• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals

    2024-01-06 01:53:14AnnBetekhtinDriTukovDenisVeselkin
    植物多樣性 2023年6期

    Ann A.Betekhtin ,Dri E.Tukov ,Denis V.Veselkin

    a Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin,19 Mira Street,Ekaterinburg 620002,Russia

    b Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology,8 Marta Street,Ekaterinburg 620144,Russia

    Keywords: Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure

    ABSTRACT The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes.Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied:16 species of Poaceae,24 species of Cyperaceae,14 species of Orchidaceae,and 7 species of Iridaceae.Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species,the following was determined:number of orders of branching roots;transverse dimensions of root,stele and cortex;number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers;length of root hairs;abundance of mycorrhiza.Species of each family had well-defined syndromes.Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis.Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs.In Iridaceae,roots were branched,and root hairs were short.Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele.Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae.Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery.The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.

    1.Introduction

    Plant taxonomy and phylogenetic systematics have long been based almost exclusively on characters of generative plant parts(Takhtadzhyan 1966;Cronquist,1988).The defining power of the characters of vegetative organs for differentiation of taxonomic plant groups is obviously low.However,the structure of vegetative organs can also be taxonomically specific.For example,such features as arrangement of leaves on a stem,leaf shape,type of venation (Takhtadzhyan,1966),characteristics of integumentary and conducting tissues(Esau,1969;Gamaley,2004),leaf thickness and density(Yudina et al.,2020).Phylogenetic groups of plants can differ in the characteristics of underground organ structures,including the type and architecture of the root system(Fitter,1987;Bouda et al.,2018),as well as the diameter of absorbing roots(Chen et al.,2013).In addition,specific root symbioses are well known in plant families,for example,mycorrhizal and nitrogen-fixing.Mycorrhiza type and mycorrhizal colonization rates are considered taxonomically correlated characters (Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).

    The variety of root syndromes are mainly associated with two alternative strategies of plant nutrition -absorption (acquisition)of soil resources and nutrition with or without participation of mycorrhizal fungi (Bergmann et al.,2020).It has recently been shown that mycorrhizal hyphae can penetrate or colonize the roots of non-host plants without forming typical mycorrhizal structures,but these plants can indirectly participate in mycorrhizal nutrition by means of host plants (Wang et al.,2022).

    It is well known that root systems and absorbing roots of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are constructed in different ways (John St,1980;Brundert,1991;Eissenstat,1992;Eissenstat et al.,2000;Bergmann et al.,2020).Arbuscular mycorrhiza(AM),ectomycorrhizae and other fungi colonize parenchyma of root cortex of plants.High AM colonization rates generally accompany large root diameter (Veselkin and Betekhtina,2013;Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),a small specific root length (SRL)(Kong et al.,2019) and root surface area relative to volume.Mycorrhizal plants have fewer root branching orders,but cortex is longer compared to non-mycorrhizal plants (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).In non-mycorrhizal and facultatively mycorrhizal plants,roots are usually not only strongly branched,but often have a short or rapidly reducing cortex,which is accompanied by a small root diameter (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019) and a higher SRL(Ryser,2006).In non-mycorrhizal plants,as a rule,root hairs are well developed and roots are adapted to direct absorption of substances from soil,since they have a large surface area in relation to their volume (Eissenstat et al.,2000).Under conditions of macronutrient deficiency,roots of non-mycorrhizal plants can form various modifications,for example,bulbous root hairs and dauciform roots in sedges (Lambers et al.,2008).

    The syndromes of the structure of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots are constant in a wide range of conditions and within different taxonomic groups.Root syndromes of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants are only one of possible major root syndromes.Another subdivision of a similar scale can be,for example,root structure syndromes of monocots and dicots,due to absence/presence of a secondary structure,as well as taxa of the superorder level(Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).Along with major syndromes,root character syndromes have been described in a limited number of species of steppe plants (Zhou et al.,2021),species within the same genus (Ehmig and Linder,2020) and subgenus(Konoplenko et al.,2017).

    Monocots include about 85,000 species from 11 to 12 orders.They dominate many biomes and are of crucial economic importance (Givnish et al.,2018).Monocot plants are convenient for studying various root traits for several reasons.Firstly,there is no secondary tissues in monocot roots.Secondly,secondary xylem and a cork layers are not formed in shoots and roots.This means that roots of different monocots have the same relatively simple morpho-anatomical structure.This creates a basis for a confident comparison of subtle or quantitative features of roots of different groups or taxa.Thirdly,monocots are characterized by a wide variety of symbiotic (arbuscular and orchid mycorrhiza,dark septate endophytes) and non-symbiotic (aerenchyma,dauciform roots,simple and bulbous root hairs) adaptations for soil resources exploitation.Characteristics of root hairs,such as high density and length,are closely related to non-mycorrhizal nutrition acquisition(John St,1980).Monocots generally have well-developed root hairs that persist over long periods(Kauff et al.,2000).This trait makes it possible to compare the length of root hairs in taxa with different adaptations to soil nutrition in an effort to understand how soil nutrition drives diversity in root structure.

    Angiosperm species that develop mycorrhizae tend to form relatively short root hairs,whereas those that do not form mycorrhizae develop relatively long root hairs (Baylis,1975;John St,1980).However,the relationship between the length of root hairs and the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization has rarely been studied.Monocots have a wide variety of relationships with mycorrhizal fungi.Thus,to understand strategies of nutrient absorption,we must examine root hair size in these plants.

    Studies of root syndromes often use integral features such as specific root length (SRL),root tissue density (RTD),and root diameter (Bergmann et al.,2020).This approach is not fully applicable to describing structural transformations of roots in response to different types of soil nutrition.For example,in thicker roots,the cortex may have a relatively larger area(Kong et al.,2014)either due to a larger number of layers of cortical cells in mycorrhizal species,or due to a well-developed aerenchyma (Lynch,2015) in nonmycorrhizal species,which in turn strongly affects the density of root tissue and its specific length.Because of this complication,it is not always possible to adequately describe the entire variety of root syndromes.Therefore,it seems to be more reasonable to find differences between anatomical features of roots.Absorbing roots of different taxa,which undoubtedly differ in many ways,are often attributed to the same type based on SRL and RTD.However,if we consider the syndromes of traits,we may encounter an unexpectedly great diversity of absorbing root structures within a class.

    We studied structural features -syndromes -of root systems and absorbing roots in species of four multispecies boreal families of monocots: Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,Iridaceae.We initially assumed that roots of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species should have different structures,primarily due to the peculiarities of their interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.Therefore,the aim of our work was to give an accurate and uniform description and quantitative characterization of root trait syndromes of Poaceae,Cyperaceae,Orchidaceae,and Iridaceae species.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Study site

    Studies were carried out in Ekaterinburg,Middle Urals,Russia(56°37′N,61°04′E),in the southern part of the boreal zone of the Middle Urals.This region has a temperate continental climate.Intensive plant growth lasts from May to August.The temperature rises above 10°C for 127 days a year on average.Average annual air temperature is +0.9°С,the highest average temperature,+17.6°С,occurs in July,and the lowest average temperature,-12.6°С,occurs in January.The average annual precipitation is 537 mm,with a maximum in July.Typical vegetation in the nearby territories is pine forest.The range of other habitats,however,is also quite wide:small-leaved forests,floodplains,meadows,petrophytic habitats,anthropogenic wastelands.Two main types of soils are common in this area -brown forest and sod-podzolic.

    2.2.Field research and sampling

    Overall,61 species were analyzed from the following families:Poaceae (16 species),Cyperaceae (24 species),Orchidaceae (14 species) and Iridaceae (7 species).Whole plants with intact roots were collected at the end of June-July 2008-2020 in their typical natural conditions,which cover a wide range of biotopes depending on moisture.Names and ciphers of habitats are given according to theEUNIS Habitat Classification(Chytry et al.,2020):R1B continental dry grassland(true steppe)-7 species;T35 temperate continentalPinus sylvestrisforest-17 species;R35 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic hay meadow -9 species;R36 moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic pasture-1 species;R37 temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grassland -1 species;Q22 poor fen -4 species;Q42 extremely rich moss-sedge fen -3 species;Q43 tall-sedge base-rich fen -1 species;Q53 tall-sedge bed -10 species;V15 bare tilled,fallow or recently abandoned arable land-1 species.The species of the genusIrisbecame an exception,as they are rarely found in natural conditions.We sampled Iridaceae from the collection of Botanical Garden of Ural Federal University,which is based on wild specimens introduced from natural habitats.

    2.3.Determination of roots structure characteristics

    Roots were cleaned out from soil with water and fixed in 70%ethanol.For each individual,we determined the order of root branching in accordance with the centripetal ordering system,where orders are distributed from the distal end (Pregitzer et al.,2002).Roots at the distal end of the root system-roots of the first order -are formed on the second order roots,which are laid on the third order roots.Thus,in monocots,the highest order is the thickest adventitious roots extending from the rhizome or stem.We took five roots of the last branching order (i.e.,the thinnest)from each individual.Then,root segments of the last order were cut transversely into sections 20-50 μm thick and examined using a Leica DM 5000 microscope (Leica,Germany) at 150× magnification.The following indicators were measured: root diameter;сortex thickness;diameter of central cylinder (stele);number of primary xylem vessels;length of root hairs;number of layers of cortical cells,including exodermis and parenchyma of cortex.Quantitative characteristics were measured using Simagis Mesoplant program(SI-AMS,Russia).Partial volume of cortex and stele was determined based on the obtained measurements by dividing the stele area by the root cross-sectional area and multiplying by 100%.

    2.4.Definition of mycorrhiza development

    For each species,one sample of roots from 5 individuals was randomly selected and fixed in 70%ethanol to analyze mycorrhiza development.Mycorrhizal colonization was determined for each sample on 15 fragments of thin roots of the last and penultimate orders,each 1 cm long.Fragments were randomly selected from the root system.Roots were subjected to maceration in a water bath in KOH for 30-60 min and colored by aniline blue(Selivanov,1981).Hyphae,arbuscules,and vesicles of AM fungi were recorded on squashed preparations at 200×magnification.Species that had arbuscules were considered mycorrhizal.Species in which hyphae and vesicles were found,but arbuscules were absent,were not classified as mycorrhizal.This condition was important for the genusCarex,most of whose species are considered nonmycorrhizal according to previous studies (Miller et al.,1999).Presence of fungal structures (hyphae,vesicles,and arbuscules)was determined in 5 fields of the microscope on each centimeterlong fragment of the root.Thus,there were 75 visual fields for each individual and 375 visual fields for each species.The intensity of mycorrhization was determined by fungus occurrence in the roots:100% -fungal structures were found in all studied visual fields in cortical cells;50% -fungal structures were found in half of the studied visual fields in cortical cells,etc.In general,accounting for AM using this method (Selivanov,1981) produces results close to those of a widely used method of accounting for AM development(McGonigle et al.,1990).This was previously demonstrated in Akhmetzhanova et al.(2012).

    2.5.Data analysis

    In the process of analyzing variability of individual variables,the following methods were used:for ranks-Kruskal-Wallis test;for dimensional and countable features-one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA).Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to determine the key features of the root structure and reduce the prediction interval.Continuum variables were transformed before ANOVA and PCA to achieve a greater compliance with normal distribution: values of dimensional and countable features were logarithmic using natural logarithm;values of features,expressed in shares,were subjected to arcsine transformation.To assess the degree of differences between species of different families according to several characters at a time,we used permutational analysis of variance -PERMANOVA (Anderson,2001) with calculation of Euclidean distance and 9999 permutations.ANOVA and PCA were performed using STATISTICA 8.0 software (StatSoft Inc.,1984-2007).PERMANOVA calculations were performed using R program (R Core Team,2022),‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al.,2020).

    3.Results

    3.1.Characteristics of root structure

    All studied features of root structure differed among families of monocots (Fig.1).Characteristics describing the overall transverse size of a root and how successful the AM formation is varied the most among families.Orchidaceae roots had the fewest branches,while Cyperaceae and Iridaceae roots had the most branches(Fig.2).The largest average,root diameter,stele diameter and cortex thickness were found in Orchidaceae(Fig.3);the smallest in Cyperaceae(Figs.3 and 4).The difference between these families in terms of the average size was 18-25 times.The abundance of mycorrhiza differed between Cyperaceae and Iridaceae the most(30 times).The least variable between families -no more than 3 times -were the partial volume of stele,the number of layers of exodermis and core parenchyma.

    Fig.1.Traits of root structure and root system of 4 monocot families (Cyp.-Cyperaceae;Iri.-Iridaceae;Poa.-Poaceae;Orc.-Orchidaceae);alphabetic indexes show homogeneous values according to Mann-Whitney U test (maximum branch order) or Tukey's test (the other traits).

    Fig.2.Roots of Cypripedium guttatum (Orchidaceae) (A), Calamagrostis epigejos (Poaceae) (B), Iris aphylla (Iridaceae) (C),Сarex supina (Cyperaceae) (D).Roman numerals mark orders of root branching according to classification(Pregitzer et al.,2002).In Orchidaceae,the root system is represented by 1st order adventitious roots that do not branch.In Carex,3rd order roots are formed from adventitious 4th order roots,then go 2nd order roots,and 1st order roots.The 1st order roots are the thinnest.In all species,we compared only 1st order roots.It can be seen how much 1st order roots differ in size in orchids and sedges.Bar for Сarex supina is 1 cm.

    Fig.3.Cross sections of the absorptive roots under visible light:Neottia nidus-avis(mycoheterotrophic orchid)(Orchidaceae)(A),Phragmites australis(Poaceae)(B),Iris pseudacorus(Iridaceae) (C), Carex pseudocyperus (Cyperaceae) (D).Legend: root hair (Rh);epidermis (Ep);exodermis (Ex);parenchyma of the cortex (C);endodermis (En);vessels of primary xylem (X).The bar is 100 microns.

    Thus,species of each family had a well-defined list of root characteristics by which they could be distinguished (Table 1).Orchidaceae and Iridaceae had thick roots and a relatively large stele.The roots of Orchidaceae did not branch,but root hairs were long.In contrast,the roots of Iridaceae were highly branched but had short root hairs.Exodermis is strongly developed in Iridaceae and less developed in Orchidaceae.In addition,Orchidaceae and Iridaceae differed in mycorrhiza types: orchid (and possibly mycoheterotrophy) in Orchidaceae and typical AM in Iridaceae.

    Table 1 Formalization of structural features of roots of four monocots families.

    Poaceae and Cyperaceae had thin roots and a relatively thin stele.But in Poaceae,roots were less branched than in Cyperaceae.Families also differed in length of root hairs,with short root hairs in Poaceae and long hairs in Cyperaceae.Also,Poaceae species are usually mycorrhizal and,in our study,formed abundant typical AM.Cyperaceae,as a rule,only randomly form AM,and in our study,the abundance of AM structures in sedge roots was low.

    3.2.Root structure syndromes

    Three of four families of monocots possessed syndromes,i.e.,combinations of root traits that clearly differed from those of other families.In three families-Orchidaceae,Iridaceae and Cyperaceae-one or more characters that form the basis of a syndrome were at extremes,i.e.,were either at their maximum or minimum compared to the values of species from other families.Orchidaceae had unbranched thick roots with a unique type of mycorrhizae.Iridaceae had relatively thick branched roots with developed exodermis,and AM.Cyperaceae had well-branched thin roots with long root hairs with sparse AM.Only Poaceae roots did not have any specific or extreme characteristics.By all indications,Poaceae occupy an intermediate position between other families.

    Principal components analysis (Table 2) can either (i) identify the leading,main features from a larger set,or (ii) collapse the original large set of measured variables into a limited number of new features-principal components.PCA has shown that some of the measured features of root structure are strongly interrelated and are combined into well-interpreted principal components.The first two principal components together explain more than 80% of the variability of the original 10 root structure characteristics,both when using the rotation of principal components and without rotation.Based on the structure of correlations obtained without their rotation,two informative,maximally unrelated,actually measured features can be distinguished:1)diameter of stele,which characterizes a total transverse size of a root;2)length of root hairs.The rest of the features are correlated to some extent with either the first or the second feature.Based on the structure of feature correlations obtained after principal components rotation,two easily interpreted principal components can be distinguished:1)a component describing a transverse size of a root;2) a component positively associated with the formation of exodermis and mycorrhiza and negatively associated with the length of root hairs.

    Using PERMANOVA analysis,we found that the monocotyledonous families differ from each other in terms of root structure,regardless of the studied set of features.Statistically significant differences between the families were established by analyzing three sets of features: 1) according to the complex of all real root structure characteristics:F(3;57)=104.87;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 85%of the total variance of root features;2)according to two key real features(Fig.5 a):F(3;57)=207.53;P<0.001;belonging to a particular family determines 92%of the total variance of root features;3)in the space of two main principal components(Fig.5b):F(3;57)=103.92;P<0.001.

    In the process of comparing all four families simultaneously,PERMANOVA tests a hypothesis that there are significant differences in at least one out of six possible pairwise comparisons.In other words,based on the results of PERMANOVA,i.e.,comparison of all four families,it is impossible to determine whether the root structure syndromes differ between the families that are closest to each other.Therefore,we conducted an additional study to see whether the differences between two families whose centroids are closest to each other (i.e.,Iridaceae and Poaceae;see Fig.4) are statistically significant.In the spaces specified by different combinations of features,the following significance of difference between these families was obtained:1)according to the complex of all the real characteristics:F(1;21)=16.76;P<0.001;2) according to two key real characteristics(see Fig.5):F(1;21)=15.39;P<0.001;3)in space of two main factors (see Fig.5):F(1;21)=5.86;P=0.009.Thus,root structure syndromes differ significantly even between two families with the closest character values.Therefore,the conclusion about the specificity of root structure syndromes in four monocotyledonous families has been proved and does not depend on specific methods of data analysis.

    Fig.5.Differentiation of species of four monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae;-Poaceae;-Orchidaceae) in space of two traits of roots structure(a)and in space of two main principal components(b).Group centroids and standard deviations are shown.Arrows in(b)show principal components loads of the main features of the root structure,which form principal components plotted along abscissa and ordinate: D -root diameter;RH -hair roots length: M-mycorrhiza;Ex -exodermis layers number.

    4.Discussion

    Available information on the characteristics of root structure and their diverse combinations observed during adaptation to different soil and climatic conditions is incomplete.What is clear thus far is only the most general changes in root structure in response to major environmental factors(Freschet et al.,2021).This model (Freschet et al.,2021) does not consider the taxonomic specificity of a root structure.

    To explain the variability of roots,the root economics approach has traditionally been used,which includes strategies for fast and slow acquisition of resources by roots(Reich,2014;Weemstra et al.,2016).The diversity of root trait syndromes has recently been associated with two contrasting strategies of soil nutrition -the ability to absorb soil resources with the participation of mycorrhizal fungi or autonomously (Bergmann et al.,2020).Integral indicators have been used to isolate these syndromes:SRL,RTD,root diameter,cortical fraction (Bergmann et al.,2020).Apparently,syndromes are more difficult to identify when it comes to the analysis of anatomical features,where the roots of plants belonging to the same group(AM)may have diverse morphotypes that cannot be attributed to one group(Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019).

    Our work focuses on species from the four largest families of monocots (Givnish et al.,2018).These families belong to two orders: Poales (Cyperaceae and Poaceae) and Asparagales (Iridaceae and Orchidaceae) (Givnish et al.,2018).In total,we studied 61 species of monocots.This consists of 10% of cereal species,23% of sedges and 44%of orchids from those growing in the Middle Urals.Our data convincingly confirm a high specificity of absorption root structural syndromes in four families of monocots.

    In monocots,compared to dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),the overall variability of some root characteristics is high.For example,in herbaceous dicots,root system branching varies from 3 to 5 orders (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2019),whereas in monocots within the present study-from 1 to 4 orders.In dicots,the thickness of first-order roots varied between families by no more than two times,and in monocots,up to 15-20 times.This is more than a 10-fold difference observed when comparing the thickness of absorptive roots (excluding roots with secondary thickening) of grasses on a global scale (Ma et al.,2018).High variability in root structure of monocots is explained by the difference between roots of Orchidaceae and the others.If we do not consider Orchidaceae,the difference between families in root system branching degree is leveled,and the characters describing transverse dimensions differ by only a factor of 2-3.

    The central feature of Orchidaceae root syndrome is an interaction with basidiomycetes to form orchid mycorrhiza (Smith and Read,2010).The root system of Orchidaceae consists of fleshy,non-branching roots that are laid down on stems or rhizomes.Weak root branching along with large transverse dimensions are also found in other plant groups (Comas and Eissenstat,2009;Comas et al.,2014;Valverde-Barrantes et al.,2015).This structure is optimal for the habitat of mycorrhizal fungi,which can increase the absorptive surface of roots by a factor of 2-6 compared to a branching root system with fine roots (McCormack and Iversen,2019).Fungal mycelium increases the absorptive surface area of roots(Dearnaley and Cameron,2017).This may be why orchid roots usually form few root hairs (Hew and Yong,2004).In our results,orchid root hairs are long.Thick parenchyma of the cortex in Orchidaceae,in addition to the symbiosis formation area,can perform storage functions.In some orchids,absorbing roots are perennial organs (Salazar et al.,2003;Hagsater et al.,2005).In orchids,along with the development of parenchyma,a strong development of the stele was recorded.Our results showed that cortical parenchyma is well developed in taxa with a welldeveloped stele,or,more precisely,in taxa with a well-developed xylem.The number and size of vessels in orchid roots is an order of magnitude higher than in roots of other families.In absorptive roots,stable allometric connections exist between cortex and stele(Kong et al.,2019).In relation to axial transport channels (phloem sieve tubes,xylem vessels),radial transport networks of parenchymal cells are the origins and ends of transport system,zones of its loading or unloading.The root parenchyma with developed mycorrhiza is accompanied by an increase in the ascending flow,compared with the parenchyma of non-mycorrhizal species(Gamaley,2004).The specificity of orchid roots structure correlates with their other bioecological features: usually highly specialized entomophily;small seeds;ontogenesis with stage of protokorma and other unusual variants of ontogenesis;a special type of mycorrhizae not found in other plants(Waterman and Bidartondo,2008;Fay and Chase 2009;Merckx,2013).

    The transverse dimensions of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae roots were not the same,but quite similar.Significant differences among Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae were related to adaptations for absorbing soil resources.The structure of root features correlations with the main principal component“Exodermis,root hairs length and mycorrhiza”(Table 2)indicates that there is a negative correlation between the abundance of AM and the length of root hairs.Such a correlation is prominent if families with arbuscular mycorrhiza-Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,and Poaceae -are analyzed without Orchidaceae.This approach allows us to see possible ranges of AM abundance depending on the length of root hairs (Fig.6).In Cyperaceae,the leading adaptation for absorption of soil resources is long root hairs,whereas in Iridaceae and Poaceae it is predominantly AM.

    Fig.6.Dependence between length of root hairs and abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in species of three monocots families in Middle Urals (-Cyperaceae;-Iridaceae; -Poaceae).Dotted lines conditionally show range of variability in abundance of mycorrhiza.

    Our data clearly illustrate a well-known pattern: the fundamental ability to form one or another type of mycorrhiza is determined phylogenetically(Kiers and Heijden,2006;Markmann et al.,2008;Davison et al.,2011;Kiers et al.,2011).However,the abundance of mycorrhiza depends not only on the taxonomic position of plants,but also on the environmental conditions (Hetrick,1991).This is evidenced by a large range of variations in AM abundance in both Iridaceae and Poaceae.

    The family Iridaceae is closely related to the orchid family(Givnish et al.,2018).In Iridaceae species,we found an unexpected combination of root characters: a high number of root branching orders,thick roots with thick cortex and stele,and short root hairs.Iridaceae were probably originally adapted to arid conditions(Rodionenko,1961),and most modern iris species have pronounced xerophytic properties,while the presence of hygrophytes and hydrophytes among them is secondary.The root systems of irises,although branched,are rather short.This indirectly indicates adaptation to pulsating inflow of water with precipitation.The strong growth of cortex in Iridaceae may be associated not only with the creation of conditions for mycorrhizal fungi(Comas et al.,2012),but also with a water storage function.It is significant that some species of the Iridaceae family are adapted to dry conditions due to the formation of contractilis roots (Ruzin,1979;Jernstedt,1984),which is also accompanied by the strong growth of root parenchyma (North et al.,2008).Strong cortex growth requires strengthening mechanical tissue-exodermis.In turn,exodermis (i) maintains the shape of thick roots,(ii) retains water in tissues,and (iii) increases the sucking power of tissues due to the elastic deformation of the cell wall (Bakhari and Wendelbo,1978).

    In the Cyperaceae root syndrome,the leading characteristics are those that compensate for a weak connection with AM fungi.These are a highly branched root system,thin roots with poorly developed cortex and stele,sparse exodermis,and long root hairs.Such structural features are aimed at increasing the surface of contact with soil and allow sedges to explore large volumes of soil.In the absence of mycorrhiza,low-accessible elements,such as phosphorus,can be obtained from sedges using dauciform roots.Interestingly,Cyperaceae is characterized by the largest range of variability for principal component 2 in Fig.5a.This may be Cyperaceae represented the largest number of species in this study.But it may also reflect Cyperaceae's great variety of original adaptations for absorbing soil resources.In addition to long root hairs and AM,a wide range of other root modifications are possible in Cyperaceae: dauciform roots (Shane et al.,2006);bulbous-based root hairs (Miller et al.,1999);ectomycorrhiza-like structures(Harrington and Mitchell,2002);aerenchyma(Visser et al.,2000);and dark septate endophytes (Muthukumar et al.,2004;Weishampel and Bedford,2006).These adaptations can be widely combined with each other both in one sedge species and in one individual (Veselkin et al.,2014;Konoplenko et al.,2017).Despite the fact that the species of Cyperaceae family are poorly related to mycorrhiza,their roots are characterized by a high percentage of cortex.Most of theCarexspecies grow in waterlogged habitats and cortex overgrowth may be associated with the formation of aerenchyma,which is necessary for storing oxygen inside the roots during flooding (Kutschera and Lichtenegger,1982).At the same time,the death and lysis of cortical cells during the formation of aerenchyma can negatively affect the development of mycorrhiza.In addition,the lower Cyperaceae stele is characterized by the absence of moisture deficiency.

    The Poaceae family is closely related to Cyperaceae (Givnish et al.,2018).The key features of the Poaceae root syndrome are intermediate between Iridaceae and Cyperaceae.These features are low-extended cortex and stele,and typical exodermis.The ability to form a typical AM is expectedly combined with short root hairs.However,the structural features of cereal roots leave them the opportunity to regulate the surface area of exchange with soil autonomously,i.e.,without mycorrhiza,which can compensate for non-obligate relationships of grass roots with mycorrhizal fungi.At the same time,the nature of emerging compromises in roots of cereals is largely determined by adaptation to the specific habitat conditions (Fort et al.,2013;Wahl and Ryser,2000).

    5.Conclusion

    Syndromes of root features of four families of monocots -Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae -were predictably different.An unexpected and therefore new result of our work that the root syndromes of different families of monocots show large-scale and highly significant differences.In fact,root structure syndromes are unique in each family.It is expected that the main vector,with which all other structural features of roots are consistent,is set by the interaction with mycorrhizal fungi.This conclusion is fully consistent with similar comparisons only within dicots (Betekhtina and Veselkin,2014) and with generalizations about plants in general(Bergmann et al.,2020).According to the peculiarities of the roots structure,the species of four families of monocots fall into three contrasting groups: Orchidaceae with a special type of mycorrhiza;Cyperaceae with rare or occasional arbuscular mycorrhiza;Iridaceae and Poaceae with typical arbuscular mycorrhiza.The features of roots of different families are so prominent that even Iridaceae and Poaceae differ significantly according to the majority of characters.The specificity of Cyperaceae,Iridaceae,Poaceae,and Orchidaceae root syndromes means that species of these families use different strategies for obtaining water and nutrients,including different symbiotic interactions in these strategies.But the traits that make up root syndromes are also correlated with other functions performed by roots,such as storing water and nutrients.The established patterns are important for understanding variability of root characters in species of different taxa growing within the same community.

    We analyzed root syndromes of only four families of monocots.This,of course,does not give a complete picture of the diversity of root syndromes in all 59,000 species of monocots and even in monocots of the boreal zone.It would be interesting to determine whether root syndromes are specific to other monocot families common in the boreal zone,such as Liliaceae and Alliaceae.Perhaps such a comparison would expand the diversity of described monocot root syndromes.

    Author contributions

    AB and DV developed the ideas and designed methodology;AB and DT collected the data;DV analyzed the data;AB and DV wrote the manuscript.All the authors significantly contributed to the drafts and gave their final approval for publication.

    Declaration of competing interest

    No conflict of interest exits with the submission of this manuscript,and it is approved by all authors for publication.

    Acknowledgements

    亚洲图色成人| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 色综合站精品国产| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 日本一二三区视频观看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国内精品宾馆在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| a级毛色黄片| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 99久久精品热视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 性色avwww在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 欧美97在线视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 三级经典国产精品| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 18+在线观看网站| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看 | 在现免费观看毛片| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 我要搜黄色片| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 成年av动漫网址| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产在线男女| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲国产色片| 老司机福利观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 色综合色国产| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 成人三级黄色视频| ponron亚洲| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产成人freesex在线| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 三级经典国产精品| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 中文字幕久久专区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 老女人水多毛片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲18禁久久av| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成年免费大片在线观看| videos熟女内射| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 少妇丰满av| 成人国产麻豆网| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 毛片女人毛片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 熟女电影av网| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美日本视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 国产精品久久视频播放| 成人无遮挡网站| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久热精品热| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 一本久久精品| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 一本一本综合久久| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产在线男女| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲国产色片| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产黄片美女视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 极品教师在线视频| av专区在线播放| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 九草在线视频观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| videossex国产| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 老女人水多毛片| 91狼人影院| 国产三级在线视频| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜视频国产福利| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚州av有码| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲av.av天堂| or卡值多少钱| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲成色77777| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲自拍偷在线| av免费在线看不卡| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久热久热在线精品观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 韩国av在线不卡| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 91久久精品电影网| 国产精品,欧美在线| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久久性生活片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美日本视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲av福利一区| 少妇的逼好多水| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 一级av片app| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 高清av免费在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 18+在线观看网站| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | av国产免费在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久久久久久久大av| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 嫩草影院新地址| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产高清三级在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产在视频线在精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| av线在线观看网站| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲综合色惰| 日韩高清综合在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产精品永久免费网站| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 看十八女毛片水多多多| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 高清av免费在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| av黄色大香蕉| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 有码 亚洲区| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 看免费成人av毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| av专区在线播放| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产真实乱freesex| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 黄色日韩在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久人妻av系列| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久久精品94久久精品| 简卡轻食公司| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲性久久影院| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| videossex国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本黄大片高清| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品久久久久久成人av| 色综合色国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费看光身美女| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 国产亚洲精品av在线| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美激情在线99| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 我要搜黄色片| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 国产极品天堂在线| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av一区综合| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 精品酒店卫生间| 九色成人免费人妻av| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费av不卡在线播放| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲av成人av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 嫩草影院精品99| 老司机福利观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 欧美激情在线99| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久久久网色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚州av有码| 久久草成人影院| 国产高潮美女av| 色播亚洲综合网| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品一区二区免费观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 在线观看一区二区三区| 老司机影院成人| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美日本视频| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 男人舔奶头视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久6这里有精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 男女国产视频网站| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日本黄色片子视频| 久久热精品热| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久久久久久久中文| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 一本久久精品| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲内射少妇av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 中文字幕制服av| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美性感艳星| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 一级毛片电影观看 | 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲综合精品二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久热精品热| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 插逼视频在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 永久网站在线| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 一级av片app| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 午夜精品在线福利| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久久久网色| 国产三级在线视频| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产综合懂色| 色哟哟·www| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v|