嵌合鞭毛蛋白在大腸桿菌BL21(DE3) 和沙門菌SL5928中的表達與組裝分析

胡茂志，潘志明，楊蕓，孟闖，張磊，耿士忠，焦新安

1 揚州大學(xué) 江蘇省高校動物重要疫病與人獸共患病防控協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心，江蘇 揚州 225009 2 揚州大學(xué) 江蘇省人獸共患病學(xué)重點實驗室，江蘇 揚州 225009

嵌合鞭毛蛋白在大腸桿菌BL21(DE3) 和沙門菌SL5928中的表達與組裝分析

胡茂志1,2*，潘志明1,2*，楊蕓1,2，孟闖1,2，張磊1,2，耿士忠1,2，焦新安1,2

1 揚州大學(xué) 江蘇省高校動物重要疫病與人獸共患病防控協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心，江蘇 揚州 225009 2 揚州大學(xué) 江蘇省人獸共患病學(xué)重點實驗室，江蘇 揚州 225009

胡茂志, 潘志明, 楊蕓, 等. 嵌合鞭毛蛋白在大腸桿菌 BL21(DE3) 和沙門菌 SL5928中的表達與組裝分析. 生物工程學(xué)報,2017, 33(8): 1335-1342.

Hu MZ, Pan ZM, Yang Y, et al. Expression and assembly of chimeric flagellins in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and Salmonella SL5928. Chin J Biotech, 2017, 33(8): 1335-1342.

鞭毛蛋白根據(jù)能否組裝可以表達為單體或多聚體。目前，關(guān)于它們之間的區(qū)別少有報道。文中，將重組質(zhì)粒pET-fliC/M2e2分別導(dǎo)入大腸桿菌BL21(DE3) 和沙門菌SL5928中來表達嵌合鞭毛蛋白mfliC/M和pfliC/M，然后分析它們的組裝特性。SDS-PAGE結(jié)果表明，兩重組菌成功表達了嵌合鞭毛蛋白。透射電鏡觀察顯示，在重組大腸桿菌表面未見鞭毛，而重組沙門菌表面呈現(xiàn)鞭毛。將嵌合蛋白純化后，圓二色譜 (Circular dichroism，CD) 分析表明，兩者的CD信號明顯不同，pfliC/M的CD信號與野生型鞭毛蛋白一致，而mfliC/M基本上沒有CD信號出現(xiàn)。動態(tài)光散射分析表明，mfliC/M的聚集程度明顯低于pfliC/M。將嵌合蛋白轉(zhuǎn)染小鼠腹腔細(xì)胞3 h后，兩者均能誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生IL-1β，但mfliC/M組高于pfliC/M組。以上結(jié)果對于鞭毛蛋白表達形式的選擇具有重要的參考價值。

鞭毛蛋白，表達，組裝，白細(xì)胞介素1β

Introduction

Bacterial flagellum is the motility device of bacterium and its elongated filament is composed primarily of many subunits of flagellin[1]. The N- and C-terminal regions of the Salmonella typhimurium phase 1 flagellin, encoded by the fliCigene, have been reported to be highly conserved helix structure across different bacterial species to maintain the integrity of the filament structure[2], whereas the middle regions are hypervariable regions (HVR).During bacterial flagellar filament assembly, flagellin has to be exported from the cytoplasm to the tip of the growing filament and undergoes a process from unfolding to folding state[3-4]. Because the folding and assembly process is essential for flagellin to be expressed on the bacterial surface[5], the recombinant flagellin can be acquired as unfolding form within the cytoplasm (monomer)[6-7]or folding form showing on the surface of bacteria (polymer)[5,8-9].

Bacterial flagellin is a potent trigger of host innate immune responses in eukaryotes[10-11]. Two forms of flagellin have been found to show different ascendency in the immune response against exogenous antigen, although they have all been reported to show adjuvanticity[12-13]. Besides, the residues of flagellin which are involved in Toll-like receptor-5 signaling and NLRC4 (NLR family,CARD domain containing 4) inflammasome response are hidden in the flagellum and only monomer is accessible for recognition by host cells[14-17]. Hence the folding and assembly process of flagellin mayinfluence their biological function. It is reported that flagella combined with exogenous antigen can significantly promote the release of cytokine, when compared with flagella alone[12]. Thus, for the flagellin-specific response assay, the present of exogenous antigen is more practical for the vaccine development than flagellin alone.

Replacement of part of the HVR of flagellin by exogenous antigen is a potentially effective strategy for the vaccine development[18]. The monomeric flagellin expressed in Escherichia coli and the polymeric form directly isolated from Salmonella is usually used in the vaccine development[8,13,19-20].Reports have shown that the linkage of flagellin with the ectodomain of matrix 2 protein of influenza A virus (M2e) is a good vaccine candidate[20-21]. In this experiment, in order to analyze the assembly and biological activities of two forms of flagellin, two tandem M2e genes were designed to replace the DNA sequence (607–684 bp) of the fliCigene in HVR and the chimeric genes were expressed in E. coli and Salmonella to produce the monomer and polymer chimeric flagellin, respectively. Then, the protein conformation, polymerization and IL-1β release in the early stage of immunization were analyzed.

1 Materials and methods

1.1 Mice and bacteria

Ten six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Comparative Medicine Center of Yangzhou University, China. This study was carried out in accordance with the regulations set forward by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology.The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Yangzhou University (Permit number: 2007-0005). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia,and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. The recombinant plasmid pET-fliC containing fliCigene of S. typhimurium LT2 in the BamHⅠ/XhoⅠ sites of pET30a+ was constructed by Dr. Hui Zhang[18]. E. coli BL21(DE3), S. typhimurium LB5000 and aflagellar S. dublin SL5928 were used in the following cloning procedures. The wild-type flagellin of S. typhimurium SL7207 was used as a control.

1.2 Construction of recombinant plasmids

The DNA fragment (5′-GATACTACGATTGCT TTAGACAATAGTACTTCCCTGCTGACCGAAGTT GAAACCCCGACCCGTAACGAATGGGAATGCCG TTGCTCCGATTCCTCCGATGGCGGCGGCTGCTC CCTGCTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCCCGACCCGTA ACGAATGGGAATGCCGTTGCTCCGATTCCTCCG AT AAATATTACGCCAAAGTTACCGTTACGGGG-3′) was synthesized by GenScript Company (Nanjing,China). In this sequence, two M2e genes (4–72 bp)were connected with a DNA sequence, 5′-GGCGG CGGCTGC-3′, to yield the M2e2 gene (underlined).At the two ends of the M2e2 gene, a partial HVR sequence of fliCigene was included for overlap polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures. The 5′-terminal region of the fliCigene, fliC-AC, was amplified from pET-fliC using the following primers:fliC-forward-A and fliC-reverse-C. The 3′-terminal region, fliC-DB, was amplified using the following primers: fliC-forward-D and fliC-reverse-B. The fliCAC-M2e2 fragment was amplified using the following primers: fliC-forward-A and M2E2-reverse from fliC-AC and M2e2. The chimeric fliC/M2e2 gene was amplified using the following primers:fliC-forward-A and fliC-reverse-B from fliC-AC-M2e2 and fliC-DB (Table 1; Fig. 1). The PCR product was cloned into the BamHⅠ/XhoⅠ sites of pET30a+ to yield the recombinant plasmid, pET-fliC/M2e2.

Table 1 Primers used in this experiment

Fig. 1 Schematic construction of the chimeric gene fliC/M2e2.

1.3 Preparation of monomeric chimeric flagellin expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)

The plasmid pET-fliC/M2e2 was transformed into BL21(DE3). The recombinant bacteria, BL21(DE3)(pET-fliC/M2e2), were cultured in LB agar plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin overnight at 37 °C and the kanamycin-resistant colonies were then amplified by culturing with 1 mmol/L isopropylβ-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The recombinant bacterium BL21(DE3)(pET) was used as a negative control. Affinity purification of His-tagged monomeric chimeric flagellin (mfliC/M) was performed with a nickel bead column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA)according to the manufacturer’s instructions after cell lysis by ultrasonication.

1.4 Preparation of polymeric chimeric flagellin expressed in Salmonella SL5928

The plasmid pET-fliC/M2e2 was electroporated into LB5000 and then transferred to SL5928 by P22HTint transduction, as previously described[18].Polymeric chimeric flagellin (pfliC/M) in the surface of kanamycin-resistant recombinant SL5928(fliC/M2e2)was extracted by acid treatment followed by ammonium sulfate precipitation, as previously described[13].

1.5 Transmission electron microscopy

The growth of chimeric flagella in the surface of bacteria and purified proteins were observed by Tecnai-12 transmission electronic microscopy(Philips, Holland) after negative staining.

1.6 SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

The expression and purity of chimeric flagellin were confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).The proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose and treated with murine anti-flagellin polyclonal antibody for Western blotting assay.

1.7 Circular dichroism

To investigate the secondary structure of purified flagellin, pfliC/M and mfliC/M, the far-ultraviolet(UV) circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded using a J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan)using 0.2 cm path length cuvettes at 20 °C. The concentration of all samples used was 50 μg/mL in 10 mmol/L phosphate buffer saline (PBS), pH 7.4.The CD spectrum of PBS was used as baseline. The mean spectra of three repeated scans in the range between 190 nm and 250 nm, corrected by subtraction of the buffer signal, were obtained by taking points every 0.1 nm with 1 nm slit width.

1.8 Dynamic light scattering

To further investigate the polymerization of mfliC/M in solution, the dynamic light scattering(DLS) measurements for pfliC/M and mfliC/M were performed with an EEN 3690 Malvern Zetasizer(Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) at 20 °C. The concentration of all samples used was adjusted to 50 μg/mL in PBS (pH 7.4).

1.9 IL-1β release

Primary peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) of C57BL/6 mice were harvested by washing the peritoneal cavity with RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (1640-FBS,Gibco, Carlsbad, CA), as previously described(Kumari and Saxena, 2011). Cells were plated in 96-well plates at 2×104cells/well and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with 1 μg/mL E. coli lipopolysaccharide(LPS). The supernatants were removed and the cells were washed with 1640-FBS. pfliC/M and mfliC/M were then transfected respectively using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and incubated for 3 h (Simon and Samuel, 2008). The non-transfected cells were used as controls. The secretion of IL-1β in supernatant was detected usinga mouse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)set (Biosciences, PharMingen, San Diego, CA).

1.10 Statistical analysis

Within each experiment, three to four replicate assays were conducted for each treatment. All statistical analyses were performed by Student’s t-test using SPSS software (Version 13.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL). A value of P≤0.05 was considered to be significant.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Identification of two forms of chimeric flagellin

In the filament assembly of bacterial flagellum,the unfolding subunit protein flagellin has to be transported via a narrow channel, and then fold before being assembled into the growing filament[3-4].The transport process is accompanied with the change of protein conformation. In this study, in order to express different forms of chimeric flagellin,the recombinant plasmid pET-fliC/M2e2 containing the chimeric gene fliC/M2e2 was designed to express as monomeric or polymeric flagellin using different expression systems, respectively.

For the expression of monomeric chimeric flagellin, the SDS-PAGE and Western blotting results indicated that mfliC/M was successfully expressed in recombinant bacteria BL21(DE3)(pET-fliC/M2e2) when compared to BL21(DE3)(pET)(Fig. 2A). No flagellum was found on the surface of recombinant E. coli. For the expression of polymeric chimeric flagellin, polymeric flagella were observed on the bacterial surface of SL5928(fliC/M2e2) when compared to SL5928 (Fig. 2B). The molecular mass of pfliC/M and mfliC/M were about 50 kDa and 60 kDa, respectively (Fig. 2C). After purified, the polymeric pfliC/M showed a filament shape similar to wild-type flagellin and was significantly different from monomeric mfliC/M by transmission electronic microscope (Fig. 2D).

In BL21(DE3), the 6×His-tag was fusion expressed with fliC/M2e2 for purification of monermeric mfliC/M. While in SL5928, the fliC/M2e2 gene was integrated into the chromosome of SL5928 through homologous recombination[18]. In this study, the molecular weight between these two forms of chimeric flagellin was different. One reason may be due to the 6×His-tag in mfliC/M, besides posttranslational modification.

2.2 Circular dichroism spectra and polymerization of two forms of chimeric flagellin

The folding and assembly of polymeric flagellin is one of the major difference compared with monomeric flagellin. CD spectroscopy is a common method for the analysis of protein structures in solution[22-23]. CD spectra between 190 and 250 nm are usually used to analyze the secondary structure of protein[23]. Moreover, the polymerization of proteins in solution can be determined by the size distribution by volume.

The far-UV CD measurements indicated that significantly different CD spectra between 190 and 250 nm were found between monomeric mfliC/M and polymeric pfliC/M. The CD signal of pfliC/M was stronger than that of mfliC/M. Similar CD spectra were observed between pfliC/M and wild-type polymeric flagellin of S. typhimurium SL7207 (Fig. 3A). The CD spectra of pfliC/M showed two negative peaks at 208 nm and 222 nm.This indicated that the helix conformation is its major secondary structure.

The polymerization of proteins in solution measured by DLS indicated that the mean dynamic radium of pfliC/M was larger than that of mfliC/M,though a few polymers were present in the mfliC/M solution (Fig. 3B). This indicated that the polymerization degree of pfliC/M was higher than that of mfliC/M.

The significant difference in transmission electronic microscope observation, CD spectra and polymerization between mfliC/M and pfliC/M may be due to the process of assembly. The terminal regions of flagellin are conserved helix structure to maintain the integrity of the filament structure[2].The secondary structure of pfliC/M in this study showed typical helix conformation confirmed this point. Whereas only low-level polymerization of mfliC/M were found in vitro, thus we suppose that the polymerization of pfliC/M in vivo is a complex process. The middle region of flagellin is a HVR varying greatly in size and composition in different strains, and the insertion of exogenous antigen into HVR does not interfere with the assembly and export function[1,3-4]. This study also verified that replacement of part of the HVR by M2e did not interfere with the conformation of polymeric flagellin.

Fig. 2 Generation of chimeric flagellin pfliC/M (polymer) and mfliC/M (monomer). (A) SDS-PAGE (lane 1, 2) and Western blotting(lane 3, 4) analysis of recombinant bacteria induced with IPTG. M: standard molecular weight markers; lane 1 and 3:BL21(DE3)(pET); lane 2 and 4: BL21(DE3)(pET-fliC/M2e2). (B) Transmission electron microscopy observation of SL5928 and SL5928(fliC/M2e2) after negative staining. (C) SDS-PAGE of purified proteins. M: standard molecular weight markers; lane 1:pfliC/M; lane 2: mfliC/M. (D) Transmission electron microscopy observation of purified mfliC/M and pfliC/M after negative staining.

Fig. 3 Circular dichroism (A) and dynamic light scattering (B) assay of pfliC/M and mfliC/M. Results represent one of four independent experiments.

2.3 IL-1β release of PECs after transfection

LPS does not activate NLRC4[24], but can induce the production of pro-IL-1β[25]. The C-terminal amino acid sequence of flagellin, which was hidden in the inner of filament, can be sensed by NLRC4 in macrophages and then trigger the maturation and release of IL-1β[4,17]. Thus, the level of IL-1β secreted by macrophages can be used to indicate the activation of the NLRC4 signaling pathway. Report has shown that the secretion of IL-1β can be stimulated after transfection of monomeric flagellin to PECs[26-27]. In the study,three hours after transfection, the IL-1β assay indicated that pfliC/M and mfliC/M could significantly induce the secretion of IL-1β in PECs compared with the untransfected group (P＜0.05).The secretion level of IL-1β triggered by pfliC/M was lower than that for mfliC/M (P＜0.05) (Fig. 4).The relatively higher level of IL-1β secretion induced by mfliC/M may be due to the direct recognition by NLRC4 in the early stage, whereas polymeric flagellin must dissociate to release the monomeric form of flagellin first. While the detailed mechanism need to be further studied.

Fig. 4 IL-1β secretion. Primary peritoneal exudate cells(2×104/well) from C57BL/6 mice were incubated with E. coli LPS (1 μg/mL) for 3 h to induce the production of pro-IL-1β.Then, pfliC/M or mfliC/M was transfected using Lipofectamine 2 000 and incubated for 3 h. The concentration of IL-1β in supernatant was detected by ELISA. Non-transfected cells were used as control. These experiments were repeated three times.

3 Conclusion

Flagellin can be recognized by the innate immune system and has been used as adjuvant in the vaccine development[28]. The different expression and assembly assay of chimeric flagellin found in this study will be beneficial for their use in the future.

REFERENCES:

[1] Malapaka RRV, Adebayo LO, Tripp BC. A deletion variant study of the functional role of the Salmonella flagellin hypervariable domain region in motility. J Mol Biol, 2007, 365(4): 1102–1116.

[2] Muskotál A, Király R, Sebestyén A, et al.Interaction of FliS flagellar chaperone with flagellin. FEBS Lett, 2006, 580(16): 3916–3920.

[3] Chng C, Kitao A. Thermal unfolding simulations of bacterial flagellin: insight into its refolding before assembly. Biophys J, 2008, 94(10): 3858–3871.

[4] Chng CP, Kitao A. Mechanical unfolding of bacterial flagellar filament protein by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Graph Modell, 2010,28(6): 548–554.

[5] Cuadros C, Lopez-Hernandez FJ, Dominguez AL,et al. Flagellin fusion proteins as adjuvants or vaccines induce specific immune responses. Infect Immun, 2004, 72(5): 2810–2816.

[6] Qian F, Li MM, Chen Y, et al. Salmonella flagellin acted as an effective fusion partner for expression of Plasmodium falciparum surface protein 25 in Escherichia coli. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2016,12(9): 2362–2364.

[7] Song L, Xiong D, Kang XL, et al. An avian influenza A (H7N9) virus vaccine candidate based on the fusion protein of hemagglutinin globular head and Salmonella typhimurium flagellin. BMC Biotechnol, 2015, 15(1): 79.

[8] Braga CJM, Massis LM, Sbrogio-Almeida ME, et al. CD8+T cell adjuvant effects of Salmonella FliCd flagellin in live vaccine vectors or as purified protein. Vaccine, 2010, 28(5): 1373–1382.

[9] Le Moigne V, Robreau G, Mahana W. Flagellin as a good carrier and potent adjuvant for Th1response: study of mice immune response to the p27 (Rv2108) Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen.Mol Immunol, 2008, 45(9): 2499–2507.

[10] Brunner R, Jensen-Jarolim E, Pali-Sch?ll. The ABC of clinical and experimental adjuvants—a brief overview. Immunol Lett, 2010, 128(1): 29–35.

[11] Mizel SB, Graff AH, Sriranganathan N, et al.Flagellin-F1-V fusion protein is an effective plague vaccine in mice and two species of nonhuman primates. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2009, 16(1): 21–28.

[12] Rochon M, R?mling U. Flagellin in combination with curli fimbriae elicits an immune response in the gastrointestinal epithelial cell line HT-29.Microbes Infect, 2006, 8(8): 2027–2033.

[13] Skountzou I, del Pilar Martin M, Wang BZ, et al.Salmonella flagellins are potent adjuvants for intranasally administered whole inactivated influenza vaccine. Vaccine, 2010, 28(24): 4103–4112.

[14] Zhang L, Pan ZM, Kang XL, et al. Amino acids 89–96 of Salmonella typhimurium flagellin represent the major domain responsible for TLR5-independent adjuvanticity in the humoral immune response. Cell Mol Immunol, 2015, 12(5): 625–632.

[15] Forstneri? V, Ivi?ak-Kocjan K, Ljubeti? A, et al.Distinctive recognition of flagellin by human and mouse Toll-like receptor 5. PLoS ONE, 2016,11(7): e0158894.

[16] Voogdt CGP, Bouwman LI, Kik MJL, et al.Reptile Toll-like receptor 5 unveils adaptive evolution of bacterial flagellin recognition. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19046.

[17] Zhang H, Liu L, Wen K, et al. Chimeric flagellin expressed by Salmonella typhimurium induces an ESAT-6-specific Th1-type immune response and CTL effects following intranasal immunization.Cell Mol Immunol, 2011, 8(6): 496–501.

[18] Bargieri DY, Leite JA, Lopes SCP, et al.Immunogenic properties of a recombinant fusion protein containing the C-terminal 19 kDa of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 and the innate immunity agonist FliC flagellin of Salmonella typhimurium. Vaccine,2010, 28(16): 2818–2826.

[19] Du LY, Zhou YS, Jiang SB. Research and development of universal influenza vaccines.Microbes Infect, 2010, 12(4): 280–286.

[20] Huleatt JW, Nakaar V, Desai P, et al. Potent immunogenicity and efficacy of a universal influenza vaccine candidate comprising a recombinant fusion protein linking influenza M2e to the TLR5 ligand flagellin. Vaccine, 2008, 26(2): 201–214.

[21] Ceaglio N, Etcheverrigaray M, Kratje R, et al.Influence of carbohydrates on the stability and structure of a hyperglycosylated human interferon alpha mutein. Biochimie, 2010, 92(8): 971–978.

[22] Meersman F, Atilgan C, Miles AJ, et al. Consistent picture of the reversible thermal unfolding of hen egg-white lysozyme from experiment and molecular dynamics. Biophys J, 2010, 99(7): 2255–2263.

[23] Furukawa Y, Inoue Y, Sakaguchi A, et al.Structural stability of flagellin subunit affects the rate of flagellin export in the absence of FliS chaperone. Mol Microbiol, 2016, 102(3): 405–416.

[24] Pelegrin P, Barroso-Gutierrez C, Surprenant A.P2X7receptor differentially couples to distinct release pathways for IL-1β in mouse macrophage.J Immunol, 2008, 180(11): 7147–7157.

[25] Simon R, Samuel CE. Interleukin-1 beta secretion is activated comparably by FliC and FljB flagellins but differentially by wild-type and DNA adenine methylase-deficient Salmonella. J Interf Cytokine Res, 2010, 28(11): 661–666.

[26] Zhao Y, Yang JL, Shi JJ, et al. The NLRC4 inflammasome receptors for bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Nature, 2011,477(7366): 596–600.

[27] Matusiak M, Van Opdenbosch N, Vande Walle L,et al. Flagellin-induced NLRC4 phosphorylation primes the inflammasome for activation by NAIP5.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112(5): 1541–1546.

[28] Xiao XX, Zhang Y, Liu JX, et al.Immunoenhancement with flagellin as an adjuvant to whole-killed rabies vaccine in mice. Arch Virol,2016, 161(3): 685–691.

(本文責(zé)編 郝麗芳)

Expression and assembly of chimeric flagellins in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and Salmonella SL5928

Maozhi Hu1,2＊, Zhiming Pan1,2＊, Yun Yang1,2, Chuang Meng1,2, Lei Zhang1,2,Shizhong Geng1,2, and Xin’an Jiao1,2

1 Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China

Flagellin can be expressed in monomeric or polymeric form based on assembly. The difference of these two forms of flagellin is less studied. In this experiment, recombinant plasmid pET-fliC/M2e2 was transferred into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and Salmonella SL5928 to express chimeric flagellin, mfliC/M and pfliC/M, respectively, and then their assembly characteristics were analyzed. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis results indicated that the two recombinant bacteria could successfully express chimeric flagellin. The transmission electronic microscope observation showed that no flagella were found on the surface of recombinant E. coli, whereas it was found for recombinant Salmonella. After purification, distinct circular dichroism spectra between them were found and pfliC/M showed the similar structure as wild-type flagellin, but not for mfliC/M. The dynamic light scattering assay also indicated that the polymerization of mfliC/M was much lower than that for pfliC/M. Three hours after transfection into mouse peritoneal macrophages, both could induce interleukin 1β secretion, but mfliC/M is stronger than pfliC/M. These data will be helpful for the selection of expression form of flagellin.

flagellin, expression, assembly, interleukin 1β

October 3, 2016; Accepted: March 9, 2017

s：Xin’an Jiao. Tel/Fax: +86-514-87971136; E-mail: jiao@yzu.edu.cn Maozhi Hu. Tel/Fax: +86-514-87979244; E-mail: mzhu@yzu.edu.cn

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31320103907, 31372414), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

*These authors contributed equally to this study.

國家自然科學(xué)基金(Nos. 31320103907, 31372414 )，江蘇省優(yōu)勢學(xué)科資助。

時間：2017-04-11

：http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1998.Q.20170411.1707.003.html