• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessment of Indices of Temperature Extremes Simulated by Multiple CMIP5 Models over China

    2015-06-09 21:37:22DONGSiyanXUYingZHOUBotaoandSHIYing
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年8期

    DONG Siyan,XU Ying,ZHOU Botao,and SHI Ying

    National Climate Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    Assessment of Indices of Temperature Extremes Simulated by Multiple CMIP5 Models over China

    DONG Siyan,XU Ying?,ZHOU Botao,and SHI Ying

    National Climate Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    Given that climate extremes in China might have serious regional and global consequences,an increasing number of studies are examining temperature extremes in China using the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5(CMIP5) models.This paper investigates recent changes in temperature extremes in China using 25 state-of-the-art global climate models participating in CMIP5.Thirteen indices that represent extreme temperature events were chosen and derived by daily maximum and minimum temperatures,including those representing the intensity(absolute indices and threshold indices), duration(duration indices),and frequency(percentile indices)of extreme temperature.The overall performance of each model is summarized by a“portrait”diagram based on relative root-mean-square error,which is the RMSE relative to the median RMSE of all models,revealing the multi-model ensemble simulation to be better than individual model for most indices.Compared with observations,the models are able to capture the main features of the spatial distribution of extreme temperature during 1986–2005.Overall,the CMIP5 models are able to depict the observed indices well,and the spatial structure of the ensemble result is better for threshold indices than frequency indices.The spread amongst the CMIP5 models in different subregions for intensity indices is small and the median CMIP5 is close to observations;however,for the duration and frequency indices there can be wide disagreementregarding the change between models and observations in some regions. The model ensemble also performs well in reproducing the observational trend of temperature extremes.All absolute indices increase over China during 1961–2005.

    temperature extremes,China,CMIP5,model evaluation

    1.Introduction

    The implications of global warming on climatic extreme events are of particular concern internationally,particularly with respect to economic,ecological,and health impacts(Orlowsky and Seneviratne,2012).The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)concluded in its Fifth Assessment Report(AR5)that climate change,whether driven by natural or human forcing,can lead to changes in the likelihood of the occurrence or strength of extreme weather and climate events,or both(Bindoff et al.,2013).Furthermore,some of the changes in weather and climate extreme events observed in the late 20th century are projected to continue into the future(Kharin et al.,2013).

    In China,weather and climate events associated with warm and cold extremes,such as heavy rain,droughts,and typhoons since 1951,have also have shown increases in frequency,intensity,and regional extent.The combined effects of these changes could result in unprecedented extreme weather and climatic events,increasing the risk to humans of extreme climatic disasters(Xu,2012).Extreme climate change has seriously affected China’s agriculture,ecosystems,distribution of water resources,and human health;thus, the assessment of climate impact,particularly regarding climate extremes,has become an important area of research (Zheng et al.,2011).

    The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project(CMIP), initiated by the World Climate Research Programme,is engaged in the simulation and prediction of the global climatic system.CMIP provides a community-based infrastructure in support of climate model diagnosis,validation,intercomparison,documentation and data access,based on state-of-the-art coupled global models for projecting and analyzing climate change.Today,the CMIP series has evolved to a fifth stage (CMIP5).CMIP5 is based on an improved CMIP3 model system,incorporating dynamic vegetation models,carbon cycle process models,and a more rational parameterization scheme,which through enhanced processing programs and coupling technology is expected to provide more detailed and more certain projections(Knutti and Sedl′aˇcek,2013). CMIP5 places greater emphasis on the consideration of landuse/cover forcing compared to CMIP3,and most models incorporate consistent land use/cover data(Taylor et al.,2012). Despite some limitations,CMIP5 simulation trends and observed trends can be determined,and the patterns of extreme temperature trends can be simulated reasonably well(Tebaldi et al.,2006).As Sillmann et al.(2013)revealed,the CMIP5 models are generally able to simulate climate extremes and their trends as representations of indices when compared with the HadEX2 gridded observational indices dataset(HadEX2 is a global land-based climate extremes dataset produced by the Met Office Hadley Centre,UK).The spread amongst the CMIP5 models for several temperature indices is reduced compared to CMIP3 models,despite the number of models participating in CMIP5 being larger(Sillmann et al.,2013). More recently,in an attempt to demonstrate its simulation capability,some researchers have used CMIP5 multi-model outputs to prove historical extremes of climate change over China,but using only parts of temperature extreme indices with a small number of models for the ensemble mean(e.g., Yao et al.,2012).

    With a focus on the annual scale,this paper provides an assessment of the performance of CMIP5 multi-model ensemble techniques in simulating temperature extremes by comparing indices with gridded observations over China. The intention is for the indices calculated in this study to provide a useful reference for a greater understanding of the impacts of climate change on temperature extremes over China.

    2.Datasets and methodology

    2.1.Global climate models

    The climate simulations of the 20th century by CMIP5, referred to as the historical experiment,are driven by observed changes in atmospheric composition(reflecting both natural and anthropogenic sources).Generally,the CMIP5 models possess higher horizontal and vertical resolutions in comparison to CMIP3.The purpose of the historical experiment is to evaluate a model’s performance against present climate and observed climate change,provide initial conditions for experiments on future scenarios,and evaluate the anthropogenic impact on the 20th century climate(Taylor et al.,2012).

    To assess climate model performances in simulating present temperature extremes,simulations of daily minimum and maximum near-surface temperatures in 25 state-of-theart coupled general circulation climate models(GCMs)were collected from PCMDI(Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison)gateway websites.Table 1 provides an overview of the institutions and the related atmosphericmodel components of those GCMs.Many GCM simulations can include multi-member ensembles,but for the purposes of model evaluation in this study,only the first ensemble member was used(1961–2005).

    Table 1.Details of the 25 CMIP5 climate models.

    2.2.Observations

    A 0.5?×0.5?daily temperature dataset over China(Xu et al.,2009)(hereafter referred to as CN05.1)was used as observations.The gridded CN05.1 dataset has been widely used for comparing model-simulated indices.For the interpolation of the climatic field,the specific temperature information(Wu and Gao,2013)was produced with reference to CRU(Climatic Research Unit)data(New et al.,1999,2000) using thin-plate spline methods implemented in the ANUSPLIN software(Hutchinson,1999).The number of observation stations used was 2416,which included national reference climatological stations,basic weather stations,and general national weather stations(Fig.1).The dataset was subjected to quality control,including the deletion of any data that varied significantly in comparison with surrounding sites (Fig.1,Table 2).

    3.Methodology

    3.1.Indices of climatic extremes

    The WMO(World Meteorological Organization)Climate Committee recommended a set of indices of extreme weather events(http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/ETCCDI/list27 indices.shtml).In addition,Frich et al.(2002)also defined a series of indices,and STARDEX(Statistical and Regional Dynamical Downscaling of Extremes for European Regions) defined extreme climate indices based on the statistics of extreme events in the European region and regional downscaling projects(Table 3).These indices were calculated from daily maximum and minimum temperatures and developed for assessing changes in the intensity(absolute indices and threshold indices),duration(duration indices),and frequency (percentile indices)of extreme climatic events.

    STARDEX produced the FORTRAN software,which calculates indices of all extremes.The source code for the selected extreme climate indices was rewritten to fit the calculated grid data in this study.The extreme temperatureindices can be divided into four categories:

    Table 2.Latitude and longitude range of the seven subregions over China.

    (1)Absolute indices,including annual maxima of daily maximum(TXx)and daily minimum(TNx)temperatures, and annual minima of daily maximum(TXn)and daily minimum(TNn)temperatures.Typically,TXx and TNx are referred to as warm extremes,while TNn and TXn are referred to as cold extremes(Wen et al.,2013).

    (2)Threshold indices,including frost days(FD),summer days(SU),and tropical nights(TR)in this study,defined as the number of days on which a temperature value falls above or below a fixed threshold.These indices are often useful for studies of climate impact.

    (3)Duration indices,including the cold wave duration index(CWDI)and heat wave duration index(HWDI),which are based on percentile thresholds calculated from the base period 1961–90.Frich et al.(2002)used a fixed threshold of 5?C above the climatology to calculate the duration indices.

    (4)Percentile indices,including cold nights(TN10p), warm nights(TN90p),cold days(TX10p),and warm days (TX90p).The percentile indices are the percentage of days with daily minimum or maximum temperature more or less than the threshold percentile of the base period(1961–90).

    3.2.Processing

    CMIP5 models possess different resolutions,ranging from 96?×48?to 640?×320?,but the observed data used were the 1961–2007 gridded daily temperatures on a 0.5?× 0.5?latitude/longitude grid over China.For our analyses, we re-gridded all daily temperatures to a common resolution (1?×1?)using a bilinear method,and then chose the China region(1961–2005)to calculate the extreme temperature indices.For the multi-model ensemble,the arithmetic mean was used.

    The studied domains included seven subregions,as shown in Fig.1 and Table 2,based on China’s climatological administrative boundaries and societal and geographical conditions, similar to those used in China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change(National Report Committee,2007).

    3.3.Performance metrics

    3.3.1.Model performance metrics

    For analyzing the performance metrics of different indices and models,a performance metric approach was used to assess model performance,based on the root-mean-square errors(RMSEs)of model climatologies(Flato et al.,2013; Sheffield et al.,2013;Sillmann et al.,2013),similar to that applied by Gleckler et al.(2008).This approach provides a general idea of relative model performance regarding various climatic parameters.

    Each model and index was assessed with respect to CN05.1.In this analysis,RMSEs were calculated for the annual climatology of the indices of extremes over China and seven subregions of China.The RMSE was calculated as

    Table 3.Definitions of the extreme temperature indices used in this study.

    where X represents the model climatology of the extreme temperature index and Y is the corresponding extreme temperature in CN05.1.

    All model RMSEs were then used to calculate the relative model error(RMSE’)for each model,defined as

    where RMSEMis the median RMSE of the 25 models.

    To prevent abnormally large model errors(outliers)influencing the results,we chose the median rather than the mean value.For example,if the value of relative error was-0.2,then the model’s RMSE would be 20%smaller than RMSEM. Conversely,if RMSE is equal to 0.2,then the RMSE would be 20%greater than RMSEM(Gleckler et al.,2008).Normalizing the calculations of RMSEs in this way produced a measure of the performance of a model compared with the typical model error.

    3.3.2.Regional performance metrics

    The Taylor diagram was originally devised to supply a concise statistical summary of how well spatial patterns match each other in terms of their correlation,root-meansquare difference,and ratio of their variances.Although the form of this diagram is generic,it is especially useful in evaluating complex models.These diagrams can also be applied in summarizing the changes in the performance of an individualmodel.In general,parameterization scheme revisions will affect all the fields simulated by a model,and amelioration in one aspect of a simulation might be offset by deterioration in another(Taylor,2001).Thus,it can be useful to summarize on a diagram how well one model simulates a variety of subregions.

    The Taylor diagram is used in this paper to compare the simulation performance for different subregions in two main aspects—spatial correlation coefficients and spatial standard deviation ratios—to compare the average simulated extreme temperature indices with the observed indices.

    4.Results

    The results of this work are presented in terms of(1) model performance,(2)spatial patterns of changes for 1986–2005,where box-and-whisker plots show regional changes and Taylor diagrams summarize variations between different regions,and(3)temporal evaluation of spatially averaged indices for the period 1961–2005.

    4.1.Model performance

    The performance of each model in simulating the climatology of indices in the period 1986–2005 is summarized in a“portrait”diagram,just as in Gleckler et al.(2008).First, the median of the model is obtained by calculating the multimodel median of each index and then obtaining its relative RMSE.The performance of each model is assessed with respect to CN05.1.Table 4 presents a summary of relative errors in the model by using“portrait”diagrams.In the table, different colors are used to characterize the magnitudes of the RMSEs;warmer colors indicate those models that perform worse,while colder colors indicated those that perform better(Gleckler et al.,2008).The portraits are arranged such that the columns are labeled by the name of the model and the rows by the extreme index name.

    Consistent with the results of other multi-model studies (Flato etal.,2013;Gleckleretal.,2008;Sillmann etal.,2013; Sheffield et al.,2013),the ensemble mean generally outperforms individual models because part of the systematic errors of the individual models are offset in the multi-model mean.Most temperature indices are also captured reasonably well for most models,particularly in IPSL-CM5A-MR, MPI-ESM-LR,and CMCC-CMS.It is also noted that models with higherresolution often do notexhibitbetterperformance than those with lower resolutions in simulations of indices of extreme temperatures(e.g.,INMCM4,whose resolution is higher than NorESM1-M etc.).

    For the construction of the percentile indices(TX90p, TX10p,TN90p,and TN10p),the performances of the models are generally good over China.The comparison between global results(Sillmann et al.,2013)and regions of China, based on RMSE′,further indicates that temperature-based percentile indices are generally better captured in China.The magnitude ofthe multi-modelmean erroroverChina,asmeasured by RMSE′,is generally larger for the threshold indices than the duration and absolute indices.

    4.2.Spatial pattern

    4.2.1.Intensity extremes(threshold indices and absolute indices)

    The spatial patterns in simulating the threshold indices in the CMIP5 ensemble are shown in Fig.2.These spatial pattern features of simulated threshold indices are similar to those of observations derived by daily minimum or maximum temperatures,e.g.FD or SU.Some fluctuations in extreme temperatures in the simulated indices,caused by regional topography,exhibit good performance,e.g.,the low value area in the high temperature zone of the low elevation region in the northwest,which demonstrates the small-scale characteristics of the simulation.However,inadequacies are illustrated by the lowersimulated value in the low elevation region in the southwest.

    The spatial structure of absolute indices shows the distribution pattern is similar to the observations.However,there are still some divergences,particularly for high elevation terrain such as the Tibetan Plateau.In these regions,CN05.1 shows higher TXx and TXn values than the ensemble mean of CMIP5.The spatial coverage of the absolute indices of minimum temperature[TNn(0.95)and TNx(0.95)]is better than for maximum temperature[TXx(0.94)and TXn(0.94)] compared with CN05.1(Fig.3).

    For a detailed evaluation of model performance,extreme temperature indices are analyzed using Taylor diagrams. The Taylor diagrams for extreme temperature indices during 1986–2005 over China are shown in Figs.4 and 5.Each number corresponds to a region and the performance of its multi-model mean.Radial and angular coordinates indicate the magnitude of normalized standard deviation and correlation,respectively.The radial distance from the origin is proportional to the normalized standard deviation of a pattern.The seven subregions in the Taylor diagrams are shown in Fig.1.Each field is normalized by the corresponding standard deviation of the reference data(hereafter referred to as NSD)(Gleckler et al.,2008),which allows the ensemble mean in the different subregions(distinguished by number) to be shown in each panel.In this figure,each numbered dotrepresents a subregion in the ensemble mean simulation, where each number represents a subregion about the ensemble mean.The nearest NSD to 1 in the extreme temperature can be found in the SU index.In contrast with other indices, the Taylor diagram for the SU indices indicate that in most regions they perform relatively well,as they are nearly close to the reference point(Fig.4).

    ?

    It is also clear that the accuracy of the model simulation depends on the extreme indices as well as the subregions.Generally,there is a much larger inter-index spread for the subregions(Fig.4).In some simulated fields,FD shows correlations with the reference data of greater than 0.9[e.g.,the NEC(Northeast China),NC(North China)and SWC(Southwest China)subregions],whereas other subregions have much lower correlations[e.g.,NWC(Northwest China)and EC(East China)].The absolute indices over China are very good,and the absolute indices in the SWC subregion are better than in the other subregions(Fig.5).

    The multi-year mean of extreme temperature indices over each region of China during 1986–2005 were calculated for the different models and the observations.Temporal and spatial averages of extreme temperature indices are also summarized in box-and-whisker plots(Fig.6).The colored solid mark within the box is the median of the multiple models (blue round solid mark within the box),and the blue dot is the observations.The interquartile model range is the range between the lower(25th)and upper(75th)percentiles of the total model ensemble,and the whiskers are the total intermodel range.It can be seen from Fig.6 that the models compare well with CN05.1.In particular,the median of the CMIP5 models agrees well with CN05.1 in the representation of FD,SU,and TR,especially the latter,which is closer to CN05.1 compared with the other indices.There is also reasonable correspondence between the CMIP5 multi-model simulation of the median of the absolute indices and CN05.1, with differences typically within several degrees over most subregions of China.However,the results also show that the CMIP5 median of TXn is smaller than CN05.1 across all re-gions,especially in the SWC subregion.

    4.2.2.Duration extremes(duration indices)

    The CMIP5 ensemble mean HWDI is close to the observed distribution pattern,and the HWDI index of the ensemble simulation in northern China is lower compared with observations(Fig.7).However,in northern,northeastern and northwestern China,as well as the Tibetan Plateau area,the simulated CWDI is higher than observed.The reason may be the difference between the modeled and actual topography,especially in the Tibetan Plateau.Also,the number of observation stations in the west is relatively small,such as in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau to the northern foot of the Kunlun Mountains and Xinjiang’s Taklimakan Desert hinterland,which may also have affected the results of the interpolation of the data.

    Figure 8 clearly shows which regions exaggerate the amplitude of extreme temperature index(e.g.,the NWC sub-region)and which models’ensembles grossly underestimate NSD in most regions.Basically,the largest NSD and the smallest correlation index in the temperature indices over China can be found in HWDI(Fig.8).

    These results show that,generally,the CMIP5 median of CWDI(Fig.6)is larger than in CN05.1 across all regions; and thus,more cold waves are simulated in comparison with CN05.1.The CWDI index also produces the most significant outliers(biases)in the simulation of CWDI compared with CN05.1,and it also exhibits significant outliers in the SWC subregion in the CMIP5 ensemble for CWDI,and in the SC subregion for HWDI.

    4.2.3.Frequency extremes(percentile indices)

    The models also disagree in terms of the annual mean value over China,insofar as the percentile indices show much larger values compared to CN05.1 with respect to TN10p and TX10p,but much lower values compared to CN05.1 with respect to TN90p and TX90p(not shown).The Taylor diagrams for the percentile indices reveal that some fields show low correlation values and NSD with the reference data in most regions(not shown).

    The results of the box-and-whisker plots(Fig.6)show that the median of the CMIP5 models is generally underestimated with respect to TX90p in comparison with CN05.1 in all regions.The CMIP5 median tends to underestimate the TN10p and Tx90p indices over China compared with CN05.1 in all regions,and overestimates the TX10p index compared with CN05.1 in most regions.The models disagree with CN05.1 with respect to TX90p,showing much smaller values than the CMIP5 median.The discrepancy is most prominent for TN10p in the NEC subregion and TX90p in the CC (central China)subregion,for which the CN05.1 values are located far above the CMIP model range.

    A comparison of the spatial structure between the CMIP5 models and observations shows that the main features of the spatial distribution of temperature extremes are captured well by the model ensemble percentile indices.As a whole,the CMIP5 models compare well with CN05.1,and the spatial structure of the ensemble result is better for indices of threshold extremes than for indices of intensity extremes(Alexander et al.,2006).In some regions,the number of observation stations in the west is relatively small,and in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau to the northern foot of the Kunlun Mountains and Xinjiang’s Taklimakan Desert hinterland,the basic distribution of observation sites,which also determines the interpolation of the data of these areas,has relatively large uncertainty.Warm extremes(SU,TR,TNx,HWDI),except TXx,are underestimated over high northern latitudes,particularly in the northwest,while cold extremes(FD,TXn,TNn, CWDI)are overestimated,which is in accordance with previous findings based on IPCC AR4 models(Wang et al.,2008).

    4.3.Temporal evolution of indices

    Sillmann et al.(2013)suggested that there is not a clear relationship between a model’s spatial resolution and its representation of temperature indices,and thus the results fromindividual CMIP5 models were not shown.For historical trends,the CMIP5 models’ensemble generally captures well the observed trends in the indices of temperature extremes during 1961–2005.The long-term trends in simulating the historical temporal evolution of the indices for the anomalies are more distinct in Figs.9 and 10.

    4.3.1.Intensity extremes(threshold indices and absolute indices)

    The modeled threshold index trends are consistent with CN05.1(figures not shown).The threshold indices of the ensemble mean show corresponding trends,with increasing numbers of TR[1.31 d(10 yr)-1]and SU[1.64 d(10 yr)-1] and decreasing numbers of FD[-2.02 d(10 yr)-1].There are similar increasing trends in the models’ensemble mean compared with CN05.1 for SU[1.44 d(10 yr)-1]and TR [1.00 d(10 yr)-1]during 1961–2005.

    The multi-model ensemble mean shows similar warming trends in the absolute indices starting in the 1960s,compared with CN05.1(Fig.9),with a general increase in TNn,TNx, TXx,and TXn.In China,the increases in both TNx[0.23?C (10 yr)-1]and TNn[0.29?C(10 yr)-1],which depend on the minimum temperature,are greater than the increases in both TXx[0.21?C(10 yr)-1]and TXn[0.24?C(10 yr)-1],which depend on maximum temperature.

    4.3.2.Duration extremes(duration indices)

    During 1961 to 2005,the mean CMIP5 models simulate a decrease in CWDI[-0.61 d(10 yr)-1],while showing a strong increase in HWDI[1.38 d(10 yr)-1]over China(not shown).

    4.3.3.Frequency extremes(percentile indices)

    The changes are much more pronounced in the percentile indices compared to the absolute indices,which are derived from annual extremes(Fig.10).The construction ofthe percentile indices leads to adequate correlation(0.67–0.91)in the temporal evolution of the CMIP models and the observations.The average across China shows a decrease in terms of cold nights(TN10p)and cold days(TX10p), but an increase in warm nights(TN90p)and warm days (TX90p).

    Differences in the percentile index lines are especially prominent between the most recent two decades and for those indices derived from minimum temperature.Increasing trends in warm days(TX90p)[1.21%(10 yr)-1]and nights(TN90p)[1.70%(10 yr)-1]and decreasing trends in cold days(TX10p)[-0.68%(10 yr)-1]and nights(TN10p) [-0.96%(10 yr)-1]can be seen in the CMIP5 models,which is consistent with globally observed changes(Alexander etal.,2006;Donat et al.,2013)and global CMIP5 model results(Sillmann et al.,2013).This is also consistent with the general trend of extreme observations in China,which shows that the frequency of extreme cold temperatures and coldtemperature events is reducing(Ding et al.,2002;Ding et al., 2009).

    5.Summary and concluding remarks

    Based on simulations of the 20th century by the 25 climate models in the CMIP5 set of experiments,the performance in simulating the indices of present temperature extremes over China was assessed.The main findings can be summarized as follows:

    (1)Extreme temperature simulation over China was derived from the 25 CMIP5 models and ensemble simulation and compared with observations.The difference between the models and observations is reduced by the multi-model ensemble method.The multi-model ensemble simulations are closer to observations in terms of relative RMSEs(RMSE relative to the median RMSE of all models)for most models and indices over China.

    (2)Compared with observations,the models are able to capture the main features of the spatial distribution of temperature during 1986–2005.The Taylor diagrams show that divergences between the multi-model ensemble and observations in terms of the threshold temperature indices are smaller than other temperature indices.For the regional mean over China,the multi-model ensemble simulations of CMIP5 with respect to FD and CWDI show larger values than CN05.1,whereas the ensemble simulations with respect to SU,TXn and TX10p underestimate the actual extreme indices in CN05.1.Uncertainties in some extreme indices(such as TN10p,TN90p,TX90p,and TXn)are larger than in others, and there are also large spatial differences between threshold indices and absolute indices,which may be associated with the larger interquartile model spread due to the different climate sensitivitiesofthe modelsand/orpositive regionalland–atmosphere feedback processes.For the duration and frequency indices,wide disagreement was found regarding the change between models and observations in some regions.

    (3)In terms of the temporal changes of the indices of temperature extremes,the model ensemble performs well in reproducing the trend of change in the indices of temperature extremes.For example,for 1961–2005,CN05.1 shows an increase in warm days(TX90p)with a trend of 1.3%(10 yr)-1, while cold days(TX10p)shows a decrease of-0.74%(10 yr)-1.The CMIP5 ensemble results also show these trends, but with a smaller trend.These results show that the ensemble simulation tends to increase warm extremes(e.g.,SU,TR, HWDI,TN90p,and TX90p)over China,and decease cold extremes(e.g.,FD,CWDI,TN10p,and TX10p).

    This study comprehensively compared model simulations and observations,but there was no in-depth analysis of the resolutions of the models,nor their physical or other processes.Avila et al.(2012)suggested that many extreme temperature indices can be affected by land use and land cover changes.Therefore,our model assessment should be extended by further studies of seasonal model performance and particular regions that are especially sensitive to climatic changes in extreme events over China.

    Additionally,considering the uncertainties in the simulations,further research should focus on how to adopt a more rational and scientific approach to extracting useful information from the simulation results,and how to better use the simulation results for detecting and attributing climate change(Orlowsky and Seneviratne,2012).

    Acknowledgements.This study was supported by the National Basic Key Project(also called 973 Project,Grant Nos. 2010CB950501 and 2010CB950102),the R&D Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry(meteorology)(Grant No.GYHY 201306019),and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41275078).

    REFERENCES

    Alexander,L.V.,and Coauthors,2006:Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation.J. Geophys.Res.,111,D05109,doi:10.1029/2005JD006290.

    Avila,F.B.,A.J.Pitman,M.G.Donat,L.V.Alexander,and G. Abramowitz,2012:Climate model simulated changes in temperature extremes due to land cover change.J.Geophys.Res.,117,D04108,doi:10.1029/2011JD016382.

    Bindoff,N.L.,and Coauthors,2013:Detection and attribution of climate change:From global to regional.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al.,Eds., Cambridge University Press,867–952,

    Ding,T.,W.H.Qian,and Z.W.Yan,2009:Characteristics and changes of cold surge events over China during 1960–2007. Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,2(6),339–344.

    Ding,Y.H.,J.Zhang,and Y.F.Song,2002:Changes in weather and climate extreme events and their association with the global warming.Meteorological Monthly,28(3),3–7.(in Chinese)

    Donat,M.G.,and Coauthors,2013:Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century:The HadEX2 dataset.J.Geophys.Res.,118,2098–2118,doi:10.1029/2012JD018606.

    Flato,G.,and Coauthors,2013:Evaluation of climate models.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al, Eds.,Cambridge University Press,741–866.

    Frich,P.,L.V.Alexander,P.Della-Marta,B.Gleason,M.Haylock, A.Tank,and T.Peterson,2002:Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century.Climatic Research,19,193–212.

    Gleckler,P.J.,K.E.Taylor,and C.Doutriaux,2008:Performance metrics for climate models.J.Geophys.Res.,113,D06104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008972.

    Hutchinson M.F.,1999:ANUSPLIN version 4.0 user guide.Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies,Australian National Univeristy,Canberra ACT 0200,51pp Australia.

    Kharin,V.V.,F.W.Zwiers,X.Zhang,and M.Wehner,2013: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble.Climatic Change,119(2),345–357.

    Knutti,R.,and J.Sedl′aˇcek,2013:Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections.Nature Climate Change,3,363–373,doi:10.1038/nclimate1716.

    National Report Committee,2007:China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change.Science Press,148 pp.(in Chi-nese)

    New,M.,M.Hulme,and P.Jones,1999:Representing twentiethcentury space-time climate variability.Part I:Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology.J.Climate, 12:829–856.

    New,M.,M.Hulme,and P.Jones,2000:Representing twentiethcentury space-time climate variability.Part II:Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate.J.Climate,13,2217–2238.

    Orlowsky,B.,and S.I.Seneviratne,2012:Global changes in extreme events:Regional and seasonal dimension.Climatic Change,110(3-4),669–696.

    Sheffield J.,and Coauthors,2013:North American climate in CMIP5 experiments.Part I:Evaluation of historical simulations of continental and regional climatology.J.Climate,26,9209–9245.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00592.1.

    Sillmann,J.,V.V.Kharin,X.Zhang,F.W.Zwiers,and D. Bronaugh,2013:Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble:Part 1.Model evaluation in the present climate.J.Geophys.Res.,118(4),1716–1733.

    Taylor,K.E.,2001:Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram.J.Geophys.Res.,106,7183–7192.

    Taylor,K.E.,R.J.Stouffer,and G.A.Meehl,2012:An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.Bull.Amer.Meteor. Soc.,93,485–498,doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.

    Tebaldi,C.,K.Hayhoe,J.M.Arblaster,and G.A.Meehl,2006: Going to the extremes.Climatic Change,79(3-4),185–211, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9051-4.

    Wang,J.,Z.H.Jiang,J.Song,and Y.G.Ding,2008:Evaluating the simulation of the GCMS on the extreme temperature indices in China.Acta Geographica Sinica,63(3),227–236.(in Chinese)

    Wen,H.Q.,X.B.Zhang,Y.Xu,and B.Wang,2013:Detecting human influence on extreme temperatures in China.Geophys. Res.Lett.,40,1171–1176,doi:10.1002/grl.50285.

    Wu,J.,and X.J.Gao,2013:A gridded daily observation dataset over China region and comparison with the other datasets.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,56(4),1102–1111, doi:10.6038/cjg20130406.(in Chinese)

    Xu,Y.,2012:The projection and possible risks of future extreme weather events.Climate Change Green Paper—Climate Financing and Low-Carbon Development,169–177.

    Xu,Y.,X.J.Gao,Y.Shen,C.H.Xu,Y.Shi,and F.Giorgi,2009: A daily temperature dataset over China and its application in validating a RCM simulation.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,26(4),763–772,doi:10.1007/s00376-009-9029-z.

    Yao,Y.,Y.Luo,and J.B.Huang,2012:Evaluation and projection of temperature extremes over China based on CMIP5 Model. Advances in Climate Change Research,3,179–185.

    Zheng,Y.H.,and Coauthors,2011:The Second National Assessment Report on Climate Change.Science Press,710 pp.(in Chinese)

    :Dong,S.Y.,Y.Xu,B.T.Zhou,and Y.Shi,2015:Assessment of indices of temperature extremes simulated by multiple CMIP5 models over China.Adv.Atmos Sci.,32(8),1077–1091,

    10.1007/s00376-015-4152-5.

    11 August 2014;revised 6 January 2015;accepted 22 January 2015)

    ?Corresponding author:XU Ying

    Email:xuying@cma.gov.cn

    国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 99热网站在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 免费观看av网站的网址| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 在线播放无遮挡| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 黄色日韩在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 身体一侧抽搐| 成人国产av品久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 一级av片app| 日韩成人伦理影院| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| av在线老鸭窝| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 人妻系列 视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲在久久综合| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产成人精品婷婷| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 观看美女的网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 有码 亚洲区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 免费av毛片视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 色视频www国产| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 色网站视频免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久6这里有精品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩强制内射视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 综合色av麻豆| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产 一区精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| av播播在线观看一区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费看不卡的av| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产综合精华液| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 三级经典国产精品| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美97在线视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久久色成人| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 夫妻午夜视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 午夜日本视频在线| 免费大片18禁| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 麻豆成人av视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲av一区综合| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 插逼视频在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 色5月婷婷丁香| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| www.av在线官网国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 男女那种视频在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美成人a在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| videossex国产| 免费av观看视频| www.色视频.com| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 97在线视频观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日日啪夜夜撸| 在现免费观看毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av在线播放精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲精品第二区| av福利片在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 99热这里只有是精品50| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久国产乱子免费精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产在线男女| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 色吧在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 乱系列少妇在线播放| av福利片在线观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 91狼人影院| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久97久久精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久久久久伊人网av| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产成人freesex在线| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产综合懂色| 免费av毛片视频| 极品教师在线视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 永久免费av网站大全| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 人妻一区二区av| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品午夜福利在线看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 插逼视频在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 免费大片18禁| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久久久九九精品影院| 熟女电影av网| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲综合精品二区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | av播播在线观看一区| 三级国产精品片| 国产极品天堂在线| 青春草国产在线视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 熟女电影av网| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久午夜福利片| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲最大成人中文| 色播亚洲综合网| 黄色日韩在线| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| av专区在线播放| 夫妻午夜视频| 熟女av电影| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文资源天堂在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 免费观看在线日韩| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产综合懂色| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 男女边摸边吃奶| a级毛色黄片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 日日啪夜夜撸| 51国产日韩欧美| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 直男gayav资源| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久影院123| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 免费看日本二区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产淫语在线视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 高清毛片免费看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 一级黄片播放器| 免费观看a级毛片全部| videos熟女内射| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 嫩草影院新地址| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产综合精华液| .国产精品久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 伊人久久国产一区二区| av一本久久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 大码成人一级视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| av在线蜜桃| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 欧美一区二区亚洲| 熟女电影av网| 成年免费大片在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日本与韩国留学比较| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产视频首页在线观看| 色综合色国产| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 一级爰片在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | av专区在线播放| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| av在线蜜桃| 极品教师在线视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久久久国产网址| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 香蕉精品网在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 色网站视频免费| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 婷婷色综合www| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 观看免费一级毛片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品久久久久久久久av| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 成人欧美大片| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 午夜福利在线在线| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av黄色大香蕉| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 99久久人妻综合| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 在线观看国产h片| av在线蜜桃| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| av在线播放精品| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 午夜老司机福利剧场|