Ｔｈｅ?。茫铮恚穑幔颍椋螅铮睢。铮妗。裕鳎铩。郑澹颍螅椋铮睿蟆。铮妗埃樱瑁酰椤。龋酢。冢瑁酰幔睢保ā端疂G傳》）

隋瑞歆

【Abstract】: Pearl S. Bucks All Men are Brothers is very great. She loved China and Chinese culture and introduced firstly Shui Hu Zhuan to the world. She gave her readers a very interesting and different story.

Sidney Shapiros Outlaws of the Marsh is very wonderful. As a man, as an English lawyer and later as a Chinese and a translator. He relived Shui Hu Zhuan in English world.

【Key words】: All Men are Brothers, Outlaws of the Marsh, comparison

Israeli translation theorist Gideon Toury says: A translation is taken to be any target-language utterance which is presented or regarded as such within the target culture, on whatever ground. And German translation theorist Christian Nord gives this definition: Translation is the production of a functional target text maintaining a relationship with a given source text that is specified according to the intended or demanded function of the target text. Toury emphasizes the culture while Nord gives more emphasis to the pragmatic approach, that is to fulfill the function through the text. And English famous scholar M.A.K. Halliday says: translation is, in fact, an extremely complicated and difficult task. It is far from being the simple, obvious exercise it is sometimes described to be. In its usual form it is appropriate more to the advanced stages of a university special degree course, when literary and historical styles are studied, than to the early stages of acquiring practical skills in a foreign language. So we can generalize with three words about the above: “faithfulness”, “expressiveness” and “elegance”.

We know that “Shui Hu Zhuan” is a very famous book written by Shi Naian in Ming dynasty and precious cultural inheritance in China. Shui Hu Zhuan is considered as a great classic in Chinese literature, and as the first novel to explore the subject of peasant uprisings in feudal China. It is a work of timeless philosophical and artistic value. It tells the epic story of the birth, rise and decline of a rebel peasant array during the end of the Northern Song Dynasty (960-1127), thus outlining the general progress of peasant revolts from their initial inception to their eventual defeat.

We know also that there are many translators in the world who want to introduce this famous book to their own countries. In these translators there are two more important persons—Pearl S. Buck 1892 – 1973, and Sidney Shapiro1915 – . Pearl S. Buck translated this book into English—All Men Are Brothers and Sidney Shapiro—Outlaws of the Marsh..

Now, lets compare these two versions from Pearl S. Buck and Sidney Shapiro:

? From these two English versions we can see different translation methods and learn how to better express “faithfulness”, “expressiveness” and “elegance” from source text into target text.

a) “faithfulness”

Lets look at the example in the chapter of “撲天雕雙修生死書 宋公明一打祝家莊”:

話說當時楊雄扶起那人來,叫與石秀相見。石秀便問道:“這位兄長是誰?”楊雄道:“這個兄弟,姓杜,名興,祖籍是中山府人氏,因為他面顏生得粗莽,以此人都叫他做鬼臉兒?！?/p>

(Pearl S. Buck translated):

At the time when Yang Hsiung lifted up that man and Shih Hsiu saw him then Shih Hsiu asked, saying, “Who is this brother?”

Yang Hsiung answered, “this brother is surnamed Tu and his name is Hsing, and his ancients were men of Chung Shan Fu. Because his face is so coarse and wild men all call him the Devil Faced.

(Sidney Shapiro translated):

Yang Xiong raised the man to his feet and called Shi Xiu over.

“Who is this brother?” asked Shi Xiu.

“Du Xing is his name. Hes from the prefecture of Zhongshan. Because of his crude features everyone calls him Demon Face.”

Another example:

我三個連夜逃走,不提防背后趕來。我弟兄兩個搠翻了他幾個,不想亂草中間,舒出兩把撓鉤,把時遷搭了去。我兩個亂撞到此,正要問路,不想遇見賢弟。

(Pearl S. Buck translated):

We three then escaped by night nor did we trouble ourselves that behind us would come pursuers. We two brothers stabbed several of them, but we did not think that out of the grass there would be thrust forth two barbed spears and that they would hook Shih Chien away. We two ran higher, then, and were about to ask the way, and we did not think to meet you, Good Brother!

(Sidney Shapiro translated):

Pursuers caught up with us and we two knocked down several, but a couple of hooked poles reached out of the thicket and dragged Shi Qian away. We barged around until we came here. We were just about to ask for directions when you unexpectedly arrived, brother.

The examples can tell us Mrs. Bucks sentences are too long and she always wants to translate every Chinese word into English. She makes her target text too more faithful from the source text. But sometimes, too more faithfulness is too stuffy and complex to read. And Mr. Shapiro can master main idea of Chinese sentences and understand them and translate them into very good English sentences. I think personally that Mr. Shapiro has so perfect understanding of “Shui Hu Zhuan” because he has a very perfect Chinese wife—Feng Zi who gave him the great help in Chinese. And because of the learning of Chinese, they both could meet each other.

b) “expressiveness”

Here is the chapter of “武松打虎”. For example:

武松來到景陽岡,遠遠見酒家杏黃旗上寫道:“三碗不過崗”

“If you drink three cups of wine you will be unable to cross the mountain ridge.” (translated by Pearl S. Buck)

“Three bowls and you can't cross the ridge”(translated by Sidney Shapiro)

From the comparison, we can see that “bowls”is much better than “cups”. “Bowls” can express Wu Songs character very well while “cups”is too small and elegant to drink the wine for a coarse man like Wu Song. At the same time, “Three bowls”is shorter than “If you drink three cups of wine” and “you cant ” is cleaner than “you will be unable to”.

Another example:

武松道,休要胡說!沒地不還你錢,再篩三碗來我吃!

“Don't talk nonsense,” said Wu Sung,“I won't cheat you. I'll pay you, so bring me three more cups of wine.”(translated by Pearl S. Buck)

“Poppycock! I am paying, aren't I? Pour me three more bowls。” (translated by Sidney Shapiro)

Poppycock is slangy English. That it is said by Wu Song is very fit for his character. While “Dont talk nonsense” is said better by the man who has read more books.

Here are only two examples but we can see clearly that the expressiveness of Pearl S. Bucks version is worse than Sidney Shapiros. I think this is because of their different English knowledge experiences. Mrs. Buck spent her childhood in China and she had no good chanceand environment to learn the best pure English. But Mr. Shapiro was a lawyer in U.S.A. before he came to China when he was 31 years old. He has very perfect and logical English system in his mind.

c) “elegance”

For example, the sentence in the chapter of 魯達上山 is so:

(魯智深在五臺山出家后,不學坐禪,選了中間的禪床倒頭便睡)禪和子嘆氣道“善哉!”魯智深便道:“團魚灑家也吃,甚么‘鱔哉!”禪和子道:“卻是苦也!”魯智深便道:“團魚大腹,又肥甜了好吃,那得苦也?”

Here, “善哉”and “鱔哉”are homophonic in Chinese. Normally, it is very hard to be translated. Firstly

lets have a look at these sentences from Pearl Bucks version:

A priest exclaimed, "What a calamity!"

Lu Ta shouted, "Even a tortoise I shall eat; what calamity will there be?"

The priest replied, "Of course there will be a calamity."

Lu Ta said, "A tortoise has a big belly, but the fat is sweet and nice to eat, so why should there be a calamity."

From the above we cant clearly understand what the translator wants to say. From “calamity” to tortoise makes man a little puzzle. And the structure is not connected and compact. The below is from Mr. Shapiros version:

"Evil!" exclaimed the monk.

"What is this talk about eels? It's turtles I like to eat."

"Oh, bitter!"

"There is nothing bitter about them. Turtle belly is fat and sweet. They make very good eating."

There is the homophonic in Chinese of “善哉”and “鱔哉” and there is also Mr. Shapiros understanding of “Evil” and “Eels”. Its very wonderful and very elegant!

Please look at another example about the description of Gao Qiu at the beginning chapter:

“這人吹彈歌舞,刺槍使棒,相撲玩耍,亦故胡亂學些詩書辭賦;若論仁義禮智,行信忠良, 卻是不會?！?/p>

(version from Pearl S. Buck):

He could play well on wood or string instruments, but was no good at poetry or literature. If there was a discussion of benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom or virtue he was unable to take part.

Mrs. Buck translated “若論” as “if” and “胡亂學些詩書詞賦” into “was no good at poetry or literature”.

But Mr. Shapiro translated them so:

In addition to his skill with weapons, Gao Qiu could play musical instruments and sing and dance. He also learned a bit about peotry and versifying. But when it came to virtue and proper behavior, hedidn't know a thing.

Mr. Shapiro used “In addition to…” to understand Gao Qius skills and “l(fā)earned a bit…” for “胡亂學些…”. So I think Sidney Shapiros translation is much more elegant than Pearl S. Bucks.

As lawyer, Sidney Shapiro has much more perfect, logical, strict and concise English system than a normal English person. This is why he can give us a better “Outlaws of Marsh” than others.

? From these two English versions we can also summarize generally that Pearl S. Buck uses foreignizing method while Sydney Shapiro uses domesticating method. Now lets know what is foreignizing method and domesticating method.

"Domesticating translation" and "foreignizing translation" are the terms coined by L. Venuti (1995) to describe the two different translation strategies. The former refers to the translation strategy in which a transparent, fluent style is adopted in order to minimize the strangeness of the foreign text for target language readers, while the latter designates the type of translation in which a target text "deliberately breaks target conventions by retaining something of the foreigness of the original" (Shuttleworth &Cowie;, 1997:59). The roots of the terms can be traced back to the German philosopher Schleiermachers argument that there are only two different methods of translation, " either the translator leaves the author in peace, as much as possible, and moves the reader towards him; or he leaves the reader in peace, as much as possible, and moves the author towards him" (Venuti, 1995: 19-20). The terms "foreignization" and "domestication" may be new to the Chinese, but the concepts they carry have been at least for a century at the heart of most translation controversies. Lu Xun (魯迅) once said that "before translating, the translator has to make a decision : either to adapt the original text or to retain as much as possible the foreign flavour of the original text" (Xu, in Luo, 1984: 315).

Mrs. Buck hopes her readers to touch the foreign cultures and her goal is to improve the communication between west and east cultures. But Mr. Shapiros purpose is to make the target text easier to read for his readers. His readers are central and he, as the first reader of the source text, hopes his readers have the clear understanding of the foreign culture. Here are several examples and we analyze them to compare the both methods.

(1)如有毫厘昧心,天誅地滅。(施耐庵 羅貫中, 1992: 410)

If there has been the least dishonesty may Heaven strike me and Earth destroy me(Buck, 1933:816)

If theyre so much as a penny off, may Heaven strike me dead.

“毫厘昧心”means that somebody loves money very much or does evil. Then “天誅地滅”means that he will be killed by heaven and earth. Only these eight Chinese can express Shi Xius loyal heart to Yang Xiong. Here,we can clearly see the foreignizing method from Mrs. Bucks sentence “l(fā)east dishonesty” and “Heaven strike me and Earth destroy me”. She not only stays her loyalty in source text but also keep its cultural elements. Mr. Shapiro uses “penny” to fit his readers feelings for them much easier to understand the target text.

(2)正是叫俺望梅止渴,畫餅充饑。(施耐庵 羅貫中, 1992: 456)

It is as though you made my mouth water to quench my thirst;

It is as though you gave me the picture of a loaf and bade me be fed.(Buck, 1933:912)

Slake my thirst looking at a sour plum or assuage my hunger with a drawing of a muffin. (Shapiro, 1980:1545)

Mrs. Buck works hardest to keep the most maximal sentences and structures of the source text. So we can see that foreignizing method is very useful when Chinese culture and language should be introduced to foreigners. But Mr. Shapiros “plum” and “muffin” can show his domesticating method in order to make his readers to understand the story well.

Summary:

Generally, Pearl S. Bucks All Men are Brothers is very great. She loved China and Chinese culture and introduced firstly Shui Hu Zhuan to the world. Although in this book, her understanding was not enough, her English words were not very beautiful and her many sentences were a little long, she gave her readers a very interesting and different story.

Sidney Shapiros Outlaws of the Marsh is very wonderful. As a man, as an English lawyer and later as a Chinese and a translator, he had a very enough understanding for Shui Hu Zhuan. He relived Shui Hu Zhuan in English world. In my heart, I love Sidney Shapiros Outlaws of the Marsh more.

Reference:

1, 《水滸傳》施耐庵 羅貫中, 1992

2,《Outlaws of the Marsh》Sidney Shapiro, 1980

3,《All Men are Brothers》Pearl S. Buck, 1933

4,賽珍珠傳 http://baike.baidu.com

5,沙博理傳 http://you.video.sina.com.