認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的交叉與跨界研究

?

認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的交叉與跨界研究

[主持人語] 本專欄共5篇文章，涉及認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的交叉和跨界研究。文旭和趙耿林在梳理認(rèn)知拓?fù)湫浴⒄Z言拓?fù)湫约捌潢P(guān)聯(lián)性的基礎(chǔ)上，提出認(rèn)知拓?fù)湔Z言學(xué)這一新興交叉學(xué)科。認(rèn)知拓?fù)湔Z言學(xué)是將拓?fù)鋵W(xué)的思維和方法運(yùn)用到認(rèn)知語言學(xué)研究中的一種新方法和新趨勢(shì)，其主要內(nèi)容包括認(rèn)知拓?fù)涞葍r(jià)觀、認(rèn)知拓?fù)溥B通觀和認(rèn)知拓?fù)溥B續(xù)觀。林正軍和董曉明對(duì)功能語言學(xué)中的語法隱喻進(jìn)行認(rèn)知轉(zhuǎn)喻解讀。他們認(rèn)為概念語法隱喻表達(dá)式所體現(xiàn)的不同語義往往凸顯同一事件中的不同概念要素；人際語法隱喻表達(dá)式所體現(xiàn)的不同語義凸顯情態(tài)或語氣的不同要素。語法隱喻不同表達(dá)式所對(duì)應(yīng)的表述意義之間存在關(guān)聯(lián)性，即轉(zhuǎn)喻關(guān)系。魏在江和李仕春的兩篇文章從認(rèn)知語言學(xué)視域研究了漢語的句法和詞匯問題。魏在江從語法轉(zhuǎn)喻這一新的視角對(duì)漢語特有的體詞謂語句進(jìn)行考察。從體詞謂語句所體現(xiàn)的構(gòu)式整體性和能產(chǎn)性論證了體詞謂語句的構(gòu)式特征；從替代指稱、完型凸顯、語義動(dòng)因三個(gè)方面探討了體詞謂語句的語法轉(zhuǎn)喻認(rèn)知機(jī)制；以英語為參照，從語言類型學(xué)及漢語意合特點(diǎn)對(duì)其理?yè)?jù)性予以觀照。該研究認(rèn)為語法轉(zhuǎn)喻改變了體詞謂語句的句法結(jié)構(gòu)和語法屬性，同時(shí)也改變了其語義指向，語法轉(zhuǎn)喻是此類結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的重要?jiǎng)右颉＠钍舜涸诨仡櫼浴白帧?、“詞”和“語素”為單位的漢語復(fù)合詞構(gòu)成的基礎(chǔ)上，提出以“義素”為單位的探索路徑。以單音詞復(fù)音化和人類認(rèn)知規(guī)律為切入點(diǎn)，探討復(fù)合詞構(gòu)成的特點(diǎn)。作者認(rèn)為，以“義素”為單位探討漢語復(fù)合詞的構(gòu)成可以清楚細(xì)致地描寫出復(fù)合詞構(gòu)成單位的語義成分在組成復(fù)合詞詞義后的種種變化，最終能據(jù)此建立真正基于人類認(rèn)知的漢語構(gòu)詞法體系。孫毅和曾昕認(rèn)為反復(fù)和隱喻之間存在關(guān)聯(lián)性，主要表現(xiàn)在：語言結(jié)構(gòu)具有非組合性特征；反復(fù)不僅是一種修辭手段，更是人們認(rèn)知世界的方式；隱喻可以彌補(bǔ)從字面意義理解反復(fù)現(xiàn)象的缺憾?；诖?，他們認(rèn)為反復(fù)這一修辭現(xiàn)象與概念隱喻同質(zhì)，創(chuàng)造性地提出了“反復(fù)隱喻”這一概念；并以英漢對(duì)比為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，考究?jī)煞N不同語言所表現(xiàn)出的異同及其動(dòng)因。本專欄的這些研究相互呼應(yīng)，各有側(cè)重，其研究結(jié)果不僅有利于認(rèn)知語言學(xué)自身的學(xué)科發(fā)展，對(duì)語言學(xué)的其他學(xué)科方向的研究也有借鑒作用，具有重要的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。

Interdisciplinary and Cross-linguistic Studies of Cognitive Linguistics

[Host Words] This volume comprises of 5 papers；highlighting the interdisciplinary and cross-linguistic studies of cognitive linguistics. By reviewing the topology of cognition；the topology of language and their relations；Wen Xu and Zhao Genglin put forward a new discipline—cognitive topological linguistics；which is a new method and trend to cognitive linguistics. In light of grammatical metaphor；Lin Zhengjun and Dong Xiaoming hold that in ideational grammatical metaphor；the meanings realized by different grammatical forms profile disparate elements of the same event；in interpersonal grammatical metaphor；the meanings of different grammatical forms profile divergent elements of modality or mood. The meanings of different grammatical forms are in a relation of metonymy. Wei Zaijiang studies the Chinese nominal-predicate sentences in light of grammatical metonymy；which is a new perspective to explore this kind of construciton. The research finds that grammatical metonymy influences the structure of nominal-predicate sentence；changes the grammatical nature；and affects the semantic profile；therefore，it is one of the main motivations of this kind of construction. Li Shichun proposes to explore the construction of compounds in terms of sememe. He explicates that this kind of explanation can describe the semantic change of the constituent units after they are compounded. The mechanism of word formation can constructed in terms of human cognition. In view of the interpretation that repetition and metaphor are closely related；Sun Yi and Zeng Xin conclude that repetition and conceptual metaphor are homogeneous；and creatively bring forward the concept of “repetition metaphor”. The results of these studies are not only beneficial to the development of cognitive linguistics itself；but also useful for other disciplines of linguistics；therefore；they all have important academic values.