王亞男
[摘要] 目的 分析普貝生與杜冷丁聯(lián)合應(yīng)用足月妊娠促宮頸成熟的效果及安全性。 方法 分析我院2014年3~10月收治的足月妊娠孕婦122例,隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組62例,應(yīng)用普貝生促宮頸成熟,研究組60例在對(duì)照組的基礎(chǔ)上加用杜冷丁。比較兩組對(duì)臨產(chǎn)時(shí)間、總產(chǎn)程、分娩方式的影響,兩組的宮頸成熟度和安全性。 結(jié)果 對(duì)照組與研究組在臨產(chǎn)時(shí)間、總產(chǎn)程、剖宮產(chǎn)率上比較有顯著增加;兩組的臨床總有效率分別為83.9%(52/62),96.7%(58/60)(x2=5.629,P<0.05);兩組新生兒Apgar評(píng)分1min、5min,產(chǎn)后出血、不良反應(yīng)比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。 結(jié)論 普貝生與杜冷丁聯(lián)合用于足月妊娠促宮頸成熟,可以減少臨產(chǎn)時(shí)間、分娩時(shí)間、總產(chǎn)程,安全可靠。
[關(guān)鍵詞]普貝生;杜冷??;足月妊娠促宮頸成熟;療效;安全性
[中圖分類號(hào)] R714 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] B [文章編號(hào)] 2095-0616(2015)15-83-03
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect and safety of propess and dolantin for promoting cervical ripening on term pregnancy. Methods 122 cases of full term pregnant women in our hospital from 2014 March to 2014 Octobor were analyzed and divided into control group and study group.62 cases in the control group received propess for promoting cervical ripening. 60 cases in the study group based on the control group treated with dolantin.The two groups' labor time, total stage of labor,delivery mode, the cervical maturity and safety were compared with each other. Results There was significantly prolonged in the labor time,total stage of labor, the rate of cesarean section of the control group compared with the study group; The total clinical efficiency of two groups were 83.9%(52/62), 96.7%(58/60)( x2=5.629,P<0.05); There were no significant differences in the neonatal Apgar scores of 1min, 5min, postpartum hemorrhage, adverse reaction between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Propess and dolantin combined for promoting cervical ripening on term pregnancy, can reduce the time of clinical time, delivery time and total production process, is safety and reliable.
[Key words] Propess; Dolantin; Promoting cervical ripening on term pregnancy; Curative effect; Safety
足月孕婦孕晚期因各種因素臨床需給予引產(chǎn),以促進(jìn)分娩順利完成,降低剖宮產(chǎn)率和增加產(chǎn)婦和新生兒的安全性。普貝生是含有前列腺素的控釋栓劑,可促進(jìn)宮頸成熟[1-2]。本組研究在應(yīng)用普貝生的基礎(chǔ)上加用了杜冷丁,現(xiàn)將臨床應(yīng)用效果報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選擇自2014年3 ~ 10月收治的122例足月妊娠孕婦。年齡18 ~ 40歲,平均(26.8±2.5)歲。入選標(biāo)準(zhǔn):初產(chǎn)婦;單胎且足月妊娠;符合終止妊娠的指征。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[3]:(1)頭盆不對(duì)稱者;(2)陰道分娩禁忌證者;(3)胎盤早破;(4)藥物過(guò)敏及有禁忌證者;(5)嚴(yán)重的心、肝、肺、腎等重要臟器衰竭者。宮頸Bishop評(píng)分≤4分68例,宮頸Bishop評(píng)分為5分54例?;颊甙凑针S機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為治療組60例與研究組62例,兩組患者年齡、Bishop評(píng)分等一般資料比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
入組者均常規(guī)進(jìn)行胎心監(jiān)護(hù)。無(wú)菌環(huán)境下進(jìn)行陰道檢查及宮頸Bishop評(píng)分,對(duì)照組給予普貝生[Controlled Therapeutics(Scotland)Limited,H20040368],10mg塞入陰道后穹隆處,平臥,用藥12h 后取出藥物。研究組在對(duì)照組的基礎(chǔ)上加用肌肉注射杜冷?。ㄇ嗪V扑帍S有限公司,H63020022),肌肉注射100mg/次。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
兩組方法對(duì)臨產(chǎn)時(shí)間、總產(chǎn)程、分娩方式的影響;宮頸成熟度;安全性:圍產(chǎn)兒結(jié)局(新生兒Apgar評(píng)分1min、5min)、產(chǎn)后出血、不良反應(yīng)(宮縮過(guò)頻、羊水污染、胎心改變)。
1.4 宮頸評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)[4]endprint