• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Molecular cytogenetic study on the plants of Elymus nutans with varying fertility on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

    2022-12-20 06:48:34BoLiuXiaoYanTaoQuanWenDou
    植物多樣性 2022年6期

    Bo Liu , Xiao-Yan Tao , Quan-Wen Dou a,b,*

    a Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China

    b Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Xining, China

    c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Keywords:Chromosome pairing Elymus nutans Fertility FISH and GISH Karyotype variation

    A B S T R A C T A molecular cytogenetic investigation was conducted on plants of the allohexaploid species Elymus nutans with varying fertility on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Molecular karyotyping revealed that chromosome variants were distributed unevenly among genomes and among different homologue chromosomes in each genome. The plants with varying fertility exhibited significantly higher numbers of chromosome variants than did the normal fertility samples, although both kinds of plants showed the same pattern of high-to-low polymorphism from the Y to St and H genomes. Heterozygosis and karyotype heterozygosity in the plants with varying fertility were 3- and 13-fold higher than those in normal samples,respectively.Significant negative correlations were found not only between seed setting rates and total genome heterozygosity but also between seed setting rates and heterozygosity of each genome in the plants of varying fertility.Chromosome pairing analysis was performed using genomic in situ hybridization in selected plants of different fertility levels. The pairing of chromosomes at meiotic metaphase I was mostly bivalent, although univalent, trivalent, quadrivalent, and other polyvalents also occurred; in addition, chromosome configuration forms and frequencies varied among the studied samples. ANOVA results showed that the average number of ring bivalents in the Y genome was significantly higher than those in the St and H genomes.Significant positive correlations between pollen grain fertility and ring bivalent number were found in the St and H genomes but not in the Y genome.Furthermore,chromosome configuration parameters(total bivalents,numbers of ring and rod bivalents)were found to be significantly correlated with heterozygosity and seed setting rates in the St and H genomes,respectively,but not in the Y genome.It was inferred that the seed setting rate and pollen grain fertility in E. nutans are strongly influenced by the heterozygosity of each genome, but the Y genome differs from the St and H genomes due to chromosome pair alterations. The St and H genomes may contain more chromosome structural variations than the Y genome in E. nutans.

    1. Introduction

    Elymus nutans Griseb.is a well-known perennial and caespitose grass belonging to the genus Elymus L. in the tribe Triticeae of the family Poaceae,which comprises approximately 150 perennial and exclusively polyploid species (L¨ove, 1984). E. nutans is widely distributed in central and eastern Asia including the Himalayas(Lu,1993; Chen and Zhu, 2006) and grows in a variety of ecological habitats, such as grasslands, bush land, riverbanks, mountain slopes, and swales, at altitudes ranging from 1000 to 5000 m (Lu,1993). E. nutans is considered a potential forage crop for agriculture on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,China,due to its high mass,high quality, and high resistance to various environmental stresses associated with high altitude (Lu and Nie, 2002). E. nutans demonstrates great variability in its morphological traits (Zhang et al.,2009), as shown by ISSR analysis (Chen et al., 2009a), SRAP (Chen et al., 2009b), AFLP (Yan et al., 2010), gliadin polymorphism (Miao et al., 2011), and SSR analysis (Chen et al., 2013).

    Elymus nutans was cytogenetically identified as an allohexaploid(2n=6x=42)with a genomic constitution of StStHHYY(Lu,1993),where St is derived from Pseudoroegneria (Neveski) L¨ove, H comes from Hordeum L.,and Y originates from an unknown species(Wang et al., 1994). Chromosome rearrangements in E. nutans were first reported from the analysis of chromosome pairing in a hybrid between parents from two different populations (Lu, 1993). A high frequency of karyotype variations in a domesticated population of E.nutans was observed using sequential FISH and GISH(Dou et al.,2009),and karyotype variation in E.nutans has also been detected in natural populations (Dou et al., 2017). High frequencies of intergenomic translocations, amplification and deletion of repeats have been identified in the studies described above (Dou et al.,2009, 2017). However, chromosome structural variations such as inversion and intragenomic translocation have not been identified because of the limitations of the techniques.Thus,it is possible that variations in the karyotype of E. nutans may involve additional chromosome structural variations.Chromosome rearrangement or chromosome structural variations are largely related to ecotype differentiation, or even to speciation, through recombination suppression(Rieseberg,2001;Todesco et al.,2020).Although E.nutans is regarded as a self-pollinating plant, intrapopulation differentiation has been somewhat supported by a population structure in which the majority of the total variation occurs within the population rather than among populations(Chen et al.,2009a,2013;Yan et al., 2010; Miao et al., 2011). It has been suggested that E. nutans may combine a certain level of self-pollination and outcrossing(Miao et al., 2011) or that the population structure of E. nutans is strongly affected by excess gene flow caused by seed dispersal from grazing animals (Yan et al., 2010). However, since highly variable karyotypes have been identified within populations,differentiation resulting from chromosome rearrangement is considered very likely in E. nutans.

    Low fertility and even sterile plants,which empirically show no distinct relationship to altitude,are frequently observed in the field in various E. nutans populations. Heterozygotes with rearranged chromosomes, such as inversions and translocations, produce chromatin with duplicated and deficient genes; in addition,disjunction patterns during the first meiotic division can cause varying degrees of sterility in the gametophytic and sporophytic phases(Livingstone and Rieseberg,2004).Given that intercrossing can occur between individuals with varied karyotypes,it is possible that low fertility in E. nutans may be due to heterozygotes derived from parents with different karyotypes, especially those with distinct chromosome rearrangements. In the present study, molecular cytogenetic analysis of varying fertility plants was carried out by fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)and genomic in situ hybridization(GISH).Heterozygosity of varying-fertility plants was identified cytogenetically, and GISH was used to observe chromosome pairing at the meiotic metaphase(MI)of pollen mother cells(PMCs). In addition, the association between chromosome differentiation, chromosome pairing, and fertility was analyzed. The results of this study will be valuable for assessing whether chromosome structural variation plays a vital role in differentiation in E. nutans on the plateau and may even enable the identification of massive haploblocks associated with adaptation.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    Elymus nutans plants with low fertility were morphologically identified first by their shedding of spikelets at maturity in the field in the fallen time.Empirically,the spikelets of plants with high seed set were thoroughly shattered at maturity, while in sterile plants,the spikelets without seeds were still preserved in the field. The vegetative bodies of over 20 target samples,including low-fertility and several high-fertility plants, which were growing along the north-eastern areas of Qinghai Lake(Qinghai,China)at an altitude of approximately 3200 m, were transplanted to an experimental plot in Xining, Qinghai, at an altitude of approximately 2200 m.Twenty-three plants were used in seed setting rate statistic and mitotic chromosome preparation, and ten of the 23 plants were used in pollen fertility observation and meiotic preparation.Finally,plants were classified as low fertility (seed set ≤75%) or normal fertility(seed set>75%)by checking the seed set in bagged spikes in the next growing season.

    2.2. Fertility determination

    To assess pollen fertility, pollen grains of mature anthers were examined after staining in I2-IK solution. Over 500 pollen grains from 5 anthers of 2 different inflorescences were counted from each plant. Pollen fertility was described as the percentage of investigated grains that were fertile (%). The inflorescences were individually bagged to evaluate seed setting after wilting.The seed setting rate was measured as the ratio of the number of seeds to the total number of florets per spike (%) from 3 spikes of each plant.

    2.3. Mitotic chromosome preparation

    Nascent secondary roots of the transplanted plants were collected with lengths of 1-2 cm. The harvested root tips were pretreated with N2O at 7 atm for 2 h and fixed in 3:1 (v/v) ethanol:glacial acetic acid. Chromosome spreads and slide preparation were performed as described in Xie et al. (2020).

    2.4. Meiotic chromosome preparation

    Inflorescences were collected at the early flowering stage,morphologically when the distance between the flag leaf and the next leaf was approximately 1-2 cm. The collected inflorescences were fixed in CarnoyII solution (ethanol:glacial acetic acid:chloroform = 6:1:3) for 24 h and then stored in 70% alcohol at-20°C until use.First,meiotic metaphase I(MI)in pollen mother cells(PMCs)was examined using a phase-contrast microscope after squashing in 45% acetic acid. Further processing was the same as the preparation of mitotic chromosome preparation.

    2.5. FISH and GISH

    Four repetitive sequences were used as markers for chromosomal discrimination, including DNA satellites pAs1 (Rayburn and Gill, 1986) and pSc119.2 (Bedbrook et al., 1980), 45S rDNA, and a microsatellite (AAG)10. Assigned oligonucleotides pAs1-1 plus pAs1-2 representing pAs1 and Oligo-pTa71-2 and OiogopSc119.2-1 plus Oligo-pSc119.2-2 representing 45S rDNA and pSc119.2 (Tang et al., 2014), respectively, were end-labelled using either fluorescein amidite (FAM, green) or carboxy tetramethyl rhodamine (TAMRA, red) (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai,China) to generate FISH probes. Genomic DNA from Hordeum bogdanii Wilensky (2n = 2x = 14, HH) and Pseudoroegneria stipifolia(Czern. ex Nevski) ′A. L¨ove (2n = 2x = 14, StSt) was treated and labelled with fluorescein-12-dUTP and tetramethyl-rhodamine-5-dUTP, respectively, by the random primer labelling method as described by Dou et al. (2009). FISH and GISH were carried out following Xie et al. (2020). Images were obtained using fluorescence microscopy (BX63, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

    2.6. Statistics

    Karyotype heterozygosity was quantified as the ratio of the number of homologous chromosome pairs with different FISH patterns to the total number of chromosome pairs, multiplied by 100%, in each investigated plant and subgenome. Plants with nonzero karyotype heterozygosity were considered to have heterozygosis. The numbers of univalents, bivalents, trivalents and quadrivalents formed within or between the subgenomes in each PMC were counted and averaged to represent the values of each configuration per plant.

    One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear fitting were carried out using Origin Pro 2019 (https://www.originlab.com/2019). Linear fitting was performed between karyotype heterozygosity, pollen fertility, seed setting rate, univalent fraction of total genomes or each subgenome, and bivalent fraction of total genomes or each subgenome. ANOVA was performed among karyotype heterozygosity,univalent fraction and bivalent fraction of each of the subgenomes.

    3. Results

    3.1. Statistics and correlation analysis of seed setting rate and pollen fertility

    Examination of transplanted plants with different seed setting rates(as observed in the field)revealed the diversity of seed setting rates among individuals under experimental plot conditions(Table S1). The results showed that 7 of 23 (30.44%) had seed setting rates exceeding 70%,2 plants had seed setting rates of 33.2%and 50%, and the remaining plants(60.87%) had seed setting rates below 10%. Ten plants were randomly selected for pollen fertility statistics.Pollen fertility showed high values in some cases,ranging from 84.95% to 92.99% in 3 plants, and low values (from 2.73% to 47.22%)in the others(Table 1,Fig.S1).Correlation analysis showed a distinct relationship between pollen fertility and seed setting(R2= 0.94, P = 4.45E-6) in 10 plants.

    3.2. Karyotype variability and the association between karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting

    Four chromosomal markers (pTa71-2, pSc119.2, pAs1 and(AAG)10) were used to identify chromosomes in E. nutans.Sequential FISH and GISH were conducted with three rounds of hybridization: first with probes of pTa71-2 and pSc119.2, second with probes of pAs1 and(AAG)10,and third with probes of St and H genomic DNA. Following this procedure, molecular karyotyping was carried out by allocating all identified chromosomes into the St,H and Y subgenomes ((Fig. 1). The nomenclature of the labelled chromosomes followed Dou et al. (2017). Finally, molecular karyotypes were obtained for 23 plants with varying seed setting(Fig.S2 and Table S2).The results showed high karyotype variation among plants and high heterozygosity in varying fertility plants;no identical karyotypes were found among these plants.

    A total of 157 chromosome variants, including 9 intergenomic translocations, were uncovered in the 23 plants investigated by FISH and GISH. These variants were unevenly distributed among the genomes and among homologous chromosome pairs in each genome (Fig. S2; Table S2). The Y genome exhibited the highest number of chromosome variants(59),while the St and H genomes had 51 and 47,respectively.Chromosomes 4H,2St,and 5Y showed the highest numbers of polymorphisms, and chromosomes 2H,1St and 2Y showed the fewest polymorphisms in each genome(Table S2, Table 2). The polymorphism pattern found in the present study was similar to that for normal fertility samples (seed setting >75%) (Dou et al., 2017), which showed high to low numbers of polymorphisms from Y to St to H. However, many more variants were detected in the present 23 plants than in the 27 samples with normal fertility(Dou et al.,2017).In the present study,the proportions of variants in the H,St,and Y genomes were 123.81%, 45.71%, and 34.09% greater, respectively, than those in normal fertility samples (Table 2). In addition, chromosomes 1H,3H,4H,5H,3St,5Y and 7Y exhibited values over 130%higher than those for the normal fertility samples, but chromosomes 2H,1St,1Y, 2Y and 3Y had similar or even decreasing proportions of variants compared with the normal fertility samples (Table 2).

    Twenty of the 23 investigated plants were heterozygous karyotypes(Table S1).The proportion of heterozygosis(86.96%)in the present sample of plants was approximately 3 times that in normal fertility samples (25.93%) (Dou et al., 2017). Furthermore, the calculated karyotype heterozygosity values varied among plants and genomes (Table S1). Total karyotype heterozygosity among plants ranged from 0 to 76.19%, with an average of 37.47%. H genome karyotype heterozygosity ranged from 0 to 85.71%,with an average of 36.65%. St genome karyotype heterozygosity ranged from 0 to 71.43%, with an average of 37.27%. Y genome karyotypeheterozygosity ranged from 0 to 85.71%,with an average of 38.51%(Table S1).In the present study,comparison with data from normal fertility samples(Dou et al.,2017),which had mean values of total heterozygosity and H, St, and Y genome heterozygosity of 2.12%,2.64%, 1.59%, and 2.12%, respectively, showed that plants with varying fertility exhibited total genome and subgenome heterozygosity over 13 times greater than in normal fertility samples(Table 3).

    Table 1 Chromosome pairing at meiotic metaphase I in the total genome.

    Fig. 1. FISH patterns in mitotic cells and karyotypes of Elymus nutans representatives. a: HY-20, b: HY-21. a1 and b1 probed by pSc119.2 (green) and pTa71-2 (red), a2 and b2 reprobed by pAs1(red)and(AAG)10(green),a3 and b3 reprobed by genomic DNA of Hordeum bogdanii(green)and Pseudoroegneria stipifolia(red),and a4 and b4 are karyotypes of HY-20 and HY-21, respectively. The scale bars are 10 μm.

    Table 2 Comparison of chromosome variants in each genome between 23 plants with varying fertility and 27 normal fertility samples in different homologous chromosome pairs.

    Given that varying seed setting may be related to different karyotype heterozygosities in these plants, correlation analysis and linear fitting were carried out.The fitting results demonstrated that total genome heterozygosity was significantly correlated with the seed setting rate: this was seen not only in the group of 23 plants having seed setting rates of 1.15-93.33%(P=4.32E-9)but also in the group of 14 plants having seed setting rates of 1.15-9.74%(P=3.49E-5) (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, when the heterozygosity of each of the genomes was measured,ANOVA revealed no significant differences in heterozygosity among the three genomes (F = 0.03, P = 0.97).However, seed setting rates were significantly correlated with the heterozygosity of the corresponding St (R2= 0.76, P = 7.04E-8), Y(R2= 0.75,P= 1.03E-7)and H(R2= 0.68,P= 1.46E-6)genomes.

    Table 3 Comparison of structural heterozygosity between plants with varying fertility and normal fertility samples in each genome.

    3.3. Meiosis and the association between chromosome configuration and pollen fertility

    Meiosis in 10 plants selected for pollen fertility statistics was examined by GISH using MI in PMCs (Fig. 3). A total of 475 PMCs(47.5 PMCs per plant)were observed,and the average chromosome configuration was 0.66 I+19.67 II(17.38 rings+2.30 rods)+0.02 III+0.46 Ⅳ+0.004 Ⅴ+0.011 Ⅵ+0.002 Ⅹ(Table 1).Bivalents were predominant, showing a high frequency of 93.67%, while other forms present at low frequencies included univalents (1.56%), trivalents (0.14%), quadrivalents (4.39%), and other polyvalents(0.25%). The chromosome configuration forms and frequencies varied among the investigated samples. Statistically, bivalents(including both ring and rod bivalents)had the lowest coefficient of variation (CV%) of 7.52, while univalent and multivalent forms showed crucially high CV%ranging from 213.46 to 2177.54.Among the bivalents, rod bivalents with a CV% of 92.13 were remarkably more diverse than ring bivalents with a CV%of 17.02.Nevertheless,heteropolyvalents were observed in 5 low-fertility plants, which were identified as heterozygous intergenomic translocation lines by FISH patterns;no heteropolyvalents were detected in the other two low-fertility plants.Moreover,the chromosome configurations of the univalents and bivalents in each of the St, Y and H genomes could be analyzed exclusively by their distinct GISH patterns in the PMCs at MI (Table 4). This analysis yielded mean formulas of 0.26 I+6.36 II(5.54 rings+0.82 rods),0.24 I+6.50 II(5.64 rings+0.86 rods)and 0.16 I+6.81 II(6.18 rings+0.63 rods)in the H,St and Y genomes, respectively. Ring bivalents were more varied in the St and H genomes, with CV% values of 22.51 and 24.69, respectively,than in the Y genome, with a CV% of 15.82 between samples(Table 4).ANOVA showed significant variation in the mean number of total bivalents among the three genomes.The average number of ring bivalents in the Y genome was significantly higher than those in both the St and H genomes, while the average number of rod bivalents in the Y genome was significantly lower than those in the St and H genomes. The average number of univalents in the H genome was significantly higher than that of the Y genome(Table 5). This indicates that the Y chromosomes were the most stably paired,whereas the H genome chromosomes were the most variably paired, on average,for plants in meiosis.

    Fig. 2. Regression scatterplots of karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting rate. Left:seed setting rate ranged from 1.15% to 93.33%;Right:seed setting rate ranged from 1.15%to 9.74%.

    Fig. 3. GISH patterns at meiotic metaphase I in plants with varying fertility. a1-h1 show the DAPI pattern diagrams; a-h are the corresponding GISH pattern diagrams. The St genome DNA signal is red,the H genome DNA signal is green,and the Y genome DNA signal is purple blue.a: 7 St II(ring) +7 Y II(ring) +7 H II(ring), b:6 St II(ring) +7 Y II(6 ring +1 rod)+6 H II(ring) +2 St/H II(arrows),c:2 St I(arrows)+6 St II(5 ring +1 rod)+7 Y II(6 ring +1 rod)+2 H I(arrows)+6 H II(5 ring +1 rod),d:7 St II(6 ring+1 rod)+2 Y I(arrows)+6 Y II(ring)+4 H I(arrows)+5 H II(ring),e:2 St I(arrowhead)+5 St II(4 ring+1 rod)+7 Y II(6 ring+1 rod)+6 H II(3 ring+3 rod)+1 St/St/H/H Ⅳ(chain,arrowhead),f:6 St II(5 ring+1 rod)+7 Y II(5 ring+2 rod)+1 H I(arrowhead)+6 H II(5 ring+1 rod)+1 H/St/St III(chain,arrowhead),g:6 St II(5 ring+1 rod)+7 Y II(6 ring+1 rod,with the rod separating in advance)+5 H II(4 ring+1 rod)+1 Y/H II(rod,arrowhead)+1 St/St/H/H Ⅳ(ring,arrowhead),h:5 St II(ring)+5 Y II(ring)+2 H II(1 ring + 1 rod) + 2 St/St/H/H Ⅳ(1 ring + 1 chain, arrowhead) + 1 4Y/6H Ⅹ(ring, arrowhead). The scale bars are 10 μm.

    Considering that chromosome pairing deviations can strongly affect pollen fertility, an analysis of correlation between chromosome configuration and pollen fertility was performed in these 10 plants. In the overall genome, pollen fertility was significantly related to the number of ring bivalents(R2=0.42,P=0.04)but not to the numbers of univalents or rod bivalents. However, pollen fertility and the number of ring bivalents were significantly correlated in the St (R2= 0.45, P = 0.03) and H genomes (R2= 0.50,P = 0.02) but not in the Y genome; moreover, pollen fertility was significantly related to univalents only in the St genome(R2=0.44,P = 0.04) and related to rod bivalents (R2= 0.47, P = 0.03) only in the H genome. This indicates that pollen fertility was greatly affected by the chromosome pairing behaviour of both the St and H genomes but not the Y genome.

    3.4. Associations among chromosome configuration, karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting

    In the analysis presented above, significant correlations were found between karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting in each genome. However, significant correlations between chromosome configuration and pollen fertility were detected only in the St and H genomes and not in the Y genome. Correlation analysis showed a distinct relationship between pollen fertility and seed setting(R2=0.94,P=4.45E-6)in 10 plants.Further correlation analysis was carried out among chromosome configuration,karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting, revealing that chromosome configuration(total bivalents, ring and rod bivalents) was significantly correlated with the heterozygosity of each genome and with seed setting in the St and H genomes, respectively, but not in the Y genome (Table 6).This suggests that the effect of heterozygosity on pollen fertility and seed setting in the Y genome was different from its effects in the St and H genomes due to the alteration of chromosome pairing.

    4. Discussion

    Significant correlation between the karyotype heterozygosity of each genome and fertility (including pollen fertility and seed setting) was found in varying fertility plants. However, significant correlations between heterozygosity and chromosome pairing behaviour at MI in pollen mother cells were detected only in the St and H genomes and not in the Y genome. Chromosome pairing behaviour and pollen fertility are closely related to chromosome structural variation (Stebbins, 1945; Stathos and Fishman, 2014).Chromosome rearrangements such as chromosome inversions,translocations, fusions, and fissions are considered dominant mutations affecting hybrid fitness, whereas heterochromatin addition and deletion are not(Rieseberg,2001).In the present study,it was difficult to detect chromosome structural variations in mitotic cells due to the use of tandem repeated DNAs as chromosomal markers,except when intergenomic translocation was detected exclusively by GISH. St/H reciprocal translocations in the heterozygous state were detected in several plants with low fertility.In some of these translocation lines,the expected frequencies of heteroquadrivalents as well as frequencies of other chromosomes with irregular pairings were observed. Furthermore, their fertility was significantly lower than that of the expected semisterility. This indicates that additional chromosome structural variations, such as intragenomic translocations or inversions, may still be included in the St and H genomes. The chromosome structural variations in the St and H genomes could be indirectly supported by comparing chromosome variants from plants with normal fertility to plants with varying fertility. The variant accumulation in the St and H genomes was higher than that in the Y genome, although a greater number of chromosome variants were also detected in the Y genome than in the St and H genomes. This suggests that chromosome polymorphisms in the Y genome may be caused by variations in repetitive sequence copies rather than variations in chromosome structure, and chromosome pairing may be less affected by the variation in repeat number.

    Chromosome rearrangement is considered more likely to be a major cause of sterility in plants than in animals,perhaps because of differences in male gamete gene expression and in sex determination (Rieseberg, 2001). The fertility of heterozygotes with chromosome arrangements is strongly affected by aberrant meiotic division(Livingstone and Rieseberg, 2004). Furthermore, rearrangements could act synergistically with isolation genes to diminish gene flow over much larger chromosomal regions by reducing recombination(Rieseberg, 2001). In the hybrid between two sympatric sister species of monkey flower,Mimulus cardinalis and M.lewisii,all QTLs for male sterility,including two underdominant loci,mapped to regions of chromosome rearrangements (Fisherman et al., 2013). In this study, a few Elymus nutans plants with low fertility showed much lower fertility than expected from chromosome rearrangements.This indicates the possible contribution of the evolved sterility genes in chromosome structure variation regions.Cytoplasm male sterility(CMS), which results from rearrangements in mitochondrial genomes,is common in plants,but fertility can be restored by nuclear fertility restoration genes (Rieseberg and Blackman 2010; Bohra et al., 2016). The concept of nucleocytoplasmic interaction (NCI)hypothesizes that specific chromosome rearrangement plays an important role in restoring fertility and nucleocytoplasmic compatibility for the genetic stabilization of newly formed hybrids and polyploids(Gill,1991;Jiang and Gill 1994).In E.nutans,heteroplasmy and variation in mitochondrial genes have been identified among individuals (Liu et al., 2020). Whether the fertility of the heterozygote is affected by NCI still requires further investigation in E.nutans.The heterozygosity of each genome of the plants with varying fertility was distinctly correlated with pollen fertility and seed setting. The St and H genomes exhibited distinctly higher levels of meiotic aberration than the Y genome in these samples.The meiotic chromosome pairing configuration was distinctly associated with pollen fertility and seed setting in the St and H genomes but not in the Ygenome in these samples.This suggests that pollen fertility and seed setting rate in E.nutans may be influenced by St and H genome heterozygosity at both the chromosomal and gene levels and influenced by Y genome heterozygosity at the gene level.

    Table 4 Chromosome pairing at meiotic metaphase I in each genome.

    Table 5 Differences in the average numbers of ring bivalents, rod bivalents, and univalents among the different genomes.

    Table 6 Correlations of chromosome configuration with karyotype heterozygosity and seed setting.

    Molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that extensive reticular evolution is widespread in Elymus, and interspecific hybridization frequently occurs between Elymus species (Sun, 2014). Large and divergent chromosome regions associated with structural variations represent introgression from other, possibly extinct, congeners (Todesco et al., 2020). E. nutans readily crosses with other Elymus taxa (Lu, 1993), and interspecies hybrids have been frequently observed in the field (Lu et al., 2019). Diverse Elymus species with StY, StH, and StYH genomes as well as StYP are sympatrically distributed with E. nutans on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau(Lu et al.,1987,1990,1999).A few H genome ancestral species,such as Hordeum bogdanii and H. brevisubulatum, are still found on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (Bothmer,1979; Dou et al., 2016). Moreover,several ancestral species of the St genome,such as Pseudoroegneria stipifolia and Ps.strigosa are codistributed in some regions of central and eastern Asia(Dewey,1984).This suggests that the chromosome structural variations in the E. nutans St and H genomes may be largely the result of introgression hybridization with related or ancestral species.The ancestor of the Y genome remains unknown.Some researchers have suggested that the Ygenome is independent of St (Sun and Komatsuda, 2010; Fan et al., 2013); in contrast, the results of other studies suggest that the Y genome originated from the St genome (Liu et al., 2020). The lower structural variation in E.nutans suggests that the ancestral taxa of the Y genome may have had low species diversity,since variation in genome structure may play an important role in speciation (Rieseberg, 2001). Thus, the possibility of Y genome extinction cannot be excluded.

    Adaptive genes can be held together in chromosomal regions with structural variations through recombination suppression(Rieseberg, 2001; Livingstone and Rieseberg, 2004). Chromosome structural variations play an essential role in ecotype differentiation(Todesco et al., 2020). Chromosome structural variations in E. nutans have been inferred from observations of mitotic chromosome patterns and meiosis pairing behaviour, as well as from the analysis of associations with fertility.Due to the high variability of the karyotype and wide adaptation of E. nutans, chromosome structural variations may play an important role in the ecological differentiation of this species. Several of the low-fertility plants in this study were in the exclusive intergenomic translocation heterozygous state. They may have been hybrids between differentiated ecotypes of E. nutans. Such differentiated ecotypes might explain why the majority of the overall variation occurred within populations rather than among populations in E. nutans.

    In this study, the most important chromosome structural variations,such as inversion and intragenomic translocation,cannot be clearly identified due to limitations of the applied techniques.Advanced molecular cytogenetic methods capable of detecting structural variations using single-copy genes(Danilova et al.,2012;Said et al.,2018)and Oligo-painting are well established in Triticeae(Li et al.,2021).In the future,chromosome structural variations will be widely identified by a combination of molecular cytogenetics and genomics in different habitats, and structural variants associated with ecological traits are expected to be uncovered.

    5. Conclusion

    Elymus nutans plants with varying fertility exhibit remarkably higher numbers of chromosome variants and karyotype heterozygosity overall and in each genome than plants with normal fertility.Heterozygosity of the total genome and of each genome is distinctly related to the seed setting rate and pollen fertility. However,chromosome configurations at MI in PMCs are significantly correlated with the heterozygosity of each genome and with seed setting in the St and H genomes but not in the Y genome.This suggests that the effect of heterozygosity on pollen fertility and seed setting in the Y genome is different from its effects in the St and H genomes due to altered chromosome pairing; in addition, the St and H genomes may include many more chromosome structural variations than in the Y genome in E. nutans populations.

    Author contributions

    BL have done the cytogenetic experiment and analyzed the data.XYT assisted in field work.QWD provided the financial support and designed the experiment.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province, China (2020-ZJ-914) and the Second Tibet Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (Grant No.2019QZKK0303).

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2021.12.003.

    香蕉丝袜av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 飞空精品影院首页| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 赤兔流量卡办理| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲成人手机| av一本久久久久| 国产成人91sexporn| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久午夜福利片| 青春草国产在线视频| 成人二区视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 自线自在国产av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久这里只有精品19| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品免费视频内射| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 中文欧美无线码| 在线观看三级黄色| 美国免费a级毛片| 人妻系列 视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 永久网站在线| 国产精品三级大全| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产淫语在线视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日日撸夜夜添| 午夜91福利影院| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产淫语在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 精品一区二区免费观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品无大码| 国产成人精品婷婷| 春色校园在线视频观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 在线 av 中文字幕| 咕卡用的链子| 久久 成人 亚洲| 一级毛片我不卡| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 成人二区视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产精品.久久久| av在线观看视频网站免费| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久久精品区二区三区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久久97久久精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 大片免费播放器 马上看| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线观看国产h片| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久免费观看电影| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 99久久综合免费| 国产成人精品一,二区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品无大码| 色播在线永久视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| av线在线观看网站| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 自线自在国产av| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 一个人免费看片子| 人妻一区二区av| 在线看a的网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 午夜91福利影院| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 七月丁香在线播放| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲伊人色综图| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 超色免费av| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久青草综合色| 国产乱来视频区| kizo精华| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲在久久综合| 中文字幕色久视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产片内射在线| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 咕卡用的链子| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| av一本久久久久| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| av福利片在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲av电影在线进入| xxx大片免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| av在线播放精品| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 天天影视国产精品| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产男女内射视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 亚洲成人手机| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美bdsm另类| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 观看美女的网站| 老女人水多毛片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 赤兔流量卡办理| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品成人在线| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| av在线老鸭窝| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产色婷婷99| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩大片免费观看网站| videossex国产| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av福利一区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产av国产精品国产| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日韩电影二区| av.在线天堂| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产激情久久老熟女| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 色播在线永久视频| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 成人国语在线视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 在线天堂最新版资源| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av在线app专区| 性少妇av在线| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 香蕉丝袜av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜免费观看性视频| 成人国语在线视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| xxx大片免费视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区激情视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲成人手机| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 五月开心婷婷网| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 国产乱来视频区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 9色porny在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产精品一国产av| 国产视频首页在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产一区二区 视频在线| av视频免费观看在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 宅男免费午夜| av片东京热男人的天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| videos熟女内射| 99香蕉大伊视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 最黄视频免费看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 电影成人av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 中文字幕制服av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| av免费观看日本| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美bdsm另类| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 香蕉国产在线看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 免费观看性生交大片5| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日本午夜av视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 永久免费av网站大全| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 三级国产精品片| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产毛片在线视频| 97在线视频观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 成人手机av| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久久久久久精品精品| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久热久热在线精品观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久97久久精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| xxx大片免费视频| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲成人手机| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 777米奇影视久久| 久久av网站| 久久97久久精品| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产成人精品无人区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 欧美另类一区| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产在视频线精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 18在线观看网站| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 男人操女人黄网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 捣出白浆h1v1| av天堂久久9| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 只有这里有精品99| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久热这里只有精品99| 成人国产av品久久久| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 看免费成人av毛片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| www.精华液| 美女中出高潮动态图| av免费在线看不卡| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲人成电影观看| 曰老女人黄片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 曰老女人黄片| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 只有这里有精品99| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 成人影院久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| av电影中文网址| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 如何舔出高潮| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看|