• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Twelve Years of Genome-Wide Association Studies of Human Protein N-Glycosylation

    2024-01-22 10:32:42AnnTimoshchukSodboShrpovYuriiAulchenko
    Engineering 2023年7期

    Ann Timoshchuk, Sodbo Shrpov, Yurii S.Aulchenko,b,*

    a MSU Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia

    b Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

    Keywords:Glycome Glycans N-glycosylation Genomics Genetics GWAS

    ABSTRACT Most human-secreted and membrane-bound proteins have covalently attached oligosaccharide chains or glycans.Glycosylation influences the physical and chemical properties of proteins,as well as their biological functions.Unsurprisingly, alterations in protein glycosylation have been implicated in a growing number of human diseases, and glycans are increasingly being considered as potential therapeutic targets, an essential part of therapeutics, and biomarkers.Although glycosylation pathways are biochemically well-studied, little is known about the networks of genes that guide the cell- and tissue-specific regulation of these biochemical reactions in humans in vivo.The lack of a detailed understanding of the mechanisms regulating glycome variation and linking the glycome to human health and disease is slowing progress in clinical applications of human glycobiology.Two of the tools that can provide much sought-after knowledge of human in vivo glycobiology are human genetics and genomics, which offer a powerful data-driven agnostic approach for dissecting the biology of complex traits.This review summarizes the current state of human populational glycogenomics.In Section 1,we provide a brief overview of the N-glycan’s structural organization,and in Section 2,we give a description of the major blood plasma glycoproteins.Next, in Section 3, we summarize, systemize, and generalize the results from current Nglycosylation genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that provide novel knowledge of the genetic regulation of the populational variation of glycosylation.Until now, such studies have been limited to an analysis of the human blood plasma N-glycome and the N-glycosylation of immunoglobulin G and transferrin.While these three glycomes make up a rather limited set compared with the enormous multitude of glycomes of different tissues and glycoproteins,the study of these three does allow for powerful analysis and generalization.Finally, in Section 4, we turn to genes in the established loci, paying particular attention to genes with strong support in Section 5.At the end of the review,in Sections 6 and 7,we describe special cases of interest in light of new discoveries, focusing on possible mechanisms of action and biological targets of genetic variation that have been implicated in human protein N-glycosylation.

    1.Introduction

    N-glycans are irregular polymers of five monosaccharides—namely, mannose, galactose, fucose, sialic acid, and Nacetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)—that are attached to polypeptide structures, forming glycoproteins through a glycosidic linkage to the asparagine (Asn) side chain [1].Glycosylation influences the physical and chemical properties of proteins, as well as their biological functions.N-glycoproteins exhibit great variety in their glycan part; an N-glycoprotein may have single or multiple Nglycosylation sites, and not all are necessarily glycosylated.Nglycans exhibit intra- and inter-protein variation: Different Nglycans may attach to different molecules of the same protein,and there is a wide spectrum of N-glycans attached to different proteins.About half of human blood plasma proteins are equipped with oligosaccharide chains(‘‘glycans”)[2].Protein glycosylation is controlled by genetic,epigenetic,and environmental factors[3–5].Although the glycosylation pathway is biochemically well-studied[6], little is known about the networks of genes that regulate the cell- and tissue-specific regulation of these biochemical reactions in humans in vivo.There is more than just academic interest in the regulation of protein N-glycosylation, as the latter’s role is increasingly recognized in human health and disease[7,8].Glycans are considered to be potential therapeutic targets[9–11],an essential part of therapeutics [12–14], and biomarkers [15–17], making glycobiology a promising field for future clinical applications [18].

    Similar to other ‘‘-omics,” an organism’s ‘‘glycome” consists of all the glycan structures synthesized by that organism [19].Cells of different types synthesize a subset of the glycome, depending on their differentiation state and physiological environment.Here,we use the term‘‘glycome”to denote a quantified repertoire of glycans that a cell or tissue produces under specified conditions of time, location, and environment.We also use the term ‘‘singleprotein glycome” (e.g., the ‘‘immunoglobulin-G N-glycome”) to describe a quantified spectrum of glycans attached to a specific protein.

    The combination of human glycomics and genomics offers a powerful ‘‘data-driven hypotheses” [20] approach for dissecting the complex human glycobiology in vivo in an agnostic manner[21].Thus far,analysis of the N-glycosylation of thousands of samples is limited to a few types of available tissues and proteins.More specifically, until recently, large cohort studies of human Nglycosylation were limited to studies of the N-glycome of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and the glycome of blood plasma (the plasma N-glycome),where the latter refers to the spectrum of glycans attached to the blood plasma glycoproteins.Tens of thousands of samples have been characterized for these glycomes [22].Recently, large-scale studies of the glycomes of other glycoproteins, such as transferrin (TF) [23], IgA [24,25], and apolipoprotein CIII [26], have become possible, but the number of samples being investigated remains limited.

    Thus far, studies on the genetic regulation of the populational variation of N-glycosylation—which require a large cohort of samples measured for both their glycomes and the genomes—have been limited to the analysis of plasma glycome, IgG, and TF Nglycosylation.These three glycomes make up a rather limited set,compared with the enormous multitude of glycomes of different tissues and glycoproteins; however, the study of these three glycomes allows for powerful analysis and generalization.

    The purpose of this review is to complement and extend the summary and discussion of populational glycogenomics in the reviews in Refs.[21,27].More specifically, we provide a detailed summary of the results that have been obtained since the previous reviews were published.We summarize this new information and consider special cases of interest in light of new discoveries,focusing on possible mechanisms of action and biological targets of genetic variation that have been implicated in human protein Nglycosylation.For a detailed discussion of already-established heritability and associated loci,interested readers are referred to previous reviews and original works.

    2.The N-glycosylation of IgG,TF,and the total plasma proteome

    IgG is the key player of systemic humoral immunity.It is the most prevalent isotype found in the circulation and tissues.Due to its wide spectrum of activity, IgG is involved in multiple immune reactions,including complement activation,phagocytosis,and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [28,29].IgG is the most abundant glycoprotein in the human bloodstream,possibly contributing close to half of all total plasma N-glycans(Table 1[2,30,31]).IgG consists of two biologically different regions: the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) and the crystallizable fragment(Fc).Both of these regions can be glycosylated.The Fc fragment of IgG harbors a conservative N-glycosylation site at the Asn297 position in the CH2domain.Since IgG is a homodimer, each of the two heavy chains can be glycosylated at Asn297.IgG-linked N-glycans are either high-mannose or biantennary glycans,usually with core fucosylation, and may carry one or two galactose residuals with a possible extension of one or two sialic acids.It has been shown that Fc-linked N-glycosylation changes during pathological and physiological events and strongly affects the antibody inflammatory properties [32–36].In contrast, little is known about Fablinked N-glycosylation.N-glycans are known to occur on 15%–25% of IgG Fab fragments; they can influence antibody affinity and avidity for antigens, as well as IgG half-life [37].

    TFs are blood plasma glycoproteins that are a key part of iron metabolism and are responsible for ferric-ion delivery.Iron plays a central role in many essential biochemical processes of human physiology; human cells’ requirement for iron as an oxidant has given rise to a complex system that tightly regulates iron levels,tissue distribution, and bioavailability [38].Human TF has two Nglycosylation sites, at the N432 and N630 residues, where a biantennary disialylated digalactosylated glycan structure without fucose is the most abundant glycan attached[39,40].Together with fibrinogen, TF is one of the most abundant non-immunoglobulin human blood glycoproteins (Table 1).

    There is little doubt that there are mechanisms that uniquely regulate the glycosylation of specific proteins.For example, a coding mutation that disturbs a canonical N-glycosylation amino acid sequence motif would result in the absence of N-glycan attachment at that site.Amino acid sequence-changing mutations outside the canonical motif that lead to changes in the Nglycosylation spectra of mutated proteins are known[41,42].Such mutations may exhibit their effect through changes in tertiary structure that result in modified accessibility of the glycosylation site.

    In addition to the considerations described above, it should be noted that the glycosylation mechanism is common to the secreted and membrane proteins produced in a specific cell.The peculiarities of this mechanism—that is, the presence or absence (or, more generally, the activity) of specific enzymes—are shared between the cells in a tissue.Thus,although unique protein-and individual cell-specific aspects can be expected,the set of rules governing the N-glycosylation of different glycoproteins in a tissue or a cell type is expected to be the same.

    Table 1 shows the average concentration and likely source of major human blood plasma glycoproteins.It is clear that the majority of glycoproteins originate from just two tissues:lymphoid and liver.Therefore, it is logical to hypothesize that the glycosylation of the plasma proteome may be driven mainly by the specifics of the regulation of glycosylation in the lymphoid tissues (mainly plasma cells) and liver (hepatocytes).Under this hypothesis, it becomes clear why studies of the total plasma, IgG, and TF glycomes complement and enhance each other, as we show below.

    3.Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of protein Nglycosylation

    Thanks to advances in high-throughput N-glycome profiling methods that have enabled the characterization of glycomes of thousands of samples[43,44],along with the availability of affordable and precise DNA technologies for measuring common(minor allele frequency>1%)genetic variation,GWASs have been applied to understand the genetic determinants of the variation of the human glycome.A GWAS is a method to identify the regions of the genome(genetic loci)where variations contribute to variations in studied traits—that is, human quantitative traits and complex diseases.In brief, this method permits the reliable discovery of the effects of genetic variation (e.g., single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs))on the abundance of specific glycans by comparing the genomes and N-glycomes of thousands of individuals.Due tolinkage disequilibrium(LD),a GWAS typically leads to the implication of sets of correlated SNPs that show a statistically significant association with the trait of interest.The classical GWAS design assumes a‘‘discovery”stage,in which the associated loci are identified at the genome-wide significant level, and a ‘‘replication”stage, in which association at the discovered loci is confirmed in independent samples [45].Replication improves the reliability of GWAS findings and helps to reduce the chance that a specific observed genotype-phenotype association is a chance finding or an artifact of the design or analysis [46].Replication is, therefore,an essential step to be taken before the complex and expensive targeted experimental follow-up studies are initiated for a specific locus.A more detailed account of the application of GWAS methodology to glycomics can be found in our recent review [21].

    Table 1 Average concentration and likely origin of major human blood plasma glycoproteins.Likely source tissue and cell type are inferred as the tissues known to secrete proteins in blood and with high expression of the protein in question.(More detailed information is provided in Table S1 in Appendix A.)

    The identification of loci associated with the glycome provides starting points for a better understanding of the glycobiology and its connection with human health and disease.However,next steps are not trivial,as neither functional polymorphism nor the affected gene can be immediately determined through a GWAS.A locus that is identified in a GWAS could encompass dozens of genes; moreover, an unknown functional element in the locus may regulate a gene that is located far beyond the associated region [47].We touch upon the challenges of linking an associated region to a biological function in the sections that follow.Below, we summarize the gene-mapping results from studies of the N-glycosylation of IgG, TF, and the total plasma proteome (plasma glycome).

    Five GWASs of IgG N-glycosylation measured in up to 8000 people have been published so far [48–52].Of the 33 genome-wide significant loci discovered in these GWASs, 29 were replicated in independent samples.The first GWAS of the IgG glycome measured with liquid chromatography identified associated variants in or near four glycosyltransferase genes and in five additional loci that did not contain genes with a known role in protein glycosylation[48].Shen et al.[49] developed and applied multivariate GWAS discovery and replication methods to extend the list by five additional loci,only one of which contained a glycosyltransferase gene.A number of loci were replicated,and one additional locus that did not contain a glycosyltransferase gene was discovered by Wahl et al.[50]in a study that used liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) to measure IgG Nglycosylation.

    While the abovementioned studies were limited to a discoverystage sample size of about 2000 individuals, a recent work by Klari? et al.[51]investigated associations between the IgG glycome and genome in a discovery sample of more than 8000 individuals.The results were replicated in 2400 samples with the IgG glycome measured via ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography(UHPLC) and validated in about 1800 samples with the IgG glycome measured using LC-ESI-MS.Overall, this work brought the number of loci that were significantly associated genome-wide with the IgG glycome to 27, 22 of which were replicated in independent samples.

    The summary statistics generated by Klari? et al.were reanalyzed by Shadrina et al.[52] using multivariate summarybased methods for GWAS discovery and replication [53].Thanks to the multivariate methodology and extended replication sample(N=3147),this analysis resulted in six new loci,five of which were replicated, and the replication of two previously discovered loci.

    Five of 29 replicated loci associated with IgG N-glycosylation contain glycosyltransferases; these are responsible for core(FUT8)and antennary(FUT6)fucosylation,the addition of bisecting GlcNAc (MGAT3), and terminal modifications such as galactosylation (B4GALT1) and sialylation (ST6GAL1).Although the other 24 loci contain genes that fall into multiple classes, a group of genes involved in the biology of antibody-producing cells,such as RUNX3,RUNX1, IKZF3, IKZF1, and TNFRSF13B, should be noted.Other notable associations include one with the human leukocyte antigen(HLA)region,as well as an association with the region that contains genes encoding immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH)—although this region also contains a secondary candidate (TMEM121, implicated through colocalization of its expression quantitative trait locus(eQTL)).The candidate genes prioritized in the implicated loci are discussed in more detail in the next section.

    Compared with studies of IgG N-glycosylation, genetic studies of the N-glycosylation of the total human plasma proteome have somewhat lagged behind in terms of the number of studies,sample sizes, and—consequently—the number of loci identified.Thus far,three GWASs of the human plasma N-glycome, measured in up to 3500 people using liquid-chromatography-based techniques,have identified 16 loci [54–56].An overwhelming majority (15)of these loci were replicated in independent samples, either in the original works or in a study by Sharapov et al.[57],which used the largest replication sample size to date, of 4800 people.The study had very high (> 95%) expected power to replicate all but one locus (chromosome 22, near KREMEN1).For the latter locus,the minor allele frequency of the associated insertion/deletion polymorphism rs140053014 was low (about 2%) in the studied populations, which complicated its imputations, hence reducing the number of available samples and power to about 10%and making the replication results inconclusive.

    Eleven of the 15 replicated loci overlap with loci discovered in studies of the genetic control of IgG N-glycosylation.These loci contain genes encoding glycosyltransferases: FUT8, FUT6, MGAT3,ST6GAL1, and B4GALT1; and other genes: HLA, IGH, IKZF1, and RUNX3.This may not be particularly surprising, given that immunoglobulins make up a major fraction of the plasma glycoproteome(Table 1).In this context,the four plasma-glycome specific loci, which were not discovered in the GWAS of IgG Nglycosylation despite their larger sample size,may be of particular interest.Three of these contain genes encoding a glycosyltransferase: MGAT5, whose product adds GlcNAc, facilitating further branching of biantennary glycans; ST3GAL4, whose product facilitates terminal sialylation; and B3GAT1, encoding a glucuronyltransferase.In addition, a region containing the gene HNF1A is specifically associated with the plasma but not the IgG Nglycome.The gene was demonstrated to be a master regulator of fucosylation in liver [54].The GWAS of the plasma N-glycome is reviewed in more detail in Ref.[21].

    A recent GWAS of TF N-glycosylation [23], despite a relatively small sample size (discovery sample size of N = 948; replication N = 952), has brought important conceptual advances.Among the eight loci implicated at the genome-wide significance level and replicated, one (containing the TF itself) has not been reported in previous studies of N-glycosylation.Five loci associated with TF N-glycosylation contain genes encoding glycosyltransferases,which are already implicated in the control of total plasma(B3GAT1, MGAT5, and ST3GAL4) or IgG and total plasma (FUT8 and FUT6) N-glycosylation.Additional shared loci include HNF1A,which is shared between TF and total plasma N-glycosylation;and NXPE2/4, which is shared between TF and IgG Nglycosylation.After a meta-analysis of the discovery and replication samples, two more loci achieved genome-wide significance.One of these significant—but not (yet) replicated—loci contained a gene encoding a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors,FOXI1,and another region was located near the gene MSR1.

    Landini et al.[23] also specifically studied the colocalization of TF and IgG N-glycosylation association patterns in the FUT8 and the FUT6 regions, which are associated with both TF and IgG Nglycosylation.They concluded that different causative variants are most likely responsible for the association of these loci with TF and IgG N-glycosylation.Six loci reported in Refs.[23,51] that are associated with changes in human protein glycosylation contain more than one independently associated variant(marked with an asterisk in Fig.1).

    To summarize,nine published GWASs established 34 replicated loci associated with variation in the N-glycosylation of the TF,IgG,or total plasma proteome.

    Methodologically, from the results discussed above, we can conclude that—given a sufficiently large replication sample—the glycomic loci discovered in the GWASs have a high replication rate.For example, for the plasma N-glycome, 15 of the 16 loci reported at genome-wide significance have been replicated and one replication was inconclusive [57], while 29 of the 33 IgG N-glycosylation loci have been replicated so far [52].These results highlight the general robustness of the GWAS findings,as well as the high standards adopted by the community studying the genetic regulation of protein N-glycosylation.

    At least in single-protein IgG N-glycosylation studies, we can also conclude that the multivariate methods of genetic analysis demonstrate superior power.Studies of IgG N-glycosylation have empirically demonstrated that the application of multivariate analysis is equivalent to increasing the sample size by 20%–50%[49,52].This significant increase in power is likely due to large correlations being observed between different glycans—correlations that are not only large but also biologically meaningful [58], which may provide an ideal case for multivariate analysis [59].

    An account of the established loci is summarized in Fig.1.The domination of loci established in studies of IgG N-glycosylation is obvious in the figure, as is the absence of plasma-glycomespecific loci.While the former observation is likely to be a statistical artefact,the latter probably reflects the true underlying biology.

    Indeed, the sample sizes of IgG N-glycosylation studies have reached 8000, while the maximal sizes of plasma glycome and TF N-glycosylation studies are 3500 and 1900, respectively.Empirically, we know that, for a complex trait, the number of loci discovered is roughly proportional to the sample size [60,61].Therefore, one would expect that the number of loci established for IgG N-glycosylation (29 loci) is roughly twice that established for the plasma glycome (15 loci) and four times that established for TF N-glycosylation (eight loci)—which is indeed the case.Moreover, we may speculate that the yield of loci per fixed sample size is roughly the same for all three studied glycomes, which may reflect similarities between their genetic effect size distributions and the relative role played by genetic and environmental variation.

    The observation that,thus far,any (replicated) locus known for total plasma N-glycosylation can be found to act on IgG and/or TF N-glycosylation is likely to reflect the underlying biology.This observation corroborates the hypothesis that the total plasma glycome could perhaps be conceived as a superposition of the glycomes of proteins secreted to the blood by two primary contributors—namely, lymphoid tissues (mainly plasma cells)and liver (hepatocytes)—and mainly driven by the specifics of the regulation of N-glycosylation in these tissues.However, the glycosylation machinery in other tissues may also have an effect on the glycosylation of plasma proteins [62].

    4.Candidate genes in the established loci

    Although replication establishes a locus as a reliable starting point for further investigation, neither a GWAS nor replication answers the question of what potential mechanism of action by which variation in the locus leads to variation of the trait.The presence of LD limits the precision of mapping of a functional polymorphism with classical statistical genetic methods.A GWAS makes it possible to establish a list of polymorphisms that contains the causative ones with high probability; however, for a locus, such a list may include tens or even hundreds of candidate polymorphisms.Only extremely large studies can map associations to just a few SNPs per locus [63], if the effect of the locus is large enough, and the LD in the region is not excessive.However,even when it is possible to limit the list to a single causative variant, this still only rarely allows a direct answer to the question of what the biological mechanism of action of this polymorphism is.It might be possible to unequivocally determine the gene target that is affected, but only when the variant is reliably predicted to change the sequence of the protein encoded by the gene.At the same time,the majority of the genetic variation involved in complex traits is regulatory[64].Although it is often the case that a gene nearest to the variant with the strongest association is indeed the target of that variation[65],it is generally not straightforward to link a regulatory variant to the gene or set of genes being regulated.For example, a functional element perturbed by the associated SNP may affect a target located millions of base pairs apart and may exhibit its action only in a specific tissue [47].Even more eccentrically, a functional element could target a gene located on a different chromosome through trans-regulatory mechanisms [66,67].

    The identification of causative polymorphisms and genes that explain association is critical in translating the statistical findings of a GWAS into actionable biological knowledge.Targeted functional experimentation is the gold standard to establish the mechanism of action; however, given the multitude of hypotheses that could be suggested for a locus, in silico functional investigation plays a large role in prioritizing possible mechanisms.In silico methods utilize a large body of accumulated knowledge on the potential consequences of changes in DNA [68,69] and the functional role of different genomic elements [70,71], as well as data accumulated in omics studies, including those investigating the genetic control of omics traits [72–76].The latter data are especially useful when hypothesizing the potential molecular genetic mechanism underlying a specific association.Summary-statisticsbased methods of colocalization analysis [74,77,78] can be used to address the question of whether the association of two traits with the same genetic region may be due to pleiotropic effects of the same genetic variant(s)or is instead a consequence of the association of two traits with two distinct—albeit close—polymorphisms.Summary-statistics-based in silico investigation is facilitated by the availability of (online) databases and tools integrating relevant information [79–83].

    In this section,we classify 34 loci that are replicably associated with protein N-glycosylation,according to the function of the proposed candidate gene.For six loci, a candidate gene could not be suggested; in these cases, the region is named after the gene(s)nearest to the most-associated polymorphism (gene names are in yellow in Fig.1).For five loci,multiple candidate genes with different functions are known, and these are classified in several categories.It should be noted, that in principle, for complex traits, an association to a locus does not have to be due to single causative gene,as multiple candidates in a locus are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

    Eight loci contain glycosyltransferase(gene names are in blue in Fig.1)as the primary candidate gene for the respective loci.It was found that, in eight glycosyltransferases, genetic variation in regions including MGAT3,ST6GAL1,and B4GALT1 is associated with variation in IgG and total plasma N-glycosylation;genetic variation near B3GAT1,MGAT5,and ST3GAL4 relates to TF and total plasma Nglycosylation; and genetic variation near FUT8 and FUT6 is associated with all three studied glycomes.Most of the candidate glycosyltransferases are transcribed in both liver and plasma cells (Fig.2(a) [84]), although there are several notable exceptions.

    MGAT3 is preferentially expressed in plasma cells and MGAT5 is expressed in hepatocytes(Fig.2(a)).This is consistent with the fact that IgG-attached glycans are biantennary,with optionally present bisecting GlcNAc(the reaction facilitated by an enzyme encoded by MGAT3),while the glycans attached to the glycoproteins produced by liver are often multiantennary (MGAT5 plays a role in glycan branching).Higher expression of α-2,3 sialyltransferase-encoding ST3GAL4 in liver, with minimal expression in plasma cells, is consistent with the fact that the locus is implicated in plasma and TF,but not in IgG N-glycosylation GWAS,and the almost exclusive α-2,6 linked sialylation of IgG is a known fact [85].A stronger expression of galactosyltransferase gene B4GALT1 in liver compared with plasma cells may seem inconsistent with observations that galactose is present in IgG as well as liver glycoprotein Nglycans, and that the locus is implicated only in IgG Nglycosylation.However, it should be noted that the expression of B4GALT1 in plasma cells, although lower than in hepatocytes, is still rather high—that is, it is higher than the expression levels of MGAT3 in plasma cells.Secondly, it should be considered that the tissue specificity of gene regulation may lead to the presence of a glycomic quantitative trait locus(QTL)in one tissue but its absence in another tissue.The latter may also explain why the region near ST6GAL1 seems to be associated only with variation of the IgG Nglycome,despite being expressed to an equally high degree in hepatocytes and plasma cells, and encoding a sialyltransferase facilitating α-2,6 bonds in glycans attached to liver-secreted proteins and immunoglobulins.

    In addition to glycosyltransferases,another locus(including the RUNX3 candidate gene)contains the gene MAN1C1,which encodes a glycosidase.This gene is expressed with low tissue specificity and encodes a protein involved in the early Golgi stages of the transition from high-mannose to hybrid glycan structures.Given the functional network results of Ref.[51]and the spectrum of associated glycoforms, it is more likely that the causative gene in the locus is RUNX3.

    A large group of prioritized candidate genes code for (tissuespecific) transcription regulators (gene names are in green in Fig.1).For plasma and TF N-glycosylation, HNF1A (located close to another candidate, SPPL3) is an example of such a gene.For IgG N-glycosylation, eight loci contain candidate genes encoding the transcription factor involved in B-cell differentiation and function.These include RUNX1 [86], RUNX3, IKZF1 [87], and IKZF3 [88],which play a central role in B-cell maturation and differentiation;the gene MEF2B, which is mutated in about 15% of follicular lymphoma and which diffuses large B-cell lymphoma and plays a role in germinal center development [89]; the gene ASXL2, with a product whose target genes strongly overlap with those of RUNX1 and is required for normal hematopoiesis [90]; and the transcription elongation factor ELL2, which directs immunoglobulin secretion in plasma cells [91].The gene TNFRSF13B, located in a recently established locus [52], encodes a lymphocyte-specific member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily known as the transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) protein.Signaling through this protein activates several transcription factors, including nuclear factor of activated T cell (NFAT), activator protein (AP)-1, and nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) [92].TACI plays a crucial role in humoral immunity, acting in synergy with other signaling networks to promote B-cell differentiation into plasma cells and immunoglobulin production [93,94].

    Many of the suggested candidates that encode transcription factors are differentially expressed in plasma cells and hepatocytes(Fig.2(b)).The group with stronger expression in plasma cells includes IKZF1, IKZF3, RUNX3, TNFRSF13B, and (perhaps) IRF1.The gene HNF1A has minimal expression in plasma cells but is strongly expressed in hepatocytes.This pattern of expression is consistent with—but is perhaps also partly driven by—the GWAS findings:Indeed, the first group was discovered in a GWAS of IgG Nglycosylation, while the locus containing HNF1A was implicated only in plasma and TF N-glycosylation.

    Three loci contain genes with products implicated in B-cell immunity.These include the IgG heavy chain locus (14q32.33)(unsurprisingly, the IGHG1 is expressed very strongly in plasma cells but not in hepatocytes; Fig.2(c)); the gene VPREB3 (near DERL3 and SMARCB1)coding for a protein,which likely participates in the transport and assembly of the pre-B cell receptor [95]; and the recently suggested [52] gene RNF168, which encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair and immunoglobulin class switch recombination [96].

    Five loci contain genes involved in (not B-cell) immune function: the HLA region, which contains multiple immune-related genes; a locus that contains a gene coding for T-box transcription factor (TBX21), whose mouse homolog regulates the expression of interferon γ (IFNγ) and controls T helper 1 (Th1) lineage commitment [97]; the gene HIVEP2 [98,99]; and IRF1, which codes for interferon regulatory factor 1.The region including IRF1 also encompasses the gene IL3 that codes for interleukin 3, a cytokine with an important function in the differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic and lymphoid cell lineages; and SLC22A4, which encodes OCTN1, the primary transporter of ergothioneine, an amino acid with anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties[100].In the same locus with the B-lineage specific transcription factor IKZF3 is GSDMB,which encodes a member of a protein family with a role in pyroptosis [101,102], and the gene ORMDL3,whose product has been shown to modulate T-lymphocyte activation via controlling the influx of calcium ions in the endoplasmic reticulum upon antigen binding [103].

    Four loci contain genes involved in the functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum,Golgi apparatus,or endosomes.These include a gene that potentially affects protein glycosylation via regulation of endosomal pH (SLC9A9); the gene DERL3 (near VPREB3 and SMARCB1),which is involved in the degradation of misfolded glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and is preferentially expressed in plasma cells (Fig.2(c));the gene SPPL3 (near HNF1A),which encodes an intramembrane protease that cleaves glycosidases and glycosyltransferases [104]; and a recently [52] established locus containing AP5B1, a gene whose expression is enriched in bone marrow and that encodes a subunit of an adaptor protein complex, AP-5 [105], which is probably involved in facilitating the late endosome-to-Golgi retrieval [106].

    Fig.2.Expression of candidate genes in hepatocytes (green) and bone marrow plasma cells (pink).Candidate genes are grouped by function:(a) glycosyltransferases and a glycosidase;(b)transcription regulators;(c)other.TPM:transcripts per million.Reproduced using data reported in Ref.[84],with methods and code identical to those used to generate Fig.5 in Ref.[23].

    In the same functional group,Frkatovic er al.[27]suggested the candidate gene SPPL2C (near MAPT).This gene encodes an intramembrane-cleaving aspartic protease that impairs vesicular transport and possibly causes retention of cargo proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum[107],thereby potentially affecting cellular processes such as protein glycosylation through mislocalization of glycan-modifying enzymes.Another member of the same gene family, SPPL3, which is expressed with low tissue specificity, is known to regulate cellular N-glycosylation [104,108].However,the expression of SPPL2C is enriched in testes, with very low expression in other tissues.Another possible candidate for this group is the serine protease inhibitor encoded by the gene SPINK4.However,its expression is enriched in intestine and limited in lymphoid tissues; its possible mechanism of action remains unclear,and experimental validation is not fully conclusive [109].Given the somewhat contradictory information regarding the possible role of genes SPPL2C and SPINK4, they are indicated in yellow in Fig.1.

    Two genes of notice do not belong to any class outlined above.One is SMARCB1 (near to VPREB3 and DERL3), which is also known as BAF47.This gene encodes a core subunit of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent chromatin remodeling complex,which plays a key role in the regulation of gene transcription[110].Finally, for TF N-glycosylation, the gene TF itself is the candidate gene in the locus established by Ref.[23].In line with known biology, the gene TF is strongly expressed in hepatocytes but not in plasma cells (Fig.2(c)).

    To conclude, even from the somewhat superficial account of candidate genes, it is clear that populational variation of protein N-glycosylation is regulated by genetic variation affecting: ①glycosyltransferases involved in the fucosylation, branching, and terminal modifications of N-glycans; ② tissue-specific regulators involved in the differentiation, maturation, and regulation of cells(hepatocytes and plasma cells) producing relevant glycoproteins;③perhaps more speculatively, the cellular machinery involved in the production and transportation of the secreted glycoproteins;and ④the production and structure of the studied glycoproteins(TF and IgG) themselves.

    5.Candidate genes with strong support

    Confidence that the genes discussed in the previous section are indeed the ones that determine the association between Nglycosylation and genetic variation in the established loci varies significantly.For example, for loci containing glycosyltransferases(except, perhaps, B3GAT1), the evidence is quite complete and compelling.It is known that these glycosyltransferases are involved in protein N-glycosylation, and that the changes in Nglycosylation associated with the locus are consistent with the known enzymatic activity of the product encoded by the candidate.For a few genes,their effects on N-glycosylation have been verified in cell line and/or model animal experiments.For some genes,mutations leading to a monogenic phenotype that includes (or could be linked to) changes in N-glycosylation are known.Some genes, however, are proposed based on known involvement in the same class of processes, such as immune system functioning;for such candidates,the level of confidence is low.Moreover,even when a strong candidate is present in an established locus, unless the mechanism through which an associated variant links to that gene’s function can be proposed and validated, our understanding of the mechanism of action of the locus is incomplete.

    In this section,we selectively summarize evidence for candidate genes with strong support from monogenic phenotypes and/or experimental studies.We discuss potential mechanisms of action and highlight possible inconsistencies.Key facts and references are presented in Table 2 [23,51,52,54,56,108,111].

    As mentioned earlier, for all but one (B3GAT1)glycosyltransferase-containing locus, the changes in Nglycosylation associated with the locus are consistent with the known enzymatic activity of the product encoded by the candidate.For half of glycosyltransferases (MGAT3, ST6GAL1, B4GALT1, and B3GAT1),the likely mechanism of genetic variation transformation into function is transcription regulation,as suggested by a colocalization between a glycomic GWAS and respective eQTL[51,52,54,107] (Fig.1 and Table 2).

    For one glycosyltransferase encoded by FUT6, a coding variant may explain the observed association with the plasma and TF Nglycome[23,56].Indeed,in people of European descent,the C allele(with a frequency of 4%) of the polymorphism with the strongest association, rs7255720 [56], is in perfect (r2= 1) LD with rs17855739-T, which codes for inactivating E247K substitution in the FUT6 catalytic domain, leading to the phenotype of (plasma)fucosyltransferase 6 (FUT6) deficiency when homozygous [112].Within this phenotype,plasma glycoproteins produced in the liver of affected individuals lack α3-fucosylation [113].Otherwise, the deleterious alleles of FUT6 may reach high frequency in some populations without apparent clinical consequences.

    Recently, Puan et al.[114] demonstrated that FUT6 deficiency compromises basophil function through the selective abrogation of their sialyl-Lewisxexpression; FUT6-deficient basophils rolling on E-selectin are severely impaired.The researchers also demonstrated that FUT6 null allele carriers exhibit elevated blood basophil counts and reduced itch sensitivity against insect bites,concluding that FUT6 deficiency dampens the basophil-mediated allergic response in the periphery.This conclusion was also supported by an observation of lower IgE titers and reduced eosinophil counts.

    The loci containing the FUT genes FUT6 and FUT8 have been implicated in both IgG and TF N-glycosylation, suggesting the important role of these genes in the N-glycosylation of proteins produced in different tissues [23,51].However, a biologically important conclusion from the work of Landini et al.[23] is that the details of the mechanisms of action of a ‘‘common” locus may not coincide for two glycoproteins, as reflected by different causative variants associated with the N-glycosylation of each of them.This finding suggests that, although some enzymes are involved in N-glycosylation in several tissues,their genetic regulation in these tissues may differ.

    A possible mechanism has been suggested for the locus containing FUT8.It is known that the expression of FUT8 is regulated by the Ikaros family zinc finger 1(IKZF1)[51]and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-α (HNF1A) [54] transcription factors in plasma cells and hepatocytes, respectively.Many variants in the FUT8 region are independently associated, and it can be speculated that some groups may affect the binding of HNF1A and consequently change the fucosylation of liver-secreted glycoproteins, while others may affect the binding of IKZF1 and consequently change the fucosylation of IgG.Thus,perhaps the most parsimonious biological explanation in this case is that different causative variants may affect the binding of different transcription factors in different tissues and therefore regulate the glycosylation of the tissue-specific proteins—that is, the TF produced in liver and the IgG produced by plasma cells in a tissue-specific manner.Although this explanation aligns with general knowledge about transcription regulation (i.e.,Ref.[74]), verification of this hypothesis would require further in silico studies and experimental functional validation.

    For the FUT6 locus, the mechanism should be at least partially different than the described above mechanism for the FUT8 locus.In plasma glycome and TF N-glycosylation GWASs [23,56,57], the variants with strongest association were in strong LD with inactivating E247K polymorphism that leads to dysfunctional FUT6(described in more detail above).In IgG N-glycosylation GWASs,however, the SNPs with the strongest association (rs35222081,rs874232, and rs12986368) are distinctly different [23,51,52] and are in weak (r2< 0.1) LD with coding polymorphism.The fact that deactivating FUT6 mutation does not show an association with IgG N-glycosylation may suggest that a different gene in the region is responsible for association in the case of IgG N-glycosylation.

    The evidence for the gene B3GAT1, which is associated with variation in plasma glycome and TF N-glycosylation [23,56], is somewhat contradictory.On the one hand, the evidence supporting this gene is strong: The candidate encodes a glycosyltransferase, and its role has been reinforced by a colocalization analysis that suggests that the same functional variant may explain the association with plasma glycan levels as well as the expression of B3GAT1 in liver (Fig.S1 in Appendix A).However, B3GAT1 is a member of the glucuronyltransferase gene family, encoding glucuronyl transferase,which acts in the biosynthesis of the carbohydrate epitope human natural killer-1(HNK-1),adding a glucuronic acid(GlcA)to the terminal N-acetyllactosamine(LacNAc)disaccharide to form the HNK-1 epitope precursor [115,116].The HNK-1 epitope is expressed on a subset of human lymphocytes,including natural killer cells.This epitope has not been reported to exist onplasma proteins.Although Huffman et al.[55] reported the presence of GlcA on some glycans contained in the DG13 plasma glycan peak associated with the B3GAT1 region,these results have not yet been replicated; it is unclear whether this observation may fully explain the observed association.

    Table 2 Summary of evidence for candidate gene mapping to the regions implicated by GWASs.Only genes with a role in N-glycosylation strongly supported by a monogenic phenotype and/or experiments are listed.The probability of being loss-of-function (LoF) intolerant (pLI) and observed (o)/expected (e) are the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD)[111] constraint metric, with pLI values close to 1 and o/e values close to 0 denoting stronger constraint.Blank cells indicate an absence of evidence at the time of manuscript preparation.

    The locus at 12q24 contains two strong candidate genes, SPPL3 and HNF1A.The gene SPPL3 encodes an intramembrane aspartyl protease that cleaves glycosidases and glycosyltransferases, and that—when suppressed—leads to hyperglycosylation [104].No monogenic phenotypes are known for this gene.For HNF1A, Lauc et al.[54] demonstrated that it and its downstream target HNF4A regulate the expression of key FUTs and fucose biosynthesis genes,showing that HNF1A is both necessary and sufficient to drive the expression of these genes in hepatic cells.The researchers suggested that HNF1A reciprocally regulates core versus antennary fucosylation, with increased expression of HNF1A repressing core fucosylation (FUT8) while activating the FUTs involved in antennary fucosylation (e.g., FUT6).In line with this mechanism of action, rare mutations in HNF1A that lead to maturity-onset diabetes of the young, type 3 (MODY-3) are characterized by an increased level of antennary fucosylation on tri- and tetraantennary plasma N-glycans[16,117],as well as a general increase in α1-3,4 fucosylation levels in blood plasma [118].A mechanism through which genetic variation in 12q24 links to the function of the candidate gene(s) has not yet been suggested.

    Two loci containing genes IKZF1 and IKZF3 that belong to the Ikaros zinc finger transcription factors family are associated with the IgG-glycome[51],while the IKZF3 locus is also associated with the total plasma glycome [56].Both genes have been reported to harbor mutations that cause monogenic forms of immunodeficiencies, which are characterized by abnormalities in B-cell functioning.Mutations in IKZF1 lead to the common variable immunodeficiency-13,an autosomal dominant primary immunodeficiency disorder associated with hypogammaglobulinemia and decreased numbers of B cells [119].Mutations in IKZF3 cause immunodeficiency-84 (IMD84), an autosomal dominant primary immunologic disorder associated with low levels of B cells and impaired early B-cell development [120].

    By exploiting the multidimensional nature of glycomic data,Klari? et al.[51] have built a network connecting associated loci.In this network, the closely located nodes are loci with a similar spectrum of associated glycans, suggesting a functional similarity of the causal genes in these loci.The presence of glycosyltransferases in the network allows for functional inferences via an interesting approach.Given two connected loci containing genes encoding a glycosyltransferase and a transcription factor, it could be suggested that the transcription factor may regulate the expression of the glycosyltransferase.In particular, it follows from the network deduced in Ref.[51] that loci containing IKZF1 and IKZF3 may regulate FUT8, an enzyme responsible for the core fucosylation of IgG-attached N-glycans.Moreover, the researchers showed that, in the IKZF3 locus, the same genetic variant(s) may have an effect on both IgG fucosylation and the expression of IKZF3 in peripheral blood.It was demonstrated that the knockdown of IKZF1 in the lymphoblastoid cell line MATAT-6 leads to decreased expression of IKZF3, increased expression of FUT8, and increased core fucosylation of IgG[51],confirming the suggested hypotheses.

    In two loci,genes belonging to the Runt-related family—namely,RUNX1 and RUNX3—have been highlighted as candidates that may be responsible for the association with IgG N-glycosylation [51].These genes,which are coding transcription factors,play an important role in hematopoietic cell differentiation[121,122].Mijakovac et al.[109]proposed that IgG galactosylation and the transcription factor genes RUNX1 and RUNX3 are regulated by estradiol.Subsequent analysis using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/dead CRISPR-associated endonuclease 9(dCas9) molecular tools in the HEK-293FS-derived cell line, which is optimized for secreting a high quantity of native IgG antibodies,provided evidence that the upregulation of RUNX3 leads to a decrease in the level of IgG galactosylation.Although the role of RUNX3 in the regulation of the IgG glycome is sufficiently supported, the exact mechanism underlying the genetic association of RUNX3 remains unclear.

    A locus harboring the gene TNFRSF13B was discovered by means of a multivariate genetic association analysis of the IgG glycome by Shadrina et al.[52].TNFRSF13B encodes the TACI protein, a lymphocyte-specific member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily.Rare TNFRSF13B mutations can increase the risk of asthma symptoms [123]; moreover, several common variants in this gene have been reported to be associated with circulating IgG levels [124,125], while coding variants in TNFRSF13B are associated with common variable immunodeficiency and selective IgA deficiency [126].

    Another locus discovered and replicated in Ref.[52] contains the gene RFN168, which encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair and immunoglobulin class switch recombination [96].The association of common genetic variation in the RNF168 locus with IgM levels was previously reported [125], and rare mutations in the gene RNF168 lead to autosomal recessive radiosensitivity, immunodeficiency, dysmorphic features,learning difficulties(RIDDLE)syndrome,the features of which include decreased immunoglobulin production[127].

    Another strong candidate for discovered and replicated in Ref.[23] locus is the gene TF.As mentioned above, TF itself is an Nglycoprotein with two N-glycosylation sites.Genetic variation in the TF locus is associated with levels of carbohydrate-deficient TF[41] and with abundances of TF-linked N-glycans [23].A cis- protein quantitative trait locus (pQTL) exists for TF, explaining about 40%of the population variation of its serum levels[128].The pQTL tagged by rs8177240[128]is in low(r2<0.1)LD with the sentinel TF N-glycosylation SNP, rs6785596 [23].On the other hand, the sentinel N-glycosylation SNP is in a reasonably strong (r2< 0.57)LD with one of the SNPs, rs1799899, associated with the levels of carbohydrate-deficient TF [41].The latter SNP codes for G277S amino acid change in the TF.It can be speculated that this amino acid substitution may change the protein tertiary structure and the accessibility of the N-glycosylation site.Whether or not the association of TF N-glycosylation with the TF region may be fully explained by the LD between the sentinel SNP reported by Landini et al.[23] and the SNPs reported by Kutalik et al.[41] remains open.

    To conclude,for about half of the 34 loci associated with variation in N-glycosylation,the biological mechanism of action may be hypothesized based on the presence of a strong candidate gene.For about half of these loci, a mechanism linking genetic variation to the target gene can also be hypothesized.The large number of loci for which the mechanism of action is difficult to guess can be a reach source of knowledge about human glycobiology.

    6.Shared genetic determinants of N-glycosylation and complex disease: Pleiotropy at specific loci

    Some loci that are associated with protein glycosylation also show an association with complex human diseases [51,52,56].The association of a locus with two traits may be due to the pleiotropic effect of a genetic variant on both traits or the independent effects of different genetic variants that are in LD with each other by two traits.It should be noted that, with perfect LD between two variants, the latter hypothesis becomes statistically indistinguishable from the former.Given this fundamental restriction, methods have been developed to distinguish between these two hypotheses [77,78].Such methods compare the patterns of regional association for the two traits associated with the same region.In the case of sufficient dissimilarity, the hypothesis of pleiotropy is rejected.A similarity suggests the possibility of pleiotropy.

    In a case in which a locus has a pleiotropic effect on a glycan level and a disease, the option of the glycan may be investigated as a biomarker of the disease [129].This logic formed the basis for the discovery of an increased level of antennary fucosylation of plasma proteins as a functional biomarker of one of the most prevalent MODY-3, which is due to mutations in the gene HNF1A.In the first plasma glycome GWAS, a locus containing the gene HNF1A was associated with changes in the composition of the human plasma N-glycome; this gene was confirmed to shift the balance between core and antennary fucosylation in a cell line experiment [54].MODY-3 is often misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) [130].The antennary fucosylation biomarkers have been successfully used to separate people with MODY-3 from people with T1D and T2D [118,131](Fig.3).

    Klari? et al.[51]demonstrated the pleiotropic effects of the IgG N-glycome-associated locus 17q12-21 (containing genes ORMDL3,GSDMB, and IKZF3) on a range of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.It is notable that 17q12-21 is one of the best-known asthma-associated loci [132].The asthma risk alleles have been associated with decreased levels of afucosylated, agalactosylated,and monogalactosylated glycans and increased levels of core fucosylated glycans[51].This locus was also pleiotropically associated with the risk of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis, as demonstrated by colocalization analysis.The autoimmune disease risk allele has been associated with increased levels of afucosylated, agalactosylated, and monogalactosylated glycans and decreased levels of fucosylated glycans[51].In line with these observations, it is known that, although the same SNPs are associated with both asthma and autoimmune disease in this locus, the risk alleles associated with autoimmune disease are the opposite of those associated with asthma risk[132].

    Fig.3.Significant associations between glycan traits and the locus containing gene HNF1A, obtained by means of GWASs [56].The framed glycans are the best-performing single glycan traits for classifying MODY-3.The figure was compiled based on results and data reported in Refs.[118,131].

    Furthermore, Shadrina et al.[52] demonstrated the pleiotropic effect of another IgG-glycome-associated locus containing genes OVAL1 and AP5B1 on asthma.This locus was also found to have pleiotropic effects on dermatological and allergic diseases [133].While it is tempting to speculate about the biological mechanisms that link or are shared between IgG N-glycosylation and asthma,a generalization may be somewhat premature.Several observations,including the association of the two loci with different spectra of glycans and subtypes of asthma, suggest that the mechanism determining the pleiotropic effects of the locus that includes ORMDL3, GSDMB, and IKZF3 and the locus that includes OVOL1 and AP5B1 on asthma and the IgG N-glycome may be different(see Ref.[52] for a more detailed discussion).

    It can be speculated that the association of the same allele with the risk of autoimmune disease and the increased abundance of afucosylated agalactosylated glycans at the ORMDL3-GSDMB-IKZF3 locus is biologically plausible, as IgG carrying such glycans is known to be pro-inflammatory [33] and to have a strong ability to induce ADCC [33].Consistent with this speculation, in the IRF1-SLC22A4 locus,the Crohn’s disease risk allele has been demonstrated to be associated with increased levels of afucosylated agalactosylated glycans and decreased levels of fucosylation [51].A colocalization analysis by Klari? et al.[51] also suggested possible pleiotropy between variants affecting glycans and the risk of Crohn’s disease at the locus containing the gene IRF7 and the risk of Parkinson’s disease at the locus containing the gene MAPT.

    To conclude, a number of loci associated with IgG Nglycosylation may have pleiotropic effects on the risk of autoimmune and inflammatory disease—particularly inflammatory bowel disease and asthma.In addition, colocalization with Parkinson’s disease was observed at the MAPT locus.For the HNF1A locus associated with TF N-glycosylation, pleiotropic effects on C-reactive protein (CRP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol levels have been shown [23].

    7.Shared genetic determinants of N-glycosylation and complex disease: Results from Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses

    Although changes in protein glycosylation have been observed in many complex human diseases[29],little is known about a causal relationship between glycosylation and complex diseases.Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard of experimental design in epidemiology for testing the causal relationship between risk factor and disease.However,the application of such a design is challenging in the case of protein glycosylation.Here, genetics offers a MR approach [80,134] that mimics a randomized controlled trial using genetic variants associated with a risk factor as instrumental variables.If genetic variants shift the level of risk factor and this shift has an effect on disease outcome,then it provides evidence that the risk factor has a causal effect on the disease outcome.In this case,the risk factor may be suggested as a therapeutic target for manipulation,which may change the risk of the disease.Reverse causality testing is also relevant because, in some cases,the manifestation of disease has a causal effect on molecular phenotypes, such as cardiovascular risk and high-density lipoprotein(HDL) [135].In this case, the molecular phenotype may be suggested as a potential biomarker of the disease.It should be mentioned that, although the idea behind MR is relatively simple,there are several assumptions, the violation of which may lead to false-positive results; thus, the results of MR should be treated with caution [134].

    Thus far, the MR approach has been used to study the causal relationship between IgG glycome traits and 12 common diseases associated with the IgG N-glycome [136,137], as well as between the total plasma N-glycome,the IgG N-glycome,and prostate cancer [138].Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) showed a causal effect on the abundance of N-glycans with bisecting GlcNAc in the total IgG N-glycome[137],suggesting this glycan trait as a biomarker of SLE.The results of the analysis are rather robust, as a large number(36)of SLE-associated genetic variants,large sample sizes, and a range of methods were used to come to a conclusion.The abundance of bisected N-glycans attached to IgG is associated with the pro-inflammatory state [139] and is elevated in patients with SLE [140], although the mechanism is not yet clear.It is possible that an increased level of bisected glycans in SLE is a consequence of lower fucosylation of IgG glycans, since bisection and core fucosylation of N-glycans are competing processes [141],although no causal relationship between IgG fucosylation and SLE has been observed.IgG-linked high-mannose glycan peak 5 (GP5;Man5) and bisected GP13 in samples from people of East Asian descent showed a causative association with T2D outcome [136],which is in line with the known correlation between these glycan traits and T2D [142].

    The same approach was used to test the causal effect of the total plasma N-glycome and IgG N-glycome traits on prostate cancer[138], where decreased high-mannose glycan (Man9) level,increased ratio of disialylated to trisialylated glycans, and increased level of four-branched heavily galactosylated and sialylated glycans (attached to α-1-acid protein—an acute-phase protein) were shown to cause a lower risk of prostate cancer.However,the latter is contradictory to the observed elevated levels of this glycan with a higher level of low-grade inflammation, and future work is needed to better understand the relationship[143].It should be noted that the obtained results were driven by one or two instrumental variables,suggesting the possible presence of weak instrumental bias [144].More powerful GWASs are needed to confirm or refute the postulated relation.

    To conclude,there is genetic support for the hypothesis that the N-glycosylation of IgG may serve as a biomarker for autoimmune disease, such as SLE, while the plasma N-glycome may provide biomarkers for endocrine disease and cancers.This hypothesis is consistent with and confirms the results of(prospective) epidemiologic studies [29,145].

    8.Conclusions

    Protein glycosylation complements other layers of omics phenotypes in studies aimed at discovering the mechanisms of human health and disease.The glycosylation of human proteins is implicated in many human diseases and pathological states, making the glycome a rich source of biomarkers and drug targets.Compared with the proteome and metabolome, examples of glycomebased biomarkers and drug targets are relatively rare.This is partly due to insufficient knowledge about the mechanisms of human glycome regulation in vivo.While the biochemical bases of glycan biosynthesis are well studied, little is known about how this network is regulated, especially in a cell-, tissue-, and environmentspecific manner.

    A combination of high-throughput glycomics, genetics, and genomics offers a ‘‘data-driven hypotheses” approach to discover the regulation of protein glycosylation in an agnostic manner[20,21].At present, genetic studies of human blood plasma, IgG,and TF N-glycosylation have established the link to genetic variation at 34 loci.From the analysis of candidate genes in these loci,it follows that this genetic variation affects glycosyltransferases involved in the fucosylation,branching,and terminal modifications of N-glycans and tissue-specific regulators involved in the differentiation, maturation, and regulation of the cells (hepatocytes and plasma cells) producing the relevant glycoproteins.The variations affecting the cellular machinery involved in the production and transportation of the secreted glycoproteins and the production and structure of the studied glycoproteins(TF and IgG)themselves are also becoming apparent.For about half of the 34 loci associated with variation in N-glycosylation, the biological mechanism of action may be hypothesized based on the presence of a strong candidate gene; moreover, for about half of these loci, a mechanism linking genetic variation to the target gene can also be hypothesized.The large number of loci for which a mechanism of action is difficult to hypothesize may provide a reach source of novel knowledge about human glycobiology.Hypotheses about the mechanism of action must be targeted in functional wet-lab experiments.

    A great deal of effort has been made to establish and understand the mechanisms linking variation in N-glycosylation to human health and disease.It has been demonstrated that a number of loci associated with IgG N-glycosylation may have pleiotropic effects on the risk of autoimmune and inflammatory disease, while plasma N-glycome loci may have pleiotropic effects on endogenous cardiovascular risk factors.The candidate genes in these loci provide a starting point for research on the common etiology of Nglycosylation and complex diseases.Genetics have provided support for the hypothesis that the N-glycosylation of IgG may serve as a biomarker for autoimmune disease, while the plasma Nglycome may provide biomarkers for endocrine disease and cancer.These findings confirm the results from epidemiologic studies that have established parts of the N-glycome as risk factors and/or biomarkers of cardiovascular,metabolic,and autoimmune diseases and cancers [29,145].However, it should be noted that glycogenomic studies have not only supported but also proposed novel biomarkers of human diseases[16,48,137].Some of these biomarkers have demonstrated high discriminative power and are en route to clinical practice [118].

    9.Perspectives

    Glycogenetics and glycogenomics are evolving rapidly.We expect at least three directions for further studies of the genetic control of human protein glycosylation.First,compared with studies of other complex traits,the sample sizes used in genetic analyses of human N-glycomics are still relatively small, which limits the application of quantitative genetics methods.We expect more powerful GWASs with increased sample size in the future.For complex human traits,it is expected that doubling the sample size will roughly double the number of discovered genetic loci [60,61].An increased sample size will lead to more precise estimates of genetic effect, thereby providing more reliable input for quantitative genetics analyses such as MR, colocalization, genetic correlation, and others, allowing for a better understanding of the role of the glycome in disease etiology.

    Second, we expect the rise of studies focused on single-protein glycosylation.The availability of material for these studies will depend on advances in high-throughput glycomics technologies[22].Scaling up conventional glycomics to large-scale glycoprotein analysis using, for example, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) instrumentation is important for the advancement toward functional glycomics that permit highly detailed site-, protein-, and cell-specific elucidation of the Nglycans attached to proteins.Therefore,it is logical to assume that a deeper understanding of the mechanism of action of specific GWAS loci will at least partly depend on developments in proteomics and glycoproteomics.Such studies will not only lead to better interpretation of observed genetic associations and deeper dissection of tissue-specific regulation networks but will also facilitate translation to clinical applications.

    Third, progress in high-throughput glycomics and the genetics of glycosylation will be complemented and enhanced by advances in multi-omics approaches.Of specific interest are techniques for measuring the transcriptomes of single cells [146].Such technology makes it possible to decompose transcription in a complex mixture of cells,thus providing potential for aligning glycosylation with specific—potentially rare—cell types.The availability of samples with measured multi-omics layers will have a synergistic effect on our understanding of human glycobiology and will improve the integration of the glycome into the system biology of cells, tissues, and organisms.It will also facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers, drug targets, and therapeutics with better lines of evidence.

    Thus, the continuous study of the genetic control of protein Nglycosylation should provide further insights into our knowledge of protein glycosylation biology, which will help in the development of new approaches for fighting glycome-dependent forms of autoimmune, cancer, and other diseases.

    Acknowledgments

    We are grateful to Anna Soplenkova and Denis Maslov for help with tables and figures.

    This work is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Research Program at the Moscow State University(MSU) Institute for Artificial Intelligence.

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Anna Timoshchuk, Sodbo Sharapov, and Yurii S.Aulchenko declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    Yurii S.Aulchenko is co-founder and co-owner of PolyKnomics BV, a research-intensive SME providing services and developing products in the field in quantitative and statistical genetics and computational genomics.

    Appendix A.Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.03.013.

    久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲在久久综合| 丝袜喷水一区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲在久久综合| 赤兔流量卡办理| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜精品在线福利| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产av不卡久久| 午夜激情欧美在线| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩av免费高清视频| av免费观看日本| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久热精品热| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产成人a区在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一本久久精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 高清av免费在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产视频内射| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲国产av新网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 在线天堂最新版资源| av福利片在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 美女高潮的动态| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 免费av毛片视频| www.色视频.com| 国产不卡一卡二| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 熟女电影av网| www.av在线官网国产| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 一级黄片播放器| 久99久视频精品免费| 国内精品宾馆在线| 一级毛片我不卡| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲国产色片| 国产91av在线免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 色综合色国产| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 老女人水多毛片| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| av黄色大香蕉| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久这里有精品视频免费| .国产精品久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产高潮美女av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 97在线视频观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 七月丁香在线播放| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 搞女人的毛片| 免费观看在线日韩| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 中国国产av一级| 久久午夜福利片| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日日啪夜夜撸| videossex国产| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日本午夜av视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美另类一区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | av一本久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲色图av天堂| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 九草在线视频观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 91狼人影院| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产色婷婷99| 精品国产三级普通话版| 成年免费大片在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人欧美大片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 插逼视频在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲精品视频女| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 黑人高潮一二区| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 免费看不卡的av| 国产精品一及| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成人综合一区亚洲| www.色视频.com| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| or卡值多少钱| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产成人91sexporn| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 嫩草影院新地址| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美区成人在线视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 内射极品少妇av片p| 天堂√8在线中文| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久久久性生活片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 日本一二三区视频观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日本免费a在线| 成人欧美大片| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 一级爰片在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲色图av天堂| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲在线观看片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 亚洲成色77777| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 赤兔流量卡办理| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 三级国产精品片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 一本一本综合久久| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 青春草国产在线视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产美女午夜福利| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国内精品宾馆在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | kizo精华| 夫妻午夜视频| 天堂网av新在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 丝袜喷水一区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 直男gayav资源| 日韩中字成人| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 极品教师在线视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 美女高潮的动态| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产高潮美女av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产色婷婷99| 一级片'在线观看视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| h日本视频在线播放| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 插逼视频在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 欧美激情在线99| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 在线免费十八禁| 男女边摸边吃奶| 三级国产精品片| 深夜a级毛片| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美人与善性xxx| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产一级毛片在线| 精品一区二区免费观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产亚洲最大av| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲成色77777| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久热精品热| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产在线男女| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 午夜免费激情av| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 日本色播在线视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 成年免费大片在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲在线自拍视频| or卡值多少钱| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久精品夜色国产| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 有码 亚洲区| 伦精品一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产成人福利小说| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 色哟哟·www| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 只有这里有精品99| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| www.av在线官网国产| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 日韩强制内射视频| av专区在线播放| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 中文天堂在线官网| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 午夜视频国产福利| 一级片'在线观看视频| av专区在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| www.av在线官网国产| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日本黄大片高清| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 毛片女人毛片| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 免费少妇av软件| 一夜夜www| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| av专区在线播放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产极品天堂在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| ponron亚洲| 99久久人妻综合| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 高清av免费在线| 黄色日韩在线| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | av黄色大香蕉| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 中文天堂在线官网| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 免费大片18禁| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 日本免费a在线| 午夜福利高清视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本免费a在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 老女人水多毛片| 综合色丁香网| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 丝袜喷水一区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 欧美97在线视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产在视频线精品| 日韩中字成人| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 99久国产av精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在|