• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals

    2024-01-06 01:53:14AnnBetekhtinDriTukovDenisVeselkin
    植物多樣性 2023年6期

    Ann A.Betekhtin ,Dri E.Tukov ,Denis V.Veselkin

    a Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin,19 Mira Street,Ekaterinburg 620002,Russia

    b Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology,8 Marta Street,Ekaterinburg 620144,Russia

    Keywords: Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure

    ABSTRACT The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes.Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied:16 species of Poaceae,24 species of Cyperaceae,14 species of Orchidaceae,and 7 species of Iridaceae.Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species,the following was determined:number of orders of branching roots;transverse dimensions of root,stele and cortex;number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers;length of root hairs;abundance of mycorrhiza.Species of each family had well-defined syndromes.Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis.Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs.In Iridaceae,roots were branched,and root hairs were short.Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele.Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae.Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery.The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.

    1.Introduction

    Plant taxonomy and phylogenetic systematics have long been based almost exclusively on characters of generative plant parts(Takhtadzhyan 1966;Cronquist,1988).The defining power of the characters of vegetative organs for differentiation of taxonomic plant groups is obviously low.However,the structure of vegetative organs can also be taxonomically specific.For example,such features as arrangement of leaves on a stem,leaf shape,type of venation (Takhtadzhyan,1966),characteristics of integumentary and conducting tissues(Esau,1969;Gamaley,2004),leaf thickness and density(Yudina et al.,2020).Phylogenetic groups of plants can differ in the characteristics of underground organ structures,including the type and architecture of the root system(Fitter,1987;Bouda et al.,2018),as well as the diameter of absorbing roots(Chen et al.,2013).In addition,specific root symbioses are well known in plant families,for example,mycorrhizal and nitrogen-fixing.Mycorrhiza type and mycorrhizal colonization rates are considered taxonomically correlated characters (Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).

    The variety of root syndromes are mainly associated with two alternative strategies of plant nutrition -absorption (acquisition)of soil resources and nutrition with or without participation of mycorrhizal fungi (Bergmann et al.,2020).It has recently been shown that mycorrhizal hyphae can penetrate or colonize the roots of non-host plants without forming typical mycorrhizal structures,but these plants can indirectly participate in mycorrhizal nutrition by means of host plants (Wang et al.,2022).

    It is well known that root systems and absorbing roots of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are constructed in different ways (John St,1980;Brundert,1991;Eissenstat,1992;Eissenstat et al.,2000;Bergmann et al.,2020).Arbuscular mycorrhiza(AM),ectomycorrhizae and other fungi colonize parenchyma of root cortex of plants.High AM colonization rates generally accompany large root diameter (Veselkin and Betekhtina,2013;Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),a small specific root length (SRL)(Kong et al.,2019) and root surface area relative to volume.Mycorrhizal plants have fewer root branching orders,but cortex is longer compared to non-mycorrhizal plants (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).In non-mycorrhizal and facultatively mycorrhizal plants,roots are usually not only strongly branched,but often have a short or rapidly reducing cortex,which is accompanied by a small root diameter (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019) and a higher SRL(Ryser,2006).In non-mycorrhizal plants,as a rule,root hairs are well developed and roots are adapted to direct absorption of substances from soil,since they have a large surface area in relation to their volume (Eissenstat et al.,2000).Under conditions of macronutrient deficiency,roots of non-mycorrhizal plants can form various modifications,for example,bulbous root hairs and dauciform roots in sedges (Lambers et al.,2008).

    The syndromes of the structure of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots are constant in a wide range of conditions and within different taxonomic groups.Root syndromes of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are only one of possible major root syndromes.Another subdivision of a similar scale can be,for example,root structure syndromes of monocots and dicots,due to absence/presence of a secondary structure,as well as taxa of the superorder level(Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).Along with major syndromes,root character syndromes have been described in a limited number of species of steppe plants (Zhou et al.,2021),species within the same genus (Ehmig and Linder,2020) and subgenus(Konoplenko et al.,2017).

    Monocots include about 85,000 species from 11 to 12 orders.They dominate many biomes and are of crucial economic importance (Givnish et al.,2018).Monocot plants are convenient for studying various root traits for several reasons.Firstly,there is no secondary tissues in monocot roots.Secondly,secondary xylem and a cork layers are not formed in shoots and roots.This means that roots of different monocots have the same relatively simple morpho-anatomical structure.This creates a basis for a confident comparison of subtle or quantitative features of roots of different groups or taxa.Thirdly,monocots are characterized by a wide variety of symbiotic (arbuscular and orchid mycorrhiza,dark septate endophytes) and non-symbiotic (aerenchyma,dauciform roots,simple and bulbous root hairs) adaptations for soil resources exploitation.Characteristics of root hairs,such as high density and length,are closely related to non-mycorrhizal nutrition acquisition(John St,1980).Monocots generally have well-developed root hairs that persist over long periods(Kauff et al.,2000).This trait makes it possible to compare the length of root hairs in taxa with different adaptations to soil nutrition in an effort to understand how soil nutrition drives diversity in root structure.

    Angiosperm species that develop mycorrhizae tend to form relatively short root hairs,whereas those that do not form mycorrhizae develop relatively long root hairs (Baylis,1975;John St,1980).However,the relationship between the length of root hairs and the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization has rarely been studied.Monocots have a wide variety of relationships with mycorrhizal fungi.Thus,to understand strategies of nutrient absorption,we must examine root hair size in these plants.

    Studies of root syndromes often use integral features such as specific root length (SRL),root tissue density (RTD),and root diameter (Bergmann et al.,2020).This approach is not fully applicable to describing structural transformations of roots in response to different types of soil nutrition.For example,in thicker roots,the cortex may have a relatively larger area(Kong et al.,2014)either due to a larger number of layers of cortical cells in mycorrhizal species,or due to a well-developed aerenchyma (Lynch,2015) in nonmycorrhizal species,which in turn strongly affects the density of root tissue and its specific length.Because of this complication,it is not always possible to adequately describe the entire variety of root syndromes.Therefore,it seems to be more reasonable to find differences between anatomical features of roots.Absorbing roots of different taxa,which undoubtedly differ in many ways,are often attributed to the same type based on SRL and RTD.However,if we consider the syndromes of traits,we may encounter an unexpectedly great diversity of absorbing root structures within a class.

    We studied structural features -syndromes -of root systems and absorbing roots in species of four multispecies boreal families of monocots: Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,Iridaceae.We initially assumed that roots of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species should have different structures,primarily due to the peculiarities of their interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.Therefore,the aim of our work was to give an accurate and uniform description and quantitative characterization of root trait syndromes of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site

    Studies were carried out in Ekaterinburg,Middle Urals,Russia(56°37′N,61°04′E),in the southern part of the boreal zone of the Middle Urals.This region has a temperate continental climate.Intensive plant growth lasts from May to August.The temperature rises above 10°C for 127 days a year on average.Average annual air temperature is +0.9°С,the highest average temperature,+17.6°С,occurs in July,and the lowest average temperature,-12.6°С,occurs in January.The average annual precipitation is 537 mm,with a maximum in July.Typical vegetation in the nearby territories is pine forest.The range of other habitats,however,is also quite wide:small-leaved forests,floodplains,meadows,petrophytic habitats,anthropogenic wastelands.Two main types of soils are common in this area -brown forest and sod-podzolic.

    2.2.Field research and sampling

    Overall,61 species were analyzed from the following families:Poaceae (16 species),Cyperaceae (24 species),Orchidaceae (14 species) and Iridaceae (7 species).Whole plants with intact roots were collected at the end of June-July 2008-2020 in their typical natural conditions,which cover a wide range of biotopes depending on moisture.Names and ciphers of habitats are given according to theEUNIS Habitat Classification(Chytry et al.,2020):R1B continental dry grassland(true steppe)-7 species;T35 temperate continentalPinus sylvestrisforest-17 species;R35 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic hay meadow -9 species;R36 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic pasture-1 species;R37 temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grassland -1 species;Q22 poor fen -4 species;Q42 extremely rich moss-sedge fen -3 species;Q43 tall-sedge base-rich fen -1 species;Q53 tall-sedge bed -10 species;V15 bare tilled,fallow or recently abandoned arable land-1 species.The species of the genusIrisbecame an exception,as they are rarely found in natural conditions.We sampled Iridaceae from the collection of Botanical Garden of Ural Federal University,which is based on wild specimens introduced from natural habitats.

    2.3.Determination of roots structure characteristics

    Roots were cleaned out from soil with water and fixed in 70%ethanol.For each individual,we determined the order of root branching in accordance with the centripetal ordering system,where orders are distributed from the distal end (Pregitzer et al.,2002).Roots at the distal end of the root system-roots of the first order -are formed on the second order roots,which are laid on the third order roots.Thus,in monocots,the highest order is the thickest adventitious roots extending from the rhizome or stem.We took five roots of the last branching order (i.e.,the thinnest)from each individual.Then,root segments of the last order were cut transversely into sections 20-50 μm thick and examined using a Leica DM 5000 microscope (Leica,Germany) at 150× magnification.The following indicators were measured: root diameter;сortex thickness;diameter of central cylinder (stele);number of primary xylem vessels;length of root hairs;number of layers of cortical cells,including exodermis and parenchyma of cortex.Quantitative characteristics were measured using Simagis Mesoplant program(SI-AMS,Russia).Partial volume of cortex and stele was determined based on the obtained measurements by dividing the stele area by the root cross-sectional area and multiplying by 100%.

    2.4.Definition of mycorrhiza development

    For each species,one sample of roots from 5 individuals was randomly selected and fixed in 70%ethanol to analyze mycorrhiza development.Mycorrhizal colonization was determined for each sample on 15 fragments of thin roots of the last and penultimate orders,each 1 cm long.Fragments were randomly selected from the root system.Roots were subjected to maceration in a water bath in KOH for 30-60 min and colored by aniline blue(Selivanov,1981).Hyphae,arbuscules,and vesicles of AM fungi were recorded on squashed preparations at 200×magnification.Species that had arbuscules were considered mycorrhizal.Species in which hyphae and vesicles were found,but arbuscules were absent,were not classified as mycorrhizal.This condition was important for the genusCarex,most of whose species are considered nonmycorrhizal according to previous studies (Miller et al.,1999).Presence of fungal structures (hyphae,vesicles,and arbuscules)was determined in 5 fields of the microscope on each centimeterlong fragment of the root.Thus,there were 75 visual fields for each individual and 375 visual fields for each species.The intensity of mycorrhization was determined by fungus occurrence in the roots:100% -fungal structures were found in all studied visual fields in cortical cells;50% -fungal structures were found in half of the studied visual fields in cortical cells,etc.In general,accounting for AM using this method (Selivanov,1981) produces results close to those of a widely used method of accounting for AM development(McGonigle et al.,1990).This was previously demonstrated in Akhmetzhanova et al.(2012).

    2.5.Data analysis

    In the process of analyzing variability of individual variables,the following methods were used:for ranks-Kruskal-Wallis test;for dimensional and countable features-one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA).Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to determine the key features of the root structure and reduce the prediction interval.Continuum variables were transformed before ANOVA and PCA to achieve a greater compliance with normal distribution: values of dimensional and countable features were logarithmic using natural logarithm;values of features,expressed in shares,were subjected to arcsine transformation.To assess the degree of differences between species of different families according to several characters at a time,we used permutational analysis of variance -PERMANOVA (Anderson,2001) with calculation of Euclidean distance and 9999 permutations.ANOVA and PCA were performed using STATISTICA 8.0 software (StatSoft Inc.,1984-2007).PERMANOVA calculations were performed using R program (R Core Team,2022),‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al.,2020).

    3.Results

    3.1.Characteristics of root structure

    All studied features of root structure differed among families of monocots (Fig.1).Characteristics describing the overall transverse size of a root and how successful the AM formation is varied the most among families.Orchidaceae roots had the fewest branches,while Cyperaceae and Iridaceae roots had the most branches(Fig.2).The largest average,root diameter,stele diameter and cortex thickness were found in Orchidaceae(Fig.3);the smallest in Cyperaceae(Figs.3 and 4).The difference between these families in terms of the average size was 18-25 times.The abundance of mycorrhiza differed between Cyperaceae and Iridaceae the most(30 times).The least variable between families -no more than 3 times -were the partial volume of stele,the number of layers of exodermis and core parenchyma.

    Fig.1.Traits of root structure and root system of 4 monocot families (Cyp.-Cyperaceae;Iri.-Iridaceae;Poa.-Poaceae;Orc.-Orchidaceae);alphabetic indexes show homogeneous values according to Mann-Whitney U test (maximum branch order) or Tukey's test (the other traits).

    Fig.2.Roots of Cypripedium guttatum (Orchidaceae) (A), Calamagrostis epigejos (Poaceae) (B), Iris aphylla (Iridaceae) (C),Сarex supina (Cyperaceae) (D).Roman numerals mark orders of root branching according to classification(Pregitzer et al.,2002).In Orchidaceae,the root system is represented by 1st order adventitious roots that do not branch.In Carex,3rd order roots are formed from adventitious 4th order roots,then go 2nd order roots,and 1st order roots.The 1st order roots are the thinnest.In all species,we compared only 1st order roots.It can be seen how much 1st order roots differ in size in orchids and sedges.Bar for Сarex supina is 1 cm.

    Fig.3.Cross sections of the absorptive roots under visible light:Neottia nidus-avis(mycoheterotrophic orchid)(Orchidaceae)(A),Phragmites australis(Poaceae)(B),Iris pseudacorus(Iridaceae) (C), Carex pseudocyperus (Cyperaceae) (D).Legend: root hair (Rh);epidermis (Ep);exodermis (Ex);parenchyma of the cortex (C);endodermis (En);vessels of primary xylem (X).The bar is 100 microns.

    Thus,species of each family had a well-defined list of root characteristics by which they could be distinguished (Table 1).Orchidaceae and Iridaceae had thick roots and a relatively large stele.The roots of Orchidaceae did not branch,but root hairs were long.In contrast,the roots of Iridaceae were highly branched but had short root hairs.Exodermis is strongly developed in Iridaceae and less developed in Orchidaceae.In addition,Orchidaceae and Iridaceae differed in mycorrhiza types: orchid (and possibly mycoheterotrophy) in Orchidaceae and typical AM in Iridaceae.

    Table 1 Formalization of structural features of roots of four monocots families.

    Poaceae and Cyperaceae had thin roots and a relatively thin stele.But in Poaceae,roots were less branched than in Cyperaceae.Families also differed in length of root hairs,with short root hairs in Poaceae and long hairs in Cyperaceae.Also,Poaceae species are usually mycorrhizal and,in our study,formed abundant typical AM.Cyperaceae,as a rule,only randomly form AM,and in our study,the abundance of AM structures in sedge roots was low.

    3.2.Root structure syndromes

    Three of four families of monocots possessed syndromes,i.e.,combinations of root traits that clearly differed from those of other families.In three families-Orchidaceae,Iridaceae and Cyperaceae-one or more characters that form the basis of a syndrome were at extremes,i.e.,were either at their maximum or minimum compared to the values of species from other families.Orchidaceae had unbranched thick roots with a unique type of mycorrhizae.Iridaceae had relatively thick branched roots with developed exodermis,and AM.Cyperaceae had well-branched thin roots with long root hairs with sparse AM.Only Poaceae roots did not have any specific or extreme characteristics.By all indications,Poaceae occupy an intermediate position between other families.

    Principal components analysis (Table 2) can either (i) identify the leading,main features from a larger set,or (ii) collapse the original large set of measured variables into a limited number of new features-principal components.PCA has shown that some of the measured features of root structure are strongly interrelated and are combined into well-interpreted principal components.The first two principal components together explain more than 80% of the variability of the original 10 root structure characteristics,both when using the rotation of principal components and without rotation.Based on the structure of correlations obtained without their rotation,two informative,maximally unrelated,actually measured features can be distinguished:1)diameter of stele,which characterizes a total transverse size of a root;2)length of root hairs.The rest of the features are correlated to some extent with either the first or the second feature.Based on the structure of feature correlations obtained after principal components rotation,two easily interpreted principal components can be distinguished:1)a component describing a transverse size of a root;2) a component positively associated with the formation of exodermis and mycorrhiza and negatively associated with the length of root hairs.

    Using PERMANOVA analysis,we found that the monocotyledonous families differ from each other in terms of root structure,regardless of the studied set of features.Statistically significant differences between the families were established by analyzing three sets of features: 1) according to the complex of all real root structure characteristics:F(3;57)=104.87;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 85%of the total variance of root features;2)according to two key real features(Fig.5 a):F(3;57)=207.53;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 92%of the total variance of root features;3)in the space of two main principal components(Fig.5b):F(3;57)=103.92;P<0.001.

    In the process of comparing all four families simultaneously,PERMANOVA tests a hypothesis that there are significant differences in at least one out of six possible pairwise comparisons.In other words,based on the results of PERMANOVA,i.e.,comparison of all four families,it is impossible to determine whether the root structure syndromes differ between the families that are closest to each other.Therefore,we conducted an additional study to see whether the differences between two families whose centroids are closest to each other (i.e.,Iridaceae and Poaceae;see Fig.4) are statistically significant.In the spaces specified by different combinations of features,the following significance of difference between these families was obtained:1)according to the complex of all the real characteristics:F(1;21)=16.76;P<0.001;2) according to two key real characteristics(see Fig.5):F(1;21)=15.39;P<0.001;3)in space of two main factors (see Fig.5):F(1;21)=5.86;P=0.009.Thus,root structure syndromes differ significantly even between two families with the closest character values.Therefore,the conclusion about the specificity of root structure syndromes in four monocotyledonous families has been proved and does not depend on specific methods of data analysis.

    Fig.5.Differentiation of species of four monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae;-Poaceae;-Orchidaceae) in space of two traits of roots structure(a)and in space of two main principal components(b).Group centroids and standard deviations are shown.Arrows in(b)show principal components loads of the main features of the root structure,which form principal components plotted along abscissa and ordinate: D -root diameter;RH -hair roots length: M-mycorrhiza;Ex -exodermis layers number.

    4.Discussion

    Available information on the characteristics of root structure and their diverse combinations observed during adaptation to different soil and climatic conditions is incomplete.What is clear thus far is only the most general changes in root structure in response to major environmental factors(Freschet et al.,2021).This model (Freschet et al.,2021) does not consider the taxonomic specificity of a root structure.

    To explain the variability of roots,the root economics approach has traditionally been used,which includes strategies for fast and slow acquisition of resources by roots(Reich,2014;Weemstra et al.,2016).The diversity of root trait syndromes has recently been associated with two contrasting strategies of soil nutrition -the ability to absorb soil resources with the participation of mycorrhizal fungi or autonomously (Bergmann et al.,2020).Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes:SRL,RTD,root diameter,cortical fraction (Bergmann et al.,2020).Apparently,syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features,where the roots of plants belonging to the same group(AM)may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group(Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).

    Our work focuses on species from the four largest families of monocots (Givnish et al.,2018).These families belong to two orders: Poales (Cyperaceae and Poaceae) and Asparagales (Iridaceae and Orchidaceae) (Givnish et al.,2018).In total,we studied 61 species of monocots.This consists of 10% of cereal species,23% of sedges and 44%of orchids from those growing in the Middle Urals.Our data convincingly confirm a high specificity of absorption root structural syndromes in four families of monocots.

    In monocots,compared to dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),the overall variability of some root characteristics is high.For example,in herbaceous dicots,root system branching varies from 3 to 5 orders (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),whereas in monocots within the present study-from 1 to 4 orders.In dicots,the thickness of first-order roots varied between families by no more than two times,and in monocots,up to 15-20 times.This is more than a 10-fold difference observed when comparing the thickness of absorptive roots (excluding roots with secondary thickening) of grasses on a global scale (Ma et al.,2018).High variability in root structure of monocots is explained by the difference between roots of Orchidaceae and the others.If we do not consider Orchidaceae,the difference between families in root system branching degree is leveled,and the characters describing transverse dimensions differ by only a factor of 2-3.

    The central feature of Orchidaceae root syndrome is an interaction with basidiomycetes to form orchid mycorrhiza (Smith and Read,2010).The root system of Orchidaceae consists of fleshy,non-branching roots that are laid down on stems or rhizomes.Weak root branching along with large transverse dimensions are also found in other plant groups (Comas and Eissenstat,2009;Comas et al.,2014;Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).This structure is optimal for the habitat of mycorrhizal fungi,which can increase the absorptive surface of roots by a factor of 2-6 compared to a branching root system with fine roots (McCormack and Iversen,2019).Fungal mycelium increases the absorptive surface area of roots(Dearnaley and Cameron,2017).This may be why orchid roots usually form few root hairs (Hew and Yong,2004).In our results,orchid root hairs are long.Thick parenchyma of the cortex in Orchidaceae,in addition to the symbiosis formation area,can perform storage functions.In some orchids,absorbing roots are perennial organs (Salazar et al.,2003;Hagsater et al.,2005).In orchids,along with the development of parenchyma,a strong development of the stele was recorded.Our results showed that cortical parenchyma is well developed in taxa with a welldeveloped stele,or,more precisely,in taxa with a well-developed xylem.The number and size of vessels in orchid roots is an order of magnitude higher than in roots of other families.In absorptive roots,stable allometric connections exist between cortex and stele(Kong et al.,2019).In relation to axial transport channels (phloem sieve tubes,xylem vessels),radial transport networks of parenchymal cells are the origins and ends of transport system,zones of its loading or unloading.The root parenchyma with developed mycorrhiza is accompanied by an increase in the ascending flow,compared with the parenchyma of non-mycorrhizal species(Gamaley,2004).The specificity of orchid roots structure correlates with their other bioecological features: usually highly specialized entomophily;small seeds;ontogenesis with stage of protokorma and other unusual variants of ontogenesis;a special type of mycorrhizae not found in other plants(Waterman and Bidartondo,2008;Fay and Chase 2009;Merckx,2013).

    The transverse dimensions of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae roots were not the same,but quite similar.Significant differences among Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae were related to adaptations for absorbing soil resources.The structure of root features correlations with the main principal component“Exodermis,root hairs length and mycorrhiza”(Table 2)indicates that there is a negative correlation between the abundance of AM and the length of root hairs.Such a correlation is prominent if families with arbuscular mycorrhiza-Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae -are analyzed without Orchidaceae.This approach allows us to see possible ranges of AM abundance depending on the length of root hairs (Fig.6).In Cyperaceae,the leading adaptation for absorption of soil resources is long root hairs,whereas in Iridaceae and Poaceae it is predominantly AM.

    Fig.6.Dependence between length of root hairs and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in species of three monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae; -Poaceae).Dotted lines conditionally show range of variability in abundance of mycorrhiza.

    Our data clearly illustrate a well-known pattern: the fundamental ability to form one or another type of mycorrhiza is determined phylogenetically(Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).However,the abundance of mycorrhiza depends not only on the taxonomic position of plants,but also on the environmental conditions (Hetrick,1991).This is evidenced by a large range of variations in AM abundance in both Iridaceae and Poaceae.

    The family Iridaceae is closely related to the orchid family(Givnish et al.,2018).In Iridaceae species,we found an unexpected combination of root characters: a high number of root branching orders,thick roots with thick cortex and stele,and short root hairs.Iridaceae were probably originally adapted to arid conditions(Rodionenko,1961),and most modern iris species have pronounced xerophytic properties,while the presence of hygrophytes and hydrophytes among them is secondary.The root systems of irises,although branched,are rather short.This indirectly indicates adaptation to pulsating inflow of water with precipitation.The strong growth of cortex in Iridaceae may be associated not only with the creation of conditions for mycorrhizal fungi(Comas et al.,2012),but also with a water storage function.It is significant that some species of the Iridaceae family are adapted to dry conditions due to the formation of contractilis roots (Ruzin,1979;Jernstedt,1984),which is also accompanied by the strong growth of root parenchyma (North et al.,2008).Strong cortex growth requires strengthening mechanical tissue-exodermis.In turn,exodermis (i) maintains the shape of thick roots,(ii) retains water in tissues,and (iii) increases the sucking power of tissues due to the elastic deformation of the cell wall (Bakhari and Wendelbo,1978).

    In the Cyperaceae root syndrome,the leading characteristics are those that compensate for a weak connection with AM fungi.These are a highly branched root system,thin roots with poorly developed cortex and stele,sparse exodermis,and long root hairs.Such structural features are aimed at increasing the surface of contact with soil and allow sedges to explore large volumes of soil.In the absence of mycorrhiza,low-accessible elements,such as phosphorus,can be obtained from sedges using dauciform roots.Interestingly,Cyperaceae is characterized by the largest range of variability for principal component 2 in Fig.5a.This may be Cyperaceae represented the largest number of species in this study.But it may also reflect Cyperaceae's great variety of original adaptations for absorbing soil resources.In addition to long root hairs and AM,a wide range of other root modifications are possible in Cyperaceae: dauciform roots (Shane et al.,2006);bulbous-based root hairs (Miller et al.,1999);ectomycorrhiza-like structures(Harrington and Mitchell,2002);aerenchyma(Visser et al.,2000);and dark septate endophytes (Muthukumar et al.,2004;Weishampel and Bedford,2006).These adaptations can be widely combined with each other both in one sedge species and in one individual (Veselkin et al.,2014;Konoplenko et al.,2017).Despite the fact that the species of Cyperaceae family are poorly related to mycorrhiza,their roots are characterized by a high percentage of cortex.Most of theCarexspecies grow in waterlogged habitats and cortex overgrowth may be associated with the formation of aerenchyma,which is necessary for storing oxygen inside the roots during flooding (Kutschera and Lichtenegger,1982).At the same time,the death and lysis of cortical cells during the formation of aerenchyma can negatively affect the development of mycorrhiza.In addition,the lower Cyperaceae stele is characterized by the absence of moisture deficiency.

    The Poaceae family is closely related to Cyperaceae (Givnish et al.,2018).The key features of the Poaceae root syndrome are intermediate between Iridaceae and Cyperaceae.These features are low-extended cortex and stele,and typical exodermis.The ability to form a typical AM is expectedly combined with short root hairs.However,the structural features of cereal roots leave them the opportunity to regulate the surface area of exchange with soil autonomously,i.e.,without mycorrhiza,which can compensate for non-obligate relationships of grass roots with mycorrhizal fungi.At the same time,the nature of emerging compromises in roots of cereals is largely determined by adaptation to the specific habitat conditions (Fort et al.,2013;Wahl and Ryser,2000).

    5.Conclusion

    Syndromes of root features of four families of monocots -Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae -were predictably different.An unexpected and therefore new result of our work that the root syndromes of different families of monocots show large-scale and highly significant differences.In fact,root structure syndromes are unique in each family.It is expected that the main vector,with which all other structural features of roots are consistent,is set by the interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.This conclusion is fully consistent with similar comparisons only within dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2014) and with generalizations about plants in general(Bergmann et al.,2020).According to the peculiarities of the roots structure,the species of four families of monocots fall into three contrasting groups: Orchidaceae with a special type of mycorrhiza;Cyperaceae with rare or occasional arbuscular mycorrhiza;Iridaceae and Poaceae with typical arbuscular mycorrhiza.The features of roots of different families are so prominent that even Iridaceae and Poaceae differ significantly according to the majority of characters.The specificity of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae root syndromes means that species of these families use different strategies for obtaining water and nutrients,including different symbiotic interactions in these strategies.But the traits that make up root syndromes are also correlated with other functions performed by roots,such as storing water and nutrients.The established patterns are important for understanding variability of root characters in species of different taxa growing within the same community.

    We analyzed root syndromes of only four families of monocots.This,of course,does not give a complete picture of the diversity of root syndromes in all 59,000 species of monocots and even in monocots of the boreal zone.It would be interesting to determine whether root syndromes are specific to other monocot families common in the boreal zone,such as Liliaceae and Alliaceae.Perhaps such a comparison would expand the diversity of described monocot root syndromes.

    Author contributions

    AB and DV developed the ideas and designed methodology;AB and DT collected the data;DV analyzed the data;AB and DV wrote the manuscript.All the authors significantly contributed to the drafts and gave their final approval for publication.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No conflict of interest exits with the submission of this manuscript,and it is approved by all authors for publication.

    Acknowledgements

    亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久性视频一级片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| av免费在线观看网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 嫩草影院精品99| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 少妇 在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | www.www免费av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲全国av大片| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久 成人 亚洲| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线免费观看的www视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 免费av毛片视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 草草在线视频免费看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 午夜激情av网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 69av精品久久久久久| 91麻豆av在线| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久热这里只有精品99| cao死你这个sao货| 久久热在线av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| av有码第一页| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产成人欧美| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产熟女xx| 一a级毛片在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产三级在线视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 91麻豆av在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产片内射在线| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 一级黄色大片毛片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 嫩草影视91久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 我的亚洲天堂| www日本黄色视频网| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 色综合站精品国产| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲成人久久性| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费观看精品视频网站| av在线播放免费不卡| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产精品二区激情视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 亚洲五月天丁香| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 又大又爽又粗| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产高清videossex| 999久久久国产精品视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 91麻豆av在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 男人操女人黄网站| 午夜激情av网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 日本三级黄在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 午夜免费鲁丝| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 极品教师在线免费播放| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产片内射在线| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 青草久久国产| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | av欧美777| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 怎么达到女性高潮| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 色av中文字幕| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久精品91蜜桃| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 露出奶头的视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| av欧美777| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 一区二区三区精品91| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 午夜激情av网站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| videosex国产| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 香蕉国产在线看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 青草久久国产| 国产99白浆流出| 久久久久国内视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产av不卡久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 校园春色视频在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| x7x7x7水蜜桃| av中文乱码字幕在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精华一区二区三区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 中国美女看黄片| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| avwww免费| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 99re在线观看精品视频| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲av熟女| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 一夜夜www| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线美女| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品人妻1区二区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 成人三级黄色视频| 色av中文字幕| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 91老司机精品| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 香蕉久久夜色| 欧美zozozo另类| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 免费av毛片视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 日日夜夜操网爽| 91成年电影在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品久久久久久,| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 看片在线看免费视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久香蕉激情| 国产野战对白在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| www.www免费av| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品人妻1区二区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 午夜免费观看网址| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 成人手机av| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久草成人影院| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 午夜福利18| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 免费高清视频大片| 香蕉久久夜色| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久久久久人人人人人| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一本一本综合久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲 国产 在线| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 男女那种视频在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| av免费在线观看网站| 国产真实乱freesex| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久热在线av| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 色av中文字幕| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 又大又爽又粗| 国产野战对白在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久国产精品影院| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 97碰自拍视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 88av欧美| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久青草综合色| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 香蕉久久夜色| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产色视频综合| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 免费高清视频大片| 日本熟妇午夜| bbb黄色大片| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 又大又爽又粗| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 看片在线看免费视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 宅男免费午夜| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久香蕉激情| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 窝窝影院91人妻| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 午夜福利18| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产色视频综合| 草草在线视频免费看|