• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India

    2014-09-06 11:13:30SreekanthBalasundaranNazeem
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    P.M. Sreekanth · M. Balasundaran · P.A. Nazeem

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India

    P.M. Sreekanth · M. Balasundaran · P.A. Nazeem

    Received: 2013-04-23; Accepted: 2013-10-07

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) is a popular hardwood species native to South and South-East Asia. The possible association of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker with morphological variables of eleven important characters viz. girth at breast height (GBH), height of tree, bole height, branch knots, presence of fluting, spiral stem, leaf hair, leaf length/breadth ratio, branching pattern, bark colour and petiole shape for nine natural populations comprising 180 genotypes of teak (9 populations × 20 trees). The phenogram constructed using Euclidean distances for the eleven morphological characters showed that the populations were not grouped according to their geographical origin. The Mantel’s test for pairwise correlation between Euclidean distances of different morphological variables and genetic distances from AFLP data revealed that only petiole character (r =0.269; p =0.046) and height of tree (r =0.200; p =0.001) were significantly correlated with that of AFLP data matrix. The nine populations in this study covered a geographic area of about 1000 km stretch along the Western Ghat of South India. A test of correlation between genetic and geographic distance matrices revealed a significant positive correlation (r =0.475; p =0.009). The lack of perfect congruence between morphological and molecular data except for geo-graphic distance, tree height and petiole character suggested that the morphological system might be useful for the morphotypes management but not appropriate to study the genetic structure of the teak populations.

    AFLP, genetic, teak, morphology, Tectona grandis

    Introduction

    Teak has a wide but discontinuous distribution in India. It grows well from sea level to an elevation of 1200 m, and with an annual precipitation range from 800-2500 mm. Indian teak provenances show significant variation in terms of adaptability, growth and form under a variety of edaphic and climatic factors. Gunaga and Vasudeva (2003) reported morphological variation in teak clones from Kerala and Karnataka states. Morphological variations in teak clones of Karnataka have been reported with respect to characters like floral traits (Vasudeva et al. 2001), vegetative and reproductive behaviors (Gunaga and Vasudeva 2003), seed germination (Mathew and Vasudeva 2005), and early vigour (Mathew 2001). Bagchi (1999) measured five characters viz. total height, total bole height, diameter at breast height and crown width in 80 sets of teak trees selected from different plantations of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka states. Kumar et al. (1997) considered height, diameter and basal area of different teak clones and reported significant genetic variation at the family level. Suri (1984) studied the quantitative and qualitative tree parameters in a provenance trial laid during 1931, comprising five seed sources from Burma, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka. The statistical analysis showed that teak seeds from moist localities were bigger than those from dry zones. The tree height appears to be a function of site quality rather than origin of seed. Kjaer et al. (1996) while studying the genetic variation in teak from South Asia and Africa observed that differences between populations were much larger for morphological traits like stem form, relative branch size, wood density and allozymes.

    Variability studies are important whenever selection forms the basis for genetic improvement (Bedell 1989). Kjaer et al. (2002) demonstrated the genetic and morphological variation inMetroxylon sagu, a sago palm (a South -East Asian crop having high socio-economic importance) using AFLP markers. Sreekumar et al. (2006) conducted molecular and morphometric analysis of different Indian and Srilankan populations of two rattan species (Calamus rivalis and C. metzianus) using RAPD markers and morphological characters. Multivariate analysis of RAPD and morphological data failed to separate rattan populations into two distinct species. Artocarpus altilis (Park) Fusberg is an important fruit vegetable tree grown in homesteads of Southern part of India. In order to provide scientific management practices and conservation measures for this species, Sreekumar et al. (2007) investigated the pattern of morphological and genetic variation existing in six populations of this species using fifteen morphological traits and AFLP markers. They found that genetic variation from AFLP data is not reflected in quantitative morphological variables. However, the genetic and geographical distances were positively correlated which were well supported by the PCoA analysis and Dollo - parsimony tree.

    The main objective of teak plantation establishment in India is to produce high quality timber having acceptable growth rates. A large variation in growth and other economically important tree characters such as stem form, mode of branching, flowering habit and wood quality is observed in plantation-grown teak. Teak wood colour seems to be influenced by the site quality and moisture availability. As the golden brown wood colour is one of teak's most attractive timber qualities, the variation in wood colour and texture has been widely studied (Kaosa-ard 1993). The success of planting programmes depends not only on the site quality but also on the genetic quality of the planting materials. Although the growth and yield of the plantations depend mostly on site selection and stem quality (i.e., straightness, persistence of stem axis and branching), is strongly controlled by genetic make-up (Keiding et al. 1986; Wellendorf and Kaosa-ard 1988; Kaosa-ard 1993). The results of international teak provenance trials carried out in Asian, African and Latin American countries have clearly demonstrated the influence of provenance or seed source on growth, stem quality, early flowering habit and health performance (Keiding et al. 1986). However, there is no available information on relation between morphology and genetic data on teak. The objective of the present study was to investigate possible relations between morphology, genetic structure and geographical distribution of natural populations of teak from the Western Ghat region of South India and to identify possible AFLP marker associated with phenotypic characters.

    Materials and Methods

    Sample collection from natural forest

    The details of morphological characters from different study sites and leaf materials for DNA isolation were collected from nine natural teak growing forests of the Western Ghats belonging to the states of Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu (Table 1 & 2; Fig. 1). These geographical areas were selected because they were the locations of origin of important provenances from the ‘very moist’ to ‘moist’ teak forests of the Western Ghats identified for raising teak plantations. Historically, Konni, Parambikulam, Nilambur, Wayanad and Thrissur provenances were the sources of huge teak logs, and currently, majority of the teak plantations (70,000 ha approx.) and almost the entire seed production plantations of Kerala are located in the first four geographic areas (Prabhu, 2005). Teak from Nilambur Valley had been acclaimed as the most famous teak source used for shipbuilding and structural purposes during 19thcentury itself. Teak population sampled from Tamil Nadu state was from Indira Gandhi Wild Life Sanctuary located at the Eastern slope of the Western Ghats (Kala et al. 2005). Teak from Barchi (Haliyal Forest Division, Karnataka State) was famous as Dandeli teak because of the unique golden colour and fine grain (Dilip Kumar 2005). Virnoli, which was also part of Haliyal Forest Division was supposed to be the locality of origin of the famous Teli variety of teak which showed fast growth, shiny and smooth leaves that escape teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera attack (Katwal 2005). Moreover, except for Virnoli and Shimoga, these locations had very large, mature trees as well as smaller girth trees available for sampling. From each location, we collected expanding leaves and morphometric details from 20 randomly selected trees from a minimum of 2.5 km2area, sufficiently interior from reserve forest boundaries.

    Fig. 1: Map showing the location of natural populations of teak in the Western Ghats region selected for morphological and genetic analysis. WLS: Wildlife Sanctuary; IGWLS: Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary; P-V WLS: Peechi- Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary

    Table 1: Particulars of the site of teak populations sample collection from the Western Ghats used for AFLP analysis.

    Table 2: Characteristics of study sites of nine teak population from the Western Ghats.

    Morphological characters

    The following are the eleven morphological characters selected. Girth at breast height (GBH): the tree circumference measured at a point 1.37m above average soil level; height of tree: the vertical distance between ground level and tip of the tree; clear bole height: the distance between ground level and the crown point; fluting: the shape of the tree roots extending up from the butt of the tree, measured across the butt end of the log as the maximum inward deviation from roundness; spiral stem: growth of fibers in a spiral direction around the trunk of the tree causing twisting of timber; branching pattern: a secondary woody stem or limb growing from the trunk or main stem of a tree; knots on trunk: results from the inclusion of branches into the tree stem as the tree grows and increases in diameter; petiole shape: winged or sessile; leaf hair: hairs arise as the outward growth of epidermal cells; leaf ratio: the ratio between the leaf length and leaf breadth; bark colour: is the appearance of protective outer covering of the trunk. These characters were recorded in respect of each sampled tree. The details of the characters are listed in Table 3 according to the method suggested by Hush et al. (1972).

    Table 3: List of morphological characters used in the study

    AFLP analysis

    Total DNA was extracted from 0.5 to 1 g of fresh leaf tissues using the modified CTAB protocol of (Doyle and Doyle, 1990). AFLP method was carried out following the standard procedure described by Vos et al. (1995). The reactions were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol (AFLP?Analysis System 1 and Starter Primer Kit; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Inc., USA). The amount of DNA was adjusted to 250 ng for the EcoRI and MseI digestion at 37 °C for 2 h. Ligation of EcoRI and MseI adapters was done at 20 °C for 2 h. Five μl of the template DNA from a 1:10 diluted ligation mixture in TE (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA) buffer was used for pre-amplification with the pre-amplification primer mix. Twenty cycles of amplification were carried out at 94°C for 30 s denaturation, 56°C for 60 s annealing and 72°C for 60 S primer extension in PTC-100 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, USA). Five μl of the pre-amplification product was used for selective amplification with ten primer combinations: E-AGG/M-CTT, E-AAC/M-CTG, E-AAC/M-CTT, E-ACT/M-CAG, E-ACC/M-CTT, E-ACA/M-CTT, E-ACC/M-CTA, E-AGG/M-CAG, E-AGG/M-CTG and E-AGG/M-CAT selected out of 64 tested combinations. Primer labeling was performed by phosphorylat-ing the 5' end of the EcoRI primer with γ-p32ATP and T4 kinase. Mix 1 and Mix 2 components were used for selective AFLP amplification in which, Mix 1 was composed of 5 μl of the labeled selected EcoRI primer and 45 μl of MseI primer. Mix 2 was made according to the protocol supplied by Life Technologies with the AFLP kit. Selective amplification was carried out using 5 μl of the pre-amplification product as the template DNA, 5 μl of Mix 1 and 10 μl of Mix 2. A touch down phase of thirteen amplification cycles was carried out initially, with first cycle at 94°C for 30 s denaturation, 65°C for 30 S annealing and 72°C for 60 s primer extension. The annealing temperature was decreased by 0.7°C each cycle during the following 12 cycles. The final 23 cycles were run at 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s and 72°C for 60 s. Samples were denatured by adding an equal volume of formamide buffer (98% formamide, 10 mM EDTA pH 8, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 0.05% xylene cyanol) and heated at 94°C for 3 min. Five μl of each sample was run in a denaturing 6 per cent, 0.4 mm polyacrylamide gel (1X TBE buffer) in a sequencing gel electrophoretic apparatus (Biorad, USA) at 40 A, 900 V for 2 h. The gel was then transferred onto Whatman No.1 chromatographic paper, dried at 80°C for 2 h on a gel drier (Biorad, USA) and exposed the gel to X-ray film (Kodak?) overnight.

    Data analysis

    Morphological analysis

    The straight forward method of qualitative two state characters recorded as + and - were scored as 1 and 0. Qualitative multistate characters recorded were scored as additive coding, with state (0) character undetectable, state (1) weak positive (+), state (2) moderate positive (++) and state 3 strong positive (+++) (Sneath and Sokal, 1973) (Table 3).

    Cluster analysis of morphometric data

    Cluster analysis was done for representing morphological distances between populations using the NTSYSpc 2.1 package (Rolf, 2000). The morphological data matrices for eleven characters recorded from nine populations were transferred to STAND option to perform the standardization of data. The standardized data were used to compute pair wise population distance matrices based on Euclidean distance coefficient in SIMINT option and then subjected to unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) clustering algorithm. Cluster analyses for 180 genotypes individually were also performed using EUCDIST (Euclidean distance) coefficient option in SIMINT module and then subjected to UPGMA clustering (r = 0.86).

    PCoA analysis of morphological data

    Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was carried out for a better representation of morphometric distances between trees of all the populations using the option STAND, SIMINIT, DECENTER and EIGEN options using NTSYSpc version 2.1 (Rolf, 2000).

    AFLP data analysis

    AFLP data for teak trees from natural forests were utilized to investigate the possible relation between genetic variation and morphological variation existing in teak populations AFLP bands were scored for presence (1) and absence (0) of bands. The data matrices were grouped into nine populations and analyzed using POPGENE, Version 1.32 package for dominant markers and a pair wise comparison of populations was made according to (Sreekanth et al. 2012). The Pair wise genetic distances (Nei 1978) obtained were subjected for correlation studies (Table 4).

    Table 4: Nei’s unbiased measures of genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal) coefficients

    Correlation of genetic and morphological distances using Mantel’s test

    Pair wise morphological distance matrix was created using EUCDIST (Euclidean distance) option in the SIMINT module of NTSYSpc 2.1 for each morphological character individually, as well as for the overall morphological data set. In order to find out possible relation between the morphological variation and genetic variation, product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between the genetic distance matrices and morphological distance matrices for each character individually as well as for the overall morphological characters using Mantel test (Mantel, 1967). Statistical significance was evaluated with 1000 permutations using TFPGA software, version 1.3 (Miller, 1997).

    Correlation between geographic data and genetic data

    The values of latitude and longitude recorded for each geographic location of each of the nine natural teak populations were entered in a prescribed format of GenAlex6 software package (Peakall and Smouse, 2006) for creating pair wise geographic distance matrix. The correlation test between the geographic distance matrices and the corresponding genetic distance matrices (as given in the above paragraph of AFLP data analysis) was performed using Mantel test (Mantel, 1967) and statistical significance was evaluated with 1000 permutations using TFPGA software, version 1.3 (Miller, 1997).

    Results

    Clustering and PCoA of morphological characters

    The phenogram constructed using Euclidean distances for eleven morphological characters showed that the nine populations werenot grouped according to their geographical proximity except Para and Thri (Fig. 2). There existed two main clusters, first main cluster formed by Konn, Nila, Shim, Waya, Barc, Virn and Tami and second main cluster comprised of Thri and Para which clustered separately. The cluster analysis of 180 trees from nine populations for similarity in morphological characters showed that the trees were generally scattered among different clusters without any geographical grouping based on their origin.

    The PCoA analysis of 180 trees based on eleven morphological characters failed to reveal any major separation in the pattern of morphological variations clearly indicating lack of distinct grouping of populations based on phenetic structure. None of the populations from neighbouring geographic regions tend to fall together in a given proportion of the two dimensional factor spaces. Some of the Para individuals were separated based on morphology (Fig. 3).

    Fig. 2: UPGMA dendrogram of morphological characters obtained using Euclidean distance between the nine teak population.

    Fig. 3: Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 180 genotypes using eight morphological characters.

    AFLP analysis

    The standard genetic distance (D) unbiased for the sample size (Nei 1978) for all pair wise population comparisons were provided in the Table 4 and the data were used to test the correlation between genetic data and morphological data.

    Mantel Test

    The mantel test did not reveal any correlation between Euclidean distance of overall morphological characters and AFLP genetic distance data (r =-0.1463; p =0.1740). The Mantel's test of pair wise correlation between Euclidean distance of individual morphological characters and genetic distance of AFLP data revealed that two morphological characters i.e. petiole character (r =0.2688; p =0.0460) and height of tree (r =0.2002; p =0.0010) were significantly correlated to AFLP data matrix. The test of correlation between genetic and geographic distance matrices also revealed a significant positive correlation (r =0.4748; p =0.0090) (Table 5).

    Table 5: Mantel’s Correlation between distance value based on pair wise morphological features and the corresponding pair wise genetic distance value.

    Discussion

    AFLP analysis was applied to reveal patterns of genetic variation in teak. The comparison between phenotypic and genotypic data depicted a low correlation. The nine populations used in this study covered a wide geographic range in latitudes and geographical distances. The multivariate analyses of morphological data clearly indicated that populations from the neighboring localities did not show any tendency to group together (Fig. 2 and 3). The PCoA analysis supported the observation that the selected morphological characters scattered along 2D-scatter plot without a phenetic gap between each individual population. The detailed analysis of individual characters revealed that there is no clear distinction between nine populations based on quantitative and qualitative morphological characters analysed. A few of the Para individuals from Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary clustered together in one axis because of higher GBH which ranged from 2400 cm to 6520 cm. The discrimination among population variables might be strongly controlled by abiotic factors. In Baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa), Assogbadgo et al. (2006) observed significant correlation of morphometric characters with abiotic factors of the environment.

    The correlation between genetic distances and morphological characters revealed positive correlation of petiole shape and height of tree with AFLP data (Table 5). Mantel’s test of significance further gave an additional support and revealed that the two characters were significantly correlated with that of genotypic data. Similar result was obtained in an AFLP marker study on genetic variation in a teak clonal seed orchard comprising 1200 trees of 31 clones established in Southern Kerala in 1985 (Sreekanth and Balasundaran, 2012). Mantel's test did not reveal any correlation between overall morphology and genetic distance. The results of the Mantel’s test indicated that the genetic variation detected by AFLP is not reflected in quantitative and qualitative morphological characters measured. Ehara et al. (2002) performed RAPD analysis of 38 accessions of Metroxylon sagu from Malay Archipelago and found that none of the morphological variables were useful in identification of specific genotypes. In the present study, the lack of correlation between genetic data and morphological variables was clearly indicated in the dendrogram and PCoA.

    One of the aims of the study was to find AFLP markers that are significantly more likely to co-occur with a morphological trait than expected by chance, that is, a marker that has a statistically significant association with the phenotypic trait. Ideally, we could not specifically reveal unique AFLP bands related to the phenotypic variables such as height of tree and petiole shape existed. Additional experiments such as QTL mapping studies are needed to identify specific genes or genome regions that might have direct influence on the observed morphometric variation.

    The nine populations in this study covered a wide geographical area. The most genetically similar populations were Virn and Barc and they were geographically very close by location, while the genetically distant populations of Barc of Karnataka State and Tami of Tamil Nadu State were far separated. The geographical and genetic distances were positively correlated (r =0.4748; p =0.0090). Mantel's test of significance also proved a significant relation between geographic and genetic distance showing genetic divergence between distant populations. This significant correlation indicated that long distance dispersal of seeds had been rare. This was well supported by the UPGMA dendrogram and PCoA analysis (Sreekanth et al. 2012).

    The morphological clustering showed no geographical structure. On the other hand, the molecular analysis showed that the genetic structure was related to the sample collection site. The lack of perfect congruence between morphological and molecular data suggested that the morphological system might be useful for the morphotype management but was not appropriate to study the genetic structure of the teak population. The spatial structure of the genetic diversity may be related to the evolution of the species and the discordance between the morphological and molecular structures might have resulted from similar selection pressures at different places leading to similar forms with a different genetic background.

    Conclusions

    In a previous study of nine natural teak populations of the Western Ghats of South India strong association between genotype of natural teak populations and their respective geographic origin has been reported through AFLP marker study (Sreekanth et al. 2012). About 75% of the total genetic diversity occurred within populations while only 25 % of the diversity was present among populations. The present study showed very little relation between morphological variations and geographic distances be-tween populations. Moreover, variation between populations in respect of most of the economically important phenotypical characters is not supported by genetic diversity revealed through AFLP markers. These findings show that ecological factors such as altitude, rainfall, soil characters, etc. also play a major role in phenotype of teak trees. Teak is a cross pollinated tree species; bole height, log size, tree form, wood colour, etc. are some of the economically important characters of teak trees. Hence, it can be concluded that for tree improvement of teak through phenotypic selection process, the number of plus trees selected from a population should be sufficiently large in order to exploit the large intra-population genetic variation. The results of these studies further emphasize the importance of progeny trial in teak tree improvement.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (S.O. No. BT/PR/2302/AGR/08/161/2000). We are thankful to the Forest Departments of Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu for giving permission for the collection of leaf materials.

    Assogbadjo AE, Kyndt T, Sinsin B, Gheysen G, Van damme P. 2006. Patterns of genetic and morphometric diversity in Baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa). Ann Botany, 97: 819?830.

    Bagchi SK. 1999. Correlation of age element in Tectona grandis Linn. f. Indian For, 125: 522?525.

    Bedell PE. 1989. Preliminary observations on the variability of teak in India. Indian For, 115: 72?73.

    Dilip Kumar PJ. 2005. Teak in Karnataka state, India. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp 45–46.

    Doyle JJ, Doyle J. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12:13–15.

    Ehara H, Kosaka S, Shimura N, Matoyoma D, Morita O, Mizota C, Naito H, Susanto S, Bintoro MH, Yamamoto Y. 2002. Genetic variation of sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) in the Malay Archipelago. In: K. Kainuma, M. Okazaki Y, Toyada Y and Cecil J.E. (eds), New frontiers of sago palm studies. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, pp. 93?100.

    Gunaga RP, Vasudevan R. 2003. Genetic variation for fruiting phenology in teak clones among provenances of Karnataka (Tectona grandis L.f). Indian J Fores, 25: 215?220.

    Hush B, Miller CI, Beers TW. 1972. Forest Mensuration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

    Kala JC, Kumaravelu G, Krishnakumar N. 2005. Status report of teak in Tamil Nadu, India. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp. 47–53.

    Kaosa-ard A. 1993. Teak international provenance trials I. Growth and stem quality. In Proceedings "50th Year of Huay Tak Teak Plantation: Teak Seminar", pp 113?129.

    Katwal RPS. 2005. Teak in India: status prospects and perspectives. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp 1–17.

    Keiding H, Wellendorf H, Lauridsen EB.1986. Evaluation of an international teak provenance trials. Danida Forest Seed Centre, p.81.

    Kjaer A, Barfod AS, Asmussen CB, Seberg O. 2002. Genetic and morphological variation in the sago palm Metroxylon sagu Rottb. (Arecaceae) in Papua New Guinea. In: K. Okazaki M. Toyada and Cecil J. E. (eds), New frontiers of sago palm studies. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, pp. 100?101.

    Kjaer ED, Seigismund HR, Suangtho V.1996. A multivariate study on genetic variation of teak (Tectona grandis. L.). Silvae Genet, 45: 361?368.

    Kumar A, Gogate, M.G, Sharma R, Mandal, AK 1997. Genetic evaluation of teak clones of Allapali region, Maharashtra. Indian For, 123: 187?189

    Mantel NA.1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res, 27: 209–220.

    Mathew J. 2001. Variation for germination and early seedling vigour among Half Sib Families of Teak ( Tectona grandis L.f.) Clones of Karnataka. M.Sc. thesis, College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Sirsi, Karnataka, p 102.

    Mathew J, Vasudeva R. 2005. Clonal variation for seed germination in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Curr Sci, 84: 1133?1136.

    Miller MP. 1997. A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data (TFPGA). Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff USA.

    Nei M.1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583–590.

    Peakall R, Smouse, PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes, 6: 288–295.

    Prabhu NH. 2005. Teak in Kerala: past present and future. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp. 83–92.

    Rolf J. 2000. NTSYS-pc, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version.2.1 Exeter, New York

    Sneath PHA, Sokal, RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman San Francisco California.

    Sreekanth PM, Balasundaran M, Nazeem PA, Suma TB. 2012. Genetic diversity of nine natural Tectona grandis Lf populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India. Conserv Genet, 13: 1409?1419.

    Sreekanth PM, Balasundaran M. 2012. AFLP diversity of teak clonal seed orchard. Indian J Genet Plant Breed, 4: 484?487.

    Sreekumar VB, Binoy AM, Sarah, TG. 2007. Genetic and morphological variation in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis (Park.) Fosberg) in the Western Ghats of India using AFLP. Genet Resour Crop Ev, 54: 1659?1665.

    Sreekumar VB, Renuka, C, Suma TB, Balasundaran, M. 2006. Taxonomic reconsideration of Calamus rivalis Thw. ex Trim. and C. metzianus Schlecht (Arecaceae) through morphometric and molecular analyses. Bot Stud, 47: 443?452.

    Suri, SK.1984. Analytical study of teak provenance tests in North Raipurdivision of Madhya Pradesh. Indian For, 110: 345?363.

    Vasudeva R, Gunaga RP, Hanumantha M. 2001. Implication of variation in reproductive traits among teak clones to management and genetics of seed orchards. Advances in Forestry Research, 24: 120?135.

    Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vande Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res, 23: 4407–4414.

    Wellendorf H Kaosa-ard A. 1988. Teak improvement strategy in Thailand. Forest Tree Improvement No.21 p.43.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0528-0

    Project founding: This work was financially supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (S.O. No. BT/PR/2302/AGR/08/161/2000).

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Biotechnology and Applied Genetics, Bangalore City College New Campus, Kalyan Nagar, Banaswadi Outer Ring Road, Bangalore 560043, India. Tel.: +91 – 80-25459946; Fax: +91 –80-25459958

    Email: sreekanthpm@gmail.com

    M. Balasundaran

    Environmental Biotechnology, Tropical Institute of Ecological Sciences, Velloor P.O, Kottayam – 686501, Kerala, India.

    P.A. Nazeem

    Centre for Plant Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Kerala Agricultural University, KAU Campus P.O, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 香蕉av资源在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 嫩草影院精品99| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 嫩草影院入口| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 成人国产综合亚洲| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 69人妻影院| 99热只有精品国产| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| avwww免费| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 三级毛片av免费| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美区成人在线视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日本一二三区视频观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久久久久伊人网av| 此物有八面人人有两片| 成年版毛片免费区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久色成人| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 中文资源天堂在线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产视频内射| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 我要搜黄色片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 香蕉av资源在线| 黄色女人牲交| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 色播亚洲综合网| 毛片女人毛片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| av在线亚洲专区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 性色avwww在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美3d第一页| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日本五十路高清| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久6这里有精品| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲无线在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 久久久国产成人精品二区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 69人妻影院| 日本a在线网址| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚州av有码| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 日日撸夜夜添| 香蕉av资源在线| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品人妻1区二区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人二区视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 在线观看一区二区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产高清激情床上av| www.色视频.com| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲最大成人av| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| videossex国产| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 国产 一区精品| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚州av有码| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| avwww免费| 久久精品影院6| 午夜免费激情av| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 在线看三级毛片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 99热这里只有是精品50| 18+在线观看网站| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| videossex国产| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 九色国产91popny在线| netflix在线观看网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 午夜精品在线福利| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 97碰自拍视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| www.www免费av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 露出奶头的视频| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 午夜福利在线在线| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产精品一及| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 直男gayav资源| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产精品久久视频播放| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 一区福利在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 99热只有精品国产| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久久色成人| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产精品三级大全| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 舔av片在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人三级黄色视频| or卡值多少钱| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久久久性生活片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| av.在线天堂| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 91在线观看av| 免费高清视频大片| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 黄片wwwwww| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 高清在线国产一区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 一本精品99久久精品77| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 黄色女人牲交| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| av黄色大香蕉| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| av黄色大香蕉| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美zozozo另类| 高清在线国产一区| av.在线天堂| 亚洲内射少妇av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 免费av观看视频| 美女免费视频网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 悠悠久久av| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久草成人影院| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本 av在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 我要搜黄色片| 成人欧美大片| 美女黄网站色视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 免费看光身美女| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 一a级毛片在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| eeuss影院久久| 如何舔出高潮| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 高清在线国产一区| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 成人国产麻豆网| www.www免费av| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久久久久伊人网av| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产精品久久视频播放| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 久久久久国内视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 99久久精品热视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产在线男女| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 成人无遮挡网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 嫩草影视91久久| 性欧美人与动物交配| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 高清在线国产一区| 88av欧美| 赤兔流量卡办理| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 黄色一级大片看看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日本 av在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 免费观看人在逋| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 露出奶头的视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产免费男女视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| avwww免费| 在线播放无遮挡| 在现免费观看毛片| 热99在线观看视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久久国产成人免费| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 少妇的逼水好多| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看|