• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    2014-09-06 11:13:31ChimaVure
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Implications of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in an oil-producing community in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

    U.D Chima · G. Vure

    Received: 2012-03-15; Accepted: 2013-05-21

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    The study evaluated the impact of crude oil pollution on natural regeneration of plant species in a major oil-producing community in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Three sites—unpolluted site (US), polluted and untreated site (PUS), and polluted and treated site (PTS)—were purposively chosen for the study. The seedling emergence method was used to evaluate soil seed banks in the various sites at two depths, 0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm. Woody-plant species richness, abundance, and diversity were higher in the US seed bank than in the PUS and PTS seed banks. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed in the US, followed by the PTS, and then the PUS. Both species richness and diversity of non-woody plants were highest at the US, followed by the PUS, and lowest in the PTS. Woody species in the US seed bank were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those of the PUS and PTS at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species in the PUS and PTS seed banks. Non-woody species at 0?10 cm US seed bank were 73.08% dissimilar with those of PUS at the two soil depths and 81.48/88.46% dissimilar with those of the 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. At 10–20 cm, non-woody species of the US were 69.66% dissimilar with those from each of the two soil depths in PUS; and 73.91/81.82% dissimilar with those of 0–10/10–20 cm of the PTS respectively. Non-woody species variation between the PUS and PTS was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm. The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrates that crude oil pollution negatively affected the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because soil seed banks serve as the building blocks for plant succession. Thorough remediation and enrichment planting are recommended to support the recovery process of vegetation in the polluted areas.

    Ogoni land, crude oil pollution, remediation, plant regeneration

    Introduction

    Contamination of soil by crude oil spills is a global environmental problem. Crude oil, the raw component of nearly all petroleum products, contains a wide variety of elements combined in various forms: the main components are carbon and hydrogen, which in their combined form are called hydrocarbons (ABB 1997). Shifts in the composition of the soil’s microbial community—as a response to low levels of gaseous hydrocarbons from underlying petroleum formations—have been investigated as support for further monitoring in case of accidental spills. Michel et al. (2002, 2005) state that petroleum is a pollutant that can persist in the environment for a long period until vegetation recovers completely; its persistence can be explained by the slow biodegradation of hydrocarbons.

    The inhibition of germination and reduction of plant growth are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). Oil contamination causes a slow rate of germination in plants (Ogbo et al. 2009), which has been attributed to the prevention or reduction of the seeds’ access to water and oxygen (Adam and Duncan, 2002). Cell membranes are damaged by penetration of hydrocarbon molecules, leading to leakage of cell contents. Oil reduces the transpiration rate, probably by blocking stomata and intercellular spaces (Baker 1970).

    Coastal ecosystems in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria are under increasing pressure from hostilities and other developmental activities. The region has a long history of crude-oil pollution. Causes of oil spills in the area are usually accidental or operational. Accidental spills occur mainly due to equipment failure. Such spills have occurred at several times and places within the region (e.g., July 1970, April 2009, and April 2012, etc. at Bomu Oil Field in the Kegbara Dere Community). Operational spills occur due to loading and discharging oil from ships and illegal bunkering activities. These spills usually cause a lot of harm to the biological resources of the area.

    Recovery of the area after spills will depend on thorough remediation or degradation of the oil and regeneration of the plantcommunities. Although the oil companies responsible for these spills in the Niger Delta sometimes carryout remediation activities, no studies have been conducted to either ascertain the impact of the spills on the regenerative potentials of the soil seed banks, or the effectiveness of the remediation effort, especially as it concerns regeneration of the native woody species of the area. Our study was a step in that direction: the specific objectives were: (1) to identify and compare the plant species composition of the soil seed banks in the unpolluted, polluted, and remediated sites; (2) to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the viability and diversity of the soil seed bank; (3) to determine the effectiveness of the remediation carried out with respect to plant regeneration; and (4) to ascertain the impact of soil depth on the abundance of soil seed banks in the three sites considered.

    Materials and methods

    Description of the study area

    Kegbara Dere is located in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State. It lies in the humid tropical zone with annual rainfall that ranges from 2000–2470 mm and an annual temperature ranging from 23°C minimum to 32°C maximum (NDES, 2001). The vegetation of the area is made up of an intricate mixture of plants that belong to different plant families, genera, and species. However, for the areas polluted with crude oil, the plants (mostly grasses) are in patches and are sparsely distributed on the site.

    A report from Port Harcourt Appeals Court (1994) observed that the soils of the polluted areas of the community are resistant to penetration by plant roots; have high bulk densities, low hydraulic conductivities, and infiltration capacities; and consequently, very poor plant growth. The report also stated that soil samples from the polluted areas are very acidic, poor in total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and organic carbon, and generally have low levels of exchangeable cations and micronutrients, and high level of manganese, all toxic to plant life.

    Selection of the study sites

    Three sites were used for the study. The first site (4°39'8" N and 7°14'26" E) was selected from an unpolluted area (about 5 km away from the Kegbara Dere/Bomu Oil Field). The second site (4°39'37" N and 7°15'8" E) was selected from a polluted but treated or remediated area; while the third site (4°39'41" N and 7°15'6" E) was selected from a polluted and untreated area. The remediation carried out at the polluted/treated site involved manual tillage and bulking of soil; this was done in 2007 and 2008. These sites were chosen to ascertain the impact of crude oil pollution on the regenerative abilities of the sites and the effectiveness of the remediation exercises.

    Studies on soil seed bank

    Ten (10) random plots, 20 cm x 20 cm. were marked out at each site. Soil samples were removed from the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers of each plot, using a sharp knife and hand trowel. Soil samples from corresponding soil layers were bulked for each site and divided into four equal parts. Germination trials were conducted for the different soil samples in the nursery. Soils were spread to a thickness of 3 cm on perforated plastic trays that were continuously kept moist. The seedling emergence method was used to assess the composition of the soil seed banks over a period of six months. Emerging seedlings that were readily identifiable were counted, recorded, and discarded on a monthly basis. Seedlings that were difficult to identify were counted, labeled, transplanted, and grown separately until they could be identified. After identification and counting of seedlings each month, the soil samples were stirred to stimulate seed germination.

    Measurement of seedling diversity

    The Simpson Diversity Index (Simpson, 1949) and Shannon Diversity Index (Odum, 1971) were used to measure diversity of the soil seed banks using Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software.

    The Simpson Index is expressed as:

    where: N is the total number of individuals encountered, ni is number of individuals of ith species enumerated for i=1……q, q is number of different species enumerated.

    Shannon Diversity Index is expressed as:

    where: pi is the proportion of individuals in the ith species, s is the total number of species.

    Comparison of seed banks at different sites

    The Sorensen Similarity Index was used to compare soil seedbank species composition between sites and soil depths. The index was computed using the methods found in Ogunleye et al. (2004), Ojo (2004), and Ihenyen et al. (2010), as expressed below:

    where: a is the number of species present in both sites; b is the number of species present in site 1 but not present in site 2; c is the number of species present in site 2 but not present in site 1.

    Results

    Woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 1 shows the woody plant species that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The abundance of woody plant species was greater in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than in the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 1). No woody tree species was recorded at both the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site (Fig. 2).

    Non-woody plant species composition of the various sites

    Table 2 shows the non-woody species recorded from the soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. The highest number of non-woody plants was observed at 0–10 cm seed bank of the unpolluted site, followed by 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/ treated site, while the lowest number was observed at the 10–20 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site (Fig. 3). The abundance of non-woody plants decreased with the increase in soil depth in all the sites.

    Table 1: Checklist of Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    Fig. 1: Number of woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths. US 0-10 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; US 10-20 cm SSB = Unpolluted Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 0-10cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PUS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Untreated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 0-10 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 0-10 cm Soil Seed Bank; PTS 10-20 cm SSB = Polluted and Treated Site 10-20 cm Soil Seed Bank. Same explanation for Figs 2-4.

    Fig. 2: Distribution of germinated woody plant species among woody plant forms

    Fig. 3: Number of non-woody plants that germinated from soil seed banks at various sites and soil depths

    Table 2: Checklist of Non-Woody Plant Species and Number of Individuals encountered in all the Sites

    The distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms is shown in Fig. 4. The herbs and grasses were greater in the two soil depths of the unpolluted site than in both soil depths at the other sites. More sedge was found at 0–10 cm seed bank of the polluted/untreated site and 10–20 cm soil seed bank of the polluted/treated site. Creeping herbs were more in the 0–10 cm soil seed bank of the unpolluted site, while fern was recorded only at this site and soil depth.

    Diversity of woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    The diversity of woody plant seedlings are shown in Table 3. The richness of woody plant species was greatest at the 0–10cm seed bank of the unpolluted site followed by the 10–20 cm seed bank of the same site while only one woody species was recorded at the two soil depths in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites. Woody plant species diversity was zero for both soil depths at the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    Fig. 4: Distribution of germinated non-woody plant species among plant forms

    Diversity of the non-woody plant seedlings at various sites/soil depths

    Table 4 presents diversity indices for non-woody plant species at various sites and soil depths. Both species richness and diversity were highest at the unpolluted site, followed by the polluted/untreated site while the polluted/treated site had the lowest species richness and diversity.The diversity of non-woody plant species decreased with soil depth except at the polluted/treated site.

    Table 3: Alpha Diversity Indices for Woody Plant Seedlings

    Table 4: Alpha Diversity Indices for Non-Woody Plant Seedlings

    Plant species compositional variation among sites and soil depths The extent of plant species compositional variation between sites and soil depths is shown in Table 5 for woody species. Woody species in the seed bank at the unpolluted site were 87.5% and 80% dissimilar with those in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites at 0–10 and 10–20 cm respectively. No variation was observed between woody species from seed banks in the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites.

    The level of variation in non-woody species composition was higher between the unpolluted site and the polluted/treated site than between the unpolluted site and the polluted/untreated site (Table 6). Non-woody species variation between the polluted/untreated site and polluted/treated site was higher at 10–20 cm than 0–10 cm.

    Table 5: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for seed bank woody seedlings

    Table 6: Sorensen’s Similarity Indices for non-woody plants at the various sites

    Discussion

    The germination trials showed more plant species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site than that of either the polluted/untreated or polluted/treated sites. Although woody plant species were generally few in all of the sites compared with the non-woody species, the unpolluted site compared better than the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites where only one woody species, Chromolaena odorata, was observed. Nonwoody species dominated the soil seed banks in all sites, although the unpolluted site also demonstrated greater species richness and abundance than the other two. The polluted/untreated site had higher non-woody species richness than the polluted/treated site while non-woody plant abundance washigher in the polluted/treated site than in the polluted/untreated site.

    Several studies on seed banks also show few woody species in comparison to non-woody species (Kebrom and Tesfaye 2000; Senbata and Teketay 2002; De Villiers et al 2003; Jalili et al. 2003; Wassie and Teketay 2006; Oke et al. 2007). Oke et al. (2007) observed that herbaceous species dominated the seed bank, consisting of 98% of the total seed density in each of the four plantations studied, with only three woody species emerging. The paucity of woody species in the seed bank of the unpolluted site may be attributed to the short-lived nature of their seeds. (Garwood 1989, Wassie and Teketay 2006). However, the higher species richness and seedling abundance recorded in the unpolluted site are indicative of the harmful impact of crude oil pollution. Although, there is no available literature on the effect of crude oil pollution on seed banks, Tefera et al. (2005) reported that disturbed lands had less seed density compared to adjacent undisturbed land. Powell (1997) equally asserted that the inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth, as well as death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons in an oil polluted area.

    Generally, seedling abundance decreased with soil depth in all of the sites with over 70% of non-woody seedlings encountered at the 0–10 cm seed bank of both the unpolluted and polluted/treated sites, and about 58% at the polluted/untreated site. Degreef (2002) observed that most seeds are located on the surface of the soil and that their numbers decline with depth.

    Woody plant species diversity was zero at both the polluted/untreated and the polluted/treated sites. Crude oil pollution appears to have a greater impact on the diversity and density of the woody plant species than the non-woody species. This may be due to the advantages most non-woody species have in colonizing degraded sites with respect to the dispersal of their seeds. Because most woody species depend on seed rain for their regeneration due to the short-lived nature of their seeds, the destruction of mature trees due to crude oil pollution may have contributed to the very poor woody species richness, diversity, and abundance. However, higher non-woody seedling abundance in the polluted/treated site than in polluted/untreated site could be attributed to improved site conditions after remediation. Dereje et al. (2003) observed that biological and soil factors contribute to variations in species richness and diversity.

    The high variation between the plant species composition in seed banks at the unpolluted site and the polluted sites could be due to the absence of toxic pollutants, and favorable biological andsoil conditions in the unpolluted site. It is well known that hydrocarbons are harmful to animals and plants (Dorn and Salanitro 2000). The inhibition of germination and the reduction of plant growth as well as its death, are indicators of the toxicity of hydrocarbons (Powell 1997). However, the existence of Chromolaena odorata in both the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites is indicative of its ability to colonize and thrive in degraded sites.

    The poor seed bank attributes at the polluted sites demonstrate how crude oil pollution impairs on the natural regeneration potential of the native flora because the soil seed bank serves as a building block for plant succession. For example, the rapid revegetation of sites disturbed by wildfire, catastrophic weather, agricultural operations, and timber harvesting is largely due to the soil seed bank. A study into the natural process that influence forest dynamics has shown that soil seed bank is one of the principle sources of recruitment for new individuals in the initial stages of forest succession (Butler and Chazdon 1998). It also is partially responsible for dynamic changes that may occur during the development of vegetation (Lunt 1997). Williams-Linera (1993) equally observed that species richness and abundance in soil seed banks may provide information on the potential of a community for regeneration.

    Conclusion

    The soil seed bank of the unpolluted site compared better than those of the polluted/untreated and polluted/treated sites in terms of plant species richness and diversity, and seedling abundance. Plant species compositional variation was very high between the unpolluted site and the polluted sites. The remediation carried out in 2007 and 2008 seems not to have been very effective.

    To restore the plant communities of the polluted areas, thorough remediation should be carried out by seasoned professionals who are committed to the project. . Since natural regeneration cannot guarantee the restoration of the plant communities (especially the woody species) at the polluted sites, enrichment planting using relevant silvicultural practices should be carried out to support and enhance the recovery process. This effort should involve collaboration with all of the stakeholders, including local people, government, oil companies, and professionals, like forest ecologists, soil scientists, and silviculturists.

    ABB. 1997. ABB’s Environmental Management Report. ABB, Stockholm, 88pp.

    Adam GI, Duncan H. 2002. Influence of diesel on seed germination. Environmental Pollution, 120: 363?370.

    Baker JM 1970. The effects of oils on plants. Environmental Pollution, 1(1): 27?44

    Butler BJ, Chazdon RL. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30: 214?222.

    Degreef J, Rocha OJ, Vanderborght T, Baudoin J-P 2002. Soil seed bank and seed dormancy in wild populations of lima bean (Fabaceae); Considerations for in situ and ex situ conservation. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1644?1650.

    Dereje A, Oba G, Weladji RB, Colman, JE. 2003. An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing land in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 14: 25?38.

    De Villiers AJ, Van Rooyen, Theron GK. 2003. Similarity between the soil seed bank and the standing vegetation in the Strandveld Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Land degradation and Development, 14: 527?540.

    Dorn PH, Salanitro J. 2000. Temporal ecology assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation Chemosphere, 40(4): 419?426.

    Garwood NC. 1989. Tropical soil seed bank, a review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, pp.149?209.

    Ihenyen J, Mensah JK, Okoegwale EE. 2010. Tree/shrubs species diversity of Ehor Forest Reserve in Uhunmwode Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. Researcher. 2(2): 37?49.

    Jalili A, Hamzeh’ee Y, Asri A, Shirvany S, Yazdani, M, Khoshnevis F, Zarrinkamar M, Ghahramani R, Safavi S, Shaw J, Hodgson K, Thompson M, Akbarzadeh, Pakparvar. 2003. Soil seed bank in the Arasbaran protected area of Iran and their significance for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 109: 425?431.

    Kebrom T, Tesfaye B. 2000. The role of seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hill slopes in Southern Wello. Biotropica, 32: 23?32.

    Lunt ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-Eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130: 21?34.

    Michel J, Henry JR CB, Thumm S. 2002. Shoreline assessment and environmental impacts from the M/T Westchester Oil Spill in the Mississippi River. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 7(3-4): 155?161.

    Michel J, Trevor G, Waldron J, Blocksisidge CT, Etkin DS, Urban R. 2005. Potentially polluting wrecks in marine waters. In: Annals of the 2005 International Oil Spill Conference, pp. 1-84. Maio 16, Miami.

    NDES. 2001. Biological Environmental Research Report. RSUST, Port Harcourt. Volume 46. 251pp.

    Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadephia, 574pp.

    Ogbo EM, Zibigha M, Odogu G. 2009. The effect of crude oil on growth of the weed (Paspalum crobiculatum L.) – phytoremediation potential of the plant, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(9): 229?233.

    Ogunleye AJ, Adeola AO, Ojo LO, Aduradola AM. 2004. Impact of farming activities on vegetation in Olokemeji Forest reserve, Nigeria, Global Nest, 6(2): 131?140.

    Ojo LO 2004. The fate of a tropical rainforest in Nigeria: Abeku sector of Omo Forest Reserve, Global Nest, 6(2): 116?130.

    Oke SO, Ayanwale TO, Isola OA. 2007. Soil seedbank in four contrasting plantations in Ile-Ife area of Southwestern Nigeria. Resource Journal of Botany, 2: 13?22.

    Port Harcourt Appeal Court. 1994. Report of Case between SPDC Nigeria Limited (Appellant/Defendant) and the Kegbara Dere People (Respondents/Plaintiffs).

    Powell R. 1997. The use of plants as “Field” biomonitors. In: Wang, W. Gorsuch, J. and Hughes, J. (eds.), Plants for Environmental Studies. Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 47?61

    Senbeta F, Taketay D. 2002. Soil seed banks in plantations and adjacent natural dry Afromontane forests of central and southern Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 43(2): 229?242.

    Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163: 688

    Tefera M, Demel T, Hulten H, Yemshaw Y. 2005. The role of enclosures in the recovery of woody vegetation in degraded dryland hillsides of central and northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment, 60: 259?281.

    Wassie A, Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora, 201: 32?43.

    Williams-Linera G. 1993. Soil seed bank in four low mountain forests of Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9: 321?337.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0538-y

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Port Harcourt- Choba, P.M.B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. email: punditzum@yahoo.ca; phone: +234-803-812-1887

    Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 夫妻午夜视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 免费观看人在逋| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| www.精华液| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日本午夜av视频| 精品福利永久在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 色吧在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久99精品国语久久久| 日本欧美视频一区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 成人影院久久| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 午夜日本视频在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 午夜福利,免费看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 午夜91福利影院| 色视频在线一区二区三区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 电影成人av| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产精品.久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日韩av免费高清视频| 视频区图区小说| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| svipshipincom国产片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 熟女av电影| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| av有码第一页| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 宅男免费午夜| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 在线天堂中文资源库| 色网站视频免费| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 五月天丁香电影| 丁香六月欧美| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品一国产av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 一级片免费观看大全| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 免费看不卡的av| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲图色成人| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 如何舔出高潮| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲国产看品久久| 99久久综合免费| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 永久免费av网站大全| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产在线视频一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 看免费成人av毛片| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| av在线老鸭窝| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| www.自偷自拍.com| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| avwww免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 成人手机av| 操出白浆在线播放| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 丁香六月欧美| 一本久久精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 91精品三级在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产男女内射视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| www日本在线高清视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久影院123| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 99热全是精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲成色77777| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲综合精品二区| 老司机靠b影院| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 中文字幕色久视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 美国免费a级毛片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 高清av免费在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 夫妻午夜视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美日韩av久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| kizo精华| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| av不卡在线播放| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 性少妇av在线| av卡一久久| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| av电影中文网址| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产毛片在线视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| av.在线天堂| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 成年av动漫网址| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 99久久综合免费| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 九草在线视频观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| av有码第一页| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 如何舔出高潮| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| avwww免费| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲人成电影观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 少妇 在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品久久久精品久久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲中文av在线| 成人国产麻豆网| 色播在线永久视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| tube8黄色片| av.在线天堂| 中国三级夫妇交换| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 99久久人妻综合| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| netflix在线观看网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 天天影视国产精品| 91国产中文字幕| 嫩草影院入口| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产精品 国内视频| 看免费av毛片| 悠悠久久av| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产又爽黄色视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 99久久综合免费| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 嫩草影院入口| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 日本色播在线视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 黄色 视频免费看| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久国产一区二区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 又大又爽又粗| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产亚洲最大av| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲中文av在线| 大码成人一级视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 电影成人av| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| svipshipincom国产片| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 一区二区av电影网| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| h视频一区二区三区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 免费少妇av软件| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| a 毛片基地| 岛国毛片在线播放| 大码成人一级视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 永久免费av网站大全| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| www.av在线官网国产| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| avwww免费| 操美女的视频在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 中文天堂在线官网| 午夜91福利影院| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 777米奇影视久久| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产精品成人在线| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 超碰97精品在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美成人午夜精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| videos熟女内射| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 婷婷色综合www| 91精品三级在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久久久视频综合| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| www.自偷自拍.com| 日本午夜av视频| 另类精品久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产精品免费视频内射| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 看免费成人av毛片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 91老司机精品| 国产在线视频一区二区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 丁香六月欧美| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 丝袜美足系列| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久热这里只有精品99| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av视频免费观看在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 97在线人人人人妻| 一区二区av电影网| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 午夜日本视频在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 满18在线观看网站| 老司机影院成人| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 在线天堂最新版资源| 咕卡用的链子| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| av有码第一页| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| avwww免费| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲第一av免费看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 捣出白浆h1v1| 丁香六月欧美| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 天天影视国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 丰满少妇做爰视频|