• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    2020-06-22 09:51:22WangTingting汪婷婷LiuYang劉楊NingZhiyuan寧志遠(yuǎn)QiRui齊瑞
    關(guān)鍵詞:志遠(yuǎn)計委建設(shè)項目

    Wang Ting-ting (汪婷婷),Liu Yang (劉楊), Ning Zhi-yuan (寧志遠(yuǎn)),Qi Rui(齊瑞)

    1Schoolof Acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina,ShanghaiUniversity of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China

    2College of Clinical Medicine,ShanghaiJiaoTong University,Shanghai 200025,China

    3Department of Rehabilitation, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Chineseand Western Medicine ShanghaiUniversity of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200437,China

    Abstract

    Keywords:AcupunctureTherapy;Osteoarthritis, Knee;Pain; Meta-analysis; SystematicReview;RandomizedControlled Trials

    Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common chronic joint disorder andcanleadtodegenerationof articular cartilage andsecondary bone hyperplasia.It often affects weight-bearing joints, such as hips, knees, spine,as well as hands and feet[1]. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is oneof the considerablecauses of physicaldisability worldwide[2]and impairs the quality of life (QOL)[3]. Pain,swelling,stiffnessandfunctionallimitationare the primary clinical manifestations of KOA. At least 19% of adults aged 45 years or older suffer from KOA in the US[4], and the prevalence of KOA in Chinese women is muchhigher thaninAmericanwomen(46.6%vs.34.8%)[5]. Moreover, households with OA patients tend topay moreannualout-of-pocket (OOP)costsin comparison with those without OA patients[6].

    There is no known cure for KOA so far. According to recent OsteoarthritisResearchSociety International(OARSI)guidelines for KOA[7],biomechanical intervention,intra-articular corticosteroids,exercise,self-management and strength training are applicable toallindividuals.Among non-surgicalapproaches,acupunctureis recommendedfor uncertainspecific clinical sub-phenotypes and has been verified to be of great benefit for pain due to OA or after replacement surgery[8-10]. Conversely, some studies have shown that there was insufficientevidenceto support the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving pain[11-12].

    Acupuncture,amajor formof traditionalChinese medicine treatment, has already become an important alternative option for KOA patients because of its fewer side effects and short-term pain relief[13]. The potential mechanismsof acupunctureinvolvebiologicaland kinetic aspects.A recent study suggestedthat electroacupuncture (EA) may slow the progression of cartilage degradation[14].Intermsof alleviating dysfunction, acupuncture can improve both short- and long-term physical function[13]and can also increase the velocity of stair climbing by developing theloading capacity of the knee joint on both sagittal and coronary planes[15].

    At present,studiesassociatedwithacupuncture differ widely in their trial protocols. Thus, the results may beaffectedby considerablefactors,anditis difficult to eliminate the placebo effect of acupuncture.Moreover,there arefew high-quality randomized controlledtrials (RCTs)comparing shamandtrue acupuncture for treatment of KOA, and it is hard to obtain the effect of acupuncture from individual cases.Therefore,thismeta-analysisaimsto explore the efficacy of acupuncture and to critically evaluate the current evidencefromRCTs of acupunctureinthe management of patients with KOA.

    1 Methods

    1.1 Data sources and searches

    This study wasconductedinaccordancewith the guidelinesof theCochrane InterventionSystematic Review[16]andCochrane Reviewers' Handbook[17]. Eight databases were extensively searched up to March 2018.RCTs comparing the efficacy of acupuncture with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture for KOA were included.Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers (Wang Ting-ting andLiu Yang). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool wasused for assessing therisk of bias.Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used to conduct the quantitative analysis of the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of KOA.

    Tworesearchers(Wang Ting-ting andLiuYang)independently searched the following databases from their inceptiontoMarch2018:CochraneCentral Register of ControlledTrials (CENTRAL),Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), PubMed, Web of Science,ChinaNationalKnowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Chongqing VIPDatabase (CQVIP), ChineseBiomedical LiteratureDatabase(CBM)andWanfangAcademic JournalFull-text Database(Wanfang).Thesearch strategies are shown in Table 1.In addition, we also manually retrieved eligible studies by browsing Google Scholar and reading relevant research.Language was limited to Chinese and English.

    Table 1. Search strategy (taking PubMed as an example)

    1.2 Study selection

    RCTs comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture(SA) or no acupuncture (NA) in the treatment of KOA patients were included.1.2.1 Inclusion criteria

    RCTs;adult patientswhohadbeenclinically or radiographically diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis; the experimentalgroupwas treatedwithmanual acupuncture (MA) or EA; the control group was treated with SA or NA; pain and physical function assessed by WesternOntarioandMcMaster Universities osteoarthritisindex (WOMAC)were consideredthe outcomes; acupuncture treatment consisted of at least 6 overall sessions, at least 1 session per week and at least 20 min per time[13].

    1.2.2 Exclusion criteria

    Participants with KOA who had knee arthroplasty and interventions combined with other treatments such as traditional Chinese medicine; studies without needed outcomes or sufficient data.

    Tworeviewers (Wang Ting-ting andLiuYang)independently selectedstudiesaccording to the inclusionandexclusioncriteria.Any disagreement wouldberesolvedthroughdiscussionwithathird reviewer (Ning Zhi-yuan).

    1.3 Definitions

    We definedSA astheuseof shamor placebo needles[18],whileNA representedeither standard conservativetreatment equivalentto thatof the experimental group or no routine treatment, such as education and waiting for treatment. Conventional care wastheonly additionalinterventionfor both experimentalandcontrolgroups,including pharmacological treatments,physicaltherapy,and health education[19].

    1.4 Data extraction

    Tworeviewers (Wang Ting-ting andLiuYang)independently extracted data from the selected studies using astandardizedformthat includedpublication year and place, authors, age of the participants, sample size, interventions, frequency and course of treatment andoutcomemeasures.Any disagreement was resolvedby negotiationwithathirdauthor (Ning Zhi-yuan).Furthermore,wecontactedthe correspondingauthors of thearticlesif therewas insufficient information.

    1.5 Assessment of risk of bias

    Tworeviewersindependently assessedtherisk of bias of each trialusing the CochraneCollaboration’s tool[20],whichincludessevendomains:sequence generation;allocationconcealment;blinding of participantsandpersonnel;blindingof outcome assessment;incompleteoutcomedata;selective outcome reporting and other bias. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a third reviewer.

    1.6 Quantitative data synthesis

    Statistical analysis of the data was mainly conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0. We chose the standardizedmeandifference(SMD)andthe corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) to present the pooled effect size because the scores of the scales variedgreatly intheincludedtrials.We preferred changes from baseline values but used final values only if these were the only available data. If we could not obtain standard deviations (SDs) even after contacting the authors, we would then useP-value, standard error,CIsor correlationcoefficientR to calculate the final values according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook[16]. Engauge Digitizer 3.0 software was used to extract data from the figures if the studies only providedfigures[18].AP-valueless than0.05is statistically significant. The statisticI2was used to assess the size of the heterogeneity. IfI2≤50%, a fixed effects model was adopted; ifI2>50%, a random effects model wasapplied.If heterogeneity existed,sourcesof heterogeneity wouldbeexplored.If thenumber of studies was ≥10, we used Stata 12.0 for meta-regression to find the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses would be performed to evaluate whether the primary results were stable. If the number of the included trials was≥10,funnelplotsor Egger’s testwouldbe conducted to assess the potential publication bias.

    1.7 Subgroup analysis

    We performedsubgroupanalysesaccording to different interventions of thecontrolgroups,which could be divided into two categories: sham acupuncture and no acupuncture. Hence, we compared the effect of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture and the effect of acupuncture versus no acupuncture.

    2 Results

    2.1 Search results

    A totalof 5019recordswereretrievedthrough electronic andmanualsearch,and2378records remained after the removal of duplicates. Through title and abstract screening, 177 studies were considered to be potentially eligible. Then, we read the full texts and excluded159records for reasonslikeinappropriate participants,irrelevant outcomes,inappropriate interventions, insufficient data, in languages other than English and Chinese, and duplicates.For studies that only provided WOMAC total score or figures from which the datacouldnot be extracted,andwe failedto receive replies when contacting the authors, we would exclude them for insufficient data. Finally, 18 RCTs with a total of 3 522 participants were recruited for metaanalysis. The selection process is shown in Figure 1.

    2.2 Study characteristics

    Table 2 presents the basic characteristics of the 18 includedRCTs.Thesetrials werepublishedbetween 1994 and 2017; 15 in English[21-35]and 3 in Chinese[36-38].The included studies were implemented in 9 different countries.No significant differences in age, sex ratio,pain or physical function scores were detected between the experimental and control groups at baseline. The 18 RCTscomprised12comparisonsbetweenthe acupuncture group and the sham-acupuncture group,and 20 comparisons between the acupuncture group and the no-acupuncture group.Half of theincluded studies combinedroutine treatmentslikemedication and physical therapy or health education. According to whether needlepenetratedtheskin,SA couldbe dividedinto twocategories:penetrating and non-penetrating, which may have a potential impact on efficacy. Therefore, in the meta-regression, we explored therelevanceof thisfactor totheresults.Each treatmenttimewas basically 20-30 min,but the frequency varied greatly, from once per week to 5 times per week. The number of sessions also differed: one study[37]offered a total of 50 treatments, while the rest had 6-16 sessions. The duration of intervention ranged from2to13weeks,andthe assessment timewas almost within 2 weeks after the last treatment, except one trial[25], which assessed the result 3 weeks after the end of the treatment.

    2.3 Risk of bias of the included studies

    The risk of bias assessment is shown in Figure 2. A total of 16 trials[21-26,28-29,31-38]reported the method of random sequence generation, while theremaining 2 trials[27,30]were evaluatedas unclear.Eleven trials[21-26,28,32-35]carriedout allocationconcealment,and the rest did not describe their process of allocation concealment in detail. Because it is almost impossible to blind the operators during physical therapy, most of the studies had high or unclear risk of bias in the item of performancebias.However,5trials[22-23,26,28,32]were considered having low risk of bias in regard to this item because they evaluated the masking effectiveness after treatment,andtheresultssuggested their blinding strategies were credible. Only 4 trials[21,34,36-37]did not mention theblinding of outcome assessment.In the domain of incomplete outcome data, the control group of 3 studies[22,34-35]had a much higher dropout rate than the experimental group, and 1 study[35]even reported that several participants were lost to follow-up owing to lack of improvement, so these 3 trials were considered tohave ahighrisk of bias. Another 4 studies[30,36-38]failedto report thedropout rateandthushadan unclear risk of bias. Only 1 trial[25]had a low risk in the domain of reporting bias because the study protocol was provided prior to the trial. However, for the other bias items, 5 studies[27,30,36-38]were assessed as unclear.

    2.4 Primary outcome analysis

    Since finalvalues wereavailablefor mostof the includedstudies,weselected thefinalvaluesfor meta-analysis. For 3 studies[22,26-27]that provided only values of changes frombaseline,weusedthe correlation coefficient R to calculate the final values and then analyzed the data of all studies. According to the control groupinterventions, a subgroupanalysis was conducted. The results showed that acupuncture was better thanshamacupuncturein painreduction(SMD=-0.34; 95%CI: -0.57 to -0.11;I2=85%;P=0.003),Figure3)andphysicalfunctionimprovement (SMD=-0.34; 95%CI -0.57 to -0.11;I2=85%;P=0.003),(Figure4).Comparedwithnoacupuncture,the acupuncture group also showed significant advantages in pain reduction (SMD=-0.79; 95%CI -1.15 to -0.43;I2=87%;P<0.0001),(Figure5)andphysicalfunction improvement(SMD=-0.75;95%CI-1.19to-0.31;I2=91%;P=0.0008),(Figure 6).However, the tests for heterogeneity showedsignificant.Therefore,we performed sensitivity analyses and meta-regression in multiple ways to find the source of heterogeneity.

    2.5 Sensitivity analysis

    Sensitivity analyses were carried out on the basis of the subgroupanalysesusing thefollowing four methods[39]:excluding the study withthemaximum effect, excluding research with insufficient original data(studiesonly with valuesof changes frombaseline),changing the effectsmodel(random- or fixed-effects model) and including only trials with low risk of bias for blinding (at least blinding of the patients and outcome assessors).Thelastonewasonly conductedinthe comparisonbetweentheacupunctureand sham-acupuncture groups, as it is difficult to blind the patients in the no-acupuncture groups. The sensitivity analysisof theacupuncturegroupversus the sham-acupuncture group is shown in Table 3, and that for the acupuncture group versus the non-acupuncture group is shown in Table 4.

    Table 2. Characteristics of the included studies

    Figure 2. Risk of bias of the included studies

    Figure 3. Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for pain reduction

    Figure 4. Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for physical function improvement

    Figure 5. Acupuncture versus noacupuncture for pain reduction

    Notonly inthe comparisonbetweenthe acupunctureandthesham-acupuncture groupsbut also in the comparison between the acupuncture and the no-acupuncture groups, the effect sizes of the RCT by Mavrommatis CI,et al[29]for improving painand physical function were much greater than those of the other studies or thepooled effects.For example,in comparing thepainrelief effect of acupuncture with that of shamacupuncture,theeffect sizewas approximately 5 timesmore than thepooledeffect.When this RCT was excluded in the sensitivity analysis,I2decreased to a certain degree but was still substantial,while the pooled effects decreased, andP-values were as significant as before.

    There were 3 studies[22,26-27]that provided only values of changes from baseline, so we excluded them in the sensitivity analysis to observe the potential effect on theresults,whichpresentedno significant changes whether they wereincludedor not.Onestudy[38]compared the effect of acupuncture with that of sham acupunctureanddidnot mentiontheblinding of patients, so we excluded it in the sensitivity analysis,and the meta-analytic estimate was very close to the primary results. When the effects model was changed,the results tended to be more conservative because in the fixed-effects model,largesamplestudieswith smaller effects occupied greater weight. In short, our primary results werestillrobust to avariety of sensitivity analyses.

    2.6 Meta-regression

    Univariate meta-regression was performed based on publication years and interventions. In the comparison of acupuncturewithshamacupunctureor no acupuncture group, publication years and the types of acupuncture (MA or EA) were regarded as the factors to be analyzed.In the comparison of acupuncture with sham acupuncture, we observed the influence of the types of shamacupuncture(penetrating or non-penetrating) on the results. In the comparison of acupuncturewithnoacupuncture,we exploredthe potential impact of the different interventions (whether containing routine treatmentsor not)of thecontrol group on the results. Finally, we found no significant differencesinthesefactors (P>0.05).Univariate meta-regression indicated that these covariates could not explain the heterogeneity, and these factors may not be the source of the heterogeneity.

    Table 3.Sensitivity analyses:acupuncture versus sham acupuncture

    Table 4.Sensitivity analyses:acupuncture versus no acupuncture

    2.7 Publication bias

    Egger’s test and jackknife analysis were conducted for allsubgroups.Egger’stestrevealednosignificant publication bias (P>0.05), and further jackknife analysis suggested that no test was needed to add or remove,indicating that the includedstudies wererelatively comprehensive.Jackknifeanalysis,asamethodof sensitivity analysis,also verifiedthestability of our primary results.

    2.8 Adverse effects

    Therewere only 3studies[29,36-38]that didnot mention adverse effects. The most common side effects includedbruising,bleeding,dizziness,nausea,numbness,excitement,weakness,musclesoreness,tingling, swelling, sleepiness, fainting, muscle cramps,headache, increased pain, infection at the acupuncture site, etc., and most of these were mild and acceptable.

    2.9 Follow-up

    Ninestudies[21,23,25-26,28-32]evaluatedWOMAC pain and physical function scores from 1 to 6 months after randomization, and 4 studies[21,28-30]showed that the acupuncturegroupwasstillsuperior to thecontrol group at follow-up. Two studies[25,31]even evaluated the outcomes at 1 year after randomization, and the results were negative.

    3 Discussion

    According to the results of this study, acupuncture wasmoreeffectivethanshamacupuncture andno acupunctureregarding painrelief andfunctional improvement.However,the effect sizesamong the eligible studies differed greatly, and there were several studies that even had much higher effect size than the pooledeffect,whichmay leadtoconsiderable heterogeneity. Notably, the effect became conservative when the study with the maximum effect was removed.Thoughmeta-regressiondidnot show asignificant difference between different types of intervention, their effect on the pooled effect could not be entirely ruled out because different treatments may lead to different effects in clinical practice.

    This systematic review and meta-analysis has certain strengths. First of all, we carried out a comprehensive searchof eligiblestudies fromChineseandEnglish databasesanddemonstratedaprofoundsubgroup analysis to investigate the differences in efficacy in the twocomparisons (acupuncture versussham acupuncture and acupuncture versus no acupuncture).Besides, we conducted a variety of sensitivity analysis andmeta-regression toseek thepotentialsource of heterogeneity, and our primary results were still robust to a variety of sensitivity analyses.

    Our study still has some limitations. Though various sensitivity analyses wereapplied,significant heterogeneity stillexistedandthesourcewas still unclear.Inaddition,someRCTsof thisstudy were assessed as having a high risk of bias, so the quality of evidence was downgraded because of the inclusion of these studies. And, all of the outcomes were evaluated by scales thathaveacertaindegreeof subjectivity,which may lead to bias.

    In this study, we investigated the effect of the blend of bothMA andEA onosteoarthritisof theknee.Thoughmany systematic reviews andmeta-analyses oftenanalyzedtheeffectof thesetwo typesof acupuncture together in one study, compared to MA,EA displayed more significant analgesic effect for KOA[40]and displayed greater analgesic effect for different types of pain[41]. Thus, there are some systematic reviews and meta-analyses[19,42]that only focused on the effect of EA treatment of KOA because including both MA and EA may generate heterogeneity[43].

    Shamacupuncture,oftencombinedwithadevice that canmakesoundsor emit light,includes penetrating andnon-penetrating shamacupuncture.The former is named minimal acupuncture[44], and the latter is named ‘Streitberger’ acupuncture[45]. Though both types of sham acupuncture have been widely used,the blinding in sham acupuncture study is still likely to fail, especially in theparticipants whohavereceived acupuncture treatment before. One study[46]found that realacupuncturetreatment hadsignificantly greater real-timepainrelief thannon-penetrating sham acupuncture,but not penetrating sham acupuncture.However,therewas no significantdifferenceinthe effect estimatebetweenthe two typesof sham acupuncture.

    Other factors generating heterogeneity included the following factors:differentnumber and frequency of treatment sessions, time of each treatment, duration,evaluationtimepoints,acupoint selection,depthof acupuncture,andacupuncturist’sexperience,etc.WOMAC has been recommended as one of the highest performing outcome measuresfor knee andhip osteoarthritis,intermsof reliability,validity,responsiveness and interpretability[47-49]. It is often used as a comparator to assess the measurement properties of other outcome measures[50-51]. This scale consists of three sub-scales: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physicalfunction(17items).This scale mainly incorporates a Likert-style version and a visual analog scale (VAS) version, which may differ in efficiency[47]. In thisstudy, the two different versions wereusedfor assessment,andpartof theraw data waseven normalized to 0-10 points[28]or 0-100 points[31-32], which may result in heterogeneity.

    Thereare few studies identifying theminimum clinically important difference (MCID)for thetotal WOMAC score and its component scores, and it is hard to measure MCID because it can be influenced by many factors such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), as wellas baselineWOMAC score[52].Inthe Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook[17], the effect size of SMD can be graded as three levels: lower than 0.41, small; 0.41-0.70,moderate;higher than0.70,large.Hence, compared withshamacupuncture,acupuncture only hadmild advantage. After the study with themaximum effect wasremoved,theSMDof painandfunction improvement was reduced to 0.2, which may not have clinicalsignificance[53-54].Whilecomparedwithno acupuncture, acupuncture showed moderate to large advantage. Therefore, this meta-analysis indicated that acupuncture may be an effective treatment for pain and physicaldysfunctionassociatedwithKOA compared with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture.

    4 Conclusion

    Theacupuncturegrouphadsignificantadvantages over the sham acupuncture or no-acupuncture groups in relieving pain and improving physical function. And our resultswererobust toavariety of sensitivity analyses.

    Conflict of Interest The authorsdeclareno conflictsof interest.Acknowledgments Thiswork wassupported by grantsfrom Project of Clinical BaseConstruction of ChineseMedicine Rehabilitation of ShanghaiHealth and Family Planning Commission (上海市衛(wèi)計委中醫(yī)康復(fù)臨床基地建設(shè)項目,No. ZY3-LCPT-1-1008).

    Received:20 September 2019/Accepted:22October 2019

    猜你喜歡
    志遠(yuǎn)計委建設(shè)項目
    基于環(huán)保竣工驗收對建設(shè)項目環(huán)評的分析
    我最喜愛的玩具①
    推動工程建設(shè)項目“非禁即入”普遍落實
    Atom interferometers with weak-measurement path detectors and their quantum mechanical analysis?
    香噴噴的年喲
    Analysis and implementation of FURLS algorithm for active vibration control system with positive feedback①
    做好對重大建設(shè)項目的監(jiān)督
    浙江人大(2014年1期)2014-03-20 16:20:01
    國家衛(wèi)計委:我國食品安全標(biāo)準(zhǔn)兩年內(nèi)與國際接軌
    衛(wèi)計委:2014年底前完成50%以上食品安全標(biāo)準(zhǔn)整合
    衛(wèi)計委構(gòu)建食品安全風(fēng)險監(jiān)測網(wǎng) 重金屬污染涵蓋其中
    美女大奶头黄色视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 一区二区av电影网| www.色视频.com| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 性色avwww在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| videos熟女内射| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久久久久久久久成人| 日本av免费视频播放| 搡老乐熟女国产| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| videosex国产| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产精品无大码| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美3d第一页| 九草在线视频观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 丝袜美足系列| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 99热这里只有精品一区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久久网色| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 18在线观看网站| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 下体分泌物呈黄色| kizo精华| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 黄片播放在线免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| av一本久久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产在线免费精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 桃花免费在线播放| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 天天影视国产精品| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 日本av免费视频播放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 天天影视国产精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 曰老女人黄片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99久国产av精品国产电影| av专区在线播放| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产成人精品一,二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| av.在线天堂| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 老司机影院毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产在线免费精品| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲性久久影院| 最黄视频免费看| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 尾随美女入室| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产 一区精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产视频内射| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 一级毛片电影观看| av黄色大香蕉| 国产极品天堂在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久精品区二区三区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品久久久噜噜| 只有这里有精品99| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产精品一国产av| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产 一区精品| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 三级国产精品片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产成人91sexporn| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久婷婷青草| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 高清不卡的av网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 丁香六月天网| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 曰老女人黄片| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲av福利一区| 如何舔出高潮| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 免费av中文字幕在线| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人无遮挡网站| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 高清毛片免费看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 999精品在线视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 人妻一区二区av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产综合精华液| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 只有这里有精品99| 成人无遮挡网站| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜免费观看性视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 精品少妇内射三级| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲国产精品999| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产亚洲最大av| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91国产中文字幕| 精品久久久精品久久久| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产片内射在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲在久久综合| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 高清欧美精品videossex| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 黄片播放在线免费| videos熟女内射| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲精品第二区| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 中国三级夫妇交换| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产精品无大码| 久久精品夜色国产| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 一本一本综合久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 高清毛片免费看| av免费观看日本| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 满18在线观看网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av天堂久久9| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 另类精品久久| 久久99一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 曰老女人黄片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产探花极品一区二区| av一本久久久久| 如何舔出高潮| freevideosex欧美| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 777米奇影视久久| 99久久人妻综合| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| av不卡在线播放| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产综合精华液| 在线播放无遮挡| 九色成人免费人妻av| 丝袜喷水一区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 精品少妇内射三级| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| av专区在线播放| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| av在线app专区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 飞空精品影院首页| 日本色播在线视频| 另类精品久久| 国产精品成人在线| 韩国av在线不卡| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 18在线观看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久久久国产网址| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产乱来视频区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 美女主播在线视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | kizo精华| videossex国产| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产 一区精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 18禁观看日本| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲国产av新网站| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成人无遮挡网站| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| av一本久久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| av播播在线观看一区| 老女人水多毛片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 999精品在线视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日日撸夜夜添| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| a级毛片在线看网站| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 夫妻午夜视频| 尾随美女入室| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲第一av免费看| 一级毛片电影观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| a级毛色黄片| 视频区图区小说| 精品久久久噜噜| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 老司机影院成人| 一区二区三区精品91| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 如何舔出高潮| 国产亚洲最大av| 日本黄大片高清| 99久久人妻综合| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| tube8黄色片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| av播播在线观看一区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 精品久久久久久久久av|