[摘要] 目的 選擇常規(guī)冠脈造影作為冠心病診斷“金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”,回顧性對(duì)比冠脈320CT與運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖對(duì)冠心病的診斷性能。 方法 根據(jù)冠心病診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),分析80例懷疑冠心病患者的冠脈320CT、運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖對(duì)冠心病診斷的敏感性和特異性。 結(jié)果 冠脈320CT的敏感性(90.9%)和特異性(83.3%)比運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖的敏感性(72.7%)和特異性(30.6%)顯著增高(P < 0.05);在懷疑冠心病的中低?;颊咧校诿}320CT對(duì)冠心病診斷的準(zhǔn)確率優(yōu)于運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P < 0.05)。 結(jié)論 在常規(guī)行冠脈造影檢查的患者中,冠脈320CT診斷冠心病性能優(yōu)于運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 320CT;運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖;冠心?。辉\斷
[中圖分類號(hào)] R541.4[文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] B[文章編號(hào)] 1673-9701(2012)10-0097-02
The comparative analysis of 320CT and exercise stress ECG in diagnosis of coronary artery disease
XIE Wengang1 HUANG Zhiqin2 LIU Yiqin3
1.Department of Cardiology, Qianxinan People’s Hospital, Guizhou, Xingyi 562400, China; 2.Emergency Department, Anlong County People's Hospital, Guizhou, Anlong 552400, China; 3.Integrated Department, Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College, Guiyang 550004, China
[Abstract] Objective To choose the conventional coronary angiography as the “gold standard” for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD), retrospectively compare the performance of coronary 320CT and exercise stress ECG in diagnosis of CAD. Methods According to diagnostic criteria for CAD, sensitivity and specificity of 320CT and exercise stress ECG in diagnosis of 80 cases CAD were analyzed. Results The sensitivity (90.9%) and specificity (83.3%) of 320CT were significantly higher than the sensitivity (72.7%) and specificity (30.6%) of exercise stress ECG (P < 0.05); The studies had shown that the diagnosis rate of 320CT of CAD had significantly statistical difference than exercise stress ECG in suspected CAD low-risk patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion 320CT is superior to exercise stress ECG in diagnosis of CAD for patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography.
[Key words] 320CT; Exercise stress ECG; CAD; Diagnosis
冠脈320CT作為無(wú)創(chuàng)性檢查,是評(píng)估冠脈血管病變很好的選擇,對(duì)冠心病的診斷總體水平相當(dāng)高。據(jù)文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道,冠脈320CT具有取代傳統(tǒng)冠脈造影的趨勢(shì)[1]。然而,運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖仍然是臨床上最常用的診斷冠心病的無(wú)創(chuàng)檢查,臨床應(yīng)用廣泛,在冠心病診斷中仍有重要的價(jià)值。因此,本研究直接比較冠脈320CT和運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖兩種無(wú)創(chuàng)檢查對(duì)冠心病的診斷性能。
1 對(duì)象與方法
1.1 研究對(duì)象
選擇2010年1~12月在我院心內(nèi)科住院懷疑冠心病未確診且接受傳統(tǒng)冠脈造影、運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖及冠脈320CT檢查的80例患者,年齡(48±24)歲,男性占71%(57/80),體重(68±15)kg,身高(164±16)cm,吸煙占50%(40/80),高血壓占55%(44/80),糖尿病占38%(30/80),血脂異常占39%(31/80),非典型心絞痛占74%(59/80),常規(guī)冠脈造影診斷冠心病占55%(44/80)。
1.2 運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖
采用運(yùn)動(dòng)平板試驗(yàn),均采集于患者住院期間。診斷冠心病標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①運(yùn)動(dòng)中或運(yùn)動(dòng)后出現(xiàn)典型的心絞痛;②運(yùn)動(dòng)中心電圖出現(xiàn)ST段下斜型或水平型下移≥1.0 mm,持續(xù)時(shí)間>2 min;③ST段呈損傷型抬高≥2 mm。符合上述標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為陽(yáng)性。
1.3 320CT
應(yīng)用東芝Aquilion one 320排容積CT進(jìn)行掃描,掃描范圍從氣管隆突至膈肌下1 cm左右,采用SupreStart軟件智能觸發(fā)掃描,觸發(fā)點(diǎn)定于掃描野中央層面胸主動(dòng)脈區(qū),觸發(fā)閾值180 HU。掃描參數(shù):電壓120 kV,球管電流500 mA,容積數(shù)據(jù)采集范圍320排×0.5 mm,機(jī)架轉(zhuǎn)速350 ms,掃描時(shí)間0.35~1.40 s。采用個(gè)體化的R-R時(shí)相進(jìn)行圖像重組,將重建的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行多平面、曲面和容積重組。分析冠脈320CT結(jié)果,冠脈狹窄≥50%診斷為冠心病,為陽(yáng)性。
1.4 傳統(tǒng)冠脈造影
320CT檢查后,用經(jīng)橈動(dòng)脈穿刺方法,采用日本東芝X線數(shù)字減影血管造影系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行冠脈血管造影。選擇至少2個(gè)相互垂直體位,確定血管直徑,血管狹窄≥50%診斷為冠心病。
1.5 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理
應(yīng)用SPSS 17.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,全部資料以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(x±s)或率表示,配對(duì)資料率的比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn),P < 0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
冠脈320CT診斷冠心病的敏感性和特異性分別為90.9%和83.3%;運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖(ES-ECG)診斷冠心病的敏感性和特異性分別為72.7%和30.6%;冠脈320CT的敏感性和特異性比ES-ECG顯著高(P < 0.05)。對(duì)冠心病的陽(yáng)性預(yù)測(cè)值和陰性預(yù)測(cè)值,冠脈320CT比ES-ECG顯著高(P < 0.05);分析冠脈320CT和ES-ECG對(duì)冠心病的診斷準(zhǔn)確性,冠脈320CT具有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P < 0.05)(表1)。當(dāng)冠脈三支血管重度狹窄,ES-ECG未見(jiàn)明顯ST-T改變;LCX重度狹窄,ES-ECG可見(jiàn)明顯ST壓低、T倒置;LAD近中段可見(jiàn)鈣化性斑塊、管腔重度狹窄,ES-ECG可見(jiàn)明顯ST抬高、T不對(duì)稱性高尖;以上均行CAG,其病變與320CT結(jié)果相符。
3 討論
本研究顯示,冠脈320CT無(wú)論在敏感性、特異性、陽(yáng)性預(yù)測(cè)值及陰性預(yù)測(cè)值方面均較運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖高,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P < 0.05)。本文所選患者中,入院前均未確診冠心病,根據(jù)患者基本資料,應(yīng)用文獻(xiàn)中多元回歸方法對(duì)本研究患者進(jìn)行冠心病的預(yù)測(cè)率為(61±14)%,危險(xiǎn)分層為低至中危組[2]。研究表明,在懷疑冠心病的中低?;颊咧?,冠脈320CT對(duì)冠心病診斷的準(zhǔn)確率優(yōu)于運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P < 0.05)。當(dāng)冠脈三支血管嚴(yán)重狹窄時(shí),ES-ECG未提示明顯陽(yáng)性改變,推測(cè)可能是由于心肌廣泛缺血導(dǎo)致心電向量相互抵消,出現(xiàn)假性正常心電圖表現(xiàn),兩者表現(xiàn)不符;當(dāng)其中一支血管發(fā)生嚴(yán)重狹窄病變、其余兩支血管無(wú)嚴(yán)重狹窄時(shí),ES-ECG即可出現(xiàn)心肌損害心電圖表現(xiàn),兩者表現(xiàn)相符。由于320CT一次性掃描是全心覆蓋,所獲取的圖像完全不存在階梯偽影,其探測(cè)器寬,掃描時(shí)間短,從血管近端到末端,其管腔內(nèi)造影劑的濃度峰值都相對(duì)一致,能夠直接觀察冠脈血管樹(shù),直接判斷血管狹窄情況,在評(píng)價(jià)冠狀動(dòng)脈血管病變方面有非常好的作用[1,3-5]。運(yùn)動(dòng)負(fù)荷心電圖是診斷冠心病的常用方法,但其對(duì)患者選擇性高,并發(fā)癥相對(duì)較多,很多患者難以完成,不能直接觀察血管病變,假陰性或假陽(yáng)性結(jié)果較常見(jiàn),影響結(jié)果判斷,臨床應(yīng)用受到一定限制,冠脈320CT禁忌證相對(duì)較少,并發(fā)癥較少,且能夠直接觀察冠脈血管樹(shù),具有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì)。綜上所述,對(duì)于懷疑冠心病的中低危患者,建議使用冠脈320CT確診或排除冠心病。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]李曉燕,李正,談紅,等. 320排CT冠狀動(dòng)脈成像與冠狀動(dòng)脈造影的影像對(duì)比研究[J]. 中華臨床醫(yī)師雜志(電子版),2010,4(11):2163-2166.
[2]Kennedy JW. Complications associated with cardiac catheterization angiography[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1982,8(1):5-11.
[3]Miller JM,Rochitte CE,Dewey M,et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT[J]. N Engl J Med,2008,359(22):2324-2336.
[4]Budoff MJ,Dowe D,Jollis JG,et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2008, 52(21):1724-1732.
[5]覃杰,劉凌云,董云旭,等. 320排CT前瞻性和回顧性心電門控冠狀動(dòng)脈成像放射劑量、圖像質(zhì)量及診斷結(jié)果的對(duì)照觀察[J]. 中華醫(yī)學(xué)影像技術(shù),2010,26(5):951-954.
(收稿日期:2011-12-01)