• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS FOR KAN TIN MAIN DRAINAGE CHANNEI IN HONG KONG*

    2012-08-22 08:31:57WANGTaoYANGKailinGUOXingleiXIEShengzongFUHuiGUOYongxin

    WANG Tao, YANG Kai-lin, GUO Xing-lei, XIE Sheng-zong, FU Hui, GUO Yong-xin

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China, E-mail: taozyy@yahoo.com.cn

    (Received November 30, 2011, Revised June 26, 2012)

    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS FOR KAN TIN MAIN DRAINAGE CHANNEI IN HONG KONG*

    WANG Tao, YANG Kai-lin, GUO Xing-lei, XIE Sheng-zong, FU Hui, GUO Yong-xin

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China, E-mail: taozyy@yahoo.com.cn

    (Received November 30, 2011, Revised June 26, 2012)

    The Kam Tin Main Drainage Channel (KTMDC) is an important river for the city drainage in Hong Kong. The roughness and its variations have an obvious effect on the flood control capacity and the flow capacity. So physical model tests are designed to study the KTMDC. Due to its complex channel structure, the tests are completed in two steps. In Step 1, the energy loss is measured along the main channel without inflows, with all inflows and outflows being sealed. In Step 2, all the inflow and outflow structures are measured, with the sealed inflows and outflows being opened on the basis of Step 1. In each step, two schemes are employed. One of the key issues is the choice of suitable materials to make the model?s roughness similar to that of the prototype. According to the gravity similarity criterion, the 1:25 scale model is built, with the main channel made of Perspex. The facing slopes of the grasscrete and the stone masonry need to be roughened. A kind of the nylon net is selected to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry and the plastic lawn for the grasscrete facing slope. For the different structure reaches, the roughness coefficients are estimated based on the hydraulic theory. The rationality of the test results is verified in this study. The results of testing can provide a reliable basis for the renovation, the expansion, the optimization of this channel.

    roughness, hydraulic character, channel, facing slope, grasscrete, masonry

    Introduction

    The Kam Tin Main Drainage Channel (KTMDC) is an important river for the city drainage in Hong Kong. A physical model is built for simulating the reach of the KTMDC between CHA 17+00 and CHA 25+50, as shown in Fig.1. Within this reach are two vehicular bridges (VB2 and VB4), one tributary branch channels (Tributary Channel B), three drainage inlets (Drain Pipe 4 and 5 (D4 and D5), Box Culvert 6 (BC6)) and a drainage outflow (Drain Pipe 7 (D7)). The channel cross-section is trapezoidal with a rectangular section in the middle and with transitions between the two forms of channel either end. The side slope of the channel is 1 vertical to 2 horizontal, and its side wall is covered with grass-crete panels or stone masonry. The channel gradient upstream of 0.68% is hydraulically steep while the gradient downstream of CHA 19+00 of 0.26% is mild. Due to the complexity of the prototype channel and the uncertai-nty about the surface roughness of its component parts, a physical model of KTMDC is needed to reveal the flow features and the hydraulic issues concerned. Through testing with a physical model, a reliable scheme is designed for the channel optimization, the reconstruction and the expansion. One of the issues in the study, the roughness coefficient of the drainage channel, is studied by the physical model testing.

    The roughness is caused by the friction resistance between the flow and the surface or the obstacle, and it affects the hydraulic characteristics of the current[1-3]. Even in the ecology study, the friction to the flow plays an important role[4-6]. In the field of the management of water resources[7]and the wastewater reclamation or reuse system[8], the friction resistance should be taken into account in the current movement. The friction resistance in an open channel with vegetations was much studied by physical experiments[9]. The friction resistance is also a subject for theoretical studies[10].

    Fig.1 General layout of the drainage channel

    Table 1 Prototype conditions on different segments

    The roughness is important for a river and a channel and affects their hydraulic characteristics seriously. Kalyanapu et al.[11]studied the effect of the land use-based surface roughness on the hydrologic model output. In their study, the model parameter sensitivity studies show that the runoff response is sensitive to the Manning roughness variations. Wang et al.[12]studied the effects of the roughness on the flow structure in a gravel-bed channel by using the particle image velocimetry. The experimental results show that the logarithmic-law region of the velocity profile changes with the size of the roughness elements. Chanson[13]studied the unsteady turbulence in Tidal Bores based on the effects of the bed roughness.

    Although much research was carried out on the roughness for stream channels, there were few reports on the roughness for the densely vegetated surface and the complex section channel. Arcement and Schneider[14]suggested that the roughness value is determined by the factors that affect the roughness of channels and flood plains. In densely vegetated flood plains, the major roughness is caused by the grasses, trees, vines, and brush. The roughness of this type can be determined by measuring the vegetation density. Wang et al.[15]reviewed and analyzed the design criteria and the calculation methods of the roughness coefficients used for water transfer canals around the world based on the field investigation and the literature. They proposed approximate formulas for the roughness of the channels and correlative equations of the roughness. Shi et al.[16]studied the effect of vegetation submerged in the river on the roughness coefficients.

    In this paper, the roughness coefficients are studied for different facing slopes of complicated channels.

    1. Experimental setup

    The roughness is an important issue in the design structure, the renovation, the expansion, and the optimization of a channel. This paper undertakes the physical tests of the roughness calibration. The studiedreach from CHA 17+00 to CHA 25+50 is in a shape of W-Type (as shown in Fig.1), with 7 types of crosssections, as listed in Table 1, and the Tributary Channel B flows into the main channel at Section CHA 18+38. The inflows to the D5, the BC6, the D4 and the outflow from D7 are arranged along this river segment, as shown Fig.1 and Table 1. The typical cross-section profiles for the trapezoidal channel and the rectangular channel are as shown in Fig.2. From Fig.2, the small drainage channel is designed in the channel base for draining the low flow in the nonflood season.

    Fig.2 Typical cross-section profile for trapezoidal channel/ rectangular channel

    Fig.3 Sealed outlet of Tributary Channel B

    The roughness calibration follows two steps. In Step 1, in order to measure the energy loss along the main channel without the bridges, the inflows from channel tributaries, the box culvert and the drainage pipes, all inflows and outflows are sealed, as shown Fig.3. The roughness coefficient so obtained would then represent predominately the effect of the boundary friction energy loss and the local energy loss along the main channel. In Step 1, the flow is only through the main channel, the test discharge obtained is 79 m3/s, 103 m3/s, 134 m3/s, respectively. In Step 2, the overall energy losses, including those from the main channel, the tributaries, all the inflow and outflow structures are measured. The sealed inflows and outflows are to be opened, as shown in Fig.4(a). Tributary Channel B is connected with the main channel, as shown Fig.4(b), whose location is denoted by a circle in Fig.1. VB2 is built in the segment from CHA 18+18 to CHA 18+27, where two bridge piers stand on the channel base to sustain the bridge deck, as shown in Fig.5. The two bridge piers provide some local resistance to the flow. The boundary condition and the pipe flow conditions in Step 2 are as shown in Table 2. In testing Step 1, the calibration is carried out first. With all boundary conditions and the model configurations similar to the prototype, the key parameters that need to be calibrated include the energy loss along the channel and the surface roughness coefficient which controls the over-all hydraulic performance and the flow capacity of the model, and they provide the basis for testing Step 2.

    Fig.4 Open inflow connected with the main channel

    Fig.5 Vehicular Bridge 2

    The design of the physical model of KTMDC is based on the hydraulic similarity theory. For free-surface flows, the hydraulic similarity criteria include the geometrical similarity and the gravity force similarity between the prototype and the model. The physicalmodels were built in a true undistorted scale of 1:25. The length of the reach of the KTMDC to be modeled is 850 m from CHA 17+00 to CHA 25+50. To ensure that the approach flows are representative of the prototype conditions as well as possible, subject to all scaling constraints, the models extend a sufficient dimension along each branch. The model extends to CHA 25+85 upstream and CHA 16+75 downstream. To replicate the flow and the boundary conditions as would be expected in the prototype, the roughness similarity is necessary. The roughness of the concrete is about 0.014, therefore, the roughness of the model material shall be 0.0082, close to that of Perspex. So the main channel is made of Perspex. In the bottle of the channel, the concrete is laid on all the facing bases. In the facing slope, the grasscrete, the masonry and the concrete are laid on different cross-sections, as shown in Table 1. Especially, the two schemes are designed to simulate the channel roughness in each step. The slopes of the grasscrete or the masonry, as shown in Table 1, are tested in the downstream from CHA 17+00 to CHA 18+38 as comparison schemes under the same boundary and flow conditions in each testing step, respectively. This means that the masonry facing slope is used in Scheme 1, and the grasscrete one in Scheme 2 from CHA 17+00 to CHA 18+ 38 when the testings in Step 1 and Step 2 are carried out, respectively.

    Table 2 Boundary conditions and pipe flow Conditions in Step 2 (m3/s)

    Fig.6 Nylon net simulating the stone masonry

    The facing slopes of the grasscrete and the stone masonry need to be roughened. The roughness of the stone masonry is related with the size and the shape of the gravel particles. According to the information provided by the Project Provider, the theoretical roughness coefficient n of the masonry slope is around 0.021, which means that the roughness of the model material shall be 0.012. Several mesh materials are used to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry. According to the comparison of the many test results, a kind of nylon netting is shown to be suitable as a surface material to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry, as shown in Fig.6(a). The net is made of the nylon material, 0.0007 m thick. The holes of the net are of squares of 0.001×0.001 m2, as shown in Fig.6(b). The roughness of the grasscrete slope changes greatly with the vegetation conditions, the grass types, the growing season and others. Zhang et al.[17]shows that the hydraulic roughness of a turf used in the revetment ranges from 0.020 to 0.090, depending on different categories of soil, period of growth and way of reinforcement. Arcement and Schneider[14]classifies the roughness vegetation into four grades (as shown in Table 3) according to the vegetation conditions, that is, that of the small adjustment for values in the range of 0.002-0.01, that of the medium adjustment for values in the range of 0.01-0.025, that of the large adjustment for values in the range of 0.025-0.05 is large, and that of very large adjustment for values in the range of 0.05-0.1. According to the on-site assessment, the design requirements and the flow conditions, the roughness is found to be about 0.028, which requires that the roughness of the model material should be 0.016. In order to better simulate the natural characteristics of the grasscrete, the plastic lawns are laid on the grasscrete facing slope. Tests were carried out by changing the density of the plastic grass and the length and the width of the grass leaves for selecting a suitable grass, to keep the similarity with respect to the prototype grasscrete. A new plastic lawn is decided, as shown in Fig.7(a). The height of the grass is 0.016 m-0.021 m on the plastic lawn, as shown in Fig.7(b).The array of the grass is shown in Fig.8, in which each circle represents a cluster of grass and the black arrow shows the direction in which the grasscrete is laid, the same as that of the black arrow in Fig.7(a).

    Table 3 Adjustment values for factors that affect the roughness of a channel[13]

    The locations where the flow rate needs to be controlled and measured include CHA 25+50 (channel upstream), West Culvert, CHB 1+66 (Tributary Channel B), the SSS East Culvert, BC6, CHA 17+00 (channel downstream), D4, and D7. At each location a flow measurement equipment is installed to control the discharge. To examine the complex three-dimensional flow pattern along the KTMDC, Acoustic-Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) meters are used to measure the 3-D velocity to obtain the velocity distribution alone the channel. To measure the water levels, fixed and movable gauges are used. With the above experiment setup, the roughness calibration is carried out.

    Fig.7 Plastic lawn simulating the grasscrete

    Fig.8 Array of plastic lawn

    2. Roughness calibration and analysis

    For natural rivers and artificial channels, the most important factors that affect the selection of the channel value n are as follows: (1) the type and the size of the materials used to cover the bed and the banks of the channel. (2) the shape of the channel. Cowan[14]developed a procedure for estimating the effects of these factors to determine the value ofn for a channel or a river. The value of n may be computed by

    where nbis a base value of n for a straight, uniform, smooth channel in natural materials, n1is a correction factor for the effect of surface irregularities, n2is a value for variations in shape and size of the channel cross section, n3is a value for obstructions, n4is a value for vegetation and flow conditions,m is a correction factor for meandering of the channel. A stable channel is defined as a channel in which the bed is composed of firm soil, gravel, cobbles, boulders, or bedrock and the channel remains relatively unchanged throughout most of the range in the flow. For the base value of nb, the roughness of the concrete ranges from 0.011 to 0.018, and that of a firm soil from 0.020 to 0.032. The roughness of the rock cut is 0.025 for a smooth channel[13]. The values of n1, n2, n3and n4, are detailed in Table 3. Therefore, the hydraulic structure channel is very complex for the KTMDC where there are above five coefficients that affect the channel?s roughness. Because of the uncertain factors in Eq.(1) and Table 3, the roughness coefficients can not be calculated by Eq.(1), appropriately. But this equation provides a useful guidance for the experiment design and the roughness analysis.

    There are three types of flow resistance in the open channel: (1) the friction resistance of the channel surface, (2) the local resistance, caused by sudden changes in the cross-section shape, (3) the energy dissipation in the turbulent flow. The above three flow resistances are governed by different resistance laws, and affect the flow characteristics and the roughness coefficients. The results of the tests are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 for Step 1 and Step 2. In Step 2, the conditions of the main channel, the Tributary Channel B and the pipe flow are as shown in Table 1. In the same step stage, the distinction between Test Scheme 1 and Test Scheme 2 is that in Test Scheme 1, the Masonry is used to cover the segment from CHA 18+38 to CHA 17+00, and in Test Scheme 2, the grasscrete is used. Comparing the test results, the conclusions are as follows.

    The calibration of the roughness is conducted in steady state flow conditions under which the water levels and the velocities at the selected locations along the model channel are constant and can be measured. Manning?s roughness coefficient n is expressed in the steady non-uniform flow as follows

    where n is the Manning?s roughness coefficient,A is the cross-section area, R is the hydraulic radius, Q is the flow rate, ziis the water level at the upstream cross-section (Section i), zi+1is the water level at the downstream cross-section (Section i+1),Liis the distance between the two cross-sections (from Section i to Section i+1). The values of the roughness coefficients in Tables 4 and 5 are explained as follows.

    Table 4 Calibrated roughness comparisons in Step 1

    Table 5 Calibrated roughness comparisons in Step 2

    At the upstream CHA 25+50-CHA 24+00, the model structure and the slope are not changed in Step 1 and Step 2. The roughness coefficient 0.041-0.042 is influenced by the turbulent flow caused by the access ramp built in this reach and the friction resistance of the channel surface. In the segment CHA 24+00-CHA 22+62, there are the inflow of D5 and the outflow of D7 for Step 2, and not for Step 1. The calibrated roughness coefficients are 0.037-0.038 (Table 4) for Step 1 and 0.040-0.042 (Table 5) for Step 2. The increasing Manning roughness is caused by the local flow mixing from the inflow and the outflow in Step 2. The segment CHA 22+62-CHA 21+35 is a transition, there is no inflow or outflow, but the hydraulic jump is observed near CHA 21+75 in the case of the flow that would occur once in 200 years in Step 2, which is why the Manning roughness changes from 0.023-0.024 to 0.049 (Tables 4 and 5). The additional energy loss by the turbulent flow is increased mainly by the hydraulic jump, not by the surface friction energy loss along the channel segment.

    The middle segment (CHA 21+35-CHA 20+55) hasa uniform rectangular section. In Step 1, the energy loss is dominated by the surface friction of the main channel, so the Manning roughness coefficients are close to the value “n” of the concrete channel. Because of the inflow from BC6 in Step 2, the calibration roughness 0.017-0.018 (Table 5) in Step 2 is slightly higher than the value of 0.013-0.014 (Table 4) in Step 1. In the case of the flow that would occur once in 50 years in Step 2, a hydraulic jump is formed so it is not only the friction resistance of the channel surface that is measured, but also the turbulent mixing and the vortex head due to the energy dissipation in the hydraulic jump. So the measured roughness values of 0.030 and 0.029 (Table 5) are not simply the Manning roughness coefficients caused by the friction resistance of the surface material. In the segment from CHA 20+55 to CHA 19+40, the roughness coefficients are close in Step 1 and Step 2 stages because the hydraulic structure and the flow condition are changed slightly in this transition reach.

    At the downstream (CHA19+40-CHA 18+38), Tributary Channel B is the inflow into the main channel. The confluence of two large streams induces strong impulse, mixing and dissipation. The originalManing?s formula, established on the bases of the single channel and the uniform flow, can not be applied, so the calibration Manning roughness is not done in Step 2. So their Manning roughness coefficients 0.024-0.027 (Table 4) are close to the value “n” of this meandering reach in Step 1.

    At the downstream (CHA 18+38-CHA 18+00), the a bove mentioned three resistances, including the friction resistance of the channel surface, the local resistance caused by sudden changes in the crosssection shape, the local energy dissipation in the turbulent flow, exist due to the piers and the deck at VB2, located in the segment from CHA 18+18 to CHA 18+27. The local resistance coefficient depends on the shape of the structure in the flow and the surface friction resistance depends on the coefficient of roughness and the hydraulic radius of the channel section. In order to distinguish their interactions, a measurement point at CHA 18+00 is added in Step 2. Influenced by the local resistance of VB2, the roughness coefficients 0.032-0.034 for Scheme 1 and 0.068-0.059 for Scheme 2 (Table 5) are increased obviously in this segment. During testing under the case of the flow that would occur once in 200 years, the flow impacts on the duck of VB2 in Scheme 2. So a larger roughness coefficient 0.068 is obtained. The phenomenon does not occur under the case of the flow that would occur once in 50 years. Therefore, the roughness coefficients are deduced according to the three resistances in the segment. If one excludes the interference caused by the local resistance of VB2, the calculated Manning?s roughness of the segment from CHA 18+00 to CHA 17+00 is 0.019-0.020 and 0.029 (Table 5), which is close to the value of the calibration in Step 1. Thus, the test results are verified.

    3. Conclusions

    The calibration was carried out in two steps. In Step1, this calibration was done by measurement of the energy loss along segments of the channel initially without branch inflows so that energy losses were predominately due to the friction along the main channel. So the Manning roughness coefficient calibrated in Step 1 represents the basic hydraulic characteristics of the channel. This calibration is carried out for the main channel only to provide a basis for the comparison of the results obtained in testing Step 2. In Step 2, the inflow and outflow structures along the main channel, D4, D5, D7 and Tributary Channel B, are connected with the main channel. The bridges are added along the main channel. The overall energy losses including those from the main channel, the tributaries, all the inflows, outflow structures and the bridges are measured. The Manning roughness coefficients measured in Step 2 including the measured local resistances can be expected to vary with the discharge, the velocity or the flow pattern. So the calibrated roughness is more representative of the roughness of the existing channel. Its results can provide a reliable basis for the renovation, the expansion, the optimization of this channel.

    The roughness calibration of the channel is a verycomplex task. In this study, some factors were not considered in the testing and analysis due to the limitations of the test condition, they should be taken into account in further tests.

    Refernces

    [1] WANG X. Y., YANG Q. Y. and LU W. Z. et al. Effects of bed load movement on mean flow characteristics in mobile gravel beds[J]. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(9): 2781-2795.

    [2] HUAI Wen-xin, HAN Jie and ZENG Yu-hong et al. Velocity distribution of flow with submerged flexible vegetations based on mixing-length approach[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2009, 30(3): 343-351.

    [3] FERRO V. Flow resistance in gravel-bed channels with large-scale roughness[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003, 28(12): 1325-1339.

    [4] HOOVER T. M., ACKERMAN J. D. and JOSEF D. A. Near-bed hydrodynamic measurements above boulders in shallow torrential streams: Implications for stream biota[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2004, 3(5): 365-378.

    [5]PENA E., ANTA J. and PUERTAS J. et al. Estimation of drag coefficient and settling velocity of the cockle cerastpderma edule using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2008, 24(4, suppl.): 150-158.

    [6] WU C. L., CHAU K. W. and HUANG J. S. Modelling coupled water and heat transport in a soil-mulch-plantatmosphere continuum (SMPAC) system[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2007, 31(2): 152-169.

    [7]CHENG C. T., CHAU K. W. Flood control management system for reservoirs in China[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2004, 19(2): 1141-1150.

    [8]LU W. Z., LEUNG A. Y. T. A preliminary study on potential of developing shower/laundry wastewater reclamation and reuse system[J]. Environmental and Public Health Management, 2003, 52(9): 1451-1459.

    [9]NENAL Laounia, YAN Zhong-min and XIA Ji-hong. Study of the flow through non-submerged vegetation[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2005, 17(4): 498- 502.

    [10]YANG Sheng-fa, HU Jiang and LI Dan-xun et al. Some new data formulas for resistance flow in fluvial open channels[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2011, 23(4): 527-534.

    [11] KALYANAPU A. J., BURIAN S. J. and MCPHERSON T. N. Effect of land use-based surface roughness on hydrologic model output[J]. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 2009, 9(2): 51-71.

    [12]WANG X. Y., SUN Y. and LU W. Z. et al. Experimental study of the effects of roughness on the flow structure in a gravel-bed channel using particle image velocimetry[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2011, (9): 710-716.

    [13] CHANSON H. Unsteady turbulence in tidal bores: Effe-cts of bed roughness[J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 136(5): 247-265.

    [14] ARCEMENT G. J., SCHNEIDER V. R. Guide for selecting Manning?s roughness. Coefficients for natural channels and flood plains[R]. United States Geological Survey Water-supply, Paper 2339, 1989.

    [15] WANG Guang-qian, HUANG Yue-fei and WEI Jia-hua et al. Identification of roughness-coefficient value for the channel of the south-to-north water transfer(middle line) project[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science and Technology, 2006, 4(1): 8-14(in Chinese).

    [16] SHI Bing, WANG Chuan-yuan and YIN Ze-gao et al. Effect of vegetation submerged in river on the roughness coefficient[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2009, 39(2): 295-298(in Chinese).

    [17] ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Chun-xin and YING Han-hai. Experimental study on hydraulic roughness of revetment with grass cover[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2007, 18(4): 483-489(in Chinese).

    10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60303-X

    * Biography: WANG Tao (1975-), Female, Master, Senior Engineer

    亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 999精品在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| av片东京热男人的天堂| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产色视频综合| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| a级毛片在线看网站| 色综合站精品国产| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 天堂√8在线中文| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜久久久久精精品| www.精华液| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产精品永久免费网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| www国产在线视频色| 很黄的视频免费| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产av又大| bbb黄色大片| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 校园春色视频在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 级片在线观看| 久久热在线av| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久影院123| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 手机成人av网站| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| av天堂在线播放| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久香蕉国产精品| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 色播亚洲综合网| 午夜精品在线福利| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久影院123| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美日本视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产精品影院久久| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| av在线天堂中文字幕| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 88av欧美| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 高清在线国产一区| 多毛熟女@视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 看免费av毛片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久久久久大精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 日本 欧美在线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 精品国产亚洲在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 免费观看人在逋| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩精品网址| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| av视频免费观看在线观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 很黄的视频免费| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 天天添夜夜摸| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 一级毛片女人18水好多| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 免费观看人在逋| 热99re8久久精品国产| 91老司机精品| 黄色成人免费大全| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久精品成人免费网站| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 在线视频色国产色| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| av福利片在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区 | 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产精品,欧美在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲成人久久性| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产成人欧美| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 无限看片的www在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲无线在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产精品九九99| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 91老司机精品| 999精品在线视频| www.999成人在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲av成人av| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 99久久国产精品久久久| 成人欧美大片| 国产av在哪里看| 满18在线观看网站| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| av欧美777| 成人手机av| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 午夜影院日韩av| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产av又大| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 丁香欧美五月| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 妹子高潮喷水视频| or卡值多少钱| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产亚洲欧美98| 少妇 在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 99热只有精品国产| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲第一青青草原| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费不卡黄色视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲 国产 在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 超碰成人久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 一夜夜www| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 高清在线国产一区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 久久香蕉精品热| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美大码av| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| www.999成人在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 色av中文字幕| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| av电影中文网址| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日本在线视频免费播放| 乱人伦中国视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美大码av| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产精品免费视频内射| 日韩欧美免费精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产麻豆69| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 午夜免费鲁丝| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 色播亚洲综合网| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 三级毛片av免费| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 一级毛片精品| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲全国av大片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲片人在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 青草久久国产| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久伊人香网站| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 丁香六月欧美| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲欧美激情在线| tocl精华| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 9色porny在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 一级片免费观看大全| av免费在线观看网站| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产成人av教育| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| av欧美777| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久草成人影院| 免费av毛片视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 制服诱惑二区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 露出奶头的视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 国产成人精品在线电影| 在线观看www视频免费| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 91成年电影在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产成人欧美| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 9色porny在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 1024视频免费在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片|