• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Dynamic Case Retrieval Method With Subjective Preferences and Objective Information for Emergency Decision Making

    2018-08-11 07:48:50JingZhengYingmingWangandShengqunChen
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2018年3期

    Jing Zheng,Yingming Wang,and Shengqun Chen

    Abstract—Case-based reasoning(CBR)is one of the best methods for generating an effective solution in an emergency.In recent years,some methods for generating emergency alternatives have been included in practical CBR applications,but there have been no in-depth studies of these processes.In this study,we propose a new method for dynamic case retrieval with subjective preferences and objective information,which considers the personal preferences of the decision makers and changes in the attributes of the emergency as the situation develops.First,we present a formula for calculating the case similarity and changing trends in the case considered,where similar cases are obtained.Next,we describe a method for measuring the overall assessment value with respect to similar historical cases,which is obtained by aggregating the case similarity,the utility case similarity,the first response time,and the implementation effect.The subjective preferences and objective information are also integrated in the decision-making process.Finally,we present a case study based on the emergency response to a fire in a highrise building,which illustrates the applicability and feasibility of the proposed method.

    I.INTRODUCTION

    THE numbers of social,environmental,and medical emergencies have been increasing in recent years,thereby causing losses of life and property,economic disruption,and environmental degradation,which often have significant effects on social development in certain regions.For example,an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome occurred in 2003,followed by H1N1 bird flu in 2009,and H7N9 avian influenza in 2014.When an emergency occurs,a decision maker(DM)is required to generate an alternative to mitigate or minimize any negative effects as soon as possible.Thus,it is important to identify the best method for generating an effective mitigation plan in a short time to facilitate optimum decision making during an emergency.

    The methods that have been used to deal with emergency decision-making include multi-attribute risk analysis[1],the group analytic network process approach[2],the fault tree analysis(FTA)-based method[3],case-based reasoning(CBR)[4],distance-based group decision-making[5],the game method[6],the analytic network process[7],and revised PROMETHEE II[8].CBR is used most widely among these various methods.CBR is a process for solving new problems by referring to previous similar cases,which helps the DM to make decisions as quickly as possible based on these precedents.CBR usually includes four steps:1)representing the target case and the historical case;2)retrieving the most similar historical case(s)from the case database;3)adapting the solution to the selected historical cases to the current situation;and 4)updating by adding and deleting the historical case(s)to create a precedent database for solving future problems,if appropriate.Retrieval is regarded as the core of these four steps.

    There are many examples of the successful use of CBR,such as Fan et al.[4]used CBR to generate project risk response strategies and emergency alternatives in the case of a gas explosion.Liao et al.[9]applied CBR in the context of environmental emergency preparedness,while Huanget al.[10]applied it to emergency management engineering.Liu et al.[11]used CBR to predict the emergency resource demand.Amailef and Lu[12]applied an ontology-supported CBR approach to emergency responses,while Liu and Yu[13]used CBR to retrieve precedent cases for risk management.As demonstrated by the high number of examples available,CBR is considered to be highly suitable for facilitating emergency decision making.

    Previous studies have made significant contributions to the use of CBR during emergency decision making.In some actual situations,the emergency may be changing continuously such as fire hazards and disease infections.Moreover,during decision making processes,the DMs are bounded rationality and they have their own preferences.Thus,it is necessary to consider a special emergency decision-making problem with several distinct characteristics,including dynamic changes in the emergency,the preferences of DMs,and the impacts of alternative responses to the emergency.However,existing decision-making methods based on CBR do not consider the dynamics of the emergency and the preferences of DMs;therefore,it is necessary to further investigate the emergency decision-making problem by considering the characteristics of dynamic change,the preferences of DMs,and alternative implementations.

    In order to achieve the aims stated above,we propose a new dynamic case retrieval approach.The proposed method makes three main contributions.First,we incorporate probability into the case representation based on the characteristics of dynamic change and we compute the utility similarity.Probability is a good measure of the possibility of random events.Changes in the emergency’s attributes can be estimated based on the probability[3],[14],[15].Every attribute can have several different states,so the state of the attribute in the next moment can be expressed by the probability of every state.The interval probability can adequately express these potential changes given that the characteristic of uncertainty exists in every emergency.The similarity of the changing trend in the emergency can then be obtained by computing the utility of the interval probability for every attribute.The similarity measurement that incorporates these changes is referred to as the dynamic similarity measurement.Second,we integrate the pairwise comparison matrix and the fuzzy preference matrix into the case retrieval process to express the preferences of DMs.During traditional emergency decision making,the DM is viewed as completely rational,whereas the DM has subjective preferences in practice.Fuzzy and multiplicative preferences are two commonly used methods for characterizing the subjective preferences of a DM[16],which can be expressed as a pairwise comparison matrix and a fuzzy preference matrix,respectively.Finally,the generation of a mitigating strategy is often complicated due to the existence of multiple criteria that affect the effectiveness of the emergency alternative.In this study,we consider the similarity between the target case and historical cases,but we also consider other factors such as the initial response time and the effects of alternative implementations according to the historical cases.Therefore,multi-criteria decision-making methods with integrated subjective preferences and objective information may prove helpful by allowing DMs to generate emergency mitigation strategies.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.In Section II,we introduce the emergency decision-making problem.In Section III,we propose the hybrid approach for selecting an optimal historical case from the historical cases library.In Section IV,we present a case study based on a fire in a highrise building.Finally,we give our conclusions in Section V.

    II.THE PROBLEM

    In this section,we briefly describe the problem of generating the optimum solution in an emergency situation.We suppose that C=(C1,...,Cm)is the set of historical emergency cases and C0is the target emergency case,G=(g1,...,gn)is the set of the attributes,and X=(xij)m×nrepresents the values of attribute gjwith regard to emergency case Ci.Let W=(w1,w2,...,wn)be the weight vector of the attributes,where wjrepresents the weight of attribute gj,0≤wj≤1,

    Due to the dynamics of an emergency case,when we apply the CBR method to generate an alternative path,it is not sufficient to only consider case similarity,but instead the similarity of the trends in the changing characteristics of the emergency also needs to be considered.Thus,we use the interval probability with regard to every state of every attribute to represent the trends in an emergency case.Θ =(θ1,θ2,...,θlj)represents the possible state of attributerepresents the interval probability of state θk(k ∈ [1,lj]),which belongs to attribute gjwith regard to emergency case CiInformation related to the historical cases and target case is shown in Table I.Z=(zit)m×4denotes the decision matrix set,where zi1represents the similarity between the historical emergency case Ciand the target case C0,zi2represents the utility similarity of the degree of change in emergency case Ciand C0,zi3represents the initial response time in the historical emergency case Ci,zi4represents the implementation effect of the historical emergency case Ci.V=(v1,v2,v3,v4)is the weight vector of the decision attributes,where νtrepresents the weight of decision attribute,Based on these conditions,we can rank the historical emergency cases and determine the most desirable alternative.

    III.THE METHOD

    In this section,we propose a dynamic case retrieval method that integrates subjective preferences and objective information for use in emergency decision-making.First,we provide the formula for measuring the emergency case similarity.Second,we provide a measure for calculating the utility similarity of the changing trends during different emergencies.Finally,the most desirable alternative is determined by considering the emergency case similarity,the utility similarity in the changing trends,the initial response time,and the effects of implementing different historical alternatives.In addition,the DM provides his/her preference in terms of the solutions to the emergency and the relative weights for its attributes.The first part of this method is described as follows.

    A.Retrieval of the Similar Historical Cases

    In this study,we consider two forms of attribute values,i.e.,interval number and fuzzy linguistic variables.

    First,we calculate the distance between the attributes for the target case C0and the historical cases Ci.di=(di1,di2,...,din)is the vector of the distance of the attributes,where dijis the distance of attribute gjwith respect to emergency case Ci.When the attribute value xijis an interval number,the formula for calculating dijcan be expressed by

    If attribute value xijis a fuzzy linguistic variable,it can be represented by the triangular fuzzy number xij=the set of linguistic variables,then eh(1≤h≤f)can be expressed by

    TABLE IINFORMATION RELATED TO THE HISTORICAL CASES AND TARGET CASE

    When the fuzzy linguistic variables are represented as a triangular fuzzy number,the formula for dijcan be expressed by

    After this process,we use the simple additive weight approach to determine the similarity of the emergency cases.In order to estimate the weight vector W,we use the subjective method with the pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of the attributes,which are provided by the DM.

    The multiplicative preference relationship between the relative weights of the attributes can be represented as

    where aji=1/aij>0 and aii=1(i,j=1,...,n).

    According to Satty’s eigenvector method(EM)[18],we can estimate the weight vector W=(w1,w2,...,wn)Tby solving the following eigenvalue problem:

    If the multiplicative preference relation A is a precise/consistent comparison matrix,equation(5)can be transformed as follows:

    which indicates that when the DM provides the multiplicative preference relation,the DM should ensure that the multiplicative preference relation is as consistent as possible.

    The DMs have a preference in terms of the attribute weights,but they also want the total distance or extent of the emergency case to be minimized.There is no guarantee that the multiplicative preference relations and the minimum of the total distance would lead to the same estimates for the relative attribute weights,so we introduce the following deviation vector[16]:

    where H=(ε1,...,εn)Tand I is an n × n unit matrix,in which the elements on the leading diagonal are one and all the others are zero.It is desirable that the absolute value of the deviation variable and the total distance are kept as small as possible,so we construct the following optimization model according to the linear weighted method[19]:

    where eT=(1,1,...,1)1×n,and α ≥ 0 and β ≥ 0 represent the weight of the total distance and the absolute value of the deviation variable,respectively,and α+β =1.In order to solve this nonlinear model,we introduce the following deviation variables:

    Let W?=be the optimal weight estimate generated by model(10).Based on this weight,the similarity between the current emergency case and historical cases can be computed using the following formula.

    According to the theory of case-based decision making[20]?[22],historical emergency cases that share high similarity with the target emergency case are selected as alternatives.Thus,we set a similarity threshold ξ,ξ∈ [min{Sim(C0,Ci)},max{Sim(C0,Ci)}],where a greater value for ξ indicates a higher similarity requirement.If Sim(C0,Ci)≥ ξ is satisfied by the emergency case,the historical cases will be selected as the library of candidate alternative cases.B.Utility Similarity Measure for Changing Trends in the Emergency Case

    Definition 1[23]:If[a,b]is an interval number and[0,1]is the function with the following dynamics:

    1)ρ(0)=0;2) ρ(1)=1;3)if x > y,then ρ(x)≥ ρ(y).

    Thus,if the function f is referred to as the COWA operator,ρ can be referred to as the basic unit-interval monotonic function.

    According to the COWA operator,we determine the utility measure for every attribute as follows.

    First,we determine the function■10ρ(y)dy.According to Definition 1,we obtain the interval probabilityas follows:

    Second,according to Definition 1 and the function(y)dy,we change the interval probabilitiesandinto the point probabilitiesand,as follows:

    Finally,the utility similarity for the changing trend in the emergency case is calculated by

    which yields the outcome:Sim0(C0,Ci)∈[0,1].

    C.Generation of the Optimal Emergency Alternative

    To obtain the most desirable alternative to the emergency,we consider the case similarity,the initial response time,and the effects of implementing the historical case solution.The initial response time is one of the most important factors during emergency decision making.In order to make a more powerful decision in an emergency,we should consider the effects of different solutions to historical cases.The method proposed for selecting the most desirable historical emergency case is explained as follows.

    Due to incommensurability among attributes,the decision matrix Z=(zit)m×4needs to be normalized.The most commonly used normalization method is as follows:

    Next,in some situations,DMs usually prefer to provide a fuzzy preference relation based on an alternative decision,which is given according to the DMs experience and professional knowledge,as studied previously[16].In order to determine the best alternative,we need to consider the DM’s preferences.Given that the DM provides a fuzzy preference matrix based on decision alternatives and a pairwise comparison matrix for the relative weights of the attributes,we combine these together into an integrated decision model to generate overall estimates of the relative weights of the attributes.

    The multiplicative preference relation based on the relative weights of the attributes is represented by matrix B using(4).The fuzzy preference relation based on the decision alternatives provided by a DM is represented by

    where qij+qji=1,qii=0.5,and qij≥0(i,j=1,...,m).

    Thus,we obtain

    Based on matrices B and F,we construct the following optimization model using the method of Wang and Parkan[16]to estimate the relative attribute weights:

    Let V?=(,...,)Tbe the optimal weight estimate generated from model(22).Thus,the overall weighted assessment value Uifor each alternative can be computed as follows.

    Subsequently,the hybrid similarities can be calculated using(23)and Ui∈[0,1].The historical case is more effective when the value of Uiis greater.Therefore,we can select the best alternative according to the value of Ui.

    IV.CASE STUDY

    In this section,we present a case study based on an emergency response to a fire,which illustrates the feasibility and validity of the proposed method.First,we introduce the high rise fire scenario.The dynamic retrieval method is then used to obtain the optimal historical case.In addition,a sensitivity analysis is presented,which shows the impact on retrieval of the factors considered.

    A.Introduction of the Case

    In recent years,increasingly higher buildings have exacerbated the risk of fire hazards in China.Thus,generating an effective emergency plan to respond to a high-rise fire has attracted significant social attention.In our scenario,a fire control center receives an alarm about a fire in a high-rise building.The fire situation(g1)is deemed to be severe,with casualties(g2)of 15 to 18 people,a damaged area(g3)measuring between 65m2and 75m2,and property damage(g4)of RMB 0.08million to RMB 0.1million.According to the case library,there are 10 similar historical cases(C1,C2,...,C10),as shown in Table II,which considers four attributes.Table II also shows that the attribute value for the fire situation with respect to the linguistic variables from the pre-established fuzzy linguistic variable set E,where E=(ES:extremely severe,VS:very severe,S:severe,SS:somewhat severe,NS:not severe,N:normal,G:good).

    TABLE IIATTRIBUTE VALUES FOR THE HISTORICAL CASES AND TARGET CASE

    With respect to the changing trends in the emergency,the interval probability of every attribute is shown in Table III.Data from the initial response time zi3and the effect of implementing the historical case zi4are shown in Table IV,where the attribute value for the implementation effect comprises linguistic variables from the pre-established fuzzy linguistic variable set T,where T=(VS:very severe,S:severe,N:normal,G:good,VG:very good).In addition,the DM provides the pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of attributes with regard to the emergency cases,as follows:

    TABLE IIICHANGES IN THE INFORMATION FOR EVERY ATTRIBUTE

    B.Generating an Optimal Emergency Alternative Using th Proposed Method

    e

    To solve the problem described above,we used the proposed method to determine the most desirable alternative to the emergency.The computation processes and results are given as follows.

    Step 1:Compute the similarity between the historical cases and the target case.For attributes in the form of interval numbers,i.e.,g2,g3,g4,the distance between attributes dijwas calculated using(1).For attributes in the form of fuzzy linguistic variables,i.e.,g1,the fuzzy linguistic variables were transformed into triangular fuzzy numbers using(2)and the fuzzy linguistic variables in set E were also transformed,i.e.,e0=(0,0,0.17),e1=(0,0.17,0.33),e2=(0.17,0.33,0.5),e3=(0.33,05,0.67),e4=(0.5,0.67,0.83),e5=(0.67,0.83,1),and e6=(0.83,1,1).Next,we calculated the distance between the attributes dijusing(3)and the results obtained are presented in Table V.

    The weight vector W?=(w?1,w?2,...,w?n)Tcan be estimated according to the GP model(10).For different combinations of the deviation variable and the total emergency case distance,Table V shows the estimated optimal relative weights for the four attributes.The results in Table V leads us to expect that for(α,β)=(1,0),(α,β)=(0.2,0.8),and(α,β)=(0,1),the other weights are all W?=(0.2114,0.3084,0.1749,0.3052),so we set these as the optimal attribute weights.The emergency case similarity Sim(C0,Ci)was then calculated using(11)and the results are shown in Table VI.

    TABLE IVINITIAL RESPONSE TIMES AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTS

    TABLE VOPTIMAL RELATIVE WEIGHTS FOR THE EMERGENCY ATTRIBUTES

    Based on the experience of experts,the case similarity threshold was set at 0.6[24].According to Table VI,it is clear that cases C1,C2,C5,C7,C8satisfied the conditions.Thus,we selected them as the most viable database or library from which we can obtain a solution to the fire hazard problem.

    Step 2:Compute the utility similarity for the changing trends in the emergency case.First,according to the interval probability of every attribute,we obtained the value ofdy using(13).Next,we changed the interval probabil-and into the point probabilities and using(14)and(15),respectively.We also calculated the utility of every attribute uijusing(16)and the results are shown in Table VII.Finally,we calculated the utility similarity between the historical cases and target case using(17).The results obtained were as follows:Sim0(C0,C1)=0.9418,Sim0(C0,C2)=0.8504,Sim0(C0,C5)=0.9081,Sim0(C0,C7)=0.8404 and Sim0(C0,C8)=0.8380.

    TABLE VIRESULTS CALCULATED FOR THE ATTRIBUTE SIMILARITY AND EMERGENCY CASE SIMILARITY

    TABLE VIIUTILITY OF EVERY ATTRIBUTE FOR THE CHANGING TRENDS IN THE EMERGENCY CASE

    Step 3:Select the optimal emergency alternative.According to the alternative case library and the decision attribute,the DM provided the fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations as follows.

    To find the best alternative for the DM,we first transformed the linguistic variables into triangular fuzzy numbers using(2),i.e.,t0= (0,0,0.25),t1= (0,0.25,0.5),t2=(0.25,0.5,0.75),t3=(0.5,0.75,1),and t4=(0.75,1,1).Next,we normalized the original decision matrix Z using(18)and(19).The normalized decision matrix Y was obtained as follows:

    Based on the given fuzzy preference relation Q and(21),we obtained the following:

    According to the fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations and the decision matrix information,we determined the weights of the decision attributes by solving model(22).Table VIII shows the optimal relative weights estimated for the four attributes using different combinations of subjective preferences and objective information.Finally,we obtained the overall weighted assessment values of the five alternatives using(23)and the results are shown in Table IX.

    TABLE VIIIOPTIMAL RELATIVE WEIGHTS FOR THE FOUR DECISION ATTRIBUTES

    TABLE IXOVERALL WEIGHTED ASSESSMENT VALUES FOR THE FOUR ALTERNATIVES

    (α,β)=(0,1)and(α,β)=(1,0)represent two extreme combinations,which do not consider either the fuzzy preference relation or the multiplicative preference relation,respectively,so they should be avoided when the two preference relations must be considered simultaneously.In this situation,irrespective of how α and β are combined,the results yield the same final ranking:C1?C5?C2?C7?C8.Thus,the historical case and the target case will be more similar when the overall weighted assessment value is greater.Therefore,the desirable historical case,i.e.,C1,can be retrieved according to the results and the response plan in historical case(C1)can be considered as the optimal solution by the fire control center.

    C.Comparison Analysis

    We performed comparative analysis based on the results obtained using our method and other methods.

    First,to obtain the most similar historical case,we used the case retrieval method described by Alptekin and Büyük?zkan,which integrates CBR and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)[25].The attribute weights produced by AHP comprised w=(0.1924,0.3014,0.2479,0.2583)and the case distance values were:dist(C0,C1)=0.0680,dist(C0,C2)=0.1628,dist(C0,C3)=0.2852,dist(C0,C4)=0.3278,dist(C0,C5)=0.0765,dist(C0,C6)=0.3622,dist(C0,C7)=0.1891,dist(C0,C8)=0.1901,dist(C0,C9)=0.2865,and dist(C0,C10)=0.4500.Therefore,the most similar historical case is case C5,which differs from the results shown in Table VI because the attribute weights are different.The method that uses AHP to determine attribute weight is objective,whereas our proposed method for determining the weight attributes is both objective and subjective.Thus,the results in Table VI are reasonable.

    Second,we employed the hybrid similarity measure[4]to compute the similarity between target case C0and the historical cases Ci.We then obtained the similarity values,i.e.,Sim(C0,C1)=0.8985,Sim(C0,C2)=0.7497,Sim(C0,C3)=0.6155,Sim(C0,C6)=0.5839,Sim(C0,C6)=0.8986,Sim(C0,C7)=0.6993,Sim(C0,C8)=0.7178,Sim(C0,C9)=0.5944,Sim(C0,C10)=0.4633,and thus the case with the highest similarity was C5.This result is the same as that shown in Table VI,although this method did not consider the trends in the development of the case,the initial response time,and the implementation effect.However,the DM at the fire control center analyzed the data and found that the changes in emergency case C1were most similar to emergency case C0,where the utility similarity of emergency case C1with regard to the changing trend was 0.9418 and the change in the degree of similarity for emergency case C5was 0.9081.In addition,Table IV shows that the initial response time and implementation effects were better for emergency case C1than emergency case C5.Therefore,we can conclude that the response plan for historical case C1was the best alternative for the fire control center and it would be expected to achieve the most favorable outcome in response to the highrise building fire.

    In addition,Li et al.[26]proposed a method for generating emergency alternatives based on similarity case analysis by considering the implementation effects of emergency alternatives belonging to similar cases.Thus,we also used this method to generate emergency alternatives for the high-rise fire.First,the attribute weights were determined according to the weight optimization model of Zhao and Yu[27],where the results comprised w=(0.2963,0.2702,0.1797,0.2583).Hence,the case similarities produced by this method and the similar cases included(C1,C2,C5,C7,C8).The case similarities comprised Sim(C0,C1)=0.8695,Sim(C0,C2)=0.6700,Sim(C0,C5)=0.8984,Sim(C0,C7)= 0.6525,and Sim(C0,C8)=0.6634,where the case ranking was:C5>C1>C2>C8>C7,which differed from the ranking obtained by our method.This is because our weight optimization model considers the distance as well as the preferences of DMs.We also calculated the evaluation values for each alternative implementation effect and the initial response time,which belonged to a valid similar historical case,and the values obtained were V1=0.7916,V2=0.8750,V5=0.9167,V7=0.5028,and V8=0.According to the evaluation values,this method selected case C5as the alternative to the target case C0,which differed from the result obtained using our proposed method.This is because the method proposed by Li et al.[26]does not consider the changing trends in the cases.In practice,emergencies are dynamic so it is reasonable to consider the changing trends in the cases.

    D.Sensitivity Analysis

    1)Impact of the Interval Probability on the Emergency Cases:We conducted the following sensitivity analysis according to the probabilities for each attribute of the target case.

    As shown in Table III,there are two types of state description:a linguistic description such as g1,or an interval number such as g2,g3,g4.First,we analyzed g1.When the attribute g1was changed in every state for the target case,the utility similarity for the emergency cases were gained and are shown in Table X,which shows that the degree of similarity for the change in the emergency case was sensitive to changes in the state of attribute g1.

    The states of attributes g2,g3,g4are interval numbers,so we consider g3as an example.The utility similarities of the five feasible emergency cases with different values of g3were calculated and are illustrated in Table XI,which clearly demonstrates that the utility similarities of the five feasible emergency cases varied according to different values of attribute g3.

    TABLE XUTILITY SIMILARITIES FOR THE FOUR FEASIBLE EMERGENCY CASES WHEN THE STATE OF ATTRIBUTE g1VARIED

    2)Impact of the Weights of the Four Decision Alternatives on the Case Ranking:We obtained different weights using various combinations of the multiplicative preference relations for the four attributes and the fuzzy preference relations for the five alternatives.When we changed the weight of the decision attribute,the overall ranking values for the historical cases also changed in the corresponding manner.The overall ranking values for the four feasible alternatives with different weights are plotted in Fig.1,which clearly demonstrate that emergency case C1was always ranked first;thus,we selected emergency case C1as the optimal alternative.

    Fig.1. Impacts of the weights of the decision attributes on the emergency case ranking.

    V.CONCLUSIONS

    In this study,we proposed a dynamic case retrieval method by integrating subjective preferences and objective information to facilitate emergency decision making.In the proposed method,we calculate the weights of the emergency attributes using a pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of the attributes.Next,we calculate the utility similarity of the emergency case with respect to changes in the attributes.An overall weighted assessment value is then calculated for the historical cases to integrate subjective preferences and objective information,and the optimal historical case(s)is retrieved according to the overall assessment value obtained.Furthermore,we conducted a case study,which demonstrated the practical utility of the proposed method.

    The proposed method has some distinct characteristics compared with existing methods for generating emergency plans.In particular,the proposed method comprehensively considers the subjective preferences of the DMs as well as the historical data in the process used to generate the emergency plans.As discussed earlier,most existing methods for generating emergency plans using CBR do not consider the subjective preferences of DMs or the degree of similarity in the changes that occur in an emergency case compared with historical precedents.Therefore,the proposed method addresses these deficiencies.Our proposed method also considers the similarity in terms of the changing attributes of an emergency,whereas few existing methods consider the dynamic development of the attributes,although this is important for selecting the optimal emergency alternative.Moreover,we conducted a sensitivity analysis and the data obtained also indicated that it is important to consider this factor.

    Therefore,we suggest that the proposed method can yield distinct improvements when generating emergency plans.For example,in terms of the emergency case similarity,ourmethod considers changes in the degree of the emergency,so the emergency plans obtained can respond better to the current emergency.Thus,the proposed method using CBR to integrate subjective preferences and objective information may ultimately facilitate improved decision making because it considers the similarity to previous emergency cases in order to generate the optimal emergency alternative,but it also considers the initial response time and the effects of implementing historical emergency cases,thereby obtaining a more practical emergency alternative.

    TABLE XIUTILITY SIMILARITIES FOR THE FOUR FEASIBLE EMERGENCY CASES WHEN THE STATE OF ATTRIBUTE g3VARIED

    In terms of future research,the proposed method can be embedded into an emergency decision support system to support DMs with effective decision making during an emergency.

    国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久人妻av系列| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 久久狼人影院| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日本免费a在线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久99一区二区三区| 99热只有精品国产| 久久中文看片网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 99热只有精品国产| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 黄色女人牲交| 在线观看一区二区三区| 自线自在国产av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 欧美日韩黄片免| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 岛国在线观看网站| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品国产一区二区久久| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 老司机福利观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 成在线人永久免费视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久久久人人人人人| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产成人欧美| 97碰自拍视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 88av欧美| 久久久久久大精品| 免费观看人在逋| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产av又大| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久久国产成人免费| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产成人av教育| bbb黄色大片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产麻豆69| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久青草综合色| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产熟女xx| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 在线视频色国产色| avwww免费| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 99香蕉大伊视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产精品av久久久久免费| cao死你这个sao货| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 露出奶头的视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 精品高清国产在线一区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产色视频综合| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 成人手机av| 日本wwww免费看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 两性夫妻黄色片| 热99re8久久精品国产| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 高清在线国产一区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 免费高清视频大片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | avwww免费| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 一级片免费观看大全| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产av又大| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成人三级做爰电影| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲av美国av| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 中文欧美无线码| 多毛熟女@视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| av有码第一页| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 午夜激情av网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 免费观看人在逋| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 电影成人av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 在线视频色国产色| 日韩欧美免费精品| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 老司机靠b影院| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美在线黄色| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 久久久久久久久中文| 国产成人欧美| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 电影成人av| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产片内射在线| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产av又大| 99国产精品99久久久久| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久精品影院6| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 中文欧美无线码| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产99白浆流出| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 在线看a的网站| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| av有码第一页| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 丁香六月欧美| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 日本三级黄在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 电影成人av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 超色免费av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久大精品| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日本wwww免费看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 视频区图区小说| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 午夜a级毛片| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美在线黄色| 国产精华一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 看免费av毛片| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 91av网站免费观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 午夜老司机福利片| 曰老女人黄片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 乱人伦中国视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久香蕉国产精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 成人国语在线视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产99白浆流出| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 91老司机精品| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 高清欧美精品videossex| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产av又大| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 香蕉丝袜av| av电影中文网址| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| www.精华液| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 老司机福利观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产三级在线视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 午夜免费激情av| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99国产精品99久久久久| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产av又大| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 黄色 视频免费看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| www.www免费av| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 超碰成人久久| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美在线黄色| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 又大又爽又粗| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 少妇 在线观看| tocl精华| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 青草久久国产| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 免费高清视频大片| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 91国产中文字幕| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 在线av久久热| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产片内射在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 曰老女人黄片| 青草久久国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 青草久久国产| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一本综合久久免费| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 1024视频免费在线观看|