• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Validation of the Modified Becker's Split-Window Approach for Retrieving Land Surface Temperature from AVHRR

    2015-11-21 11:23:31QUANWeijun權(quán)維俊CHENHongbin陳洪濱HANXiuzhen韓秀珍andMAZhiqiang馬志強
    Journal of Meteorological Research 2015年5期
    關(guān)鍵詞:志強

    QUAN Weijun(權(quán)維?。?,CHEN Hongbin(陳洪濱),HAN Xiuzhen(韓秀珍),and MA Zhiqiang(馬志強)

    1 Key Laboratory for Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2 Environmental Meteorology Forecast Center of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei,Beijing Meteorological Bureau,Beijing 100089

    3 National Satellite Meteorological Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    Validation of the Modified Becker's Split-Window Approach for Retrieving Land Surface Temperature from AVHRR

    QUAN Weijun1,2?(權(quán)維?。?,CHEN Hongbin1(陳洪濱),HAN Xiuzhen3(韓秀珍),and MA Zhiqiang2(馬志強)

    1 Key Laboratory for Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029

    2 Environmental Meteorology Forecast Center of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei,Beijing Meteorological Bureau,Beijing 100089

    3 National Satellite Meteorological Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    To further verify the modified Becker's split-window approach for retrieving land surface temperature(LST)from long-term Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer(AVHRR)data,a cross-validation and a radiance-based(R-based)validation are performed and examined in this paper.

    LST,split-window approach,MODTRAN,AVHRR,validation

    1.Introduction

    Land surface temperature(LST)is a key parameter in estimating the radiation budget on the land surface because it combines the results of all surfaceatmosphere interactions and energy fluxes between atmosphere and ground(Karnieli et al.,2010;Qian et al.,2013).It is closely related to soil moisture and canopy evaportraspiration and therefore,can be used for monitoring vegetation water stress,assessing surface energy balance,detecting soil drought,investigating urban climate and environment,and indicating land surface thermal conditions(Wan et al.,2004; Weng et al.,2004;Wang et al.,2007;Kustas and Anerson,2009;Weng,2009;Zhu et al.,2015).Furthermore,LST was assimilated into weather prediction models to improve the simulation of land-atmosphere exchange(Price,1982;Diak and Whipple,1993).Due to the strong heterogeneity of land surface characteristics such as vegetation,topography,and soil(Liu Yuanbo et al.,2006;Neteler,2010),and due to the fact that LST changes rapidly on both spatial and temporal scales,LST measurements with detailed spatial and temporal sampling are required in order to capture its distribution and temporal evolution.Given the complexity of surface temperature over land,ob-taining ground measurements is not practical over wide areas.With the development of remote sensing from space,satellite data offer the only possibility for measuring LST over the entire globe with sufficiently high temporal resolution and complete spatially averaged values rather than point values(Wang and Lu,2006;Li et al.,2013a).

    Supported by the Meteorological Key Technology Integration and Application Program of the China Meteorological Administration(CMAGJ2013Z20 and CMAGJ2015Z19).

    ?Corresponding author:quanquan78430@163.com.

    ?The Chinese Meteorological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    Up to now,several LST retrieval algorithms have been proposed in terms of various sensors aboard different satellites. These algorithms can be roughly grouped into three categories:the single channel algorithms(Ottl′e and Vidal-Madjar,1992;Qin et al.,2001;Jim′enez-Mu?noz and Sobrino,2003;Jim′enez-Mu?noz et al.,2009),the split-window algorithms(Becker,1987;Becker and Li,1990;Coll et al.,1994;Prata,1994;Sobrino et al.,1994;Wan and Dozier,1996;Tang et al.,2008;Quan et al.,2012),and the multi-angle algorithms(Prata,1993;Sobrino et al.,1996;Li et al.,2001),provided that the land surface emissivities(LSEs)are known a priori.If the LSEs are not known,the algorithms can be categorized into three types:stepwise retrieval method,simultaneous retrieval of LSEs and LST with known atmospheric information,and simultaneous retrieval with unknown atmospheric information(Li et al.,2013a).

    Validation of satellite derived LST product is also important because it not only provides useful information for users to understand the reliability and accuracy of LST product but also offers feedback for algorithm developers to further improve the retrieval algorithm. There are three methods,to date,which are generally used to verify LST retrieved from space:the temperature-based method(T-based),the radiance-based method(R-based),and the crossvalidation method.The T-based method fulfills verification by comparing the retrieved LST with the coincident ground measured LST(Wan et al.,2002;Coll et al.,2005;Pinker et al.,2009).Its main merit is that it provides a direct evaluation of the retrieved LST with the ground measured LST(Li et al.,2013a). However,the reliability of the T-based validation depends heavily on the accuracy of the ground LST values and how well they represent the LST on the satellite pixel scale.Because of pixel scale discrepancies between satellite and ground instruments and the heterogeneities of ground,validating retrieved LST by using the T-based method is a complex and difficult task.The R-based method is an advanced alternative method for validating space-based LST measurements(Wan and Li,2008;Coll et al.,2012).This method does not rely on ground-measured LST values but it does require the LSE spectra and the measured atmospheric profiles over the validation site at the time of the satellite overpass(Wan and Li,2008;Li et al.,2013a).The R-based method uses the satellitederived LST,the measured atmospheric profiles,and the LSEs as input parameters to an atmospheric radiative transfer model(RTM),such as the Moderate Resolution Transmittance Model(MODTRAN)(Berk et al.,2003),to simulate the radiance reaching the top of atmosphere(TOA)when the satellite overpasses.The inputting LST is not adopted until the simulated radiance matches the satellite-measured radiance.Only then is the input LST recognized as a true LST value and is further used as a criterion to evaluate the accuracy of the retrieved LST.The success of the R-based method depends on the accuracies of the atmospheric RTM,the atmospheric profiles,and the LSEs on pixel scale.The cross-validation method uses a well validated LST product,e.g.,the MYD11A1,as a reference and compares the satellite-derived LST to the reference product(Frey et al.,2012).The success of this method relies on the spatial-temporal matching accuracy and the reliability of the reference product.

    In our previous work,we have compared the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer(AVHRR)LST image retrieved from the modified Becker and Li's approach with the corresponding Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)LST product over Beijing(Quan et al.,2012).To fully verify the performance of the modified Becker's approach,however,it is still necessary to validate the LST products of AVHRR retrieved from the modified Becker's approach by using diverse validation methods over wide regions.The current paper serves this purpose.In this paper,Section 2 reviews the modified Becker's split-window approach for retrieving LST from longterm AVHRR data.A brief description of the MODISLST/LSE products and the cross-validation procedure and results are also given in this section.Section 3 presents the procedure of the R-based method to validate the modified Becker's LST retrieval.The last section gives the conclusions and discussion.

    2.Cross-validation

    2.1 Scheme of cross-validation

    The key points of the cross-validation method depend on the matching accuracies in observing time,location,and view angle between two LST products as well as quality of the reference LST product.It is well known that the observing times for all pixels in one image are nearly the same while the local solar times for them are quite different.For instance,in a polar-orbit satellite image such as an MODIS image,the difference in the local solar time between the east and the west pixels along the scanning line can be up to 1.5 h,which means that the east pixels are exposed to solar irradiation approximately 1.5 h before the west ones if the sky is clear(Duan et al., 2014).As a result,the LST products derived from the same satellite cannot be compared if the differences in the local solar times of the pixels are significant.This phenomenon also affects LST products acquired by different satellites at different times,and significantly limits the applicability of the instantaneous LST products(Li et al.,2013a).Therefore,in this paper,a point-based comparison scheme is chosen instead of the image-based comparison to guarantee that each comparison is highly spatially-temporally matched.This minimizes potential discrepancies due to location,observation time,and view zenith angle.

    In this paper,548 weather stations are selected as validation sites(Fig.1).The land cover types include forests,shrublands,grasslands,croplands,urban areas,barren lands,desert,etc.(Fig.2).

    First,the LST pairs from the AVHRR LST and the MYD11A1 products for 2002-2008 are extracted according to the positions(longitude and latitude)of the validation sites.The LST pairs thus selected must satisfy four criteria:(1)the local solar time difference for each pixel pair should less than 10 min to minimizethe temporal match error as much as possible;(2)the quality control(QC)bit flag of the MYD11A1 must be equal to 0,which means that the MODIS LST value selected as reference has good data quality,is cloud free,has a small error in emissivity,and so on;(3)the AVHRR LST pixel must be cloud free;and(4)the view zenith angle difference between AVHRR and MODIS is less than 5°.Then,statistical analysis is performed to validate the LST pairs by using the MODIS MYD11A1 LST value as a reference to illustrate the accuracy and consistency of the AVHRR LST product.

    Fig.1.Locations of the validation sites(red dots)and radiosonde stations(blue rectangles).

    Fig.2.Land cover types(from Liu Yonghong et al.,2006).

    2.2 AVHRR LST products

    The AVHRR LST product is obtained by using the modified Becker's split-window approach(Quan et al.,2012)from long-term AVHRR data.The equation of the local split-window LST retrievalalgorithm proposed by Becker and Li(1990)is expressed as:

    where Tsis the LST;T4and T5are brightness temperatures in channels 4 and 5 of the AVHRR,respectively.The regression coefficients A0,P,and M are calculated by using the following equation: where ε=(ε4+ε5)/2 is the average emissivity,and Δε= (ε4-ε5)is the emissivity difference between channels 4 and 5.It is noted that the original regression coefficients A0,α,β,γ′,α′,and β′in Eq.(2)were calculated in terms of the spectral response functions(SRFs)of channels 4 and 5 of NOAA-9 AVHRR.The SRFs of different AVHRRs always have some discrepancies,such as spectral bandwidth and spectral sensitivity,which could result in different brightness temperatures even though the radiance into the sensors is the same.In other words,when the Becker's splitwindow algorithm is applied to the AVHRRs other than NOAA-9 AVHRR,the error of LST could be as large as 2.3 K(Czajkowski et al.,1998).To make the Becker's split-window algorithm applicable to various AVHRRs,the regression coefficients in Eq.(2)were recalculated by using the MODTRAN model simulations along with the SRFs of channels 4 and 5 for AVHRRs aboard nine NOAA satellites from NOAA-7 to NOAA-18(see Table 4 in Quan et al.,2012).

    2.3 MODIS LST and LSE products

    The MYD11A1 product of version V005 over China from 2002 to 2008 is selected as a reference to validate the AVHRR LST product. The MYD11A1 product is retrieved from the observations of MODIS aboard the Aqua satellite,whoseoverpass time is close to that of NOAA afternoon satellites. The MYD11A1 dataset is downloaded from the Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center(LP DAAC),which is one of several discipline-specific data centers within the NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information System(EOSDIS)(https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/modisproducts-table/myd11a1). There are 12 scientific datasets in the MYD11A1 product.Besides the LST,quality control(QC),view time(local solar time),view angle,and clear-sky coverage,the emissivities in bands 31 and 32 are also included.The emissivities in bands 31 and 32 are estimated based on the land cover type in the pixel,which is determined by the input data of 250 m resolution land cover(MYD12Q1)and daily 1-km snow cover(MYD10-L2),using the land cover classification-based emissivity method(Snyder et al.,1998).

    The MYD11A1 product is generated from the level-2 LST product MYD11-L2,in which the LST is derived by using the generalized split-window LST algorithm(Wan and Dozier,1996):

    where Tsis the LST;T31and T32are brightness temperatures in channels 31 and 32 of the MODIS,respectively;ε= (ε31+ε32)/2 is the average emissivity,and Δε= (ε31-ε32)is the emissivity difference between channels 31 and 32 of the MODIS;C,A1,A2,A3,B1,B2,and B3are regression coefficients.

    2.4 Cross-validation results

    2.4.1 LST comparison results

    First,extracting is applied to the region of interest(ROI)along with the locations of 548 weather stations(denoted as red points in Fig.1)for the longterm AVHRR LST and MYD11A1 products for producing an LST pair file,in which each line consists of the LST pair and some auxiliary data that are extracted from the AVHRR and MYD11A1 at the same location,e.g.,the observing time and view zenith angle of AVHRR and MODIS,the emissivities in channels 4 and 5 of AVHRR,the emissivities in channels 31 and 32 of MODIS,the QC flag of MYD11A1,etc.Finally,3481 LST pairs that satisfy the criteria described in Section 2.1 are selected from this file and further analyzed.The AVHRR LSTs are higher than the corresponding MYD11A1 in most of the cases(Fig.3a). On the other hand,the AVHRR LSTs,adjusted with a linear regression equation,are close to the MYD11A1 values(Fig.3b).It can be seen from Fig.3b that a good linear relationship exists between the AVHRR LST and the MYD11A1 product.The determination coefficient of regression(R2)is equal to 0.91,the bias is -0.03 K,and the root-mean-square-deviation(RMSD)is 3.0 K.

    To further illustrate the performance of the modified Becker's split-window approach,the validation LST pairs are grouped into four categories according to the seasons. Simultaneously,in each category,six sub-categories are also generated in terms of the land cover type,i.e.,forests(evergreen needleleaf forest,evergreen broadleaf forest,deciduous needleleaf forest,deciduous broadleaf forest,and mixed forest),shrublands(closed shrublands and open shrublands),grasslands(woody savannas,savannas,grasslands,and high-cold steppe),croplands(single cropping system,double cropping system,dry and paddy cropping system,and double cropping paddy),deserts(barren lands and desert),and others(urban areas,marsh wetlands,coastal wetlands,water bodies,and snow and ice).The statistical results for the crossvalidation of each category and sub-category are listed in Table 1.

    Table 1 indicates that the biggest difference occurs on desert lands for all seasons,for which the AVHRR LST is at least 1.5 K less than the MYD11A1. This phenomenon was also found on bare soil in the previous investigation,in which the errors in the general split-window(GSW)retrieved MODIS LSTs can be greater than near surface temperature by more than 16 K(Wan and Li,2008).On the other hand,the AVHRR LSTs are greater than the MYD11A1 by 0.9 and 0.7 K on forest land in spring and winter,respectively.The LST differences on croplands are close to0 in all seasons except winter,in which the LST difference has a value of 2.0 K.However,this value is not reliable due to the small sample number.Due to the larger seasonal variations of grasslands,the LST difference on grasslands is less than-0.1 K in spring and autumn but greater than 0.7 K in summer and winter,respectively.Table 1 also shows that the RMSD between the AVHRR LST and MYD11A1 ranges from1.6 to 4.1 K,and the mean correlation coefficients(R)for all land cover types are 0.932,0.761,0.957,and 0.954 in spring,summer,autumn,and winter,respectively.The lower correlation coefficient between the AVHRR LST and the MYD11A1 for summer may stem from total water vapor amount(WV)being at its maximum during this season and the different sensitivities of the two retrieval algorithms to WV.

    Fig.3.Scatter plots of MYD11A1 versus AVHRR LST derived from the modified Becker's split-window approach.(a)Before regression and(b)after regression.

    Table 1.Statistical results of the cross comparison between the MYD11A1 and AVHRR LST products for different land cover types

    2.4.2 LSE comparison results

    It is necessary to explain the spectral characters of the thermal-infrared(TIR)channels of AVHRR and MODIS before comparing their LSE products.The SRFs of Aqua/MODIS and NOAA-18/AVHRR(represents AVHRR sensors)are plotted in Fig.4.

    Figure 4 indicates that the spectral width of the MODIS TIR channel is narrower than that of the corresponding AVHRR TIR channel.Additionally,there is almost no overlap between the two adjacent MODIS TIR channels while somewhat overlap exists between channels 4 and 5 of AVHRR.On the other hand,the central wavelength of channel 31 of MODIS tends towards a longer wavelength relative to that of channel 4 of AVHRR.

    It should be noted that the LSE estimation methods used in the MYD11A1 and AVHRR LST products are quite different.The land surface emissivities adopted in retrieving MODIS LST are estimated with the classification-based emissivity method(CBEM),which assumes that similarly classified land covers exhibit similar LSEs.On contrast,the land surface emissivities used in deriving AVHRR LST are calculated based on the normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI)value,with a so-called NDVI-based emissivity method(NBEM).The NBEM takes advantage of a statistical relationship between the NDVI calculated from the visible-near infrared(VNIR)data and the LSE in the TIR channels(Van De Griend and Owe,1993;Valor and Caselles,1996;Sobrino and Raissouni,2000).

    The reliability of CBEM depends on accuracy of land cover classification,prior knowledge for each class,and precision of the component(endmember)weight within a satellite pixel with coarse resolution(Li et al.,2013b).Snyder et al.(1998)pointed out that the accuracy of CBEM would degrade as a result of the uncertainties in the soil moisture,the annual biophysical cycle of vegetation,and the appearance of snow and ice.In some cases,there is not a direct correlation between the land cover based on the VNIR classification and the LSE in the TIR channel.

    Since different formulae are adopted in the calculation of LSEs for soil,mixed soil,vegetation,and dense vegetation types,the main deficiency of the NBEM is the lack of continuity in the LSE values during the land cover type transitioning from soil to vegetation(Sobrino et al.,2008).Difficulty in obtaining a priori knowledge of the emissivities of soil and vegetation is another souce of error in this method(Jim′enez-Mu?noz and Sobrino,2006).

    Owing to the different LSE estimation methodsand the SRF discrepancies in TIR channels between MODIS and AVHRR,it seems unsound to compare the LSEs applied in the MYD11A1 and AVHRR LST products.In this paper,scatter points of the difference in LSE for 3481 validation LSE pairs are plotted in Fig.5 to help users roughly understand the relationships between them.It can be seen from Fig. 5 that the points are symmetrically distributed along the average lines,though the point distribution patterns are dispersive.Meanwhile,the general trends of the LSE differences are also plotted in Fig.5 with red lines,in which the data points are smoothed by using a moving average.Generally speaking,the LSE difference between AVHRR channel 4 and MODIS channel 31 is larger than that between AVHRR channel 5 and MODIS channel 32,and the average LSE difference(standard deviation)is-0.0092(0.0104)and-0.0038(0.0058),respectively.

    Fig.4.Aqua/MODIS and NOAA-18/AVHRR spectral response functions.

    3.Radiance-based validation

    3.1 Scheme of R-based validation

    Wan and Li(2008)presented a radiance-based validation method to verify the MODIS LST V5 product.The core steps of this method contain three parts:1)calculate the TOA radiance in MODIS channel 31 by using the MODTRAN 4 code with the assumption that the surface emissivity spectrum and the atmospheric profiles have been precisely measured;2)simulate the radiance in MODIS channel 31 using the MODTRAN model by adjusting the input LST value. If the simulated radiance in MODIS channel 31 is equal to that measured by the MODIS sensor,the last input LST is considered the true LST value;and 3)comparethe retrieved MODIS LST with the last input LST in the second step.This method is suitable for validating the LST product in both day and night conditions and does not rely on ground-measured LST values.

    Fig.5.Scatter plots of LSE differences(a)between AVHRR channel 4 and MODIS channel 31 and(b)between AVHRR channel 5 and MODIS channel 32.Blue points denote the differences in LSE between AVHRR and MODIS,and red lines are the results of those points after being smoothed by a moving average.Mean and Stddev are the mean value and standard devation calculated from the smoothed values,respectively.

    The flow chart of the R-based validation method employed in this study is shown in Fig.6.First,the AVHRR LST product is derived from the AVHRR L1B data by using the modified Becker's split-window algorithm. Second,the TOA brightness temperature in AVHRR channel 4 and retrieved LST at four radiosonde stations(Beijing,Chifeng,Qingdao,and Zhangqiu)are extracted by using the ROI extracting method along with the positions of the stations from the AVHRR L1B and the AVHRR LST product,respectively.Third,atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles for the whole atmoshpere at the radiosonde stations are rebuilt by assembling the radiosonde balloon measurements,whose maximum detecting altitudes are lower than 30 km in most cases,and the standard atmospheric profiles with the altitude higher than 30 km.Fourth,the land surface emissivity estimated with the NDVI by using the NBEM method,the atmospheric profiles,and the initial surface temperature(Ts)are input into the MODTRAN 4.1 model to calculate the radiance reaching the TOA. The radiance is then further converted to the brightness temperature by using the inverse of Planck's radiation equation(Robel,2007,2009).This step does not stop until the simulated brightness temperature matches that observed by the AVHRR at the stations. Then,the input Tsis recognized as the true value of LST,i.e.,the inverted LST.Finally,the statistical results are given on the basis of the comparison between the inverted and the retrieved LST data.

    3.2 Atmospheric profiles

    Accurate temperature profile and total water vapor amount are two key parameters in the R-based LST validation method. It is worth noting that the observation times of routine radiosonde balloons are usually fixed at 0000 and 1200 UTC,which differs from the overpass times of the afternoon NOAA satellites.Fortunately,two additional observations at 0200 and 1400 BT(Beijing Time)during summer were performed at some radiosonde stations in China.In this paper,21 atmospheric profiles at 4radiosonde stations,observing at 1400 BT under clear sky conditions,are selected as input parameters into the MODTRAN and plotted in Fig.7.The four radiosonde stations(denoted with blue rectangles in Fig. 1)include Beijing(54511),Chifeng(54218),Qingdao(54857),and Zhangqiu(54727)stations.The differ-ences between the radiosonde balloon observation time and the satellite overpassing time are limited to 30 min in order to guarantee that these atmospheric profiles can represent the atmospheric conditions when the satellites are overpassing.These radiosonde balloon data come from the mandatory pressure level dataset of China Radiosonde Archive version 1.0(CRA-M1.0),produced by the National Meteorological Information Center of the China Meteorological Administration.At the same time,the WV values are also calculated by integrating the humidity profiles for the whole atmosphere(Yang and Qiu,2002),and are listed in Table 2.

    Fig.6.Flow chart of the R-based method to validate AVHRR LST product.

    Fig.7.Atmospheric temperature profiles used in the R-based validation.(a)Beijing,(b)Chifeng,(c)Qingdao,and(d)Zhangqiu.ST-ID is the station ID,and the observing times for these profiles are also denoted,e.g.,2007072714 is 1400 BT 27 July 2007.

    Figure 7 shows all atmospheric profiles that were obtained in the summer from 2006 to 2012.The maximum sounding altitudes in these cases are below 30 km except the one observed at Chifeng on 26 August 2007(Fig.7b),which was 31.4 km.Additionally,there were no clouds or temperature inversions occurring in these cases.

    Table 2.Results of the R-based LST validations

    3.3 Estimation of surface emissivity

    Surface emissivity is another important input to the MODTRAN model.In this paper,the LSEs at the radiosonde stations are estimated by using the NBEM method with the NDVI values.For details,refer to Section 4.1 in Quan et al.(2012).

    3.4 Results

    The overall results of the R-based validation are listed in Table 2.It can be seen that the satellite overpassing times in all cases are close to the radiosonde time(1400 BT).The WV values range from 7.1 to 44.7 mm,i.e.,the atmosphere is relatively moist.Additionally,the atmospheric transmittance,which ranges from 0.486 to 0.928,generally decreases with the increase of WV.The brightness temperature in channel 4 of AVHRR at the validation sites is extracted from the AVHRR channel 4 images.The LSE in channel 4 of AVHRR,which is estimated from the NDVI value by using the NBEM method,is also listed.

    Table 2 indicates that the retrieved LSTs from the AVHRR data by using the modified Becker's splitwindow approach are generally less than the inverted LSTs,especially in cases when the WV is greater than 15 mm.To further understand the water vapor impact on the retrieved LST,the average ΔT is calculated forhigh and low WV values.The result shows that the average ΔT is-1.3 K when the WV is less than 20 mm and up to-2.5 K when the WV is greater than 20 mm. Besides the WV,the LSEs and the view angles also influence the accuracy of retrieved LST.Therefore,the atmosphere-independent coefficients in the modified Becker's split-window algorithm are only suitable for the scenarios in which the atmosphere is not too wet(WV<20 mm).To make the split-window algorithm applicable to more general atmospheric conditions,the regression coefficients in the modified Becker's algorithm need to be considered as functions of WV,view zenith angle,etc.

    4.Conclusions and discussion

    Validation of the LST retrieved from the satellite observations is an important step towards improving the accuracy of the retrieval algorithm and implemeting better use of the LST product.However,it is a hard task due to many variables such as the true surface temperature,the accurate pixel matching,and the suitable atmospheric profiles.In this paper,we take advantage of two different methods,i.e.,the crossvalidation method and the R-based validation method,to verify the LST product retrieved from long-term AVHRR data by using the modified Becker's splitwindow algorithm(Quan et al.,2012).

    The cross-validations are carried out via comparison between 3481 LST validation pairs. Using data from 548 weather stations in China from 2002 to 2008,these LST validation pairs are extracted from the AVHRR LST and the corresponding MYD11A1 products. The results show that there is a strong linear relationship between the AVHRR LST and the MYD11A1,with a bias of 0.03 K and a RMSD of 3.0 K.The cross-validation method takes advantage of the QC bit flag in the MYD11A1 to choose the high quality MYD11A1 LST as a reference.However,the MYD11A1 product is also retrieved surface temperature rather than a true value of the LST.Thus,this comparison can only be used to indicate the similarity between the AVHRR LST product and the reference MODIS LST product.

    On the other hand,the R-based LST validation method does not need in-situ LST measurements,so it is suitable for the validation of both daytime and nighttime LSTs. To apply the R-based validation approach,accurate atmospheric temperature and water vapor profiles around the satellite overpass time are needed as input parameters into the MODTRAN model in order to simulate the satellite sensor's measurements. Fortunately,a few Chinese radiosonde stations provided additional observations at 1400 BT during summer,which made the accurate atmospheric profiles around the satellite overpass time available. In this paper,21 accurate atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles at 4 radiosonde stations are used along with the estimated LSE as the input parameters into the MODTRAN 4.1 model to fulfill the R-based validation.The result shows that the AVHRR LST retrieved from the modified Becker's split-window approach underestimates the LST in most of the cases and with an average LST difference of-1.3 K when the WV is less than 20 mm,and-2.5 K when the WV is larger than 20 mm.

    In the future,considerable work needs to be conducted to improve the accuracy and consistency of the LST retrieval algorithm.For example,a split-window LST retrieval algorithm can be developed to derive the LST from long time series AVHRR data,taking into consideration the view zenith angle,LSE,WV,etc. Of course,the LST validation method and validation scheme are still necessary to guarantee that the LST retrieval algorithm is reliable.

    Acknowledgments.We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable and stimulating comments that have greatly improved the paper.We also appreciate the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,California Institute of Technology of USA for providing the ASTER spectral library,which contains the John Hopkins University spectral emissivity data used in this paper.We are also very grateful to Mrs. Hu Tianjie and Mr.Ma Jingjin from the Beijing Meteorological Bureau for providing the radiosonde data.

    Becker,F(xiàn).,1987:The impact of spectral emissivity on the measurement of land surface temperature froma satellite.Int.J.Remote Sens.,8,1509-1522.

    Becker,F(xiàn).,and Li Zhaoliang,1990:Towards a local split window method over land surfaces.Int.J.Remote Sens.,11,369-393.

    Berk,A.,G.P.Anderson,P.K.Acharya,et al.,2003:MODTRAN4 Version 3 Revision 1 User's Manual,Air Force Research Laborary,North Andover,MA,USA,10-35.

    Coll,C.,V.Caselles,J.A.Sobrino,et al.,1994:On the atmospheric dependence of the split-window equation for land surface temperature.Int.J.Remote Sens.,15,105-122.

    Coll,C.,V.Caselles,J.M.Galve,et al.,2005:Ground measurements for the validation of land surface temperatures derived from AATSR and MODIS data. Remote Sens.Environ.,97,288-300.

    Coll,C.,E.Valor,J.M.Galve,et al.,2012:Long-term accuracy assessment of land surface temperatures derived from the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer.Remote Sens.Environ.,116,211-225.

    Czajkowski,K.P.,S.N.Goward,and H.Ouaidrari,1998:Impact of AVHRR filter functions on surface temperature estimation from the split window approach. Int.J.Remote Sens.,19,2007-2012.

    Diak,G.R.,and M.S.Whipple,1993:Improvements to models and methods for evaluating the land-surface energy balance and‘effective'roughness using radiosonde reports and satellite-measured‘skin'temperature data.Agric.Forest Meteor.,63,189-218.

    Duan,S.B.,Z.L.Li,B.H.Tang,et al.,2014:Generation of a time-consistent land surface temperature product from MODIS data.Remote Sens.Environ.,140,339-349.

    Frey,C.M.,C.Kuenzer,and S.Dech,2012:Quantitative comparison of the operational NOAA-AVHRR LST product of DLR and the MODIS LST product V005. Int.J.Remote Sens.,33,7165-7183.

    Jim′enez-Mu?noz,J.C.,and J.A.Sobrino,2003:A generalized single-channel method for retrieving land surface temperature from remote sensing data.J. Geophys.Res.,108,doi:10.1029/2003JD003480.

    Jim′enez-Mu?noz,J.C.,and J.A.Sobrino,2006:Error sources on the land surface temperature retrieved from thermal infrared single channel remote sensing data.Int.J.Remote Sens.,27,999-1014.

    Jim′enez-Mu?noz,J.C.,J.Cristobal,J.A.Sobrino,et al.,2009:Revision of the single-channel algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat thermal-infrared data.IEEE Trans.Geosci.Remote Sens.,47,339-349.

    Karnieli,A.,N.Agam,R.T.Pinker,et al.,2010:Use of NDVI and land surface temperature for drought assessment:Merits and limitations.J.Climate,23,618-633.

    Kustas,W.,and M.Anderson,2009:Advances in thermal infrared remote sensing for land surface modeling. Agric.Forest Meteor.,149,2071-2081.

    Li Zhaoliang,M.P.Stoll,Zhang Renhua,et al.,2001:On the separate retrieval of soil and vegetation temperatures from ATSR data.Sci.China(Ser.D),44,97-111.

    Z.H.Li,B.H.Tang,H.Wu,et al.,2013a:Satellitederived land surface temperature:Current status and perspectives.Remote Sens.Environ.,131,14-37.

    Li,Z.L.,H.Wu,N.Wang,et al.,2013b:Land surface emissivity retrieval from satellite data.Int.J.Remote Sens.,34,3084-3127.

    Liu Yuanbo,T.Hiyama,Y.Yamaguchi,2006:Scaling of land surface temperature using satellite data:A case examination on ASTER and MODIS products over a heterogeneous terrain area. Remote Sens. Environ.,105,115-128.

    Liu Yonghong,Niu Zheng,Xu Yongming,et al.,2006:Design of land cover classification system for China and its application research based on MODIS data. Trans.CSAE,22,99-104.(in Chinese)

    Neteler,M.,2010:Estimating daily land surface temperatures in mountainous environments by reconstructed MODIS LST data.Remote Sens.,2,333-351.

    Ottl′e,C.,and D.Vidal-Madjar,1992:Estimation of land surface temperature with NOAA9 data.Remote Sens.Environ.,40,27-41.

    Pinker,R.T.,D.L.Sun,M.P.Hung,et al.,2009:Evaluation of satellite estimates of land surface temperature from GOES over the United States.J.Appl. Meteor.Climatol.,48,167-180.

    Prata,A.J.,1993:Land surface temperatures derived from the advanced very high resolution radiometer and the along-track scanning radiometer.1:Theory. J.Geophys.Res.,98,16689-16702.

    Prata,A.J.,1994:Land surface temperature determination from satellites.Adv.Spac.Res.,14,15-26.

    Price,J.C.,1982:On the use of satellite data to infer surface fluxes at meteorological scales.J.Appl.Meteor.,21,1111-1122.

    Qian,Y.G.,Z.L.Li,and F.Nerry,2013:Evaluation of land surface temperature and emissivities retrieved from MSG/SEVIRI data with MODISland surfacetemperatureand emissivity products.Int.J.Remote Sens.,34,3140-3152,doi:10.1080/01431161.2012.716538.

    Qin,Z.,A.Karnieli,and P.Berliner,2001:A monowindow algorithm for retrieving land surface temperature from Landsat TM data and its application to the Israel-Egypt border region.Int.J.Remote Sens.,22,3719-3746.

    Quan Weijun,Chen Hongbin,Han Xiuzhen,et al.,2012:A modified Becker's split-window approach for retrieving land surface temperature from AVHRR and VIRR.Acta Meteor.Sinica,26,229-240,doi:10.1007/s13351-012-0208-y.

    Robel,J.,2007:AVHRR Level 1b data base.NOAA polar orbiter data user's guide,U.S.Department of Commerce,Asheville,USA,22-28.

    Robel,J.,2009:Calibration of NOAA KLM instruments.NOAA KLM user's guide with NOAA-N,-N'Supplement,National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,Asheville,USA,1-11.

    Snyder,W.C.,Z.Wan,Y.Zhang,et al.,1998:Classification-based emissivity for land surface temperature measurement from space.Int.J.Remote Sens.,19,2753-2774.

    Sobrino,J.A.,Z.L.Li,M.P.Stoll,et al.,1994:Improvements in the split-window technique for land surface temperature determination.IEEE Trans.Geosci. Remote Sens.,32,243-253.

    Sobrino,J.A.,Z.L.Li,M.P.Stoll,et al.,1996:Multichannel and multi-angle algorithms for estimating sea and land surface temperature with ATSR data. Int.J.Remote Sens.,17,2089-2114.

    Sobrino,J.A.,and N.Raissouni,2000:Toward remote sensing methods for land cover dynamic monitoring:Application to Morocco.Int.J.Remote Sens.,21,353-366.

    Sobrino,J.A.,J.A.Jim′enez-Mu?noz,C.S`oria,et al.,2008:Land surface emissivity retrieval from different VNIR and TIR sensors.IEEE Trans.Geosci. Remote Sens.,46,316-327.

    Tang Bohui,Bi Yuyun,Li Zhaoliang,et al.,2008:Generalized split-window algorithm for estimate of land surface temperature from Chinese geostationary FengYun meteorologicalsatellite(FY-2C)data. Sensors,8,933-951.

    Valor,E.,and V.Caselles,1996:Mapping land surface emissivity from NDVI:Application to European,African and South American areas.Remote Sens. Environ.,57,167-184.

    Van De Griend,A.A.,and M.Owe,1993:On the relationship between thermal emissivity and the normalized difference vegetation index for natural surfaces. Int.J.Remote Sens.,14,1119-1131.

    Wan,Z.M.and J.Dozier,1996:A generalized splitwindow algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space.IEEE Trans.Geosci.Remote Sens.,34,892-905.

    Wan,Z.M.,Y.L.Zhang,Q.C.Zhang,et al.,2002:Validation of the land-surface temperature products retrieved from Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data.Remote Sens.Environ.,83,163-180.

    Wan,Z.M.,P.Wang,and X.Li,2004:Using MODIS land surface temperature and normalized difference vegetation index products for monitoring drought in the southern Great Plains,USA.Int.J.Remote Sens.,25,61-72.

    Wan,Z.M.,and Z.L.Li,2008:Radiance-based validation of the V5 MODIS land-surface temperature product.Int.J.Remote Sens.,29,5373-5395.

    Wang,K.C.,P.C.Wang,Z.Q.Li,et al.,2007:A simple method to estimate actual evapotranspiration from a combination of net radiation,vegetation index,and temperature.J.Geophys.Res.,112,D15107,doi:10.1029/2006JD008351.

    Wang Minyan and L¨u Daren,2006:Diurnal and seasonal variation of clear-sky land surface temperature of several representative land surface types in China retrieved by GMS-5.Acta Meteor.Sinica.,20,475-488.

    Weng Qihao,2009:Thermal infrared remote sensing for urban climate and environmental studies:Methods,applications,and trends.ISPRS J.Photogramm. Remote Sens.,64,335-344.

    Weng,Q.H.,D.S.Lu,and J.Schubring,2004:Estimation of land surface temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens.Environ.,89,467-483.

    Yang Jingmei and Qiu Jinhuan,2002:A method for estimating precipitable water and effective water vapor content from ground humidity parameters.Chinese J.Atmos.Sci.,26,9-22.(in Chinese)

    Zhu Xiaochen,Qiu Xinfa,Zeng Yan,et al.,2015:A remote sensing model to estimate sunshine duration in the Ningxia Hui autonomous region,China.J. Meteor.Res.,29,144-154,doi:10.1007/s13351-015-4059-1.

    Quan Weijun,Chen Hongbin,Han Xiuzhen,et al.,2015:Validation of the modified Becker's splitwindow approach for retrieving land surface temperature from AVHRR.J.Meteor.Res.,29(5),823-836,

    10.1007/s13351-015-4110-2.

    (Received November 6,2014;in final form July 18,2015)

    In the cross-validation,3481 LST data pairs are extracted from the AVHRR LST product retrieved with the modified Becker's approach and compared with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)LST product(MYD11A1)for the period 2002-2008,relative to the positions of 548 weather stations in China.The results show that in most cases,the AVHRR LST values are higher than the MYD11A1. When the AVHRR LSTs are adjusted with a linear regression,the values are close to the MYD11A1,showing a good linear relationship between the two datasets(R2=0.91).

    In the R-based validation,comparison is made between AVHRR LST retrieved from the modified Becker's approach and the inversed LST from the Moderate Resolution Transmittance Model(MODTRAN)consolidated with observed temperature and humidity profiles at four radiosonde stations.The results show that the retrieved AVHRR LST deviates from the MODTRAN inversed LST by-1.3(-2.5)K when the total water vapor amount is less(larger)than 20 mm.This provides useful hints for further improvement of the LST retrieval algorithms'accuracy and consistency.

    猜你喜歡
    志強
    NFT與絕對主義
    趙志強書法作品
    學習“集合”,學什么
    李志強·書法作品稱賞
    袁志強 始終奮戰(zhàn)在防疫第一線
    盧志強 用心于畫外
    海峽姐妹(2019年4期)2019-06-18 10:39:00
    送別張公志強
    寶藏(2018年12期)2019-01-29 01:50:50
    ON ENTIRE SOLUTIONS OF SOME TYPE OF NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS?
    Analysis of Tibetan Plateau Vortex Activities Using ERA-Interim Data for the Period 1979-2013
    志強的石
    中華奇石(2014年12期)2014-07-09 18:30:22
    成年动漫av网址| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 美女福利国产在线| 国产成人欧美| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| av福利片在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| tocl精华| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| a级毛片黄视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 十八禁网站免费在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 午夜福利欧美成人| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 少妇 在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 脱女人内裤的视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 99久久人妻综合| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久青草综合色| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| av在线播放免费不卡| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 99国产精品99久久久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 在线观看66精品国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 大香蕉久久成人网| 91麻豆av在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 香蕉久久夜色| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲九九香蕉| 午夜精品在线福利| 免费不卡黄色视频| 777米奇影视久久| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 飞空精品影院首页| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产精品 国内视频| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线观看66精品国产| tube8黄色片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 午夜老司机福利片| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 午夜影院日韩av| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美日韩精品网址| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| bbb黄色大片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 电影成人av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日本a在线网址| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 99香蕉大伊视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 男人操女人黄网站| av天堂久久9| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久这里只有精品19| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 中文字幕色久视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 一夜夜www| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 成人精品一区二区免费| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| av福利片在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 18在线观看网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 在线观看www视频免费| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 18禁观看日本| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久99久视频精品免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 91字幕亚洲| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 搡老岳熟女国产| 青草久久国产| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 91老司机精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 大型av网站在线播放| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 成在线人永久免费视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | av电影中文网址| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 夫妻午夜视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产色视频综合| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 大码成人一级视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久影院123| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 又大又爽又粗| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久这里只有精品19| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产欧美亚洲国产| av网站在线播放免费| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人精品无人区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产野战对白在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| a在线观看视频网站| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 天天影视国产精品| 制服诱惑二区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 电影成人av| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 天天影视国产精品| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| av不卡在线播放| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 下体分泌物呈黄色| 岛国毛片在线播放| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| av有码第一页| 久久热在线av| 天天影视国产精品| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人精品无人区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 午夜激情av网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| svipshipincom国产片| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| www.熟女人妻精品国产| av天堂在线播放| 久9热在线精品视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲九九香蕉| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 久久香蕉国产精品| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久久久国内视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲全国av大片| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 18在线观看网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美日韩av久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 黄频高清免费视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| av天堂久久9| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 嫩草影视91久久| tocl精华| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 免费少妇av软件| 成人18禁在线播放| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 电影成人av| 曰老女人黄片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久热在线av| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久影院123| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 精品视频人人做人人爽| 午夜老司机福利片| 黄色 视频免费看| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 成年动漫av网址| 国产亚洲欧美98| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲第一青青草原| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| www.精华液| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一区在线观看完整版| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 久久亚洲真实| a级毛片黄视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 91在线观看av| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 免费观看人在逋| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| a级毛片黄视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| av国产精品久久久久影院| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 在线av久久热| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 性少妇av在线| 天堂动漫精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美乱妇无乱码| av天堂在线播放| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 999精品在线视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 老司机影院毛片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 91成年电影在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 多毛熟女@视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产亚洲欧美98| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久亚洲真实| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 18在线观看网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品成人在线|