• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Major Factors Affecting the Distribution of Anuran Communities in the Urban, Suburban and Rural Areas of Shanghai, China

    2017-01-20 11:06:29XiaoxiaoSHUWeiZHANGBenLIEnlePEIXiaoYUANTianhouWANGandZhenghuanWANG
    Asian Herpetological Research 2016年4期

    Xiaoxiao SHU,Wei ZHANG, Ben LI, Enle PEI, Xiao YUAN, Tianhou WANG*and Zhenghuan WANG*

    1School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

    2Shanghai Landscaping and City Appearance Administrative Bureau, Shanghai 200040, China

    Major Factors Affecting the Distribution of Anuran Communities in the Urban, Suburban and Rural Areas of Shanghai, China

    Xiaoxiao SHU1,Wei ZHANG1, Ben LI1, Enle PEI2, Xiao YUAN2, Tianhou WANG1*and Zhenghuan WANG1*

    1School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

    2Shanghai Landscaping and City Appearance Administrative Bureau, Shanghai 200040, China

    There is a dearth of information on the effects of landscape and microhabitat variables on the distribution of anurans in areas of rapid urban development, in both tropical and subtropical regions. Therefore, we studied 24 wetlands sites from the center of Shanghai city, China extending outward to rural areas. Sampling was performed from May through July 2014. Urbanization was categorized by the proportion of hard ground cover. Transect sampling and‘calling’ surveys were used to investigated the richness and density of anurans; microhabitat factors were recorded simultaneously. One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted to analyze differences of total density, species richness and density of individual anuran species in the three urbanization levels; redundancy analysis was carried out on the relationship between anuran density and environmental variables. Species richness was lowest in the areas where the proportion of hard ground cover was > 80%, and the total density of anurans was highest in the areas where coverage of the hard ground cover was < 30%. We recorded fve species belonging to four genera and four families and an individual anuran species that had varied representations in urban environments. Beijing gold-striped pond frogs (Pelophylax plancyi) and Zhoushan toads (Bufo gargarizans) appeared to be well adapted to the Shanghai metropolis. Large water environments and aquatic vegetation (foating-leaves and emergent vegetation) were indicators of the presence of Beijing gold-striped pond frogs. The density of black-spotted pond frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus) was at the lowest density in the areas where hard ground coverage was > 80%, and tended to prefer larger bodies of water. Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs (Fejervarya multistriata) and ornamented pygmy frogs (Microhyla achatina) both suffered severely from cropland loss due to urban development. Bare land around breeding grounds was important for Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs, since it usually chooses mud coast caves for hibernation.

    subtropical regions, rapid urbanization, amphibian, habitat variable, breeding seasons

    1. Introduction

    Anurans are indicator species of the health of wetland ecosystems (Guzy et al., 2012), and are facing worldwide decline. The speed at which this decline in species richness and abundance is occurring is faster than that of birds and mammals (Stuart et al., 2004). This downtrend has happened for many reasons, with urban development being recognized as one of the main causes.

    Urban development changes land-use patterns, increasing impervious surface cover with the widespread development of buildings and extensive complex road networks (McDonnell et al., 1997; Collins et al. 2000; McKinney, 2002), resulting in the fragmentation and loss of vital habitats and habitat corridors (Czech et al., 2000; McKinney, 2002; Miller and Hobbs, 2002). Complex road systems also cause a high mortality of anurans (Hels and Buchwald, 2001; Mazerolle, 2004). Anurans usually form metapopulations in urban environments, therefore, habitat connectivity is vital to their survival (Brown and Kodric-Brown, 1977), as their ability to migrate is relatively poor. All the above urbanization factors have a negative influence on amphibian species richness and anuran migration (Vos and Chardon, 1998; Rubbo and Kiesecker, 2005; Pautasso, 2007; Pillsbury and Miller, 2008; Vignoli et al., 2009).

    On a microhabitat scale, aquatic and terrestrial habitats are both necessary for anurans to complete their life cycle. Urbanization, however, has led to the degradation of a diverse range of suitable habitats (Dodd and Smith, 2003; Stevens and Paszkowski, 2004). The urban heat island effect which occurs in urban areas has caused an increase not only in atmospheric temperatures but also local water temperatures, resulting in increased mortality rates of amphibian eggs (Bornstein, 1968; McDonnell et al., 1993; Corn and Muths, 2002; Grimm et al., 2008). Urban water environments are prone to heavy metal pollution and natural water are at risk of contamination due to runoff from the wide application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, threatening larval survival (Semlitsch, 2000; Paul and Meyer, 2001; Boone and Bridges, 2003; Rubbo and Kiesecker, 2005). The habitat characteristics of artificial wetlands, such as the presence of predator fish also negatively affect the survival of breeding amphibians (Orizaola and Bra?a, 2006).

    Only 1% of the research related to organismal distribution across urbanization gradients relates to amphibians and reptiles (McDonnell and Hahs, 2008). Studies on the effect of rapid urbanization on anurans in tropical and subtropical regions are rare (Hamer and McDonnell, 2008). Nearly 40% of China’s wetlands are under moderate and serious threat (An et al., 2008). Forest and agricultural areas around cities are being quickly replaced by residential buildings, roads and other constraining features (Fazal, 2000; Liu et al., 2003; Yoon, 2009). Urbanization has developed rapidly in the past few decades in China (Liu et al.,2003), especially in Shanghai, which is located along the Yangtze River estuary and is a commercial and financial center of mainland China. The Shanghai region experienced rapid economic and population growth, from 1982 to 1990; the Shanghai downtown area increased from 149.85 km2to 279.78 km2and continued to expand to 377.56 km2after 2000 (Song, 2003). From 1989 to 2013, the population of Shanghai had an average annual growth rate of 0.89%. The population density has grown from 2013 persons/km2to 3809 persons/km2(Shanghai statistical yearbook, 1989–2013), making it the city with the highest population density and the fastest growing urban development in China (Wang et al., 2014). According to terrestrial wildlife resource surveys in Shanghai, three anuran species disappeared between 2000 and 2013. Dramatic urban development may be responsible for the decline and disappearance of these anuran species (Xie et al., 2002).

    Our research selected Shanghai, the largest city with the fastest urbanization in China as the study area, and we investigated the distribution patterns and major infuential factors on the anuran community within each urbanization level (urban, suburban and rural) (Matson, 1990; McDonnell and Pickett, 1990), which has been commonly applied to studies of urbanization impacts on avian populations (Clergeau et al., 1998, 2006; Melles et al., 2003; Crooks et al., 2004; Vignoli et al., 2013). This awareness should help implement and support effective protection strategies for amphibians.

    2. Materials and Methods

    2.1 Study AreaThe research study area was located in the city of Shanghai, China, a recognized subtropical region, and an area undergoing accelerated urbanization. Urban expansion infrastructure needs to meet a myriad of developmental demands, including new housing, commercial buildings, transport infrastructure, etc. Most researchers use ‘land-use’ or ‘land-cover’ as criteria for determining urbanization gradients (McDonnell and Hahs, 2008). This research used the proportion of hard ground cover within 2 km of the sample plot to define urbanization levels (Marzluff et al., 2001). “Hard ground cover” included residential or commercial buildings, roads networks and other impermeable strata, and sites with values > 80% were defned as urban areas, between 30%–80% as suburban areas and < 30% as rural areas. In this study, 24 sites were chosen from the city center to the outer rural perimeter (Figure 1). Eight study sites were located within each urbanization level (urban, suburban and rural). Site selection was based on two principles; first, sites must be at least 1 km apart to control data independence and second, sites had to be classified as a permanent or semi-permanent pond to qualify for investigation and ensure reliable data collection.

    2.2 Anuran SamplingDuring the breeding seasons, May through July 2014, transect sampling (Harris and Burnham, 2002), and calling surveys (Weir et al., 2009) were conducted to evaluate the population size. Due to variation in sample plot accessibility, sample transect lengths were not always consistent. The mean sample transect length was 1113 m (standard error SE: 126 m), with a transect width of 5 m. Surveys were conductedat least 0.5 h after sunset and completed by 00:00. Air temperatures ranged from 18.7 oC–26.5 oC and water temperatures between 22.1 oC–26.7 oC, with wind speeds below 5.8 m/s.

    2.3 Landscape CharacteristicsIn general, anurans tend to have poor dispersal ability (Semlitsch, 2000; Smith and Green, 2005), based on their limited distribution potential. Therefore, landscape characteristics were quantified within 1 km radius of each sample plot using Google Earth Pro (version 6.2.2.6613), which included water and cropland coverage.

    2.4 Breeding Habitat CharacteristicsAs microhabitat variables, we selected water depth, pH and water salinity, aquatic vegetation coverage (floating-leaves vegetaion, emergent vegetation and submerged vegetation), argillaceous bank coverage, slopes and bare land coverage within 2 m of the sample plot. Water depth was measured using a 1.5 m tape, and five water depths were taken within 1 m of the water’s edge (Hazell et al., 2004), to obtain an averaged value. The AZ8685 Pen Type pH meter and the AZ8371 handheld salinometer (Frank Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) were used to measure pH and water salinity at the water surface, approximately 30 cm from the water’s edge (Hazell et al., 2004; Rubbo and Kiesecker, 2005). Visual estimation was used to determine aquatic vegetation coverage (Price et al., 2005; Clark et al., 2007), argillaceous bank coverage and bare land coverage. The pond slope was measured using a geological compass. Data of breeding habitat variables were collected during anuran surveys.

    2.5 Statistical AnalysesThe Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine whether total density, species richness and density of targeted anuran species were normally distributed. Data were converted by arcsine transformation in order to conform to a normal distribution with homogeneity of variance.

    One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to deduce differences of the density of Beijing gold-striped pond frogs and Zhoushan toads along the urbanization gradient, because they conformed to the assumed parameters. However, Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post-hoc pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze density differences of Black-spotted pond frogs, Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs and ornamented pygmy frogs in each urbanization level, because they did not conform the assumed parameters. We conducted this statistical analyses using SPSS version 20.0.

    Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was used to analyze the data of species-sample,and the gradient lengths of axis 1 were 2.641<3; therefore, we conducted a redundancy analysis (RDA) involving five species and environmental variables to determine which environmental variables were the major influencing factors in the distribution of individual anuran species at breeding sites. RDA is an extension of multiple linear regression (Dodkins et al., 2005), which is a simple method to elucidate the relationship between species and environmental variables. The statistical signifcance of the RDA was evaluated by Monte Carlo permutation tests. We conducted this statistical analyses in Canoco 4.5.

    3. Results

    3.1 Distribution of the Anuran Community in the Urban-Suburban-Rural AreasAnuran species richness was signifcantly lowest in the areas where hard ground coverage was > 80% (F2,21=8.749, P=0.002), but there was no signifcant difference between rural and suburban areas (Table 1). The anuran total density was signifcantly increased with decreasing urbanization degree (F2,21=7.429, P=0.004), and reached its peak where hard ground coverage was < 30% (rural areas), there was no signifcant difference between urban and suburban areas (Table 1).

    Each anuran species was found to have its own individual responses to urbanization. The density of the Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ2=15.398, df=2, P<0.001) and ornamented pygmy frogs (Kruskal-Wallis test: χ2=6.530, df=2, P=0.038) was significantly different between the three urbanization levels (Table 1); the density of Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs increased with decreasing urbanization degree and ornamented pygmy frogs were not present in the urban areas. The density of Black-spotted pond frogs were signifcantly the lowest in the areas where coverage of the hard ground cover was > 80% (urban areas) (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ2=6.935, df=2, P=0.031), but no signifcant difference was noted between the suburban and rural areas (Table 1).

    The density of the Beijing gold-striped pond frogs (F2,21=3.419, P=0.052) and Zhoushan toads (F2,21=0.340, P=0.716) did not reveal a signifcant difference between three urbanization levels (Table 1).

    3.2 Factors Underlying Anuran Community DistributionIn the RDA analyses, the four axis explained 60.7% of the species variation. The percent of explained variation for the frst and second axis of RDA was 35.7% and 15.0%, respectively. Correlation betweenenvironmental variables, ordering axis and species variable ordering axis was 0.922 and 0.894, respectively (Table 2). According to Monte Carlo permutation tests of the RDA, explained variation of the first canonical axis had a significant effect on species (F=6.657, P=0.018), and all canonical axis was also have signifcant (F=1.773, P=0.039).

    Water coverage, cropland coverage, emerged vegetation coverage and bare land coverage were significantly correlated to the first axis (Table 3, Figure 2), these environmental variables increased along the axis one from left to right; water coverage and bare land coverage were signifcantly correlated to the second axis (Table 3, Figure 2), and water coverage was increased along axis two from the bottom up; however, bare land was decreased along axis two from the bottom up.

    Our results indicated that anurans had species-specifc requirements for habitat conditions and resources. The result of RDA shows that Black-spotted pond frogs were significantly positively associated with water coverage (Table 4, Figure 2), Beijing gold-striped pond frogs were positively associated with water coverage and aquatic vegetation coverage including floating-leaves and emerged vegetation (Table 4, Figure 2), cropland coverage and bare land coverage had signifcant infuence on the density of Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs (Table 4, Figure 2), and only cropland coverage had a signifcantly relationship with Ornamented pygmy frogs (Table 4, Figure 2). RDA analysis did not show any variable that significantly influenced the distribution of Zhoushan toads.

    4. Discussion

    This study found that a high level of urbanization has a negative effect on density and distribution of local anurans (Table 1); similar findings have been reported in other localities (Shirose et al. 2000; MacGregor-Fors et al., 2013). As urbanization levels increased, species richness decreased, and total species density reached a minimum where hard ground cover was >80%. Urbanization reduces habitat availability for anurans, and the decreased species richness in urban wetlands was attributable to the rarity of Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs and Ornamented pygmy frogs, which prefer cropland habitat (Table 4), we hypothesize that the disappearance of cropland habitat is the main reason for decline in species richness urban areas.

    Figure 1 Location of study sites in Shanghai. The People’s square in Shanghai was served as the urban center in this study.

    Figure 2 First and second axis of the RDA involving anuran species and environmental variables in Shanghai, Environmental variables (arrows) are: Water Coverage (WaterCov); Cropland Coverage (Cropland); Water depth (WaterDe); Slope; Water PH; Water salinity (WaterSa); Floating-leaves vegetation Coverage (FLVC); Emergent vegetation Coverage (EVC); Submerged vegetation Coverage (SVC); Argillaceous bank Coverage (Argillac); Bare land (Bare Lan). Species (acronyms) are: Black-spotted pond frog (BSPF); Beijing gold-strip pond frog (BGSPF); Hong Kong rice-paddy frog (HKRF); Ornamented pygmy frog (OPF); Zhoushan toad (ZT).

    Individual anuran species have different responses to urbanization, and the infuence of urbanization on anurans is highly associated with the life history of the species and their sensitivity to environmental changes (Garden et al., 2006). Decreasing cropland coverage is the main limiting factor affecting the distribution of Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs and Ornamented pygmy frogs in the three urbanization levels (Table 4). This is consistent with the dispersal-dependent-decline hypothesis that

    sedentary species can be extremely sensitive to habitat loss and habitat degradation, and paddy-associated frogs are sensitive to the loss of cropland habitats (Tsuji et al., 2011). From our research alone, it has been demonstrated that the rapid development of urban infrastructure and shrinkage of cropland reduce the optimum habitat of the Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs and ornamented pygmy frogs, causing their populations to undergo a dramatic decline. These may eventually become the first two threatened anuran species in the next decade. deMaynadier and Hunter (1999) showed that high-density vegetation growing on the edge of wetlands can provide food, shelter and migration and overwintering sites. However, bare land plays an important role in the survival of the Hong Kong rice-paddy frog (Table 4), since it can provide mud caves for hibernation sites (Wang et al., 2008). In the feld, we also observed that frogs hide in the mud caves when threatened.

    Table 1 Species richness and anuran density in the three urbanization levels.

    Table 2 Statistical characteristics of four ordination axis of the RDA.

    Table 3 Correlation coeffcients between environmental variation and RDA ordination axis.

    Table 4 Correlation coeffcients between environmental variables and fve anurans species.

    High levels of urbanization hindered the distribution of the Black-spotted pond frog, and reduce their density. However, different from a similar study in Osaka-kobe (Japan) (Tsuji et al., 2011), our research noted that in Shanghai, the density and distribution of the Blackspotted pond frog was restricted by the size of the water area, which is important for their reproduction and larval development (Vignoli et al., 2009). Farmland ecosystems become restrictive habitat factors for the survival of Black-spotted pond frog in Osaka-Kobe (Tsuji et al., 2011). Differences in habitat selection may be associated with the different urban development patterns and local agricultural practices. Osaka-Kobe is a metropolitan area with paddy fields widely distributed in rural and urban zones (Tsuji et al., 2011), but the urbanization development of Shanghai is mainly diffused outward in a circular confguration, with no paddy felds in the interior urban environment. Different urbanization development models may contribute to different urbanization pressures on the same anurans, and Black-spotted pond frogs may change its habitat preferences in order to adapt to these different environmental stresses.

    It has been reported that some anurans can adapt to urbanization (Rubbo and Kiesecker, 2005; Tsuji et al., 2011). According to our research, rapid urbanization has had little effect on the density and distribution of the Beijing gold-striped pond frogs and Zhoushan toads (Table 1). The Beijing gold-striped pond frog tended to choose a wetland ecosystem with abundant foating-leaves vegetation, such as water lilies (Nymphaea odorata) and duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza). Emergent vegetation, such as the lotus fower (Nelumbo nucifera) and bulrush (Phragmites communis) were also potential indicators for the presence of the frog (Table 4). Aquatic vegetation is also a good indicator for in predicting anuran occurrence and larvae survival of North American amphibians (Skidds et al., 2007; Purrenhage and Boone, 2009), The density of aquatic vegetation affects all life-cycle stages of Beijing gold-striped pond frogs, providing shelter for larvae, spawning sites for adults and can also be used as a platform for resting and breathing (Egan and Paton, 2004; Skidds et al., 2007; Scheffers and Paszkowski, 2013). In addition, large-area water environmental play an important role in the reproduction and migration of Beijing gold-striped pond frogs.

    5. Conservation Implications

    Our research noted that highly urbanized areas have significant negative effects on the survival of some anurans, and a reasonable collocation of a variety of habitat characteristics which were benefcial to the frogs complete life history are critical for anurans conservation (Garcia-Gonzalez and Garcia-Vazquez, 2012).

    According to our research, the survival of the Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs and Ornamented pygmy frogs was dependent on cropland habitat. Retaining this essential habitat is a critical conservation measures for these two anurans. In addition, terrestrial habitats such as reserves of bare land around artifcial wetlands are also important, as they can provide hibernation sites and shelter for Hong Kong rice-paddy frogs.

    Large-area wetland ecosystems are more productive for the conservation of the Black-spotted pond frogs and Beijing gold-striped pond frog. The question of whether large ponds should be constructed or multiple small ponds interconnected to form a larger integrated water network is still a topic to be discussed and requires further research.

    Ponds in urban areas attract visitors and allow for recreation, but also play an important role in the urban ecosystem and have irreplaceable ecological functions in the conservation of urban anurans (Shirose et al., 2000), providing an alternative permanent habitat for urban adaption. Carrier and Beebee (2003) noted that British urban and suburban areas with many good quality ponds provide excellent conditions for the common frogs (Rana temporaria). Maintaining floating-leaves vegetation and emergent vegetation in the urban ponds or establishing aquatic vegetation buffer strips along the shoreline of large lakes would be effective methods for towards the conservation of Beijing gold-striped pond frogs.

    AcknowledgmentsWe thank T. WU for his guidance in sample region mapping. We appreciate the cooperation of the various urban park managers. This project was fully supported by research funding and permits from Shanghai Landscaping and City Appearance Administrative Bureau (Grant No. F131508).

    An N., Gao N. Y., Liu C. E. 2008. Wetland degradation in China: Causes, evaluation, and protection measures. Chin J Ecol, 27: 821–828

    Brown J. H., Kodric-Brown A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58: 445–449

    Boone M. D., Bridges C. M. 2003. Effects of pesticides on amphibian populations. In Semlitsch R. D. (Ed.), Amphibian Conservation. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 152–167

    Bengtsson G., Tranvik L. 1989. Critical metal concentrations for forest soil invertebrates. Water Air Soil Pollut, 47: 381–417

    Czech B., Paul R. K., Patrick K. D. 2000. Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States refect the integration of economic sectors, supporting the theory and evidence that economic growth proceeds at the competitive exclusion of nonhuman species in the aggregate. BioScience, 50: 593–601

    Carrier J. A., Beebee T. J. C. 2003. Recent, substantial, and unexplained declines of the common toad Bufo bufo in lowland England. Biol Conserv, 111: 395–399

    Clark P. J., Reed J. M., Tavernia B. G., Windmiller B. S., Regosin J. V. 2008. Urbanization effects on spotted salamander and wood frog presence and abundance for the study of amphibians and reptiles. University of Waterloo

    Corn P. S., Muths E. 2002. Variable breeding phenology affects the exposure of amphibian embryos to ultraviolet radiation. Ecology, 83: 2958–2963

    Collins J. P., Kinzig A., Grimm N. B., Fagan W. F., Hope D., Wu J. 2000. A new urban ecology. Am Sci, 88: 416–425

    Clergeau P., Savard J. P. L., Mennechez G., Falardeau G. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban–rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor, 100: 413–425

    Clergeau P., Croci S., Jokim?ki, J., Kaisanlahti-Jokim?ki, M. L., Dinetti M. 2006. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv, 127: 336–344

    Crooks K. R., Suarez A. V., Bolger D. T. 2004. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv, 115: 451–462

    deMaynadier P. G., Hunter M. L. 1999. Forest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine. J Wildl Manage, 63: 441–450

    Dodd C. K., Smith L. L. 2003. Habitat destruction and alteration. Amphibian Conservation. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 94–112

    Dodkins I., Rippey B., Hale P. 2005. An application of canonical correspondence analysis for developing ecological quality assessment metrics for river macrophytes. Freshwater Biol, 50: 891–904

    Egan R. S., Paton P. W. C. 2004. Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands, 24: 1–13

    Fazal S. 2000. Urban expansion and loss of agricultural land-a GIS based study of Saharanpur City, India. Environ Urban, 12: 133–149

    Grimm N. B., Faeth S. H., Golubiewski N. E., Redman C. L., Wu J., Bai X., Briggs J. M. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319: 756–760

    Garden J., Mcalpine C., Peterson A. N. N., Jones D., Possingham H. 2006. Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral Ecol, 31: 126–148

    Garcia-Gonzalez C., Garcia-Vazquez E. 2012. Urban ponds, neglected Noah’s ark for amphibians. J Herpetol, 46: 507–514

    Guzy J. C., Mccoy E. D., Deyle A. C., Gonzalez S. M., Halstead N., Mushinsky H. R. 2012. Urbanization interferes with the use of amphibians as indicators of ecological integrity of wetlands. J Appl Ecol, 49: 941–952

    Hazell D., Hero K., Lindenmayer D., Cunningham R. 2004. A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv, 119: 61–71

    Hamer A. J., McDonnell M. J. 2008. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biol Conserv, 141: 2432–2449

    Hels T., Buchwald E. 2001. The effect of road kills on amphibian populations. Biol Conserv, 99: 331–340

    Harris R. B., Burnham K. P. 2002. On estimating wildlife densities from line tramsect data. Curr Zool, 48: 812–818

    Internet reference. Shanghai statistical yearbook, density of population 1989–2013. Retrieved from:

    http://#cnki.net/kns55/navi/result.aspx?id=N2010040188&fle =N2010040188000080&foor=1

    http://#cnki.net/kns55/navi/result.aspx?id=N2014090171&fle =N2014090171000021&foor=1

    Liu J. Y., Liu M. L., Zhuang D. F., Zhang Z. X., Deng X. Z. 2003. Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Science in China Series D: Earth Sci, 46: 373–384

    McKinney M. L. 2002, Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience, 52: 883–890

    Marzluff J. M., Bowman R., Donnelly R. 2001. A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. New York: Springer, 1–17

    Miller J. R., Hobbs R. J. 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol, 16: 330–337

    Mazerolle M. J. 2004. Amphibian road mortality in response to nightly variations in traffc intensity. Herpetologica, 60: 45–53

    McDonnell M. J., Pickett S. T. A., Pouyat R. V. 1993. The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. Humans as components of ecosystems. New York:Springer, 175–189

    MacGregor-Fors I., Ordo?ez O. H., Ortega-álvarez R. 2013. Urban croaking: Diversity and distribution of anurans in a neotropical city. Urban Ecosyst, 16: 389–396

    Matson P. 1990. The use of urban gradients in ecological studies. Ecology, 71: 1231

    McDonnell M. J., Hahs A. K. 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: Current status and future directions. Land Ecol, 23: 1143–1155

    McDonnell M. J., Pickett S. T. A. 1990. The study of ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for Ecology. Ecology, 71: 1232–1237

    McDonnell M. J., Pickett S. T. A., Groffman P., Bohlen P., Pouyat R. V., Zipperer W. C., Parmelee R. V., Carreiro M. M., Medley K. 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosys, 1: 21–36

    Melles S., Glenn S., Martin K. 2003. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity. Species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol, 7: 271–279

    Orizaola G., Bra?a F. 2006. Effect of salmonid introduction and other environmental characteristics on amphibian distribution and abundance in mountain lakes of northern spain. Anim Conserv, 9: 171–178

    Pautasso M. 2007. Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. Ecol Lett, 10: 16–24

    Porej D., Hetherington T. E. 2005. Designing wetlands for amphibians: The importance of predatory fish and shallow littoral zones in structuring of amphibian communities. Wetl Ecol Manag, 13: 445–455

    Petranka J. W., Harp E. M., Holbrook C. T., Hamel J. A. 2007. Long-term persistence of amphibian populations in a restored wetland complex. Biol Conserv, 138: 371–380

    Purrenhage J. L., Boone M. D. 2009. Amphibian community response to variation in habitat structure and competitor density. Herpetologica, 65: 14–30

    Price S. J., Marks D. R., Howe R. W., Hanowski J. A. M., Niemi G. J. 2005. The importance of spatial scale for conservation and assessment of anuran populations in coastal wetlands of the western great lakes, USA. Landscape Ecol, 20: 441–454

    Pillsbury F. C., Miller J. R. 2008. Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban-rural gradient. Ecol Appl, 18: 1107–1118

    Paul M. J., Meyer J. L. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 32: 333–365

    Rubbo M. J., Kiesecker J. M. 2005. Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv Biol, 19: 504–511

    Stuart S. N., Chanson J. S., Cox N., Young B. E., Rodrigues A. S. L., Fischman D. L., Waller R. W. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306: 1783–1786

    Semlitsch R. D. 2000. Principles for management of aquaticbreeding amphibians. J Wildl Manage, 64: 5–31

    Stevens C. E., Paszkowski C. A. 2004. Using chorus-size ranks from call surveys to estimate reproductive activity of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). J Herpetol, 38: 404–410

    Scheffers B. R., Paszkowski C. A. 2013. Amphibian use of urban stormwater wetlands: The role of natural habitat features. Landscape Urban Plan, 113: 139–149

    Skidds D. E., Mitchell J. C. 2007. Habitat correlates of reproductive effort in wood frogs and spotted salamanders in an urbanizing watershed. J Herpetol, 41: 439–450

    Shirose L., Dunn L., Barton D. R., Struger J., Bishop C. A., Shepherd D., Lang A. L. 2000. Contamination and wildlife communities in stormwater detention ponds in Guelph and the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, 1997 and 1998, Part 1. Wildlife communities. Water Qual Res J Can, 35: 399–435

    Smith A. M., Green D. M. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: Are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28: 110–128

    Song B. S. 2003. Urbanization, Suburbanization and Social Reconstruction–A Case Study of Shanghai. J East China Norm Univ (Philos Soc Sci), 35: 97–104

    Tsuji M., Ushimaru A., Osawa T., Mitsuhashi H. 2011.Paddyassociated frog declines via urbanization: A test of the dispersaldependent-decline hypothesis. Landscape Urban Plan, 103: 318–325

    Vasconcelos D., Calhoun A. J. K. 2006. Monitoring created seasonal pools for functional success: A six-year case study of amphibian responses, Sears Island, Maine, USA. Wetlands, 26: 992–1003

    Vos C. C., Chardon J. P. 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. J Appl Ecol, 44–56

    Vignoli L., Mocaer I., Luiselli L., Bologna M. A. 2009. Can a large metropolis sustain complex herpetofauna communities? An analysis of green space areas suitability in Rome, Anim Conserv, 12: 456–466

    Vignoli L., Scirè S., Bologna M. A. 2013. Rural–urban gradient and land use in a millenary metropolis: How urbanization affects avian functional groups and the role of old villas in bird assemblage patterning. Web Ecol, 13: 49–67

    Weir L. A., Fiske I. J., Royle J. A. 2009. Trends in Anuran Occupancy From Northem States of the Ametic: An Amphibian Monitoring Program. Herpetol Conserv Biol, 4: 389–402

    Wang J. L., Xue W. J., Li N. B., Wang X. L., Jiang H. R., Xu H. F. 2008. Hibernation of Rana limnocharis in Shanghai farmland. Chin J Ecol, 10: 1289–1291

    Wang Z., Zhou H. W., Chen G. Z., Gao H. 2014. Countermeasure to Control Shanghai Population Scale with Fast Growth Effectively. J Soc Sci, 2: 56–65

    Xie Y. M., Huang Z. Y., Du D. C., Qin X. K., Ma J. F., Yu K., Yu W. D., Xu H. F. 2002. Shanghai terrestrial wildlife resources investigation report. Shanghai Municipal Forestry Administration

    Yoon C. G. 2009. Wise use of paddy rice fields to partially compensate for the loss of natural wetlands. Paddy Water Environ, 7: 357–366

    *Corresponding authors: Prof. Tianhou WANG, from East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, with his research focusing on wetland ecology and conservation biology; Dr. Zhenghuan WANG, from East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, with his research focusing on urban ecology and wildlife biology.

    E-mail: thwang@bio.ecnu.edu.cn (Tianhou WANG); zhwang@bio.ecnu. edu.cn (Zhenghuan WANG)

    Received: 26 November 2015 Accepted: 14 January 2016

    大香蕉久久网| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产 精品1| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 丰满少妇做爰视频| tube8黄色片| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 51国产日韩欧美| tube8黄色片| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品一国产av| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 91国产中文字幕| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲性久久影院| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产精品.久久久| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 热re99久久国产66热| 999精品在线视频| 久久av网站| 午夜日本视频在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 日日撸夜夜添| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 视频区图区小说| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产极品天堂在线| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久热久热在线精品观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 免费观看性生交大片5| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 一区在线观看完整版| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 色吧在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 91成人精品电影| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 午夜91福利影院| 丝袜喷水一区| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 久久中文看片网| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 又大又爽又粗| 精品高清国产在线一区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 中文欧美无线码| 日日夜夜操网爽| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| av一本久久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 桃花免费在线播放| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 多毛熟女@视频| 不卡一级毛片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 免费看十八禁软件| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产黄色免费在线视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 一区二区av电影网| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | av天堂在线播放| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 免费看十八禁软件| 一本综合久久免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 捣出白浆h1v1| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 操出白浆在线播放| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| aaaaa片日本免费| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 丁香六月天网| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 在线看a的网站| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产在线观看jvid| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| www日本在线高清视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久香蕉激情| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 久久久国产成人免费| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品人妻1区二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 在线观看人妻少妇| av福利片在线| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| tocl精华| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久99一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一夜夜www| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 一区二区三区激情视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久精品成人免费网站| a级毛片黄视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费观看人在逋| 脱女人内裤的视频| kizo精华| 高清av免费在线| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 中文字幕色久视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久九九热精品免费| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| tube8黄色片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 青草久久国产| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 一本久久精品| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 看免费av毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 91大片在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 又大又爽又粗| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 免费观看av网站的网址| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美在线黄色| 操美女的视频在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 女警被强在线播放| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 三级毛片av免费| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| av网站免费在线观看视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 五月开心婷婷网| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 18禁观看日本| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产片内射在线| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| av天堂久久9| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产精品免费大片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 成人18禁在线播放| 蜜桃在线观看..| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产淫语在线视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 欧美午夜高清在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 1024香蕉在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 美女福利国产在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品福利观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 老司机靠b影院| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 丁香六月天网| av网站在线播放免费| 成年动漫av网址| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| av天堂久久9| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 老司机靠b影院| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 成人影院久久| 十八禁网站免费在线| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久亚洲真实| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| av天堂在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 在线av久久热| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 视频区图区小说| 丁香六月天网| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 中文字幕色久视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 香蕉久久夜色| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 中文欧美无线码| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 在线av久久热| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产不卡一卡二| aaaaa片日本免费| 日韩免费av在线播放| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产av又大| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 不卡一级毛片| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久国产精品影院| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| cao死你这个sao货| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久av网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 老司机靠b影院| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 69av精品久久久久久 | 99热网站在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 成人三级做爰电影| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产精品免费大片| av有码第一页| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 美女主播在线视频| 久久狼人影院| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品福利观看| 视频区图区小说| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 人妻一区二区av| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 手机成人av网站| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 一级毛片精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 大香蕉久久网| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 操出白浆在线播放| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品高清国产在线一区| 大型av网站在线播放| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 黄色 视频免费看| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 一级毛片女人18水好多| av网站免费在线观看视频| 18禁观看日本| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 考比视频在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产av国产精品国产| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 女警被强在线播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 91老司机精品| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产男女内射视频| 国产精品九九99| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久国产精品影院| 久久久久视频综合| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品一二三| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品国产一区二区久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 午夜福利,免费看| 岛国在线观看网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看|