• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Nomogram for predicting transmural bowel infarction in patients with acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

    2020-08-17 07:12:34MengJiangChangLiLiChunQiuPanWenZhiLvYuFeiRenXinWuCuiChristophDietrich
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年26期

    Meng Jiang, Chang-Li Li, Chun-Qiu Pan, Wen-Zhi Lv, Yu-Fei Ren, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F Dietrich

    Abstract

    Key words: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; Acute mesenteric ischemia;

    INTRODUCTION

    As a rare insidious condition, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) has an incidence of 1 in 1000 emergency laparotomies for acute abdomen[1]. The prevalence of MVT has increased over the last two decades, likely as a result of the wide use of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Superior MVT (SMVT) is the most common type of MVT that accounts for approximately 5% - 10% of all mesenteric ischemia[2]. Despite advances in managing thromboembolic diseases over the past 40 years, the average 30-d mortality of acute SMVT is still as high as 32.1% in severe cases[3]. The predisposition to develop transmural bowel infarction (TBI) is of clinical concern, which can lead to fatal sepsis with hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure[4].

    Advances in imaging modalities, especially CT angiography, have greatly enabled early detection of SMVT in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Unfortunately, TBI is not rare, and intestinal resection is still mandatory for some patients. TBI often leads to a complex clinical situation and increases the patients' physiological burden, which poses a major challenge for clinicians. Thus, accurate and reliable prediction of bowel infarction is critical for decision-making in an emergency setting. Preventing the progression from reversible intestinal ischemia to TBI should be a primary goal in the management of SMVT.

    Nomograms can provide individualized and highly accurate risk estimation, which are easy to use and can facilitate clinical decision-making. We undertook the present study to develop and externally validate a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    Consecutive patients with SMVT from Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (as training cohort) and from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (as validation cohort) were included. This retrospective study (clinical trial number: ChiCTR1900026320) was approved by the institutional review board of the two hospitals. Since the study was retrospectively designed and did not cause any harm to the patients, the informed consent was waived by the board.

    We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record system using the key word “mesenteric venous thrombosis” to identify SMVT patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at the two institutions. SMVT-related AMI was defined as the association of acute abdominal symptoms, CT features of bowel injury, as well as vascular insufficiency of the superior mesenteric vein. Two senior radiologists reviewed all CT images and con?rmed the presence of thrombosis and bowel injury based on consensus. K statistics was used to evaluate the concordance between the two radiologists, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion. Diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in cases that intestinal resection was performed. To explore the effect of SMVT on bowel infarction without confounding risk factors, we excluded patients who had coexisting mesenteric artery thrombosis. In addition, cases in that acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction were also excluded.

    Treatment protocol

    At the two tertiary referral centers in China, we have employed a standard protocol for the treatment of acute SMVT. The treatment protocol included bowel rest, nasogastric tube decompression for patients with abdominal distention, intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics, prompt anticoagulation or surgical exploration if necessary. For all patients, once acute SMVT was diagnosed, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin (3000-5000 IU/d) or subcutaneous administration of lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH or enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg per day) was applied at first. Thereafter, for patients with anticipated surgery, intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered according to the active partial thrombin time. Patients who received conservative treatment were injected with LMWH (1 mg/kg; BID) subcutaneously and monitored closely. Transmural bowel necrosis from resected specimens was confirmed histologically.

    Outcomes

    To determine the indicators of TBI, patients were divided into two groups according to the final therapeutic outcome. The TBI group was defined as: (1) Pathology assessment as extensive, transmural intestinal necrosis; (2) De?nite imaging of bowel perforation on CT; or (3) Unresected patients with extensive bowel necrosis assessed during openclose laparotomy procedures. All resected specimens were retrospectively reviewed by a senior pathologist. The patients who did not progress to transmural bowel necrosis but recovered from AMI or superficial ischemic lesions after systemic anticoagulation or thrombectomy were categorized as reversible intestinal ischemia group. This was confirmed by explorative laparotomy, repeated CT scan or clinical follow-up.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range), and were compared between the training and validation cohort using Mann-Whitney U test orttest as appropriate. Categorical variables were reported as whole numbers and proportions and were compared by theχ2test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.6.1) and SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All the statistical signi?cance levels were two-sided, withPvalue less than 0.05. The detailed description of the decision curve analysis (DCA) algorithm is provided in the Supplementary text.

    Data collection

    Demographic and clinical data were extracted from case records, including age, gender, coexisting medical conditions (e.g., tobacco use, malignant disease, or previous history of deep venous thrombosis), clinical manifestations, physical ?ndings and laboratory test results. All serum biochemical parameters were collected at the onset of symptoms. Radiologic features including extent of thrombus and associated conditions (e.g., decreased bowel wall enhancement, bowel wall thickening and pneumatosis intestinalis) were also recorded. We also extracted the suspected risk factors for acute SMVT, such as recent surgery, intraperitoneal inflammation, and liver cirrhosis.

    Construction of the nomogram

    Continuous variables were transformed into dichotomous variables using the upper value of normal as the cutoff level (e.g., white blood cell count > 10 × 109/L, percentage of neutrophil granulocyte > 75%, creatinine > 106 μmol/L, or venous lactate levels > 2 mmol/L), and C-reactive protein (50 mg/L as cutoff value in line with previous study[5].

    Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess each variable in the training cohort for investigating the independent risk factors associated with TBI. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating all the significant risk variables was performed, using backward step-down selection procedure with a liberalP< 0.05 as the retention criteria to select the final indicators of TBI. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    Performance of the nomogram

    Calibration of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (non-significance of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicates good agreement)[6]. The discrimination performance of the nomogram was assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). The nomogram was subjected to bootstrapping validation (1000 bootstrap resamples) to calculate a relatively corrected AUC. Then the performance of the nomogram was tested in the external validation cohort by calibration curve and AUC.

    Clinical use assessment

    DCA was performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model by quantifying the net bene?ts at different threshold probabilities[7,8]. For clinical use, the total scores (defined as Nomo-score in this study) of each case were calculated according to the nomogram algorithm. Then the optimal cutoff value of the Nomoscore was determined by maximizing the Youden index. Performance of the optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.

    RESULTS

    Patient selection

    After excluding 12 patients with chronic SMVT, chart review yielded 230 consecutive patients who had acute SMVT in the training cohort between July 2005 and June 2018 (Wuhan cohort). Of the 230 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the analysis as the acute SMVT was secondary to mechanical small bowel obstruction. Acute SMVT concomitant with mesenteric artery thrombosis was found in 10 patients, who were also excluded, leaving a ?nal sample of 207 patients. Explorative laparotomy was performed in 78 (38%) patients , and bowel resection was performed in 65 (83%) of these patients based on assessment of bowel viability with respect to color, dilatation and peristaltic motion of the bowel, pulsations of the mesenteric arcade arteries, as well as bleeding from cut surfaces. Thrombectomy was performed in 11 (14%) patients, and 2 (3%) received open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis, who refused further treatment and died at last. The algorithm of patient screening in the training cohort is shown in Figure 1A. Pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed TBI in 56 (86%) of the 65 patients, while superficial ischemic lesions were seen in 9 (14%) patients. The mean time between admission and surgical exploration for patients with and without TBI was 41.6 ± 30.5 (8-192) h and 32.4 ± 23.7 (5-96) h, respectively.

    In this study, patients with superficial ischemic lesions confirmed by pathological examination and clinically recovered through thrombectomy were classified as reversible intestinal ischemia group, while patients who underwent open-close procedure due to extensive bowel necrosis were deemed as TBI. One hundred twentynine patients (62%) who did not progress to surgery and recovered after conservative therapy were considered as having reversible intestinal ischemia. Eventually, reversible intestinal ischemia and TBI were the final diagnosis in 149 (72%) and 58 (28%) patients, respectively.

    In the external validation cohort (Guangzhou cohort), 89 eligible cases were retrieved from August 2007 to December 2018 using the same criteria (Figure 1B). TBI was confirmed in 27 (30%) of these patients.

    Characteristics of the study population

    The patients’ clinical characteristics in the training and validation cohorts are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two cohorts in most of the comparisons. In the training cohort, 82 patients had a clinical history of liver cirrhosis, and 20.7% (17/82) cases developed TBI. In the validation cohort, 18.9% (7/37) of the patients with liver cirrhosis progressed to TBI finally.

    Development and validation of a TBI-predicting nomogram

    The results of univariate logistic analysis are presented in Table 2. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001), rebound tenderness (OR = 7.14,P< 0.001), serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L (OR = 3.14,P= 0.009) and previous history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 6.37,P< 0.001) all independently predicted TBI (Table 3). These independently associated risk factors were used to construct a TBI risk estimation nomogram (Figure 2A). The scoring system is shown in Supplementary Table 1, which can be used for a more accurate calculation of predictions than drawing lines on the nomogram. Figure 2B shows the calibration curve of the nomogram. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistics (P= 0.316) showed good calibration in the training cohort. An AUC of 0.860 (95%CI: 0.771-0.925) also showed good discrimination by the nomogram (Figure 2D). The favorable calibration of the nomogram was also confirmed in the external validation set (Figure 2C). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded aPvalue of 0.203, and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.851 (95%CI: 0.796-0.897) (Figure 2E). Thus, our nomogram performed well in both the training and external validation sets.

    Decision curve analysisDCA was used to facilitate the assessment of the nomogram. Figure 3A shows the basic plot of model performance for the nomogram. The DCA graphically demonstrated the clinical value of the model based on a continuum of threshold for TBI risk (X axis) and the net bene?t of using the model to stratify the risk of the patients (Y axis) relative to the hypothesis that no patient will have a TBI. The decision curve indicated that when the threshold probability for a patient or a doctor is within a range from 0 to 1.0, the nomogram adds more net benefit than the “treat-all”or “treat-none” schemes. Figure 3B shows the estimated number of patients who would be at high risk for each potential risk threshold and visually demonstrates the proportion of the patients who are truly positive cases. For instance, if a 40% risk threshold was used, of 1000 patients screened, about 200 patients would be deemed athigh risk, with about 180 of these patients being true TBI cases.

    Table 1 Participant characteristics

    Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort

    Predicting TBI based on the Nomo-score

    The optimal cutoff value of the Nomo-score was determined to be 90. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value when used in predicting TBI were 88.89%, 67.74%, 54.55%, and 93.33% in the training cohort, and 84.84%, 71.81%, 53.85%, and 92.24% in the external validation cohort, respectively (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    Acute SMVT is a rare but serious condition due to its intestinal ischemic complications. The widespread use of contrast-enhanced CT has made early diagnosis possible by a noninvasive approach, which can provide incremental information as evidence of ischemia warranting a change in treatment strategy. However, acute SMVT still carries a high risk of extensive intestinal infarction and surgical exploration with bowel resection is still mandatory for some patients. Recently, Kimet al[9]conducted a study involving 66 patients with acute SMVT, of whom 15 (23%) patients underwent bowel resection due to progressive intestinal ischemia and bowel infarction, and 3 (5%) patients died at last, despite adequate intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation were applied immediately at diagnosis. Another research reported the application of multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy for acute SMVT, and 18 of the 43 (42%) subjects underwent bowel resection due to TBI[10]. The reported rates of bowel infarction in existing literatures ranged from 6% to 42%, consistent with our rate of 29%[2,10-16]. Therefore, preventing the progression from reversible to irreversible ischemic bowel injury should be a primary goal in the management of acute SMVT[5]. However, the early detection of TBI remains a challenge and further investigation is required to identify the most important prognostic factors.

    In this retrospective study, we developed and externally validated a nomogram to predict TBI in patients with acute SMVT. The decreased bowel wall enhancement, rebound tenderness, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and previous history of DVT independently predicted this event. Incorporating these clinical, biological, and radiological factors into an easy-to-use prediction model can facilitate the individualized prediction of TBI. The nomogram also consistently predicted TBI with a high accuracy and provided good clinical usefulness throughout the range of bowel infarction risk as assessed by DCA.

    Based on our ?ndings, the previous history of DVT could increase the chances of bowel infarction in the setting of acute SMVT. Venous thrombosis often results from a combination of endothelial injury, hypercoagulability or stasis. The patients with a previous history of DVT may have had several episodes of undetected (possibly asymptomatic) MVT prior to the index event and thus have acute-on-chronic thrombosis with greater compromise of venous flow.

    The decreased bowel wall enhancement on CT angiography is a strong established risk indictor for bowel infarction[9,17]. In our study, CT scan detected this feature in 70 patients, and among them, 34 patients had confirmed TBI finally. Previous studies demonstrated that the decreased bowel wall enhancement in patients with acute SMVT was signi?cantly associated with surgical exploration and bowel resection[9,10].

    Several other reports on AMI implied that the extent of venous thrombus wasrelated to TBI[9,18]. However, Grishamet al[19]found no association between the presence of multiple vein thromboses and increased mortality rates. Additionally, Kumaret al[20]showed that patients with isolated SMVT were even at a greater risk of development of bowel infarction, and more likely to require surgery. In view of that the extent of venous thrombus did not show enough predictive strength on the basis of univariate association with bowel infarction, we excluded this variable for model construction.

    Table 4 Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction

    Peritoneal signs, including involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness, and abdominal wall rigidity often present in the case of TBI. According to our results, the rebound tenderness could be a strong predictor for TBI. In parallel with our outcomes, Kimet al[9]found that rebound tenderness was observed more frequently in patients who underwent bowel resection than those who did not (33%vs4%).

    Lactate is an important parameter that closely related to necrosis, inflammation and hypoxia. Our results demonstrated that serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L was significantly associated with the occurrence of TBI. In line with our findings, Higashizono and Nuzzo revealed that serum lactate levels tend to increase significantly after bowel infarction[5,21]. Additionally, Leoneet al[22]indicated that serum lactate levels decreased significantly after resection of the necrotic bowel, further validating its predictive value for TBI.

    Accurate identification of patients that will need surgery due to bowel infarction is crucial, because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with unidentified and unresected necrotic intestine[3,23,24]. Earlier resection of necrotic bowel before the development of multi-organ failure could improve the functional outcome of the small bowel and patient prognosis. However, this issue remains a challenge. In a study the authors presented 767 surgeons with a clinical vignette of AMI, and showed that the surgeons’ decision on whether a surgery is required or not varies markedly[25].

    In a previous study, Nuzzoet al[5]developed a risk score incorporating organ failure, serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L and bowel loop dilation on CT scan to predict irreversible transmural bowel necrosis for AMI. The risk factors associated with bowel necrosis identified in this study was partly different from ours, probably because their cohort comprised venous and arterial occlusion, but we just included acute SMVT patients. In addition, we suggested that organ failure might be of late onset during the disease course. Furthermore, we think that the risk score based on the number of predictive factors could not reflect the weight of each parameter.

    Although several studies have investigated the risk factors of TBI for AMI, to our knowledge, none have presented the data in the form of a validated nomogram[5,9,26,27]. Nomograms have advantages as they provide quanti?ed individual risk assessment in a dynamic manner. For clinical use of our nomogram, we proposed the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value in assessing the risk of TBI using 90 as the cut-off value (Table 4). We show that patients with a Nomo-score less than 90 are the subgroup of low-risk inclined to TBI (negative predictive value, 93.33% for training and 92.24% for validation). The AUC of our model was 0.860 and 0.851 in the training and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves presented a good agreement between the actual probability and predicted probability of TBI. Thus, we believe that our nomogram could be a reliable and objective tool that will provide clinicians favorable evidence for decision making.

    Figure 2 Nomogram for evaluation of transmural bowel infarction risk and its predictive performance. A: Nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The nomogram is used to find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the risk of TBI at the lower line of the nomogram. For example, a 30-year-old male patient (have transmural bowel infarction finally) with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, no rebound tenderness and no decreased bowel wall enhancement, has a risk of 59% of TBI calculated by the nomogram; B and C: Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves depict the calibration of the model in terms of the agreement between the predicted probabilities of TBI and observed outcomes of TBI. The dotted blue line represents an ideal prediction, and the dotted red line represents the predictive ability of the nomogram. The closer the dotted red line fit is to the dotted blue line, the better the predictive accuracy of the nomogram is; D and E: The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. TBI: Transmural bowel infarction; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic curve.

    Cautions should be exercised when interpreting the ?ndings due to several limitations. First, some bias may inevitably exist and affect our analysis because it was a retrospective study. And thus, treatment strategy might not be entirely consistent among clinicians. Second, although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application. Third, pathological evidence could not be obtained for patients that did not progress to surgery but confirmed by recovery from the specific vascular therapy. Fourth, evaluation of decreased bowel wall enhancement in the nomogram was related to the reading of CT images, and interpretation may vary among radiologists. In addition, since it is hard to assess the length of decreased bowel wall enhancement quantitatively on CT imaging, we did not examine the association between this factor and TBI. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify this issue. Finally, data on the long-term outcomes of patients were unavailable, however, this will not affect our ability to identify risk factors of TBI associated with AMI.

    Figure 3 Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. A: The Y-axis shows the net benefit. The X-axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The green line represents the assumption that all patients have transmural bowel infarction (TBI). The thin black line represents the assumption that no patients have TBI. The red line represents the nomogram. The decision curve in the validation cohort indicated that if the threshold probability is between 0 and 1.0, then using the nomogram to predict TBI adds more benefit than the treat-all-patients scheme or treat-none scheme; B: Clinical impact curve for the risk model. Of 1000 patients, the red solid line shows the total number who would be deemed at high risk for each risk threshold. The green dashed line shows how many of those would be true positives cases. DCA: Decision curve analysis; TBI: Transmural bowel infarction.

    In conclusion, our nomogram is an individual predictive tool that incorporates four risk factors, shows favorable predictive accuracy for assessing TBI risk in patients with AMI. The model might facilitate timely recognition and effective management of highrisk patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research conclusions

    The nomogram achieved an optimal prediction of TBI in patients with AMI. Using the model, the risk for an individual patient inclined to TBI can be assessed, thus providing a rational therapeutic choice.

    Research perspectives

    Although we have validated the nomogram in an external cohort, the number of variables evaluated in respect to the number of primary outcome events may have led to an overfitting of the accuracy of the model, thus prospective multicenter validation using a larger group of patients is still necessary to acquire high-level evidence for further clinical application.

    99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 看免费av毛片| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 91成人精品电影| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产亚洲欧美98| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| av免费在线观看网站| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| av天堂久久9| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 怎么达到女性高潮| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久中文看片网| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品免费视频内射| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久99一区二区三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产熟女xx| 国产精品影院久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 成在线人永久免费视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| av电影中文网址| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 午夜免费激情av| av网站在线播放免费| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品 国内视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线播放国产精品三级| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 手机成人av网站| 一区福利在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲成人久久性| 五月开心婷婷网| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 成人三级做爰电影| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 伦理电影免费视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产成人精品在线电影| 成人国语在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| avwww免费| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 在线观看www视频免费| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 在线av久久热| 精品福利观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产1区2区3区精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日本a在线网址| 精品第一国产精品| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| www国产在线视频色| 无限看片的www在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 中国美女看黄片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| netflix在线观看网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久久久国内视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久狼人影院| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 91av网站免费观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 在线av久久热| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产熟女xx| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 久久中文字幕一级| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 99热只有精品国产| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 制服诱惑二区| 超碰成人久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 日本欧美视频一区| 电影成人av| aaaaa片日本免费| 岛国在线观看网站| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| www日本在线高清视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产三级黄色录像| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 91精品三级在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 校园春色视频在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 性少妇av在线| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产成人av教育| 9色porny在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 色播在线永久视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久国产精品影院| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产成人精品在线电影| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久伊人香网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 青草久久国产| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 久久人妻av系列| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 女警被强在线播放| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 看片在线看免费视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| www国产在线视频色| av中文乱码字幕在线| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久中文字幕一级| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲激情在线av| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 窝窝影院91人妻| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 不卡一级毛片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产又爽黄色视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩有码中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| tocl精华| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 999久久久国产精品视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 中文欧美无线码| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 成年人黄色毛片网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 一夜夜www| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产成人精品在线电影| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 在线天堂中文资源库| av天堂久久9| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 丁香欧美五月| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 宅男免费午夜| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 18禁观看日本| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 自线自在国产av| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 在线观看66精品国产| tocl精华| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 自线自在国产av| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 91av网站免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美色视频一区免费| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 99热只有精品国产| 午夜91福利影院| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 在线观看日韩欧美| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产色视频综合| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产区一区二久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 中文字幕色久视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久中文看片网| netflix在线观看网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久伊人香网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| av电影中文网址| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 看片在线看免费视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 精品福利观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 在线国产一区二区在线| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 高清在线国产一区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 电影成人av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产色视频综合| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久影院123| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲九九香蕉| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 色综合站精品国产| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久香蕉精品热| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 看黄色毛片网站| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 91精品三级在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区|