• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS FOR KAN TIN MAIN DRAINAGE CHANNEI IN HONG KONG*

    2012-08-22 08:31:57WANGTaoYANGKailinGUOXingleiXIEShengzongFUHuiGUOYongxin

    WANG Tao, YANG Kai-lin, GUO Xing-lei, XIE Sheng-zong, FU Hui, GUO Yong-xin

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China, E-mail: taozyy@yahoo.com.cn

    (Received November 30, 2011, Revised June 26, 2012)

    EXPERIMENTAL STUDY HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS FOR KAN TIN MAIN DRAINAGE CHANNEI IN HONG KONG*

    WANG Tao, YANG Kai-lin, GUO Xing-lei, XIE Sheng-zong, FU Hui, GUO Yong-xin

    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China, E-mail: taozyy@yahoo.com.cn

    (Received November 30, 2011, Revised June 26, 2012)

    The Kam Tin Main Drainage Channel (KTMDC) is an important river for the city drainage in Hong Kong. The roughness and its variations have an obvious effect on the flood control capacity and the flow capacity. So physical model tests are designed to study the KTMDC. Due to its complex channel structure, the tests are completed in two steps. In Step 1, the energy loss is measured along the main channel without inflows, with all inflows and outflows being sealed. In Step 2, all the inflow and outflow structures are measured, with the sealed inflows and outflows being opened on the basis of Step 1. In each step, two schemes are employed. One of the key issues is the choice of suitable materials to make the model?s roughness similar to that of the prototype. According to the gravity similarity criterion, the 1:25 scale model is built, with the main channel made of Perspex. The facing slopes of the grasscrete and the stone masonry need to be roughened. A kind of the nylon net is selected to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry and the plastic lawn for the grasscrete facing slope. For the different structure reaches, the roughness coefficients are estimated based on the hydraulic theory. The rationality of the test results is verified in this study. The results of testing can provide a reliable basis for the renovation, the expansion, the optimization of this channel.

    roughness, hydraulic character, channel, facing slope, grasscrete, masonry

    Introduction

    The Kam Tin Main Drainage Channel (KTMDC) is an important river for the city drainage in Hong Kong. A physical model is built for simulating the reach of the KTMDC between CHA 17+00 and CHA 25+50, as shown in Fig.1. Within this reach are two vehicular bridges (VB2 and VB4), one tributary branch channels (Tributary Channel B), three drainage inlets (Drain Pipe 4 and 5 (D4 and D5), Box Culvert 6 (BC6)) and a drainage outflow (Drain Pipe 7 (D7)). The channel cross-section is trapezoidal with a rectangular section in the middle and with transitions between the two forms of channel either end. The side slope of the channel is 1 vertical to 2 horizontal, and its side wall is covered with grass-crete panels or stone masonry. The channel gradient upstream of 0.68% is hydraulically steep while the gradient downstream of CHA 19+00 of 0.26% is mild. Due to the complexity of the prototype channel and the uncertai-nty about the surface roughness of its component parts, a physical model of KTMDC is needed to reveal the flow features and the hydraulic issues concerned. Through testing with a physical model, a reliable scheme is designed for the channel optimization, the reconstruction and the expansion. One of the issues in the study, the roughness coefficient of the drainage channel, is studied by the physical model testing.

    The roughness is caused by the friction resistance between the flow and the surface or the obstacle, and it affects the hydraulic characteristics of the current[1-3]. Even in the ecology study, the friction to the flow plays an important role[4-6]. In the field of the management of water resources[7]and the wastewater reclamation or reuse system[8], the friction resistance should be taken into account in the current movement. The friction resistance in an open channel with vegetations was much studied by physical experiments[9]. The friction resistance is also a subject for theoretical studies[10].

    Fig.1 General layout of the drainage channel

    Table 1 Prototype conditions on different segments

    The roughness is important for a river and a channel and affects their hydraulic characteristics seriously. Kalyanapu et al.[11]studied the effect of the land use-based surface roughness on the hydrologic model output. In their study, the model parameter sensitivity studies show that the runoff response is sensitive to the Manning roughness variations. Wang et al.[12]studied the effects of the roughness on the flow structure in a gravel-bed channel by using the particle image velocimetry. The experimental results show that the logarithmic-law region of the velocity profile changes with the size of the roughness elements. Chanson[13]studied the unsteady turbulence in Tidal Bores based on the effects of the bed roughness.

    Although much research was carried out on the roughness for stream channels, there were few reports on the roughness for the densely vegetated surface and the complex section channel. Arcement and Schneider[14]suggested that the roughness value is determined by the factors that affect the roughness of channels and flood plains. In densely vegetated flood plains, the major roughness is caused by the grasses, trees, vines, and brush. The roughness of this type can be determined by measuring the vegetation density. Wang et al.[15]reviewed and analyzed the design criteria and the calculation methods of the roughness coefficients used for water transfer canals around the world based on the field investigation and the literature. They proposed approximate formulas for the roughness of the channels and correlative equations of the roughness. Shi et al.[16]studied the effect of vegetation submerged in the river on the roughness coefficients.

    In this paper, the roughness coefficients are studied for different facing slopes of complicated channels.

    1. Experimental setup

    The roughness is an important issue in the design structure, the renovation, the expansion, and the optimization of a channel. This paper undertakes the physical tests of the roughness calibration. The studiedreach from CHA 17+00 to CHA 25+50 is in a shape of W-Type (as shown in Fig.1), with 7 types of crosssections, as listed in Table 1, and the Tributary Channel B flows into the main channel at Section CHA 18+38. The inflows to the D5, the BC6, the D4 and the outflow from D7 are arranged along this river segment, as shown Fig.1 and Table 1. The typical cross-section profiles for the trapezoidal channel and the rectangular channel are as shown in Fig.2. From Fig.2, the small drainage channel is designed in the channel base for draining the low flow in the nonflood season.

    Fig.2 Typical cross-section profile for trapezoidal channel/ rectangular channel

    Fig.3 Sealed outlet of Tributary Channel B

    The roughness calibration follows two steps. In Step 1, in order to measure the energy loss along the main channel without the bridges, the inflows from channel tributaries, the box culvert and the drainage pipes, all inflows and outflows are sealed, as shown Fig.3. The roughness coefficient so obtained would then represent predominately the effect of the boundary friction energy loss and the local energy loss along the main channel. In Step 1, the flow is only through the main channel, the test discharge obtained is 79 m3/s, 103 m3/s, 134 m3/s, respectively. In Step 2, the overall energy losses, including those from the main channel, the tributaries, all the inflow and outflow structures are measured. The sealed inflows and outflows are to be opened, as shown in Fig.4(a). Tributary Channel B is connected with the main channel, as shown Fig.4(b), whose location is denoted by a circle in Fig.1. VB2 is built in the segment from CHA 18+18 to CHA 18+27, where two bridge piers stand on the channel base to sustain the bridge deck, as shown in Fig.5. The two bridge piers provide some local resistance to the flow. The boundary condition and the pipe flow conditions in Step 2 are as shown in Table 2. In testing Step 1, the calibration is carried out first. With all boundary conditions and the model configurations similar to the prototype, the key parameters that need to be calibrated include the energy loss along the channel and the surface roughness coefficient which controls the over-all hydraulic performance and the flow capacity of the model, and they provide the basis for testing Step 2.

    Fig.4 Open inflow connected with the main channel

    Fig.5 Vehicular Bridge 2

    The design of the physical model of KTMDC is based on the hydraulic similarity theory. For free-surface flows, the hydraulic similarity criteria include the geometrical similarity and the gravity force similarity between the prototype and the model. The physicalmodels were built in a true undistorted scale of 1:25. The length of the reach of the KTMDC to be modeled is 850 m from CHA 17+00 to CHA 25+50. To ensure that the approach flows are representative of the prototype conditions as well as possible, subject to all scaling constraints, the models extend a sufficient dimension along each branch. The model extends to CHA 25+85 upstream and CHA 16+75 downstream. To replicate the flow and the boundary conditions as would be expected in the prototype, the roughness similarity is necessary. The roughness of the concrete is about 0.014, therefore, the roughness of the model material shall be 0.0082, close to that of Perspex. So the main channel is made of Perspex. In the bottle of the channel, the concrete is laid on all the facing bases. In the facing slope, the grasscrete, the masonry and the concrete are laid on different cross-sections, as shown in Table 1. Especially, the two schemes are designed to simulate the channel roughness in each step. The slopes of the grasscrete or the masonry, as shown in Table 1, are tested in the downstream from CHA 17+00 to CHA 18+38 as comparison schemes under the same boundary and flow conditions in each testing step, respectively. This means that the masonry facing slope is used in Scheme 1, and the grasscrete one in Scheme 2 from CHA 17+00 to CHA 18+ 38 when the testings in Step 1 and Step 2 are carried out, respectively.

    Table 2 Boundary conditions and pipe flow Conditions in Step 2 (m3/s)

    Fig.6 Nylon net simulating the stone masonry

    The facing slopes of the grasscrete and the stone masonry need to be roughened. The roughness of the stone masonry is related with the size and the shape of the gravel particles. According to the information provided by the Project Provider, the theoretical roughness coefficient n of the masonry slope is around 0.021, which means that the roughness of the model material shall be 0.012. Several mesh materials are used to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry. According to the comparison of the many test results, a kind of nylon netting is shown to be suitable as a surface material to simulate the roughness of the stone masonry, as shown in Fig.6(a). The net is made of the nylon material, 0.0007 m thick. The holes of the net are of squares of 0.001×0.001 m2, as shown in Fig.6(b). The roughness of the grasscrete slope changes greatly with the vegetation conditions, the grass types, the growing season and others. Zhang et al.[17]shows that the hydraulic roughness of a turf used in the revetment ranges from 0.020 to 0.090, depending on different categories of soil, period of growth and way of reinforcement. Arcement and Schneider[14]classifies the roughness vegetation into four grades (as shown in Table 3) according to the vegetation conditions, that is, that of the small adjustment for values in the range of 0.002-0.01, that of the medium adjustment for values in the range of 0.01-0.025, that of the large adjustment for values in the range of 0.025-0.05 is large, and that of very large adjustment for values in the range of 0.05-0.1. According to the on-site assessment, the design requirements and the flow conditions, the roughness is found to be about 0.028, which requires that the roughness of the model material should be 0.016. In order to better simulate the natural characteristics of the grasscrete, the plastic lawns are laid on the grasscrete facing slope. Tests were carried out by changing the density of the plastic grass and the length and the width of the grass leaves for selecting a suitable grass, to keep the similarity with respect to the prototype grasscrete. A new plastic lawn is decided, as shown in Fig.7(a). The height of the grass is 0.016 m-0.021 m on the plastic lawn, as shown in Fig.7(b).The array of the grass is shown in Fig.8, in which each circle represents a cluster of grass and the black arrow shows the direction in which the grasscrete is laid, the same as that of the black arrow in Fig.7(a).

    Table 3 Adjustment values for factors that affect the roughness of a channel[13]

    The locations where the flow rate needs to be controlled and measured include CHA 25+50 (channel upstream), West Culvert, CHB 1+66 (Tributary Channel B), the SSS East Culvert, BC6, CHA 17+00 (channel downstream), D4, and D7. At each location a flow measurement equipment is installed to control the discharge. To examine the complex three-dimensional flow pattern along the KTMDC, Acoustic-Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) meters are used to measure the 3-D velocity to obtain the velocity distribution alone the channel. To measure the water levels, fixed and movable gauges are used. With the above experiment setup, the roughness calibration is carried out.

    Fig.7 Plastic lawn simulating the grasscrete

    Fig.8 Array of plastic lawn

    2. Roughness calibration and analysis

    For natural rivers and artificial channels, the most important factors that affect the selection of the channel value n are as follows: (1) the type and the size of the materials used to cover the bed and the banks of the channel. (2) the shape of the channel. Cowan[14]developed a procedure for estimating the effects of these factors to determine the value ofn for a channel or a river. The value of n may be computed by

    where nbis a base value of n for a straight, uniform, smooth channel in natural materials, n1is a correction factor for the effect of surface irregularities, n2is a value for variations in shape and size of the channel cross section, n3is a value for obstructions, n4is a value for vegetation and flow conditions,m is a correction factor for meandering of the channel. A stable channel is defined as a channel in which the bed is composed of firm soil, gravel, cobbles, boulders, or bedrock and the channel remains relatively unchanged throughout most of the range in the flow. For the base value of nb, the roughness of the concrete ranges from 0.011 to 0.018, and that of a firm soil from 0.020 to 0.032. The roughness of the rock cut is 0.025 for a smooth channel[13]. The values of n1, n2, n3and n4, are detailed in Table 3. Therefore, the hydraulic structure channel is very complex for the KTMDC where there are above five coefficients that affect the channel?s roughness. Because of the uncertain factors in Eq.(1) and Table 3, the roughness coefficients can not be calculated by Eq.(1), appropriately. But this equation provides a useful guidance for the experiment design and the roughness analysis.

    There are three types of flow resistance in the open channel: (1) the friction resistance of the channel surface, (2) the local resistance, caused by sudden changes in the cross-section shape, (3) the energy dissipation in the turbulent flow. The above three flow resistances are governed by different resistance laws, and affect the flow characteristics and the roughness coefficients. The results of the tests are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 for Step 1 and Step 2. In Step 2, the conditions of the main channel, the Tributary Channel B and the pipe flow are as shown in Table 1. In the same step stage, the distinction between Test Scheme 1 and Test Scheme 2 is that in Test Scheme 1, the Masonry is used to cover the segment from CHA 18+38 to CHA 17+00, and in Test Scheme 2, the grasscrete is used. Comparing the test results, the conclusions are as follows.

    The calibration of the roughness is conducted in steady state flow conditions under which the water levels and the velocities at the selected locations along the model channel are constant and can be measured. Manning?s roughness coefficient n is expressed in the steady non-uniform flow as follows

    where n is the Manning?s roughness coefficient,A is the cross-section area, R is the hydraulic radius, Q is the flow rate, ziis the water level at the upstream cross-section (Section i), zi+1is the water level at the downstream cross-section (Section i+1),Liis the distance between the two cross-sections (from Section i to Section i+1). The values of the roughness coefficients in Tables 4 and 5 are explained as follows.

    Table 4 Calibrated roughness comparisons in Step 1

    Table 5 Calibrated roughness comparisons in Step 2

    At the upstream CHA 25+50-CHA 24+00, the model structure and the slope are not changed in Step 1 and Step 2. The roughness coefficient 0.041-0.042 is influenced by the turbulent flow caused by the access ramp built in this reach and the friction resistance of the channel surface. In the segment CHA 24+00-CHA 22+62, there are the inflow of D5 and the outflow of D7 for Step 2, and not for Step 1. The calibrated roughness coefficients are 0.037-0.038 (Table 4) for Step 1 and 0.040-0.042 (Table 5) for Step 2. The increasing Manning roughness is caused by the local flow mixing from the inflow and the outflow in Step 2. The segment CHA 22+62-CHA 21+35 is a transition, there is no inflow or outflow, but the hydraulic jump is observed near CHA 21+75 in the case of the flow that would occur once in 200 years in Step 2, which is why the Manning roughness changes from 0.023-0.024 to 0.049 (Tables 4 and 5). The additional energy loss by the turbulent flow is increased mainly by the hydraulic jump, not by the surface friction energy loss along the channel segment.

    The middle segment (CHA 21+35-CHA 20+55) hasa uniform rectangular section. In Step 1, the energy loss is dominated by the surface friction of the main channel, so the Manning roughness coefficients are close to the value “n” of the concrete channel. Because of the inflow from BC6 in Step 2, the calibration roughness 0.017-0.018 (Table 5) in Step 2 is slightly higher than the value of 0.013-0.014 (Table 4) in Step 1. In the case of the flow that would occur once in 50 years in Step 2, a hydraulic jump is formed so it is not only the friction resistance of the channel surface that is measured, but also the turbulent mixing and the vortex head due to the energy dissipation in the hydraulic jump. So the measured roughness values of 0.030 and 0.029 (Table 5) are not simply the Manning roughness coefficients caused by the friction resistance of the surface material. In the segment from CHA 20+55 to CHA 19+40, the roughness coefficients are close in Step 1 and Step 2 stages because the hydraulic structure and the flow condition are changed slightly in this transition reach.

    At the downstream (CHA19+40-CHA 18+38), Tributary Channel B is the inflow into the main channel. The confluence of two large streams induces strong impulse, mixing and dissipation. The originalManing?s formula, established on the bases of the single channel and the uniform flow, can not be applied, so the calibration Manning roughness is not done in Step 2. So their Manning roughness coefficients 0.024-0.027 (Table 4) are close to the value “n” of this meandering reach in Step 1.

    At the downstream (CHA 18+38-CHA 18+00), the a bove mentioned three resistances, including the friction resistance of the channel surface, the local resistance caused by sudden changes in the crosssection shape, the local energy dissipation in the turbulent flow, exist due to the piers and the deck at VB2, located in the segment from CHA 18+18 to CHA 18+27. The local resistance coefficient depends on the shape of the structure in the flow and the surface friction resistance depends on the coefficient of roughness and the hydraulic radius of the channel section. In order to distinguish their interactions, a measurement point at CHA 18+00 is added in Step 2. Influenced by the local resistance of VB2, the roughness coefficients 0.032-0.034 for Scheme 1 and 0.068-0.059 for Scheme 2 (Table 5) are increased obviously in this segment. During testing under the case of the flow that would occur once in 200 years, the flow impacts on the duck of VB2 in Scheme 2. So a larger roughness coefficient 0.068 is obtained. The phenomenon does not occur under the case of the flow that would occur once in 50 years. Therefore, the roughness coefficients are deduced according to the three resistances in the segment. If one excludes the interference caused by the local resistance of VB2, the calculated Manning?s roughness of the segment from CHA 18+00 to CHA 17+00 is 0.019-0.020 and 0.029 (Table 5), which is close to the value of the calibration in Step 1. Thus, the test results are verified.

    3. Conclusions

    The calibration was carried out in two steps. In Step1, this calibration was done by measurement of the energy loss along segments of the channel initially without branch inflows so that energy losses were predominately due to the friction along the main channel. So the Manning roughness coefficient calibrated in Step 1 represents the basic hydraulic characteristics of the channel. This calibration is carried out for the main channel only to provide a basis for the comparison of the results obtained in testing Step 2. In Step 2, the inflow and outflow structures along the main channel, D4, D5, D7 and Tributary Channel B, are connected with the main channel. The bridges are added along the main channel. The overall energy losses including those from the main channel, the tributaries, all the inflows, outflow structures and the bridges are measured. The Manning roughness coefficients measured in Step 2 including the measured local resistances can be expected to vary with the discharge, the velocity or the flow pattern. So the calibrated roughness is more representative of the roughness of the existing channel. Its results can provide a reliable basis for the renovation, the expansion, the optimization of this channel.

    The roughness calibration of the channel is a verycomplex task. In this study, some factors were not considered in the testing and analysis due to the limitations of the test condition, they should be taken into account in further tests.

    Refernces

    [1] WANG X. Y., YANG Q. Y. and LU W. Z. et al. Effects of bed load movement on mean flow characteristics in mobile gravel beds[J]. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(9): 2781-2795.

    [2] HUAI Wen-xin, HAN Jie and ZENG Yu-hong et al. Velocity distribution of flow with submerged flexible vegetations based on mixing-length approach[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2009, 30(3): 343-351.

    [3] FERRO V. Flow resistance in gravel-bed channels with large-scale roughness[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003, 28(12): 1325-1339.

    [4] HOOVER T. M., ACKERMAN J. D. and JOSEF D. A. Near-bed hydrodynamic measurements above boulders in shallow torrential streams: Implications for stream biota[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2004, 3(5): 365-378.

    [5]PENA E., ANTA J. and PUERTAS J. et al. Estimation of drag coefficient and settling velocity of the cockle cerastpderma edule using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2008, 24(4, suppl.): 150-158.

    [6] WU C. L., CHAU K. W. and HUANG J. S. Modelling coupled water and heat transport in a soil-mulch-plantatmosphere continuum (SMPAC) system[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2007, 31(2): 152-169.

    [7]CHENG C. T., CHAU K. W. Flood control management system for reservoirs in China[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2004, 19(2): 1141-1150.

    [8]LU W. Z., LEUNG A. Y. T. A preliminary study on potential of developing shower/laundry wastewater reclamation and reuse system[J]. Environmental and Public Health Management, 2003, 52(9): 1451-1459.

    [9]NENAL Laounia, YAN Zhong-min and XIA Ji-hong. Study of the flow through non-submerged vegetation[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2005, 17(4): 498- 502.

    [10]YANG Sheng-fa, HU Jiang and LI Dan-xun et al. Some new data formulas for resistance flow in fluvial open channels[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2011, 23(4): 527-534.

    [11] KALYANAPU A. J., BURIAN S. J. and MCPHERSON T. N. Effect of land use-based surface roughness on hydrologic model output[J]. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 2009, 9(2): 51-71.

    [12]WANG X. Y., SUN Y. and LU W. Z. et al. Experimental study of the effects of roughness on the flow structure in a gravel-bed channel using particle image velocimetry[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2011, (9): 710-716.

    [13] CHANSON H. Unsteady turbulence in tidal bores: Effe-cts of bed roughness[J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 136(5): 247-265.

    [14] ARCEMENT G. J., SCHNEIDER V. R. Guide for selecting Manning?s roughness. Coefficients for natural channels and flood plains[R]. United States Geological Survey Water-supply, Paper 2339, 1989.

    [15] WANG Guang-qian, HUANG Yue-fei and WEI Jia-hua et al. Identification of roughness-coefficient value for the channel of the south-to-north water transfer(middle line) project[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science and Technology, 2006, 4(1): 8-14(in Chinese).

    [16] SHI Bing, WANG Chuan-yuan and YIN Ze-gao et al. Effect of vegetation submerged in river on the roughness coefficient[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2009, 39(2): 295-298(in Chinese).

    [17] ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Chun-xin and YING Han-hai. Experimental study on hydraulic roughness of revetment with grass cover[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2007, 18(4): 483-489(in Chinese).

    10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60303-X

    * Biography: WANG Tao (1975-), Female, Master, Senior Engineer

    此物有八面人人有两片| 一级毛片电影观看 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 午夜激情欧美在线| 成人av在线播放网站| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人三级黄色视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| av在线老鸭窝| 欧美性感艳星| 大香蕉久久网| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| av天堂在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产午夜精品论理片| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 一本一本综合久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 大香蕉久久网| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 午夜福利在线在线| 男人舔奶头视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜久久久久精精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一级黄片播放器| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美激情在线99| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 97在线视频观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 成人三级黄色视频| 日本五十路高清| 97碰自拍视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 一a级毛片在线观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 午夜福利高清视频| ponron亚洲| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久久久国产网址| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 毛片女人毛片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 色av中文字幕| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲无线观看免费| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久久久久久久大av| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久午夜福利片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 热99re8久久精品国产| 99久国产av精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产色婷婷99| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久精品影院6| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久久久九九精品影院| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 久久久色成人| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 麻豆一二三区av精品| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产成人福利小说| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 久久人人爽人人片av| 男女那种视频在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 免费看光身美女| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲五月天丁香| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久色成人| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 搞女人的毛片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 综合色av麻豆| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲无线在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久久精品大字幕| h日本视频在线播放| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美zozozo另类| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久久久久伊人网av| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | av国产免费在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久久久国内视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 99热这里只有精品一区| av天堂中文字幕网| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日本a在线网址| 免费看av在线观看网站| 在线播放无遮挡| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 乱人视频在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产高清激情床上av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久精品影院6| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一级毛片电影观看 | 联通29元200g的流量卡| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久精品夜色国产| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 男人舔奶头视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 高清毛片免费看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 深夜精品福利| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲性久久影院| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| www日本黄色视频网| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产成人freesex在线 | 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 午夜视频国产福利| av福利片在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 一级av片app| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 在线观看66精品国产| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 美女免费视频网站| 一本久久中文字幕| 看片在线看免费视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产成人一区二区在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 搞女人的毛片| 免费av毛片视频| 简卡轻食公司| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 天堂√8在线中文| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 少妇高潮的动态图| 床上黄色一级片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 免费大片18禁| 久久人妻av系列| 午夜福利在线在线| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| a级毛片a级免费在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 午夜福利在线在线| av卡一久久| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| avwww免费| 国产成人aa在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 97在线视频观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 日本色播在线视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 日本成人三级电影网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 精品久久久噜噜| 黄片wwwwww| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 不卡一级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 午夜a级毛片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 色视频www国产| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久久久国产网址| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久色成人| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 中国国产av一级| aaaaa片日本免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚州av有码| 热99re8久久精品国产| 大香蕉久久网| 观看美女的网站| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲图色成人| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 午夜福利高清视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 内射极品少妇av片p| 乱人视频在线观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 香蕉av资源在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| a级毛色黄片| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美3d第一页| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| av卡一久久| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 免费看av在线观看网站| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| videossex国产| 尾随美女入室| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产av不卡久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 99久国产av精品| 美女大奶头视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲无线观看免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 老女人水多毛片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 床上黄色一级片| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久精品影院6| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看 | 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 极品教师在线视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产成人福利小说| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| av在线亚洲专区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| a级毛色黄片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站|