張雪鳳,劉崎,陳士躍,詹茜,彭雯佳,陳錄廣,田霞,陸建平
高分辨率磁共振評(píng)價(jià)單側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞管腔形態(tài)特征及腦梗死類(lèi)型
張雪鳳,劉崎,陳士躍,詹茜,彭雯佳,陳錄廣,田霞,陸建平*
目的 利用高分辨率磁共振(high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging,HR-MRI)評(píng)價(jià)單側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞兩種不同的管腔形態(tài)特征及對(duì)應(yīng)腦梗死類(lèi)型的差異。材料與方法 回顧性分析因缺血性腦卒中住院診斷為單側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞患者資料,所有患者均在發(fā)病1周內(nèi)行HR-MRI及頭顱擴(kuò)散加權(quán)成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)檢查,觀察大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞管腔形態(tài)特征及頭顱DWI上腦梗死類(lèi)型。依照HR-MRI上閉塞管腔的形態(tài)學(xué)特征將患者分為斑塊形成組與非斑塊形成組;DWI上腦梗死類(lèi)型分為單發(fā)腦梗死、多發(fā)腦梗死、無(wú)腦梗死灶。結(jié)果 44例患者納入分析,斑塊形成組30例,非斑塊形成組14例。斑塊形成組閉塞位置位于近端16例,遠(yuǎn)端14例,非斑塊形成組閉塞部位為近端13例,遠(yuǎn)端1例,兩組閉塞部位差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.025,χ2=4.99),非斑塊形成組閉塞部位多為M1段近端。斑塊形成組與非斑塊形成組單發(fā)性腦梗死分別為11例和5例,多發(fā)性梗死分別為15例和2例,無(wú)梗死灶分別為4例和7例,兩組腦梗死類(lèi)型差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.016,χ2=8.29),斑塊形成組腦梗死類(lèi)型多為多發(fā)性腦梗死,而非斑塊組多為單個(gè)腦梗死或無(wú)梗死灶。結(jié)論 高分辨MRI對(duì)大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞管腔管壁形態(tài)特征評(píng)價(jià)具有重要價(jià)值,閉塞管腔內(nèi)是否有斑塊與主干周?chē)袩o(wú)側(cè)支形成可能是大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞后不同腦梗死類(lèi)型差異的一個(gè)重要原因。
大腦中動(dòng)脈;磁共振成像,高分辨率;卒中;動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化
既往研究認(rèn)為大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞(middle cerebral artery occlusion,MCAO)的原因多為血栓形成和栓子栓塞,因尸檢率的下降,關(guān)于MCAO的相關(guān)機(jī)制仍舊不明[1]。MCAO腦梗死的臨床表現(xiàn)差異很大,有可能是大面積腦梗死、小的梗死灶、或甚至是無(wú)梗死灶(transient ischemic attack,TIA)。雖然目前CT血管造影(CT angiography,CTA)、磁共振血管造影(magnetic resonance angiography,MRA)及數(shù)字減影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)常規(guī)檢查可較快地對(duì)MCAO做出診斷,但只能顯示消失的血管,管腔內(nèi)的影像學(xué)表現(xiàn)卻很少被人認(rèn)識(shí)。近年來(lái)高分辨率磁共振(high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging,HR-MRI)已越來(lái)越多地應(yīng)用于大腦中動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化疾病的研究[2-3],但對(duì)MCAO的研究相對(duì)較少。本研究通過(guò)對(duì)比分析非栓子栓塞性MCAO兩種不同的HR-MRI管腔形態(tài)學(xué)表現(xiàn)以及對(duì)應(yīng)腦梗死類(lèi)型差異,擬從管腔形態(tài)特征探討MCAO不同腦梗死類(lèi)型差異的可能機(jī)制。
1.1 一般資料
收集2011年3月至2015年5月在上海長(zhǎng)海醫(yī)院因缺血性腦卒中在腦外科及神經(jīng)內(nèi)科住院診斷為單側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞的患者,納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)頭顱CTA、MRA或DSA顯示大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段主干閉塞;(2)有明確與閉塞側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈供血區(qū)相關(guān)的癥狀,包括短暫性缺血癥狀;(3)發(fā)病1周內(nèi)行HR-MRI及常規(guī)頭顱DWI掃描;(4)具有頸部血管影像學(xué)檢查及心臟檢查資料。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)臨床診斷急性栓子栓塞性MCAO;(2)同時(shí)存在同側(cè)顱內(nèi)動(dòng)脈或頸動(dòng)脈狹窄大于50%;(3)合并心源性栓子、房顫、血管動(dòng)脈炎,動(dòng)脈夾層、高凝狀態(tài)等基礎(chǔ)疾?。?4)圖像質(zhì)量差無(wú)法診斷。對(duì)每例患者都采集如下臨床資料:年齡、性別、高血壓史、糖尿病史、吸煙史、血脂水平及發(fā)病時(shí)間。所有患者均簽署知情同意書(shū)。
1.2 檢查方法
所有患者均在GE Signa HDxt 3.0 T磁共振設(shè)備上進(jìn)行檢查。先行頭顱常規(guī)DWI掃描:TR/TE 5300 ms/74.3 ms,F(xiàn)OV 24 cm×24 cm,b= 1000 s/mm2,激勵(lì)次數(shù)(NEX)2,矩陣160×160,層厚5 mm,掃描時(shí)間42 s。再行3D-TOF掃描:TR/TE 29 ms/3.4 ms,F(xiàn)OV 24 cm×21.6 cm,NEX 1,矩陣384×192,掃描時(shí)間4 min 47 s。隨后根據(jù)3D-TOF圖像定位MCA走形區(qū)再行HR-MRI掃描,病灶側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈掃描序列包括T2WI、T1WI、T1WIGd-DTPA增強(qiáng),健側(cè)只行T2WI掃描,其中T2WI參數(shù)為:TR/TE 2884 ms/51 ms,F(xiàn)OV 10 cm×10 cm,NEX 6,矩陣320×256,回波鏈長(zhǎng)度(echo train length,ETL)20,掃描時(shí)間3 min 51 s;T1WI平掃和增強(qiáng)序列參數(shù)為:TR/TE 581 ms/20 ms,F(xiàn)OV 10 cm×10 cm,NEX 4,矩陣320×256,ETL 6,掃描時(shí)間5 min。高分辨率T1WI增強(qiáng)掃描采用Gd-DTPA對(duì)比劑,注射劑量0.2 mmol/kg,流率2 mL/s,注射對(duì)比劑后立即掃描。
1.3 圖像分析
掃描完成后將圖像導(dǎo)入PACS系統(tǒng),由2名專(zhuān)門(mén)從事血管影像診斷的影像科醫(yī)生在不了解患者臨床資料的情況下進(jìn)行圖像分析。M1段閉塞管腔的形態(tài)特征依據(jù)HR-MRI管腔橫斷面表現(xiàn)分為斑塊形成組(閉塞管腔內(nèi)可見(jiàn)到明顯斑塊形成)與非斑塊形成組(閉塞管腔內(nèi)未見(jiàn)斑塊,閉塞血管管壁增厚、管腔縮窄閉塞、沿大腦中動(dòng)脈走形區(qū)可見(jiàn)多發(fā)細(xì)小流空血管形成)。管腔閉塞的位置依據(jù)TOFMRA表現(xiàn)分為M1段主干近端(定義為自主干起始部即未見(jiàn)血管)、主干遠(yuǎn)端(主干尚可見(jiàn)部分殘留的血管腔,其遠(yuǎn)端未見(jiàn)顯示)。根據(jù)DWI上顯示的梗死病灶部位、大小和分布將腦梗死病灶分布模式分為[4]:(1)單發(fā)腦梗死(腦梗死僅累及1個(gè)血管供血區(qū)域):小的穿支動(dòng)脈供血區(qū)梗死(small perforating artery infarct,SPAI)(病灶直徑<2 cm),大的穿支動(dòng)脈供血區(qū)梗死(large perforating artery infarct,LPAI)(病灶直徑≥2 cm),分水嶺梗死(borderzone infarct,BZI),皮質(zhì)分支血管供血區(qū)梗死(pial infarct,PI);(2)多發(fā)腦梗死(腦梗死累及2個(gè)以上血管供血區(qū)域):穿支動(dòng)脈供血區(qū)梗死(perforating artery infarct,PAI)+PI,PAI+PI+BZI,PAI+BZI,PI+BZI;(3)TIA。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析
應(yīng)用SPSS 19.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,對(duì)組間計(jì)數(shù)資料用行×列表χ2檢驗(yàn)或Fisher's精確四格表檢驗(yàn),對(duì)組間計(jì)量資料以表示并行t檢驗(yàn),P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 一般資料
本研究共納入44例患者,男35例,女9例,年齡31~76歲,平均(54.25±10.95)歲,斑塊形成組患者中高血壓的比例明顯大于非斑塊形成組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(表1)。
2.2 斑塊的HR-MRI形態(tài)特征
斑塊形成組HR-MRI顯示大腦中動(dòng)脈內(nèi)可見(jiàn)偏心或環(huán)形斑塊充填管腔,斑塊在T2WI序列呈高、稍高信號(hào),信號(hào)較混雜,T1WI為等、高信號(hào),增強(qiáng)后斑塊均有不同程度強(qiáng)化(圖1);非斑塊形成組HR-MRI顯示大腦中動(dòng)脈主干管腔縮窄閉塞,并且在大腦中動(dòng)脈走行區(qū)見(jiàn)多發(fā)細(xì)小流空側(cè)枝血管影(圖2),其中2例患者(14.29%)管壁較均勻增厚,而閉塞對(duì)側(cè)正常的中動(dòng)脈卻沒(méi)有觀察到此征象。斑塊形成組閉塞位置近端16例,遠(yuǎn)端14例,非斑塊形成組閉塞部位為近端13例,遠(yuǎn)端1例,兩組閉塞部位差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.025,χ2=4.99)。
2.3 斑塊的形態(tài)特征與腦梗死類(lèi)型的差異
斑塊形成組與非斑塊形成組腦梗死類(lèi)型分布不同如表2所示。兩組中單發(fā)性腦梗死分別為11例和5例,多發(fā)性梗死分別為15例和2例,無(wú)梗死灶分別為4例和7例,兩組管腔特征對(duì)應(yīng)的腦梗死類(lèi)型差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.016,χ2=8.29),斑塊形成組腦梗死類(lèi)型多為多發(fā)性腦梗死,而非斑塊組多為單個(gè)腦梗死或無(wú)梗死灶。
3.1 高分辨率磁共振對(duì)大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞管腔的評(píng)價(jià)價(jià)值
HR-MRI應(yīng)用于大腦中動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化疾病的研究已有很多報(bào)道,HR-MRI不僅能清晰顯示動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化管腔斑塊,而且可以評(píng)估斑塊易損性、腦梗死類(lèi)型以及預(yù)測(cè)卒中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[5-6],但應(yīng)用于MCAO研究不多。傳統(tǒng)血管成像技術(shù)CTA、MRA及DSA可明確MCAO診斷,但無(wú)法直接顯示病變血管管壁情況,難以對(duì)MCAO進(jìn)行確切的病因診斷,動(dòng)脈閉塞性病變的治療主要基于病因診斷,故明確動(dòng)脈閉塞病變的性質(zhì)對(duì)于卒中防治至關(guān)重要[1]。既往研究認(rèn)為MCAO的原因主要分為兩類(lèi):源于動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化的血栓形成和來(lái)自心房栓子脫落所致栓塞[1]。本研究中排除栓子栓塞的MCAO患者,研究通常所說(shuō)動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化血栓形成患者,筆者依照HR-MRI上閉塞管腔的形態(tài)學(xué)特征將這些病例分為斑塊形成組與非斑塊形成組,斑塊形成組可觀察到MCAO原因?yàn)閯?dòng)脈粥樣硬化斑塊及伴發(fā)的血栓,但發(fā)現(xiàn)非斑塊形成組患者閉塞管腔內(nèi)并未看到斑塊,而是顯示縮窄的動(dòng)脈管腔、沿中動(dòng)脈走形區(qū)多發(fā)側(cè)支血管形成(流空血管影),并且這一現(xiàn)象只有在閉塞側(cè)有,健側(cè)并沒(méi)有觀察到此征象。筆者認(rèn)為斑塊形成組MCAO原因?yàn)閯?dòng)脈粥樣硬化,而非斑塊形成組MCAO發(fā)病機(jī)制不完全是動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化,其原因可能為先天性大腦中動(dòng)脈發(fā)育不全或后天性大腦中動(dòng)脈主干萎縮。本研究中斑塊形成組高血壓、糖尿病、吸煙等動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化的危險(xiǎn)因素比例均較非斑塊形成組高,其中高血壓這一因素在斑塊形成組與非斑塊形成組中的差異表現(xiàn)得尤為明顯(P=0.03)。Kim等[7]認(rèn)為后天大腦中動(dòng)脈萎縮閉塞是一個(gè)非常緩慢、漸進(jìn)性的過(guò)程,這個(gè)變化過(guò)程可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致不尋常的側(cè)枝血管形成,如穿支動(dòng)脈的顯著擴(kuò)張;從大腦中動(dòng)脈主干到側(cè)枝血管血流動(dòng)力學(xué)負(fù)荷的改變可能誘發(fā)大腦中動(dòng)脈主干萎縮性重構(gòu)。另外,Xu等[8]利用HR-MRI研究顯示無(wú)癥狀MCAO者大腦中動(dòng)脈周?chē)嬖诙鄠€(gè)直徑微小的血管流空信號(hào)(deep tiny flow voids,DTFV),與本研究中非斑塊形成組的大腦中動(dòng)脈主干多發(fā)流空側(cè)枝血管表現(xiàn)相仿,他們認(rèn)為DTFV的存在為血管閉塞后深部側(cè)枝再生或者為深部軟腦膜側(cè)枝動(dòng)脈的特殊影像表現(xiàn)。非斑塊形成組2例患者(14.29%)同時(shí)可見(jiàn)血管壁增厚,這與煙霧病內(nèi)膜增厚的血管壁表現(xiàn)相似,但煙霧病管腔狹窄閉塞多起自頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈末端,而本研究中閉塞段均為M1段,非斑塊形成組管壁增厚的原因是否是局部炎癥所致將有待組織病理學(xué)證實(shí)。
表1 大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞患者的臨床資料Tab. 1 Clinical data of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion
表2 大腦中動(dòng)脈不同閉塞管腔形態(tài)對(duì)應(yīng)的腦梗死類(lèi)型分布Tab. 2 Different infarction patterns in the middle cerebral artery occlusion
圖1 同一例斑塊形成組患者的MRI圖像。TOF-MRA顯示左側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞(A),DWI顯示左側(cè)大的穿支動(dòng)脈供血區(qū)及內(nèi)分水嶺區(qū)多發(fā)腦梗死(B),C~N為HR-MRI顯示大腦中動(dòng)脈管腔內(nèi)斑塊充填(白色箭所指),T2WI圖像(C~F),T1WI平掃圖像(G~J),H~J示斑塊出血,T1WI增強(qiáng)后斑塊明顯強(qiáng)化(K~N)Fig. 1 MRI images inthe same patient of plaque formation group, TOFMRA shows leftmiddle cerebral artery M1segment occlusion (A), DWI shows left largeperforating artery infarct and interior border-zone infarct (B), C—N imagesare HR-MRIshown the middle cerebralartery lumen full of plaque (white arrow), T2WI image (C—F), T1WI image(G—J), H—Jimage shownplaque hemorrhage, K—N image shownsignifcantenhancement ofplaque inT1WI.
圖2 同一例非斑塊形成組患者M(jìn)RI圖像。TOF檢查顯示右側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈M1段閉塞(A),DWI示無(wú)腦梗死灶(B),C~F為HR-MRI圖像T2WI顯示大腦中動(dòng)脈纖細(xì)閉塞,管腔內(nèi)未見(jiàn)斑塊形成,其走形區(qū)多發(fā)側(cè)枝小血管形成(白色箭所指)Fig. 2 MRI images in the same patient of non plaque formation group, TOF-MRA shows right middle cerebralartery M1 segment occlusion (A), DWI shown no cerebralinfarction (B), C—F images areT2WIimage of HR-MRI shows middle cerebral arteryslenderocclusion, noplaque formation in the lumen,andits shape-shaped areaofmultiple collateral smallvessel formation(white arrow).
MCAO的位置與腦梗死類(lèi)型相關(guān)[9],閉塞位于大腦中動(dòng)脈管腔近端者深穿支動(dòng)脈梗死比例高于閉塞位于管腔遠(yuǎn)端者。這是因?yàn)榇┲?dòng)脈位于大腦中動(dòng)脈主干近側(cè),當(dāng)大腦中動(dòng)脈近端閉塞時(shí),有兩種情況導(dǎo)致其供血區(qū)梗死:(1)栓子或血栓直接阻塞穿支動(dòng)脈開(kāi)口部[10];(2)大腦中動(dòng)脈主干閉塞后其血流代償主要依靠軟腦膜側(cè)支循環(huán),而穿支動(dòng)脈為側(cè)枝循環(huán)代償?shù)哪┒耍虼鷥敳蛔愣鴮?dǎo)致腦梗死[11]。本研究中非斑塊形成組閉塞部位近端明顯多于遠(yuǎn)端(P=0.025),但出現(xiàn)深穿支動(dòng)脈梗死比例不多,筆者認(rèn)為非斑塊形成組多發(fā)的深部軟腦膜側(cè)支循環(huán)的建立起到了重要作用。
因此,HR-MRI可顯示MCAO不同的管腔形態(tài)特征,有助于臨床獲得MCAO可能的病因診斷,并可用于評(píng)估MCAO后深部軟腦膜側(cè)枝循環(huán)的形成。
3.2 大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞不同腦梗死類(lèi)型的機(jī)制探討
本研究中斑塊形成組腦梗死類(lèi)型多為多發(fā)性腦梗死,而非斑塊組多為單個(gè)腦梗死或無(wú)梗死灶。MCAO腦梗死的病灶分布、類(lèi)型及臨床癥狀均因不同的機(jī)制而有不同的表現(xiàn)。源于動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化的MCAO腦梗死或TIA的可能機(jī)制包括:動(dòng)脈血栓形成導(dǎo)致完全閉塞、動(dòng)脈至動(dòng)脈栓塞、血流動(dòng)力不足(低灌注)、深穿支開(kāi)口處局部分支閉塞,或是這些機(jī)制的聯(lián)合作用[12]。本研究中斑塊形成組的患者腦梗死機(jī)制筆者認(rèn)為多數(shù)是因?yàn)樵粍?dòng)脈血栓形成性閉塞及動(dòng)脈至動(dòng)脈閉塞。急性動(dòng)脈血栓形成始于動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化斑塊纖維帽破裂,由此破壞動(dòng)脈內(nèi)皮細(xì)胞表層,組織因子釋放促進(jìn)附于斑塊的血凝塊發(fā)展,局部閉塞和繼發(fā)性動(dòng)脈至動(dòng)脈栓塞隨機(jī)產(chǎn)生。本研究通過(guò)HR-MRI可直觀顯示斑塊形成組中較大的斑塊充填于動(dòng)脈管腔內(nèi),部分病例可觀察到T1WI高信號(hào),T1WI高信號(hào)代表斑塊內(nèi)出血或血栓形成[13],這種動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化所形成的原位血栓閉塞所產(chǎn)生的腦梗死往往大于其他機(jī)制導(dǎo)致的病灶。Lee等[1]利用HR-MRI在大腦中動(dòng)脈斑塊穩(wěn)定性與腦梗死類(lèi)型的相關(guān)性研究中認(rèn)為那些斑塊內(nèi)出血伴有強(qiáng)化的不穩(wěn)定斑塊更多表現(xiàn)為動(dòng)脈-動(dòng)脈栓塞的腦梗死類(lèi)型。Wong等[12]研究認(rèn)為動(dòng)脈至動(dòng)脈栓塞產(chǎn)生的栓子不易清除導(dǎo)致多發(fā)腦梗死,尤其并發(fā)分水嶺梗死。本研究斑塊形成組多發(fā)腦梗死比例多(50%)且均并發(fā)分水嶺梗死,與Lee及Wong等研究結(jié)果相符。但是動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化斑塊的形成是緩慢進(jìn)展過(guò)程,卒中發(fā)生后梗死灶的最終大小可根據(jù)側(cè)枝循環(huán)的發(fā)展、動(dòng)脈閉塞的速度及血流動(dòng)力的穩(wěn)定性而不同。本研究中非斑塊組患者大腦中動(dòng)脈走形區(qū)多細(xì)小流空血管形成,是血管閉塞后側(cè)枝循環(huán)形成好的一個(gè)重要標(biāo)志,側(cè)枝循環(huán)建立好的MCAO患者腦梗死的面積小或只表現(xiàn)為T(mén)IA,這與國(guó)外報(bào)道的研究結(jié)果吻合[14-17]。因此,MCAO不同管腔的形態(tài)特征與腦梗死類(lèi)型具有極大的相關(guān)性,利用HR-MRI可預(yù)測(cè)梗死的類(lèi)型。
3.3 本研究存在的不足
HR-MRI管壁成像掃描時(shí)間長(zhǎng),本研究對(duì)象多為腦梗死癥狀相對(duì)較輕者,病情較重、無(wú)法配合檢查者不能行HR-MRI檢查而未選入研究中,這部分患者的管壁及腦梗死類(lèi)型需進(jìn)一步研究;本研究為回顧性研究,樣本量小,尚需連續(xù)性大樣本研究來(lái)證實(shí)腦梗死機(jī)制;研究表明[18]在腦梗死發(fā)病早期會(huì)有少部分復(fù)發(fā)病例,本研究DWI掃描時(shí)間為發(fā)病后一周內(nèi)完成,非發(fā)病24 h內(nèi)檢測(cè),不排除少部分復(fù)發(fā)急性腦梗死病例的可能。
總之,HR-MRI對(duì)大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞管腔管壁形態(tài)特征評(píng)價(jià)具有重要價(jià)值,閉塞管腔內(nèi)是否有斑塊及主干周?chē)袩o(wú)側(cè)支形成可能是大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞后不同腦梗死類(lèi)型差異的一個(gè)重要原因。
[References]
[1] Lee KJ, Jung KH, Byun JI, et al. Infarct pattern and clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 38(1): 31-38.
[2] Xie SS, Cheng JL, Zhang Y, et al. High-resolution MRI study of middle cerebral artery stenosis rate differences in infarct and TIA patients. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 4(6): 411-415.
謝珊珊, 程敬亮, 張勇, 等. 應(yīng)用高分辨率MRI研究大腦中動(dòng)脈狹窄率在腦梗死與短暫性腦缺血發(fā)作患者中的差異. 磁共振成像, 2013, 4(6): 411-415.
[3] Li YD, Zhou ZC, Li R, et al. Current status and progress in magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 7(2): 142-148.
李赟鐸, 周賾辰, 李睿, 等. 磁共振血管壁成像技術(shù)現(xiàn)狀及進(jìn)展. 磁共振成像, 2016, 7(2): 142-148.
[4] Lee DK, Kim JS, Kwon SU, et al. Lesion patterns and stoke mechanism in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery disease early diffusion-weighted imaging study. Stroke, 2005, 36(12): 2583-2588.
[5] Kim JM, Jung KH, Sohn CH, et al. Middle cerebral artery plaque and prediction of the infarction pattern. Arch Neurol, 2012, 69(11): 1470-1475.
[6] Peng WJ, Zhan Q, Chen SY, et al. Vulnerability of symptomatic atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery by high-resolution MR imaging. J Pract Radiol, 2015, 31(12): 1931-1936.
彭雯佳, 詹茜, 陳士躍, 等. 高分辨磁共振對(duì)癥狀性大腦中動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化斑塊易損性的研究. 實(shí)用放射學(xué)雜志, 2015, 31(12): 1931-1936.
[7] Kim SM, Ryu CW, Jahng GH, et al. Two different morphologies of chronic unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation using high-resolution MRI. J Neuroimaging, 2014, 24(5): 460-466.
[8] Xu WH, Li ML, Niu JW, et al. Deep tiny fow voids along middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic occlusions: a high-resolution MR imaging study. J Neurol Sci, 2014, 339(1-21): 130-133.
[9] Chen HB, Xu GL, Xiao GD, et al. Effects of sites and mechanisms of midge cerelral artery occlusion on lesion patterns and the national institutes of health stroke scale. International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2008, 16(6):441-446.
陳紅兵, 徐格林, 肖國(guó)棟, 等. 大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞部位和機(jī)制對(duì)腦梗死病灶分布模式和NIHSS評(píng)分的影像. 國(guó)際腦血管病雜志, 2008, 16(6): 441-446.
[10] Saito I, Segawa H, Shiokawa Y, et al. Middle cerebral artery occlusion: correlation of computed tomography and angiography with clinical outcome. Stroke, 1987, 18(5): 863-868.
[11] Ueda S, Fujitsu K, Inomori S, et al. Thrombotic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Stroke, 1992, 23(12): 1781-1766.
[12] Wong KS, Gao S, Chan YL, et al. Mechanisms of acute cerebral infarctions in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis: a diffusion-weighted imaging and microemboli monitoring study. Ann Neurol, 2002, 52(1): 74-81.
[13] Xu WH, Li ML, Niu JW, et al. Luminal thrombosis in middle cerebral artery occlusions: a high resolution MRI study. Ann Transl Med, 2014, 2(8): 75.
[14] Souza LC, Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA, et al. Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2012, 33(7): 1331-1336. [15] Lima FO, Furie KL, Silva GS, et al. The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke, 2010, 41(10): 2316-2322.
[16] Bang OY, Saver JL, Kim SJ, et al. Collateral fow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2011, 42(3): 693-699.
[17] Angermaier A, Langner S, Kirsch M, et al. CT-angiographic collateralization predicts final infarct volume after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2011, 31(2): 177-184.
[18] Kang DW, Latour LL, Chalela JA, et al. Early ischemic lesion recurrence within a week after acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol, 2003, 54(1): 66-74.
Evaluation of the morphological characteristics and infarction pattern of unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging
ZHANG Xue-feng, LIU Qi, CHEN Shi-yue, ZHAN Qian, PENG Wen-jia, CHEN Luguang, TIAN Xia, LU Jian-ping*
Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Objective: To evaluate the two different morphological characteristics and corresponding infarction pattern of unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). Materials and Methods: The data of patients with ischemic stroke in hospital diagnosed as unilateral middle cerebral artery M1 segment occlusion was retrospectively analyzed. HR-MRI and DWI were performed in all patients within 1 week of symptom onset. To observe the morphological characteristics of occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (M1) segment and the cerebral infarction type on the cranial DWI. The patients were divided into plaque formation group and non plaque formation group according to the morphological characteristics of HR-MRI. DWI lesion patterns were classifed as single cerebral infarction, multiple cerebral infarction, and no cerebral infarction (TIA). Results: Forty-four patients were included in the analysis, 30 cases of plaque formation group, while 14 cases of non plaque formation group. There were 16 cases in plaque formation group with the location of occlusion in the proximal of M1 segment, 14 cases in the distal and non plaque formation group in the proximal 13 cases,while 1 case in the distal, there was signifcant difference between the two groups (P=0.025, χ2=4.99), the location of occlusion of plaque formation group was mostly in the proximal. Plaque formation group and non plaque formation group of single cerebral infarction in 11 cases and 5 cases respectively, multiple infarction in 15 cases and 2 cases, no infarction lesion in 4 cases and 7 cases, there were signifcant differences in the types of cerebral infarction between the two groups (P=0.016, χ2=8.29). Infarction pattern in plaque formation was mostly multiple cerebral infarction, but the non plaque group was single cerebral infarction or no cerebral infarction (TIA). Conclusion: HR-MRI has important value in evaluating the morphological characteristics of the lumen of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Whether there is plaque in the lumen of the occlusion or collateral formation around the trunk may be one of the important reasons for different types of cerebral infarction after middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Middle cerebral artery; Magnetic resonance imaging, high resolution; Stroke; Atherosclerosis
國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):31470910);上海市市級(jí)醫(yī)院新興前沿技術(shù)聯(lián)合攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):SHDC12013110);全軍醫(yī)學(xué)科研“十二五”計(jì)劃重點(diǎn)課題(編號(hào):BWS12J026)
第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)附屬長(zhǎng)海醫(yī)院影像醫(yī)學(xué)科,上海 200433
陸建平,E-mail:cjr.lujianping@ vip.163.com
2016-06-10
接受日期:2016-08-01
R445.2;R743.3
A
10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.10.001
張雪鳳, 劉崎, 陳士躍, 等. 高分辨率磁共振評(píng)價(jià)單側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈閉塞管腔形態(tài)特征及腦梗死類(lèi)型. 磁共振成像, 2016, 7(10): 721-726.
*Correspondence to: Lu JP, E-mail: cjr.lujianping@vip.163.com
Received 10 Jun 2016, Accepted 1 Aug 2016
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was part of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31470910); Emerging frontier technology joint research program of Shanghai municipal hospital (No. SHDC12013110); Twelth fve-year plan of medical key project of the People's Liberation Army (No. BWS12J026).