張薇薇, 劉曦嬌, 李崢艷, 黃子星, 宋彬
?
·普美顯增強(qiáng)MRI專題·
Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI在肝臟局灶性病變中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)展
張薇薇, 劉曦嬌, 李崢艷, 黃子星, 宋彬
肝臟局灶性病變是常見的肝臟疾病,常用的影像學(xué)檢查方法包括超聲、CT及MRI,MRI因?yàn)榫哂辛己玫慕M織對(duì)比及可使用多種對(duì)比劑等優(yōu)勢(shì),成為診斷肝臟局灶性病變的重要檢查方法。Gd-EOB-DTPA是通過(guò)肝細(xì)胞特異性攝取的對(duì)比劑,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)于肝臟局灶性病灶的診斷、鑒別診斷、指導(dǎo)治療等具有重要意義。本文就Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI在肝臟局灶性病變中的應(yīng)用做一綜述。
磁共振成像; Gd-EOB-DTPA; 肝臟病變
肝臟局灶性病變是常見的肝臟疾病,包括原發(fā)性局灶性結(jié)節(jié)增生(focal nodule hyperplasia,FNH)、肝腺瘤(hepatocellular adenoma,HCA)、肝癌、轉(zhuǎn)移瘤等。早期發(fā)現(xiàn)病灶、定性診斷、指導(dǎo)臨床治療、判斷預(yù)后等對(duì)臨床非常重要。近年來(lái),隨著影像技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展,肝臟局灶性病灶的檢出率明顯提高,影像學(xué)檢查在肝臟局灶性病變的診斷與鑒別診斷中發(fā)揮著重要作用[1,2],包括超聲、CT及MRI。MRI具有軟組織分辨力高,可多參數(shù)、多方位、多序列成像、無(wú)電離輻射等優(yōu)點(diǎn)[3],在肝臟疾病診斷方面具有重要作用。
目前臨床上應(yīng)用的MRI對(duì)比劑大致分為五類:①分布于細(xì)胞外的對(duì)比劑;②肝膽特異性對(duì)比劑(hepatobiliary-specific contrast agent,HSCA),是通過(guò)肝細(xì)胞選擇性攝取的對(duì)比劑,能被肝細(xì)胞吸收并通過(guò)膽道系統(tǒng)排泄,因而適用于肝臟病變的檢出;③分布于網(wǎng)狀內(nèi)皮系統(tǒng)或巨噬細(xì)胞-單核細(xì)胞吞噬系統(tǒng)的對(duì)比劑,即超順磁性氧化鐵(superparamagnetic iron oxide,SPIO)顆粒,它適用于具有網(wǎng)狀內(nèi)皮系統(tǒng)的器官和組織的顯示;④血管內(nèi)或血池性對(duì)比劑,如超微粒超順磁性氧化鐵(USPIO)顆粒,其顆粒直徑小,可逃避網(wǎng)狀內(nèi)皮系統(tǒng)的吞噬,且其血液半衰期延長(zhǎng),表現(xiàn)為短T1、短T2效應(yīng),適用于帶有特定分子的細(xì)胞組織顯示,可作為MRI分子影像研究的示蹤劑;⑤其它對(duì)比劑[4]。
Gd-EOB-DTPA,又名釓塞酸二鈉(商品名普美顯),屬于肝膽特異性對(duì)比劑,經(jīng)靜脈注射后到達(dá)肝臟,快速滲透過(guò)肝內(nèi)毛細(xì)血管網(wǎng)而分布于細(xì)胞外間隙內(nèi)并迅速達(dá)到平衡狀態(tài),并經(jīng)腎臟排泄。
Gd-EOB-DTPA分子中Gd通過(guò)增加T1弛豫率縮短組織T1弛豫時(shí)間,可用作非特異性的細(xì)胞外對(duì)比劑,具有與其他對(duì)比劑效一致的動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)效果[4],從而有效顯示病灶的血供情況;另一方面,其親脂性的EOB基團(tuán)使Gd-EOB-DTPA具有與血漿蛋白結(jié)合的能力,能被肝細(xì)胞膜上的有機(jī)陰離子轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)系統(tǒng)選擇性攝取并經(jīng)過(guò)膽道系統(tǒng)排泄。正常肝腎功能人體內(nèi)約50%由肝細(xì)胞攝取并經(jīng)膽道排泄,50%經(jīng)腎臟代謝[5]。因此在肝膽期成像中,具有正常功能肝細(xì)胞的實(shí)質(zhì)因攝取對(duì)比劑而強(qiáng)化;肝細(xì)胞功能減退、正常肝細(xì)胞數(shù)量減少或缺失時(shí),該病變部位因攝取較少或不攝取對(duì)比劑而表現(xiàn)為稍低或低信號(hào),從而為病變的檢出和鑒別診斷提供信息[6]。
Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI檢查既能反映腫瘤血供情況,也能反映肝細(xì)胞功能,從而提高肝臟局灶性病變的檢出和診斷能力[7,8]。既往研究顯示,與超聲、CT、傳統(tǒng)動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)MRI以及SPIO增強(qiáng)MRI等成像技術(shù)相比,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI檢查在診斷和鑒別診斷肝臟局灶性病變方面具有一定優(yōu)勢(shì)[9,10]。
和Gd-DTPA及其它傳統(tǒng)細(xì)胞外對(duì)比劑相比,Gd-EOB-DTPA的T1弛豫效應(yīng)更強(qiáng)。相比于Gd-DTPA 0.1 mmol/kg的劑量,Gd-EOB-DTPA僅需要0.025 mmol/kg(0.1 mL/kg)的劑量即可達(dá)到臨床診斷需要[11]。Gd-EOB-DTPA經(jīng)靜脈注射流率為1~2 mL/s,對(duì)比劑注射后需用生理鹽水20 mL以相同注射流率沖洗,以優(yōu)化動(dòng)脈期掃描[12,13]。Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI檢查掃描序列包括同、反相位的T1WI、自旋回波序列(SE)T2WI、注射對(duì)比劑后應(yīng)用3D梯度回波序列T1WI或容積式內(nèi)插值法屏氣檢查(volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination,VIBE)序列軸面T1WI。推薦的肝膽期采集時(shí)間為注射對(duì)比劑后10~20 min,有學(xué)者提出對(duì)于肝硬化或血清膽紅素水平升高者,延遲20 min以上更合適。
Gd-EOB-DTPA的不良反應(yīng)不常見,且絕大多數(shù)為輕度到中度,包括頭痛、頭暈、發(fā)熱、面部潮紅、注射部位反應(yīng)(包括對(duì)比劑滲漏,注射部位冷感、疼痛等)等。對(duì)于嚴(yán)重的急慢性腎損傷患者,注射Gd-EOB-DTPA可能會(huì)發(fā)生腎源性系統(tǒng)纖維化;但由于Gd-EOB-DTPA注射劑量低,且具有雙通道排泄機(jī)制,理論上其發(fā)生腎源性系統(tǒng)纖維化的概率較其它釓對(duì)比劑低,目前尚無(wú)相關(guān)報(bào)道。Gd-EOB-DTPA禁用于孕婦及哺乳期婦女。
1.原發(fā)性肝癌
原發(fā)性肝癌是臨床上最常見的惡性腫瘤之一,其發(fā)病率逐年增長(zhǎng),居于惡性腫瘤的第5位,年死亡人數(shù)接近60萬(wàn)[14,15]。肝細(xì)胞癌 (hepatocelluar carcinoma,HCC)是原發(fā)性肝癌中最主要的類型。HCC的發(fā)生與肝硬變基礎(chǔ)上產(chǎn)生的肝細(xì)胞結(jié)節(jié)密切相關(guān),發(fā)現(xiàn)這些結(jié)節(jié)并準(zhǔn)確診斷和鑒別診斷,對(duì)HCC的診斷、治療、監(jiān)測(cè)和預(yù)后均具有重要價(jià)值[16,17]。
HCC在MRI圖像上多表現(xiàn)為T2WI高信號(hào),增強(qiáng)掃描往往具有典型的“快進(jìn)快出”征象,即動(dòng)脈期強(qiáng)化,門靜脈期或平衡期強(qiáng)化減弱。由于大部分HCC病灶對(duì)Gd-EOB-DTPA攝取減少,在肝膽期多表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào)。眾多文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期對(duì)HCC尤其是小肝癌(直徑<2.0 cm)的診斷具有重要價(jià)值,特別是結(jié)合擴(kuò)散灌注成像掃描時(shí),在診斷和鑒別診斷肝硬化相關(guān)結(jié)節(jié)及小肝癌病灶上優(yōu)于其他檢查技術(shù),應(yīng)作為首選檢查方法[18-21]。Sugimoto等[22,23]研究認(rèn)為Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI和增強(qiáng)超聲對(duì)乏血供HCC具有相似的診斷效能,但增強(qiáng)超聲對(duì)富血供病灶的診斷準(zhǔn)確度更高。與MSCT相比,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)HCC,尤其是小肝癌的診斷敏感度和準(zhǔn)確度優(yōu)于CT[22,24,25]。數(shù)項(xiàng)研究比較Gd-EOB-DTPA和Gd-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)小肝癌的診斷效能[26,27],認(rèn)為前者更敏感。Kim等[28]報(bào)道Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)直徑<3.0 cm HCC的診斷敏感度明顯高于SPIO增強(qiáng)MRI。Park等[29]研究比較Gd-EOB-DTPA與Gd-BOPTA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)HCC的診斷效能,結(jié)果顯示前者發(fā)現(xiàn)了59例病灶中的51例,而后者僅發(fā)現(xiàn)了38例。
2.肝臟轉(zhuǎn)移瘤
肝臟是轉(zhuǎn)移性腫瘤好發(fā)部位之一,約占所有實(shí)質(zhì)性器官轉(zhuǎn)移瘤的25%[30]。結(jié)直腸癌、食管癌、胃癌、胰腺癌、乳腺癌、肺癌等均易發(fā)生肝臟轉(zhuǎn)移。轉(zhuǎn)移性肝癌可單發(fā)或多發(fā),屬于腫瘤晚期,預(yù)后差,及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)肝轉(zhuǎn)移瘤,明確其數(shù)目和位置,對(duì)于原發(fā)病灶的尋找、治療方式的選擇及預(yù)后都有重要意義[31]。
在增強(qiáng)MRI圖像上,肝臟轉(zhuǎn)移瘤多表現(xiàn)為環(huán)形強(qiáng)化或邊緣強(qiáng)化。由于不含肝細(xì)胞,轉(zhuǎn)移瘤在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào),這與周圍強(qiáng)化的肝實(shí)質(zhì)形成對(duì)比,從而提高檢出率。有時(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移瘤在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為周邊強(qiáng)化,這可能是由于腫瘤增大后壓迫鄰近正常肝實(shí)質(zhì),其仍具有正常肝功能,能夠攝取Gd-EOB-DTPA,但排泄延遲所致[32]。有文獻(xiàn)指出,常規(guī)平掃M(jìn)RI序列已能發(fā)現(xiàn)絕大多數(shù)肝臟轉(zhuǎn)移瘤,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期成像還能有助于某些疾病如肝臟嗜酸性粒細(xì)胞浸潤(rùn)等與肝轉(zhuǎn)移瘤的鑒別[33]。與擴(kuò)散加權(quán)成像相比,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)肝臟轉(zhuǎn)移瘤的檢出率更高,不過(guò)擴(kuò)散加權(quán)成像對(duì)微小轉(zhuǎn)移灶的檢出率更高[34,35]。Niekel等[36,37]比較CT、MRI、PET及PET/CT對(duì)結(jié)腸癌肝轉(zhuǎn)移瘤的診斷能力,提出MRI是結(jié)腸癌肝轉(zhuǎn)移瘤的首選檢查方法,亞組分析結(jié)果顯示Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI的診斷敏感度為94%。
3.膽管細(xì)胞癌
膽管細(xì)胞癌組織學(xué)包含膽管細(xì)胞和纖維成分,不含肝細(xì)胞,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI顯示其動(dòng)態(tài)期強(qiáng)化表現(xiàn)與常規(guī)MRI類似,動(dòng)脈期、門脈期及平衡期表現(xiàn)為進(jìn)行性強(qiáng)化;肝膽期由于周圍肝實(shí)質(zhì)強(qiáng)化明顯,表現(xiàn)為相對(duì)低信號(hào)。膽管細(xì)胞癌影像學(xué)上與肝細(xì)胞癌鑒別有時(shí)較困難,細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查或組織病理學(xué)檢查是鑒別兩者的金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[38]。
4.肝血管瘤
肝血管瘤是肝臟最常見的良性腫瘤,以海綿狀血管瘤多見,其組織學(xué)改變?yōu)榛螖U(kuò)張的血竇,不含正常肝細(xì)胞。典型血管瘤的診斷并不困難,MRI常規(guī)序列即可對(duì)其進(jìn)行較準(zhǔn)確地定位、定性診斷,典型征象包括T2WI高信號(hào),動(dòng)脈期邊緣結(jié)節(jié)樣強(qiáng)化,隨時(shí)間推移強(qiáng)化進(jìn)一步向中心推進(jìn),呈“快進(jìn)慢出”表現(xiàn);在Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào)。
文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道普遍認(rèn)為肝血管瘤Gd-EOB-DTPA肝膽期圖像并不能為診斷提供更多有價(jià)值的信息,且肝膽期的某些征象可能增加診斷難度[39]。小的血管瘤可能在動(dòng)脈期表現(xiàn)為快速均一強(qiáng)化,而在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào),表現(xiàn)為“假廓清征”,與富血供腫瘤較難鑒別[40]。Tamada等[41]發(fā)現(xiàn)約47%的肝血管瘤在Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期表現(xiàn)為病變周圍低信號(hào),這與轉(zhuǎn)移瘤等惡性病灶的肝膽期表現(xiàn)難以鑒別,因此出現(xiàn)這一征象的病灶還需結(jié)合其他掃描序列圖像和臨床表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行綜合診斷??紤]到存在上述問(wèn)題,目前對(duì)于懷疑肝血管瘤的患者并不推薦行Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI檢查[42]。
5.FNH
FNH是肝內(nèi)常見的良性腫瘤,多好發(fā)于女性。FNH是肝細(xì)胞對(duì)先天性血管發(fā)育異常的一種增生性反應(yīng),由正常肝細(xì)胞異常排列形成,內(nèi)可見小膽管,但不與大膽管相通。FNH最大的病理特點(diǎn)是以星狀纖維瘢痕組織為核心向周圍呈輻射狀分布的纖維分隔,星狀瘢痕組織內(nèi)通常含一條或多條動(dòng)脈。
FNH在T1WI、T2WI圖像上多與正常肝實(shí)質(zhì)信號(hào)相近,增強(qiáng)掃描呈明顯強(qiáng)化,伴中心瘢痕延遲強(qiáng)化[43,44]。Grazioli等[45]研究顯示,68%的FNH在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為高信號(hào),28.9%表現(xiàn)為等信號(hào)。Zech等[44]分析59例FNH在注射對(duì)比劑后20 min時(shí)采集的肝膽期圖像,發(fā)現(xiàn)大多數(shù)FNH表現(xiàn)為相對(duì)于正常肝實(shí)質(zhì)的高信號(hào)、等信號(hào)或混雜信號(hào);之所以部分FNH在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為等信號(hào),一種可能的解釋是病灶內(nèi)含有正常肝細(xì)胞和膽管;表現(xiàn)為高信號(hào)是因?yàn)楦渭?xì)胞內(nèi)小膽管并未與大膽管連通,導(dǎo)致對(duì)比劑殘留;也有少數(shù)病灶在肝膽期表現(xiàn)為相對(duì)低信號(hào),其機(jī)制目前尚不清楚。
6.HCA
HCA是罕見的肝臟良性腫瘤,組織學(xué)上HCA細(xì)胞內(nèi)有大量糖原和脂質(zhì)沉積,但缺乏膽管結(jié)構(gòu)。
在MRI圖像上,HCA多表現(xiàn)為T1WI等信號(hào)或稍高信號(hào),動(dòng)脈期呈均勻或不均勻明顯強(qiáng)化,門脈期和平衡期呈等信號(hào)。Grazioli等[45]發(fā)現(xiàn)32例HCA在肝膽期均表現(xiàn)為相對(duì)正常肝實(shí)質(zhì)的低信號(hào)。另一篇文獻(xiàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)3例HCA在Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào)[46]。Sakamoto等[47]報(bào)道了1例糖原貯積癥男性患者多發(fā)HCA,肝膽期表現(xiàn)為高、低混雜信號(hào)。
HCA和FNH均為富血供病變,常規(guī)影像學(xué)檢查對(duì)其鑒別診斷存在一定困難,有學(xué)者嘗試用Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期成像鑒別兩者,結(jié)果顯示,肝腺瘤在肝膽期多表現(xiàn)為低信號(hào),而FNH多表現(xiàn)為等信號(hào)或高信號(hào),因此肝膽期圖像能為兩者的鑒別診斷提供相關(guān)依據(jù)[48-50]。
評(píng)價(jià)腫瘤分化程度
評(píng)價(jià)HCC的惡性程度、病理分級(jí)對(duì)臨床制定治療方案及評(píng)價(jià)預(yù)后至關(guān)重要?,F(xiàn)有的HCC腫瘤分化程度評(píng)估手段存在局限性,如病理組織學(xué)或細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查是目前已知的金標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但其為有創(chuàng)性檢查,難以廣泛應(yīng)用。因此,需要尋找新的評(píng)估HCC腫瘤分化程度的檢查方法。
有研究認(rèn)為肝膽期HCC的強(qiáng)化程度與其分化程度相關(guān),Lee等[51]報(bào)道了4例肝膽期表現(xiàn)為高信號(hào)的HCC,其病理分級(jí)均為高分化腫瘤。Kogita等[52]計(jì)算不同分化程度的HCC在肝膽期的強(qiáng)化率與分化程度的關(guān)系,認(rèn)為病灶強(qiáng)化程度低者分化程度更差,但該強(qiáng)化率在HCC和退變結(jié)節(jié)間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。Kim等[53]研究認(rèn)為Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI能預(yù)測(cè)肝功能CTP分級(jí)A級(jí)患者的肝癌分化程度。Frericks等[54]通過(guò)對(duì)比分析有肝硬化基礎(chǔ)的HCC患者Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI圖像和術(shù)后病理結(jié)果,發(fā)現(xiàn)HCC在動(dòng)脈期和肝膽期的強(qiáng)化程度與病理分級(jí)不存在相關(guān)性。Kobayashi等[55]提出僅考慮病灶在肝膽期的強(qiáng)化程度,相對(duì)于正常肝實(shí)質(zhì)呈等信號(hào)或高信號(hào)的病灶進(jìn)展為HCC的概率與低信號(hào)病灶間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。因此,HCC肝膽期表現(xiàn)與腫瘤病理學(xué)惡性程度及預(yù)后之間的關(guān)系尚不明確。
腫瘤是典型的血管依賴性病變,血管生成不僅能促進(jìn)腫瘤的生長(zhǎng),還與腫瘤浸潤(rùn)、轉(zhuǎn)移及復(fù)發(fā)密切相關(guān)。HCC是富血供腫瘤,血管生成在HCC的生長(zhǎng)與轉(zhuǎn)移過(guò)程中起著重要作用,其中微血管密度(microvessel density,MVD)是評(píng)價(jià)腫瘤新生血管的有效指標(biāo),但其表達(dá)需通過(guò)免疫組化顯示,限制了其在臨床中的應(yīng)用。目前,隨著MRI技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展,使影像學(xué)無(wú)創(chuàng)評(píng)價(jià)腫瘤血管生成成為可能。Frouge等分析了Gd -DTPA 動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)MRI與乳腺腫瘤MVD的關(guān)系。Buadu等[56]將73例乳腺病變的MRI時(shí)間-強(qiáng)度曲線分成四型,發(fā)現(xiàn)曲線的類型和最大對(duì)比增強(qiáng)率與組織學(xué)MVD的高低有關(guān)。也有研究提示HCC動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)MRI與腫瘤MVD相關(guān),HCC的MR對(duì)比增強(qiáng)率與MVD值呈正相關(guān),快速上升型曲線腫瘤的MVD值高,緩慢上升型曲線腫瘤的MVD值低[57-59]。但目前還沒(méi)有Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI與MVD的相關(guān)研究,尚需進(jìn)一步探討。
HCC惡性程度高,常呈浸潤(rùn)性生長(zhǎng)。HCC血管侵犯是腫瘤肝內(nèi)播散及轉(zhuǎn)移的重要信號(hào),也與術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)密切相關(guān),包括肉眼可見的大血管侵犯及鏡下微血管侵犯。隨著診斷技術(shù)的進(jìn)步,直徑≤3.0 cm的肝癌(小肝癌)的檢出率日益提高,由于其治療可獲得較好的臨床療效,目前已經(jīng)成為臨床研究的重點(diǎn)。肝切除術(shù)是治療HCC的有效方法,但由于原發(fā)腫瘤的肝內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)移和多中心發(fā)生,患者術(shù)后較高的復(fù)發(fā)率嚴(yán)重影響遠(yuǎn)期療效,其中絕大多數(shù)患者的死亡與復(fù)發(fā)相關(guān)。微血管侵犯是小肝癌肝內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)移的直接證據(jù),是影響術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)和患者預(yù)后最重要的危險(xiǎn)因素。目前也有部分關(guān)于Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI與微血管侵犯相關(guān)的研究報(bào)道。Kim等[60]研究了58例HCC患者(病灶直徑均≤2.0 cm),結(jié)果表明具有典型Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI表現(xiàn)且直徑為1.1~2.0 cm的小肝癌多數(shù)有微血管侵犯。Kim等[61]的研究表明,肝膽期呈高信號(hào)改變的HCC病灶,微血管侵犯比例較低信號(hào)病灶低。肝膽期HCC病灶周圍低信號(hào)則提示微血管侵犯可能,其診斷敏感度較低(38.3%),但特異度較高(93.2%)[62];以上研究結(jié)果提示Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)HCC微血管侵犯有一定的診斷價(jià)值。
HCC術(shù)后隨訪復(fù)查對(duì)患者療效評(píng)價(jià)及預(yù)后非常重要。目前也有不少關(guān)于Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI在這方面的研究報(bào)道。Yoon等[63]對(duì)經(jīng)射頻消融治療的HCC患者進(jìn)行隨訪,發(fā)現(xiàn)Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI對(duì)存活和復(fù)發(fā)病灶的診斷優(yōu)于MSCT。但也有研究者發(fā)現(xiàn),一些良性病變?cè)诟文懫诒憩F(xiàn)為低信號(hào),容易與存活灶或腫瘤復(fù)發(fā)轉(zhuǎn)移灶混淆[64]。Seidensticker等[65]對(duì)接受放射治療的肝癌患者進(jìn)行隨訪研究,將Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期圖像與其接受放射治療的三維立體數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行對(duì)照分析,以MRI信號(hào)為橋梁,探索照射劑量與病灶周邊肝實(shí)質(zhì)損傷之間的關(guān)系,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)肝膽期圖像對(duì)HCC病灶邊界顯示更為清晰,腫瘤直徑及體積的測(cè)量更精確,對(duì)侵犯、包繞血管的判斷更明確,有利于評(píng)估療效和病情。
綜上所述,Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI在肝臟局灶性病變的診斷、鑒別診斷、預(yù)后及療效評(píng)價(jià)方面均具有重要作用,并顯示出其相對(duì)于其他檢查方法的優(yōu)勢(shì)。既往研究已經(jīng)明確了肝臟局灶性病變Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI的典型影像學(xué)表現(xiàn),而對(duì)于不典型病灶的影像學(xué)表現(xiàn)及其發(fā)生機(jī)制是未來(lái)的研究方向之一。需要補(bǔ)充的是,盡管一再?gòu)?qiáng)調(diào)Gd-EOB-DTPA增強(qiáng)MRI肝膽期成像的診斷價(jià)值,病灶的定性診斷還需結(jié)合其它序列及臨床進(jìn)行綜合判斷。
[1]Low RN.Abdominal MRI advances in the detection of liver tumours and characterisation[J].Lancet Oncol,2007,8(6):525-535.
[2]Furlan A,Marin D,Cabassa P,et al.Enhancement pattern of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at contrast-enhanced US (CEUS),MDCT,and MRI:intermodality agreement and comparison of diagnostic sensitivity between 2005 and 2010 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines[J].Eur J Radiol,2012,81(9):2099-2105.
[3]Hussain SM,Zondervan PE,JN IJ,et al.Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules:MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation[J].Radiographics,2002,22(5):1023-1039.
[4]Kuhn JP,Hegenscheid K,Siegmund W,et al.Normal dynamic MRI enhancement patterns of the upper abdominal organs:gadoxetic acid compared with gadobutrol[J].AJR,2009,193(5):1318-1323.
[5]Reimer P,Schneider G,Schima W.Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver:properties,clinical development and applications[J].Eur Radiol,2004,14(4):559-578.
[6]Van Beers BE,Pastor CM,Hussain HK.Primovist,Eovist: what to expect?[J].J Hepatol,2012,57(2):421-429.
[7]Huppertz A,Haraida S,Kraus A,et al.Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging:correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT——initial observations[J].Radiology,2005,234(2):468-478.
[8]Kudo M.Will Gd-EOB-MRI change the diagnostic algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma?[J].Oncology,2010,78(Suppl 1):87-93.
[9]Bluemke DA,Sahani D,Amendola M,et al.Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent:U.S. multicenter phase III study[J].Radiology,2005,237(1):89-98.
[10]Hammerstingl R,Huppertz A,Breuer J,et al.Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy:comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions[J].Eur Radiol,2008,18(3):457-467.
[11]Rohrer M,Bauer H,Mintorovitch J,et al.Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths[J].Invest Radiol,2005,40(11):715-724.
[12]Ringe KI,Husarik DB,Sirlin CB,et al.Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver:part 1,protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver[J].AJR,2010,195(1):13-28.
[13]Kudo M,Matsui O,Sakamoto M,et al.Role of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus at the Symposium of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan[J].Oncology,2013,84(Suppl 1):21-27.
[14]Bosch FX,Ribes J,Diaz M,et al.Primary liver cancer:worldwide incidence and trends[J].Gastroenterology,2004,127(5 Suppl 1):S5-S16.
[15]Llovet JM,Burroughs A,Bruix J.Hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Lancet,2003,362(9399):1907-1917.
[16]Bruix J,Sherman M.Management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatology,2005,42(5):1208-1236.
[17]Ahn SS,Kim MJ,Lim JS,et al.Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Radiology,2010,255(2):459-466.
[18]Sano K,Ichikawa T,Motosugi U,et al.Imaging study of early hepatocellular carcinoma:usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,2011,261(3):834-844.
[19]Di Martino M,De Filippis G,De Santis A,et al.Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients:prospective comparison of US,CT and MR imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2013,23(4):887-896.
[20]梁亮,陳財(cái)忠,饒圣祥,等.肝膽特異性磁共振對(duì)比劑Gd-EOB-DTPA在肝臟局灶性病變?cè)\斷中的應(yīng)用研究[J].放射學(xué)實(shí)踐,2012,27(7):765-770.
[21]Haradome H,Grazioli L,Tinti R,et al.Additional value of gadoxetic acid-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma:comparison with dynamic triple-phase multidetector CT imaging[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2011,34(1):69-78.
[22]Sugimoto K,Moriyasu F,Shiraishi J,et al.Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma:comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2012,22(6):1205-1213.
[23]Takahashi M,Maruyama H,Shimada T,et al.Characterization of hepatic lesions (≤30mm) with liver-specific contrast agents:a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging[J].Eur J Radiol,2013,82(1):75-84.
[24]Kim SH,Lee J,Kim MJ,et al.Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].AJR,2009,192(6):1675-1681.
[25]Di Martino M,Marin D,Guerrisi A,et al.Intraindividual comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging and 64-section multidetector CT in the Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis[J].Radiology,2010,256(3):806-816.
[26]Mita K,Kim SR,Kudo M,et al.Diagnostic sensitivity of imaging modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 2cm[J].World J Gastroenterol,2010,16(33):4187-4192.
[27]Hammerstingl R,Zangos S,Schwarz W,et al.Contrast-enhanced MRI of focal liver tumors using a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent:detection and differential diagnosis using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced versus Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the same patient[J].Acad Radiol,2002,9(Suppl 1):S119-S120.
[28]Kim YK,Kim CS,Han YM,et al.Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Clin Radiol,2010,65(5):358-365.
[29]Park Y,Kim SH,Jeon YH,et al.Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI versus gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for preoperatively detecting hepatocellular carcinoma:an initial experience[J].Korean J Radiol,2010,11(4):433-440.
[30]Centeno BA.Pathology of liver metastases[J].Cancer Control,2006,13(1):13-26.
[31]Qian J.Interventional therapies of unresectable liver metastases[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2011,137(12):1763-1772.
[32]Zech CJ,Grazioli L,Jonas E,et al.Health-economic evaluation of three imaging strategies in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases:Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI vs extracellular contrast media enhanced MRI and 3-phase MDCT in Germany,Italy and Sweden[J].Eur Radiol.2009,19(Suppl 3):s753-s763.
[33]Lee MH,Kim SH,Kim H,et al.Differentiating focal eosinophilic infiltration from metastasis in the liver with gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J].Korean J Radiol,2011,12(4):439-449.
[34]Lowenthal D,Zeile M,Lim WY,et al.Detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions in colorectal carcinoma patients:comparison of diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2011,21(4):832-840.
[35]Shimada K,Isoda H,Hirokawa Y,et al.Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases[J].Eur Radiol,2010,20(11):2690-2698.
[36]Niekel MC,Bipat S,Stoker J.Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT,MR imaging,FDG PET,and/or FDG PET/CT:a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment[J].Radiology,2010,257(3):674-684.
[37]Muhi A,Ichikawa T,Motosugi U,et al.Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases:comparison of contrast-enhanced CT,contrast-enhanced US,superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI,and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2011,34(2):326-335.
[38]Rimolia J,Forner A,Reig M,et al.Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis:absence of contrast washout in delayed phases by magnetic resonance imaging avoids misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Hepatology,2009,50(3):791-798.
[39]Goshima S,Kanematsu M,Watanabe H,et al.Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis:differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3T MRI[J].AJR,2010,195(4):941-946.
[40]Doo KW,Lee CH,Choi JW,et al."Pseudo washout" sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor[J].AJR,2009,193(6):W490-496.
[41]Tamada T,Ito K,Ueki A,et al.Peripheral low intensity sign in hepatic hemangioma:diagnostic pitfall in hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of the liver[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,35(4):852-858.
[42]Goodwin MD,Dobson JE,Sirlin CB,et al.Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents[J].Radiographics,2011,31(6):1547-168.
[43]Marin D,Brancatelli G,Federle MP,et al.Focal nodular hyperplasia:typical and atypical MRI findings with emphasis on the use of contrast media[J].Clin Radiol,2008,63(5):577-585.
[44]Zech CJ,Grazioli L,Breuer J,et al.Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging:results of a multicenter trial[J].Invest Radiol,2008,43(7):504-511.
[45]Grazioli L,Morana G,Kirchin MA,et al.Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging:prospective study[J].Radiology,2005,236(1):166-177.
[46]Giovanoli O,Heim M,Terracciano L,et al.MRI of hepatic adenomatosis:initial observations with gadoxetic acid contrast agent in three patients[J].AJR,2008,190(5):290-293.
[47]Sakamoto A,Hayashi H,Sakamoto I,et al.Multiple hepatocellular adenomas in a patient with glycogen storage disease type I:various enhancement patterns in MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA[J].Abdom Imaging,2012,37(2):239-243.
[48]Mohajer K,Frydrychowicz A,Robbins JB,et al.Characterization of hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia with gadoxetic acid[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,36(3):686-696.
[49]Grazioli L,Bondioni MP,Haradome H,et al.Hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia:value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis[J].Radiology,2012,262(2):520-529.
[50]Bieze M,van den Esschert JW,Nio CY,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in differentiating hepatocellular adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia:prospective study of the additional value of gadoxetate disodium[J].AJR,2012,199(1):26-34.
[51]Lee SA,Lee CH,Jung WY,et al.Paradoxical high signal intensity of hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: initial experience[J].Magn Reson Imaging,2011,29(1):83-90.
[52]Kogita S,Imai Y,Okada M,et al.Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma:correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow[J].Eur Radiol,2010,20(10):2405-2413.
[53]Kim HY,Choi JY,Kim CW,et al.Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma only in patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis[J].Liver Transpl,2012,18(7):850-857.
[54]Frericks BB,Loddenkemper C,Huppertz A,et al.Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA[J].AJR,2009,193(4):1053-1060.
[55]Kobayashi S,Matsui O,Gabata T,et al.Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic Acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings of borderline lesions at high risk for progression to hypervascular classic hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2011,35(2):181-186.
[56]Buadu LD,Murakami J,Murayama S,et al.Breast lesions:correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR imageswith histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis[J].Radiology,1996,200(3):639-649.
[57]Lu JP,Wang J,Wang T,et al.Microvessel density of malignant and benign hepatic lesions and MRI evaluation[J].World J Gastroenterol,2004,10(12):1730-1734.
[58]潘平,劉愛(ài)連,宋清,等.動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)磁共振在評(píng)價(jià)肝細(xì)胞癌微血管密度中的意義[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)計(jì)算機(jī)成像雜志,2001,7(5):326-330.
[59]衛(wèi)靜,鄒利光,廖翠薇,等.肝細(xì)胞癌MRI動(dòng)態(tài)增強(qiáng)表現(xiàn)的血供基礎(chǔ)研究[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)影像技術(shù),2004,20(4):506-509.
[60]Kim MJ,Lee M,Choi JY,et al.Imaging features of small hepatocellular carcinomas with microvascular invasion on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging[J].Eur J Radiol,2012,81(10):2507-2512.
[61]Kim JY,Kim MJ,Kim KA,et al.Hyperintense HCC on hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI:correlation with clinical and pathological features[J].Eur J Radiol,2012,81(12):3877-3882.
[62]Kim KA,Kim MJ,Jeon HM,et al.Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma:usefulness of peritumoral hypointensity seen on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase images[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,35(3):629-634.
[63]Yoon JH,Lee EJ,Cha SS,et al.Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging versus four-phase multi-detector row computed tomography in assessing tumor regression after radiofrequency ablation in subjects with hepatocellular carcinomas[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2010,21(3):348-356.
[64]Shinagawa Y,Sakamoto K,Fujimitsu R,et al.Pseudolesion of the liver observed on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging obtained shortly after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Jpn J Radiol,2010,28(6):483-488.
[65]Seidensticker M,Seidensticker R,Mohnike K,et al.Quantitative in vivo assessment of radiation injury of the liver using Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: tolerance dose of small liver volumes[J].Radiat Oncol,2011,17(6):40.
610041成都,四川大學(xué)華西醫(yī)院放射科
張薇薇(1981-),女,山西人,主治醫(yī)師,主要從事腹部影像診斷研究工作。
宋彬,E-mail:cjr.songbin@vip.163.com
國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目資助項(xiàng)目(81171338;81471658)
R575; R445.2
A
1000-0313(2016)01-0044-05
10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2016.01.011
2015-10-23
2015-12-04)