• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessment of Indices of Temperature Extremes Simulated by Multiple CMIP5 Models over China

    2015-06-09 21:37:22DONGSiyanXUYingZHOUBotaoandSHIYing
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年8期

    DONG Siyan,XU Ying,ZHOU Botao,and SHI Ying

    National Climate Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    Assessment of Indices of Temperature Extremes Simulated by Multiple CMIP5 Models over China

    DONG Siyan,XU Ying?,ZHOU Botao,and SHI Ying

    National Climate Center,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081

    Given that climate extremes in China might have serious regional and global consequences,an increasing number of studies are examining temperature extremes in China using the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5(CMIP5) models.This paper investigates recent changes in temperature extremes in China using 25 state-of-the-art global climate models participating in CMIP5.Thirteen indices that represent extreme temperature events were chosen and derived by daily maximum and minimum temperatures,including those representing the intensity(absolute indices and threshold indices), duration(duration indices),and frequency(percentile indices)of extreme temperature.The overall performance of each model is summarized by a“portrait”diagram based on relative root-mean-square error,which is the RMSE relative to the median RMSE of all models,revealing the multi-model ensemble simulation to be better than individual model for most indices.Compared with observations,the models are able to capture the main features of the spatial distribution of extreme temperature during 1986–2005.Overall,the CMIP5 models are able to depict the observed indices well,and the spatial structure of the ensemble result is better for threshold indices than frequency indices.The spread amongst the CMIP5 models in different subregions for intensity indices is small and the median CMIP5 is close to observations;however,for the duration and frequency indices there can be wide disagreementregarding the change between models and observations in some regions. The model ensemble also performs well in reproducing the observational trend of temperature extremes.All absolute indices increase over China during 1961–2005.

    temperature extremes,China,CMIP5,model evaluation

    1.Introduction

    The implications of global warming on climatic extreme events are of particular concern internationally,particularly with respect to economic,ecological,and health impacts(Orlowsky and Seneviratne,2012).The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)concluded in its Fifth Assessment Report(AR5)that climate change,whether driven by natural or human forcing,can lead to changes in the likelihood of the occurrence or strength of extreme weather and climate events,or both(Bindoff et al.,2013).Furthermore,some of the changes in weather and climate extreme events observed in the late 20th century are projected to continue into the future(Kharin et al.,2013).

    In China,weather and climate events associated with warm and cold extremes,such as heavy rain,droughts,and typhoons since 1951,have also have shown increases in frequency,intensity,and regional extent.The combined effects of these changes could result in unprecedented extreme weather and climatic events,increasing the risk to humans of extreme climatic disasters(Xu,2012).Extreme climate change has seriously affected China’s agriculture,ecosystems,distribution of water resources,and human health;thus, the assessment of climate impact,particularly regarding climate extremes,has become an important area of research (Zheng et al.,2011).

    The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project(CMIP), initiated by the World Climate Research Programme,is engaged in the simulation and prediction of the global climatic system.CMIP provides a community-based infrastructure in support of climate model diagnosis,validation,intercomparison,documentation and data access,based on state-of-the-art coupled global models for projecting and analyzing climate change.Today,the CMIP series has evolved to a fifth stage (CMIP5).CMIP5 is based on an improved CMIP3 model system,incorporating dynamic vegetation models,carbon cycle process models,and a more rational parameterization scheme,which through enhanced processing programs and coupling technology is expected to provide more detailed and more certain projections(Knutti and Sedl′aˇcek,2013). CMIP5 places greater emphasis on the consideration of landuse/cover forcing compared to CMIP3,and most models incorporate consistent land use/cover data(Taylor et al.,2012). Despite some limitations,CMIP5 simulation trends and observed trends can be determined,and the patterns of extreme temperature trends can be simulated reasonably well(Tebaldi et al.,2006).As Sillmann et al.(2013)revealed,the CMIP5 models are generally able to simulate climate extremes and their trends as representations of indices when compared with the HadEX2 gridded observational indices dataset(HadEX2 is a global land-based climate extremes dataset produced by the Met Office Hadley Centre,UK).The spread amongst the CMIP5 models for several temperature indices is reduced compared to CMIP3 models,despite the number of models participating in CMIP5 being larger(Sillmann et al.,2013). More recently,in an attempt to demonstrate its simulation capability,some researchers have used CMIP5 multi-model outputs to prove historical extremes of climate change over China,but using only parts of temperature extreme indices with a small number of models for the ensemble mean(e.g., Yao et al.,2012).

    With a focus on the annual scale,this paper provides an assessment of the performance of CMIP5 multi-model ensemble techniques in simulating temperature extremes by comparing indices with gridded observations over China. The intention is for the indices calculated in this study to provide a useful reference for a greater understanding of the impacts of climate change on temperature extremes over China.

    2.Datasets and methodology

    2.1.Global climate models

    The climate simulations of the 20th century by CMIP5, referred to as the historical experiment,are driven by observed changes in atmospheric composition(reflecting both natural and anthropogenic sources).Generally,the CMIP5 models possess higher horizontal and vertical resolutions in comparison to CMIP3.The purpose of the historical experiment is to evaluate a model’s performance against present climate and observed climate change,provide initial conditions for experiments on future scenarios,and evaluate the anthropogenic impact on the 20th century climate(Taylor et al.,2012).

    To assess climate model performances in simulating present temperature extremes,simulations of daily minimum and maximum near-surface temperatures in 25 state-of-theart coupled general circulation climate models(GCMs)were collected from PCMDI(Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison)gateway websites.Table 1 provides an overview of the institutions and the related atmosphericmodel components of those GCMs.Many GCM simulations can include multi-member ensembles,but for the purposes of model evaluation in this study,only the first ensemble member was used(1961–2005).

    Table 1.Details of the 25 CMIP5 climate models.

    2.2.Observations

    A 0.5?×0.5?daily temperature dataset over China(Xu et al.,2009)(hereafter referred to as CN05.1)was used as observations.The gridded CN05.1 dataset has been widely used for comparing model-simulated indices.For the interpolation of the climatic field,the specific temperature information(Wu and Gao,2013)was produced with reference to CRU(Climatic Research Unit)data(New et al.,1999,2000) using thin-plate spline methods implemented in the ANUSPLIN software(Hutchinson,1999).The number of observation stations used was 2416,which included national reference climatological stations,basic weather stations,and general national weather stations(Fig.1).The dataset was subjected to quality control,including the deletion of any data that varied significantly in comparison with surrounding sites (Fig.1,Table 2).

    3.Methodology

    3.1.Indices of climatic extremes

    The WMO(World Meteorological Organization)Climate Committee recommended a set of indices of extreme weather events(http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/ETCCDI/list27 indices.shtml).In addition,Frich et al.(2002)also defined a series of indices,and STARDEX(Statistical and Regional Dynamical Downscaling of Extremes for European Regions) defined extreme climate indices based on the statistics of extreme events in the European region and regional downscaling projects(Table 3).These indices were calculated from daily maximum and minimum temperatures and developed for assessing changes in the intensity(absolute indices and threshold indices),duration(duration indices),and frequency (percentile indices)of extreme climatic events.

    STARDEX produced the FORTRAN software,which calculates indices of all extremes.The source code for the selected extreme climate indices was rewritten to fit the calculated grid data in this study.The extreme temperatureindices can be divided into four categories:

    Table 2.Latitude and longitude range of the seven subregions over China.

    (1)Absolute indices,including annual maxima of daily maximum(TXx)and daily minimum(TNx)temperatures, and annual minima of daily maximum(TXn)and daily minimum(TNn)temperatures.Typically,TXx and TNx are referred to as warm extremes,while TNn and TXn are referred to as cold extremes(Wen et al.,2013).

    (2)Threshold indices,including frost days(FD),summer days(SU),and tropical nights(TR)in this study,defined as the number of days on which a temperature value falls above or below a fixed threshold.These indices are often useful for studies of climate impact.

    (3)Duration indices,including the cold wave duration index(CWDI)and heat wave duration index(HWDI),which are based on percentile thresholds calculated from the base period 1961–90.Frich et al.(2002)used a fixed threshold of 5?C above the climatology to calculate the duration indices.

    (4)Percentile indices,including cold nights(TN10p), warm nights(TN90p),cold days(TX10p),and warm days (TX90p).The percentile indices are the percentage of days with daily minimum or maximum temperature more or less than the threshold percentile of the base period(1961–90).

    3.2.Processing

    CMIP5 models possess different resolutions,ranging from 96?×48?to 640?×320?,but the observed data used were the 1961–2007 gridded daily temperatures on a 0.5?× 0.5?latitude/longitude grid over China.For our analyses, we re-gridded all daily temperatures to a common resolution (1?×1?)using a bilinear method,and then chose the China region(1961–2005)to calculate the extreme temperature indices.For the multi-model ensemble,the arithmetic mean was used.

    The studied domains included seven subregions,as shown in Fig.1 and Table 2,based on China’s climatological administrative boundaries and societal and geographical conditions, similar to those used in China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change(National Report Committee,2007).

    3.3.Performance metrics

    3.3.1.Model performance metrics

    For analyzing the performance metrics of different indices and models,a performance metric approach was used to assess model performance,based on the root-mean-square errors(RMSEs)of model climatologies(Flato et al.,2013; Sheffield et al.,2013;Sillmann et al.,2013),similar to that applied by Gleckler et al.(2008).This approach provides a general idea of relative model performance regarding various climatic parameters.

    Each model and index was assessed with respect to CN05.1.In this analysis,RMSEs were calculated for the annual climatology of the indices of extremes over China and seven subregions of China.The RMSE was calculated as

    Table 3.Definitions of the extreme temperature indices used in this study.

    where X represents the model climatology of the extreme temperature index and Y is the corresponding extreme temperature in CN05.1.

    All model RMSEs were then used to calculate the relative model error(RMSE’)for each model,defined as

    where RMSEMis the median RMSE of the 25 models.

    To prevent abnormally large model errors(outliers)influencing the results,we chose the median rather than the mean value.For example,if the value of relative error was-0.2,then the model’s RMSE would be 20%smaller than RMSEM. Conversely,if RMSE is equal to 0.2,then the RMSE would be 20%greater than RMSEM(Gleckler et al.,2008).Normalizing the calculations of RMSEs in this way produced a measure of the performance of a model compared with the typical model error.

    3.3.2.Regional performance metrics

    The Taylor diagram was originally devised to supply a concise statistical summary of how well spatial patterns match each other in terms of their correlation,root-meansquare difference,and ratio of their variances.Although the form of this diagram is generic,it is especially useful in evaluating complex models.These diagrams can also be applied in summarizing the changes in the performance of an individualmodel.In general,parameterization scheme revisions will affect all the fields simulated by a model,and amelioration in one aspect of a simulation might be offset by deterioration in another(Taylor,2001).Thus,it can be useful to summarize on a diagram how well one model simulates a variety of subregions.

    The Taylor diagram is used in this paper to compare the simulation performance for different subregions in two main aspects—spatial correlation coefficients and spatial standard deviation ratios—to compare the average simulated extreme temperature indices with the observed indices.

    4.Results

    The results of this work are presented in terms of(1) model performance,(2)spatial patterns of changes for 1986–2005,where box-and-whisker plots show regional changes and Taylor diagrams summarize variations between different regions,and(3)temporal evaluation of spatially averaged indices for the period 1961–2005.

    4.1.Model performance

    The performance of each model in simulating the climatology of indices in the period 1986–2005 is summarized in a“portrait”diagram,just as in Gleckler et al.(2008).First, the median of the model is obtained by calculating the multimodel median of each index and then obtaining its relative RMSE.The performance of each model is assessed with respect to CN05.1.Table 4 presents a summary of relative errors in the model by using“portrait”diagrams.In the table, different colors are used to characterize the magnitudes of the RMSEs;warmer colors indicate those models that perform worse,while colder colors indicated those that perform better(Gleckler et al.,2008).The portraits are arranged such that the columns are labeled by the name of the model and the rows by the extreme index name.

    Consistent with the results of other multi-model studies (Flato etal.,2013;Gleckleretal.,2008;Sillmann etal.,2013; Sheffield et al.,2013),the ensemble mean generally outperforms individual models because part of the systematic errors of the individual models are offset in the multi-model mean.Most temperature indices are also captured reasonably well for most models,particularly in IPSL-CM5A-MR, MPI-ESM-LR,and CMCC-CMS.It is also noted that models with higherresolution often do notexhibitbetterperformance than those with lower resolutions in simulations of indices of extreme temperatures(e.g.,INMCM4,whose resolution is higher than NorESM1-M etc.).

    For the construction of the percentile indices(TX90p, TX10p,TN90p,and TN10p),the performances of the models are generally good over China.The comparison between global results(Sillmann et al.,2013)and regions of China, based on RMSE′,further indicates that temperature-based percentile indices are generally better captured in China.The magnitude ofthe multi-modelmean erroroverChina,asmeasured by RMSE′,is generally larger for the threshold indices than the duration and absolute indices.

    4.2.Spatial pattern

    4.2.1.Intensity extremes(threshold indices and absolute indices)

    The spatial patterns in simulating the threshold indices in the CMIP5 ensemble are shown in Fig.2.These spatial pattern features of simulated threshold indices are similar to those of observations derived by daily minimum or maximum temperatures,e.g.FD or SU.Some fluctuations in extreme temperatures in the simulated indices,caused by regional topography,exhibit good performance,e.g.,the low value area in the high temperature zone of the low elevation region in the northwest,which demonstrates the small-scale characteristics of the simulation.However,inadequacies are illustrated by the lowersimulated value in the low elevation region in the southwest.

    The spatial structure of absolute indices shows the distribution pattern is similar to the observations.However,there are still some divergences,particularly for high elevation terrain such as the Tibetan Plateau.In these regions,CN05.1 shows higher TXx and TXn values than the ensemble mean of CMIP5.The spatial coverage of the absolute indices of minimum temperature[TNn(0.95)and TNx(0.95)]is better than for maximum temperature[TXx(0.94)and TXn(0.94)] compared with CN05.1(Fig.3).

    For a detailed evaluation of model performance,extreme temperature indices are analyzed using Taylor diagrams. The Taylor diagrams for extreme temperature indices during 1986–2005 over China are shown in Figs.4 and 5.Each number corresponds to a region and the performance of its multi-model mean.Radial and angular coordinates indicate the magnitude of normalized standard deviation and correlation,respectively.The radial distance from the origin is proportional to the normalized standard deviation of a pattern.The seven subregions in the Taylor diagrams are shown in Fig.1.Each field is normalized by the corresponding standard deviation of the reference data(hereafter referred to as NSD)(Gleckler et al.,2008),which allows the ensemble mean in the different subregions(distinguished by number) to be shown in each panel.In this figure,each numbered dotrepresents a subregion in the ensemble mean simulation, where each number represents a subregion about the ensemble mean.The nearest NSD to 1 in the extreme temperature can be found in the SU index.In contrast with other indices, the Taylor diagram for the SU indices indicate that in most regions they perform relatively well,as they are nearly close to the reference point(Fig.4).

    ?

    It is also clear that the accuracy of the model simulation depends on the extreme indices as well as the subregions.Generally,there is a much larger inter-index spread for the subregions(Fig.4).In some simulated fields,FD shows correlations with the reference data of greater than 0.9[e.g.,the NEC(Northeast China),NC(North China)and SWC(Southwest China)subregions],whereas other subregions have much lower correlations[e.g.,NWC(Northwest China)and EC(East China)].The absolute indices over China are very good,and the absolute indices in the SWC subregion are better than in the other subregions(Fig.5).

    The multi-year mean of extreme temperature indices over each region of China during 1986–2005 were calculated for the different models and the observations.Temporal and spatial averages of extreme temperature indices are also summarized in box-and-whisker plots(Fig.6).The colored solid mark within the box is the median of the multiple models (blue round solid mark within the box),and the blue dot is the observations.The interquartile model range is the range between the lower(25th)and upper(75th)percentiles of the total model ensemble,and the whiskers are the total intermodel range.It can be seen from Fig.6 that the models compare well with CN05.1.In particular,the median of the CMIP5 models agrees well with CN05.1 in the representation of FD,SU,and TR,especially the latter,which is closer to CN05.1 compared with the other indices.There is also reasonable correspondence between the CMIP5 multi-model simulation of the median of the absolute indices and CN05.1, with differences typically within several degrees over most subregions of China.However,the results also show that the CMIP5 median of TXn is smaller than CN05.1 across all re-gions,especially in the SWC subregion.

    4.2.2.Duration extremes(duration indices)

    The CMIP5 ensemble mean HWDI is close to the observed distribution pattern,and the HWDI index of the ensemble simulation in northern China is lower compared with observations(Fig.7).However,in northern,northeastern and northwestern China,as well as the Tibetan Plateau area,the simulated CWDI is higher than observed.The reason may be the difference between the modeled and actual topography,especially in the Tibetan Plateau.Also,the number of observation stations in the west is relatively small,such as in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau to the northern foot of the Kunlun Mountains and Xinjiang’s Taklimakan Desert hinterland,which may also have affected the results of the interpolation of the data.

    Figure 8 clearly shows which regions exaggerate the amplitude of extreme temperature index(e.g.,the NWC sub-region)and which models’ensembles grossly underestimate NSD in most regions.Basically,the largest NSD and the smallest correlation index in the temperature indices over China can be found in HWDI(Fig.8).

    These results show that,generally,the CMIP5 median of CWDI(Fig.6)is larger than in CN05.1 across all regions; and thus,more cold waves are simulated in comparison with CN05.1.The CWDI index also produces the most significant outliers(biases)in the simulation of CWDI compared with CN05.1,and it also exhibits significant outliers in the SWC subregion in the CMIP5 ensemble for CWDI,and in the SC subregion for HWDI.

    4.2.3.Frequency extremes(percentile indices)

    The models also disagree in terms of the annual mean value over China,insofar as the percentile indices show much larger values compared to CN05.1 with respect to TN10p and TX10p,but much lower values compared to CN05.1 with respect to TN90p and TX90p(not shown).The Taylor diagrams for the percentile indices reveal that some fields show low correlation values and NSD with the reference data in most regions(not shown).

    The results of the box-and-whisker plots(Fig.6)show that the median of the CMIP5 models is generally underestimated with respect to TX90p in comparison with CN05.1 in all regions.The CMIP5 median tends to underestimate the TN10p and Tx90p indices over China compared with CN05.1 in all regions,and overestimates the TX10p index compared with CN05.1 in most regions.The models disagree with CN05.1 with respect to TX90p,showing much smaller values than the CMIP5 median.The discrepancy is most prominent for TN10p in the NEC subregion and TX90p in the CC (central China)subregion,for which the CN05.1 values are located far above the CMIP model range.

    A comparison of the spatial structure between the CMIP5 models and observations shows that the main features of the spatial distribution of temperature extremes are captured well by the model ensemble percentile indices.As a whole,the CMIP5 models compare well with CN05.1,and the spatial structure of the ensemble result is better for indices of threshold extremes than for indices of intensity extremes(Alexander et al.,2006).In some regions,the number of observation stations in the west is relatively small,and in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau to the northern foot of the Kunlun Mountains and Xinjiang’s Taklimakan Desert hinterland,the basic distribution of observation sites,which also determines the interpolation of the data of these areas,has relatively large uncertainty.Warm extremes(SU,TR,TNx,HWDI),except TXx,are underestimated over high northern latitudes,particularly in the northwest,while cold extremes(FD,TXn,TNn, CWDI)are overestimated,which is in accordance with previous findings based on IPCC AR4 models(Wang et al.,2008).

    4.3.Temporal evolution of indices

    Sillmann et al.(2013)suggested that there is not a clear relationship between a model’s spatial resolution and its representation of temperature indices,and thus the results fromindividual CMIP5 models were not shown.For historical trends,the CMIP5 models’ensemble generally captures well the observed trends in the indices of temperature extremes during 1961–2005.The long-term trends in simulating the historical temporal evolution of the indices for the anomalies are more distinct in Figs.9 and 10.

    4.3.1.Intensity extremes(threshold indices and absolute indices)

    The modeled threshold index trends are consistent with CN05.1(figures not shown).The threshold indices of the ensemble mean show corresponding trends,with increasing numbers of TR[1.31 d(10 yr)-1]and SU[1.64 d(10 yr)-1] and decreasing numbers of FD[-2.02 d(10 yr)-1].There are similar increasing trends in the models’ensemble mean compared with CN05.1 for SU[1.44 d(10 yr)-1]and TR [1.00 d(10 yr)-1]during 1961–2005.

    The multi-model ensemble mean shows similar warming trends in the absolute indices starting in the 1960s,compared with CN05.1(Fig.9),with a general increase in TNn,TNx, TXx,and TXn.In China,the increases in both TNx[0.23?C (10 yr)-1]and TNn[0.29?C(10 yr)-1],which depend on the minimum temperature,are greater than the increases in both TXx[0.21?C(10 yr)-1]and TXn[0.24?C(10 yr)-1],which depend on maximum temperature.

    4.3.2.Duration extremes(duration indices)

    During 1961 to 2005,the mean CMIP5 models simulate a decrease in CWDI[-0.61 d(10 yr)-1],while showing a strong increase in HWDI[1.38 d(10 yr)-1]over China(not shown).

    4.3.3.Frequency extremes(percentile indices)

    The changes are much more pronounced in the percentile indices compared to the absolute indices,which are derived from annual extremes(Fig.10).The construction ofthe percentile indices leads to adequate correlation(0.67–0.91)in the temporal evolution of the CMIP models and the observations.The average across China shows a decrease in terms of cold nights(TN10p)and cold days(TX10p), but an increase in warm nights(TN90p)and warm days (TX90p).

    Differences in the percentile index lines are especially prominent between the most recent two decades and for those indices derived from minimum temperature.Increasing trends in warm days(TX90p)[1.21%(10 yr)-1]and nights(TN90p)[1.70%(10 yr)-1]and decreasing trends in cold days(TX10p)[-0.68%(10 yr)-1]and nights(TN10p) [-0.96%(10 yr)-1]can be seen in the CMIP5 models,which is consistent with globally observed changes(Alexander etal.,2006;Donat et al.,2013)and global CMIP5 model results(Sillmann et al.,2013).This is also consistent with the general trend of extreme observations in China,which shows that the frequency of extreme cold temperatures and coldtemperature events is reducing(Ding et al.,2002;Ding et al., 2009).

    5.Summary and concluding remarks

    Based on simulations of the 20th century by the 25 climate models in the CMIP5 set of experiments,the performance in simulating the indices of present temperature extremes over China was assessed.The main findings can be summarized as follows:

    (1)Extreme temperature simulation over China was derived from the 25 CMIP5 models and ensemble simulation and compared with observations.The difference between the models and observations is reduced by the multi-model ensemble method.The multi-model ensemble simulations are closer to observations in terms of relative RMSEs(RMSE relative to the median RMSE of all models)for most models and indices over China.

    (2)Compared with observations,the models are able to capture the main features of the spatial distribution of temperature during 1986–2005.The Taylor diagrams show that divergences between the multi-model ensemble and observations in terms of the threshold temperature indices are smaller than other temperature indices.For the regional mean over China,the multi-model ensemble simulations of CMIP5 with respect to FD and CWDI show larger values than CN05.1,whereas the ensemble simulations with respect to SU,TXn and TX10p underestimate the actual extreme indices in CN05.1.Uncertainties in some extreme indices(such as TN10p,TN90p,TX90p,and TXn)are larger than in others, and there are also large spatial differences between threshold indices and absolute indices,which may be associated with the larger interquartile model spread due to the different climate sensitivitiesofthe modelsand/orpositive regionalland–atmosphere feedback processes.For the duration and frequency indices,wide disagreement was found regarding the change between models and observations in some regions.

    (3)In terms of the temporal changes of the indices of temperature extremes,the model ensemble performs well in reproducing the trend of change in the indices of temperature extremes.For example,for 1961–2005,CN05.1 shows an increase in warm days(TX90p)with a trend of 1.3%(10 yr)-1, while cold days(TX10p)shows a decrease of-0.74%(10 yr)-1.The CMIP5 ensemble results also show these trends, but with a smaller trend.These results show that the ensemble simulation tends to increase warm extremes(e.g.,SU,TR, HWDI,TN90p,and TX90p)over China,and decease cold extremes(e.g.,FD,CWDI,TN10p,and TX10p).

    This study comprehensively compared model simulations and observations,but there was no in-depth analysis of the resolutions of the models,nor their physical or other processes.Avila et al.(2012)suggested that many extreme temperature indices can be affected by land use and land cover changes.Therefore,our model assessment should be extended by further studies of seasonal model performance and particular regions that are especially sensitive to climatic changes in extreme events over China.

    Additionally,considering the uncertainties in the simulations,further research should focus on how to adopt a more rational and scientific approach to extracting useful information from the simulation results,and how to better use the simulation results for detecting and attributing climate change(Orlowsky and Seneviratne,2012).

    Acknowledgements.This study was supported by the National Basic Key Project(also called 973 Project,Grant Nos. 2010CB950501 and 2010CB950102),the R&D Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry(meteorology)(Grant No.GYHY 201306019),and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41275078).

    REFERENCES

    Alexander,L.V.,and Coauthors,2006:Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation.J. Geophys.Res.,111,D05109,doi:10.1029/2005JD006290.

    Avila,F.B.,A.J.Pitman,M.G.Donat,L.V.Alexander,and G. Abramowitz,2012:Climate model simulated changes in temperature extremes due to land cover change.J.Geophys.Res.,117,D04108,doi:10.1029/2011JD016382.

    Bindoff,N.L.,and Coauthors,2013:Detection and attribution of climate change:From global to regional.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al.,Eds., Cambridge University Press,867–952,

    Ding,T.,W.H.Qian,and Z.W.Yan,2009:Characteristics and changes of cold surge events over China during 1960–2007. Atmos.Oceanic Sci.Lett.,2(6),339–344.

    Ding,Y.H.,J.Zhang,and Y.F.Song,2002:Changes in weather and climate extreme events and their association with the global warming.Meteorological Monthly,28(3),3–7.(in Chinese)

    Donat,M.G.,and Coauthors,2013:Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century:The HadEX2 dataset.J.Geophys.Res.,118,2098–2118,doi:10.1029/2012JD018606.

    Flato,G.,and Coauthors,2013:Evaluation of climate models.Climate Change 2013:The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,T.F.Stocker et al, Eds.,Cambridge University Press,741–866.

    Frich,P.,L.V.Alexander,P.Della-Marta,B.Gleason,M.Haylock, A.Tank,and T.Peterson,2002:Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century.Climatic Research,19,193–212.

    Gleckler,P.J.,K.E.Taylor,and C.Doutriaux,2008:Performance metrics for climate models.J.Geophys.Res.,113,D06104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008972.

    Hutchinson M.F.,1999:ANUSPLIN version 4.0 user guide.Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies,Australian National Univeristy,Canberra ACT 0200,51pp Australia.

    Kharin,V.V.,F.W.Zwiers,X.Zhang,and M.Wehner,2013: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble.Climatic Change,119(2),345–357.

    Knutti,R.,and J.Sedl′aˇcek,2013:Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections.Nature Climate Change,3,363–373,doi:10.1038/nclimate1716.

    National Report Committee,2007:China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change.Science Press,148 pp.(in Chi-nese)

    New,M.,M.Hulme,and P.Jones,1999:Representing twentiethcentury space-time climate variability.Part I:Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology.J.Climate, 12:829–856.

    New,M.,M.Hulme,and P.Jones,2000:Representing twentiethcentury space-time climate variability.Part II:Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate.J.Climate,13,2217–2238.

    Orlowsky,B.,and S.I.Seneviratne,2012:Global changes in extreme events:Regional and seasonal dimension.Climatic Change,110(3-4),669–696.

    Sheffield J.,and Coauthors,2013:North American climate in CMIP5 experiments.Part I:Evaluation of historical simulations of continental and regional climatology.J.Climate,26,9209–9245.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00592.1.

    Sillmann,J.,V.V.Kharin,X.Zhang,F.W.Zwiers,and D. Bronaugh,2013:Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble:Part 1.Model evaluation in the present climate.J.Geophys.Res.,118(4),1716–1733.

    Taylor,K.E.,2001:Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram.J.Geophys.Res.,106,7183–7192.

    Taylor,K.E.,R.J.Stouffer,and G.A.Meehl,2012:An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.Bull.Amer.Meteor. Soc.,93,485–498,doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.

    Tebaldi,C.,K.Hayhoe,J.M.Arblaster,and G.A.Meehl,2006: Going to the extremes.Climatic Change,79(3-4),185–211, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9051-4.

    Wang,J.,Z.H.Jiang,J.Song,and Y.G.Ding,2008:Evaluating the simulation of the GCMS on the extreme temperature indices in China.Acta Geographica Sinica,63(3),227–236.(in Chinese)

    Wen,H.Q.,X.B.Zhang,Y.Xu,and B.Wang,2013:Detecting human influence on extreme temperatures in China.Geophys. Res.Lett.,40,1171–1176,doi:10.1002/grl.50285.

    Wu,J.,and X.J.Gao,2013:A gridded daily observation dataset over China region and comparison with the other datasets.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,56(4),1102–1111, doi:10.6038/cjg20130406.(in Chinese)

    Xu,Y.,2012:The projection and possible risks of future extreme weather events.Climate Change Green Paper—Climate Financing and Low-Carbon Development,169–177.

    Xu,Y.,X.J.Gao,Y.Shen,C.H.Xu,Y.Shi,and F.Giorgi,2009: A daily temperature dataset over China and its application in validating a RCM simulation.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,26(4),763–772,doi:10.1007/s00376-009-9029-z.

    Yao,Y.,Y.Luo,and J.B.Huang,2012:Evaluation and projection of temperature extremes over China based on CMIP5 Model. Advances in Climate Change Research,3,179–185.

    Zheng,Y.H.,and Coauthors,2011:The Second National Assessment Report on Climate Change.Science Press,710 pp.(in Chinese)

    :Dong,S.Y.,Y.Xu,B.T.Zhou,and Y.Shi,2015:Assessment of indices of temperature extremes simulated by multiple CMIP5 models over China.Adv.Atmos Sci.,32(8),1077–1091,

    10.1007/s00376-015-4152-5.

    11 August 2014;revised 6 January 2015;accepted 22 January 2015)

    ?Corresponding author:XU Ying

    Email:xuying@cma.gov.cn

    成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品,欧美在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 黄色成人免费大全| 午夜a级毛片| 天天添夜夜摸| 大型av网站在线播放| 欧美3d第一页| 不卡av一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99re在线观看精品视频| avwww免费| 午夜a级毛片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色综合站精品国产| av片东京热男人的天堂| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 日韩欧美在线二视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产99白浆流出| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 波多野结衣高清作品| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 毛片女人毛片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 搞女人的毛片| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 成人三级黄色视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 88av欧美| 国产日本99.免费观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 午夜福利18| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| www.999成人在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 1024视频免费在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 成人三级黄色视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 成人精品一区二区免费| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品,欧美在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 成人欧美大片| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 色在线成人网| 一级片免费观看大全| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲av熟女| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 美女免费视频网站| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久久久九九精品影院| 不卡一级毛片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| tocl精华| 亚洲最大成人中文| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久香蕉激情| 搞女人的毛片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 露出奶头的视频| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 91av网站免费观看| 91老司机精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 999久久久国产精品视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 观看免费一级毛片| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产午夜精品论理片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 搞女人的毛片| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 成年版毛片免费区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品 国内视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品福利观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久久精品大字幕| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美zozozo另类| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 99热只有精品国产| 精品久久久久久成人av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久精品成人免费网站| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线观看日韩欧美| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| www.www免费av| 超碰成人久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线视频色国产色| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| www国产在线视频色| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产av不卡久久| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产亚洲欧美98| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲 国产 在线| 一本一本综合久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 中文资源天堂在线| 舔av片在线| 久久久精品大字幕| 波多野结衣高清作品| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 床上黄色一级片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| svipshipincom国产片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 舔av片在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 免费高清视频大片| xxx96com| 长腿黑丝高跟| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 88av欧美| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 一级毛片女人18水好多| www.999成人在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 丰满的人妻完整版| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 美女大奶头视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品人妻1区二区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精华一区二区三区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 看免费av毛片| 国产三级黄色录像| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产av又大| 日本黄大片高清| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久久久久大精品| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美成人午夜精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 最好的美女福利视频网| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 老司机靠b影院| 一进一出抽搐动态| 嫩草影视91久久| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| ponron亚洲| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 美女午夜性视频免费| svipshipincom国产片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 色综合婷婷激情| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 中文字幕久久专区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久国产精品影院| cao死你这个sao货| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产av在哪里看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 一夜夜www| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 伦理电影免费视频| 午夜a级毛片| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 色综合站精品国产| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲精品在线美女| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一区福利在线观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久久精品大字幕| 免费观看人在逋| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | tocl精华| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久中文字幕一级| 熟女电影av网| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产熟女xx| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美网| 香蕉丝袜av| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日本五十路高清| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美日韩黄片免| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 99久久国产精品久久久| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 看片在线看免费视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 九色国产91popny在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 日韩免费av在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精品免费视频内射| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产高清videossex| 日韩欧美免费精品| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 91字幕亚洲| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 91老司机精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 99久久精品热视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲av美国av|