• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A cavitation aggressiveness index within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes methodology for cavitating flows*

    2015-11-24 05:28:13KOUKOUVINISBERGELESGAVAISES
    水動力學研究與進展 B輯 2015年4期

    KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G., GAVAISES M.

    Department of Engineering and Mathematical Science, City University London, Northampton Square, London,EC1V0HB, UK, E-mail: Foivos.koukouvinis.1@city.ac.uk

    A cavitation aggressiveness index within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes methodology for cavitating flows*

    KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G., GAVAISES M.

    Department of Engineering and Mathematical Science, City University London, Northampton Square, London,EC1V0HB, UK, E-mail: Foivos.koukouvinis.1@city.ac.uk

    The paper proposes a methodology within the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) solvers for cavitating flows capable of predicting the flow regions of bubble collapse and the potential aggressiveness to material damage. An aggressiveness index is introduced, called cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI) based on the total derivative of pressure which identifies surface areas exposed to bubble collapses, the index is tested in two known cases documented in the open literature and seems to identify regions of potential cavitation damage.

    cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI), cavitation erosion, multiphase cavitating flows

    Introduction

    Cavitation is a phenomenon commonly associated with the appearance of vapour cavities within the bulk of a liquid flow when pressure drops below the vapour pressure at the local liquid temperature, in such areas due to the existence of impurities in the flow field or surface irregularities, phase-change takes place, initiating from either the material surface or inside the bulk of the flow. The bubbles produced may contain both vapour and non-condensable gas (i.e. air). Theses bubbles when advected to lower pressure regions, increase in size and if subsequently are brought abruptly into higher pressure regions in the flow, they collapse, during the collapsing process, their energy is transformed into pressure pulses which are emitted into the surrounding, causing material damage and erosion, mainly on non-deformable (metallic) surfaces. There is a substantial effort within the fluid mechanics community in developing a computational tool within the numerical algorithms currently used in cavitating flows, for predicting not only the location of the vapour bubble creation but mainly the region of its destruction, thus aiming into predicting the surface areas most prone to cavitation damage. Cavitation damage is considered to be caused by two fluid mechanics mechanisms: (1) either by the emitted pressure waves impinging on material surfaces during the bubble implosion and its subsequent rebound, according to Brennen and Leighton[1,2], (2) by the impulse momentum of a penetrating liquid micro jet impinging on the surface and which is created due to asymmetric bubble collapse near the surface and related to a hydraulic jump pressure Hammitt[3,4]. Kedrinskii[5], questions the potential of a single bubble collapse near a surface to create material damage as the amount of force that can be exerted on a surface by a single collapsing bubble is order of magnitudes smaller than the material hardness while in the case of the liquid micro jet impinging on the surface its kinetic energy is order of magnitudes smaller than the energy stored in the collapsing single bubble. According to Kedrinskii, it is the synchronous collapse of many bubbles which creates a cumulative pressure effect, above a threshold,which can initiate material erosion. Patella et al.[6-9]proposed an erosion model based on the pressure wave power density emitted by the imploding bubbles near a surface. The pressure wave energy emitted is obtained fromthe numerical solution of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation, with compressibility effe-cts taken into account, the time dependent wave energy results were then used for calculating the pit volume due to surface deformation of the material exposed to the pressure pulse, a linear relation was found with the coefficient of linearity depending on the material properties, the reliability of the model was also tested against experimental results on eroded samples of various metals with a good correlation. The wave power density, based on the maximum pressure emitted upon bubble collapse was found to be a good indicator of the erosion aggressiveness of the flow.

    Franc and Mitchel[10]estimate the various pressures created upon bubble implosion and they conclude that the impacting pressure due to liquid micro jet may be of the same order of magnitude with the impacting pressure wave due to bubble collapse, however, its duration is orders of magnitude smaller, moreover, the mechanism of collapse of cavitating vortices, found in unsteady hydrofoil flows, is more important creating high impact loads, with order of magnitude higher duration, even higher than the collective synchronous bubble collapse. Dular et al.[11]conducted experiments in a water tunnel and presented erosion results on a cavitating hydrofoil at various flow conditions, the results obtained, mainly after visual inspection with the time of the eroded surface, were used to develop an erosion model based on the concept of the impulse pressure acting on the surface due to the liquid micro jet impingement upon asymmetric bubble collapse near the wall. The measurements indicate that erosion damage is related to cavity unsteadiness, while erosion aggressiveness is correlated to a power law of the nominal flow velocity, besides, increase of the noncondensable gas content in the water of the water tunnel reduces the erosion damage. The proposed erosion model correlates reasonably well, the impulse pressure created by the impinging liquid micro jet with the pit area created on the surface.

    Dular and Coutier-Delgosha[12]used a CFD model based on RANS finite volume methodology for time dependent flows coupled with a barotropic model to account for cavitating flows, a modification was also employed to the k-εRNG model for computing turbulent viscosity which takes in an heuristic way into account mixture compressibility, the CFD results were post processed and information about pressure distribution was coupled to the erosion model, proposed in Ref.[11]. The CFD methodology predicted the various phases of cavity cloud collapse, the associated pressure signatures in time and the resulting erosion as manifested by the formation of the pits in time. Even though the predictions are not very well correlated to measurements, the coupling of CFD post processing and the erosion model gives a direction for developing such an approach for engineering design. Terwisga et al.[13]reviewed the various erosion models reported in the literature and drew the conclusion that an initial bubble implosion synchronizes the implosion of a bubble cloud and that the synchronous implosion of many bubbles either per se or after breaking up of the traveling cavitation vortices may be the physical mechanism leading to cavitation erosion. Li[14]tested various erosion functions like pressure, partial derivative of pressure with time, the rate of change of volume vapour fraction and their time integrals based on CFD results after post processing. She concluded that the maximum rate of change of pressure in time is a better criterion for cavitation damage and it seems that high values of the rate of change of vapour volume fraction do not correlate with erosion damage. Li and Terwisga[15]investigated the time derivative of pressure as an erosion risk index in a flow around a hydrofoil at 8oangle of attack and concluded that an erosion intensity function which is the time mean value of the time derivatives of pressure above a threshold correlates well with the experimental evidence of erosion risk regions on the hydrofoil surface.

    1. The cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI)

    The paper proposes a methodology for predicting the region of bubble collapse and its cavitation aggressiveness. The idea for the proposed methodology is based on the concept that for a vapour bubble to collapse two conditions must be met: (1) the total derivative of the vapour volume fractiona must be negative(as bubbles must have decreasing volume) or equally the total derivative of the mixture density must be positive and (2) the total derivative of the pressurep must be positive (bubbles collapse at regions of increasing pressure),

    The idea of using total derivatives (and not just partial derivatives) in estimating cavitation damage originates from the fact that bubbles at the final stages of collapse follow the streamlines due to their small size and collapse along them, the use of the total derivative makes the procedure applicable not only to unsteady but also to quasi steady-state flow calculations, flow regions of high positive total pressure, calculated with a steady-state RANS methodology, might be potential areas for cavitation damage in flows with intermittent cavitation regions, thus indicating secondary areas of cavitation damage. The previous two conditions,Eqs.(1) and (2), define a topology in the flow field where cavitation damage might appear.

    1.1 The concept of the CAI

    In a cavitating flow there is a region where an unsteady cavity is formed in the flow, inside of which and at some region, the total derivative of the vapour volume fraction is negative, periodically also due to the interaction of the re-entrant jet and the oscillating cavity, the cavity breaks up and a vapour cloud is advected by the flow which collapses further downstream at pressure recovery regions, i.e., in regions characterized also by negative total derivative of vapour volume fraction. These two regions are regions vulnerable to erosion damage. The total derivative of pressure indicates the rate at which the pressure changes as a fluid particle moves along the streamline, a bubble following the streamlines having a maximum radius of Rmaxobtained at a flow region of minimum pressure Pmin(which inside the vapor cavity is equal to the vapor pressure) reduces in size and finally collapses under the influence of the pressure difference between the external pressure (Pout), i.e., the recovery pressure far outside the cavity, and its vapour pressure,the strength of the emitted pressure pulses depends on the imposed pressure difference and a characteristic time scale defined by the time required for bubble collapse when the environmental pressure is abruptly imposed. The time scale characteristic of the bubble collapse, is given by[1](Rayleigh bubble collapse time),

    where a=0.917. Therefore a time derivative of pressure difference characteristic of bubble collapse is of the order of

    The maximum bubble radius at equilibrium can be calculated on the assumption of isothermal bubble growth and applying Eq.(2.3) of Franc and Michel[10],is estimated to be equal to

    where the initial pressure Pg0of the non-condensable gas inside the bubble upon inception(R0)is assumed to be

    P0being the total pressure of the flow. From the above it can be estimated that the characteristic rate of pressure for bubble collapse is

    (a is taken equal to unity).

    Similarly, within the cavity, a threshold hydrodynamic rate pressure difference due to cavity oscillations could be defined as

    where lrefand urefare characteristic length and velocity (time) scales of the vapor cavity (i.e., length of cavity and vapor velocity at the middle of the cavity)andPout,cavis the pressure outside the cavity. The two time scales introduced above, one due to bubble collapse and the other due to cavity oscillation are maybe orders of magnitude different (i.e., μs and ms respectively), therefore in order to bridge these two regions a logarithmic scale is proposed and a cavitation aggressiveness index (CAI) on a ten-scale is thus defined as

    Values of the CAI above zero (related to cavity unsteadiness to 10 (related to bubble collapse) indicate areas of hydrodynamic cavitation aggressiveness from cavity oscillations and break up to vapor cloud collapse.

    1.2Preliminary investigation of the CAI behavior in a flow

    The turbulent flow around a planar-convex hydrofoil at zero and four degrees angle of attack has been chosen as a preliminary case for testing the proposed CAI, the flow has been documented experimentally by Le et al.[16]and studied numerically by Franket al.[17]using the ANSYS CFX commercial code with a homogeneous multiphase model. In both cases the flow velocity is small and cavitation damage is not expected, thus these two cases were chosen to test the behavior of the proposed Cavitation Aggressiveness Index.

    Fig.1(a) Streamlines around the hydrofoil at 0oand pressure distribution

    Fig.1(b) Distribution of vapour volume fraction (VOF)-two vapour cavities are formed

    1.2.1Turbulent flow around the planar-convex hydrofoil at zero degree angle of attack, Le et al.[11]

    The flow around the hydrofoil has been numerically investigated using the commercial software Fluent with a fine grid around the hydrofoil supplemented with local grid refinement, the k-εturbulence model was used, curvature correction and pressure gradients effects in the wall functions were also included and theyplusvalues were around 50. The inlet flow velocity was set to 5 m/s and the cavitation number equal to 0.4, the Reynolds number of the flow was 106. Details of the experimental set up can be found in Ref.[16]. For the particular flow conditions studied,according to Le et al.[16]a steady attached very thin cavity develops at the leading edge of the hydrofoil with a length around 0.4 the hydrofoil chord. Figure 1(a) shows the steady state streamlines around the hydrofoil area indicating two regions of low pressure, a small one near the leading edge of the suction side and a larger one at the pressure side near the trailing edge of the hydrofoil, the low static pressure inside these regions is associated with cavitation and Fig.1(b) indicates the corresponding fraction of the vapour volume in the two cavity regions. The vapour cavity is shorter than the flow separation region, at the suction side of the hydrofoil the vapour cavity length is in fair agreement compared to the experiments (experimental uncertainty from 2% to 10%) and to the corresponding predictions of Ref.[17].

    Fig.1(c) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    Fig.1(d) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of pressure (Dp/Dt>0)

    Fig.1(e) Regions of potential cavitation erosion-intersection of Da/Dt<0and Dp/Dt>0

    Fig.1(f) CAI values on and around the hydrofoil

    Figure 1(c) indicates the regions of negative values of the total derivative of the vapour volume fraction. Figure 1(d) indicates regions of positive values of total derivative. The Boolean intersection of the re-gions in Fig.1(c) and 1(d), shown in Fig.1(e), indicate the areas of bubble collapse under pressure. The corresponding CAI values, Fig.1(f), on the hydrofoil surface are very small, apart from the tiny region at the leading edge, indicating that the hydrofoil might be free of cavitation erosion and the cloud collapse takes place at regions far from the hydrofoil surface. Time dependent calculations indicate that the flow exhibits some limited time unsteadiness, mainly at the cavity region of the pressure side with the cavity at the suction side remaining steady.

    Fig.2(a) Streamlines around the hydrofoil at 4oangle of attack and pressure distribution

    Fig.2(b) Distribution of VOF

    Fig.2(c) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    1.2.2Turbulent flow around the plano-convex hydrofoil at 4oangle of attack, Le et al.[16]

    For the experimental conditions described in Section 1.2.1 and for a cavitation number of 0.5 and angle of attack 4o, Fig.2(a) shows the time mean streamlines around the hydrofoil obtained after a time dependent solution of the flow field over many cycles,in contrast to the previous case, the suction side separation region has increased inheight whilst the pressure side separation region has disappeared in the time mean picture, the low static pressure in the region of separated flow is associated with cavitation and Fig.2(b) indicates the corresponding fraction of the vapour volume in the cavity. The time mean length of the cavity at the suction side of the hydrofoil is in qualitatively agreement with the measurements and the prediction of Frank et al.[17]but slightly underestimated.

    Fig.2(d) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of pressure

    Fig.2(e) Regions of potential cavitation damage

    Figure 2(c) indicates the regions of positive values of the total derivative of mixture density (negative values of the total derivative of vapour volume fraction). Figure 2(d) indicates regions of positive values of total derivative of pressure. The Boolean intersection of the regions in Figs.2(c) and 2(d) indicate the areas of bubble collapse under pressure. Figure 2(e)indicates the values of CAI distribution where it is found that cloud collapse takes place far from the hydrofoil surface except at the leading edge where high CAI values are calculated, therefore the hydrofoil under the present operating conditions should not face erosion problems apart at the leading edge. However,the flow field at this flow condition according to Le[16],i.e.,4oangle of attack, is unsteady and Figs.2(f), 2(g),2(h), 2(i) show four indicative time instants of the flow development, the maximum cavity length is greater than half the hydrofoil chord.

    For these particular instances the CAI values are shown in Fig.2(j) it is concluded that at the leading edge the CAI index is high indicating cavitation aggressiveness, whilst a smaller value is found during thetime dependent calculations not computed from the time mean values of the flow field as it is associated with the oscillating cavity.

    Figs.2(f)-2(i) Flow development and vapor cavity at various time instants

    Fig.2(j) Instantaneous distribution of CAI on the hydrofoil suction surface, for the instances above

    Fig.3(a) The experimental set up, Franc et al.[18]

    Fig.3(b) The erosion zones measured

    2. The LEGI erosion investigation, Franc et al.[18,19]

    Erosion tests on specimens have been systematically conducted at the specially build hydraulics tunnel in the university of Grenoble (LEGI), the particular case to be examined in the present investigation is shown in Fig.3(a). Water with a velocity of 40.5 m/s is flowing into the round pipe, where it is forced to turn abruptly into the small radial passage, upon turn, cavitation takes place and a large cavity attached to the upper part of the disk is formed. Three erosion zones are found, one just at the bent, i.e., entrance to the narrow passage, a second one attached to the upper disk and a third one on the lower disk opposite the end of the second erosion zone. The measured erosion areas are shown in Fig.3(b).

    The numerical solution of the turbulent flow field was obtained using the Fluent software, it has been assumed that the flow is steady, incompressible and axisymmetric. The standard k-εturbulence model hasbeen utilized with non-equilibrium wall functions to account for pressure gradient effects in the wall functions. A telescopic grid refinement technique was adopted that led to grid independent solution and the ypluswas kept around 50, in the fully turbulent region. Figure 3(c) indicates pressure distribution where the pressure region below the liquid vapour pressure is evident, a vapour cavity is formed attached to the upper disk, as shown in Fig.3(d), a large recirculation region is also formed attached to the upper disk with a length larger than the vapour cavity extending up to position 0.026 m, ending in the region of Zone 3 of erosion of the target-lower disk, the vapor cavity ends at a distance within the erosion Zone 2.

    Fig.3(c) Pressure distribution and details of the streamlines structure

    Fig.3(d) Distribution of the vapour volume fraction()a

    Fig.3(e) Distribution of positive values of total derivative of mixture density (Da/Dt<0)

    Fig.3(f) Distribution of positive values of total pressure gradient

    Fig.3(g) Regions of potential cavitation damage

    Fig.3(h) CAI values in the flow field and on the wall

    Figure 3(e) presents the regions of bubble collapse, designated by the positive values of the total derivative of the mixture density and Fig.3(g) indicates the regions of possible cavitation damage on the condition of Da/Dt<0(Boolean intersection of flow areas of Figs.3(e) and 3(f). Figure 3(h) indicates the values of CAI. High values of CAI are found at the corner of the upper disk, location A, as also at the lower disk at two locations, locations C and D, atY= 0.021 and Y=0.027respectively, lower values of CAI around zero are found atY=0.016at the upper disk, location B, all four predicted erosion prone locations are within the erosion zones of the experiments,as shown in Fig.3(b). The CAI value at the upper diskis associated with the vapor cavity “oscillation”, whilst the two locations on the lower disk are associated with cloud collapse. In reality the investigated flow exhibits unsteadiness and the eroded area would spread around these locations; a detailed unsteady flow calculation should indicate the extent of the areas prone to erosion, the interested reader is also addressed to the recent publications of Gavaises et al.[19,20].

    3. Conclusion

    The paper has proposed a CAI based on the total derivative of pressure, properly non-dimensionalized which proved to be a reliable tool capable of identifying flow regions of potentialmaterial damage due to cavitation. The index being based on post processing results from CFD calculations using RANS solvers is suitable both for steady and unsteady flows, its possible correlation with energy release concepts upon bubble collapse could create an index of erosion rate of material.

    Acknowledgments

    References

    [1]BRENNEN C. E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics[M]. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    [2]LEIGHTON T. G. The acoustic bubble[M]. London,UK: Academic Press, 1994.

    [3]HAMMITT F. G. Cavitation and multiphase flow phenomena[M]. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    [4]KIM K. H., CHAHINE G. and FRANC J. P. et al. Advanced experimental and numerical techniques for cavitation erosion prediction[M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2014, 3-20.

    [5]KEDRINSKII V. K. Bubble cluster, cumulative jets,and cavitation erosion[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 1996, 37(4): 476-483.

    [6]PATELLA R. F., CHALLIER G. and REBOUD J. L. Cavitation erosion mechanism: numerical simulations of the interaction between pressure waves and solid boundaries[C]. CAV2001: Fourth International Symposium on Cavitation. Pasadena, CA, USA, 2001.

    [7]PATELLA F. R., CHOFFAT T. and REBOUD J.-L. et al. Mass loss simulation in cavitation erosion: Fatigue criterion approach[J]. Wear, 2013, 300(1-2): 205-215.

    [8]PATELLA R. F., ARCHER A. and FLAGEUL C. Numerical and experimental investigations on cavitation erosion[C]. 26th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems. Beijing, China, 2012.

    [9]PATELLA R. F., REBOUD J. L. and ARCHER A. Cavitation damage measurement by 3D laser profilometry[J]. Wear, 2000, 246(1-2): 59-67.

    [10]FRANC J. P., MICHEL J. M. Fundamentals of cavitation[M]. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2004, 328.

    [11]DULAR M., STOFFEL B. and ?IROK B. Development of a cavitation erosion model[J]. Wear, 2006, 261(5-6):642-655.

    [12]DULAR M., COUTIER-DELGOSHA O. Numerical modelling of cavitation erosion[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 61(12):1388-1410.

    [13]TERWISGA T. V., ZIRU L. and FITZSIMMONS P. et al. Cavitation erosion-A review of physical mechanisms and erosion risk models[C]. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2009.

    [14]LI Z. R. Assessment of cavitation erosion with a multiphase Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes method[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 2012.

    [15]LI Z., TERWISGA T. J. C. On the capability of a RANS method to assess the cavitation erosion risk on a hydrofoil[C]. 8th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV). Singapore, 2012.

    [16]LE Q., FRANC J. P. and MICHEL J. M. Partial cavities:Global behavior and mean pressure distribution[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1993, 115(2): 243-248.

    [17]FRANK T., LIFANTE C. and JEBAUER S. et al. CFD simulation of cloud and tip vortex cavitation on hydrofoils[C]. 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow (ICMF 2007). Leipzig, Germany, 2007.

    [18]FRANC J. P., RIONDET M. and KARIMI A. et al. Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting[J]. Wear, 2012, 274(3): 248-259.

    [19]GAVAISES M., VILLA F. and KOUKOUVINIS P. et al. Visualisation and LES simulation of cavitation cloud formation and collapse in an axisymmetric geometry[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68:14-26.

    [20]KOUKOUVINIS P., BERGELES G. and GAVAISES M. A new methodology for estimating cavitation erosion: Application on a high speed cavitation rig[C]. 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics. Barcelona, Spain, 2014.

    (February 20, 2015, Revised May 2, 2015)

    * Biography: KOUKOUVINIS P. (1986-), Male, Ph. D.

    GAVAISES M.,

    E-mail: M.Gavaises@city.ac.uk

    The research leading to these results has funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement No. 324313.

    国产精华一区二区三区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 欧美在线黄色| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产熟女xx| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 大香蕉久久成人网| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产区一区二久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜福利,免费看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产成人欧美| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 级片在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久草成人影院| 久久久国产成人免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一区在线观看完整版| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产成人精品无人区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| 性少妇av在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线看a的网站| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线观看日韩欧美| 91精品三级在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲国产看品久久| 最好的美女福利视频网| 少妇 在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 免费高清视频大片| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 午夜两性在线视频| 超碰成人久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产精品二区激情视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 免费观看人在逋| 在线天堂中文资源库| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 自线自在国产av| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 丁香六月欧美| 怎么达到女性高潮| 看免费av毛片| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 我的亚洲天堂| 一级毛片精品| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 性欧美人与动物交配| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 亚洲伊人色综图| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 91老司机精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 操美女的视频在线观看| 青草久久国产| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久久久久大精品| 久久香蕉国产精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| www.自偷自拍.com| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 91大片在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久九九热精品免费| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | www.www免费av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美成人午夜精品| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲第一av免费看| 露出奶头的视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲av电影在线进入| a在线观看视频网站| 一区在线观看完整版| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 超色免费av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产区一区二久久| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久国产精品影院| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 色在线成人网| 黄色女人牲交| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 午夜免费激情av| 多毛熟女@视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 9色porny在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| tocl精华| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| ponron亚洲| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日本a在线网址| 中国美女看黄片| 日本a在线网址| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久99一区二区三区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久久久久人人人人人| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 自线自在国产av| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 丁香六月欧美| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美大码av| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产麻豆69| 色综合婷婷激情| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产在线观看jvid| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 色综合婷婷激情| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 怎么达到女性高潮| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 超碰成人久久| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 成人手机av| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 大香蕉久久成人网| 看免费av毛片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 高清av免费在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 两个人看的免费小视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 色播在线永久视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 夜夜爽天天搞| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产熟女xx| 午夜视频精品福利| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 麻豆av在线久日| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 五月开心婷婷网| av片东京热男人的天堂| 高清欧美精品videossex| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲av成人av| 香蕉国产在线看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产又爽黄色视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 午夜激情av网站| 久久狼人影院| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲avbb在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 免费不卡黄色视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 手机成人av网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产免费男女视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 丁香六月欧美| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久性视频一级片| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 成在线人永久免费视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 超色免费av| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 嫩草影视91久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 一级作爱视频免费观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产av又大| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 丁香欧美五月| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 午夜视频精品福利| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 18禁观看日本| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 满18在线观看网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| a在线观看视频网站| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲国产欧美网| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久精品成人免费网站| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| av有码第一页| 久久精品成人免费网站| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 老司机靠b影院| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 美女午夜性视频免费| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 大型av网站在线播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲成人久久性| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 色综合站精品国产| 窝窝影院91人妻| 深夜精品福利| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品国产国语对白av| av有码第一页| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久久国产一区二区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| av有码第一页| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 天天影视国产精品| 国产区一区二久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 午夜免费激情av| 少妇 在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 91大片在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日本 av在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 免费看a级黄色片| aaaaa片日本免费| av天堂在线播放| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日本免费a在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 电影成人av| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久亚洲真实| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 9色porny在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 天天添夜夜摸|