• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Gas exchange and water relations of young potted loquat cv. Algerie under progressive drought conditions

    2018-06-06 09:13:05StellfeldtMaldonadoHuesoCuevas
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年6期

    A. Stellfeldt, M. A. Maldonado, J. J. Hueso, J. Cuevas

    1 Department of Agronomy, University of Almeria, ceiA3 Almeria 04120, Spain

    2 Experimental Station of Cajamar Las Palmerillas, ceiA3 Almeria 04710, Spain

    1. Introduction

    Plants need large amounts of water to grow and reproduce.When soil water content does not match these plant demands, water stress appears. If plant water demand is not satisfied, root water potential and turgor reach very low values, stimulating the synthesis of several plant growth regulators, including abscisic acid (ABA) (Davies and Zhang 1991). ABA, formed in roots, is then transported to the leaves and induce partial or complete stomatal closure to limit water losses due to transpiration (Davieset al. 2005;Lissoet al. 2011). The closure of stomata has a drastic effect on reducing photosynthetic CO2fixation and, in turn,on plant growth and productivity (Davies and Lakso 1978;Floreet al. 1985; Chaveset al. 2002; Medranoet al. 2002;Díaz-Espejoet al. 2006). However, the magnitude of these negative effects depends on the severity and duration of water stress and also on the drought tolerance of the crop and the phenological stage in which the plant is. Some species have developed mechanisms to maintain the turgor of photosynthetic tissues and the stomatal aperture in order to preserve certain levels of photosynthesis (Matthews and Boyer 1984; Nuneset al. 1989).

    Among those plants tolerant to severe water deficits,we might cite loquat (Eriobotrya japonicaLindl.). Loquat is an evergreen subtropical fruit crop native to southeast China (Linet al. 1999) that belongs to the family Rosaceae subtribe Pyrinae (Potteret al. 2007). Despite its origin,loquat seems well-adapted to the Mediterranean climate where drought periods during summer are very frequent.During this period, loquat can withstand prolonged periods of water stress to which responds in terms of early blooming once irrigation (or rain) comes (Cuevaset al. 2007). Loquat is, in fact, a crop model for the application of regulated deficit irrigation, since the plant responds to irrigation withholding in summer producing a more profitable crop due to the advancement of harvest dates (Hueso and Cuevas 2008,2010). In the last years, our research team refined the best strategy of regulated deficit irrigation for Algerie loquat as that suspending irrigation starting in early June, and prolong it until plants reach a level of water stress integral (SΨ) of around 47 MPa, usually after 8-9 weeks of no irrigation(Fernándezet al. 2010; Cuevaset al. 2012). These levels ofSΨwere measured in commercial plots, where individual trees never exceeded values of stem water potential below–2.2 MPa despite suffering periods of drought of up to 3 months.

    With the aim of determining the maximum level of water stress that a loquat plant may survive, we suspended irrigation in young Algerie loquats grown in pots of reduced volume as long as possible. On these plants, we carefully monitored plant water status and gas exchange parameters in response to the increasing levels of water stress in order to check its effect on CO2assimilation rates and see which levels of water stress may provoke complete stomatal closure and cancel photosynthesis. We also pretended to determine the relationships among soil and plant water status and gas exchange parameters by means of correlation and regression analyses to guide irrigation practice linking photosynthesis rate to soil and plant water status.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials and experimental conditions

    Measurements of leaf gas exchange and water relations were performed during summer 2012 in an irrigation experiment carried out on 5-year-old potted loquat trees(Fig. 1), located at the Cajamar Experimental Station in Almeria, Southeast Spain (36°48′N, 2°43′W). This area presents a semi-arid subtropical climate with an average rainfall of 241 mm and no rain in summer. The annual evaporation, measured with a Class A pan placed on bare soil at the vicinity of the experimental orchard, averages 1 940 mm yr-1, with extreme values of 8.7 mm d-1on July,2012.

    Fig. 1 Irrigated (I) (A and C) and non-irrigated (NI) (B and D)plants and details of leaves at the end of the experiment.

    The loquat trees were grafted on Provence quince and were grown in pots with a volume of 50 L (outside diameter 0.5-m, and height of 0.41-m) filled with a mixture of sandyloam soil typical of the area (2/3) and peat (1/3). On these plants, we established 2 treatments, a control treatment in which the trees were maintained near field capacity, that is,irrigated (I) and a treatment in which the trees were nonirrigated (NI) until they were near wilting point. The effects of the treatments were analyzed following a randomized complete design with 5 trees (replicates) per treatment. To keep control irrigation treatment close to field capacity, drip irrigation was daily performed providing 6 L pot-1and day.There was no rain at all during the experimental period.The experiment was designed to last 2 weeks. However,the harsh conditions suffered during that summer (see results) forced us to shorten irrigation withholding period,and restart the irrigation 10 days after the beginning of the experiment. The time course of ambient temperature and relative humidity and therefore vapor pressure deficit is provided in Appendix A.

    2.2. Soil and plant water status and gas exchange measurements

    To determine the relationships of gas exchange with the conditions suffered by the trees, we carefully monitored the environmental conditions, soil water content, plant water status, gas exchange parameters and leaf temperature during the experimental period (from June 17 to July 6). Measurements were performed just before irrigation suspension (0 day), and 2, 4, 7, and 9 days after irrigation withholding (DAIW). A new measurement was performed one week after irrigation was restarted.

    Weather (air temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit) parameters were recorded every 5 min using a data logger HOBO (model U23-001, Onset Computer Co., Bourne, MA, USA). The averages during the period of measurement are provided in Appendix A. Changes in soil moisture were followed recording pot weight changes due to evapotranspiration and for changes in volumetric soil water content during the experiment. The changes in the weight of the pots were recorded using a weighing scale of 0.1 kg precision (Cobos Serie K-Rekord, Barcelona, Spain). No drainage or runoff took place in the pots of I or NI plants.The volumetric soil water content was determined with a time domain reflectometry (TDR) system (Trase 6050X1,Soil Moisture Equipment Co., Santa Barbara, CA, USA).Readings were taken on 5 trees per treatment during the water deficit period and after re-irrigation using 15 cm long waveguides.

    Plant water status was monitored by measuring midday stem water potential (Ψst) with a pressure chamber (Model 3000, Soil Moisture Equipment Co., Santa Barbara, CA,USA). Each time, measurements were performed in 5 fully expanded leaves (one per tree and treatment) located in branches near tree trunk and randomly selected. Leaves were bagged and covered with aluminum foil early in the morning, more than 2 h before leaf detachment (McCutchan and Shackel 1992).

    Pnand stomatal conductance(Gs) were measured using a portable open infrared gas analyzer (CIRAS-2; PP System, Hitchin, Herts, UK) on fully expanded leaves.Readings were taken after steady-state conditions in gas exchange were achieved (around 1 min). The CO2concentration inside the chamber was automatically controlled by the CIRAS-2 porometer at 400 ppm (ambient CO2concentration, approximately), whereas the radiation,temperature and evaporative demands were those of the environment too. CO2and water vapor concentration differences, as well as leaf temperature obtained from energy balance equations, were used to calculate leaf area based onPn, transpiration rate (E) andGsusing von Caemmerer and Farquhar’s equation (von Caemmerer and Farquhar 1981). For gas exchange measurements, 3 fully expanded sunlit leaves in 5 trees per treatment (15 leaves per treatment) were randomly selected and tagged for continuous measurements. The measurements ofPnandGswere made during the period of water stress and after re-irrigation. Irrigation was restarted 10 days after the beginning of the experiment. Daily variations of leaf gas exchange were measured between 10:00 and 13:00 h Greenwich mean time (GTM).

    In order to establish the relationships among soil and plant water status and gas exchange parameters, correlation and regression analyses were performed. Statistical analyses were done using Statgraphic and Sigmaplot software.

    3. Results

    3.1. Soil and plant water status

    The suspension of irrigation caused a rapid and significant loss in pot weight, more acute in the first 7 d of the experiment when a daily average of 0.88 kg of water was lost in the pots of non-irrigated loquats (Fig. 2-A). Pot weight losses continued at a lower rate from 7 to 9 DAIW. Once irrigation was restored, potted loquats regained original weight (Fig. 2-A). The weight of the pots in irrigated plants remained constant along the whole period of the experiment.Initial measurements of I and NI plants showed that the treatments did not differ in this regard, as they did not do it at the beginning of the experiment for any other parameters under control (Fig. 2).

    Volumetric soil water content measured using TDR also diminished as the dry period advanced, showing significant differences between I and NI plants at 2 DAIW (I=40.59vs.NI=30.79 mm), coinciding with the first significant loss of pot weight. The differences became higher at 4 DAIW (I=38.31vs.NI=13.36 mm) and after (Fig. 2-B). Soil water content in I plants did not show large variations during the period of the experimentation, oscillating around field capacity value (Fig. 2-B). Since runoff and drainage were not observed, lack of changes in pot weight in I plants confirm the adequacy of the irrigation program.

    Ψstclearly reproduced the changes in water availability showing significant differences between treatments also beginning at 2 DAIW (Fig. 2-C). The differences remained significant for the entire dry period, but diminished in a great extent a week after irrigation was restarted (Fig. 2-C). In the last day of the dry period, the averageΨstvalue in NI plants was –4.05 MPa. At that time, the measurements made with the pressure chamber became very difficult, since the emergence of the water drop through the petiole of the leaf was largely delayed, even at very high pressures, causing in occasions the tearing of the leaf blade inside the chamber. In these circumstances, the displacement of the petiole out of the pressure chamber made the measurements dangerous,given the high pressures applied. A single plant reached a negative value ofΨst=–5.00 MPa, before we decided to cancell the dry period. I plants showed values ofΨstbetween–0.70 and –1.15 MPa all the time.

    Fig. 2 Changes in pot weight (A), volumetric soil water content (SWC, B) and stem water potential (Ψst, C) during the experiment (from June 18 to July 6, 2012) in irrigated (I)and non-irrigated (NI) plants. The different letters in each measurement date indicate significant differences at 0.05 level.ns, not significantly different. Bars indicate SE.

    3.2. Gas exchange parameters

    Water stress did indeed affect gas exchange parameters,but the changes were not observed. From equivalent values of stomatal conductance before irrigation withholding(I=150.40vs.NI=148.60 mmol m–2s–1),Gsrecords dropped in NI plants, while remained more or less stable in I plants(Fig. 3-A). The differences became significant at 4 DAIW and increased afterwards, sinceGsvalues plummeted in NI loquats as the dry period progressed. At the end of the dry period,Gsrecords in NI plants averaged only 5.37 mmol m–2s–1.Gswas occasionally reduced in I plants, probably due to the harsh environmental conditions suffered during the experiment (high temperatures and low relative humidity leading to high vapor pressure deficits, Appendix A). In any case,Gsdifferences between I and NI plants remained significant until the end of the dry period. Once irrigation was restarted, these differences disappeared.

    The effects of irrigation withholding on photosynthesis were also noted at 4 DAIW, whenPnvalues in NI plants were barely a 50% of those measured in I plants (I=16.23vs.NI=8.74 μmol m–2s–1). In the last day of irrigation withholding, thePnin NI plants averaged 3.49 μmol m–2s–1,which was much lower than the value measured in control plants (20.35 μmol m–2s–1). After watering was reassumed,NI reached an averagePnvalue of 14.98vs.an average of 14.93 μmol m–2s–1measured in I plants, informing of the fast recovery of NI loquats. Minor oscillations inPnlinked to changes in the environment were also observed in I plants (Fig. 3-B).

    In line with previous argument, the transpiration (E) in NI plants was largely reduced due to the severe water stress.The differences between I and NI plants became significant at 4 DAIW too (I=1.94vs.NI=1.01 mmol m–2s–1) (Fig. 3-C).The differences were even larger at the end of the dry period (I=1.48vs.NI=0.52 mmol m–2s–1), but once again disappeared 1 week after reirrigation (I=0.77vs.NI=0.76 mmol m–2s–1). Stomatal closure has been often linked to an increase in leaf temperature since the lack of transpiration through the closed stomata makes the refrigeration of the leaf tissues difficult. Daily morning temperature during the experiment was between 28.7 and 32.9°C. At solar noon,when measurements were taken, temperatures rose to 30.7-36.7°C (Appendix A). Leaf temperature did not show a clear trend during the experiment. In occasions, leaf temperature was above ambient (approximately 2°C above in both treatments), while in some other moments readings taken in the leaves were below ambient temperatures. The differences between treatments in leaf temperature were not significant and scarcely reached a few tenths of a degree(Appendix A).

    Fig. 3 Changes in stomatal conductance (gs, A), net photosynthetic rate (Pn, B) and transpiration rate (C) during the experiment (from June 17 to July 6, 2012) in irrigated (I) and non-irrigated (NI) plants. The different letters mean significant differences at 0.05 level. ns, no significant different. Bars indicate SE.

    Multiple linear regressions were performed to detect the main environmental and physiological determinants of photosynthetic rates in Algerie loquats. The analyses show significant relationships betweenPnandGs(P=0.007), and betweenPnandΨst(P=0.008). The highest coefficient of determination ofPnrate was obtained forGs(r2=0.759).Non-linear regressions confirmed the significant relationship between these 2 parameters (P<0.0001). The best fitting(r2=0.794) was observed for a logistic model (Fig. 4), in which 3 parts can be identified. In the first part of the curve,forGsvalues close to zero,Pnwas minimal. In the second part of the curve, a linear relationship betweenGsandPncan be deduced. Finally, asGsvalues were higher than 80 mmol m–2s–1,Pndid not increase much, but showed instead a plateau around values of 20 μmol m–2s–1. The highest single measurement ofPnwas 25.6 μmol m–2s–1in control fully irrigated plants measured at the beginning of the experiment in leaves with a value ofGsof 253 mmol m–2s–1.Photosynthesis was never zero. The minimum value ofPnmeasured was 1.8 μmol m–2s–1in NI plants at the end of the dry period when stomata seemed almost close (Gs=1.0 mmol m–2s–1). The comparison of the slopes of the regression equations explaining the relationships betweenPnandGsin different sections of the range showed significant differences(P<0.001) (Fig. 4). The slope of central section was 10 times higher (m=0.1777) than the increase rate observed in the region of the plateau (m=0.0178), meaning a much higher increase ofPnin the central section of the curve.

    On the contrary, no significant relationships were found betweenPnand pot weight, or soil water content,Eand leaf temperature (data not shown). The significant relationship betweenGsandΨstwas not lineal either, but exponential,meaning in this case that higher (less negative) values ofΨstallowed a much higher stomatal aperture (Fig. 5). In other words, a better water status of Algerie loquat plants allows higher stomatal aperture which in turn favors a higher photosynthesis rate. On the contrary, whenΨstfell below–1.5 MPa,Gsdiminished very rapidly precluding then CO2fixation asPndrops acutely. IfΨstdropped to values lower than –3.0 MPa,Gsbecame almost zero (Fig. 5).

    4. Discussion

    Irrigation withholding caused a rapid reduction in water availability in young Algerie trees that were planted in small pots with a limited soil volume. This reduction was reflected in a drastic diminution of the weight of the pots, consequence of the water losses that in turn affected plant water status.Soil water content as well asΨstvalues were extremely low at the end of the irrigation withholding period forcing us to cancel the dry period before the 2-week duration scheduled.The strong water losses and the negative effects observed on plant water status must be the result of the difference between the reduced availability of water in the small pots and the evaporative demand (Boyer 1995), quite high during summer in Almeria, Spain (Appendix A). Detrimental effects on plant water status caused by days with high evaporative demand are often reported in the Mediterranean climate,even for fully irrigated trees of many crops (Morianaet al.2003; Tognettiet al. 2009; Martín-Vertedoret al. 2011).Nonetheless, the main force reducingΨstin NI loquats seems the complete suspension of irrigation. If rapid negative effects were noted on NI plants when irrigation was suspended, equally rapid was the recovery of them when irrigation was restarted, demonstrating thus the extraordinary capacity of loquat to endure severe water restrictions.

    Progressive stomatal closure was the response of NI plants to adapt to the drastic water losses in the soil and to the compromised plant water status. In accordance to this response,Gswas progressively diminished in NI plants reaching the lowest values at the end of the dry period. The significant relationships betweenΨstvalues andGsrecords is shown in Fig. 5, from which it can be deduced that whenΨstfalls below –1.5 MPa,Gsdiminishes rapidly. IfΨstdrops to values lower than –3.0 MPa,Gsbecomes almost zero. This indicates notable effects of moderate levels of water stress on gas exchange parameters, and extreme if water stress is severe. This response is compatible with the remarkable capacity of water-stressed loquats to fully recover once irrigation was restarted.

    Fig. 4 Relationship between net photosynthetic (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Gs). The whole set of data significantly fitted a logistic curve and a linear increase of Pn was found for values of Gs<80 mmol m–2 s–1. For values above this level, a plateau region was observed with the slopes of these regions being significantly different (P<0.001).

    Fig. 5 Relationship between stomatal conductance (Gs) and stem water potential (Ψst).

    Stomatal closure in response to ABA accumulation in the leaves is a common response to water deficits (Lissoet al.2011), since one of the most important function of ABA is to avoid water losses and regulates the tolerance to osmotic stress (Boudsocq and Lauriere 2005). In this sense, it seems that ABA accomplishes a double function in response to drought: it diminishes guard cells turgor and, in addition,induces the expression of genes involved in the tolerance to severe water deficits (Zhu 2002). Low water availability is the main environmental factor limiting photosynthesis and growth in flowering plants (Boyer 1982). This effect often causes severe yield reductions in crops growing in arid and semi-arid zones such as in the Mediterranean climate (Chaveset al. 2003). When water availability is limited after drought episodes, the negative effects on plant water status might lead to progressive stomatal closure and to lower rates of photosynthesis (Lawlor 1995). In this regard, a lineal relationship between stomatal closure and photosynthetic rates has often been reported. In our case,Gsreduction in potted loquats caused a rapid fall ofPnrates(Fig. 4) and a diminution ofE. However, in some species,the relationship between these parameters is more complex.In this regard, Farquhar and Sharkey (1982) conclude that althoughGssubstantially reduces transpiration, rarely limits significantly photosynthesis, because this process is more often limited for other factors contributing to stomatal closure. For instance, under high CO2levels, the limiting factor for photosynthesis is the regeneration of Rubisco.

    In our study,Pnrate showed a significant relationship withGs. The best fitting was observed for a logistic model.Logistic model suggests a maximum level ofPnestablished around an asymptote. That asymptote was around 20 μmol m–2s–1when stomata were fully open. In the logistic curve, 3 parts were identified. The closerGsvalue was to zero, the lessPnwas, althoughPnwas not zero but 2 μmol m–2s–1. In the second part of the curve, a linear relationship betweenGsandPnwas found. Finally, forGsvalues higher than 80 mmol m–2s–1,Pndid not increase much, but instead it showed a plateau, meaning than higher aperture of stomata scarcely increasesPnin young potted Algerie loquats (Fig. 4). Low CO2levels within the leaves often limit photosynthesis in cases of severe water stress. In this regard, Flexaset al. (2004) concluded after a detailed study that water stress mostly affects CO2diffusion in leaves. This decreasing in CO2diffusion could be a consequence of the reduction inGs, but in any case, water deficit would affect the biochemical capacity of the leaves for CO2assimilation. Our experiment shows that despite severe water stress strongly reduced photosynthesis, CO2assimilation never dropped to zero, indicating that the closure of stomata largely reduced,but did not suspend completely photosynthesis in ‘Algerie’loquats. This suggests that some CO2diffused through the cuticle despite stomata are almost closed. This CO2entry would allow a slight photosynthetic rate, even at severe water stress. Boyeret al. (1997) assure that leaf cuticle protects efficiently leaves from dehydration, but that even when stomata are sealed, CO2and water vapor diffuse slowly through the cuticle.

    After restoring irrigation,Pnlevels were rapidly recovered reinforcing the hypothesis that photosynthetic machinery remained intact, after such a severe water stress.Similarly, olive trees subjected to severe water stress had photosynthesis values between 0 and 2 μmol m–2s–1, but also recovered rapidly after irrigation (Morianaet al. 2002).Young apricot trees subjected to 2 periods of water deficit only diminished photosynthetic rate at the end of the dry periods, showing also a fast recovery afterwards. These results suggest that stomata behavior is not a passive response to water deficit. On the contrary, it seems that the aperture and closure of stomata is under a more complex regulation (Ruiz-Sánchezet al. 1997), at least in species well-adapted to the Mediterranean climate such as olive,apricot and loquat. Additionally, in avocado, photosynthesis is inhibited under mild water stress due to a reduction in CO2diffusion linked to stomata closure and to changes in the structure of the mesophyll of the leaf.(Chartzoulakiset al. 2002).

    In this study, we did not find an effect of irrigation withholding on leaf temperature. In this sense, leaf temperature differences between treatments were not significant and scarcely reached a few tenths of a degree.Leaf temperature is directly determined by leaf energy and water balance, but radiation, air temperature, humidity and wind speed modify leaf temperature (Fuchs 1990). High values ofPnwere observed in control plants even when leaf temperature was very high. On the contrary, in a previous study conducted on adult trees in a loquat orchard, very lowPnvalues were observed at midday for fully irrigated plants (Stellfeldtet al. 2011). It is widely known that in Mediterranean climate,Pnat midday strongly decreases during summer due to high temperature, high vapor pressure deficit and high irradiance (Tehnunnenet al. 1984; Ogaya and Pe?uelas 2003; Llusiaet al. 2016). This behavior is a consequence of the strong stomatal control exerted by the plant to avoid large water losses during summer. In this experiment, control plants were fully irrigated in the morning allowing the maintenance of a high enough stomatal conductance and high photosynthetic rates at midday.

    Finally, it is worth mentioning that all NI plants bloomed at the same period, which was regular than I plants did. In previous field experiments, water-stressed loquats during summer bloomed well in advance to control fully irrigated trees (Cuevaset al. 2007, 2008). The lack of effects of the dry period on phenology may be due to NI plants did not reach the threshold level ofSΨneeded to modify flowering dates (SΨ>29 MPa days; Fernándezet al. 2010). In this experiment,SΨin NI plants scarcely reached 20 MPa days, because the dry period was too short to successfully advance blooming dates, despite of the water stress intensity.

    5. Conclustion

    Even though deficit irrigated plants wilted and dropped some leaves, all water stressed plants survived. Furthermore,1 week after irrigation was restored, water stressed plants reachedPnvalues very like those of non-stressed plants confirming the remarkable water stress tolerance of loquat and suggesting that photosynthesis machinery remain intact even after severe levels of water stress in ‘Algerie’ loquat.These results also confirm the good adaptation of loquat to the summer dry periods typical of the Mediterranean climate.No unexpectedly, Spain is the second largest producer of loquat in the world after China.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was partially financed by the Junta de Andalucía with European Union (FEDER) funds (AGR-03183).

    Appendixassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Boudsocq M, Lauriere C. 2005. Osmotic signaling in plants.Multiple pathways mediated by emerging kinase families.Plant Physiology,138, 1185–1194.

    Boyer J S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment.Science,218, 443–448.

    Boyer J S. 1995. Biochemical and biophysical aspects of water deficits and predisposition to disease.Annual Review of Phytopathology,33, 251–274.

    Boyer J S, Wong S C, Farquhar G D. 1997. CO2and water vapor exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials.Plant Physiology,114, 185–191.

    von Caemmerer S V, Farquhar G D. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.Planta,153, 376–387.

    Chartzoulakis K, Patakas A, Kofidis G, Bosabalidis A, Nastou A. 2002. Water stress affect leaf anatomy, gas exchange,water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars.Scientia Horticulturae,95, 39–50.

    Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. 2003. Understanding plants responses to drought - From genes to the whole plant.Functional Plant Biology,30, 239–264.

    Chaves M M, Pereira J S, Maroco J, Rodrigues M L, Ricardo C P P, Osório M L. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field: Photosynthesis and growth.Annals of Botany89, 907–916.

    Cuevas J, Ca?ete M L, Pinillos V, Zapata A J, Fernández M D,González M, Hueso J J. 2007. Optimal dates for regulated deficit irrigation in ‘Algerie’ loquat (Eriobotrya japonicaLindl.) cultivated in Southeast Spain.Agricultural Water Management,89, 131–136.

    Cuevas J, Hueso J J, Rodríguez M C. 2008. Deficit irrigation as a tool for manipulating flowering date in loquat (Eriobotrya japonicaLindl.). In: Sorensen M L, ed.,Agricultural Water Management Research Trends. Nova Science Publishers,New York. pp. 237–253.

    Cuevas J, Pinillos V, Ca?ete M L, Parra S, González M, Alonso F, Fernández M D, Hueso J J. 2012. Optimal duration of irrigation withholding to promote early bloom and harvest in Algerie loquat (Eriobotrya japonicaLindl.).Agricultural Water Management,111, 79–86.

    Davies F S, Lakso A N. 1978. Water relations in apple seedlings:changes in water potential components, abscisic acid levels and stomatal conductance under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions.Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,103, 310–313.

    Davies W J, Kudoyarova G, Hartung W. 2005. Long-distance ABA signaling and its relation to other signaling pathways in the detection of soil drying and the mediation of the plant’s response to drought.Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,24, 285.

    Davies W J, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soils.Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,42, 55–76.

    Díaz-Espejo A, Walcroft A S, Fernández J E, Hafidi B, Palomo M J, Girón I F. 2006. Modeling photosynthesis in olive leaves under drought conditions.Tree Physiology,26, 1445–1456.

    Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.Annual Review of Plant Physiology,33,317–340.

    Fernández M D, Hueso J J, Cuevas J. 2010. Water stress integral for successful modification of flowering dates in‘Algerie’ loquat.Irrigation Science,28, 127–134.

    Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey T D. 2004.Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3plants.Plant Biology,6, 269–279.

    Flore J A, Moon J W, Lakso A N. 1985. The effect of water stress and vapor pressure gradient on stomatal conductance,water use efficiency, and photosynthesis of fruit crops.Acta Horticulturae,171, 207–218.

    Fuchs M. 1990. Infrared measurement of canopy temperature and detection of plant water stress.Theoretical and Applied Climatology,42, 253–261.

    Hueso J J, Cuevas J. 2008. Loquat as a crop model for successful deficit irrigation.Irrigation Science,26, 269–276.

    Hueso J J, Cuevas J. 2010. Ten consecutive years of regulated deficit irrigation probe the sustainability and profitability of this water saving strategy in loquat.Agricultural Water Management,97, 645–650.

    Lawlor D W. 1995. The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis.In: Smirnoff N, ed.,Environment and Plant Metabolism. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford. pp. 129–160.

    Lin S, Sharpe R H, Janick J. 1999. Loquat: Botany and horticulture.Horticultural Reviews,23, 233–276.

    Lisso J, Schr?der F, Fisahn J, Müssig C. 2011. NFX1-LIKE2(NFXL2) suppresses abscisic acid accumulation and stomatal closure inArabidopsis thaliana.PLoS ONE,6,e26982.

    Llusia J, Roahtyn S, Yakir D, Rotenberg E, Seco R, Guenther A, Pe?uelas J. 2016. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and terpene emission response to water availability in dry and mesic Mediterranean forests.Trees,30, 749–759.

    Martín-Vertedor A, Pérez J M, Pietro H, Fereres E. 2011.Interactive responses to water deficits and crop load in olive (Olea europeaL.cv. Morisca). I. Growth and water relations.Agricultural Water Management,98, 941–949.

    Matthews M A, Boyer J S. 1984. Acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials.Plant Physiology,74, 161–166.

    McCutchan H, Shackel K S. 1992. Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domesticaL.cv.French).Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,117, 607–611.

    Medrano H, Escalona J M, Bota J, Gulías J, Flexas J. 2002.Regulation of photosynthesis of C3plants in response to progressive drought: Stomatal conductance as a reference parameter.Annals of Botany,89, 895–905.

    Moriana A, Orgaz, F, Pastor M, Fereres E. 2003. Yield responses of a mature olive orchards to water deficits.Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,128, 435–441.

    Moriana A, Villalobos F J, Fereres E. 2002. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of olive (Olea europeaL.) leaves to water deficits.Plant,Cell and Environment,25, 395–405.

    Nunes M A, Catarino F, Pinto E. 1989. Strategies for acclimation to seasonal drought inCeratonia siliqualeaves.Physiologia Plantarum,77, 150–156.

    Ogaya R, Pe?uelas J. 2003. Comparative seasonal gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two dominant woody species in a Holm Oak.Flora,198, 132–141.

    Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans R C, Oh S, Smedmark J E E,Morgan D R, Kerr M, Robertson K R, Arsenault M, Dickinson T A, Campbell C S. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae.Plant Systematics and Evolution,266, 5–43.

    Ruiz-Sánchez M, Domingo R, Savé R, Biel C, Torrecillas A.1997. Effects of water stress and rewatering on leaf water relations of lemon plants.Biologia Plantarum,39, 623-631.

    Stellfeldt A, Cuevas J, Hueso J J. 2011. Gas exchange in‘Algerie’ loquat during its annual cycle in the Mediterranean basin.Acta Horticulturae,887, 233–237.

    Tenhunen J D, Lange O L, Gebel J, Beyschlag W, Weber J A.1984. Changes in photosynthetic capacity, carboxylation efficiency, and CO2compensation point associated with midday stomatal closure and midday depression of net CO2exchange of leaves of Quercus suber.Planta,162,193–203.

    Tognetti R, Giovanelli A, Lavini A, Morelli G, Fragnito F,d’Andria R. 2009. Assessingenvironmental controls over conductance through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in an experimental olive tree plantation of Southern Italy.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,149, 1229–1243.

    Zhu J K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants.Annual Review of Plant Biology,53, 247–273.

    国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 夜夜爽天天搞| 嫩草影院新地址| 日韩欧美免费精品| 夜夜爽天天搞| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 色视频www国产| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲av美国av| ponron亚洲| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 久久久色成人| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一区福利在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久热精品热| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 极品教师在线视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品久久久噜噜| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一夜夜www| 麻豆国产av国片精品| xxxwww97欧美| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日本黄色片子视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 色av中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品50| 中文字幕久久专区| 高清在线国产一区| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久草成人影院| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 国产成人福利小说| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲综合色惰| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 91麻豆av在线| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日本五十路高清| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 18+在线观看网站| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女免费视频网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产午夜精品论理片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产成人av教育| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品,欧美在线| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99久国产av精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 亚洲av美国av| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产色婷婷99| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产探花极品一区二区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久久性生活片| 久久香蕉精品热| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| av黄色大香蕉| 国产探花极品一区二区| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 看黄色毛片网站| 热99在线观看视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 一夜夜www| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产精品无大码| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久久黄片| 免费大片18禁| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 色5月婷婷丁香| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美+日韩+精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99久国产av精品| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久9热在线精品视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 如何舔出高潮| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 色在线成人网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 久久久久久久久大av| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美bdsm另类| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 日本 av在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品福利观看| 日本 欧美在线| 日本熟妇午夜| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| aaaaa片日本免费| 久久热精品热| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 性色avwww在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 在线播放无遮挡| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 观看免费一级毛片| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 97超视频在线观看视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 九色国产91popny在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产免费男女视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 免费观看精品视频网站| 有码 亚洲区| 中文字幕久久专区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 老司机福利观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| av专区在线播放| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 在线国产一区二区在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 悠悠久久av| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 色综合色国产| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 内射极品少妇av片p| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 在现免费观看毛片| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 一区福利在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产av在哪里看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久草成人影院| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 如何舔出高潮| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产三级在线视频| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲国产色片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 波多野结衣高清作品| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 久久人妻av系列| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久这里只有精品中国| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 91麻豆av在线| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久99久视频精品免费| 男人舔奶头视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 午夜福利在线在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 天堂√8在线中文| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 毛片女人毛片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 在线观看一区二区三区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 88av欧美| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久精品91蜜桃| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产 一区精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一本一本综合久久| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 很黄的视频免费| avwww免费| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费看日本二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 尾随美女入室| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 级片在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 日本成人三级电影网站| 热99re8久久精品国产| avwww免费| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 日本 欧美在线| 久久热精品热| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久久色成人| 日韩中字成人| 窝窝影院91人妻| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲av一区综合| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 成年版毛片免费区| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 少妇的逼水好多| 嫩草影院入口| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久久国产成人免费| 一区福利在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| www.www免费av| 成人三级黄色视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 97热精品久久久久久| 日本与韩国留学比较| 成人综合一区亚洲| 精品久久久久久久末码| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 美女免费视频网站| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 中国美女看黄片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| a在线观看视频网站|