M3型硅酸三鈣固溶體超晶胞與偽六方亞晶胞之間的取向關(guān)系及轉(zhuǎn)換矩陣

閔輝華　徐峰　呂憶農(nóng)　楊靜　丁林飛　蘇凡　朱健民(南京林業(yè)大學(xué)電子顯微鏡室，南京007)(東南大學(xué)MEMS教育部重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京0096)(南京工業(yè)大學(xué)材料化學(xué)工程國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京0009)(南京大學(xué)固體微結(jié)構(gòu)物理國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京009)

M3型硅酸三鈣固溶體超晶胞與偽六方亞晶胞之間的取向關(guān)系及轉(zhuǎn)換矩陣

閔輝華＊,1,2徐峰2呂憶農(nóng)3楊靜1丁林飛1蘇凡1朱健民4
(1南京林業(yè)大學(xué)電子顯微鏡室，南京210037)
(2東南大學(xué)MEMS教育部重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京210096)
(3南京工業(yè)大學(xué)材料化學(xué)工程國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京210009)
(4南京大學(xué)固體微結(jié)構(gòu)物理國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，南京210093)

通過(guò)透射電子顯微鏡(TEM)對(duì)M3型硅酸三鈣(C3S)固溶體進(jìn)行了研究。基于偽六方亞晶胞(空間群R3m，a=0.705 9 nm，b= 0.705 5 nm，c=2.492 4 nm，α=89.79°，β=90.04°，γ=120.14°)對(duì)選區(qū)電子衍射花樣(SAED)和高分辨透射電子顯微鏡(HRTEM)像進(jìn)行了分析。結(jié)果表明：在M 3型硅酸三鈣固溶體中，由超結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的衍射斑點(diǎn)沿著[117]H*調(diào)制波矢量方向，具有一維調(diào)制結(jié)構(gòu)特征，并且可以表示為h a*+k b*+l c*+m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)]，其中m=±1、±2和±3?；贛3超晶胞(空間群Cm，a=3.310 8 nm，b=0.703 6 nm，c=1.852 1 nm，β=94.137°)對(duì)SAED花樣和HRTEM像進(jìn)行了模擬，最終確立了M3超晶胞和偽六方亞晶胞之間的取向關(guān)系，即：(600)M3、(020)M3和(006)M3分別相當(dāng)于(112)H、(110)H和(117)H，[100]M3//[772]H、[010]M3//[110]H以及[001]M3//[111]H。此外，還確定了M3超晶胞和偽六方亞晶胞之間的轉(zhuǎn)換矩陣。

硅酸三鈣；調(diào)制結(jié)構(gòu)；取向關(guān)系；透射電子顯微術(shù)

0　Introduction

Solid solutions of tricalcium silicate(C3S)are one of the principal components of Portland cement clinker,and pure C3S is known to exist in seven modifications:three triclinic(T1,T2,T3),three monoclinic(M1,M2,M3),and one rhombohedral(R). These modifications are reported to appear via successive,reversible phase transitions when heated, occurring in the following sequence[1-3]:

However,the presence of foreign ions may stabilize some of the high-temperature forms at room temperature.For instance,sulphate or magnesium impurities induce the stabilization of M1 and M3 modifications respectively[2,4].M3 modification was first reported by Jeffery[5]and the cell parameters were a= 3.308 nm,b=0.707 nm,c=1.856 nm,β=94.10°.He determined a pseudohexagonal average structure(Space group R3m;a=0.7 nm,c=2.5 nm)that he considered as a valid approximation for all the true structures. Several years later,Nish and Takéuch[6]established the atomic coordinates of M3 by single-crystal diffraction method.They described an average monoclinic unit cell,referred as

The purpose of this work is to describe the superstructure of the M3 modification in detail,and the orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell will be studied by computer simulation.

1　Experimental

Reagent-grade CaCO3,SiO2and MgO were used as starting materials.CaCO3and SiO2were mixed in a molar ratio of 3∶1 and MgO(2.0%,Mass percentage) was added to the mixture with respect to C3S.Raw materials were mixed and ball-milled by a planetary mill at 250 r·min-1for 4 h and screened through a 120-mesh sieve.Then,the powder was mixed in an agate mortar wetted by ethanol,which was pressed into pellets 30 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness. The pellets were heated at 1 500℃for 6 h and then quenched in air.To synthesize a specimen free from dicalcium silicate,the fired pellets were pulverized, pelletized and heated again via the same heating process.

The Resulting product was identified using an XRD device(Model ARL X′TRA,Thermo Electron Co.,America)with Cu Kα radiation(λ=0.154 18 nm) operated at 40 kV and 35 mA.The XRD patterns of the C3S solid solution were recorded in a continuous mode at a scanning rate of 0.1°·min-1.The pseudohexagonal subcell parameters of the C3S solid solution were calculated from the peak positions in the XRD pattern and refined by least-squares method.

The specimen was crushed and dispersed in ethanol.The resulting suspension was scooped onto a copper grids covered with holey carbon film;then the specimen was dried under magnesium lamp.SAEDpatterns and HRTEM images were recorded using a TEM device(Model JEM-2100UHR,JEOL,Tokyo, Japan)at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.The device was equipped with a double tilt goniometer, where the maximum tilting angle was±20°around the x-and y-axes respectively.

The SAED patterns were calculated using a computer program SingleCrystal(CrystalMaker Software Ltd.,U.K.)and the HRTEM images were simulated using a program MacTempas(Total Resolution Inc.,U.S.A.).The three-dimensional structure model of the orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell was constructed using the program CrystalMaker (CrystalMaker Software Ltd.,U.K.).

2　Results and discussion

2.1XRD study

Two conventional angular windows(2θCu=32°～33° and 2θCu=51°～52°)which were proposed by Bigaré et al.[1]are good indicators of the symmetries of the modifications.In this study,the details of the XRD peaks appearing at the two conventional angular windows for the specimen are given in Fig.1.As shown in the figure,double peaks were observed at the two conventional windows.Compared with the former researches[1,8-9],this specimen was identified as M3.The pseudohexagonal subcell parameters refined by least-squares method based on XRD data were: Space group R3m;a=0.705 9 nm,b=0.705 5 nm,c= 2.492 4 nm,α=89.79°,β=90.04°and γ=120.14°.

Fig.1 Characteristic reflection groups in XRD pattern for C3S doped with MgO(2.0%,Mass percentage)

2.2TEM study

Traditionally,the structural studies are almost based on XRD data.However,some structural details such as modulated structures are easily to be ignored in analysing because of the low intensity of XRD. Furthermore,the angular windows used to identify the modifications are rather similar with each other;it also causes difficulties in study.

In order to further investigate the M3 superstructure features and establish the orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell, the specimen was examined by TEM.The SAED patterns and HRTEM images recorded along different zone axes and the corresponding simulation results were shown in Fig.2～4.All the patterns recorded in this study were indexed based on the pseudohexagonal subcell,the simulated SAED patterns were indexed based on the M3 supercell proposed by Torre[10](Space group Cm;a=3.310 8 nm,b=0.703 6 nm,c=1.852 1 nm,β=94.137°).

Fig.2(a)shows the SAED pattern recorded along [110]Hzone axis and the corresponding indexing reciprocal planes are shown in Fig.2(b).Reflections with higher intensities were responsible for the pseudohexagonal subcell;those with lower intensities (satellite reflections)were attributable to the M3 supercell.The satellite reflections show modulated structure feature with 6 times of subcell dimension along[117]H*and could be expressed as h a*+k b*+ l c*+m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)],where m=±1,±2 and±3.It was consistent with the results reported by Groves[7]and Urabe[8].Fig.2(c)shows the corresponding HRTEM image,wavy contrasts were observed with a repeat of 1.84 nm parallel to(117)H,which is 6 times greater than the(117)Hspacing.Based on the atomic coordinates established by Torre[10],the SAED pattern and HRTEM image simulated along[010]M3zone axis under a defocus value of-60 nm and thickness of 60 nm are shown in Fig.2(d)and(f)respectively.It is found that the simulated results were consistent with those obtained from experiments.The corresponding reciprocal planes indexed based on M3 supercell areshown in Fig.2(e),which reveals that(117)H,(111)Hand(003)Hare equivalent to(006)M3,(402)M3and(202)M3respectively and[010]M3//[110]H.

Fig.2(a)SAED pattern along[110]Hzone axis;(b)Schematic diagram of indices based on pseudohexagonal subcell; (c)HRTEM image corresponding to(a);(d)Simulated SAED pattern along[010]M3zone axis;(e)Schematic diagram of indices based on M3 supercell;(f)Simulated HRTEM image corresponding to(d)

The SAED pattern in Fig.3(a)was taken along [181]Hzone axis and the corresponding indexing reciprocal planes are shown in Fig.3(b).It is found that the modulated structure feature along this zone axis is the same as it was found along[110]Hzone axis,which is 6 times of subcell dimension along [117]H*and the satellite reflections could be also expressed as h a*+k b*+l c*+m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)],where m=±1,±2 and±3.Fig.3(c)shows the corresponding HRTEM image,and the wavy contrasts were observed with a repeat of 1.84 nm parallel to(117)H,which is 6 times greater than the(117)Hspacing.The SAED pattern and HRTEM image along[130]M3zone axis were simulated under a defocus value of-60 nm and thickness of 60 nm and are shown in Fig.3(d)and(f) respectively.By contrast,it is found that the simulated results were in good agreement to that observed in experiments.The corresponding reciprocal planes indexed based on M3 supercell are shown in Fig.3(e),which reveals that(117)H,(101)Hand(216)Hare equivalent to(006)M3,(310)M3and(316)M3respectively and[181]H//[130]M3.

Fig.4(a)and(b)show the SAED pattern recorded along[241]Hzone axis and the corresponding indexing reciprocal planes respectively.In this pattern,the satellite reflections show modulated structure feature with 3 times of subcell dimension along[112]H*and they could be expressed as h a*+k b*+l c*±1/[3(-a*+ b*-2c*)].Fig.4(c)shows the corresponding HRTEM image,as shown in the figure,wavy contrasts were observed with a repeat of 1.65 nm parallel to(112)H, which is 3 times greater than the(112)Hspacing.The SAED pattern and HRTEM image along[021]M3zoneaxis were simulated under a defocus value of-60 nm and thickness of 60 nm and are shown in Fig.3(d)and (f)respectively and they were consistent with those obtained from experiments.The corresponding reciprocal planes indexed based on M3 supercell are shown in Fig.4(e),which reveals that(102)H,(210)Hand(112)Hare equivalent to(112)M3,(712)M3and(600)M3respectively and[241]H//[021]M3.

Fig.3(a)SAED pattern along[181]Hzone axis;(b)Schematic diagram of indices based on pseudohexagonal subcell; (c)HRTEM image corresponding to(a);(d)Simulated SAED pattern along[130]M3zone axis;(e)Schematic diagram of indices based on M3 supercell;(f)Simulated HRTEM image corresponding to(d)

Urabe et al.[11]suggested that the coordinates of the superstructure reflections in reciprocal space could be described by the modulated wave vector with the minimum value and he found the one-dimensional type modulated wave vector in T1 superstructure.In this work,the vector along[117]H*with an interval of 0.59 nm-1is the minimum value in the experiment.

Fig.5 shows the schematic diagram of indices based on pseudohexagonal subcell along[110]Hzone axis.As shown in the figure,the coordinates of 1/[3(-a* +b*-2c*)]for the satellite reflections(it is also observed along[241]Hzone axis)could be expressed as-3c*+1/[3(-a*+b*+7c*)].It reveals that the reflections at 1/[3(-a*+b*-2c*)]is a satellite occurs at the 1/3 place between[003]H*and[114]H*,where the line passing through those two points is parallel to the direction of[117]H*.All the satellite reflections observed along other zone axes could be also described in the same way,and could be expressed as:h a*+k b*+l c*+ m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)],where m=±1,±2 and±3.Therefore, the structural modulation in M3 had the character of a one-dimensional type.

Fig.4(a)SAED pattern along[241]Hzone axis;(b)Schematic diagram of indices based on pseudohexagonal subcell; (c)HRTEM image corresponding to(a);(d)Simulated SAED pattern along[021]M3zone axis;(e)Schematic diagram of indices based on M3 supercell;(f)Simulated HRTEM image corresponding to(d)

Fig.5 Schematic diagram of indices based on pseudohexagonal subcell along[110]Hzone axis

2.3Orientation relations derivation

Whatever the experimental technique,TEM or XRD,the superstructures produce additional weak characteristic Bragg lines.Urabe et al.[11]did an excellent work that they indexed various SAED patterns recorded along different zone axes and finally established the plane orientation relations between pseudohexagonal subcell and T1 supercell.Groves[12]proposed a conversion matrix between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell planes based on TEM data,but it was not confirmed in later researches.In this work,the TEM results show that(117)H,(112)Hand(101)Hare equivalent to(006)M3,(600)M3and(310)M3respectively.Therefore,the detail orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell planes can be derived via calculation based on vector relations,and they are listed in Table 1.For instance:

Table 1 Plane orientation relations between M 3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell

In this study,only one basic crystal axis orientation relationship was directly established from Fig.2 that[010]M3//[110]H.Though the crystal axes orientation relations of[100]M3and[001]M3with respect to pseudohexagonal subcell couldn′t be established directly from TEM data in this work,they can be derived from Table 1 based on zone law.For instance, (600)M3and(020)M3belong to[001]M3zone axis;(112)Hand(110)Hbelong to[111]Hzoneaxis,so we can conclude that[001]M3//[111]H.In the same way,all the crystal axes orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell could be established and they are listed in Table 2.Meanwhile,the conversion matrix between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell is established as following which disagrees with Groves′result[12]:

In order to directly observe the detail orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell,a three-dimensional structure model was constructed and it is shown in Fig.6.It reveals that the pseudohexagonal subcell could be considered as an average structure in C3S and it extends to yield the supercell along specific directions according to the relations listed in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 2 Crystal axes orien tation relations between M 3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell

Fig.6 Orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell

3　Conclusions

C3S solid solution of M3 was prepared by doping MgO(2.0%,Mass percentage).SAED patterns were analyzed using the peseudohexagonal subcell with the following parameters:space group R3m;a=0.705 9 nm, b=0.705 5 nm,c=2.492 4 nm,α=89.79°,β=90.04°and γ=120.14°.Reflections caused by the superstructure were proven to occur along the modulation wave vector[117]H*with one-dimensional type and could be expressed as h a*+k b*+l c*+m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)],where m=±1,±2 and±3.The orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell wereestablished that(600)M3,(020)M3and(006)M3are equivalent to(112)H(110)H,and(117)Hrespectively, and[100]M3//[772]H,[010]M3//[110]H,and[001]M3//[111]H. Furthermore,the conversion matrix between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell is established.

[1]Bigaré M,Guinier A,Mazières C,et al.J.Am.Ceram.Soc., 1967,50(11):609-619

[2]Maki I,Chrom S.Il Cemento,1978,3:252-274

[3]Maki I,Kato K.Cem.Concr.Res.,1982,12(1):93-100

[4]Maki I,Goto K.Cem.Concr.Res.,1982,12(3):301-308

[5]Jeffery J W.Acta Crystallogr.,1952,5:26-35

[6]Nish F,Takèuchi Y,Maki I.Z.Kristallogr.,1985,172:297-314

[7]Sinclair W,Groves G.J.Am.Ceram.Soc.,1984,69(5):325-330

[8]Urabe K,Nakano H,Morita H.J.Am.Ceram.Soc.,2002,85 (2):423-429

[9]Courtial M,de Noirfontaine M N,Dunstetter F,et al.Powder Diffr.,2003,18(10):7-15

[10]de La Torre á G,Bruque S,Campo J.Cem.Concr.Res., 2002,32(9):1347-1356

[11]Urabe K,Shirakami T,Iwashima M.J.Am.Ceram.Soc., 2000,83(5):1253-1258

[12]Hudson K E,Groves W.Cem.Concr.Res.,1982,12(1):61-68

Orientation Relations and Conversion M atrix Between M 3 Supercell and Pseudohexagonal Subcell in Tricalcium Silicate Solid Solution

MIN Hui-Hua＊,1,2XU Feng2Lü Yi-Nong3YANG Jing1DING Lin-Fei1SU Fan1ZHU Jian-Min4
(1Electron Microscope Lab,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China)
(2Key Laboratory of MEMS of the Ministry of Education,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China)
(3State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 210009,China)
(4State Key Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)

A M3 modification of tricalcium silicate(C3S)solid solution was investigated using transmission electron microscope(TEM).Selected area electron diffraction(SAED)patterns and high resolution transmission electron microscopy(HRTEM)images were analyzed based on a pseudohexagonal subcell(Space group R3m;a= 0.7059 nm,b=0.705 5 nm,c=2.492 4 nm,α=89.79°,β=90.04°,γ=120.14°).Reflections caused by the superstructure were proven to occur along the modulation wave vector[117]H*with one-dimensional type and could be expressed as h a*+k b*+l c*+m/[6(-a*+b*+7c*)],where m=±1,±2 and±3.SAED patterns and HRTEM images based on the M3 supercell(Space group Cm;a=3.310 8 nm,b=0.703 6 nm,c=1.852 1 nm,β=94.137°)were simulated and finally the orientation relations between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell were established as follows:(600)M3,(020)M3and(006)M3were equivalent to(112)H,(110)Hand(117)Hrespectively,and[100]M3//[772]H,[010]M3// [110]H,and[001]M3//[111]H.Furthermore,the conversion matrix between M3 supercell and pseudohexagonal subcell was established.

tricalcium silicate;modulated structure;orientation relations;transmission electron m icroscopy

TQ172

A

1001-4861(2016)01-0145-08

10.11862/CJIC.2016.014

2015-09-01。收修改稿日期：2015-10-19。

國(guó)家重點(diǎn)基礎(chǔ)研究發(fā)展計(jì)劃(No.2015CB352106)、江蘇省博士后科研資助計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(No.1402037B)、國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(No.31570576，61574034)和江蘇高校優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科建設(shè)工程資助。

＊通信聯(lián)系人。E-mail：hhmin@njfu.edu.cn