• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A cavitation aggressiveness index within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes methodology for cavitating flows*

    2015-11-24 05:28:13KOUKOUVINISBERGELESGAVAISES
    水動力學研究與進展 B輯 2015年4期

    KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G., GAVAISES M.

    Department of Engineering and Mathematical Science, City University London, Northampton Square, London,EC1V0HB, UK, E-mail: Foivos.koukouvinis.1@city.ac.uk

    A cavitation aggressiveness index within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes methodology for cavitating flows*

    KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G., GAVAISES M.

    Department of Engineering and Mathematical Science, City University London, Northampton Square, London,EC1V0HB, UK, E-mail: Foivos.koukouvinis.1@city.ac.uk

    The paper proposes a methodology within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) solvers for cavitating flows capable of predicting the flow regions of bubble collapse and the potential aggressiveness to material damage. An aggressiveness index is introduced, called cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI) based on the total derivative of pressure which identifies surface areas exposed to bubble collapses, the index is tested in two known cases documented in the open literature and seems to identify regions of potential cavitation damage.

    cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI), cavitation erosion, multiphase cavitating flows

    Introduction

    Cavitation is a phenomenon commonly associated with the appearance of vapour cavities within the bulk of a liquid flow when pressure drops below the vapour pressure at the local liquid temperature, in such areas due to the existence of impurities in the flow field or surface irregularities, phase-change takes place, initiating from either the material surface or inside the bulk of the flow. The bubbles produced may contain both vapour and non-condensable gas (i.e. air). Theses bubbles when advected to lower pressure regions, increase in size and if subsequently are brought abruptly into higher pressure regions in the flow, they collapse, during the collapsing process, their energy is transformed into pressure pulses which are emitted into the surrounding, causing material damage and erosion, mainly on non-deformable (metallic) surfaces. There is a substantial effort within the fluid mechanics community in developing a computational tool within the numerical algorithms currently used in cavitating flows, for predicting not only the location of the vapour bubble creation but mainly the region of its destruction, thus aiming into predicting the surface areas most prone to cavitation damage. Cavitation damage is considered to be caused by two fluid mechanics mechanisms: (1) either by the emitted pressure waves impinging on material surfaces during the bubble implosion and its subsequent rebound, according to Brennen and Leighton[1,2], (2) by the impulse momentum of a penetrating liquid micro jet impinging on the surface and which is created due to asymmetric bubble collapse near the surface and related to a hydraulic jump pressure Hammitt[3,4]. Kedrinskii[5], questions the potential of a single bubble collapse near a surface to create material damage as the amount of force that can be exerted on a surface by a single collapsing bubble is order of magnitudes smaller than the material hardness while in the case of the liquid micro jet impinging on the surface its kinetic energy is order of magnitudes smaller than the energy stored in the collapsing single bubble. According to Kedrinskii, it is the synchronous collapse of many bubbles which creates a cumulative pressure effect, above a threshold,which can initiate material erosion. Patella et al.[6-9]proposed an erosion model based on the pressure wave power density emitted by the imploding bubbles near a surface. The pressure wave energy emitted is obtained fromthe numerical solution of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation, with compressibility effe-cts taken into account, the time dependent wave energy results were then used for calculating the pit volume due to surface deformation of the material exposed to the pressure pulse, a linear relation was found with the coefficient of linearity depending on the material properties, the reliability of the model was also tested against experimental results on eroded samples of various metals with a good correlation. The wave power density, based on the maximum pressure emitted upon bubble collapse was found to be a good indicator of the erosion aggressiveness of the flow.

    Franc and Mitchel[10]estimate the various pressures created upon bubble implosion and they conclude that the impacting pressure due to liquid micro jet may be of the same order of magnitude with the impacting pressure wave due to bubble collapse, however, its duration is orders of magnitude smaller, moreover, the mechanism of collapse of cavitating vortices, found in unsteady hydrofoil flows, is more important creating high impact loads, with order of magnitude higher duration, even higher than the collective synchronous bubble collapse. Dular et al.[11]conducted experiments in a water tunnel and presented erosion results on a cavitating hydrofoil at various flow conditions, the results obtained, mainly after visual inspection with the time of the eroded surface, were used to develop an erosion model based on the concept of the impulse pressure acting on the surface due to the liquid micro jet impingement upon asymmetric bubble collapse near the wall. The measurements indicate that erosion damage is related to cavity unsteadiness, while erosion aggressiveness is correlated to a power law of the nominal flow velocity, besides, increase of the noncondensable gas content in the water of the water tunnel reduces the erosion damage. The proposed erosion model correlates reasonably well, the impulse pressure created by the impinging liquid micro jet with the pit area created on the surface.

    Dular and Coutier-Delgosha[12]used a CFD model based on RANS finite volume methodology for time dependent flows coupled with a barotropic model to account for cavitating flows, a modification was also employed to the k-εRNG model for computing turbulent viscosity which takes in an heuristic way into account mixture compressibility, the CFD results were post processed and information about pressure distribution was coupled to the erosion model, proposed in Ref.[11]. The CFD methodology predicted the various phases of cavity cloud collapse, the associated pressure signatures in time and the resulting erosion as manifested by the formation of the pits in time. Even though the predictions are not very well correlated to measurements, the coupling of CFD post processing and the erosion model gives a direction for developing such an approach for engineering design. Terwisga et al.[13]reviewed the various erosion models reported in the literature and drew the conclusion that an initial bubble implosion synchronizes the implosion of a bubble cloud and that the synchronous implosion of many bubbles either per se or after breaking up of the traveling cavitation vortices may be the physical mechanism leading to cavitation erosion. Li[14]tested various erosion functions like pressure, partial derivative of pressure with time, the rate of change of volume vapour fraction and their time integrals based on CFD results after post processing. She concluded that the maximum rate of change of pressure in time is a better criterion for cavitation damage and it seems that high values of the rate of change of vapour volume fraction do not correlate with erosion damage. Li and Terwisga[15]investigated the time derivative of pressure as an erosion risk index in a flow around a hydrofoil at 8oangle of attack and concluded that an erosion intensity function which is the time mean value of the time derivatives of pressure above a threshold correlates well with the experimental evidence of erosion risk regions on the hydrofoil surface.

    1. The cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI)

    The paper proposes a methodology for predicting the region of bubble collapse and its cavitation aggressiveness. The idea for the proposed methodology is based on the concept that for a vapour bubble to collapse two conditions must be met: (1) the total derivative of the vapour volume fractiona must be negative(as bubbles must have decreasing volume) or equally the total derivative of the mixture density must be positive and (2) the total derivative of the pressurep must be positive (bubbles collapse at regions of increasing pressure),

    The idea of using total derivatives (and not just partial derivatives) in estimating cavitation damage originates from the fact that bubbles at the final stages of collapse follow the streamlines due to their small size and collapse along them, the use of the total derivative makes the procedure applicable not only to unsteady but also to quasi steady-state flow calculations, flow regions of high positive total pressure, calculated with a steady-state RANS methodology, might be potential areas for cavitation damage in flows with intermittent cavitation regions, thus indicating secondary areas of cavitation damage. The previous two conditions,Eqs.(1) and (2), define a topology in the flow field where cavitation damage might appear.

    1.1 The concept of the CAI

    In a cavitating flow there is a region where an unsteady cavity is formed in the flow, inside of which and at some region, the total derivative of the vapour volume fraction is negative, periodically also due to the interaction of the re-entrant jet and the oscillating cavity, the cavity breaks up and a vapour cloud is advected by the flow which collapses further downstream at pressure recovery regions, i.e., in regions characterized also by negative total derivative of vapour volume fraction. These two regions are regions vulnerable to erosion damage. The total derivative of pressure indicates the rate at which the pressure changes as a fluid particle moves along the streamline, a bubble following the streamlines having a maximum radius of Rmaxobtained at a flow region of minimum pressure Pmin(which inside the vapor cavity is equal to the vapor pressure) reduces in size and finally collapses under the influence of the pressure difference between the external pressure (Pout), i.e., the recovery pressure far outside the cavity, and its vapour pressure,the strength of the emitted pressure pulses depends on the imposed pressure difference and a characteristic time scale defined by the time required for bubble collapse when the environmental pressure is abruptly imposed. The time scale characteristic of the bubble collapse, is given by[1](Rayleigh bubble collapse time),

    where a=0.917. Therefore a time derivative of pressure difference characteristic of bubble collapse is of the order of

    The maximum bubble radius at equilibrium can be calculated on the assumption of isothermal bubble growth and applying Eq.(2.3) of Franc and Michel[10],is estimated to be equal to

    where the initial pressure Pg0of the non-condensable gas inside the bubble upon inception(R0)is assumed to be

    P0being the total pressure of the flow. From the above it can be estimated that the characteristic rate of pressure for bubble collapse is

    (a is taken equal to unity).

    Similarly, within the cavity, a threshold hydrodynamic rate pressure difference due to cavity oscillations could be defined as

    where lrefand urefare characteristic length and velocity (time) scales of the vapor cavity (i.e., length of cavity and vapor velocity at the middle of the cavity)andPout,cavis the pressure outside the cavity. The two time scales introduced above, one due to bubble collapse and the other due to cavity oscillation are maybe orders of magnitude different (i.e., μs and ms respectively), therefore in order to bridge these two regions a logarithmic scale is proposed and a cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI) on a ten-scale is thus defined as

    Values of the CAI above zero (related to cavity unsteadiness to 10 (related to bubble collapse) indicate areas of hydrodynamic cavitation aggressiveness from cavity oscillations and break up to vapor cloud collapse.

    1.2Preliminary investigation of the CAI behavior in a flow

    The turbulent flow around a planar-convex hydrofoil at zero and four degrees angle of attack has been chosen as a preliminary case for testing the proposed CAI, the flow has been documented experimentally by Le et al.[16]and studied numerically by Franket al.[17]using the ANSYS CFX commercial code with a homogeneous multiphase model. In both cases the flow velocity is small and cavitation damage is not expected, thus these two cases were chosen to test the behavior of the proposed Cavitation Aggressiveness Index.

    Fig.1(a) Streamlines around the hydrofoil at 0oand pressure distribution

    Fig.1(b) Distribution of vapour volume fraction (VOF)-two vapour cavities are formed

    1.2.1Turbulent flow around the planar-convex hydrofoil at zero degree angle of attack, Le et al.[11]

    The flow around the hydrofoil has been numerically investigated using the commercial software Fluent with a fine grid around the hydrofoil supplemented with local grid refinement, the k-εturbulence model was used, curvature correction and pressure gradients effects in the wall functions were also included and theyplusvalues were around 50. The inlet flow velocity was set to 5 m/s and the cavitation number equal to 0.4, the Reynolds number of the flow was 106. Details of the experimental set up can be found in Ref.[16]. For the particular flow conditions studied,according to Le et al.[16]a steady attached very thin cavity develops at the leading edge of the hydrofoil with a length around 0.4 the hydrofoil chord. Figure 1(a) shows the steady state streamlines around the hydrofoil area indicating two regions of low pressure, a small one near the leading edge of the suction side and a larger one at the pressure side near the trailing edge of the hydrofoil, the low static pressure inside these regions is associated with cavitation and Fig.1(b) indicates the corresponding fraction of the vapour volume in the two cavity regions. The vapour cavity is shorter than the flow separation region, at the suction side of the hydrofoil the vapour cavity length is in fair agreement compared to the experiments (experimental uncertainty from 2% to 10%) and to the corresponding predictions of Ref.[17].

    Fig.1(c) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    Fig.1(d) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of pressure (Dp/Dt>0)

    Fig.1(e) Regions of potential cavitation erosion-intersection of Da/Dt<0and Dp/Dt>0

    Fig.1(f) CAI values on and around the hydrofoil

    Figure 1(c) indicates the regions of negative values of the total derivative of the vapour volume fraction. Figure 1(d) indicates regions of positive values of total derivative. The Boolean intersection of the re-gions in Fig.1(c) and 1(d), shown in Fig.1(e), indicate the areas of bubble collapse under pressure. The corresponding CAI values, Fig.1(f), on the hydrofoil surface are very small, apart from the tiny region at the leading edge, indicating that the hydrofoil might be free of cavitation erosion and the cloud collapse takes place at regions far from the hydrofoil surface. Time dependent calculations indicate that the flow exhibits some limited time unsteadiness, mainly at the cavity region of the pressure side with the cavity at the suction side remaining steady.

    Fig.2(a) Streamlines around the hydrofoil at 4oangle of attack and pressure distribution

    Fig.2(b) Distribution of VOF

    Fig.2(c) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    1.2.2Turbulent flow around the plano-convex hydrofoil at 4oangle of attack, Le et al.[16]

    For the experimental conditions described in Section 1.2.1 and for a cavitation number of 0.5 and angle of attack 4o, Fig.2(a) shows the time mean streamlines around the hydrofoil obtained after a time dependent solution of the flow field over many cycles,in contrast to the previous case, the suction side separation region has increased inheight whilst the pressure side separation region has disappeared in the time mean picture, the low static pressure in the region of separated flow is associated with cavitation and Fig.2(b) indicates the corresponding fraction of the vapour volume in the cavity. The time mean length of the cavity at the suction side of the hydrofoil is in qualitatively agreement with the measurements and the prediction of Frank et al.[17]but slightly underestimated.

    Fig.2(d) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of pressure

    Fig.2(e) Regions of potential cavitation damage

    Figure 2(c) indicates the regions of positive values of the total derivative of mixture density (negative values of the total derivative of vapour volume fraction). Figure 2(d) indicates regions of positive values of total derivative of pressure. The Boolean intersection of the regions in Figs.2(c) and 2(d) indicate the areas of bubble collapse under pressure. Figure 2(e)indicates the values of CAI distribution where it is found that cloud collapse takes place far from the hydrofoil surface except at the leading edge where high CAI values are calculated, therefore the hydrofoil under the present operating conditions should not face erosion problems apart at the leading edge. However,the flow field at this flow condition according to Le[16],i.e.,4oangle of attack, is unsteady and Figs.2(f), 2(g),2(h), 2(i) show four indicative time instants of the flow development, the maximum cavity length is greater than half the hydrofoil chord.

    For these particular instances the CAI values are shown in Fig.2(j) it is concluded that at the leading edge the CAI index is high indicating cavitation aggressiveness, whilst a smaller value is found during thetime dependent calculations not computed from the time mean values of the flow field as it is associated with the oscillating cavity.

    Figs.2(f)-2(i) Flow development and vapor cavity at various time instants

    Fig.2(j) Instantaneous distribution of CAI on the hydrofoil suction surface, for the instances above

    Fig.3(a) The experimental set up, Franc et al.[18]

    Fig.3(b) The erosion zones measured

    2. The LEGI erosion investigation, Franc et al.[18,19]

    Erosion tests on specimens have been systematically conducted at the specially build hydraulics tunnel in the university of Grenoble (LEGI), the particular case to be examined in the present investigation is shown in Fig.3(a). Water with a velocity of 40.5 m/s is flowing into the round pipe, where it is forced to turn abruptly into the small radial passage, upon turn, cavitation takes place and a large cavity attached to the upper part of the disk is formed. Three erosion zones are found, one just at the bent, i.e., entrance to the narrow passage, a second one attached to the upper disk and a third one on the lower disk opposite the end of the second erosion zone. The measured erosion areas are shown in Fig.3(b).

    The numerical solution of the turbulent flow field was obtained using the Fluent software, it has been assumed that the flow is steady, incompressible and axisymmetric. The standard k-εturbulence model hasbeen utilized with non-equilibrium wall functions to account for pressure gradient effects in the wall functions. A telescopic grid refinement technique was adopted that led to grid independent solution and the ypluswas kept around 50, in the fully turbulent region. Figure 3(c) indicates pressure distribution where the pressure region below the liquid vapour pressure is evident, a vapour cavity is formed attached to the upper disk, as shown in Fig.3(d), a large recirculation region is also formed attached to the upper disk with a length larger than the vapour cavity extending up to position 0.026 m, ending in the region of Zone 3 of erosion of the target-lower disk, the vapor cavity ends at a distance within the erosion Zone 2.

    Fig.3(c) Pressure distribution and details of the streamlines structure

    Fig.3(d) Distribution of the vapour volume fraction()a

    Fig.3(e) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    Fig.3(f) Distribution of positive values of total pressure gradient

    Fig.3(g) Regions of potential cavitation damage

    Fig.3(h) CAI values in the flow field and on the wall

    Figure 3(e) presents the regions of bubble collapse, designated by the positive values of the total derivative of the mixture density and Fig.3(g) indicates the regions of possible cavitation damage on the condition of Da/Dt<0(Boolean intersection of flow areas of Figs.3(e) and 3(f). Figure 3(h) indicates the values of CAI. High values of CAI are found at the corner of the upper disk, location A, as also at the lower disk at two locations, locations C and D, atY= 0.021 and Y=0.027respectively, lower values of CAI around zero are found atY=0.016at the upper disk, location B, all four predicted erosion prone locations are within the erosion zones of the experiments,as shown in Fig.3(b). The CAI value at the upper diskis associated with the vapor cavity “oscillation”, whilst the two locations on the lower disk are associated with cloud collapse. In reality the investigated flow exhibits unsteadiness and the eroded area would spread around these locations; a detailed unsteady flow calculation should indicate the extent of the areas prone to erosion, the interested reader is also addressed to the recent publications of Gavaises et al.[19,20].

    3. Conclusion

    The paper has proposed a CAI based on the total derivative of pressure, properly non-dimensionalized which proved to be a reliable tool capable of identifying flow regions of potentialmaterial damage due to cavitation. The index being based on post processing results from CFD calculations using RANS solvers is suitable both for steady and unsteady flows, its possible correlation with energy release concepts upon bubble collapse could create an index of erosion rate of material.

    Acknowledgments

    References

    [1]BRENNEN C. E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics[M]. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    [2]LEIGHTON T. G. The acoustic bubble[M]. London,UK: Academic Press, 1994.

    [3]HAMMITT F. G. Cavitation and multiphase flow phenomena[M]. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    [4]KIM K. H., CHAHINE G. and FRANC J. P. et al. Advanced experimental and numerical techniques for cavitation erosion prediction[M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2014, 3-20.

    [5]KEDRINSKII V. K. Bubble cluster, cumulative jets,and cavitation erosion[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 1996, 37(4): 476-483.

    [6]PATELLA R. F., CHALLIER G. and REBOUD J. L. Cavitation erosion mechanism: numerical simulations of the interaction between pressure waves and solid boundaries[C]. CAV2001: Fourth International Symposium on Cavitation. Pasadena, CA, USA, 2001.

    [7]PATELLA F. R., CHOFFAT T. and REBOUD J.-L. et al. Mass loss simulation in cavitation erosion: Fatigue criterion approach[J]. Wear, 2013, 300(1-2): 205-215.

    [8]PATELLA R. F., ARCHER A. and FLAGEUL C. Numerical and experimental investigations on cavitation erosion[C]. 26th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems. Beijing, China, 2012.

    [9]PATELLA R. F., REBOUD J. L. and ARCHER A. Cavitation damage measurement by 3D laser profilometry[J]. Wear, 2000, 246(1-2): 59-67.

    [10]FRANC J. P., MICHEL J. M. Fundamentals of cavitation[M]. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2004, 328.

    [11]DULAR M., STOFFEL B. and ?IROK B. Development of a cavitation erosion model[J]. Wear, 2006, 261(5-6):642-655.

    [12]DULAR M., COUTIER-DELGOSHA O. Numerical modelling of cavitation erosion[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 61(12):1388-1410.

    [13]TERWISGA T. V., ZIRU L. and FITZSIMMONS P. et al. Cavitation erosion-A review of physical mechanisms and erosion risk models[C]. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2009.

    [14]LI Z. R. Assessment of cavitation erosion with a multiphase Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes method[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 2012.

    [15]LI Z., TERWISGA T. J. C. On the capability of a RANS method to assess the cavitation erosion risk on a hydrofoil[C]. 8th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV). Singapore, 2012.

    [16]LE Q., FRANC J. P. and MICHEL J. M. Partial cavities:Global behavior and mean pressure distribution[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1993, 115(2): 243-248.

    [17]FRANK T., LIFANTE C. and JEBAUER S. et al. CFD simulation of cloud and tip vortex cavitation on hydrofoils[C]. 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow (ICMF 2007). Leipzig, Germany, 2007.

    [18]FRANC J. P., RIONDET M. and KARIMI A. et al. Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting[J]. Wear, 2012, 274(3): 248-259.

    [19]GAVAISES M., VILLA F. and KOUKOUVINIS P. et al. Visualisation and LES simulation of cavitation cloud formation and collapse in an axisymmetric geometry[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68:14-26.

    [20]KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G. and GAVAISES M. A new methodology for estimating cavitation erosion: Application on a high speed cavitation rig[C]. 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics. Barcelona, Spain, 2014.

    (February 20, 2015, Revised May 2, 2015)

    * Biography: KOUKOUVINIS P. (1986-), Male, Ph. D.

    GAVAISES M.,

    E-mail: M.Gavaises@city.ac.uk

    The research leading to these results has funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement No. 324313.

    99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 1000部很黄的大片| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 毛片女人毛片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 又大又爽又粗| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 久久人妻av系列| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲成人久久性| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 精品福利观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 一夜夜www| 一本久久中文字幕| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 午夜福利欧美成人| 变态另类丝袜制服| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产视频内射| av黄色大香蕉| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲av成人av| 免费大片18禁| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| xxxwww97欧美| 天堂网av新在线| 搞女人的毛片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲av美国av| 我要搜黄色片| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 宅男免费午夜| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲激情在线av| 91av网站免费观看| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 久久精品影院6| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 男人舔奶头视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 色av中文字幕| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 18禁观看日本| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久热在线av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| xxx96com| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本与韩国留学比较| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| avwww免费| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 一本一本综合久久| 在线播放国产精品三级| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产免费男女视频| 国产乱人视频| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久国产精品影院| 国产不卡一卡二| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 床上黄色一级片| 天堂√8在线中文| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| xxx96com| 99视频精品全部免费 在线 | 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美在线黄色| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 不卡一级毛片| 黄片小视频在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 色视频www国产| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲av熟女| 怎么达到女性高潮| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 成年免费大片在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧美3d第一页| 搞女人的毛片| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日本a在线网址| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久成人免费电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一本精品99久久精品77| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美日韩乱码在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| svipshipincom国产片| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产精品,欧美在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 黄色 视频免费看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 69av精品久久久久久| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲色图av天堂| 黄色女人牲交| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 超碰成人久久| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 精品日产1卡2卡| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产成人系列免费观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日本黄大片高清| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 一区二区三区激情视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 宅男免费午夜| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产乱人视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产99白浆流出| 舔av片在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 很黄的视频免费| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 免费看十八禁软件| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一夜夜www| 少妇的逼水好多| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久伊人香网站| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日本 欧美在线| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 黄色女人牲交| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 在线看三级毛片| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 999精品在线视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 又大又爽又粗| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 宅男免费午夜| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产精品,欧美在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产av不卡久久| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 一夜夜www| 日本熟妇午夜| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日本成人三级电影网站| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人久久性| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 老司机福利观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | av国产免费在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 成在线人永久免费视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| a在线观看视频网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 性欧美人与动物交配| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 丁香六月欧美| 91av网站免费观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| www.www免费av| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日韩有码中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 一进一出抽搐动态| 午夜福利在线在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲国产色片| 日本黄大片高清| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品九九99| 怎么达到女性高潮| 宅男免费午夜| 黄色成人免费大全| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 毛片女人毛片| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| av欧美777| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品影院久久| 精品久久久久久成人av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 青草久久国产| av天堂在线播放| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产成人福利小说| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 俺也久久电影网| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| av中文乱码字幕在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 性色avwww在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 在线a可以看的网站| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 美女大奶头视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 88av欧美| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久这里只有精品中国| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 俺也久久电影网| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 在线观看66精品国产| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品一及| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久这里只有精品19| 1024香蕉在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| aaaaa片日本免费| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| a在线观看视频网站| 美女大奶头视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 免费看十八禁软件| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久亚洲真实| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 精品久久久久久,| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 怎么达到女性高潮| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产精品影院久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日本 欧美在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日本 av在线|