• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals

    2024-01-06 01:53:14AnnBetekhtinDriTukovDenisVeselkin
    植物多樣性 2023年6期

    Ann A.Betekhtin ,Dri E.Tukov ,Denis V.Veselkin

    a Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin,19 Mira Street,Ekaterinburg 620002,Russia

    b Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology,8 Marta Street,Ekaterinburg 620144,Russia

    Keywords: Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure

    ABSTRACT The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes.Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied:16 species of Poaceae,24 species of Cyperaceae,14 species of Orchidaceae,and 7 species of Iridaceae.Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species,the following was determined:number of orders of branching roots;transverse dimensions of root,stele and cortex;number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers;length of root hairs;abundance of mycorrhiza.Species of each family had well-defined syndromes.Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis.Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs.In Iridaceae,roots were branched,and root hairs were short.Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele.Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae.Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery.The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.

    1.Introduction

    Plant taxonomy and phylogenetic systematics have long been based almost exclusively on characters of generative plant parts(Takhtadzhyan 1966;Cronquist,1988).The defining power of the characters of vegetative organs for differentiation of taxonomic plant groups is obviously low.However,the structure of vegetative organs can also be taxonomically specific.For example,such features as arrangement of leaves on a stem,leaf shape,type of venation (Takhtadzhyan,1966),characteristics of integumentary and conducting tissues(Esau,1969;Gamaley,2004),leaf thickness and density(Yudina et al.,2020).Phylogenetic groups of plants can differ in the characteristics of underground organ structures,including the type and architecture of the root system(Fitter,1987;Bouda et al.,2018),as well as the diameter of absorbing roots(Chen et al.,2013).In addition,specific root symbioses are well known in plant families,for example,mycorrhizal and nitrogen-fixing.Mycorrhiza type and mycorrhizal colonization rates are considered taxonomically correlated characters (Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).

    The variety of root syndromes are mainly associated with two alternative strategies of plant nutrition -absorption (acquisition)of soil resources and nutrition with or without participation of mycorrhizal fungi (Bergmann et al.,2020).It has recently been shown that mycorrhizal hyphae can penetrate or colonize the roots of non-host plants without forming typical mycorrhizal structures,but these plants can indirectly participate in mycorrhizal nutrition by means of host plants (Wang et al.,2022).

    It is well known that root systems and absorbing roots of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are constructed in different ways (John St,1980;Brundert,1991;Eissenstat,1992;Eissenstat et al.,2000;Bergmann et al.,2020).Arbuscular mycorrhiza(AM),ectomycorrhizae and other fungi colonize parenchyma of root cortex of plants.High AM colonization rates generally accompany large root diameter (Veselkin and Betekhtina,2013;Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),a small specific root length (SRL)(Kong et al.,2019) and root surface area relative to volume.Mycorrhizal plants have fewer root branching orders,but cortex is longer compared to non-mycorrhizal plants (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).In non-mycorrhizal and facultatively mycorrhizal plants,roots are usually not only strongly branched,but often have a short or rapidly reducing cortex,which is accompanied by a small root diameter (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019) and a higher SRL(Ryser,2006).In non-mycorrhizal plants,as a rule,root hairs are well developed and roots are adapted to direct absorption of substances from soil,since they have a large surface area in relation to their volume (Eissenstat et al.,2000).Under conditions of macronutrient deficiency,roots of non-mycorrhizal plants can form various modifications,for example,bulbous root hairs and dauciform roots in sedges (Lambers et al.,2008).

    The syndromes of the structure of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots are constant in a wide range of conditions and within different taxonomic groups.Root syndromes of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are only one of possible major root syndromes.Another subdivision of a similar scale can be,for example,root structure syndromes of monocots and dicots,due to absence/presence of a secondary structure,as well as taxa of the superorder level(Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).Along with major syndromes,root character syndromes have been described in a limited number of species of steppe plants (Zhou et al.,2021),species within the same genus (Ehmig and Linder,2020) and subgenus(Konoplenko et al.,2017).

    Monocots include about 85,000 species from 11 to 12 orders.They dominate many biomes and are of crucial economic importance (Givnish et al.,2018).Monocot plants are convenient for studying various root traits for several reasons.Firstly,there is no secondary tissues in monocot roots.Secondly,secondary xylem and a cork layers are not formed in shoots and roots.This means that roots of different monocots have the same relatively simple morpho-anatomical structure.This creates a basis for a confident comparison of subtle or quantitative features of roots of different groups or taxa.Thirdly,monocots are characterized by a wide variety of symbiotic (arbuscular and orchid mycorrhiza,dark septate endophytes) and non-symbiotic (aerenchyma,dauciform roots,simple and bulbous root hairs) adaptations for soil resources exploitation.Characteristics of root hairs,such as high density and length,are closely related to non-mycorrhizal nutrition acquisition(John St,1980).Monocots generally have well-developed root hairs that persist over long periods(Kauff et al.,2000).This trait makes it possible to compare the length of root hairs in taxa with different adaptations to soil nutrition in an effort to understand how soil nutrition drives diversity in root structure.

    Angiosperm species that develop mycorrhizae tend to form relatively short root hairs,whereas those that do not form mycorrhizae develop relatively long root hairs (Baylis,1975;John St,1980).However,the relationship between the length of root hairs and the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization has rarely been studied.Monocots have a wide variety of relationships with mycorrhizal fungi.Thus,to understand strategies of nutrient absorption,we must examine root hair size in these plants.

    Studies of root syndromes often use integral features such as specific root length (SRL),root tissue density (RTD),and root diameter (Bergmann et al.,2020).This approach is not fully applicable to describing structural transformations of roots in response to different types of soil nutrition.For example,in thicker roots,the cortex may have a relatively larger area(Kong et al.,2014)either due to a larger number of layers of cortical cells in mycorrhizal species,or due to a well-developed aerenchyma (Lynch,2015) in nonmycorrhizal species,which in turn strongly affects the density of root tissue and its specific length.Because of this complication,it is not always possible to adequately describe the entire variety of root syndromes.Therefore,it seems to be more reasonable to find differences between anatomical features of roots.Absorbing roots of different taxa,which undoubtedly differ in many ways,are often attributed to the same type based on SRL and RTD.However,if we consider the syndromes of traits,we may encounter an unexpectedly great diversity of absorbing root structures within a class.

    We studied structural features -syndromes -of root systems and absorbing roots in species of four multispecies boreal families of monocots: Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,Iridaceae.We initially assumed that roots of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species should have different structures,primarily due to the peculiarities of their interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.Therefore,the aim of our work was to give an accurate and uniform description and quantitative characterization of root trait syndromes of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site

    Studies were carried out in Ekaterinburg,Middle Urals,Russia(56°37′N,61°04′E),in the southern part of the boreal zone of the Middle Urals.This region has a temperate continental climate.Intensive plant growth lasts from May to August.The temperature rises above 10°C for 127 days a year on average.Average annual air temperature is +0.9°С,the highest average temperature,+17.6°С,occurs in July,and the lowest average temperature,-12.6°С,occurs in January.The average annual precipitation is 537 mm,with a maximum in July.Typical vegetation in the nearby territories is pine forest.The range of other habitats,however,is also quite wide:small-leaved forests,floodplains,meadows,petrophytic habitats,anthropogenic wastelands.Two main types of soils are common in this area -brown forest and sod-podzolic.

    2.2.Field research and sampling

    Overall,61 species were analyzed from the following families:Poaceae (16 species),Cyperaceae (24 species),Orchidaceae (14 species) and Iridaceae (7 species).Whole plants with intact roots were collected at the end of June-July 2008-2020 in their typical natural conditions,which cover a wide range of biotopes depending on moisture.Names and ciphers of habitats are given according to theEUNIS Habitat Classification(Chytry et al.,2020):R1B continental dry grassland(true steppe)-7 species;T35 temperate continentalPinus sylvestrisforest-17 species;R35 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic hay meadow -9 species;R36 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic pasture-1 species;R37 temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grassland -1 species;Q22 poor fen -4 species;Q42 extremely rich moss-sedge fen -3 species;Q43 tall-sedge base-rich fen -1 species;Q53 tall-sedge bed -10 species;V15 bare tilled,fallow or recently abandoned arable land-1 species.The species of the genusIrisbecame an exception,as they are rarely found in natural conditions.We sampled Iridaceae from the collection of Botanical Garden of Ural Federal University,which is based on wild specimens introduced from natural habitats.

    2.3.Determination of roots structure characteristics

    Roots were cleaned out from soil with water and fixed in 70%ethanol.For each individual,we determined the order of root branching in accordance with the centripetal ordering system,where orders are distributed from the distal end (Pregitzer et al.,2002).Roots at the distal end of the root system-roots of the first order -are formed on the second order roots,which are laid on the third order roots.Thus,in monocots,the highest order is the thickest adventitious roots extending from the rhizome or stem.We took five roots of the last branching order (i.e.,the thinnest)from each individual.Then,root segments of the last order were cut transversely into sections 20-50 μm thick and examined using a Leica DM 5000 microscope (Leica,Germany) at 150× magnification.The following indicators were measured: root diameter;сortex thickness;diameter of central cylinder (stele);number of primary xylem vessels;length of root hairs;number of layers of cortical cells,including exodermis and parenchyma of cortex.Quantitative characteristics were measured using Simagis Mesoplant program(SI-AMS,Russia).Partial volume of cortex and stele was determined based on the obtained measurements by dividing the stele area by the root cross-sectional area and multiplying by 100%.

    2.4.Definition of mycorrhiza development

    For each species,one sample of roots from 5 individuals was randomly selected and fixed in 70%ethanol to analyze mycorrhiza development.Mycorrhizal colonization was determined for each sample on 15 fragments of thin roots of the last and penultimate orders,each 1 cm long.Fragments were randomly selected from the root system.Roots were subjected to maceration in a water bath in KOH for 30-60 min and colored by aniline blue(Selivanov,1981).Hyphae,arbuscules,and vesicles of AM fungi were recorded on squashed preparations at 200×magnification.Species that had arbuscules were considered mycorrhizal.Species in which hyphae and vesicles were found,but arbuscules were absent,were not classified as mycorrhizal.This condition was important for the genusCarex,most of whose species are considered nonmycorrhizal according to previous studies (Miller et al.,1999).Presence of fungal structures (hyphae,vesicles,and arbuscules)was determined in 5 fields of the microscope on each centimeterlong fragment of the root.Thus,there were 75 visual fields for each individual and 375 visual fields for each species.The intensity of mycorrhization was determined by fungus occurrence in the roots:100% -fungal structures were found in all studied visual fields in cortical cells;50% -fungal structures were found in half of the studied visual fields in cortical cells,etc.In general,accounting for AM using this method (Selivanov,1981) produces results close to those of a widely used method of accounting for AM development(McGonigle et al.,1990).This was previously demonstrated in Akhmetzhanova et al.(2012).

    2.5.Data analysis

    In the process of analyzing variability of individual variables,the following methods were used:for ranks-Kruskal-Wallis test;for dimensional and countable features-one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA).Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to determine the key features of the root structure and reduce the prediction interval.Continuum variables were transformed before ANOVA and PCA to achieve a greater compliance with normal distribution: values of dimensional and countable features were logarithmic using natural logarithm;values of features,expressed in shares,were subjected to arcsine transformation.To assess the degree of differences between species of different families according to several characters at a time,we used permutational analysis of variance -PERMANOVA (Anderson,2001) with calculation of Euclidean distance and 9999 permutations.ANOVA and PCA were performed using STATISTICA 8.0 software (StatSoft Inc.,1984-2007).PERMANOVA calculations were performed using R program (R Core Team,2022),‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al.,2020).

    3.Results

    3.1.Characteristics of root structure

    All studied features of root structure differed among families of monocots (Fig.1).Characteristics describing the overall transverse size of a root and how successful the AM formation is varied the most among families.Orchidaceae roots had the fewest branches,while Cyperaceae and Iridaceae roots had the most branches(Fig.2).The largest average,root diameter,stele diameter and cortex thickness were found in Orchidaceae(Fig.3);the smallest in Cyperaceae(Figs.3 and 4).The difference between these families in terms of the average size was 18-25 times.The abundance of mycorrhiza differed between Cyperaceae and Iridaceae the most(30 times).The least variable between families -no more than 3 times -were the partial volume of stele,the number of layers of exodermis and core parenchyma.

    Fig.1.Traits of root structure and root system of 4 monocot families (Cyp.-Cyperaceae;Iri.-Iridaceae;Poa.-Poaceae;Orc.-Orchidaceae);alphabetic indexes show homogeneous values according to Mann-Whitney U test (maximum branch order) or Tukey's test (the other traits).

    Fig.2.Roots of Cypripedium guttatum (Orchidaceae) (A), Calamagrostis epigejos (Poaceae) (B), Iris aphylla (Iridaceae) (C),Сarex supina (Cyperaceae) (D).Roman numerals mark orders of root branching according to classification(Pregitzer et al.,2002).In Orchidaceae,the root system is represented by 1st order adventitious roots that do not branch.In Carex,3rd order roots are formed from adventitious 4th order roots,then go 2nd order roots,and 1st order roots.The 1st order roots are the thinnest.In all species,we compared only 1st order roots.It can be seen how much 1st order roots differ in size in orchids and sedges.Bar for Сarex supina is 1 cm.

    Fig.3.Cross sections of the absorptive roots under visible light:Neottia nidus-avis(mycoheterotrophic orchid)(Orchidaceae)(A),Phragmites australis(Poaceae)(B),Iris pseudacorus(Iridaceae) (C), Carex pseudocyperus (Cyperaceae) (D).Legend: root hair (Rh);epidermis (Ep);exodermis (Ex);parenchyma of the cortex (C);endodermis (En);vessels of primary xylem (X).The bar is 100 microns.

    Thus,species of each family had a well-defined list of root characteristics by which they could be distinguished (Table 1).Orchidaceae and Iridaceae had thick roots and a relatively large stele.The roots of Orchidaceae did not branch,but root hairs were long.In contrast,the roots of Iridaceae were highly branched but had short root hairs.Exodermis is strongly developed in Iridaceae and less developed in Orchidaceae.In addition,Orchidaceae and Iridaceae differed in mycorrhiza types: orchid (and possibly mycoheterotrophy) in Orchidaceae and typical AM in Iridaceae.

    Table 1 Formalization of structural features of roots of four monocots families.

    Poaceae and Cyperaceae had thin roots and a relatively thin stele.But in Poaceae,roots were less branched than in Cyperaceae.Families also differed in length of root hairs,with short root hairs in Poaceae and long hairs in Cyperaceae.Also,Poaceae species are usually mycorrhizal and,in our study,formed abundant typical AM.Cyperaceae,as a rule,only randomly form AM,and in our study,the abundance of AM structures in sedge roots was low.

    3.2.Root structure syndromes

    Three of four families of monocots possessed syndromes,i.e.,combinations of root traits that clearly differed from those of other families.In three families-Orchidaceae,Iridaceae and Cyperaceae-one or more characters that form the basis of a syndrome were at extremes,i.e.,were either at their maximum or minimum compared to the values of species from other families.Orchidaceae had unbranched thick roots with a unique type of mycorrhizae.Iridaceae had relatively thick branched roots with developed exodermis,and AM.Cyperaceae had well-branched thin roots with long root hairs with sparse AM.Only Poaceae roots did not have any specific or extreme characteristics.By all indications,Poaceae occupy an intermediate position between other families.

    Principal components analysis (Table 2) can either (i) identify the leading,main features from a larger set,or (ii) collapse the original large set of measured variables into a limited number of new features-principal components.PCA has shown that some of the measured features of root structure are strongly interrelated and are combined into well-interpreted principal components.The first two principal components together explain more than 80% of the variability of the original 10 root structure characteristics,both when using the rotation of principal components and without rotation.Based on the structure of correlations obtained without their rotation,two informative,maximally unrelated,actually measured features can be distinguished:1)diameter of stele,which characterizes a total transverse size of a root;2)length of root hairs.The rest of the features are correlated to some extent with either the first or the second feature.Based on the structure of feature correlations obtained after principal components rotation,two easily interpreted principal components can be distinguished:1)a component describing a transverse size of a root;2) a component positively associated with the formation of exodermis and mycorrhiza and negatively associated with the length of root hairs.

    Using PERMANOVA analysis,we found that the monocotyledonous families differ from each other in terms of root structure,regardless of the studied set of features.Statistically significant differences between the families were established by analyzing three sets of features: 1) according to the complex of all real root structure characteristics:F(3;57)=104.87;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 85%of the total variance of root features;2)according to two key real features(Fig.5 a):F(3;57)=207.53;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 92%of the total variance of root features;3)in the space of two main principal components(Fig.5b):F(3;57)=103.92;P<0.001.

    In the process of comparing all four families simultaneously,PERMANOVA tests a hypothesis that there are significant differences in at least one out of six possible pairwise comparisons.In other words,based on the results of PERMANOVA,i.e.,comparison of all four families,it is impossible to determine whether the root structure syndromes differ between the families that are closest to each other.Therefore,we conducted an additional study to see whether the differences between two families whose centroids are closest to each other (i.e.,Iridaceae and Poaceae;see Fig.4) are statistically significant.In the spaces specified by different combinations of features,the following significance of difference between these families was obtained:1)according to the complex of all the real characteristics:F(1;21)=16.76;P<0.001;2) according to two key real characteristics(see Fig.5):F(1;21)=15.39;P<0.001;3)in space of two main factors (see Fig.5):F(1;21)=5.86;P=0.009.Thus,root structure syndromes differ significantly even between two families with the closest character values.Therefore,the conclusion about the specificity of root structure syndromes in four monocotyledonous families has been proved and does not depend on specific methods of data analysis.

    Fig.5.Differentiation of species of four monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae;-Poaceae;-Orchidaceae) in space of two traits of roots structure(a)and in space of two main principal components(b).Group centroids and standard deviations are shown.Arrows in(b)show principal components loads of the main features of the root structure,which form principal components plotted along abscissa and ordinate: D -root diameter;RH -hair roots length: M-mycorrhiza;Ex -exodermis layers number.

    4.Discussion

    Available information on the characteristics of root structure and their diverse combinations observed during adaptation to different soil and climatic conditions is incomplete.What is clear thus far is only the most general changes in root structure in response to major environmental factors(Freschet et al.,2021).This model (Freschet et al.,2021) does not consider the taxonomic specificity of a root structure.

    To explain the variability of roots,the root economics approach has traditionally been used,which includes strategies for fast and slow acquisition of resources by roots(Reich,2014;Weemstra et al.,2016).The diversity of root trait syndromes has recently been associated with two contrasting strategies of soil nutrition -the ability to absorb soil resources with the participation of mycorrhizal fungi or autonomously (Bergmann et al.,2020).Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes:SRL,RTD,root diameter,cortical fraction (Bergmann et al.,2020).Apparently,syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features,where the roots of plants belonging to the same group(AM)may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group(Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).

    Our work focuses on species from the four largest families of monocots (Givnish et al.,2018).These families belong to two orders: Poales (Cyperaceae and Poaceae) and Asparagales (Iridaceae and Orchidaceae) (Givnish et al.,2018).In total,we studied 61 species of monocots.This consists of 10% of cereal species,23% of sedges and 44%of orchids from those growing in the Middle Urals.Our data convincingly confirm a high specificity of absorption root structural syndromes in four families of monocots.

    In monocots,compared to dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),the overall variability of some root characteristics is high.For example,in herbaceous dicots,root system branching varies from 3 to 5 orders (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),whereas in monocots within the present study-from 1 to 4 orders.In dicots,the thickness of first-order roots varied between families by no more than two times,and in monocots,up to 15-20 times.This is more than a 10-fold difference observed when comparing the thickness of absorptive roots (excluding roots with secondary thickening) of grasses on a global scale (Ma et al.,2018).High variability in root structure of monocots is explained by the difference between roots of Orchidaceae and the others.If we do not consider Orchidaceae,the difference between families in root system branching degree is leveled,and the characters describing transverse dimensions differ by only a factor of 2-3.

    The central feature of Orchidaceae root syndrome is an interaction with basidiomycetes to form orchid mycorrhiza (Smith and Read,2010).The root system of Orchidaceae consists of fleshy,non-branching roots that are laid down on stems or rhizomes.Weak root branching along with large transverse dimensions are also found in other plant groups (Comas and Eissenstat,2009;Comas et al.,2014;Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).This structure is optimal for the habitat of mycorrhizal fungi,which can increase the absorptive surface of roots by a factor of 2-6 compared to a branching root system with fine roots (McCormack and Iversen,2019).Fungal mycelium increases the absorptive surface area of roots(Dearnaley and Cameron,2017).This may be why orchid roots usually form few root hairs (Hew and Yong,2004).In our results,orchid root hairs are long.Thick parenchyma of the cortex in Orchidaceae,in addition to the symbiosis formation area,can perform storage functions.In some orchids,absorbing roots are perennial organs (Salazar et al.,2003;Hagsater et al.,2005).In orchids,along with the development of parenchyma,a strong development of the stele was recorded.Our results showed that cortical parenchyma is well developed in taxa with a welldeveloped stele,or,more precisely,in taxa with a well-developed xylem.The number and size of vessels in orchid roots is an order of magnitude higher than in roots of other families.In absorptive roots,stable allometric connections exist between cortex and stele(Kong et al.,2019).In relation to axial transport channels (phloem sieve tubes,xylem vessels),radial transport networks of parenchymal cells are the origins and ends of transport system,zones of its loading or unloading.The root parenchyma with developed mycorrhiza is accompanied by an increase in the ascending flow,compared with the parenchyma of non-mycorrhizal species(Gamaley,2004).The specificity of orchid roots structure correlates with their other bioecological features: usually highly specialized entomophily;small seeds;ontogenesis with stage of protokorma and other unusual variants of ontogenesis;a special type of mycorrhizae not found in other plants(Waterman and Bidartondo,2008;Fay and Chase 2009;Merckx,2013).

    The transverse dimensions of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae roots were not the same,but quite similar.Significant differences among Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae were related to adaptations for absorbing soil resources.The structure of root features correlations with the main principal component“Exodermis,root hairs length and mycorrhiza”(Table 2)indicates that there is a negative correlation between the abundance of AM and the length of root hairs.Such a correlation is prominent if families with arbuscular mycorrhiza-Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae -are analyzed without Orchidaceae.This approach allows us to see possible ranges of AM abundance depending on the length of root hairs (Fig.6).In Cyperaceae,the leading adaptation for absorption of soil resources is long root hairs,whereas in Iridaceae and Poaceae it is predominantly AM.

    Fig.6.Dependence between length of root hairs and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in species of three monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae; -Poaceae).Dotted lines conditionally show range of variability in abundance of mycorrhiza.

    Our data clearly illustrate a well-known pattern: the fundamental ability to form one or another type of mycorrhiza is determined phylogenetically(Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).However,the abundance of mycorrhiza depends not only on the taxonomic position of plants,but also on the environmental conditions (Hetrick,1991).This is evidenced by a large range of variations in AM abundance in both Iridaceae and Poaceae.

    The family Iridaceae is closely related to the orchid family(Givnish et al.,2018).In Iridaceae species,we found an unexpected combination of root characters: a high number of root branching orders,thick roots with thick cortex and stele,and short root hairs.Iridaceae were probably originally adapted to arid conditions(Rodionenko,1961),and most modern iris species have pronounced xerophytic properties,while the presence of hygrophytes and hydrophytes among them is secondary.The root systems of irises,although branched,are rather short.This indirectly indicates adaptation to pulsating inflow of water with precipitation.The strong growth of cortex in Iridaceae may be associated not only with the creation of conditions for mycorrhizal fungi(Comas et al.,2012),but also with a water storage function.It is significant that some species of the Iridaceae family are adapted to dry conditions due to the formation of contractilis roots (Ruzin,1979;Jernstedt,1984),which is also accompanied by the strong growth of root parenchyma (North et al.,2008).Strong cortex growth requires strengthening mechanical tissue-exodermis.In turn,exodermis (i) maintains the shape of thick roots,(ii) retains water in tissues,and (iii) increases the sucking power of tissues due to the elastic deformation of the cell wall (Bakhari and Wendelbo,1978).

    In the Cyperaceae root syndrome,the leading characteristics are those that compensate for a weak connection with AM fungi.These are a highly branched root system,thin roots with poorly developed cortex and stele,sparse exodermis,and long root hairs.Such structural features are aimed at increasing the surface of contact with soil and allow sedges to explore large volumes of soil.In the absence of mycorrhiza,low-accessible elements,such as phosphorus,can be obtained from sedges using dauciform roots.Interestingly,Cyperaceae is characterized by the largest range of variability for principal component 2 in Fig.5a.This may be Cyperaceae represented the largest number of species in this study.But it may also reflect Cyperaceae's great variety of original adaptations for absorbing soil resources.In addition to long root hairs and AM,a wide range of other root modifications are possible in Cyperaceae: dauciform roots (Shane et al.,2006);bulbous-based root hairs (Miller et al.,1999);ectomycorrhiza-like structures(Harrington and Mitchell,2002);aerenchyma(Visser et al.,2000);and dark septate endophytes (Muthukumar et al.,2004;Weishampel and Bedford,2006).These adaptations can be widely combined with each other both in one sedge species and in one individual (Veselkin et al.,2014;Konoplenko et al.,2017).Despite the fact that the species of Cyperaceae family are poorly related to mycorrhiza,their roots are characterized by a high percentage of cortex.Most of theCarexspecies grow in waterlogged habitats and cortex overgrowth may be associated with the formation of aerenchyma,which is necessary for storing oxygen inside the roots during flooding (Kutschera and Lichtenegger,1982).At the same time,the death and lysis of cortical cells during the formation of aerenchyma can negatively affect the development of mycorrhiza.In addition,the lower Cyperaceae stele is characterized by the absence of moisture deficiency.

    The Poaceae family is closely related to Cyperaceae (Givnish et al.,2018).The key features of the Poaceae root syndrome are intermediate between Iridaceae and Cyperaceae.These features are low-extended cortex and stele,and typical exodermis.The ability to form a typical AM is expectedly combined with short root hairs.However,the structural features of cereal roots leave them the opportunity to regulate the surface area of exchange with soil autonomously,i.e.,without mycorrhiza,which can compensate for non-obligate relationships of grass roots with mycorrhizal fungi.At the same time,the nature of emerging compromises in roots of cereals is largely determined by adaptation to the specific habitat conditions (Fort et al.,2013;Wahl and Ryser,2000).

    5.Conclusion

    Syndromes of root features of four families of monocots -Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae -were predictably different.An unexpected and therefore new result of our work that the root syndromes of different families of monocots show large-scale and highly significant differences.In fact,root structure syndromes are unique in each family.It is expected that the main vector,with which all other structural features of roots are consistent,is set by the interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.This conclusion is fully consistent with similar comparisons only within dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2014) and with generalizations about plants in general(Bergmann et al.,2020).According to the peculiarities of the roots structure,the species of four families of monocots fall into three contrasting groups: Orchidaceae with a special type of mycorrhiza;Cyperaceae with rare or occasional arbuscular mycorrhiza;Iridaceae and Poaceae with typical arbuscular mycorrhiza.The features of roots of different families are so prominent that even Iridaceae and Poaceae differ significantly according to the majority of characters.The specificity of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae root syndromes means that species of these families use different strategies for obtaining water and nutrients,including different symbiotic interactions in these strategies.But the traits that make up root syndromes are also correlated with other functions performed by roots,such as storing water and nutrients.The established patterns are important for understanding variability of root characters in species of different taxa growing within the same community.

    We analyzed root syndromes of only four families of monocots.This,of course,does not give a complete picture of the diversity of root syndromes in all 59,000 species of monocots and even in monocots of the boreal zone.It would be interesting to determine whether root syndromes are specific to other monocot families common in the boreal zone,such as Liliaceae and Alliaceae.Perhaps such a comparison would expand the diversity of described monocot root syndromes.

    Author contributions

    AB and DV developed the ideas and designed methodology;AB and DT collected the data;DV analyzed the data;AB and DV wrote the manuscript.All the authors significantly contributed to the drafts and gave their final approval for publication.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No conflict of interest exits with the submission of this manuscript,and it is approved by all authors for publication.

    Acknowledgements

    在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人影院久久| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 女警被强在线播放| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久香蕉精品热| 超碰97精品在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 两性夫妻黄色片| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲国产欧美网| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久久久大精品| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 曰老女人黄片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 成人国语在线视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 黄色视频不卡| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 欧美中文综合在线视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 热re99久久国产66热| 丝袜美足系列| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 免费少妇av软件| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 99热只有精品国产| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 黄色视频不卡| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产高清videossex| 咕卡用的链子| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| av网站在线播放免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 深夜精品福利| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| av网站在线播放免费| 国产1区2区3区精品| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美成人午夜精品| 在线天堂中文资源库| 性少妇av在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 亚洲五月天丁香| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久影院123| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久精品影院6| 99久久国产精品久久久| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 视频区图区小说| 色综合婷婷激情| 午夜视频精品福利| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | www.精华液| 久久人妻av系列| 咕卡用的链子| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲激情在线av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产av一区二区精品久久| av有码第一页| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| www日本在线高清视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产av又大| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 午夜福利欧美成人| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 黄色 视频免费看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 免费在线观看日本一区| 搡老岳熟女国产| a在线观看视频网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲av熟女| 久久青草综合色| 在线视频色国产色| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 高清在线国产一区| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产精品免费视频内射| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美在线黄色| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 91成人精品电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 制服诱惑二区| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 美国免费a级毛片| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产在线观看jvid| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久影院123| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 丝袜美足系列| 黄色 视频免费看| videosex国产| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美大码av| 亚洲 国产 在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 88av欧美| 精品第一国产精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 黄色 视频免费看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 在线观看66精品国产| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久热在线av| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品电影一区二区在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久9热在线精品视频| 999精品在线视频| 久久亚洲真实| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 99re在线观看精品视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 黄色视频不卡| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 电影成人av| 美女福利国产在线| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久精品成人免费网站| 看黄色毛片网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久伊人香网站| 国产av在哪里看| 青草久久国产| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 午夜免费成人在线视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产av在哪里看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 色在线成人网| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品永久免费网站| 深夜精品福利| 99国产精品99久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 美国免费a级毛片| 一夜夜www| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| www.www免费av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 手机成人av网站| www.www免费av| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久久久九九精品影院| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 99热只有精品国产| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产av在哪里看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 美女福利国产在线| 1024香蕉在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 午夜福利欧美成人| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 一级片免费观看大全| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 五月开心婷婷网| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成年版毛片免费区| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 91成年电影在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日本a在线网址| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 老司机福利观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 99久久人妻综合| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 伦理电影免费视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久人妻av系列| 88av欧美| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 在线天堂中文资源库| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 美国免费a级毛片| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| a级毛片黄视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 午夜视频精品福利| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久香蕉国产精品| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 视频区图区小说| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 午夜福利,免费看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线看a的网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品第一国产精品| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 午夜免费激情av| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| aaaaa片日本免费| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一级片'在线观看视频| 黄色女人牲交| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产区一区二久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲在线自拍视频| videosex国产| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品|