• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Dynamic Case Retrieval Method With Subjective Preferences and Objective Information for Emergency Decision Making

    2018-08-11 07:48:50JingZhengYingmingWangandShengqunChen
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2018年3期

    Jing Zheng,Yingming Wang,and Shengqun Chen

    Abstract—Case-based reasoning(CBR)is one of the best methods for generating an effective solution in an emergency.In recent years,some methods for generating emergency alternatives have been included in practical CBR applications,but there have been no in-depth studies of these processes.In this study,we propose a new method for dynamic case retrieval with subjective preferences and objective information,which considers the personal preferences of the decision makers and changes in the attributes of the emergency as the situation develops.First,we present a formula for calculating the case similarity and changing trends in the case considered,where similar cases are obtained.Next,we describe a method for measuring the overall assessment value with respect to similar historical cases,which is obtained by aggregating the case similarity,the utility case similarity,the first response time,and the implementation effect.The subjective preferences and objective information are also integrated in the decision-making process.Finally,we present a case study based on the emergency response to a fire in a highrise building,which illustrates the applicability and feasibility of the proposed method.

    I.INTRODUCTION

    THE numbers of social,environmental,and medical emergencies have been increasing in recent years,thereby causing losses of life and property,economic disruption,and environmental degradation,which often have significant effects on social development in certain regions.For example,an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome occurred in 2003,followed by H1N1 bird flu in 2009,and H7N9 avian influenza in 2014.When an emergency occurs,a decision maker(DM)is required to generate an alternative to mitigate or minimize any negative effects as soon as possible.Thus,it is important to identify the best method for generating an effective mitigation plan in a short time to facilitate optimum decision making during an emergency.

    The methods that have been used to deal with emergency decision-making include multi-attribute risk analysis[1],the group analytic network process approach[2],the fault tree analysis(FTA)-based method[3],case-based reasoning(CBR)[4],distance-based group decision-making[5],the game method[6],the analytic network process[7],and revised PROMETHEE II[8].CBR is used most widely among these various methods.CBR is a process for solving new problems by referring to previous similar cases,which helps the DM to make decisions as quickly as possible based on these precedents.CBR usually includes four steps:1)representing the target case and the historical case;2)retrieving the most similar historical case(s)from the case database;3)adapting the solution to the selected historical cases to the current situation;and 4)updating by adding and deleting the historical case(s)to create a precedent database for solving future problems,if appropriate.Retrieval is regarded as the core of these four steps.

    There are many examples of the successful use of CBR,such as Fan et al.[4]used CBR to generate project risk response strategies and emergency alternatives in the case of a gas explosion.Liao et al.[9]applied CBR in the context of environmental emergency preparedness,while Huanget al.[10]applied it to emergency management engineering.Liu et al.[11]used CBR to predict the emergency resource demand.Amailef and Lu[12]applied an ontology-supported CBR approach to emergency responses,while Liu and Yu[13]used CBR to retrieve precedent cases for risk management.As demonstrated by the high number of examples available,CBR is considered to be highly suitable for facilitating emergency decision making.

    Previous studies have made significant contributions to the use of CBR during emergency decision making.In some actual situations,the emergency may be changing continuously such as fire hazards and disease infections.Moreover,during decision making processes,the DMs are bounded rationality and they have their own preferences.Thus,it is necessary to consider a special emergency decision-making problem with several distinct characteristics,including dynamic changes in the emergency,the preferences of DMs,and the impacts of alternative responses to the emergency.However,existing decision-making methods based on CBR do not consider the dynamics of the emergency and the preferences of DMs;therefore,it is necessary to further investigate the emergency decision-making problem by considering the characteristics of dynamic change,the preferences of DMs,and alternative implementations.

    In order to achieve the aims stated above,we propose a new dynamic case retrieval approach.The proposed method makes three main contributions.First,we incorporate probability into the case representation based on the characteristics of dynamic change and we compute the utility similarity.Probability is a good measure of the possibility of random events.Changes in the emergency’s attributes can be estimated based on the probability[3],[14],[15].Every attribute can have several different states,so the state of the attribute in the next moment can be expressed by the probability of every state.The interval probability can adequately express these potential changes given that the characteristic of uncertainty exists in every emergency.The similarity of the changing trend in the emergency can then be obtained by computing the utility of the interval probability for every attribute.The similarity measurement that incorporates these changes is referred to as the dynamic similarity measurement.Second,we integrate the pairwise comparison matrix and the fuzzy preference matrix into the case retrieval process to express the preferences of DMs.During traditional emergency decision making,the DM is viewed as completely rational,whereas the DM has subjective preferences in practice.Fuzzy and multiplicative preferences are two commonly used methods for characterizing the subjective preferences of a DM[16],which can be expressed as a pairwise comparison matrix and a fuzzy preference matrix,respectively.Finally,the generation of a mitigating strategy is often complicated due to the existence of multiple criteria that affect the effectiveness of the emergency alternative.In this study,we consider the similarity between the target case and historical cases,but we also consider other factors such as the initial response time and the effects of alternative implementations according to the historical cases.Therefore,multi-criteria decision-making methods with integrated subjective preferences and objective information may prove helpful by allowing DMs to generate emergency mitigation strategies.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.In Section II,we introduce the emergency decision-making problem.In Section III,we propose the hybrid approach for selecting an optimal historical case from the historical cases library.In Section IV,we present a case study based on a fire in a highrise building.Finally,we give our conclusions in Section V.

    II.THE PROBLEM

    In this section,we briefly describe the problem of generating the optimum solution in an emergency situation.We suppose that C=(C1,...,Cm)is the set of historical emergency cases and C0is the target emergency case,G=(g1,...,gn)is the set of the attributes,and X=(xij)m×nrepresents the values of attribute gjwith regard to emergency case Ci.Let W=(w1,w2,...,wn)be the weight vector of the attributes,where wjrepresents the weight of attribute gj,0≤wj≤1,

    Due to the dynamics of an emergency case,when we apply the CBR method to generate an alternative path,it is not sufficient to only consider case similarity,but instead the similarity of the trends in the changing characteristics of the emergency also needs to be considered.Thus,we use the interval probability with regard to every state of every attribute to represent the trends in an emergency case.Θ =(θ1,θ2,...,θlj)represents the possible state of attributerepresents the interval probability of state θk(k ∈ [1,lj]),which belongs to attribute gjwith regard to emergency case CiInformation related to the historical cases and target case is shown in Table I.Z=(zit)m×4denotes the decision matrix set,where zi1represents the similarity between the historical emergency case Ciand the target case C0,zi2represents the utility similarity of the degree of change in emergency case Ciand C0,zi3represents the initial response time in the historical emergency case Ci,zi4represents the implementation effect of the historical emergency case Ci.V=(v1,v2,v3,v4)is the weight vector of the decision attributes,where νtrepresents the weight of decision attribute,Based on these conditions,we can rank the historical emergency cases and determine the most desirable alternative.

    III.THE METHOD

    In this section,we propose a dynamic case retrieval method that integrates subjective preferences and objective information for use in emergency decision-making.First,we provide the formula for measuring the emergency case similarity.Second,we provide a measure for calculating the utility similarity of the changing trends during different emergencies.Finally,the most desirable alternative is determined by considering the emergency case similarity,the utility similarity in the changing trends,the initial response time,and the effects of implementing different historical alternatives.In addition,the DM provides his/her preference in terms of the solutions to the emergency and the relative weights for its attributes.The first part of this method is described as follows.

    A.Retrieval of the Similar Historical Cases

    In this study,we consider two forms of attribute values,i.e.,interval number and fuzzy linguistic variables.

    First,we calculate the distance between the attributes for the target case C0and the historical cases Ci.di=(di1,di2,...,din)is the vector of the distance of the attributes,where dijis the distance of attribute gjwith respect to emergency case Ci.When the attribute value xijis an interval number,the formula for calculating dijcan be expressed by

    If attribute value xijis a fuzzy linguistic variable,it can be represented by the triangular fuzzy number xij=the set of linguistic variables,then eh(1≤h≤f)can be expressed by

    TABLE IINFORMATION RELATED TO THE HISTORICAL CASES AND TARGET CASE

    When the fuzzy linguistic variables are represented as a triangular fuzzy number,the formula for dijcan be expressed by

    After this process,we use the simple additive weight approach to determine the similarity of the emergency cases.In order to estimate the weight vector W,we use the subjective method with the pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of the attributes,which are provided by the DM.

    The multiplicative preference relationship between the relative weights of the attributes can be represented as

    where aji=1/aij>0 and aii=1(i,j=1,...,n).

    According to Satty’s eigenvector method(EM)[18],we can estimate the weight vector W=(w1,w2,...,wn)Tby solving the following eigenvalue problem:

    If the multiplicative preference relation A is a precise/consistent comparison matrix,equation(5)can be transformed as follows:

    which indicates that when the DM provides the multiplicative preference relation,the DM should ensure that the multiplicative preference relation is as consistent as possible.

    The DMs have a preference in terms of the attribute weights,but they also want the total distance or extent of the emergency case to be minimized.There is no guarantee that the multiplicative preference relations and the minimum of the total distance would lead to the same estimates for the relative attribute weights,so we introduce the following deviation vector[16]:

    where H=(ε1,...,εn)Tand I is an n × n unit matrix,in which the elements on the leading diagonal are one and all the others are zero.It is desirable that the absolute value of the deviation variable and the total distance are kept as small as possible,so we construct the following optimization model according to the linear weighted method[19]:

    where eT=(1,1,...,1)1×n,and α ≥ 0 and β ≥ 0 represent the weight of the total distance and the absolute value of the deviation variable,respectively,and α+β =1.In order to solve this nonlinear model,we introduce the following deviation variables:

    Let W?=be the optimal weight estimate generated by model(10).Based on this weight,the similarity between the current emergency case and historical cases can be computed using the following formula.

    According to the theory of case-based decision making[20]?[22],historical emergency cases that share high similarity with the target emergency case are selected as alternatives.Thus,we set a similarity threshold ξ,ξ∈ [min{Sim(C0,Ci)},max{Sim(C0,Ci)}],where a greater value for ξ indicates a higher similarity requirement.If Sim(C0,Ci)≥ ξ is satisfied by the emergency case,the historical cases will be selected as the library of candidate alternative cases.B.Utility Similarity Measure for Changing Trends in the Emergency Case

    Definition 1[23]:If[a,b]is an interval number and[0,1]is the function with the following dynamics:

    1)ρ(0)=0;2) ρ(1)=1;3)if x > y,then ρ(x)≥ ρ(y).

    Thus,if the function f is referred to as the COWA operator,ρ can be referred to as the basic unit-interval monotonic function.

    According to the COWA operator,we determine the utility measure for every attribute as follows.

    First,we determine the function■10ρ(y)dy.According to Definition 1,we obtain the interval probabilityas follows:

    Second,according to Definition 1 and the function(y)dy,we change the interval probabilitiesandinto the point probabilitiesand,as follows:

    Finally,the utility similarity for the changing trend in the emergency case is calculated by

    which yields the outcome:Sim0(C0,Ci)∈[0,1].

    C.Generation of the Optimal Emergency Alternative

    To obtain the most desirable alternative to the emergency,we consider the case similarity,the initial response time,and the effects of implementing the historical case solution.The initial response time is one of the most important factors during emergency decision making.In order to make a more powerful decision in an emergency,we should consider the effects of different solutions to historical cases.The method proposed for selecting the most desirable historical emergency case is explained as follows.

    Due to incommensurability among attributes,the decision matrix Z=(zit)m×4needs to be normalized.The most commonly used normalization method is as follows:

    Next,in some situations,DMs usually prefer to provide a fuzzy preference relation based on an alternative decision,which is given according to the DMs experience and professional knowledge,as studied previously[16].In order to determine the best alternative,we need to consider the DM’s preferences.Given that the DM provides a fuzzy preference matrix based on decision alternatives and a pairwise comparison matrix for the relative weights of the attributes,we combine these together into an integrated decision model to generate overall estimates of the relative weights of the attributes.

    The multiplicative preference relation based on the relative weights of the attributes is represented by matrix B using(4).The fuzzy preference relation based on the decision alternatives provided by a DM is represented by

    where qij+qji=1,qii=0.5,and qij≥0(i,j=1,...,m).

    Thus,we obtain

    Based on matrices B and F,we construct the following optimization model using the method of Wang and Parkan[16]to estimate the relative attribute weights:

    Let V?=(,...,)Tbe the optimal weight estimate generated from model(22).Thus,the overall weighted assessment value Uifor each alternative can be computed as follows.

    Subsequently,the hybrid similarities can be calculated using(23)and Ui∈[0,1].The historical case is more effective when the value of Uiis greater.Therefore,we can select the best alternative according to the value of Ui.

    IV.CASE STUDY

    In this section,we present a case study based on an emergency response to a fire,which illustrates the feasibility and validity of the proposed method.First,we introduce the high rise fire scenario.The dynamic retrieval method is then used to obtain the optimal historical case.In addition,a sensitivity analysis is presented,which shows the impact on retrieval of the factors considered.

    A.Introduction of the Case

    In recent years,increasingly higher buildings have exacerbated the risk of fire hazards in China.Thus,generating an effective emergency plan to respond to a high-rise fire has attracted significant social attention.In our scenario,a fire control center receives an alarm about a fire in a high-rise building.The fire situation(g1)is deemed to be severe,with casualties(g2)of 15 to 18 people,a damaged area(g3)measuring between 65m2and 75m2,and property damage(g4)of RMB 0.08million to RMB 0.1million.According to the case library,there are 10 similar historical cases(C1,C2,...,C10),as shown in Table II,which considers four attributes.Table II also shows that the attribute value for the fire situation with respect to the linguistic variables from the pre-established fuzzy linguistic variable set E,where E=(ES:extremely severe,VS:very severe,S:severe,SS:somewhat severe,NS:not severe,N:normal,G:good).

    TABLE IIATTRIBUTE VALUES FOR THE HISTORICAL CASES AND TARGET CASE

    With respect to the changing trends in the emergency,the interval probability of every attribute is shown in Table III.Data from the initial response time zi3and the effect of implementing the historical case zi4are shown in Table IV,where the attribute value for the implementation effect comprises linguistic variables from the pre-established fuzzy linguistic variable set T,where T=(VS:very severe,S:severe,N:normal,G:good,VG:very good).In addition,the DM provides the pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of attributes with regard to the emergency cases,as follows:

    TABLE IIICHANGES IN THE INFORMATION FOR EVERY ATTRIBUTE

    B.Generating an Optimal Emergency Alternative Using th Proposed Method

    e

    To solve the problem described above,we used the proposed method to determine the most desirable alternative to the emergency.The computation processes and results are given as follows.

    Step 1:Compute the similarity between the historical cases and the target case.For attributes in the form of interval numbers,i.e.,g2,g3,g4,the distance between attributes dijwas calculated using(1).For attributes in the form of fuzzy linguistic variables,i.e.,g1,the fuzzy linguistic variables were transformed into triangular fuzzy numbers using(2)and the fuzzy linguistic variables in set E were also transformed,i.e.,e0=(0,0,0.17),e1=(0,0.17,0.33),e2=(0.17,0.33,0.5),e3=(0.33,05,0.67),e4=(0.5,0.67,0.83),e5=(0.67,0.83,1),and e6=(0.83,1,1).Next,we calculated the distance between the attributes dijusing(3)and the results obtained are presented in Table V.

    The weight vector W?=(w?1,w?2,...,w?n)Tcan be estimated according to the GP model(10).For different combinations of the deviation variable and the total emergency case distance,Table V shows the estimated optimal relative weights for the four attributes.The results in Table V leads us to expect that for(α,β)=(1,0),(α,β)=(0.2,0.8),and(α,β)=(0,1),the other weights are all W?=(0.2114,0.3084,0.1749,0.3052),so we set these as the optimal attribute weights.The emergency case similarity Sim(C0,Ci)was then calculated using(11)and the results are shown in Table VI.

    TABLE IVINITIAL RESPONSE TIMES AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTS

    TABLE VOPTIMAL RELATIVE WEIGHTS FOR THE EMERGENCY ATTRIBUTES

    Based on the experience of experts,the case similarity threshold was set at 0.6[24].According to Table VI,it is clear that cases C1,C2,C5,C7,C8satisfied the conditions.Thus,we selected them as the most viable database or library from which we can obtain a solution to the fire hazard problem.

    Step 2:Compute the utility similarity for the changing trends in the emergency case.First,according to the interval probability of every attribute,we obtained the value ofdy using(13).Next,we changed the interval probabil-and into the point probabilities and using(14)and(15),respectively.We also calculated the utility of every attribute uijusing(16)and the results are shown in Table VII.Finally,we calculated the utility similarity between the historical cases and target case using(17).The results obtained were as follows:Sim0(C0,C1)=0.9418,Sim0(C0,C2)=0.8504,Sim0(C0,C5)=0.9081,Sim0(C0,C7)=0.8404 and Sim0(C0,C8)=0.8380.

    TABLE VIRESULTS CALCULATED FOR THE ATTRIBUTE SIMILARITY AND EMERGENCY CASE SIMILARITY

    TABLE VIIUTILITY OF EVERY ATTRIBUTE FOR THE CHANGING TRENDS IN THE EMERGENCY CASE

    Step 3:Select the optimal emergency alternative.According to the alternative case library and the decision attribute,the DM provided the fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations as follows.

    To find the best alternative for the DM,we first transformed the linguistic variables into triangular fuzzy numbers using(2),i.e.,t0= (0,0,0.25),t1= (0,0.25,0.5),t2=(0.25,0.5,0.75),t3=(0.5,0.75,1),and t4=(0.75,1,1).Next,we normalized the original decision matrix Z using(18)and(19).The normalized decision matrix Y was obtained as follows:

    Based on the given fuzzy preference relation Q and(21),we obtained the following:

    According to the fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations and the decision matrix information,we determined the weights of the decision attributes by solving model(22).Table VIII shows the optimal relative weights estimated for the four attributes using different combinations of subjective preferences and objective information.Finally,we obtained the overall weighted assessment values of the five alternatives using(23)and the results are shown in Table IX.

    TABLE VIIIOPTIMAL RELATIVE WEIGHTS FOR THE FOUR DECISION ATTRIBUTES

    TABLE IXOVERALL WEIGHTED ASSESSMENT VALUES FOR THE FOUR ALTERNATIVES

    (α,β)=(0,1)and(α,β)=(1,0)represent two extreme combinations,which do not consider either the fuzzy preference relation or the multiplicative preference relation,respectively,so they should be avoided when the two preference relations must be considered simultaneously.In this situation,irrespective of how α and β are combined,the results yield the same final ranking:C1?C5?C2?C7?C8.Thus,the historical case and the target case will be more similar when the overall weighted assessment value is greater.Therefore,the desirable historical case,i.e.,C1,can be retrieved according to the results and the response plan in historical case(C1)can be considered as the optimal solution by the fire control center.

    C.Comparison Analysis

    We performed comparative analysis based on the results obtained using our method and other methods.

    First,to obtain the most similar historical case,we used the case retrieval method described by Alptekin and Büyük?zkan,which integrates CBR and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)[25].The attribute weights produced by AHP comprised w=(0.1924,0.3014,0.2479,0.2583)and the case distance values were:dist(C0,C1)=0.0680,dist(C0,C2)=0.1628,dist(C0,C3)=0.2852,dist(C0,C4)=0.3278,dist(C0,C5)=0.0765,dist(C0,C6)=0.3622,dist(C0,C7)=0.1891,dist(C0,C8)=0.1901,dist(C0,C9)=0.2865,and dist(C0,C10)=0.4500.Therefore,the most similar historical case is case C5,which differs from the results shown in Table VI because the attribute weights are different.The method that uses AHP to determine attribute weight is objective,whereas our proposed method for determining the weight attributes is both objective and subjective.Thus,the results in Table VI are reasonable.

    Second,we employed the hybrid similarity measure[4]to compute the similarity between target case C0and the historical cases Ci.We then obtained the similarity values,i.e.,Sim(C0,C1)=0.8985,Sim(C0,C2)=0.7497,Sim(C0,C3)=0.6155,Sim(C0,C6)=0.5839,Sim(C0,C6)=0.8986,Sim(C0,C7)=0.6993,Sim(C0,C8)=0.7178,Sim(C0,C9)=0.5944,Sim(C0,C10)=0.4633,and thus the case with the highest similarity was C5.This result is the same as that shown in Table VI,although this method did not consider the trends in the development of the case,the initial response time,and the implementation effect.However,the DM at the fire control center analyzed the data and found that the changes in emergency case C1were most similar to emergency case C0,where the utility similarity of emergency case C1with regard to the changing trend was 0.9418 and the change in the degree of similarity for emergency case C5was 0.9081.In addition,Table IV shows that the initial response time and implementation effects were better for emergency case C1than emergency case C5.Therefore,we can conclude that the response plan for historical case C1was the best alternative for the fire control center and it would be expected to achieve the most favorable outcome in response to the highrise building fire.

    In addition,Li et al.[26]proposed a method for generating emergency alternatives based on similarity case analysis by considering the implementation effects of emergency alternatives belonging to similar cases.Thus,we also used this method to generate emergency alternatives for the high-rise fire.First,the attribute weights were determined according to the weight optimization model of Zhao and Yu[27],where the results comprised w=(0.2963,0.2702,0.1797,0.2583).Hence,the case similarities produced by this method and the similar cases included(C1,C2,C5,C7,C8).The case similarities comprised Sim(C0,C1)=0.8695,Sim(C0,C2)=0.6700,Sim(C0,C5)=0.8984,Sim(C0,C7)= 0.6525,and Sim(C0,C8)=0.6634,where the case ranking was:C5>C1>C2>C8>C7,which differed from the ranking obtained by our method.This is because our weight optimization model considers the distance as well as the preferences of DMs.We also calculated the evaluation values for each alternative implementation effect and the initial response time,which belonged to a valid similar historical case,and the values obtained were V1=0.7916,V2=0.8750,V5=0.9167,V7=0.5028,and V8=0.According to the evaluation values,this method selected case C5as the alternative to the target case C0,which differed from the result obtained using our proposed method.This is because the method proposed by Li et al.[26]does not consider the changing trends in the cases.In practice,emergencies are dynamic so it is reasonable to consider the changing trends in the cases.

    D.Sensitivity Analysis

    1)Impact of the Interval Probability on the Emergency Cases:We conducted the following sensitivity analysis according to the probabilities for each attribute of the target case.

    As shown in Table III,there are two types of state description:a linguistic description such as g1,or an interval number such as g2,g3,g4.First,we analyzed g1.When the attribute g1was changed in every state for the target case,the utility similarity for the emergency cases were gained and are shown in Table X,which shows that the degree of similarity for the change in the emergency case was sensitive to changes in the state of attribute g1.

    The states of attributes g2,g3,g4are interval numbers,so we consider g3as an example.The utility similarities of the five feasible emergency cases with different values of g3were calculated and are illustrated in Table XI,which clearly demonstrates that the utility similarities of the five feasible emergency cases varied according to different values of attribute g3.

    TABLE XUTILITY SIMILARITIES FOR THE FOUR FEASIBLE EMERGENCY CASES WHEN THE STATE OF ATTRIBUTE g1VARIED

    2)Impact of the Weights of the Four Decision Alternatives on the Case Ranking:We obtained different weights using various combinations of the multiplicative preference relations for the four attributes and the fuzzy preference relations for the five alternatives.When we changed the weight of the decision attribute,the overall ranking values for the historical cases also changed in the corresponding manner.The overall ranking values for the four feasible alternatives with different weights are plotted in Fig.1,which clearly demonstrate that emergency case C1was always ranked first;thus,we selected emergency case C1as the optimal alternative.

    Fig.1. Impacts of the weights of the decision attributes on the emergency case ranking.

    V.CONCLUSIONS

    In this study,we proposed a dynamic case retrieval method by integrating subjective preferences and objective information to facilitate emergency decision making.In the proposed method,we calculate the weights of the emergency attributes using a pairwise comparison matrix based on the relative weights of the attributes.Next,we calculate the utility similarity of the emergency case with respect to changes in the attributes.An overall weighted assessment value is then calculated for the historical cases to integrate subjective preferences and objective information,and the optimal historical case(s)is retrieved according to the overall assessment value obtained.Furthermore,we conducted a case study,which demonstrated the practical utility of the proposed method.

    The proposed method has some distinct characteristics compared with existing methods for generating emergency plans.In particular,the proposed method comprehensively considers the subjective preferences of the DMs as well as the historical data in the process used to generate the emergency plans.As discussed earlier,most existing methods for generating emergency plans using CBR do not consider the subjective preferences of DMs or the degree of similarity in the changes that occur in an emergency case compared with historical precedents.Therefore,the proposed method addresses these deficiencies.Our proposed method also considers the similarity in terms of the changing attributes of an emergency,whereas few existing methods consider the dynamic development of the attributes,although this is important for selecting the optimal emergency alternative.Moreover,we conducted a sensitivity analysis and the data obtained also indicated that it is important to consider this factor.

    Therefore,we suggest that the proposed method can yield distinct improvements when generating emergency plans.For example,in terms of the emergency case similarity,ourmethod considers changes in the degree of the emergency,so the emergency plans obtained can respond better to the current emergency.Thus,the proposed method using CBR to integrate subjective preferences and objective information may ultimately facilitate improved decision making because it considers the similarity to previous emergency cases in order to generate the optimal emergency alternative,but it also considers the initial response time and the effects of implementing historical emergency cases,thereby obtaining a more practical emergency alternative.

    TABLE XIUTILITY SIMILARITIES FOR THE FOUR FEASIBLE EMERGENCY CASES WHEN THE STATE OF ATTRIBUTE g3VARIED

    In terms of future research,the proposed method can be embedded into an emergency decision support system to support DMs with effective decision making during an emergency.

    舔av片在线| 91狼人影院| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美性感艳星| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久9热在线精品视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲av美国av| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 一级黄片播放器| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 少妇的逼好多水| 午夜a级毛片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | ponron亚洲| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产高清三级在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 观看美女的网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 色在线成人网| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 日本一本二区三区精品| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| aaaaa片日本免费| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 久久久久国内视频| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产熟女xx| netflix在线观看网站| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 老司机福利观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 很黄的视频免费| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 简卡轻食公司| 国产真实乱freesex| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| av视频在线观看入口| 久久6这里有精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲五月天丁香| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 性色avwww在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 在线看三级毛片| 久久草成人影院| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 99热只有精品国产| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久中文看片网| 99热只有精品国产| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 午夜福利18| 热99在线观看视频| 99热只有精品国产| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 综合色av麻豆| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 婷婷丁香在线五月| av黄色大香蕉| 99热精品在线国产| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| h日本视频在线播放| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 色在线成人网| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 露出奶头的视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 直男gayav资源| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| av天堂中文字幕网| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 精品人妻1区二区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 青草久久国产| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 熟女电影av网| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 毛片女人毛片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 综合色av麻豆| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 丁香欧美五月| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 嫩草影院新地址| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 日本熟妇午夜| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 九色国产91popny在线| 特级一级黄色大片| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 午夜免费激情av| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 午夜激情福利司机影院| av在线老鸭窝| 精品福利观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 国产单亲对白刺激| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 熟女电影av网| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 特级一级黄色大片| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 深夜精品福利| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 极品教师在线免费播放| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产老妇女一区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 波多野结衣高清作品| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲av一区综合| 99热6这里只有精品| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品日产1卡2卡| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 热99re8久久精品国产| av专区在线播放| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久久久久大精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 午夜免费激情av| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 精品久久久久久,| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 日韩欧美精品v在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚州av有码| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 男女那种视频在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精品,欧美在线| 观看美女的网站| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 看黄色毛片网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美3d第一页| 在线观看66精品国产| 免费高清视频大片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日本黄色片子视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产av不卡久久| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 99热只有精品国产| 很黄的视频免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 色视频www国产| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 熟女电影av网| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品影院久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 99久国产av精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 午夜福利欧美成人| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产黄片美女视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 欧美在线黄色| 简卡轻食公司| 午夜两性在线视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 级片在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产精品,欧美在线| 老司机福利观看| 国产三级在线视频| 简卡轻食公司| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 欧美午夜高清在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一级av片app| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 69人妻影院| 欧美+日韩+精品| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 中文字幕久久专区| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 搡老岳熟女国产| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产在视频线在精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 性欧美人与动物交配| 午夜影院日韩av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 黄色日韩在线| 性色avwww在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 一本一本综合久久| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久性视频一级片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美区成人在线视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| ponron亚洲| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | xxxwww97欧美| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 最好的美女福利视频网| 性欧美人与动物交配| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| www.色视频.com| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 丁香欧美五月|