• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India

    2014-09-06 11:13:30SreekanthBalasundaranNazeem
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年4期

    P.M. Sreekanth · M. Balasundaran · P.A. Nazeem

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India

    P.M. Sreekanth · M. Balasundaran · P.A. Nazeem

    Received: 2013-04-23; Accepted: 2013-10-07

    ? Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) is a popular hardwood species native to South and South-East Asia. The possible association of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker with morphological variables of eleven important characters viz. girth at breast height (GBH), height of tree, bole height, branch knots, presence of fluting, spiral stem, leaf hair, leaf length/breadth ratio, branching pattern, bark colour and petiole shape for nine natural populations comprising 180 genotypes of teak (9 populations × 20 trees). The phenogram constructed using Euclidean distances for the eleven morphological characters showed that the populations were not grouped according to their geographical origin. The Mantel’s test for pairwise correlation between Euclidean distances of different morphological variables and genetic distances from AFLP data revealed that only petiole character (r =0.269; p =0.046) and height of tree (r =0.200; p =0.001) were significantly correlated with that of AFLP data matrix. The nine populations in this study covered a geographic area of about 1000 km stretch along the Western Ghat of South India. A test of correlation between genetic and geographic distance matrices revealed a significant positive correlation (r =0.475; p =0.009). The lack of perfect congruence between morphological and molecular data except for geo-graphic distance, tree height and petiole character suggested that the morphological system might be useful for the morphotypes management but not appropriate to study the genetic structure of the teak populations.

    AFLP, genetic, teak, morphology, Tectona grandis

    Introduction

    Teak has a wide but discontinuous distribution in India. It grows well from sea level to an elevation of 1200 m, and with an annual precipitation range from 800-2500 mm. Indian teak provenances show significant variation in terms of adaptability, growth and form under a variety of edaphic and climatic factors. Gunaga and Vasudeva (2003) reported morphological variation in teak clones from Kerala and Karnataka states. Morphological variations in teak clones of Karnataka have been reported with respect to characters like floral traits (Vasudeva et al. 2001), vegetative and reproductive behaviors (Gunaga and Vasudeva 2003), seed germination (Mathew and Vasudeva 2005), and early vigour (Mathew 2001). Bagchi (1999) measured five characters viz. total height, total bole height, diameter at breast height and crown width in 80 sets of teak trees selected from different plantations of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka states. Kumar et al. (1997) considered height, diameter and basal area of different teak clones and reported significant genetic variation at the family level. Suri (1984) studied the quantitative and qualitative tree parameters in a provenance trial laid during 1931, comprising five seed sources from Burma, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka. The statistical analysis showed that teak seeds from moist localities were bigger than those from dry zones. The tree height appears to be a function of site quality rather than origin of seed. Kjaer et al. (1996) while studying the genetic variation in teak from South Asia and Africa observed that differences between populations were much larger for morphological traits like stem form, relative branch size, wood density and allozymes.

    Variability studies are important whenever selection forms the basis for genetic improvement (Bedell 1989). Kjaer et al. (2002) demonstrated the genetic and morphological variation inMetroxylon sagu, a sago palm (a South -East Asian crop having high socio-economic importance) using AFLP markers. Sreekumar et al. (2006) conducted molecular and morphometric analysis of different Indian and Srilankan populations of two rattan species (Calamus rivalis and C. metzianus) using RAPD markers and morphological characters. Multivariate analysis of RAPD and morphological data failed to separate rattan populations into two distinct species. Artocarpus altilis (Park) Fusberg is an important fruit vegetable tree grown in homesteads of Southern part of India. In order to provide scientific management practices and conservation measures for this species, Sreekumar et al. (2007) investigated the pattern of morphological and genetic variation existing in six populations of this species using fifteen morphological traits and AFLP markers. They found that genetic variation from AFLP data is not reflected in quantitative morphological variables. However, the genetic and geographical distances were positively correlated which were well supported by the PCoA analysis and Dollo - parsimony tree.

    The main objective of teak plantation establishment in India is to produce high quality timber having acceptable growth rates. A large variation in growth and other economically important tree characters such as stem form, mode of branching, flowering habit and wood quality is observed in plantation-grown teak. Teak wood colour seems to be influenced by the site quality and moisture availability. As the golden brown wood colour is one of teak's most attractive timber qualities, the variation in wood colour and texture has been widely studied (Kaosa-ard 1993). The success of planting programmes depends not only on the site quality but also on the genetic quality of the planting materials. Although the growth and yield of the plantations depend mostly on site selection and stem quality (i.e., straightness, persistence of stem axis and branching), is strongly controlled by genetic make-up (Keiding et al. 1986; Wellendorf and Kaosa-ard 1988; Kaosa-ard 1993). The results of international teak provenance trials carried out in Asian, African and Latin American countries have clearly demonstrated the influence of provenance or seed source on growth, stem quality, early flowering habit and health performance (Keiding et al. 1986). However, there is no available information on relation between morphology and genetic data on teak. The objective of the present study was to investigate possible relations between morphology, genetic structure and geographical distribution of natural populations of teak from the Western Ghat region of South India and to identify possible AFLP marker associated with phenotypic characters.

    Materials and Methods

    Sample collection from natural forest

    The details of morphological characters from different study sites and leaf materials for DNA isolation were collected from nine natural teak growing forests of the Western Ghats belonging to the states of Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu (Table 1 & 2; Fig. 1). These geographical areas were selected because they were the locations of origin of important provenances from the ‘very moist’ to ‘moist’ teak forests of the Western Ghats identified for raising teak plantations. Historically, Konni, Parambikulam, Nilambur, Wayanad and Thrissur provenances were the sources of huge teak logs, and currently, majority of the teak plantations (70,000 ha approx.) and almost the entire seed production plantations of Kerala are located in the first four geographic areas (Prabhu, 2005). Teak from Nilambur Valley had been acclaimed as the most famous teak source used for shipbuilding and structural purposes during 19thcentury itself. Teak population sampled from Tamil Nadu state was from Indira Gandhi Wild Life Sanctuary located at the Eastern slope of the Western Ghats (Kala et al. 2005). Teak from Barchi (Haliyal Forest Division, Karnataka State) was famous as Dandeli teak because of the unique golden colour and fine grain (Dilip Kumar 2005). Virnoli, which was also part of Haliyal Forest Division was supposed to be the locality of origin of the famous Teli variety of teak which showed fast growth, shiny and smooth leaves that escape teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera attack (Katwal 2005). Moreover, except for Virnoli and Shimoga, these locations had very large, mature trees as well as smaller girth trees available for sampling. From each location, we collected expanding leaves and morphometric details from 20 randomly selected trees from a minimum of 2.5 km2area, sufficiently interior from reserve forest boundaries.

    Fig. 1: Map showing the location of natural populations of teak in the Western Ghats region selected for morphological and genetic analysis. WLS: Wildlife Sanctuary; IGWLS: Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary; P-V WLS: Peechi- Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary

    Table 1: Particulars of the site of teak populations sample collection from the Western Ghats used for AFLP analysis.

    Table 2: Characteristics of study sites of nine teak population from the Western Ghats.

    Morphological characters

    The following are the eleven morphological characters selected. Girth at breast height (GBH): the tree circumference measured at a point 1.37m above average soil level; height of tree: the vertical distance between ground level and tip of the tree; clear bole height: the distance between ground level and the crown point; fluting: the shape of the tree roots extending up from the butt of the tree, measured across the butt end of the log as the maximum inward deviation from roundness; spiral stem: growth of fibers in a spiral direction around the trunk of the tree causing twisting of timber; branching pattern: a secondary woody stem or limb growing from the trunk or main stem of a tree; knots on trunk: results from the inclusion of branches into the tree stem as the tree grows and increases in diameter; petiole shape: winged or sessile; leaf hair: hairs arise as the outward growth of epidermal cells; leaf ratio: the ratio between the leaf length and leaf breadth; bark colour: is the appearance of protective outer covering of the trunk. These characters were recorded in respect of each sampled tree. The details of the characters are listed in Table 3 according to the method suggested by Hush et al. (1972).

    Table 3: List of morphological characters used in the study

    AFLP analysis

    Total DNA was extracted from 0.5 to 1 g of fresh leaf tissues using the modified CTAB protocol of (Doyle and Doyle, 1990). AFLP method was carried out following the standard procedure described by Vos et al. (1995). The reactions were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol (AFLP?Analysis System 1 and Starter Primer Kit; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Inc., USA). The amount of DNA was adjusted to 250 ng for the EcoRI and MseI digestion at 37 °C for 2 h. Ligation of EcoRI and MseI adapters was done at 20 °C for 2 h. Five μl of the template DNA from a 1:10 diluted ligation mixture in TE (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA) buffer was used for pre-amplification with the pre-amplification primer mix. Twenty cycles of amplification were carried out at 94°C for 30 s denaturation, 56°C for 60 s annealing and 72°C for 60 S primer extension in PTC-100 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, USA). Five μl of the pre-amplification product was used for selective amplification with ten primer combinations: E-AGG/M-CTT, E-AAC/M-CTG, E-AAC/M-CTT, E-ACT/M-CAG, E-ACC/M-CTT, E-ACA/M-CTT, E-ACC/M-CTA, E-AGG/M-CAG, E-AGG/M-CTG and E-AGG/M-CAT selected out of 64 tested combinations. Primer labeling was performed by phosphorylat-ing the 5' end of the EcoRI primer with γ-p32ATP and T4 kinase. Mix 1 and Mix 2 components were used for selective AFLP amplification in which, Mix 1 was composed of 5 μl of the labeled selected EcoRI primer and 45 μl of MseI primer. Mix 2 was made according to the protocol supplied by Life Technologies with the AFLP kit. Selective amplification was carried out using 5 μl of the pre-amplification product as the template DNA, 5 μl of Mix 1 and 10 μl of Mix 2. A touch down phase of thirteen amplification cycles was carried out initially, with first cycle at 94°C for 30 s denaturation, 65°C for 30 S annealing and 72°C for 60 s primer extension. The annealing temperature was decreased by 0.7°C each cycle during the following 12 cycles. The final 23 cycles were run at 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s and 72°C for 60 s. Samples were denatured by adding an equal volume of formamide buffer (98% formamide, 10 mM EDTA pH 8, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 0.05% xylene cyanol) and heated at 94°C for 3 min. Five μl of each sample was run in a denaturing 6 per cent, 0.4 mm polyacrylamide gel (1X TBE buffer) in a sequencing gel electrophoretic apparatus (Biorad, USA) at 40 A, 900 V for 2 h. The gel was then transferred onto Whatman No.1 chromatographic paper, dried at 80°C for 2 h on a gel drier (Biorad, USA) and exposed the gel to X-ray film (Kodak?) overnight.

    Data analysis

    Morphological analysis

    The straight forward method of qualitative two state characters recorded as + and - were scored as 1 and 0. Qualitative multistate characters recorded were scored as additive coding, with state (0) character undetectable, state (1) weak positive (+), state (2) moderate positive (++) and state 3 strong positive (+++) (Sneath and Sokal, 1973) (Table 3).

    Cluster analysis of morphometric data

    Cluster analysis was done for representing morphological distances between populations using the NTSYSpc 2.1 package (Rolf, 2000). The morphological data matrices for eleven characters recorded from nine populations were transferred to STAND option to perform the standardization of data. The standardized data were used to compute pair wise population distance matrices based on Euclidean distance coefficient in SIMINT option and then subjected to unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) clustering algorithm. Cluster analyses for 180 genotypes individually were also performed using EUCDIST (Euclidean distance) coefficient option in SIMINT module and then subjected to UPGMA clustering (r = 0.86).

    PCoA analysis of morphological data

    Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was carried out for a better representation of morphometric distances between trees of all the populations using the option STAND, SIMINIT, DECENTER and EIGEN options using NTSYSpc version 2.1 (Rolf, 2000).

    AFLP data analysis

    AFLP data for teak trees from natural forests were utilized to investigate the possible relation between genetic variation and morphological variation existing in teak populations AFLP bands were scored for presence (1) and absence (0) of bands. The data matrices were grouped into nine populations and analyzed using POPGENE, Version 1.32 package for dominant markers and a pair wise comparison of populations was made according to (Sreekanth et al. 2012). The Pair wise genetic distances (Nei 1978) obtained were subjected for correlation studies (Table 4).

    Table 4: Nei’s unbiased measures of genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal) coefficients

    Correlation of genetic and morphological distances using Mantel’s test

    Pair wise morphological distance matrix was created using EUCDIST (Euclidean distance) option in the SIMINT module of NTSYSpc 2.1 for each morphological character individually, as well as for the overall morphological data set. In order to find out possible relation between the morphological variation and genetic variation, product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between the genetic distance matrices and morphological distance matrices for each character individually as well as for the overall morphological characters using Mantel test (Mantel, 1967). Statistical significance was evaluated with 1000 permutations using TFPGA software, version 1.3 (Miller, 1997).

    Correlation between geographic data and genetic data

    The values of latitude and longitude recorded for each geographic location of each of the nine natural teak populations were entered in a prescribed format of GenAlex6 software package (Peakall and Smouse, 2006) for creating pair wise geographic distance matrix. The correlation test between the geographic distance matrices and the corresponding genetic distance matrices (as given in the above paragraph of AFLP data analysis) was performed using Mantel test (Mantel, 1967) and statistical significance was evaluated with 1000 permutations using TFPGA software, version 1.3 (Miller, 1997).

    Results

    Clustering and PCoA of morphological characters

    The phenogram constructed using Euclidean distances for eleven morphological characters showed that the nine populations werenot grouped according to their geographical proximity except Para and Thri (Fig. 2). There existed two main clusters, first main cluster formed by Konn, Nila, Shim, Waya, Barc, Virn and Tami and second main cluster comprised of Thri and Para which clustered separately. The cluster analysis of 180 trees from nine populations for similarity in morphological characters showed that the trees were generally scattered among different clusters without any geographical grouping based on their origin.

    The PCoA analysis of 180 trees based on eleven morphological characters failed to reveal any major separation in the pattern of morphological variations clearly indicating lack of distinct grouping of populations based on phenetic structure. None of the populations from neighbouring geographic regions tend to fall together in a given proportion of the two dimensional factor spaces. Some of the Para individuals were separated based on morphology (Fig. 3).

    Fig. 2: UPGMA dendrogram of morphological characters obtained using Euclidean distance between the nine teak population.

    Fig. 3: Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 180 genotypes using eight morphological characters.

    AFLP analysis

    The standard genetic distance (D) unbiased for the sample size (Nei 1978) for all pair wise population comparisons were provided in the Table 4 and the data were used to test the correlation between genetic data and morphological data.

    Mantel Test

    The mantel test did not reveal any correlation between Euclidean distance of overall morphological characters and AFLP genetic distance data (r =-0.1463; p =0.1740). The Mantel's test of pair wise correlation between Euclidean distance of individual morphological characters and genetic distance of AFLP data revealed that two morphological characters i.e. petiole character (r =0.2688; p =0.0460) and height of tree (r =0.2002; p =0.0010) were significantly correlated to AFLP data matrix. The test of correlation between genetic and geographic distance matrices also revealed a significant positive correlation (r =0.4748; p =0.0090) (Table 5).

    Table 5: Mantel’s Correlation between distance value based on pair wise morphological features and the corresponding pair wise genetic distance value.

    Discussion

    AFLP analysis was applied to reveal patterns of genetic variation in teak. The comparison between phenotypic and genotypic data depicted a low correlation. The nine populations used in this study covered a wide geographic range in latitudes and geographical distances. The multivariate analyses of morphological data clearly indicated that populations from the neighboring localities did not show any tendency to group together (Fig. 2 and 3). The PCoA analysis supported the observation that the selected morphological characters scattered along 2D-scatter plot without a phenetic gap between each individual population. The detailed analysis of individual characters revealed that there is no clear distinction between nine populations based on quantitative and qualitative morphological characters analysed. A few of the Para individuals from Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary clustered together in one axis because of higher GBH which ranged from 2400 cm to 6520 cm. The discrimination among population variables might be strongly controlled by abiotic factors. In Baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa), Assogbadgo et al. (2006) observed significant correlation of morphometric characters with abiotic factors of the environment.

    The correlation between genetic distances and morphological characters revealed positive correlation of petiole shape and height of tree with AFLP data (Table 5). Mantel’s test of significance further gave an additional support and revealed that the two characters were significantly correlated with that of genotypic data. Similar result was obtained in an AFLP marker study on genetic variation in a teak clonal seed orchard comprising 1200 trees of 31 clones established in Southern Kerala in 1985 (Sreekanth and Balasundaran, 2012). Mantel's test did not reveal any correlation between overall morphology and genetic distance. The results of the Mantel’s test indicated that the genetic variation detected by AFLP is not reflected in quantitative and qualitative morphological characters measured. Ehara et al. (2002) performed RAPD analysis of 38 accessions of Metroxylon sagu from Malay Archipelago and found that none of the morphological variables were useful in identification of specific genotypes. In the present study, the lack of correlation between genetic data and morphological variables was clearly indicated in the dendrogram and PCoA.

    One of the aims of the study was to find AFLP markers that are significantly more likely to co-occur with a morphological trait than expected by chance, that is, a marker that has a statistically significant association with the phenotypic trait. Ideally, we could not specifically reveal unique AFLP bands related to the phenotypic variables such as height of tree and petiole shape existed. Additional experiments such as QTL mapping studies are needed to identify specific genes or genome regions that might have direct influence on the observed morphometric variation.

    The nine populations in this study covered a wide geographical area. The most genetically similar populations were Virn and Barc and they were geographically very close by location, while the genetically distant populations of Barc of Karnataka State and Tami of Tamil Nadu State were far separated. The geographical and genetic distances were positively correlated (r =0.4748; p =0.0090). Mantel's test of significance also proved a significant relation between geographic and genetic distance showing genetic divergence between distant populations. This significant correlation indicated that long distance dispersal of seeds had been rare. This was well supported by the UPGMA dendrogram and PCoA analysis (Sreekanth et al. 2012).

    The morphological clustering showed no geographical structure. On the other hand, the molecular analysis showed that the genetic structure was related to the sample collection site. The lack of perfect congruence between morphological and molecular data suggested that the morphological system might be useful for the morphotype management but was not appropriate to study the genetic structure of the teak population. The spatial structure of the genetic diversity may be related to the evolution of the species and the discordance between the morphological and molecular structures might have resulted from similar selection pressures at different places leading to similar forms with a different genetic background.

    Conclusions

    In a previous study of nine natural teak populations of the Western Ghats of South India strong association between genotype of natural teak populations and their respective geographic origin has been reported through AFLP marker study (Sreekanth et al. 2012). About 75% of the total genetic diversity occurred within populations while only 25 % of the diversity was present among populations. The present study showed very little relation between morphological variations and geographic distances be-tween populations. Moreover, variation between populations in respect of most of the economically important phenotypical characters is not supported by genetic diversity revealed through AFLP markers. These findings show that ecological factors such as altitude, rainfall, soil characters, etc. also play a major role in phenotype of teak trees. Teak is a cross pollinated tree species; bole height, log size, tree form, wood colour, etc. are some of the economically important characters of teak trees. Hence, it can be concluded that for tree improvement of teak through phenotypic selection process, the number of plus trees selected from a population should be sufficiently large in order to exploit the large intra-population genetic variation. The results of these studies further emphasize the importance of progeny trial in teak tree improvement.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (S.O. No. BT/PR/2302/AGR/08/161/2000). We are thankful to the Forest Departments of Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu for giving permission for the collection of leaf materials.

    Assogbadjo AE, Kyndt T, Sinsin B, Gheysen G, Van damme P. 2006. Patterns of genetic and morphometric diversity in Baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa). Ann Botany, 97: 819?830.

    Bagchi SK. 1999. Correlation of age element in Tectona grandis Linn. f. Indian For, 125: 522?525.

    Bedell PE. 1989. Preliminary observations on the variability of teak in India. Indian For, 115: 72?73.

    Dilip Kumar PJ. 2005. Teak in Karnataka state, India. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp 45–46.

    Doyle JJ, Doyle J. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12:13–15.

    Ehara H, Kosaka S, Shimura N, Matoyoma D, Morita O, Mizota C, Naito H, Susanto S, Bintoro MH, Yamamoto Y. 2002. Genetic variation of sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) in the Malay Archipelago. In: K. Kainuma, M. Okazaki Y, Toyada Y and Cecil J.E. (eds), New frontiers of sago palm studies. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, pp. 93?100.

    Gunaga RP, Vasudevan R. 2003. Genetic variation for fruiting phenology in teak clones among provenances of Karnataka (Tectona grandis L.f). Indian J Fores, 25: 215?220.

    Hush B, Miller CI, Beers TW. 1972. Forest Mensuration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

    Kala JC, Kumaravelu G, Krishnakumar N. 2005. Status report of teak in Tamil Nadu, India. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp. 47–53.

    Kaosa-ard A. 1993. Teak international provenance trials I. Growth and stem quality. In Proceedings "50th Year of Huay Tak Teak Plantation: Teak Seminar", pp 113?129.

    Katwal RPS. 2005. Teak in India: status prospects and perspectives. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp 1–17.

    Keiding H, Wellendorf H, Lauridsen EB.1986. Evaluation of an international teak provenance trials. Danida Forest Seed Centre, p.81.

    Kjaer A, Barfod AS, Asmussen CB, Seberg O. 2002. Genetic and morphological variation in the sago palm Metroxylon sagu Rottb. (Arecaceae) in Papua New Guinea. In: K. Okazaki M. Toyada and Cecil J. E. (eds), New frontiers of sago palm studies. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, pp. 100?101.

    Kjaer ED, Seigismund HR, Suangtho V.1996. A multivariate study on genetic variation of teak (Tectona grandis. L.). Silvae Genet, 45: 361?368.

    Kumar A, Gogate, M.G, Sharma R, Mandal, AK 1997. Genetic evaluation of teak clones of Allapali region, Maharashtra. Indian For, 123: 187?189

    Mantel NA.1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res, 27: 209–220.

    Mathew J. 2001. Variation for germination and early seedling vigour among Half Sib Families of Teak ( Tectona grandis L.f.) Clones of Karnataka. M.Sc. thesis, College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Sirsi, Karnataka, p 102.

    Mathew J, Vasudeva R. 2005. Clonal variation for seed germination in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Curr Sci, 84: 1133?1136.

    Miller MP. 1997. A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data (TFPGA). Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff USA.

    Nei M.1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583–590.

    Peakall R, Smouse, PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes, 6: 288–295.

    Prabhu NH. 2005. Teak in Kerala: past present and future. In: K.M. Bhat, K.K.N. Nair, K. V Bhat E. M. Muralidharan Sharma J.K. (eds), Quality timber products of teak from sustainable forest management. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, pp. 83–92.

    Rolf J. 2000. NTSYS-pc, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version.2.1 Exeter, New York

    Sneath PHA, Sokal, RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman San Francisco California.

    Sreekanth PM, Balasundaran M, Nazeem PA, Suma TB. 2012. Genetic diversity of nine natural Tectona grandis Lf populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India. Conserv Genet, 13: 1409?1419.

    Sreekanth PM, Balasundaran M. 2012. AFLP diversity of teak clonal seed orchard. Indian J Genet Plant Breed, 4: 484?487.

    Sreekumar VB, Binoy AM, Sarah, TG. 2007. Genetic and morphological variation in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis (Park.) Fosberg) in the Western Ghats of India using AFLP. Genet Resour Crop Ev, 54: 1659?1665.

    Sreekumar VB, Renuka, C, Suma TB, Balasundaran, M. 2006. Taxonomic reconsideration of Calamus rivalis Thw. ex Trim. and C. metzianus Schlecht (Arecaceae) through morphometric and molecular analyses. Bot Stud, 47: 443?452.

    Suri, SK.1984. Analytical study of teak provenance tests in North Raipurdivision of Madhya Pradesh. Indian For, 110: 345?363.

    Vasudeva R, Gunaga RP, Hanumantha M. 2001. Implication of variation in reproductive traits among teak clones to management and genetics of seed orchards. Advances in Forestry Research, 24: 120?135.

    Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vande Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res, 23: 4407–4414.

    Wellendorf H Kaosa-ard A. 1988. Teak improvement strategy in Thailand. Forest Tree Improvement No.21 p.43.

    DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0528-0

    Project founding: This work was financially supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (S.O. No. BT/PR/2302/AGR/08/161/2000).

    The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

    Biotechnology and Applied Genetics, Bangalore City College New Campus, Kalyan Nagar, Banaswadi Outer Ring Road, Bangalore 560043, India. Tel.: +91 – 80-25459946; Fax: +91 –80-25459958

    Email: sreekanthpm@gmail.com

    M. Balasundaran

    Environmental Biotechnology, Tropical Institute of Ecological Sciences, Velloor P.O, Kottayam – 686501, Kerala, India.

    P.A. Nazeem

    Centre for Plant Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Kerala Agricultural University, KAU Campus P.O, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

    国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日本午夜av视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 成人二区视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 男人舔奶头视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 色网站视频免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 99热全是精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 一区二区av电影网| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| av网站免费在线观看视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费看不卡的av| 尾随美女入室| 成人欧美大片| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 免费看日本二区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| av专区在线播放| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 一级黄片播放器| 国产乱来视频区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美zozozo另类| 美女高潮的动态| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 观看美女的网站| 综合色av麻豆| 久久久色成人| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| av在线播放精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久6这里有精品| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日本一二三区视频观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 婷婷色综合www| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 在线观看人妻少妇| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 日本wwww免费看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| www.av在线官网国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| eeuss影院久久| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| av在线app专区| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品国产av在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 永久网站在线| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久精品性色| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 综合色丁香网| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产乱来视频区| 丝袜喷水一区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲av男天堂| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 黄片wwwwww| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久97久久精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产成人一区二区在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 99热这里只有是精品50| 三级经典国产精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 日日撸夜夜添| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 国产探花极品一区二区| 少妇丰满av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 尾随美女入室| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 视频区图区小说| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 99久久人妻综合| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 69人妻影院| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲最大成人av| 毛片女人毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 色综合色国产| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产精品999| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 久久精品久久久久久久性| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 99久久精品热视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲av男天堂| 综合色丁香网| a级毛色黄片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日日啪夜夜撸| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 婷婷色综合www| videos熟女内射| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av男天堂| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 18+在线观看网站| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日本色播在线视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产精品无大码| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 深夜a级毛片| 综合色丁香网| 欧美3d第一页| 国产毛片在线视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| av.在线天堂| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 一级黄片播放器| 大香蕉久久网| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 香蕉精品网在线| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 在线播放无遮挡| av播播在线观看一区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 午夜福利高清视频| 免费大片18禁| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品第二区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 中文天堂在线官网| 在线观看国产h片| 成年av动漫网址| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 午夜免费观看性视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产成人精品一,二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 天堂网av新在线| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产精品成人在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 少妇人妻 视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产成人一区二区在线| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av免费在线看不卡| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久6这里有精品| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产综合懂色| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| av福利片在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 观看免费一级毛片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日韩成人伦理影院| 99久久精品热视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日本黄大片高清| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲无线观看免费| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 久久久久网色| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲在线观看片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 婷婷色综合www| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 成人免费观看视频高清| 色哟哟·www| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 久久6这里有精品| 在线播放无遮挡| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 秋霞在线观看毛片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲av福利一区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 99热6这里只有精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 街头女战士在线观看网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 尾随美女入室| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 中文字幕制服av| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产高潮美女av| 毛片女人毛片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| av卡一久久| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 免费大片18禁| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 日本黄色片子视频| 美女主播在线视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美bdsm另类| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产乱来视频区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久热精品热| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产 精品1| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 直男gayav资源| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品无大码| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 一本一本综合久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色|