• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    What factors influence patient experience in orthopedic oncology office visits?

    2020-06-19 06:35:58AlanBlankSaraShawConnorWakefieldYueZhangWeiLiuKevinJonesLorRandall
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020年3期
    關(guān)鍵詞:樹丫用力風(fēng)箏

    Alan T Blank, Sara Shaw, Connor J Wakefield, Yue Zhang, Wei J Liu, Kevin B Jones, R Lor Randall

    Abstract

    Key words: Press Ganey? survey; Orthopedic oncology; Outpatient clinic; Patient experience; Patient satisfaction; Patient reported outcomes

    INTRODUCTION

    Patient satisfaction and patient reported outcomes are becoming increasingly important in determining the efficacy of clinical care. For decades in the orthopedic oncology literature, overall survival, metastasis and local recurrence statistics have been well published[1-4]. Using these metrics, patients were determined to be doing well if they were alive, free of local or metastatic disease at various time points.Assessment of patient functional outcomes has been evaluated using scoring systems such as the musculoskeletal tumor society score and Toronto extremity salvage score.However, not until more recently have physicians begun to evaluate various functional, pain related, and psychological outcomes[5-8]. Since this recent interest, the literature has shown that using these metrics can provide valuable information regarding how patients are functioning on a physical and psychological level while being treated as well as during surveillance.

    Overall patient satisfaction scores and patient reported outcomes are challenging measurements to understand[9-11]. Each patient has a unique personality as well as pathology and these can both affect patient satisfaction scores. There has been some conflicting data published studying the subject of how patient satisfaction correlates to efficacy of clinical care. Some studies have found positive correlations to efficacy of care and others have found the opposite[9,12]. Understanding the patient perspective certainly provides the care team insight regarding the patients' perceived strengths and weaknesses of care. Furthermore, patient satisfaction scores may in part determine the future of hospital and physician reimbursements[13]. Press Ganey?medical practice outpatient and ambulatory surgery patient experience of care survey(“Press Ganey survey”) is a questionnaire used to evaluate patient satisfaction in the outpatient clinic setting. The number of cancer patients and cancer related costs in the United States is significant and rises every year, hence we feel this is an important demographic to further investigate[14]. In this study, our group evaluated prospectively collected survey information to determine what factors contributed to patients’ likelihood to recommend our practice as well as our providers in our orthopedic oncology outpatient clinic. The study also aimed to identify areas of our clinical practice that were rated highly and those that needed improvement from the patient perspective.

    Patient satisfaction surveys have the capacity to provide the orthopedic care team with a window into the perspective of the patient. Although it is unclear whether patient satisfaction scores are directly or indirectly related to efficacy of care this information provides insight to the care team and can help to implement reasonable and necessary changes. The Press Ganey survey is a questionnaire used in the outpatient setting to gather this information from the patient perspective. No study to date has evaluated which factors within the Press Ganey survey are most valued by orthopedic oncology patients. Further, no study to date has reviewed Press Ganey survey results from an orthopedic oncology practice outpatient setting in order to determine practice strengths and weaknesses. We feel the results of this study can provide valuable information about the patient perspective in a clinic setting which can be useful for not just orthopedic oncology clinics but all orthopedic outpatient clinics.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients and methods

    We performed an IRB approved retrospective review of prospectively collected Press Ganey survey data from our orthopedic oncology outpatient clinic. The Press Ganey survey was distributed electronically to all patients seen in the outpatient orthopedic oncology clinic. The Press Ganey survey consists of 37 questions involving the clinical check-in process, facility quality, ease of communication with clinic staff, surgical educational information, and overall patient experience. The full survey takes approximately 15 min to complete. Computer adaptive versions are available which shorten the survey to 5-10 questions and allow for completion in as little as 5 min.Patients have 30 d from their clinic encounter to complete the questionnaire. Data was collected during the 2015 and 2016 calendar year. One hundred sixty-two completed the Press Ganey surveys from the outpatient orthopedic oncology clinic and responses were prospectively collected in order to retrospectively review. Basic demographic data along with survey category responses were collected.

    Statistical analysis

    Data was recorded electronically and obtained in accordance with the medical center’s IRB protocol. The data was then submitted to the University Study Design and Biostatistics Center for statistical evaluation. Frequency and percent were presented for all categorical variables as well as for outcome variables "likelihood to recommend the physician" and "likelihood to recommend the practice". Analysis of variance was applied continuous variables andχ2-test/Fisher’s exact test was applied to assess between categorical variables. All bivariate analyses were two-tailed and the statistical significance was set asP< 0.05. Firth logistic regression analyses were performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to identify predictive factors for each outcome of interest.

    Due to the low frequencies of some answers in the survey all original variables with results-0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and N/A were re-categorized as not completely satisfied(0/25/50/75), completely satisfied (100) and N/A.

    Descriptive and bivariate analyses were based on the analysis data set composed by every patient’s first record. Mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum were presented for numeric variables. Frequency and percent were presented for categorical variables in overall, and by outcome variables "likelihood to recommend the physician" and "likelihood to recommend the practice". Analysis of variance was applied to assess the possible difference in mean of continuous variable with approximately normal distribution among groups specified by outcome variable.χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test was applied to assess the possible association between two categorical variables. All bivariate analyses were two-tailed and the statistical significance was set asP< 0.05.

    Based on results from previous steps and nature of the data (e.g., rare events and quasi-complete separation), Firth logistic regression analyses were performed using LASSO to identify predictive factors truly informative for each outcome of interest,and the final model for each outcome was determined based on the optimal tuning parameter adopting 10 fold cross-validation criteria. The final models were unpenalized; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported.

    Statistical software was SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States) and R(www.r-project.org). All LASSO analyses were conducted using the “glmnet” package in R. All statistical methods were reviewed by Yue Zhang and Wei J Liu from the University of Utah.

    RESULTS

    Among the 162 participants, regarding patient’s characteristics, the average age was 54.4 years (standard deviation = 16.2 years, median = 56 years, range = 17 to 95 years);83 (51.2%) participants were female; 104 (64.2%) participants were from in-state; 89(54.9%) participants had malignant diagnosis.

    Regarding the outcomes “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician/likelihood to recommend the practice” and patient’s characteristics, it was statistically significant on bivariate analysis that participants who lived out of state were more likely to have complete satisfaction of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician/likelihood to recommend the practice” compared to participants who lived in state (91.4%vs73.1%,P= 0.027; 86.2%vs69.2%,P= 0.029,χ2-test); among other patient characteristics, there were no statistically significant relationships observed (P> 0.02,P> 0.05 in all instances, ANOVA,χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test).

    Regarding outcomes “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician/likelihood to recommend the practice” and individual question responses, it was statistically significant on bivariate analysis that, for each item participants reported “Completely satisfied” they were more likely to have complete satisfaction of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician” compared to participants who reported “Not completely satisfied” (P< 0.004,P< 0.001 in all instances,χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test). The outcome “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician/likelihood to recommend the practice” was statistically associated with each individual survey question answered on bivariate analysis (P< 0.01,P< 0.001 in all instances, Fisher’s exact test).

    Regarding the model of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician”, Firth logistic regression analysis (with LASSO regulation) results suggested that complete satisfaction of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the physician” was positively associated with complete satisfaction of factors including MD friendliness/courtesy (OR = 14.4,95%CI: 2.5-84.3), MD confidence (OR = 48.2, 95%CI: 6.2-376.5), MD instructions follow up care (OR = 2.5, 95%CI: 0.4-7.4), sensitivity to needs (OR = 16.1 , 95%CI: 1-62.5)(Table 1).

    Regarding model of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the practice”, Firth logistic regression analysis (with LASSO regulation) results suggested that complete satisfaction of “l(fā)ikelihood to recommend the practice” was positively associated with complete satisfaction of factors including MD confidence (OR = 11.6, 95%CI: 2.1-63.4),sensitivity to needs (OR = 5.8, 95%CI: 1.3-26.7), staff work together (OR = 36.1, 95%CI:7.9-165.1) (Table 1).

    DISCUSSION

    Disease related outcomes have been the gold standard in outcomes measures when discussing oncology patients for many years. Indeed, knowing local recurrence,metastasis and overall survival rates are crucial in understanding the efficacy of treatments. However, functional outcomes and patient reported outcomes also have critical roles in better describing how patients are living after their diagnosis is made and treatment undertaken.

    In the orthopedic oncology literature functional outcomes have adapted over time starting with general evaluations such as the SF-36. Functional outcomes then became somewhat more orthopedic based and included tests such as the Harris hip, Oxford knee and DASH scores. From that point, functional evaluations have been developed specifically for orthopedic oncology and include the musculoskeletal tumor society score and Toronto extremity salvage scoring system[1-3]. A relatively new development in patient reported outcomes is the utilization of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, which is a simple, computer adaptive test that has been utilized in the oncology literature recently[15-17].

    The next progression in evaluating care from the patient perspective comes in the form of patient satisfaction surveys. These surveys, such as Press Ganey, focus on the purely subjective aspect of which aspects of their care they found to be acceptable,and which needed improvement[8,18-20]. There is some debate in the literature as to whether patient satisfaction is positively or negatively correlated with efficacy of care[21,22]. Fentonet al[9]in 2012 published results of a large prospective series and found that higher patient satisfaction was associated with more admissions, more prescription drugs, more overall expenditures and a higher mortality rate. Changet al[7]in 2006 published their results that among a geriatric cohort of 236 patients,assessments of quality of care was not related to global ratings of care. The group recommended against using global ratings of care to be used as a marker of technical quality of care[7]. In the orthopedic literature, Chughtaiet al[18]published their results of a retrospective study involving 736 knee replacement patients and found there was no statistically significant relationship between Press Ganey survey scores and standard arthroplasty outcomes measures.

    Table 1 Factors for likelihood to recommend physician and practice

    Conversely Tsaiet al[12]published in 2015 that among a large cohort of surgical patients, hospitals with higher patient satisfaction provided more efficient care with fewer readmissions and lower mortality rates. Similarly, Sackset al[23]in 2015 published results of a retrospective study of over 100,000 patients and found that patients treated in hospitals which ranked in the highest satisfaction quartile had significantly lower risk of death and minor complications compared to those in the lowest satisfaction quartile.

    Regardless of the correlation, important information can be gathered from the survey data collected in this study. In the oncology patient population, we believe that elucidating which factors of the clinic experience are perceived positively and which negatively can help the care team to improve the overall patient experience while not compromising clinical care.

    Our study certainly has several limitations including the response rate of 17%overall. Other limitations include the ability of patients to complete surveys up to 30 d after the clinical encounter which may affect patient recall ability. Our clinical practice is quite diverse, with some patients presenting for general orthopedic complaints and a distant history of cancer, and some currently undergoing treatment for sarcoma. We believe that this is in fact the typical patient population for an orthopedic oncology clinic and the heterogeneity increases our external validity. Finally, there is no consensus as to whether patient satisfaction scores are positively or negatively correlated with clinical outcomes. Because of this it is quite difficult to determine if implementing changes based on the outcomes of the satisfaction scores is appropriate in all settings.

    The results of this study demonstrate that out-of-state patients may be more likely to be satisfied with their care than inpatients. The group had a difficult time explaining this finding but believes may be related to the fact that our clinical practice has a very wide catchment area and often patients will travel more than 500 miles for care. Those traveling very far are from more rural areas and often have a difficult time finding appropriate physicians for treatment in their hometown, which contributes to their unique perspective.

    The data demonstrated that patients perceived our clinic to perform well in the categories of confidence in MD (81%), MD concern about worries/questions (75%),courtesy of staff (76%), MD friendliness/courtesy (79%), cleanliness (75%), MD including you in decision making (72%) and MD explained condition (75%). The clinic showed room for improvement in the categories of ease of getting on the phone (49%),information about delays (36%), wait time (37%) and MD speaking about medications(45%). Our outpatient clinic found this information useful in regards to areas which were satisfactory and which needed improvement and simple measures will be taken to address those insufficiencies while not compromising clinical care.

    The data demonstrated that the patients' likelihood to recommend the practice was positively associated with confidence in the physician, sensitivity to their needs and the staff working together. The data also demonstrated that the patients' likelihood to recommend the physician was positively associated with the courtesy of the physician, confidence in the physician, physician instructions on follow up care, and sensitivity to the patients’ needs. These findings are also reasonable categories which patients would find most important and should be considered during every patient interaction.

    We believe that by understanding which aspects of patient care are important to the patient, we can continue to improve the patient experience without compromising clinical care. The literature has shown that in some circumstance’s patient reported outcomes may be negatively correlated to clinical outcomes while at other times they are positively associated[9,12]. In both situations, useful information can be obtained from better understanding the patient perspective. The outpatient clinic of study was able to determine which areas of their care were perceived as sufficient and which were insufficient and thus was able to make reasonable and appropriate changes without changing the overall care algorithm. This information may be very useful to orthopedic oncology clinics in addition to the various surgical oncology clinics in the quest to improve on patient experiences in a clinic setting.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Patient satisfaction and reported outcomes play an important role in determining efficacy of clinical care. Little is known about the patient experience in an orthopedic oncology outpatient clinic.

    風(fēng)箏被樹丫只是輕輕地纏住,樹很高,爬上去弄是不現(xiàn)實的,而如果手用力,只會讓風(fēng)箏扯破。我建議,要不把線剪斷吧。

    Research motivation

    This study aims to evaluate the potential factors that impact the patient experience within an outpatient orthopedic oncology clinic. Identification of these factors will allow us and others to improve the patient experience.

    Research objectives

    The primary objective of this study was to identify potentially modifiable factors that impact the patient reported experience. With this knowledge one can implement strategies to improve the outpatient experience.

    Research methods

    This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained through routine medical care at a single orthopedic oncology outpatient clinic.

    Research results

    This study identified that most patients within the practice were from out of state. Likelihood to recommend the attending physician was associated with MD friendliness/courtesy, MD confidence, MD instructions follow-up care, and sensitivity to needs. Although the clinic operation performed well in the categories of courtesy of staff and cleanliness there is room for improvement in ease of getting on the phone, information about delays, and wait time.

    Research conclusions

    Orthopedic specialties can greatly benefit with the knowledge obtained from this study by understanding which factors are associated the patient experience in an outpatient clinic. Future studies can be aimed at improving areas of care identified from this study.

    Research perspectives

    The patient experience and reported satisfaction is becoming an important measure of clinical efficacy through various surgical and medical specialties. Little is known on the patient experience within an orthopedic oncology outpatient clinic. Future research is required to investigate strategies at improving areas within the outpatient clinic identified from this study.

    猜你喜歡
    樹丫用力風(fēng)箏
    《樹丫上的鳥巢》
    散文詩(2019年12期)2019-01-28 06:24:38
    風(fēng)箏
    在手賬中為風(fēng)箏比心
    小樹丫的翅膀
    暮鴉
    民主(2017年4期)2017-05-10 19:30:00
    學(xué)做風(fēng)箏
    雪花(2015年5期)2015-10-28 18:06:45
    “小狗”上樹
    用力!用力!再用力!
    小主人報(2015年23期)2015-02-28 20:45:10
    暴力行為
    海外英語(2013年6期)2013-08-27 09:23:45
    69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产老妇女一区| 一区福利在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| svipshipincom国产片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产熟女xx| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 两个人看的免费小视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 波多野结衣高清作品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 草草在线视频免费看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲在线观看片| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 香蕉av资源在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 天堂动漫精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩欧美免费精品| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 黄色日韩在线| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲国产色片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日韩高清综合在线| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 露出奶头的视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 一本久久中文字幕| 中文字幕高清在线视频| av国产免费在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久人妻av系列| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产av不卡久久| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美大码av| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| svipshipincom国产片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 一级黄片播放器| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久亚洲真实| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产av不卡久久| 国产真实乱freesex| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 日本a在线网址| 老司机福利观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久性视频一级片| 91在线观看av| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 天堂网av新在线| ponron亚洲| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 露出奶头的视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲18禁久久av| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| eeuss影院久久| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久久色成人| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产视频内射| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 黄色女人牲交| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 级片在线观看| 色在线成人网| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 99久久精品热视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 特级一级黄色大片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 性欧美人与动物交配| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 色在线成人网| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久香蕉精品热| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 精品人妻1区二区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 18+在线观看网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美性感艳星| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日本五十路高清| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 91在线观看av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久人妻av系列| 午夜福利高清视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产熟女xx| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲内射少妇av| 91麻豆av在线| av中文乱码字幕在线| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 黄色成人免费大全| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| www.999成人在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 色在线成人网| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 丁香六月欧美| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 俺也久久电影网| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本 欧美在线| 久久久精品大字幕| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 有码 亚洲区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 美女免费视频网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产在视频线在精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 成人无遮挡网站| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 美女免费视频网站| 91麻豆av在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 观看美女的网站| 看黄色毛片网站| 十八禁网站免费在线| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 美女大奶头视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日本五十路高清| 国产成人aa在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 一本久久中文字幕| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 美女高潮的动态| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| tocl精华| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| www日本在线高清视频| 观看美女的网站| 一本综合久久免费| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 禁无遮挡网站| 一区二区三区激情视频| 毛片女人毛片| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 精品电影一区二区在线| 三级毛片av免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 午夜激情福利司机影院| av中文乱码字幕在线| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| av国产免费在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 丁香六月欧美| 极品教师在线免费播放| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 不卡一级毛片| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 热99在线观看视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 一本综合久久免费| 色播亚洲综合网| av福利片在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 丁香六月欧美| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久草成人影院| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 身体一侧抽搐| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲无线在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| www.www免费av| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 看片在线看免费视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日本 av在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本 av在线| 脱女人内裤的视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 观看美女的网站| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品一及| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 69人妻影院| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久久久久久久大av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 中国美女看黄片| 91字幕亚洲| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美zozozo另类| 不卡一级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久这里只有精品中国| 丁香六月欧美| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 色综合站精品国产| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 色在线成人网| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 免费av观看视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| av专区在线播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产精品影院久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产黄片美女视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 少妇丰满av| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产色婷婷99| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲最大成人中文| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 波多野结衣高清作品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 欧美在线一区亚洲|