[摘要]"目的"探討智能控壓輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)(intelligent"pressure"controlled"retrograde"renal"surgery,IRIRS)治療長(zhǎng)徑2~3cm腎結(jié)石的臨床療效和安全性。方法"將2019年1月至2021年12月贛州市人民醫(yī)院收治的110例長(zhǎng)徑2~3cm腎結(jié)石患者采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為IRIRS組和對(duì)照組(微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡吸引取石術(shù)),每組55例,比較兩組間的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后4周結(jié)石清除率、血紅蛋白下降值、術(shù)后疼痛評(píng)分、住院時(shí)間、及并發(fā)癥情況。結(jié)果"IRIRS組和對(duì)照組的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后4周的結(jié)石清除率比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05);IRIRS組住院時(shí)間、血紅蛋白下降值、術(shù)后疼痛評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05);IRIRS組和對(duì)照組術(shù)后總并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。結(jié)論"IRIRS是治療長(zhǎng)徑2~3cm腎結(jié)石有效、安全的方法,值得臨床推廣應(yīng)用。
[關(guān)鍵詞]"智能控壓輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù);腎結(jié)石;安全性
[中圖分類號(hào)]"R699.2""""""[文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼]"A""""""[DOI]"10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2024.14.004
Clinical"study"on"the"treatment"of"2-3cm"renal"stones"with"intelligent"pressure"controlled"retrograde"nephrolithotomy
YANG"Zhongsheng,"WU"Junjing,"CHEN"Hua,"HUANG"Yongming,"SONG"Leming
Department"of"Urology,"Ganzhou"People’s"Hospital"(The"Affiliated"Ganzhou"Hospital"of"Nanchang"University),"Ganzhou"341000,"Jiangxi,"China
[Abstract]"Objective"To"investigate"the"clinical"efficacy"and"safety"of"intelligent"pressure"controlled"retrograde"renal"surgery"(IRIRS)"for"the"treatment"of"2-3cm"kidney"stones."Methods"Totally"110"patients"with"renal"stones"with"a"diameter"of"2-3cm"admitted"to"Ganzhou"People’s"Hospital"from"January"2019"to"December"2021"were"randomly"divided"into"IRIRS"group"and"control"group(microchannel"percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"with"vacuum"aspiration),"with"55"cases"in"each"group.The"surgical"time,"rate"of"stone"clearance,"hemoglobin"decrease,"scores"for"postoperative"pain,"hospital"stay"and"incidence"of"complications"were"systematically"compared"between"the"two"groups."Results"The"surgical"time"and"stone"clearance"rates"at"four"weeks"post-operation"did"not"exhibit"any"statistically"significant"differences"between"the"IRIRS"group"and"the"control"group"(Pgt;0.05)."The"hospitalization"time,"hemoglobin"decrease,"and"scores"for"postoperative"pain"in"the"IRIRS"group"were"notably"lower"compared"to"the"control"group,"with"these"differences"being"statistically"significant(Plt;0.05)."The"difference"in"total"postoperative"complication"rates"between"the"IRIRS"and"control"groups"was"not"statistically"significant"(Pgt;0.05)."Conclusion"IRIRS"is"an"effective"and"safe"method"for"treating"renal"stones"with"a"diameter"of"2-3"cm,"meriting"broader"clinical"adoption"and"application.
[Key"words]"Intelligent"pressure"controlled"retrograde"nephrolithotomy;"Renal"stones;"Security
中國(guó)南方是泌尿系結(jié)石高發(fā)地區(qū),發(fā)病率高達(dá)5.5%~11.6%,是泌尿外科住院最常見(jiàn)疾病之一[1]。輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)是治療腎結(jié)石的主要方法,經(jīng)自然腔道進(jìn)行碎石取石,有損傷小、出血少、恢復(fù)快等優(yōu)點(diǎn),但也有碎石效率低等缺點(diǎn)[2-3]。腔內(nèi)碎石手術(shù)中腎盂壓力是備受關(guān)注的一個(gè)重要問(wèn)題,由于灌注不當(dāng)或排出不暢都可能導(dǎo)致腎盂壓力過(guò)高,腎盂高壓可以導(dǎo)致腎臟不同程度的損害、液體返流和外滲、感染擴(kuò)散、膿毒血癥甚至膿毒性休克[4-5]。為了解決腎盂高壓的問(wèn)題和提高手術(shù)效率,臨床發(fā)明了智能控壓輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)(intelligent"pressure"controlled"retrograde"intrarenal"surgery,IRIRS),一般用于治療lt;2cm的腎結(jié)石,取得了不錯(cuò)的臨床療效[6]。微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡吸引取石術(shù)(microchannel"percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"with"vacuum"aspiration,VMPCNL)具有碎石效率高、可以取出碎石等優(yōu)勢(shì),常用于大于2cm的腎結(jié)石治療[7-8]。本研究以VMPCNL治療長(zhǎng)徑2~3cm腎結(jié)石為對(duì)照,探討IRIRS治療長(zhǎng)徑2~3cm腎結(jié)石的療效和安全性。
1""對(duì)象與方法
1.1""研究對(duì)象
收集2019年1月至2021年12月在贛州市人民醫(yī)院接受治療、符合納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的2~3cm腎結(jié)石患者共110例,通過(guò)隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分配,將其分為IRIRS組和對(duì)照組,每組55例。本研究通過(guò)醫(yī)院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)[(2019)年倫審第011號(hào)],所有參與本研究的患者都已充分了解研究?jī)?nèi)容,并簽署了知情同意書(shū)。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):長(zhǎng)徑為2~3cm腎結(jié)石,年齡18~75歲,男女不限。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①出血性疾病,嚴(yán)重心肺功能不全,嚴(yán)重脊柱畸形,極度肥胖,合并急性感染,泌尿道畸形和孕婦;②并發(fā)有腎腫瘤的患者;③輸尿管狹窄病史。其中IRIRS組男27例,女28例,平均年齡(50.50±4.55)歲,結(jié)石最大徑(2.46±0.28)cm,結(jié)石CT值(986.6±98.3)Hu;對(duì)照組男29例,女26例,平均年齡(48.60±4.45)歲,結(jié)石最大徑(2.57±0.24)cm,結(jié)石CT值(998.4±99.6)Hu。兩組患者年齡、性別,結(jié)石直徑和分布、CT值等比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。
1.2""手術(shù)方法
IRIRS組患者行全身麻醉,取健側(cè)臥奔跑位。通過(guò)輸尿管硬鏡觀察輸尿管情況,置入導(dǎo)絲至腎盂內(nèi),沿導(dǎo)絲置入測(cè)壓輸尿管吸引鞘至腎盂輸尿管連接處。通過(guò)液壓傳感器連接輸尿管鞘的測(cè)壓通道和醫(yī)用灌注吸引平臺(tái)的測(cè)壓端口。輸尿管鞘的吸引通道接吸引管與平臺(tái)的結(jié)石收集瓶連接,結(jié)石收集瓶連接平臺(tái)的吸引裝置。進(jìn)入醫(yī)用灌注吸引平臺(tái)的灌注吸引自動(dòng)模式,用生理鹽水排空傳感器及輸尿管鞘測(cè)壓管道的空氣,然后腔內(nèi)壓力校零。設(shè)定術(shù)中需要的灌注流量(50~120ml/min)、腔內(nèi)壓力控制值(0~9mmHg,1mmHg=0.133kPa)和腔內(nèi)壓力警戒值(30mmHg),進(jìn)行輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)。置入200mm或者365mm鈥激光光纖(對(duì)于腎盂或中上盞結(jié)石,結(jié)石位置比較好,軟鏡不需要彎曲太多時(shí)應(yīng)用365光纖,可以明顯提高碎石效率)把結(jié)石粉碎,通過(guò)鏡鞘間隙和吸引通道隨水流吸出;較大碎石顆粒可通過(guò)退鏡將碎石吸引出。碎石和吸引取石交替進(jìn)行,吸引碎石時(shí),可以將灌注流量調(diào)大(100~120ml/"min),也可輕拍患者腎區(qū),有助于碎石吸出。如果碎石離輸尿管鞘較遠(yuǎn)時(shí),注意灌流水流和吸引水流的方向,先將碎石吸引至腎盂等更接近鞘的位置,再將其吸出。檢查腎盂、腎盞后,術(shù)后放置F5輸尿管支架管。
對(duì)照組行VMPCNL,全身麻醉或腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉下,取截石位,先置入5Fr輸尿管導(dǎo)管至腎盂并固定,再改平俯臥位,腹部不需要墊高,在彩超引導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行穿刺,建立經(jīng)皮腎通道,置入16F微通道吸引鞘,用Wolf腎鏡找到結(jié)石后應(yīng)用大功率鈥激光(2.5J×30Hz)進(jìn)行切割式碎石,碎石顆粒通過(guò)吸引鞘吸出,碎石清石同時(shí)進(jìn)行。對(duì)角度較大的腎盞結(jié)石,可用金屬鞘將結(jié)石撥出到腎盂后再碎。檢查各腎盞時(shí),如盞頸較小,用鞘適當(dāng)擴(kuò)張盞頸,再進(jìn)入腎盞碎石清石,檢查未見(jiàn)結(jié)石后常規(guī)放置F6輸尿管支架管及腎造瘺管。
1.3""觀察指標(biāo)
記錄所有患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血(血紅蛋白下降值),是否輸血及行介入手術(shù),是否術(shù)后感染(術(shù)后發(fā)熱gt;38.5℃,是否膿毒血癥),術(shù)后疼痛視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分(visual"analog"scale,VAS),是否有輸尿管損傷、周圍臟器損傷等并發(fā)癥,住院時(shí)間,術(shù)后4周復(fù)查腹部正位片及CT記錄結(jié)石清除率。患者每隔6個(gè)月隨訪1次,復(fù)查泌尿系CT了解有沒(méi)有輸尿管狹窄、腎積水、殘石、結(jié)石復(fù)發(fā)等情況。
1.4""統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS"26.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理分析,計(jì)量數(shù)據(jù)以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差()表示,組間比較采用LSD-t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料用例數(shù)(百分率)[n(%)]表示,采用χ2檢驗(yàn)、Fisher精確概率法進(jìn)行比較,Plt;0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2""結(jié)果
2.1""手術(shù)情況比較
IRIRS組中有1例患者第一次手術(shù)因輸尿管狹窄中止手術(shù),留置輸尿管支架2周后二期軟鏡手術(shù)成功;對(duì)照組中均成功建立經(jīng)皮腎通道進(jìn)行手術(shù),術(shù)中沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)輸尿管撕脫、大出血、周圍臟器損傷等嚴(yán)重并發(fā)癥。IRIRS組手術(shù)時(shí)間為(59.5±6.6)min,對(duì)照組手術(shù)時(shí)間為(51.7±5.9)min,兩組手術(shù)時(shí)間比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。IRIRS組血紅蛋白下降值為(3.7±0.5)g/L明顯低于對(duì)照組的(19.3±1.6)g/L,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。
2.2""術(shù)后情況比較
對(duì)照組有1例進(jìn)行了輸血治療。IRIRS組術(shù)后有兩例患者出現(xiàn)發(fā)熱,對(duì)照組有3例發(fā)熱,均應(yīng)用了抗生素抗感染治療后痊愈,沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)膿毒血癥病例,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。IRIRS組術(shù)后VAS、住院時(shí)間低于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05)。兩組并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率及術(shù)后4周結(jié)石清除率比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
2.3""隨訪情況比較
所有患者進(jìn)行了6~24個(gè)月的隨訪,平均隨訪時(shí)間為12個(gè)月。IRIRS組有4例患者出現(xiàn)結(jié)石復(fù)發(fā),需再次手術(shù)治療;對(duì)照組有2例結(jié)石復(fù)發(fā),需再次行手術(shù)治療。兩組結(jié)石復(fù)發(fā)率比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。術(shù)后隨訪發(fā)現(xiàn)IRIRS組和對(duì)照組均有1例腎盂輸尿管交界處狹窄伴腎積水,予以腹腔鏡輸尿管成形手術(shù)治療。
3""討論
隨著輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)(retrograde"intrarenal"surgery,RIRS)的廣泛應(yīng)用,輸尿管軟鏡、碎石工具等設(shè)備的不斷升級(jí),術(shù)者經(jīng)驗(yàn)的積累,RIRS碎石的效率不斷提高,并發(fā)癥減少,RIRS適應(yīng)證也在不斷發(fā)展變化[9-10]。IRIRS由于增加了壓力監(jiān)測(cè)與控制以及吸引,術(shù)中灌注的流量可以明顯加大,避免了目前軟鏡手術(shù)中灌注流量小導(dǎo)致的視野不清、碎石效率慢、熱損傷等不足[11]。IRIRS碎石時(shí)的灌注流量一般是50~100ml/min,碎完清石的流量更大,可達(dá)50~120ml/min,流量明顯加大了以后,術(shù)中碎石視野明顯清晰,加快了碎石效率和速度,同時(shí)吸引出的液體也在加快,將部分小碎石吸出體外,避免了碎石堆有助于提高碎石清石的效率,對(duì)于腎盂積水較輕的腎盂及中上盞結(jié)石和腎盞、腎盂角度大的下盞結(jié)石,健側(cè)側(cè)臥位的體位,腎盂出口處于腎盂、腎盞的最低位,結(jié)石容易通過(guò)水流吸出,所以可以不需要將結(jié)石完全粉末化,大部分的小碎石也可以吸出,減少了碎石的時(shí)間[12-13]。本研究IRIRS平均手術(shù)時(shí)間不到1h,手術(shù)效率有比較明顯的提高,結(jié)石清除率也是相對(duì)較高,由于此手術(shù)已將大部分結(jié)石清除,術(shù)后發(fā)生結(jié)石復(fù)發(fā)需要再次手術(shù)的患者也比較少見(jiàn)。
VMPCNL由于通道更大、更短,可以用功率更大的激光等碎石工具,用生理鹽水沖出較大的碎石,不需要粉末化結(jié)石,碎石取石的效率較RIRS明顯更高[14]。但是其在手術(shù)過(guò)程中需要更換體位,需要建立經(jīng)皮腎通道,有可能損傷周圍臟器和大出血,術(shù)后需要更長(zhǎng)的恢復(fù)時(shí)間[15-16]。本研究結(jié)果顯示,IRIRS治療2~3cm腎結(jié)石在結(jié)石清除率與MPCNL相比,其結(jié)石清除率稍低,但差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。MPCNL碎石效率比IRIRS會(huì)更高,特別是CT值比較高的結(jié)石,而且經(jīng)皮腎碎石后即刻可以吸出碎石,而IRIRS通過(guò)粉末化結(jié)石后通過(guò)水流吸引取石,或者通過(guò)套石籃等取出較大碎塊,對(duì)于腎盂、腎盞夾角小的下盞結(jié)石,或者積水較多時(shí),吸引取石有時(shí)比較困難,需要患者排石[17]。本研究結(jié)果表明兩組術(shù)后4周結(jié)石清除率差異不明顯,說(shuō)明了IRIRS碎石效率較以往有了明顯提高,其重要的原因就是新設(shè)備的使用以及結(jié)石大部分也可以吸出,還有就是軟鏡有些時(shí)候可以更容易的檢查各個(gè)腎盞以及碎石。研究結(jié)果顯示IRIRS組手術(shù)時(shí)間長(zhǎng)于對(duì)照組,術(shù)后感染發(fā)生率兩者相當(dāng),手術(shù)時(shí)間方面,MPCNL要優(yōu)于IRIRS,這個(gè)與MPCNL有更高碎石取石效率有關(guān)。隨著智能控壓的應(yīng)用,有效的降低了腎盂內(nèi)壓,加上手術(shù)時(shí)間的縮短,術(shù)后感染的并發(fā)癥也相應(yīng)的減少,沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重膿毒血癥病例,IRIRS感染(術(shù)后發(fā)熱)發(fā)生率稍低,但也有感染發(fā)生,不能完全避免,可能由于IRIRS有時(shí)輸尿管鞘無(wú)法到達(dá)預(yù)定的理想位置有關(guān),會(huì)出現(xiàn)短暫的局部壓力高[18]。術(shù)中出血情況,住院時(shí)間和術(shù)后VAS疼痛評(píng)分比較,IRIRS明顯優(yōu)于MPCNL,IRIRS經(jīng)自然腔道,而MPCNL需要經(jīng)皮血管豐富的腎皮質(zhì)建立通道,MPCNL創(chuàng)傷要明顯大于IRIRS,出血量也要明顯高于IRIRS,而且需輸血治療的比率也更高,恢復(fù)更慢。
綜上所述,IRIRS治療長(zhǎng)徑2"~3"cm腎結(jié)石的結(jié)石清除率較高,并發(fā)癥少,值得臨床推廣應(yīng)用。
利益沖突:所有作者均聲明不存在利益沖突。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1] ZENG"G,"MAI"Z,"XIA"S,"et"al."Prevalence"of"kidney"stones"in"China:"An"ultrasonography"based"cross-"sectional"study[J]."BJU"Int,"2017,"120(1):"109–116.
[2] 朱科,"李建,"周建,"等."輸尿管軟鏡與經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療腎盞憩室伴結(jié)石的對(duì)比分析[J]."國(guó)際泌尿系統(tǒng)雜志,"2022,"42(4):"632–636.
[3] 沈柏華,"林奕偉."輸尿管軟鏡碎石取石術(shù)的發(fā)展新趨勢(shì)[J]."浙江醫(yī)學(xué),"2023,"45(15):"1569–1571,"1597.
[4] KREYDIN"E"I,"EISNER"B"H."Risk"factors"for"sepsis"after"percutaneous"renal"stone"surgery[J]."Nat"Rev"Urol,"2013,"10(10):"598–605.
[5] OMAR"M,"NOBLE"M,"SIVALINGAM"S,"et"al."Systemic"Inflammatory"response"syndrome"after"percutaneous"Nephrolithotomy:"A"randomized"single-blind"clinical"trial"evaluating"the"impact"of"irrigation"pressure[J]."J"Urol,"2016,"196(1):"109–114.
[6] CHEN"H,"QIU"X,"DU"C,"et"al."The"comparison"study"of"flexible"ureteroscopic"suctioning"lithotripsy"with"intelligent"pressure"control"versus"minimally"invasive"percutaneous"suctioning"nephrolithotomy"in"treating"renal"calculi"of"2"to"3cm"in"size[J]."Surg"Innov,"2019,"26(5):"528–535.
[7] CHEN"Y,"DENG"T,"DUAN"X,"et"al."Percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"versus"retrograde"intrarenal"surgery"for"pediatric"patients"with"upper"urinary"stones:"A"systematic"review"and"meta-analysis[J]."Urolithiasis,"2019,"47(2):"189–199.
[8] 吳運(yùn)海,"郝強(qiáng),"胡彬,"等."微通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡碎石術(shù)和輸尿管軟鏡碎石術(shù)治療直徑2~3cm單發(fā)腎盂結(jié)石的療效及安全性研究[J]."微創(chuàng)泌尿外科雜志,"2020,"9(3):"166–170.
[9] DORANTES-CARRILLO"L,"BASULTO-MARTíNEZ"M,"SUáREZ-IBARROLA"R,"et"al."Retrograde"intrarenal"surgery"versus"miniaturized"percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"for"kidney"stones"gt;1cm:"A"systematic"review"and"meta-analysis"of"randomized"trials[J]."Eur"Urol"Focus,"2022,"8(1):"259–270.
[10] ZEWU"Z,"CUI"Y,"FENG"Z,"et"al."Comparison"of"retrograde"flexible"ureteroscopy"and"percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"in"treating"intermediatesize"renal"stones"(2-3cm):"A"Meta-analysis"and"systematic"review[J]."Int"Braz"J"Urol,"2019,"45(1):"10–22.
[11] 姚磊,"宋樂(lè)明,"陳華."可智能監(jiān)控腎盂內(nèi)壓的輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)"治療馬蹄腎結(jié)石的療效分析[J]."中國(guó)內(nèi)鏡雜志,"2019,"25(4):"80–83.
[12] 蔡云霞,"宋樂(lè)明,"朱秋華,"等."健側(cè)奔跑位在新型智能監(jiān)控腎盂內(nèi)壓輸尿管軟鏡碎石吸引取石術(shù)中的應(yīng)用效果[J]."護(hù)理研究,"2019,"33(22):"3949–3952.
[13] 何忠南."智能控壓輸尿管軟鏡吸引取石術(shù)治療腎結(jié)石的臨床效果研究[J]."中國(guó)實(shí)用醫(yī)藥,"2021,"16(16):"67–69.
[14] 施文燕."經(jīng)輸尿管軟鏡取石術(shù)與經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療腎結(jié)石臨床對(duì)比研究[J]."糖尿病天地,"2020,"17(9):"126.
[15] FERNáNDEZ"A"A,"RUIZ"H"M,"GóMEZ"DOS"S"V,"et"al."Comparison"between"percutaneous"nephrolithotomy"and"flexible"ureteroscopy"for"the"treatment"of"2"and"3cm"renal"lithiasis[J]."Actas"Urol"Esp"(Engl"Ed),"2019","43(3):"111–117.
[16] 李立昌,"崔金."輸尿管軟鏡碎石術(shù)與經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療腎結(jié)石的臨床價(jià)值體會(huì)[J]."中國(guó)實(shí)用醫(yī)藥,"2021,"16"(19):"96–98.
[17] 徐辰,"蔣民軍,"張煒,"等."比較輸尿管軟鏡與單通道微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療單側(cè)多發(fā)腎盞結(jié)石的療效[J]."江蘇醫(yī)藥,"2022,"48(2):"180–182.
[18] 戴澤昊,"黃云騰."輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)中腎盂內(nèi)壓監(jiān)測(cè)與負(fù)壓吸引技術(shù)[J]."中國(guó)醫(yī)師進(jìn)修雜志,"2023,"46(1):"87–92.
(收稿日期:2023–12–26)
(修回日期:2024–02–18)
(上接第10頁(yè))
[14] LEE"S"H,"JOHNSON"D,"LUONG"R,"et"al."Crosstalking"between"androgen"and"PI3K/AKT"signaling"pathways"in"prostate"cancer"cells[J]."J"Biol"Chem,"2015,"290(5):"2759–2768.
[15] KALASHNIKOVA"E,"LORCA"R"A,"KAUR"I,"et"al."SynDIG1:"An"activity-regulated,"AMPA-receptor-interacting"transmembrane"protein"that"regulates"excitatory"synapse"development[J]."Neuron,"2010,"65(1):"80–93.
[16] LIU"H,"HAN"L,"ZHONG"L,"et"al."FBXL16"promotes"endometrial"progesterone"resistance"via"PP2A(B55α)/"cyclin"D1"axis"in"ishikawa[J]."J"Immunol"Res,"2022,"2022:"7372202.
[17] SATO"K,"KUSAMA"Y,"TATEGU"M,"et"al."FBXL16"is"a"novel"E2F1-regulated"gene"commonly"upregulated"in"p16INK4A-"and"p14ARF-silenced"HeLa"cells[J]."Int"J"Oncol,"2010,"36(2):"479–490.
[18] YANG"M,"JING"F."FBXL16"modulates"the"proliferation"and"autophagy"in"breast"cancer"cells"via"activating"SRC-3-AKT"signaling"pathway[J]."Reprod"Biol,"2021,"21(3):"100538.
[19] KIM"Y"J,"ZHAO"Y,"MYUNG"J"K,"et"al."Suppression"of"breast"cancer"progression"by"FBXL16"via"oxygen-"independent"regulation"of"HIF1α"stability[J]."Cell"Rep,"2021,"37(8):"109996.
[20] HONARPOUR"N,"ROSE"C"M,"BRUMBAUGH"J,"et"al."F-box"protein"FBXL16"binds"PP2A-B55α"and"regulates"differentiation"of"embryonic"stem"cells"along"the"FLK1+"lineage[J]."Mol"Cell"Proteomics,"2014,"13(3):"780–791.
(收稿日期:2024–01–12)
(修回日期:2024–03–03)