Asymmetric Features for Two Types of ENSO

LI Zhiyu(李智玉), XU Haiming*(徐海明), and ZHANG Wenjun(張文君)

1 Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

2 College of Atmospheric Sciences,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

Asymmetric Features for Two Types of ENSO

LI Zhiyu1,2(李智玉), XU Haiming1,2*(徐海明), and ZHANG Wenjun1,2(張文君)

1 Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

2 College of Atmospheric Sciences,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044

There are two types of ENSO,namely,the eastern Pacific(EP)ENSO that is characterized by the warmest(coldest)SST anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific,and the central Pacific(CP)ENSO whose maximum(minimum)SST anomalies are over the central equatorial Pacific.Asymmetric features of SST anomalies for the EP and CP types of ENSO events and their possible mechanisms were analyzed by using a variety of data during the period 1961–2010.The responses of atmospheric circulation to the two types of ENSO were also discussed.The results showed asymmetric features of SST anomalies in terms of spatial and temporal distributions and intensity.Although the dominant mechanisms differed at both development and decay stages,the oceanic vertical advection played a key role in the asymmetric intensity of the two ENSO events.In addition,both local and remote atmospheric responses showed strong asymmetric signals,which were consistent with the asymmetric distribution of SST anomalies.The asymmetric atmospheric responses in EP-ENSO(CP-ENSO)were similar to those associated with EP-El Ni?no(CP-La Ni?na).The intensity of asymmetric responses related to the EP-ENSO was much stronger than that related to the CP-ENSO.

EP-ENSO,CP-ENSO,air-sea coupled features,asymmetry

1.Introduction

ENSO is the most significant large-scale air-sea interaction in the global climate system,which is also recognized as one of the hopeful means to improve seasonal prediction.Climate scientists and governments around the world concern the ENSO due to its crucial influence on the global climate(van Loon and Madden,1981;Ropelewski and Halpert,1987,1996; Trenberth and Caron,2000).Many studies have illustrated the complexity and diversity of ENSO events (Neelin et al.,1998;Trenberth and Stepaniak,2001; Jin et al.,2003;Bejarano and Jin,2008;Zhang et al.,2009,2012). In the last 20 years,a warming phenomenon different from the conventional El Ni?no occurred frequently over the equatorial Pacific,with its maximum anomalous SST located over the central equatorial Pacific rather than eastern equatorial Pacific(Yeh et al.,2009;Lee and McPhaden,2010).It is known that an El Ni?no event is typically characterized by anomalous warm SST located over the eastern equatorial Pacific while anomalous cold SST is located over the western equatorial Pacific.However,the new type of El Ni?no usually has positive SST anomalies (SSTAs)over the central equatorial Pacific,together with weak warm SSTAs over the eastern equatorial Pacific and negligible cold SSTAs over the western Pacific,which is named as the“dateline El Ni?no,”“El Ni?no Modoki,”“central Pacific El Ni?no”(CP-El Ni?no),or“warm pool El Ni?no,”while the classical El Ni?no is called“conventional El Ni?no,”“eastern Pacific El Ni?no”(EP-El Ni?no),or“cold tongue El Ni?no”(Larkin and Harrison,2005;Ashok et al.,2007;Kao and Yu,2009;Kug et al.,2009;Ren and Jin,2011).

Correspondingly,Kao and Yu(2009)classified La Ni?na events into EP and CP types based on empirical orthogonal function(EOF)analysis.Using the Ni?no3 and Ni?no4 indexes,Yuan and Yan(2013),Wang et al.(2014),and Zhang et al.(2015)also categorized La Ni?na events into two types according to the spatial distribution of SSTAs in their mature phases.In this study,the two types of ENSO are described as EP-El Ni?no(EP-La Ni?na)and CP-El Ni?no(CP-La Ni?na),respectively.Consistently,these two types of ENSO events can be identified by their zonal locations of SSTAs despite of disagreement on their definitions and names.

Though some researchers had doubts about the existence of the new type of El Ni?no,and about the independence of these two types of El Ni?no(Trenberth and Stepaniak,2001;Trenberth et al.,2002;Takahashi et al.,2011;Karnauskas,2013),many studies showed marked differences between these two types in terms of physical mechanisms and climate impacts.For the EP-El Ni?no,its initiation and developing processes are mainly influenced by changes in thermocline and surface winds over the equatorial Pacific.In contrast, the CP-El Ni?no tends to start,develop,and decay over the central equatorial Pacific,as a local air-sea coupling(Kug et al.,2009;Ren et al.,2012).Moreover,air-sea coupled processes of these two types of El Ni?no can impact the global climate via teleconnection patterns,including distinct climate responses in the countries and regions around the Pacific Ocean such as East Asia(Wang et al.,2000;Zhang et al., 2011,2013,2014;Yuan and Song,2012),Southeast Asia(Feng et al.,2010b),America(Weng et al.,2007, 2009;Zhang et al.,2012),South America(Tedeschi et al.,2012),Australia(Taschetto et al.,2010),and even Africa and Europe(Moron and Ward,1998).In addition,the two types of El Ni?no exert influences on the SST over the Indian Ocean(Kao and Yu,2009), the tropical cyclones over the western North Pacific (Chen and Tam,2010)and North Atlantic(Kim et al.,2009),and the storms over the Southern Hemisphere(Ashok et al.,2009).On the other hand,the impacts of the two types of La Ni?na remain uncertain. Some studies argued that the zonal shift of anomalous SST pattern in a cold event is not significant compared to a warm event(Kug et al.,2009;Kug and Ham,2011;Ren and Jin,2011).However,many recent studies suggested that La Ni?na events need to be separated into two types based on their regional dynamics and extratropical teleconnections.In some studies,La Ni?na events can be classified into two types regarding their SST patterns,anomalous ocean current,and dynamic features(Shinoda et al.,2011;Zhang et al., 2015).Meanwhile,other studies found that the two types of La Ni?na are associated with different regional climate responses.For example,both observational and numerical studies have confirmed that the two types of La Ni?na have roughly opposite impacts on the location of tropospheric jet stream and the phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation(NAO)(Wang et al., 2014;Zhang et al.,2015).Also,the two types of La Ni?na events can lead to different anomalous climate states over Australia and Brazil(Cai and Cowan,2009; Tedeschi et al.,2012).It was also found that climatic impacts of the two types of ENSO events are different in their warm and cold phases.With respect to the Australian summer rainfall,Cai et al.(2010)found that the EP-ENSO-rainfall relationship is asymmetric,that is,the southeast Queensland summer rainfall increases with La Ni?na amplitude,while no significant change is found in the El Ni?no-related rainfall.Similarly,an asymmetric rainfall teleconnection pattern also exists in CP-ENSO.As suggested by Karori et al. (2013),the boreal summer rainfall over the Yangtze River valley and South China also shows asymmetric features under the two types of ENSO.Taking summer rainfall over South China for example,it has a significant negative relationship with EP-El Ni?no and a positive relationship with CP-El Ni?no,while it does not correlate with both types of La Ni?na events.Therefore,climatic responses to the two types of ENSO not only are closely related to the ENSO type but also depend on the ENSO phase.

Climate responses to the ENSO are sensitive to the location and intensity of SSTAs.Thus,the response to the warm phase is not opposite of that to the cold phase because of the asymmetry of ENSO; and a La Ni?na even cannot be regarded as an op-

posite event of El Ni?no. In practice,especially in terms of seasonal prediction,treating ENSO as a linear system would lose some important signals.Previous studies have revealed that the El Ni?no events are always stronger than the La Ni?na events(Kang and Kug,2002;An and Jin,2004;Okumura and Deser, 2010),indicative of their asymmetries in amplitude. Furthermore,researchers have explored the asymmetric features between extremely strong and weak ENSO events(Dommenget et al.,2013;Frauen et al.,2014), including their spatial pattern,phase transition,duration,and propagation(Zhang et al.,2009;Dommenget et al.,2013;Yeh et al.,2014),together with their possible causes,such as the nonlinear dynamic heating(An and Jin,2004;Su et al.,2010),the atmospheric nonlinear responses(Kang and Kug,2002), the effect of tropical instability waves(Jochum and Murtugudde,2004),the adjustment of Madden–Julian Oscillation(MJO)(Kessler and Kleeman,2000;Li et al.,2014),and the biological-physical feedback(Timmermann and Jin,2002).

The EP-El Ni?no dominated over the equatorial Pacific prior to the 1990s,while the CP-El Ni?no occurred more frequently in the recent 20 years(Kim et al.,2009;Dou,2011;Zhang et al.,2011,2012,2014; Xu et al.,2012;Yeh et al.,2014).The occurrence of these two types of El Ni?no exhibits significant interdecadal variation,as well as a stronger EP-El Ni?no than CP-El Ni?no.Although many studies focused on the asymmetry of the ENSO,detailed analysis for the asymmetric features related to the two types of ENSO and their possible mechanisms is still needed.In this study,we compare asymmetric atmospheric responses to the two types of ENSO and explore their possible mechanisms,in order to gain a further understanding of the mechanisms of the ENSO events.

2.Data and method

The datasets used in this study are as follows: 1)monthly SST from the extended reconstructed SST (ERSST.V3b;Smith et al.,2008)and monthly precipitation from the precipitation reconstruction(PREC; Chen et al.,2002),for the period of 1961–2010 provided by the NOAA;2)monthly mean 850-hPa wind and 500-hPa geopotential height fields for the same period of 1961–2010 from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis(Kalnay et al.,1996);3)the interpolated outgoing longwave radiation(OLR)for the period from June 1974 to December 2010 from NOAA(Liebmann and Smith,1996);4)oceanic subsurface temperatures (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation,SODA2.0.2-4)for the period of 1961–2007 from the University of Maryland(Carton et al.,2000);5)monthly surface heat fluxes derived from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis for the period of 1961–2007(Kalnay et al.,1996);and 6) monthly mean rainfall at 160 stations for the period of 1961–2010,available from the China Meteorological Administration.

In this study,the winter(DJF)is regarded as the mature period of El Ni?no(La Ni?na)event.Anomalies of each variable are defined as the deviation from the seasonal mean based on the climatology from 1961 to 2010,except for the anomalies of OLR,which are calculated based on the climatology from 1975 to 2010. The heat budget equation diagnosis is based on the data from 1961 to 2007.A composite analysis method is applied to all the variables for the two types of ENSO events.Moreover,taking the sum of El Ni?no and La Ni?na events as the asymmetric component is widely used(e.g.,Okumura and Deser,2010;Wu et al.,2010;Karori et al.,2013),and the Student t-test is used.

At present,there are many indexes defining ENSO events.Previous studies classified these two types of ENSO events by using the EOF method. However,An and Jin(2004)pointed out that this linear method cannot describe the asymmetric features between El Ni?no and La Ni?na events.In addition,some studies utilized Ni?no3 index and El Ni?no Modoki index(EMI)to depict the two types of events. According to Ashok et al. (2007),EMI=1.0TA–0.5TB–0.5TC,where TA,TB,and TCrepresent the area-averaged SSTAs over the regions A(10°S–10°N,165°E–140°W),B(15°S–5°N,110°–70°W),and C(10°S–20°N,125°–145°E),respectively.Zhang et al.(2015)mentioned that despite the fact that the EMI can well characterize CP-El Ni?no,it cannot effec-

tively differentiate the two types of La Ni?na events.By comparing the differences among a variety of ENSO indexes and their capacities to describe the seasonallocking features for these two types of ENSO,Cao (2011)suggested that the Ni?no3 index is the best one to identify the EP events while the Ni?no4 index is much better for identifying the CP events.Motivated by Kug et al.(2009)that proposed the two types of ENSO events be distinguished by comparing Ni?no3 and Ni?no4 indexes together with their relative intensity,Ren and Jin(2011)put forward two new Ni?no indexes in combination with Ni?no3 and Ni?no4 indexes based on a simple linear method,and these two new Ni?no indexes can be used to identify these two types of events,but not suitable for separating the La Ni?na events into two types.Hence,the categorization for these two types of ENSO events,especially for the La Ni?na events,not only relies on Ni?no indexes but also should be combined with SSTA pattern.

Referring to the definitions of the two types of El Ni?no events from Kug et al.(2009),Yeh et al.(2009) and Zhang et al.(2011)and the definitions of the two types of La Ni?na events from Wang et al.(2014)and Zhang et al.(2015),the two types of ENSO events in this study are identified based on the National Climate Prediction Center(NOAA CPC)definition of ENSO events in combination with SSTA pattern in the mature period.First,according to the CPC's definition of El Ni?no and La Ni?na events[considering 3-month running mean Ni?no3.4 index(5°S–5°N,120°–170°W), El Ni?no(La Ni?na)events are identified when the winter SSTAs are higher than(less than)0.5℃ (–0.5℃) for five consecutive months],17 El Ni?no events and 16 La Ni?na events are selected during the period 1961–2010.Second,comparing the absolute values of winter normalized Ni?no3 index(5°S–5°N,150°–90°W)and Ni?no4 index(5°S–5°N,160°E–150°W),respectively. If the Ni?no3 index is greater than the Ni?no4 index, the corresponding event is defined as EP-El Ni?no(or EP-La Ni?na);otherwise,it is referred to CP-El Ni?no (or CP-La Ni?na).According to Wang et al.(2014) and Zhang et al.(2015),three La Ni?na events(i.e., 1970/1971,1999/2000,and 2007/2008)are characterized by westward-propagating negative SSTAs in their peak phases;it is difficult to categorize them in terms of air-sea coupling features.Thus,they are removed from the following composite analysis;the 2008/2009 La Ni?na event is also removed for its short duration. In addition,the 1968/1969 and 1969/1970 events are regarded as one El Ni?no event;so are the 1986/1987 and 1987/1988 events,and the stronger events in 1968/1969 and 1986/1987 are chosen as the representatives of these two processes,respectively.Similarly, the stronger 1975/1976 event is taken as a representative of the long-lasting 1974/1975 and 1975/1976 La Ni?na events.Furthermore,comparing the composite results before and after removing these three events with long durations,it is found that the influences of removing these events on the results are negligible. The selected events for these two types of ENSO are listed in Table 1.The La Ni?na events are consistent with those in Wang et al.(2014)and Zhang et al. (2015);and the El Ni?no events are similar to those in the previous studies despite of some minor differences that do not affect our conclusions.

3.SST anomalies and associated asymmetric features

Figure 1 shows the composite SST anomaly patterns for the two types of ENSO events and their asymmetric features.As mentioned before,at the mature stage of EP-El Nin?o,marked positive SSTAs appear over the eastern equatorial Pacific with maximum SSTAs(greater than +2.0℃)located in the Ni?no3 region,whereas negative SSTAs over the western equatorial Pacific,and subtropical North and South Pacific (Fig.1a).In contrast,negative SSTAs are limited tothe eastern equatorial Pacific near the Ni?no3 region during EP-La Ni?na with a relatively weak intensity (–0.8℃),which is about half of that during El Ni?no. Meanwhile,the warm SSTAs over the western equatorial Pacific are not significant,and anomalous warming only occurs near the west coast of South America(Fig.1c).Therefore,the asymmetric features of EP-ENSO are mainly characterized by the differences between the intensity and location of El Ni?no and La Ni?na,shown as positive SSTAs over the eastern equatorial Pacific extending from the west coast of South America to the east of the dateline along the equator, and the negative anomalies over the western equatorial Pacific,western North Pacific,and the subtropical central South Pacific(Fig.1e).

Table 1.Two types of ENSO events during 1961–2010

Fig.1.Composites of winter mean SSTAs(℃)over the equatorial Pacific during(a)EP-El Ni?no,(b)CP-El Ni?no,(c) EP-La Ni?na,(d)CP-La Ni?na,(e)EP-ENSO(EP-El Ni?no+EP-La Ni?na),and(f)CP-ENSO(CP-El Ni?no+CP-La Ni?na)events.The contour interval is 0.4℃in(a)–(d)and 0.2℃in(e)–(f).The black box indicates the Ni?no3 region in (a)and(c),and the Ni?no4 region in(b)and(d).Shadings from light to dark indicate the 90%,95%,and 99%confidence level,respectively.

Compared with the EP-ENSO,the anomalous SST centers related to the CP-ENSO event shift westward. It can be clearly seen that positive SSTAs shift to the central equatorial Pacific,with maximum SSTAs(greater than+1.2℃)in the Ni?no4 region(Fig. 1b).Meanwhile,the negative SSTAs over the western Pacific are not significant but with an anomalous cooling in the subtropical South Pacific.Like the CP-El Ni?no,the negative SSTA center of CP-La Ni?na also moves westward to the central equatorial Pacific Ocean with a relatively stronger intensity(up to–1.6℃).In addition,significant positive SSTAs appear over the western equatorial Pacific and in the subtropical North and South Pacific,together with the negative SSTAs over the central equatorial Pacific,forming a horseshoe-like pattern in the Pacific similar to the distribution of EP-El Ni?no in the equatorial Pacific(Fig.1d).When CP-El Ni?no and CP-La Ni?na are compared,it is clear that the asymmetric component of the CP-ENSO is mainly characterized by negative SSTAs near the west coast of North and South

America extending westward along the equator,and positive SSTAs in the western North Pacific as well as subtropical central North and South Pacific(Fig.1f). In general,the asymmetric distribution of SST during the EP-ENSO is similar to that during the EP-El Ni?no,while the asymmetric distribution of SST during the CP-ENSO is similar to that during the CP-La Ni?na.

The time-longitude cross-section of SSTAs over the equatorial Pacific are shown in Fig.2.For the EP-El Ni?no event,SSTAs appear in the eastern equatorial Pacific in spring and then propagate westward, but with positive SSTAs first emerge in the central and western equatorial Pacific(near the dateline).Some studies have pointed out that the propagation feature of El Ni?no experienced an abrupt decadal change in the late 1970s,with its propagation direction switching from westward to eastward(Guilyardi,2006;Ren and Jin,2011).Their associated mechanisms,however,are still not well understood.EP-El Ni?no reaches its mature phase in the boreal winter,with its maximum SSTA center near 120°W and significant negative SSTAs over the western Pacific(Fig.2a).Then, it slowly decays in the following spring and its positive SSTAs are even maintained in the late spring and early summer of the next year.The negative SSTAs in the eastern equatorial Pacific for EP-La Ni?na,which is the cold episode of EP-ENSO,are almost opposite to those for El Ni?no.However,the SSTAs propagate westward in the developing and decay stages with short durations.What is more,the early SSTAs signal of EP-La Ni?na appears in the eastern Pacific during the winter, while it ends quickly in the following early spring after the mature stage(Fig.2c).Weak positive SSTAs over the western equatorial Pacific are dominant only in the mature stage.Comparing the warm and cold events during the EP-ENSO,it can be concluded that due to the SST differences between the amplitudes of El Ni?no and La Ni?na,significant positive SSTAs appear in the eastern equatorial Pacific,while negative SSTAs appear in the western equatorial Pacific during the current summer to the following spring.In addition,the notable negative SSTAs over the eastern equatorial Pacific in winter are likely associated with the accumulation of cold water there before the EP-El Ni?no appears(Fig.2e).

Fig. 2. Composites of time-longitude cross-section of SSTAs(℃)over the equatorial Pacific(along 5°S–5°N) during(a)EP-El Ni?no,(b)CP-El Ni?no,(c)EP-La Ni?na, (d)CP-La Ni?na,(e)EP-ENSO(EP-El Ni?no+EP-La Ni?na),and(f)CP-ENSO(CP-El Ni?no+CP-La Ni?na) events.Shadings from light to dark indicate the 90%,95%, and 99%confidence level,respectively.Number 0 in the parentheses denotes the occurrence year,and number 1 denotes the following year.

Different from the EP-El Ni?no,the CP-El Ni?no event usually initiates,develops,and decays locally (Fig.2b),consistent with previous studies(Kao and Yu,2009;Ren et al.,2012;Zhang et al.,2014).During

the CP-El Ni?no,positive SSTAs first appear in the central Pacific(west of the dateline),then spread eastward in autumn and winter,and decay westward in the following spring until reversing its sign in the eastern equatorial Pacific.Meanwhile,the positive SSTAs in the western Pacific extend westward,with the maximum SSTA center limited near the dateline.Similar to the CP-El Ni?no,the CP-La Ni?na event also propagates eastward with its anomalous cold center limited to the central equatorial Pacific,which differs from the EP-La Ni?na.However,it is noticeable that the CPLa Ni?na has a longer duration and stronger intensity compared to the CP-El Ni?no.In addition,its significant cold anomalies over the whole central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean are maintained even in the following summer(Fig.2d),which is confirmed by Fig. 2f.On the one hand,due to the differences between the intensities of CP-El Ni?no and CP-La Ni?na events, the asymmetric features of CP-ENSO are shown as significant negative SSTAs in the central-eastern equatorial Pacific,together with strong positive anomalies in the western equatorial Pacific during its initiation and development periods.On the other hand,the asymmetric component of the CP-ENSO during the decay period is still characterized by remarkable negative SSTAs over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific due to the discrepancy between the persistence of the two events(Fig.2f).

To verify the asymmetry of CP-ENSO in its persistence and intensity,the temporal evolutions of the two types of ENSO events are shown in Fig.3.Standardized Ni?no3 and Ni?no4 indexes are used to represent EP-ENSO and CP-ENSO events,respectively. In comparison,the EP-El Ni?no event persists much longer and even lasts to the following summer,while the EP-La Ni?na event rapidly demises in the early spring of the following year.CP-El Ni?no signal damps in the early summer of the next year,while the CPLa Ni?na signal persists to the following autumn and even winter.In addition,the intensity difference between the two types of ENSO can be clearly seen from Fig.3.The EP-El Ni?no event is much stronger,with its amplitude up to 2 standard deviations,than the EP-La Ni?na event regarding the intensity,while the intensity of EP-La Ni?na is only about half of the EPEl Ni?no(Fig.3a).The intensity of CP-El Ni?no is about 1.5 standard deviations,which is weaker than that of EP-El Ni?no,while the strength of CP-La Ni?na is close to–2 standard deviations(Fig.3b),which is much stronger than that of the EP-La Ni?na or the CP-El Ni?no event.However,the intensity difference of the CP-ENSO is only about 0.5 standard deviations, weaker than that of the EP-ENSO.

4.Heat budget

In this section,we analyze the various dynamical processes of ENSO based on a heat budget equation for mixed layer temperature,and try to understand the possible mechanisms by which the associated SSTA asymmetries for the two types of ENSO are maintained.The heat budget equation(Zhang et

al.,2013)is as follows:

Fig.3.Temporal evolutions of(a)composited normalized Ni?no3 index during EP-ENSO events,and(b)composited normalized Ni?no4 index during CP-ENSO events.Number 0 in the parentheses denotes the occurrence year,and number 1 denotes the following year.

where T,u,v,and w denote the mixed-layer(0–45 m) SST,zonal,meridional,and vertical current velocities,respectively.Subscript c represents the climatology monthly mean,and subscript a denotes anomalies with respect to the climatology;Qarepresents anomalous net sea surface heat flux,including longwave and shortwave radiation,latent and sensible heat fluxes;ρ0and cpindicate the density and heat capacity of seawater,respectively;H is the mixed layer depth;R is the residual term,including small-scale processes and dissipation.We only consider the effect of lower-layer ocean temperature on the upper-layer ocean temperature here.Therefore,the function H(w)=1 for w＞0 and H(w)=0 for w＜0.

Fig.4.Composites of total SST tendency(DTA;blue) and its SST tendency(℃ month?1)component by zonal advection(UATC;green),meridional advection(VCTA; red),vertical advection(WCTA;orange),and net flux (FLUX;purple)for(a)EP-El Ni?no,(b)EP-La Ni?na,and (c)EP-ENSO(EP-El Ni?no+EP-La Ni?na),averaged over 3°S–3°N,150°–90°W.

As shown in Fig. 4a,zonal advection UATC and vertical advection WCTA play major roles in the growth and decay of EP-El Ni?no over the eastern equatorial Pacific,which is consistent with Kug et al. (2010).In the development stage,vertical advection determined by mean upwelling and anomalous temperature gradient is relatively large,suggesting that the thermocline feedback mechanism is more important in the development process of EP-El Ni?no than zonal advection.Zonal advection,vertical advection, and other terms reverse their signs from positive to negative during the decay stage,accompanied by EPEl Ni?no strong discharge process and reversed zonallyaveraged heat content.In addition,heat flux(FLUX) remains negative in the evolution,indicating dissipative effect on positive SSTAs in EP-El Ni?no development process.However,FLUX does not contribute to the negligible magnitude in the decay stage.It is noticeable that the values of meridional advection (VCTA)in the processes of development and decay are relatively large.Suggested by Zhang et al.(2009, 2013),the development and termination of VCTA are in phase with those of the SSTAs.As a result,VCTA

may not play a major role in the growth and decay of ENSO as zonal and vertical advection terms do,and it mainly acts to spread SSTAs poleward through meridional advection.Therefore,VCTA is no use for the corresponding SSTA growth despite of its large value. For this reason,no detailed analysis of VCTA is given further in this paper.

By comparison,the terms in EP-La Ni?na are almost the same as those in EP-El Ni?no,but with opposite signs.Zonal and vertical advection terms still dominate the development and decay stages,while heat flux tends to become weak from the development to the decay stages.Nevertheless,the terms in EP-La Ni?na event are relatively weak,especially in the development stage,with only half of those in EP-El Ni?no event in terms of magnitude.Meanwhile,zonal advection is relatively crucial during the development and decay stages,which contributes to the phase transition.Interestingly,all the terms are weak during the development stage but become stronger during the decay stage,suggesting that an EP-La Ni?na event grows slowly but decays fast,which is consistent with Fig. 3a in terms of asymmetric features in temporal revolution.However,EP-El Ni?no is almost symmetry during its evolution(Fig.4b).

As for the EP-ENSO asymmetric component(Fig. 4c),the magnitudes of terms tend to decrease from development to termination,except for zonal advection. In addition,the signs of terms in asymmetry component are generally consistent with those in EP-El Ni?no. For example,both vertical and zonal advections significantly contribute to the evolution of ENSO,but the former is much stronger.Therefore,the asymmetric EP-El Ni?no-like distribution of SSTAs for the EP-ENSO is mainly attributed to the strong vertical and zonal advections in the temporal evolution,especially for the vertical advection of EP-El Ni?no event.

Fig.5.As in Fig.4,but for(a)CP-El Ni?no,(b)CPLa Ni?na,and(c)CP-ENSO(CP-El Ni?no+CP-La Ni?na), averaged over 3°S–3°N,160°E–150°W.

In contrast with the EP-El Ni?no event,the dynamic processes of CP-El Ni?no are much weaker with only half of the intensity of EP-El Ni?no,leading to a relatively weaker signal of SSTAs during the peak stage(Fig. 5a). The dynamic feedbacks of their growth and termination are also different.For example,zonal advection dominates the whole process of CP-El Ni?no,while vertical advection is relatively weak (even close to zero in the decay stage).It is revealed that zonal advection plays a more important role in the CP-El Ni?no's evolution instead of vertical advection(Kug et al.,2010).In general,the thermocline in the central equatorial Pacific is deeper than that in eastern equatorial Pacific,resulting in insensitive response of subsurface temperature to the change in thermocline.Therefore,changes in wind and pressure lead to weak anomalous temperature over the central equatorial Pacific.On the other hand,the temperature gradient over the central equatorial Pacific (the transition region of eastern and western Pacific) is quite strong,and eastward ocean current anomaly caused by anomalous pressure field enhances the warm water transport from the western Pacific to the central Pacific,leading to a large increase in SST.When the CP-El Ni?no demises,the discharge process is weak due to the deep thermocline over the central equatorial

Pacific.As a result,vertical advection is almost zero and the phase transition of SST is mainly attributed to zonal advection.Note that heat flux also contributes to the termination of ENSO.

Correspondingly,the sign of each term is reversed in the CP-La Ni?na event,and the magnitude increases, especially in the development stage. Unlike CP-El Ni?no,vertical advection is relatively large compared to zonal advection during the developing stage of CPLa Ni?na,which is similar to that of EP-El Ni?no.During the decay stage,vertical and zonal advections are comparable in magnitude(Fig.5b).On the other hand,heat flux is almost unchanged in both development and decay stages.Heat flux is out-of-phase with the general trend of SSTAs during the development stage,which acts to damp SSTAs,while it is in-phase with the observed SST tendency in the decay stage to enhance SST warming.Interestingly,due to the asymmetry of the amplitudes of SST trend between the development and decay stages,negative SSTAs require more time to disappear,resulting in a longer duration of CP-La Ni?na event(Fig.3b).

Comparing the warm and cold events of CPENSO,it is clear that the magnitude of the asymmetric component for CP-ENSO is quite small.What is more,the sign of each term is in accordance with that of CP-La Ni?na,indicating that CP-ENSO asymmetric pattern of SSTAs is similar to CP-La Ni?na asymmetric pattern.However,it should be pointed out that the asymmetry in the intensity of CP-ENSO varies with time just like the EP-ENSO but with smaller amplitude,that is,the event is strong in the development stage but weak in the following stage.As vertical advection dominates the whole asymmetric evolution (Fig.5c),the intensity asymmetry of CP-ENSO can be attributed to vertical advection as well.

As mentioned before,the marine vertical advection is relatively strong in EP-El Ni?no and CP-La Ni?na events,which is probably related to their background conditions.When an EP-El Ni?no event happens,the warm water propagates eastward and the shallow thermocline deepens over the eastern Pacific;thus,strong vertical motion favors the growth of EP-El Ni?no event. When an EP-La Ni?na occurs,the thermocline is faintly shoaled due to the shallow thermocline over the eastern equatorial Pacific. Therefore,the change is so diminutive that the marine vertical advection is relatively weak.Similarly,the thermocline over the central equatorial Pacific is much deeper than that over the eastern Pacific.Thus,the deepened thermocline caused by warm water is negligible in the CP-El Ni?no event,together with weaker vertical motion,while the thermocline tends to shoal remarkably over the central equatorial Pacific during the CP-La Ni?na.Therefore, the enhanced vertical advection results in stronger CPLa Ni?na compared to CP-El Ni?no.

5.Asymmetric atmospheric responses

How does the atmosphere respond to the SST asymmetry for the two types of ENSO?The issue will be discussed in this section.

5.1Atmospheric responses in the equatorial Pacific Ocean

To examine the atmospheric responses in the equatorial Pacific Ocean,the distributions of winter mean OLR anomalies over the equatorial Pacific for the two types of ENSO are shown in Fig.6.During EP-El Ni?no event,OLR anomalies show a significant dipole pattern as enhanced convection over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific near 170°W and suppressed convection over the western equatorial Pacific and subtropical North Pacific(Fig.6a).The spatial distribution of anomalous OLR in EP-La Ni?na event is in accordance with that in EP-El Ni?no but with the opposite signs,shown as suppressed convection over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific but enhanced convection over the western equatorial Pacific, despite of slightly westward-shifted convective centers toward 180°with only half of the amplitude for EP-El Ni?no event.Nevertheless,no relevant negative OLR anomalies occur over the subtropical North Pacific(Fig.6c).In general,the asymmetric responses of tropical convection in EP-ENSO correspond to the asymmetric SSTAs,which is similar to the distribution in EP-El Ni?no but with the signals disappearing over the western equatorial Pacific.The asymmetric responses are mainly characterized by suppressed con-

vection over subtropical central North and South Pacific and Southeast Pacific,and enhanced convection over the central-eastern Pacific extending northeastward to the south of North America,with the asymmetric convection centers moving eastward to near 150°W(Fig.6e).

Fig.6.Composites of winter mean OLR anomalies(W m?2)over the equatorial Pacific during(a)EP-El Ni?no,(b) CP-El Ni?no,(c)EP-La Ni?na,(d)CP-La Ni?na,(e)EP-ENSO(EP-El Ni?no+EP-La Ni?na),and(f)CP-ENSO(CP-El Ni?no+CP-La Ni?na)events.The contour interval is 5 W m?2in(a)–(e)and 4 W m?2in(f).Shadings from light to dark indicate the 90%,95%,and 99%confidence level,respectively.

It is quite obvious that anomalous OLR in CPEl Ni?no is weaker than that in EP-El Ni?no,and the relevant enhanced convection moves westward along with the SSTAs(Kug et al.,2009).Different from the EP type,an anomalous tripole pattern shows enhanced convection near the dateline and suppressed convection over the eastern equatorial Pacific and over a wide region extending from the western equatorial Pacific to the subtropical central North and South Pacific(Fig.6b).As for the cold event,suppressed convection in CP-La Ni?na is also located near the dateline,and enhanced convective activities appear over the western equatorial Pacific and subtropical central South Pacific.However,the tripole pattern of anomalous OLR in CP-La Ni?na is not significant,especially in the eastern equatorial Pacific,with an enhanced convection center east of 150°W over the subtropical North Pacific(Fig.6d).Therefore,the asymmetric distribution of anomalous OLR in CP-ENSO is not similar to that in CP-La Ni?na.Only one suppression center occurs over the western equatorial Pacific,and the asymmetric response is relatively weak in the central equatorial Pacific.Moreover,weak negative OLR anomaly appears in the subtropical central South Pacific,together with a northwest-southeast“–+–”spatial pattern over the eastern equatorial Pacific(Fig. 6f).Note that the convection responses to EP-El Ni?no and CP-El Ni?no are quite similar near the dateline.In addition,the locations of anomalous positive centers in the central equatorial Pacific for the two types of La Ni?na events are more similar,resulting in similar patterns of anomalous precipitation along the equator for the two types of La Ni?na events(Yuan and Yan, 2013;Yeh et al.,2014),which makes it difficult to distinguish one from the other.

Anomalous SST related to ENSO causes atmospheric circulation responses via anomalous convections,leading to different tropical atmospheric responses.In terms of EP-El Ni?no-related SST changes, anomalous sea level pressure(SLP)shows a clear seesaw pattern,shown as decreased pressure in the eastern equatorial Pacific and increased pressure in the western equatorial Pacific.Meanwhile,the westerly prevails over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific

while the easterly prevails over the western Pacific.As a result,anomalous airflow tends to converge and ascend over the eastern equatorial Pacific,but tends to diverge and sink over the western equatorial Pacific, forming a strong anticyclone over the region to the east of the Philippines,that is,the Philippines anticyclone(Fig.7a).Numerous studies have confirmed that the Philippines anticyclone contributes notably to the climate in East Asia(Zhang et al.,1996;Wang et al.,2000;Feng et al.,2010a;Zhang et al.,2011;Yuan and Song,2012).In addition,the ascending motion of anomalous Walker circulation is strong and wide over the eastern equatorial Pacific,extending from 120°W to the dateline,in response to the remarkable warming there,while the descending motion is confined over the western Pacific between 120°and 150°E(Fig.8a).On the contrary,EP-La Ni?na generally exhibits symmetric configuration in low-level circulation with EP-El Ni?no, including low pressure in the western equatorial Pacific with easterly wind anomaly over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific and westerly wind anomaly over the western Pacific,and the anomalous cyclone near the Philippines,together with the anti-Walker circulation anomalies over the equatorial Pacific.However,there are still asymmetries in space and intensity,such as the non-significant positive pressure anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific,which are weaker than those in EP-El Ni?no.In addition,the anomalous easterly wind is weak and shiftes westward,resulting in the Philippines cyclone to shift westward(Fig.7c)and weaken descending branch of the anomalous Walker circulation(Fig. 8c),which is consistent with Wu et al.(2010).Since the warm event is strong,the asymmetric component of EP-ENSO shares many features with that of EP-El Ni?no regarding pressure and wind,except for the positive pressure anomaly center over the western equatorial Pacific turning into north and south parts(Fig.7e).The asymmetric ascending is mainly located at the middle troposphere near the eastern equatorial Pacific between 150°and 120°W, and the descending branch occurs in the upper troposphere extending from 120°to 150°E(Fig.8e).

Fig.8.As in Fig.6,but for the streamline(m s )of anomalous Walker circulation(averaged over 5S–5N).The anomalous vertical velocity has been multiplied by a factor of–50 for convenience.

Anomalous SST and its associated enhanced convection are shifted westward in CP-El Ni?no compared to those in EP-El Ni?no.Thus,the related SLP and wind fields also show some distinct changes.The SLP anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific are not significant and the negative SLP anomalies move to the middle of the subtropical South Pacific.In addition, the easterly wind anomaly appears over the eastern and western equatorial Pacific,while westerly wind anomaly is limited to the central equatorial Pacific. What is more,the Philippines anticyclone moves to 10°N,120°E with a reduced scope and intensity,leading to different climate impacts from those in EPEl Ni?no(Fig. 7b). The ascending branch of the anomalous Walker circulation is mainly located near 180°while the descending one is located at 120°E over the western equatorial Pacific in the upper troposphere,which is weaker than that in EP-El Ni?no. Note that the weak descending motion in the lower troposphere east of 90°W over the eastern equatorial Pacific does not pass the t-test(Fig.8b).CP-La Ni?na shows symmetry with CP-El Ni?no,including the

opposite phase of SLP,the westward displacement of anomalous SLP center and the reversed Walker circulation anomalies over the equatorial ocean.Nevertheless,there are also asymmetries in space and amplitude.In terms of SLP,CP-La Ni?na is out-of-phase with EP-El Ni?no,characterized by increased pressure in the eastern equatorial Pacific and decreased pressure in the western equatorial Pacific;these opposite patterns are possibly linked to their strong signals. As for the low-level winds,stronger and wider easterly wind anomaly along the equator even extends to the west of 150°E in CP-La Ni?na compared to CP-El Ni?no,which further converges with the westerly wind anomaly from the western equatorial Pacific over the maritime continent.Meanwhile,the Philippines cyclone shifts slightly northward compared to that in CP-El Ni?no(Fig.7d).On the other hand, the descending motion of the anomalous Walker circulation dominates the central-eastern equatorial Pacific between 180°and 120°W while the ascending motion dominates over the eastern and western equatorial Pacific,forming two anomalous Walker circulations over the equatorial ocean.Although the spatial differences between warm and cold events of CPENSO are significant,CP-ENSO does not show dominant asymmetric features in the equatorial wind and SLP fields due to their little differences in intensity. The most notably asymmetric features include positive pressure anomalies and related anticyclone circulation in North Pacific near 30°N,150°W and weak easterly wind anomaly over the central equatorial Pacific(Fig.7f).In addition,the asymmetric responses of anomalous Walker circulation are characterized by the anomalous descending motion in the lower troposphere over the central equatorial Pacific near 180°and in the upper troposphere over the eastern Pacific near 120°W,and the weak anomalous ascending motion in the upper troposphere near 70°W.As such,the responses in the western equatorial Pacific disappear. Overall,the asymmetric pattern of CP-ENSO is still similar to the pattern of CP-La Ni?na(Fig.8f).Thus, local atmospheric responses to the two types of ENSO show strong asymmetric signals in intensity,which is consistent with the asymmetric distribution of SSTAs. Generally,local convective activities are enhanced due to the strong tropical SST warming,leading to asymmetric intensity in local atmospheric responses.

5.2 Atmospheric responses in the extratropical Pacific Ocean

Tropical heating not only causes local atmospheric responses but also forces atmospheric circulation outside the tropics through teleconnection,affecting the weather and climate in the high latitudes(Hoskins and Karoly,1981;Wallace and Gutzler,1981).A strong tropical heating would cause an intense extratropical response;thus,the asymmetric response in the extratropics is similar to that in the tropics.However,when energy spreads outside of the tropics,local responses may be affected by local circulation,especially strong nonlinear wave-current interaction in the midlatitudes;however,the related physical mechanism has not yet been well understood. This mechanism is beyond the scope of this article and is not studied further.When the ENSO happens, the most obvious signals of extratropical atmospheric responses occur over North Pacific and its surrounding areas;thus,the responses over this region are discussed.Atmospheric responses in the Northern Hemisphere during EP-El Ni?no is shown as decreased SLP in the mid-low latitudes over North Pacific and southeastern United State,together with increased pressure over western Canada,which is the positive phase of the Pacific-North America(PNA)teleconnection pattern.This spatial pattern is a quasi-barotropical structure and associated with an anomalous wave train in the middle troposphere(Fig.9a).Correspondingly,EP-La Ni?na shows a negative phase of the PNA but with a relatively weak signal,including a significant positive geopotential height anomaly located at 45°N over North Pacific(Wang et al.,2014),together with weak negative anomalies over western Canada and weak positive anomalies over southeastern United States(Fig.9c).In general,asymmetric teleconnection pattern of EP-ENSO is similar to that of EP-El Ni?no,except for negligible anomaly centers over western Canada and the central North Pacific.Meanwhile, a negative geopotential height anomaly center occurs

in the high latitudes over East Asia and a positive one over Southeast Japan;and negative anomalies extend from the northwest of North America to southwestern United States(Fig.9e).

Similar to EP-El Ni?no,CP-El Ni?no is also related to the PNA positive phase but with non-significant negative anomalies over the central North Pacific.Interestingly,atmospheric responses over North America and North Atlantic tend to shift northward compared to those in EP-El Ni?no;for example,the positive anomaly center over Canada moves north to 65°N (Fig.9b).Ashok et al.(2007)suggested that the northward shift of positive anomalies over Canada might be related to the adjustment of subtropical and sub-polar jet streams induced by CP-El Ni?no.Comparing to CP-El Ni?no,CP-La Ni?na accompanies with a remarkable negative PNA pattern.However,atmospheric responses to CP-La Ni?na are much stronger:a significantly southward-shifted positive anomaly center is located over North Pacific,together with an eastward-shifted negative anomaly center over Canada (Fig.9d).Thus,under the influence of the asymmetric intensity of SSTAs in CP-ENSO,the differences between the warm and cold phases of CP-ENSO are shown as a positive anomaly center over the central North Pacific and two negative anomaly centers to the south and north,respectively,which are similar to those in CP-La Ni?na.It is noticeable that the positive anomaly center in the high latitudes over North America corresponds to that in CP-El Ni?no,which may be part of local responses(Fig.9f).

To further explore the influence of the asymmetry of the two types of ENSO on the extratropical region,composites of winter mean precipitation anomalies over North Pacific and its surrounding land are shown in Fig.10.It can be seen that negative precipitation anomalies in the western equatorial Pacific extend northeastward to thecentralNorth Pacific,resulting in reduced precipitation over a larger region in the EP-El Ni?no.Moreover,precipitation is increased over Northwest Pacific and southern North America,while deficient precipitation is found along the Okhotsk coast and over central North America and northern South America(Fig.10a).Correspondingly,EP-La Ni?na symmetrically leads to positive precipitation anomalies in a small region over the central North Pacific and significant negative precipitation anomalies in Northwest Pacific.However,pre-

cipitation anomalies along the Okhotsk coast remain negative during EP-La Ni?na,and precipitation anomalies over North American continent exhibit the northsouth“–+–”pattern(Fig.10c).Hence,the asymmetric extratropical rainfall of EP-ENSO mainly has the meridional“–+–”pattern over North Pacific,the negative anomalies along the Okhotsk coast,and also deficient precipitation over northern North America and northern South America,but excessive precipitation over central and southern North America(Fig. 10e).

Different from the EP-El Ni?no event,CP-El Ni?norelated anomalous precipitation is relatively weak over a small region,with the maximum values concentrated over the equator.In addition,the spatial pattern of precipitation anomalies over North Pacific and its adjacent land is similar to that in EP-El Ni?no,including reduced precipitation over the central North Pacific and northern South America,while increased rainfall over Northwest Pacific.However,negative precipitation anomalies are more dispersed in the central North Pacific.What is more,precipitation is also decreased over western Canada under the influence of CP-El Ni?no(Fig.10b).On the other hand,the distribution of anomalous precipitation of CP-La Ni?na is similar to that of CP-El Ni?no,including increased precipitation in the central North Pacific and northern South America,and reduced rainfall in Northwest Pacific.Nevertheless,responses of precipitation are more significant over the central North Pacific and North America,especially in southern North America where precipitation is significantly reduced,and the impact is relatively weak over East Asia(Fig. 10d).Overall,the asymmetric precipitation distribution of CP-ENSO shows the north-south“+–”structure over North Pacific,which is similar to that of CPLa Ni?na and is opposite to that of EP-ENSO(Fig. 10f).In addition,deficient precipitation dominates East Asian and North American continents,especially in the Sea of Okhotsk and in northwestern and southwestern North America.

Fig.10.As in Fig.6,but for precipitation anomalies(mm day?1).

To examine asymmetric responses to the two types of ENSO in detail,Fig.11 shows the spatial distributions of anomalous precipitation in China.Affected by two different circulation patterns of ENSO, especially by the anomalous Philippines anticyclone (cyclone)over Northwest Pacific,distinct patterns of anomalous precipitation appear over China.In the EP-El Ni?no event,the southwesterly wind anomaly from the anomalous anticyclone to the east of the

Philippines dominates South China,whereas Northeast China and the Hetao area(located in the upper reaches of the Yellow River)are controlled by anomalous northerly wind(Fig.7a).As a result,precipitation is increased in South China and is reduced in the Hetao area and Northeast China during winter.When EP-La Ni?na occurs,anomalous easterly wind is weakened over China,together with the southwestwardshifted Philippines cyclone(Fig.7c).Thus,the impact of EP-La Ni?na on winter precipitation is not significant,and only weak negative anomalies occur in Southwest China(Fig.11c).As concluded before,the asymmetric component of EP-ENSO isthesame as that of EP-El Ni?no regarding wind and pressure (Fig.7e).Thus,winter precipitation responses to the asymmetry of EP-ENSO are characterized by negative anomalies in Central and Northeast China and positive anomalies in South China,which are consistent with that of EP-El Ni?no(Fig.11e).

Fig.11.As in Fig.6,but for precipitation anomalies(mm)over China.Shadings from light to dark indicate the 80%, 90%,and 95%confidence level,respectively.

It is noticeable that the Philippines anticyclone in the CP-El Ni?no event moves to 10°N,120°E,compared pared to that moves to 12°N,135°E,in the EP-El Ni?no

event.Although the range is smaller and the intensity is much weaker,the southwesterly wind anomaly along the anomalous anticyclone still dominates East China(Fig.7b),resulting in significantly increased precipitation there(Fig.11b).When CP-La Ni?na occurs,the Philippines cyclone is slightly shifted northward and anomalous northwesterly wind prevails over Northeast and Southwest China(Fig.7d),reducing precipitation over Southwest,North,and Northeast China(Fig.11d).As mentioned before,asymmetric features of CP-ENSO over the equatorial region are similar to those of CP-La Ni?na but are not significant(Fig.7f).However,asymmetric responses of winter precipitation to CP-ENSO are shown as positive anomalies in East China and negative anomalies in North and Northeast China(Fig.11f),which is closer to those in CP-El Ni?no.Thus,the impact of the ENSO events on precipitation over China remains complex. Note that the conclusions in this study are qualitatively consistent with those in previous studies(Weng et al.,2007;Feng et al.,2010b;Yuan and Yan,2013), except for some different responses in South China, which may be related to a different period chosen in this study.Previous studies focused on the period after 1979,while this study focuses on the ENSO events during 1961–2010;therefore,there are more samples used in this study.Moreover,it can also be seen that the relationship between ENSO and East Asian climate is quite complex.

6.Conclusions

Based on monthly mean SST,precipitation reconstruction,outgoing longwave radiation from NOAA, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis,and SODA products during 1961–2010,the spatial distributions of SSTAs and their associated asymmetric features for the EP and CP types of ENSO events were analyzed.Each dynamic process was diagnosed via the heat budget equation,in order to explore possible mechanisms for the asymmetry of SSTAs in the two types of ENSO.Moreover,atmospheric responses to the asymmetry for the two types of ENSO events were examined.The conclusions are as follows:

(1)The SSTAs of the two types of ENSO exhibit asymmetric features in space and time and in intensity. The EP-El Ni?no(CP-La Ni?na)shows a stronger asymmetry of intensity than EP-La Ni?na(CP-El Ni?no)in an EP-ENSO(CP-ENSO)event.In terms of temporal asymmetric features,the EP-El Ni?no(CP-La Ni?na)is characterized by a longer duration than EP-La Ni?na (CP-El Ni?no).The cold anomalies in the CP-La Ni?na event even last to the following autumn.

(2)The two types of El Ni?no events are primarily maintained by two feedback mechanisms in the development and decay stages.Generally,the thermocline feedback plays a dominant role in EP-El Ni?no,while the zonal advection feedback is more important in CPEl Ni?no.The dynamic mechanisms are more complex in the two types of La Ni?na events.EP-La Ni?na develops slowly but decays fast,which is crucially affected by the zonal advection feedback during its evolution. However,vertical advection is slightly stronger in the development stage of CP-La Ni?na,while both vertical and zonal advections are fairly important in the decay stage.Although the dominant mechanisms vary in the development and decay stages for the two types of events,oceanic vertical advection plays a key role in the asymmetry of anomalous SST.

(3)Due to asymmetries in space and amplitude between cold and warm events for the two types of ENSO,both local atmospheric responses directly forced by SSTAs and remote responses forced via teleconnection show strong asymmetry,which is consistent with the asymmetric distribution of SSTAs,that is,the asymmetric distributions of atmospheric responses in EP-ENSO(CP-ENSO)are similar to those associated with EP-El Ni?no(CP-La Ni?na).What is more,the intensity of EP-ENSO-related asymmetric responses is much stronger than that of CP-ENSO-related asymmetric responses.

Asymmetric features for the two types of ENSO were compared in this study. The results showed that the asymmetric distributions of SSTAs for the two types of ENSO led to asymmetric atmospheric responses,bringing out different climatic impacts over neighboring countries and Pacific.However,global climatic impacts caused by asymmetry for the two types

of ENSO events have not been fully investigated. Considering that the two types of ENSO events are reacted as symmetric systems in forecast models,we need to study the asymmetric features for the two types of ENSO to improve the prediction of ENSO. As a result,more studies are required to understand the climatic impacts of the asymmetry for the two types of ENSO events.

An,S.-I.,and F.-F.Jin,2004:Nonlinearity and asymmetry of ENSO.J.Climate,17,2399–2412.

Ashok,K.,S.K.Behera,S.A.Rao,et al.,2007:El Ni?no Modoki and its possible teleconnection.J.Geophys. Res.,112,C11007.

Ashok,K.,C.-Y.Tam,and W.-J.Lee,2009:ENSO Modoki impact on the Southern Hemisphere storm track activity during extended austral winter.Geophys.Res.Lett.,36,L12705.

Bejarano,L.,and F.-F.Jin,2008:Coexistence of equatorial coupled modes of ENSO.J.Climate,21,3051–3067.

Cai,W.J.,and T.Cowan,2009:La Ni?na Modoki impacts Australian autumn rainfall variability.Geophys.Res.Lett.,36,L12805.

Cai,W.J.,P.V.Rensch,T.Cowan,et al.,2010:Asymmetry in ENSO teleconnection with regional rainfall, its multidecadal variability,and impact.J.Climate, 23,4944–4955.

Cao Lu,2011:Two types of ENSO and atmospheric circulation responses.M.S.dissertation,Dept.of Atmospheric Sciences,Nanjing University,China, 64 pp.(in Chinese)

Carton,J.A.,G.Chepurin,and X.H.Cao,2000:A simple ocean data assimilation analysis of the global upper ocean 1950–95.Part II:Results.J.Phys. Oceanogr.,30,311–326.

Chen,G.H.,and C.-Y.Tam,2010:Different impacts of two kinds of Pacific Ocean warming on tropical cyclone frequency over the western North Pacific.J. Geophys.Res.,37,L01803.

Chen,M.Y.,P.P.Xie,J.E.Janowiak,et al.,2002: Global land precipitation:A 50-yr monthly analysis based on gauge observations.J.Hydrometeor.,3, 249–266.

Dommenget,D.,T.Bayr,and C.Frauen,2013:Analysis of the non-linearity in the pattern and time evolution of El Ni?no Southern Oscillation.Climate Dyn., 40,2825–2847.

Dou Jingjing,2011:The difference between impacts of El Ni?no Modoki and El Ni?no on atmosphere circulation.Proceeding of the 28th Chinese Meteorological Society Annual Meeting.Xiamen,Fujian,November,Chinese Meteorological Society,67–82.

Feng,J.,W.Chen,C.-Y.Tam,et al.,2010a:Different impacts of El Ni?no and El Ni?no Modoki on China rainfall in the decaying phases.Int.J.Climatol., 31,2091–2101,doi:10.1002/joc.2217.

Feng,J.,L.Wang,W.Chen,et al.,2010b:Different impacts of two types of Pacific Ocean warming on Southeast Asian rainfall during boreal winter.J. Geophys.Res.,115,D24122.

Frauen,C.,D.Dommenget,and N.Tyrrell,2014:Analysis of the nonlinearity of El Ni?no-Southern Oscillation teleconnections.J.Climate,27,6225–6244.

Guilyardi,E.,2006:El Ni?no-mean state-seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Climate Dyn.,26,329–348.

Hoskins,B.J.,and D.J.Karoly,1981:The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing.J.Atmos.Sci.,38,1179–1196.

Jin,F.-F.,J.-S.Kug,S.-I.An,et al.,2003:A near-annual coupled ocean-atmosphere mode in the equatorial Pacific Ocean.Geophys.Res.Lett.,30,1080,doi: 10.1029/2002GL015983.

Jochum,M.,and R.Murtugudde,2004:Internal variability of the tropical Pacific Ocean.Geophys.Res. Lett.,31,L14309.

Kalnay,E.,M.Kanamitsu,R.Kistler,et al.,1996:The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer.Meteor.Soc.,77,437–471.

Kang,I.-S.,and J.-S.Kug,2002:El Ni?no and La Ni?na sea surface temperature anomalies:Asymmetry characteristics associated with their wind stress anomalies. J.Geophys.Res.,107,4372.

Kao,H.-Y.,and J.-Y.Yu,2009:Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO.J.Climate,22,615–632.

Karnauskas,K.B.,2013:Can we distinguish canonical El Ni?no from Modoki?Geophys.Res.Lett.,40, 5246–5251.

Karori,M.A.,J.P.Li,and F.-F.Jin,2013:The asymmetric influence of the two types of El Ni?no and La

Ni?na on summer rainfall over Southeast China.J. Climate,26,4567–4582.

Kessler,W.S.,and R.Kleeman,2000:Rectification of the Madden-Julian Oscillation into the ENSO cycle. J.Climate,13,3560–3575.

Kim,H.-M.,P.J.Webster,and J.A.Curry,2009:Impact of shifting patterns of Pacific Ocean warming on North Atlantic tropical cyclones.Science,325, 77–80.

Kug,J.-S.,F.-F.Jin,and S.-I.An,2009:Two types of El Ni?no events:Cold tongue El Ni?no and warm pool El Ni?no.J.Climate,22,1499–1515.

Kug,J.-S.,J.Choi,S.-I.An,et al.,2010:Warm pool and cold tongue El Ni?no events as simulated by the GFDL 2.1 coupled GCM.J.Climate,23,1226–1239.

Kug,J.-S.,and Y.-G.Ham,2011:Are there two types of La Ni?na events?Geophys.Res.Lett.,38,L16704, doi:10.1029/2011GL048237.

Larkin,N.K.,and D.E.Harrison,2005:Global seasonal temperature and precipitation anomalies during El Ni?no autumn and winter.Geophys.Res.Lett.,32, L16705,doi:10.1029/2005GL022860.

Lee,T.,and M.J.McPhaden,2010:Increasing intensity of El Ni?no in the central-equatorial Pacific.Geophys. Res.Lett.,37,L14603,doi:10.1029/2010GL044007.

Li Chongyin,Lin Jian,Song Jie,et al.,2014:Research progress in China on the tropical atmospheric intraseasonal oscillation.J.Meteor.Res.,28,671–692.

Liebmann,B.,and C.A.Smith,1996:Description of a complete(interpolated)outgoing longwave radiation dataset.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,77,1275–1277.

Moron,V.,and M.N.Ward,1998:ENSO teleconnections with climate variability in the European and African sectors.Weather,53,287–295.

Neelin,J.D.,D.S.Battisti,A.C.Hirst,et al.,1998: ENSO theory.J.Geophys.Res.,103,14261–14290.

Okumura,Y.M.,and C.Deser,2010:Asymmetry in the duration of El Ni?no and La Ni?na.J.Climate,23, 5826–5843.

Ren,H.-L.,and F.-F.Jin,2011:Ni?no indices for two types of ENSO.Geophys.Res.Lett.,38,L04704.

Ren Fumin,Yuan Yuan,Sun Chenghu,et al.,2012:Review of progress of ENSO studies in the past three decades.Adv.Meteor.Sci.Technol.,2,17–24.

Ropelewski,C.F.,and M.S.Halpert,1987:Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Ni?no/Southern Oscillation.Mon.Wea.Rev., 115,1606–1626.

Ropelewski,C.F.,and M.S.Halpert,1996:Quantifying Southern Oscillation-precipitation relationships.J. Climate,9,1043–1059.

Shinoda,T.,H.E.Hurlburt,E.J.Metzger,et al.,2011: Anomalous tropical ocean circulation associated with La Ni?na Modoki. J.Geophys. Res.,116, C12001.

Smith,T.M.,R.W.Reynolds,T.C.Peterson,et al., 2008:Improvements to NOAA's historical merged land-ocean surfacetemperatureanalysis(1880–2006).J.Climate,21,2283–2296.

Su,J.Z.,R.H.Zhang,T.Li,et al.,2010:Causes of the El Ni?no and La Ni?na amplitude asymmetry in the equatorial eastern Pacific.J.Climate,23,605–617.

Takahashi,K.,A.Montecinos,K.Goubanova,et al., 2011:ENSO regimes:Reinterpreting the canonical and Modoki El Ni?no.Geophys.Res.Lett.,38, L10704,doi:10.1029/2011GL047364.

Taschetto,A.S.,R.J.Haarsma,A.S.Gupta,et al.,2010: Teleconnections associated with the intensification of the Australian monsoon during El Ni?no Modoki events.IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,11,012031,doi:10.1088/1755-1315/11/1/012031.

Tedeschi,R.G.,I.F.A.Cavalcanti,and A.M.Grimm, 2012:Influences of two types of ENSO on South American precipitation.Int.J.Climatol.,33,1382–1400,doi:10.1002/joc.3519.

Timmermann,A.,and F.-F.Jin,2002:Phytoplankton influences on tropical climate.Geophys.Res.Lett., 29,9-1-19-4,doi:10.1029/2002GL015434.

Trenberth,K.E.,and J.M.Caron,2000:The Southern Oscillation revisited:Sea level pressures,surface temperatures,and precipitation. J.Climate,13, 4358–4365.

Trenberth,K.E.,and D.P.Stepaniak,2001:Indices of El Ni?no evolution.J.Climate,14,1697–1701.

Trenberth,K.E.,D.P.Stepaniak,and J.M.Caron,2002. Interannual variations in the atmospheric heat budget.J.Geophys.Res.,107,AAC 4-1–AAC 4-15.

van Loon,H.,and R.A.Madden,1981:The Southern Oscillation.Part I:Global associations with pressure and temperature in northern winter. Mon. Wea.Rev.,109,1150–1162.

Wallace,J.M.,and D.S.Gutzler,1981:Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter.Mon.Wea.Rev.,109,784–812.

Wang,B.,R.G.Wu,and X.H.Fu,2000:Pacific-East Asian teleconnection:How does ENSO affect East Asian climate?J.Climate,13,1517–1536.

Wang Lei,Zhang Wenjun,Qi Li,et al.,2014:Contrasting air-sea features associated with two types of La Ni?na during the seasonal evolution.Acta Oceanologica Sinica,36,72–85.(in Chinese)

Weng,H.Y.,K.Ashok,and S.K.Behera,et al.,2007: Impacts of recent El Ni?no Modoki on dry/wet conditions in the Pacific rim during boreal summer. Climate Dyn.,29,113–129.

Weng,H.Y.,S.K.Behera,and T.Yamagata,2009: Anomalous winter climate conditions in the Pacific rim during recent El Ni?no Modoki and El Ni?no events.Climate Dyn.,32,663–674.

Wu,B.,T.Li,and T.J.Zhou,2010:Asymmetry of atmospheric circulation anomalies over the western North Pacific between El Ni?no and La Ni?na.J.Climate,23,4807–4822.

Xu,K.,C.W.Zhu,and J.H.He,2012:Linkage between the dominant modes in Pacific subsurface ocean temperature and the two type ENSO events.Chin. Sci.Bull.,57,3491–3496.

Yeh,S.-W.,J.-S.Kug,B.Dewitte,et al.,2009:El Ni?no in a changing climate.Nature,461,511–514.

Yeh,S.-W.,J.-S.Kug,and S.I.An,2014:Recent progress on two types of El Ni?no:Observations,dynamics, and future changes.J.Atmos.Sci.,50,69–81.

Yuan,Y.,and Y.Song,2012:Impacts of different types of El Ni?no on the East Asian climate:Focus on ENSO cycles.J.Climate,25,7702–7722.

Yuan Yuan and Yan Hongming,2013:Different types of La Ni?na events and different responses of the tropical atmosphere.Chin.Sci.Bull.,58,406–415.

Zhang,R.H.,A.Sumi,and M.Kimoto,1996:Impact of El Ni?no on the East Asian monsoon:A diagnostic study of the'86/87 and'91/92 events.J.Meteor. Soc.Japan,74,49–62.

Zhang,W.J.,J.P.Li,and F.-F.Jin,2009: Spatial and temporal features of ENSO meridional scales. Geophys. Res. Lett.,36,L15605,doi: 10.1029/2009GL038672.

Zhang,W.J.,F.-F.Jin,J.P.Li,et al.,2011:Contrasting impacts of two-type El Ni?no over the western North Pacific during boreal autumn. J.Meteor. Soc.Japan,89,563–569.

Zhang,W.J.,F.-F.Jin,H.-L.Ren,et al.,2012:Differences in teleconnection over the North Pacific and rainfall shift over the USA associated with two types of El Ni?no during boreal autumn.J.Meteor.Soc. Japan,90,535–552,doi:10.2151/jmsj.2012-407.

Zhang,W.J.,F.-F.Jin,J.-X.Zhao,et al.,2013:On the bias in simulated ENSO SSTA meridional widths of CMIP3 models.J.Climate,26,3173–3186.

Zhang,W.J.,F.-F.Jin,and A.Turner,2014:Increasing autumn drought over southern China associated with ENSO regime shift.Geophys.Res.Lett.,41, 4020–4026,doi:10.1002/2014GL060130.

Zhang,W.J.,L.Wang,B.Q.Xiang,et al.,2015:Impacts of two types of La Ni?na on the NAO during boreal winter.Climate Dyn.,44,1351–1366.

:Li Zhiyu,Xu Haiming,and Zhang Wenjun,2015:Asymmetric features for two types of ENSO. J.Meteor.Res.,29(6),896–916,

10.1007/s13351-015-5044-4.

Supported by the National(Key)Basic Research and Development(973)Program of China(2012CB955602),National Natural Science Foundation of China(41275094,41490643,and 41575077),Priority Academic Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions,and Qing-Lan Project of Jiangsu Province.

?Corresponding author:hxu@nuist.edu.cn.

?The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

(Received March 11,2015;in final form September 2,2015)