• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Horizontal gas mixing in rectangular fluidized bed:A novel method for gas dispersion coefficients in various conditions and distributor designs

    2017-05-29 01:39:44AsheeshNautiyalChienSongChyangPinWeiLiHsinYungHou

    Asheesh Nautiyal,Chien-Song Chyang*,Pin-Wei Li,Hsin-Yung Hou

    Department of Chemical Engineering,Chung Yuan Christian University,Taoyuan 320,Taiwan,China

    1.Introduction

    A gas- fluidized bed is a system ofrandomly spread macroscopic particles that are suspended by an upward flow of air.In a fluidized bed,widespread gas and solid mixing provide a large active surface area to enhance chemical reactions and heat transfer[1].Fluidized beds are used in industry,particularly for the combustion of various fuels,the bulk drying of materials,and some food processing techniques[2,3].Various studies discussed gas-solid mixing,dispersion in a fluidized bed and fluidized bed design to promote high levels of contact between gases and solids[4-6].

    Numerous studies have been made to estimate only the dispersion coefficient(Dr)for a circularand rectangular fluidized bed,and itis generally constant at all levels in the bed(excluding the level near the bottom).Werther and Molerus[7]reported a detailed experimental study on the bubble behavior of fluidized beds with different diameters,sizes and densities.They suggested that near the distributor,a zone of maximum bubble growth exists in an annulus near the wall.With increasing bed height,this zone approaches the center of the bed.They stated that the presence of the wall prevents attraction to the inner bubbles from the outside;thus,the bubbles tend to coalesce,and the maximum bubble flow position approaches the central axis.If the wall is circular,the effectis circumferentially even,and the peak is atnearly the same radial location at a given height.However,Whitehead and Dent[8]suggested that if the wall is square,then the wall effect is not circumferentially even,and the peak position does not form a circular position but forms several spots arranged in a rectangle.

    Some previous studies observed and discussed the dispersion behavior and dispersion coefficients of the tracer in the lateral and horizontal planes in rectangular and circular fluidized beds.Kunii and Levenspiel[9]reported lateral dispersion of fluidized solids,postulating thatsolid particles are displaced by the rising bubbles,and then the particles are drawn into the wake of the bubbles where they are mixed.Shi and Fan[10]measured the lateral dispersion coefficients of particles(Dsr)in a rectangular gas-solid fluidized bed.They developed an empirical,dimensionless correlation to estimate the lateral dispersion coefficient.Klinkenberget al.[11]presented a study of the concentration distributions caused by diffusion in a fluid moving in a cylindrical tube at uniform velocity.They obtained a solution for a general equation of nonisotropic diffusion using two-sided Laplace integrals with boundary conditions.Brenner[12]provided a method forthe solution ofthe diffusion model of homogeneous fluid displacement in beds of finite length.The results presented in Brenner's paper are given in dimensionless form for the instantaneous concentration of solute leaving the bed and the average solute concentration in the bed at any instant.

    Using the study by Klinkenberget al.[11],Rowe and Evans[13]predicted the tracer dispersion at points within the bed using a singlephase model,primarily depending on the radial dispersion coefficient(Dr).In their study,the radial dispersion coefficient increases rapidly from a value near molecular diffusion with an increase in the excess gas flow(U-Umf.).Atimtay and Cakaloz[14]obtained the two-dimensional diffusion model.They measuredDrof a gas in a 10-cm-diameter fluidized bed charged with resin beads using a new strip staining technique with bromine as the tracer.Lin and Chyang[15]discussed the gas mixing in the radial direction within a cold model circular fluidized bed,which was studied using response surface methodology(RSM).Their results showed that the standard deviation of the time-averaged radial tracer concentration is well correlated with the operational and geometric parameters.?tefanica and Hrdli?ka[16]described the experimental apparatus for measurement ofDr,and the effects of gas velocity at various fluidization values and bed heights were investigated.The maximum value ofDron each level was found either in the center of the bed or at the wall.

    Fuel mixing has a large impact on the overallperformance of a fluidized bed combustor(FBC).As the fuel's horizontal mixing improves,there is a more uniform local stoichiometric ratio in the reactor's cross section,and this lowers the occurrence of sites with unreacted fuel or oxygen.The effects of various operating parameters on the dispersion coefficient have been studied in previous works.Such studies primarily focus on the effects of the operating parameters,such as super ficial gas velocity and particle size,on dispersion behavior[17-19].

    Most studies related to dispersion in the horizontal plane use smallscale circular and rectangular beds.Van Deemter[20]investigated mixing in small and large fluidized beds and demonstrated the importance of the size effect.The author concluded that the differences and similarities between a small and large bed could be attributed to the flow regime.Zhanget al.[21]suggested that the particle concentration is evenly distributed across the bed core but rapidly increases at the boundary layer towards the wall surfaces in circulating fluidized bed boilers.They mentioned that the cross-sectional average solid volume fraction was low,even as low as 0.003.The high particle concentration at the wall in such a dilute phase might be attributed to the membrane-tube wall con figuration and to the small bed aspect ratio,which is an order of magnitude of 10.The effects of various operating parameters on the dispersion coefficient are considered a wellunderstood phenomenon;yet,the effect of the side walls on the dispersion coefficient has not been discussed considerably.Therefore,it is necessary to investigate the effect of the chamber walls on dispersion behavior.

    Using the radial dispersion coefficient(Dr)for a circular fluidized bed is acceptable,but switching to a rectangular bed,Drneeds to be decomposed into Cartesian form,DxandDy,in the horizontal plane.This study uses a new analytic solution to estimateDxandDy.

    Rectangular fluidized-bed combustors have been widely adopted for commercial application.For most of the commercial fluidized beds,tuyere nozzles or bubbling caps are used as the distributor instead of perforated plates.Fora perforated plate,the gas jetfrom the distributoris in the vertical direction.Rather,for a fluidized bed equipped with tuyeretype distributor,the gas jetfromthe nozzle is in the horizontalplane.So,it becomes necessary to develop a method for estimating dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,in a rectangular fluidized bed.Additionally,in a rectangular fluidized bed,with a relatively low length-to-width ratio,back-mixing of solids does not substantially occur.

    In this study,a novel analytical solution,in terms ofDxandDy,was established for a governing equation of the tracer dispersion in the steady state.However,the solutions are valid for specialized situations,such as tracer injection from a point source with the physically relevant boundary conditions[15].Further,a novelsurface fitting ofthe obtained analytical solution to the experimental data is presented in this study.The tracer concentration data points along theXandYaxes at a certain height(Z-axis)were collected using controllable probes with CO2detection tips.In the fluidized bed,the dispersion coefficients are discussed within a Cartesian coordinate system of a three-dimensional dispersion model.In addition,the obtained results were compared with the conventional model[13],which shows that the values ofDxandDyremain in the same range.

    2.Experimental

    All ofthe experiments are conducted in a lab-scale rectangular fluidized bed,fabricated with a transparentacrylic column.The cross section ofthe bed is 0.2 m×0.4 m,and itis 1.5 min height.Aschematic diagram of the apparatus is shown in Fig.1.The experimental setup is similar to thatofour previously published papers[15,17].The fluidizing air is supplied by a 15 hp.Roots blower,and the super ficial gas velocities are set to be multiples of minimum fluidization velocity(Umf),that is,3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf.Glass beads with a mean density of 2500 kg·m-3and a mean size of 385 μm are used as the bed material.The minimum fluidizing velocity is 0.115 m·s-1.The static bed height(Hs)is 0.2 m.At the bottom,an acrylic perforated plate with 343 holes of 1.85 mm ID is employed as the gas distributor.In this experiment,carbon dioxide is used as the tracer gas.The glass bead used in this study is smooth and the absorption of CO2by glass beads can be neglected.The injection rate of the tracer gas is 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas was continuously injected from the center while maintaining the same distributor levelviaa 6.4 mm ID stainless-steel tube into the bed.After reaching a steady state of the tracer gas in the bed,using a stainless-steel probe of 6.35 mm I.D,the downstream tracer gas is sampled at 5 and 10 cm(sampling height(Z)is the distance between tracer gas injector and sampling point)above the distributor in a horizontal plane at fixed distances in 2D coordinate geometry,as shown in Fig.2.To observe the effect of the side walls,the tracer position shifted from the center to near the wall of the chamber along the long side,i.e.,theX-axis.To examine the effect of the bed height,two static bed heights of 15 cm and 20 cm were prepared.

    To study the effect of distributor design on the dispersion coefficients,the perforated plate was replaced with a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.The super ficial gas velocities are 3.5Umfand 5Umf.The bed materials are the same and the static bed height is 25 cm.The height of tracer injection is 10 cm and the sampling height(Z)is 10 cm above the distributor for the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.

    The concentrations of the tracer gas in the bed are analyzed using a nondispersive infrared gas analyzer(ETG IMA 3000B).The dimensionless ratio,C/Co,represents the concentration of the tracer gas in the study,whereCis the concentration of the tracer gas in the bed where the gas is mixed with the bed particles,andCois the concentration of the tracer gas within the freeboard.The tracer gas and fluidizing air are assumed to be well mixed.In this study,Cois 2350×10-6.Fig.3 shows the con figuration of the 3D lab-scale rectangular fluidized bed with the tracer gas injection and the data sampling locations in the horizontal(X-Y)plane and in the vertical(Z)direction.Our lab scale fluidized bed setup is a small-scale replica of commercially used fluidized bed technology,so the results from this study can be applied more accurately to a large size fluidized bed.

    2.1.Modeling

    In this study,a governing equation for tracer dispersion in a rectangular fluidized bed is formulated.An analytical solution is obtained for the governing equation of tracer dispersion with the physically relevant boundary conditions.

    The governing equation for tracer dispersion in the rectangular bed is as follows:

    whereCis the tracer concentration(kg·cm-3);Vx,Vy,andVzare the super ficial gas velocity vectors(cm·s-1)in the respective directions;andDx,Dy,andDzare the dispersion coefficients(cm2·s-1)in the respective directions.In a fluidized bed, flow through the bed is commonly represented by dispersed plug flow,where the mechanismofmixing involves the effective dispersion coefficients,DyandDr,known as axial and radial dispersion,respectively.Axial dispersion(Dy)can be offset by radial dispersion(Dr),which means that radial dispersion in fluences the plug flow behavior.For a steady state,plug flow,and negligible vertical dispersion(compared with the convective transport)from a point source in the rectangular bed,Eq.(1)can be simplified,as follows:

    The tracer progresses as a thin slab(dZ)in a rectangular bed where a massM(kg)oftracer is released atX=Y=Z=0.Rearranging Eq.(2)in the moving frame of reference with the direction of flow,thenZ/U= τ and ?C/?(Z/U)=?C/?τ and Eq.(2)transforms into the following equation:

    Fig.3.Continuous release of the tracer at mid-width W(X=0),(Y=0)and(Z=0).(a)The lab-scale fluidized bed.(b)Tracer point at mid-width.

    The solution is found by collecting thefandηterms on separate sides of the equation,as follows:

    As assumed in the beginning,τ=Z/U,we return to the stationary frame.Further,the solution transforms into the following equation:

    Dividing Eq.(6)by dZ(the tracer moving as a thin slab of heightdZ),the following equation is obtained:

    whereMis?m·(dZ/U)in which?mis the mass flow rate(kg·s-1,i.e.,Co·U·A),Cois the tracer gas concentration(kg·cm-3)atZ= ∞,andAis the cross-sectional area of theXYplane.Eq.(7)can be written as follows:

    The obtained experimental data are analyzed in OriginPro 8,which includes conversion of the worksheet data into the matrix for the 3D surface plot in theX-Y-Zdimensions.Origin's 3D surface fitting is performed by the nonlinear least squares fitter(NLFit)tool using a “user de fined built-in function”based on the compiled language(Origin C)of Eq.(8)[24,25].The solution,i.e.,Eq.(8),is written in the“Z-Script function form”,whereZis the dependent variable,andXandYare independentvariables.The other parameters in the“Z-Scriptfunction form”for surface fitting of Eq.(8)are de fined as follows:Z0,U1,D1,andD2 are named for the parametersA,U,DxandDy,respectively.Next,the“Z-Script function form”is compiled,and the parameter initialization is performed with constant and initial guess values.The nonlinear fitting always starts with an initial guess of the parameter to ensure greater convergence.Finally,auto-iterations are performed to achieve the best fit of Eq.(8)to the experimental data.

    Previously,Rowe and Evans[13]have discussed the solution and estimation ofDrusing a single-phase modelwith remote boundary conditions,as shown in Eq.(9).The results from Eq.(9)are used for comparison with the proposed model,i.e.,Eq.(8).

    3.Results and Discussion

    3.1.Effect of super ficial gas velocities(U)on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Fig.4.The experimental 3D surface plot of tracer gas concentrations with various super ficial gas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=5 cm).(a)U=3.5U mf;(b)U=5U mf;(c)U=6.5U mf.

    Fig.4(a)-(c)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at the sampling height of 5 cm with super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf,respectively.TheXaxis andYaxis represent the length and width,respectively,of the lab-scale fluidized bed as shown in Fig.3.The unit is in centimeter.From Fig.4(a)-(c),it can be observed that as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,the tracer gas concentration spreads farther.

    Subsequently,Fig.5(a)-(c)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting,based on the analytical solution,on the 3D surface plot ofthe experimental data to estimateDxandDy.The values of Adj.R-square in all surface fittings are greater than 97%,which indicates the quality of the best fit.Table 1 shows the estimated dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,from the nonlinear surface fitting of the experimentaldata under different working conditions.

    Fig.6(a)and(b)show the 2D form of the concentration profiles of the tracer gas along theXandYaxes with various super ficial gas velocities.The concentration profiles flatten as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,which indicates that the mixing extent at a higher super ficial gas velocity is improved.Fig.6(a)and(b)also show that the tracer gas concentration reaches a steady value,which is equivalent to the CO2concentration in the air(approximately 400×10-6).Because ofthe low sampling height(Z=5 cm),the jet effect is vigorous.Therefore,the maximum vertical tracer gas concentration could be overvalued.The maximum points are distantfrom the peak line.From Table 1,Dxis generally greater thanDy,which may be due to the effect of the side walls.The ratio ofDxtoDyaverages approximately 1.4-1.5,exceptundersome conditions,such aslowersampling height(Z=5 cm)and highersuperficial gas velocity(>3.5Umf)where the jet effect is dominant.

    Table 1Summary of the experimental conditions and results with tracer at center

    Fig.6.Experimental 2D concentration profiles of tracer gas with various super ficial gas velocities(H s=20 cm;Z=5 cm).(a)C/C o vs.Location on X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.Location on Y-axis.

    3.2.Effect of data sampling heights(Z)on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Fig.7(a)-(c)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at the sampling height of 10 cm with different super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umf,5Umf,and 6.5Umf,respectively.It can be observed that as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,the tracer gas concentration spreads farther,and the trends are similar to Fig.4(a)-(c).However,the effectof the side walls on the tracer gas concentration profile in Fig.7(b)and(c)is noticeable.The walleffectatZ=5 cm(Fig.5)is not highly significant.

    Fig.7.The experimental 3D surface plotof concentrations of the tracer gas with various super ficialgas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm).(a)U=3.5U mf;(b)U=5U mf;(c)U=6.5U mf.

    Fig.8(a)-(c)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting,based on the analytical solution,on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data to estimateDxandDy.The values of Adj.R-square in all surface fittings are greater than 99%,which indicates the quality of the best fit.The estimated dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,are also listed in Table 1.As the sampling height(Z=10 cm)is increased,the jet effect is no longer significant.The side walls along the length of the chamber act as an immediate barrier at a higher super ficial gas velocity;thus,the tracer concentration near the wall is detected as markedly higher.This may affect the estimation of the dispersion coefficients,DxandDy;thus,Dxis not equal toDy.If the bed is sufficiently large throughout its width,then the tracer gas can disperse farther without being blocked by the side walls.In this ideal case,Dxwill be equal toDy.

    Fig.9.Experimental 2D concentration profiles of tracer gas with various super ficial gas velocities.(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm).(a)C/C o vs.Location on X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.Location on Y-axis.

    Fig.9(a)and(b)show the 2D form of the concentration profiles of the tracer gas along theXandYaxes with various super ficial gas velocities.The concentration profiles flatten as the super ficial gas velocity is increased,and the trends are similar to those in Fig.6(a)and(b).However,the jet effect in Fig.9(a)and(b)is not significant compared with that in Fig.6(a)and(b),demonstrating the significance of the sampling height in estimating the dispersion coefficients.

    Fig.10(a)and(b)show the dispersion behavior in theX-Yplane with various fluidization values at sampling heights of 5 cm and 10 cm,respectively.As can be observed in Fig.10(a)and(b),the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare increased with the super ficial gas velocity.With no jet effect atZ=10 cm,the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyshow a linear trend.Because of the jet effect atZ=5 cm,when the super ficial gas velocity is greater than 3.5Umf,the dispersion coefficientDxis larger than the value obtained atZ=10 cm.

    3.3.Effect ofwalls on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)atdifferent tracer positions

    Fig.11(a)shows the 3Dsurface plotofthe concentrations ofthe tracer gas when the tracer's injection position is in the center ofthe bed.The operating conditions areU=5Umf,Hs=20 cm,andZ=10 cm.Subsequently,Fig.11(b)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data in Fig.11(a)from whichDxandDyare estimated.The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 2.

    Compared with Fig.11(a),which has similar operating conditions(U=5Umf;Hs=20 cm;Z=10 cm),Fig.12(a)-(c)shows the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations when the location of the tracer gas injection point is near the wall.Subsequently,Fig.13(a)-(c)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.12(a)-(c).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 1.

    Under ideal conditions,at the same horizontal plane with similar working conditions and operating parameters,the dispersion coefficientsDxandDyshould notdiffer.Theoretically,by modeling the analytic solution and assuming thatDx=Dy=46.0 cm2·s-1,which is given in Fig.11(b),the simulation of the tracer's concentration profile is presented in Fig.14.By comparing Figs.11(a)and 14,we can see that the tracer gas concentration profiles differ experimentally and theoretically.

    Fig.10.Gas dispersion coefficient with various fluidization numbers at different sampling heights(H s=20 cm).(a)Dx vs.U/U mf;(b)Dy vs.U/U mf.

    Table 2Summary of the experimental conditions and results with different location of the tracer

    However,in Fig.13(a)-(c),as the tracergas injection pointshifted to near the wall from the center,the dispersion coefficients differed.From Table 2,we can see that given similar operating conditions,the value ofDxdecreased,whereasDyremained almostunchanged.The ratio ofDxtoDywas 1.4 in the case when the tracer injection point was at the center.As the tracer injection pointshifted to near the wall,the ratio ofDxtoDywas 1.1.This change could be attributed to the fact that the concentration of the tracer gas(Ca/Co=28.9)was greater near the walls of the chamber.Therefore,the effect of the side walls on both dispersion coefficients in theXandYdirections is similar.Conversely,the tracer that was released at the center can diffuse much farther in theXdirection(Dx=46 cm2·s-1)because the walls are distant compared with theYdirection(Dx=32 cm2·s-1).In other words,if the length to width ratio of the rectangular bed is not appropriate,the mixing in the center area of the bed will not be excellent.

    Painet al.[26]discussed that the particles may slip at the wall or bounce off the wall,which creates complicated boundary conditions.These authors found that the time-averaged distribution of particles demonstrated that bubbles move in the central region of the bed and particles fall down along the bed wall.Liet al.[27]discussed that the solid-phase wall boundary condition needs to be specified with great care when gas mixing is modeled,because free-slip,partial-slip and no-slip wall boundary conditions result in substantial differences in the extent to which gas is transported downwards at the wall.Liet al.[28],in another study,found that both 2D and 3D simulations capture the general flow behavior in bubbling fluidized beds,but the wall effect in an experimental“two-dimensional”column was importantand must be considered when quantitatively comparing numerical simulations and experimental data.

    3.4.The effectof the gas injection rates on the dispersion coef ficients Dx and Dy in a horizontal plane

    To observe the effect of the side walls in the case of different gas injection rates,we changed the tracer gas injection rate from 0.20%to 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate.Fig.15(a)shows the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations when positioned at the center of the bed.The operating conditions were similar tofig.11(a),asU=5Umf,Hs=20 cm,andZ=10 cm,but the gas injection rate was 0.10%.Subsequently,Fig.15(b)shows the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.15(a).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyare listed in Table 2.Evidently,we can see thatDychanged slightly from 32 to 29.8 cm2·s-1,butDxchanged from 46 to 26.5 cm2·s-1.At a tracer gas injection rate of 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate,the value ofDxwas approximately equal toDy.

    This result may be because the difference between the ambient and referenced carbon dioxide concentration was 1950×10-6(i.e.,2350×10-6-400×10-6)when the gas injection rate was 0.20%of the fluidizing air;the difference was 950×10-6(i.e.,1350×10-6-400×10-6)when the gas injection rate was 0.10%of the fluidizing air.This difference between the ambient and the referenced carbon dioxide concentration in the bed may be significant.The reduction in the ambient carbon dioxide from the background in the case when the gas injection rate was 0.20%ofthe fluidizing air improves the detection sensitivity.Therefore,the value ofDxcan be detected more accurately and is greater thanDy.In contrast,when the gas injection rate was 0.10%ofthe fluidizing air,Dxwas approximately equal toDydue to the lower detection sensitivity.

    3.5.Effect of the static bed heights on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)

    Figs.16(a)and 11(a)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration with a super ficial gas velocity of 5Umfat static bed heights of 15 cm and 20 cm,respectively.Subsequently,the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data in Figs.16(a)and 11(a)are shown in Figs.16(b)and 11(b).The estimated dispersion coefficientsDxandDyfor both bed heights(Hs=15 cm and 20 cm)are listed in Table 2.Fig.17(a)and(b)show the 2D representation of the tracer concentration for different bed heights(Hs=15 cm and 20 cm)in theXandYdirections,respectively.Clearly,the effect of static bed height onDxappears to be insignificant.This result is in agreement with our previous study where the effect of different bed heights onDrwas insignificant[29,30].However,the value ofDyincreased from 32 cm2·s-1to 37.3 cm2·s-1as the bed heightdecreased from 20 cm to 15 cm.Overall,the estimation ofthe optimal length to width ratio,bed height,and gas injection rate for good mixing in a rectangular bed is helpful for designing and controlling the fluidized bed reactor.

    3.6.Effect of the super ficial gas velocities on the gas dispersion coef ficients(Dx and Dy)with the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor

    Fig.18(a)and(b)show the 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at super ficial gas velocities of 3.5Umfand 5Umfand static bed heights of 25 cm,respectively.It can be seen clearly that in the case of a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor,the maximum concentration of tracer gas is not at the center of the bed as was observed in the case of perforated plate distributor.The maximum concentration is shifted to the direction of nozzle orientation rather than stable at the center.We would like to validate our dispersion model in the case of a multihorizontal nozzle distributor.For this purpose,we rearranged the scale in theXdirection while inYdirection,the scale remains same.Fig.19(a)and(b)show the nonlinear least squares surface fitting on the 3D surface plot of the experimental data from Fig.18(a)and(b)and the results are listed in Table 2.It can be seen thatDxis considerably larger thanDyfor the multi-horizontal nozzle distributor compared to the perforated plate distributor in Table 2.The ratio ofDxandDyis 1.8.This shows that dispersion in theXdirection is higher for the multi-horizontal distributor than for the perforated plate distributor.

    Fig.12.The experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas injection was near the wall(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(a)Corner view;(b)side view;(c)front view.

    Fig.13.Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate.The tracer gas injection was near the wall(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(a)Corner view;(b)side view;(c)front view.

    4.Comparison With the Conventional Method

    Fig.14.The simulated 3D surface plot of the tracer concentrations based on Dx=Dy=46.0 cm2·s-1 where H s=20 cm,Z=10 cm,and U=5U mf.

    Fig.15.(a).The experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentrations at 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.10%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=20 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.16.(a).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracergas concentration at0.20%ofthe fluidizing air flow rate(H s=15 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate(H s=15 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.17.Experimental 2D concentration profile of the tracer gas obtained using various static bed heights at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate(Z=10 cm U=5U mf).(a)C/C o vs.location along the X-axis;(b)C/C o vs.location along the Y-axis.

    Fig.18.(a).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracergas concentration at0.20%ofthe fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=3.5U mf).(b).The experimental3Dsurface plotofthe tracer gas concentration at0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    Fig.19.(a).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multihorizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=3.5U mf).(b).Nonlinear least squares surface fitting matrix on the experimental 3D surface plot of the tracer gas concentration at 0.20%of the fluidizing air flow rate for a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor(H s=25 cm;Z=10 cm;U=5U mf).

    This approach is compared with the well-known conventional method[13]for estimating dispersion coefficients.In Table 1,by comparingDrwithDxandDy,the values and their order of magnitude generally remain in the same domain.These results show good support for this model.Previously,due to the assumption of uniform tracer concentration in theXandYdirections and the limitation of the solution,i.e.,Eq.(9),itwas only possible to calculateDrby neglecting the effectofthe side walls.With this new solution and using the 3Dsurface fitting method,which further decomposesDrintoDxandDy,it is possible to analyze the nature ofthe dispersion in both directionsas wellas the effect ofthe side walls in the rectangular chamber.It can be considered that there is always disparity between the theoretical and experimental dispersion behaviors due to the design of the chamber.

    5.Conclusions

    In this study,a mathematicalmodel for tracer dispersion in a rectangular fluidized bed is formulated.An analyticalsolution using the Pitheorem of dimensional analysis was obtained for 3D surface fitting of the experimental data.The dispersion coefficients,DxandDy,are estimated and analyzed.The experimental results obtained in this study indicate that the effect of super ficial gas velocity on the extent of gas dispersion is significant.The surface fitting shows that the estimatedDxandDyincrease with the super ficial gas velocity.The results also discussed the domination of the jet effect at a lower sampling height with higher super ficial gas velocity.The jet effect becomes insignificant as the sampling height increases.The estimatedDxandDyare not equal due to the effect of the side walls.The experimental results obtained in this study indicate that the effectof the side walls is significant.With similar working conditions,as the tracer gas injection point shifts near the wall from the center,DxandDychanged.The width to length ratio in a small rectangular fluidized bed affects the mixing in the centerofthe bed.Ata lowertracergas ratio ofthe injected gas to the totalgas flow rate,DxandDyare approximately equal.The results also show that the effect of bed height onDxis insignificant,whereas bed height may have an effect onDy.This model is also able to estimate the dispersion coefficients in the case of a multi-horizontal nozzle distributor.The results from this model are compared with the conventional method,which shows reasonably good agreement.

    Acknowledgements

    The financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant MOST 105-3113-E-033-001 is greatly acknowledged.

    [1]K.Daizo,O.Levenspiel,Fluidization Engineering,Butterworth-Heinemann,USA,1991.

    [2]E.J.Anthony,Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels;status,successes and problems of the technology,Prog.Energy Combust.Sci.21(1995)239-268.

    [3]V.Orsat,V.Raghavan,Radio-frequency processing,in:D.W.Sun(Ed.),Emerging Technologies for Food Processing,Elsevier,USA 2005,pp.445-468.

    [4]D.Bing,L.S.Fan,F.Wei,W.Warsito,Gas and solids mixing in a turbulent fluidized bed,AICHE J.48(2002)1896-1909.

    [5]D.Y.Liu,X.P.Chen,Quantifying lateral solids mixing in a fluidized bed by modeling the thermal tracing method,AICHE J.58(2012)745-755.

    [6]J.J.Derksen,Simulations of scalar dispersion in fluidized solid-liquid suspensions,AICHE J.60(2014)1880-1890.

    [7]J.Werther,O.Molerus,The local structure of gas fluidized beds-II.The spatial distribution of bubbles,Int.J.Multiphase Flow1(1973)123-138.

    [8]A.B.Whitehead,D.C.Dent,Behavior of multiple tuyere assemblies in large fluidized beds,in:A.A.H.Drinkenburg(Ed.),Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fluidization,Netherlands University Press,Amsterdam 1967,pp.802-820.

    [9]D.Kunii,O.Levenspiel,Lateraldispersion ofsolid in fluidized beds,J.Chem.Eng.Jpn2(1969)122-124.

    [10]Y.F.Shi,L.T.Fan,Lateral mixing of solids in batch gas-solids fluidized beds,Ind.Eng.Chem.Process.Des.Dev.23(1984)337-341.

    [11]A.Klinkenberg,H.J.Krajenbrink,H.A.Lauwerier,Diffusion in a fluid moving at uniform velocity in a tube,Ind.Eng.Chem.45(1953)1202-1208.

    [12]H.Brenner,The diffusion model of longitudinal mixing in beds of finite length.Numerical values,Chem.Eng.Sci.17(1962)229-243.

    [13]P.N.Rowe,T.J.Evans,Dispersion of tracer gas supplied at the distributor of freely bubbling fluidised beds,Chem.Eng.Sci.2235-2246(1974).

    [14]A.Atimtay,T.Cakaloz,An investigation on gas mixing in a fluidized bed,Powder Technol.20(1978)1-7.

    [15]Y.C.Lin,C.S.Chyang,Radial gas mixing in a fludized bed using response surface methodology,Powder Technol.131(2003)48-55.

    [16]J.?tefanica,J.Hrdli?ka,Experimental investigation of radial gas dispersion coefficients in a fluidized bed,Acta Polytech.52(2012)97-100.

    [17]C.S.Chyang,Y.L.Han,C.H.Chien,Gas dispersion in a rectangular bubbling fluidized bed,J.Taiwan Inst.Chem.Eng.41(2010)195-202.

    [18]J.Sternéus,F.Johnsson,B.Leckner,Characteristics of gas mixing in a circulating fluidised bed,Powder Technol.126(2002)28-41.

    [19]R.S.Deng,F.Wei,T.F.Liu,Y.Jin,Radial behavior in riser and downer during the FCC process,Chem.Eng.Process.41(2002)259-266.

    [20]J.J.Van Deemter,Mixing patterns in large-scale fluidized beds,in:J.R.Grace,J.M.Matsen(Eds.),Fluidization,Plenum,New York 1991,pp.69-89.

    [21]W.Zhang,F.Johnsson,B.Leckner,Characteristics of the lateral particle distribution in circulating fluidized bed boilers,in:A.A.Avidan(Ed.),Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds,AIChE,USA 1993,pp.314-319.

    [22]W.D.Curtis,J.D.Logan,W.A.Parker,Dimensional analysis and the pi theorem,Linear Algebra Appl.7(1982)117-126.

    [23]L.Brand,The Pi theorem of dimensional analysis,Arch.Ration.Mech.Anal.1(1957)35-45.

    [24]M.L.Oyen,C.C.Ko,Examination of local variations in viscous,elastic,and plastic indentation responses in healing bone,J.Mater.Sci.Mater.Med.18(2007)623-628.

    [25]C.Xu,R.Shamey,Nonlinear modeling of equilibrium sorption of selected anionic adsorbates from aqueous solutions on cellulosic substrates.Part 1:model development,Cellulose19(2012)615-625.

    [26]C.C.Pain,S.Mansoorzadeh,C.R.E.De Oliveira,A study of bubbling and slugging fluidised beds using the two- fluid granular temperature model,Int.J.Multiphase Flow27(2001)527-551.

    [27]T.Li,Y.Zhang,J.R.Grace,X.Bi,Numerical investigation of gas mixing in gas-solid fluidized beds,AICHE J.56(2010)2280-2296.

    [28]T.Li,J.R.Grace,X.Bi,Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized bed,Powder Technol.203(2010)447-457.

    [29]C.S.Chyang,K.Lieu,S.S.Hong,The effect of distributor design on gas dispersion in a bubbling fluidized bed,J.Chin.Inst.Chem.Eng.39(2008)685-692.

    [30]G.H.Sedahmed,Mass transfer at packed-bed,gas-evolving electrodes,J.Appl.Electrochem.17(1987)746-752.

    国产激情欧美一区二区| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 中文字幕色久视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 操出白浆在线播放| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 不卡一级毛片| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 又大又爽又粗| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久9热在线精品视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 99riav亚洲国产免费| av天堂久久9| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 制服诱惑二区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久青草综合色| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 不卡一级毛片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产区一区二久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 中国美女看黄片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 一级片免费观看大全| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| www.www免费av| 精品第一国产精品| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| videosex国产| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| a在线观看视频网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产av又大| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲全国av大片| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久伊人香网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一本综合久久免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 色播在线永久视频| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 丝袜美足系列| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| av有码第一页| 久久久久九九精品影院| 咕卡用的链子| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久热这里只有精品99| 禁无遮挡网站| 搞女人的毛片| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 大香蕉久久成人网| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| av欧美777| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 手机成人av网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 一本久久中文字幕| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 免费高清视频大片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产精品野战在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 亚洲五月天丁香| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| ponron亚洲| 国产成人精品无人区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精品久久久久久,| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久伊人香网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| www.精华液| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 老司机靠b影院| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 中文字幕色久视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 少妇 在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久影院123| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 午夜激情av网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 九色国产91popny在线| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 成人三级做爰电影| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| or卡值多少钱| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品久久久久久,| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久性视频一级片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| avwww免费| av片东京热男人的天堂| 91字幕亚洲| 午夜免费激情av| 岛国在线观看网站| 两个人视频免费观看高清| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产激情久久老熟女| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜老司机福利片| 97碰自拍视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| cao死你这个sao货| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久久久久大精品| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 日韩欧美在线二视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 午夜福利18| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| or卡值多少钱| bbb黄色大片| 色综合婷婷激情| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 欧美日韩精品网址| 一夜夜www| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 免费高清视频大片| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av成人av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲av成人av| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲无线在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一本综合久久免费| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| av免费在线观看网站| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久性视频一级片| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久热在线av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 色综合站精品国产| 无限看片的www在线观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产色视频综合| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 在线av久久热| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 丝袜美足系列| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 中国美女看黄片| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 午夜精品在线福利| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日本 欧美在线| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| av欧美777| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 久久性视频一级片| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 日本 欧美在线| 一区二区三区激情视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久中文看片网| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| www.www免费av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 9色porny在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | av天堂在线播放| www国产在线视频色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 成人国产综合亚洲| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| netflix在线观看网站| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 午夜老司机福利片| av欧美777| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 午夜激情av网站| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 午夜a级毛片| 91老司机精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 我的亚洲天堂| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产麻豆69| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 99国产精品99久久久久| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 天堂动漫精品| 国产免费男女视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲av美国av| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 手机成人av网站| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 精品久久久精品久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| av有码第一页| 一级黄色大片毛片| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 久久亚洲真实| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 免费av毛片视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看 | 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 老司机靠b影院| www.精华液| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 在线观看www视频免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| av电影中文网址| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久 成人 亚洲| www.www免费av| 美女大奶头视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产成人影院久久av| 美女免费视频网站| 成人精品一区二区免费| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 99re在线观看精品视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 香蕉国产在线看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 美国免费a级毛片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 日韩欧美免费精品|