• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    2014-09-06 11:13:31ChimaVure
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    Received: 2012-03-15; Accepted: 2013-05-21

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    The study evaluated the impact of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in a major oil-producing community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Three sites—unpolluted site (US), polluted and untreated site (PUS), and polluted and treated site (PTS)—were purposively chosen for the study. The seedling emergence method was used to evaluate soil seed banks in the various sites at two depths, 0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm. Woody-plant species richness, abundance, and diversity were higher in the US seed bank than in the PUS and PTS seed banks. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed in the US, followed by the PTS, and then the PUS. Both species richness and diversity of non-woody plants were highest at the US, followed by the PUS, and lowest in the PTS. Woody species in the US seed bank were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those of the PUS and PTS at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species in the PUS and PTS seed banks. Non-woody species at 0?10 cm US seed bank were 73.08% dissimilar with those of PUS at the two soil depths and 81.48/88.46% dissimilar with those of the 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. At 10–20 cm, non-woody species of the US were 69.66% dissimilar with those from each of the two soil depths in PUS; and 73.91/81.82% dissimilar with those of 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. Non-woody species variation between the PUS and PTS was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm. The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrates that crude oil pollution negatively affected the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because soil seed banks serve as the building blocks for plant succession. Thorough remediation and enrichment planting are recommended to support the recovery process of vegetation in the polluted areas.

    Ogoni land, crude oil pollution, remediation, plant regeneration

    Introduction

    Contamination of soil by crude oil spills is a global environmental problem. Crude oil, the raw component of nearly all petroleum products, contains a wide variety of elements combined in various forms: the main components are carbon and hydrogen, which in their combined form are called hydrocarbons (ABB 1997). Shifts in the composition of the soil’s microbial community—as a response to low levels of gaseous hydrocarbons from underlying petroleum formations—have been investigated as support for further monitoring in case of accidental spills. Michel et al. (2002, 2005) state that petroleum is a pollutant that can persist in the environment for a long period until vegetation recovers completely; its persistence can be explained by the slow biodegradation of hydrocarbons.

    The inhibition of germination and reduction of plant growth are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). Oil contamination causes a slow rate of germination in plants (Ogbo et al. 2009), which has been attributed to the prevention or reduction of the seeds’ access to water and oxygen (Adam and Duncan, 2002). Cell membranes are damaged by penetration of hydrocarbon molecules, leading to leakage of cell contents. Oil reduces the transpiration rate, probably by blocking stomata and intercellular spaces (Baker 1970).

    Coastal ecosystems in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria are under increasing pressure from hostilities and other developmental activities. The region has a long history of crude-oil pollution. Causes of oil spills in the area are usually accidental or operational. Accidental spills occur mainly due to equipment failure. Such spills have occurred at several times and places within the region (e.g., July 1970, April 2009, and April 2012, etc. at Bomu Oil Field in the Kegbara Dere Community). Operational spills occur due to loading and discharging oil from ships and illegal bunkering activities. These spills usually cause a lot of harm to the biological resources of the area.

    Recovery of the area after spills will depend on thorough remediation or degradation of the oil and regeneration of the plantcommunities. Although the oil companies responsible for these spills in the Niger Delta sometimes carryout remediation activities, no studies have been conducted to either ascertain the impact of the spills on the regenerative potentials of the soil seed banks, or the effectiveness of the remediation effort, especially as it concerns regeneration of the native woody species of the area. Our study was a step in that direction: the specific objectives were: (1) to identify and compare the plant species composition of the soil seed banks in the unpolluted, polluted, and remediated sites; (2) to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the viability and diversity of the soil seed bank; (3) to determine the effectiveness of the remediation carried out with respect to plant regeneration; and (4) to ascertain the impact of soil depth on the abundance of soil seed banks in the three sites considered.

    Materials and methods

    Description of the study area

    Kegbara Dere is located in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State. It lies in the humid tropical zone with annual rainfall that ranges from 2000–2470 mm and an annual temperature ranging from 23°C minimum to 32°C maximum (NDES, 2001). The vegetation of the area is made up of an intricate mixture of plants that belong to different plant families, genera, and species. However, for the areas polluted with crude oil, the plants (mostly grasses) are in patches and are sparsely distributed on the site.

    A report from Port Harcourt Appeals Court (1994) observed that the soils of the polluted areas of the community are resistant to penetration by plant roots; have high bulk densities, low hydraulic conductivities, and infiltration capacities; and consequently, very poor plant growth. The report also stated that soil samples from the polluted areas are very acidic, poor in total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and organic carbon, and generally have low levels of exchangeable cations and micronutrients, and high level of manganese, all toxic to plant life.

    Selection of the study sites

    Three sites were used for the study. The first site (4°39'8" N and 7°14'26" E) was selected from an unpolluted area (about 5 km away from the Kegbara Dere/Bomu Oil Field). The second site (4°39'37" N and 7°15'8" E) was selected from a polluted but treated or remediated area; while the third site (4°39'41" N and 7°15'6" E) was selected from a polluted and untreated area. The remediation carried out at the polluted/treated site involved manual tillage and bulking of soil; this was done in 2007 and 2008. These sites were chosen to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the regenerative abilities of the sites and the effectiveness of the remediation exercises.

    Studies on soil seed bank

    Ten (10) random plots, 20 cm x 20 cm. were marked out at each site. Soil samples were removed from the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers of each plot, using a sharp knife and hand trowel. Soil samples from corresponding soil layers were bulked for each site and divided into four equal parts. Germination trials were conducted for the different soil samples in the nursery. Soils were spread to a thickness of 3 cm on perforated plastic trays that were continuously kept moist. The seedling emergence method was used to assess the composition of the soil seed banks over a period of six months. Emerging seedlings that were readily identifiable were counted, recorded, and discarded on a monthly basis. Seedlings that were difficult to identify were counted, labeled, transplanted, and grown separately until they could be identified. After identification and counting of seedlings each month, the soil samples were stirred to stimulate seed germination.

    Measurement of seedling diversity

    The Simpson Diversity Index (Simpson, 1949) and Shannon Diversity Index (Odum, 1971) were used to measure diversity of the soil seed banks using Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software.

    The Simpson Index is expressed as:

    where: N is the total number of individuals encountered, ni is number of individuals of ith species enumerated for i=1……q, q is number of different species enumerated.

    Shannon Diversity Index is expressed as:

    where: pi is the proportion of individuals in the ith species, s is the total number of species.

    Comparison of seed banks at different sites

    The Sorensen Similarity Index was used to compare soil seedbank species composition between sites and soil depths. The index was computed using the methods found in Ogunleye et al. (2004), Ojo (2004), and Ihenyen et al. (2010), as expressed below:

    where: a is the number of species present in both sites; b is the number of species present in site 1 but not present in site 2; c is the number of species present in site 2 but not present in site 1.

    Results

    Woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 1 shows the woody plant species that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The abundance of woody plant species was greater in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than in the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 1). No woody tree species was recorded at both the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 2).

    Non-woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 2 shows the non-woody species recorded from the soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed at 0–10 cm seed bank of the unpolluted site, followed by 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/ treated site, while the lowest number was observed at the 10–20 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site (Fig. 3). The abundance of non-woody plants decreased with the increase in soil depth in all the sites.

    Table 1: Checklist of Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    Fig. 1: Number of woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. US 0-10 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; US 10-20 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 0-10cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 0-10 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank. Same explanation for Figs 2-4.

    Fig. 2: Distribution of germinated woody plant species among woody plant forms

    Fig. 3: Number of non-woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths

    Table 2: Checklist of Non-Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    The distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms is shown in Fig. 4. The herbs and grasses were greater in the two soil depths of the unpolluted site than in both soil depths at the other sites. More sedge was found at 0–10 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site and 10–20 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/treated site. Creeping herbs were more in the 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the unpolluted site, while fern was recorded only at this site and soil depth.

    Diversity of woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    The diversity of woody plant seedlings are shown in Table 3. The richness of woody plant species was greatest at the 0–10cm seed bank of the unpolluted site followed by the 10–20 cm seed bank of the same site while only one woody species was recorded at the two soil depths in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites. Woody plant species diversity was zero for both soil depths at the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    Fig. 4: Distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms

    Diversity of the non-woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    Table 4 presents diversity indices for non-woody plant species at various sites and soil depths. Both species richness and diversity were highest at the unpolluted site, followed by the polluted/untreated site while the polluted/treated site had the lowest species richness and diversity.The diversity of non-woody plant species decreased with soil depth except at the polluted/treated site.

    Table 3: Alpha Diversity Indices for Woody Plant Seedlings

    Table 4: Alpha Diversity Indices for Non-Woody Plant Seedlings

    Plant species compositional variation among sites and soil depths The extent of plant species compositional variation between sites and soil depths is shown in Table 5 for woody species. Woody species in the seed bank at the unpolluted site were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites at 0–10 and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species from seed banks in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    The level of variation in non-woody species composition was higher between the unpolluted site and the polluted/treated site than between the unpolluted site and the polluted/untreated site (Table 6). Non-woody species variation between the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm.

    Table 5: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for seed bank woody seedlings

    Table 6: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for non-woody plants at the various sites

    Discussion

    The germination trials showed more plant species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than that of either the polluted/untreated or polluted/treated sites. Although woody plant species were generally few in all of the sites compared with the non-woody species, the unpolluted site compared better than the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites where only one woody species, Chromolaena odorata, was observed. Nonwoody species dominated the soil seed banks in all sites, although the unpolluted site also demonstrated greater species richness and abundance than the other two. The polluted/untreated site had higher non-woody species richness than the polluted/treated site while non-woody plant abundance washigher in the polluted/treated site than in the polluted/untreated site.

    Several studies on seed banks also show few woody species in comparison to non-woody species (Kebrom and Tesfaye 2000; Senbata and Teketay 2002; De Villiers et al 2003; Jalili et al. 2003; Wassie and Teketay 2006; Oke et al. 2007). Oke et al. (2007) observed that herbaceous species dominated the seed bank, consisting of 98% of the total seed density in each of the four plantations studied, with only three woody species emerging. The paucity of woody species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site may be attributed to the short-lived nature of their seeds. (Garwood 1989, Wassie and Teketay 2006). However, the higher species richness and seedling abundance recorded in the unpolluted site are indicative of the harmful impact of crude oil pollution. Although, there is no available literature on the effect of crude oil pollution on seed banks, Tefera et al. (2005) reported that disturbed lands had less seed density compared to adjacent undisturbed land. Powell (1997) equally asserted that the inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth, as well as death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons in an oil polluted area.

    Generally, seedling abundance decreased with soil depth in all of the sites with over 70% of non-woody seedlings encountered at the 0–10 cm seed bank of both the unpolluted and polluted/treated sites, and about 58% at the polluted/untreated site. Degreef (2002) observed that most seeds are located on the surface of the soil and that their numbers decline with depth.

    Woody plant species diversity was zero at both the polluted/untreated and the polluted/treated sites. Crude oil pollution appears to have a greater impact on the diversity and density of the woody plant species than the non-woody species. This may be due to the advantages most non-woody species have in colonizing degraded sites with respect to the dispersal of their seeds. Because most woody species depend on seed rain for their regeneration due to the short-lived nature of their seeds, the destruction of mature trees due to crude oil pollution may have contributed to the very poor woody species richness, diversity, and abundance. However, higher non-woody seedling abundance in the polluted/treated site than in polluted/untreated site could be attributed to improved site conditions after remediation. Dereje et al. (2003) observed that biological and soil factors contribute to variations in species richness and diversity.

    The high variation between the plant species composition in seed banks at the unpolluted site and the polluted sites could be due to the absence of toxic pollutants, and favorable biological andsoil conditions in the unpolluted site. It is well known that hydrocarbons are harmful to animals and plants (Dorn and Salanitro 2000). The inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth as well as its death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). However, the existence of Chromolaena odorata in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites is indicative of its ability to colonize and thrive in degraded sites.

    The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrate how crude oil pollution impairs on the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because the soil seed bank serves as a building block for plant succession. For example, the rapid revegetation of sites disturbed by wildfire, catastrophic weather, agricultural operations, and timber harvesting is largely due to the soil seed bank. A study into the natural process that influence forest dynamics has shown that soil seed bank is one of the principle sources of recruitment for new individuals in the initial stages of forest succession (Butler and Chazdon 1998). It also is partially responsible for dynamic changes that may occur during the development of vegetation (Lunt 1997). Williams-Linera (1993) equally observed that species richness and abundance in soil seed banks may provide information on the potential of a community for regeneration.

    Conclusion

    The soil seed bank of the unpolluted site compared better than those of the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites in terms of plant species richness and diversity, and seedling abundance. Plant species compositional variation was very high between the unpolluted site and the polluted sites. The remediation carried out in 2007 and 2008 seems not to have been very effective.

    To restore the plant communities of the polluted areas, thorough remediation should be carried out by seasoned professionals who are committed to the project. . Since natural regeneration cannot guarantee the restoration of the plant communities (especially the woody species) at the polluted sites, enrichment planting using relevant silvicultural practices should be carried out to support and enhance the recovery process. This effort should involve collaboration with all of the stakeholders, including local people, government, oil companies, and professionals, like forest ecologists, soil scientists, and silviculturists.

    ABB. 1997. ABB’s Environmental Management Report. ABB, Stockholm, 88pp.

    Adam GI, Duncan H. 2002. Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environmental Pollution, 120: 363?370.

    Baker JM 1970. The effects of oils on plants. Environmental Pollution, 1(1): 27?44

    Butler BJ, Chazdon RL. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30: 214?222.

    Degreef J, Rocha OJ, Vanderborght T, Baudoin J-P 2002. Soil seed bank and seed dormancy in wild populations of lima bean (Fabaceae); Considerations for in situ and ex situ conservation. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1644?1650.

    Dereje A, Oba G, Weladji RB, Colman, JE. 2003. An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing land in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 14: 25?38.

    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen, Theron GK. 2003. Similarity between the soil seed bank and the standing vegetation in the Strandveld Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Land degradation and Development, 14: 527?540.

    Dorn PH, Salanitro J. 2000. Temporal ecology assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation Chemosphere, 40(4): 419?426.

    Garwood NC. 1989. Tropical soil seed bank, a review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, pp.149?209.

    Ihenyen J, Mensah JK, Okoegwale EE. 2010. Tree/shrubs species diversity of Ehor Forest Reserve in Uhunmwode Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. Researcher. 2(2): 37?49.

    Jalili A, Hamzeh’ee Y, Asri A, Shirvany S, Yazdani, M, Khoshnevis F, Zarrinkamar M, Ghahramani R, Safavi S, Shaw J, Hodgson K, Thompson M, Akbarzadeh, Pakparvar. 2003. Soil seed bank in the Arasbaran protected area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 109: 425?431.

    Kebrom T, Tesfaye B. 2000. The role of seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hill slopes in Southern Wello. Biotropica, 32: 23?32.

    Lunt ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-Eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130: 21?34.

    Michel J, Henry JR CB, Thumm S. 2002. Shoreline assessment and environmental impacts from the M/T Westchester Oil Spill in the Mississippi River. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 7(3-4): 155?161.

    Michel J, Trevor G, Waldron J, Blocksisidge CT, Etkin DS, Urban R. 2005. Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Annals of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, pp. 1-84. Maio 16, Miami.

    NDES. 2001. Biological Environmental Research Report. RSUST, Port Harcourt. Volume 46. 251pp.

    Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadephia, 574pp.

    Ogbo EM, Zibigha M, Odogu G. 2009. The effect of crude oil on growth of the weed (Paspalum crobiculatum L.) – phytoremediation potential of the plant, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(9): 229?233.

    Ogunleye AJ, Adeola AO, Ojo LO, Aduradola AM. 2004. Impact of farming activities on vegetation in Olokemeji Forest reserve, Nigeria, Global Nest, 6(2): 131?140.

    Ojo LO 2004. The fate of a tropical rainforest in Nigeria: Abeku sector of Omo Forest Reserve, Global Nest, 6(2): 116?130.

    Oke SO, Ayanwale TO, Isola OA. 2007. Soil seedbank in four contrasting plantations in Ile-Ife area of Southwestern Nigeria. Resource Journal of Botany, 2: 13?22.

    Port Harcourt Appeal Court. 1994. Report of Case between SPDC Nigeria Limited (Appellant/Defendant) and the Kegbara Dere People (Respondents/Plaintiffs).

    Powell R. 1997. The use of plants as “Field” biomonitors. In: Wang, W. Gorsuch, J. and Hughes, J. (eds.), Plants for Environmental Studies. Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 47?61

    Senbeta F, Taketay D. 2002. Soil seed banks in plantations and adjacent natural dry Afromontane forests of central and southern Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 43(2): 229?242.

    Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163: 688

    Tefera M, Demel T, Hulten H, Yemshaw Y. 2005. The role of enclosures in the recovery of woody vegetation in degraded dryland hillsides of central and northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment, 60: 259?281.

    Wassie A, Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 201: 32?43.

    Williams-Linera G. 1993. Soil seed bank in four low mountain forests of Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9: 321?337.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0538-y

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Port Harcourt- Choba, P.M.B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. email: punditzum@yahoo.ca; phone: +234-803-812-1887

    Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲成人久久性| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚州av有码| 91狼人影院| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲av成人av| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 露出奶头的视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 熟女电影av网| av在线蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 美女免费视频网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 变态另类丝袜制服| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| av福利片在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 99热全是精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 综合色丁香网| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 深夜a级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲国产色片| 男女那种视频在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 在线观看66精品国产| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 露出奶头的视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 乱人视频在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜精品在线福利| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 在线播放国产精品三级| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 免费大片18禁| 三级经典国产精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 直男gayav资源| 在线播放国产精品三级| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 97在线视频观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 精品人妻视频免费看| 99热6这里只有精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲五月天丁香| 嫩草影院新地址| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 色吧在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美激情在线99| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| av在线播放精品| 欧美性感艳星| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 在线免费观看的www视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 悠悠久久av| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 色av中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精品永久免费网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 搞女人的毛片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 精品久久久久久久末码| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲在线观看片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产高清激情床上av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 在线a可以看的网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 一本久久中文字幕| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费看a级黄色片| 舔av片在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产色婷婷99| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 一级av片app| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 我要搜黄色片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲五月天丁香| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 老司机福利观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 一级黄片播放器| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久99久视频精品免费| 成人av在线播放网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲最大成人av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 一夜夜www| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲综合色惰| www日本黄色视频网| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美日本视频| 国产老妇女一区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲内射少妇av| 色视频www国产| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| av专区在线播放| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 午夜影院日韩av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 草草在线视频免费看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 插逼视频在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成人二区视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 色5月婷婷丁香| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 中国美女看黄片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久成人免费电影| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲国产色片| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| av在线蜜桃| 国产精品,欧美在线| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产老妇女一区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 午夜视频国产福利| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费观看在线日韩| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲18禁久久av| av在线老鸭窝| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 禁无遮挡网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 精品日产1卡2卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲性久久影院| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 成年免费大片在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 国产美女午夜福利| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一本一本综合久久| 不卡一级毛片| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品福利观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲最大成人av| 在线看三级毛片| 国产黄片美女视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 成人欧美大片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 香蕉av资源在线| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 91精品国产九色| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| av在线播放精品| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲图色成人| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 在线天堂最新版资源| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久久色成人| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 午夜福利18| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产精品一及| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 91在线观看av| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国内精品宾馆在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 51国产日韩欧美| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 99riav亚洲国产免费| h日本视频在线播放| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 看片在线看免费视频| av在线播放精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲av成人av| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 中国美女看黄片| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久人人爽人人片av| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品一及| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲av熟女| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久久久久中文| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 99久国产av精品| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 简卡轻食公司| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人影院久久av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 一本一本综合久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人欧美大片| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 三级经典国产精品| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 成人二区视频| avwww免费| 老司机福利观看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一区福利在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产 一区精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日本色播在线视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一级毛片电影观看 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日本与韩国留学比较| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看|