• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Pragmatic Analysis of the British TV Series Sherlock

    2016-07-15 09:20ZHANGYi-ran
    科技視界 2016年17期
    關鍵詞:關聯(lián)理論

    ZHANG+Yi-ran

    【Abstract】Most often, in communication, one delivers messages clearly and smoothly. However, there occur the occasions when this direct communication intentionally fails in order to generate an implicature for the hearers to digest. This case also extends to literary, film or TV works. The creators use clever languages to produce suspense or arouse curiosity. As classic theories in pragmatics, Cooperative Principle, Relevance Theory and later Levinsons Theory play significant roles in explaining why such phenomena appear in communication. This paper aims to figure out whether they explain the existences of non-observant scenarios in conversations by carrying out a case study on the lines from one most welcomed British TV series, Sherlock.

    【Key words】Cooperative Principle; Relevance theory; Levinsons Theory

    【摘 要】在理想會話中,說話人希望將信息清楚明了地傳達給對方。然而,在實際對話中,人們時常故意模糊話語。而此中含意(implicture),需聽者揣摩。這種語言上的技巧經(jīng)常被文學及影視作品借用,以此來制造懸念或喚起人們的好奇心。作為語用學中的經(jīng)典理論,合作原理,關聯(lián)理論以及萊文森理論為研究話語交流做出了巨大貢獻。本文借助上述三種理論,從語用角度分析一部廣受好評的英劇《神探夏洛克》。

    【關鍵詞】合作原理;關聯(lián)理論;萊文森理論

    1 Introduction

    In pragmatics, Grice explained why naturally occurring data breaching the Cooperative Principle. This paper presented with an aim to explore whether the Principle still explain perfectly with the advent of modern theories: Relevance Theory and the more recent the prevailing Levinsons Theory. The first part of this paper covers the past literature review concerning the concept of implicature and the Cooperative Principles by Grice (1975), the Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986) and Neo-Gricean theories advocated mainly by Horn (1984) and Levinson (2000). Next, a detailed analysis is presented to demonstrate how the data, extracted from the TV Series Sherlock(2010) generate implicatures by not observing the maxims with supplement explanations via Relevance Theory and the Levinsons Theory, which Grices maxims could not cope with.

    2 Literature Review

    The first part of the literature review covers a brief introduction of Grice s Cooperative Principles, the derived four maxims, the ways of non-observant of the maxims and the concept of implicature. Next comes the Relevance Theory, which is on the other spectrum. The final part presents Neo-Gricean theories which are considered to be revised version of Grices theory.

    2.1 The Cooperative Principles

    Grice is considered to the founding father of conversational implicatures (1975). As he put it ‘“A meant something by X” is roughly equivalent to “A uttered X with the intention of inducing a belief by means of the recognition of this intention” The “meaning” here, is a non-natural meaning which can be interpreted as “l(fā)iteral meaning plus implicature”. This is further spelled out by the Cooperative Principle. The latter is considered being the underlying principle that determines the way in which language is used with maximum effect to achieve rational interaction in communication. This overriding dictum is further supported by the four subdivided maxims quoted from Thomas (1995, p. 63-64):

    a)Maxim of Quantity: 1) Make you contribution as informative as is required for the current purpose of the exchange; 2) Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.

    b)Maxim of Quality: 1) Do not say what you believe to be false; 2) Do not say that for which you lack evidence.

    c)Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.

    d)Maxim of Manner: 1) Avoid obscurity of expression; 2) Avoid ambiguity; 3) Be brief; 4) Be orderly.

    Grice suggests that the speaker is best cooperative when his utterance is true and relevant and provide appropriate amount of information in an explicit manner. When one of the presented maxims is not confirmed, we do not assume that the speaker is not cooperative; in fact he is generating a conversational implicature via flouting the maxim. Moreover, we do not assume that this blatantly unfulfilling is nonsense. On the contrary, it is consider that an appropriate meaning is there to be inferred. In other words, when a maxim is flouted, the hearer is prompt to look for the implicature(Thomas, 1995, p. 65).

    Grice (1975) also mentions that there are two implicatures: one is Generalised implicature which requires little background knowledge to work out, the other is Particularized implicature which does require special background information to be understood by the hearer.

    2.2 Relevance Theory

    Another theory this study employs, developed based on the Gricean theory, is Relevance Theory proposed by Wilson & Sperber (1986). Although Relevance Theorists abide by Grices Relevance Maxim, they cast doubt on the rest of the maxims and even the invention of the Cooperative Principle and the maxims (Cutting, 2008). They argue that, the communication proceeds not because the speaker persistently to obey the maxims but what they seek for relevance is a basic common ground knowledge they both share. The most significant type of cognitive effect is a contextual implicature which is acknowledged as new information. The other forms of cognitive effects are confirming, strengthening or contradicting, weakening an existing assumption. When this cognitive process applied in the communicative aspect, an utterance or an act of inferential communication is “optimal relevant when on the one hand, achieves the greatest contextual effects and on the other hand, achieves for putting in the minimised efforts. Relevance Theory is considered an improvement compared to the Cooperative Principle because it values more the natural and flexible characters of language (Cutting, 2008, p. 41).

    2.3 Neo-Gricean Pragmatics

    The last theory this study touches on is the Neo-Gricean pragmatics advocated by Horn(1984) and Levinson (2000). Largely based on the Grices Cooperative Principle, Horn (1984) reduces the maxims to two: the Quality remained and Quantity, Relation and Manner merged into two principles: the Q[uantity] Principle: Make the information contributable; say as much as and as one can. The R[ation] Principle: make the contribution necessary; say no more than one must. In other words, the reductionist theory involves with maximising the R Principle and minimising the Q Principles. Levinsons theory (2000), another Neo-Gricean theory, is comprised of three categories: (Q) Quantity, (I) Information and (M) Manner. Huang (2007, p. 41, 46, 50) simplified Levinsons theories as follows:

    The Q-principle:

    Speaker: do not say less than is required (bearing the I-principle in mind).

    Addressee: what is not said is not the case.

    The I-principle:

    Speaker: do not say more than is required( bearing the I-principle in mind)

    Addressee: what is generally said is stereotypically and specifically exemplified.

    The M-principle:

    Speaker: do not use a marked expression without reason.

    Addressee: what is said in a mark way is not unmarked.

    Because Levinsons theory, based on the Grices Cooperative Principle and revised Horns theory, makes the conversational implicature analysis easier to carry on, this analysis mainly carries out comparisons between Levinsons theory with Griceans theory.

    3 The Analysis

    3.1 Introduction of Sherlock (2010)

    This is a qualitative study with the data extracted from a British TV series, Sherlock (2010). Sherlock, the long being acclaimed London based “consulting detective” formed by Scottish fictionist and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He is famous for his strong logical deduction and forensic skills to solve extreme difficult cases. The Sherlock in the new series (2010) succeeds all the characteristics the original has: an arrogant and genius consulting detective who has been holding a desire to be proved as the cleverest among both the criminals and polices. Dr. John Watson, another main character, is an army doctor retired from warfare. He is considered to compromise everything that Sherlock has even his arrogant character. However, they do share one thing in common -- the wit. It is wit that binds them together and it is wit that makes the Doctor proved understand practically every utterance Sherlock puts. The new series was well received by the audience with the view rating ranking in several countries including China. It is believed that the wit embedded in language plays crucial part in wining the audience. Therefore, examples are extracted to see whether Grices theory can explain how and why such wits are achieved by not observing the principles. The indeterminate ones are further analysed with the Relevance Theory and Neo-Gricean theories, in particular Levinsons system to find the best possible explanations.

    3.2 Case study

    In Grices Cooperative Principle, the speaker is expected to contribute the true information as much and as accurate as he could with the shared conversation purpose in mind (Grice, 1975). He then points out that several sub-maxims should be proposed with the goal to generate results from the Cooperative Principle as stated in the literature review. What comes along with the Cooperative Principle is the implicature. In daily conversation, there are numerous occasions when one does not obey one or more maxims which are considered, on large scale, to yield implicatures.

    According to Grice (1975), there are five ways of not observing the maxims and two of which are focus here. They are:

    Flouting a maxim-one blatantly breaches a maxim carrying an implicature

    Violating a maxim-one covertly breaches a maxim with a misleading or deceiving purpose

    In the following part, several non-observant phenomena with examples in Sherlock are shown and explanations why such non-observance occur follow.

    3.3 Flouting the maxims

    Quality

    Example 1

    [When Sherlock and Dr. Watson were brought to the Buckingham Palace, they guessed who could probably have them there.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Here to see the Queen?

    b) Sherlock: Oh, apparently, yes.

    c) Mycroft: Just once, can you two behave like grown-ups?

    In example 1, Dr. Watson made a most reasonable deduction when in the highest land of a country, one is expected to see the highest person, and in Buckingham Palace, it would be the Queen. Sherlock answered “Oh, apparently, yes.” when they both saw Mycroft, Sherlocks brother, walked in and burst into laughter. In this case, Sherlock flouted the maxim of Quality in which he gave wrong information not to mislead but on the contrary, to humiliate his brother. Apparently, his brother cannot be a queen who by the nature should be a female sex. Besides, what the word “queen” embedded is someone who is flamboyant and acting like a girl. The implicature generated by flouting the maxim of Quality is well received by the three persons at the scene which lead to the dramatic laughter of Sherlock and Dr. Watson and the rebuttal by Mycroft in 1c). Mycrofts argument is again a flouting of the maxim of Quality. True to the fact that Dr. Watson and his younger brother are grown-ups but by overlooking the fact and also the cooperative principle that it requires right information to communicate, he gave the opposite answer. By uttering this, Mycroft intended to insult Sherlock and Dr. Watson by the implicature: What they just did was childish, and they should behave maturely as adults.

    Quantity

    Example 2

    [Sherlock and Dr. Watson were forced to go to some place they had no idea of and finally they were there which turned out to the Buckingham Palace. As a consultant detective, Sherlock insisted on his brother Mycroft to tell him straight who his client was and thats when Harry, the employee of the direct client came in.]

    a) Sherlock: And my client is...?

    b) Harry: Illustrious, in the extreme. And remaining, I have to inform you, entirely anonymous.

    Harrys answer breaches the maxim of Quantity. When Sherlock asked who his client was, he expected an answer that contributes appropriate amount of information in a direct manner like “the client is whom.” However, out of expectation, Harry chose not to give a proper answer. Together with the qualifiers, “illustrious”, “in the extreme” and “anonymous”, the speaker aimed to imply that the client was too celebrated to be informed by the name. Although this answer did give Sherlock an opportunity to generate such implicature; he chose to ignore it, which gave rise to the following conversation.

    Example 3

    a) Sherlock: Who is my client?

    b) Mycroft: Take a look at where youre standing, and make a deduction.

    c) Mycroft: You are to be engaged by the highest in the land.

    Sherlock insisted to know who exactly his client was by asking a direct question in 3a), a much stronger request than 2a). This time, Sherlock still did not get a satisfactory answer from Mycroft. What Mycroft said in 3b) can be viewed as a flout of the maxim of Relation because there is no direct association between “who ones client is” and “ones deduction”. 3c) is another case of flouting of the maxim of Quantity. “The highest in the land” is more or less equivalent to the one who was “illustrious in the extreme”. Still who the client was is concealed. This one can also be deemed as the speakers unwillingness to reveal the identity of the person talked about. The curious audience might suspect that the client was not really a significant matter or the one was too famous to be known in such occasion. In such a word puzzle, it successfully arouses suspense and the audiences curiosity.

    Relation

    Example 4

    [Dr. Watson is typing another blog titled “Sherlock Holmes Baffled”.]

    a) Sherlock: No, no, no, dont mention the unsolved ones.

    b) Dr. Watson: People want to know youre human.

    When Sherlock says in the example 4a) “Dont mention the unsolved case.” in fact he wants Dr. Watson to stop putting the unsolved case online. According to Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962), Sherlock utters 4a) (locution) with an expectation that Dr Watson would follow his request (illocution). However, instead of doing what Sherlock demanded, the Doctor says 4b) in the way that flouts the maxim of Relation: What John informed is not relevant. Under such circumstance, Sherlock cleverly received the implicature that by unostentatiously bleaching the Maxim Dr. Watson implicates that his public image was almighty that there was no case would set him back, but by reading Dr. Watsons blog the public could get that the opinions previously held were wrong.

    Manner

    Example 5

    a) Sherlock: Do people actually read your blog?

    b) Dr. Watson: Where do you think our clients come from?

    c) Sherlock: I have a website.

    d) Dr. Watson: In which you enumerate 240 different types of tobacco ash.

    e) Dr. Watson: Nobodys reading your website.

    Example 5 is a case when flouting the maxim of Manner comes. When Sherlock asked the way in 5a), in fact he wanted Dr. Watson to provide an accurate answer: “yes” or “no”. However, instead of giving an explicit answer, the doctor asked back in 5b). It was Sherlock himself, in the detectives mind, who attracted clients to the consultancy out of either admiration or need after reading his own website Science of Deduction. The replies given by Dr. Watson in 5d) and e) failed Sherlocks expectation indirectly and then directly and produced a comic effect.

    3.4 Violating the maxims

    Quality

    Example 6

    [Dr. Watson is on a crime scene in place of Sherlock when they were talking about Sherlocks constantly talking habit.]

    a) Dr. Watson: Do you just carry on talking when Im away?

    b) Sherlock: I dont know, how often are you away?

    Sherlocks utterance is a violation of the maxim of Quality. Under rare circumstances do people totally be oblivion of the environment especially one holds a desire to be informative. Here Sherlocks utterance “I dont know” in 6b) is therefore considered to be deceiving. Probably, he was trying to indicate that he did not know the doctor was away because he did not require a response when he kept talking or he just did not pay any attention to his partner. This latter implicature is more or less proved by Sherlocks supplement “how often are you away?”. This utterance yet could not possibly be explained by the Cooperative Principles because it obeys all the maxims but still generates implicatures either as he did not expect to communicate with the other speaker for most of the times he simply informed him whatever came across his mind or actually Sherlock knew his partner was not so often away which made Dr. Watsons initial utterance a violation of the maxim of Quality.

    Example 7

    [The two came to Irenes in searching of the compromising photos the client from the Buckingham Palace required. When asked, Irene deliberately turned the topic away to another case Sherlock was working on.]

    a) Sherlock: I know the victim was a sportsman, recently returned from foreign travel

    b) Sherlock: and that the photographs Im looking for are in this room.

    c) Irene: OK, but how?

    d) Sherlock: So they are in this room. Thank you.

    The utterance in 7a) by Sherlock shows his marvellous talent. He comes to Irenes for the compromising photos she was taken with one of the Royal members. However, he was told that he would not be given the photos and then asked about one of the cases Sherlock was investigating. Sherlock explains his investigation together with a seemingly irrelevant sentence 7b). Under this circumstance, Sherlock blatantly breaches the maxim of Relevance but this is not even the trigger of an implicature yet. In fact, this utterance is not true. Sherlock did not know the exact location of the photos. By uttering “I know that the photographs Im looking for are in this room” he holds a 50 to 50 chance that the photos might be in this room. Through this abruptly changing of topic he would expect a confirmed answer. In this way, Sherlock violated the maxim of Quality by saying something he lacked evidence with a purpose to mislead and this misleading function was further justified by his utterance in 7d). In this case, breaching of two maxims collides with flouting the maxim of Relation.

    Quantity

    Example 8

    [Dr. Watson keeps typing.]

    a) Sherlock: What are you typing?

    b) Dr. Watson: Blog.

    c) Sherlock: About?

    d) Dr. Watson: Us.

    e) Sherlock: You mean me.

    The dialogues in example 8 are a case when the speaker secretly hid certain information from the hearer. From 8a) to 8d), each time when Sherlock tried to ask a question on the typing thing, Dr. Watson intentionally gave unsatisfactory reply. What Dr. Watson provided, was in fact the true information relevant to Sherlocks question and not in an ambiguous way, which is an observance of the maxims of Quality, Relation as well as Manner. What Dr. Watson failed to observe is the maxim of Quantity. In other words, in his utterances both in 8b) and 8d) he did not give sufficient information for the hearer. However, the shared background knowledge, Sherlock did know Dr. Watson owned a blog keeping tracks of every case they worked on, makes the seemingly misleading conversation could continue.

    Relation

    Example 9

    [Sherlock and Irene were fighting against the broken-in Americans and then Sherlock looked at the opened safe.]

    a) Sherlock: Do you mind?

    b) Irene: Not at all.

    Sherlock asked if Irene minded that he took whats inside the safe out. However, Irene misunderstood that the man was asking about the feelings of him observing her measurement early on which later proved to be the code to the safe. Irenes answer was misleading to the Americans and even the viewers but highly relevant to the question. In this case, there is no implicature although Sherlocks asking does violate the maxim of Manner if in full it would be “Do you mind if I…”. Nonetheless, he avoided some of the information in order to get what he perceived to be the satisfactory answer.

    Manner

    Example 10

    [Harry and Mycroft were describing the case to Sherlock in Buckingham Palace.]

    a) Harry: My employer has a problem.

    b) Mycroft: A matter has come to light of an extremely delicate and potentially criminal nature, and in this hour of need, dear brother, your name has arisen.

    In example 10, Harry vaguely referred the case as a “problem”. And without more detailed information, one cannot deduce how severe the problem was. This utterance violates the maxim of Manner in which he failed to give accurate answer. Mycroft, thereupon supplemented by uttering 10b). If Harrys misleadingness was unintentional, Mycrofts one was deliberate. First, Mycrofts talk was so deceiving that he used such ambiguous words like “extremely” and “potentially”. One can hardly define the degree of “extreme” and “potential”, which may confuse a detective. For one thing, one may be concerned whether it was a crime and for another the matter was really severe (which in fact might not be). Mycroft used this ambiguous or even misleading utterance to lure his brother to take the case for his well understanding of Sherlocks curious character.

    The above discussed how Cooperative Principle and its subdivided four maxims cope with the data in the TV series Sherlock (2010). It can be seen that, Grice theory can explain most the problems that occur yet there are unsolved ones such as the reasons for generating particular implicatures and the obscured boundaries of each maxim. Next comes a brief discussion about the Relevance Theory and the Neo-Gricean theories with a perspective to witness whether they are in supportive to the Cooperative Principle.

    3.5 Relevance Theory

    What Relevance Theory contributes to the daily conservation is that it pays more attention to the ambiguity and the flexibility which are the very nature of language. It does not provide fixed maxims for speakers to follow but the reasons why people behave in that way. Wilson and Sperber (1986) argue that communication is possible not because the interlocutors seek to obey certain maxim but based on a particular relevance, a common feature of human cognition. They also point out that an utterance is optimally relevant if and only of that on the one hand, it is relevant enough to worth an audiences attention and on the other hand, it achieves the most adequate contextual effects. In this way, the four maxims proposed by Grice can be replaced by one: the principle of Relevance. Relevance Theory can explain some phenomenon easier what Grices theory almost fails to. The following example is served as an evidence.

    Example 11

    a) Inspector: Dr Watson?

    b) Dr. Watson: Yeah.

    c) Inspector: Its for you.

    d) Dr. Watson: OK, thanks.

    e) Inspector: No, sir, the helicopter.

    This conversation took place when Dr. Watson was on a crime scene for Sherlock when suddenly they lost contact through Internet. At the same time, an inspector came to Dr. Watson with a phone call still on. A humorous effect, if examined via the Relevance Theory, was caused by the contrast between the largest relevance and the optimal relevance. The largest relevance is the effect based on the greatest contextual effects and the smallest processing efforts. However, the optimal relevance is the one that is compatible with communicators abilities and preferences together with the audiences minimum processing efforts. In the example 11, the utterance by the Inspector “its for you.” meant “a helicopter is for you”. Dr. Watson misunderstood that the phone call in process was for him. The doctor had such reaction because he saw the Inspector was engaged by a call, the most influential context, so he spared his least efforts to work out “ it” in “ its for you.” meant the phone. He then was proved wrong by the Inspectors utterance: “no, sir. The helicopter.” with the approaching sound of a helicopter. Following the doctors deduction process from the largest relevance to the optimal relevance, as soon as the optimal relevance is revealed, the viewers immediately sense the humour. This example can also be interpreted as a violation of Manner maxim as the Inspector gave misleading information by uttering ambiguously it in 10c). If examined in cognitive deduction, the reference of it here is obvious because our mind tends to combine what is saying with what is doing, especially when the utterance involves an act. Therefore, in this case, the humorous effect best be analysed using the Relevance Theory.

    3.6 The Levinsons System

    One contribution Levinsons System makes is that it pays equivalent attention to both Particularized implicatures as well as Generalized implicatures compared to Grices mainly focus on the Particularized ones. In Levinsons three principles, the first two Q-principle and I-principle which restrict each other and can be examined through the semantic aspect while the Manner-principle which is more or less similar to Grices Manner maxim and Wilson & Sperbers Relevance Theory relies on cognitive aspect as well as the contextual effect. As a supplement to the Grices theory, this paper only touches its application to generate a Generalized implicature which do not need background.

    Here is one example also from the TV series talked.

    Example 12

    a) Sherlock: I was in the middle of a case, Mycroft.

    b) Mycroft: What, the hiker and the backfire? I glanced at the police report.

    c) Mycroft: A bit obvious, surely?

    d) Sherlock: Transparent.

    This case accords with the Q-principle. In dialogues, Sherlock and Mycroft were talking about “the hiker and the backfire” case. Mycroft intended to let Sherlock to attend to the case he was about to mention by putting forward that he had already known the fact and Sherlock confirmed his idea by uttering “transparent”. “Transparent” is semantically stronger than “obvious”. Here, Mycroft opted for the semantically weaker “obvious” casting doubt that Mycroft might lack confidence to say the case was exactly what he thought to be because he gave out a hint that he merely glanced at the police report. What Sherlock did thereafter was to back up his implicature by using what Mycroft did not entailed, the semantically stronger “transparent”.

    4 Conclusion

    The aim of this study is to show whether the Cooperative Principles and the four maxims proposed by Grice are key roles to generate implicatures by using the non-observant data from the series, Sherlock. From what has been discussed above, the conclusion can be drawn that Grices theory does work out most of the implicatures and give most of satisfactory explanations. However it functions, the Grices theory gives too much focus on the hearers and makes the flexible conversations rigid by preparing the principle speaker should obey. In addition, sometimes, it is difficult to distinguish which maxim speakers breach. The problems are revised by the Relevance Theory in which both cognition and context-based activity are considered. This makes the explanation of why speakers generate implicatures clearer and more convincible. The main contribution Levinsons Theory makes to the Grices Cooperative Principle is the supplement of the generalized implicatures which makes Grices theory more applicable in various fields. To sum up, the Gricean Cooperative principles are still most feasible in analysing the implicatutres in daily conversations with Relevence Theory as well as the Neo-Griceans pragmatics serve as supplementary roles. It should also be pointed out that it is not an exhaustive comparison on the three theories. On the one hand, it is a detailed case study with the data exacted mainly from one TV series, and the corpus should be further expanded. On the other hand, it focuses on the non-observant phenomena of the maxims of the Cooperative Principles, the rest, for instance, the Levinsons Theory, this paper only mentioned two principles. Researchers may continue to explore other aspects of Levinsons Theory.

    【References】

    [1]Austin, J. L.. How to do things with words. Cambridge[J]. MA: Harvard University Press,1962.

    [2]Grice, H.P.. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole(Ed.)Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts[J]. New York: Academic Press,1975:41-58.

    [3]Cutting, J.. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students. 2nd edution. London & New York: Routledge,2008.

    [4]Horn, R.. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin(ed.), Meaning, form, and the use in context: linguistic applications[J]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,1984:11-42.

    [5]Huang, Y.. Pragmatics[J]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2007.

    [6]Levinson,C.. Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature[J]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,2000.

    [7]Sperber,D.,&Wilson,D.. Relevance: communication and cognition[J]. Oxford: Blackwell,1986.

    [8]Thomas,J..Meaning in interaction: an introduction to Pragmatics[J]. London: Longman,1995.

    [責任編輯:王偉平]

    猜你喜歡
    關聯(lián)理論
    《西游記》中幽默語言的英譯研究
    新高考改革下如何提高學生的閱讀理解能力
    《生活大爆炸》中刻意曲解之關聯(lián)理論探析
    關聯(lián)視閾下的學習者語用能力發(fā)展研究
    關聯(lián)理論視角下的漢英隱喻翻譯
    基于關聯(lián)理論的高中英語讀前活動優(yōu)化設計
    91精品国产九色| 久久久久国产网址| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产av在哪里看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| av一本久久久久| 高清av免费在线| 久久久久久久久大av| 777米奇影视久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产精品一及| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 男女边摸边吃奶| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 国产成人精品久久久久久| 黄片wwwwww| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 黄色一级大片看看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产色婷婷99| 黄色一级大片看看| 热99在线观看视频| 中国国产av一级| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 色5月婷婷丁香| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 美女黄网站色视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 韩国av在线不卡| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 男女国产视频网站| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久久久久久久大av| or卡值多少钱| 国产视频内射| 联通29元200g的流量卡| av福利片在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 一级av片app| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲成色77777| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产亚洲最大av| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲性久久影院| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| www.色视频.com| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 老司机影院成人| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 在线 av 中文字幕| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 99热6这里只有精品| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| av在线观看视频网站免费| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产视频内射| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 少妇的逼好多水| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 精品久久久久久久末码| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲四区av| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美潮喷喷水| 看黄色毛片网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲国产av新网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 中国国产av一级| 久久6这里有精品| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 一本久久精品| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美97在线视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲精品第二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久99精品国语久久久| 综合色av麻豆| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| av专区在线播放| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久精品夜色国产| av在线亚洲专区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产高清三级在线| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| av在线蜜桃| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 嫩草影院入口| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久97久久精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产成人91sexporn| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 少妇的逼水好多| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | av免费观看日本| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 日日啪夜夜爽| av国产免费在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 男女国产视频网站| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 22中文网久久字幕| videossex国产| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美潮喷喷水| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 麻豆成人av视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚州av有码| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产av不卡久久| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产成人精品福利久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久97久久精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲性久久影院| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 嫩草影院新地址| 日韩电影二区| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 黄片wwwwww| 99热6这里只有精品| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产单亲对白刺激| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 人妻系列 视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久午夜福利片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产午夜精品论理片| 91av网一区二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 久久97久久精品| 高清毛片免费看| ponron亚洲| 亚州av有码| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 综合色av麻豆| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 尾随美女入室| 美女主播在线视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 伦精品一区二区三区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 高清毛片免费看| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产综合精华液| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一本一本综合久久| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 色综合色国产| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产成人福利小说| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 午夜激情久久久久久久| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 三级毛片av免费| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 搞女人的毛片| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 99久久精品一区二区三区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 三级经典国产精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲av成人av| 国产综合懂色| 色哟哟·www| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲综合色惰| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 日韩中字成人| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产成人福利小说| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚州av有码| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| av.在线天堂| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产三级在线视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美bdsm另类| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 七月丁香在线播放| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 老女人水多毛片| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产在线男女| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 内射极品少妇av片p| 午夜福利视频精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲综合色惰| 成年免费大片在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费看日本二区| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 色哟哟·www| 免费少妇av软件| 美女黄网站色视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 老司机影院毛片| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 床上黄色一级片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩av免费高清视频| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 丝袜喷水一区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 免费大片18禁| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产永久视频网站| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 老女人水多毛片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久草成人影院| eeuss影院久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日本免费a在线| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99热这里只有精品一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美日本视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产视频首页在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 直男gayav资源| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲精品第二区| 只有这里有精品99| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 精品酒店卫生间| 午夜福利视频精品| av.在线天堂| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产精品.久久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 午夜久久久久精精品| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 久久久午夜欧美精品| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本午夜av视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 视频中文字幕在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一本久久精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲美女视频黄频| av在线亚洲专区| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 久久久色成人|