• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    2014-09-06 11:13:31ChimaVure
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    Received: 2012-03-15; Accepted: 2013-05-21

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    The study evaluated the impact of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in a major oil-producing community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Three sites—unpolluted site (US), polluted and untreated site (PUS), and polluted and treated site (PTS)—were purposively chosen for the study. The seedling emergence method was used to evaluate soil seed banks in the various sites at two depths, 0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm. Woody-plant species richness, abundance, and diversity were higher in the US seed bank than in the PUS and PTS seed banks. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed in the US, followed by the PTS, and then the PUS. Both species richness and diversity of non-woody plants were highest at the US, followed by the PUS, and lowest in the PTS. Woody species in the US seed bank were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those of the PUS and PTS at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species in the PUS and PTS seed banks. Non-woody species at 0?10 cm US seed bank were 73.08% dissimilar with those of PUS at the two soil depths and 81.48/88.46% dissimilar with those of the 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. At 10–20 cm, non-woody species of the US were 69.66% dissimilar with those from each of the two soil depths in PUS; and 73.91/81.82% dissimilar with those of 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. Non-woody species variation between the PUS and PTS was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm. The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrates that crude oil pollution negatively affected the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because soil seed banks serve as the building blocks for plant succession. Thorough remediation and enrichment planting are recommended to support the recovery process of vegetation in the polluted areas.

    Ogoni land, crude oil pollution, remediation, plant regeneration

    Introduction

    Contamination of soil by crude oil spills is a global environmental problem. Crude oil, the raw component of nearly all petroleum products, contains a wide variety of elements combined in various forms: the main components are carbon and hydrogen, which in their combined form are called hydrocarbons (ABB 1997). Shifts in the composition of the soil’s microbial community—as a response to low levels of gaseous hydrocarbons from underlying petroleum formations—have been investigated as support for further monitoring in case of accidental spills. Michel et al. (2002, 2005) state that petroleum is a pollutant that can persist in the environment for a long period until vegetation recovers completely; its persistence can be explained by the slow biodegradation of hydrocarbons.

    The inhibition of germination and reduction of plant growth are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). Oil contamination causes a slow rate of germination in plants (Ogbo et al. 2009), which has been attributed to the prevention or reduction of the seeds’ access to water and oxygen (Adam and Duncan, 2002). Cell membranes are damaged by penetration of hydrocarbon molecules, leading to leakage of cell contents. Oil reduces the transpiration rate, probably by blocking stomata and intercellular spaces (Baker 1970).

    Coastal ecosystems in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria are under increasing pressure from hostilities and other developmental activities. The region has a long history of crude-oil pollution. Causes of oil spills in the area are usually accidental or operational. Accidental spills occur mainly due to equipment failure. Such spills have occurred at several times and places within the region (e.g., July 1970, April 2009, and April 2012, etc. at Bomu Oil Field in the Kegbara Dere Community). Operational spills occur due to loading and discharging oil from ships and illegal bunkering activities. These spills usually cause a lot of harm to the biological resources of the area.

    Recovery of the area after spills will depend on thorough remediation or degradation of the oil and regeneration of the plantcommunities. Although the oil companies responsible for these spills in the Niger Delta sometimes carryout remediation activities, no studies have been conducted to either ascertain the impact of the spills on the regenerative potentials of the soil seed banks, or the effectiveness of the remediation effort, especially as it concerns regeneration of the native woody species of the area. Our study was a step in that direction: the specific objectives were: (1) to identify and compare the plant species composition of the soil seed banks in the unpolluted, polluted, and remediated sites; (2) to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the viability and diversity of the soil seed bank; (3) to determine the effectiveness of the remediation carried out with respect to plant regeneration; and (4) to ascertain the impact of soil depth on the abundance of soil seed banks in the three sites considered.

    Materials and methods

    Description of the study area

    Kegbara Dere is located in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State. It lies in the humid tropical zone with annual rainfall that ranges from 2000–2470 mm and an annual temperature ranging from 23°C minimum to 32°C maximum (NDES, 2001). The vegetation of the area is made up of an intricate mixture of plants that belong to different plant families, genera, and species. However, for the areas polluted with crude oil, the plants (mostly grasses) are in patches and are sparsely distributed on the site.

    A report from Port Harcourt Appeals Court (1994) observed that the soils of the polluted areas of the community are resistant to penetration by plant roots; have high bulk densities, low hydraulic conductivities, and infiltration capacities; and consequently, very poor plant growth. The report also stated that soil samples from the polluted areas are very acidic, poor in total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and organic carbon, and generally have low levels of exchangeable cations and micronutrients, and high level of manganese, all toxic to plant life.

    Selection of the study sites

    Three sites were used for the study. The first site (4°39'8" N and 7°14'26" E) was selected from an unpolluted area (about 5 km away from the Kegbara Dere/Bomu Oil Field). The second site (4°39'37" N and 7°15'8" E) was selected from a polluted but treated or remediated area; while the third site (4°39'41" N and 7°15'6" E) was selected from a polluted and untreated area. The remediation carried out at the polluted/treated site involved manual tillage and bulking of soil; this was done in 2007 and 2008. These sites were chosen to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the regenerative abilities of the sites and the effectiveness of the remediation exercises.

    Studies on soil seed bank

    Ten (10) random plots, 20 cm x 20 cm. were marked out at each site. Soil samples were removed from the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers of each plot, using a sharp knife and hand trowel. Soil samples from corresponding soil layers were bulked for each site and divided into four equal parts. Germination trials were conducted for the different soil samples in the nursery. Soils were spread to a thickness of 3 cm on perforated plastic trays that were continuously kept moist. The seedling emergence method was used to assess the composition of the soil seed banks over a period of six months. Emerging seedlings that were readily identifiable were counted, recorded, and discarded on a monthly basis. Seedlings that were difficult to identify were counted, labeled, transplanted, and grown separately until they could be identified. After identification and counting of seedlings each month, the soil samples were stirred to stimulate seed germination.

    Measurement of seedling diversity

    The Simpson Diversity Index (Simpson, 1949) and Shannon Diversity Index (Odum, 1971) were used to measure diversity of the soil seed banks using Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software.

    The Simpson Index is expressed as:

    where: N is the total number of individuals encountered, ni is number of individuals of ith species enumerated for i=1……q, q is number of different species enumerated.

    Shannon Diversity Index is expressed as:

    where: pi is the proportion of individuals in the ith species, s is the total number of species.

    Comparison of seed banks at different sites

    The Sorensen Similarity Index was used to compare soil seedbank species composition between sites and soil depths. The index was computed using the methods found in Ogunleye et al. (2004), Ojo (2004), and Ihenyen et al. (2010), as expressed below:

    where: a is the number of species present in both sites; b is the number of species present in site 1 but not present in site 2; c is the number of species present in site 2 but not present in site 1.

    Results

    Woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 1 shows the woody plant species that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The abundance of woody plant species was greater in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than in the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 1). No woody tree species was recorded at both the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 2).

    Non-woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 2 shows the non-woody species recorded from the soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed at 0–10 cm seed bank of the unpolluted site, followed by 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/ treated site, while the lowest number was observed at the 10–20 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site (Fig. 3). The abundance of non-woody plants decreased with the increase in soil depth in all the sites.

    Table 1: Checklist of Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    Fig. 1: Number of woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. US 0-10 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; US 10-20 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 0-10cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 0-10 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank. Same explanation for Figs 2-4.

    Fig. 2: Distribution of germinated woody plant species among woody plant forms

    Fig. 3: Number of non-woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths

    Table 2: Checklist of Non-Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    The distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms is shown in Fig. 4. The herbs and grasses were greater in the two soil depths of the unpolluted site than in both soil depths at the other sites. More sedge was found at 0–10 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site and 10–20 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/treated site. Creeping herbs were more in the 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the unpolluted site, while fern was recorded only at this site and soil depth.

    Diversity of woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    The diversity of woody plant seedlings are shown in Table 3. The richness of woody plant species was greatest at the 0–10cm seed bank of the unpolluted site followed by the 10–20 cm seed bank of the same site while only one woody species was recorded at the two soil depths in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites. Woody plant species diversity was zero for both soil depths at the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    Fig. 4: Distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms

    Diversity of the non-woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    Table 4 presents diversity indices for non-woody plant species at various sites and soil depths. Both species richness and diversity were highest at the unpolluted site, followed by the polluted/untreated site while the polluted/treated site had the lowest species richness and diversity.The diversity of non-woody plant species decreased with soil depth except at the polluted/treated site.

    Table 3: Alpha Diversity Indices for Woody Plant Seedlings

    Table 4: Alpha Diversity Indices for Non-Woody Plant Seedlings

    Plant species compositional variation among sites and soil depths The extent of plant species compositional variation between sites and soil depths is shown in Table 5 for woody species. Woody species in the seed bank at the unpolluted site were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites at 0–10 and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species from seed banks in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    The level of variation in non-woody species composition was higher between the unpolluted site and the polluted/treated site than between the unpolluted site and the polluted/untreated site (Table 6). Non-woody species variation between the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm.

    Table 5: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for seed bank woody seedlings

    Table 6: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for non-woody plants at the various sites

    Discussion

    The germination trials showed more plant species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than that of either the polluted/untreated or polluted/treated sites. Although woody plant species were generally few in all of the sites compared with the non-woody species, the unpolluted site compared better than the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites where only one woody species, Chromolaena odorata, was observed. Nonwoody species dominated the soil seed banks in all sites, although the unpolluted site also demonstrated greater species richness and abundance than the other two. The polluted/untreated site had higher non-woody species richness than the polluted/treated site while non-woody plant abundance washigher in the polluted/treated site than in the polluted/untreated site.

    Several studies on seed banks also show few woody species in comparison to non-woody species (Kebrom and Tesfaye 2000; Senbata and Teketay 2002; De Villiers et al 2003; Jalili et al. 2003; Wassie and Teketay 2006; Oke et al. 2007). Oke et al. (2007) observed that herbaceous species dominated the seed bank, consisting of 98% of the total seed density in each of the four plantations studied, with only three woody species emerging. The paucity of woody species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site may be attributed to the short-lived nature of their seeds. (Garwood 1989, Wassie and Teketay 2006). However, the higher species richness and seedling abundance recorded in the unpolluted site are indicative of the harmful impact of crude oil pollution. Although, there is no available literature on the effect of crude oil pollution on seed banks, Tefera et al. (2005) reported that disturbed lands had less seed density compared to adjacent undisturbed land. Powell (1997) equally asserted that the inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth, as well as death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons in an oil polluted area.

    Generally, seedling abundance decreased with soil depth in all of the sites with over 70% of non-woody seedlings encountered at the 0–10 cm seed bank of both the unpolluted and polluted/treated sites, and about 58% at the polluted/untreated site. Degreef (2002) observed that most seeds are located on the surface of the soil and that their numbers decline with depth.

    Woody plant species diversity was zero at both the polluted/untreated and the polluted/treated sites. Crude oil pollution appears to have a greater impact on the diversity and density of the woody plant species than the non-woody species. This may be due to the advantages most non-woody species have in colonizing degraded sites with respect to the dispersal of their seeds. Because most woody species depend on seed rain for their regeneration due to the short-lived nature of their seeds, the destruction of mature trees due to crude oil pollution may have contributed to the very poor woody species richness, diversity, and abundance. However, higher non-woody seedling abundance in the polluted/treated site than in polluted/untreated site could be attributed to improved site conditions after remediation. Dereje et al. (2003) observed that biological and soil factors contribute to variations in species richness and diversity.

    The high variation between the plant species composition in seed banks at the unpolluted site and the polluted sites could be due to the absence of toxic pollutants, and favorable biological andsoil conditions in the unpolluted site. It is well known that hydrocarbons are harmful to animals and plants (Dorn and Salanitro 2000). The inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth as well as its death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). However, the existence of Chromolaena odorata in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites is indicative of its ability to colonize and thrive in degraded sites.

    The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrate how crude oil pollution impairs on the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because the soil seed bank serves as a building block for plant succession. For example, the rapid revegetation of sites disturbed by wildfire, catastrophic weather, agricultural operations, and timber harvesting is largely due to the soil seed bank. A study into the natural process that influence forest dynamics has shown that soil seed bank is one of the principle sources of recruitment for new individuals in the initial stages of forest succession (Butler and Chazdon 1998). It also is partially responsible for dynamic changes that may occur during the development of vegetation (Lunt 1997). Williams-Linera (1993) equally observed that species richness and abundance in soil seed banks may provide information on the potential of a community for regeneration.

    Conclusion

    The soil seed bank of the unpolluted site compared better than those of the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites in terms of plant species richness and diversity, and seedling abundance. Plant species compositional variation was very high between the unpolluted site and the polluted sites. The remediation carried out in 2007 and 2008 seems not to have been very effective.

    To restore the plant communities of the polluted areas, thorough remediation should be carried out by seasoned professionals who are committed to the project. . Since natural regeneration cannot guarantee the restoration of the plant communities (especially the woody species) at the polluted sites, enrichment planting using relevant silvicultural practices should be carried out to support and enhance the recovery process. This effort should involve collaboration with all of the stakeholders, including local people, government, oil companies, and professionals, like forest ecologists, soil scientists, and silviculturists.

    ABB. 1997. ABB’s Environmental Management Report. ABB, Stockholm, 88pp.

    Adam GI, Duncan H. 2002. Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environmental Pollution, 120: 363?370.

    Baker JM 1970. The effects of oils on plants. Environmental Pollution, 1(1): 27?44

    Butler BJ, Chazdon RL. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30: 214?222.

    Degreef J, Rocha OJ, Vanderborght T, Baudoin J-P 2002. Soil seed bank and seed dormancy in wild populations of lima bean (Fabaceae); Considerations for in situ and ex situ conservation. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1644?1650.

    Dereje A, Oba G, Weladji RB, Colman, JE. 2003. An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing land in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 14: 25?38.

    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen, Theron GK. 2003. Similarity between the soil seed bank and the standing vegetation in the Strandveld Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Land degradation and Development, 14: 527?540.

    Dorn PH, Salanitro J. 2000. Temporal ecology assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation Chemosphere, 40(4): 419?426.

    Garwood NC. 1989. Tropical soil seed bank, a review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, pp.149?209.

    Ihenyen J, Mensah JK, Okoegwale EE. 2010. Tree/shrubs species diversity of Ehor Forest Reserve in Uhunmwode Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. Researcher. 2(2): 37?49.

    Jalili A, Hamzeh’ee Y, Asri A, Shirvany S, Yazdani, M, Khoshnevis F, Zarrinkamar M, Ghahramani R, Safavi S, Shaw J, Hodgson K, Thompson M, Akbarzadeh, Pakparvar. 2003. Soil seed bank in the Arasbaran protected area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 109: 425?431.

    Kebrom T, Tesfaye B. 2000. The role of seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hill slopes in Southern Wello. Biotropica, 32: 23?32.

    Lunt ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-Eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130: 21?34.

    Michel J, Henry JR CB, Thumm S. 2002. Shoreline assessment and environmental impacts from the M/T Westchester Oil Spill in the Mississippi River. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 7(3-4): 155?161.

    Michel J, Trevor G, Waldron J, Blocksisidge CT, Etkin DS, Urban R. 2005. Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Annals of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, pp. 1-84. Maio 16, Miami.

    NDES. 2001. Biological Environmental Research Report. RSUST, Port Harcourt. Volume 46. 251pp.

    Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadephia, 574pp.

    Ogbo EM, Zibigha M, Odogu G. 2009. The effect of crude oil on growth of the weed (Paspalum crobiculatum L.) – phytoremediation potential of the plant, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(9): 229?233.

    Ogunleye AJ, Adeola AO, Ojo LO, Aduradola AM. 2004. Impact of farming activities on vegetation in Olokemeji Forest reserve, Nigeria, Global Nest, 6(2): 131?140.

    Ojo LO 2004. The fate of a tropical rainforest in Nigeria: Abeku sector of Omo Forest Reserve, Global Nest, 6(2): 116?130.

    Oke SO, Ayanwale TO, Isola OA. 2007. Soil seedbank in four contrasting plantations in Ile-Ife area of Southwestern Nigeria. Resource Journal of Botany, 2: 13?22.

    Port Harcourt Appeal Court. 1994. Report of Case between SPDC Nigeria Limited (Appellant/Defendant) and the Kegbara Dere People (Respondents/Plaintiffs).

    Powell R. 1997. The use of plants as “Field” biomonitors. In: Wang, W. Gorsuch, J. and Hughes, J. (eds.), Plants for Environmental Studies. Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 47?61

    Senbeta F, Taketay D. 2002. Soil seed banks in plantations and adjacent natural dry Afromontane forests of central and southern Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 43(2): 229?242.

    Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163: 688

    Tefera M, Demel T, Hulten H, Yemshaw Y. 2005. The role of enclosures in the recovery of woody vegetation in degraded dryland hillsides of central and northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment, 60: 259?281.

    Wassie A, Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 201: 32?43.

    Williams-Linera G. 1993. Soil seed bank in four low mountain forests of Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9: 321?337.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0538-y

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Port Harcourt- Choba, P.M.B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. email: punditzum@yahoo.ca; phone: +234-803-812-1887

    Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    成年人黄色毛片网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久久久久大精品| 99久久国产精品久久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久热这里只有精品99| 天堂动漫精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av福利片在线| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜a级毛片| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久久性视频一级片| 中文字幕久久专区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 99热只有精品国产| 国产av又大| 精品第一国产精品| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 91大片在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 制服人妻中文乱码| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 一进一出抽搐动态| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产视频内射| av电影中文网址| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品人妻1区二区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 超碰成人久久| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| tocl精华| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 999久久久国产精品视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| xxxwww97欧美| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 很黄的视频免费| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 88av欧美| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费高清视频大片| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久久久大精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | av视频在线观看入口| 久久伊人香网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 18禁观看日本| a级毛片在线看网站| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 91字幕亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| av福利片在线| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 在线看三级毛片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 午夜a级毛片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 宅男免费午夜| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产熟女xx| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 又大又爽又粗| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| tocl精华| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 88av欧美| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 日本 欧美在线| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| av在线播放免费不卡| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| www.www免费av| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久精品成人免费网站| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | www国产在线视频色| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲五月天丁香| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 一级毛片精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日韩有码中文字幕| 不卡一级毛片| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 91av网站免费观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| avwww免费| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 不卡一级毛片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 欧美大码av| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 嫩草影院精品99| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久九九热精品免费| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | ponron亚洲| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 免费在线观看完整版高清| svipshipincom国产片| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 午夜免费观看网址| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 成年免费大片在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 午夜影院日韩av| 国产亚洲欧美98| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 免费看日本二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产视频内射| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一夜夜www| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 国产av一区在线观看免费| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 黄色视频不卡| av电影中文网址| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 两性夫妻黄色片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 人人妻人人澡人人看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 老司机福利观看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一本综合久久免费| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲无线在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 免费看十八禁软件| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 悠悠久久av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| www.精华液| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 91av网站免费观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲av美国av| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日本一本二区三区精品| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 青草久久国产| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 脱女人内裤的视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 三级毛片av免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一进一出抽搐动态| av欧美777| 我的亚洲天堂| 日本免费a在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 三级毛片av免费| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 中文字幕久久专区| 一夜夜www| 久久精品91蜜桃| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | xxxwww97欧美| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲国产看品久久| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久香蕉精品热| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 黄色成人免费大全| 午夜老司机福利片| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 悠悠久久av| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 长腿黑丝高跟| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产熟女xx| 青草久久国产| 欧美在线黄色| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久性视频一级片| 在线视频色国产色| 看免费av毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| av视频在线观看入口| 91字幕亚洲| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 免费av毛片视频| 搞女人的毛片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美日本视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 草草在线视频免费看| av电影中文网址| 久久久国产成人免费| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 91国产中文字幕| 午夜a级毛片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 午夜激情av网站| 成人国语在线视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080|