• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Water sources of plants and groundwater in typical ecosystems in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    2014-10-09 08:11:04YunFengRuanLiangJuZhaoHongLangXiaoGuoDongChengMaoXianZhouFangWang
    Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions 2014年3期

    YunFeng Ruan , LiangJu Zhao , HongLang Xiao , GuoDong Cheng ,MaoXian Zhou , Fang Wang

    1. Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology and Integrated River Basin Science of CAS, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

    2. Key Laboratory of Heihe Ecohydrology and Basin Science of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    1 Introduction

    In terrestrial ecosystems, the potential water sources of plants include precipitation (snow in winter), soil water (both shallow and deep), river water,and groundwater. These different water bodies have different hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions(δD, δ18O). Previous studies proved that plant roots do not discriminate against specific water isotopes during water uptake, and there is no fractionation during wa-ter transfer in xylem (Dawsonet al., 1998; Alessioet al., 2004). Therefore, the isotopic composition of root water can determine the potential plant water sources.By comparing δD and δ18O of plant root water and their potential water sources, we can understand the potential water sources (such as precipitation, river,groundwater, and shallow and deep soil water) of plants (Gat, 1996) and their respective contributions to plants (Ehleringeret al., 2000; Hall-Asplandet al.,2005; Phillipset al., 2005). Also, at annual and seasonal scales, the δD and δ18O of root and stem water can reflect the variations of potential plant water sources (White, 1989), and plant water sources vary according to variations of plant species, water environments, and growing seasons (Linet al., 1996; Liet al., 2006).

    There are many applications of plant water sources and water utilization in different ecosystems such as deserts, forests, riparian and coast forests(Ehleringer and Dawson, 1992; Brunelet al., 1995;Chimner and Cooper, 2004). In desert regions between Utah and Arizona in America, for example,variations of the xylem water δD in desert dominant plants have indicated that annual and succulent plants only use summer precipitation; perennial plants use summer precipitation and deep soil water; and deep-rooted perennial plants use groundwater and winter soil water (Ehleringeret al., 1991). Linet al.(1996) simulated increased 25- and 50-mm summer rain events by enriched deuterium isotopes water,and found that the absorption of rain water by perennial shrubs differed greatly by species in a cold desert ecosystem. In riparian forests in Australia,Eucalyptusused not only shallow soil water and river water originating from precipitation, but also groundwater in riverbanks (Thorburn and Walker,1993; Dawson and Pate, 1996). The transpiration water ofAcer negundoin a riparian forest in Utah originated from groundwater (Dawson and Ehleringer, 1991), but from river water and precipitation in Arizona (Kolbet al., 1997).

    Along the banks of perennial rivers in the California mountains, trees mainly use the upper soil water in the early growing season, and mainly use groundwater when the soil is dry (Smithet al., 1991). In addition,more groundwater is used when shallow soil water is decreased gradually (Thorburn and Walker, 1993).These results demonstrate that plant water sources vary by the plant species, water environment, and growing season. In China, comprehensive studies on plant water sources have used stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopic techniques (Caoet al., 2002), but there are few study cases about the plant water sources in arid-region ecosystems (Ohteet al., 2003;Zhaoet al., 2008).

    By measuring the δ18O and δD of precipitation of the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin, and soil water and shallow groundwater of a riparian forest, an artificial shrub forest, and Gobi in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, we investigated the recharge sources of shallow groundwater and soil water of these ecosystems. In addition, variations of δ18O values for root water ofPopulous euphraticaand theTamarix ramosissimain the riparian forest ecosystem,ofHaloxylon ammodendronin the artificial forest ecosystem, and ofReaumuria soongoricain the Gobi ecosystem, as well as the δ18O values for soil water and groundwater, revealed the plant water sources and effective water uptake areas in these different ecosystems. This information on the mechanisms of plant water use and the strategies of adapting to extremely dry environments will be useful in restoring and rebuilding damaged desert ecosystems, and maintaining their stability and sustainable development.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Study area

    The study area is located near Ejina, an oasis that lies in western Inner Mongolia in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, which is the second-largest inland river basin in China. This region is extremely arid, with a dry climate, low precipitation, strong evaporation, high winds, and long hours of sunshine.In Ejina, the mean annual precipitation is 42 mm/a;during 1957 to 2003 the maximum annual rainfall was 103 mm and the minimum was 7 mm, and 70%–80%of the rainfall occurs between June and September (Siet al., 2005). During our study period of June 21 to 22,23 to 24, and 26 to 27 in 2010, the annual rainfall was only 8 mm. Because the mean and the highest potential evapotranspiration are 3,755 mm/a and 4,035 mm/a, respectively, which is 89 times more than the rainfall, Ejina is considered one of the driest regions in China.

    Our research was mainly conducted in three typical ecosystems of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin (Figure 1). The major vegetation of those ecosystems arePopulous euphraticaand shrubs ofTamarix ramosissimaandSophora alopecuroidein the riparian forest,Haloxylon ammodendronin the artificial shrub forest which was planted in the 1990s,and the naturally dominantReaumuria soongoricain the Gobi ecosystem.

    The riparian forest is located in the protection zone of Qidaoqiao in the southeast part of the Ejina(42°01'N, 101°14'E); its area is 1,333 hm2. From 1960 to 2007 the mean annual temperature was 8.8 °C, with a mean January temperature of -11.3 °C and a mean July temperature of 26.9 °C. The annual average frost-free period is 146 days and there are 3,426.14 sunshine hours. The age of the riparian forest varied from 25 to 30 years, and the mean height and diameter ofPopulous euphraticawere about 10 m and 18.3±5.7 cm, respectively. The density ofPopulous euphraticavaried from 500 to 1,000 trees per hm2(Xiaoet al.,2010), with additional coverage ofTamarix ramosissima,Sophora alopecuroide, andTaraxacum officinale(dandelion). The soil texture was sandy loam at 40 cm and from 80 to 100 cm, and the remaining soil layer was silty sand. The organic matter content was 0.724%and 0.127% from 0 to 30 cm and from 30 to 200 cm,respectively. The groundwater level was near 2 m during the study period.

    The artificial shrub forest is located at the south end of Ejina (41°57'N, 101°01'E). It was planted in a 3m×4m grid in 1994-1995 and the plant height ofHaloxylon ammodendronwas between 2.2 and 2.4 m.The age of these trees was between 16 and 17 years.This forest is irrigated once a year and the groundwater depth was 2.6 m during the study period.

    Figure 1 Study sites of plant water sources in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    The Gobi ecosystem is located in the north part of Ejina (42°16'N, 101°07'E).Reaumuria soongoricawas the dominant species in that ecosystem, with coverage of less than 10%, mean plant height of 17.3 cm, and density of 57 trees per 100 m2. The soil texture was sandy soil from the surface to 1.85 m, and a clay layer below 1.85 m. The groundwater depth was greater than 3 m.

    2.2 Methods and sample analysis

    2.2.1 Sampling methods

    Soil water and plant root samples were collected in all three ecosystems on June 21 to 22, 23 to 24,and 26 to 27 in 2010. Root samples of four plants ofPopulous euphraticas,Tamarix ramosissimas,Ha-loxylon ammodendrons, andReaumuria soongoricas,were collected along with soil samples. The distribution of roots and variations of soil texture of the soil profiles are shown in figure 1, and soil samples were collected according to these distributions and variations. The saturated layers of the riparian forest and the artificial shrub forest were 180 and 250 cm, respectively, and soil samples of the saturated layers were also collected. In the Gobi, the groundwater depth was more than 3 m. The soil texture was sand and gravel material from the surface to 185 cm, and was clay below 185 cm. Typically, two samples were collected at each site: an 8-mL sample with two replicates for soil and plant water extraction, and a 15-mL sample with three replicates for soil water content measurement. All the samples were sealed and kept frozen until analysis.

    2.2.2 Water extraction and sample analysis

    Water was extracted from the plant and soil samples by a cryogenic vacuum distillation method(Dawson and Ehleringer, 1993) at the Isotopic Laboratory of Pretreatment of the Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of the Inland River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The δ18O values for different water bodies were measured at the Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of the Inland River Basin. An isoprime isotope ratio mass spectrometer was used to measure the δ18O values after the reaction of the water samples in high-temperature pyrolysis(reduction furnace), and the experimental error of the δ18O value was less than 0.5‰. The results were calibrated using the standard materials of V-SMOW(Nelson, 2000). The soil water content was measured by the weight method.

    2.2.3 Data analysis

    For a single water source, samples and sources had the same δD and δ18O values when there was no isotopic fractionation. For two water sources, the δD and δ18O values were between the values of the two sources. For two or more water sources, we could not determine the water sources without increasing the number of isotopic species measured.

    Multiple possible water sources were mixed to produce a single isotope value; these potential water sources were considered the "initial" water sources which have been converted to soil water through precipitation, groundwater, and runoff. The soil water that was directly absorbed by plants was extracted from artificially divided soil profiles, either shallow soil water or deep soil water. The principle is that if there exist several water sources, the isotopic compositions of the plant water should be a linear combinatory value of the isotopic compositions of the various water sources; therefore, the endmember linear mixing model (Phillips, 2001) can be formulated from the following equations:

    where δ18Oprepresents the δ18O value of plant water;δ18Oirepresents the δ18O value of the potential water sourcei; andfirepresents the proportional contributions of potential water sourceito plant water uptake.The isotopic compositions of soil water of different soil layers and groundwater were analyzed with IsoSource software (Phillips and Gregg, 2003) to evaluate the respective contributions of soil water and groundwater to root water. The fractional increment was set at 1%, and the uncertainty level was set at 0.2%.

    3 Results and discussion

    3.1 Variations of soil water content

    There were significant differences in soil water content among the three typical ecosystems in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin (Figure 2).For example, in the riparian forest ecosystem, the groundwater level and the depth of the saturated-soil aquifer layer were 200 and 180 cm, respectively. Soil water content varied from 3.7% to 25.6%, and was close to or greater than 5.0% in all the profiles. From 80 to 135 cm, the soil texture was sand gravel, with the lowest soil water content (the mean soil water content of 20 cm and from 80 to 100 cm was 4.0%);from 35 cm to 70 cm the soil texture was sand with slight amounts of clay, and mean the soil water content was 8.1% from 40 to 60 cm. The depth of the saturated aquifer layer was 180 cm and the soil water content was 25.6%. The roots ofPopulous euphraticaandTamarix ramosissimawere mainly distributed from 35 to 70 cm and from 100 to 125 cm.

    The groundwater level and the depth of the saturated-soil aquifer of the artificial shrub forest ecosystem were 260 and 250 cm, respectively (Figure 2).The soil water content was the greatest at the 250-cm depth (12.2%), followed by 10.4% at 100 cm and 4.7% from 40 to 80 cm. However, the soil water content was 1.4% between 160 and 200 cm due to the clay layer prevent infiltration of irrigation water. Below 230 cm, the soil water content increased gradually and became saturated at 250 cm due to recharge of the groundwater. The roots ofHaloxylon ammodendronwere mainly distributed from 40 to 60 cm vertically and about 100 cm horizontally.

    The mean soil water content of the Gobi was as low as 1.4% above 160 cm due to its far distance from the river and its lack of recharge of irrigation water.From 175 to 180 cm, soil water content increased slightly to 2.4% due to the mixing of sand gravel and clay. The soil texture was clay below 185 cm, and the soil water content increased sharply to 15.8%, 18.0%,22.8%, and 28.0% at 185 cm, 200 cm, 220 cm, and 255 cm, respectively. The main roots ofReaumuria soongoricawere distributed vertically throughout the soil profile except at the sand and clay interface layer(Figure 2).

    Figure 2 The soil water content and plant roots distribution of the typical ecosystems in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    3.2 Correlations between precipitation in the upper reaches and soil water of the typical ecosystems in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    The lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin is an extremely arid region, with a mean annual rainfall of 42 mm. Soil water recharge by precipitation can be ignored because the annual rainfall in 2010 was only 8 mm. In order to understand the water sources of soil water and shallow groundwater of the typical ecosystems in this area, we compared the δD–δ18O plots of soil water and shallow groundwater of the riparian forest, the artificial shrub forest, and the Gobi with the local meteoric water line (LMWL) of the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin. Figure 3 shows that the δD–δ18O plots of soil water and shallow groundwater in the riparian forest ecosystem were all near the local meteoric water line (LMWL) of the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin, except for the soil water above 40 cm. This indicates that soil water and shallow groundwater were recharged by river water which originates from precipitation in the upper reaches.

    The δD–δ18O plots of deep soil water and shallow groundwater in the artificial shrub forest ecosystem were also close to the local meteoric water line(LMWL), showing that soil water of this area was also recharged by precipitation in the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin. However, the δD–δ18O plots deviate from the local meteoric water line (LMWL),indicating that these samples had been affected by intense evaporation (Figure 3).

    The Gobi is not recharged by the Heihe River due to its distant location from the river. Moreover, we did not collect soils deeper than 255 cm because of the thick clay layer. The δD–δ18O plots of soil water from a depth below 140 cm in the Gobi are far away from the local meteoric water line (LMWL), indicating that the soil water of this area does not receive the water supply of the middle and upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin (Figure 3). From this, we conclude that the soil water and shallow groundwater near the river in the lower reaches are mainly supplied by the water sources of the middle and upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin, and soil water far away from the river bank is derived from deep groundwater by capillarity.

    3.3 Comparisons of the δ18O values in plant root water with its potential water sources

    3.3.1 Variations of the δ18O values for soil water in the typical ecosystems

    Previous studies have shown that shallow soil water is enriched with the heavier isotopes of both hydrogen and oxygen, and the D and18O values are significantly positive in dry seasons, primarily because of the fractionation in evaporation of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. This leads to variations in isotopic compositions of soil water in different soil profiles(Zimmermannet al., 1967; Allison and Hughes, 1983).Figure 4 shows that in our study the δ18O values for soil water varied according to the different ecosystem types and varying climatic conditions, and the significant change layers for soil water in thePopulous euphraticaandTamarix ramosissimadistribution area were between 60–80 cm and 100–120 cm, respectively, in the riparian forest (Figure 4b). In the artificial shrub forest ecosystem, significant change occurred in the saturated soil layer between 230 and 250 cm (Figure 4c). In the Gobi, the soil texture was sandy from the surface to 175 cm, and was clay below 180 cm. Only the δ18O values of soil water below 140 cm were measured due to the low soil water content above 140 cm (Figure 4d). Except for the significantly negative δ18O values of the soil water in the interface layer of the sand and clay, the δ18O values of soil water gradually became more negative from 140 to 255 cm, suggesting that soil water evaporation was related to the ecosystem types and climatic conditions. For example, in the riparian forest ecosystem, the soil water evaporating layer was shallow (from 60 to 80 cm) in thePopulous euphraticadistribution area due to high canopy density and low soil water evaporation, whereas in theTamarix ramosissimadistribution area, the soil water evaporating layer was deeper (100–120 cm) due to lower canopy density and intense soil water evaporation,with less variation below 60 cm. The soil water evaporating layer of the artificial shrub forest was located near the saturated-soil aquifer (230 cm) due to low density and canopy and strong evaporation.The soil water evaporating layer of the Gobi was below 255 cm due to the extremely arid conditions in Ejina, the deep groundwater level, low precipitation recharge, and long-term strong evaporation.

    Figure 3 Comparisons of δD and δ18O plots of soil water and shallow groundwater in the lower reaches to local meteoric water line(LMWL) of the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin. The LMWL of the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin was cited from He (2011) and the precipitation samples were collected from September 2007 to August 2010. PE, TR, and RS indicate Populous euphratica, Tamarix ramosissima, and Reaumuria soongorica, respectively, in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    In summary, the most intense soil evaporation occurred from 60 to 80 cm and from 100 to120 cm (Figures 4a,4b), from 230 to 250 cm (Figure 4c), and below 255 cm (Figure 4d) in the riparian forest, the artificial shrub forest, and the Gobi of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, respectively. This compares well with a study by Asbjornsenet al. (2007) in which the significant change layers of the δ18O values for a soil profile occurred from 80 to 100 cm in a midwestern U.S. savanna, and from 60 to 80 cm in a forest region with approximately 840 mm rainfall in the same vicinity. Those researchers concluded that the main soil water movement layers were related to precipitation and the ecosystem type (Asbjornsenet al., 2007).

    3.3.2 The δ18O values for plant xylem water of the typical ecosystems as well as relationships with the potential water sources

    Figures 4a and 4b compare the δ18O values of root water ofPopulous euphratica(-6.1‰) andTamarix ramosissima(-4.6‰) with the soil water and groundwater, respectively, in the riparian forest ecosystem. The δ18O value ofPopulous euphraticaroot water was similar to that of soil water at 40 cm(-5.6‰) and 60 cm (-6.9‰) and groundwater(-6.4‰), and theTamarix ramosissimaroot water was similar to that of soil water at 40 cm (-3.2‰), 60 cm (-5.7‰), and 80 cm (-5.9‰), indicating that the potential water sources ofPopulous euphraticaare groundwater and 40- and 60-cm soil water. That ofTamarix ramosissimawas soil water from 40-, 60-,and 80-cm soil. The similar δ18O values of root water ofPopulous euphraticaandTamarix ramosissimaand soil water of 40 cm and 60 cm were related to their root distributions in the soil profile (Figure 2).

    Figure 4 Comparisons of the δ18O values in plant root water and the potential water sources in the typical ecosystems of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin. (a) and (b) represent the Populous euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima distribution areas of the riparian forest ecosystem, respectively; (c) and (d) represent the artificial shrub forest and the Gobi ecosystems, respectively

    In the artificial shrub forest ecosystem, the δ18O values ofHaloxylon ammodendronroot water (-7.3‰)and soil water of 200 cm (-5.9‰), 230 cm (-7.4‰),the saturated soil layer (250 cm) (-7.6‰), and groundwater (-7.8‰) were similar (Figure 4c), indicating that the potential water sources ofHaloxylon ammodendronwere the soil water at 200 cm and 230 cm, the saturated soil layer, and groundwater.

    In the Gobi ecosystem, the δ18O value ofReaumuria soongoricaroot water was -1.0‰, similar to the values of soil water at 175 cm (1.2‰), 180 cm(-1.0‰), 185 cm (-0.6‰), and 200 cm (-0.9‰),showing that the potential water sources ofReaumuria soongoricawere the soil water between 175 and 200 cm; these results also match with the layers where theReaumuria soongoricaroots were distributed(Figure 2).

    3.4 Dependence of dominant plants on different water sources

    IsoSource software was applied to the above results to calculate the relationships of plant water δ18O values and those of their potential water sources, and to reveal the contribution ratios of different potential water sources to the plant water sources in different ecosystems in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin (Table 1).

    The results show that the contribution ratios of the 40- and 60-cm soil water and groundwater to the water sources ofPopulous euphraticawere 44.1%, 21.0%,and 34.9%, respectively, and of soil water from 40 cm,60 cm, and 80 cm toTamarix ramosissimawere 46.8%, 32.0% and 21.2%, respectively, in the riparian forest ecosystem. In the artificial shrub forest ecosystem, the contribution ratios of the soil water from 200 cm, 230 cm, the saturated soil water, and groundwater to the total plant water uptake byHaloxylon ammodendronwere 17.7%, 30.8%, 27.1%, and 24.3%,respectively. In the Gobi ecosystem,Reaumuria soongoricamainly absorbed the soil water between 175 cm and 200 cm, and the contribution ratios of soil water from 175 cm, 180 cm, 185 cm, and 200 cm were 22.7%, 29.1%, 26.5%, and 31.7%, respectively.

    Table 1 The potential water sources and their contribution ratios to dominant plants in the typical ecosystems of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin

    Our results suggest that soil water and shallow groundwater are the main plant water sources for desert plants to survive in arid desert regions, which is in agreement with Buschet al. (1992) and Synder and William (2000). The groundwater depth directly affects the soil water and nutrient dynamics, which are closely related to the vegetation growth, and it is the controlling factor in determining the distribution,growth, and species succession of desert vegetation as well as the development of desert oases, as found by Zhaoet al. (2003) and Fanet al. (2004). Xiaoet al.(2010) determined that the formation of tree rings ofPopulous euphraticais significantly related to the groundwater depth in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, and water use efficiency ofPopulous euphraticaincreases with the increase of groundwater depth (Caoet al., 2012). Therefore, in the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin adequate shallow groundwater and soil water levels are important to maintain the normal growth of desert plants.

    4 Conclusions

    In three typical ecosystems of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, the recharge sources for soil water and groundwater vary according to their distance from the Heihe River channel. Soil water content, soil water evaporating layers, and plant water sources vary with the different ecosystem types.

    1) The groundwater level, depth of the saturated soil aquifer, and the soil water content were the highest in the studied riparian forest ecosystem. Its recharge source is the Heihe River, which originates from precipitation in the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin. In the artificial shrub forest ecosystem,the recharge source of soil water and groundwater is also the Heihe River, but the soil water content is relatively low due to this forest’s location far from the river, the small recharge amount, and strong local evaporation. The Gobi soil water contents were the lowest, due to its distance from the river and strong local evaporation.

    2) The δ18O values of soil water in various profiles show that the intense evaporating layers of soil water become deeper with the decrease of vegetation coverage and groundwater level. The evaporating layers of the riparian forest, the artificial shrub forest, and the Gobi were from 60 to 120 cm, from 230 to 250 cm,and below 255 cm, respectively.

    3) Plant water sources and the contribution ratios of different potential water sources to plant water sources vary with the differences in vegetation coverage, groundwater level, and the structure of soil profiles in the extremely arid region of the lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin. In the riparian forest, the water sources ofPopulous euphraticamainly come from 40- and 60-cm soil water and from groundwater, and those ofTamarix ramosissimacome from 40- to 80-cm soil water. In the artificial shrub forest ecosystem,Haloxylon ammodendronmainly uses soil water from 200 cm to the saturated layer and groundwater, andin the GobiReaumuria soongoricamainly uses soil water from 175 to 200 cm.

    This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91325102,91025016 and 91125025) and the National Science &Technology Support Project (No. 2011BAC07B05).

    Alessio GA, De Lillis M, Brugnoli E,et al., 2004. Water sources and water-use efficiency in Mediterranean coastal dune vegetation. Plant Biology, 6: 350–357. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820882.

    Allison GB, Hughes MW, 1983. The use of natural tracers as indicators of soil water movement in a temperate semi-arid region.Journal of Hydrology, 60: 157–173. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90019-7.

    Asbjornsen H, Mora G, Helmers MJ, 2007. Variation in water uptake dynamics among contrasting agricultural and native plant communities in midwestern U.S. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment, 121: 343–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.009.

    Brunel JP, Walker GR, Kennett-Smith AK, 1995. Field validation of isotopic procedures for determining source water used by plants in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Hydrology, 167:351–368. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)02575-V.

    Busch DE, Ingraham NL, Smith SD, 1992. Water uptake in woody riparian phreatophytes of the southwestern United States: A stable isotope study. Ecological Application, 2: 450–459. DOI:10.2307/1941880.

    Cao SK, Feng Q, Si JH,et al., 2012. Variations of foliar stable carbon isotope composition and water use efficiency inPopulus euphraticafor different plots. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 34(1): 155–160.

    Cao YL, Lu Q, Lin GH, 2002. Review and perspective on hydrogen stable isotopes technique in tracing plant water sources researches. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(1): 111–117. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.01.015.

    Chimner RA, Cooper DJ, 2004. Using stable oxygen isotopes to quantify the water source used for transpiration by native shrubs in the San Luis Valley, Colorado U.S.A.. Plant and Soil,260: 225–236. DOI: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030190.70085.e9.

    Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR, 1991. Streamside trees that do not use stream water. Nature, 350: 335–337. DOI: 10.1038/350335a0.

    Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR, 1993. Isotopic enrichment of water in the "woody" tissues of plants: Implications for plant water source, water uptake, and other studies which use the stable isotopic composition of cellulose. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57: 3487–3492. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90554-A.

    Dawson TE, Pate JS, 1996. Seasonal water uptake and movement in root systems of Australian phraeatophytic plants of dimorphic root morphology: A stable isotope investigation. Oecologia, 107: 13–20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00582230.

    Dawson TE, Pausch RC, Parker HM, 1998. The role of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in understanding water movement along the soil-plant-atmospheric continuum. In: Griffiths H(ed.). Stable Isotopes: Integration of Biological, Ecological and Geochemical Processes. Bios Scientific Publisher Limited,Oxford, pp. 169–183.

    Ehleringer JR, Dawson TE, 1992. Water uptake by plants: Perspectives from stable isotope composition. Plant Cell and Environment, 15: 1073–1082. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01657.x.

    Ehleringer JR, Phillips SL, Schuster WSF,et al., 1991. Differential utilization of summer rains by desert plants. Oecologia, 88:430–434. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317589.

    Ehleringer JR, Roden J, Dawson TE, 2000. Assessing ecosystem-level water relations through stable isotope ratio analyses.In: Osvaldo ES, Robert BJ, Harold AM,et al.(eds.). Methods in Ecosystem Science. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.181–198. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1224-9_13.

    Fan ZL, Ma YJ, Zhang H,et al., 2004. Research of eco-water table and rational depth of groundwater of Tarim River Drainage Basin. Arid Land Geography, 27(1): 8–13. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6060.2004.01.002.

    Gat JR, 1996. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24:225–262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.225.

    Hall-Aspland SA, Hall AP, Rogers TL, 2005. A new approach to the solution of the linear mixing model for a single isotope:application to the case of an opportunistic predator. Oecologia,143: 143–147. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1783-0.

    He JQ, 2011. Spatial and temporal variations of stable isotopes of precipitation and river water of the inland river basin in Hexi,China. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Gansu, China.

    Kolb TE, Hart SC, Amundson R, 1997. Boxelder water source and physiology at perennial and ephemeral stream sites in Arizona.Tree Physiology, 17: 151–160. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/17.3.151.

    Li SG, Tsujimura M, Sugimoto A,et al., 2006. Seasonal variation in oxygen isotope composition of waters for a montane larch forest in Mongolia. Trees—Structure and Function, 20:122–130. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-005-0019-1.

    Lin GH, Phillips SL, Ehleringer JR, 1996. Monsoonal precipitation responses of shrubs in a cold desert community on the Colorado Plateau. Oecologia, 106: 8–17. DOI: 10.1007/BF00334402.

    Nelson ST, 2000. A simple, practical methodology for routine VSMOW/SLAP normalization of water samples analyzed by continuous flow methods. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 14: 1044–1046. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0231(20000630)14:12<1044::AID-RCM987>3.0.CO;2-3.

    Ohte N, Koba K, Yoshikawa K,et al., 2003. Water utilization of natural and planted trees in the semiarid desert of Inner Mongolia, China. Ecological Applications, 13: 337–351. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0337:WUONAP]2.0.CO;2.

    Phillips DL, 2001. Mixing models in analysis of diet using multiple stable isotopes: A critique. Oecologia, 127: 166–170. DOI:10.1007/s004420000571.

    Phillips DL, Gregg JW, 2003. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: Coping with too many sources. Oecologia, 136:261–269. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1218-3.

    Phillips DL, Newsome SD, Gregg JW, 2005. Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods. Oecologia, 144: 520–527. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1816-8.

    Si JH, Feng Q, Zhang XY,et al., 2005. Vegetation changes in the lower reaches of the Heihe River after its water import. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 25(4): 631–640. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.04.001.

    Smith SD, Wellington AB, Nachlinger JL,et al., 1991. Functional responses of riparian vegetation to streamflow diversions in eastern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Application, 1: 89–97. DOI:10.2307/1941850.

    Synder KA, William DG, 2000. Water sources used by riparian trees varies among stream types on the Pedro River, Arizona.Agricultural and Forest Metrology, 105: 227–240. DOI:10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00193-3.

    Thorburn PJ, Walker GR, 1993. The source of water transpired byEucalyptus camaldulensis: Soil, groundwater, or streams? In:Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farqubar GD (eds.). Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon-Water Relations. Academic Press, San Diego,pp. 511–527.

    White JWC, 1989. Stable hydrogen isotope ratios in plants: A review of current theory and some potential application. In:Rundel PW, Ehleringer JR, Nagy KA (eds.). Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.142–162.

    Xiao SC, Xiao HL, Si JH,et al., 2010. Study on the sub-diurnal radial growth ofPopulus euphratica. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 32(4): 816–822.

    Zhao LJ, Xiao HL, Cheng GD,et al., 2008. A preliminary study of water sources of riparian plants in the lower reaches of the Heihe Basin. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 29(6): 709–718.

    Zhao WZ, Chang XL, He ZB, 2003. Responses of distribution pattern of desert riparian forests to hydrologic process in Ejina oasis. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 33(suppl.):21–30.

    Zimmermann U, Enhalt D, Munnich KO, 1967. Soil-water movement and evapotranspiration: Changes in the isotopic composition of the water. Isotopes in Hydrology, Vienna, IAEA, pp.567–585.

    日本午夜av视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| www.999成人在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产成人欧美| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| videosex国产| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 午夜福利视频精品| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| videos熟女内射| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品成人在线| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 一区二区av电影网| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲第一青青草原| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 久久久精品94久久精品| 在线av久久热| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产在线视频一区二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 七月丁香在线播放| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 美女主播在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 九草在线视频观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 九草在线视频观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 女警被强在线播放| 中国美女看黄片| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产精品.久久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 尾随美女入室| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 日本欧美视频一区| 18在线观看网站| av天堂久久9| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 美女主播在线视频| 一本综合久久免费| 1024香蕉在线观看| 少妇人妻 视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产在线免费精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲av男天堂| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久9热在线精品视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 日本五十路高清| 在线看a的网站| av一本久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 一级毛片电影观看| 自线自在国产av| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 久久久久久久精品精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av天堂久久9| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 下体分泌物呈黄色| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| av网站在线播放免费| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| www.av在线官网国产| 青草久久国产| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 91字幕亚洲| 国产在线视频一区二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 香蕉丝袜av| svipshipincom国产片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久99一区二区三区| 成人三级做爰电影| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久影院123| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 制服诱惑二区| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 欧美成人午夜精品| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 在线av久久热| 丝袜在线中文字幕| av网站免费在线观看视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 视频区图区小说| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 欧美另类一区| www.自偷自拍.com| 18在线观看网站| av在线播放精品| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲成人手机| 老司机靠b影院| 免费看不卡的av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 午夜激情av网站| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 777米奇影视久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 中文字幕色久视频| 18禁观看日本| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 另类精品久久| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 超碰成人久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产淫语在线视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 一本综合久久免费| 老司机影院毛片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 蜜桃在线观看..| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 成年av动漫网址| 青草久久国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| kizo精华| 青草久久国产| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 考比视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 日本五十路高清| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 九草在线视频观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| av天堂在线播放| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久av网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产高清videossex| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 宅男免费午夜| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产在线观看jvid| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产成人精品无人区| 丁香六月欧美| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产淫语在线视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产野战对白在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| a级毛片黄视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 精品人妻在线不人妻| videosex国产| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 精品第一国产精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久热这里只有精品99| 性少妇av在线| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 女警被强在线播放| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 久久性视频一级片| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久精品成人免费网站| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日本a在线网址| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 只有这里有精品99| av网站免费在线观看视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 丝袜喷水一区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 男女国产视频网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| videosex国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 免费不卡黄色视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲 国产 在线| 一级毛片 在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 成人国产av品久久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 成人手机av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 色94色欧美一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 精品第一国产精品| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| av网站在线播放免费| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 丝袜美足系列| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 亚洲三区欧美一区| 最黄视频免费看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美大码av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久人人爽人人片av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 精品一区二区三卡| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 欧美精品一区二区大全| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 精品人妻1区二区| 视频区图区小说| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 在线观看国产h片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 咕卡用的链子| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 老熟女久久久| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 婷婷成人精品国产| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 天堂8中文在线网| www.999成人在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日韩电影二区| 成人影院久久| 1024香蕉在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 91老司机精品|