• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals

    2024-01-06 01:53:14AnnBetekhtinDriTukovDenisVeselkin
    植物多樣性 2023年6期

    Ann A.Betekhtin ,Dri E.Tukov ,Denis V.Veselkin

    a Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin,19 Mira Street,Ekaterinburg 620002,Russia

    b Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology,8 Marta Street,Ekaterinburg 620144,Russia

    Keywords: Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure

    ABSTRACT The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes.Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied:16 species of Poaceae,24 species of Cyperaceae,14 species of Orchidaceae,and 7 species of Iridaceae.Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species,the following was determined:number of orders of branching roots;transverse dimensions of root,stele and cortex;number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers;length of root hairs;abundance of mycorrhiza.Species of each family had well-defined syndromes.Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis.Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs.In Iridaceae,roots were branched,and root hairs were short.Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele.Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae.Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery.The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.

    1.Introduction

    Plant taxonomy and phylogenetic systematics have long been based almost exclusively on characters of generative plant parts(Takhtadzhyan 1966;Cronquist,1988).The defining power of the characters of vegetative organs for differentiation of taxonomic plant groups is obviously low.However,the structure of vegetative organs can also be taxonomically specific.For example,such features as arrangement of leaves on a stem,leaf shape,type of venation (Takhtadzhyan,1966),characteristics of integumentary and conducting tissues(Esau,1969;Gamaley,2004),leaf thickness and density(Yudina et al.,2020).Phylogenetic groups of plants can differ in the characteristics of underground organ structures,including the type and architecture of the root system(Fitter,1987;Bouda et al.,2018),as well as the diameter of absorbing roots(Chen et al.,2013).In addition,specific root symbioses are well known in plant families,for example,mycorrhizal and nitrogen-fixing.Mycorrhiza type and mycorrhizal colonization rates are considered taxonomically correlated characters (Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).

    The variety of root syndromes are mainly associated with two alternative strategies of plant nutrition -absorption (acquisition)of soil resources and nutrition with or without participation of mycorrhizal fungi (Bergmann et al.,2020).It has recently been shown that mycorrhizal hyphae can penetrate or colonize the roots of non-host plants without forming typical mycorrhizal structures,but these plants can indirectly participate in mycorrhizal nutrition by means of host plants (Wang et al.,2022).

    It is well known that root systems and absorbing roots of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are constructed in different ways (John St,1980;Brundert,1991;Eissenstat,1992;Eissenstat et al.,2000;Bergmann et al.,2020).Arbuscular mycorrhiza(AM),ectomycorrhizae and other fungi colonize parenchyma of root cortex of plants.High AM colonization rates generally accompany large root diameter (Veselkin and Betekhtina,2013;Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),a small specific root length (SRL)(Kong et al.,2019) and root surface area relative to volume.Mycorrhizal plants have fewer root branching orders,but cortex is longer compared to non-mycorrhizal plants (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).In non-mycorrhizal and facultatively mycorrhizal plants,roots are usually not only strongly branched,but often have a short or rapidly reducing cortex,which is accompanied by a small root diameter (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019) and a higher SRL(Ryser,2006).In non-mycorrhizal plants,as a rule,root hairs are well developed and roots are adapted to direct absorption of substances from soil,since they have a large surface area in relation to their volume (Eissenstat et al.,2000).Under conditions of macronutrient deficiency,roots of non-mycorrhizal plants can form various modifications,for example,bulbous root hairs and dauciform roots in sedges (Lambers et al.,2008).

    The syndromes of the structure of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots are constant in a wide range of conditions and within different taxonomic groups.Root syndromes of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are only one of possible major root syndromes.Another subdivision of a similar scale can be,for example,root structure syndromes of monocots and dicots,due to absence/presence of a secondary structure,as well as taxa of the superorder level(Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).Along with major syndromes,root character syndromes have been described in a limited number of species of steppe plants (Zhou et al.,2021),species within the same genus (Ehmig and Linder,2020) and subgenus(Konoplenko et al.,2017).

    Monocots include about 85,000 species from 11 to 12 orders.They dominate many biomes and are of crucial economic importance (Givnish et al.,2018).Monocot plants are convenient for studying various root traits for several reasons.Firstly,there is no secondary tissues in monocot roots.Secondly,secondary xylem and a cork layers are not formed in shoots and roots.This means that roots of different monocots have the same relatively simple morpho-anatomical structure.This creates a basis for a confident comparison of subtle or quantitative features of roots of different groups or taxa.Thirdly,monocots are characterized by a wide variety of symbiotic (arbuscular and orchid mycorrhiza,dark septate endophytes) and non-symbiotic (aerenchyma,dauciform roots,simple and bulbous root hairs) adaptations for soil resources exploitation.Characteristics of root hairs,such as high density and length,are closely related to non-mycorrhizal nutrition acquisition(John St,1980).Monocots generally have well-developed root hairs that persist over long periods(Kauff et al.,2000).This trait makes it possible to compare the length of root hairs in taxa with different adaptations to soil nutrition in an effort to understand how soil nutrition drives diversity in root structure.

    Angiosperm species that develop mycorrhizae tend to form relatively short root hairs,whereas those that do not form mycorrhizae develop relatively long root hairs (Baylis,1975;John St,1980).However,the relationship between the length of root hairs and the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization has rarely been studied.Monocots have a wide variety of relationships with mycorrhizal fungi.Thus,to understand strategies of nutrient absorption,we must examine root hair size in these plants.

    Studies of root syndromes often use integral features such as specific root length (SRL),root tissue density (RTD),and root diameter (Bergmann et al.,2020).This approach is not fully applicable to describing structural transformations of roots in response to different types of soil nutrition.For example,in thicker roots,the cortex may have a relatively larger area(Kong et al.,2014)either due to a larger number of layers of cortical cells in mycorrhizal species,or due to a well-developed aerenchyma (Lynch,2015) in nonmycorrhizal species,which in turn strongly affects the density of root tissue and its specific length.Because of this complication,it is not always possible to adequately describe the entire variety of root syndromes.Therefore,it seems to be more reasonable to find differences between anatomical features of roots.Absorbing roots of different taxa,which undoubtedly differ in many ways,are often attributed to the same type based on SRL and RTD.However,if we consider the syndromes of traits,we may encounter an unexpectedly great diversity of absorbing root structures within a class.

    We studied structural features -syndromes -of root systems and absorbing roots in species of four multispecies boreal families of monocots: Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,Iridaceae.We initially assumed that roots of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species should have different structures,primarily due to the peculiarities of their interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.Therefore,the aim of our work was to give an accurate and uniform description and quantitative characterization of root trait syndromes of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site

    Studies were carried out in Ekaterinburg,Middle Urals,Russia(56°37′N,61°04′E),in the southern part of the boreal zone of the Middle Urals.This region has a temperate continental climate.Intensive plant growth lasts from May to August.The temperature rises above 10°C for 127 days a year on average.Average annual air temperature is +0.9°С,the highest average temperature,+17.6°С,occurs in July,and the lowest average temperature,-12.6°С,occurs in January.The average annual precipitation is 537 mm,with a maximum in July.Typical vegetation in the nearby territories is pine forest.The range of other habitats,however,is also quite wide:small-leaved forests,floodplains,meadows,petrophytic habitats,anthropogenic wastelands.Two main types of soils are common in this area -brown forest and sod-podzolic.

    2.2.Field research and sampling

    Overall,61 species were analyzed from the following families:Poaceae (16 species),Cyperaceae (24 species),Orchidaceae (14 species) and Iridaceae (7 species).Whole plants with intact roots were collected at the end of June-July 2008-2020 in their typical natural conditions,which cover a wide range of biotopes depending on moisture.Names and ciphers of habitats are given according to theEUNIS Habitat Classification(Chytry et al.,2020):R1B continental dry grassland(true steppe)-7 species;T35 temperate continentalPinus sylvestrisforest-17 species;R35 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic hay meadow -9 species;R36 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic pasture-1 species;R37 temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grassland -1 species;Q22 poor fen -4 species;Q42 extremely rich moss-sedge fen -3 species;Q43 tall-sedge base-rich fen -1 species;Q53 tall-sedge bed -10 species;V15 bare tilled,fallow or recently abandoned arable land-1 species.The species of the genusIrisbecame an exception,as they are rarely found in natural conditions.We sampled Iridaceae from the collection of Botanical Garden of Ural Federal University,which is based on wild specimens introduced from natural habitats.

    2.3.Determination of roots structure characteristics

    Roots were cleaned out from soil with water and fixed in 70%ethanol.For each individual,we determined the order of root branching in accordance with the centripetal ordering system,where orders are distributed from the distal end (Pregitzer et al.,2002).Roots at the distal end of the root system-roots of the first order -are formed on the second order roots,which are laid on the third order roots.Thus,in monocots,the highest order is the thickest adventitious roots extending from the rhizome or stem.We took five roots of the last branching order (i.e.,the thinnest)from each individual.Then,root segments of the last order were cut transversely into sections 20-50 μm thick and examined using a Leica DM 5000 microscope (Leica,Germany) at 150× magnification.The following indicators were measured: root diameter;сortex thickness;diameter of central cylinder (stele);number of primary xylem vessels;length of root hairs;number of layers of cortical cells,including exodermis and parenchyma of cortex.Quantitative characteristics were measured using Simagis Mesoplant program(SI-AMS,Russia).Partial volume of cortex and stele was determined based on the obtained measurements by dividing the stele area by the root cross-sectional area and multiplying by 100%.

    2.4.Definition of mycorrhiza development

    For each species,one sample of roots from 5 individuals was randomly selected and fixed in 70%ethanol to analyze mycorrhiza development.Mycorrhizal colonization was determined for each sample on 15 fragments of thin roots of the last and penultimate orders,each 1 cm long.Fragments were randomly selected from the root system.Roots were subjected to maceration in a water bath in KOH for 30-60 min and colored by aniline blue(Selivanov,1981).Hyphae,arbuscules,and vesicles of AM fungi were recorded on squashed preparations at 200×magnification.Species that had arbuscules were considered mycorrhizal.Species in which hyphae and vesicles were found,but arbuscules were absent,were not classified as mycorrhizal.This condition was important for the genusCarex,most of whose species are considered nonmycorrhizal according to previous studies (Miller et al.,1999).Presence of fungal structures (hyphae,vesicles,and arbuscules)was determined in 5 fields of the microscope on each centimeterlong fragment of the root.Thus,there were 75 visual fields for each individual and 375 visual fields for each species.The intensity of mycorrhization was determined by fungus occurrence in the roots:100% -fungal structures were found in all studied visual fields in cortical cells;50% -fungal structures were found in half of the studied visual fields in cortical cells,etc.In general,accounting for AM using this method (Selivanov,1981) produces results close to those of a widely used method of accounting for AM development(McGonigle et al.,1990).This was previously demonstrated in Akhmetzhanova et al.(2012).

    2.5.Data analysis

    In the process of analyzing variability of individual variables,the following methods were used:for ranks-Kruskal-Wallis test;for dimensional and countable features-one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA).Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to determine the key features of the root structure and reduce the prediction interval.Continuum variables were transformed before ANOVA and PCA to achieve a greater compliance with normal distribution: values of dimensional and countable features were logarithmic using natural logarithm;values of features,expressed in shares,were subjected to arcsine transformation.To assess the degree of differences between species of different families according to several characters at a time,we used permutational analysis of variance -PERMANOVA (Anderson,2001) with calculation of Euclidean distance and 9999 permutations.ANOVA and PCA were performed using STATISTICA 8.0 software (StatSoft Inc.,1984-2007).PERMANOVA calculations were performed using R program (R Core Team,2022),‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al.,2020).

    3.Results

    3.1.Characteristics of root structure

    All studied features of root structure differed among families of monocots (Fig.1).Characteristics describing the overall transverse size of a root and how successful the AM formation is varied the most among families.Orchidaceae roots had the fewest branches,while Cyperaceae and Iridaceae roots had the most branches(Fig.2).The largest average,root diameter,stele diameter and cortex thickness were found in Orchidaceae(Fig.3);the smallest in Cyperaceae(Figs.3 and 4).The difference between these families in terms of the average size was 18-25 times.The abundance of mycorrhiza differed between Cyperaceae and Iridaceae the most(30 times).The least variable between families -no more than 3 times -were the partial volume of stele,the number of layers of exodermis and core parenchyma.

    Fig.1.Traits of root structure and root system of 4 monocot families (Cyp.-Cyperaceae;Iri.-Iridaceae;Poa.-Poaceae;Orc.-Orchidaceae);alphabetic indexes show homogeneous values according to Mann-Whitney U test (maximum branch order) or Tukey's test (the other traits).

    Fig.2.Roots of Cypripedium guttatum (Orchidaceae) (A), Calamagrostis epigejos (Poaceae) (B), Iris aphylla (Iridaceae) (C),Сarex supina (Cyperaceae) (D).Roman numerals mark orders of root branching according to classification(Pregitzer et al.,2002).In Orchidaceae,the root system is represented by 1st order adventitious roots that do not branch.In Carex,3rd order roots are formed from adventitious 4th order roots,then go 2nd order roots,and 1st order roots.The 1st order roots are the thinnest.In all species,we compared only 1st order roots.It can be seen how much 1st order roots differ in size in orchids and sedges.Bar for Сarex supina is 1 cm.

    Fig.3.Cross sections of the absorptive roots under visible light:Neottia nidus-avis(mycoheterotrophic orchid)(Orchidaceae)(A),Phragmites australis(Poaceae)(B),Iris pseudacorus(Iridaceae) (C), Carex pseudocyperus (Cyperaceae) (D).Legend: root hair (Rh);epidermis (Ep);exodermis (Ex);parenchyma of the cortex (C);endodermis (En);vessels of primary xylem (X).The bar is 100 microns.

    Thus,species of each family had a well-defined list of root characteristics by which they could be distinguished (Table 1).Orchidaceae and Iridaceae had thick roots and a relatively large stele.The roots of Orchidaceae did not branch,but root hairs were long.In contrast,the roots of Iridaceae were highly branched but had short root hairs.Exodermis is strongly developed in Iridaceae and less developed in Orchidaceae.In addition,Orchidaceae and Iridaceae differed in mycorrhiza types: orchid (and possibly mycoheterotrophy) in Orchidaceae and typical AM in Iridaceae.

    Table 1 Formalization of structural features of roots of four monocots families.

    Poaceae and Cyperaceae had thin roots and a relatively thin stele.But in Poaceae,roots were less branched than in Cyperaceae.Families also differed in length of root hairs,with short root hairs in Poaceae and long hairs in Cyperaceae.Also,Poaceae species are usually mycorrhizal and,in our study,formed abundant typical AM.Cyperaceae,as a rule,only randomly form AM,and in our study,the abundance of AM structures in sedge roots was low.

    3.2.Root structure syndromes

    Three of four families of monocots possessed syndromes,i.e.,combinations of root traits that clearly differed from those of other families.In three families-Orchidaceae,Iridaceae and Cyperaceae-one or more characters that form the basis of a syndrome were at extremes,i.e.,were either at their maximum or minimum compared to the values of species from other families.Orchidaceae had unbranched thick roots with a unique type of mycorrhizae.Iridaceae had relatively thick branched roots with developed exodermis,and AM.Cyperaceae had well-branched thin roots with long root hairs with sparse AM.Only Poaceae roots did not have any specific or extreme characteristics.By all indications,Poaceae occupy an intermediate position between other families.

    Principal components analysis (Table 2) can either (i) identify the leading,main features from a larger set,or (ii) collapse the original large set of measured variables into a limited number of new features-principal components.PCA has shown that some of the measured features of root structure are strongly interrelated and are combined into well-interpreted principal components.The first two principal components together explain more than 80% of the variability of the original 10 root structure characteristics,both when using the rotation of principal components and without rotation.Based on the structure of correlations obtained without their rotation,two informative,maximally unrelated,actually measured features can be distinguished:1)diameter of stele,which characterizes a total transverse size of a root;2)length of root hairs.The rest of the features are correlated to some extent with either the first or the second feature.Based on the structure of feature correlations obtained after principal components rotation,two easily interpreted principal components can be distinguished:1)a component describing a transverse size of a root;2) a component positively associated with the formation of exodermis and mycorrhiza and negatively associated with the length of root hairs.

    Using PERMANOVA analysis,we found that the monocotyledonous families differ from each other in terms of root structure,regardless of the studied set of features.Statistically significant differences between the families were established by analyzing three sets of features: 1) according to the complex of all real root structure characteristics:F(3;57)=104.87;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 85%of the total variance of root features;2)according to two key real features(Fig.5 a):F(3;57)=207.53;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 92%of the total variance of root features;3)in the space of two main principal components(Fig.5b):F(3;57)=103.92;P<0.001.

    In the process of comparing all four families simultaneously,PERMANOVA tests a hypothesis that there are significant differences in at least one out of six possible pairwise comparisons.In other words,based on the results of PERMANOVA,i.e.,comparison of all four families,it is impossible to determine whether the root structure syndromes differ between the families that are closest to each other.Therefore,we conducted an additional study to see whether the differences between two families whose centroids are closest to each other (i.e.,Iridaceae and Poaceae;see Fig.4) are statistically significant.In the spaces specified by different combinations of features,the following significance of difference between these families was obtained:1)according to the complex of all the real characteristics:F(1;21)=16.76;P<0.001;2) according to two key real characteristics(see Fig.5):F(1;21)=15.39;P<0.001;3)in space of two main factors (see Fig.5):F(1;21)=5.86;P=0.009.Thus,root structure syndromes differ significantly even between two families with the closest character values.Therefore,the conclusion about the specificity of root structure syndromes in four monocotyledonous families has been proved and does not depend on specific methods of data analysis.

    Fig.5.Differentiation of species of four monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae;-Poaceae;-Orchidaceae) in space of two traits of roots structure(a)and in space of two main principal components(b).Group centroids and standard deviations are shown.Arrows in(b)show principal components loads of the main features of the root structure,which form principal components plotted along abscissa and ordinate: D -root diameter;RH -hair roots length: M-mycorrhiza;Ex -exodermis layers number.

    4.Discussion

    Available information on the characteristics of root structure and their diverse combinations observed during adaptation to different soil and climatic conditions is incomplete.What is clear thus far is only the most general changes in root structure in response to major environmental factors(Freschet et al.,2021).This model (Freschet et al.,2021) does not consider the taxonomic specificity of a root structure.

    To explain the variability of roots,the root economics approach has traditionally been used,which includes strategies for fast and slow acquisition of resources by roots(Reich,2014;Weemstra et al.,2016).The diversity of root trait syndromes has recently been associated with two contrasting strategies of soil nutrition -the ability to absorb soil resources with the participation of mycorrhizal fungi or autonomously (Bergmann et al.,2020).Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes:SRL,RTD,root diameter,cortical fraction (Bergmann et al.,2020).Apparently,syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features,where the roots of plants belonging to the same group(AM)may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group(Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).

    Our work focuses on species from the four largest families of monocots (Givnish et al.,2018).These families belong to two orders: Poales (Cyperaceae and Poaceae) and Asparagales (Iridaceae and Orchidaceae) (Givnish et al.,2018).In total,we studied 61 species of monocots.This consists of 10% of cereal species,23% of sedges and 44%of orchids from those growing in the Middle Urals.Our data convincingly confirm a high specificity of absorption root structural syndromes in four families of monocots.

    In monocots,compared to dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),the overall variability of some root characteristics is high.For example,in herbaceous dicots,root system branching varies from 3 to 5 orders (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),whereas in monocots within the present study-from 1 to 4 orders.In dicots,the thickness of first-order roots varied between families by no more than two times,and in monocots,up to 15-20 times.This is more than a 10-fold difference observed when comparing the thickness of absorptive roots (excluding roots with secondary thickening) of grasses on a global scale (Ma et al.,2018).High variability in root structure of monocots is explained by the difference between roots of Orchidaceae and the others.If we do not consider Orchidaceae,the difference between families in root system branching degree is leveled,and the characters describing transverse dimensions differ by only a factor of 2-3.

    The central feature of Orchidaceae root syndrome is an interaction with basidiomycetes to form orchid mycorrhiza (Smith and Read,2010).The root system of Orchidaceae consists of fleshy,non-branching roots that are laid down on stems or rhizomes.Weak root branching along with large transverse dimensions are also found in other plant groups (Comas and Eissenstat,2009;Comas et al.,2014;Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).This structure is optimal for the habitat of mycorrhizal fungi,which can increase the absorptive surface of roots by a factor of 2-6 compared to a branching root system with fine roots (McCormack and Iversen,2019).Fungal mycelium increases the absorptive surface area of roots(Dearnaley and Cameron,2017).This may be why orchid roots usually form few root hairs (Hew and Yong,2004).In our results,orchid root hairs are long.Thick parenchyma of the cortex in Orchidaceae,in addition to the symbiosis formation area,can perform storage functions.In some orchids,absorbing roots are perennial organs (Salazar et al.,2003;Hagsater et al.,2005).In orchids,along with the development of parenchyma,a strong development of the stele was recorded.Our results showed that cortical parenchyma is well developed in taxa with a welldeveloped stele,or,more precisely,in taxa with a well-developed xylem.The number and size of vessels in orchid roots is an order of magnitude higher than in roots of other families.In absorptive roots,stable allometric connections exist between cortex and stele(Kong et al.,2019).In relation to axial transport channels (phloem sieve tubes,xylem vessels),radial transport networks of parenchymal cells are the origins and ends of transport system,zones of its loading or unloading.The root parenchyma with developed mycorrhiza is accompanied by an increase in the ascending flow,compared with the parenchyma of non-mycorrhizal species(Gamaley,2004).The specificity of orchid roots structure correlates with their other bioecological features: usually highly specialized entomophily;small seeds;ontogenesis with stage of protokorma and other unusual variants of ontogenesis;a special type of mycorrhizae not found in other plants(Waterman and Bidartondo,2008;Fay and Chase 2009;Merckx,2013).

    The transverse dimensions of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae roots were not the same,but quite similar.Significant differences among Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae were related to adaptations for absorbing soil resources.The structure of root features correlations with the main principal component“Exodermis,root hairs length and mycorrhiza”(Table 2)indicates that there is a negative correlation between the abundance of AM and the length of root hairs.Such a correlation is prominent if families with arbuscular mycorrhiza-Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae -are analyzed without Orchidaceae.This approach allows us to see possible ranges of AM abundance depending on the length of root hairs (Fig.6).In Cyperaceae,the leading adaptation for absorption of soil resources is long root hairs,whereas in Iridaceae and Poaceae it is predominantly AM.

    Fig.6.Dependence between length of root hairs and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in species of three monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae; -Poaceae).Dotted lines conditionally show range of variability in abundance of mycorrhiza.

    Our data clearly illustrate a well-known pattern: the fundamental ability to form one or another type of mycorrhiza is determined phylogenetically(Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).However,the abundance of mycorrhiza depends not only on the taxonomic position of plants,but also on the environmental conditions (Hetrick,1991).This is evidenced by a large range of variations in AM abundance in both Iridaceae and Poaceae.

    The family Iridaceae is closely related to the orchid family(Givnish et al.,2018).In Iridaceae species,we found an unexpected combination of root characters: a high number of root branching orders,thick roots with thick cortex and stele,and short root hairs.Iridaceae were probably originally adapted to arid conditions(Rodionenko,1961),and most modern iris species have pronounced xerophytic properties,while the presence of hygrophytes and hydrophytes among them is secondary.The root systems of irises,although branched,are rather short.This indirectly indicates adaptation to pulsating inflow of water with precipitation.The strong growth of cortex in Iridaceae may be associated not only with the creation of conditions for mycorrhizal fungi(Comas et al.,2012),but also with a water storage function.It is significant that some species of the Iridaceae family are adapted to dry conditions due to the formation of contractilis roots (Ruzin,1979;Jernstedt,1984),which is also accompanied by the strong growth of root parenchyma (North et al.,2008).Strong cortex growth requires strengthening mechanical tissue-exodermis.In turn,exodermis (i) maintains the shape of thick roots,(ii) retains water in tissues,and (iii) increases the sucking power of tissues due to the elastic deformation of the cell wall (Bakhari and Wendelbo,1978).

    In the Cyperaceae root syndrome,the leading characteristics are those that compensate for a weak connection with AM fungi.These are a highly branched root system,thin roots with poorly developed cortex and stele,sparse exodermis,and long root hairs.Such structural features are aimed at increasing the surface of contact with soil and allow sedges to explore large volumes of soil.In the absence of mycorrhiza,low-accessible elements,such as phosphorus,can be obtained from sedges using dauciform roots.Interestingly,Cyperaceae is characterized by the largest range of variability for principal component 2 in Fig.5a.This may be Cyperaceae represented the largest number of species in this study.But it may also reflect Cyperaceae's great variety of original adaptations for absorbing soil resources.In addition to long root hairs and AM,a wide range of other root modifications are possible in Cyperaceae: dauciform roots (Shane et al.,2006);bulbous-based root hairs (Miller et al.,1999);ectomycorrhiza-like structures(Harrington and Mitchell,2002);aerenchyma(Visser et al.,2000);and dark septate endophytes (Muthukumar et al.,2004;Weishampel and Bedford,2006).These adaptations can be widely combined with each other both in one sedge species and in one individual (Veselkin et al.,2014;Konoplenko et al.,2017).Despite the fact that the species of Cyperaceae family are poorly related to mycorrhiza,their roots are characterized by a high percentage of cortex.Most of theCarexspecies grow in waterlogged habitats and cortex overgrowth may be associated with the formation of aerenchyma,which is necessary for storing oxygen inside the roots during flooding (Kutschera and Lichtenegger,1982).At the same time,the death and lysis of cortical cells during the formation of aerenchyma can negatively affect the development of mycorrhiza.In addition,the lower Cyperaceae stele is characterized by the absence of moisture deficiency.

    The Poaceae family is closely related to Cyperaceae (Givnish et al.,2018).The key features of the Poaceae root syndrome are intermediate between Iridaceae and Cyperaceae.These features are low-extended cortex and stele,and typical exodermis.The ability to form a typical AM is expectedly combined with short root hairs.However,the structural features of cereal roots leave them the opportunity to regulate the surface area of exchange with soil autonomously,i.e.,without mycorrhiza,which can compensate for non-obligate relationships of grass roots with mycorrhizal fungi.At the same time,the nature of emerging compromises in roots of cereals is largely determined by adaptation to the specific habitat conditions (Fort et al.,2013;Wahl and Ryser,2000).

    5.Conclusion

    Syndromes of root features of four families of monocots -Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae -were predictably different.An unexpected and therefore new result of our work that the root syndromes of different families of monocots show large-scale and highly significant differences.In fact,root structure syndromes are unique in each family.It is expected that the main vector,with which all other structural features of roots are consistent,is set by the interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.This conclusion is fully consistent with similar comparisons only within dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2014) and with generalizations about plants in general(Bergmann et al.,2020).According to the peculiarities of the roots structure,the species of four families of monocots fall into three contrasting groups: Orchidaceae with a special type of mycorrhiza;Cyperaceae with rare or occasional arbuscular mycorrhiza;Iridaceae and Poaceae with typical arbuscular mycorrhiza.The features of roots of different families are so prominent that even Iridaceae and Poaceae differ significantly according to the majority of characters.The specificity of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae root syndromes means that species of these families use different strategies for obtaining water and nutrients,including different symbiotic interactions in these strategies.But the traits that make up root syndromes are also correlated with other functions performed by roots,such as storing water and nutrients.The established patterns are important for understanding variability of root characters in species of different taxa growing within the same community.

    We analyzed root syndromes of only four families of monocots.This,of course,does not give a complete picture of the diversity of root syndromes in all 59,000 species of monocots and even in monocots of the boreal zone.It would be interesting to determine whether root syndromes are specific to other monocot families common in the boreal zone,such as Liliaceae and Alliaceae.Perhaps such a comparison would expand the diversity of described monocot root syndromes.

    Author contributions

    AB and DV developed the ideas and designed methodology;AB and DT collected the data;DV analyzed the data;AB and DV wrote the manuscript.All the authors significantly contributed to the drafts and gave their final approval for publication.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No conflict of interest exits with the submission of this manuscript,and it is approved by all authors for publication.

    Acknowledgements

    日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 91av网站免费观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 在线观看66精品国产| 9色porny在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲九九香蕉| 日本 av在线| av免费在线观看网站| 亚洲avbb在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 少妇 在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 高清av免费在线| 午夜免费激情av| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久 成人 亚洲| 91麻豆av在线| 国产av又大| 免费看十八禁软件| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜久久久在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 一夜夜www| 国产精品九九99| 欧美午夜高清在线| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 久久久久九九精品影院| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 在线免费观看的www视频| 丁香欧美五月| 精品电影一区二区在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 91在线观看av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 很黄的视频免费| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜两性在线视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产av又大| 大香蕉久久成人网| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产精品九九99| 深夜精品福利| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲av成人av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 不卡一级毛片| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产免费男女视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 在线av久久热| 青草久久国产| 久久精品成人免费网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| av有码第一页| 免费av毛片视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 夫妻午夜视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 91国产中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 黄色视频不卡| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 制服诱惑二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 香蕉丝袜av| av有码第一页| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 91av网站免费观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 一进一出好大好爽视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品九九99| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 精品一区二区三卡| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 黄色女人牲交| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 一级毛片精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 香蕉久久夜色| 超碰成人久久| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 悠悠久久av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 乱人伦中国视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 亚洲九九香蕉| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久九九热精品免费| 麻豆av在线久日| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费高清视频大片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 精品一区二区三卡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 丰满的人妻完整版| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| bbb黄色大片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久性视频一级片| 在线av久久热| 制服人妻中文乱码| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 满18在线观看网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 黄色女人牲交| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 老司机福利观看| netflix在线观看网站| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久狼人影院| 久久狼人影院| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| www国产在线视频色| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 看黄色毛片网站| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 国产黄色免费在线视频| bbb黄色大片| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜免费观看网址| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产精品九九99| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费在线观看日本一区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产区一区二久久| 精品国产国语对白av| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 免费高清视频大片| av福利片在线| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 乱人伦中国视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| www.熟女人妻精品国产| av免费在线观看网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 色在线成人网| 一夜夜www| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 在线视频色国产色| 久久久久久大精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品福利观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 多毛熟女@视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 午夜激情av网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品一区二区三卡| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 91老司机精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 中文字幕色久视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 99热只有精品国产| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 成人手机av| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| www.999成人在线观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久影院123| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产又爽黄色视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产成人精品无人区| 丝袜美足系列| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 99久久国产精品久久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 午夜福利欧美成人| 日韩有码中文字幕| 黄色成人免费大全| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| www.精华液| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 嫩草影院精品99| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 身体一侧抽搐| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 高清在线国产一区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 999精品在线视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 人人澡人人妻人| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产成人系列免费观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 中文欧美无线码| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| avwww免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产av在哪里看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 成人手机av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 免费看十八禁软件| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久亚洲真实| 国产精品免费视频内射| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 久久久久久大精品| 美女福利国产在线| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产99久久九九免费精品| www.999成人在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 高清av免费在线| av欧美777| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 久久狼人影院| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 免费av毛片视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 在线天堂中文资源库| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 91在线观看av| 一夜夜www| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 精品福利观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看|