• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    2014-09-06 11:13:31ChimaVure
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    Received: 2012-03-15; Accepted: 2013-05-21

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    The study evaluated the impact of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in a major oil-producing community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Three sites—unpolluted site (US), polluted and untreated site (PUS), and polluted and treated site (PTS)—were purposively chosen for the study. The seedling emergence method was used to evaluate soil seed banks in the various sites at two depths, 0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm. Woody-plant species richness, abundance, and diversity were higher in the US seed bank than in the PUS and PTS seed banks. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed in the US, followed by the PTS, and then the PUS. Both species richness and diversity of non-woody plants were highest at the US, followed by the PUS, and lowest in the PTS. Woody species in the US seed bank were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those of the PUS and PTS at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species in the PUS and PTS seed banks. Non-woody species at 0?10 cm US seed bank were 73.08% dissimilar with those of PUS at the two soil depths and 81.48/88.46% dissimilar with those of the 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. At 10–20 cm, non-woody species of the US were 69.66% dissimilar with those from each of the two soil depths in PUS; and 73.91/81.82% dissimilar with those of 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. Non-woody species variation between the PUS and PTS was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm. The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrates that crude oil pollution negatively affected the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because soil seed banks serve as the building blocks for plant succession. Thorough remediation and enrichment planting are recommended to support the recovery process of vegetation in the polluted areas.

    Ogoni land, crude oil pollution, remediation, plant regeneration

    Introduction

    Contamination of soil by crude oil spills is a global environmental problem. Crude oil, the raw component of nearly all petroleum products, contains a wide variety of elements combined in various forms: the main components are carbon and hydrogen, which in their combined form are called hydrocarbons (ABB 1997). Shifts in the composition of the soil’s microbial community—as a response to low levels of gaseous hydrocarbons from underlying petroleum formations—have been investigated as support for further monitoring in case of accidental spills. Michel et al. (2002, 2005) state that petroleum is a pollutant that can persist in the environment for a long period until vegetation recovers completely; its persistence can be explained by the slow biodegradation of hydrocarbons.

    The inhibition of germination and reduction of plant growth are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). Oil contamination causes a slow rate of germination in plants (Ogbo et al. 2009), which has been attributed to the prevention or reduction of the seeds’ access to water and oxygen (Adam and Duncan, 2002). Cell membranes are damaged by penetration of hydrocarbon molecules, leading to leakage of cell contents. Oil reduces the transpiration rate, probably by blocking stomata and intercellular spaces (Baker 1970).

    Coastal ecosystems in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria are under increasing pressure from hostilities and other developmental activities. The region has a long history of crude-oil pollution. Causes of oil spills in the area are usually accidental or operational. Accidental spills occur mainly due to equipment failure. Such spills have occurred at several times and places within the region (e.g., July 1970, April 2009, and April 2012, etc. at Bomu Oil Field in the Kegbara Dere Community). Operational spills occur due to loading and discharging oil from ships and illegal bunkering activities. These spills usually cause a lot of harm to the biological resources of the area.

    Recovery of the area after spills will depend on thorough remediation or degradation of the oil and regeneration of the plantcommunities. Although the oil companies responsible for these spills in the Niger Delta sometimes carryout remediation activities, no studies have been conducted to either ascertain the impact of the spills on the regenerative potentials of the soil seed banks, or the effectiveness of the remediation effort, especially as it concerns regeneration of the native woody species of the area. Our study was a step in that direction: the specific objectives were: (1) to identify and compare the plant species composition of the soil seed banks in the unpolluted, polluted, and remediated sites; (2) to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the viability and diversity of the soil seed bank; (3) to determine the effectiveness of the remediation carried out with respect to plant regeneration; and (4) to ascertain the impact of soil depth on the abundance of soil seed banks in the three sites considered.

    Materials and methods

    Description of the study area

    Kegbara Dere is located in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State. It lies in the humid tropical zone with annual rainfall that ranges from 2000–2470 mm and an annual temperature ranging from 23°C minimum to 32°C maximum (NDES, 2001). The vegetation of the area is made up of an intricate mixture of plants that belong to different plant families, genera, and species. However, for the areas polluted with crude oil, the plants (mostly grasses) are in patches and are sparsely distributed on the site.

    A report from Port Harcourt Appeals Court (1994) observed that the soils of the polluted areas of the community are resistant to penetration by plant roots; have high bulk densities, low hydraulic conductivities, and infiltration capacities; and consequently, very poor plant growth. The report also stated that soil samples from the polluted areas are very acidic, poor in total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and organic carbon, and generally have low levels of exchangeable cations and micronutrients, and high level of manganese, all toxic to plant life.

    Selection of the study sites

    Three sites were used for the study. The first site (4°39'8" N and 7°14'26" E) was selected from an unpolluted area (about 5 km away from the Kegbara Dere/Bomu Oil Field). The second site (4°39'37" N and 7°15'8" E) was selected from a polluted but treated or remediated area; while the third site (4°39'41" N and 7°15'6" E) was selected from a polluted and untreated area. The remediation carried out at the polluted/treated site involved manual tillage and bulking of soil; this was done in 2007 and 2008. These sites were chosen to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the regenerative abilities of the sites and the effectiveness of the remediation exercises.

    Studies on soil seed bank

    Ten (10) random plots, 20 cm x 20 cm. were marked out at each site. Soil samples were removed from the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers of each plot, using a sharp knife and hand trowel. Soil samples from corresponding soil layers were bulked for each site and divided into four equal parts. Germination trials were conducted for the different soil samples in the nursery. Soils were spread to a thickness of 3 cm on perforated plastic trays that were continuously kept moist. The seedling emergence method was used to assess the composition of the soil seed banks over a period of six months. Emerging seedlings that were readily identifiable were counted, recorded, and discarded on a monthly basis. Seedlings that were difficult to identify were counted, labeled, transplanted, and grown separately until they could be identified. After identification and counting of seedlings each month, the soil samples were stirred to stimulate seed germination.

    Measurement of seedling diversity

    The Simpson Diversity Index (Simpson, 1949) and Shannon Diversity Index (Odum, 1971) were used to measure diversity of the soil seed banks using Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software.

    The Simpson Index is expressed as:

    where: N is the total number of individuals encountered, ni is number of individuals of ith species enumerated for i=1……q, q is number of different species enumerated.

    Shannon Diversity Index is expressed as:

    where: pi is the proportion of individuals in the ith species, s is the total number of species.

    Comparison of seed banks at different sites

    The Sorensen Similarity Index was used to compare soil seedbank species composition between sites and soil depths. The index was computed using the methods found in Ogunleye et al. (2004), Ojo (2004), and Ihenyen et al. (2010), as expressed below:

    where: a is the number of species present in both sites; b is the number of species present in site 1 but not present in site 2; c is the number of species present in site 2 but not present in site 1.

    Results

    Woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 1 shows the woody plant species that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The abundance of woody plant species was greater in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than in the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 1). No woody tree species was recorded at both the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 2).

    Non-woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 2 shows the non-woody species recorded from the soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed at 0–10 cm seed bank of the unpolluted site, followed by 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/ treated site, while the lowest number was observed at the 10–20 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site (Fig. 3). The abundance of non-woody plants decreased with the increase in soil depth in all the sites.

    Table 1: Checklist of Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    Fig. 1: Number of woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. US 0-10 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; US 10-20 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 0-10cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 0-10 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank. Same explanation for Figs 2-4.

    Fig. 2: Distribution of germinated woody plant species among woody plant forms

    Fig. 3: Number of non-woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths

    Table 2: Checklist of Non-Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    The distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms is shown in Fig. 4. The herbs and grasses were greater in the two soil depths of the unpolluted site than in both soil depths at the other sites. More sedge was found at 0–10 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site and 10–20 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/treated site. Creeping herbs were more in the 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the unpolluted site, while fern was recorded only at this site and soil depth.

    Diversity of woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    The diversity of woody plant seedlings are shown in Table 3. The richness of woody plant species was greatest at the 0–10cm seed bank of the unpolluted site followed by the 10–20 cm seed bank of the same site while only one woody species was recorded at the two soil depths in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites. Woody plant species diversity was zero for both soil depths at the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    Fig. 4: Distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms

    Diversity of the non-woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    Table 4 presents diversity indices for non-woody plant species at various sites and soil depths. Both species richness and diversity were highest at the unpolluted site, followed by the polluted/untreated site while the polluted/treated site had the lowest species richness and diversity.The diversity of non-woody plant species decreased with soil depth except at the polluted/treated site.

    Table 3: Alpha Diversity Indices for Woody Plant Seedlings

    Table 4: Alpha Diversity Indices for Non-Woody Plant Seedlings

    Plant species compositional variation among sites and soil depths The extent of plant species compositional variation between sites and soil depths is shown in Table 5 for woody species. Woody species in the seed bank at the unpolluted site were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites at 0–10 and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species from seed banks in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    The level of variation in non-woody species composition was higher between the unpolluted site and the polluted/treated site than between the unpolluted site and the polluted/untreated site (Table 6). Non-woody species variation between the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm.

    Table 5: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for seed bank woody seedlings

    Table 6: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for non-woody plants at the various sites

    Discussion

    The germination trials showed more plant species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than that of either the polluted/untreated or polluted/treated sites. Although woody plant species were generally few in all of the sites compared with the non-woody species, the unpolluted site compared better than the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites where only one woody species, Chromolaena odorata, was observed. Nonwoody species dominated the soil seed banks in all sites, although the unpolluted site also demonstrated greater species richness and abundance than the other two. The polluted/untreated site had higher non-woody species richness than the polluted/treated site while non-woody plant abundance washigher in the polluted/treated site than in the polluted/untreated site.

    Several studies on seed banks also show few woody species in comparison to non-woody species (Kebrom and Tesfaye 2000; Senbata and Teketay 2002; De Villiers et al 2003; Jalili et al. 2003; Wassie and Teketay 2006; Oke et al. 2007). Oke et al. (2007) observed that herbaceous species dominated the seed bank, consisting of 98% of the total seed density in each of the four plantations studied, with only three woody species emerging. The paucity of woody species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site may be attributed to the short-lived nature of their seeds. (Garwood 1989, Wassie and Teketay 2006). However, the higher species richness and seedling abundance recorded in the unpolluted site are indicative of the harmful impact of crude oil pollution. Although, there is no available literature on the effect of crude oil pollution on seed banks, Tefera et al. (2005) reported that disturbed lands had less seed density compared to adjacent undisturbed land. Powell (1997) equally asserted that the inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth, as well as death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons in an oil polluted area.

    Generally, seedling abundance decreased with soil depth in all of the sites with over 70% of non-woody seedlings encountered at the 0–10 cm seed bank of both the unpolluted and polluted/treated sites, and about 58% at the polluted/untreated site. Degreef (2002) observed that most seeds are located on the surface of the soil and that their numbers decline with depth.

    Woody plant species diversity was zero at both the polluted/untreated and the polluted/treated sites. Crude oil pollution appears to have a greater impact on the diversity and density of the woody plant species than the non-woody species. This may be due to the advantages most non-woody species have in colonizing degraded sites with respect to the dispersal of their seeds. Because most woody species depend on seed rain for their regeneration due to the short-lived nature of their seeds, the destruction of mature trees due to crude oil pollution may have contributed to the very poor woody species richness, diversity, and abundance. However, higher non-woody seedling abundance in the polluted/treated site than in polluted/untreated site could be attributed to improved site conditions after remediation. Dereje et al. (2003) observed that biological and soil factors contribute to variations in species richness and diversity.

    The high variation between the plant species composition in seed banks at the unpolluted site and the polluted sites could be due to the absence of toxic pollutants, and favorable biological andsoil conditions in the unpolluted site. It is well known that hydrocarbons are harmful to animals and plants (Dorn and Salanitro 2000). The inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth as well as its death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). However, the existence of Chromolaena odorata in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites is indicative of its ability to colonize and thrive in degraded sites.

    The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrate how crude oil pollution impairs on the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because the soil seed bank serves as a building block for plant succession. For example, the rapid revegetation of sites disturbed by wildfire, catastrophic weather, agricultural operations, and timber harvesting is largely due to the soil seed bank. A study into the natural process that influence forest dynamics has shown that soil seed bank is one of the principle sources of recruitment for new individuals in the initial stages of forest succession (Butler and Chazdon 1998). It also is partially responsible for dynamic changes that may occur during the development of vegetation (Lunt 1997). Williams-Linera (1993) equally observed that species richness and abundance in soil seed banks may provide information on the potential of a community for regeneration.

    Conclusion

    The soil seed bank of the unpolluted site compared better than those of the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites in terms of plant species richness and diversity, and seedling abundance. Plant species compositional variation was very high between the unpolluted site and the polluted sites. The remediation carried out in 2007 and 2008 seems not to have been very effective.

    To restore the plant communities of the polluted areas, thorough remediation should be carried out by seasoned professionals who are committed to the project. . Since natural regeneration cannot guarantee the restoration of the plant communities (especially the woody species) at the polluted sites, enrichment planting using relevant silvicultural practices should be carried out to support and enhance the recovery process. This effort should involve collaboration with all of the stakeholders, including local people, government, oil companies, and professionals, like forest ecologists, soil scientists, and silviculturists.

    ABB. 1997. ABB’s Environmental Management Report. ABB, Stockholm, 88pp.

    Adam GI, Duncan H. 2002. Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environmental Pollution, 120: 363?370.

    Baker JM 1970. The effects of oils on plants. Environmental Pollution, 1(1): 27?44

    Butler BJ, Chazdon RL. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30: 214?222.

    Degreef J, Rocha OJ, Vanderborght T, Baudoin J-P 2002. Soil seed bank and seed dormancy in wild populations of lima bean (Fabaceae); Considerations for in situ and ex situ conservation. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1644?1650.

    Dereje A, Oba G, Weladji RB, Colman, JE. 2003. An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing land in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 14: 25?38.

    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen, Theron GK. 2003. Similarity between the soil seed bank and the standing vegetation in the Strandveld Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Land degradation and Development, 14: 527?540.

    Dorn PH, Salanitro J. 2000. Temporal ecology assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation Chemosphere, 40(4): 419?426.

    Garwood NC. 1989. Tropical soil seed bank, a review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, pp.149?209.

    Ihenyen J, Mensah JK, Okoegwale EE. 2010. Tree/shrubs species diversity of Ehor Forest Reserve in Uhunmwode Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. Researcher. 2(2): 37?49.

    Jalili A, Hamzeh’ee Y, Asri A, Shirvany S, Yazdani, M, Khoshnevis F, Zarrinkamar M, Ghahramani R, Safavi S, Shaw J, Hodgson K, Thompson M, Akbarzadeh, Pakparvar. 2003. Soil seed bank in the Arasbaran protected area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 109: 425?431.

    Kebrom T, Tesfaye B. 2000. The role of seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hill slopes in Southern Wello. Biotropica, 32: 23?32.

    Lunt ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-Eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130: 21?34.

    Michel J, Henry JR CB, Thumm S. 2002. Shoreline assessment and environmental impacts from the M/T Westchester Oil Spill in the Mississippi River. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 7(3-4): 155?161.

    Michel J, Trevor G, Waldron J, Blocksisidge CT, Etkin DS, Urban R. 2005. Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Annals of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, pp. 1-84. Maio 16, Miami.

    NDES. 2001. Biological Environmental Research Report. RSUST, Port Harcourt. Volume 46. 251pp.

    Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadephia, 574pp.

    Ogbo EM, Zibigha M, Odogu G. 2009. The effect of crude oil on growth of the weed (Paspalum crobiculatum L.) – phytoremediation potential of the plant, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(9): 229?233.

    Ogunleye AJ, Adeola AO, Ojo LO, Aduradola AM. 2004. Impact of farming activities on vegetation in Olokemeji Forest reserve, Nigeria, Global Nest, 6(2): 131?140.

    Ojo LO 2004. The fate of a tropical rainforest in Nigeria: Abeku sector of Omo Forest Reserve, Global Nest, 6(2): 116?130.

    Oke SO, Ayanwale TO, Isola OA. 2007. Soil seedbank in four contrasting plantations in Ile-Ife area of Southwestern Nigeria. Resource Journal of Botany, 2: 13?22.

    Port Harcourt Appeal Court. 1994. Report of Case between SPDC Nigeria Limited (Appellant/Defendant) and the Kegbara Dere People (Respondents/Plaintiffs).

    Powell R. 1997. The use of plants as “Field” biomonitors. In: Wang, W. Gorsuch, J. and Hughes, J. (eds.), Plants for Environmental Studies. Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 47?61

    Senbeta F, Taketay D. 2002. Soil seed banks in plantations and adjacent natural dry Afromontane forests of central and southern Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 43(2): 229?242.

    Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163: 688

    Tefera M, Demel T, Hulten H, Yemshaw Y. 2005. The role of enclosures in the recovery of woody vegetation in degraded dryland hillsides of central and northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment, 60: 259?281.

    Wassie A, Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 201: 32?43.

    Williams-Linera G. 1993. Soil seed bank in four low mountain forests of Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9: 321?337.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0538-y

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Port Harcourt- Choba, P.M.B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. email: punditzum@yahoo.ca; phone: +234-803-812-1887

    Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚州av有码| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人二区视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| .国产精品久久| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 简卡轻食公司| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费大片18禁| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产视频内射| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 大码成人一级视频| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 婷婷色综合www| 中文字幕制服av| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜影院在线不卡| 欧美97在线视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 熟女av电影| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 九九在线视频观看精品| 午夜av观看不卡| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 老女人水多毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产亚洲最大av| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 六月丁香七月| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久网色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 日本wwww免费看| 精品国产国语对白av| 丁香六月天网| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲国产色片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 午夜影院在线不卡| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 嫩草影院新地址| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久久久人妻| av在线app专区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 中文欧美无线码| 夫妻午夜视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 午夜91福利影院| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 精品国产一区二区久久| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美性感艳星| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | av国产精品久久久久影院| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 高清毛片免费看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品成人在线| av天堂久久9| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产精品免费大片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 大陆偷拍与自拍| av播播在线观看一区| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲在久久综合| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 久久久久久久久久成人| av黄色大香蕉| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站 | 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 在线观看三级黄色| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 免费看不卡的av| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 人妻一区二区av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 午夜久久久在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 观看av在线不卡| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 插阴视频在线观看视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲天堂av无毛| av福利片在线| freevideosex欧美| 免费观看在线日韩| 色网站视频免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产极品天堂在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产一区二区在线观看av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 曰老女人黄片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 成人国产麻豆网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 老熟女久久久| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久97久久精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 一级av片app| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | av天堂久久9| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 有码 亚洲区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| h日本视频在线播放| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 免费观看在线日韩| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人无遮挡网站| h视频一区二区三区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产成人freesex在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 色吧在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产91av在线免费观看| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久久久人妻| 中文天堂在线官网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲第一av免费看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一区二区av电影网| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美性感艳星| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 日日撸夜夜添| 少妇 在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 中国国产av一级| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 观看免费一级毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产淫语在线视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美性感艳星| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| .国产精品久久| 在线观看三级黄色| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 老司机影院成人| 色5月婷婷丁香| 观看av在线不卡| 在现免费观看毛片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 观看美女的网站| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| a级毛色黄片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 久久青草综合色| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久精品夜色国产| 只有这里有精品99| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 午夜视频国产福利| 日本av手机在线免费观看| av有码第一页| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 熟女电影av网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| av卡一久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 99热这里只有是精品50| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 性色av一级| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 老司机影院毛片| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 高清毛片免费看| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 只有这里有精品99| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲第一av免费看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 99久久人妻综合| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 美女主播在线视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 高清欧美精品videossex| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 两个人免费观看高清视频 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 永久免费av网站大全| 一级毛片我不卡| 在线看a的网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 一级av片app| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| av免费观看日本| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 中文字幕制服av| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 少妇高潮的动态图| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| videossex国产| 永久网站在线| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 中文字幕制服av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 免费看日本二区| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品午夜福利在线看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| av在线app专区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 97在线人人人人妻| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 久久久久视频综合| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o|