• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Landslide disaster prevention and mitigation through works in Hong Kong

    2013-10-19 06:56:50ChoiRaymondCheung
    關(guān)鍵詞:負(fù)責(zé)制責(zé)任制總經(jīng)理

    K.Y. Choi, Raymond W.M. Cheung

    Geotechnical Engineering Of fice, Civil Engineering and Development Department, The Government of the Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, China

    1. Introduction

    Hong Kong has a hilly terrain with little flat land; among the total land area of about 1100 km2, some 63% of the land is steeper than 15°and 30% steeper than 30°. Because of the intense urban development, a large number of man-made slopes are formed on hillsides in close proximity to buildings, roads and other facilities.These man-made slopes may be susceptible to landsliding during periods of high seasonal rainfall, which could be a serious hazard if not attended to. The situation was exacerbated by the lack of proper engineering standards in the design and construction of man-made slopes prior to the setting up of the Geotechnical Engineering Office(GEO, formerly known as the Geotechnical Control Office) in 1977 as a central body to regulate various aspects of slope safety in Hong Kong. Indeed, landslides have occurred regularly in Hong Kong over the past century, causing extensive socio-economic damage and loss of lives (CEDD, 2005). In the past 65 years since 1947, some 470 people have been killed by landslides in Hong Kong, mostly as a result of failures associated with man-made slopes. The notable incidents include two fatal landslides at Po Shan Road and Sau Mau Ping respectively on 18 June 1972 where a total of 138 people were killed, and another fatal landslide at Sau Mau Ping on 25 August 1976 where 18 people were killed (Fig. 1).

    Apart from man-made slopes, Hong Kong is faced with the insidious natural terrain landslide hazards. Based on a review of aerial photographs taken from 1924 to 2006, about 100,000 past landslides on natural terrain were identified (MFJV, 2007). In the severe rainstorm of 4 and 5 November 1993, over 800 landslides occurred on the natural terrain on Lantau Island. About 2400 natural terrain landslides occurred in West Lantau during another severe rainstorm of 7 June 2008. Whilst most of these natural terrain landslides occurred in relatively remote areas, some of them had affected existing facilities including buildings and roads. For example, a channelized debris flow was triggered by natural terrain landslides above Sham Tseng San Tsuen on 23 August 1999(Fig. 2).

    The channelized debris flow had travelled down the natural hillside and demolished several squatter structures at the foothill.One person was killed and another 13 persons were injured as a result of this incident (FMSWJV, 2005). Immediate emergency measures including closure of roads and evacuation of homes were implemented to ensure public safety. These incidents highlight the hazards arising from natural terrain landslides. With the growing demand for land to meet housing needs and other purposes, there is a trend to locate developments closer to areas of steep natural hillsides with a consequent increase in landslide risk.

    Fig. 1. The fatal landslides at Po Shan Road and Sau Mau Ping in the 1970s.

    Fig. 2. The 1999 natural terrain landslide at Sham Tseng San Tsuen.

    2. The Landslip Preventive Measures Programme from 1977 to 1994

    In the aftermath of the disastrous man-made slope failures in the 1970s, the Government embarked on a long-term slope retro fitting programme in 1977, known as the Landslip Preventive Measures (LPM) Programme, to deal with substandard man-made slopes. A catalogue of sizeable man-made slopes including cut slopes, fill slopes and retaining walls was compiled. Currently, there are about 60,000 man-made slopes registered in the New Slope Catalogue (Fig. 3). These slopes are mainly situated within developed areas or adjacent to traf fic routes over different geographical locations of Hong Kong.

    Fig. 3. Spatial distribution of the 60,000 man-made slopes in Hong Kong.

    Fig. 4. Distribution of slopes upgraded under the LPM Programme from 1977 to 2010.

    Initially, most of the slopes included in the LPM Programme were fill slopes affecting housing estates, schools and hospitals,mainly as a result of the two fatal landslides involving liquefaction of loose fill at Sau Mau Ping in 1972 and 1976, respectively. Since the mid-1980s, the proportion of soil cut slopes, rock cut slopes and retaining walls in the LPM Programme had increased. Up to 1994, a total of 620 slopes (Fig. 4) had been upgraded under the LPM Programme. In sum, the focus of the LPM Programme in this period, i.e. 1977-1994, was on treating man-made slopes affecting occupied buildings. The total expenditure involved was about HK$1200 million (Fig. 5).

    In general, there are four stages in the design and construction of slope upgrading works under the LPM Programme. These include:

    Fig. 5. Expenditure incurred under the LPM Programme from 1997 to 2010.

    (a) Stage 1 - Preliminary study consisting of a site reconnaissance to identify slopes that require a detailed study. Where signs of immediate and obvious danger are identified, urgent repair works would be initiated.

    (b) Stage 2 - Detailed study consisting of desk study, aerial photograph interpretation, site observations, stability analysis, and if necessary, ground investigation works to decide whether or not upgrading works are necessary. For private slopes, where there is primafacie evidence that the slope is dangerous or liable to become dangerous, a statutory repair order would be issued to the private owners concerned. This process is referred to as“safety screening”.

    (c) Stage 3 - Design of slope upgrading works to bring the slope up to the required safety standards.

    (d) Stage 4 - Construction of slope upgrading works including tender documentation, contract administration and site supervision.

    Fig. 6. The 1994 fatal landslide at Kwun Lung Lau.

    3. Acceleration of the LPM Programme from 1995 to 2010

    On 23 July 1994, a fatal landslide occurred below Block D of Kwun Lung Lau, Kennedy Town (Fig. 6). Five people were killed and another three people were injured during the incident. In addition, about 3900 residents were temporarily evacuated overnight.A comprehensive investigation into the cause of the landslide was subsequently carried out by the GEO. An international renowned geotechnical engineering expert was engaged by the Government to conduct an independent review of the investigation (GEO,2000a). A Select Committee was established by the Legislative Council in 1994 to inquire into matters related to the fatal landslide.Prompted by the Kwun Lung Lau landslide, the Government initiated a Slope Safety Review at the end of 1994 to examine the policy,legislation and resources related to the prevention of landslides in Hong Kong, and to recommend improvement measures.

    Following the investigation, inquiry and review, a number of recommendations to improve the slope safety system were made. One of the recommendations was to accelerate the LPM Programme. Following acceptance of the recommendations, the Government launched the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme in April 1995. The target was to complete the upgrading works for about 800 substandard government man-made slopes and to carry out safety screening studies for 1500 private man-made slopes. To ensure that the most deserving slopes are selected for action under the Programme, a risk-based priority ranking system incorporating the results of quantitative risk assessment (QRA), and the experience and technical know-how in landslides accrued over the years was adopted (Wong, 2005). The risk-based priority ranking system takes account of both the likelihood of landslide and the consequence of the slope failure. A total score which reflects the risk of the slope is obtained by the product of instability score and consequence score. The instability score is determined by a number of factors including age of slope, level of geotechnical input during the formation of the slope, slope geometry, signs of distress, records of instability and other characteristics. The consequence score is determined by the type and proximity of the facilities affected, the probable scale of failure and the topography adjacent to the slope.

    Over the 5 years from 1995 to 2000, a total of 794 slopes were upgraded under the LPM Programme (Fig. 4). The total expenditure involved is about HK$ 2930 million (Fig. 5). At the end of the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme, about 250 slopes were upgraded each year which is about five to six times the average productivity before 1995. It is worth noting that QRA has been applied at that time to evaluate and monitor the performance of the LPM Programme.An assessment made in 2000 found that the overall landslide risk posed by pre-1977 man-made slopes was reduced to 50% of the level existed in 1977 upon completion of the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme (Cheung and Shiu, 2000).

    As part of the Government’s long-term strategy to improve slope safety in Hong Kong, the 10-year Extended LPM Programme was launched in 2000 upon completion of the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme. The annual output under the 10-year Extended LPM Programme was to upgrade 250 government man-made slopes and to carry out safety-screening studies on 300 private man-made slopes. The aim was to reduce the landslide risk posed by pre-1977 man-made slopes to 25% of the level in 1977 (Cheng, 2011). The 10-year Extended LPM Programme was successfully completed in 2010, and this has brought about substantial improvement in the safety of slopes and a significant reduction in the number of fatal landslides in recent years.

    During the period from 1977 to 2010, about 4500 substandard government man-made slopes were upgraded under the LPM Programme (Fig. 4). The average number of slopes upgraded from 1977 to 1994 was about 35 per year and this had progressively increased to 250 per year during the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme. The average number of slopes upgraded per year under the 10-year Extended LPM Programme had further increased to 300.

    The cumulative expenditure incurred under the LPM Programme from 1977 to 2010 was about HK$ 14 billion (Fig. 5). Before the 5-year Accelerated LPM Programme, the annual expenditure was about HK$ 60 million. Over the 5 years from 1995, the expenditure had increased geometrically until it reached the peak of about HK$ 900 million in 2000. In the next 10 years from 2000 to 2010,the average annual expenditure was about HK$ 950 million.

    Apart from LPM upgrading works, enhanced maintenance (EM)works, generally by means of prescriptive measures, were carried out on some 5000 selected old slopes maintained by various government departments who are responsible for maintaining these slopes. This also helps achieve quick improvement to the stability of old substandard slopes.

    Fig. 7. Landslide risk profile of Hong Kong.

    4. The post-2010 Landslip Prevention and MitigationProgramme

    With the introduction of geotechnical control and the implementation of the LPM Programme, the landslide risk has decreased progressively and reached the “As low as reasonably practicable” (ALARP) zone in 2010 (Fig. 7). However, there is no room for complacency. If investment in slope safety is not maintained, the landslide risk will increase with time due to slope deterioration and encroachment of urban development or redevelopment upon steep natural hillside. This would cause, in addition to risk to life,significant economic losses and social disruption as a result of road blockages and building evacuation due to landslides, thereby compromising public safety, sustainable development and Hong Kong’s reputation as a modern metropolitan city and tourist hub.

    The majority of the remaining landslide risk comes from about 15,000 man-made slopes with moderate risk affecting development and about 2700 natural hillside catchments (Fig. 8) with known hazards and close to existing buildings and important transport corridors. Therefore, the Government has implemented Landslip Prevention and Mitigation (LPMit) Programme since 2010 to dovetail with the 10-year extended LPM Programme. The strategy of the LPMit Programme is to contain this remaining landslide risk through rolling enhancement of man-made slopes and systematic mitigation of natural terrain landslide risk pursuant to the“react-to-known” hazard principle, i.e. to carry out studies and mitigation actions where significant hazards become evident. The annual target of the LPMit Programme is to complete the upgrading works for 150 substandard government slopes, carry out safety screening studies on 100 private slopes and carry out landslide risk mitigation works for 30 vulnerable natural hillside catchments from 2010 onwards.

    Fig. 8. Spatial distribution of the 2700 vulnerable natural hillside catchments.

    5. Technical advancement in man-made slope upgradingworks

    Slope upgrading works are substantial engineering works based on the principles of removal (e.g. cutting back the slope to reduce its gradient), reinforcement (e.g. strengthening slopes by installation of steel bars called soil nails), retention (i.e. supporting slopes with retaining structures), and replacement (e.g. excavating and reforming slopes with a denser surface soil layer). Combinations of different types of works may be used for upgrading man-made slopes. The design and construction practice for man-made slopes has evolved over time, as a result of the technical advancements made in respect of slope engineering and construction techniques.In particular, the findings of the systematic landslide investigation Programme initiated by the GEO since 1997 have contributed to achieving an improved understanding of the mechanisms and causes of slope failures. Areas for improvement in enhancing the slope engineering practice are identified, which are promulgated by Ho et al. (2002).

    Fig. 9. Stabilization of fill slopes.

    5.1. Fill slopes

    Substandard fill slopes, typically comprising loose fill materials,are susceptible to liquefaction when they become saturated and subjected to shearing. The conventional method of treating these fill slopes is to excavate and re-compact the top 3 m of loose fill to achieve 95% relative compaction (Fig. 9a). This is based on the recommendations made by the independent review panel for fill slopes, which was set up following the 1976 Sau Mau Ping landslide(HKG, 1977). Most of the fill slopes under LPM Programme were upgraded by means of this method because of its effectiveness and reliable performance in improving the stability of the fill slopes. A variant to this method, which entails the use of rock fill or cement stabilized soil in place of compacted soil fill to form the 3 m cap,has been adopted in some cases (Fig. 9b).

    Fig. 10. Upgrading of loose fill slopes using soil nails and grillage.

    5.2. Soil cut slopes

    Before 1990, the usual method of improving the stability of a substandard soil cut slope was by trimming back the slope to a gentler profile (Koirala and Tang, 1988). The major construction activity involved is excavation and removal of soil materials from the slope. Because no special engineering techniques are needed,the construction cost is relatively cheap and easy to implement.Vegetation is used as the slope surface cover in order to make the slope look as natural as possible. Where there is insufficient space at the crest to accommodate the cut back profile, structural supports such as hand dug caissons and retaining walls would be used to improve the stability of the slopes (Powell et al., 1990).

    Discussions on the reliability of the design of soil cut slopes were made in the 1980s (Malone, 1985). The profession recognized that there were uncertainties inherent in some of the important elements of a slope design such as the geological model, selection of slip surfaces, groundwater conditions and shear strength of the soil materials. Although the soil cut slopes are designed to the same factor of safety (FOS) derived from deterministic analysis, the reliability in terms of the probability of failure may vary significantly.Hence the mere demonstration of an adequate FOS carries with it no guarantee that the probability of failure is adequately low. It was necessary to improve the design of soil cut slopes that would give greater reliability and robustness for the same FOS.

    Soil nailing, which comprises high yield steel reinforcing bars installed into the ground by means of drilling and grouting, was introduced in Hong Kong in the mid-1980s. The process of soil nailing is not very susceptible to weather conditions and there is flexibility to position the soil nails to avoid existing trees. The technique is simple and versatile compared with other structural solutions, rendering it adaptable to the physical constraints commonly encountered in slope sites. In addition, because soil nails are usually installed at close spacing, they can reduce the vulnerability of the slope to undetected weak geological zones and unfavourable relict joints by binding the soil together to form an integral mass. That means the design of soil-nailed cut slopes is less sensitive to adverse ground conditions. Following documentation of the design approach and the construction practice by Watkins and Powell (1992), soil nailing has been accepted as a robust and economical engineering solution for improving the stability of soil cut slopes in Hong Kong. In order to improve the soil nailing technology and rationalize the design standards, a series of studies were conducted by the GEO in the early 2000s. This involved literature review, field tests, laboratory investigations, physical modelling,numerical modelling and analytical study (Figs. 11 and 12). The findings from these soil nails studies have led to the publication of a guide on soil nail design and construction (GEO, 2008). It enhances the technical know-how of local engineers in the technique.

    The use of soil nails in soil cut slopes has become increasingly popular. About 3400 and 2600 slopes have been upgraded using soil nails under the LPM Programme and EM Programme respectively up to 2010. Through theoretical studies and field observations, soil nailing is now recognized as a more robust and reliable scheme than cutting back in that the scheme is more resilient to local geological defects.

    Fig. 11. Numerical modelling of soil nails with different inclinations.

    (a) Set-up of a nailed-slope model in centrifuge test.

    Fig. 12. Centrifuge modelling of a soil-nailed slope.

    5.3. Retaining walls

    Most of the substandard retaining walls are old masonry walls constructed during the period from 1850 to 1950. A number of fatal landslide incidents involving masonry walls had occurred in the history of Hong Kong. In 1925, a masonry wall at Po Hing Fong on Hong Kong Island collapsed, demolishing seven houses and killing over 70 people. Most recently in 1994, the failure of a 100-year old masonry wall at Kwun Lung Lau claimed the lives of 5 persons (Fig. 6). These tragic incidents have highlighted the need for understanding the structure and behaviour of old masonry walls so that appropriate stabilization measures can be carried out to improve their stability.

    The assessment of stability of old masonry retaining walls is not simple because of their variable and non-monolithic construction.In order to tackle the problem, a comprehensive review on masonry retaining walls in Hong Kong, including the construction practice and structure of masonry walls, an examination of their structural behaviour, analyses of case histories of wall failures and suggestions on the approach to investigate stability of masonry walls, was carried out by Chan (1996). Further guidelines on the assessment of old masonry walls were given by GEO (2004) following a review of the lessons learnt from the Kwun Lung Lau landslide incident.

    A special feature found on many old masonry walls in Hong Kong is the presence of “wall trees”, which refer to trees growing from the open joints or crevices between stone blocks. These“wall trees” constitute an important landscape element in the community and should be preserved where at all possible in view of their special amenity value. A study on masonry walls with trees was carried out by Wong and Jim (2011). The study concluded that the roots of wall trees would not induce failure of masonry walls.They would occasionally cause displacement of masonry blocks at the wall crest but the roots would also strengthen the wall face by providing a form of mesh reinforcement. However, wall trees would affect the stability of masonry walls due to its surcharge effect and this should be considered in the stability assessment. The study also identified suitable methods of stabilizing old masonry walls. One of the methods is to use soil nailing, which has the bene fit of preserving both the existing wall trees and the original masonry facade (Fig. 13b). Other methods include the provision of conventional buttresses or flying buttresses in front of the masonry wall, and the construction of hand-dug caissons behind the wall.

    5.4. Rock cut slopes

    The stability of rock slopes is mainly controlled by the characteristics and orientations of discontinuities within the rock mass, as well as the groundwater conditions. Detailed engineering geological mapping is required for the investigation, design and construction of rock slope stabilization measures. Very often, the design of the necessary works can only be finalized during the construction stage when safe access for close inspection of the rock face has been made available and obscuring vegetation and surface covers have been removed. The common stabilization measures for use in rock cut slopes include scaling, buttresses, dentition, dowels and rock bolts, drainage provisions and mesh netting. The design and construction practice for upgrading existing rock cut slopes under the LPM Programme was described by Dubin et al. (1986).

    公司采用股份有限責(zé)任制,并根據(jù)公司發(fā)展特點(diǎn),初期采取直線制管理。后期根據(jù)公司發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進(jìn)行調(diào)整。公司所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)分離,實(shí)行總經(jīng)理負(fù)責(zé)制。

    In the design of rock slope stabilization works, it is important to identify laterally persistent discontinuities such as sheeting joints which are conducive to large-scale rock slope failures. However,dislodgement of small rock blocks by way of rotation, sliding or ravelling may occur as a result of progressive deterioration and/or development of cleft water pressures within adversely oriented joints. Although the chance of direct impact by a small rock fall is not high, the consequence in the event of direct impact may be very serious given the nature of the material. Therefore, extreme care should be taken to ensure that minor but kinematically critical joints are not overlooked during the design process. Based on the key lessons learnt from studies of engineered rock cut slope failures and a review of the practice for the investigation and design of rock cut slopes, technical guidance on enhancement of rock slope engineering practice was promulgated by Yu et al.(2005).

    Fig. 13. Application of soil nailing technique in soil cut slopes and old masonry walls.

    6. Technical advancement in natural terrain mitigation works

    Natural terrain occupies an area of about 650 km2, which covers about 60% of the land area of Hong Kong. There is a high concentration of developments in Hong Kong mingled with man-made slopes and natural hillsides. The severe rainstorm of 7 June 2008 is a vivid reminder of the potential vulnerability of developments located close to natural terrain. To provide a dataset for planning of risk mitigation works, an inventory of hillside catchments with historical landslides that occurred close to existing buildings and important transport corridors has been compiled. The criteria are based on the proximity of the crown or toe of a landslide to an important facility. The inventory comprises about 2700 hillside catchments,scattered over different areas of Hong Kong (Fig. 8). A risk-based ranking system has been devised for establishing the priority of the 2700 hillside catchments for systematic follow-up action under the LPMit Programme.

    In Hong Kong, natural terrain hazards have been grouped into five main hazard types on the basis of the mechanism of transportation, the nature of displaced material and the topographic location. These include open hillside landslide, channelized debris flow, deep-seated failure, boulder fall and rock fall. A natural terrain hazard study is carried out to formulate the geological and geomorphological model for the hillside and evaluate the hazards involved.Three different approaches, namely FOS, QRA and design event,may be used either individually or in combination for evaluation of natural terrain hazards. In practice, the majority of natural terrain hazard assessments are carried out using the design event approach. The FOS approach is used only if it is pragmatic and cost-effective to stabilize the natural hillside. QRA, fairly involved and costly, is adopted if rigorous quantification of the landslide risk or cost-benefit analysis of alternative risk mitigation strategies is required for the natural terrain concerned. Regardless of the approach adopted, the large areal extent of the natural hillsides means that only limited ground investigation and testing can be carried out during the process of natural terrain hazard studies. Therefore, geological and geomorphological inputs based on site-specific observations should be provided to complement the investigation. Technical guidance on natural terrain hazard assessment is given by Ng et al. (2003).

    In the management of natural terrain risk under the LPMit Programme, the preferred approach is not to carry out extensive stabilization works to large areas of the natural hillside, which is impractical and environmentally damaging, but to mitigate the risk through the provision of defense measures to contain the landslide debris from the natural hillside above. In most cases, the defense measures adopted in Hong Kong consist of the provision of a concrete barrier at the toe of the natural hillside (Fig. 14). A review of the local and international natural terrain landslide risk mitigation strategy and practice was carried out by Shum and Lam (2011).As part of the review, a number of established techniques not commonly used in Hong Kong have also been examined. Some of these techniques including flexible debris-resisting barriers, transport channels and debris-straining structures would have potential applications to certain natural terrain landslide problems in Hong Kong.

    Fig. 14. Concrete barrier at the toe of a natural hillside.

    6.1. Debris mobility modelling

    One of the important factors affecting the design of defense works is debris mobility. This requires the use of dynamic analysis to assess the probable distance of debris runout and debris velocity of natural terrain landslides, based on continuum models which have been calibrated against field observations. These continuum models utilize the principles of conservation of mass,momentum and energy to describe the dynamic motion of landslide debris and incorporate a rheological model to represent the flow behaviour of the landslide debris. The findings of a study of the mobility of natural terrain landslides in Hong Kong by Ayotte and Hungr (1998) concluded that the frictional rheology and Voellmy rheology can be used to estimate the mobility of open hillside landslides and channelized debris flows (CDFs),respectively. A set of conservative material parameters for debris mobility analysis in Hong Kong, including the apparent friction angle for the frictional rheology and the apparent friction angle and turbulence coefficient for Voellmy rheology were recommended.

    However, the natural terrain landslides triggered by the 7 June 2008 rainstorm have provided plenty of additional information and data on debris movement. Back-analysis of selected CDF triggered by the 7 June 2008 rainstorm carried out by GEO showed that about 1% of the CDFs were more mobile than that predicted using the Voellmy parameters recommended by Ayotte and Hungr (1998).Based on findings of the back-analysis, supplementary guidelines on the assessment of mobility of CDFs are promulgated by GEO(2011).

    The GEO has developed its own two-dimensional (2D) dynamic modelling algorithm, based on a formulation and solution methodology similar to that adopted in the DAN model formulated by Hungr (1995). The GEO has also developed a three-dimensional(3D) landslide runout simulation model based on the Particle-in-Cell technique (Kwan and Sun, 2007). Both modelling algorithms have been used to back analyze CDFs and open hillslope failures(OHF) in Hong Kong. The development of 2D and 3D numerical modelling of debris movement has greatly enhanced the capability of assessing debris influence zones and design of the corresponding risk mitigation works.

    A benchmarking exercise on landslide debris mobility modelling was held in December 2007 in Hong Kong during the International Forum on Landslide Disaster Management (Hungr et al., 2007). It was participated by 13 groups of researchers and practitioners from different regions of the world including the GEO. A range of numerical models were used by the participants to complete the mobility analysis of selected benchmark cases. The outcome of this benchmarking exercise showed that the simulation results obtained by GEO’s 3D landslide runout simulation model were reasonably accurate compared with the corresponding analytical solutions, laboratory measurements and field observations. The results were also consistent with those determined from other numerical models by other participants,which would mean that the debris mobility modelling capability in Hong Kong is comparable to that in other technical leaders.

    6.2. Flexible debris-resisting barriers

    Flexible barriers, which are mainly formed of steel ring nets mounted between horizontal steel ropes spanning between steel posts and anchored into the ground, are one of the techniques that can be used to mitigate natural terrain landslides (Fig. 15a). The advantages of flexible barriers are that they are relatively easy to install on steep natural terrain, less visually obtrusive and have less environmental impact compared with reinforced concrete barriers.Whilst flexible barriers have been in use for over twenty years as a protective measure against boulder falls and rock falls, the application of flexible barriers for resisting the impact of natural terrain landslide debris is a relatively new concept.

    The design methodology for flexible rock fall barriers is based on an energy approach whereby a falling rock or boulder is stopped in one go by the barrier designed to absorb the kinetic energy carried by the rock or boulder. The design usually entails the use of proprietary flexible barrier systems with specific energy absorbing capacities that are verified by full scale field testing in accordance with the relevant national or international standards. The technology involved is relatively mature. In contrast to a rock fall, the impact of landslide debris hitting a flexible barrier is delivered as consecutive pulses due to the compressibility and mobility of the debris. Therefore, the design methodology for rock fall barriers is not applicable to the design of flexible barriers as a debris resisting structure. So far, there are no national or international standards for the design of flexible debris-resisting barriers. Suggestions on the design approaches for flexible debris-resisting barriers were prepared by Kwan and Cheung (2012) based on a review of the present state of knowledge, which would serve as a useful reference for the relevant practitioners. Fig. 15b shows the establishment of a numerical model for a flexible debris-resisting barrier using a commercial software LS-DYNA in conjunction with the suggested force design approach.

    Fig. 15. Flexible debris-resisting barrier.

    6.3. Managing public expectation

    Natural terrain mitigation works differ from slope upgrading works in that they would not stop the occurrence of landslides on the natural hillsides. Instead, they would only reduce the consequence of landslides. Muddy water and some debris could sometimes spill over to the roads and buildings they protect, which may still have to be closed temporarily for safety against risks remaining from the landslide scars. Furthermore, because of the variable nature of the natural terrain and the limitations in the current technology, the mitigation measures, which will contribute to reducing the consequence, may be overwhelmed under very severe or extreme rainstorms. Therefore, it is necessary to manage public expectation through public education so that the people of Hong Kong can be prepared for such situation.

    Fig. 16. Guidelines for planting on slopes.

    7. Landscaping to slopes

    It is government policy to make slopes look as natural as possible, blending them with their surroundings and minimizing their visual impact on the built environment. To pursue this policy, vegetation is used as slope surface cover in the upgrading of existing man-made slopes which are not steeper than 55°(Fig. 16). A hard surface cover such as chunam or shotcrete may be used for steeper slopes, but suitable landscape measures such as applying subdued colour, masonry facing and providing planter holes on the slope surface for screen planting are taken to minimize the visual impact(Fig. 17).

    For natural terrain mitigation works, the extent of mitigation works is minimized as far as practicable to reduce disturbance to the hillside and the environment. The existing vegetation, including trees and shrubs, is also preserved whereas possible during the construction of landslide risk mitigation measures. Landscape treatments such as vertical greening, screen planting and toe planters (Fig. 18) would be provided to minimize the visual impact of the mitigation works and blend them with their surrounding environment.

    Fig. 17. Landscaping to man-made slope with hard cover.

    In 2000, the GEO produced a set of technical guidelines on landscape treatment and bioengineering for man-made slopes and retaining walls (GEO, 2000b). A review of the technical guidelines was carried out in 2010 with a view to promulgating the latest best practice and expanding the scope to include landscape treatments for natural terrain mitigation works and landslide repairs.The review has culminated in the new GEO Publication No. 1/2011“Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment on Slopes” (GEO,

    2011).

    Fig. 18. Landscaping to natural terrain mitigation measures.

    Apart from slope appearance, we are mindful of the ecological impact of slope works. The GEO has put in effort to achieve ecological enhancement of slope works by using native species. A good example is the adoption of ecological planting in upgrading 24 man-made slopes along South Lantau Road between 2001 and 2004 (Fig. 19). Native species, either planted alone or when mixed with exotic species, would attract local wildlife including birds and insects which may act as seed dispersers to enrich the plant biodiversity. A bio-diversified vegetation cover is ecologically stable and hence more sustainable. Good practice on ecological planting for man-made slopes and engineering works for natural terrains with native species is given in GEO Publication No. 1/2011 (GEO,

    2011).

    Fig. 19. A success example to landscape the slopes along South Lantau Road.

    As part of the continuous improvement in landscape treatment of slopes, the GEO has been researching into the use of vegetation in slope works and experimenting with new techniques of providing erosion control measures and vegetation covers to steep slopes, with due regard to safety, cost, aesthetic quality, and longterm maintenance requirements. Since 2002, the GEO has set up a database called “Greening Methods on Slopes” to co-ordinate updates of the information on the different new greening techniques that have been tried on Government slopes. Studies have been undertaken to assess the performance of different greening techniques and to identify vegetation species that can successfully establish and self-sustain on steep slopes. In collaboration with the Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, the GEO has carried out a planting trial of native small tree and shrub species on steep slopes.The results of the studies and the planting trial provide useful information for further research into the establishment of robust,cost-effective, and eco-friendly vegetation covers on man-made slopes. Further studies on the application of various vegetation species for greening of man-made slopes were completed in 2007 and 2011, respectively, which have expanded the range of suitable vegetation species for landscape use on man-made slopes.

    8. Conclusions

    Hong Kong is unique in the world in terms of its combination of high seasonal rainfall and close proximity of dense urban development to steep terrain. As a result, landslides are one of the common natural hazards in Hong Kong. Some of the past landslides had caused widespread damage and many casualties, together with significant economic losses and social disruption. Through sustained efforts to prevent landslide disasters by means of slope engineering works over the past 35 years, the overall landslide risk posed to the community of Hong Kong has been substantially reduced. This is corroborated by the declining trend of landslide fatality rate since 1977.

    Under the current LPMit Programme, about half of the funding resources will be allocated to natural terrain risk mitigation works.The philosophy and technology for dealing with man-made slope features and natural terrain landslide hazards differ significantly.The limited size of man-made slopes permits a level of ground investigation and testing sufficient for deterministic analysis and design. The technology is relatively well established. In contrast,natural terrain hazards studies require plenty of geological and geomorphological analyses with limited ground investigation and testing. The objective of mitigation works is to divert or contain landslide debris instead of preventing failure, which involves evaluation of debris movement down the slope and its interaction with the mitigation measures. The technology is still evolving. Further development work is being carried out in order to enhance the reliability, cost-effectiveness and buildability of natural terrain mitigation measures.

    Apart from keeping the slopes safe, it is necessary to make them look as natural as possible in order to create a safer and better living environment for the people of Hong Kong. Landscape design is treated as an essential part of the design of upgrading works for man-made slopes and natural terrain hazard mitigation works.Input by professional landscape architects is provided at the early stage of the design process to ensure that landscaping input is integrated with geotechnical input. Where appropriate, native species are used in the landscaping works in order to create a visually acceptable and ecological sustainable slope environment.

    Sustained development in Hong Kong requires continued vigilance and perennial attention in respect of landslide risk management. Notwithstanding this, absolute slope safety is not practical or achievable due to many uncertainties inherent in the variables including geological settings, properties of soil and rock,rainfall pattern and groundwater conditions. Hence, it is necessary to promote an accurate understanding of the nature of landslip danger in Hong Kong in order to enable the public to develop a realistic expectation for slope safety. This would reduce the likelihood of public over-reaction in future landslips and maintain community’s support and trust in the implementation of the landslip prevention and mitigation works.

    Acknowledgements

    This paper is published with the permission of the Head of the Geotechnical Engineering Office and the Director of Civil Engineering and Development, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Ayotte D, Hungr O. Runout analysis of debris flows and avalanches in Hong Kong.Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 1998.

    CEDD. When hillside collapse: a century of landslides in Hong Kong. Hong Kong:Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR Government; 2005.

    Chan YC. Study of old masonry retaining walls in Hong Kong (GEO Report No. 31).Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 1996.

    Cheng PFK. Assessment of landslide risk posed by man-made slopes as of 2010 (Special Project Report No. SPR 1/2011). Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government: Hong Kong; 2011.

    Cheung WM, Shiu YK. Assessment of global landslide risk posed by pre-1978 manmade slope features: risk reduction from 1977 to 2000 achieved by the LPM Programme (GEO Report No. 125). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office,HKSAR Government; 2000.

    Dubin BI, Watkins AT, Chang DCH. Stabilisation of existing rock faces in urban areas of Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the conference on rock engineering and excavation in an urban environment. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers; 1986. p. 155-71.

    FMSWJV. Report on the debris flow at Sham Tseng San Tsuen of 23 August 1999(GEO Report No. 181). Fugro Maunsell Scott Wilson Joint Venture. Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office. HKSAR Government; 2005.

    GEO. Guidelines for assessment of old masonry retaining walls in geotechnical studies and for action to be taken on private walls (GEO circular no. 33). Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2004.

    GEO. Guide to soil nail design and construction (Geoguide 7). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2008.

    GEO. Report on the Kwun Lung Lau landslide of 21 July 1994 (GEO Report No.103). Hong Kong: N.R. Morgenstern & Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2000a.

    GEO. Technical guidelines on landscape treatment and bio-engineering for manmade slopes and retaining walls (GEO Publication No. 1/2000). Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2000b.

    GEO. Technical guidelines on landscape treatment for slopes (GEO Publication No.1/2011). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government;2011.

    HKG. Report on the slope failures at Sau Mau Ping. Hong Kong: Government of Hong Kong; 1977.

    HKIE. Soil nails in loose fill slopes (a preliminary study) - final report. Hong Kong:Geotechnical Division, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers; 2003.

    Ho KKS, Sun HW, Hui THH. Enhancing the reliability and robustness of engineered slopes (GEO Report No. 139). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office,HKSAR Government; 2002.

    Hungr O. A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides: debris flows and avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1995;32(4):610-23.

    Hungr O, Morgenstern NR, Wong HN. Review of benchmarking exercise on landslide debris runout and mobility modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international forum on landslide disaster management. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers; 2007. p. 755-812.

    Koirala NP, Tang KY. Design of landslip preventive works for cut slopes in Hong Kong.In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on landslides. Lausanne,Switzerland: A.A. Balkema; 1988. p. 933-8.

    Kwan JSH, Sun HW. Benchmarking exercise on landslide mobility modeling-runout analyses using 3dDMM. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international forum on landslide disaster management. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers;2007. p. 945-66.

    Kwan JSH, Cheung RWM. Suggestions on design approaches for flexible debrisresisting barriers (GEO Discussion Note 1/2012). In: Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office. HKSAR Government; 2012.

    Malone AW. The reliability of the design of cuttings in Hong Kong (GCO Discussion Note 5/85). In: Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office. HKSAR Government; 1985.

    MFJV. Final report on the compilation of the enhanced natural terrain landslide inventory. Hong Kong: Maunsell Fugro Joint Venture. HKSAR Government:Geotechnical Engineering Office; 2007.

    Ng KC, Parry S, King JP, Franks CAM, Shaw R. Guidelines for natural terrain hazard studies (GEO Report No. 138). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office,HKSAR Government; 2003.

    Powell GE, Tang KW, Au-Yeung YS. The use of large diameter piles in landslip prevention in Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the tenth Southeast Asian geotechnical conference; 1990. p. 197-202.

    Shum LKW, Lam AYT. Review of natural terrain landslide risk management practice and mitigation measures (GEO technical note 3/2011). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2011.

    Watkins AT, Powell GE. Soil nailing to existing slopes as landslip preventive works.Hong Kong: Hong Kong Engineer; 1992. p. 20-7.

    Wong CM, Jim CY. Study on masonry walls with trees (GEO Report No. 257). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government; 2011.

    Wong HN. Landslide risk assessment for individual facilities. In: Proceedings of international conference on landslide risk management. Vancouver, Canada: Taylor& Francis Ltd.; 2005. p. 237-96.

    猜你喜歡
    負(fù)責(zé)制責(zé)任制總經(jīng)理
    黨建責(zé)任制要算好“兩本賬”——優(yōu)化國有企業(yè)黨建工作責(zé)任制考核體系研究
    糧食安全省長責(zé)任制順利“首考”
    用心做好產(chǎn)品 專訪Primare總經(jīng)理Slemen Algra先生
    向更前奔跑 向更廣尋找——訪Materialise公司中國區(qū)總經(jīng)理Kim Francois女士
    你會選哪個(gè)經(jīng)銷商
    DMG娛樂營銷總經(jīng)理徐衛(wèi)兵赴CIPRA演講
    主審法官責(zé)任制論析
    高?;鶎訉W(xué)院黨政共同負(fù)責(zé)制初探
    司法改革中合議庭負(fù)責(zé)制——走出“形合實(shí)獨(dú)”的困境
    讓主診醫(yī)師負(fù)責(zé)制健康運(yùn)作
    91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 如何舔出高潮| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| av播播在线观看一区| 午夜av观看不卡| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 在线观看三级黄色| 国产 一区精品| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产片内射在线| 久久久久视频综合| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 性色av一级| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 9色porny在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 自线自在国产av| av在线老鸭窝| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 多毛熟女@视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 婷婷成人精品国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 最黄视频免费看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一级爰片在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产在线免费精品| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| av专区在线播放| 香蕉精品网在线| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产片内射在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲成色77777| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品成人在线| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av播播在线观看一区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久免费观看电影| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 22中文网久久字幕| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 一区二区三区精品91| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 99久久人妻综合| 多毛熟女@视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 性色avwww在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久午夜福利片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 91精品国产九色| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 精品亚洲成国产av| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产永久视频网站| 国产成人精品在线电影| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲国产精品999| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 在线播放无遮挡| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 色网站视频免费| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| www.色视频.com| 夫妻午夜视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 99久久人妻综合| 国产视频内射| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久影院123| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 一级黄片播放器| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲性久久影院| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产永久视频网站| 只有这里有精品99| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| a 毛片基地| 亚洲图色成人| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产av国产精品国产| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 午夜av观看不卡| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 91精品国产九色| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲精品视频女| 一级毛片 在线播放| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 制服人妻中文乱码| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日日撸夜夜添| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 在线 av 中文字幕| 高清毛片免费看| 91精品三级在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久久精品区二区三区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| tube8黄色片| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 97在线视频观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产永久视频网站| 少妇的逼好多水| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美97在线视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 一级毛片电影观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 搡老乐熟女国产| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚州av有码| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久狼人影院| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产毛片在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产色婷婷99| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲综合色惰| av不卡在线播放| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 免费看不卡的av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久97久久精品| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 满18在线观看网站| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| www.色视频.com| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| h视频一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 综合色丁香网| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲天堂av无毛| videossex国产| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产亚洲最大av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| www.av在线官网国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 草草在线视频免费看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久久午夜欧美精品| av卡一久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产精品一国产av| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 少妇丰满av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产成人一区二区在线| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 18+在线观看网站| 草草在线视频免费看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| a 毛片基地| 九草在线视频观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 一级毛片我不卡| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 大码成人一级视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 视频区图区小说| 自线自在国产av| 观看av在线不卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 自线自在国产av| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 九草在线视频观看| 观看美女的网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 永久网站在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久久国产一区二区| av在线app专区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产av国产精品国产| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日本黄色片子视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 51国产日韩欧美| 日本黄大片高清| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产av国产精品国产| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 精品国产一区二区久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产片内射在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 超色免费av| 久久久久久人妻| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 18禁观看日本| 日本wwww免费看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 一本久久精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 美女中出高潮动态图| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| av有码第一页| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 自线自在国产av| 国产男女内射视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频|