• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Hepatobiliary manifestations following two-stages elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis: A prospective observational study

    2023-04-02 10:49:06TamerHabeebAbdulzahraHussainMauroPoddaPasqualeCianciBruceRamshawKhaledSafwatWesamAmrTamerWasefyAlaaFiadMohamedIbrahimMansourAdelMahmoudMoursiGamalOsmanAnassQasemMohamedFawzyMohamedIbrahimAboAlsaadAbdElfattahKalmoushMoh

    Tamer A A M Habeeb,Abdulzahra Hussain,Mauro Podda,Pasquale Cianci,Bruce Ramshaw,Khaled Safwat,Wesam M Amr,Tamer Wasefy,Alaa A Fiad,Mohamed Ibrahim Mansour,Adel Mahmoud Moursi,Gamal Osman,Anass Qasem,Mohamed Fawzy,Mohamed Ibrahim Abo Alsaad,Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush,Mohammed Shaaban Nassar,Fawzy M Mustafa,Mahmoud Hassib Morsi Badawy,Ahmed Hamdy,Hamdi Elbelkasi,Bassam Mousa,Abd-Elrahman M Metwalli,Walid A Mawla,Mostafa M Elaidy,Muhammad Ali Baghdadi,Ahmed Raafat

    Tamer A A M Habeeb,Khaled Safwat,Wesam M Amr,Tamer Wasefy,Alaa A Fiad,Mohamed lbrahim Mansour,Adel Mahmoud Moursi,Gamal Osman,Bassam Mousa,Abd-Elrahman M Metwalli,Walid A Mawla,Mostafa M Elaidy,Muhammad Ali Baghdadi,Ahmed Raafat,Department of General Surgery,Faculty of Medicine,Zagazig University,Zagazig 44759,Sharkia,Egypt

    Abdulzahra Hussain,Homerton University Hospital,London E9 6SR,UK

    Mauro Podda,Department of Surgical Science,University of Cagliari,Cagliari 2432,Italy

    Pasquale Cianci,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences,Università degli studi di Foggia,Foggia 546,Italy

    Bruce Ramshaw,MD CQInsights PBC,Co-founder &CEO,Tennessee,TN 37010,United States

    Anass Qasem,Department of Internal Medicine,Zagazig University,Zagazig 2355,Egypt

    Mohamed Fawzy,Department of Internal Medicine,Suez University,Suez 235,Egypt

    Mohamed lbrahim Abo Alsaad,Department of General Surgery,Faculty of Medicine -Merit University,Sohag 82511,Egypt

    Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush,Mohammed Shaaban Nassar,Fawzy M Mustafa,Mahmoud Hassib Morsi Badawy,Department of General Surgery,Al-azhar University,Cairo 285,Egypt

    Ahmed Hamdy,Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic (HBP) Surgery,National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute,Cairo 285,Egypt

    Hamdi Elbelkasi,Department of General Surgery,Mataryia Teaching Hospital,Cairo 285,Egypt

    Abstract BACKGROUND Hepatobiliary manifestations occur in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.The effect of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (LRP) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) on hepatobiliary manifestations is debated.AIM To evaluate hepatobiliary changes after two-stages elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with UC.METHODS Between June 2013 and June 2018,167 patients with hepatobiliary symptoms underwent two-stage elective LRP for UC in a prospective observational study.Patients with UC and having at least one hepatobiliary manifestation who underwent LRP with IPAA were included in the study.The patients were followed up for four years to assess the outcomes of hepatobiliary manifestations.RESULTS The patients' mean age was 36 ± 8 years,and males predominated (67.1%).The most common hepatobiliary diagnostic method was liver biopsy (85.6%),followed by Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (63.5%),Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (62.5%),abdominal ultrasonography (35.9%),and Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (6%).The most common hepatobiliary symptom was Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (62.3%),followed by fatty liver (16.8%) and gallbladder stone (10.2%).66.4% of patients showed a stable course after surgery.Progressive or regressive courses occurred in 16.8% of each.Mortality was 6%,and recurrence or progression of symptoms required surgery for 15%.Most PSC patients (87.5%) had a stable course,and only 12.5% became worse.Two-thirds (64.3%) of fatty liver patients showed a regressive course,while one-third (35.7%) showed a stable course.Survival rates were 98.8%,97%,95.8%,and 94% at 12 mo,24 mo,36 mo,and at the end of the follow-up.CONCLUSION In patients with UC who had LRP,there is a positive impact on hepatobiliary disease.It caused an improvement in PSC and fatty liver disease.The most prevalent unchanged course was PSC,while the most common improvement was fatty liver disease.

    Key Words: Courses;Hepatobiliary manifestations;Primary sclerosing cholangitis;Restorative proctocolectomy

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to affect 1% of the population over the next decade[1].Although the primary clinical manifestations of IBD are centred on the gastrointestinal tract,25%-40% of IBD patients develop at least one extraintestinal manifestation (EIM)[2].

    Hepatobiliary manifestations constitute one of the most common EIMs in IBD[3].Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC),autoimmune hepatitis (AIH),fatty liver,cholelithiasis,primary biliary cholangitis,portal vein thrombosis,and hepatic abscess are the most prevalent hepatobiliary manifestations of ulcerative colitis (UC)[4,5].

    Most UC patients can be managed with medications,but minorities require proctocolectomy[6].Twostage laparoscopic proctocolectomy (LRP) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a cure for UC,but its effect on hepatobiliary diseases is controversial[6-10].Therefore,we conducted a prospective observational study to examine the effects of LRP with IPAA on hepatobiliary symptoms to evaluate the role of surgery in preventing or ameliorating liver damage from the disease progression.

    MATERlALS AND METHODS

    Study design and participants

    This is a prospective observational study on 167 patients with hepatobiliary manifestations who underwent two-stage elective LRP with IPAA for UC from June 2013 to June 2018 at our universities’ hospitals.Inclusion criteria were all patients between 18 and 69 years;men and women with at least one hepatobiliary manifestation.In patients with UC,surgery was decided according to The European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation guidelines on therapeutics in UC[11].Exclusion criteria included: Alcohol abuse,severe heart failure or type II diabetes mellitus,complications or death related to LRP operation,liver toxicity of IBD-related medications,active or chronic viral hepatitis,hemochromatosis,Wilson's disease,drugs-induced steatosis (amiodarone or tamoxifen),morbid obesity or patients undergoing bariatric surgery,immunoglobulin G4-related cholangitis;human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome;tuberculosis;secondary sclerosing cholangitis;cholangiocarcinoma;complications of advanced PSC (hepatic encephalopathy,portal hypertension,hepatorenal syndrome,or hepato-pulmonary syndrome;end-stage liver failure),hypercoagulability status (systemic lupus erythematosus,increased von Willebrand factor or increased homocysteine level),oral contraceptive pills,Grave's disease,dyslipidemia,and previous biliary tract surgery including cholecystectomy.

    Study ethics

    The Institutional Review Board approved the study (Approval No.ZU IRB#9841).Each patient signed a written consent form,and the study followed the rules of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki principles.In addition,the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05495178) and done according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

    Definitions of outcomes and measurements

    PSC is progressive biliary fibrosis affecting intra and/or extrahepatic bile ducts[12] and diagnosed by laboratory tests [(cholestasis,Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)],radiology [abdominal ultrasonography (US),abdominal computed tomography (CT),endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP),or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)],and liver biopsy.Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is characterized by the loss of small and medium-sized bile ducts on liver biopsy,elevated anti-mitochondrial antibodies,and altered gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels[13].Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by fat storage in ≥ 5% of hepatic steatosis in the absence of concomitant liver disease (chronic viral hepatitis),use of steatosis-inducing medications (amiodarone or tamoxifen),autoimmune hepatitis,hemochromatosis,Wilson's disease,or excessive alcohol consumption[14].Diagnosis of NAFLD was made by liver biopsies or US[15],and the severity score was previously stated[16].Autoimmune hepatitis diagnosis based on the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria with a score of > 15 points consisting of demographic,histologic,and laboratory markers,including antinuclear antibodies with a titer of at least 1:40 and liver histology[17].An aseptic liver abscess is diagnosed based on IBD history,US,and CT[18].Ultrasound,colour Doppler,and/or CT scans were used to detect portal vein thrombosis.

    Perioperative technique and follow-up after surgery

    For patients with UC who require surgery,two stages of LRP with IPAA and a diverting loop ileostomy are the gold standard[19].The diverting loop ileostomy was reversed 2-3 mo following surgery.Because of the increased risk of thromboembolic events,prophylactic anticoagulation medication was scheduled and continued for six months after surgery.The follow-up period was four years,and cases lost during the follow-up period were excluded from the study.

    Follow-up with the clinical progression of patients' conditions and laboratory evaluations was performed at six months,one year,two years,three years,and four years,or at any time of patients’ complaint.These data were compared to data obtained immediately before surgery (at the time of surgery).Follow-ups were performed at outpatient clinics,viaphone,or by email.Laboratory (Liver function tests,antibodies,Cancer antigen 19-9) and radiology (abdominal ultrasonography,colour Doppler,CT,MRCP) tests were performed as part of the follow-up assessments.An endoscopic examination of the ileal pouch on an annual basis was arranged.A liver biopsy was planned at the end of the study.

    Statistical methods

    Version 28 of SPSS was used for data management and statistical analysis (IBM,Armonk,New York,United States).The normality of quantitative data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test,the Shapiro-Wilk test,and direct data visualization methods.Means and standard deviations,or medians and ranges based on normality tests,were used to summarize the quantitative data.As a summary of categorical data,numbers and percentages were used.The McNemar test compared laboratory and clinical findings before and after surgery.We used a Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate overall survival and recurrence-free survival.The independentt-test or the Mann-WhitneyUtest for normally and non-normally distributed quantitative variables was used to compare the regression rates of hepatobiliary manifestations in the two groups.We compared categorical data using the Chi-square test.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to predict no regression of hepatobiliary manifestations.Each significant variable on the univariate levels was included in a multivariate regression model and adjusted for age,gender,smoking,family history of UC,and UC duration.The odds ratios and confidence intervals at 95% were calculated.All statistical tests were two-sided.Pvalues < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    General characteristics

    Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study cohort.As shown in Table 1,the mean age was 36 ± 8 years,with male predominance (67.1%).The most frequent diagnostic method for hepatobiliary manifestations was liver biopsy (85.6%),followed by MRCP (63.5%),ANCA (62.5%),US (35.9%),and ERCP (6%).Figure 2 shows the frequency of different hepatobiliary manifestations.

    Outcomes

    After surgery,there were clinical and laboratory improvements (Table 2 and Figure 3).Figure 4 showed that 66.4% of patients had a stationary course.In comparison,16.8% of patients showed a progressive or regressive course,and there are variations in the courses of different types of hepatobiliary manifestations.

    Overall survival and recurrence-free survival using kaplan-meier analysis

    The survival rate was 98.8%,97%,95.8%,and 94% at 12 mo,24 mo,36 mo,and at the end of the followup.Regarding the recurrence or progression of symptoms requiring surgery,the recurrence-free rate at 12 mo was 98.2%.At 24 mo,it was 92.8%.At 36 mo,it was 89.2%.At the end of the follow-up,it reached 85% (Figure 5).

    Figure 1 Flow diagram of inclusion and exclusion criteria of the studied patients.

    Figure 2 Hepatobiliary manifestations of the studied patients.

    Figure 3 Laboratory and clinical findings before and after surgery.

    Figure 4 The course and outcome of each hepatobiliary manifestations.

    Figure 5 Overall and recurrence-free survival of the studied patients.

    Factors affecting regression of hepatobiliary manifestations

    Patients with no regression (stationary and progressive course) demonstrated higher use of anti-Tumor necrosis factor (15.1%vs0%,P=0.028),corticosteroids (43.2%vs17.9%,P=0.012),and hepatobiliary treatment (80.6%vs7.1%,P< 0.001).In addition,they demonstrated higher percentages of high alanine transaminase (ALT) (74.8vs39.3%,P< 0.001),high aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (75.5%vs57.1%,P=0.047),high alkaline phosphatase (71.2%vs3.6%,P< 0.001),jaundice (67.6%vs46.4%,P=0.033),pruritus (59%vs14.3%,P< 0.001),and fever (24.5%vs3.6%,P=0.013).Age (P=0.578),gender (P=0.327),smoking (P=0.780),family history (P=0.278),duration of UC (P=0.877),treatment for UC (P=0.601),family history of PSC (P=0.079),pain (P=0.496),and fatty liver score (P=0.121) were not found to be significantly different (Table 3).

    Table 1 General characteristics of the studied patients,n (%)

    Prediction of no regression of hepatobiliary symptoms

    The predictors of no regression were steroid treatment (OR=3.68,95%CI=1.29 - 10.45,P=0.015),high ALT (OR=5.39,95%CI=2.19 - 13.28,P< 0.001),high AST (OR=2.59,95%CI=1.08 - 6.2,P=0.032),high ALP (OR=73.59,95%CI=9.52 - 568.93,P< 0.001),high bilirubin (OR=2.72,95%CI=1.16 - 6.4,P=0.022),jaundice (OR=2.49,95%CI=1.07 - 5.8,P=0.034),pruritus (OR=9.75,95%CI=3.12 - 30.5,P< 0.001),and fever (OR=9.7,95%CI=1.25 - 75.03,P=0.029).The predictors with their odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are illustrated in Table 4.

    Table 2 Laboratory and clinical findings before (immediately before surgery) and after surgery (at the end of the study),n (%)

    Table 3 Factors affecting regression of hepatobiliary manifestations,n (%)

    Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict no regression of hepatobiliary symptoms

    DlSCUSSlON

    To the best of our knowledge,this is the first current study to investigate the course of hepatobiliary symptoms in patients with UC after elective two-stage LRP with IPAA.Colectomy was correlated to a considerably low rate of progressive course in this study of 167 patients: 66.4% for an unchanged course,16.8% for a regressive course,and 16.8% for a progressive course.There were not many changes for PSC (91/104,87.5%),while the most progressive cases were gallbladder disorders (12/17,70.5%),and the most regressive cases were fatty liver (18/28,64.3%).

    Many theories have been proposed to explain the course of PSC after LRP with IPAA,including autoimmune phenomena[20],liver-gut crosstalk[21],the influence of saturated fat on changes in the bile acid pool,with an increase in the taurocholic acid[22],and bacterial translocation or absorption of bacterial endotoxins into the portal circulationviaa chronically inflamed bowel with Kupffer cell activation[23-26].The effects of colectomy on PSC have been documented in conflicting ways.Colectomy was beneficial according to a study by Lepist?et al[6] that stated that PSC severity increased in four (13%) patients,regressed in 15 (50%),and stayed stationary in 11 (37%).Regarding the incidence of progression,our findings are identical to those of this study,but not in the incidence of stationary and regressive courses.Our stationary course of PSC is higher (87.5%vs37%),and none of the cases in our study demonstrated a regression course.We performed liver biopsies and MRCP on all PSC patients prior to surgery and during the follow-up period,whereas the previous study relied on liver function for diagnosis and did not perform liver biopsies on all patients.Furthermore,our study had a large number of patients,and cases lost to follow-up were excluded from our study (in comparison to earlier study).Our study's higher stable course of PSC may be attributable to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (15 mg/kg/day) in all patients after LRP,whereas only 9/30 patients had UDCA following colectomy in the prior study.Treatment with UDCA has a beneficial effect on the course of PSC;studies have demonstrated efficacy[27-30].A good proportion of PSC cases not progressing to a more severe form is associated with the absence of pouchitis in all of our patients' ileoanal pouch anastomosis.The study corroborated our conclusion that pouchitis may aggravate PSC[31].

    In contrast,another study by Cangemiet al[7] stated that proctocolectomy exerted no beneficial effect on PSC,the stage of which has remained unchanged or has progressed with no statistically significant improvements in liver function test values[7].On the contrary,our results showed a statistically significant improvement in liver function test values after surgery.Variations in the results could be attributed to methodological differences,diagnostic procedures (liver biopsy in 71% of cases only),and the number of cases.Perhaps,the effect of LRP on PSC is beneficial,as evidenced by the higher percentage of stable disease and smaller progressive cases.Another study by Treeprasertsuket al[32] discovered that proctocolectomy had no benefit and a lower survival rate than expected.They experienced only progressive courses with higher mortality rates;LCF,acute cholangitis,right hepatic vein thrombosis with liver infarcts,and many cases that needed liver transplantation.The poor prognosis could be attributed to the study's small sample size,open approach,surgical difficulties,and heterogeneity in selection criteria,particularly the inclusion of cirrhotic patients with low platelet counts and albumin levels.

    In patients with LRP,resection of a short segment of the ileum and the entire colon inhibits bile acid absorption,resulting in supersaturation of biliary cholesterol[8],pouch metaplasia with decreased primary bile acid absorption[33],and delayed gall bladder emptying[34].We found a high incidence of recurrent biliary colic requiring surgery (12/17,70.5%),while the remaining five cases had a stationary course without symptoms.Concomitant cholecystectomy with LRP may prolong the operative time (nearly 40 min) and add more risk of complications.However,it saves the patient from going through more difficult cholecystectomy operation /gallstone complications in the future[35].There were no cases of gallbladder cancer in our study.This is because most gallstone cases develop symptoms following LRP,necessitating cholecystectomy.Another problem is the short duration of follow-up (4 years).

    Multiple studies showed that proctocolectomy could help with fatty liver regression[7,36,37].We agree with prior evidence that proctocolectomy is favourable for NAFLD.LRP had a positive effect on fatty liver,with 18 cases (18/28,64%) showing complete regression to normal liver and the remaining ten patients (36%) showing a stationary course.This improvement is due to improvements in malnutrition,anaemia,and a reduction in corticosteroid dosage during the surgical follow-up period,as supported by a study[38].NAFLD progression was not observed in our cases due to the absence of pouchitis.As a result,we concluded that proctocolectomy plays a definitive role in the management of NAFLD-complicating UC,as evidenced by radiology and liver biopsy (improvement of fatty liver score from a median of 2 (range 1-3) in preoperative biopsies to a median of 1 (range 0-3) in postoperative biopsies).

    High incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in IBD may be due to increased factors V and VIII levels,platelet counts,fibrinogen levels,or decreased antithrombin III levels[39,40].In our study,we identified six patients with PVT: Four cases before surgery,no recurrence after surgery,and two patients who developed PVT after surgery.One of the two postoperative PVT cases exhibited partial portal vein obstruction,which was treated with anticoagulants.In contrast,the second case exhibited complete obstruction of PVT with intestinal gangrene,necessitating resection of the majority of the small intestine with short bowel syndrome,and died two months later.The low incidence of postoperative PVT can be due to the small number of cases,the routine use of low molecular heparin in the postoperative period for six months in all cases according to the current society guidelines and expert opinion[40],absence of pouchitis which increases the incidence of PVT[41],and the possible occurrence of PVT not associated with specific symptoms or asymptomatic[42].The use of abdominal ultrasound and colored Doppler at regular intervals unquestionably aided in detecting asymptomatic cases.We concluded that proctocolectomy decreases the incidence but not the severity of PVT with an unfavorable outcome,despite the small number of cases,with a mortality rate of 50% among those who developed PVT is similar to the findings of other studies[43].

    Two isolated PBC accidentally discovered cases were included;one regressed to normal liver condition,while the other progressed to liver cell failure and required liver transplantation without mortality.We thought that the excellent prognosis was due to obeticholic acid that improved the course of the disease[44],removal of the colon,the site of antibody production,which helped make the prognosis better after surgery,and absence of pouchitis[9].

    One patient with UC developed a liver abscess before surgery,whereas no such case was reported after LRP.We concur with the pathogenesis that liver abscess may be caused by antibodies produced by patients with UC attacking the liver,resulting in necrosis and abscess formation that was negative for bacteria[45].Proctocolectomy permanently eliminates the site of antibody production.Furthermore,postoperative corticosteroids help to prevent recurrence[46].Proctocolectomy prevents liver abscesses,according to our findings.

    One case of AIH was diagnosed before surgery and regressed to normal following LRP with a favourable prognosis,demonstrating the positive effects of proctocolectomy[47].The favorable prognosis of our patient was likely due to the removal of the inflamed colon and steroid-based immunosuppressive therapy[10].

    An earlier study confirmed the efficacy of proctocolectomy for nonspecific reactive hepatitis[7].In accordance with the previous study's findings,we diagnosed 8 patients with nonspecific reactive hepatitis,and complete regression in every case was confirmed.

    Strengths and limitations

    This is a large prospective multicenter study of different hepatobiliary manifestations assessment after LRP with a relatively long duration of patient follow-up.We also included comprehensive clinical points evaluating different courses of hepatobiliary manifestations.A prospective study prevents selection bias with accurate results that could be generalized.

    However,our study has some limitations.One is the lack a control group of patients that were not operated on.Therefore,this study did not handle the severity of preoperative colitis and its effect on the course of hepatobiliary manifestations in the postoperative period.Another limitation is that it did not evaluate the disease course after liver transplantation.Another limitation is that we did not evaluate the treatment of both UC and hepatobiliary manifestations during the postoperative course.Finally,we did not evaluate the causes of the high incidence of symptomatic gallbladder stones.

    CONCLUSlON

    This is a large prospective multicenter study of different hepatobiliary manifestations assessment after LRP with a relatively long duration of patient follow-up.We also included comprehensive clinical points evaluating different courses of hepatobiliary manifestations.A prospective study prevents selection bias with accurate results that could be generalized.

    However,our study has some limitations.One is the lack a control group of patients that were not operated on.Therefore,this study did not handle the severity of preoperative colitis and its effect on the course of hepatobiliary manifestations in the postoperative period.Another limitation is that it did not evaluate the disease course after liver transplantation.Another limitation is that we did not evaluate the treatment of both UC and hepatobiliary manifestations during the postoperative course.Finally,we did not evaluate the causes of the high incidence of symptomatic gallbladder stones.

    ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

    Research background

    Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to affect 1% of the population over the next decade.Hepatobiliary manifestations constitute one of the most common extraintestinal manifestations in IBD.Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC),autoimmune hepatitis,fatty liver,cholelithiasis,primary biliary cholangitis,portal vein thrombosis,and hepatic abscess are the most prevalent hepatobiliary manifestations of ulcerative colitis (UC).Most UC patients can be managed with medications,but minorities require proctocolectomy.

    Research motivation

    Two-stage laparoscopic proctocolectomy (LRP) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a cure for UC,but its effect on hepatobiliary diseases is controversial.

    Research objectives

    Therefore,we conducted a prospective observational study to examine the effects of LRP with IPAA on hepatobiliary symptoms to evaluate the role of surgery in preventing or ameliorating liver damage from the disease progression.

    Research methods

    This is a prospective observational study on 167 patients with hepatobiliary manifestations who underwent two-stage elective LRP with IPAA for UC We examined the effects of LRP with IPAA on hepatobiliary symptoms to evaluate the role of surgery in preventing or ameliorating liver damage from the disease progression.

    Research results

    The course of hepatobiliary manifestations after surgery is improved in most forms.Most PSC patients had a stable course,Two-thirds of fatty liver patients showed a regressive course with an improved survival rate at the end of the study.

    Research conclusions

    Our study emphasized the positive and improving effects of surgery on hepatobiliary manifestations in patients with UC.

    Research perspectives

    Further studies are required in a larger sample size to evaluate the effect of surgery on different forms of hepatobiliary manifestations in patients with UC.further studies are required to compare the effect of surgery and effects of medical treatment.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Habeeb TAAM is the corresponding author and is responsible for patient recruitment;Habeeb TAAM,Hussain A,Podda M,Cianci P,Ramshaw B,Safwat K,Amr WM,Wasefy T,Fiad AA,Mansour MI,Moursi AM,Osman G,Qasem A,Fawzy M,Alsaad MIA,Kalmoush A,Nassar MS,Mustafa FM,Badawy MHM,Hamdy A,Elbelkasi H,Mousa B,Metwalli AM,Mawla WA,Elaidy MM,Baghdadi MA,Raafat A shared data collection,data analysis,study design,and writing up the first draft and final form of the manuscript;All authors accept the final version of the manuscript.

    lnstitutional review board statement:The study was reviewed and approved by the Zagazig University Institutional Review Board (Approval No.ZU IRB#9841).

    lnformed consent statement:Informed written consent was obtained from the patient and her family for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

    Data sharing statement:Data will be available by the author on demand.

    STROBE statement:The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items,and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:Egypt

    ORClD number:Tamer A A M Habeeb 0000-0002-7049-4267;Mauro Podda 0000-0001-9941-0883;Pasquale Cianci 0000-0003-2839-2520.

    S-Editor:Liu GL

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Liu GL

    久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 人妻系列 视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 欧美bdsm另类| 日韩中字成人| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 九草在线视频观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 婷婷色综合www| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成人免费观看视频高清| 麻豆成人av视频| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久精品夜色国产| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 三级国产精品片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美3d第一页| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 777米奇影视久久| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 一本久久精品| 老司机影院成人| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 男人舔奶头视频| 黄片wwwwww| 国产成人精品婷婷| 舔av片在线| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产 精品1| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av在线app专区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 岛国毛片在线播放| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品一及| 久久久国产一区二区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 美女高潮的动态| 国产一级毛片在线| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲最大成人av| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久久久久久精品精品| 欧美日本视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 熟女av电影| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 一级毛片我不卡| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久影院123| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产成人freesex在线| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 性色av一级| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 岛国毛片在线播放| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 少妇 在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费看a级黄色片| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 天堂网av新在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 色视频www国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一级毛片 在线播放| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| a级毛色黄片| 丝袜喷水一区| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| freevideosex欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 综合色丁香网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一级爰片在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 综合色av麻豆| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 香蕉精品网在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久久色成人| 老女人水多毛片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 美女高潮的动态| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 看免费成人av毛片| 免费看a级黄色片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产视频首页在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲四区av| 直男gayav资源| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 一区二区av电影网| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 三级经典国产精品| 日本色播在线视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 97在线人人人人妻| 九九在线视频观看精品| eeuss影院久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久热精品热| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产成人aa在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 免费看光身美女| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 少妇 在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产成人a区在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 少妇 在线观看| 熟女av电影| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 一本一本综合久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一区二区三区精品91| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 另类亚洲欧美激情| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产91av在线免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| kizo精华| 少妇人妻 视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 午夜福利视频精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| freevideosex欧美| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 老女人水多毛片| 在线看a的网站| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 三级国产精品片| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产成人91sexporn| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 精品一区二区免费观看| 在线免费十八禁| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 在线 av 中文字幕| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 在线观看一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 在线观看三级黄色| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 色网站视频免费| 男女国产视频网站| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产成人福利小说| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品一区二区三卡| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲四区av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 大码成人一级视频| 一级av片app| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 18+在线观看网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费观看性生交大片5| av专区在线播放| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 看免费成人av毛片| av一本久久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩伦理黄色片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产av国产精品国产| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线观看国产h片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 一级av片app| 国产高潮美女av| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 如何舔出高潮| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产乱来视频区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 春色校园在线视频观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 免费大片18禁| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产极品天堂在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 伦精品一区二区三区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 日本一本二区三区精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日本色播在线视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 一本一本综合久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 麻豆成人av视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久久欧美国产精品| 高清av免费在线| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产成人精品婷婷| 免费少妇av软件| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产高清三级在线| 亚州av有码| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产成人91sexporn| 日日啪夜夜爽| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| av在线app专区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费少妇av软件| 国产成人福利小说| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国内精品宾馆在线| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 婷婷色综合www| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 中文欧美无线码| 国产91av在线免费观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| av在线老鸭窝| 国产男女内射视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| av免费在线看不卡| 在线观看人妻少妇| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久午夜福利片| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩中字成人| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 大码成人一级视频| videos熟女内射| 少妇人妻 视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍|