• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Pragmatic Analysis of the British TV Series Sherlock

    2016-07-15 09:20ZHANGYi-ran
    科技視界 2016年17期
    關鍵詞:關聯(lián)理論

    ZHANG+Yi-ran

    【Abstract】Most often, in communication, one delivers messages clearly and smoothly. However, there occur the occasions when this direct communication intentionally fails in order to generate an implicature for the hearers to digest. This case also extends to literary, film or TV works. The creators use clever languages to produce suspense or arouse curiosity. As classic theories in pragmatics, Cooperative Principle, Relevance Theory and later Levinsons Theory play significant roles in explaining why such phenomena appear in communication. This paper aims to figure out whether they explain the existences of non-observant scenarios in conversations by carrying out a case study on the lines from one most welcomed British TV series, Sherlock.

    【Key words】Cooperative Principle; Relevance theory; Levinsons Theory

    【摘 要】在理想會話中,說話人希望將信息清楚明了地傳達給對方。然而,在實際對話中,人們時常故意模糊話語。而此中含意(implicture),需聽者揣摩。這種語言上的技巧經(jīng)常被文學及影視作品借用,以此來制造懸念或喚起人們的好奇心。作為語用學中的經(jīng)典理論,合作原理,關聯(lián)理論以及萊文森理論為研究話語交流做出了巨大貢獻。本文借助上述三種理論,從語用角度分析一部廣受好評的英劇《神探夏洛克》。

    【關鍵詞】合作原理;關聯(lián)理論;萊文森理論

    1 Introduction

    In pragmatics, Grice explained why naturally occurring data breaching the Cooperative Principle. This paper presented with an aim to explore whether the Principle still explain perfectly with the advent of modern theories: Relevance Theory and the more recent the prevailing Levinsons Theory. The first part of this paper covers the past literature review concerning the concept of implicature and the Cooperative Principles by Grice (1975), the Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986) and Neo-Gricean theories advocated mainly by Horn (1984) and Levinson (2000). Next, a detailed analysis is presented to demonstrate how the data, extracted from the TV Series Sherlock(2010) generate implicatures by not observing the maxims with supplement explanations via Relevance Theory and the Levinsons Theory, which Grices maxims could not cope with.

    2 Literature Review

    The first part of the literature review covers a brief introduction of Grice s Cooperative Principles, the derived four maxims, the ways of non-observant of the maxims and the concept of implicature. Next comes the Relevance Theory, which is on the other spectrum. The final part presents Neo-Gricean theories which are considered to be revised version of Grices theory.

    2.1 The Cooperative Principles

    Grice is considered to the founding father of conversational implicatures (1975). As he put it ‘“A meant something by X” is roughly equivalent to “A uttered X with the intention of inducing a belief by means of the recognition of this intention” The “meaning” here, is a non-natural meaning which can be interpreted as “l(fā)iteral meaning plus implicature”. This is further spelled out by the Cooperative Principle. The latter is considered being the underlying principle that determines the way in which language is used with maximum effect to achieve rational interaction in communication. This overriding dictum is further supported by the four subdivided maxims quoted from Thomas (1995, p. 63-64):

    a)Maxim of Quantity: 1) Make you contribution as informative as is required for the current purpose of the exchange; 2) Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.

    b)Maxim of Quality: 1) Do not say what you believe to be false; 2) Do not say that for which you lack evidence.

    c)Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.

    d)Maxim of Manner: 1) Avoid obscurity of expression; 2) Avoid ambiguity; 3) Be brief; 4) Be orderly.

    Grice suggests that the speaker is best cooperative when his utterance is true and relevant and provide appropriate amount of information in an explicit manner. When one of the presented maxims is not confirmed, we do not assume that the speaker is not cooperative; in fact he is generating a conversational implicature via flouting the maxim. Moreover, we do not assume that this blatantly unfulfilling is nonsense. On the contrary, it is consider that an appropriate meaning is there to be inferred. In other words, when a maxim is flouted, the hearer is prompt to look for the implicature(Thomas, 1995, p. 65).

    Grice (1975) also mentions that there are two implicatures: one is Generalised implicature which requires little background knowledge to work out, the other is Particularized implicature which does require special background information to be understood by the hearer.

    2.2 Relevance Theory

    Another theory this study employs, developed based on the Gricean theory, is Relevance Theory proposed by Wilson & Sperber (1986). Although Relevance Theorists abide by Grices Relevance Maxim, they cast doubt on the rest of the maxims and even the invention of the Cooperative Principle and the maxims (Cutting, 2008). They argue that, the communication proceeds not because the speaker persistently to obey the maxims but what they seek for relevance is a basic common ground knowledge they both share. The most significant type of cognitive effect is a contextual implicature which is acknowledged as new information. The other forms of cognitive effects are confirming, strengthening or contradicting, weakening an existing assumption. When this cognitive process applied in the communicative aspect, an utterance or an act of inferential communication is “optimal relevant when on the one hand, achieves the greatest contextual effects and on the other hand, achieves for putting in the minimised efforts. Relevance Theory is considered an improvement compared to the Cooperative Principle because it values more the natural and flexible characters of language (Cutting, 2008, p. 41).

    2.3 Neo-Gricean Pragmatics

    The last theory this study touches on is the Neo-Gricean pragmatics advocated by Horn(1984) and Levinson (2000). Largely based on the Grices Cooperative Principle, Horn (1984) reduces the maxims to two: the Quality remained and Quantity, Relation and Manner merged into two principles: the Q[uantity] Principle: Make the information contributable; say as much as and as one can. The R[ation] Principle: make the contribution necessary; say no more than one must. In other words, the reductionist theory involves with maximising the R Principle and minimising the Q Principles. Levinsons theory (2000), another Neo-Gricean theory, is comprised of three categories: (Q) Quantity, (I) Information and (M) Manner. Huang (2007, p. 41, 46, 50) simplified Levinsons theories as follows:

    The Q-principle:

    Speaker: do not say less than is required (bearing the I-principle in mind).

    Addressee: what is not said is not the case.

    The I-principle:

    Speaker: do not say more than is required( bearing the I-principle in mind)

    Addressee: what is generally said is stereotypically and specifically exemplified.

    The M-principle:

    Speaker: do not use a marked expression without reason.

    Addressee: what is said in a mark way is not unmarked.

    Because Levinsons theory, based on the Grices Cooperative Principle and revised Horns theory, makes the conversational implicature analysis easier to carry on, this analysis mainly carries out comparisons between Levinsons theory with Griceans theory.

    3 The Analysis

    3.1 Introduction of Sherlock (2010)

    This is a qualitative study with the data extracted from a British TV series, Sherlock (2010). Sherlock, the long being acclaimed London based “consulting detective” formed by Scottish fictionist and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He is famous for his strong logical deduction and forensic skills to solve extreme difficult cases. The Sherlock in the new series (2010) succeeds all the characteristics the original has: an arrogant and genius consulting detective who has been holding a desire to be proved as the cleverest among both the criminals and polices. Dr. John Watson, another main character, is an army doctor retired from warfare. He is considered to compromise everything that Sherlock has even his arrogant character. However, they do share one thing in common -- the wit. It is wit that binds them together and it is wit that makes the Doctor proved understand practically every utterance Sherlock puts. The new series was well received by the audience with the view rating ranking in several countries including China. It is believed that the wit embedded in language plays crucial part in wining the audience. Therefore, examples are extracted to see whether Grices theory can explain how and why such wits are achieved by not observing the principles. The indeterminate ones are further analysed with the Relevance Theory and Neo-Gricean theories, in particular Levinsons system to find the best possible explanations.

    3.2 Case study

    In Grices Cooperative Principle, the speaker is expected to contribute the true information as much and as accurate as he could with the shared conversation purpose in mind (Grice, 1975). He then points out that several sub-maxims should be proposed with the goal to generate results from the Cooperative Principle as stated in the literature review. What comes along with the Cooperative Principle is the implicature. In daily conversation, there are numerous occasions when one does not obey one or more maxims which are considered, on large scale, to yield implicatures.

    According to Grice (1975), there are five ways of not observing the maxims and two of which are focus here. They are:

    Flouting a maxim-one blatantly breaches a maxim carrying an implicature

    Violating a maxim-one covertly breaches a maxim with a misleading or deceiving purpose

    In the following part, several non-observant phenomena with examples in Sherlock are shown and explanations why such non-observance occur follow.

    3.3 Flouting the maxims

    Quality

    Example 1

    [When Sherlock and Dr. Watson were brought to the Buckingham Palace, they guessed who could probably have them there.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Here to see the Queen?

    b) Sherlock: Oh, apparently, yes.

    c) Mycroft: Just once, can you two behave like grown-ups?

    In example 1, Dr. Watson made a most reasonable deduction when in the highest land of a country, one is expected to see the highest person, and in Buckingham Palace, it would be the Queen. Sherlock answered “Oh, apparently, yes.” when they both saw Mycroft, Sherlocks brother, walked in and burst into laughter. In this case, Sherlock flouted the maxim of Quality in which he gave wrong information not to mislead but on the contrary, to humiliate his brother. Apparently, his brother cannot be a queen who by the nature should be a female sex. Besides, what the word “queen” embedded is someone who is flamboyant and acting like a girl. The implicature generated by flouting the maxim of Quality is well received by the three persons at the scene which lead to the dramatic laughter of Sherlock and Dr. Watson and the rebuttal by Mycroft in 1c). Mycrofts argument is again a flouting of the maxim of Quality. True to the fact that Dr. Watson and his younger brother are grown-ups but by overlooking the fact and also the cooperative principle that it requires right information to communicate, he gave the opposite answer. By uttering this, Mycroft intended to insult Sherlock and Dr. Watson by the implicature: What they just did was childish, and they should behave maturely as adults.

    Quantity

    Example 2

    [Sherlock and Dr. Watson were forced to go to some place they had no idea of and finally they were there which turned out to the Buckingham Palace. As a consultant detective, Sherlock insisted on his brother Mycroft to tell him straight who his client was and thats when Harry, the employee of the direct client came in.]

    a) Sherlock: And my client is...?

    b) Harry: Illustrious, in the extreme. And remaining, I have to inform you, entirely anonymous.

    Harrys answer breaches the maxim of Quantity. When Sherlock asked who his client was, he expected an answer that contributes appropriate amount of information in a direct manner like “the client is whom.” However, out of expectation, Harry chose not to give a proper answer. Together with the qualifiers, “illustrious”, “in the extreme” and “anonymous”, the speaker aimed to imply that the client was too celebrated to be informed by the name. Although this answer did give Sherlock an opportunity to generate such implicature; he chose to ignore it, which gave rise to the following conversation.

    Example 3

    a) Sherlock: Who is my client?

    b) Mycroft: Take a look at where youre standing, and make a deduction.

    c) Mycroft: You are to be engaged by the highest in the land.

    Sherlock insisted to know who exactly his client was by asking a direct question in 3a), a much stronger request than 2a). This time, Sherlock still did not get a satisfactory answer from Mycroft. What Mycroft said in 3b) can be viewed as a flout of the maxim of Relation because there is no direct association between “who ones client is” and “ones deduction”. 3c) is another case of flouting of the maxim of Quantity. “The highest in the land” is more or less equivalent to the one who was “illustrious in the extreme”. Still who the client was is concealed. This one can also be deemed as the speakers unwillingness to reveal the identity of the person talked about. The curious audience might suspect that the client was not really a significant matter or the one was too famous to be known in such occasion. In such a word puzzle, it successfully arouses suspense and the audiences curiosity.

    Relation

    Example 4

    [Dr. Watson is typing another blog titled “Sherlock Holmes Baffled”.]

    a) Sherlock: No, no, no, dont mention the unsolved ones.

    b) Dr. Watson: People want to know youre human.

    When Sherlock says in the example 4a) “Dont mention the unsolved case.” in fact he wants Dr. Watson to stop putting the unsolved case online. According to Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962), Sherlock utters 4a) (locution) with an expectation that Dr Watson would follow his request (illocution). However, instead of doing what Sherlock demanded, the Doctor says 4b) in the way that flouts the maxim of Relation: What John informed is not relevant. Under such circumstance, Sherlock cleverly received the implicature that by unostentatiously bleaching the Maxim Dr. Watson implicates that his public image was almighty that there was no case would set him back, but by reading Dr. Watsons blog the public could get that the opinions previously held were wrong.

    Manner

    Example 5

    a) Sherlock: Do people actually read your blog?

    b) Dr. Watson: Where do you think our clients come from?

    c) Sherlock: I have a website.

    d) Dr. Watson: In which you enumerate 240 different types of tobacco ash.

    e) Dr. Watson: Nobodys reading your website.

    Example 5 is a case when flouting the maxim of Manner comes. When Sherlock asked the way in 5a), in fact he wanted Dr. Watson to provide an accurate answer: “yes” or “no”. However, instead of giving an explicit answer, the doctor asked back in 5b). It was Sherlock himself, in the detectives mind, who attracted clients to the consultancy out of either admiration or need after reading his own website Science of Deduction. The replies given by Dr. Watson in 5d) and e) failed Sherlocks expectation indirectly and then directly and produced a comic effect.

    3.4 Violating the maxims

    Quality

    Example 6

    [Dr. Watson is on a crime scene in place of Sherlock when they were talking about Sherlocks constantly talking habit.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Do you just carry on talking when Im away?

    b) Sherlock: I dont know, how often are you away?

    Sherlocks utterance is a violation of the maxim of Quality. Under rare circumstances do people totally be oblivion of the environment especially one holds a desire to be informative. Here Sherlocks utterance “I dont know” in 6b) is therefore considered to be deceiving. Probably, he was trying to indicate that he did not know the doctor was away because he did not require a response when he kept talking or he just did not pay any attention to his partner. This latter implicature is more or less proved by Sherlocks supplement “how often are you away?”. This utterance yet could not possibly be explained by the Cooperative Principles because it obeys all the maxims but still generates implicatures either as he did not expect to communicate with the other speaker for most of the times he simply informed him whatever came across his mind or actually Sherlock knew his partner was not so often away which made Dr. Watsons initial utterance a violation of the maxim of Quality.

    Example 7

    [The two came to Irenes in searching of the compromising photos the client from the Buckingham Palace required. When asked, Irene deliberately turned the topic away to another case Sherlock was working on.]

    a) Sherlock: I know the victim was a sportsman, recently returned from foreign travel

    b) Sherlock: and that the photographs Im looking for are in this room.

    c) Irene: OK, but how?

    d) Sherlock: So they are in this room. Thank you.

    The utterance in 7a) by Sherlock shows his marvellous talent. He comes to Irenes for the compromising photos she was taken with one of the Royal members. However, he was told that he would not be given the photos and then asked about one of the cases Sherlock was investigating. Sherlock explains his investigation together with a seemingly irrelevant sentence 7b). Under this circumstance, Sherlock blatantly breaches the maxim of Relevance but this is not even the trigger of an implicature yet. In fact, this utterance is not true. Sherlock did not know the exact location of the photos. By uttering “I know that the photographs Im looking for are in this room” he holds a 50 to 50 chance that the photos might be in this room. Through this abruptly changing of topic he would expect a confirmed answer. In this way, Sherlock violated the maxim of Quality by saying something he lacked evidence with a purpose to mislead and this misleading function was further justified by his utterance in 7d). In this case, breaching of two maxims collides with flouting the maxim of Relation.

    Quantity

    Example 8

    [Dr. Watson keeps typing.]

    a) Sherlock: What are you typing?

    b) Dr. Watson: Blog.

    c) Sherlock: About?

    d) Dr. Watson: Us.

    e) Sherlock: You mean me.

    The dialogues in example 8 are a case when the speaker secretly hid certain information from the hearer. From 8a) to 8d), each time when Sherlock tried to ask a question on the typing thing, Dr. Watson intentionally gave unsatisfactory reply. What Dr. Watson provided, was in fact the true information relevant to Sherlocks question and not in an ambiguous way, which is an observance of the maxims of Quality, Relation as well as Manner. What Dr. Watson failed to observe is the maxim of Quantity. In other words, in his utterances both in 8b) and 8d) he did not give sufficient information for the hearer. However, the shared background knowledge, Sherlock did know Dr. Watson owned a blog keeping tracks of every case they worked on, makes the seemingly misleading conversation could continue.

    Relation

    Example 9

    [Sherlock and Irene were fighting against the broken-in Americans and then Sherlock looked at the opened safe.]

    a) Sherlock: Do you mind?

    b) Irene: Not at all.

    Sherlock asked if Irene minded that he took whats inside the safe out. However, Irene misunderstood that the man was asking about the feelings of him observing her measurement early on which later proved to be the code to the safe. Irenes answer was misleading to the Americans and even the viewers but highly relevant to the question. In this case, there is no implicature although Sherlocks asking does violate the maxim of Manner if in full it would be “Do you mind if I…”. Nonetheless, he avoided some of the information in order to get what he perceived to be the satisfactory answer.

    Manner

    Example 10

    [Harry and Mycroft were describing the case to Sherlock in Buckingham Palace.]

    a) Harry: My employer has a problem.

    b) Mycroft: A matter has come to light of an extremely delicate and potentially criminal nature, and in this hour of need, dear brother, your name has arisen.

    In example 10, Harry vaguely referred the case as a “problem”. And without more detailed information, one cannot deduce how severe the problem was. This utterance violates the maxim of Manner in which he failed to give accurate answer. Mycroft, thereupon supplemented by uttering 10b). If Harrys misleadingness was unintentional, Mycrofts one was deliberate. First, Mycrofts talk was so deceiving that he used such ambiguous words like “extremely” and “potentially”. One can hardly define the degree of “extreme” and “potential”, which may confuse a detective. For one thing, one may be concerned whether it was a crime and for another the matter was really severe (which in fact might not be). Mycroft used this ambiguous or even misleading utterance to lure his brother to take the case for his well understanding of Sherlocks curious character.

    The above discussed how Cooperative Principle and its subdivided four maxims cope with the data in the TV series Sherlock (2010). It can be seen that, Grice theory can explain most the problems that occur yet there are unsolved ones such as the reasons for generating particular implicatures and the obscured boundaries of each maxim. Next comes a brief discussion about the Relevance Theory and the Neo-Gricean theories with a perspective to witness whether they are in supportive to the Cooperative Principle.

    3.5 Relevance Theory

    What Relevance Theory contributes to the daily conservation is that it pays more attention to the ambiguity and the flexibility which are the very nature of language. It does not provide fixed maxims for speakers to follow but the reasons why people behave in that way. Wilson and Sperber (1986) argue that communication is possible not because the interlocutors seek to obey certain maxim but based on a particular relevance, a common feature of human cognition. They also point out that an utterance is optimally relevant if and only of that on the one hand, it is relevant enough to worth an audiences attention and on the other hand, it achieves the most adequate contextual effects. In this way, the four maxims proposed by Grice can be replaced by one: the principle of Relevance. Relevance Theory can explain some phenomenon easier what Grices theory almost fails to. The following example is served as an evidence.

    Example 11

    a) Inspector: Dr Watson?

    b) Dr. Watson: Yeah.

    c) Inspector: Its for you.

    d) Dr. Watson: OK, thanks.

    e) Inspector: No, sir, the helicopter.

    This conversation took place when Dr. Watson was on a crime scene for Sherlock when suddenly they lost contact through Internet. At the same time, an inspector came to Dr. Watson with a phone call still on. A humorous effect, if examined via the Relevance Theory, was caused by the contrast between the largest relevance and the optimal relevance. The largest relevance is the effect based on the greatest contextual effects and the smallest processing efforts. However, the optimal relevance is the one that is compatible with communicators abilities and preferences together with the audiences minimum processing efforts. In the example 11, the utterance by the Inspector “its for you.” meant “a helicopter is for you”. Dr. Watson misunderstood that the phone call in process was for him. The doctor had such reaction because he saw the Inspector was engaged by a call, the most influential context, so he spared his least efforts to work out “ it” in “ its for you.” meant the phone. He then was proved wrong by the Inspectors utterance: “no, sir. The helicopter.” with the approaching sound of a helicopter. Following the doctors deduction process from the largest relevance to the optimal relevance, as soon as the optimal relevance is revealed, the viewers immediately sense the humour. This example can also be interpreted as a violation of Manner maxim as the Inspector gave misleading information by uttering ambiguously it in 10c). If examined in cognitive deduction, the reference of it here is obvious because our mind tends to combine what is saying with what is doing, especially when the utterance involves an act. Therefore, in this case, the humorous effect best be analysed using the Relevance Theory.

    3.6 The Levinsons System

    One contribution Levinsons System makes is that it pays equivalent attention to both Particularized implicatures as well as Generalized implicatures compared to Grices mainly focus on the Particularized ones. In Levinsons three principles, the first two Q-principle and I-principle which restrict each other and can be examined through the semantic aspect while the Manner-principle which is more or less similar to Grices Manner maxim and Wilson & Sperbers Relevance Theory relies on cognitive aspect as well as the contextual effect. As a supplement to the Grices theory, this paper only touches its application to generate a Generalized implicature which do not need background.

    Here is one example also from the TV series talked.

    Example 12

    a) Sherlock: I was in the middle of a case, Mycroft.

    b) Mycroft: What, the hiker and the backfire? I glanced at the police report.

    c) Mycroft: A bit obvious, surely?

    d) Sherlock: Transparent.

    This case accords with the Q-principle. In dialogues, Sherlock and Mycroft were talking about “the hiker and the backfire” case. Mycroft intended to let Sherlock to attend to the case he was about to mention by putting forward that he had already known the fact and Sherlock confirmed his idea by uttering “transparent”. “Transparent” is semantically stronger than “obvious”. Here, Mycroft opted for the semantically weaker “obvious” casting doubt that Mycroft might lack confidence to say the case was exactly what he thought to be because he gave out a hint that he merely glanced at the police report. What Sherlock did thereafter was to back up his implicature by using what Mycroft did not entailed, the semantically stronger “transparent”.

    4 Conclusion

    The aim of this study is to show whether the Cooperative Principles and the four maxims proposed by Grice are key roles to generate implicatures by using the non-observant data from the series, Sherlock. From what has been discussed above, the conclusion can be drawn that Grices theory does work out most of the implicatures and give most of satisfactory explanations. However it functions, the Grices theory gives too much focus on the hearers and makes the flexible conversations rigid by preparing the principle speaker should obey. In addition, sometimes, it is difficult to distinguish which maxim speakers breach. The problems are revised by the Relevance Theory in which both cognition and context-based activity are considered. This makes the explanation of why speakers generate implicatures clearer and more convincible. The main contribution Levinsons Theory makes to the Grices Cooperative Principle is the supplement of the generalized implicatures which makes Grices theory more applicable in various fields. To sum up, the Gricean Cooperative principles are still most feasible in analysing the implicatutres in daily conversations with Relevence Theory as well as the Neo-Griceans pragmatics serve as supplementary roles. It should also be pointed out that it is not an exhaustive comparison on the three theories. On the one hand, it is a detailed case study with the data exacted mainly from one TV series, and the corpus should be further expanded. On the other hand, it focuses on the non-observant phenomena of the maxims of the Cooperative Principles, the rest, for instance, the Levinsons Theory, this paper only mentioned two principles. Researchers may continue to explore other aspects of Levinsons Theory.

    【References】

    [1]Austin, J. L.. How to do things with words. Cambridge[J]. MA: Harvard University Press,1962.

    [2]Grice, H.P.. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole(Ed.)Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts[J]. New York: Academic Press,1975:41-58.

    [3]Cutting, J.. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. 2nd edution. London & New York: Routledge,2008.

    [4]Horn, R.. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin(ed.), Meaning, form, and the use in context: linguistic applications[J]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,1984:11-42.

    [5]Huang, Y.. Pragmatics[J]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2007.

    [6]Levinson,C.. Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature[J]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,2000.

    [7]Sperber,D.,&Wilson,D.. Relevance: communication and cognition[J]. Oxford: Blackwell,1986.

    [8]Thomas,J..Meaning in interaction: an introduction to Pragmatics[J]. London: Longman,1995.

    [責任編輯:王偉平]

    猜你喜歡
    關聯(lián)理論
    《西游記》中幽默語言的英譯研究
    新高考改革下如何提高學生的閱讀理解能力
    《生活大爆炸》中刻意曲解之關聯(lián)理論探析
    關聯(lián)視閾下的學習者語用能力發(fā)展研究
    關聯(lián)理論視角下的漢英隱喻翻譯
    基于關聯(lián)理論的高中英語讀前活動優(yōu)化設計
    久久久久久久午夜电影| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人欧美在线观看| www.精华液| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久中文字幕一级| 一本久久中文字幕| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 日本免费a在线| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 免费观看精品视频网站| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 美女免费视频网站| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 很黄的视频免费| www.精华液| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲av成人av| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产三级中文精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 精品国产亚洲在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 悠悠久久av| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 精品日产1卡2卡| 91老司机精品| www.自偷自拍.com| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产成人aa在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产av又大| 看黄色毛片网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 精品久久久久久久末码| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中国美女看黄片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产野战对白在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品福利观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 91在线观看av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 很黄的视频免费| 成年版毛片免费区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 精品日产1卡2卡| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 99久久精品热视频| 成人国语在线视频| 悠悠久久av| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 欧美中文综合在线视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久香蕉激情| 91老司机精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 丰满的人妻完整版| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲18禁久久av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 午夜福利18| 国产三级黄色录像| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲美女黄片视频| videosex国产| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 麻豆av在线久日| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | www国产在线视频色| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| www.自偷自拍.com| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 日本a在线网址| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲av美国av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久久久九九精品影院| 成人国产综合亚洲| 一夜夜www| 一级毛片精品| 天堂√8在线中文| 99热这里只有精品一区 | av中文乱码字幕在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久久国内视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 成人国语在线视频| 手机成人av网站| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产99白浆流出| a级毛片在线看网站| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99热这里只有是精品50| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 一夜夜www| 亚洲国产欧美网| 黄片小视频在线播放| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 身体一侧抽搐| 1024手机看黄色片| 老司机靠b影院| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 丁香欧美五月| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| cao死你这个sao货| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| xxx96com| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看网址| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| xxx96com| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 观看免费一级毛片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美日本视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 午夜老司机福利片| 超碰成人久久| 88av欧美| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 一夜夜www| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| xxx96com| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 一本久久中文字幕| 无限看片的www在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 国产高清videossex| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一进一出抽搐动态| 在线观看www视频免费| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 黄片小视频在线播放| 色av中文字幕| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久九九热精品免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 熟女电影av网| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成人av教育| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 一区福利在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 天天添夜夜摸| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 欧美日本视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| videosex国产| 手机成人av网站| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久性生活片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产成人系列免费观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 黄色 视频免费看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 免费av毛片视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| xxxwww97欧美| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 天堂动漫精品| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一级片免费观看大全| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 成在线人永久免费视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 午夜免费激情av| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日本免费a在线| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 天堂√8在线中文| www日本在线高清视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产av在哪里看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 久久久国产成人免费| 午夜a级毛片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 级片在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 操出白浆在线播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| 久9热在线精品视频| 日本 av在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 久久香蕉精品热| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲 国产 在线| 成人国语在线视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 看免费av毛片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 91麻豆av在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产区一区二久久| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品福利观看| 成人国语在线视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久草成人影院| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产av一区在线观看免费|