張維
【摘要】 目的 分析骨科創(chuàng)面治療時(shí)使用負(fù)壓封閉引流術(shù)的臨床療效。方法 66例有較大創(chuàng)面患者, 隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和觀察組, 每組33例。對(duì)照組患者實(shí)施開(kāi)放引流術(shù), 觀察組患者采用負(fù)壓封閉引流術(shù)治療。觀察兩組臨床療效。結(jié)果 觀察組患者治療顯效17例, 有效15例, 無(wú)效1例, 總有效32例, 治療總有效率96.97%, 對(duì)照組患者顯效13例, 有效12例, 無(wú)效7例, 總有效25例, 治療總有效率75.76%, 觀察組治療總有效率明顯高于對(duì)照組, 差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。觀察組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率為3.03%, 對(duì)照組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率為18.18%, 觀察組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率明顯低于對(duì)照組, 差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論 在對(duì)骨科有較大創(chuàng)面患者治療時(shí), 使用負(fù)壓封閉引流術(shù)可取得更加安全有效的臨床療效, 有較高的臨床使用價(jià)值。
【關(guān)鍵詞】 負(fù)壓封閉引流術(shù);骨科;感染創(chuàng)面;應(yīng)用
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.32.024
【Abstract】 Objective To analyze clinical effect by vacuum sealing drainage for wound treatment in department of orthopedics. Methods A total of 66 patients with large wound were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 33 cases in each group. The control group received open drainage, and the observation group received vacuum sealing drainage for treatment. Clinical effects of the two groups were observed. Results The observation group had 17 excellent cases, 15 effective cases and 1 ineffective case, with 32 total effective cases and total effective rate as 96.97%, and the control group had 13 excellent cases, 12 effective cases and 7 ineffective cases, with 25 total effective cases and total effective rate as 75.76%. The observation group had obviously higher total effective rate than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). The observation group had incidence of complications as 3.03%, which was 18.18% in the control group. The observation group had much lower incidence of complications than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Implement of vacuum sealing drainage provides safe and effective clinical effect in treating patients with large wound. This method contains high value for clinical application.
【Key words】 Vacuum sealing drainage; Department of orthopedics; Infected wound; Application
由于骨骼創(chuàng)傷的特點(diǎn), 在受傷過(guò)程中往往會(huì)有著巨大外力的作用, 因此不僅會(huì)導(dǎo)致患者出現(xiàn)骨骼創(chuàng)傷, 同時(shí)對(duì)其軟組織也會(huì)造成較大創(chuàng)面, 導(dǎo)致臨床治療出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重影響。以往在對(duì)骨科有較大創(chuàng)面患者治療時(shí), 開(kāi)放式引流術(shù)是最為常見(jiàn)的治療方法, 但需注意的是, 這一方法治療時(shí)間較長(zhǎng), 其治療效果在當(dāng)前也無(wú)法滿足相關(guān)要求[1]。本次研究中, 分析了對(duì)骨科患者創(chuàng)面實(shí)施負(fù)壓封閉引流術(shù)治療的效果, 現(xiàn)報(bào)告如下。
1 資料與方法
1. 1 一般資料 選取本院2015年3月~2016年3月在骨科中收治的66例有較大創(chuàng)面患者, 其中男36例, 女30例, 年齡19~78歲, 平均年齡(42.38±10.45)歲。將患者按照隨機(jī)方法分為對(duì)照組和觀察組, 每組33例。對(duì)照組患者中, 男18例, 女15例, 年齡19~77歲, 平均年齡(42.11±10.17)歲。觀察組患者中, 男18例, 女15例, 年齡20~78歲, 平均年齡(42.63±10.75)歲。兩組患者一般資料比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05), 具有可比性。
1. 2 方法
1. 2. 1 對(duì)照組治療方法 患者實(shí)施臨床治療時(shí), 需要使用常規(guī)開(kāi)放式引流的方法治療, 在實(shí)際的治療中需首先對(duì)其創(chuàng)面進(jìn)行清洗, 將創(chuàng)面滲液、膿液以及壞死組織進(jìn)行清除, 并且需要按照創(chuàng)面的實(shí)際大小和創(chuàng)面滲出液情況, 每隔2 d對(duì)敷料進(jìn)行更換。若患者創(chuàng)面比較大, 需要使用引流條對(duì)其進(jìn)行引流處理, 若患者創(chuàng)面已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了感染情況, 并且使用病原學(xué)研究顯示感染為陽(yáng)性, 可使用抗生素對(duì)其創(chuàng)面進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的控制。若因有著嚴(yán)重壞死組織, 可對(duì)其實(shí)施二次創(chuàng)面清理。