• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Different n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratios affect postprandial metabolism in normal and hypertriglyceridemic rats

    2023-01-03 11:30:26LigngYngChoYngZhixiuSongMinWnHuiXiXinYngDengfengXuPnHechunLiuShokngWngGuijuSun
    食品科學與人類健康(英文) 2023年4期

    Ligng Yng, Cho Yng, Zhixiu Song, Min Wn, Hui Xi, Xin Yng,Dengfeng Xu, D Pn, Hechun Liu, Shokng Wng, Guiju Sun,*

    a Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China b Second Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China

    Keywords:Polyunsaturated fatty acid n-6 Fatty acids n-3 Fatty acids Postprandial metabolism Hypertriglyceridemia

    A B S T R A C T Postprandial metabolism plays major roles in many pathological conditions. The n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio is closely related to various physiological disorders. This study aimed to investigate the effects of high fat meals with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial metabolism in normal control(NC) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) rats. The postprandial response of triglyceride (TG) in HTG groups was higher than that in NC groups after different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. The HTG groups showed higher postprandial total cholesterol (TC) responses than NC groups after 1:1 and 20:1 ratio meals. The 5:1 n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio elicited lower postprandial responses of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) than 1:1 and 10:1 ratios in HTG groups. The postprandial malondialdehyde (MDA) response was lower after a 5:1 n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal than 1:1 and 20:1 ratio meals in HTG groups. The 1:1 ratio resulted in a lower postprandial reactive oxygen species (ROS) level than 5:1 and 10:1 n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC groups. The results showed that a low n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio improved postprandial dysmetabolism induced by a high fat meal in NC and HTG rats. A high n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio increased the difference in postprandial metabolism between NC and HTG rats.

    1. Introduction

    Postprandial metabolism plays an important role in the development of many pathological conditions [1]. The vascular system is often exposed to long-term postprandial hyperlipidemia and multiple atherogenic products during postprandial states [2]. Postprandial responses are affected by the quantity and composition of experimental meals, background diets, the characteristics of subjects, postprandial time and suitable markers [3,4]. Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is closely associated with postprandial hyperlipidemia and increased oxidative stress, inf lammation, and endothelial dysfunction [5,6].

    n-6 andn-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have different physiological and metabolic characteristics and they interact with each other to regulate many important biological processes [7,8]. Moderate intake ofn-6 andn-3 PUFAs is beneficial to regulate various physiological responses such as lipid metabolism, inflammation,oxidative stress, platelet aggregation, and hemagglutination [9,10].Linoleic acid (18:2n-6; LA) andα-linolenic acid (18:3n-3; ALA)are the most commonn-6 andn-3 PUFAs. Compared with marinen-3 PUFAs, which include eicosapentaenoic (20:5n-3; EPA) and docosahexaenoic (22:5n-3; DHA), plantn-3 PUFA (ALA) is more abundant in many food sources [11,12]. Plant ALA and marine EPA and DHA have different physiological effects on postprandial lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in hyperlipidemic patients [13].Both plant and marinen-3 PUFAs attenuate inf lammation and induce characteristic pro-resolving lipid mediator metabolomes [14,15]. Our previous study showed that a highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio with plantderivedn-3 fatty acids increases the difference in postprandial lipid responses between HTG and healthy subjects [16]. Another study showed that high fat diets with a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio improve lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial functions in rats using plant oils as then-3 fatty acid source, whereas a highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio has adverse effects [10]. Furthermore, acute marinen-3 PUFA dietary supplementation improves postprandial lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses in rats with metabolic syndrome [17].

    Despite these findings, few studies have reported the effect of high fat meals with differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial functions in HTG rats. Hence, the aim of the present study was to examine the effects of differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial metabolism in normal control (NC) and HTG rats using plant sources ofn-3 fatty acids.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1 Animals

    Male Sprague-Dawley rats, which weighed 140-160 g, were purchased from Zhejiang Medical Experimental Animal Center(Hangzhou, China). The rats were fed in a single cage. The temperature was controlled at (22 ± 2) °C and the humidity was controlled at 50%-70% with 12 h light/12 h dark cycle in the feeding room. The rats were acclimatized for 1 week before experiments.

    The rats were randomly divided into NC and HTG groups. The rats were fed a complete formula diet. The NC diet was prepared by referring to the AIN-76A experimental animal synthetic diet recommended by the American Society of Nutrition, which contained 230 g casein, 295 g corn starch, 310 g sucrose, 50 g cellulose, 70 g soybean oil, 30 g mixed mineral salts, 10 g mixed vitamins, 3 gDL-methionine, and 2 g choline chloride. HTG rats were fed high fat model feed. The high fat model diet consisted of 33.5% fat, 19.4%protein and 47.1% carbohydrate (% of energy), and the diet contained 215 g casein, 258 g corn starch, 265 g sucrose, 50 g cellulose, 117.5 g lard, 12.5 g cholesterol, 2 g bile salts, 30 g mixed mineral salts, 10 g mixed vitamins, 3 gDL-methionine, and 2 g choline chloride.

    Before an experiment, no significant difference in body weight or blood lipids was found among the groups. Rats in each group were provided with the corresponding diet and had free access to water.The rats were weighed weekly and food intake was recorded every other day. When the HTG group had significantly higher triglycerides(TGs) than the NC group after 6 weeks, HTG rats were established.

    NC and HTG rats were randomly divided into 4 subgroups according ton-6/n-3 PUFA ratios of 1:1, 5:1, 10:1 and 20:1,respectively, in liquid high fat meals, with 10 rats in each group.

    2.2 Test meals

    To minimize the effect on postprandial metabolism, postprandial metabolic meals were prepared as liquid meals. The liquid high fat meals consisted of water, blended oil, sucrose, casein, lactose,maltodextrin, and monoglycerides. The blended oil was butter, corn oil, linseed oil and olive oil. The liquid meals consisted of 50% fat,15% protein, and 35% carbohydrate (% of energy). The test meals contained 60 g blended oils, 40.5 g casein, 6.625 g lactose, 59.535 g sucrose, and 28.35 g maltodextrin per 500 mL. The formulas of the 4 test meals were similar except for differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios.The compositions of the test meals are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1Compositions of the test meals.

    2.3 Postprandial experimental procedure

    The postprandial experiments were performed after establishment of the HTG rats. The rats were fasted overnight for 12 h with free access to water. Before the postprandial experiment, the liquid high fat meals were homogenized. After collecting a fasted blood sample, rats in each group orally received the homogeneous emulsion(2 g/100 g bw) in the fasted state. Subsequent blood samples were collected at 2, 4, and 6 h after meal consumption. Blood samples were collected sequentially from the tail vein using heparinized capillary tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged to separate serum for 10 min at 3 000 ×g, which was stored at -80 °C. Finally,all animals were anesthetized with sodium pentothal and sacrificed by decapitation.

    The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southeast University (approval number: 20150516) on April 28, 2015. All animal care and experimental procedures complied with the principles of European Directive 2010/63/EU.

    2.4 Serum biochemical analyses

    The serum levels of TG, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), glucose (GLU), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), malondialdehyde (MDA),reactive oxygen species (ROS) and von Willebrand factor (vWF)were measured. Enzymatic method was used to determine serum TG, TC and HDL-C levels. GLU was determined by oxidase endpoint method. Levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits purchased from Science Biotechnology (Yantai, China). Levels of MDA, ROS and vWF were measured using ELISA kits purchased from Jrdun BioTech(Shanghai, China). The determination method was carried out according to the instruction of these kits.

    2.5 Statistical analysis

    All data were processed by statistical software SPSS 17.0.Data were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD). Oneway analysis of variance was used for significance test. Repeated measurement analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to anaylze the time-varying repeatable measures.P< 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

    3. Results

    3.1 Effects of different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial GLU and lipid responses in NC and HTG rats

    3.1.1 Postprandial TG response

    Except in the 1:1 (Fig. 1A) subgroup (P> 0.05), significant changes were observed in postprandial TG levels over time in 5:1(Fig. 1B), 10:1 (Fig. 1C), and 20:1 (Fig. 1D) subgroups (P< 0.01).As shown in Figs. 1A-D, the postprandial responses of TGs in HTG groups were higher than those in NC groups after the differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (P< 0.01). There was a significant time effect on postprandial TG levels in both NC (Fig. 1E) and HTG (Fig. 1F)groups (bothP< 0.001). However, the postprandial responses of TGs were not significantly different among then-6/n-3 PUFA ratio treatments in NC (Fig. 1E) and HTG (Fig. 1F) groups (bothP> 0.05).

    Fig. 1 The curve of TG concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. Effect of time, meal, meal × time:repeated measures ANOVA. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10). (A) 1:1 group, (B) 5:1 group, (C) 10:1 group, (D) 20:1 group, (E) NC group,(F) HTG group, the same below.

    Fig. 2 The curve of TC concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. Effect of time, meal, meal × time:repeated measures ANOVA. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

    3.1.2 Postprandial TC response

    TC concentrations decreased within 2 h and then increased after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals and there was a significant change in postprandial TC levels over time in all groups (P< 0.001)(Figs. 2A-D). The HTG groups showed higher postprandial TC responses than NC groups after 1:1 (Fig. 2A) and 20:1 (Fig. 2D)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (bothP< 0.05). Furthermore, the difference in postprandial responses of TC between NC and HTG groups tended to be broader after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals along with the increase in postprandial time (Figs. 2A-D). However,the postprandial TC responses were not significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio subgroups in NC (Fig. 2E) and HTG (Fig. 2F)groups (bothP> 0.05).

    3.1.3 Postprandial HDL-C response

    For postprandial HDL-C responses, there was no meal effect(P> 0.05) or time × meal interaction (P> 0.05), but there was a significant time effect (P< 0.001) after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (Tables 2 and 3). As shown in Tables 2 and 3, postprandial HDL-C responses showed similar patterns over time with a decreasing trend from baseline.

    Table 2Concentrations of HDL-C (mmol/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in NC rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD, n = 10).

    Table 3Concentrations of HDL-C (mmol/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in HTG rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD, n = 10).

    3.1.4 Postprandial GLU response

    For postprandial GLU responses, there was no meal effect(P> 0.05) or time × meal interaction (P> 0.05) after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (Tables 4 and 5). As shown in Tables 4 and 5,a significant time effect was observed in postprandial GLU responses after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (P <0.001).Postprandial GLU levels peaked at 2 h, and then declined gradually (Tables 4 and 5).

    Table 4Concentrations of GLU (mmol/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in NC rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD, n = 10).

    Table 5Concentrations of GLU (mmol/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in HTG rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD, n = 10).

    3.2 Effects of different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial inflammatory responses in NC and HTG rats

    3.2.1 Postprandial IL-6 response

    As shown in Tables 6 and 7, there was a significant time effect(P< 0.001) on postprandial IL-6 responses and postprandial IL-6 levels showed an increasing trend after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (Tables 6 and 7). The postprandial responses of IL-6 exhibited no meal effects or time × meals interaction (P> 0.05) after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (Tables 6 and 7). However, the postprandial IL-6 concentrations at 6 h in HTG groups were significantly lower than those in NC groups after 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals(P< 0.05) (Tables 6 and 7).

    Table 6Concentrations of IL-6 (ng/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in NC rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD).

    Table 7Concentrations of IL-6 (ng/L) at different time points before and after fat loading in HTG rats with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios (mean ± SD).

    3.2.2 Postprandial TNF-α response

    The postprandial responses of TNF-α in HTG groups were higher than those in NC groups after the 1:1 (Fig. 3A) and 10:1 (Fig. 3C)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (bothP< 0.01). The postprandial TNF-α levels showed a decreasing trend over time after the 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal in both NC and HTG groups (Fig. 3B), but exhibited an increasing trend after the 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal (Fig. 3D)in both NC and HTG groups. The postprandial responses of TNF-α

    were not significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio treatments in NC groups (P> 0.05) (Fig. 3E), but the 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal caused lower postprandial TNF-α responses than 1:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in HTG groups (P< 0.05) (Fig. 3F).

    3.3 Effects of different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial oxidative stress responses in NC and HTG rats

    3.3.1 Postprandial MDA response

    Althouth the postprandial responses of MDA were not significantly different between NC and HTG groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (Figs. 4A-D) (P> 0.05), the 5:1 (Fig. 4B)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal tended to reduce the postprandial MDA response in both NC and HTG groups. Conversely, 1:1 (Fig. 4A) and 20:1 (Fig. 4D)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals caused an increasing trend of postprandial MDA responses in both NC and HTG groups. Furthermore, the postprandial MDA levels at 4 h in the HTG group were higher than those in the NC group after the 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal(P< 0.05) (Fig. 4C). The 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals caused lower postprandial responses of MDA than the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal in NC groups (P< 0.05) (Fig. 4E). Additionally, the 1:1 and 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals caused higher postprandial responses of MDA than the 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in HTG groups (P< 0.05) (Fig. 4F).

    Fig. 3 The curve of TNF-α concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. a-c Mean values with differentletters were significantly different (P < 0.05). Effect of time, meal, meal × time: repeated measures ANOVA. *Significantly different between groups at the same time point, P < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

    Fig. 4 The curve of MDA concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. a, bMean values with differentletters were significantly different (P < 0.05). Effect of time, meal, meal × time: repeated measures ANOVA. *Significantly different between groups at the same time point, P < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

    3.3.2 Postprandial ROS response

    As shown in Figs. 5A-D, postprandial ROS levels were increased significantly in both NC and HTG groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (P< 0.001). The postprandial responses of ROS were not significantly different between NC and HTG groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (P> 0.05)(Figs. 5A-D). However, the postprandial ROS concentration at 6 h in the HTG group was significantly higher than that in the NC group after the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal (P< 0.05) (Fig. 5A). Additionally,the 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal caused higher postprandial ROS level at 4 h in the HTG group than that in the NC group (P< 0.05)(Fig. 5D). Conversely, the HTG group showed lower postprandial ROS levels at 6 h than the NC group after the 5:1 PUFA ratio meal(P< 0.05) (Fig. 5B).

    The postprandial responses of ROS were significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio subgroups of the NC group (P< 0.01)(Fig. 5E), but not significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in HTG groups (P> 0.05) (Fig. 5F). The postprandial response of ROS after the 1:1 PUFA ratio meal was lower than that after 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in NC groups (P< 0.05)(Fig. 5E). Additionally, the difference in postprandial response of ROS amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio subgroups tended to widen in both NC (Fig. 5E)and HTG (Fig. 5F) groups along with the increase in postprandial time.

    Fig. 5 The curve of ROS concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. a, bMean values with differentletters were significantly different (P < 0.05). Effect of time, meal, meal × time: repeated measures ANOVA. *Significantly different between groups at the same time point, P < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

    Fig. 6 The curve of vWF concentrations over 6 h after fat loading with different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in NC and HTG groups. Effect of time, meal, meal × time:repeated measures ANOVA. *Significantly different between groups at the same time point, P < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

    3.4 Effects of different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial endothelial functions in NC and HTG rats

    3.4.1 Postprandial vWF response

    The postprandial responses of vWF were not significantly different between NC and HTG groups after 1:1 (Fig. 6A), 10:1(Fig. 6C) and 20:1 (Fig. 6D)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (allP> 0.05)except for the 5:1 (Fig. 6B) subgroup (P< 0.05). However, the postprandial concentrations changed significantly over time in both NC and HTG groups after 1:1 (Fig. 6A), 10:1 (Fig. 6C), and 20:1 (Fig. 6D)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals (P< 0.05) except for the 5:1 (Fig. 6B)n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio (P> 0.05). The postprandial vWF concentrations at 6 h in HTG groups were significantly higher than in NC groups after the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal (Fig. 6A) (P< 0.05).

    The postprandial responses of vWF were not significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio subgroups in both NC (Fig. 6E)and HTG (Fig. 6F) groups (bothP> 0.05). A decreasing tendency was observed in postprandial vWF levels from baseline after the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal (Fig. 6F), whereas the 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal caused a slight upward trend in postprandial vWF concentrations in HTG groups (Fig. 6F). Additionally, the postprandial vWF concentrations increased, peaked at 4 h, and then decreased below the baseline after the 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal in HTG groups (Fig. 6F).

    4. Discussion

    HTG is a common dyslipidemia. Postprandial lipemia is closely related to inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction [18].Although some studies have been carried out [19,20], the definitions of HTG vary [21] and there is no widely agreed definition of postprandial lipemia [19,22]. However, some HTG animal models may provide additional insights into HTG metabolism [23-25].Reducing the ratio ofn-6 ton-3 fatty acids is preferable to reduce the risk of many chronic diseases [7]. Thus, we established an animal model of fasting and postprandial HTG in rats fed a high fat diet and to evaluate the effects of differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial metabolism in HTG rats using plant sources ofn-3 fatty acids. Considering the different effects of saturated fatty acid (SFA),monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and PUFA on postprandial metabolism [26], the SFA:MUFA:PUFA ratio in meals was fixed in this study.

    Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) increases after meals and a delay in its clearance leads to postprandial hyperlipidemia [27]. As expected, our study showed that postprandial TG levels increased in both HTG and NC groups. Furthermore, the HTG groups had higher postprandial TG responses than NC groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. However, our results indicated no difference in the postprandial TG response after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in both HTG and NC groups. A possible reason was that the high intake ofn-6 PUFA, which is similar to high intake ofn-3 PUFA,reduced TG in hyperlipidemia [28,29]. Althoughn-3 PUFA (ALA)has a stronger anti-hyperlipidemic effect thann-6 PUFA (LA) [30],the postprandial time was too short to distinguish the postprandial TG response after different fatty acid challenges [31]. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that the fasting TG concentration is an important factor that affects the postprandial TG response [32].Postprandial TGs suggest impaired TG clearance more conveniently and effectively compared with fasting TG levels [33]. The increase of the postprandial TG concentration is a potential driving force for the decrease of HDL-C. HDL-C usually decreases after a high fat diet and is inversely correlated with TG [34]. As expected, our results showed that HDL-C decreased, reached the mimimum value at 2 h, and then slightly increased after high fat meals. Blood GLU in each group increased, reached a peak at 2 h, and then decreased after the meals. However, the postprandial HDL-C and GLU responses were unaffected by differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios and no significant difference in postprandial HDL-C and GLU responses was found between HTG and NC groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. In support of our results, a previous study has shown that postprandial GLU and TG concentrations did not differ between high fat meals rich in LAs (n-6 PUFA) and linolenic acids (n-3 PUFA) in male rats [35]. Our results also showed that the postprandial TC levels decreased and then slowly increased after the different meals. This may be due to the slow absorption and synthesis of cholesterol [36].Interestingly, our study indicated that the difference in postprandial TC concentrations between HTG and NC groups tended to widen as the postprandial time increased after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. Additionally, the HTG groups showed higher postprandial TC responses than NC groups after 1:1 and 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. Thus, our study indicated that postprandial TC responses in HTG and NC rats were different from postprandial TG and HDL-C responses after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. This finding was consistent with other studies in which plant-derivedn-3 PUFA (ALA)had a significant effect on TC, and marinen-3 PUFAs (EPA and DHA) improved the TG and HDL-C status [37,38]. We speculated that HTG increased the postprandial TG response and a very high or lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio increased the difference in the postprtandial TC response between HTG and NC rats. Alternatively, we aslo hypothesized that the beneficial effects of a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio on lipid levels may require a longer time to be better observed [37].

    Nutrition-mediated postprandial inflammation is characterized by increased circulating IL-6 and TNF-α levels [39].n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios may be important determinants of the postprandial inflammation response [40].n-3 PUFAs have an anti-inflammatory effect andn-6 PUFAs have a pro-inflammatory effect. Thus, maintaining a propern-6/n-3 PUFA ratio is important to reduce inflammation [41]. Our study revealed a significant increase in postprandial IL-6 levels after the high fat meal in both HTG and NC groups, which was consistent with previous studies [42]. However, no difference in the postprandial IL-6 response was found between HTG and NC groups after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. Interestingly, our results showed that the 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios tended to decrease the postprandial IL-6 levels at 6 h in HTG groups compared with those in NC groups. Our study indicated that an appropriately lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio may be partly beneficial to ameliorate HTGinduced elevation of postprandial IL-6. The increase in postprandial TNF-α levels may result from a higher percentage of TNF-α-producing monocytes in circulation after a fatty meal [43]. Our results showed that postprandial TNF-α concentrations tended to decrease after 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in both NC and HTG groups. Furthermore, the 5:1 subgroup had a lower postprandial TNF-α response than the 1:1 and 10:1 subgroups of the HTG groups. Conversely, our results indicated that the postprandial TNF-α responses in HTG groups were higher than those in NC groups after 1:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. The results also suggested that an excessively lown-6/n-3 ratio (1:1) was detrimental to postprandial inflammation. Wei et al. [44] reported that a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio decreased the concentration of serum TNF-α and IL-6. We speculate that an appropriately lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal inhibits postprandial inflammation compared with very low or highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios.

    Oxidative stress induced by postprandial lipemia may adversely affect multiple physiological processes [18]. A diet rich inn-3 PUFA may reduce postprandial oxidative stress [45]. Supplementation ofn-3 PUFAs in a diet significantly enhances the antioxidant effect because of their strong free radical-scavenging ability [46,47].MDA is widely regarded as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation [48].Our resutls showed that the 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals caused lower postprandial MDA responses than 1:1 and 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in HTG groups. Furthermore, the 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios caused a lower postprandial MDA response than the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio in NC groups. Moreover, 1:1, 10:1 and 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals tended to elevate postprandial MDA responses, whereas the 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals induced a slight decline in the postprandial MDA level in HTG groups. Thus,our results indicated that the lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 5:1 improved postprandial MDA response in HTG groups. There is an imbalance between the production and elimination of ROS by the antioxidant system in the postprandial state [49,50]. In the present study,postprandial ROS levels were increased after differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in both HTG and NC groups. Furthermore, the difference in the postprandial ROS response amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals tended to increase along with the postprandial time in both NC and HTG groups. Our results showed that the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal induced a lower postprandial ROS response than the 5:1 and 10:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals in NC groups. An interesting finding was that the HTG group showed a higher postprandial ROS level at 6 h than the NC group after the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal, whereas the 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio induced a lower postprandial ROS level at 6 h in the HTG group than in the NC group. Our study indicated that 5:1 was the optimaln-6/n-3 PUFA ratio for the postprandial ROS response in the HTG group, whereas 1:1 was the optimaln-6/n-3 PUFA ratio in the NC group. Therefore, it appeared that lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratios were more effective in improving postpranpranal ROS. This observation was in agreement with the findings of Wei et al. [51] who showed that a highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio reduced the antioxidant capacity. Conversely, high intake ofn-3 PUFAs increase the antioxidant capacity by reducing the level of arachidonic acid(AA) and its products [52], thereby decreasing the level of endothelial ROS [53] and scavenging superoxide [54].

    Postprandial lipemia causes endothelial dysfunction via transient increases of oxidant stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and soluble adhesion molecules [55,56]. vWF is a marker of endothelial dysfunction, and elevated plasma vWF levels may be an acute phase reactant [57]. To date, few studies have examined the effects of differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial vWF responses.Although our results showed that the postprandial responses of vWF were not significantly different amongn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio subgroups in both NC and HTG groups, the 1:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio tended to reduce the postprandial vWF levels, whereas the 10:1 and 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios caused an increasing trend of the postprandial vWF levels in both HTG and NC groups. However, the postprandial vWF response did not show a marked change over time after the 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal and the postprandial vWF response in the HTG group was higher than that in the NC group after 5:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meals. Furthermore, the 20:1n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio meal caused a higher postprandial vWF concentration at 4 h in the HTG group than the NC groups. Our results suggested that then-6/n-3 PUFA ratio influenced transient changes in postprandial vWF levels.The transient postprandial endothelial dysfunction may be mediated by increased postprandial TG and inflammatory responses in HTG subjects [58]. The results were consistent with the hypothesis that a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio improves postprandial endothelial functions.Conversely, a highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio causes postprandial endothelial dysfunction. This was consistent with our previous findings of reduced serum levels of vWF in rats fed high fat diets with a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio [10].

    The present study demonstrated that high fat meals increased postprandial lipid metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress.A highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio enhanced the difference in postprandial metabolism after high fat meals between NC and HTG rats. A propern-6/n-3 PUFA ratio improved postprandial metabolism in HTG groups. Furthermore, our results were in accordance with the hypothesis that excessive intake ofn-6 PUFAs orn-3 PUFAs is closely related to the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases [59].However, further study is necessary to determine the underlying metabolic pathways.

    This study had some limitations. Most small animal models are resistant to the development of atherosclerosis unless provided with a high fat and cholesterol diet or genetic manipulation [60].Additionally, rats are naturally deficient in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity [61]. Compared with anti-atherosclerosis rats, there is evidence that people with atherosclerotic susceptibility have significantly higher mean CETP activity [62]. Humans were different from rodents in postprandial metabolism [63]. Thus, the results observed in rats might not be directly extrapolated to humans.It is important to point out that other oxidative markers provide additional information about postprandial oxidative stress caused by diets with differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios and some oxidative stress markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) might require more time to change. Additionally, a relationship between dietaryn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios and the dose effect was not proven in this study. Despite the above limitations of this study, to our knowledge, this was the first study to investigate the effects of differentn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios on postprandial lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial functions in normal and hypertriglyceridemic rats using plant sources ofn-3 fatty acids.

    5. Conclusion

    This study demonstrated that high fat meals elevated postprandial lipid metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress, which were influenced by dietaryn-6/n-3 PUFA ratios in both NC and HTG rats. Our results indicated that a lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 5:1 may provide beneficial effects on postprandial dysmetabolism induced by a high-fat diet. Conversely, a highn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 20:1 increased the difference in postprandial metabolism between NC and HTG rats. However, the adverse effects of an excessively lown-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 1:1 on postprandial metabolism should be a concern.Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms related to the regulation of postprandial HTG metabolism by the dietaryn-6/n-3 PUFA ratio. Our study also suggested that the difference in postprandial metabolism between normal and HTG rats may increase over postprandial time. Further research can be conducted to study the effects of postprandial time after multiple meals on postprandial metabolism. Additionally, the results observed in rats might not be directly applicable to humans and whether such changes occur in humans remains to be determined.

    Declaration of conflicting interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors alone are

    responsible for the content and writing of this article.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFD0400604) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073551).

    午夜影院在线不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 丝袜美足系列| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 欧美另类一区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 咕卡用的链子| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 另类精品久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲国产看品久久| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 岛国毛片在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 日本色播在线视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 99香蕉大伊视频| av网站在线播放免费| 久久影院123| 高清不卡的av网站| 丁香六月欧美| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 91成人精品电影| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久婷婷青草| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 久久免费观看电影| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 日本av免费视频播放| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 电影成人av| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品免费大片| 在线观看国产h片| av在线播放精品| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 精品酒店卫生间| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品一国产av| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 综合色丁香网| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 一个人免费看片子| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久免费观看电影| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 自线自在国产av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av在线app专区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲在久久综合| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲四区av| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 精品国产国语对白av| 丁香六月天网| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 天天影视国产精品| 中文欧美无线码| 久久97久久精品| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产视频首页在线观看| 老熟女久久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产男女内射视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品.久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品第二区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日本色播在线视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 久热这里只有精品99| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 一区二区av电影网| a级毛片黄视频| 深夜精品福利| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美另类一区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 99久久综合免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | av不卡在线播放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美日韩av久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 免费av中文字幕在线| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久久网色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 9色porny在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 99热全是精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 丝袜喷水一区| 成人手机av| 久久久久网色| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美另类一区| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 欧美97在线视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 人人澡人人妻人| 乱人伦中国视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 成人影院久久| 18禁观看日本| 日本av免费视频播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| av在线播放精品| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 一本久久精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 大码成人一级视频| 999精品在线视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 99久久综合免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产色婷婷99| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久狼人影院| 国产激情久久老熟女| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费看不卡的av| av网站免费在线观看视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 免费观看性生交大片5| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 香蕉丝袜av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 少妇人妻 视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 9热在线视频观看99| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 看免费成人av毛片| 精品一区在线观看国产| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲综合精品二区| 九草在线视频观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 男人操女人黄网站| 999精品在线视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 操出白浆在线播放| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 考比视频在线观看| 成人手机av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| videosex国产| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| h视频一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日本wwww免费看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 韩国av在线不卡| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 中文欧美无线码| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 99热全是精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 美女福利国产在线| 人妻一区二区av| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 考比视频在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久免费观看电影| 婷婷色综合www| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 中文欧美无线码| av国产精品久久久久影院| 考比视频在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 高清不卡的av网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av有码第一页| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 黄色一级大片看看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 人妻一区二区av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日本午夜av视频| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 七月丁香在线播放| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产在线免费精品| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 99九九在线精品视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产乱来视频区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日本欧美视频一区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 一级片免费观看大全| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| av在线老鸭窝| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 免费不卡黄色视频| tube8黄色片| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产在线免费精品| 99九九在线精品视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 另类精品久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久热在线av| 国产av精品麻豆| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 一级片'在线观看视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 91成人精品电影| 一级毛片电影观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 9191精品国产免费久久| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲av福利一区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲欧洲国产日韩|