• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Significant reduction of ammonia emissions while increasing crop yields using the 4R nutrient stewardship in an intensive cropping system

    2023-06-07 11:30:08ZHANGChongWANGDandanZHAOYongjianXlAOYulinCHENHuanxuanLlUHepuFENGLiyuanYUChanghaoJUXiaotang
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2023年6期

    ZHANG Chong ,WANG Dan-dan ,ZHAO Yong-jian ,XlAO Yu-lin ,CHEN Huan-xuan ,LlU He-pu ,FENG Li-yuan,YU Chang-hao,JU Xiao-tang#

    1 College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, P.R.China

    2 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

    Abstract Ammonia (NH3) emissions should be mitigated to improve environmental quality.Croplands are one of the largest NH3 sources,they must be managed properly to reduce their emissions while achieving the target yields.Herein,we report the NH3 emissions,crop yield and changes in soil fertility in a long-term trial with various fertilization regimes,to explore whether NH3 emissions can be significantly reduced using the 4R nutrient stewardship (4Rs),and its interaction with the organic amendments (i.e.,manure and straw) in a wheat–maize rotation.Implementing the 4Rs significantly reduced NH3 emissions to 6 kg N ha–1 yr–1 and the emission factor to 1.72%,without compromising grain yield (12.37 Mg ha–1 yr–1)and soil fertility (soil organic carbon of 7.58 g kg–1) compared to the conventional chemical N management.When using the 4R plus manure,NH3 emissions (7 kg N ha–1 yr–1) and the emission factor (1.74%) were as low as 4Rs,and grain yield and soil organic carbon increased to 14.79 Mg ha–1 yr–1 and 10.09 g kg–1,respectively.Partial manure substitution not only significantly reduced NH3 emissions but also increased crop yields and improved soil fertility,compared to conventional chemical N management.Straw return exerted a minor effect on NH3 emissions.These results highlight that 4R plus manure,which couples nitrogen and carbon management can help achieve both high yields and low environmental costs.

    Keywords: ammonia emission,crop yield,4R nutrient stewardship,partial manure substitution,winter wheat–summer maize cropping system

    1.lntroduction

    The application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer is crucial for boosting crop yields and sustaining population growth(Erismanet al.2008;Zhang Xet al.2021).However,the application of N fertilizer or manure to croplands may lead to the emissions of large amounts of ammonia(NH3),particularly from high-pH (alkaline) soils.High atmospheric NH3concentrations contribute to the formation of fine particulate matter,which exert adverse impacts on human health (Plautz 2018).Ammonia deposition in ecosystems can also lead to the loss of biodiversity and water pollution (Bowmanet al.2008;Suttonet al.2011;Hernándezet al.2016;Liuet al.2022).Croplands are one of the largest NH3sources,emitting as much as 9–16 Tg N yr–1of NH3globally because of N fertilizer application,this value is likely to double by 2050 (Maet al.2021;Zhanet al.2021;Xuet al.2022).Ammonia emission is one of the major pathways for N loss in cropping systems;it represents 10–19% of the N loss from applied fertilizer,reaching up to 64% in some cases (Panet al.2016;Zhanet al.2021).Therefore,proper management to achieve a high targeted yield and low NH3emissions is crucial in intensive cropping systems(Zhanget al.2015;Guet al.2021).

    Improving N management is the key to reducing NH3emissions in croplands (Younget al.2021),and this can be summarized as the concept of the 4R nutrient stewardship (4Rs),i.e.,applying the right source of N at the right rate,right time,and right place.The 4Rs are widely used to reduce NH3losses (Huanget al.2016;Panet al.2016;Xiaet al.2017a;Liet al.2018;Tiet al.2019;Shaet al.2021) while increasing crop N acquisition and yields globally (Zhanget al.2015;Nkebiweet al.2016).For instance,the optimum N rates,deep placement of N fertilizer,split N applications,and replacement of ammonium bicarbonate with urea have reduced NH3emissions by 51,69,17,and 40%,respectively (Shaet al.2021).However,most studies to date have generally analyzed only one or two aspects of the 4Rs,and few have investigated the interactions among all the four aspects of the 4Rs (i.e.,full implementation of the 4Rs)in reducing NH3emissions in croplands.The application of organic amendments (e.g.,manure and straw) is a common practice to increase soil fertility and crop yield,especially in the long run (Zhanget al.2020).Recently,many researchers have called for the application of the 4Rs along with manure,which is called 4R Plus (4R Plus 2022),to reduce nutrient losses,and improve productivity and soil fertility (4R Plus 2022).However,few studies have examined the effects of 4R Plus on NH3emissions under field conditions.

    We selected the North China Plain (NCP),one of the global hotspots for NH3emissions,as the study region,it emits 1.6–2.8 Tg N yr–1of NH3,and 45% of these emissions come from croplands (Liuet al.2018;Zeng and Li 2020).Its NH3emission factors (EFs) are twice as large as the global average,largely because of the alkalinity of its soils (pH>7.5),higher air temperature during summer seasons (Zhanet al.2021),and poor N fertilizer management,including surface broadcasting of a large amount of urea (Guet al.2020).The main cropping system in the NCP is winter wheat–summer maize (Zhanget al.2019),and the hot and wet summer season provides favorable conditions for NH3emissions.Soils in the NCP(primarily calcareous Cambisols) are characterized by low fertility because of the low content of organic matter(Duet al.2018).The use of organic manure or straw to increase soil fertility has received much attention in recent years (Zhang Cet al.2021).The soils and cropping systems in the NCP provide opportunities to study the following objectives: (1) to what extent NH3emissions can be reduced by implementing the 4Rs;and (2) the effects of manure (4R Plus) and straw application on NH3emissions and crop yield.We conducted this study under various fertilization regimes in a long-term field trial.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Site description

    A long-term field trial was established in October 2006 at the Shangzhuang Experimental Station (40°08.4′N(xiāo),116°10.7′E) of China Agricultural University.The site has a humid continental monsoon climate,with a mean annual air temperature and rainfall of 13°C and 540 mm(1981–2015),respectively,and 60–70% of the rain falls between June and August.The soil is a calcareous Cambisol (WRB classification) or fluvo-aquic (according to the Chinese soil genetic classification).At the beginning of the long-term field trial in 2006,the soil had the following basic properties: a clay loam texture with 28% clay,52% silt,and 20% sand;bulk density,1.31 g cm–3;pH,8.1 (measured in water at a ratio of 1:2.5 of soil:water);organic carbon content,7.1 g kg–1;total N,0.8 g kg–1;ammonium N,1.2 mg kg–1;nitrate N,24.5 mg kg–1;Olsen-P,7.8 mg kg–1;and K,76.2 mg kg–1(Huanget al.2013).Winter wheat was sown in early October and harvested in the middle of June the following year,and summer maize was sown immediately after the winter wheat harvest and harvested in early October in the same year for a continuous winter wheat–summer maize rotation system.

    2.2.Experimental design

    The field trial included eight treatments with four N levels,namely,no N (N0),optimum N (Nopt),conventional N (Ncon),and balanced N (Nbal),as well as two straw management methods,namely,straw removal and return (Table 1).The N rates in the Nopttreatments were determined using the target yield,which was 160 kg N ha–1of urea for both summer maize and winter wheat.In the Ncontreatments,the urea N rate was 260 kg N ha–1for summer maize and 300 kg N ha–1for winter wheat,which are the typical N rates used by local farmers.The N rates in the Nbaltreatments were also determined based on target yields,which were 180 kg N ha–1for summer maize and 170 kg N ha–1for winter wheat.The N fertilizer used in the Nbaltreatments was cattle manure plus urea.The target yields of the Nbaltreatments were higher than those of the Nopttreatments because the combination of urea and manure N in Nbaltreatments could achieve better synchrony of crop N demand and soil N supply,and thus higher yields.Decomposed cattle manure (equivalent to 30 t ha–1of fresh weight) was applied annually before sowing winter wheat.We assumed that 40 and 20% of the manure N was available in the winter wheat and summer maize growing seasons,respectively (Qiuet al.2012),and that the gap between the available manure N and balanced N rates was filled by urea.Details on the N application rates in the eight treatments are shown in Table 2.

    Table 1 Treatments in long-term field trial

    Table 2 Synthetic and manure N inputs in field treatments from 2017 to 20191)

    With respect to the N application method,urea was applied at a depth of 5–7 cm during four-and ten-leaf fertilization for summer maize.Urea and manure N were surface-broadcasted,and deep plowing was performed using a deep plow machine (approximately 20 cm);and topdressing urea-N was surface-broadcasted,and then flood irrigation was performed for winter wheat.In the maize season,half the urea-N was applied during four-leaf fertilization and the other half during ten-leaf fertilization.In the wheat season,half the urea-N was applied during basal fertilization and the other half during topdressing for the synthetic N treatments (Nopt,SNopt,Nconand SNcon),while one-third of the urea-N was applied during basal fertilization and two-thirds during topdressing for thebalanced N treatments (MNbaland SMNbal).Therefore,the N fertilizers were applied at the right place and the right time in all the fertilization treatments (Ju and Zhang 2017).A randomized complete block design was used with three replicates,and each plot was 64 m2(8 m×8 m)in area.Based on the above experimental design,the optimum N treatments (Noptand SNopt) represented examples of fully implementing the 4Rs,and the balanced N treatments (MNbaland SMNbal) could be examples of 4R Plus applications (4R Plus 2022).

    The same amounts of synthetic phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were applied in all eight treatments:200 kg P2O5ha–1yr–1and 200 kg K2O ha–1yr–1,respectively,and half was applied during four-leaf fertilization of summer maize and the other half during the sowing of winter wheat.The irrigation timing and rates for winter wheat were determined using soil moisture measurements,and irrigation was conducted three to five times annually at rates of 28–70 mm each time.Summer maize was rain-fed and irrigated only when dry weather occurred at emergence.At the sowing of winter wheat,deep plowing(approximately 20 cm) was performed using a plow machine to incorporate the fertilizer and maize straw.There was no tillage after the winter wheat harvest,and the wheat straw was shredded and left on the soil surface.After 11 years of cultivation,the soil properties in the plots for the eight treatments were determined in October 2017 and they were found to be quite diverse (Table 3).

    Table 3 Soil properties in eight field treatments1)

    2.3.Measurement of ammonia flux

    Ammonia flux was measured using the continuous-airflow enclosure method (Yao etal.2018).The apparatus included a pump,two NH3trappers (250 mL gas washing bottles,each containing 80 mL of 0.025 mol L–1sulfuricacid),a stainless-steel dynamic chamber (30 cm in length,15 cm in width,and 15 cm in height),a valve,and tubes.Two dynamic chambers in each plot were inserted to a depth of 10 cm in the soil,and 5 cm was left above the soil surface.When collecting NH3,a plexiglass lid with a silicone pad was placed beyond the dynamic chamber and held by four clamps;ambient air at 2.5 m above the soil surface was pumped into the chamber at a rate of 15–20 chamber headspace volumes per min (Yaoet al.2018).The NH3emitted from the soil was captured by the two NH3trappers.After collection,the sulfuric acid solution in the NH3trappers was transferred to the laboratory to determine the NH4+-N concentrationviathe indophenol blue colorimetric method at 625 nm using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UVmini-1240,Shimadzu,Japan).Ammonia flux was measured daily for 1–10 days and then every 3–5 days for 10–21 days after fertilization.On the day of measurement,NH3was sampled from 8 a.m.to 10 a.m.

    2.4.Auxiliary measurements

    Soil samples were collected 2–3 days after N fertilization to measure the mineral N (NH4+and NO3) and moisture levels.Three soil cores,at a depth of 0–20 cm,were sampled from each plot using a 3 cm-diameter gauge auger,and they were combined to form a composite sample.Soil samples were passed through a 2-mm sieve,and a 24 g fresh sub-sample was then extracted using 1 mol L–1KCl with a 5:1 mass ratio of KCl solution to soil.The NH4+and NO3–concentrations in the extracts were analyzed using an AA3 continuous flow analyzer(BranCLuebbe GmbH,Norderstedt,Germany).A 20 g fresh sub-sample was oven-dried at 105°C for 24 h to determine the soil gravimetric water content and calculate the water-filled pore space (WFPS) using the methods proposed by Gaoet al.(2014).

    At maturity,6 m2of winter wheat and 14.4 m2of summer maize were harvested and separated into grains and straw.They were weighed separately to calculate the biomass,and the straw was manually shredded.Subsamples of grain and straw were weighed immediately,and then again after drying at 70°C to determine the water content.They were then ground sufficiently to pass through a 0.15-mm sieve,and the N content was measured using a CN analyzer (Vario Max CN,Elementar,Hanau,Germany).

    The air temperature was measured using a sensor(HMP155A-L,Campbell Scientific,USA) and rainfall was measured using a tipping bucket rain gauge (TE525MM-L,Campbell Scientific).The data were recorded using a data logger (CR1000;Campbell Scientific).

    2.5.Calculations and statistical analysis

    The NH3flux on the day of measurement was calculated using eq.(1).The NH3flux on non-sampling days was estimated using linear interpolation between two adjacent measurements.The cumulative NH3flux was calculated as the sum of the daily NH3fluxes during the entire observation period.

    where C is the NH4+-N concentration of the field plot samples (mg N L–1),V is the volume of the sulfuric acid solution (L),S is the coverage area of the dynamic chamber (m2),T is the sampling duration (h),and 10–2is the unit conversion factor.

    The NH3emission factor (EF) was calculated using eq.(2):

    where NH3-Nfertilizationand NH3-Nnon-fertilizationare the cumulative NH3emissions in the fertilization and non-fertilization treatments,respectively (kg N ha–1),and N rate is the synthetic and manure N rate (kg N ha–1).As there were no significant differences in the cumulative NH3emissions between the N0and SN0treatments (refer to Section 3.2),they were averaged as the soil background NH3emissions in the calculation of the NH3EFs.

    The N surplus was calculated using eq.(3):

    where Nfer,Nman,Nstr,Ndep,and NBNFare the N inputs from synthetic fertilizer,manure,straw,deposition,and biological N fixation,respectively (kg N ha–1);and Nharis the aboveground N uptake (kg N ha–1).N deposition data were obtained from Yinet al.(2017),who reported that N deposition was 35 kg N ha–1for summer maize (from June to September) and 23 kg N ha–1for winter wheat (from October to May) in the NCP.Estimates of biological N fixation for maize and wheat (5 kg N ha–1) were obtained from Bouwmanet al.(2013).

    All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,USA).The differences in NH3emissions,crop yield,N surplus,and other parameters were determined using Duncan’s test with a significance level ofP<0.05.Graphs were plotted using SigmaPlot 14.0.

    3.Results

    3.1.Ammonia flux

    There was a large variation in the NH3fluxes for summer maize during different years and fertilization events(Fig.1-A).The flux was relatively high during four-leaf fertilization in 2017 and 2019,and the conventional N treatments (Nconand SNcon) produced the highest NH3fluxes of 0.05–12.76 kg N ha–1d–1(average 2.19 kg N ha–1d–1),whereas the other four fertilization treatments produced fluxes of 0.05–4.65 kg N ha–1d–1(average 0.88 kg N ha–1d–1).Ammonia fluxes in the other four fertilization events (four-leaf fertilization in 2018 and ten-leaf fertilization in 2017,2018,and 2019) were relatively low,with the conventional N treatments and the other four fertilization treatments producing fluxes of 0.04–2.03 kg N ha–1d–1(average 0.32 kg N ha–1d–1)and 0.05–0.58 kg N ha–1d–1(average 0.21 kg N ha–1d–1),respectively (Fig.1-A).The low NH3fluxes in these four fertilization events were associated with the occurrence of rainfall within 3 days after fertilization (Fig.1-B).The air temperature was 21–31°C (average 27°C),and the soil WFPS was 30–69% (average 51%) during the maize season (Fig.1-B).This implied that NH3emissions were primarily determined by N management and rainfall within 1 week after fertilization for summer maize.

    Fig.1 Ammonia flux (A),rainfall,soil water-filled pore space and air temperature (WFPS;B) in summer maize during 2017–2019.N0,Nopt,Ncon,and Nbal denote no N,optimum N rate,conventional N rate,and balanced N rate,respectively;S and M denote straw and manure,respectively.Bars denote standard errors (n=3).

    The NH4+-N concentrations of soil for the fertilization treatments was 0–28.83 mg N kg–1(average 4.68 mg N kg–1),except for the conventional N treatments which had higher soil NH4+-N concentrations of 0–41.21 mg N kg–1(average 7.82 mg N kg–1) (Appendix A).The soil NH4+-N concentration generally peaked within 7 days of fertilization and then decreased,indicating rapid nitrification in the studied soil (Appendix A).This corresponds well with the high NH3flux,which occurred within 1 week of fertilization (Fig.1-A).Soil NO3–-N concentrations in the fertilization treatments were in the range of 1.92–53.53 mg N kg–1(average 20.82 mg N kg–1),except for the conventional N treatments,which had higher soil NO3–-N concentrations of 0.04–81.90 mg N kg–1(average 26.82 mg N kg–1) (Appendix A).

    The NH3flux of winter wheat was much lower than that of summer maize,with values between 0.02 and 0.35 (average 0.10) kg N ha–1d–1in the six fertilization treatments (Fig.2-A).The flux values fluctuated with air temperature,and the magnitude was similar in different fertilization events (Fig.2-A and B).The air temperature during the winter wheat season was 6–19°C (average 12°C),which was significantly lower than that in the summer maize season (Fig.2-B),and it was the key factor responsible for the lower NH3emissions from winter wheat.

    Fig.2 Ammonia flux (A),rainfall,soil water-filled pore space and air temperature (WFPS;B) in winter wheat during 2017–2019.N0,Nopt,Ncon and Nbal denote no N,optimum N rate,conventional N rate and balanced N rate,respectively;S and M denote straw and manure,respectively.Vertical bars denote standard errors (n=3).

    The NH4+-N concentration in soil for winter wheat was much lower than that for summer maize,with values between 0 and 8.72 mg N kg–1(average 1.63 mg N kg–1) (Appendix B) in the fertilization treatments;peak soil NH4+-N concentrations occurred within 7 days of fertilization (Appendix B).Soil NO3–-N concentrations in the fertilization treatments were in the range of 1.00–40.09 mg N kg–1(average 16.16 mg N kg–1),except for the conventional N treatments,which had higher soil NO3–-N concentrations of 5.73–74.93 mg N kg–1(average 32.28 mg N kg–1) (Appendix B).

    3.2.Ammonia emission

    Cumulative NH3emissions from summer maize varied significantly every year for the fertilization treatments,with averages of 13.57,8.05,and 30.89 kg N ha–1in 2017,2018,and 2019,respectively (Fig.3-A).The conventional N treatments produced the highest NH3losses of 25.30–27.59 kg N ha–1,whereas the optimum N treatments and manure plus synthetic N treatments (Nopt,SNopt,MNbal,and SMNbal) significantly reduced the losses to 12.29–14.08 kg N ha–1in the three summer maize seasons (Fig.3-A).Cumulative NH3losses in the winter were much lower than those in the summer (Fig.3-B).The values of the two-season average cumulative NH3losses ranged from 3.13 to 3.40 kg N ha–1in the six fertilization treatments(Fig.3-B).

    Fig.3 Cumulative ammonia emissions from summer maize (A),winter wheat (B),and summer maize–winter wheat rotation (C)during 2017–2019.M,W,and M–W denote maize,wheat,and summer maize–winter wheat rotation (n=3),respectively;N0,Nopt,Ncon,and Nbal denote no N,optimum N rate,conventional N rate,and balanced N rate,respectively;S and M denote straw and manure,respectively.The means are the average NH3 losses during the three seasons of maize cultivation and are shown in Fig.3-A (n=9),and two seasons of wheat cultivation are shown in Fig.3-B (n=6),whereas the means in Fig.3-C are the sums of the means in Fig.3-A and B (n=3).Vertical bars denote standard errors,and lowercase letters denote the mean values among treatments,where different letters indicate significant (P<0.05) mean differences.

    The annual cumulative NH3emissions also varied every year and were primarily determined by the NH3emissions from summer maize,which accounted for 79–89% (average 83%) of the annual emissions.The emissions were significantly higher in the two conventional N treatments (28.46–30.99 kg N ha–1) than in the other four fertilization treatments (15.47–17.21 kg N ha–1) (Fig.3-C).The emissions in the straw return treatments were comparable to those in the straw removal treatments,indicating that straw return had a minor effect on NH3emissions under the studied conditions (Fig.3).

    The NH3EFs for summer maize were,on average,3.59,1.27,and 9.76% in 2017,2018,and 2019,respectively(Fig.4-A).The conventional N treatments exhibited the highest NH3EFs of 6.91–7.79% in a three-year average.The optimum N rate and manure plus synthetic treatments significantly reduced NH3EFs to 3.10–4.70%,and no significant differences were observed among the four treatments (Fig.4-A).The NH3EFs in winter were much lower than those in the summer (Fig.4-B) and showed the same magnitude between the two seasons.The two-year average of NH3EFs were 0.15–0.29% for the six fertilizer treatments (Fig.4-B).The annual average NH3EFs of the two conventional N treatments (3.29–3.74%) was significantly higher than those of the other four fertilization treatments (1.66–1.81%) (Fig.4-C).

    Fig.4 Ammonia emission factors for summer maize (A),winter wheat (B),and summer maize–winter wheat rotation (C) during 2017–2019.M,W,and W–M denote maize,wheat,and winter wheat–summer maize rotation (n=3),respectively;N0,Nopt,Ncon,and Nbal denote no N,optimum N rate,conventional N rate,and balanced N rate,respectively;S and M denote straw and manure,respectively.The means are the average NH3 emission factors for the three seasons of maize cultivation,as shown in Fig.4-A (n=9),and the two seasons of wheat cultivation are shown in Fig.4-B (n=6),whereas the means in Fig.4-C are the sums of the means in Fig.4-A and B (n=3).Vertical bars denote standard errors,and lowercase letters denote the mean values among treatments,where different letters indicate significant (P<0.05) mean differences.

    3.3.Crop yield

    The manure plus synthetic N treatments produced the highest maize grain yields (8.21–8.46 Mg ha–1),followed by the four synthetic N treatments (6.36–7.65 Mg ha–1),whereas the no N treatments produced the lowest (5.40–5.59 Mg ha–1) (Fig.5-A).The two-season average wheat grain yields were the highest in the manure plus synthetic N treatments (6.14–6.76 Mg ha–1),followed by the synthetic N treatments (5.28–6.14 Mg ha–1),and thereafter the no N treatments (1.36–1.52 Mg ha–1) (Fig.5-B).Annual grain yields were 14.35–15.22,11.44–13.69,and 6.76–7.11 Mg ha–1in the manure plus synthetic N,synthetic N,and no N treatments,respectively (Fig.5-C).Straw return increased the grain yields in the long-term fertilization treatments,although no significant differences were observed (Fig.5).

    Fig.5 Grain yields of summer maize (A),winter wheat (B),and summer maize–winter wheat rotation (C) during 2017–2019.M,W,and M–W denote maize,wheat,and summer maize–winter wheat rotation (n=3),respectively;N0,Nopt,Ncon,and Nbal denote no N,optimum N rate,conventional N rate,and balanced N rate,respectively;S and M denote straw and manure,respectively.The means are the average yields of the three seasons of maize cultivation,as shown in Fig.5-A (n=9),and the two seasons of wheat cultivation are shown in Fig.5-B (n=6),whereas the means in Fig.5-C are the sums of the means in Fig.5-A and B (n=3).Vertical bars denote standard errors,and lowercase letters denote the mean values among treatments,where different letters indicate significant (P<0.05) mean differences.

    3.4.N surplus

    The annual N surplus values were calculated in the rotation cycles of 2017–2018 and 2018–2019.The conventional N treatments had the highest N surpluses of 276–387 kg N ha–1yr–1,whereas the optimum N treatments and manure plus synthetic N treatments had significantly lower N surpluses of 35–154 kg N ha–1yr–1.The non-fertilization treatments had negative N surpluses of between–64 to–19 kg N ha–1yr–1.Straw return significantly increased the N surplus,with the exception of the non-fertilization treatments in 2017–2018 (Table 4).Both NH3emissions and EFs increased exponentially with an increase in the N surplus (R2>0.40,P<0.01;Fig.6).

    Fig.6 Relationship between N surplus and NH3 emissions (A) and NH3 emission factors (B).** denotes P<0.01.Open and solid circles denote data for the rotation cycles of 2017–2018 and 2018–2019,respectively.

    Table 4 N surplus (kg N ha–1 yr–1) under different nutrient management conditions in summer maize–winter wheat rotation

    4.Discussion

    4.1.Ammonia emissions in maize and wheat seasons

    Maize and wheat planting are the two largest sources of NH3emissions globally,primarily because of the large planting areas of these two crops (Zhanet al.2021;Liuet al.2022),and the wheat–maize double cropping system is one of the most intensively managed high-yield systems in China.This study found that NH3fluxes in the maize season were substantially higher than those in the wheat season,accounting for an average of 83% of the annual NH3emissions (Figs.1–3),which suggests that controlling the NH3emissions in the hot-wet maize season is the key to reducing annual NH3emissions (Zhanget al.2022).The low NH3emissions in the wheat season(NH3EFs of 0.15–0.29%) could be attributed to two main factors: 1) Low temperatures slow down urea hydrolysis,the transformation of NH4+-N to NH3,and NH3diffusion from soil to air,thus limiting NH3emission,even under high N application rates (Fig.2) (Pedersenet al.2021).2)Proper application techniques (even under conventional management by farmers),such as the deep placement of N fertilizer in basal fertilization and immediate irrigation after topdressing,which move the urea to deep soils,prevent the upward diffusion of NH3as deep soil particles retain more NH4+-N (Rochetteet al.2013).Although N fertilizer was deep-placed in the maize season,the high temperature increased NH3concentrations in the soil matrix and NH3diffusion from soil to air,resulting in higher NH3emissions than those from wheat.

    Ammonia flux was measured using the dynamic chamber method in this study,this method has been widely used to determine field NH3emissions,and its results are comparable with those of the micrometeorological method (Maet al.2021).Therefore,we compared our results with studies that used the dynamic chamber or micrometeorological method to measure NH3emissions.It was reported that global NH3EFs were 11.13–12.70% and China exhibits higher NH3EFs for maize (14.33%) (Maet al.2021;Zhanet al.2021).Although the soil–climate condition was favorable for NH3emissions during the maize season in the studied region (Fig.1),the NH3EFs were only 3.10–7.79%,much lower than those in previous studies (Fig.4) (Ju and Zhang 2017;Maet al.2021;Zhanet al.2021).These differences could be attributed to the deep placement of N fertilizer,which significantly inhibited NH3emissions(Rochetteet al.2013;Zhanget al.2022).In contrast,surface broadcasting or surface banding of urea at high N fertilizer application rates,which is a common N application method in China (Guet al.2020),has been used in other studies (Juet al.2009;Gaoet al.2014).

    4.2.Significant reduction in NH3 emissions using 4Rs

    In this study,the cumulative NH3emissions and NH3EFs were significantly reduced upon fully implementing the 4Rs (i.e.,optimum synthetic N and manure plus synthetic treatments) compared to those in the conventional N treatments (Figs.3 and 4).The 4Rs achieved NH3EFs of 3.10–4.70,0.17–0.29,and 1.66–1.81% for maize,wheat,and wheat–maize rotation,respectively,which are substantially lower than the NH3EF of 10.0% for N fertilizers in Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines (De Kleinet al.2006).According to recent studies,the estimated global NH3EFs is 11.13–12.70% (corresponding N rates of 120–122 kg N ha–1) for maize and 12.05–13.30%(corresponding N rates of 94–101 kg N ha–1) for wheat(Ladhaet al.2016;Maet al.2021;Zhanet al.2021;IFA 2022),indicating the great NH3mitigation potential of implementing the 4Rs in croplands.Previous studies have generally investigated only one or two aspects of the 4Rs,rather than fully implementing all of them.For instance,Liet al.(2017) evaluated the effectiveness of the urease inhibitor Limus?,under surface broadcast conditions during the maize season;and although Limus?significantly reduced NH3emissions compared to the non-Limus?treatment,the emissions were still high (29 kg N ha–1and accounted for 19% of the applied N fertilizer).Similar results were obtained by Wanget al.(2022) in wheat–maize rotation.

    Previous studies have shown that manure substitution significantly reduces NH3emissions because manure enhances the microbial immobilization of inorganic N(Xiaet al.2017b) and increases crop N uptake from the soil organic N poolviabetter synchronization of the crop N demand and soil N supply (Zhang Cet al.2021).Our results indicate that a proper combination of manure and synthetic N can serve as a promising measure for reducing NH3emissions in croplands.Straw return had a minor effect on NH3emissions (Figs.4 and 5),which is in line with the reports of Xuet al.(2022) and Shaet al.(2021).Although straw return supplies additional N,the comparable NH3emissions between the straw return and removal treatments may be attributed to two factors: 1)The high straw C:N ratios (53–94 for wheat and 35–55 for maize) can increase soil microbial N immobilization,thus stimulating inorganic N incorporation into the organic pool(Chenget al.2017).2) Straw return increases the grain yield and crop N uptake (Fig.5;Table 4),thus reducing the substrate for NH3emissions.

    4.3.The combination of manure and synthetic N achieves both low NH3 emissions and high crop yield

    The best N management strategy should achieve high crop yields,low N losses,and maintain or improve soil fertility (Ju and Zhang 2021).We compared the crop yields,NH3losses,soil fertility (soil organic carbon and total nitrogen),and N surplus under different N and C treatments.The 3Rs (right source,right time,and right place but excessive rate,i.e.,the conventional synthetic N fertilizer treatments) were associated with the highest NH3losses (20 kg N ha–1) and N surplus (335 kg N ha–1),despite being associated with a desirable crop yield of 12.80 Mg ha–1,highlighting the importance of including the right rate in reducing NH3emissions.Above yield is similar to the results of Wuet al.(2014),who reported regional attainable grain yields of wheat–maize rotation in the NCP.The 3Rs also maintained soil fertility,in terms of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen (Hanet al.2017;Huanget al.2017) (Fig.7),suggesting that this strategy is associated with grain production at high environmental costs.

    Fig.7 Ammonia losses and crop yields under different N and C managements.The 3Rs denote the right source,right time,and right place but excessive rate (Ncon and SNcon treatments);the 4Rs denote the right source,right time,right place,and right rate(Nopt and SNopt treatments);4Rs+manure (4R Plus) denotes partial manure substitution under the condition of the 4Rs (MNbal and SMNbal treatments);U denotes urea and M denotes cattle manure,EF denotes emission factor (%).

    After fully implementing the 4Rs,the N surplus was only 108 kg N ha–1,which is lower than the N surplus benchmark of 160 kg N ha–1for wheat–maize rotation in the NCP proposed by Zhanget al.(2019),resulting in minimal NH3losses (6 kg N ha–1and an NH3EF of 1.72%) without compromising crop yields (12.37 Mg ha–1)and soil fertility (compared with that in conventional N management) (Fig.7).After using 4R plus manure,the NH3losses (7 kg N ha–1and an NH3EF of 1.74%) and N surplus (98 kg N ha–1) were still at very low levels,and as an extra benefit,the grain yield increased by 16–20%,compared with that obtained in the case of the 3Rs and 4Rs (Fig.7),suggesting that the combination of manure and synthetic N can be used to achieve low NH3emissions with even higher crop yields.

    5.Conclusion

    Conventional chemical N management achieved desirable crop yields but induced high NH3losses.In contrast,the application of N fertilizer by fully implementing the 4Rs effectively reduced the NH3emissions,produced desirable crop yields,and maintained soil fertility.4R plus manure was associated not only with low NH3emissions,similar to the 4Rs,but also with much higher crop yields and soil fertility than the 4Rs.Straw return exerted minor effects on NH3emissions but increased crop yields and improved soil fertility.These findings have important implications for achieving the sustainable goals of food security and environmental protection.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Hainan Key Research and Development Project,China (ZDYF2021XDNY184),the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (422RC597),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41830751),the Hainan Major Science and Technology Program,China (ZDKJ2021008),and the Hainan University Startup Fund,China(KYQD(ZR)-20098).

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper are available on https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.12.008

    久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 女警被强在线播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 青草久久国产| 多毛熟女@视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲第一青青草原| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 大码成人一级视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 777米奇影视久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| xxx大片免费视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 搡老岳熟女国产| 乱人伦中国视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产成人av教育| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 91字幕亚洲| 久久狼人影院| 大香蕉久久网| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 自线自在国产av| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 搡老岳熟女国产| 满18在线观看网站| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 777米奇影视久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| av欧美777| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 精品国产一区二区久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| av在线播放精品| 美女中出高潮动态图| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产精品免费大片| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 操美女的视频在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 免费不卡黄色视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久9热在线精品视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 老司机影院毛片| 在线av久久热| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久狼人影院| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 丝袜美足系列| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 日日夜夜操网爽| videos熟女内射| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 超碰97精品在线观看| videosex国产| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 91成人精品电影| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 中国国产av一级| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久久久久人人人人人| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 午夜福利视频精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久这里只有精品19| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品福利观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 欧美日韩黄片免| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产一区二区 视频在线| a 毛片基地| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久av网站| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 美女主播在线视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 日本五十路高清| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲第一青青草原| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| svipshipincom国产片| 在线观看www视频免费| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 999精品在线视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 1024视频免费在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产片内射在线| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 午夜两性在线视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| videos熟女内射| 日本午夜av视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲综合色网址| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 老司机影院成人| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久中文字幕一级| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲精品一二三| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品久久久久久电影网| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲伊人色综图| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 午夜激情av网站| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品国产国语对白av| 黄色一级大片看看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 夫妻午夜视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 尾随美女入室| 黄片播放在线免费| 深夜精品福利| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 天天影视国产精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久九九热精品免费| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 一级片免费观看大全| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 99久久综合免费| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| av电影中文网址| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 五月天丁香电影| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 97在线人人人人妻| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 免费少妇av软件| 成人三级做爰电影| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 精品福利永久在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲人成电影观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日本wwww免费看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| videos熟女内射| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 中文字幕色久视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| av一本久久久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费观看人在逋| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久人人爽人人片av| 91国产中文字幕| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 一区二区av电影网| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 夫妻午夜视频| 深夜精品福利| 精品高清国产在线一区| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 一本久久精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 自线自在国产av| 亚洲av男天堂| 一区福利在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 中国美女看黄片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| bbb黄色大片| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产男女内射视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一本综合久久免费| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 777米奇影视久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲人成电影观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产麻豆69| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 搡老乐熟女国产| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 一本久久精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 色网站视频免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 丝袜美足系列| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 欧美性长视频在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产精品三级大全| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久久网色| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲国产看品久久| av国产精品久久久久影院| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久久久久久精品精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 性色av一级| 七月丁香在线播放| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一本久久精品| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 99热全是精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 日本五十路高清| 在线av久久热| 久久狼人影院| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲国产精品999| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产成人精品在线电影| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| 18禁观看日本| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 高清av免费在线| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 一级黄色大片毛片| 日本色播在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久久久视频综合| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| www.av在线官网国产| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲第一青青草原| 在现免费观看毛片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费看不卡的av| 婷婷色综合www| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产色视频综合| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av天堂在线播放| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久国产精品影院| 成人国产av品久久久| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 悠悠久久av| 精品一区在线观看国产| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 18禁观看日本| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| www.自偷自拍.com| 91老司机精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美|