• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Metabolic and Phylogenetic Profile of Bacterial Community in Guishan Coastal Water (Pearl River Estuary),South China Sea

    2014-04-20 09:24:20HUXiaojuanLIUQingLIZhuojiaHEZhiliGONGYingxueCAOYuchengandYANGYufeng
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2014年5期

    HU Xiaojuan, LIU Qing LI Zhuojia, HE Zhili, GONG Yingxue, CAO Yucheng, and YANG Yufeng

    1) Institute of Hydrobiology, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    2) South China Sea Fisheries Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, P. R. China

    3) Institute of Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA

    4) Research Center for Molecular Biology, Institute of Life and Health Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    5) Key Laboratory of Eutrophication and Red Tide Prevention, Education Department of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    Metabolic and Phylogenetic Profile of Bacterial Community in Guishan Coastal Water (Pearl River Estuary),
    South China Sea

    HU Xiaojuan1),2), LIU Qing1), LI Zhuojia2), HE Zhili3), GONG Yingxue4), CAO Yucheng2), and YANG Yufeng1),5),*

    1) Institute of Hydrobiology, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    2) South China Sea Fisheries Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, P. R. China

    3) Institute of Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA

    4) Research Center for Molecular Biology, Institute of Life and Health Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    5) Key Laboratory of Eutrophication and Red Tide Prevention, Education Department of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510632, P. R. China

    Characteristics of a microbial community are important as they indicate the status of aquatic ecosystems. In the present study, the metabolic and phylogenetic profile of the bacterioplankton community in Guishan coastal water (Pearl River Estuary), South China Sea, at 12 sites (S1–S12) were explored by community-level physiological profiling (CLPP) with BIOLOG Eco-plate and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Our results showed that the core mariculture area (S6, S7 and S8) and the sites associating with human activity and sewage discharge (S11 and S12) had higher microbial metabolic capability and bacterial community diversity than others (S1–5, S9–10). Especially, the diversity index of S11 and S12 calculated from both CLPP and DGGE data (H >3.2) was higher than that of others as sewage discharge may increase water nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient. The bacterial community structure of S6, S8, S11 and S12 was greatly influenced by total phosphorous, salinity and total nitrogen. Based on DGGE fingerprinting, proteobacteria, especially γ- and α-proteobacteria, were found dominant at all sites. In conclusion, the aquaculture area and wharf had high microbial metabolic capability. The structure and composition of bacterial community were closely related to the level of phosphorus, salinity and nitrogen.

    Microbial community; environmental factor; mariculture; CLPP; DGGE

    1 Introduction

    Guishan Island in Pearl River Estuary is an important base of the marine cage culture in Guangdong Province, South China (Wu et al., 2008). By 2010, Guanshan Island had developed fish cage culture of 90000 m2and achieved mariculture production of 4729 t. The over-development of aquaculture may cause a variety of environmental problems such as eutrophication, pollution, oxygen depletion and community biodiversity change in coastal ecosystems (Troell et al., 2003). Therefore, it is required to develop the environmentally friendly aquaculture ecosystems in order to benefit both environments and farmers.

    Microbes distribute dissolved organic matter, increase nutrient availability and affect many eco-environmental processes (González et al., 2000). The characteristics of a microbial community are important indicators of the status of aquatic ecosystems (Paerl et al., 2002). Community level physiological profiling (CLPP) is an approach commonly used to characterizing a microbial community function according to its sole carbon source utilization pattern (Weber and Legge, 2010). Kirk et al. (2005) considered that CLPP was sensitive enough for differentiating microbial populations. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) is another popular molecular method used to assessing the microbial community structure. Cook et al. (2007) and Song et al. (2011) analyzed the microbial community structure in the sediment of various aquatic environments with DGGE. However, studying microbial community composition and its relationship with environmental factors from a single research perspective may overlook some important information. Kirk et al. (2005) considered that comprehensive information of a microbial community should be obtained from multi-ple perspectives. Sala et al. (2005) used both DGGE and CLPP in combination to studying the phylogenetic and functional diversity of bacterioplankton during Alexandrium sp. blooms.

    In the present study, the effect of aquaculture on the bacterial community structure and environmental factors in Guishan coastal water was explored with CLPP and DGGE in combination with redundancy analysis (RDA). The results provide new insights into our better understanding the bacterial community structure and function, and useful information for protection of coastal microbial resources and Guishan estuarine ecosystems.

    2 Materials and Methods

    2.1 Studying Sites

    Twelve sampling sites (S1–S12) were established around the core mariculture area in Guishan coastal water, Pearl River Estuary, South China Sea (Fig.1). S6, S7 and S8 located at the core mariculture area, S10 was close to a navigation channel, S11 was in an abandoned culture area where fishing boats were docked, and S12 was adjacent to a wharf associated with sewage discharge. S11 and S12 were frequently affected by humans, for example, passengers ferry from Zhuhai to Guishan and fishmen. There was a breakwater between S8 and S9 as well as between S10 and S11. For microbial analysis, surface water sample (0.5 m) was collected from these sites on August 8, 2011.

    2.2 Environmental Property Analysis

    In situ water physicochemical variables including salinity, temperature, pH value and dissolve oxygen (DO) content were determined at the sampling sites using a YSI 556 system (YSI Incorporated, USA). Transparency was measured with a Secchi disk. The concentration of nutrients including total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), ammonia (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-) and phosphate (PO43-) was determined with standard methods (GB/T 12763.4-2007, China). Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was the sum of NH4+, NO3-and NO2-. The chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration was measured with an acetone extraction method (Lorenzen, 1967).

    2.3 Community-Level Physiological Profiling (CLPP) Analysis

    CLPP of the microbial community functional diversity was performed with Eco-plates (Biolog Eco-plateTM, USA). An Eco-plate contains three replicate sets of 31 carbon substrates and a control. Each sample was inoculated into an Eco-plate, 150 μL each well, to determine the metabolic potential of microbial communities. The plates were incubated at 30℃ and analyzed spectrophotomically at 590 nm every 24 h during an incubating period of 168 h. The diversity index was calculated with the data obtained at 120 h.

    2.4 Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) Fingerprinting and Sequencing of Representative Bands

    The fresh water sample was concentrated onto 0.2 μm membrane filters (Millipore) for DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted from 1 L of surface water from each site using an Omega E.Z.N.A.? Water DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, USA), from which the selected gene was a amplified using a nested PCR. In detail, complete 16S rRNA gene was amplified using a nested PCR with the primers 8f (5’-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3’) and 1492r (5’-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3’), while the V3 region of 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer 341f-GC (5’-CGC CCG CCG CGC GCG GCG GGC GGG GCG GGG GCA CGG GGG GCC TAG GGG AGG CAG CAG-3’) and 534r (5’-ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG-3’) for DGGE (Muyzer et al., 1993). The nest PCR was carried out in a mixture of 50 μL in volume containing 0.5 μL of 16S rRNA gene PCR product, 5 μL of 10×PCR buffer (TaKaRa), 1 μL of each primer (10 μmol L-1), 4 μL of 2.5 mmol L-1of dNTP (each), and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa). The amplification protocol included a denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, 20 touch-down cycles at 94℃ for 45 s, 65–55℃ for 45 s (0.5℃ decrease each cycle) and 72℃ for 30 s, followed by 10 normal cycles at 94℃ for 45 s, 55℃ for 45 s and 72℃ for 30 s, and a final extension at 72℃ for 10 min.

    DGGE was performed with 8% denaturing acrylamide gel containing a linear gradient (45%–65%) of denaturants (7 mol L-1urea and 40% formamide were defined as 100%). Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V, and 60℃for 12 h with a Dcode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). DNA was visualized with ethidium bromide staining and photographed with UV transillumination. DGGE images were used for microbial community structure comparisons with Quantity One v4.6.2.

    Individual DGGE bands of interest were excised,placed in 1.5 mL sterile tubes and rinsed with 100 μL of sterile distilled water (SDW). After washing, the bands were crushed, resuspended in 30 μL of SDW, and incubated overnight at 4℃. One microliter of eluting water for each band was used as the template for the amplification of V3 region under the same condition as was used for DGGE to verify the band position and purity. One microliter of eluting water was used also to PCR amplification with the primer 341 (forward, lacking GC clamp) and 518 (reverse) by denaturing at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94℃ for 45 s, annealing 55℃ for 45 s, and extending at 72℃ for 30 s, and a final extension at 72℃ for 10 min. The amplifying product was purified with an Omega E.Z.N.A.? PCR Purification Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, USA), and inserted into pMD18-T (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Recombinant plasmids were amplified in E. coli with standard procedures and submitted for sequencing commercially in Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd.

    The sequences were used as queries in searching Gen-Bank with the basic local alignment search tool algorithm for homologs (Lee et al., 2010). The sequences described in this study have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers JX195613-JX195632.

    2.5 Statistical Analysis

    Average well color development (AWCD) presents the potential utilization of various carbon sources by a microbial community. To compare the control and samples, AWCD was calculated from the OD595value of each well in an Eco-plate according to

    where C is the OD595value of each well, R is the OD595value of control well, and n is the number of substrates used (Garland and Mills, 1991). The Shannon diversity index (H) was calculated using where Pi was calculated by the OD595value in each substrate over the total value of OD595in all the substrates (or intensity of individual DGGE band over the total intensity of all the bands), expressed as

    In addition, the Shannon evenness index (E) that presents the distribution of individuals within species is given by (Moss and Bassall, 2006)

    where S is the number of positive wells in each sample (or the total number of species in the sample).

    A multivariate ordination method was used to analyze the relationship between microbial community structure and environmental variables in CANOCO v4.5. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was performed to test whether weighted-averaging techniques or linear methods were appropriate. The longest gradient resulted from DCA of CLPP and DGGE data were 0.705 and 1.547, respectively. Accordingly, redundancy analysis (RDA) (Ter Braak and ?milauer, 2002) of CLPP and DGGE data was performed to select the environmental predictors that best explained the variance of microbial communities. Data of microbial communities were also obtained from

    where Cidis the OD595value of each well on day i (or the intensity of each DGGE band), Ridis the OD595value of control well on day i (or zero for DGGE), and AWCDidis the AWCD value on day i (or the average intensity of total possible bands) (Lee et al., 2010).

    3 Results

    3.1 Environmental Characteristics

    No significant temperature and acidity variation ofsurface water was detected among different sampling sites (Table 1). Water depth at S7, S8, S11 and S12 (inside the breakwater) was shallower than that at other sites. The DO content ranged from 5.42 to 6.67 mg L-1, generally lower at S7, S8, S9, S11 and S12 than at others. The TN and TP level ranged from 33.14 μmol L-1to 73.05 μmol L-1, and 1.07 μmol L-1to 3.31 μmol L-1, respectively, with the highest recorded at S11 and S12, respectively. The average DIN and PO43-concentrations were 26.89 μmol L-1and 0.61 μmol L-1, respectively. According to the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus, the surface water in Guishan Island was mostly at a state of potential eutrophication with medium limited phosphorous. The Chl a concentration ranged from 0.56 μg L-1to 6.03 μg L-1.

    Table 1 Water physicochemical properties of the 12 sampling sites at Guishan Island

    Fig.2 Variations in the average well color development (AWCD) from the community-level physiological profile assay using Eco-plates.

    3.2 Metabolic Potential of Bacterial Communities Detected by CLPP

    The variation in the optical density of culture suspension was measured at different time points as a microbial growth indicator (Fig.2). The samples exhibited different variation patterns with individual substrates. As an expression of heterotrophic bacterial activity, the AWCD value was generally high at S6, S12, S11, S7 and S8 associating with mariculture operations and S11 and S12 being affected by anthropogenic activities (e.g., transportation), and low at S4, S3, S2, and S1.

    3.3 Phylogenetic Composition of Bacterial Communities Detected by DGGE

    The DGGE profile of 12 samples sites produced 16, 21, 27, 15, 16, 17, 13, 18, 21, 25, 31 and 30 distinct bands, respectively (Fig.3). In general, S3, S10, S11 and S12 had more bands than others. There were some common bands. The prominent DGGE bands that separated the sampling sites, 25 in total, were sequenced. They represented diverse phylotypes (Table 2). In addition to S10 and S12, the most dominant bacterium at other sites was Pseudoalteromonas sp. (G7, G9, and G11) of γ-proteobacteria. The bacterial community structure at S10, S11 and S12 was different from that at others. Following γ-proteobacteria, α-proteobacteria were the second most predominantat S10, S11 and S12, especially S11 and S12. The sequenced fragments were clustered into four major phylogenetic groups, most in γ-proteobacteria and α-proteobacteria while a small proportion in cyanobacteria and uncultured bacteria. The closest relatives of retrieved from GenBank (Table 2) were 98%–100% similar to those obtained in this study.

    Table 2 The similarity of the sequences obtained in this study to the closest relatives and their phylogenetic affiliations

    Fig.3 Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis pattern of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from surface water at 12 sampling sites in Guishan Island. Sequences were obtained from the bands marked by numbers on the left. G1 through G25, band 1 through band 25 were marked.

    The clustering of normalized DGGE gels was analyzed with Jacard coefficient (Table 3). The comparison analysis of DGGE bands showed that S8 and S9 were 77.9% similar with each other, the closest between sites, and S6 and S12 were 31.7% similar with each other, the farthest between sites. In total, 25 pairs of sites were >60% similar with each other, indicating that the similarity in bacterial community structure between sites was relatively high.

    3.4 Microbial Diversity Detected by DGGE and CLPP

    The Shannon diversity index (H) calculated from DGGE data varied in a relatively wide range (2.45–3.40), indicating that microbial diversity of the samples in terms of bacterial community structure was substantially different (Fig.4a). The DGGE-based diversity index value was >3.0 at S3, S10, S11 and S12, which was consistent with the number of distinct DGGE bands at these sites. On the contrary, the CLPP-based Shannon index showed a relatively narrow range (2.90–3.26). The highest value of CLPP-based Shannon index was found at S6, S8, S11 and S12, being similar to the result of AWCD. Similarly, the result of DGGE and CLPP indicated also higher diversity at S11 and S12 where human activity was intensive than others where human activity was weak.

    The Shannon evenness index (E) calculated from DGGE data showed a small change (0.95–0.99) (Fig.4b). However, the value of CLPP-based Shannon evenness index showed large differences among sampling sites. The E values at S1, S2 and S4 were the highest because of the low ability of the microbial communities of utilizing carbon sources.

    3.5 Redundancy Analysis (RDA)

    RDA ordination was performed to correlate environmental factors with bacterial communities measured by DGGE (Fig.5a) and CLPP (Fig.5b). Results showed that the first two axes explained 39.0% of the total variation in DGGE profiles. TP, transparency and DIN made a great contribution to Axis 2 according to the biplot scaling of RDA (Fig.5a). Moreover, salinity and TP were the major environmental factors influencing the abundance and distribution of bacterioplankton. G7, the most dominant bacterial population, was less affected by environmental factors. Concerning the utilization property of individual substrate at 12 sites, the first axis explained 28.8% of the total variation and the first and second axes explained 46.6% of the total variation in CLPP data. Biplot scaling of RDA indicated that salinity, temperature, acidity and DO were the major environmental factors influencing bacterial communities (Fig.5b). The bacterial community structure at S6, S8, S11 and S12 based on CLPP data was greatly influenced by TP, TN and salinity.

    Table 3 Jacard coefficient clustering of normalized DGGE gels

    Fig.4 The diversity and evenness index of the bacterial community at 12 sampling sites based on DGGE and CLPP data. a, Shannon diversity index (H); H-DGGE, H of bacterial community in sampling sites based on DGGE data; H-ECO, H of bacterial community based on CLPP data; b, Shannon evenness index (E); E-DGGE, E of bacterial community at sampling sites based on DGGE data; E-ECO, E of bacterial community based on CLPP data.

    Fig.5 Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination of data from denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and community-level physiological profiling (CLPP). a, RDA ordination of DGGE data, in which triangles and numbers indicate dominant bacteria and arrows indicate environmental variables; b, RDA ordination of CLPP data, in which circles and numbers indicate sampling sites and arrows indicate environmental variables.

    4 Discussion

    The impacts of aquaculture on environment are evident. It is estimated that approximately 80% and 75% of input fish food carbon and nitrogen in a fish cage aquaculture are respectively released to the aquatic environment (Hall et al., 1992). Over-development of aquaculture without considering the environment may cause eutrophication, pollution and oxygen depletion of coastal waters (Troell et al., 2003). Bacteria in seawater are considered acting on the increased organic matters loaded from fish farms or sewage (Paerl et al., 2003), which provide sensitive, meaningful and quantifiable indications of ecological changes (Sakami et al., 2007). Therefore, a comprehensive characterization of bacterial community is an important mean of assessing the effect of aquaculture and anthropogenic activity on environment.

    CLPP is an approach of characterizing microbial community function based on the sole carbon source utilization pattern (Weber and Legge, 2010), which provides data of the metabolic characteristics and overall stability of a specific microbial community over time (Weber and Legge, 2011). In the present study, CLPP data showed that the core mariculture area (S6, S7 and S8) and the area associated with human activity and sewage discharge (S11 and S12) had higher microbial metabolic capability and diversity than others. The AWCD and Shannon index value at S6, S12, S11, S7 and S8 were higher than those at other sites. Lee et al. (2010) considered that more heterotrophic bacteria should have higher microbial activity detected by aerobic Eco-plates. Interestingly, the diversity indices calculated from both DGGE and CLPP data were higher at S11 and S12 (H>3.2) thanat other sites, indicating that sewage discharge possibly increases water nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient (Table 1), thus stimulates the growth of microorganisms and their activity. Moreover, there was a breakwater between S8 and S9 as well as between S10 and S11. These four sites (S7, S8, S11 and S12) located inside an artificial dam with shallower water depths and lower DO content than other sites. Due to the presence of breakwater, water exchange was poor at S7, S8, S11 and S12 in comparison with other sites. Thus, the nutrients accumulate easy in waters beside the breakwater. As expected, the highest concentration of TN and TP were recorded at S11 and S12.

    The bacterial community structure detected by CLPP at S6, S8, S11 and S12 was greatly influenced by TP, salinity and TN (Fig.5b). As a major nutrient for aquatic ecology, phosphorus is recognized as the most critical nutrient that limits the productivity (Jin et al., 2005). Yuan et al. (2011) reported that phosphorus regulate primary and bacterial production, being a potential limiting nutrient in Pearl River water. It is clear that estuaries are subjecting to the dual impact of freshwater and seawater. Thus, the difference in microbial distribution pattern between sampling sites may be attributed to the difference of ambient environments. Environmental factors may play an important role in controlling the restructure of a bacterial community (Sun et al., 2012).

    DGGE fingerprinting showed that proteobacteria, especially γ- and α-proteobacteria, was dominant in the studied area. The dominance of proteobacteria in Pearl River estuary was consistent with the reported early (Du et al., 2011). These findings indicated that this group of bacteria played a critical role in biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in marine environments (Sun et al., 2012). The most dominant bacterial genus, Pseudoalteromonas, was previously found to be the most representative obligate marine bacteria comprising of numerous clusters (Yoza et al., 2007). Competitive survival pressure in diverse environments has promoted the evolution of numerous metabolic pathways in this genus (Kalinovskaya et al., 2004).

    In conclusions, this study revealed that bacterial community in mariculture area and where affected by humans was higher in metabolic capability and diversity than others, and the structure and composition of bacterial communities were closely related to the level of water phosphorus, salinity and nitrogen.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Dr. Yangguang Gu of Jinan University for the assistances in sample collection and data processing. This research was supported by the Support Project of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2012BAD18B01), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201403008) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1301235, 41173079), special scientific research funds for central non-profit institutes, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (2014TS04).

    Cook, P., Veuger, B., B?er, S., and Middelburg, J. J., 2007. Effect of nutrient availability on carbon and nitrogen incorporation and flows through benthic algae and bacteria in nearshore sandy sediment. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 49: 165-180.

    Du, J. K., Xiao, K., Huang, Y. L., Li, H. X., Tan, H. M., Cao, L. X., Lu, Y. J., and Zhou, S. N., 2011. Seasonal and spatial diversity of microbial communities in marine sediments of the South China Sea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 100: 317-331.

    Garland, J. L., and Mills, A. L., 1991. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level, sole-carbon-source utilization. Applied Environment Microbiology, 57: 2351-2359.

    GB/T 12763.4-2007. Specifications for oceanographic survey-Part 4: Survey of chemical parameters in sea water. National Standards of the P. R. China.

    González, J. M., Simó, R., Massana, R., Covert, J. S., Casamayor, E. O., Pedrós-Alió, C., and Moran, M. A., 2000. Bacterial community structure associated with a dimethylsulfoniopropionate-producing North Atlantic algal bloom. Applied Environment Microbiology, 66: 4237-4246.

    Hall, P. O. J., Holby, O., Kollberg, S., and Samuelsson, M. O., 1992. Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. IV. Nitrogen. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 89: 81-91.

    Jin, X., Wang, S., Pang, Y., Zhao, H., and Zhou, X., 2005. The adsorption of phosphate on different trophic lake sediments. Colloids and Surfaces A, 254: 241-248.

    Kalinovskaya, N. I., Ivanova, E. P., Alexeeva, Y. V., Gorshkova, N. M., Kuzentsova, T. A., Dmitrenok, A. S., and Nicolau, D. V., 2004. Low molecular weight biologically active compounds from marine Pseudoalteromonas species. Current Microbiology, 48: 441-446.

    Kirk, J. L., Klironomos, J. N., Lee, H., and Trevors, J. T., 2005. The effects of perennial ryegrass and alfalfa on microbial abundance and diversity in petroleum contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution, 133: 455-465.

    Lee, E. H., Kim, J., Kim, J. Y., Koo, S. Y., Lee, S. D., Ko, K. S., Ko, D. C., Yum, B. Y., and Cho, K. S., 2010. Comparison of microbial communities in petroleum-contaminated groundwater using genetic and metabolic profiles at Kyonggi-Do, South Korea. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60: 371-382.

    Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: Spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography, 12: 343-346.

    Moss, A., and Bassall, M., 2006. Effects of disturbance on the biodiversity and abundance of isopods in temperature grasslands. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42: S254-S268.

    Muyzer, G., De-Waal, E. C., and Uitterlinden, A. G., 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied Environment Microbiology, 59: 695-700.

    Paerl, H., Dyble, J., Twomey, L., Pinckney, J., Nelson, J., and Kerkhof, L., 2002. Characterizing man-made and natural modifications of microbial diversity and activity in coastal ecosystems. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81: 487-507.

    Paerl, H. W., Dyble, J., Moisander, P. H., Noble, R. T., Piehler, M. F., Pinckney, J. L., Steppe, T. F., Twomey, L., and Valdes,L. M., 2003. Microbial indicators of aquatic ecosystem change: Current applications to eutrophication studies. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 46: 233-246.

    Sakami, T., Abo, K., and Takayanagi, K., 2007. Microbial activity and community structure in a net pen aquaculture area. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Agency, 19: 53-68.

    Sala, M. M., Balagué, V., Pedrós-Alió, C., Massana, R., Felipe, J., Arin, L., Illoul, H., and Estrada, M., 2005. Phylogenetic and functional diversity of bacterioplankton during Alexandrium spp. Blooms. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 54: 257-267.

    Song, H., Li, Z., Du, B., Wang, G., and Ding, Y., 2011. Bacterial communities in sediments of the shallow Lake Dongping in China. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 112: 79-89.

    Sun, F. L., Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. L., Wang, Y. T., and Qian, P. L., 2012. Spatial and vertical distribution of bacteria in the Pearl River estuary sediment. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11: 2256-2266.

    Ter Braak, C. J. F., and ?milauer, P., 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.

    Troell, M., Hallling, C., Neori, A., Chopin, T., Buschmann, A. H., Kautsky, N., and Yarish, C., 2003. Integrated mariculture: Asking the right questions. Aquaculture, 226: 69-90.

    Weber, K. P., and Legge, R. L., 2010. Community-level physiological profiling. In: Bioremediation: Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 599. Cummings, S. P., ed., Humana Press, New York, 263-281.

    Weber, K. P., and Legge, R. L., 2011. Dynamics in the bacterial community-level physiological profiles and hydrological characteristics of constructed wetland mesocosms during start-up. Ecological Engineering, 37: 666-677.

    Wu, Z. J., Zhou, H. Y., Peng, X. T., Jia, N., Wang, Y. H., and Yuan, L. X., 2008. Anaerobic oxidation of methane in coastal sediment from Guishan Island (Pearl River Estuary) South China Sea. Journal of Earth System Science, 117: 935-943.

    Yoza, B. A., Harada, R. M., Nihous, G. C., Li, Q. X., and Masytani, S. M., 2007. Impact of mariculture on microbial diversity in sediments near open ocean farming of Polydactylus sexfilis. Ecological Indicators, 7: 108-122.

    Yuan, X. C., Yin, K. D., Harrison, P., He, L., and Xu, J., 2011. Variations in apparent oxygen utilization and effects of P addition on bacterial respiration in subtropical Hong Kong waters. Estuaries and Coasts, 34: 536-543.

    (Edited by Qiu Yantao)

    (Received March 4, 2013; revised May 22, 2013; accepted May 4, 2014)

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    ? Corresponding author. Tel: 0086-20-85221397

    E-mail: tyyf@jnu.edu.cn

    男女之事视频高清在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产成人欧美| 久久久欧美国产精品| 69av精品久久久久久 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 最黄视频免费看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲综合色网址| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 十八禁网站免费在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 69av精品久久久久久 | av不卡在线播放| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | www日本在线高清视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 99国产精品99久久久久| av在线app专区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久国内视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 黄色 视频免费看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 久久青草综合色| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 99热全是精品| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99久久国产精品久久久| 不卡av一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日本91视频免费播放| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 精品国产国语对白av| 丝袜喷水一区| 超色免费av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品国产国语对白av| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 91老司机精品| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 免费观看人在逋| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 考比视频在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲全国av大片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 99久久人妻综合| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 999久久久国产精品视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲中文av在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av不卡在线播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 超色免费av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 国产成人av激情在线播放| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产成人精品在线电影| 777米奇影视久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 亚洲国产精品999| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 午夜福利,免费看| 成人手机av| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩欧美免费精品| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日本欧美视频一区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 美女主播在线视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区 | 国产精品成人在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久国产成人免费| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 999精品在线视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 大香蕉久久网| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 手机成人av网站| 国产精品.久久久| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 三级毛片av免费| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 免费少妇av软件| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| av欧美777| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 男女免费视频国产| www.精华液| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一区二区三区精品91| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩视频在线欧美| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 国产精品成人在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产区一区二久久| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲三区欧美一区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品影院久久| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产三级黄色录像| 99国产精品99久久久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久久久久久精品精品| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久热在线av| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 午夜91福利影院| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 精品福利观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 免费少妇av软件| 成人三级做爰电影| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 深夜精品福利| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 满18在线观看网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| tocl精华| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 电影成人av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 五月天丁香电影| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 一区福利在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 另类精品久久| 国产精品 国内视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久中文字幕一级| 精品福利观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 中文字幕制服av| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产av国产精品国产| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产在线观看jvid| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 18在线观看网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 成人国产av品久久久| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久9热在线精品视频| videos熟女内射| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 三级毛片av免费| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品福利观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久影院123| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲av美国av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| av在线app专区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 丝袜美足系列| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲全国av大片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| av在线老鸭窝| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| bbb黄色大片| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久影院123| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲av电影在线进入| av电影中文网址| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久久久人人人人人| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av欧美777| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 99久久人妻综合| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 老司机福利观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 777米奇影视久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩大片免费观看网站| www.av在线官网国产| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美另类一区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 91字幕亚洲| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| cao死你这个sao货|