• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Prevalence,risk factors,and BRAF mutation of colorectal sessile serrated lesions among Vietnamese patients

    2024-03-07 04:29:44NhuThiHanhVuHuyMinhLeDiemThiNgocVoHoangAnhVuNhanQuangLeDungDangQuyHoDucTrongQuach
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology 2024年2期

    Nhu Thi Hanh Vu,Huy Minh Le,Diem Thi-Ngoc Vo,Hoang Anh Vu,Nhan Quang Le,Dung Dang Quy Ho,Duc Trong Quach

    Abstract BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are considered precancerous colorectal lesions that should be detected and removed to prevent colorectal cancer.Previous studies in Vietnam mainly investigated the adenoma pathway,with limited data on the serrated pathway.AIM To evaluate the prevalence,risk factors,and BRAF mutations of SSLs in the Vietnamese population.METHODS This is a cross-sectional study conducted on patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam.SSLs were diagnosed on histopathology according to the 2019 World Health Organization classification.BRAF mutation analysis was performed using the Sanger DNA sequencing method.The multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine SSL-associated factors.RESULTS There were 2489 patients,with a mean age of 52.1 ± 13.1 and a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.1.The prevalence of SSLs was 4.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-5.1].In the multivariate analysis,factors significantly associated with SSLs were age ≥ 40 [odds ratio (OR): 3.303;95%CI: 1.607-6.790],male sex (OR: 2.032;95%CI: 1.204-3.429),diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.721;95%CI: 1.551-4.772),and hypertension (OR: 1.650,95%CI: 1.045-2.605).The rate of BRAF mutations in SSLs was 35.5%.CONCLUSION The prevalence of SSLs was 4.2%.BRAF mutations were present in one-third of SSLs.Significant risk factors for SSLs included age ≥ 40,male sex,diabetes mellitus,and hypertension.

    Key Words: Colorectal cancer;Sessile serrated lesion;BRAF mutation;Risk factors;Diabetes mellitus;Hypertension

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third most prevalent cancer and the second cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide[1].More than 182000 new cases were diagnosed in Vietnam,and 122000 deaths were recorded in 2020[1].For a long time,it was considered that colorectal adenomas were the only precursor lesions for CRC.However,recent studies have indicated that despite a high adenoma detection rate,postcolonoscopy CRC still occurs,with serrated lesions being the most likely cause[2].There is mounting evidence that 15%-30% of all CRCs develop from serrated lesionsviathe serrated neoplasia pathway[3].Furthermore,proximal serrated lesions pose a higher risk of metachronous neoplasia than tubular adenomas,emphasizing the significance of screening and surveillance[4].According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2019,serrated lesions were divided into hyperplastic polyps,sessile serrated lesions(SSLs),SSLs with dysplasia,traditional serrated adenomas,and unclassified serrated adenomas[5].SSLs are the most common and significant precancerous serrated lesions due to their rapid growth and high potential for malignant transformation[6].Nevertheless,SSLs are challenging to detect by colonoscopy due to their typically subtle appearance as flat or sessile lesions and having an overlying mucous cap[7].Moreover,they are often incompletely resected because of the indistinct borders,thus related to interval and synchronous CRC[8].The histopathological identification of SSLs also tends to be difficult for both expert and non-expert pathologists[9].Consequently,the reported prevalence of SSLs varies widely across studies,leading to an underestimation of their prevalence and subsequent biased analysis[10,11].

    Studies analyzing risk factors for SSLs have been limited and controversial,primarily due to obstacles posed by their evolving histological definition and the relatively low prevalence of these polyps.In addition,most published data have included all histopathological types of serrated lesions with different malignant progression risks[12].As a result,there were inconsistent findings,and the risk factors for SSLs could not be accurately evaluated.Moreover,existing studies have shown that serrated lesions and adenomas share common risk factors[12,13].Nonetheless,several factors correlated with serrated lesions differently than conventional adenomas[13,14].

    In contrast to the conventional pathway,the serrated pathway is characterized by BRAF mutations and a CpG island methylator phenotype with or without microsatellite instability (MSI)[15].Most BRAF mutations in CRC and other tumors are a thymidine-to-adenine transversion at nucleotide 1796,converting a valine at amino acid 600 to glutamic acid(V600E)[16].It has been demonstrated that proximal serrated lesions with BRAF mutations have a considerably high risk for malignant progression[17].Hence,detecting BRAF mutations as an adjunct diagnostic tool in clinical pathology may reliably identify proximal serrated lesions with cancer risk,which require more aggressive therapy and attentive clinical surveillance.Additionally,BRAF mutations may serve as a potential therapeutic target for serrated colorectal neoplasia[18].

    In Vietnam,previous research on colorectal polyps has focused heavily on the adenoma pathway,with limited data on the serrated pathway.Despite the importance of SSLs,there remains a paucity of evidence on their prevalence,risk factors,and molecular characteristics.Thus,this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence,risk factors,and BRAF mutations of SSLs in Vietnamese patients.These findings may provide valuable insights into the prevention,early detection,enhancement of treatment,and surveillance approaches for SSLs in the Vietnamese population.

    MATERlALS AND METHODS

    Study participants

    From March 2022 to July 2023,a cross-sectional study was carried out on outpatients over 18 who presented with lower gastrointestinal symptoms and underwent colonoscopy at the University Medical Center at Hochiminh City,Vietnam.Only the first colonoscopy was included if patients received multiple colonoscopies during the study period to ensure a per-patient analysis.Exclusion criteria comprised a history of CRC or colorectal surgery,inflammatory bowel disease,inherited cancer syndromes,coagulation disorders,unqualified bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) with a total score of < 6 and each region score of < 2,incomplete colonoscopy,withdrawal time of less than 6 minutes,and not willing to participate in the research.

    This study's sample size was determined by applying the following formula:

    ThePvalues were chosen based on the prevalence of SSLs and BRAF mutations in previous Asian studies,with 2.6%and 82%,respectively[19,20].The estimated loss of samples would be 10% during the study.Thus,the minimum sample size was 2411 patients.

    The demographic,clinical,endoscopic,pathologic,and BRAF mutation data were recorded and evaluated.Smoking conditions were classified as "never," "former," and "current" users.Obesity was defined as having a body mass index equal to or greater than 25.0 kg/m2.Nonalcohol consumption was identified as either never drinking or drinking alcohol once per month or less.Hypertension was diagnosed when systolic blood pressure was ≥ 140 mmHg and/or their diastolic blood pressure was ≥ 90 mmHg or when they were on antihypertensive medication.Patients were classified as having diabetes mellitus (DM) if they fulfilled any of the following criteria: (1) A random venous plasma glucose concentration ≥ 11.1 mmol/L;(2) a fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥ 7.0 mmol/L;(3) HbA1C ≥ 6.5%;and (4) on medication for hyperglycemia with a history of DM.The definition of a family history of CRC was the presence of at least one affected first-degree relative.

    All eligible patients signed a written informed consent form.The study protocol was approved by the Board of Ethics in Biomedical Research of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (ID number: 615/HDDDDHYD,signed on November 19,2021).

    Colonoscopic procedure

    Precolonoscopy bowel preparations were obtained with three liters of polyethylene glycol-based (Fortrans?,Beaufour Ipsen Industrie,France).The colonoscopies were carried out by experienced endoscopists using the Olympus Evis Exera III High Definition CV-190 (Olympus Co.,Ltd,Tokyo,Japan).All participating endoscopists had performed at least 3000 colonoscopic procedures over the last five years and had an adenoma detection rate of over 25%,resulting in highperformance colonoscopies.Moreover,all endoscopists had attended the web-based educational program (CATCH project) to detect flat and depressed colorectal lesions before the commencement of the study[21].In addition,they also participated in a local training session to standardize the examination process and the interpretation of colon lesions suspected as SSLs.

    The assessment of bowel preparation quality was conducted utilizing the BBPS.The colon was divided into three sections,including the right colon,transverse colon,and left colon,and each section was scored from 0 to 3.Qualified bowel preparation was defined as a total score of ≥ 6 and each region score of ≥ 2[22].Confirmation of cecal intubation was achieved by identifying the appendiceal orifice,cecal valve,or intubation of the ileum.Stopwatches were used to record withdrawal times,which were mandated at least six minutes after excluding the time required for polypectomies.

    The Paris classification was utilized to classify the macroscopic type,including three categories: type 0-I: polypoid (0-Is:sessile,0-Ip: pedunculated),type 0-II: nonpolypoid (0-IIa: slightly elevated,0-IIb: flat,0-IIc: slightly depressed),and type 0-III: excavated[23].The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification was used to categorize the colorectal lesions by magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopic findings[24].Type 1 is identified by an invisible vascular pattern and a surface pattern with dark and white spots,resembling the surrounding normal mucosa.Type 2A is defined by its regular surface pattern and vessel pattern,including a regular caliber or distribution.Type 2B is characterized by vessels with variable caliber,irregular distribution,and an irregular or obscure surface pattern.Type 3 is recognized by loose vessel regions,thick vessel disruptions and/or a surface pattern of amorphous areas.The proximal colon included the cecum,ascending colon,hepatic flexure,and transverse colon.The distal colon included the splenic flexure,descending colon,sigmoid colon,and rectum.The size of the lesions was measured by comparing them with open (with a width of 7 mm)or closed (equivalent to 3 mm) biopsy forceps or polypectomy snares of known diameters.Multiple polyps were identified as having at least two lesions.The most advanced or largest lesion was considered for the primary diagnosis in subjects with multiple lesions.All detected polyps were removed and obtained for histopathological evaluation.

    Histopathological analysis

    All resected lesions were collected in distinct jars and preserved in 10% formalin.Sections were cut at 4 μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin-eosin.Serrated lesions were classified in accordance with the updated WHO 2019 criteria[5].The presence of a single unequivocally distorted crypt was regarded as a diagnostic criterion for SSL.An obviously distorted serrated crypt had at least one of the following histologic characteristics: (1) Horizontally growing crypt along the muscularis mucosa (L-shaped or inverted T-shaped crypt);(2) crypt base dilation,comprising the basal one-third of the crypt;(3) serrations that extend into the crypt base;and (4) asymmetrical expansion of the crypts.SSLs with dysplasia were subclassified into SSLs with dysplasia.The dysplastic component is identified as clearly separated from the SSL with architectural modifications,including the presence of villous architecture,elongated crypts,crowded crypts with complicated branching,cribriforming,and excessive or diminished luminal serration compared with the background SSL[5].Cells may exhibit intestinal dysplasia similar to that observed in conventional adenomas;serrated dysplasia with round atypical nuclei,large nucleoli,multiple mitoses,and eosinophilic cytoplasm;or (less frequently) subtle cytological atypia,including hypermucinous alterations.Stratification of dysplasia into low-grade and high-grade is not applicable in this study.All histopathological diagnoses were made by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists.Any disagreements were discussed to achieve a consensus.

    BRAF mutation analysis

    BRAF mutation analysis was conducted on all specimens diagnosed with SSLs using Sanger sequencing at the Center for Molecular Biomedicine,University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City.The ReliaPrep FFPE gDNA Miniprep System Kit (Promega,Madison,WI,USA) was used to extract genomic DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues according to the manufacturer's protocol.Exon 15 of BRAF was amplified utilising TaKaRa Taq HotStart Polymerase (Takara Bio,Shiga,Japan) with a primer pair (forward: 5’-ACTCTTCATAATGCTTGCTC-3’ and reverse: 5’-CCACAAAATGGATCCAGACA-3’).Following purification with ExoSAP-IT reagent (Thermo Fisher,Scientific,Waltham,MA,United States),the products of the polymerase chain reaction were sequenced in both the sense and antisense directions using an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems,Foster City,CA,United States) and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Kit.SeqScape Software version 2.6 (Thermo Fisher,Scientific,Waltham,MA,USA) was utilised to analyse mutations.

    Statistical analysis

    All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL).The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine the normality of continuous variables.The t-test was utilized to compare variables that followed a normal distribution and were presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD).Those with a nonnormal distribution were reported as the median (upper and lower quartiles) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.The categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test and presented as numbers and percentages.The prevalence was estimated by dividing the proportion of colonoscopies containing at least one SSL by the total number of performed colonoscopies.The prevalence and risk factors for SSLs were determined on a per-patient basis.In addition,the data were analyzed per lesion to determine the characteristics of SSLs and BRAF mutations.The SSL patient group was compared to the control group,with no polyps detected.Univariate analyses were conducted in order to evaluate the factors correlated with SSLs.Variables with aPvalue of 0.2 or less were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.AllPvalues of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of participants

    There were 2706 patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms who were referred for colonoscopy.Among them,2590 participants met the inclusion criteria and underwent colonoscopy.We excluded 101 cases due to incomplete colonoscopy,unqualified bowel preparation,and withdrawal time of less than 6 min.As a result,a total of 2489 patients were included in the analysis (Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Flow chart of participant recruitment. CRC: Colorectal cancer;IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease.

    The main indications for colonoscopy were abdominal pain (62.4%),diarrhea (51%),constipation (29.2%),and hematochezia (13.8%).The mean age of the participants was 52.1 ± 13.1 (range: 19-87 years).The female-to-male ratio was 1:1.1.

    Prevalence and risk factors for SSLs

    There were 1009 participants with at least one colorectal polyp (40.5%).A total of 121 specimens from 105 patients were histopathologically confirmed to have SSLs,with a prevalence of 4.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-5.1].The demographic and clinical features of the SSL patients are presented in Table 1.The mean age of the SSL patients was 57.6± 12 years,ranging from 21 to 84 years,and 91.4% were over 40 years.Male patients accounted for a larger proportion,with 61% of all cases.There was a remarkable trend in the prevalence of SSLs with increasing age.The SSL prevalence in patients under 40 was only 8.6%;meanwhile,this prevalence increased to 33.3% and 44.8% in those aged 50 to 59 years and those aged ≥ 60,respectively.

    Table 1 Characteristics of participants,n (%)

    In the per-patient univariate analysis,age ≥ 40,male sex,current or ex-smokers,DM,and hypertension were significantly related to SSLs (Table 1).Table 2 displays the results of the multivariate logistic regression models.The factors significantly associated with SSLs in the multivariate model were age ≥ 40 (odds ratio [OR]: 3.303;95%CI: 1.607-6.790;P=0.001),male sex (OR: 2.032;95%CI: 1.204-3.429;P=0.008),DM (OR: 2.721;95%CI: 1.551-4.772;P< 0.001),and hypertension (OR: 1.650;95%CI: 1.045-2.605;P=0.031).

    Table 2 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with sessile serrated lesions

    Characteristics of SSLs

    A total of 121 Lesions from 105 patients were diagnosed with SSLs.There were 90 patients (85.7%) who had one SSL,and 15 patients had two SSLs (14.3%).The mean size of the SSLs was 8.8 ± 4.8 mm.Endoscopic features of SSLs are described in Table 3.

    Table 3 Endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions,n (%)

    BRAF mutations and related factors in SSLs

    BRAF mutations were observed in 43 (35.5%) out of 121 Lesions from patients diagnosed with SSLs.The majority were V600E,amounting to 95.3%,while the others were D594N and K601E.Risk factors correlated with BRAF mutations are described in Table 4.Male patients comprised 55.1% of the SSL group without BRAF mutations and 62.8% of those with BRAF mutations;this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.410).In univariate analysis,age less than 60 years old and SSLs without dysplasia were correlated with BRAF mutations (P< 0.05).However,multivariate analysis indicated no risk factors with statistically significant differences.

    Table 4 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with BRAF mutation in sessile serrated lesions

    DlSCUSSlON

    To the best of our knowledge,this is the first study evaluating the prevalence,related factors,and BRAF mutations for SSLs among Vietnamese individuals.The prevalence of SSLs has shown considerable heterogeneity across various investigations,with reported rates ranging from 1% to 14%[25-27].According to a recent systematic analysis,SSL prevalence varied by region,with rates of 2.6% in Asia,3.9% in Europe,5.1% in the United States,and 10.5% in Australia[19].The differences in patient demographics,ethnicity,colonoscopy qualities,pathology criteria,and interobserver variability among endoscopists and pathologists may explain these discrepancies[19,28,29].Our findings indicated that the prevalence rate of SSLs was 4.2%,which was higher than that in most previous studies conducted in Asia.This discrepancy can be partly explained by several reasons.First,the research subjects in most previous studies in Asia screened asymptomatic participants,while our study was on patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms.Second,pathological diagnostic criteria for SSLs in other Asian studies applied the old WHO classification,which might lower the prevalence of SSLs.The old WHO classification for the diagnosis of SSLs necessitated the presence of two to threedistorted serrated crypts[30].In contrast,the recent WHO criteria 2019 have been revised to require just one distorted serrated crypt for SSL diagnosis[5].Third,in some studies,only one pathologist was responsible for interpreting the results.In our study,all lesions were assessed by two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists using the WHO criteria 2019 to minimize interobserver variation and increase diagnostic accuracy.Fourth,the participating endoscopists in our study also received training in recognizing SSLs prior to the commencement of the investigation.It is anticipated that the elements mentioned above might contribute to our investigation's enhanced precision of SSL prevalence.

    Our data revealed that age ≥ 40,male sex,DM,and hypertension were independent risk factors for SSLs.Prior studies also concluded that older age was a risk factor for SSLs.However,the age cutoff in these studies was higher than in our analysis,with cutoffs over 50 or 60 years old[13,25,31].These observed disparities could be attributed to our study participants having a lower mean age and gastrointestinal symptoms.As early-onset CRC (i.e.,< 50 years of age) is prevalent in Vietnam,colonoscopy is generally considered in Vietnamese patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms at a lower threshold of age,as recommended by the Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for CRC screening[32].One previous study in Vietnamese reported a significantly high proportion of early-onset CRC (i.e.,< 50 years of age) of 28%,of which 11% of patients were under 40[33].Nonetheless,it remains controversial that several studies have found no association between age and SSLs[26,34,35].Meesteret al[19] conducted a systematic review and reported that SSL prevalence increased with age.Nevertheless,the relationship was smaller than that for adenomas and did not reach statistical significance.Therefore,additional research is needed to ascertain the connection between age and the formation of SSLs,especially in the Vietnamese population.

    There have been conflicting results about the relationship between gender and SSLs.Some research revealed no differences based on sex[12,27,35],whereas others showed an association between SSLs and female sex[36].In our study,male sex increased the odds of SSLs.In a recent meta-analysis,males also had a higher rate of serrated lesions than females,and estrogen or hormone replacement therapy may reduce the risk of CRC and serrated lesions[37].One clinical trial found a reduction of 40% in the risk of CRC in postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy,which may contribute to a decreased risk of serrated lesions[38].

    The association between DM and the development of CRC and conventional adenomas has been established in previous research[39,40].In addition,there is a correlation between the usage of diabetes drugs and CRC.Metformin use has been shown in recent meta-analyses to significantly reduce the incidence of CRC,and improve CRC outcomes[41,42].Conversely,hyperinsulinemia is hypothesized to stimulate the development and proliferation of cells[43].The relationship between insulin therapy and cancer growth is biologically connectedviahyperinsulinemia.One metaanalysis of observational studies suggested that insulin therapy might increase the risk of CRC[44].However,additional prospective cohort studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to validate this correlation.Regarding the relationship between DM and SSLs,limited data have addressed this matter.Luiet al[13] provided evidence that DM increased the risk of developing SSLs in the screening population aged 50-70.Burnett-Hartmanet al[45] included symptomatic patients,and DM was considered a risk factor for SSLs.These findings were consistent with our results.Nevertheless,Macarieet al[46] demonstrated that DM was unrelated to SSLs,although hypertension and obesity were statistically associated with SSL development.Hence,the association between DM and SSLs remains unclear.Further investigations should be carried out to clarify this issue.

    Limited studies have evaluated the relationship between hypertension and SSL patients,and the results were inconsistent.Our results indicated that hypertension was statistically associated with SSLs.This finding was also reported by a case-control study conducted in Romania[46].One study in Korea also showed that SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma were significantly associated with metabolic diseases,including hypertension,type 2 DM,and dyslipidemia[47].In contrast,two studies in the Chinese population found no association between hypertension and SSLs[13].Therefore,this is a crucial issue that needs to be further investigated.

    The most prominent critical feature in the initial phase of the serrated neoplastic pathway is a mutation in the BRAF proto-oncogene,which activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade.This BRAF mutation leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation,similar to the KRAS mutation in adenomas[17].The incidence of BRAF mutations has been reported in 50%-72% of microvesicular hyperplastic polyps,70%-80% of SSLs,and only 1% of tubular adenomas[48].However,there have been differences in BRAF mutation rates in Eastern and Western countries.Based on data from Western countries,the prevalence of BRAF mutations in SSLs ranges from 63% to 100%[17,49-53],which is higher than that in East Asian nations,with reported rates ranging from 14% to 86%[54-58].In our study,the percentage of BRAF mutations was 35.5%.These dissimilarities indicated that BRAF mutations in SSLs may depend on ethnicity,lifestyle,and diet.Moreover,BRAF mutations may not be a significant molecular feature of the serrated neoplasia pathway in a subset of Eastern populations,as in Western populations.The low frequency of BRAF mutations in SSLs in Asia may also partially explain the low prevalence of SSLs compared to Western countries.Furthermore,our results reported no statistically significant association with age,sex,endoscopic,or pathologic factors.More future studies will be needed to better investigate the molecular characteristics of SSLs in the Vietnamese population.

    This study has several limitations.First,this is a single-center study.Second,some potential risk factors,such as dietary habits,dyslipidemia,and medication histories,have not been investigated.Third,the study participants were symptomatic patients undergoing colonoscopy.These limitations could limit the generalizability of the study findings.Fourth,the available data about diabetes duration and therapy used in the patients with DM in our study are insufficient and constrained.Therefore,we could not analyze these data in our manuscript.

    CONCLUSlON

    In conclusion,we reported for the first time a prevalence of SSLs of 4.2% in Vietnamese patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms undergoing colonoscopy.Male sex,age ≥ 40,DM,and hypertension were independent factors associated with SSLs.The rate of BRAF mutations in patients with SSLs was 35.5%.Further investigations are needed to identify the role of BRAF mutations in the Vietnamese population.

    ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

    Research background

    Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precancerous colorectal lesions that should be identified and removed to prevent colorectal cancer.However,previous research in Vietnam mainly focused on the adenoma pathway,with limited information on the serrated pathway.

    Research motivation

    The reported prevalence of SSLs varies widely across studies,leading to underestimating their prevalence and biased analysis.Moreover,studies analyzing risk factors for SSLs have been limited and controversial.Furthermore,BRAF mutations may be a potential therapeutic target in serrated colorectal neoplasia.

    Research objectives

    Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence,risk factors,and BRAF mutations of SSLs in Vietnamese patients.These findings may provide valuable insights into the prevention,early detection,treatment improvement,and surveillance approaches for SSLs in the Vietnamese population.

    Research methods

    This is a cross-sectional study carried out on patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent colonoscopy at the University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam.SSLs were diagnosed on histopathology according to the updated 2019 WHO classification.BRAF mutation analysis was performed using the Sanger DNA sequencing method.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine SSL-associated factors.

    Research results

    There were 2489 patients were included in the analysis,with a mean age of 52.1 ± 13.1 and a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.1.A total of 121 specimens from 105 patients were histopathologically confirmed to have SSLs,with a prevalence of 4.2%[95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-5.1].The factors significantly associated with SSLs in the multivariate model were age ≥40 [odds ratio (OR): 3.303;95%CI: 1.607-6.790;P=0.001],male sex (OR: 2.032;95%CI: 1.204-3.429;P=0.008),diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.721;95%CI: 1.551-4.772;P< 0.001),and hypertension (OR: 1.650;95%CI: 1.045-2.605;P=0.031).The rate of BRAF mutations in SSLs was 35.5%.

    Research conclusions

    We reported for the first time a prevalence of SSLs in Vietnamese patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms.Our data revealed that age ≥ 40,male sex,diabetes mellitus,and hypertension were independent risk factors for SSLs.Additional investigations are needed to ascertain the connection between these risk factors and SSLs,especially in the Vietnamese population.

    Research perspectives

    It is crucial to conduct multicenter,prospective,and follow-up studies to determine the prevalence,risk factors,and molecular characteristics of SSLs,especially in the Vietnamese population.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors would like to thank Drs.Truc Le Thanh Tran,Mai Ngoc Luu,Quang Dinh Le,Doan Thi Nha Nguyen,and Vy Ly Thao Tran at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City and the University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City for their support.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Quach DT contributed to the study’s conception;Vu NTH,Le NQ,Le HM,Vo DTN,and Vu HA conducted data curation;Vu NTH,and Quach DT performed data analysis;Ho DDQ,Quach DT,Le NQ,and Le HM provided supervision for the study;Vu NTH,Quach DT,and Vu HA drafted the initial manuscript;Ho DDQ,Vo DTN,Quach DT,Le HM,Le NQ,and Vu HA reviewed and edited the manuscript.

    lnstitutional review board statement:The study was approved by the Board of Ethics in Biomedical Research of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (ID number: 615/HDDD-DHYD,signed on November 19,2021).

    lnformed consent statement:All study participants,or their legal guardian,provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:We have no financial relationships to disclose.

    Data sharing statement:No additional data are available.

    STROBE statement:The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items,and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:Viet Nam

    ORClD number:Nhu Thi Hanh Vu 0000-0003-4208-7813;Duc Trong Quach 0000-0003-0141-921X.

    S-Editor:Gong ZM

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Zhang XD

    精品少妇久久久久久888优播| videosex国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久久久视频综合| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久精品夜色国产| 欧美在线黄色| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 大码成人一级视频| 国产在视频线精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看 | 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜91福利影院| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 在线观看人妻少妇| 久久av网站| 国产成人精品在线电影| videos熟女内射| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲图色成人| 精品亚洲成国产av| av视频免费观看在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 七月丁香在线播放| av一本久久久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产精品一国产av| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 老司机影院毛片| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久精品夜色国产| 在线天堂中文资源库| 中文欧美无线码| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 视频区图区小说| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av在线播放精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一区二区av电影网| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 在线 av 中文字幕| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 色94色欧美一区二区| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 99久久综合免费| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 多毛熟女@视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 一级片免费观看大全| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲最大av| 性色av一级| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩伦理黄色片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲四区av| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 免费少妇av软件| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久精品区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 永久网站在线| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产野战对白在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 久热这里只有精品99| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 考比视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 91成人精品电影| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 美女福利国产在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 丝袜美足系列| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| kizo精华| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 999精品在线视频| 男女免费视频国产| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产淫语在线视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产 精品1| 国产av精品麻豆| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产片内射在线| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产色婷婷99| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 99热全是精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 99久久综合免费| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 夫妻午夜视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久热久热在线精品观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 成人二区视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线 av 中文字幕| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 热re99久久国产66热| 看免费成人av毛片| 伦理电影免费视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 美女主播在线视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 一区在线观看完整版| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产 精品1| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| videossex国产| videosex国产| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 天堂8中文在线网| 一区福利在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 99热网站在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 超碰成人久久| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 伦理电影免费视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲国产看品久久| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 免费少妇av软件| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片在线| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 香蕉精品网在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 成年av动漫网址| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 桃花免费在线播放| 免费少妇av软件| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 1024视频免费在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 超碰成人久久| 男女边摸边吃奶| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日本91视频免费播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 宅男免费午夜| 久久青草综合色| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 成人手机av| 久久午夜福利片| 男女免费视频国产| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 制服诱惑二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| h视频一区二区三区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| www日本在线高清视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 超色免费av| 三级国产精品片| 国产精品.久久久| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 99九九在线精品视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 日本91视频免费播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| av卡一久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲精品一二三| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品酒店卫生间| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产精品一国产av| 午夜影院在线不卡| 精品第一国产精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产av精品麻豆| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 在现免费观看毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 如何舔出高潮| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 春色校园在线视频观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲av男天堂| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| av不卡在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 高清不卡的av网站| 久久免费观看电影| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 青草久久国产| 丁香六月天网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 香蕉丝袜av| 成人二区视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产在线免费精品| a级毛片黄视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 超碰成人久久| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| videossex国产| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久午夜福利片| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 满18在线观看网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产综合精华液| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产亚洲最大av| 永久网站在线| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 老熟女久久久| 久久热在线av| 国产成人精品无人区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲|