• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Fully relativistic many-body perturbation energies,transition properties,and lifetimes of lithium-like iron Fe XXIV

    2023-11-02 08:40:00ShuangLi李雙MinZhao趙敏GuoQingLiu劉國(guó)慶ChangBaoHu胡昌寶andGuoZhuPan潘國(guó)柱
    Chinese Physics B 2023年10期
    關(guān)鍵詞:國(guó)柱趙敏

    Shuang Li(李雙), Min Zhao(趙敏), Guo-Qing Liu(劉國(guó)慶),Chang-Bao Hu(胡昌寶), and Guo-Zhu Pan(潘國(guó)柱)

    1School of Electrical and Opto-electronic Engineering,West Anhui University,Lu’an 237012,China

    2College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China

    3Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics,Beijing 100088,China

    4Shanghai EBIT Laboratory,Institute of Modern Physics,Department of Nuclear Science and Technology,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China

    Keywords: relativistic many-body perturbation,multi-reference configuration,radiative rates,lifetime

    1.Introduction

    In recent years, people have shown great interests in lithium-like (or Li-like) ions (with only three electrons outside the nucleus).[1-5]Studying these ions can aid in the exploration of fundamental physics,such as QED effects.[1,2,4,5]Additionally, due to the simplicity of the electronic structure of the ions thus the relatively accurate spectral data,the spectral lines of lithium-like ions can be used for spectral calibration.Furthermore, they can also be used for spectral line identification,[6]as well as for electron temperature, density,and chemical composition diagnostics.[7-9]

    The spectra of lithium-like ions have been widely observed in astrophysical and laboratory plasmas, as noted in Refs.[7-9].For example, the spectra of the lithium-like iron have been observed in the solar corona,[10,11]laserproduced plasmas,[12]tokamaks,[13]and electron-beam ion traps.[14,15]Furthermore, the spectra of the lithium-like iron have been observed up to high levels withn=6, as reported in Refs.[11,12,15].

    Due to the importance of lithium-like ions, there have been many studies on the ions.[3,6-9,16-30]

    In particular, Naharet al.[28](hereafter referred to as Nahar1999) used the quasi-relativistic Breit-PauliR-matrix method (BPRM) to calculate E1 transition radiative rates between energy levels up ton= 10 for lithium-like iron.In their calculations, they just added one-body relativistic correction terms to the non-relativistic Hamiltonian,[31]which included the one-body mass correction, the one-body Darwin term, and the spin-orbit term, they did not even include the two-body interactions in the Breit-Pauli approximation(such as the spin-other orbit, spin-spin, orbit-orbit, two-body Darwin, and spin-contact terms).[32,33]However, when considering the iron ion, it is crucial to incorporate relativistic effects right from the beginning,[34]and the fully relativistic Dirac formalism, which is employed in the present research,is essential.[35]Aggarwalet al.[8](denoted as Aggarwal2012)used the GRASP0 program originally developed by Grantet al.[36]and revised by Norrington to calculate the E1,M1,E2,and M2 transition radiative rates between the lowest 24 energy levels withn ≤5 for lithium-like ions (Z= 21-28, including iron ion).However, the findings of Aggarwal2012 were insufficient in identifying or synthesizing the observed spectra involving then=6 energy levels.Therefore, it is crucial to enhance the results of Aggarwal2012 by further incorporating then=6 energy levels in the calculations, as demonstrated in the present study.In 2016, El-Maaref[24](denoted as El-Maaref2016)provided lifetimes of 1s2nlconfigurations(wheren=2-6 andl=0,...,n-1)for lithium-like iron,but did not report the results for 6f7/2,6g9/2,6h9/2,and 6h11/2levels.El-Maaref used the fully relativistic multi-configuration Dirac-Hartree-Fock(MCDHF)method,[37]which was implemented in the fully relativistic atomic structure program package GRASP2K.[37]Through the procedure of configuration interaction(CI),the relativistic effects such as Breit Hamiltonian and quantum electrodynamics effects (QED) were included,and the considered configuration state functions(CSFs)were from all single-(S) and double-(D) excitations (or substitutions)up to 7l,and single-(S),double-(D),and triple-(T)excitations up to the 6lorbitals.

    However, unfortunately, although El-Maaref2016 employed an advanced fully relativistic method (MCDHF),the lifetimes of El-Maaref2016 in the “Table 3”[24]are significantly different from the fully relativistic lifetimes of Aggarwal2012[8]and the quasi-relativistic ones of Nahar1999.[28,38]For example,among the 30 reported lifetime values,20,14,10,and 7 have differences with Nahar1999 exceeding 2%, 5%, 10%, and 20%, respectively.The lifetime differences for the 1s24f5/2and 1s26s1/2levels are even up to one order of magnitude, which is quite astonishing! On the other hand,the lifetime values from Aggarwal2012 are almost identical to Nahar1999 ones, with most lifetimes agreeing within 1%,and all within 2%.

    Although a fully relativistic method was used in Aggarwal2012, however, the employed program was an early version of GRASP0,[36]besides, the configuration interactions were only limited to withinn ≤5 levels.Thus the lifetime values maybe have some deviations.On the other hand,El-Maaref2016 utilized the latest version of GRASP, called GRASP2K,[37]which is an advanced fully relativistic implementation.Furthermore, larger configuration interactions up to withinn ≤7 levels were considered in El-Maaref2016.Therefore,the newly reported fully relativistic lifetime values from El-Maaref2016 are possibly even the most accurate ones.However, the significant differences between El-Maaref’s results and the ones from both Aggarwal2012 and Nahar1999 cannot be disregarded.

    To address the larger discrepancies of El-Maaref2016,here,we employ the advanced relativistic configuration interaction (RCI) combined with many-body perturbation theory(MBPT) method (RMBPT for short), which has been implemented in the FAC code,[39]we provide energies and lifetime values for the lowest 35 energy levels from the 1s2nlconfigurations (wheren ≤6 andl=0,...,n-1) of Li-like iron Fe XXIV, as well as complete data on the transition wavelengths, radiative rates, absorption oscillator strengths, and line strengths between the levels.The transitions include both allowed (E1) and forbidden (magnetic dipole M1, magnetic quadrupole M2,and electric quadrupole E2)ones.

    Furthermore, to delve deeper into the evaluation of the present RMBPT results, we additionally utilize the multireference configuration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) combined with the RCI method (MCDHF/RCI for short) as implemented in the GRASP2K code (version 2018[40]).In recent years,we have successfully applied both the RMBPT and MCDHF/RCI methods to the highly accuracy studies of Nilike,O-like,F-like,and Ne-like ions.[41-44]

    2.Calculations

    For the RMBPT calculations,we employ the widely used flexible atomic code (FAC),[39]elaborate descriptions of the RMBPT method can be found in references.[27,45-47]Therefore,we will not delve into the theoretical aspects in great detail here.Instead, we will offer an overview of the parameter settings for the present RMBPT computations.The Hilbert space is divided into two subspaces: the model space M (CI effects are exactly treated)and the orthogonal space N(CI effects are treated in the second-order perturbation way).The M space contains all the levels from the(1s2)nlconfigurations(where the principal quantum numbern=2-8 and the angular quantum numberl=0,...,n-1).The orthogonal space N consists of single-(S)and double-(D)substitutions from the M space,with the highest S-substitutions up ton=200,and the highest first and second electrons of the D-substitutions up ton=200 andn'=80,respectively.

    To further evaluate the accuracy of present RMBPT results, we also perform MCDHF/RCI calculations for the ion using the GRASP2K package(version 2018[40]).After carrying on the relativistic self-consistent field procedure,we determine both the radial parts of the Dirac orbitals and the expansion coefficients of thej j-coupled configuration state functions(CSFs)expansions,and then in the following RCI calculation,the Breit interaction is considered in the low-frequency limit by multiplying the frequency with a scale factor of 10-6.In the present RMCDHF/RCI calculations,the multi-reference(MR) configuration sets are from (1s2)nlwithn=2-6 andl=0,...,(n-1),namely,for even parity,the MR sets include 2s,3s,3d,4s,4d,5s,5d,5g,6s,6d,and 6g,while for odd parity,the MR sets include 2p,3p,4p,4f,5p,5f,6p,6f,and 6h.For Li-like ions with just one electron outside the 1s closed shell, consequently there is no outer correlation.[48]The correlation corrections to the Dirac-Fock results can therefore be categorized as core-valence (CV) and core-core (CC) types(i.e.both the S-and D-substitutions are allowed).[48]Both the CV and CC correlations are important for highly accurate radiative parameters.[48,49]For instance, it has been shown that the CC correlations can enhance the line strength of the 2s-2p resonance line in the lithium atom by approximately 0.6%.[48]In the present case, our tests show that the CV and CC correlations indeed contribute to line strength corrections of up to 0.7%for the 2p1/2-6d3/2transition and up to 1.3%for the 2p1/2-6s1/2transition, respectively.However, the impact of CV and CC correlations becomes prominent for certain Δn=0 transition rates with low transition energies.For instance,the CV and CC correlations contribute to corrections of approximately one order of magnitude for the 5f7/2-5g7/2transition and around two orders of magnitude for the 6g9/2-6h9/2transition, respectively.However, it should be noted that these Δn=0 transitions are not the primary radiative decay channels for the upper levels.Hence, the impact of both CV and CC correlations on the lifetimes are limited, with maximum impacts of 1.7% for the CV correlation and of 0.8% for the CC correlation,both for the 2p1/2level.For this simple Li-like atomic system with only three electrons,as did in the previous studies,[48,50]we can further include the second-order correlations effects[51]by relaxing the substitution rules to generate all possible CSFs,which means all the three electrons can be substituted in the present case (i.e.all the S-, D-, and Tsubstitutions are permitted),the calculation is said to be a complete active space(CAS)calculation.[34]In our final CAS calculation, by allowing all the S-, D-, and T-substitutions from the MR configurations to active sets up ton=7, andjup to 9/2 and 11/2 for even and odd parities, respectively, which produces 101767 and 123182 CSFs expansions.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Energies

    Table 1 provides the energy values from both present RMBPT and MCDHF/RCI calculations, as well as other theoretical and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) values.The NIST team has meticulously compiled and evaluated energies and other atomic data, and their recommended results can be accessed for free on their website at https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/levels form.html.Figure 1 shows comparisons between these theoretical energy values and the NIST ones, to make the figure clearer and in detail, the original energy ratio of Key=2 and 3 (i.e., 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels) from Nahar1999 are +0.01 and-0.015,respectively.

    Table 1 and figure 1 reveal relatively large deviations between the energies of Nahar1999[28,38]based on the quasirelativistic Breit-Pauli theory and the NIST ones, with majority of the energy differences falling within the range of 0.3%-0.4%.Notably,the largest deviations occur for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels, with deviations of approximately 1.5% and 1.9%,respectively.In contrast,the GRASP2K results from El-Maaref2016[24]and the GRASP0 results from Aggarwal2012 demonstrate good agreements with the NIST energies, with most results matching within 0.03%.The deviations for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels are slightly larger, around 0.1% and 0.05%for El-Maaref2016,and around 0.4%and 0.2%for Aggarwal2012.The present MCDHF/RCI results exhibit similar agreement with the NIST ones,with the deviations for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels being around 0.1%-0.2%.Finally, the present RMBPT results demonstrate the best match with the NIST energies, most within 0.03%, and all within 0.05% including those for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels.Regarding the energy levels of lithium-like iron Fe XXIV, there have been many studies.In general, the experimental energy level data from National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST)is highly precise,which is why we primarily focus on comparing with them.However,it is worth mentioning that for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels, the energies obtained from literatures[30,52]are actually the preferable theoretical ones, particularly the highly accurate results from reference,[30]although they are limited to then ≤2 levels.However, for then=3-6 levels,the present RMBPT energies should be favored.

    We also investigated the configuration interaction(CI)on the energies,three different CI modes are considered here,i.e.RCI1,RCI2,and RCI3.The RCI1 and RCI2 represent the calculations without and with considering configuration interaction between the(1s2)nl(n ≤6)levels,respectively,while the RCI3 represents the consideration of configuration interaction between more levels withn ≤8.For clarity, the corresponding results from the three modes are not presented in Table 1 or Fig.1.

    Furthermore, most of the RCI1 energies agree with the NIST values within 0.05%.However,the agreement is slightly worse for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2energy levels, with discrepancies of around 0.36% and 0.21%, respectively.Nevertheless,when considering configuration interaction within then ≤6 levels (i.e.the RCI2 mode), the agreements with the NIST values improve significantly.For example, the discrepancies decrease to 0.26% and 0.16% for the 2p1/2and 2p3/2levels,respectively,and become negligible(within 0.05%)for all the other levels.Further consideration of CI between more levels withn ≤8(i.e.the RCI3 mode)does not result in significant energy corrections,with the agreements with the RCI2 values being within 0.01%,meaning that the convergence of energies from the relativistic configuration interaction (RCI) methods is relatively slow.To consider configuration interactions between even more levels, the RMBPT method can be utilized.Our RMBPT results demonstrate further improvements of the energies compared to the RCI3 results.Specifically, the two lowest levels exhibit energy corrections of 0.22%and 0.11%,respectively, then=6 levels demonstrate corrections of approximately 0.01%, and the corrections are below 0.01% for the other levels.

    The above comparisons show that the present RMBPT energies are highly accurate, and that CI effects are important,especially for the two low lying levels of the ion.

    3.2.Radiative rates

    Table 2 provides radiative data for dipole allowed (E1)and forbidden transitions (magnetic dipole M1, magnetic quadrupole M2, and electric quadrupole E2) of Li-like iron using the RMBPT method.The data includes wavelengthsλi j(in unit °A),radiative ratesA(in unit 1/s),absorption oscillator strengthsf(dimensionless),and line strengthsS(in unit a.u.), where 1 a.u.=6.460×10-36cm2·esu2.Here, we just present a partial set of data as an example,with the complete data available in electronic form on the website addresses data DOI, data private access link, data anonymous private link,and data CSTR.

    It is important to note that our RMBPT energy values agree best with those of NIST, resulting in good agreements between our RMBPT wavelengths and the observed ones compiled by NIST.In fact, both our RMBPT wavelengths for 2s1/2-2p1/2and 2s1/2-2p3/2transitions agree with the observed ones to within 0.05%.However, for transitions with small energy differences (Δn= 0), particularly those with high principal quantum numbers (n=5,6), the corresponding wavelengths may be less accurate, these inaccuracies can propagate to the radiative rates,leading to further inaccuracies.This phenomenon is quite common for any theoretic radiative rates from each method.

    Table 2.Transition properties for dipole allowed(E1)and forbidden ones(magnetic dipole M1, magnetic quadrupole M2, and electric quadrupole E2)from present RMBPT methods for lithium-like iron Fe XXIV.Parameters i and j are the lower(i)and upper(j)levels of a transition as defined in Table 1, λi j is transition wavelength (in unit °A), A is radiative transition rate(in unit 1/s), f is absorption oscillator strength(dimensionless),S is line strength in atomic unit (a.u.), and a±b ≡a×10±b.Note: only a portion of transition data are presented here,the complete dataset are in an electronic form on the website of this journal data DOI,data private access link,data anonymous private link,and data CSTR.

    In Fig.2, we compare present RMBPT radiative rates with our MCDHF/RCI results and results from previous literatures.Figure 2(a) for dipole allowed (E1) transitions, and figure 2(b)for forbidden(M1,M2,and E2)ones.

    For E1 transitions,as can be seen from Fig.2(a),present RMBPT radiative rates are in good agreement with our MCDHF/RCI results, as well as with the results from Aggarwal2012 and Nahar1999.For instance,the radiative rates calculated by present RMBPT and MCDHF/RCI show a high degree of agreement,with deviations below 1%for all the Δn/=0 transitions,except for the 2p1/2-6s1/2transition,for which the deviation is around 2%.Moreover, for most Δn=0 transitions,the deviations between the two sets of radiative rates are below 2%.Nonetheless, for two specific Δn=0 transitions,namely 5f7/2-5g7and 6f7/2-6g7/2,the deviations reach up to a factor of 5.These deviations mainly arise from discrepancies in the wavelength determinations, as both the strengths from the two data sets are in agreements within 2%.As for comparisons with previous literatures, for all the Δn/=0 transitions,the present RMBPT radiative rates are in agreements with Aggarwal2012 and Nahar1999 within 1.5%and 3%,respectively.

    Fig.2.Comparisons of other radiative rates with present RMBPT ones for(a) E1 transitions and (b) forbidden transitions (M1, M2, and E2).Here,other radiative rates are from present MCDHF/RCI calculations, and those of El-Maaref2016,[24] Aggarwal2012,[8] and Nahar1999.[28,38]

    We also make comparisons with other theoretical results for E1 transitions.For example,all the current RMBPT radiative rates are in agreements with the MCDHF results for transitions below the 3d level as reported by Denget al.[6]to within 0.5%.Additionally, our RMBPT ones agree with the manybody perturbation theory results for transitions below the 3s level as reported by Johnsonet al.[52]to within 0.3%.Furthermore, the current radiative rates agree with the MCDHF results for transitions below the 4s level as reported by Fischer and Tachiev in the NIST multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock and multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock database to within 0.6%.For the sake of simplicity, the comparison with the above three are not plotted in the figure.

    However,the newly reported fully relativistic GRASP2K results for all the 130 E1 radiative rates betweenn ≤6 levels from El-Maaref2016[24]have significant deviations with all the other theoretical values and present RMBPT ones, as can be seen from Fig.2(a).For example, compared to our RMBPT results, there are 48, 33, and 21 radiative rates with deviations greater than 5%,10%,and 20%,respectively.The largest difference corresponds to the 2p1/2-6s1/2and 2p3/2-6s1/2transitions,with differences even reaching about a factor of 3.Among the 21 transitions with differences greater than 20%,except for the 5s1/2-5p1/2transition,which is a Δn=0 transition(the difference is from the wavelength),all the other 20 transitions are the Δn/=0 transitions,for which the differences come from the line strengths.It is worth noting that,besides the considerable deviation of transitions involving high levels(n=5,6),there are also significant discrepancies in the radiative transition rates between low levels.For instance,for the 2p1/2-4s1/2and 2p3/2-4s1/2transitions,the radiative rates differences with the MCDHF ones from Fischer and Tachiev in the NIST database are in the range of 22%-24%.In contrast,the present RMBPT values for both the transitions are in agreements with the NIST database ones to within 0.5%.The main reason for such large discrepancies of El-Maaref2016[24]is maybe due to the inclusion of limited (and arbitrary) CI in their work, as explained by Aggarwal[53]for resolving similar issues caused by El-Maarefet al.for sulfur-like scandium,where the deviations of the lifetimes from El-Maarefet al.are up to three orders of magnitude.

    As far as forbidden(M1,M2,and E2)transitions are concerned, to the best of our knowledge, the only available theoretical data are from GRASP0 results of Aggarwal2012 for transitions betweenn ≤5 levels.In Fig.2(b), we compare our RMBPT forbidden radiation rates with the results of Aggarwal2012 and observe a good agreement between the two.For strong M1 transitions(i.e.,those greater than 1/104of the maximum radiative rate of the type),most of them are within 1%agreements,and the worst is within 12%agreement,corresponding to the 2p1/2-5p1/2transition.All of strong M2 transitions have less than 1%differences,and most strong E2 transitions also exhibit less than 1% differences.However, there are fourn=2 ton=5 strong E2 transitions having differences ranging from 2%to 3%,with the 2p1/2-5p3/2transition showing the largest difference of 6%.

    In Fig.3, we further investigate the impact of configuration interaction (CI) on radiative rates by comparing the results obtained from the three CI modes (RCI1, RCI2, and RCI3) with our present RMBPT results.Interestingly, the RCI1 results, which do not consider any CI, closely match our RMBPT results, with differences mostly within 2% and all within 5%.However, once the CI betweenn ≤6 levels is included(i.e.,RCI2),significant discrepancies are observed for certain transitions.For example,out of 127 strong E1 transitions(i.e.,those greater than 1/104of the maximum radiative rate of the type),30,14,and 7 have differences exceeding 5%,10%, and 20%, respectively, and all of the 7 transitions involven=6 levels.The largest discrepancies are observed for the 2p1/2-6s1/2and 2p3/2-6s1/2transitions, with differences of 57% and 48%, respectively.This suggests that the lifetime of the 6s1/2level could be significantly affected by the CI effect, as these two transitions are important channels for its radiative decay.In fact, the CI effect causes a change in the lifetime of the level by more than 20%,as discussed later in Subsection 3.3.However, when larger-scale CI betweenn ≤8 levels is considered(i.e.,RCI3),the agreements with our RMBPT results immediately improve as expected.The number of transitions with differences exceeding 5%, 10%, and 20% decreases to 16, 7, and 2, respectively.The agreements for the two transitions(2p1/2-6s1/2and 2p3/2-6s1/2)with the largest differences also improve to within 25% and 21%, respectively.An interesting phenomenon worth mentioning is that the radiative rates obtained from our RCI1, which does not consider any configuration interaction,are actually closer to our final RMBPT results compared to our RCI2 involving a small amount of configuration interaction, however, when we further expand the scale of configuration interaction in RCI3, the radiative rates demonstrate closer agreement with our final RMBPT results.This oscillating convergence pattern of atomic parameters as expanding configuration interaction, has also been reported in previous literatures.[51,54,55]This suggests the fortuitous agreements between our RCI1 and RMBPT results are merely coincidental,and that the scale of configuration interaction in our RCI2 is still relatively limited.Therefore, further expansion of the configuration interaction,as demonstrated in the RCI3, is necessary.Finally, based on the RCI3, we consider even more extensive configuration interaction(up ton=200)using the second-order perturbation method leading to our present RMBPT results.

    For forbidden transitions, the role of configuration interaction (or correlation) is even more crucial.The RCI1 radiative rates and the present RMBPT ones show good agreements,with strong transitions differing by no more than 10%,and all by no more than 27%.However, the RCI2, which considers configuration interaction between levels withn ≤6, can result in notable differences,particularly for some strong forbidden transitions,around 10%strong forbidden ones with differences larger than 15%(nearly all of them involvingn=6 levels,a few of them involvingn=5 levels),and with differences of up to a factor of four for 2p1/2-6p3/2transition (E2).On the other hand,the RCI3,which takes into account more configuration interaction effects between levels withn ≤8, generally agrees well (within 5%) with present RMBPT results for strong M1 and M2 transitions, with only a few involvingn=6 levels exhibiting radiative rate differences of about 20%,and the majority of strong E2 transitions agree with present RMBPT ones to within 15%,while some transitions with differences greater than 15% involve then=6 levels, with the largest reaching up to 43%for the 2p1/2-6p3/2transition.

    Through above detailed comparisons, it is evident that the present RMBPT calculations offer highly precise radiative rates.Strong E1 transition rates betweenn ≤5 levels are typically accurate within 1%, and within 2%for those involving then=6 levels.For strong forbidden transitions,RMBPT radiative rates for most M1 and M2 transition rates are likely to be better than 5%,and 15%for most E2 ones.

    3.3.Lifetimes

    By utilizing the present RMBPT radiative rates listed in Table 2, one can calculate the radiative lifetime of an excited level using the expression:τj=1/∑i Ai j, here,idenotes all the lower levels that can be accessed from the excited levelj.In the calculations of present RMBPT lifetimes, we consider all the electric dipole allowed transitions (E1) radiative rates, as well as the other forbidden transitions, which include magnetic dipole M1, electric quadrupole E2, and magnetic quadrupole M2 transitions.In fact, our further studies show that the influence of forbidden transitions on the lifetime values of the lowest 35 levels of the iron ion is negligible (less than 0.4%).This can be understood, because each excited level has at least one dominant E1 transition channel connected to it, so considering only E1 transition can obtain accurate lifetime values here for lithium-like iron, although the forbidden ones are required for plasma modelling.[8]

    Table 3 presents the lifetimes from both the RMBPT and MCDHF/RCI methods for the lowest 35 levels from then=2-6 configurations of lithium-like iron,including for the ground level 1s22s, the lifetime of which is considered to be infinite.Since our studies mentioned above have shown that the forbidden transitions have negligible contributions for the lifetime values of the ion, the corresponding lifetimes from the present MCDHF/RCI calculation only consider the contributions of E1 transitions,while ignoring the forbidden ones.Additionally, the table also provides the fully relativistic lifetimes from both El-Maaref2016[24]and Aggarwal2012,[8]as well as the quasi-relativistic Breit-PauliR-matrix results from Nahar1999.[28]Furthermore,for the sake of intuitive presentation,we also plot the ratios of various theoretical lifetime values between present fully relativistic RMBPT ones in Fig.4.

    As can be seen from Table 3 and Fig.4(a), the present MCDHF/RCI lifetime values match very well with our RMBPT ones,for example,the differences of 21 and 33 lifetime values out of a total of 35 are within 0.2% and 0.4%,respectively,and all the lifetime values differences are within 0.8%.In addition, the present RMBPT lifetimes also match well with those from both Aggarwal2012 and Nahar1999,for example, most of the lifetime value differences are within 0.5%,and all within 1.4%.

    In addition, we can also easily see from Table 3 and Fig.4(a)that there are significant lifetime differences between El-Maaref2016 and our RMBPT results(and hence the present MCDHF/RCI ones).For example,among the 30 lifetime values from El-Maaref2016,20,13,10,and 6 of them differ from our RMBPT results by more than 2%,5%,10%,and 20%,respectively.Furthermore, for the 1s24f5/2and 1s26s1/2levels,the differences are even greater than one order of the magnitude.On the contrary,our RMBPT results for these two levels are consistent with those of both the present MCDHF/RCI and Nahar1999, with differences of less than 0.8%.Additionally,we note in the present study that there are no lifetime values for the four levels 6f7/2, 6g9/2, 6h9/2, and 6h11/2in the “Table 3” from El-Maaref2016.Furthermore, the “Table 3” also contains some minor printing errors, such as thejvalue of the second 4d level should be 5/2 instead of 3/2, and thejvalue of the second 4f level should be 7/2 instead of 5/2.Additionally, the lifetime value given by Aggarwal2012 for the 5g9/2level in the “Table 3” should be 7.070×10-13instead of 7.700×10-13.

    Such differences of El-Maaref2016 are too large for such a simple three-electrons lithium atomic system.While we have no specific information regarding El-Maaref’s numerical calculations and the subsequent processing of lifetime values for the ion, we highly encourage El-Maaref and other researchers to delve deeper into the ion’s theoretical and/or experimental aspects.While generating atomic data has become more accessible,the accuracy and reliability of such data can be difficult to ensure.Multiple sets of data may be available in literatures,however,not all the users may have the expertises to evaluate the quality of published data.Thus, it is important for data producers to conduct rigorous checks and comparisons to assess the accuracies.While recent data may be assumed to be the most accurate ones,this may not always be the case, as noted by Aggarwal.[56]Hence, atomic data users must exercise discretion and cautions to avoid erroneous conclusions.

    We further investigate configuration interaction (CI) effects on the lifetime values of the ion using the relativistic configuration interaction(RCI)method as implemented in the FAC program.[39]We consider three different configuration interaction modes as mentioned above,denoted as RCI1,RCI2,and RCI3,respectively,and the lifetimes from the three modes are also shown in Table 3 and Fig.4(b).

    As we consider CI between more and more levels, we expect that the accuracy of the lifetimes would gradually improve from RCI1 to RCI3, but oscillatory convergence might occur, and the subsequent analysis also confirm this type of convergence of the lifetimes.From Fig.4(b), we can see that most of the lifetime values from the RCI1 agree with the present RMBPT ones within 2%, and all within 5%.Such agreements are considered to be a coincidence, because we have not yet considered any configuration interaction between then ≤6 levels.Once we consider these interactions,namely the RCI2 mode, the results immediately become worse, as shown in Fig.4(b), there are many lifetime values that deviate from the present RMBPT values by more than 5%,and the largest deviation corresponding to the 6s1/2level,the deviation even up to 21%,which is quite surprising,because the lithiumlike ion system is simply with only one electron outside the 1s2closed shell,and the nuclear chargeZhere is highly up to 26, but the effect of configuration interaction on the lifetime values is still significant.

    Table 3.The lifetime values(τ,in unit s)of lithium-like iron.The table includes our sets of fully relativistic lifetime values and previously theoretical results. τRCI1, τRCI2, and τRCI3 in the table represent lifetime values obtained using three different relativistic configuration interaction modes, where RCI1 and RCI2 represent the calculations without and with considering configuration interaction between the(1s2)nl(n ≤6)levels,respectively,while RCI3 represents the consideration of configuration interaction between more levels with n ≤8.In addition,τRMBPT and τMCDHF/RCI represent lifetime values obtained from our RMBPT and MCDHF/RCI methods, respectively.The τEl-Maaref2016, τAggarwal2012, and τNahar1999 represent lifetime values given in the literature by El-Maaref2016,[24] Aggarwal2012,[8] and Nahar1999,[28,38] respectively, where the Nahar1999 results are quasi-relativistic and the other two are fully relativistic ones.And a±b ≡a×10±b.

    Fig.4.Comparisons of various theoretical lifetime values of Li-like iron with the present fully relativistic RMBPT ones.Panel (a) presents the comparisons between previous theoretical results (i.e., Aggarwal2012,[8]Nahar1999,[28,38]and El-Maaref2016[24])and the present RMBPT ones.To make the results in panel (a) clearer, the lifetime ratio of the 4f5/2 level with Key =14 from El-Maaref2016 is multiplied by a factor of 0.1 (denoted as ×0.1 nearing the 4f5/2 level label).Panel (b) shows the ratios of the results obtained from three different relativistic configuration interaction(RCI) modes (RCI1, RCI2, and RCI3) and also from our MCDHF/RCI to the present RMBPT ones, here, RCI1 and RCI2 represent the calculations without and with considering configuration interaction between the(1s2)nl(n ≤6)levels,respectively,while RCI3 represents the consideration of configuration interaction between more levels with n ≤8.

    We continue to consider more configuration interactions,i.e.,considering the interactions between levels withn ≤8.We denote the lifetime values obtained under this mode as RCI3.As shown in Fig.4(b), the RCI3, which considers more configuration interactions, can indeed significantly improve the lifetime values.For example, for the lifetime value of 6s1/2level, it can be corrected by up to about 10%.Our test calculations show that the convergence of the RCI method based on a single central potential for all configurations[39]is very slow.Hence, it is not feasible to achieve even higher precision solely through the pure RCI method.Therefore, based on the RCI3,here,we adopt the second-order many-body perturbation method to incorporate extensive CI correlations withnup to 200 (i.e.our final RMBPT ones), leading to further improvements of the lifetimes by up to about 10%, as can be clearly seen from Fig.4(b).

    Finally, the accuracies of the present lifetimes obtained using the RMBPT method, which have been successfully applied in our investigations of highly accurate atomic data for N-like,[41]O-like,[42]and F-like[43]ions, have been demonstrated above through their consistency with our MCDHF/RCI results and previous theoretical ones.[8,28]And configuration interaction effects are important for the calculations of lifetime values of the ion.

    4.Conclusion

    Using the fully relativistic RMBPT method, we have provided energies and lifetime values for the lowest 35 energy levels from the 1s2nlconfigurations(wheren=2-6 andl=0,...,n-1)of lithium-like iron Fe XXIV,as well as complete data on the transition wavelengths, radiative rates, absorption oscillator strengths, and line strengths between the levels.The transitions include both allowed (E1) and forbidden(magnetic dipole M1,magnetic quadrupole M2,and electric quadrupole E2)ones.Our level energy precision is within 0.05%,and the radiative rate accuracy of strong E1 transitions withinn ≤5 levels is within 1%, and for transitions involving then=6 levels, it is within 2%.For strong forbidden transitions,the current RMBPT radiative rates for M1 and M2 transitions have accuracies likely better than 5%, while most E2 transitions have accuracies better than 15%.Secondly,we have found that configuration interaction is crucial for lithiumlike ions.To obtain accurate energies and radiation data for the ion, careful consideration of configuration interaction is required.Our present RMBPT results have potential applications in the identification of spectral lines,as well as in plasma modeling and diagnosing.

    Acknowledgments

    Project supported by the Research Foundation for Higher Level Talents of West Anhui University (Grant No.WGKQ2021005).The author (S Li) also would like to express his gratitude for the support received through the Visiting Researcher Programs at Fudan University (C Y Chen’s research group)and the Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics (J Yan’s research group).The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Y R Zhu for many valuable discussions in this research.The authors sincerely thank the referee and the editor for their thorough review and valuable comments on this manuscript,their feedback has greatly benefited our work.

    猜你喜歡
    國(guó)柱趙敏
    2023年高考化學(xué)模擬試題A卷
    Combined effects of cycling endurance and total ionizing dose on floating gate memory cells
    千金鵝耳櫪播種育苗試驗(yàn)
    Analysis on degradation mechanisms of normally-off p-GaN gate AlGaN/GaN high-electron mobility transistor?
    鹽系犬男趙敏皓
    Implementation Scheme of Two-Photon Post-Quantum Correlations?
    趙敏教授簡(jiǎn)介
    不將就
    Task—based Language Teaching and Oral Interaction
    東方教育(2016年14期)2017-01-16 00:55:25
    閉著眼睛的男孩
    女士(2015年3期)2015-07-05 01:11:32
    久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| av黄色大香蕉| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产 一区精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 成人二区视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 午夜91福利影院| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 免费少妇av软件| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 精品久久久噜噜| 如何舔出高潮| 丝袜美足系列| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| av专区在线播放| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 久久97久久精品| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久热这里只有精品99| 老熟女久久久| 久久久久网色| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产精品成人在线| 成人免费观看视频高清| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 成人影院久久| freevideosex欧美| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av线在线观看网站| 五月天丁香电影| 国产精品免费大片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 999精品在线视频| 国产综合精华液| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久网色| 国产精品免费大片| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲图色成人| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 九色成人免费人妻av| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| av在线老鸭窝| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美另类一区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产色婷婷99| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| h视频一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 老女人水多毛片| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产成人精品一,二区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 中文天堂在线官网| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| av一本久久久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| videossex国产| av国产精品久久久久影院| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美3d第一页| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 在线观看www视频免费| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产精品无大码| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 性色avwww在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲图色成人| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久97久久精品| 少妇丰满av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 精品一区二区三卡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 制服诱惑二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 简卡轻食公司| 青春草国产在线视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日本黄色片子视频| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美97在线视频| 熟女av电影| 国产淫语在线视频| kizo精华| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 综合色丁香网| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费观看av网站的网址| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 精品酒店卫生间| 91久久精品电影网| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 老司机影院毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| av福利片在线| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 777米奇影视久久| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久久久网色| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲综合色网址| 有码 亚洲区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 高清不卡的av网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 美女福利国产在线| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 99久久综合免费| 精品少妇内射三级| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 欧美日韩av久久| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久影院123| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 美女福利国产在线| 少妇 在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 婷婷色综合www| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲成人手机| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 免费大片18禁| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产色婷婷99| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久热精品热| 久久久久久久久大av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久久久久久久久成人| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久精品夜色国产| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| av黄色大香蕉| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 午夜福利视频精品| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲av.av天堂| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99九九在线精品视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 午夜av观看不卡| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产 精品1| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| av天堂久久9| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久久网色| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美97在线视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| .国产精品久久| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一本久久精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 高清av免费在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 久久99热6这里只有精品| av.在线天堂| 人人澡人人妻人| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲成色77777| 天堂8中文在线网| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日韩强制内射视频| 天天影视国产精品| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久热精品热| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 91国产中文字幕| av电影中文网址| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 日韩电影二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 另类精品久久| av免费观看日本| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 99热全是精品| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲av.av天堂| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| av.在线天堂| 大码成人一级视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 超色免费av| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 蜜桃在线观看..| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 有码 亚洲区| 天天影视国产精品| 日韩强制内射视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 午夜影院在线不卡| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 老女人水多毛片| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日韩成人伦理影院| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲图色成人| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 只有这里有精品99| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 成人国语在线视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产片内射在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久午夜福利片| 看免费成人av毛片| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产视频内射| 美女大奶头黄色视频| a级毛片黄视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美三级亚洲精品| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人精品在线电影| av卡一久久| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 三级国产精品片| 777米奇影视久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 一区二区av电影网| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 51国产日韩欧美| 成人国语在线视频| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成人影院久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产 一区精品| 蜜桃国产av成人99|