the planning problem. In the reduced costs method, global objectives are dealt with the dual prices of global constraints, whereas the applications of CA employ a global priority function that is added to the local function.

    Cellular automata, which were used in the current study, are self-organizing algorithms based on the assumption that the interaction between cells decreases rapidly with increasing distance (Von Neumann 1966;Strange et al. 2001; Wolfram 2002). Although the name of the method refers to (square-shaped) cells, the method can also be used with other types of calculation units. Each unit takes one of a limited number of states,which can be management schedules, land uses or, as in the current study, the cut vs. uncut status of an individual tree. The purpose of CA is to find the optimal status for each cell,by considering the variables of the cell itself and the local neighborhood of the cell. The cell states evolve in discrete time steps according to a set of rules.Spatial relationships can be included in CA and other heuristic methods in various ways, for instance by considering only spatially adjacent calculation units(similar vs. different prescription), by also including the neighbors of adjacent units (Kurttila et al. 2002)or using distance as the criterion of neighborhood(Heinonen et al. 2018).

    The aim of the study is to present a tree selection method that removes economically mature trees from the stand while also considering the spatial distribution of the harvested trees. A user controls whether the pattern of harvested trees is clustered or dispersed. We present a solution as to how tree-level data can be used in the spatial formulation of the optimization model common in forest and harvesting planning. The proposed method was tested in Central Spain on a stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) forest area with two different spatial distributions of trees. For this purpose, we implemented a simple ITD inventory, although the focus is on the tree selection algorithm.

    Study area and materials

    The study area is the public forest MUP50 owned by the municipality of Portillo in the province of Valladolid(366658-371652 Easting, 4590001-4586476 Northing,711-862 m a.s.l.) located in Castilla y León (Central Spain). The study area of 1100 ha consists of pure stone pine stands at different stages of development. The area is part of the Northern Plateau (Calama et al. 2008)where the stone pine forests are managed using evenaged forestry with the aim of providing a constant flow of revenue (timber, firewood and nut production) and other ecosystem services, such as erosion control(Calama et al. 2011).

    We selected two sub-areas in a 78-year old stone pine forest. These two areas differed in average tree size and the spatial distribution of the trees (Fig.1). In Area #1(106.4 ha), the spatial distribution of the trees was more or less regular, i.e., tree spacing was somewhat constant.In Area #2 (47.9 ha), the trees grow more in groups and stand density and tree spacing was variable.

    Field sample plots

    Systematic sampling was used to establish a network of 35 circular sample plots in the area and used to model the relationship between tree height and diameter.Sample plots were collected in 2010. The size of each plot was 706.86 m2, i.e. circular plots with a radius of 15 m. The sample plots contained a total of 344 trees. The locations of the plot centers were determined by a submeter precision GNSS equipment (Garmin International Inc., Missouri, USA). On each plot, all trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) over 7.5 cm were callipered and their heights were measured using a Vertex IV hypsometer (Hagl?f, Sweden). In addition, the distance and heading with respect to the plot center were determined with the distance meter and a Vertex IV compass (Hagl?f, Sweden). All the measured trees were stone pines. A summary of tree- and plot-level attributes is provided in Table 1.

    Airborne laser scanning data

    The ALS data were collected in 2010 using an ALS60 laser scanning system. The study area was scanned from an altitude of 2000 m above ground level with a scan angle of ±10 degrees. The average density of first echoes per square meter was 0.5. A digital terrain model (DTM)was constructed by first classifying echoes as ground and non-ground hits according to the approach described by Axelsson (2000). Then, a raster DTM of 1 m spatial resolution was interpolated from ground hits using Delaunay triangulation. Heights above ground level(AGL) were calculated by subtracting the DTM from the elevation of ALS echoes.

    Table 1 Minimum, mean,and maximum of tree and plot attributes

    Methods

    Individual tree detection and tree attribute prediction

    The canopy height model (CHM) of 1 m spatial resolution was interpolated by searching the highest ALS echo at AGL within each cell. If there were no ALS echoes within a cell, the value was interpolated from the neighboring cells. Individual trees were detected by searching treetops from the CHM. This was implemented with a local maximum filter (Hyypp? et al.2001). The CHM was slightly smoothed before searching local maxima to remove false positives (Koch et al.2006). Local maxima located <3 m (AGL) were removed in order to exclude local maxima on the ground and very small trees. Tree height was considered the same as the height (AGL) of the local maxima in the unsmoothed CHM. Tree detection worked quite well in the study area even though the ALS data had low echo density. The reason for this is that the crowns of individual stone pine trees do not usually touch each other.

    The trees measured in the field plots and ALSdetected trees were linked to each other if treetops were located within a 3-m Euclidean distance in threedimensional space (see details in Vauhkonen et al. 2011).Then a tree diameter model was fitted using successfully linked trees as follows:

    where DBH is the diameter at breast height in the fieldmeasured tree, HALSis the ALS detected tree height, and β0and β1are coefficients estimated from the data. We fitted the model with the least squares method using the nls function available in the R environment (R Development Core Team 2011). The estimated model coefficients (β0=5.3602, β1=2.2675) were statistically significant with both p-values less than 0.001.The coefficient of determination (R2) of the model was 0.66 and the RMSE was 5.26 cm. Finally, the model was used to predict DBH for all detected trees in the study area. The outputs of the ITD inventory were tree coordinates(XY), height and DBH for all detected trees.

    Growth and yield models

    The models presented in Calama and Montero (2006)were used to calculate the stem volume using predicted tree height and DBH for all trees. For each detected tree,the number of trees per hectare, basal area and dominant height (mean height of 100 largest trees per hectare)were computed using a buffer of 20 m around the tree.Site index was calculated using the existing model of Calama et al. (2003). The stand age in the study area was 78 years. The taper model (Calama and Montero 2006) was used to calculate the value of the stem. The following assortments, top diameters (dtop), minimum log lengths (hmin) and unit prices were assumed (Pasalodos-Tato et al. 2016): grade 1 (dtop≥40 cm, hmin2.4 m,30 €·m-3), grade 2 (dtop≥30 cm, hmin2.4 m, 18 €·m-3),grade 3(dtop≥20 cm, hmin2.4 m,13 €·m-3),grade 4 timber (dtop≥5 cm, hmin1.0 m, 5 €·m-3). The models from Calama and Montero (2004, 2005) were used to predict the 5-year increment in DBH and tree height, and the taper model was again used to compute the volume and the value of the trees 5 years later. Value increment was obtained as the difference of stem value at two time points. The relative value increment over a period of 5 years was calculated by dividing value increment by the value of the stem in the beginning of the 5-year period.See Pasalodos-Tato et al. (2016) for more details.

    A power diagram to create tree regions

    Tree-level forest data consist of detached tree regions(i.e. tree crowns) or points (i.e. stem locations), but not adjacent regions (e.g. grid cells or stands). Here we consider trees as point type objects. Then, we partition the space to trees with the assumption that a large tree occupies a larger area than a small tree. We refer to these partitions as tree regions. The partitioning is based on a power diagram, which is a type of weighted Voronoi diagram (Aurenhammer 1987). The power diagram is defined from a set of circles. Circle center is called a site.In this study, detected tree locations are sites and predicted DBH multiplied by 50 defines the radius of each circle. The power diagram consists of the points with the smallest power distance for a particular circle. In the case where all the circle radii are equal, the power diagram coincides with the Voronoi diagram. An example of the power diagram is given in Fig.2. Tree regions enable the use of adjacency relationships that take into account tree size, and the spatial optimization can be performed in a similar way as employed with traditional regions (e.g. grid cell or stand).

    Spatial optimization

    The cellular automaton developed for this study follows the ideas presented in Heinonen and Pukkala (2007) in which both local and global objectives are included in the priority function. In this study, the following priority function P was maximized for each tree:

    where VTreeis the volume of the subject tree (m3), VTotalis the volume of all trees within the optimization area,RelValInc is the relative value increment of the tree (%in 5 years), CC is the proportion of the cut-cut border(of the total border length with adjacent tree regions;Fig.3); CuC is the proportion of the cut-uncut border;w1, w2and w3are the weights of the “l(fā)ocal” tree-level objectives RelValInc, CC and CuC, respectively; p1, p2and p3are sub-priority functions of the local objective variables (Fig.4); w4is the initial weight of the “global”objective TotCut (total volume of cut trees) and p4is a priority function for the global objective. In this study,the proposed target volume to be harvested was 20% of the initial standing volume. The target harvest was 654.6 m3for Area #1 and 459.3 m3for Area #2.

    The priority function of Eq. 2 can be interpreted as a removal score for a tree. Low relative value increment(high economic maturity) and presence (aggregation problem) or absence (dispersion problem) of cut neighbors increases the probability of removal. Maximizing CC leads to the aggregation of cut trees and a large total area of cut trees, while the minimization of CuC contributes to compact aggregations on cut trees (Heinonen and Pukkala 2004).

    In the CA developed in this study, two options were inspected for every tree for several iterations:cutting the tree or letting it continue to grow. The option that maximizes the priority function was selected. All trees were inspected during each iteration in random order. After a certain number of iterations,the weighting of the global objective variable (w4) was progressively incremented using a certain step. Iterations with gradually increasing value for w4were repeated until the total volume of harvested trees was sufficiently close to the target value of harvested volume. In this study, the initial value of w4in the optimizations was always 0.01. Three iterations were conducted with the initial value, after which the value of w4was incremented by 0.01 after every additional iteration. Iterations were stopped when the difference between the achieved harvested volume and the target volume was less than 5% of the target removal.

    The CA described above is a simplified version of the automaton proposed by Strange et al. (2002) and Heinonen and Pukkala (2007). The first simplification is that the innovation probability is constant (one),implying that all trees are inspected at every iteration.The second simplification is that there are no mutations (mutation probability is constantly zero). Previous studies have shown that a high innovation probability and a low mutation probability work well in forest management problems (e.g., Heinonen and Pukkala 2007).

    The CA described above leads to aggregations of cut trees. If the aim is to disperse cut trees, CC needs to be minimized and CuC maximized.In that case, the priority functions for CC and CuC need to be replaced by a 1-0 and 0-1 sub-utility functions, respectively, as shown with dashed lines in Fig.4. The following weights were used to mimic the various silvicultural tree selection methods in optimization:

    · Non-spatial: RelValInc (w1=0.99), CC (w2=0.00),CuC (w3=0.00), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Single tree: RelValInc (w1=0.84), CC (w2=0.05),CuC (w3=0.10), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Tree group: RelValInc (w1=0.79), CC (w2=0.05),CuC (w3=0.15), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    · Clearcut:RelValInc (w1=0.69), CC (w2=0.10),CuC (w3=0.20), TotCut(w4=0.01 initially)

    In the Single tree selection,the aim was to disperse trees,which was achieved by using the sub-priority functions for CC and CuC shown as dashed lines in Fig.4. In the Tree group and Clearcut selections, the aim was to aggregate trees, which was achieved by using the sub-priority functions for CC and CuC shown as continuous lines in Fig.4.

    Results

    Initial tree regions

    The number of tree regions in Area#1 and Area#2 was 13,438 and 4296, respectively. The tree regions, together with tree volume and relative value increment of the tree, are shown in Fig.5. Tree spacing and consequently the size of tree regions differed between areas.The size of tree regions was smaller in Area #1 (mean 73, range 6-279 m2) than in Area#2(mean 98,range 10-938 m2).In general,trees were much larger in Area #2 (mean 0.49 m3, max 1.70 m3per tree)than in Area#1(mean 0.26 m3,max 0.72 m3per tree).The relative value increment (% in 5 years) was almost equal in both areas but due to larger trees the value increment(€in 5 years)was substantially higher in Area#2.

    There was a clear east-west gradient in relative value increment in Area #2. This was partly due to small trees that rapidly increased their value but was also due to the higher site index (data not shown here) in the western part of Area #2. The relationship between tree volume and relative value increment was apparent: low tree volume indicated high relative value increment, which is logical due to the rapidly increasing proportion of valuable timber assortments in small trees.

    Effect of tree selection method on stem number, tree size and value increment

    In the absence of spatial objectives (Non-spatial), the proportion of cut trees (Table 2) and the relative value increment of those trees (Table 3) were less than in cases where spatial objective variables were included.

    Table 2 Effect of tree selection method on the number of trees and mean diameter at breast height (DBH)for cut and uncut trees

    Table 3 Effect of tree selection method on the relative value increment (%in 5 years)for cut, uncut and post-cut trees

    The difference between Non-spatial and Single tree selections was clearly evident: aiming for dispersed locations of cut trees increased the average relative value increment of cut trees by almost 70%. This means that the dispersion objective led to the removal of trees that were not among the most economically mature. In both areas, the inclusion of spatial objective variables slightly decreased the average DBH of the cut trees.

    In Tree group and Clearcut the purpose was to aggregate cut trees.The relative value increment of cut trees increased more (compared to Non-spatial) when more weighting was given to aggregating harvested trees,meaning that large cutting aggregations led to the removal of many economically productive trees. Logically, the difference in relative value increment between cut and uncut trees decreased with increasing importance of creating cutting aggregations. In Area #2, the relative value increment of cut trees was greatest with Clearcut, whereas the Single tree method in Area#1 clearly resulted in the greatest relative value increment of cut trees.This suggests that Clearcut in Area#2 and Single tree in Area#1 were most in conflict with the economic objective.

    The relative value increment was also computed after simulating the removal of the selected trees. The relative value increments were calculated with the assumption that the cut trees no longer existed in the stand.We call this the"post-cut" stage (Table 3). In general, the post-cut values were slightly greater than the uncut values. The difference in uncut and post-cut values was greatest in Single-tree selection and smallest in Clearcut selection, because Single tree selection decreased the competition of almost all trees,whereas the competition in Clearcut was decreased only for trees that were growing near the edges of the cut areas.

    Size and spatial distribution of harvest blocks

    The number of harvest blocks (continuous tree regions selected for cutting) was 4-5 times greater in Single tree than in the Non-spatial tree selection method (Table 4).Correspondingly, the mean size of the harvest blocks was about three times smaller in Single tree than in the Non-spatial selection method. Moving from the Nonspatial to the Tree group method increased the mean size of harvest blocks 8- or 9-fold. The Clearcut selection, which had a higher weighting on spatial objectives,clearly provided the largest harvest block size and the smallest number of harvest blocks.

    On average, the distance from a cut tree to the nearest cut tree was longest with the Single-tree selection method (Table 5). This proves that Single-tree selection performed as desired (the purpose was to disperse cut trees). In the Non-spatial selection, the mean distance between cut trees was shorter than with the Single-tree selection and the standard deviation of distances was greatest. This is a logical outcome because Non-spatial selection does not attempt to generate a particular spatial distribution of trees.In the Tree group and Clearcut selections, the distances of cut trees were shortest because the aim was to cluster cut trees. The mean distances from uncut trees to their nearest neighbors were also shortest in the Tree group and Clearcut where most of the area was not thinned at all. Compared to cut trees, however, the mean distances did not vary much between tree selection methods.

    Maps showing the spatial pattern of harvest blocks and the tree regions are displayed in Fig.6(Area #1) and Fig.7 (Area #2). Visual inspection verifies the conclusions drawn from Tables 4 and 5: (a) the Non-spatial selection does not show any particular spatial layout, (b)the Single-tree selection disperses trees to be cut, (c) the Tree group and (d) Clearcut selections cluster cut trees to various degrees, Clearcut more than Tree group. The spatial distribution of cut trees is slightly different in the two areas. In Area #1, where the spatial distribution is somewhat regular, the Single-tree method selected trees to be cut more evenly than in Area #2, where trees grow more in groups and stand density and tree spacing is variable.

    Table 4 Number of harvest blocks(i.e., continuous tree regions selected for cutting) and mean size(m2) of blocks

    Table 5 Mean distance between trees and their nearest neighbors.

    Discussion

    We presented a new approach for tree-level harvest planning that considers both the spatial distribution and the value increment of the trees. The problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem, which is solved by a tailored CA algorithm. The idea is to bundle the tree selection method with tree-level inventory data obtained by means of ITD and ALS data. The ITD inventory is currently a feasible method for certain forest types in an operational setting.Therefore,there is a need to develop spatially explicit methods for tree-level harvest and forest planning.

    Spatial optimization in the forestry context is typically based on adjacency relationships of region type objects (Weintraub and Murray 2006). In practice, adjacency is often defined by computing cut-cut and cut-uncut border lengths of adjacent regions. Because tree-level data do not form adjacent regions, we partitioned the space to trees with the assumption that a large tree represents a larger area than a small tree.This means that both tree size and distance to its neighbors are included in the definition of adjacency:for large trees the length of the common border with adjacent trees is greater than for small trees. However, it is not apparent how strongly tree size should affect the size of the tree region. We used a power diagram to compose the tree regions, wherein the radius of a circle is the tuning parameter, the value of which depended on the tree size. We defined the radius of the circle to be 50×DBH. This value was selected arbitrarily, and future studies should examine the best approach to define its value more precisely.For example, the radius of a circle could be defined based on the growth potential of a tree.

    Tree selection was combined with the use of an individual tree-level growth model that takes into account the neighborhood of the target tree. If tree selection requires the use of growth models, such as the relative value increment used in this study, it makes sense to use distance-dependent tree-level growth models or regular tree-level growth models in a spatial manner. Otherwise,the growth model predicts similar growth for all spatial distributions of trees and does not properly react to cuttings in the neighborhood of a target tree.

    We controlled the spatial distribution of cut trees by modifying the weights and sub-priority functions of spatial objective variables CC and CuC. The weight of the global objective (total volume of cut trees) was fixed to a small initial value (0.01) in every case. The economic criteria (relative value increment) always received the remainder of the weights (1 - TotCut -CC - CuC). In the Non-spatial selection, the weights of CC and CuC were set to zero, thus the spatial aspect was ignored entirely (Figs. 5a and 6a). It provided a reference to other selections that took the spatial distribution of the trees into account. In the Single tree selection, CC was minimized and CuC was maximized. This clearly dispersed trees to be cut(Figs. 6b and 7b). In the Tree group selection, cutting aggregations were targeted with low weights for CC and CuC. This led to tree groups of different sizes(Figs. 6c and 7c). In the Clearcut selection, the spatial weights of CC and CuC were larger, which led to bigger tree groups resampling traditional clearcut areas(Figs. 6d and 7d). We deliberately used a rather simple priority function; there could be more objective variables and sub-priority functions. For instance, a constraint type sub-priority function could be used to force a certain size of tree groups.

    Modifying the sub-priority functions and the weights of the spatial objective variables (CC and CuC) offers a means to enable the CA to mimic different disturbance regimes (Kuuluvainen 2016; Kulakowski et al. 2017),while always aiming at economically profitable forestry.For example, dispersion of cut trees (Single tree) mimics the damage caused by some insects that kill individual weak trees, the Tree group selection produces a landscape similar to wind damage (Kulakowski et al. 2017)and the Clearcut selection might correspond to damage caused by forest fire. Therefore, varying the weightings and sub-priority functions of spatial objective variables makes it possible to produce forested landscapes resembling those that result from different natural disturbance regimes.

    In addition to disturbance regimes, it is also possible to mimic alternative silvicultural systems, ranging from continuous cover selection forestry (Single tree) via group selection (Wing et al. 2019) to evenaged forestry where clear-fellings are conducted in mature stands. The degree to which a certain disturbance regime or silvicultural system is pursued can be closely controlled. If low weights are given to the spatial objectives, the outcome of CA mainly depends on the heterogeneity of the forest. Large disturbances are created in forests where economically mature trees form large aggregations and tree groups are harvested when mature trees occur in groups. In this way, it is possible to mimic different disturbance regimes at minimal loss in profitability of timber production. A greater need to control the spatial aggregation of cut trees would increase economic losses.

    In this study, we present and evaluate the proposed tree selection method as a tool for tree-level harvest planning. However, the method can be used as a part of a multi-objective forest planning system, in which dynamic treatment units are composed from trees by means of spatial optimization. This means that the trees to be cut are selected in each planning period, and subsequent periods must take into consideration the silvicultural operations implemented in earlier periods. The use of the proposed tree selection method as a part of multi-objective forest planning needs to be examined in subsequent studies.

    Conclusions

    The proposed tree selection method considers the spatial distribution of harvested trees and economic goals. It can be used to simulate cuttings in different type of silvicultural systems and mimic various disturbance regimes. It is easy to control by adjusting the sub-priority functions and the weightings of the spatial objectives. The method is utilized here as a tool in tree-level harvest planning but it can also be used in longer term forest management planning.

    Abbreviations

    ALS: Airborne laser scanning; ABA: Area-based approach; ITD: Individual tree detection; CHM: Canopy height model; AGL: Above ground level;DTM: Digital terrain model; DBH: Diameter at breast height; RMSE: Root mean square error; HALS: Height of ALS detected tree; CR: Circle’s radius in power diagram; CA:Cellular automaton;RelValInc:Relative value increment of the tree; TotCut: Total volume of cut trees; CC:Proportion of cut-cut border; CuC: Proportion of cut-uncut border; VTree: Volume of the subject tree; VTotal: Volume of all trees

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Mr. Francisco Rodríguez from the ‘For? Forest Technologies’ for providing the field plot data to this study.

    Authors’contributions

    All authors contributed to the design and implementation of analysis.Authors also wrote the manuscript together,and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This research was supported by the University of Eastern Finland Strategic Funding, School of Forest Sciences and the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland for the FORBIO project (Decision Number 314224).Adrián Pascual was also partially funded by Portuguese National Funds through FCT -Funda??o para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. in the scope of Norma Transitória - DL57/2016/CP5151903067/CT4151900586, and the project MODFIRE-A multiple criteria approach to integrate wildfire behavior in forest management planning with the reference PCIF/MOS/0217/2017.

    Availability of data and materials

    The tree regions and associated tree attributes used in the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland.2Forest Research Center, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.

    Received: 11 September 2019 Accepted: 23 March 2020

    两个人看的免费小视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 一区在线观看完整版| 蜜桃在线观看..| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av天堂久久9| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 777米奇影视久久| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲av美国av| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜两性在线视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 满18在线观看网站| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 天堂动漫精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲成人手机| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久狼人影院| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 免费看十八禁软件| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久香蕉激情| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 三级毛片av免费| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日本a在线网址| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| kizo精华| 1024香蕉在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日本五十路高清| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲九九香蕉| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 超色免费av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美大码av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 香蕉国产在线看| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 夫妻午夜视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜福利欧美成人| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 色在线成人网| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 日韩免费av在线播放| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 老熟女久久久| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| av线在线观看网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 午夜福利欧美成人| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一夜夜www| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 大码成人一级视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 国产1区2区3区精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| av有码第一页| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 女人精品久久久久毛片| svipshipincom国产片| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一级毛片精品| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 成人精品一区二区免费| 99九九在线精品视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 色在线成人网| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产单亲对白刺激| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 在线天堂中文资源库| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 手机成人av网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲av美国av| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 在线av久久热| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 一本综合久久免费| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 麻豆av在线久日| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇 在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 宅男免费午夜| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜老司机福利片| 青草久久国产| 久久免费观看电影| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲av美国av| 国产淫语在线视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 色94色欧美一区二区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产麻豆69| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产成人影院久久av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 另类精品久久| av电影中文网址| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产区一区二久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 岛国毛片在线播放| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲中文av在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 精品国产一区二区久久| 看免费av毛片| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久性视频一级片| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品影院久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| av一本久久久久| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| tube8黄色片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产成人av教育| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久影院123| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 91字幕亚洲| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 老司机福利观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| netflix在线观看网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 久久免费观看电影| 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日本av免费视频播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 在线观看人妻少妇| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| aaaaa片日本免费| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| av电影中文网址| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲国产欧美网| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产成人欧美| 在线看a的网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 深夜精品福利| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 两性夫妻黄色片| a级毛片黄视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日日夜夜操网爽| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 精品久久久久久电影网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| av一本久久久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 黄色视频不卡| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产又爽黄色视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 黄色 视频免费看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 天天影视国产精品| 久久中文字幕一级| 免费看十八禁软件| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| av欧美777| 国产区一区二久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 丁香欧美五月| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| aaaaa片日本免费| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| av福利片在线| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产区一区二久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 宅男免费午夜| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 日韩视频在线欧美| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产色视频综合| 另类精品久久| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久亚洲真实| 手机成人av网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久国产精品影院| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| a在线观看视频网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| bbb黄色大片| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 一级毛片精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片|