• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    2014-09-06 11:13:31ChimaVure
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    Received: 2012-03-15; Accepted: 2013-05-21

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    The study evaluated the impact of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in a major oil-producing community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Three sites—unpolluted site (US), polluted and untreated site (PUS), and polluted and treated site (PTS)—were purposively chosen for the study. The seedling emergence method was used to evaluate soil seed banks in the various sites at two depths, 0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm. Woody-plant species richness, abundance, and diversity were higher in the US seed bank than in the PUS and PTS seed banks. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed in the US, followed by the PTS, and then the PUS. Both species richness and diversity of non-woody plants were highest at the US, followed by the PUS, and lowest in the PTS. Woody species in the US seed bank were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those of the PUS and PTS at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species in the PUS and PTS seed banks. Non-woody species at 0?10 cm US seed bank were 73.08% dissimilar with those of PUS at the two soil depths and 81.48/88.46% dissimilar with those of the 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. At 10–20 cm, non-woody species of the US were 69.66% dissimilar with those from each of the two soil depths in PUS; and 73.91/81.82% dissimilar with those of 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. Non-woody species variation between the PUS and PTS was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm. The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrates that crude oil pollution negatively affected the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because soil seed banks serve as the building blocks for plant succession. Thorough remediation and enrichment planting are recommended to support the recovery process of vegetation in the polluted areas.

    Ogoni land, crude oil pollution, remediation, plant regeneration

    Introduction

    Contamination of soil by crude oil spills is a global environmental problem. Crude oil, the raw component of nearly all petroleum products, contains a wide variety of elements combined in various forms: the main components are carbon and hydrogen, which in their combined form are called hydrocarbons (ABB 1997). Shifts in the composition of the soil’s microbial community—as a response to low levels of gaseous hydrocarbons from underlying petroleum formations—have been investigated as support for further monitoring in case of accidental spills. Michel et al. (2002, 2005) state that petroleum is a pollutant that can persist in the environment for a long period until vegetation recovers completely; its persistence can be explained by the slow biodegradation of hydrocarbons.

    The inhibition of germination and reduction of plant growth are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). Oil contamination causes a slow rate of germination in plants (Ogbo et al. 2009), which has been attributed to the prevention or reduction of the seeds’ access to water and oxygen (Adam and Duncan, 2002). Cell membranes are damaged by penetration of hydrocarbon molecules, leading to leakage of cell contents. Oil reduces the transpiration rate, probably by blocking stomata and intercellular spaces (Baker 1970).

    Coastal ecosystems in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria are under increasing pressure from hostilities and other developmental activities. The region has a long history of crude-oil pollution. Causes of oil spills in the area are usually accidental or operational. Accidental spills occur mainly due to equipment failure. Such spills have occurred at several times and places within the region (e.g., July 1970, April 2009, and April 2012, etc. at Bomu Oil Field in the Kegbara Dere Community). Operational spills occur due to loading and discharging oil from ships and illegal bunkering activities. These spills usually cause a lot of harm to the biological resources of the area.

    Recovery of the area after spills will depend on thorough remediation or degradation of the oil and regeneration of the plantcommunities. Although the oil companies responsible for these spills in the Niger Delta sometimes carryout remediation activities, no studies have been conducted to either ascertain the impact of the spills on the regenerative potentials of the soil seed banks, or the effectiveness of the remediation effort, especially as it concerns regeneration of the native woody species of the area. Our study was a step in that direction: the specific objectives were: (1) to identify and compare the plant species composition of the soil seed banks in the unpolluted, polluted, and remediated sites; (2) to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the viability and diversity of the soil seed bank; (3) to determine the effectiveness of the remediation carried out with respect to plant regeneration; and (4) to ascertain the impact of soil depth on the abundance of soil seed banks in the three sites considered.

    Materials and methods

    Description of the study area

    Kegbara Dere is located in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State. It lies in the humid tropical zone with annual rainfall that ranges from 2000–2470 mm and an annual temperature ranging from 23°C minimum to 32°C maximum (NDES, 2001). The vegetation of the area is made up of an intricate mixture of plants that belong to different plant families, genera, and species. However, for the areas polluted with crude oil, the plants (mostly grasses) are in patches and are sparsely distributed on the site.

    A report from Port Harcourt Appeals Court (1994) observed that the soils of the polluted areas of the community are resistant to penetration by plant roots; have high bulk densities, low hydraulic conductivities, and infiltration capacities; and consequently, very poor plant growth. The report also stated that soil samples from the polluted areas are very acidic, poor in total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and organic carbon, and generally have low levels of exchangeable cations and micronutrients, and high level of manganese, all toxic to plant life.

    Selection of the study sites

    Three sites were used for the study. The first site (4°39'8" N and 7°14'26" E) was selected from an unpolluted area (about 5 km away from the Kegbara Dere/Bomu Oil Field). The second site (4°39'37" N and 7°15'8" E) was selected from a polluted but treated or remediated area; while the third site (4°39'41" N and 7°15'6" E) was selected from a polluted and untreated area. The remediation carried out at the polluted/treated site involved manual tillage and bulking of soil; this was done in 2007 and 2008. These sites were chosen to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the regenerative abilities of the sites and the effectiveness of the remediation exercises.

    Studies on soil seed bank

    Ten (10) random plots, 20 cm x 20 cm. were marked out at each site. Soil samples were removed from the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers of each plot, using a sharp knife and hand trowel. Soil samples from corresponding soil layers were bulked for each site and divided into four equal parts. Germination trials were conducted for the different soil samples in the nursery. Soils were spread to a thickness of 3 cm on perforated plastic trays that were continuously kept moist. The seedling emergence method was used to assess the composition of the soil seed banks over a period of six months. Emerging seedlings that were readily identifiable were counted, recorded, and discarded on a monthly basis. Seedlings that were difficult to identify were counted, labeled, transplanted, and grown separately until they could be identified. After identification and counting of seedlings each month, the soil samples were stirred to stimulate seed germination.

    Measurement of seedling diversity

    The Simpson Diversity Index (Simpson, 1949) and Shannon Diversity Index (Odum, 1971) were used to measure diversity of the soil seed banks using Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software.

    The Simpson Index is expressed as:

    where: N is the total number of individuals encountered, ni is number of individuals of ith species enumerated for i=1……q, q is number of different species enumerated.

    Shannon Diversity Index is expressed as:

    where: pi is the proportion of individuals in the ith species, s is the total number of species.

    Comparison of seed banks at different sites

    The Sorensen Similarity Index was used to compare soil seedbank species composition between sites and soil depths. The index was computed using the methods found in Ogunleye et al. (2004), Ojo (2004), and Ihenyen et al. (2010), as expressed below:

    where: a is the number of species present in both sites; b is the number of species present in site 1 but not present in site 2; c is the number of species present in site 2 but not present in site 1.

    Results

    Woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 1 shows the woody plant species that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The abundance of woody plant species was greater in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than in the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 1). No woody tree species was recorded at both the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 2).

    Non-woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 2 shows the non-woody species recorded from the soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed at 0–10 cm seed bank of the unpolluted site, followed by 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/ treated site, while the lowest number was observed at the 10–20 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site (Fig. 3). The abundance of non-woody plants decreased with the increase in soil depth in all the sites.

    Table 1: Checklist of Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    Fig. 1: Number of woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. US 0-10 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; US 10-20 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 0-10cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 0-10 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank. Same explanation for Figs 2-4.

    Fig. 2: Distribution of germinated woody plant species among woody plant forms

    Fig. 3: Number of non-woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths

    Table 2: Checklist of Non-Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    The distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms is shown in Fig. 4. The herbs and grasses were greater in the two soil depths of the unpolluted site than in both soil depths at the other sites. More sedge was found at 0–10 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site and 10–20 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/treated site. Creeping herbs were more in the 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the unpolluted site, while fern was recorded only at this site and soil depth.

    Diversity of woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    The diversity of woody plant seedlings are shown in Table 3. The richness of woody plant species was greatest at the 0–10cm seed bank of the unpolluted site followed by the 10–20 cm seed bank of the same site while only one woody species was recorded at the two soil depths in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites. Woody plant species diversity was zero for both soil depths at the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    Fig. 4: Distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms

    Diversity of the non-woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    Table 4 presents diversity indices for non-woody plant species at various sites and soil depths. Both species richness and diversity were highest at the unpolluted site, followed by the polluted/untreated site while the polluted/treated site had the lowest species richness and diversity.The diversity of non-woody plant species decreased with soil depth except at the polluted/treated site.

    Table 3: Alpha Diversity Indices for Woody Plant Seedlings

    Table 4: Alpha Diversity Indices for Non-Woody Plant Seedlings

    Plant species compositional variation among sites and soil depths The extent of plant species compositional variation between sites and soil depths is shown in Table 5 for woody species. Woody species in the seed bank at the unpolluted site were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites at 0–10 and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species from seed banks in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    The level of variation in non-woody species composition was higher between the unpolluted site and the polluted/treated site than between the unpolluted site and the polluted/untreated site (Table 6). Non-woody species variation between the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm.

    Table 5: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for seed bank woody seedlings

    Table 6: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for non-woody plants at the various sites

    Discussion

    The germination trials showed more plant species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than that of either the polluted/untreated or polluted/treated sites. Although woody plant species were generally few in all of the sites compared with the non-woody species, the unpolluted site compared better than the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites where only one woody species, Chromolaena odorata, was observed. Nonwoody species dominated the soil seed banks in all sites, although the unpolluted site also demonstrated greater species richness and abundance than the other two. The polluted/untreated site had higher non-woody species richness than the polluted/treated site while non-woody plant abundance washigher in the polluted/treated site than in the polluted/untreated site.

    Several studies on seed banks also show few woody species in comparison to non-woody species (Kebrom and Tesfaye 2000; Senbata and Teketay 2002; De Villiers et al 2003; Jalili et al. 2003; Wassie and Teketay 2006; Oke et al. 2007). Oke et al. (2007) observed that herbaceous species dominated the seed bank, consisting of 98% of the total seed density in each of the four plantations studied, with only three woody species emerging. The paucity of woody species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site may be attributed to the short-lived nature of their seeds. (Garwood 1989, Wassie and Teketay 2006). However, the higher species richness and seedling abundance recorded in the unpolluted site are indicative of the harmful impact of crude oil pollution. Although, there is no available literature on the effect of crude oil pollution on seed banks, Tefera et al. (2005) reported that disturbed lands had less seed density compared to adjacent undisturbed land. Powell (1997) equally asserted that the inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth, as well as death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons in an oil polluted area.

    Generally, seedling abundance decreased with soil depth in all of the sites with over 70% of non-woody seedlings encountered at the 0–10 cm seed bank of both the unpolluted and polluted/treated sites, and about 58% at the polluted/untreated site. Degreef (2002) observed that most seeds are located on the surface of the soil and that their numbers decline with depth.

    Woody plant species diversity was zero at both the polluted/untreated and the polluted/treated sites. Crude oil pollution appears to have a greater impact on the diversity and density of the woody plant species than the non-woody species. This may be due to the advantages most non-woody species have in colonizing degraded sites with respect to the dispersal of their seeds. Because most woody species depend on seed rain for their regeneration due to the short-lived nature of their seeds, the destruction of mature trees due to crude oil pollution may have contributed to the very poor woody species richness, diversity, and abundance. However, higher non-woody seedling abundance in the polluted/treated site than in polluted/untreated site could be attributed to improved site conditions after remediation. Dereje et al. (2003) observed that biological and soil factors contribute to variations in species richness and diversity.

    The high variation between the plant species composition in seed banks at the unpolluted site and the polluted sites could be due to the absence of toxic pollutants, and favorable biological andsoil conditions in the unpolluted site. It is well known that hydrocarbons are harmful to animals and plants (Dorn and Salanitro 2000). The inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth as well as its death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). However, the existence of Chromolaena odorata in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites is indicative of its ability to colonize and thrive in degraded sites.

    The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrate how crude oil pollution impairs on the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because the soil seed bank serves as a building block for plant succession. For example, the rapid revegetation of sites disturbed by wildfire, catastrophic weather, agricultural operations, and timber harvesting is largely due to the soil seed bank. A study into the natural process that influence forest dynamics has shown that soil seed bank is one of the principle sources of recruitment for new individuals in the initial stages of forest succession (Butler and Chazdon 1998). It also is partially responsible for dynamic changes that may occur during the development of vegetation (Lunt 1997). Williams-Linera (1993) equally observed that species richness and abundance in soil seed banks may provide information on the potential of a community for regeneration.

    Conclusion

    The soil seed bank of the unpolluted site compared better than those of the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites in terms of plant species richness and diversity, and seedling abundance. Plant species compositional variation was very high between the unpolluted site and the polluted sites. The remediation carried out in 2007 and 2008 seems not to have been very effective.

    To restore the plant communities of the polluted areas, thorough remediation should be carried out by seasoned professionals who are committed to the project. . Since natural regeneration cannot guarantee the restoration of the plant communities (especially the woody species) at the polluted sites, enrichment planting using relevant silvicultural practices should be carried out to support and enhance the recovery process. This effort should involve collaboration with all of the stakeholders, including local people, government, oil companies, and professionals, like forest ecologists, soil scientists, and silviculturists.

    ABB. 1997. ABB’s Environmental Management Report. ABB, Stockholm, 88pp.

    Adam GI, Duncan H. 2002. Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environmental Pollution, 120: 363?370.

    Baker JM 1970. The effects of oils on plants. Environmental Pollution, 1(1): 27?44

    Butler BJ, Chazdon RL. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30: 214?222.

    Degreef J, Rocha OJ, Vanderborght T, Baudoin J-P 2002. Soil seed bank and seed dormancy in wild populations of lima bean (Fabaceae); Considerations for in situ and ex situ conservation. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1644?1650.

    Dereje A, Oba G, Weladji RB, Colman, JE. 2003. An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing land in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 14: 25?38.

    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen, Theron GK. 2003. Similarity between the soil seed bank and the standing vegetation in the Strandveld Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Land degradation and Development, 14: 527?540.

    Dorn PH, Salanitro J. 2000. Temporal ecology assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation Chemosphere, 40(4): 419?426.

    Garwood NC. 1989. Tropical soil seed bank, a review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, pp.149?209.

    Ihenyen J, Mensah JK, Okoegwale EE. 2010. Tree/shrubs species diversity of Ehor Forest Reserve in Uhunmwode Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. Researcher. 2(2): 37?49.

    Jalili A, Hamzeh’ee Y, Asri A, Shirvany S, Yazdani, M, Khoshnevis F, Zarrinkamar M, Ghahramani R, Safavi S, Shaw J, Hodgson K, Thompson M, Akbarzadeh, Pakparvar. 2003. Soil seed bank in the Arasbaran protected area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 109: 425?431.

    Kebrom T, Tesfaye B. 2000. The role of seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hill slopes in Southern Wello. Biotropica, 32: 23?32.

    Lunt ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-Eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130: 21?34.

    Michel J, Henry JR CB, Thumm S. 2002. Shoreline assessment and environmental impacts from the M/T Westchester Oil Spill in the Mississippi River. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 7(3-4): 155?161.

    Michel J, Trevor G, Waldron J, Blocksisidge CT, Etkin DS, Urban R. 2005. Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Annals of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, pp. 1-84. Maio 16, Miami.

    NDES. 2001. Biological Environmental Research Report. RSUST, Port Harcourt. Volume 46. 251pp.

    Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadephia, 574pp.

    Ogbo EM, Zibigha M, Odogu G. 2009. The effect of crude oil on growth of the weed (Paspalum crobiculatum L.) – phytoremediation potential of the plant, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(9): 229?233.

    Ogunleye AJ, Adeola AO, Ojo LO, Aduradola AM. 2004. Impact of farming activities on vegetation in Olokemeji Forest reserve, Nigeria, Global Nest, 6(2): 131?140.

    Ojo LO 2004. The fate of a tropical rainforest in Nigeria: Abeku sector of Omo Forest Reserve, Global Nest, 6(2): 116?130.

    Oke SO, Ayanwale TO, Isola OA. 2007. Soil seedbank in four contrasting plantations in Ile-Ife area of Southwestern Nigeria. Resource Journal of Botany, 2: 13?22.

    Port Harcourt Appeal Court. 1994. Report of Case between SPDC Nigeria Limited (Appellant/Defendant) and the Kegbara Dere People (Respondents/Plaintiffs).

    Powell R. 1997. The use of plants as “Field” biomonitors. In: Wang, W. Gorsuch, J. and Hughes, J. (eds.), Plants for Environmental Studies. Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 47?61

    Senbeta F, Taketay D. 2002. Soil seed banks in plantations and adjacent natural dry Afromontane forests of central and southern Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 43(2): 229?242.

    Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163: 688

    Tefera M, Demel T, Hulten H, Yemshaw Y. 2005. The role of enclosures in the recovery of woody vegetation in degraded dryland hillsides of central and northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment, 60: 259?281.

    Wassie A, Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 201: 32?43.

    Williams-Linera G. 1993. Soil seed bank in four low mountain forests of Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9: 321?337.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0538-y

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Port Harcourt- Choba, P.M.B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. email: punditzum@yahoo.ca; phone: +234-803-812-1887

    Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    一级av片app| 在线播放无遮挡| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产成人av教育| av在线老鸭窝| 一区二区三区激情视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产成人aa在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 热99在线观看视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 一本久久中文字幕| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 男女那种视频在线观看| 91在线观看av| 欧美日韩黄片免| 成人欧美大片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久精品影院6| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| h日本视频在线播放| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久6这里有精品| 一级av片app| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产不卡一卡二| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 日本五十路高清| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 日本a在线网址| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久草成人影院| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲av一区综合| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品野战在线观看| 永久网站在线| 热99在线观看视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| videossex国产| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| www日本黄色视频网| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产精品一区二区性色av| 一区福利在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品国产三级普通话版| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产不卡一卡二| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品一及| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | av福利片在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 三级毛片av免费| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 深夜a级毛片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲无线在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| av在线亚洲专区| 国产三级中文精品| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日本成人三级电影网站| av国产免费在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 嫩草影院入口| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲四区av| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| avwww免费| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一区二区三区激情视频| av在线亚洲专区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 色在线成人网| 久久久久久久久大av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产综合懂色| 国产av在哪里看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 欧美潮喷喷水| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久亚洲真实| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产av不卡久久| 乱系列少妇在线播放| av专区在线播放| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 国产精品一及| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| www日本黄色视频网| videossex国产| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 在现免费观看毛片| 成人精品一区二区免费| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 高清在线国产一区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲内射少妇av| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 免费av观看视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久草成人影院| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人aa在线观看| 免费av观看视频| 黄片wwwwww| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲不卡免费看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 老司机福利观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 在线看三级毛片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 少妇高潮的动态图| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美性感艳星| 中文资源天堂在线| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 99热只有精品国产| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日本 av在线| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美性感艳星| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| or卡值多少钱| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲四区av| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久6这里有精品| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品野战在线观看| 午夜福利18| 成人无遮挡网站| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 美女黄网站色视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 88av欧美| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 91在线观看av| 免费av毛片视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 在线免费十八禁| 91久久精品电影网| 国产视频内射| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久午夜福利片| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久草成人影院| 久久这里只有精品中国| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 搞女人的毛片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 成人综合一区亚洲| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| eeuss影院久久| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 两个人的视频大全免费| 色综合站精品国产| av在线老鸭窝| 美女免费视频网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产三级中文精品| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 国内精品美女久久久久久| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产三级中文精品| 色视频www国产| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 99久国产av精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日日啪夜夜撸| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久成人免费电影| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 极品教师在线免费播放| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费| av在线蜜桃| 一级av片app| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产视频内射| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 看黄色毛片网站| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产黄片美女视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 成人精品一区二区免费| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| ponron亚洲| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 变态另类丝袜制服| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 日本 av在线| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 综合色av麻豆| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美色视频一区免费| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 色视频www国产| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 少妇的逼水好多| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美日韩黄片免| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| av天堂在线播放| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 少妇高潮的动态图| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 91在线观看av| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 免费观看在线日韩| xxxwww97欧美| 国产高清激情床上av| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| h日本视频在线播放| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 99热只有精品国产| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美bdsm另类| av在线老鸭窝| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 直男gayav资源| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产真实乱freesex| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 色av中文字幕| 免费高清视频大片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 1024手机看黄色片|