• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Pragmatic Analysis of the British TV Series Sherlock

    2016-07-15 09:20ZHANGYi-ran
    科技視界 2016年17期
    關鍵詞:關聯(lián)理論

    ZHANG+Yi-ran

    【Abstract】Most often, in communication, one delivers messages clearly and smoothly. However, there occur the occasions when this direct communication intentionally fails in order to generate an implicature for the hearers to digest. This case also extends to literary, film or TV works. The creators use clever languages to produce suspense or arouse curiosity. As classic theories in pragmatics, Cooperative Principle, Relevance Theory and later Levinsons Theory play significant roles in explaining why such phenomena appear in communication. This paper aims to figure out whether they explain the existences of non-observant scenarios in conversations by carrying out a case study on the lines from one most welcomed British TV series, Sherlock.

    【Key words】Cooperative Principle; Relevance theory; Levinsons Theory

    【摘 要】在理想會話中,說話人希望將信息清楚明了地傳達給對方。然而,在實際對話中,人們時常故意模糊話語。而此中含意(implicture),需聽者揣摩。這種語言上的技巧經(jīng)常被文學及影視作品借用,以此來制造懸念或喚起人們的好奇心。作為語用學中的經(jīng)典理論,合作原理,關聯(lián)理論以及萊文森理論為研究話語交流做出了巨大貢獻。本文借助上述三種理論,從語用角度分析一部廣受好評的英劇《神探夏洛克》。

    【關鍵詞】合作原理;關聯(lián)理論;萊文森理論

    1 Introduction

    In pragmatics, Grice explained why naturally occurring data breaching the Cooperative Principle. This paper presented with an aim to explore whether the Principle still explain perfectly with the advent of modern theories: Relevance Theory and the more recent the prevailing Levinsons Theory. The first part of this paper covers the past literature review concerning the concept of implicature and the Cooperative Principles by Grice (1975), the Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986) and Neo-Gricean theories advocated mainly by Horn (1984) and Levinson (2000). Next, a detailed analysis is presented to demonstrate how the data, extracted from the TV Series Sherlock(2010) generate implicatures by not observing the maxims with supplement explanations via Relevance Theory and the Levinsons Theory, which Grices maxims could not cope with.

    2 Literature Review

    The first part of the literature review covers a brief introduction of Grice s Cooperative Principles, the derived four maxims, the ways of non-observant of the maxims and the concept of implicature. Next comes the Relevance Theory, which is on the other spectrum. The final part presents Neo-Gricean theories which are considered to be revised version of Grices theory.

    2.1 The Cooperative Principles

    Grice is considered to the founding father of conversational implicatures (1975). As he put it ‘“A meant something by X” is roughly equivalent to “A uttered X with the intention of inducing a belief by means of the recognition of this intention” The “meaning” here, is a non-natural meaning which can be interpreted as “l(fā)iteral meaning plus implicature”. This is further spelled out by the Cooperative Principle. The latter is considered being the underlying principle that determines the way in which language is used with maximum effect to achieve rational interaction in communication. This overriding dictum is further supported by the four subdivided maxims quoted from Thomas (1995, p. 63-64):

    a)Maxim of Quantity: 1) Make you contribution as informative as is required for the current purpose of the exchange; 2) Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.

    b)Maxim of Quality: 1) Do not say what you believe to be false; 2) Do not say that for which you lack evidence.

    c)Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.

    d)Maxim of Manner: 1) Avoid obscurity of expression; 2) Avoid ambiguity; 3) Be brief; 4) Be orderly.

    Grice suggests that the speaker is best cooperative when his utterance is true and relevant and provide appropriate amount of information in an explicit manner. When one of the presented maxims is not confirmed, we do not assume that the speaker is not cooperative; in fact he is generating a conversational implicature via flouting the maxim. Moreover, we do not assume that this blatantly unfulfilling is nonsense. On the contrary, it is consider that an appropriate meaning is there to be inferred. In other words, when a maxim is flouted, the hearer is prompt to look for the implicature(Thomas, 1995, p. 65).

    Grice (1975) also mentions that there are two implicatures: one is Generalised implicature which requires little background knowledge to work out, the other is Particularized implicature which does require special background information to be understood by the hearer.

    2.2 Relevance Theory

    Another theory this study employs, developed based on the Gricean theory, is Relevance Theory proposed by Wilson & Sperber (1986). Although Relevance Theorists abide by Grices Relevance Maxim, they cast doubt on the rest of the maxims and even the invention of the Cooperative Principle and the maxims (Cutting, 2008). They argue that, the communication proceeds not because the speaker persistently to obey the maxims but what they seek for relevance is a basic common ground knowledge they both share. The most significant type of cognitive effect is a contextual implicature which is acknowledged as new information. The other forms of cognitive effects are confirming, strengthening or contradicting, weakening an existing assumption. When this cognitive process applied in the communicative aspect, an utterance or an act of inferential communication is “optimal relevant when on the one hand, achieves the greatest contextual effects and on the other hand, achieves for putting in the minimised efforts. Relevance Theory is considered an improvement compared to the Cooperative Principle because it values more the natural and flexible characters of language (Cutting, 2008, p. 41).

    2.3 Neo-Gricean Pragmatics

    The last theory this study touches on is the Neo-Gricean pragmatics advocated by Horn(1984) and Levinson (2000). Largely based on the Grices Cooperative Principle, Horn (1984) reduces the maxims to two: the Quality remained and Quantity, Relation and Manner merged into two principles: the Q[uantity] Principle: Make the information contributable; say as much as and as one can. The R[ation] Principle: make the contribution necessary; say no more than one must. In other words, the reductionist theory involves with maximising the R Principle and minimising the Q Principles. Levinsons theory (2000), another Neo-Gricean theory, is comprised of three categories: (Q) Quantity, (I) Information and (M) Manner. Huang (2007, p. 41, 46, 50) simplified Levinsons theories as follows:

    The Q-principle:

    Speaker: do not say less than is required (bearing the I-principle in mind).

    Addressee: what is not said is not the case.

    The I-principle:

    Speaker: do not say more than is required( bearing the I-principle in mind)

    Addressee: what is generally said is stereotypically and specifically exemplified.

    The M-principle:

    Speaker: do not use a marked expression without reason.

    Addressee: what is said in a mark way is not unmarked.

    Because Levinsons theory, based on the Grices Cooperative Principle and revised Horns theory, makes the conversational implicature analysis easier to carry on, this analysis mainly carries out comparisons between Levinsons theory with Griceans theory.

    3 The Analysis

    3.1 Introduction of Sherlock (2010)

    This is a qualitative study with the data extracted from a British TV series, Sherlock (2010). Sherlock, the long being acclaimed London based “consulting detective” formed by Scottish fictionist and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He is famous for his strong logical deduction and forensic skills to solve extreme difficult cases. The Sherlock in the new series (2010) succeeds all the characteristics the original has: an arrogant and genius consulting detective who has been holding a desire to be proved as the cleverest among both the criminals and polices. Dr. John Watson, another main character, is an army doctor retired from warfare. He is considered to compromise everything that Sherlock has even his arrogant character. However, they do share one thing in common -- the wit. It is wit that binds them together and it is wit that makes the Doctor proved understand practically every utterance Sherlock puts. The new series was well received by the audience with the view rating ranking in several countries including China. It is believed that the wit embedded in language plays crucial part in wining the audience. Therefore, examples are extracted to see whether Grices theory can explain how and why such wits are achieved by not observing the principles. The indeterminate ones are further analysed with the Relevance Theory and Neo-Gricean theories, in particular Levinsons system to find the best possible explanations.

    3.2 Case study

    In Grices Cooperative Principle, the speaker is expected to contribute the true information as much and as accurate as he could with the shared conversation purpose in mind (Grice, 1975). He then points out that several sub-maxims should be proposed with the goal to generate results from the Cooperative Principle as stated in the literature review. What comes along with the Cooperative Principle is the implicature. In daily conversation, there are numerous occasions when one does not obey one or more maxims which are considered, on large scale, to yield implicatures.

    According to Grice (1975), there are five ways of not observing the maxims and two of which are focus here. They are:

    Flouting a maxim-one blatantly breaches a maxim carrying an implicature

    Violating a maxim-one covertly breaches a maxim with a misleading or deceiving purpose

    In the following part, several non-observant phenomena with examples in Sherlock are shown and explanations why such non-observance occur follow.

    3.3 Flouting the maxims

    Quality

    Example 1

    [When Sherlock and Dr. Watson were brought to the Buckingham Palace, they guessed who could probably have them there.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Here to see the Queen?

    b) Sherlock: Oh, apparently, yes.

    c) Mycroft: Just once, can you two behave like grown-ups?

    In example 1, Dr. Watson made a most reasonable deduction when in the highest land of a country, one is expected to see the highest person, and in Buckingham Palace, it would be the Queen. Sherlock answered “Oh, apparently, yes.” when they both saw Mycroft, Sherlocks brother, walked in and burst into laughter. In this case, Sherlock flouted the maxim of Quality in which he gave wrong information not to mislead but on the contrary, to humiliate his brother. Apparently, his brother cannot be a queen who by the nature should be a female sex. Besides, what the word “queen” embedded is someone who is flamboyant and acting like a girl. The implicature generated by flouting the maxim of Quality is well received by the three persons at the scene which lead to the dramatic laughter of Sherlock and Dr. Watson and the rebuttal by Mycroft in 1c). Mycrofts argument is again a flouting of the maxim of Quality. True to the fact that Dr. Watson and his younger brother are grown-ups but by overlooking the fact and also the cooperative principle that it requires right information to communicate, he gave the opposite answer. By uttering this, Mycroft intended to insult Sherlock and Dr. Watson by the implicature: What they just did was childish, and they should behave maturely as adults.

    Quantity

    Example 2

    [Sherlock and Dr. Watson were forced to go to some place they had no idea of and finally they were there which turned out to the Buckingham Palace. As a consultant detective, Sherlock insisted on his brother Mycroft to tell him straight who his client was and thats when Harry, the employee of the direct client came in.]

    a) Sherlock: And my client is...?

    b) Harry: Illustrious, in the extreme. And remaining, I have to inform you, entirely anonymous.

    Harrys answer breaches the maxim of Quantity. When Sherlock asked who his client was, he expected an answer that contributes appropriate amount of information in a direct manner like “the client is whom.” However, out of expectation, Harry chose not to give a proper answer. Together with the qualifiers, “illustrious”, “in the extreme” and “anonymous”, the speaker aimed to imply that the client was too celebrated to be informed by the name. Although this answer did give Sherlock an opportunity to generate such implicature; he chose to ignore it, which gave rise to the following conversation.

    Example 3

    a) Sherlock: Who is my client?

    b) Mycroft: Take a look at where youre standing, and make a deduction.

    c) Mycroft: You are to be engaged by the highest in the land.

    Sherlock insisted to know who exactly his client was by asking a direct question in 3a), a much stronger request than 2a). This time, Sherlock still did not get a satisfactory answer from Mycroft. What Mycroft said in 3b) can be viewed as a flout of the maxim of Relation because there is no direct association between “who ones client is” and “ones deduction”. 3c) is another case of flouting of the maxim of Quantity. “The highest in the land” is more or less equivalent to the one who was “illustrious in the extreme”. Still who the client was is concealed. This one can also be deemed as the speakers unwillingness to reveal the identity of the person talked about. The curious audience might suspect that the client was not really a significant matter or the one was too famous to be known in such occasion. In such a word puzzle, it successfully arouses suspense and the audiences curiosity.

    Relation

    Example 4

    [Dr. Watson is typing another blog titled “Sherlock Holmes Baffled”.]

    a) Sherlock: No, no, no, dont mention the unsolved ones.

    b) Dr. Watson: People want to know youre human.

    When Sherlock says in the example 4a) “Dont mention the unsolved case.” in fact he wants Dr. Watson to stop putting the unsolved case online. According to Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962), Sherlock utters 4a) (locution) with an expectation that Dr Watson would follow his request (illocution). However, instead of doing what Sherlock demanded, the Doctor says 4b) in the way that flouts the maxim of Relation: What John informed is not relevant. Under such circumstance, Sherlock cleverly received the implicature that by unostentatiously bleaching the Maxim Dr. Watson implicates that his public image was almighty that there was no case would set him back, but by reading Dr. Watsons blog the public could get that the opinions previously held were wrong.

    Manner

    Example 5

    a) Sherlock: Do people actually read your blog?

    b) Dr. Watson: Where do you think our clients come from?

    c) Sherlock: I have a website.

    d) Dr. Watson: In which you enumerate 240 different types of tobacco ash.

    e) Dr. Watson: Nobodys reading your website.

    Example 5 is a case when flouting the maxim of Manner comes. When Sherlock asked the way in 5a), in fact he wanted Dr. Watson to provide an accurate answer: “yes” or “no”. However, instead of giving an explicit answer, the doctor asked back in 5b). It was Sherlock himself, in the detectives mind, who attracted clients to the consultancy out of either admiration or need after reading his own website Science of Deduction. The replies given by Dr. Watson in 5d) and e) failed Sherlocks expectation indirectly and then directly and produced a comic effect.

    3.4 Violating the maxims

    Quality

    Example 6

    [Dr. Watson is on a crime scene in place of Sherlock when they were talking about Sherlocks constantly talking habit.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Do you just carry on talking when Im away?

    b) Sherlock: I dont know, how often are you away?

    Sherlocks utterance is a violation of the maxim of Quality. Under rare circumstances do people totally be oblivion of the environment especially one holds a desire to be informative. Here Sherlocks utterance “I dont know” in 6b) is therefore considered to be deceiving. Probably, he was trying to indicate that he did not know the doctor was away because he did not require a response when he kept talking or he just did not pay any attention to his partner. This latter implicature is more or less proved by Sherlocks supplement “how often are you away?”. This utterance yet could not possibly be explained by the Cooperative Principles because it obeys all the maxims but still generates implicatures either as he did not expect to communicate with the other speaker for most of the times he simply informed him whatever came across his mind or actually Sherlock knew his partner was not so often away which made Dr. Watsons initial utterance a violation of the maxim of Quality.

    Example 7

    [The two came to Irenes in searching of the compromising photos the client from the Buckingham Palace required. When asked, Irene deliberately turned the topic away to another case Sherlock was working on.]

    a) Sherlock: I know the victim was a sportsman, recently returned from foreign travel

    b) Sherlock: and that the photographs Im looking for are in this room.

    c) Irene: OK, but how?

    d) Sherlock: So they are in this room. Thank you.

    The utterance in 7a) by Sherlock shows his marvellous talent. He comes to Irenes for the compromising photos she was taken with one of the Royal members. However, he was told that he would not be given the photos and then asked about one of the cases Sherlock was investigating. Sherlock explains his investigation together with a seemingly irrelevant sentence 7b). Under this circumstance, Sherlock blatantly breaches the maxim of Relevance but this is not even the trigger of an implicature yet. In fact, this utterance is not true. Sherlock did not know the exact location of the photos. By uttering “I know that the photographs Im looking for are in this room” he holds a 50 to 50 chance that the photos might be in this room. Through this abruptly changing of topic he would expect a confirmed answer. In this way, Sherlock violated the maxim of Quality by saying something he lacked evidence with a purpose to mislead and this misleading function was further justified by his utterance in 7d). In this case, breaching of two maxims collides with flouting the maxim of Relation.

    Quantity

    Example 8

    [Dr. Watson keeps typing.]

    a) Sherlock: What are you typing?

    b) Dr. Watson: Blog.

    c) Sherlock: About?

    d) Dr. Watson: Us.

    e) Sherlock: You mean me.

    The dialogues in example 8 are a case when the speaker secretly hid certain information from the hearer. From 8a) to 8d), each time when Sherlock tried to ask a question on the typing thing, Dr. Watson intentionally gave unsatisfactory reply. What Dr. Watson provided, was in fact the true information relevant to Sherlocks question and not in an ambiguous way, which is an observance of the maxims of Quality, Relation as well as Manner. What Dr. Watson failed to observe is the maxim of Quantity. In other words, in his utterances both in 8b) and 8d) he did not give sufficient information for the hearer. However, the shared background knowledge, Sherlock did know Dr. Watson owned a blog keeping tracks of every case they worked on, makes the seemingly misleading conversation could continue.

    Relation

    Example 9

    [Sherlock and Irene were fighting against the broken-in Americans and then Sherlock looked at the opened safe.]

    a) Sherlock: Do you mind?

    b) Irene: Not at all.

    Sherlock asked if Irene minded that he took whats inside the safe out. However, Irene misunderstood that the man was asking about the feelings of him observing her measurement early on which later proved to be the code to the safe. Irenes answer was misleading to the Americans and even the viewers but highly relevant to the question. In this case, there is no implicature although Sherlocks asking does violate the maxim of Manner if in full it would be “Do you mind if I…”. Nonetheless, he avoided some of the information in order to get what he perceived to be the satisfactory answer.

    Manner

    Example 10

    [Harry and Mycroft were describing the case to Sherlock in Buckingham Palace.]

    a) Harry: My employer has a problem.

    b) Mycroft: A matter has come to light of an extremely delicate and potentially criminal nature, and in this hour of need, dear brother, your name has arisen.

    In example 10, Harry vaguely referred the case as a “problem”. And without more detailed information, one cannot deduce how severe the problem was. This utterance violates the maxim of Manner in which he failed to give accurate answer. Mycroft, thereupon supplemented by uttering 10b). If Harrys misleadingness was unintentional, Mycrofts one was deliberate. First, Mycrofts talk was so deceiving that he used such ambiguous words like “extremely” and “potentially”. One can hardly define the degree of “extreme” and “potential”, which may confuse a detective. For one thing, one may be concerned whether it was a crime and for another the matter was really severe (which in fact might not be). Mycroft used this ambiguous or even misleading utterance to lure his brother to take the case for his well understanding of Sherlocks curious character.

    The above discussed how Cooperative Principle and its subdivided four maxims cope with the data in the TV series Sherlock (2010). It can be seen that, Grice theory can explain most the problems that occur yet there are unsolved ones such as the reasons for generating particular implicatures and the obscured boundaries of each maxim. Next comes a brief discussion about the Relevance Theory and the Neo-Gricean theories with a perspective to witness whether they are in supportive to the Cooperative Principle.

    3.5 Relevance Theory

    What Relevance Theory contributes to the daily conservation is that it pays more attention to the ambiguity and the flexibility which are the very nature of language. It does not provide fixed maxims for speakers to follow but the reasons why people behave in that way. Wilson and Sperber (1986) argue that communication is possible not because the interlocutors seek to obey certain maxim but based on a particular relevance, a common feature of human cognition. They also point out that an utterance is optimally relevant if and only of that on the one hand, it is relevant enough to worth an audiences attention and on the other hand, it achieves the most adequate contextual effects. In this way, the four maxims proposed by Grice can be replaced by one: the principle of Relevance. Relevance Theory can explain some phenomenon easier what Grices theory almost fails to. The following example is served as an evidence.

    Example 11

    a) Inspector: Dr Watson?

    b) Dr. Watson: Yeah.

    c) Inspector: Its for you.

    d) Dr. Watson: OK, thanks.

    e) Inspector: No, sir, the helicopter.

    This conversation took place when Dr. Watson was on a crime scene for Sherlock when suddenly they lost contact through Internet. At the same time, an inspector came to Dr. Watson with a phone call still on. A humorous effect, if examined via the Relevance Theory, was caused by the contrast between the largest relevance and the optimal relevance. The largest relevance is the effect based on the greatest contextual effects and the smallest processing efforts. However, the optimal relevance is the one that is compatible with communicators abilities and preferences together with the audiences minimum processing efforts. In the example 11, the utterance by the Inspector “its for you.” meant “a helicopter is for you”. Dr. Watson misunderstood that the phone call in process was for him. The doctor had such reaction because he saw the Inspector was engaged by a call, the most influential context, so he spared his least efforts to work out “ it” in “ its for you.” meant the phone. He then was proved wrong by the Inspectors utterance: “no, sir. The helicopter.” with the approaching sound of a helicopter. Following the doctors deduction process from the largest relevance to the optimal relevance, as soon as the optimal relevance is revealed, the viewers immediately sense the humour. This example can also be interpreted as a violation of Manner maxim as the Inspector gave misleading information by uttering ambiguously it in 10c). If examined in cognitive deduction, the reference of it here is obvious because our mind tends to combine what is saying with what is doing, especially when the utterance involves an act. Therefore, in this case, the humorous effect best be analysed using the Relevance Theory.

    3.6 The Levinsons System

    One contribution Levinsons System makes is that it pays equivalent attention to both Particularized implicatures as well as Generalized implicatures compared to Grices mainly focus on the Particularized ones. In Levinsons three principles, the first two Q-principle and I-principle which restrict each other and can be examined through the semantic aspect while the Manner-principle which is more or less similar to Grices Manner maxim and Wilson & Sperbers Relevance Theory relies on cognitive aspect as well as the contextual effect. As a supplement to the Grices theory, this paper only touches its application to generate a Generalized implicature which do not need background.

    Here is one example also from the TV series talked.

    Example 12

    a) Sherlock: I was in the middle of a case, Mycroft.

    b) Mycroft: What, the hiker and the backfire? I glanced at the police report.

    c) Mycroft: A bit obvious, surely?

    d) Sherlock: Transparent.

    This case accords with the Q-principle. In dialogues, Sherlock and Mycroft were talking about “the hiker and the backfire” case. Mycroft intended to let Sherlock to attend to the case he was about to mention by putting forward that he had already known the fact and Sherlock confirmed his idea by uttering “transparent”. “Transparent” is semantically stronger than “obvious”. Here, Mycroft opted for the semantically weaker “obvious” casting doubt that Mycroft might lack confidence to say the case was exactly what he thought to be because he gave out a hint that he merely glanced at the police report. What Sherlock did thereafter was to back up his implicature by using what Mycroft did not entailed, the semantically stronger “transparent”.

    4 Conclusion

    The aim of this study is to show whether the Cooperative Principles and the four maxims proposed by Grice are key roles to generate implicatures by using the non-observant data from the series, Sherlock. From what has been discussed above, the conclusion can be drawn that Grices theory does work out most of the implicatures and give most of satisfactory explanations. However it functions, the Grices theory gives too much focus on the hearers and makes the flexible conversations rigid by preparing the principle speaker should obey. In addition, sometimes, it is difficult to distinguish which maxim speakers breach. The problems are revised by the Relevance Theory in which both cognition and context-based activity are considered. This makes the explanation of why speakers generate implicatures clearer and more convincible. The main contribution Levinsons Theory makes to the Grices Cooperative Principle is the supplement of the generalized implicatures which makes Grices theory more applicable in various fields. To sum up, the Gricean Cooperative principles are still most feasible in analysing the implicatutres in daily conversations with Relevence Theory as well as the Neo-Griceans pragmatics serve as supplementary roles. It should also be pointed out that it is not an exhaustive comparison on the three theories. On the one hand, it is a detailed case study with the data exacted mainly from one TV series, and the corpus should be further expanded. On the other hand, it focuses on the non-observant phenomena of the maxims of the Cooperative Principles, the rest, for instance, the Levinsons Theory, this paper only mentioned two principles. Researchers may continue to explore other aspects of Levinsons Theory.

    【References】

    [1]Austin, J. L.. How to do things with words. Cambridge[J]. MA: Harvard University Press,1962.

    [2]Grice, H.P.. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole(Ed.)Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts[J]. New York: Academic Press,1975:41-58.

    [3]Cutting, J.. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. 2nd edution. London & New York: Routledge,2008.

    [4]Horn, R.. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin(ed.), Meaning, form, and the use in context: linguistic applications[J]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,1984:11-42.

    [5]Huang, Y.. Pragmatics[J]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2007.

    [6]Levinson,C.. Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature[J]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,2000.

    [7]Sperber,D.,&Wilson,D.. Relevance: communication and cognition[J]. Oxford: Blackwell,1986.

    [8]Thomas,J..Meaning in interaction: an introduction to Pragmatics[J]. London: Longman,1995.

    [責任編輯:王偉平]

    猜你喜歡
    關聯(lián)理論
    《西游記》中幽默語言的英譯研究
    新高考改革下如何提高學生的閱讀理解能力
    《生活大爆炸》中刻意曲解之關聯(lián)理論探析
    關聯(lián)視閾下的學習者語用能力發(fā)展研究
    關聯(lián)理論視角下的漢英隱喻翻譯
    基于關聯(lián)理論的高中英語讀前活動優(yōu)化設計
    亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 日本免费在线观看一区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品无大码| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产1区2区3区精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 1024视频免费在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美97在线视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲国产色片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 观看av在线不卡| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲国产色片| 久久婷婷青草| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 免费看av在线观看网站| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 国产成人精品在线电影| av有码第一页| 岛国毛片在线播放| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲成色77777| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| kizo精华| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久精品区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中国国产av一级| 欧美3d第一页| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 午夜av观看不卡| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 超碰97精品在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| av在线观看视频网站免费| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本av免费视频播放| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产成人欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 欧美+日韩+精品| av福利片在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 欧美性感艳星| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久久久久久国产电影| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 久热这里只有精品99| 1024视频免费在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 国产高清三级在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| videos熟女内射| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 少妇的逼好多水| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 少妇的逼好多水| 在线观看www视频免费| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 久热久热在线精品观看| 永久网站在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲国产看品久久| av福利片在线| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 大码成人一级视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 精品少妇内射三级| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲精品一二三| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产成人精品无人区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 色哟哟·www| 精品第一国产精品| 丝袜美足系列| videossex国产| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久久人妻| 黄色配什么色好看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 高清不卡的av网站| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品一国产av| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产精品.久久久| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产在视频线精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| av.在线天堂| 99香蕉大伊视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 曰老女人黄片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 丝袜美足系列| 国产在线免费精品| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 一级毛片 在线播放| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲在久久综合| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 中文字幕制服av| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 观看美女的网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 秋霞伦理黄片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产 精品1| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲成人手机| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| videossex国产| 黄色一级大片看看| 中国国产av一级| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 97在线人人人人妻| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 色94色欧美一区二区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成人影院久久| 宅男免费午夜| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久狼人影院| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 99香蕉大伊视频| 成人二区视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 曰老女人黄片| 1024视频免费在线观看| 三级国产精品片| freevideosex欧美| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品无大码| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久99精品国语久久久| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| freevideosex欧美| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久免费观看电影| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 午夜91福利影院| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产综合精华液| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产色婷婷99| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲国产看品久久| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 999精品在线视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 九草在线视频观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美bdsm另类| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 满18在线观看网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| av在线app专区| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 熟女电影av网| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 成人手机av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 飞空精品影院首页| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 少妇精品久久久久久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 好男人视频免费观看在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 全区人妻精品视频| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成人国产av品久久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产片内射在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 婷婷成人精品国产| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 最黄视频免费看| av黄色大香蕉| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 婷婷成人精品国产| 中国三级夫妇交换| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 久久av网站| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日本黄大片高清| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美97在线视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 考比视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美3d第一页| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成人手机av| 精品亚洲成国产av| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久久久精品性色| 日本午夜av视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 精品国产国语对白av| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费看不卡的av| 精品国产国语对白av| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 美女中出高潮动态图| av在线播放精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久久久久久国产电影| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 亚洲精品第二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 老司机影院成人| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 99国产精品免费福利视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 成人二区视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产av精品麻豆| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品.久久久| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 成人国语在线视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| a 毛片基地| 亚洲综合色惰| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲精品第二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 欧美bdsm另类| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久 成人 亚洲| 超色免费av| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产 一区精品| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产|